All Adobe is saying is "we're not going to compete in a market where we'll be soundly trounced."
By the way, Acrobat sucks pretty bad on OS X. Most people use Preview instead of Reader. Creation of pdf files is as easy as hitting "Print", then "Save as PDF", which takes away much of the need for the full version of Acrobat.
I find Wikipedia provides a lot more objective information without all the useless fluff. Another plus is that it doesn't have that bizarre "culture" that e2 has. I don't want to have to make friends to record information.
It's not a port. It's a completely different product. They tried a direct port with Word 6, and it failed miserably. Mac users don't want Windows ports.
Most of the work is most certainly not done. It's not like we run/usr/bin/word. It's a Cocoa app, not a UNIX app.
You sign a contract saying that you will not use the data when the rental is over. If you do, you might get away with it, but you stand a good chance of being sued into oblivion.
If someone wants to rent it for 999 years, they just sign a 999-year contract, I imagine.
And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?
About 95% of the world's computer users.
Since when has a Linux user honestly given a cr*p what anyone else thinks?
As long as I can remember. I'm not saying it's bad, but linux users are just as fanatical as Mac users. Almost any negative commentary about linux is met with a slew of rebuttals.
If linux users are really independent of popular opinion, why is it that every high profile article stating that maybe linux isn't all it's cracked up to be generates several hundred comments on slashdot?
A full reload is pointless on most sites. Why bother reloading title.gif when you want to see if there are any new slashdot stories? It's a waste of bandwidth.
It sucks that the shift-reload trick is undocumented, but you could easily fix that.
All Adobe is saying is "we're not going to compete in a market where we'll be soundly trounced."
By the way, Acrobat sucks pretty bad on OS X. Most people use Preview instead of Reader. Creation of pdf files is as easy as hitting "Print", then "Save as PDF", which takes away much of the need for the full version of Acrobat.
What would we do without wget --recursive?
:P
We would use wget -r.
GNU-style flags are annoying to us lazy folk
I have since moved on to Wikipedia.
I find Wikipedia provides a lot more objective information without all the useless fluff. Another plus is that it doesn't have that bizarre "culture" that e2 has. I don't want to have to make friends to record information.
My annual operating cost for an $800 HP LaserJet 2200 is about a $100 for toner.
Sure, I paid a lot more up front, but having to spend $100 every two months to maintain an Epson Inkjet added up quickly.
ImageMagick.
convert foo.svg foo.eps
Easy as can be.
It discriminates against people such as yourself.
Home Page Reader works very well.
Debra Bowen, which was killed yesterday ...
Man, this spam war is getting serious.
You're right. Don't know what I was thinking.
That makes them even less portable.
It's not a port. It's a completely different product. They tried a direct port with Word 6, and it failed miserably. Mac users don't want Windows ports.
/usr/bin/word. It's a Cocoa app, not a UNIX app.
Most of the work is most certainly not done. It's not like we run
If you want to get rid of unusable meat, that's what hot dogs are for.
All I'm saying is that it's not like Spam is that bad of a product. It's real meat.
It's not like Spam is what's left over from meat processing.
It's a product, not a by-product.
At Fetuses-R-Us we're having a blowout sale!
Every fetus must go!
If you're tired of paying high prices for fetuses, we've got the deal for you!
fvi ivg o cshhlw
pg u
You sign a contract saying that you will not use the data when the rental is over. If you do, you might get away with it, but you stand a good chance of being sued into oblivion.
If someone wants to rent it for 999 years, they just sign a 999-year contract, I imagine.
And you have to ask yourselves, does anyone need more proof that Linux is as capable as any other operating platform out there?
About 95% of the world's computer users.
Since when has a Linux user honestly given a cr*p what anyone else thinks?
As long as I can remember. I'm not saying it's bad, but linux users are just as fanatical as Mac users. Almost any negative commentary about linux is met with a slew of rebuttals.
If linux users are really independent of popular opinion, why is it that every high profile article stating that maybe linux isn't all it's cracked up to be generates several hundred comments on slashdot?
There are better ways to do that, man.
Like how DOS was free. Windows 95 was free. Office 95 was free.
It's a conspiracy, man!
Anyone who would want the AOL integration is most likely happy with AOL.
It's baffling.
A full reload is pointless on most sites. Why bother reloading title.gif when you want to see if there are any new slashdot stories? It's a waste of bandwidth.
It sucks that the shift-reload trick is undocumented, but you could easily fix that.
This is my 700th post. Hooray for me!
Getting too much gay?
You, sir, are a fucking bigot.
Fuck you and your bogus religion.
God loves fags.
You need to work out more often.
Sure, it's big, but it still fits in a backpack.
Don't read Mac threads.
Unless you enjoy telling us all how pissed off they make you.
Because, you know, we really care.
It's a PC that's got Linux on it.
Clear enough?
We're terrified of barcodes.
Where have you been, man?
Then I could buy a legit copy of Windows XP!