Slashdot Mirror


Ink More Expensive Than Champagne

laing writes "According to this story, ink for home printers is now seven times more expensive than vintage champagne.Ink in a typical replacement cartridge costs about £1.70 per millilitre, compared with 1985 Dom Perignon at 23p per millilitre." Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

587 comments

  1. Hardcore dupe action by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was all covered earlier. The story posted by Michael earlier today about Lexmark's DMCA suit contained a link to a BBC article showing the price of ink to be higher then that of vintage champagne. The 1.70 per millitre thing was even covered.

    You guys are editorial juggernaughts.

    1. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha... excellent reply :)

      And totally right as well.. its hardly like /. are claiming it to be their own work. Sheesh.

    2. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the most discussed and shocking aspect of the entire Lexmark story, therefore making it easily recognizable and this story redundant, as it has been very recently discussed. You square headed conservative idiot.

    3. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well not everyone reads every damn article to look for other stories that might show up somewhere in the links. If you've got that kind of spare time on your hands, then might I recommend that you go fuck yourself?

    4. Re:Hardcore dupe action by snazzed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I found the repost useful. Reading the Headline and summary on the HP - DMCA article, I had no interest in reading the full article. Hence, I never read anything about the cost of Ink.

      Reposting the story with a different theme may get the attention of people who may not have been interested in the original story... people like myself. The link may be a Dupe, but the idea behind the posts were not.

      Thanks
      Snazzed

    5. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think its bowell

    6. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, cockgobbler, I guess not everyone is as perfect as you, so why don't you take the inordinate amount of spare time you obviously have and spend the next few hours autofellating yourself, salad tosser. Mm-k?. I've taken shits that have more character than you.

    7. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant to call you Bowell, the British-born Canadian prime minister (1894-1896) who later led the Conservative opposition (1896-1906).

    8. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a canadian prime minister full of shit? is that good or bad?

    9. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant to call you Bowell, the British-born Canadian prime minister (1894-1896) who later led the Conservative opposition (1896-1906).

      We had a prime minister named Bowell? Whoa.

    10. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to add to the list of posts by "AC." I should probably add some infantile insult or other, but can't bring myself to do so. In other news, I'm madly in love.

    11. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe add something to slashcode that parses articles for urls before the article is posted, and if a certain number of urls match display a warning flag?

    12. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? What's the lucky fella's name?

    13. Re:Hardcore dupe action by dark-br · · Score: 5, Funny

      New /. slogan: "News that mattered. Stuff for the amnesiac." ;)

    14. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are editorial juggernaughts.

      Heehee.

    15. Re:Hardcore dupe action by WalletBoy · · Score: 1

      Hey now I have an idea for the slashdot T-shirt:

      "Wow it's Tony Randall"

      (Think Tom Hanks on SNL if you want to know what this is a reference to)

    16. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Coniagas · · Score: 1

      Borden .. you idiots... Like the glue

    17. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent = funniest.ac.ever

    18. Re:Hardcore dupe action by billimad · · Score: 1

      New /. slogan: "News that mattered. Stuff for the amnesiac." ;)

      oh, did someone say that already! when?

    19. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for amnesiacs. Stuff that mattered. News for amnesiacs.

    20. Re:Hardcore dupe action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also like "/. Stuff that matters. Stuff that matters. Stuff that matters."

  2. Reassignment of terms. by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ink costs more than champagne? What?! That's not the natural order of things. To correct this problem, the French must immediately start drinking printer ink and printing with champagne. That should kill a few problems with one stone (sorry for the mixed metaphor). To clear up the resulting confusion we will call printer ink "Freedom Champagne" and champagne, "printer ink 2: full-speed".

    1. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Uart · · Score: 5, Funny

      what will really blow your mind is when you realize that gasoline is cheaper than bottled water...

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    2. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      what will really blow your mind is when you realize that gasoline is cheaper than bottled water...

      Good thing I don't buy bottled water, otherwise I'd consume "drinking gasoline" and pour "combustible bottled water" in my car in an attempt to save money.

    3. Re:Reassignment of terms. by nr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, and weed growing in your garden is more worth than gold!

    4. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Bill+Currie · · Score: 0, Troll

      Gasoline is cheaper than alcahol. Here in Alberta gasoline is bouncing around 70 cents/litre. Beer is about $4.44/liter (6 pack of 375ml bottles costs $10)

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    5. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUH!!!

      Of course petroleum is cheaper than alcohol. Otherwise we'd all be using pure ethanol in our cars.

      (I mean, we'd be using it for the purpose of combustion.)

    6. Re:Reassignment of terms. by neverkevin · · Score: 1

      Well, If my car ran out of gas in the middle of no where and I had only $10 and a choice between $10 in gas or $10 in beer, I'd be really drunk.

    7. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      what will really blow your mind is when you realize that gasoline is cheaper than bottled water...

      This is why I laugh every time one of those nutcases claims to have invented a car that will run on pure water.

    8. Re:Reassignment of terms. by TheMidget · · Score: 2, Informative
      $0.25 a gallon? Wow, where do you get gas from?

      He's probably a Merkin, where gas is cheap, but clean drinking water is expensive. In the US, the only thing that is cheaper than gas is donated blood....

    9. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it tastes better too!

    10. Re:Reassignment of terms. by haystor · · Score: 1

      Alcohol would be a hell of a lot cheaper if it wasn't a requirement that consumable alcohol be made through fermentation and distillation.

      Yes, you can have 100% ethanol if you make it chemically.

      Everclear is for wimps.

      --
      t
    11. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Otter · · Score: 1
      Uh, no, gas is $1.60-1.90 / gallon and clean water comes out of the sink.

      And we blood donors get an equal amount back for free.

    12. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not funny, dude.

      *hic*

    13. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      $0.25 a gallon? Wow, where do you get gas from?

      He said "Bottled Water", not water from refilling stations where you can get a gallon for 25c.

      To explain the water>gas phenomenon, you just have to look closely in urban areas. In California, bottled water such as evian, dasani, arrowhead in tiny or medium tall bottles are more of an accessory than something which serves a specific purpose - thirst quenching; rehydration.

      It is psychological behaviour and water-distributing mafia knows this. Historically homo-sapiens always had the need to carry around something. Whether it was a rock, a spear, sword, etc; later became smoking and morphed into the idiotic bottled water trend. It is the ideal successor to smoking, because it repeats the 2 basic patterns cigarettes serve - hold it in hand, intake into the body through the mouth. And thus we have companies exploiting it with inflated prices and we get bombarded with constant advertisements on TV, billboards, etc.

      I'm no psychologist, but I think I've narrowed it down to why the bottled water costs more than gas.
    14. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He definitely said bottled water, which does not come out of a sink. pls fix kthx

    15. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you can't. 100% ethanol is impossible, ethanol is always in a solution of water. Practical upper limits on the percent of ehtanol is 95-96% without expensive technology. You can go to mexico and buy this alchohol cheaply, but I wouldn't recommend drinking it.

    16. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Uart · · Score: 2, Informative

      last I checked I was paying $1 or more for a liter for water (bottled), and $1.55 or so for a GALLON of gas.

      liter gallon

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    17. Re:Reassignment of terms. by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      I pay $.47 a gallon for bottled water at Walmart. So its not that bad. Tap water in SoCal tastes horrible and leaves mineral deposits in my pans.

    18. Re:Reassignment of terms. by zodar · · Score: 1

      Alcohol is an azeotropic mixture; it's capped at 96%. If you look at the distillation curve, it curves back up at the end, which means it can never be distilled to 100%. But I'm interested in what the original poster meant by "making ethanol chemically."

    19. Re:Reassignment of terms. by cristofer8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny thing is that this is a somewhat recent change. My old hp c400 inkjet (really slow and ugly) had print cartridges with refill holes built into them.

    20. Re:Reassignment of terms. by conway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whats even more interesting is that, for example, Coke is cheaper than bottled water.
      (Compare Coke and Dasani -- both produced by the same company, but the "flavored" water is more expensive than plain!)
      In fact, bottled water seems to be the most expensive soft drink :)

    21. Re:Reassignment of terms. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Denatured alchohol which has the H2O stripped chemically can get to 99.9+% pure. It's a real bitch to do and is too expensive to make it practical for drinking (no one sane drinks 96% stuff straight anyways so whats the point?). Lab quality alchohol is often extremely pure like this but it has to be kept sealed because it will pull water out of the air and drop back down to around 96% purity rather quickly.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    22. Re:Reassignment of terms. by conway · · Score: 3, Funny
      Tap water in SoCal tastes horrible and leaves mineral deposits in my pans.

      How many times do I have to tell you: humans consume liquid with the top orifice, not the bottom one. Do try to be more careful, or we might be noticed!

    23. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative
      Uh, no, gas is $1.60-1.90 / gallon and clean water comes out of the sink.

      Quite correct. In almost every city in America, clean drinking water is available from your city water tank almost for free.

      The reason bottled water is so expensive in the US is because almost nobody pays for ordinary drinking water unless their local supply was contaminated by a flood or something.

      At local convenience stores, you can buy distilled water such as Aquafina (bottled by the Coca-cola company) for about a dollar for 20 ounces or imported mineral water like Evian for about the same price. When an American says "bottled water," they are usually talking about that sort of thing... And yes, it is more expensive than gasoline. Drinking bottled water is looked upon by many Americans with a certain amount of scorn for lack of thrift, and perhaps a little bit of class-envy.

      Some people in some parts of the US buy distilled water out of fears about chlorides or other additives in the municipal water (for a humorous reference, watch the movie "Dr. Strangelove,") but most Americans just drink what comes out of their tap, leaving very little demand for $0.25 gallon jugs of water from the store.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    24. Re:Reassignment of terms. by damiam · · Score: 1
      clean water comes out of the sink.

      That's all well and good, but we're not talking about tap water (which is not always clean, although it usually is or can be cheaply filtered). We're talking about bottled water, which is a good deal more expensive and most certainly doesn't come out of my sink.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    25. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Enraged_jawa · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Evian" spelled backwards is "Naive" .. the French knew all along

    26. Re:Reassignment of terms. by OECD · · Score: 2, Funny

      My old hp c400 inkjet (really slow and ugly) had print cartridges with refill holes built into them.

      But my champagne bottles never did! You couldn't even put the corks back in the darned thing! I'll bet you that's where they got the idea from!

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    27. Re:Reassignment of terms. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I pay ~ $1 per GALLON for DISTILLED water.

      Unless you feel a special need to swindle yourself, paying $1/per litre is entirely unecessary.

      Buy a canteen or something...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In NJ its hard to find cheap bottled water, which I don't buy anyway, water tastes like crap.

      Anyway, nice to see someone else with a Slashdot UID lower than 100,000

    29. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Mignon · · Score: 1
      Tap water in SoCal tastes horrible and leaves mineral deposits in my pans.

      A combination of my fuzzy anti-aliased font and the power of association from just having seen a Conan O'Brien rerun made me think you were complaining about mineral deposits in your pants. I was going to say that bottled water won't help that problem.

    30. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I did graduate from a top 25 university and no I can't spell or use grammar properly, guess it doesn't matter :)

      The fact that you graduated from a decent university and can't spell or use grammar properly somehow shows that poor grammar, spelling, and punctuation don't matter at all??

      I think it says more about the state of our educational system.

      If you still think your argument makes any sense at all, consider this:

      I graduated from high school recently, and I can't read, write, or do basic arithmetic. I guess it doesn't matter after all. (btw, this happens all the time in inner city high schools.)

    31. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The natural order of things is listed here

      Printer Ink retails for $2,701.52 per gallon, but that's a mere pitance, compared to "Chanel No. 5" perfume ($25,600 per gallon) or LSD ($122,880 per gallon)

    32. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      source of the above information.

    33. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Pah, we used to do that and it was fine. You could get a liter of everclear (which is 96% ethanol) for about $4. That's more than enough to get about 10 people stinking drunk. Beats paying $5 for a cocktail at a bar.

    34. Re:Reassignment of terms. by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 3, Funny

      once a bottle of water became more expensive than beer, I quit drinking water. Shortly there after I was rushed to the hospital after I collapsed of dehydration and alcohol poisoning. The moral of the story, cheap boozed is not your friend

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    35. Re:Reassignment of terms. by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      Except Florida, where clean water is being redifined to allow for more fecal matter!

    36. Re:Reassignment of terms. by outsider007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's harder to acquire a taste for ink than for champagne, but once you do...
      you are one classy motherfucker.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    37. Re:Reassignment of terms. by wrf3 · · Score: 1

      Aquafina is a Pepsi product.

    38. Re:Reassignment of terms. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I'll suggest a revolutionary idea: Try the web.

      New Jersey can't be THAT far away from civilization.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    39. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its not, moron. Its niave. Go back to school or something you retard.

    40. Re:Reassignment of terms. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      or LSD ($122,880 per gallon)
      ok now I'm not going to do the math, but I would imagine that at 100 micrograms a pop, a gallon of lsd would fry everybody on the planet a few times over.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    41. Re:Reassignment of terms. by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Funny

      humans consume liquid with the top orifice, not the bottom one.

      However, much of the time they speak out of the bottom one...
      Today, you can lead the revolution! Speak out of your top orifice for once...

    42. Re:Reassignment of terms. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      It is psychological behaviour and water-distributing mafia knows this. Historically homo-sapiens always had the need to carry around something. Whether it was a rock, a spear, sword, etc; later became smoking and morphed into the idiotic bottled water trend.

      OR, perhaps California's tap water is so bad (here in Fresno, our tap water is actually illegal) that the idea of drinking water that doesn't take like sand and pollutants is worth paying for?

      I drink bottled water at home. No "carrying around as an accessory" nonsense. Just water that doesn't cause my body to revolt.

      I have a filter on my kitchen sink, which helps a bit. But buying bottled water by the case instead of by the bottle makes the price not so terrible. Certainly comparable to other store-bought beverages.

    43. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, so the sudden increase in the human populace over the last few centuries could be due to cigarettes keeping us from sticking our weapons in our mouths?

      I'm speechless man, utterly speechless....I'm gonna find a King Cobra to carry around and stick in my mouth now.

    44. Re:Reassignment of terms. by NickisGod.com · · Score: 1

      morphed into the idiotic bottled water trend

      Some people have throat irritation when they don't drink water for more than an hour, asshole?

      Anyway, you ever drink water in South Florida? Ughh. I'm very happy spending five dollars ever week and a half for a big 5 gallon water bottle (like you see in offices). Best damn $175 I spend in a year. Helps keep the breath from stinking too.

    45. Re:Reassignment of terms. by k4w0ru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not like this in all of the US.

      The tap water in the area where I live is horrible.

      I can't stand to drink it, it just doesn't taste like what water should taste like, and it's probably not the most healthy thing to drink.
      Mostly everyone I know does not drink from the tap, unless it's being filtered.

      But, I still don't pay more for water than gas. I usually buy bottled water at $0.50 to $1 a gallon.

    46. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some people have throat irritation when they don't drink water for more than an hour, asshole?

      Perhap[s if they stopped drinking it so often, they wouldn't. Either that or stop sucking on car exhausts.

    47. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey asswipe, look it up in a dictionary, naive is correct.

      You made a fool out of yourself, ha ha!!

    48. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aaaah so that is why the United States emits the most carbon in the Americas by far-
      more than 3 times the rest of the Western Hemisphere combined with only 4% of the world's population

      Where i come from it is more expensive than cola so we have to drive teensie little vehicles or ride bikes!

      MMM gimme a great big truck and your gasoline prices now!

    49. Re:Reassignment of terms. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " And thus we have companies exploiting it with inflated prices and we get bombarded with constant advertisements on TV, billboards, etc."

      Supply and demand. If the prices are 'inflated' it's because the customers decided that it wasn't too much to pay. Prices would go down if interest in bottled water disappeared. One could hardly call that 'exploitation'. It may cost them pennies to produce a bottle of water, but $1.20 for a liter of clean fresh water is cheap.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    50. Re:Reassignment of terms. by vuke69 · · Score: 1
      New Jersey can't be THAT far away from civilization.


      I take it you have never been to NJ...
      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
    51. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here's the latest crusty screed from Michael Shermer making fun of dumb people who pay for bottled water.

    52. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Visiting SoCal from Vancouver, ya, you guys have some pretty hard water down there...

      I think a water softener/filter would probably do the job and still be cheaper than paying big money for bottled water.

      But then, we're a throwaway disposable society, even if a small portion is eventually recycled... so... gotta go with the flow.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    53. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens all the time in "outer" city high schools, too. That is, everywhere. High school is designed to either ship you off to college or get you pregnant so you can go on welfare.

    54. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Where the heck do you live that people look upon bottled-water drinkers with scorn? Here in Phoenix, AZ, I don't know anyone that drinks tap water, unless it's filtered. In fact, at my workplace, the break room has a sign (put up by the corporation) saying specifically not to use the water from the sink to make ice cubes, because it is not filtered (the water fountains have filters).

      Even filtering doesn't get rid of all the bad taste, so most people drink bottled water. I only use filtered water at home for cooking, otherwise I use bottled.

    55. Re:Reassignment of terms. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Far from it.

      1 gallon = 3.78 litre = 3.78 .10^3 g (assuming density of LSD is 1)

      3.78 . 10^3 g / 100 . 10^-6 g = 37.8 10^6 doses

      not even 38 million people would get high once.

      Population of the planet ~6 billions

    56. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Enry · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's sad really. Public places have been removing chilled water fountains and replacing them with either warm water fountains or selling bottled water (that's cold).

      At home, I buy a 24-pk of bottles for cheap, then refill them from my filtered tap. Refil 5-10 times until the bottle gets crusty.

    57. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Malfeas · · Score: 1

      In some places, bottled water is cheaper than Boone's Farm wine, heh. That's pretty disturbing, actually.

    58. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You should be paying lawyers to evict your city govenment rather than buying overpriced bottled water. Potable water is a basic human need which should be guaranteed to everyone in the world. I would be outraged if I were you.

      Think of it this way. If the city couldn't provide decent electrical service, what would you do? Would you say, "O h well I'll just buy gas for my generator instead of electricity from the power company."? No, you'd raise a big shit, I'm sure. Why is water any different? If anything it's a more basic need, so you should be more outraged.

      IANAL, but I'd look into getting one if I were you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    59. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey. I live in Weston and I feel your pain. But I highly recommend getting a Brita or Pur filter or something. Tastes nearly as good as bottled water.

