Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Psychology, Politics, Economics to name a few - and most importantly which school/academy/university/nation should be the highest authority on any given subject.
Dark matter, dark energy - not enough data for a true disagreement to exist.
Psychology, Politics, Economics - not sciences.
Don Corleone: So, Dodd will move against you first. He'll set up a meeting with someone that you absolutely trust, guaranteeing your safety, and at that meeting your Internet will be assassinated.
Being euphamistic also leads to ambiguity. You could be talking about storing a tokamak below the building, which is, after all a thermonuclear device, just not a bomb. In the event of an emergency, it will draw a lot of power and spit out a few neutrons. I'm not sure how this will be much use.
Could be either:
1. Warhead: activation reduces neighborhood to plasma. Problem solved.
2. Fusion experiment: activation sucks up all electrical power, capital and labor for miles around. Problem erased or at least rendered comparatively unimportant.
You paid it in and you (and your generation) elected politicians who squandered it. Your generation delivered the current economic problems to my generation and now you expect US to clean up YOUR mess. YOUR generation destroyed the SS and Medicare system. YOU should have been more responsible.
I just wanted to point out that there are no such things as "generations". That term is used by media as a filler because they don't have the time or inclination to be more subtle in their analyses. It isn't like humans give birth every 20 years en masse. The distribution of birth dates in the population follows a nice epidemiological curve.
I don't know what you mean, but a good Christian would indeed render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and also realize that the things we do to the least of our brothers, we do to Christ.
Because that's the actual philosophy attributed to Jesus, and I don't really understand the problem with it.
The problem is that this Jesus fellow advocates against every plank in the Republican Party platform.
These are not the only citations in the literature, just the first three that came up. The issue of antibiotic fate and persistence in the animal is pretty well known, so I am guessing that they dosed the animals in amounts which would reflect some steady state expected from normal feeding.
1. You liberal commie scientists are making this shite up to get your billions in grant money.
2. Okay, it's happening, but it's die to natural cycles and shite. Nothing we did.
3. Okay, we caused all this shite, but it'll cost us too much to deal with now.
4. The ocean is two feet deep on South Beach, but the government moved my mansion and all my shite to higher ground onto property confiscated from someone not smart enough to run a huge PAC.
Rule 1: The submission linked to a Village Voice editorial which itself linked to the original story which itself linked to court records. The allegations in the story may or may not be true, but I have read many other submissions with less verifiable support.
Rule V: The claim was that Wikipedia deleted a page. Wikipedia did indeed delete the page. Why it deleted the page was the subject of the discussion.
Fuck you, I have two children in public school one of which is disabled and I damn well tell you I would be more prudent with MY money and their care than the state workers are. You stupid shits think you are so smart spending other peoples money.
Any other questions fuck face?
Only about the current dosage of your meds, but HIPAA prevents that discussion.
The other day there was a reddit thread on the front page about a billionaire allegedly buying off Wikipedia to erase mention of his alleged incest. Oddly enough, the thread itself then also disappeared from reddit due to some questionable mod decisions.
You do get that, right? A phrase used dozens of times as the title of books, movies, and TV episodes. If it was an original phrase that had never been used before, then his case might have some merit, but it's not, and he's just trolling.
I am no lawyer, but the difference here is the difference between a copyright, which you automatically get upon creation, and a trademark, which you have to apply for and pay the USPTO for.
Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Psychology, Politics, Economics to name a few - and most importantly which school/academy/university/nation should be the highest authority on any given subject.
Dark matter, dark energy - not enough data for a true disagreement to exist.
Psychology, Politics, Economics - not sciences.
In case two people are disagreeable on a topic where currently there is no scientific consensus....
Name that topic.
This is obviously viral marketing for Ocean's Fourteen.
Don Corleone: So, Dodd will move against you first. He'll set up a meeting with someone that you absolutely trust, guaranteeing your safety, and at that meeting your Internet will be assassinated.
That's like asking what the best fast food restaurant is.
It used to be Wendy's, but they've done something to the bacon, and hiked up the prices. They've gone downhill quite a bit since Dave Thomas died.