    60. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I went and bought a Brita (Carbon?) filter pitcher ($25 + 1 filter). Replacement filters are (I think) $16 for 3. Each filter lasts about 2 months.

      I wonder if (a) I'm a chump, (b) the stupid filter thing does anything useful, or (c) it's just like drinking tap water anyway. My *idea* was I'd be getting essentially what I'd get in bottled water but save money.

      Anybody know?

    61. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you outraged? Potable water is a basic human need. What are you paying taxes for anyway?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    62. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dcmeserve · · Score: 5, Funny
      Historically homo-sapiens always had the need to carry around something. Whether it was a rock, a spear, sword, etc;...

      [Ooog walks into cave]

      Bogg: Hi, Ooog! I see you have your rock with you.

      Ooog: Yeah, I know, it's kinda heavy, but, well, you know, ya gotta carry something...

      Bogg: Oh, I know! Believe me!

      [Bogg picks up his rock]

      Bogg: I've had this sucker for 3 days now. It really fills the void left when I threw my last rock into the river...

      Ooog: What'd you do that for, anyways?

      Bogg: Oh, well, you know, gotta throw something...

      Ooog: Oh yeah, I hear ya!

      Boog: Hey, can you believe they're charging three squirrels for a good rock nowadays?

      Ooog: Oh, man, that sucks! That's even more than a good clay pot -- those are 2 squirrels, maybe 2 and a half max!

      Bogg: Yeah, man, why are there so many idiots who would pay so much just for a rock?!

      Ooog: Well, ya know, gotta carry something...

      Bogg: Oh, yeah, I hear ya!

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    63. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      I have a filter on my kitchen sink, which helps a bit. But buying bottled water by the case instead of by the bottle makes the price not so terrible. Certainly comparable to other store-bought beverages.

      Might want to try a reverse-osmosis system. A cheap one will run not much more than $100. Have to replace the carbon filters every 6 months, at abour $40 each time, and the reverse-osmosis filter itself every couple of years; not sure how much that is. Not too hard to set up, especially if your kitchen sink has some pre-made accessory holes.

      Probably less expensive than your current approach sounds.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    64. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should be paying lawyers to evict your city govenment rather than buying overpriced bottled water.

      That, or he should move north, to a state with higher standards of sanitation. He would have to annul his marriage to his sister first, but that's the price you pay for joining civilization.

    65. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      My source (http://www.cockeyed.com/science/gallon/liquid.htm l) apparently used .125 oz servings, for a total of 1024 doses. Definitely not pure.

      Let's see. 1 floz = 29.5 ml. That would imply a dosage of 3.68 ml. A lot of LSD.

      According to the LSD faq when LSD was legal, it was available in 1 ml ampules, each containing 100 micrograms of LSD dissolved in water. Assuming (ha ha ha) that street LSD is prepared to the same standards as Delysid, the $200 ampules would contain 300-400 micrograms. A heavy dose, to be sure.

    66. Re:Reassignment of terms. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Might want to try a reverse-osmosis system. A cheap one will run not much more than $100. Have to replace the carbon filters every 6 months, at abour $40 each time, and the reverse-osmosis filter itself every couple of years; not sure how much that is. Not too hard to set up, especially if your kitchen sink has some pre-made accessory holes.

      Could be a good idea. I don't recall if my sink has holes or not (moved here just recently) and if it doesn't, I won't be adding them since this is a rented apartment. But if it does, I'll look into this.

    67. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes, it does happen everywhere, but not to equal degrees. How many schools can 'boast' a 60% dropout rate, where of the 40% that graduate, only 10% can actually read?!

      Like anything, there is hardship *everywhere*, but let's not pretend that it's the same everywhere.

    68. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah, we used to do that and it was fine. You could get a liter of everclear (which is 96% ethanol) for about $4. That's more than enough to get about 10 people stinking drunk. Beats paying $5 for a cocktail at a bar.


      Holy blindness Batman! You had any methanol poisoning problems?

    69. Re:Reassignment of terms. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Why aren't you outraged? Potable water is a basic human need. What are you paying taxes for anyway?

      I *am* outraged.

      The biggest problem is that our useless governor, Governor Davis, has pretty much jacked the state budget and has a hiring freeze for state government agencies... so the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board is littered with open positions that can only be filled by existing state or regional board employees. Soooo, the only people that can replace them are their equally-incompetant peers.

      The state's money, of course, has been pissed away elsewhere.

      I am outraged at the state government. I am more outraged at every absolute moron that RE-ELECTED Governor Davis. Worst governor in state history.

    70. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I always get a chuckle out of the Aquafina bottle with it's little squiggle logo evocative of mountains. In reality, it's distilled/bottled in Munster, IN, a very flat place that is a few miles away from Lake Michigan.

      And yes, it's a Pepsi product.

    71. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      Its probably due to the amount of chlorine they use in your area. I have the exact same problem, and my water is only boiled and used to make sweet sweet tea.

      --
      | - | - |
    72. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you get all bent out of shape, most public utility tap water is just fine. It's the bottled water that's ripping you off.

      Have you never seen Penn and Teller's Bullshit? Look here Bottled water.

      It's all advertising. It's all bullshit. Drink water straight from the tap and save enough money for a fucking brain transplant!

    73. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it repeats the 2 basic patterns cigarettes serve - hold it in hand, intake into the body through the mouth.

      We also narrowed down why a blow job costs more than gas too.

      It's funny. Laugh.

    74. Re:Reassignment of terms. by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up!

      it is so absolutley true, if the water company doesnt provide you good water, do something, if they CANT provide water up to their standards, make them buy you a filter. It should be your right to have good water and, let me guess, there is only one water provider available (I doubt you have multiple sets of pipes)

      --
      Bottles.
    75. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Drinking bottled water is looked upon by many Americans with a certain amount of scorn for lack of thrift, and perhaps a little bit of class-envy.
      noo it's usually looked upon by people as complete contempt at the idiocy.

      If your municipal water supply is safe... and it has to be by FEDERAL LAW... then drinking bottled water is purely for the complete idiot... which happens to make up about 50% of the population.

      I worked in water filtration for over 7 years as a water chemist /microbiologist... the water I oversaww filtered from the water plant I worked in that was built in 1912 was BETTER in microbiological safety than any bottled water we tested. and if I ran it through a $12.95 carbon block that will filter 500 gallons of water before needing replacement... it tasted BETTER in double blind tests at local city events by the general public. we had 3 bottled waters and 1 of our municipal water.

      we ALWAYS won in the taste tests.

      unless you have to drink it because of safety or it's the only source of H2O... drinking bottled water is purely based in stupidity...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    76. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

      In Europe it costs ~1.40 for 1.5 liters of standard American-style water (not carbonated mineral crap). Mineral water is cheaper, but I couldn't stand the stuff, so buying was the only choice while I was there. In hostels its a major bitch to get water from the sink, so I had to buy daily. The only place I could get tap water was when I was staying with a friend, and they frowned upon it, so that sucked. But, their tap water is very drinkable and actually tastes good, unlike ours.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    77. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Silly fellow, we produce goods at the most efficient rate of pollution around. Pretty much everybody else creates more dirt per $ of GDP than the US. If you don't measure it that way but just by pure amounts, everybody should emulate the economic policies of Vatican City which produces the least pollutants of all.

    78. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Actually, a gallon of ink retails for $264.

    79. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      I am outraged at the state government. I am more outraged at every absolute moron that RE-ELECTED Governor Davis. Worst governor in state history.

      Can you name your local representative to the state assembly?

      I know I can't. I don't think many can. And that's where the deeper problem lies. It's easy to blame the Governor; it's a lot harder to study who the assemblypersons are and figure out which ones (if any) really deserve our votes.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    80. Re:Reassignment of terms. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Calgary (Alberta - you know, all tucked away down there in Canada?)

      I can't tell the difference between tap water and evian most of the time to be honest. Bottled water is for those times when you can't find a fountain.

      Restaurants here all serve tap water, even the fanciest.

      Course this is widely considered the cleanest city in Canada, and therefore probably the world. I've never been anyplace else that even approaches Calgarian sanitation standards(and I have traveled a lot).

      --
      Jeremy
    81. Re:Reassignment of terms. by DonaldBeckman817 · · Score: 1

      no, I buy bottled drinking water because I get about 8 notices a year from our water co that they found something in the water that can kill/make sick/damage kids and old people. While I am nether, if it can hurt them, it cant be good for me!

    82. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Wow. I bet you're happy you went the cowardly route.

    83. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The price I gave was for many dozens of cartridges, bought at retail.

    84. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I am sure because your water plant was super fabulous and worth SHOUTING about, this means every water plant in the United States, nay, the world, also must be up to your standards of water purity.

      the water in my city tastes like shit my friend. I and many of this mad place I call home also drink bottled water. Either we are all idiots (and the millions like us), or the FEDERAL LAW is not strict enough, or your scientific tests were flawed (or not applicable to the general population... have you read other water studies? Do they all prove hands down tap water is both healthier and better tasting than any bottled water?) etc etc...

      or you are crazy.

      is this really the ultimate degradation of a thread that started about chapagne and ink catridges??!? Troll? TrrroooOOOOLLLL! Damn you!

    85. Re:Reassignment of terms. by micromoog · · Score: 1
      ...the water I oversaww filtered from the water plant I worked in that was built in 1912 was BETTER in microbiological safety than any bottled water we tested...

      Not all public water is created equal. I can smell the chlorine in mine; that's where the Brita filter really comes in handy.

    86. Re:Reassignment of terms. by ian+wentzell · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's really funny is that some standards for tap water are actually higher than those for bottled water. A different government agency (the FDA) oversees standards for bottled water than the one (the EPA) for tap water.

      Very often bottled water is really just tap water, or worse. Just look at this article. Some bottled water is actually from very dangerous sources near industrial waste sites, and the FDA requires significantly less frequent testing for bottled water sources than does the EPA for tap water.

      Some standards, though, like the maximum permissible amount of lead, are actually lower for tap water, but only by a miniscule amount: a difference of 10 parts per billion. If you're really nervous about that insignificant amount of lead, though, you can always get a Brita or Pür water filter to remove it, which is a hell of a lot cheaper than buying water by the bottle (refer again to FDA article for that).

      There is also the consideration, though, that the minerals in mineral water make it taste better, not to mention make it possibly better for you, than probably the tap water of your region. But a lot of bottled water, like the Coca-cola company's Dasani, ain't mineral water ("Ingredients: water, magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, salt"). Be sure about the significance, or lack thereof, to your health of what you're buying. I think that for most intents and purposes bottled waters by varying degrees are scams, and for that matter so are sodas, at the prices we get charged.

    87. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Nope.. You can get everclear in the states too, it's just about $30 a bottle. Great for making punch, as it tastes like nothing and a little bit goes a long way.

    88. Re:Reassignment of terms. by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Actually, Aquafina comes from the nearest PepsiCo bottler. For example, in the New England area, Aquafina comes from scenic Ayer, Massachusetts. (But no mountains. And it's only scenic in the fall. And not really, at that.)

      This makes a lot of sense, really: the big bottlers all take the municipal water source, purify it, and then carbonate and add syrup to it. Bottled water is simply soda with no carbonation and no syrup.

      I'd really like to post a link listing all the sources, but I can't find one, so I'll make do with this Michigan Daily article about a controversy over the source of bottled water. Which is six years old, but I don't think things have changed.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    89. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you should be tearing your municipal leaders a new one. A lack of potable water is not something you should tolerate.

    90. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They, at the very least, change the taste of the water. Much of the chlorine is gone after passing through the filter. No idea about any other impurities.

    91. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've gotten one of those notices here in Walkerton, Ontario (Canada) in the past 20 years. It was the result of a politician taking an ultimately terrible risk for personal gain. He was run out of office (officially, resigned). He's lucky he wasn't lynched.
      I don't know how it is where you live, but we don't put up with that shit here.

    92. Re:Reassignment of terms. by leshert · · Score: 1

      With all respect due to your experience, I would submit that some public water systems do produce water that, while safe, tastes absolutely awful. I've lived in a community for which that was true.

      Fortunately, where I live now, the tap water is indistiguishable from bottled, but where I lived before, I invested in a floor-model water cooler (the kind that uses the five- and six-gallon bottles). I agree that (except for drinks on the go) single-serving bottled water is silly, but sometimes the tap is just not good.

    93. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's no surprise... anything is cheaper than bottled water.

    94. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt that. Not even by weight. Unless you're talking dry weight.

      In any case, having gold grow in your garden is far cooler (and useful) than growing weed.

    95. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the water in my city tastes like shit my friend. I and many of this mad place I call home also drink bottled water. Either we are all idiots

      You are idiots. Why the fuck aren't you tearing the municipality a collective new one for unacceptable and intolerable water quality.
      It's not something you put up with, period.

    96. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty pleased with myself, Barfo_Dung. How bout you? Are you happy you're a retard?

    97. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'ow stupide do I zink ze Americans are? I could zell zem water.
      I do not joke, zey weel buy eet. I could zell zem sheet, mon Dieu. Hohn-hohn-hohn!

    98. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's potable; it meets the water quality standards. But it just tastes so nasty that no one wants to drink it. Taste isn't in the water quality standards.

    99. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dake de ashaded to caff dyself Anonydous Coward!
      It's speffed "about". And can't you read? I think your fonts are screwed up if it fooks fike "Barfo_Dung".

    100. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Bottled water is cheap now. I get like 24, half liter bottles for about $3.

      In some places the tap water is very gross. Especially if you live in a city. Sure they say it is "safe", but there are still about 500ppm of chemicals used in the cleaning process that leave the water with a very bad taste. I just couldn't find this acceptable to drink unless I was very thirsty.

    101. Re:Reassignment of terms. by luzrek · · Score: 1

      In at least one terminal of the Atlanta Airport (think it is either D or C), there are no waterfountains, and the only water avalible is either from the taps in the bathroom (which is hot) or buying the bottled water from the "convience" stores. Fortunately, if one has time you can always walk down to the "International" Terminal where there is a half-way decent food court and waterfountains.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    102. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chlorine evaporates faster than water. Put a pitcher of water in the fridge with no cover on it overnight. By the next morning, almost all of that chlorine will be gone, and you will have water that is probably safer than the bottled stuff, without spending money on those Britta filters.

    103. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      How to get 100% ethanol.
      Mix with concentrated sulphuric acid and distill off the ethanol.

    104. Re:Reassignment of terms. by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      Now I not only have another argument against smokers, but one against bottled water drinkers, who I also hold in low regard.

      Super!

      Thanx,

      Nalfy

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

    105. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Good! You remembered to spell check that time. Now you just need to work on some witty comebacks and you'll be able to attribute your posts like a big boy.

    106. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dekashizl · · Score: 1
      Oh come on, this complete mad ramblings gets a +5 insightful?
      Historically homo-sapiens always had the need to carry around something.
      According to whom? Is that based on your extensive travels in your time machine or is it from your unpublished but detailed studies of bone abrasions on the underside of the right hand of human skeletons over the last 40 thousand years?

      Please, homo-sapiens don't have a need to carry around anything, especially "a rock, a spear, sword, etc; later became smoking." The first three (rock, spear, sword) were carried around for functional purposes, for hunting, or defense at times when animals or foreigners were always a possible threat (most of our history). As soon as people got into a comfortable and more secure environment, they put down these "necessities" and danced, told stories, slept, etc.

      As for smoking, there's a lot of deep psychological reasons why people smoke. Social lubricant? OK, sure. Addictive stimulant? Of course. Something repetetive to do with your hands/mouth and synchronize your brain state so you don't become anxious? Yes, to some extent. But "needing to carry around something" is far from the top of the list.

      Your point that bottled water and cigarettes both share the traits of being held in your hand and taken into the body through the mouth is valid. And perhaps for some people, holding and drinking water might even help them stop smoking, as it does give them a replacement for some of the similar cravings. But to suggest that this is as simple as homo-sapiens needing to carry something around is overly-reductive, and even if true, would have little to do with the cost of bottled water, even less to do with the cost of gas, and not a damn thing to do with champagne or ink.
    107. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      In many clubs in Prag the cheapest drink available is beer and the most expensive clean water. In between are all the different kinds of liquor.

    108. Re:Reassignment of terms. by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      > Aquafina (bottled by the Coca-cola company) for about a dollar for 20 ounces or imported mineral water like Evian for about the same price.

      That joke about spelling "Evian" backwards always makes me laugh :)

    109. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Larsing · · Score: 1

      $0.25 a gallon? Wow, where do you get gas from?

      Half a liter bottle of water in a high street Pret a Manger: 75p (£1.50p/l)

      One liter of unleaded petrol at the pummp: 85p

      Going blind from drinking petrol: Priceless!

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    110. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      I'm no psychologist, but I think I've narrowed it down to why the bottled water costs more than gas.

      Not exactly, you are

      1. not a psychologist;
      2. have no idea what are you talking about;
      3. wrong.
    111. Re:Reassignment of terms. by junkgoof · · Score: 1

      And Naya is just an abbreviation.

      --
      You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
    112. Re:Reassignment of terms. by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Goto Praug, A good beer costs a only 10 cents (USD)

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    113. Re:Reassignment of terms. by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Then you should have said so as it is not a gallon of ink but a gallon of ink with a lot of expensive and highly marked up plastic and electronics wrapped around it. I like the lasermonks site but if I had a high volume print operation I'd work with a CFS system.

    114. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classy? Surely you mean "blueblooded"?

      Okay, CMYK blooded...

    115. Re:Reassignment of terms. by twoslice · · Score: 1

      $0.25 a gallon? Wow, where do you get gas from?

      I dunno, I think it was at Frank's beanery - only it was $2.95 per bowl. Not as expensive as ink but definitely cheaper than champange!

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    116. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      It's really not that dumb. Maybe I want a clean, cold beverage that doesn't contain nasty sugar or carbonation. And I can reuse the bottles and fill up at home if I know I'm going to want a drink in advance.
      I think pop drinkers are dumb because they're paying the same price as bottled water, but their beverage has crap mixed in with it.

    117. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the idiot if you think this hasn't already been tried, and failed all over the country... don't you remember bush lowering lead standards in public water during his FIRST day in office?!

    118. Re:Reassignment of terms. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Sure can - Steve Samuelian's the local state assemblyman. George Radanovich is the district representative in the US House.

      Samuelian's new - 2002 elected.

      And while I agree that it's easy to pin blame on the Governor. However, in this case, it's not uncalled for. The governor's budget plans (past and present) have crippled this state. His current budget attempts, to get us out of this "budget crisis"... do you think they involve and real cuts in spending? Nope, they involve a shitload of tax increases! California is already taxed out the nose, but of course all we need is HIGHER taxes to fix everything, right?

    119. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have news for you. Most bottled water hereabouts comes from the Los Angeles city taps.

      If your water tastes bad, it's usually because your house pipes are either old and cruddy, or plastic (which interacts nastily with chlorinated water). Let the water run til the temp changes for the last time (meaning your lines are fully cleared out and you're getting water that's only been sitting in the main, not in your pipes) and you may find it's remarkably different.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    120. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guilty me, I buy bottled water all the time at markets and gas stations. It has nothing to do with class envy, or a lack of thrift, it has everything to do with not wanting to buy a jug of sugar water. I drink it straight from the tap at home, but when I am on the go and thirsty, all I ever buy is water. If I could find a bottle of carrot juice, I would buy that instead. Since that never happens, I buy the cheapest bottled water they have.

    121. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try drinking tap water in mid coastal florida.

    122. Re:Reassignment of terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example several central Ohio bottled waters if you read the label, are bottled from a municipal source.

  3. And the buzz is better by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Plus, the rad high you get from sipping ink completely blows away that bubbly kind of drunk you get when you pound the Christobal.

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:And the buzz is better by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Plus, the rad high you get from sipping ink completely blows away that bubbly kind of drunk you get when you pound the Christobal


      "I see colors! Cyans, Yellows, Magentas! All over my hands, my face! Maybe I'm full of chocolate inside? But where are the munchkins?"
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    2. Re:And the buzz is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of pounding ass, here's Lane.exe.

  4. On the other hand... by Raindance · · Score: 5, Funny

    People are taking this so negatively; just revel in the fact that champaign is so cheap!

    1. Re:On the other hand... by EinarH · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yeah, I know this was meant as a joke but you made me think.

      The other day HP introduced their new DeskJet printers. Their prices start on something that would have been almost unbelievable a few years ago; *$39*. Isolated that's just freaking cheap for a printer capable of printing medium quality photos.

      However the only reason they go so low in pricing is because they have managed to trick the public into almost exclusively buying HP-ink. Ink is a substance that's *pretty* generic. And still people still buy HP cartridges even if they could get ink elsewhere at 1/3 of the HP price-tag. That's beyond me.

      AFAIK these printers don't contain chips that makes it impossible to use generic ink or third party cartridges.

      I guess that the price on HP-ink feels right to many consumers as long as they are still willing to pay the price.

      And BTW about the Champagne; the price on this former exclusive goods has been falling steadily after the Y2K buzz about the world running out of it. Basically the price curve on some brands like Dom Perignon looks like a stock chart for a dot-com.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:On the other hand... by fussman · · Score: 1

      another reason why there are so many typos on /. (including posts of my own!)

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    3. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, nobody has ever paid for the "champaign" room at a titty bar...

    4. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You *are* right. Somebody *has* made you think. Now, this time, try to think for yourself.

    5. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that I'd agree that ink is generic. When I worked at HP (not in the printer group), they had flocks of PhD's researching ink, trying to figure out how to make it smear and fade less, and in general, look better.

      You might not feel HP ink looks any better than Joe's Ink Shack, but HP does. What one needs is a Consumer's Reports evaluation of how each performs.

    6. Re:On the other hand... by cesarcardoso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (About low printer prices)

      However the only reason they go so low in pricing is because they have managed to trick the public into almost exclusively buying HP-ink. Ink is a substance that's *pretty* generic. And still people still buy HP cartridges even if they could get ink elsewhere at 1/3 of the HP price-tag. That's beyond me.

      They tell people, "buy original or your printer'll blow or something".

      It's the same BS they tell about pirated CDs, at least here in Brazil.

      --
      Cesar Cardoso can be found at cesar at zyakannazio dot eti dot br (or at least I believe so)
    7. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cesarcardoso@cesarcardoso.tk
      That'll learn ya, you profit-stealing pig.

    8. Re:On the other hand... by ill_mango · · Score: 1

      The way some companies are doing it now (Cannon especially) is to give away two free ink carts with each printer, one black and one colour.

      When you're done the ink, it is the same price to buy a new printer rather than two new "licensed" ink carts.

    9. Re:On the other hand... by sunspot55 · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone insist that the printer companies are trying to pull the wool over their eyes. The price if ink is fully disclosed when you are going to go buy your printer. There are no secrets or gotchas here. If the average consumer is too lazy or dumb to go analyze the total cost of ownership of their printer, then I don't really feel bad for them. Either the printing companies make the money on the printer, or on the ink. It's not rocket science, and it's not a conspiracy.

    10. Re:On the other hand... by FCKGW · · Score: 1

      That's probably because not only is the printer a loss-leader for ink, but the cartridges that come with the printers supposedly aren't even close to being full.

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
    11. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with colour ink cartridges is that they come in yellow, blue and purple. They could vastly simplify the catridge mechanism and costs by producing just a single colour, flesh tone, that would suit most of us. On the other hand indeed. :)

  5. Explains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

    I <hic /> don' know what yer takin' 'bout. <hic /> I get those spams alla time.

  6. Hmm? by Squidgee · · Score: 2

    Champagne.ink? Has someone been coding in Java too much recently...? =p

  7. Toner vs Booze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze

    The thought of even drinking the ink, or snorting toner sends shivers up my spine! Urghhh! Us geeks know how to have a good time eh? ;-P

  8. Toner by My+name+isn't+Tim · · Score: 1

    if you think toner is expensive you should see the cost of MICR toner used to print cheques

    1. Re:Toner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't that stuff magnetic so that sorting machines can read it? Moreover, I think its used just for that number at the check bottom, and the rest of the check is printed using soy ink, so the end result is that not THAT much money is being wasted.

      Of course, the special properties of such a toner would indeed make it cost more.

  9. +5 Funny! Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See title.

  10. You don't get any for booze because... by gmajor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't get any for booze because the ATF would go postal on spammers. They take their job very seriously.

    1. Re:You don't get any for booze because... by Oirad · · Score: 1

      You make that sound like a bad thing.

    2. Re:You don't get any for booze because... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is why we need a bureau of Printer Ink, Natural Viagra Supplements, Genital Enlargement, Nigerian Banks and Obscure Domain Name Registrars.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  11. Comparing apples and oranges. by DumbMarketingGuy · · Score: 0
    Printing ink doesn't taste very nice. Champagne doesn't make for very clear printouts. What is the point of this futile comparision ?


    Anyway, why do we need all this hard copy anyway ? A more interesting article could be written on the technological tricks the Chateuax Petrus has used to ensure a good grape harvest.

    1. Re:Comparing apples and oranges. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Printing ink doesn't taste very nice. Champagne doesn't make for very clear printouts. What is the point of this futile comparision ?

      Yep. Plus a magnum of Dom will probably provide about a dozen glasses of Champagne whereas a cartridge will manage hundreds of sheets of paper.

      I love the way the media is so obsessed with comparisons that they feel obliged to make pointless ones. I remember a hanger for a giant airship was described as being as high as an olympic swimming pool on its end. All those who have seen an olympic swimming pool balancing on its end will understand how tall that is.

  12. Slashdot is too UK-centric by bdesham · · Score: 4, Funny

    But seriously -- anyone mind providing conversions to USD?

    --
    Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
    1. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by Some+Woman · · Score: 1

      The exchange rate generally hovers around 1.5 dollars/pound.

      --
      My dingo ate your honor student.
    2. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by BrynM · · Score: 2, Informative

      As of today's exchange rate of £1 to $1.67179

      £1.70 = $2.84
      23p (£0.23) = 38 ($0.38)

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by dinog · · Score: 5, Funny
      USD $2.84

      Thanks to : http://www.xe.com/ucc/

      So a bottle of Lexmark ink would cost USD 2132.00. Unfortunately, it doesn't taste nearly as good, and goes rather poorly with lobster. The initial bouquet is bad, the nose just aweful, and the horrid taste sticks to you tongue like, well, ink.

      Dean G.

    4. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by mickwd · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Unfortunately, it doesn't taste nearly as good, and goes rather poorly with lobster."

      Since it's ink, perhaps it would go rather better with squid ?

    5. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would make Slashdot too US-centric again. What about conversions to Euro?

      Btw: I wonder what kind of Champagne costs 234 a bottle. Here in Germany you can get REAL Champagne for about 15 ($17.25) a bottle.

    6. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, people jump to conclusions too fast. If we convert those limey units into something else, we'll probably find out that the ratio flips over, and champagne costs more.

    7. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, it doesn't taste nearly as good, and goes rather poorly with lobster.

      Well, yes, when you use the blue ink. If you try the red ink, I'm sure you'll be much happier.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ObPunchline: Fluctuations? Fluc you Amelicans too!

    9. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Red ink with sea food?!?!? Philistine!!!

      Now, if only champagne came in the right colors (the archival quality stuff that is).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    10. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Bah! Let them eat the giant blob.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    11. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Blue! It's Cyan You Insensitive CLOD!

    12. Re:Slashdot is too UK-centric by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't drink, and I don't eat seafood. For a second there, I almost did say yellow...now let me go and I'll find a nice tall bridge to jump off in this great flat land where I live. I'd better get started, it could take a while.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  13. I read this in the metro this morning by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    the Manchester(UK) metro this moring, the Metro for all those who dont know is the free bus read in the morning.. I dont know if its just me but its amusing that the Metro got the story out 16hours before /.

    --
    moo
    1. Re:I read this in the metro this morning by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially considering you're *only* 5 hours ahead of the US EST.

      Slashdot is always showing things a little later. They don't *post news*, the post links to *other peoples* news. Been like this forever. Deal with it.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:I read this in the metro this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot doesn't generate the news, it just links to it. Logically, there must be a delay between the origonal story comming out, and posting on slashdot. Somebody noticing + caring + writing it up + submitting + edit queue. Your manchester paper has not done anything special.

  14. Ink is too expensive by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've long held the belief that ink for inkjet printers is way to expensive. I bought a cheap laser printer 4 years ago, for about twice that of a nice inkjet printer. However, I am still using the same toner cartiridge that came with it. I've probably saved myself 10 times the money by going with a laser printer. Yeah, I can't print in color but that does not bother me. I'm not sure how the price of toner compares to ink cartridges, but laser is the way to go.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Ink is too expensive by odyrithm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      one pretty nagling problem with companys using color printers is that when the black cart goes the color suffers and instantly the user thinks its the color cart thats gone.. so wanders to tech to get another.. end of the day Im sure you can see whats happened.. and how much money is wasted/lost.

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Ink is too expensive by temojen · · Score: 1

      Hmm, our printer has an LCD display with bar graphs for each cartidge.

    3. Re:Ink is too expensive by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      your pretty lucky then ;P

      --
      moo
    4. Re:Ink is too expensive by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed for B&W absolutely... I have had a laser printer for about 8 years or so, and the original toner cartridge just ran out last year. Sure the cartridge costs $150 (CDN), but it lasts forever, and the text is sharp enough to shave with, and blacker than hell.

      However, colour has its place, so when I finally bought an inkjet printer to print out photos from my digital camera, one of the primary factors was long term operating cost.

      Epson printers are the top of the line for visual quality, and a very cheap initial purchase, but they gouge you on replacement cartridges later... so I went for a Canon (s820) instead, and am extremely pleased with both the print quality, and ink economy. It has SIX refillable cartridges (photo, or "light", magenta and cyan in addition to standard CMYB) as opposed to Epson's microchip crippled, non refillable 1 or 4 cartridge solutions.

      The Canon is also way faster and quieter to boot, and everytime I show someone a photo I've printed, they want to know what professional Photo Lab I went to. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    5. Re:Ink is too expensive by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

      With most Epson Printers though, it's possible to find prefectly cheap generic cartridges.

    6. Re:Ink is too expensive by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I'm setting up NetBSD on an old SE/30 in hopes that I can use it as a print server (to a LW 4/600 PS) for both my computer and my wife's. If anyone happens to have any tips that would be helpful to this novice, please pass them along. URLs, whatever. Thanks.

    7. Re:Ink is too expensive by rkz · · Score: 1

      yeah, you just have to shop around... generic ink for epson is widely available.

    8. Re:Ink is too expensive by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it sucks. More frequently clogged nozzles, incorrect color casts... I'm never buying generic ink for my Epson again.

    9. Re:Ink is too expensive by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally I see no need to print in color. Most documents that I would actually print (word, visio etc) look fine in greyscale. And I've had the same experiences with toner, the cartridges are expensive, but they last forever.

      I just dumped a 10 year old Epson laser last year. Only because I needed more memory(the 1 meg printer was choking on large documents and flowcharts). Epson memory for my model was like $50 a meg And the printer had a 4 meg max. (Would have been $150 for 3 megs of memory) So instead I got a new HP for $450.(16 megs, 1200 dpi).

      Interestingly, the toner cartridge for the old Epson was 25% full. If I didn't have the memory requirement, i probably could have gotten another 2 years out of the toner.

      The only thing I can think of reasonably needing a color printer for is photographs. And I figure: why bother? If I need a print of digital photos, I just send them off the service. They come back on photographic paper, looking almost as good as prints from my SLR.

      --
      Huh?
    10. Re:Ink is too expensive by pmz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't print in color but that does not bother me.

      Laser printers are perfect for legal documents and resumes, which are about all that's worth printing, anymore.

      The only uses I've seen for color inkjets are home-made birthday cards and rather unprofessional-looking digital photographs.

      BTW, has anyone been brave enough to do a color resume, yet?

    11. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      They figure 9 out of 10 people will "bite on the free razor and pay for the blades" instead of planning for the future -- and they're right.

      The mooing is deafening when one of these stories runs.

    12. Re:Ink is too expensive by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "The only thing I can think of reasonably needing a color printer for is photographs."

      Well, exactly! That's what I bought it for. That's what I use it for. I print them on high gloss photo paper, usually as gifts for friends. Nicer to punch a button and have a print in two minutes than having to deal with a printing service.

      And I wasn't exaggerating about people asking me what pro Print Shop I got them done at... happens every time, like clockwork. The quality is really that good with a decent modern photo printer.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    13. Re:Ink is too expensive by gmack · · Score: 1

      No tech should *ever* just hand over a replacement cartrige and trust the user to install it correctly.

      If this is standard procedure where your working then they are likely to be out far more than the cost of a few toner cartriges.

      No one but the techs should be replacing toner.

    14. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using a Canon BJC-8200 for 3 years, and must agree that the print quality borders on stunning. After deciding I wasn't going to keep spending insane amounts on replacement cartridges I went with a generic equivalent, and suddenly all of the hues were off - disturbingly so. With a best guess as to where the hue-shift was occurring I made do until replacements were once again required and went with yet another company's generic equivalent (with a colour match guarantee) and got the same brutal results. It pains me to think of what I pay for the real deal, but as you said - everyone wants to know where I "bought" my collection of Floyd concerts.

    15. Re:Ink is too expensive by afidel · · Score: 1

      HP color laserjets tell you which cartridge is low or needs replaced, and when you open the top it will even rotate the carousell to that cart.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Ink is too expensive by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      speaking of which, does anyone know where I can get my old LJIIP fixed?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    17. Re:Ink is too expensive by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then you haven't seen the right photo-printers. The new range are incredibly good. In fact the output of my friends HP when printing photos from his D60 are impossible to distinguish from a photo-print without a loop. This is up to 17*something inches.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the HR people I've spoken with, and the temp agencies I've worked with, color resumes are a bad idea.

      But feel free to do your own research :-)

    19. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Google search resulted in many sites offering replacement parts and repair...

    20. Re:Ink is too expensive by Maserati · · Score: 3, Funny

      Agreed. I really need to lock up my "ready use" stocks at the office. They've saved me some weekend trips to the office, but we also had to pay for a printer repair+part due to msyterious circumstances:

      Part of the paper feed system of an HP5000 (good printers, ask me about 79.00FE errors from OS X clients) managed to disappear; without this part of the guide, it will jam on every single sheet. To get at this part you have to remove the toner cartridge, lift up another part, and take out two screws. This piece vanished. I was watching the repair when the tach found it, and two days later I watched him put the new one in.

      Two weeks later... Yep, the printer is jamming again. I watch the tech take it apart. That same damned piece is missing again.

      It just has to be users.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    21. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LCD display
      Liquid Crystal Display display? :-)

    22. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, HP is taking care of that, too! Whereas I am a devoted fan of their old LaserJet II, III, and 4's their newer LaserJets have all shrunk the toner cartridge until it's just useless for business work and the toner costs more then the replacement toner carts you can still get for the old ones!

      My LaserJet 4P just died after 11 years of hard use and I elected to buy a rebuilt IIIP rather than one of their new lasers.

    23. Re:Ink is too expensive by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      standard CMYB

      What standard is CMYB? Is B supposed to stand for Black? Try K. It's CMYK.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    24. Re:Ink is too expensive by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Well, exactly! That's what I bought it for.

      I understand. In my case I don't have the floorspace for a second printer. Even if I did, I probably still wouldn't get one because I don't want to be bothererd worrying about getting the right paper, and inks. Besides the cost of the second printer itself.

      It's easier for me to drop a bunch of files on a CD and bring them to the place where I get my regular film developed. This is just my way of getting this done.

      So your way works for you, my way works for me. We're both happy I think. :)

      --
      Huh?
    25. Re:Ink is too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      BTW, has anyone been brave enough to do a color resume, yet?

      No, man... Fuck no- I do believe you would get your ass kicked for that.

    26. Re:Ink is too expensive by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The DesignJets do this as well.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    27. Re:Ink is too expensive by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Here's one for your list, my company needs color for CAD & GIS. It's cheaper to own the machines (and pay for ink, we've found a great local company that has a large range of good quality generic ink & toner for HPs) than to send this stuff off to print due to quantity.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    28. Re:Ink is too expensive by Buran · · Score: 1

      Errrr... why would a user remove such a part from a printer? I'm missing something here. It's not part of the toner cartridge, is it?

    29. Re:Ink is too expensive by Maserati · · Score: 1

      You have stumbled onto the essential dilemma of the situation: Why ?

      Of nearly equal importance is: How

      Followed closely by: Who, and do I need to start locking up the screwdrivers ?