Dave Thomas dies. Their bacon changes taste. Oh, God, no!
Being euphamistic also leads to ambiguity. You could be talking about storing a tokamak below the building, which is, after all a thermonuclear device, just not a bomb. In the event of an emergency, it will draw a lot of power and spit out a few neutrons. I'm not sure how this will be much use.
Could be either:
1. Warhead: activation reduces neighborhood to plasma. Problem solved.
2. Fusion experiment: activation sucks up all electrical power, capital and labor for miles around. Problem erased or at least rendered comparatively unimportant.
A thermonuclear device planted below the building - in case things go bad.
You paid it in and you (and your generation) elected politicians who squandered it. Your generation delivered the current economic problems to my generation and now you expect US to clean up YOUR mess. YOUR generation destroyed the SS and Medicare system. YOU should have been more responsible.
I just wanted to point out that there are no such things as "generations". That term is used by media as a filler because they don't have the time or inclination to be more subtle in their analyses. It isn't like humans give birth every 20 years en masse. The distribution of birth dates in the population follows a nice epidemiological curve.
I don't know what you mean, but a good Christian would indeed render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and also realize that the things we do to the least of our brothers, we do to Christ.
Because that's the actual philosophy attributed to Jesus, and I don't really understand the problem with it.
The problem is that this Jesus fellow advocates against every plank in the Republican Party platform.
Interesting summary from SciAm: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=our-big-pig-problem
These are not the only citations in the literature, just the first three that came up. The issue of antibiotic fate and persistence in the animal is pretty well known, so I am guessing that they dosed the animals in amounts which would reflect some steady state expected from normal feeding.
antibiotics (which remain in the meat, even after cooking
Citation needed.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf00047a035
http://mbioblog.asm.org/mbiosphere/2012/08/antibiotic-residues-in-fermented-sausage-meat-target-beneficial-bacteria-leave-pathogens-alone.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2134130/
Who grades the evaluation?
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" -Thomas Mann
That's grand. Now whose definition of evil do we use?
1. You liberal commie scientists are making this shite up to get your billions in grant money.
2. Okay, it's happening, but it's die to natural cycles and shite. Nothing we did.
3. Okay, we caused all this shite, but it'll cost us too much to deal with now.
4. The ocean is two feet deep on South Beach, but the government moved my mansion and all my shite to higher ground onto property confiscated from someone not smart enough to run a huge PAC.
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/component/content/article/37-static/254-jref-challenge-faq.html
It still seems to me to be arbitrary decisions.
Rule 1: The submission linked to a Village Voice editorial which itself linked to the original story which itself linked to court records. The allegations in the story may or may not be true, but I have read many other submissions with less verifiable support.
Rule V: The claim was that Wikipedia deleted a page. Wikipedia did indeed delete the page. Why it deleted the page was the subject of the discussion.
Fuck you, I have two children in public school one of which is disabled and I damn well tell you I would be more prudent with MY money and their care than the state workers are. You stupid shits think you are so smart spending other peoples money.
Any other questions fuck face?
Only about the current dosage of your meds, but HIPAA prevents that discussion.
The other day there was a reddit thread on the front page about a billionaire allegedly buying off Wikipedia to erase mention of his alleged incest. Oddly enough, the thread itself then also disappeared from reddit due to some questionable mod decisions.
http://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/102qtm/til_that_wikipedia_deleted_a_page_about_a/
We are throwing more and more money at the schools to the point of bankruptcy.
You obviously have no children in public school
http://i.imgur.com/djqjb.jpg
I respectfully disagree. "Nazi" has become a generic term, like "aspirin" or "hell"
The hitler you say!
Capitalization nazi, not punctuation nazi. And apparently also a semantics nazi.
Nazi should be capitalized.
You do get that, right? A phrase used dozens of times as the title of books, movies, and TV episodes. If it was an original phrase that had never been used before, then his case might have some merit, but it's not, and he's just trolling.
I am no lawyer, but the difference here is the difference between a copyright, which you automatically get upon creation, and a trademark, which you have to apply for and pay the USPTO for.
Here Lies Paiute
[citation needed]