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    30. Re:Ink is too expensive by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      No one but the techs should be replacing toner.

      can you cup both of your arse cheeks with your hands , bend over and mime that?

      seriously you are talking out of your colon, utilising staff to do jobs like this lessons the work load of the "techs" that have far far better things to do than change toner, your talking like you need years of experience and a degree to change a toner.. really mate it isnt as hard as it seems.

      --
      moo
    31. Re:Ink is too expensive by gmack · · Score: 1

      That was experiance talking. Sure, it doesn't requrire years of experiance but I've found a signifigant number of users find amazing new ways to screw it up if they are left to do it. The 5 minutes it will take the tech will guaruntee that the old toner is actually empty and it's not some other problem entirely and the new cartrige is installed correctly.

      Otherwise if it's not one of the clued in users they mess it up and the tech gets called for a more time consuming problem.

      It's all about pain prevention.

    32. Re:Ink is too expensive by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      oh yeah offcourse, Ive had staff remove the actual membrane and jets of the cartridge with the small plastic tab thats used to protect the jets while in storage.. so ey there is allot of money wasted with idiots like that but it dosnt happen very often and Im working with 200 staff.. and its less than a 5minute job once your actualy at the printer but when your walking back and forth over a building area the size of a football pitch it starts to take up allot more time and can get very frustrating when you can just have said staff member do it themselves.

      Easiest thing is to sit them all down and explain the procedure, your find hardly anyone will fuck up after being explained exactly how to do it.

      --
      moo
    33. Re:Ink is too expensive by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 1

      really? Ive been working with id10T users for way too many years. If it can be messed up, they WILL find a way. But IT department time and cost has to be weighed out against printer downtime, cost, cartridge cost, and boss view. Personally, I just handle it myself in most cases. I do have a couple of trusted employees who can change a cartridge without supervision, but they are the exception, not the rule.

      "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

  15. No Kidding by GFunk83 · · Score: 1

    I know it's expensive, but when you're choosing between champagne for your "lady-friend" and a $30 ink cartridge, what do you do?

    1. Re:No Kidding by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      depends on wether or not you want to print her out in color so you can take her to the bathroom. Or risk spilling fluids all over your screen.

    2. Re:No Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to put the term lady-friend in quotes, I'd suggest going with the ink cartridge. Unless you're in to shemales..

  16. just buy a laserjet by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Informative

    My annual operating cost for an $800 HP LaserJet 2200 is about a $100 for toner.

    Sure, I paid a lot more up front, but having to spend $100 every two months to maintain an Epson Inkjet added up quickly.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:just buy a laserjet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is it $100 per two months ($600/year) or $100/year? This isn't informative, it's confusing...

    2. Re:just buy a laserjet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So is it $100 per two months ($600/year) or $100/year? This isn't informative, it's confusing...

      Did you miss a reading comprehension class? He said $600/year when he was using Inkjets and $100/year for Laser toner.

    3. Re:just buy a laserjet by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I have a laserjet 6 and a apple laserwriter pro (really a hp laserjet 5)

      I got the apple laserwriter for free. $79.00 fuser assembly and $59.00 toner cartridge later it's working perfectly at 600 dpi and my resumes and documents look as good as the 2400dpi HP8100DN at work.

      It's been working now for 4 years.... always works perfectly. and the paper costs much more than the printer operation.

      if you dont need the 60 pages per minute... get a older laser printer for dirt... have it fixed for dirt..

      it's only smart to buy a new laser printer if you are a business... otherwise get a old one... they print just as good as the new stuff....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  17. Printer mod, chip resetters... by pacc · · Score: 1

    Everyone buying ink in bottles keeping
    control of both quality and price should
    post their methods and experiences so
    we don't have to use this thread to whine
    about suspect business methods anymore.

  18. Bootlegging by retto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean people are going to start bootlegging ink? Will the great crime families ditch the drug trade for the undergound ink market? I fear the day our great cities are brought under the heel of the ink barons.

    1. Re:Bootlegging by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Carly Fiona's my aunt, so start coughing up the "protection money", capiche?

    2. Re:Bootlegging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask your aunt if she plans to drive HP/Compaq into bankruptcy and massive layoffs immediately, or if she can be presuaded to hold off until the economy takes a bit of an upturn.

      I'm not looking forward to another 30,000 competitors dumped onto the job search market.

    3. Re:Bootlegging by Oz_mjk · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, ink bootlegging wouldn't be such a bad idea... put it in a sort of generic cartridge that would work with x-number of different printers, or perhaps put it in cartridges that only fit specific printers like is done now. In fact, I don't think any law could stop a person using different ink in their Epson, lexmark, HP or whatever. And since you, the ink manufacturer, don't have to sell printers really cheap, you could charge as little as $5-$10. Interesting...

      --
      ---
  19. Ink by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tend to find the 86' Lexmark ink has a fruity taste which can be complimeted only by a good mature cheese and a decent toner cartrige.

    1. Re:Ink by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally, I prefer fava beans and a nice Epson. Thththththththth.

    2. Re:Ink by hobbesx · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tend to find the 86' Lexmark ink has a fruity taste which can be complimeted only by a good mature cheese and a decent toner cartrige.

      Hmmm- could anyone recommend a delicate Champagne to accent my vintage Canon bubbly-jet?

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    3. Re:Ink by jejones · · Score: 1

      And if you use the magenta, you can fool people into thinking it's Perth Pink!

  20. lucky drunks by abe_is_fun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even though ink is more expensive than fine champagne, and therefore is better than fine champagne (proof by induction), you shouldn't drink it.

    It would stain your teeth some ugly color like #006666, and you would never get a date and you would die cold and alone, a pitiful 30 year old virgin.

    Instead, drink beer -- it's been helping ugly people get laid for over 200 years!

    --
    I don't want to be here.
    1. Re:lucky drunks by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Instead, drink beer -- it's been helping ugly people get laid for over 200 years!

      No, no, that's when you get the _other_ person to drink the beer. If _you_ drink the beer, then you only THINK you get laid: "I can't remember what I did last night, so I must've had a helluva good time!"

    2. Re:lucky drunks by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      I thought I'd give beer a try last St. Patty's day, but I didn't get laid and my teeth still ended up #006666.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    3. Re:lucky drunks by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Instead, drink beer -- it's been helping ugly people get laid for over 200 years!

      Beer was invented by the babylonians or Sumarians at least 6,000 years ago (it is mentioned in the epic of gilgamesh, approx 3,000 years ago).

      It was also an important part of the diet of the european middle-ages peasant. Peasants would stockpile barley and wheat for the winter, but towards the end of the winter, the grains would start to go bad. The solution to this is beer, which could be made from slightly bad grains and still convey the nutritional value of the food. Beer is nothing if not a good energy source, rich in sugars and other more complex carbohydrates.

      So, you could say that beer may have saved Europe in the Middle Ages.

      Or, you could just say that it's been getting people laid for quite a lot longer than 200 years.

      (damn history degree)

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:lucky drunks by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      It was also an important part of the diet of the european middle-ages peasant. Peasants would stockpile barley and wheat for the winter, but towards the end of the winter, the grains would start to go bad. The solution to this is beer, which could be made from slightly bad grains and still convey the nutritional value of the food. Beer is nothing if not a good energy source, rich in sugars and other more complex carbohydrates.


      Beer was teh sukc back then. It had a very low alcoholic content. In addition, its consistency wasn't the nice amber with the bit of foamy head on top that we are used to today. It was almost soup-like.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    5. Re:lucky drunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...and you would never get a date and you would die cold and alone, a pitiful 30 year old virgin."

      Hey, how did you know I'm a 30 year old vir--

      Um, never mind. Move along now.

      Is there an "Un-Submit" button?

    6. Re:lucky drunks by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It would stain your teeth some ugly color like #006666, and you would never get a date

      I think your problem getting a date is because you refer to colors by digits... God only knows what other "fun" habbits you have.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go get a 0x0B pack.

      return (0);
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:lucky drunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that you confuse more people if you work in octal rather than hex -- the fact that you're not using any extra numerals confuses them. So, that would be a "14 pack" you're going for.

    8. Re:lucky drunks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Peasants would stockpile barley and wheat for the winter, but towards the end of the winter, the grains would start to go bad. The solution to this is beer, which could be made from slightly bad grains and still convey the nutritional value of the food."

      Ahhh, the danger of stockpiling...

      If I recall correctly, the reason that they were witch trials in salem and other places were in fact caused by grain going bad with some sort of mold that created some rather disturbing hallucinations. So basically it boils down to either callling someone a witch because the grain is bad, or calling your boss the day after a beer bash and saying that your seeing pink elephants.

      Hmmm. Cant be burned for seing elephants I guess.

    9. Re:lucky drunks by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of debate about the salem witch trials. If you were in high school or college in the past 10 years, you may have had to purchase a book called "After the fact: The art of historical detection" for a history test.

      That book puts forth several theories on the Salem witch trials, including the fermented wheat that produced hallucinations. They also said that the hallucination theory can be telling of the times in which the theory was developed. In the 50's, people drew paralells to McCarthyism, saying that the "witches" must have been unloyal to the leadership, or something. The 60's, of course, spawned the psycodellic theories. Later, people turned to historical psyco-analysis, claiming that, perhaps, the people drank some bad water and were just simply crazy. Now, the current theory is that the witches and accusers were from different classes of society, and it was a social conflict.

      No one of these theories is wrong, and it's interesting to discuss the history of the theories as a paralell to the current popular environment of the researchers. // end of history lecture. gotta stop doing that.. but there are so many interesting and intriguing stories in history...

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. also by abhisarda · · Score: 4, Informative

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!.

    Sending booze by mail across state lines is not legal in many places.
    1. Re:also by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!.
      Sending booze by mail across state lines is not legal in many places.


      Yes, but what does that have to do with spam?

      Are you implying that the people who send spam actually fullfill their orders?

      I thought they just took your money and then laughed at you for sending money to an anonymous jackass on the internet.

    2. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know.. I understand that people who buy these products are stupid. But how do they pay for these products? With a credit card.

      If the goods don't reach you, you can file a dispute with the credit card company. Since you did not get the product, you get your money back.

    3. Re:also by antibryce · · Score: 1
      Sending booze by mail across state lines is not legal in many places.


      Neither is selling illicit copies of anti-virus software, yet I still get daily spam offerring me Norton for $2.95.

    4. Re:also by ctve · · Score: 1

      I imagine some printer companies would like the same thing. Region coding of printer cartridges, anyone?

    5. Re:also by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Hell in some states it's not even legal to transport it across county lines.

  23. Other shocking comparisons.. by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pound for pound...

    Poodles cost more than horses!

    Crack whores cost more than fatties!

    Eardrums cost more than eyeballs!

    1. Re:Other shocking comparisons.. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Athlons cost more than Aircraft Carriers!

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Other shocking comparisons.. by pmz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Crack whores cost more than fatties!

      You can get a better value by requesting the Assistant Crack Whore-in-Training. They haven't mastered the trade, yet, but they get the job done.

    3. Re:Other shocking comparisons.. by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah but you get much better image quality when you use poodles.

  24. Fortunatelly, is just the ink by nbarr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This happens with ink. How fortunate we are that other stuff for computers cant be sold the same way ink is.

    Its a good strategy selling cheap hardware, and than charging huge amounts in the stuff needed to make the hardware function. Should this be illegal?

    --
    Call on God, but row away from the rocks.
    1. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by pirodude · · Score: 1

      You mean like buying a $200 pc from walmart and having to spend almost that much on just the operating system?

    2. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by agilen · · Score: 1

      Its a good strategy selling cheap hardware, and than charging huge amounts in the stuff needed to make the hardware function. Should this be illegal?

      Last I heard, the Xbox wasn't doing too well.

    3. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gillette has been giving away razors and selling the blades at ever-higher prices for decades... (full disclosure -- I'm one of the suckers who switched from Mach 2 to Mach 3, and did it so long ago that I don't even remember if there's a difference anymore!)

    4. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Xbox is doing much better than the Pippin ever did.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

      Gillette's been doing that for decades. Give 'em the razor, sell 'em the blades....

    6. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it shouldn't be illegal. It should just be unprofitable, since the customers would all Just Say No. The real point of the story is to inform people that they are idiots for paying that much.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Fortunatelly, is just the ink by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      How fortunate we are that other stuff for computers cant be sold the same way ink is.

      You mean, like operating systems?

  25. Off topic but interesting point about ink. by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    This post reminds me of when the Mayo Clinic informed me that they make their own ink to keep costs down, since they like to insource as much as possible. Perhaps it was the cost of outsourced ink. From IT to Ink there are good reasons to do it yourself.

    I just found it interesting that the Mayo Clinic, as far as I could tell by working with them, is a company that is going the opposite direction as most IT companies when looking at sourcing projects.

    1. Re:Off topic but interesting point about ink. by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Funny
      This post reminds me of when the Mayo Clinic informed me that they make their own ink to keep costs down...
      Ok, I know where they would get large quantities of red and yellow, but where do they get the other two colors?

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Off topic but interesting point about ink. by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

      bashing victims

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    3. Re:Off topic but interesting point about ink. by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

      Vulcans and any undead vicims.

  26. It's been done. by packethead · · Score: 0

    This one I think is called a yink. And all he does is drink drink drink. And what he likes to drink is ink. And the ink he likes to drink is pink.
    so, if you have a lot of ink, you should get a yink, I think. -Dr. Suess

    --
    .sig
    1. Re:It's been done. by packethead · · Score: 1

      and to elude to an earlier story:

      Celui-ci que je pense s'appelle un yink. Et tout qu'il est boisson de boissons de boissons. Et ce qu'il aime boire est encre. Et l'encre qu'il aime boire est rose. ainsi, si vous avez beaucoup d'encre, vous devriez obtenir un yink, je pensez. - Dr. Suess

      and now, when translated back:

      This one I think is called has yink. And all He does is drink drink drink. And what He likes to drink is ink. And the ink He likes to drink is pink. so, yew you cuts has batch of ink, you should get has yink, I think. - Dr. Suess

      Where can I sign up for that M$ IM client???

      --
      .sig
    2. Re:It's been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to be french ? Or maybe Babelfished-french... :)

    3. Re:It's been done. by packethead · · Score: 1

      Right. That was my point.

      --
      .sig
  27. The sheer wastefulness of ink marketing by robogun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I usually get the generic cartridges for my pre-chip Epson. When they ran out of those, I had to buy the "economical" two-pack of genuine Epson.

    Aside from the $40 cost (deep-discount, as I understand), just getting the cartridges out from all the packaging was a chore. It was like peeling an onion. It was time- consuming. I needed a knife to get past the hard shell. There were slick-coated 4-color ads in and on the packaging.

    The resulting stack of garbage took up half the wastebasket -- not including the spent cartridges, which I am starting to save for refilling.

    Knowing I paid for all that glossy, 4-color trash makes me highly reluctant to buy those genuine cartridges again.

    1. Re:The sheer wastefulness of ink marketing by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Feel lucky. I recently got 5 Harry Potter [some junk] CDs with HP cartridges. (luckily I'm not the one who pays for them)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  28. Get Smart by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny
    Chief: This desk runs entirely on ink.

    Max: But chief, that's incredible. Do you realize what this could mean to our energy supply?

    Chief: Unfortunately its an extremely rare type of ink that can only be found in the Middle East.

    Yes I'm paraphrasing, but that's the first thing that came to mind;-)

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  29. Stupidity makes sense at last by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been going on for a while, it shouldn't surprise anyone. Manufacturers are getting cheaper (not all their own faults, but it's a fact of life for most consumer grade items). The make crap and hope to keep selling it, because other manufacturers are finding cheaper ways to produce the same goods (usuallt with offshore labor, but not always).

    So...in the end, they produce crap and try to make up profits elsewhere. In the printer business, that's either paper or ink. And not a lot of printer manufacturers are selling much expensive paper. And, they're not liekly to beat the paper industry at inexpensive paper either.

    Me, I cut printer costs by saving everything on $0.50/GB hard drives instead of printing, always cheaper in the end.

    --
    Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    1. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by b!arg · · Score: 1

      I know I always make a joke along the lines of buying a new printer is cheaper than getting new ink cartridges. Does anyone out there know of a printer out there that would make this true?

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    2. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by Ewan · · Score: 1

      dell dell are selling a lexmark Color Jetprinter Z35 for £33 ($50?), that's cheaper than both a full colour and full black and white cartridge, but often now these ultra-cheap printers ship with a half-full cartridge to make people buy more. Ewan

    3. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      This is true of Lexmark in general. They sell the printers for $30-45 at places like Wal-mart, but then if you try to buy a color and black cartridge, you find the cost is around $70 each time.

    4. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...buy it for $50...use it up...buy a new one...sell 'slightly used' one on eBay for $30. There ya have it...a full refill (well, half) for $20. Ok...I guess it doesn't make much sense. :)

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    5. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      tis true. I went to buy new cartridges for a z23 i have here. They would be about $70 total. The printer itself was below the cartridges on display. It was selling for $25. I almost just bought a new printer to get the catridges. But then i realized how insane it is to trash a whole printer.

      Fuck the printer companies. If there was ever a reason to go paperless, they are it.

    6. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by norite · · Score: 1
      I agree. I bought an Epson stylus C40UX last year for £59. The replacement cartidges cost about £25. The first time it ran out of ink, I took out the colour cartidge, had a look at the type (so I could buy a new one), then replaced it. The printer software reported that the ink cartidge was full!! It printed out quite a few pages after that, before it ran out (!!)

      Since refill kits cost less than half the prices of a single cartidge,(Morrisons were doing a 2 for one colour refill special for £11.99 a few months back) and I can refill a cartridge about 3 times with them, the printer companies can kiss my arse, because I'll NEVER buy a new cartridge ever :0)

      --
      -- Fuck Beta
    7. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      While I agree it's ridiculous across the board, Epson isn't as bad as some of the others, especially Lexmark. In your case, the cartridge was a little less than half the total cost of the printer. With Lexmark, they're generally DOUBLE the initial cost of the printer. All things relative I suppose. That and the fact that the C4x series are actually really nice printers for the money. Same quality print as the $700 1280 series, only real difference being that the C40 only prints up to 8"x10", while the 1280 can do full poster size paper.

    8. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      OK I baught a NEW HP 832 or some such (it's still in the box) with a "disposable" digital camera and some photo paper for 54 bucks on clearance at sears. Now I had a 810c that needed cartigaes that generaly run me at staples 60 bucks a set. If I get them online it's less than half that. But prety much I got a few hunded sheets of photo paper a camera and a printer along with a set of replacement ink. Sell the old printer on ebay (this on is marginialy better)

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    9. Re:Stupidity makes sense at last by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Me, I cut printer costs by saving everything on $0.50/GB hard drives instead of printing, always cheaper in the end.

      You could save a lot of money by saving everything on $0.10/GB DVD-Rs instead.

      Besides, it's not the same. Nobody has yet made a monitor that is as easy to read as a piece of paper (though they could, but that's another rant). Also, computers are notorious for being noisy, large, and requiring electricity no matter where you want to take them, or what you want to do on them.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  30. Open Source Solution? by pjdepasq · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Isn't there some type of Open Source Solution for this problem? Shouldn't there be one? We need to get a group together and create an Open Source printer. Then we need a similar ink solution helping to drive down the prices.

    1. Re:Open Source Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to get a group together and create an Open Source printer. Then we need a similar ink solution helping to drive down the prices.

      At which point ideological differences will cause a fork in printer development resulting in an ink cartridge that looks similar but can't be used on the other printer.

    2. Re:Open Source Solution? by sapgau · · Score: 1

      How is this offtopic?

      Defining the basic elements for a computer printer is the first step to come up with alternatives and free up the monopoly from the Lexmark, Epson, etc.

  31. P & � by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many "p" equal 1 £?

    1. Re:P & � by sleadlay · · Score: 1

      100

    2. Re:P & � by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      100.

      ~~~

    3. Re:P & � by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple. Recall that there 252 pennies to the guinea. A half guinea is worth 10 and six, or about 11/20 of a pound. 5 newpence (p) are equal to 12 pennies (d). It's all frighteningly easy, once you get the hang of it.

    4. Re:P & � by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      did I say 11/20 of a pound? I meant 21/40.

    5. Re:P & � by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More random witterings, such as how to remember it all...

      12 shillings to the old pound (240d)

      So a shilling is 1/20 of an old pound.

      One new pound is 100p ... so 100 / 20 = 5p

      A guinea is 1 pound, 1 shilling, or £1.05 in new money.

      End of random witterings on the subject...

    6. Re:P & � by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I've always wondered what the hell that all meant.

    7. Re:P & � by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      I bet that you're the type of guy that finds those tea-towels that explain the rules of cricket for foreigers "frightfully" funny.

      You know the one: "The first team who's in goes out and the other team goes out as well and tries to get the team that's in, out...."

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
  32. I wonder when (or if?) by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    ...there will appear a printer company that doesn't do nasty tricks about its cartridges and sells printers and materials at reasonable prices. I'm sure there is a large market for this.

    Like: Cartridges with "refill valve", authorised "refill sets" and "cleaning units" (so dried cartridges could be reused), the cartridge capacity used in 100% and not lowered, new cartridges that come with the printer full, not just with enough ink for 5 pages, and nothing that would try to make your cartridge useless sooner than it just rubs off against the paper or gets broken in some other "normal way". Plus user policy that grants not changing that.

    I'm sure "per customer" profit would be way lower, but sales would beat all the competition.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I wonder when (or if?) by afidel · · Score: 1

      Canon is close, although they don't sell or condone refills they do nothing to prevent it. If you get really cheap, shitty cartridges it will clog the print heads which are basically the same to replace as getting a new printer, but there is SOME reason that the manufacturer inks are expensive.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:I wonder when (or if?) by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Canon is the one that sells printers with nearly empty cartridges, besides (I may be wrong) most of their models come with quite small cartridges.

      HP sells half-empty cartridges, besides it has lowered the default capacity recently.

      Lexmark has really small cartridges.

      Nowadays the best choice is old HP and non-original cartridges (they are full and quite big plus cheaper than HP. )

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  33. Good Ink by ebpotter · · Score: 1

    The 1997 Epson is printing quite nicely. Too bad ink doesn't get better with age.

  34. Damn by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Unlike Champagne, ink becomes useless with age, your drivers turn up their nose at an old cartridge. Damn expiration dates.

  35. I guess... by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

    I guess this means I'm going to be giving my English instructor a bottle of champagne instead of a research paper this Fall.

    1. Re:I guess... by Flwyd · · Score: 1

      I guess this means I'm going to be giving my English instructor a bottle of champagne instead of a research paper this Fall.

      It's just as well. He'll be happier, and you'll get a better grade.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  36. Newsflash: Apples and Oranges vary in price! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny
    Is this one of those tests?

    Champagne is to printer ink as:

    a) Automobiles are to shoes.
    b) Doorknobs are to bedpans.
    c) Beach sand is to integrated circuits.

    The answer is c because integrated circuits are computer related and this is slashdot...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Newsflash: Apples and Oranges vary in price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a little harder next time. It would be much funnier if you said things like, "shoes cost more per pound than cars." Style is the difference between humor and a whine.

    2. Re:Newsflash: Apples and Oranges vary in price! by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Actually beach sand is used to make integrated circuits (silicon). So technically, they aren't exclusive to each other. If you were a slashdot dork you'd have already known this. =P

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    3. Re:Newsflash: Apples and Oranges vary in price! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      c) I do know that. I know everything :-)

      a) - autos and shoes are both transportation.
      b) - both made of metal (generally).
      c) - a perfectly good analogy, hence it was selected.
      d) rum - err, sorry, that is the current influence. usually it is gin!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    4. Re:Newsflash: Apples and Oranges vary in price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "b) Doorknobs are to bedpans."

      For a moment I was dreading one of those goatse.cx links...

      "Excuse me sir, is that your mind lying in the gutter?"

  37. Re:Quick! by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of drunken soviet cartritges that refill YOU!!!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  38. But How Much is Inside by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well according to this, ink costs about the same as Chanel No. 5 Eau Du Parfum, but when was the last time you tried to print porn with parfume or champagne?

    1. Re:But How Much is Inside by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 2, Funny

      abd oh yeah... the cartrige purchaced was $32, and the 146 pages of porn were printed and for $41. It seems to me after all is said and done, the cartrige costs about -$0.21 a mililitter.

  39. But is it FINE ink?! by N10sb2002 · · Score: 0

    Huh?! Is it?!

    --
    "I wonder what it's like living in a constant haze of stupidity" - Hiei, Yu Yu Hakusho
  40. Model car kit paint is astronomically pricy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1/4 of an ounce will set you back a dollar. That means one gallon will cost you $512.

    You think that's pricy? I advise you not to look at the cost of perfumes or colognes then.

  41. whats being done about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell realized how much money is being made by all the printer manufacturers. They wanted a piece of the action. So they buy Lexmark printers, put the Dell logo on the front, and modify the printers so they only take Dell cartridges. Then idiots that think they are getting a great fuckin' deal on that $80 printer have to pay $30 for black ink and $30 for a 3 color cartidge. It makes people not want to print anything. Before they hit the print button they have to pause and think "Man, do i really want to print this? Its going to cost a couple dollars just to print..." I miss the days of dot matrix. This is one thing about the PC industry that really pisses me off. They must be making $20 profit on a $28 cartridge. I thought competition was supposed to keep prices in check? Is there a printer "cartel?" There is obviously some kind of price fixing going on here because I fucking know it doesnt cost $20 for a few CCs of ink

  42. Inkjet vs Laser Printer by divide+overflow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

    Actually, it says nothing about toner and everything about the high price of ink. Note that:

    1. Ink is for inkjet printers.
    2. Toner is for laser printers.
    3. Toner is usually MUCH cheaper per page than ink.

    I've been waiting to find a color printing option that approaches the cost per page of a laser printer with the color quality and resolution of a good inkjet printer. So, has anyone here on Slashdot found an optimal solution that offers reasonably quick printing? Extra points for built-in network support.

    1. Re:Inkjet vs Laser Printer by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I've been waiting to find a color printing option that approaches the cost per page of a laser printer with the color quality and resolution of a good inkjet printer.

      Yes, what you need is a color laser printer. I've seen the best color inkjet printers, and IMHO, they don't come anywhere close to the quality of Laser.

      That said, if you aren't interested in the durability of the picture (with a little effort, you can scratch the color off) you should look into Xerox's Solid-Ink printers. Inexpensive inital cost, very fast, cheap-ink, etc. (Previously known as Tektronics printers)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  43. Re:Stupid comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and a gallon of milk costs more than a gallon of gasoline.

    You obviously don't live in California.

  44. Well which lasts longer? by donutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, you drink some champaigne, take a piss an hour later, and it's gone.

    You print out your term paper...and behold! It's still there! Way to go ink manufacturers!

    Of course, you could always try your luck with pissing on a piece of paper...but I don't think your instructor would like to read your essay that you printed that way....

    1. Re:Well which lasts longer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the way I drink, a little of my liver goes with it!

    2. Re:Well which lasts longer? by ctve · · Score: 1

      You could just try and sell it to the Tate Modern.

    3. Re:Well which lasts longer? by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      You drink some champagne and an hour later you're having a great time with a girl. Inkjet ink? You're fighting with a misspelled HOWTO in single user mode...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    4. Re:Well which lasts longer? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      I mean, you drink some champaigne, take a piss an hour later, and it's gone.

      On the other hand, I picked up my fiance while drunk. That was two years ago; she is still around.

      Tor

    5. Re:Well which lasts longer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're not taking full advantage of the Champange. Get drunk, get laid, and *bam* you've got child support payments for the next 18 years. Your term paper? Forgotton at the end of the semester.

    6. Re:Well which lasts longer? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Of course, you could always try your luck with pissing on a piece of paper...but I don't think your instructor would like to read your essay that you printed that way....

      Aww, man... And I just finished learning how to piss in 3 different fonts.

      Arial and Times New Roman wasn't too difficult... It was Wingdings that took the longest

      Hmm, maybe if I drink ink, I'll be able to put my skills to use...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Well which lasts longer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You print out your term paper...and behold! It's still there! "

      But for how long? The biggest problem with inkjets is that the ink fades; the greater the light exposure, the quicker. Not that it matters for a term paper...

      "Of course, you could always try your luck with pissing on a piece of paper..."

      That's your instructor's job, and usually after you've already printed on it.

  45. Re:Stupid comparison by ElectroKiwiMonkey · · Score: 1

    You're waiting for /. to post a review of T3? Why? About a zillion sites have got reviews of it up already if you weren't too lazy to go look.

    --
    I am not a man, I am a free number.
  46. Not the only thing with surprisingly high prices by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It was reported several months ago that many prescription drug cost more than their weight in gold. An excerpt (emphasis mine):
    Lipitor, the anti-cholesterol medicine, costs about 20 times as much as gold, based on late-2002 prices from www.drugstore.com. Prilosec, used to treat ulcers and gastric reflux, costs 35 times as much. Prevacid, used for the same purposes, costs 25 times more.

    Zocor, an anti-cholesterol medicine, is worth 33 times its weight in gold.
  47. My New Businessplan by sherpajohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Develope color printing technology that is cheaper than ink-jet.
    2. Make scads of money
    3. Buy one of the really prestigious Champagne "Houses" - they are so funny...they do not call them estates, but houses!
    4. Hire the best chef in France to make lots of Hot Grits
    5. Invite Natalie Portman over
    6. Enjoy 3 course meal of Fine Champagne, hot grits and Natalie
    7. Print out pictures of #6 on cheap color printer
    8. Sell copies of pictures
    9 Profit!!!!!

    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
    1. Re:My New Businessplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed out a Soviet Russia joke

    2. Re:My New Businessplan by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia, ink cartridges refill YOU!

      Good enough?

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  48. Makes sense by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    How do you think HP got the cash to buy out Compaq? God knows Carly had yet to make HP produce a decent PC themselves. Whole-lotta profit in those itty-bitty cartriges.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  49. Not only is it less expensive... by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...when you buy Champagne, the bottle is actually full. Plus there is no crime against refilling the bottle and using it for your own stuff.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  50. Re:Stupid comparison by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

    I agree for another reason: I drive thru a stretch of dairy farms on my daily commutte to work and if I were asked to go and milk those stinky cows under a constant barrage of pigeon/bird droppings I would be charging an arm and a leg too :)

  51. What is all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Consider this:

    1. Buy mint condition Epson Stylus Photo EX @ Goodwill for $8.

    2. Buy (6) color and (6) black ink tanks from 'inkinablink' on eBay for ~ $45 delivered

    3. Connect to Linux box and configure CUPS

    4. Print. A lot. $53 per year, plus paper.

    5. Printer breaks? Printhead clogs? Repeat step #1 as necessary. I 'upgraded' from a $20 Stylus Color 800 to the $8 Photo EX.

    Come on people, use tha brain a bit, you don't have to go to CrapUSA to buy this stuff...............

  52. Champangne business model by InferiorFloater · · Score: 1

    Fancy restaurant starts you off cheap, with like a 4 dollar beer or 7 dollar mixed drink... but by the end of the night you're shelling out $200 for the dom perignon to maintain the drunken stupor!

    Get the word out to the people! This is an injustice!

    --

    ---------
    Get back to me when my brain starts working.
  53. Sounds like "General's Hospital"... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Funny
    This whole champagne and ink thing reminds me of one of the weirder stories in the fortune files:

    The General disliked trying to explain the highly technical inner workings of the U.S. Air Force.

    "$7,662 for a ten cup coffee maker, General?" the Senator asked.

    In his head he ran through his standard explanations. "It's not so," he thought. "It's a deterrent." Soon he came up with, "It's computerized, Senator. Tiny computer chips make coffee that's smooth and full-bodied. Try a cup."

    The Senator did. "Pfffttt! Tastes like jet fuel!"

    "It's not so," the General thought. "It's a deterrent."

    Then he remembered something. "We bought a lot of untested computer chips," the General answered. "They got into everything. Just a little mix-up. Nothing serious."

    Then he remembered something else. It was at the site of the mysterious B-1 crash. A strange smell in the fuel lines. It smelled like coffee. Smooth and full bodied...

    -- Another Episode of General's Hospital

    1. Re:Sounds like "General's Hospital"... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It's a good joke, but it's written so that I had to read it 3 times to understand what was being said...

      It would be far easier to read without the odd:
      "It's not so," he thought. "It's a deterrent."

      throughout...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  54. Worms more expensive than steak! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's nothing. You should see the cost of worms. This week, 250 grams of mail-order worms cost me 4UKP (say $6). So much for the urban legends about worms going into McBurgers. I bet they just use cheap filler ingredients instead, like ground up cow.

    1. Re:Worms more expensive than steak! by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, I get hammered with worms all the time. There's so much of them that people shove them in your emails and web servers. :)

    2. Re:Worms more expensive than steak! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the right restraunt, and you get worms with your steak free!

      Or you can go somewhere where they wash their hands...

  55. $17 for 24 refills by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Refill your Canon i320 printer that you bought for $40 (U.S. price) with this refill system: http://www.ims-ink.com/. It costs $17 at Costco and refills the black cartridge an estimated 24 times. The system also comes with bottles of colored ink; haven't calculated the color refills yet.

  56. So? by Kegetys · · Score: 1

    For a person that uses his printer alot, one ink cartridge lasts quite a long time compared to how long a champagne bottle lasts for someone who drinks alot.

  57. The comparison is useless by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Informative

    I buy a drink mix that, added to water, yields a liquid that's more expensive than gasoline. Does that say anything about the high cost of the mix, or the low cost of gasoline? NO! They're two different things and thus have two different prices. Telling me that a little tub of ink costs more than champagne on a per-unit basis is similarly useless information, unless I can substitute champagne for the ink.

    1. Re:The comparison is useless by dex22 · · Score: 1
      I'm glad you mentioned gasoline. A US gallon is 4500 millilitres. That would be 7,650 uk pounds work. That's about $11,475 per gallon for inkjet ink.

      Bear in mind how much it costs to find, drill for, extract, transport, refine, transport again and use gasoline. The only think complex about printer ink is the packaging. That must be less than a buck a shot, including the print head!

    2. Re:The comparison is useless by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      People are still shocked by this because champagne is supposed to be a premium product, while ink is a more everyday item. Further, ink is supposed to be mass produced (I bet you use more ink per year than champagne) in an easily scaleable process, while champagne of quality is supposed to be difficult to produce in a process that is hard to refine further for efficiency without compromising quality.

      You cannot substitute one for the other, but is it strange to wonder about the consumer cost of both given the factors that govern/constrain their manufacture?

    3. Re:The comparison is useless by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      It's even more shocking when you think about companies like Quad/Graphics that use alcohol-based inks (chemically similar to inkjet ink) and buy them in 55-gallon drums (and those drums, I assure you, cost nothing near the $631,125.00 inkjet companies would have you believe it costs--try moving the decimal point three places to the left and you get the drum's real cost.)

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    4. Re:The comparison is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think printer ink grows on trees? I'm just guessing, but since they are dyes, I'd guess they are made from petrolium. It's just a complex as gasoline. Of course complexity has nothing to do with price, that was your idea.

    5. Re:The comparison is useless by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      Do you think printer ink grows on trees? I'm just guessing, but since they are dyes, I'd guess they are made from petrolium.

      I find this question ironic given that the very first dyes were ground up plants. I don't know if they grow printer ink on trees (probably doubtfull) but they certainly _could_. However it would most likely cost a lot more that way. Nowdays anything you can grow costs a lot more than most things you can dig out of the ground.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re:The comparison is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just stick an expensive ink cartridge label on a cheap bottle of champagne. Keep the expensive ink for yourself, and give your newly relabeled champagne bottle to the kid or something. 2 ink cartridges for the price of 1 + champagne..

    7. Re:The comparison is useless by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
      You cannot substitute one for the other, but is it strange to wonder about the consumer cost of both given the factors that govern/constrain their manufacture?

      It's fine to wonder about it. But consider the common wood pencil and all that goes into making it. Metals, artificial rubber, wood, graphite, paint. Stuff that has to be mined, cut, milled, pressed, refined, formed, transported, marketed, inventoried, etc. Not to mention all the stuff that went into making the machines that did the mining, milling, refining, etc. If you think about the entire chain of materials, processes, events, and infrastructure that go into producing even the most mundane object, you start to wonder how in the hell anything ever gets made. It's one of those mental exercises like Zeno's Paradox: fun to ponder, but ultimately you end up proving the impossibility of what lies before your eyes. Same deal with ink vs champagne. One looks "easy" and one looks "hard", but start tugging a thread of the fabric of their manufacture and pretty soon you find the entire world is attached to the other end. In the end we pretty much have to rely on competition in the marketplace to drive the price to its true level; we'll never be able to tell just by looking.

    8. Re:The comparison is useless by babbage · · Score: 1
      Not that you're wrong, but I think it's the comparison itself that holds interest, not the idea that the items being compared are really interchangeable. By way of comparison, the B-2 Stealth Bomber has been claimed to be worth something like seventeen times its weight in gold (followed by dumb jokes about "well then why not build a fleet 17 times bigger by using planes of pure gold?").

      It's not that weapons of [democratic] mass destruction and shiny lumps of malleable yellow metal are in any way interchangeable to most people, but that most people somehow perceive a far higher value in one kind of item (champagne or gold) and are startled to learn that a far more mundane or less useful item seems to be worth far more.

      It's correlation without causation or for that matter any kind of useful relation, but in this context that's okay, because the real lesson is that it instructs us to question assumptions about whether we're getting a good deal or not.

  58. Re:Not the only thing with surprisingly high price by Blrfl · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the difference is that there's no R&D costs with gold, nor does the FDA force the miners to put it through an expensive approval process before it can be molded into your favorite bling.

  59. Price of bottling by Gorimek · · Score: 3, Informative

    That tells you more about the price of bottling than anything else.

    Compare bottled water to bottled gasoline, or pumped water to pumped gasoline to get a fair comparision.

    1. Re:Price of bottling by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 4, Informative

      no, it tells you that people are idiots to be paying $1 for a pint of water.

      its all profit. water is dirt cheap. plastic bottles are dirt cheap. distribution method is already in place for the big guys.

      Bottled water is almost pure profit.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Price of bottling by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Thing is, some bottled water is just bottled tap water. People are paying an insane price for water that is already provided at a cheap cost.

    3. Re:Price of bottling by suwain_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mmmmm. Nothing like a good bottle of gasoline. ;)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    4. Re:Price of bottling by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're also paying more for the packaging tiny amounts of ink inside electronic reservoirs than you are for large amounts of champaigne in plain glass magnums.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:Price of bottling by whovian · · Score: 1
      Bottled water is almost pure profit.
      So are the "fountain" versions of sodas that are reconstituted from the caramel syrup.

      (Not only that, but the average person born in the US probably doesn't realize how they are getting reamed due to their ignorance of the metric system -- but that's a slight tangent.)
      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    6. Re: Price of bottling by gidds · · Score: 1

      Or maybe about the cost of ensuring purity. If bottled water was allowed all the impurities that petrol has, there would be a health scare serious enough to make people realise just how silly the SARS one is...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    7. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      You are not paying for the bottle, or the water. You are paying for the refrigeration storage, so when you are on a road-trip in the middle of nowhere, you can have ice-cold water on demand without lugging a huge cooler around.

      Bottled water is almost pure profit, but guess what? The bottle of Coke right next to it on the refrigerated shelf, which is the same size and same price, has almost exactly the same cost behind it, and is also almost pure profit. Cola costs pennies per gallon to make, which is almost as cheap as the distillation and/or filtering process of most bottled waters.

      I used to feel dumb for paying $1 for a bottle of water, until I realized that most of the people next to me are paying $1 for something that is not as good for them.

    8. Re:Price of bottling by Politburo · · Score: 1

      (Not only that, but the average person born in the US probably doesn't realize how they are getting reamed due to their ignorance of the metric system -- but that's a slight tangent.)

      Oh do tell.. I'd love to hear this one.

    9. Re: Price of bottling by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      Most bottled water is repackaged TAP water. You pay for the convenience of getting water. I wish I was the evil genius that thought up this bottled water BS. That bastard.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    10. Re:Price of bottling by nathanh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's only a ripoff if you don't consider the whole picture. Consider that soft drink for $1 a bottle is easily 10x the cost of the materials (mostly sugar and water). But what you're paying for is the FRIDGE at the store that keep it cold and the CONVENIENCE from not lugging around a bottle of water until you needed it. Convenience has a price. You can't simply look at the raw materials to determine value.

      Look at it this way, there is 2c worth of wheat and yeast and water in a loaf of bread. They charge $2 for it. Where did the other $1.98 go? Into the cost of preparing and cooking and packaging and marketting and transporting and storage and the sales clerks salary. So what if there is 0.01c worth of water in a $1 bottle? You've still gotta pay for all the other costs including a much more expensive storage cost (refrigerated).

      PS: I don't buy bottled water, I prefer juice :-)

    11. Re:Price of bottling by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Bottled water is almost pure profit.

      Hrm. Sorta like music CDs these day, hm?

      Yet, when people drink water from the taps, or catch rainwater in their back yard, you don't hear the bottled water industry whining about "thieves" "stealing" income from them.

      Being commoditized isn't necessarily a bad thing.

      Schwab

    12. Re:Price of bottling by noda132 · · Score: 1

      But what you're paying for is the FRIDGE at the store that keep it cold

      Considering that, like most soft drinks, water does not go bad when it's warm, I think it's safe to say refridgeration costs are in the same ballpack as material costs. The fridge is only the icing on the cake at the very end of a bottle's lifespan.

    13. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy bottled water, I prefer juice :-)

      Poop juice?

    14. Re:Price of bottling by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      Only have to refrigerate it at the Point Of Sale. So refrigeratation probley doesn't cost all that much.

    15. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, put that gas in a plastic 2L bottle and seal it tight, then stick it in your backpack.

      Then go out for a smoke with your buddies.

    16. Re:Price of bottling by bheer · · Score: 1

      Also -- bottled water is insanely useful in areas without reliable water supply. In developing countries like India, Coke *and* Pepsi (and various local bottlers) sell 1 litre of bottled water for 20c and turn a profit. Interestingly, Evian sells for $1.60/litre here.

    17. Re: Price of bottling by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      I wish I had the patent on the business model.

    18. Re:Price of bottling by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      It's cheaper than Sterno.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    19. Re:Price of bottling by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Buy from the monks. Their prices are proof that the regular sellers are making a killing.

    20. Re:Price of bottling by JamieF · · Score: 1

      I like your argument. Where did the billions that WorldCom "lost" go? Well, that's just the cost of paying for all the employees, especially the CEO. It's not a ripoff, really. That's just how much it costs.

    21. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it this way, there is 2c worth of wheat and yeast and water in a loaf of bread. They charge $2 for it. Where did the other $1.98 go?

      dont know where you shop... but bread averages $1.00 a loaf here.. and I usually buy the no-name 45 cent loaves at the local bakery that taste better than any $1.98 a loaf you can find... that's only if I dont have the 15 minutes to whip one up myself (if you cant make bread... please go shoot yourself.. it's the simplest thing on this planet.)

      $1.98 for bread... wow rich people are pretty much morons today....

    22. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's only if I dont have the 15 minutes to whip one up myself (if you cant make bread... please go shoot yourself.. it's the simplest thing on this planet.)

      15 minutes? What kind of bread are you making? Even unleaven bread takes more than 15 minutes. The baking alone is nearly an hour. If you put yeast in there, you have to spend a minimum of another hour letting it rise.

    23. Re:Price of bottling by cornjones · · Score: 0

      1.98 for bread... wow rich people are pretty much morons today....

      jeez, who's the snide fuck.... maybe you live in bumblefuck nowher where shit is cheap but it sounds like he is talking big city prices to me.

      the grocery on my corner has bread anywhere from 1.50$ and up w/ most around 2 bucks. the bakery sells loaves as much as 8$ my weekly shopping bill for 2 people is almost always 150$+

      everything is expensive in the city

      maybe if i went farther from home i could find a better price. but is it worth my time and effort to carry the groceries X blocks home(no car in the city)? so far i usually say no, it isn't. convience wins.

    24. Re:Price of bottling by nathanh · · Score: 1
      dont know where you shop... but bread averages $1.00 a loaf here.

      I shop in Australia.

      please go shoot yourself... rich people are pretty much morons today....

      I'm gonna guess you're American.

    25. Re:Price of bottling by Muffhead · · Score: 1

      Well I had some kerosene last night. Nicer than gasoline. No, I'm not joking. My hands still stink of the stuff.

    26. Re:Price of bottling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying it is *more* convenient to pump oil from deep in the earth, build pipelines across a continent, build ships to cart it a half a world away, refine the oil, and distribute again across the continent. I guess the difference is the fridge that makes water cost more...?

    27. Re:Price of bottling by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Heh, and I daresay a poor moron is worse off than a rich moron ;).

      --
  60. Re:And the winner is. by bperkins · · Score: 1

    Because it's only an inch and a half accross?

    Or because it isn't a real t-shirt, just a ascii art one?

  61. Re:Not the only thing with surprisingly high price by EinarH · · Score: 1

    Well based on the Pfizer stock it looks like, to some, Viagra is worth much much more than 35 times it weight in gold...

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  62. Re: Your answer by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was once told by the design dept. where I work that they would never let me take the printers they were using.

    Then I gave them one of these.

    They couldn't get rid of the other printers fast enough. 20 PPM full photographic color, single-pass laser printing. The damn thing basically has a first generation Power Macintosh G4 under the hood for the RIP processor (PowerPC 7400 / 500Mhz, 20GB hard disk, 512 MB RAM).

    It is the most impressive printer I have seen in a long time. Be warned: it's damn expensive, but it has already paid for itself many times in the last six months.

    Oh, and it has your built-in Ethernet, and responds to AppleTalk, LPR, and Windows printing.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  63. Yeah, but... by Red+Rocket · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I bet it can't touch Bull Semen.

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by certsoft · · Score: 1
      BLACK MAXIMIZER (L)* 100

      And to think I can't even give mine away.

  64. Yeah, that's right. by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    So it costs him $900 in the first year with the laser printer, and $700 in the first year with the InkJet ($100 for the Printer, $100/2 months on ink). The second year, it only costs him another $100 for the Laser, and another $600 for the InkJet, which is where it makes a difference.

  65. oh no! by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

    geez, don't give them ideas!

    --

    ID-10-T is a way of life

  66. DIY? by Ontotheological · · Score: 1

    What's printer ink made of anyway? How hard would it be to make your own, with the right pigments?

  67. "more worth" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the weed seems to be taking effect..

    1. Re:"more worth" by nr · · Score: 1

      It was a joke, hope you did understand that and by the why english is not my native language.

  68. correct, it is PART of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    retarded cum jockey

  69. ITS STILL CHEAPER THAN BULL SEMEN by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    but it doesnt give michaels sandwiches the same tangy zip he craves.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:ITS STILL CHEAPER THAN BULL SEMEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is possibly the funniest thing I have ever read.
      Keep up the good work.

  70. What's with the mods?? by Atario · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hang on just a gol-durn minute here!

    "mao che minh (611166)" points out that this story is a rapid-fire dupe, and gets a +5, Informative. I say the same thing (albeit in a more smartassed way) -- and even go to the trouble of self-deprecating as "obvious" -- and get a -1, Troll?? What am I trolling for, complete apathy?

    I was expecting a +2, Funny, or, at worst, 0, Redundant. Are mod points being passed out in Cracker Jacks these days, or what?

    (Now watch as the original modders also mod down this complaint against them.)

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  71. STFU gooker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A link to a story that links to a different article does not make for a redundant link, zipperhead. But nice job whoring that karma!!

  72. Have the editors googled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously not.

  73. Just buy a new printer! by somberlain · · Score: 1

    Over here in Belgium, ink is more expensive than buying a new printer. So... You'd better buy a new printer, use it with the ink that comes with the printer, sell the printer after the ink is gone, and buy a new one.

  74. you are a loser (nm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a loser.

  75. Lickable Paper... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    Why not just use champagne as ink toner? That way it doesn't matter whats written on the page, the reader always puts it down with a smile.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  76. Re: Xerox Phaser 7700 Printer (was: Your answer) by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

    Ah, yes...that's probably a result of the printer technology that Xerox got when they bought Tektronix. Good stuff. I'm sure it's a great printer, but the price is still a tad stiff (~$1,500USD) and toner cart prices on Pricewatch seem a bit spendy, though certainly better than inkjet per-print prices. Probably a great choice for a workgroup printer but a bit of a stretch for a home office printer. Good suggestion though...thanks for the feedback.

  77. Cutting costs on printing supplies by hellfire · · Score: 1

    1) Buy a $20 PDF writer which writes all printed documents to a PDF file.
    2) Mail said document to your office overnight.
    3) Print said document and quickly dash over to the printer and snatch it before your local bean counter or IT gastapo catches you using company resources.
    4) Lower personal costs to zero.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Cutting costs on printing supplies by Jester998 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "$20 PDF writer"

      Umm, no. How about you try PDF995. It's free and works great. I use it all the time.

    2. Re:Cutting costs on printing supplies by afidel · · Score: 1

      better yet use ghostscript, redmon, and freepdf and save $20 =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  78. Ahh, talking about coffee... by hak+hak · · Score: 1

    Why not make some good strong coffee and fill your cartridge with that? It's black, it's liquid... voila!

  79. What the hell have I been doing? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Funny

    I need to stop printing and start drinking. Its "cheaper". Yeah honney. I was thinking about printing out the manual for your new stairmaster, but I wanted to save money so I drank a case of cris and then put it together.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  80. Get a grant! by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

    Ahh, but the NEA might give you a grant for that!

    --
    My name fits again.
  81. And... by BlueSkyResearch · · Score: 1

    Other in other news, Dick Cheney is the appointed Vice-President of the United States... More news at 11:00.

  82. In Soviet France. by XSforMe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bottled water is more expensive than wine.... Crab, what a great place to go out for a party!

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  83. apples to oranges by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Comparing prescription drugs to a standard commodity such as gold by weight is likely to produce very skewed results, for two reasons. First, gold is a commodity. You can buy it from anybody and there is no patent-protected monopoly on it. Second, the masses of effective doses for most pharmaceuticals are extrememly variable and can vary by something like six orders of magnitude from one compound to another.

    To get really ridiculous, why not talk about the cost of software per gram? It approaches either positive or negative infinity, depending on whether a blank CD gains or loses mass when they stamp it.

  84. Radio Shack by eples · · Score: 1

    They're just cashing in on the Radio Shack business model. You buy the gadgets, and they've got the supplies you need.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  85. Cost of various liquids. by Falcor · · Score: 1

    Cockeyed.com did a comparison of the cost of various liquids by the gallon in the US. Check it out, some of them are pretty amazing: Cockeyed presents: The Price of a Gallon

  86. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Page for page, slashdot costs more than the bible.

  87. Re: Your answer by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    The damn thing basically has a first generation Power Macintosh G4 under the hood for the RIP processor (PowerPC 7400 / 500Mhz, 20GB hard disk, 512 MB RAM).

    For some reason the first thing I thought of when I saw this was remembering that at one time, the fastest Apple computer was the original LaserWriter. It had a faster CPU than the Macs available at the time.

  88. Some numbers by freeweed · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've been pricing out toner/ink comparisons lately, because I spend way too much on ink, and end up just printing stuff out at work anyway.

    In Canada, a $100 toner cartridge gets you around 5000 sheets on a low-end laser printer. The same price cartridge for a more expensive printer (same toner, but different cartridge shape for obvious reasons) gets you well over 10000 sheets.

    Most inkjet cartridges here are in the $40-$50 range (assuming all black printing). You get anywhere between 200 to 500 pages per cartridge.

    So basically:
    • a $300 laser printer + $100 toner = 5000 pages, or about 8 cents per page, with any extra pages costing 2 cents a pop.

    • a $600 printer + $100 toner = 10000 pages, or about 7 cents per page, extra pages around 1 cent each.

    • a $99 inkjet + $50 ink = 500 pages (I'll be optimistic here), or about 30(!!) cents a page. Extra pages are 10 cents each.

    Note that I'm ignoring any ink/toner that comes with the printer; usually these are extremely low-yield 'samples', and in any case the initial toner cartridge almost always outperforms what you get for free with an inkjet.

    So basically, unless you're planning on only printing a few hundred pages EVER, it makes no sense to buy an inkjet for B&W printing. Never mind the fact that if you rarely use an inkjet, the ink nozzles eventually stop working even if there's plenty of ink inside. At least, no amount of cleaning can fix the ones I use in my Epson Stylus 700, if I don't print for more than 3 months.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Some numbers by MobiusKlein · · Score: 1

      Your math is a bit faulty.

      The crossover point for Inkjet vs Cheap laser printer is at 2500-2999 pages printed.

      Laser cost = $300 base + 1 * $100 cartridge = $400
      Inkjet cost = $100 base + 6 * $50 cartridge = $400

      Crossover for the Expensive printer is
      Laser cost = $600 base + 1 * $100 cartridge = $700
      Inkjet cost = $100 base + 12 * $50 cartridge = $700
      Or at 5500-5999 pages printed.

      Crossover for the Cheap vs Expensive printer is
      Cheap... $300 + 6 * $100 = $900 (30000 pages)
      Expensive $600 + 3 * $100 = $900 (30000 pages)

      Or at 25000-34999 pages printed, the cost is the same. (You start saving money after page 35000)

      If your printer prints 10 pages a day, the expensive printer saves you money after 9 years, 7 months.

      The laser saves you money after 10 months over the inkjet at that rate. (Home user don't usually print that much. Office printers do.)

      rbb

    2. Re:Some numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a $99 inkjet + $50 ink = 500 pages (I'll be optimistic here), or about 30(!!) cents a page. Extra pages are 10 cents each.

      Welcome to Planet Rape.

    3. Re:Some numbers by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      I've just had an Epson 440 gum up so I sympathise.

      I was thinking the same about B&W lasers until I realised one thing: I can't feed card through them. I do some kids work in my spare time and it can be quite useful when you're doing some modelling with them to be able to print the worksheet / templates direct onto card. HPs won't do this because of that U-shaped paper path but Epsons definitely do and I'm pretty sure Canons would. Lexmark should be taken out and shot ;-)

      Annoyingly, inkjets just have that extra flexibility over lasers. Pity, or I'd have a laser sitting next to me right now and lovely crisp text.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  89. Printers by pokka · · Score: 5, Informative

    One interesting fact about ink cartridges:

    As you all probably know: ink prices average around $30 US per cartridge.

    Did you know that most of the $50 printers use 10mL ink cartridges, while the more expensive ones use 40+ mL cartridges?

    The strange thing is that when it's time to refill the ink, the 10mL cartridges cost almost the same price as the 30 mL that are used in more expensive models. So while you saved a little money by getting the dirt-cheap printer, you're now paying 3 times as much for the ink!

    This is (in my opinion) a very unethical way to trick consumers into thinking that they are saving money by buying a cheaper printer. I've heard many people say that "it's cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy the refill cartridges". But it turns out that this is not true.

    Don't believe me? Check out the HP deskjet 3300 series ($40 printer). It uses 10mL cartridges that cost $17.00, which is $1.70 per milliliter.

    Now check the Deskjet 6127, a $299 printer. It uses 42mL cartridges @ $29.00, which is only $0.69/mL! The ink for the $40 printer is 2.4 times as expensive.

    By the way, this does not apply to Canon printers, but does apply to most others.

    1. Re:Printers by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's unethical. The prices are publically posted, it's up to the consumer to research his choices instead of buying the first printer he sees when he walks into CompUSA.

      Plus, the break-even point comes between 6 and 7 ink cartridges, which, if the printer is only used occasionally, might be pretty close to the life span of both models anyway.

    2. Re:Printers by pokka · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's a "buyer-beware" market, and HP certainly has the right to sell at any price they want.

      But changing pricing structures in a way that intentionally misleads the customer is not something that a reputable company should do. HP is generally trusted by consumers, and they are taking advantage of that trust. They even go so far as to pad the 10ml cartridge boxes with extra cardboard to make them look the same size! How could you say that's ethical? Do you work for HP?

    3. Re:Printers by evilviper · · Score: 1

      FOR GOD'S SAKE PEOPLE! STAY AWAY FROM INKJETS

      I realized that ink for cheaper inkjet printers was much more expensive than for the higher-end printers when I was shopping for an inkjet (to replace my old B&W Laser printer), but there can be a lot more to it than ink prices.

      After looking at price of ink/page, I decided to get an Epson Stylus C80. Unfortunately, I was just a little behind the times, and the C80 had been EOLed, so no good. I did a little research on the C82 and all the information said it was practcially identical, even using the same cartridges.

      Well, I later learned that there's much more to it. When looking for C82 cartridges, I found C80 cartridges instead. Even Staples, the big "We have your ink" guys gave me C80 ink for my C82. well guess what, after a call to tech support (long-distance, Epson doesn't even have a 1-800 phone number), I discovered that they don't work in the slightest. And guess what, the C82 cartridges are more expensive.

      That is the only surprise I recieved. Although I never expected to get 22PPM as advertised, I didn't expect it to take 20 minutes to print out a single page in high-res. Even at the lowest res, it takes several minutes for a full page (even on simple webpages).

      You have to clean the heads after just about every 10 pages you print, or else you will have spots of ink randomly on the page. A process which Epson admits uses up a good ammount of ink.

      Then there's the isse of those ink cartridges just not lasting as long as they should. I know the metric is 5% coverage per-page, but I still doubt I got anywhere near that ammount of ink from the cartridges.

      In addition to that, their supposed 5760 x 1440 DPI doesn't look anywhere as good as the 600 x 600 DPI of my old B&W laser.

      And just think, all this from a (top-of-the-line) $150 inkjet printer. I can only imagine things would be worse with something cheaper. As you said, the cheaper versions of the Epson printers use ink cartrides that are the same price, but hold half as much ink, but I imagine there are other problems that are even worse.

      I don't want this to come off as trashing Epson, as I'm sure practically every other inkjet manufacturer makes their products just as crappy. However, consider this a warning for printer buyers. Don't even consider an inkjet.

      Seriously consider investing in a Laser printer. You may have to invest $1,000 for a good color laser, but what you will get for that $1,000 is infinitely more than you get when you get an inkjet. You can't even compare a laser to an InkJet... The 1200x1200 DPI on a color laser will be many times better looking than a inkjet with a rated resolution of 10Xs that.

      Personally, I'd sugest Xerox, because they seem to use the same toner in all their products, and that toner in very inexpensive, but I haven't yet purchased one, so I can't comment on specifics. One more suggestion, avoid solid-ink printers (that Xerox produces) unless you _want_ to print a picture that can be scratched off the paper like crayon (can't say anything else about solid-ink printers, that was enough to make me look elsewhere).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Printers by hemanman · · Score: 1

      DON'T buy Xerox, unless you want to write your own driver. Xerox hardware is prob. ok, I wouldn't know because each time i've encountered them, their drivers sucked so much that we had to deliver it back, or get a huge discount when their own technicians gave up, and use it for simple photocopying, in case of a photocopier/printer.

      -H

    5. Re:Printers by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Umm, all the Xerox printers I've looked at accept standard Postscript. Was there some feature you couldn't control with standard postscript drivers? Would postscript drivers not work on that particular model? If so what model?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  90. Aquafina is Pepsi, Dasani is Coke by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Don't make that mistake again, you might get sued!

    1. Re:Aquafina is Pepsi, Dasani is Coke by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      It's not distilled, either. It's probably just the same water that goes into the making of soft drinks, but without the carbonation and flavorings. It's no doubt filtered or otherwise treated, but I would be surprised if they'd use such a relatively expensive process as distillation (it takes lots of energy to create steam from water, and it takes lots more energy to condense the steam back into water).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Aquafina is Pepsi, Dasani is Coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it takes lots of energy to create steam from water

      True.

      and it takes lots more energy to condense the steam back into water

      I think conservation of energy says that condensation is exothermic, yielding as much energy as it took to do the water to steam phase change.

    3. Re:Aquafina is Pepsi, Dasani is Coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think conservation of energy says that condensation is exothermic, yielding as much energy as it took to do the water to steam phase change.

      Entropy ensures that it does not, but refrigeration to induce condensation certainly doesn't require as much energy as boiling it in the first place.

  91. Okidata 10e LEDJet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purchased an Okidate 10e Ledjet that uses a high density LED array bar vs laser. It also features an enclosed paper drawer and feed mechanism that precludes dust - the main killer or printers. Also, it's a nice boxy HPish-looking thing, i.e., it doesn't look like belongs in an organic garden.

    I forget the exact cost, but it was around $250. Toner cartridges are very resonable to, I remember around $30-$40 - so reasonable I bought two while I was at it. They last a long while too.

    I chose it because we did reliablity testing at work (point of sale systems), and it was the hands-down winner. Heat, dust, dirt, humidity, vibration, etc. Very popular printer with point of sale apps such as McDonnalds (think grease), NAPA (think dirt) and so on.

    Cheap, reliable, laser-equivalent performance at lower cost, and no ink!

  92. Whoa, hold on there scout... by smoondog · · Score: 1

    You forgot electricity. HP Laserjet 1000 burns 200 watts printing (7 in standby), and the 2300 burns 400 watts printing. And it used to be a whole lot worse, some laser printers burned more than 1000 watts. To compare, a deskjet 3300 burns 23 watts printing. You may not pay for it, but someone does. Those watts may not sound like a lot, but they really do add up. Even an energy star networked printer will burn $10-30/year. Most of which would be saved on an inkjet.

    -Sean

    1. Re:Whoa, hold on there scout... by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Well do the math for your electricity then. I bet you find it is STILL way cheaper.

      But more important there is another issue with ink jets that has been ignored so far. How fast and easy they dry up and then how much ink is spent doing a cleaning to clear out the clogged nozzles.

      My Canon 5100 is simply pathetic with this. If I don't print anything for even a week it takes a cleaning to get it going. If it sits for long it will often NEVER get fully clean before I have spooged all the ink just trying to clean it.

      I have spent nearly 2 cartridges worth printing no more than 10 pages.

      So don't forget to factor in those costs. Looking at that I have since stopped buying ink (or even refills which seemed to dry out faster) and am just printing at work. At some point I will go ahead and buy myself a laserjet which will pay for itself in the first month of NOT PRINTING ANYTHING because the toner won't dry out.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    2. Re:Whoa, hold on there scout... by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 1

      If you want to compare energy costs, you also have to consider how long it takes to print. DJ3320 is 1.5ppm in best mode on plain paper, b/w, 600 dpi.
      My LJ2100m is 10ppm, 1200dpi, b/w. So the dj will take about 6.7 times as long, and the energy used won't be nearly as different as you suggest.

    3. Re:Whoa, hold on there scout... by smoondog · · Score: 1

      Good point...

  93. It's not just the ink by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    You also buy new jets now. No champaign comes with a delivery mechanism that can precisely deposit little droplets of it on paper exactely where it should go - at least some of the carts cost is there.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:It's not just the ink by Star_Gazer · · Score: 1

      Only HP and IIRC Lexmark are replacing the printhead with the cartridge, Epson and Canon have permanent printheads. HP claims it is technically necessary and use it to defend their high ink costs. But, strangely enough, their High-Volume Business Inkjets may not have permanent heads, but you only have to replace them after every 5 or 10 ink fills, so it is (IMHO) safe to assume they could do that with the consumer models as well.

      But, beside that, the Epson cartridges are basically just a lump of plastics, no jets included, and their ink is still much more expensive than Dom Perignon, so in the end you pay them way too much as well.

      There should be a law that makes it mandatory for every manufacturer of standard consumer goods to provide fully (and completly free usable) documentation to interface their products, be it for consumables or for hard- and software connections (ie. replacement parts for cars, a full documentation of the protocols used between WIndows Servers and Clients and whatever else). But general tendency with todays lawmakers aims into just force you to drop your money into the industries pockets without getting anything back. Thats in full force in the US, and even we old europeans slowly move into that direction :(

    2. Re:It's not just the ink by August_zero · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but the delivery mechanism is hardly more than a parallel plate capacitor. That is, with your toner, you get a plastic box, and a couple sheets of copper foil. The actual expenisve bit of the whole system is in the actual printer so no, this is not a justified cost.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    3. Re:It's not just the ink by serbanp · · Score: 1
      Hmmmm, the whole thread talks about the INK-JET technology, not the laser/LED one. There is no toner (i.e. ultrafinely ground plastic particles) in the inkjet; the closest one can get to particles in ink is the coloidal pigment found in some longer-lasting inks.

      So, the delivery mechanism is hardly more than a parallel plate capacitor is a false statement. The inkjet uses small nozzles that spit ink.

      Serban

    4. Re:It's not just the ink by August_zero · · Score: 1

      The inkjet uses small nozzles that spit ink.

      which carries a slight electrical charge and is guided towards the "target" via electrostatic repulsion. really, it's practically magic.

      And i meant ink but said toner, sorry, "toner" is a cooler word than "ink" and thus I am once again guilty of choosing words based on their sounds rather than meanings.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    5. Re:It's not just the ink by serbanp · · Score: 1

      My understanding of how the thing works is that the dropplet is moved by mechanical forces.

      The Lexmark and HP method is using small built-in heaters next to the ink cavities; electric pulses in the resistors overheat the ink, ejecting it with high speed towards the paper.

      The Epson way is to use the piezoresistive effect, turned to its head: the ink cavities carved in a monocrystalline head are changing shape based on an electrical field applied to the crystal, thus pushing out the ink.

      Am I wrong?

      Serban

  94. Its not the cost, its the market by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I firmly believe ink is NOT expensive to make. The ink I buy for my fountain pen is cheaper to buy then inkjet ink and its MUCH higher quality...

    But the market will bear the insane pricing.. so it continues...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  95. OT: Sig file correction by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    It's, "You can drive out nature with a pitchfork..." not "you can drive nature out..."

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:OT: Sig file correction by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      I knew something didn't look right. Thanks for the correction!

  96. Can't be a Subject Line Troll; the post has a body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. Makes sense.... by jemenake · · Score: 1
    ...ink for home printers is now seven times more expensive than vintage champagne
    This makes sense for our current economic climate. Consider that champagne is needed for when your company goes public and ink is what's needed when it goes bust (ie. resume').
  98. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  99. Re:And the best buzz is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a fine sativa.

    And to stay on topic, pot is worth more than gold.

    Actually, here in canada the media tells us that american drug dealers are so dumb that they trade coke for our pot, pound for pound.

    zeke

  100. Market Forces by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wirked for California Coolers for a while (anyone remember them?) and let me tell you, bottliing is cheap. After the initial capital investment is earned back, it's pretty much a minimum cost operation.

    What this fact tells us is that people will buy just about anything. We've gotten so condition to the $1.00-$1.25 bottle of soda (talk about a pure profit market!) that we willingly accept a $1.00 bottle of water. Add in the snob appeal of certain brands of bottled water and you've got yourself a massive money-maker.

    One thing you have to remember is that price is NOT a function of cost. Price is a function of market forces. It is whatever people are willing to pay.

    Consider: I used to wirk for a computer store eight years ago. A regular six-connector 50-pin SCSI1 internal ribbon cable was priced at $60.00. You know how much it cost the store to buy it? $5.00. Yep. $55.00 markup. Why? People beleived that SCSI was more expensive.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Market Forces by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      People beleived that SCSI was more expensive.

      Yep, and even today, people pay three times more for SCSI drives, even though the underlying technology is the same as any other hard disk.

      Sure, the QA is probably a little higher, and the quantities smaller, and warantees longer, but not enough to make it cost three times more per GB or more.

      Besides, regarding 5 year warantees, would you seriously spend time RMAing a 6 gig drive from 1998?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Market Forces by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup. Cause if you do, your replacement ain't gonna be a 6 gig drive. They'll replace it with whatever they have handy, because giving all their RMA replacements a 40 gig drive is cheaper than continuing to make 6 gig drives.

    3. Re:Market Forces by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      If you're going to write BS that makes you come off as a pretentious blowhard, you should at least use correct metaphors

      What the hell are you talking about?

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    4. Re:Market Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's called a sig.

      go under your prefferenced and tell it to add a divider between the text and the sig

    5. Re:Market Forces by Cplus · · Score: 1

      Lol, it's all good bro, it's his sig...confusing as it may be.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    6. Re:Market Forces by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Well, he needs to make that more obvious. I didn't tack those two dashes on my sig as a fashion statement.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    7. Re:Market Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't YOU make it more obvious.

      Go to http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm, and select Signature Dash

      Moron.

    8. Re:Market Forces by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hell, local stores are still doing this. A 6' firewire cable at a local chain electronics store is $35.

      Go to the distributer in town, and they sell the same cable in bulk for $6. The only difference? It's not packaged in a plastic windowed box with full-color labeling and "instructions for use" (ya, plug it in!).

      Of course, as soon as the store repackages the bulk product, they charge over 5x the price. For probably about $1.50 worth of additional packaging.

      Consumers are stupid and companies are there to squeeze the money out of the stupid ones as fast as possible.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:Market Forces by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as an aside, I use one of these, both at home and at work:

      Continuous Ink System

      Works great, and I bet it scares printer manufacturers like hell. I can print all day on these things and when the ink runs low, I just unscrew the top of the bottle and pour a little more in.

      I was printing 11x14s by the dozen without worrying about it. Great stuff!

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:Market Forces by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Like the AC pointed out, I figure most everyone has turned on the sig dash option in their preferences that wants it.

      I had to fight to get that sig to fit, two dashes just won't fit without changing the wording of the sig a lot.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Market Forces by cesarcardoso · · Score: 1

      Consider: I used to wirk for a computer store eight years ago. A regular six-connector 50-pin SCSI1 internal ribbon cable was priced at $60.00. You know how much it cost the store to buy it? $5.00. Yep. $55.00 markup. Why? People beleived that SCSI was more expensive.

      Isn't ALL price economics made of this? You believe, or somebody make you believe, that A is more expensive than B, and you ACTUALLY pay more for A than B, even if A is cheaper to produce than B!

      --
      Cesar Cardoso can be found at cesar at zyakannazio dot eti dot br (or at least I believe so)
    12. Re:Market Forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitch.

    13. Re:Market Forces by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We've gotten so condition to the $1.00-$1.25 bottle of soda (talk about a pure profit market!) that we willingly accept a $1.00 bottle of water.

      Yup.. Sams Club... (a walmart for the rich and snooty.. you have to pay to shop there...) a CASE of 36 bottles of water.... $3.95

      bottling costs are NOTHING.. as well as distribution, marketing,everything....

      Hell I asked and I can get a pallet of 144 cases of 36 bottles for only $150.00.. nothing special for a business to buy a pallet of product.

      2 cents per BOTTLE of water my Cost.

      and I am nobody special.

      Let's add that product to my store... If I sell it for 25 cents a bottle I get over 1000% profit. if I chill it, I'm only getting 300% profit..

      If I put it in a vending machine at a local spot.. I get 500% profit! and that includes the payback on the vending machine!

      Anyone here trying to justify the $1.00 a bottle for water is a complete and utter moron.... or just a scumbag at heart.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Market Forces by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "Let's add that product to my store... If I sell it for 25 cents a bottle I get over 1000% profit. if I chill it, I'm only getting 300% profit.."

      I take it your own labor and the rent for your store is included in that calculation.

      "Anyone here trying to justify the $1.00 a bottle for water is a complete and utter moron.... or just a scumbag at heart. "

      I'm not trying to justify anything. I don't need to. The people selling and the people buying bottled water can do whatever they want. It's no skin off my back. I don't sell any of that stuff and I don't buy any of that stuff (even sodas). The real people who scare me are the ones who claim somekind of moral superiority upon the people who sell/buy such water bottles. Call me a scumbag if you will, but if someone wants bottled water, then I don't see anything wrong with fullfilling that desire.

    15. Re:Market Forces by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Who told you it fits? Not everyone uses the same browser and the same fonts as you do. :/

    16. Re:Market Forces by will_die · · Score: 1

      Must admit I am one of thoses that pay $1+ for bottle water, actually around $3 for a gallon.
      However I have yet to find a way to bring carbonated mineral water to a tap cheaply.

    17. Re:Market Forces by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? The sig is limited to 120 characters. I'm talking about it fitting in that limit.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    18. Re:Market Forces by peccary · · Score: 1

      There IS something wrong with creating the desire in the first place. It's an intentional scheme to emotionally manipulate people into being dissatisfied, for one's own profit, at the disadvantage of the "mark". It's selfish and immoral.

      Knowing that, it is also immoral to profit indirectly from that offense, even if you didn't perpetrate the offense yourself.

    19. Re:Market Forces by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "There IS something wrong with creating the desire in the first place."

      When I try to make myself more attractive to the opposite sex, is that "wrong" too?

      "It's an intentional scheme to emotionally manipulate people into being dissatisfied, for one's own profit, at the disadvantage of the "mark". It's selfish and immoral."

      Selfish. May be. Immoral. I don't think so.

      If people actually worried more about their individual happiness/selfishness, then may be we'll have less psychopaths in this world. Selfishness for oneself and selfishness for ones own family is a natural need. If you repress that need (as society makes you do), you only make the world more unfair for yourself and you increase your ever-growing frustration.

      My advice. Go enjoy yourself. Go get laid. Go sell bottled water (if you want). There is nothing immoral about selfishness. Changing others by making them feel guilty is not going to work. You can continue trying (if that's how you get your jollies), but frankly I don't think that's going to work.

  101. Ink != Toner by dark-br · · Score: 3, Informative

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

    Toner is an powder mixture used to develop images in photocopy machines and laser printers working as follow:

    * A copier drum is given a positive charge.
    * The image from the original copy illuminates the charged drum and a latent image is formed.
    * Static electricity attracts toner to the drum surface and a visible image is formed.
    * Toner on the drum is transferred to paper by positive charging.
    * After the image transfer process is completed, the paper is separated from the drum surface.
    * Toner on the copy paper is firmly fixed when the paper runs between heat and pressure rollers.
    * A cleaning blade wipes off excess toner.
    * The drum is exposed by a neon lamp to erase remaining static charge.

    1. Re:Ink != Toner by AvengerXP · · Score: 0, Troll

      Shut the fuck up you pedantic bastard.

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  102. .... heh by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    " ink for home printers is now seven times more expensive than vintage champagne."

    It's also 4x more intoxicating!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  103. I suppose... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    " Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze! "

    Yeah, that was the conclusion we all came to. All the other theories about availability of booze at the local convenience store were just too easy to refute.

  104. Re:And the best buzz is by Izago909 · · Score: 1

    Actually, here in canada the media tells us that american drug dealers are so dumb that they trade coke for our pot, pound for pound.

    I have some freinds in college who would LOVE to meet those idiots. You must smoke too much of those BCs to believe that garbage. Screw the media, no matter which country they are in.

  105. Bottled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bottled Water more expensive than Gasoline! crazy.

  106. Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. by RatBastard · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm afraid that's wishful thinking. Most consumers don't look at the long-term costs of anything. If they did they wouldn't buy inkjets or SUVs. They'd buy LaserJets and more fuel eficient automobiles. People either buy the item that has the lowest off-the-showrrom price or what they've let Amdison Avenue convince them they want.

    The costs-more-but-will-save-you-money-later printer will wither and die next to the costs-less-but-will-eat-you-alive-later printer. Once people buy something they'll pay through the nose to keep that item viable, if for no other reason than to convince themselves they didn't get ripped off.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      Thats the samelogic that put the small computer shop I once worked in out of busisness. People would come in and have me price them a system. THen they'd argue that Best Buy next door was selling the same thing for $200 less. Then I'd go into the speil about how they could upgrade forever (one thing at a time until they get a new MOBO). I'd tell them all they need to do is drop in no more than $100 (no more than 200) a year to keep it up to date. That never worked. People would rather save $200 now instead of being able to save a thousand over several years. Why upgrade for years at a fraction of the original price when we can throw the thing out, go back up to best buy or gateway, grab our ankles, and let them remove another $600 from our anus every other year? The more experience I have with them, the more I see that the standard human is fiscal cattle.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Well, such a company wouldn't have to be more expensive than the competition! Just keep the same product price as competition and earn on sold refill sets. With such ridiculously high prices as current producers have, gaining reasonable profit from reasonable (or even by comparison very low) price would be easy.
      Most probably the competition would use some really dirty tricks to kick you off the market though.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      lowest off-the-showrrom price or what they've let Amdison Avenue convince them they want.

      Hey, I work right off of Amdison. Well, between Amdison and kraP Ave.

  107. While we're flipping out about ink pricing... by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    How about designer brand shoes and clothing.

  108. Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explains why my husband won't let me print ("is that IN COLOR?") but doesn't mind when I'm drunk?

  109. how much ink by kardar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was looking at the HP 3420 - it was on sale recently for something like $40 or so.

    I had always used second-hand DeskJet 500's, 560's etc... with the "26" cartridge - that cartridge holds 40 ml and prints out about 800+ or so pages. These "51626" cartridges are right around slightly less than $30 US. I have printed thousands of pages of material using these old HP DeskJets and have had no problems. I like those printers. They are kind of slow, but very reliable.

    The black cartridge for the HP 3420 holds 10ml and is expected to print about 200+ pages. It costs slightly less than $20 US. The color cartridge for this printer holds 8ml and produces slightly less than 200 pages.

    The higher quality (and more expensive) printers have larger page number counts for their refills, but many of the less expensive brands and printers had page counts of less than 500 pages per cartridge, and even though the cartridges have dropped in price, they hold a lot less ink and you can hardly get anything printed with one cartridge. These bargain printers are probably an excellent solution for those who just need to print out an occasional web page or order confirmation here or there. They probably are not designed for people who print a lot. And, paying 18 dollars for a cartridge just kind of feels better than paying 28 dollars for a cartridge, despite the fact that there is only 1/4 as much ink in there!!! The boxes are all the same size on the shelf, who would guess that one cartridge has 10ml and the other has 40ml?

    I have come to expect over 500 pages from one deskjet cartridge. Closer to 1000 would be better - some printer can do this. The HP DeskJet 1200 (which is an older model) - this black print cartridge was rated at 1100+ pages before it ran out (42ml). Same price as the others - about $30 US.

    I don't doubt that the quality of the printed pages is good - I love Hewlett Packard printers, it's just that if you print a lot of stuff, you really need to get a printer (even second-hand, if you can find one) that was originally designed to do some serious printing. I found a second-hand HP printer (I love HP printers) that is rated for 12,000 pages per month; not like I would ever print that many pages per month, but it is kind of cool to know that you could if you wanted to.

    Office Depot's site has page counts on all the refills - I found it helpful when shopping around for a printer. To some people, page counts per cartridge don't matter - they don't print enough stuff to have that matter. But to many of us, it does make a big difference, and it is surprising how expensive the ink is for the really inexpensive printers.

    1. Re:how much ink by thdexter · · Score: 1

      I read all of your comment, but one thing escapes me: do you love HP printers?

      (Fun fact: HP's printer division is based in my hometown of Boise, Idaho.)

      --
      I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    2. Re:how much ink by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I recently bought 3 Laserjet IIs, a Laserjet 3 and a Laserjet 4 at auction, with some other gear. They all had partially used toner cartridges. And I paid $5 for all of them.

      Nobody's gonna tell me I can get a better deal on one of those inkspray printers. I gave away my Deskjet 500 when I got my first laser printer. The wobbly alignment, the ink that streaks if you sneeze on the page... there's nothing there I want.

  110. Bizarre by CausticWindow · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have you ever tried drinking ink?

    It tastes shit, and got no bubbles.

    What is the point of this story? If I want to drink expensive and good bubbly, I drink Cristal!

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Bizarre by CausticWindow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Overrated? I think not. This is the only sane comment to this bizarre article. I'll never drink ink, no matter how expensive it is.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  111. Amazing how cheap gas is. by Kris+Warkentin · · Score: 1

    Think about it. Can you think of very many fluids that are cheaper than gas? Other than plain tap water, there really aren't very many liquids that you can get that cheap.

    --

    In Soviet Russia, hot grits put YOU down THEIR pants.
    1. Re:Amazing how cheap gas is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urine is still pretty cheap. I'll give you mine for 1 cent/gallon.

    2. Re:Amazing how cheap gas is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'course, in the US, gas prices are HEAVILY subsidized. how many gas companies paid for the war(s) in iraq or afghanistan? none.

    3. Re:Amazing how cheap gas is. by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      It's more like a lot of places really place high taxes on their gas. Iraq is going to cost $70B this year. That's a considerable amount less than would be collected in taxes if gasoline was $4-5/gallon as it is in the EU. We don't invade every year.

      You're just a foaming leftist conspiracy theorist.

  112. Ink tasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmm. *swishswish* *sip* *dribble*

    This ink is an India vintage...2002 I think. It has an excellently robust color and a nice stain. The spread is characteristic of a 3% solution. The smell contains just a hint of petroleum. Yes, I am certain this is Epson Black, catalog number 734-T4.

    *polite applause*

  113. depends on the Champagne by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    Ok so it is more expensive than an 85 Dom. There are more expensive bottles of chapagne out there. There are some really damn expensive ones. And as for Sauternes.... a '67 Chateau d'Yquem is quite pricey (as is any Yquem). 1945 vintage ports go for a nice dollar as well. So it's not more expensive than champagne just some champagnes. Which, of course, is disengenuous because champagne is not used in the extremely small quantities that inkjet ink is used in. 750ml of ink would last a helluva long time, a lot longer than 750ml (standard size bottle) of champagne would last (especially in my vicinity).

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  114. *NEWSFLASH* - Rap world turned upside down by zorcon · · Score: 1

    In an unexpected turn of events, East and West coast rappers have swapped Cristal and Dom Perignon for cases of Cyan Photo Ink Tanks BCI-6PC. Reasoning aside from the need to hemorage money on useless things, drinking printer ink while cruising the Escalade does not result in a DUI. Rumor has it famed Long Beach rapper Snoop Dogg has even begun smoking HP 78 Inkjet Cartridges.

    In other news:
    Moet & Chandon and Roederer will begin shipment of their first ever CMYK Photo Inkjet vintage.

  115. Ya, but ink lasts a bit longer by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Well a printer cartridge will print for a few weeks/months... unlike Dom Perignon which can't get you drunk for a few weeks/months.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  116. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just doesn't pay to discover.

  117. printer ink must get u pretty wasted then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats why its so expensive

  118. You don't live in So. Cal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In almost every city in America, clean drinking water is available from your city water tank almost for free. ... Drinking bottled water is looked upon by many Americans with a certain amount of scorn for lack of thrift

    I guess it's drinkable here, but it won't pass as "clean" for me until it loses that mysterious nasty taste (filters help, but not enough).

    That said, the best thing about travelling is everywhere else I go the tap water tastes as good as bottled Arrowhead (which I get at Costco for $4.50 for 6 gallons; better than $1.80/gal for gas)...

  119. Dr. Strangelove by benjamindees · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Mandrake, have you ever heard of a thing called fluoridation? Fluoridation of water?"

    "Do you know what it is? Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot that we have ever had to face?"

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Dr. Strangelove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, fluoridation is a corporate plot to get rid of dangerous industrial waste by feeding it to our children. Ralph Nader told me so.

    2. Re:Dr. Strangelove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you commie, it's all about purity of essence!

    3. Re:Dr. Strangelove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is of the utmost importance that we maintain the purity of our "precious bodily fluids".

    4. Re:Dr. Strangelove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OPIE?

  120. $0.25 gallons of water? WHERE?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kroger wants at least $1 here in Memphis. And that's for Kroger brand water.

  121. Ink piracy by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

    These high prices are just a result of rampant piracy in the ink industry. College students are especially guilty of downloading ink from Kazaa and sharing it with their friends.

    --

    "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
  122. pot o' gold by 0x12d3 · · Score: 1

    Yeah and marijuana is more expensive per ounce than Gold is, suppy and demand.

    1. Re:pot o' gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and you americans only get like, 12 karat pot...
      I'm used to the 24 karat stuff in BC

    2. Re:pot o' gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno...our Alaskan Thunderfuck and White Widow harvest here in Virginia is mighty nice.

  123. Fake Ink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, this fake Ink crap must be your alka seltzer in ginger ale

  124. makes me glad... by agendi · · Score: 2, Funny
    that I don't drink printer ink really.

    I wonder when I'll be able to order it in resturant.

    me: I'd like a flute of printer ink thank you.
    waiter: Would that be red, yellow, blue or black?
    me: Make it blue - oh and none of that refiller ink crap!

    6 years from now at McDonalds. "Would you like printer ink with that?"

    --
    I just can't be bothered.
  125. quantity by javaguy · · Score: 1

    Remember that the quantity of champagne you would consume in a sitting is far more than the quantity of ink you'd consume (use) in a sitting (or day). So per day, you're spending less on ink than drink.

  126. I'm on the wagon, no more ink for me. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    I got tired of the cost of ink cartridges. $24USD is just too much for casual printing.

    I just dug my IBM (pre Lexmark) dot-matrix printer out of the closet and found ribbons on the web. Only $16 dollars for 3 ribbons. They'll last me at least a year.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  127. I that Dom had come with a wine cooler... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    Dear world,

    That Dom would be a lot more expensive had it come with a very price-at-a-loss wine cooler. The OEMs make the money by selling the ink and toner cartridges.

    Later,
    Slashdot Junky
    .

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  128. I guess it's a good thing by cyclist1200 · · Score: 4, Funny

    that your printer doesn't require a magnum of ink!

  129. Unless you live by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    In Cupertino wher the local water tastes like..UGH!

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    1. Re:Unless you live by darien · · Score: 1

      Plus, I think there's some kind of psychoactive chemical in it, judging by some of the strange stuff that comes out of Cupertino...

    2. Re:Unless you live by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      You could be right why else did apple put the "INVENTOR OF THE INTERNET"
      on the board of directors?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  130. Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Crappy taste and the possibility of lead contamination lead me to bottled a long time ago (no pun intended).

    I live in Fairfax County, VA--one of the wealthier counties, and yet the water is still crappy. Apparently, in response to concerns about microbes, they've been adding more chlorine to the water. Yuck. Then there's our pipes. Although the pipes are copper, they are joined with solder which may be lead based (40 year old pipes). Although it's unlikely that the lead levels are dangerous, this just gives me one more reason to drink bottled.

    I still cook with tap water, but I let the water run a few minutes to clear the pipes before using it.

    Of course, it could be worse. I could be living in DC, paying a million dollar mortgage, and drinking out of pipes that--wait for it--date back to the Civil War.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, why not test your water for lead? You can get a testing kit for the price of a few bottles of fancy water.

    2. Re:Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Those testing kits are crap. Real testing costs real money. Besides, I don't believe we have lead contamination. I just flush the pipes to be extra cautious; perhaps even a bit paranoid. I drank the water with no ill effects for years. It was the extra chlorine that really pissed me off.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by tarp · · Score: 0

      I live in Fairfax County too. The water tastes better than what I've tasted in many places, such as Los Angeles (horrible), Miami and indeed much of Florida. But the tap water in most of Ontario, Canada is excellent compared to Fairfax County's water.

      BTW, my water comes from the Occoquan Reservoir. The water coming from the Potomac is actually better tasting.

    4. Re:Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Ontario, and I drink bottled water. It's clean and tastes like water should taste.

      Of course, I fill those bottles from tap. ;)

    5. Re:Crappy Taste And Possible Pb Contamination by tarp · · Score: 0

      The other great thing about Ontario water is... its usually nice and cold, right from the tap. :-)

  131. not quite correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well if you bought ink in a five gallon drum, the price would probably be different, but you need to account for the cost of the cartridge as well.

  132. it's not necessarily a sanitation issue by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

    A lot of people complaining about bad water are mainly complaining about the mineral content of their water. Water in some areas is naturally "harder" (contains more minerals) than others, and it'd be prohibitively expensive to distill it all. It's not dangerous, and many people don't mind the taste, but some people dislike it (and it tends to leave mineral deposits in your shower/bathtub).

    1. Re:it's not necessarily a sanitation issue by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

      (and it tends to leave mineral deposits in your shower/bathtub).

      So, what, they shower in Evian?

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    2. Re:it's not necessarily a sanitation issue by zlata_the_goat · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, yes. FWIW, Kim Basinger once demanded that her hair be shampooed solely in Evian.

      http://www.anecdotage.com/index.php?aid=2051

  133. Seek Lithium by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    In the time it took you to type this non-puncutuated, illeterate rant and the lame picture, you could have read every fucking dupe on this thread twice. Seek medication or counselling man.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  134. OSR by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    It was also an important part of the diet of the european middle-ages peasant. Peasants would stockpile barley and wheat for the winter, but towards the end of the winter, the grains would start to go bad. The solution to this is beer

    Ahhhh, beer!
    The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems!
    -H.J.S.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  135. Big deal by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 1

    How much per liter is white-out? How much per pound is lead refills for a mechanical pencil? How much per liter are eye drops?

    It's all a matter of volumes and supply and demand. If everyone bought ink by the bottle like they did champagne, the volumes would be way up and the consumer price would probably be more similar.

  136. Cupertino by cscx · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tastes like apples?

    1. Re:Cupertino by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Universal City has its own well (it doesn't use L.A. city tap water) and their water tastes very faintly like grape koolaid. No idea what causes it; well water is typically not filtered or otherwise-treated between origin and tap (no need, especially with a deep well).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  137. sex by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    yea, ...but there's still no sex in the champagne room

  138. Units? by JewFish · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    £1.70 per millilitre, compared with 1985 Dom Perignon at 23p per millilitre


    I don't get it how do you compare £ to p? What is a p and isn't 23 > 1.70 if they are both pounds per ml? I have never heard anyone in the states write millilitre, why not just write ml? thats whats the beakers and pipes I been smoking out of use!

    1. Re:Units? by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      British pounds (£) are the American equivalent of dollars. 'p', referrs to pents, or smaller denominations, much like American cents.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  139. and the funny thing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...that, for instance, HP only produces a few different actual types of printers. i.e. the printers' guts are all the same, just the software is different to allow better printing quality. So it's very likely your $50 printer is the same one as the $350 printer. Just different software and different plastic exterior.

  140. Re:poop-chute.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You left that way too open.

    Yeah, and you just couldn't wait to put it in, eh?

  141. YEH by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    Road Apples :>

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  142. even better: by mblase · · Score: 1

    A better option (well, IMO) you can get off-brand cartridges for many printers online, and inkfinder.com is my site of choice for tracking the best prices. Last time I got twelve cartridges for my Epson C80, three of each color, for about $65 shipped -- about the cost of two black Epson-brand cartridges at Office Depot.

  143. Ahhh... Drugs by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    One of the big problems is with name brand designer drugs, is tha tthey have ridiculous amounts of patent control and lock down every bit of research associated with the drugs so other people really can't get their hands on a cheaper alternative. Recall all of the articles (no linking here, there are like 50) about ridiculous patents, or the making of patents purely to keep other people from competing with you?

    That's pretty much what huge drug companies like Pfizer and Glaxco do. Combine that with the screwy HMO system in the United States and you get outrageous prices that go into paying off junkets for doctors and health-care managers.

    Recently (like last year and early 2003) there was a big debate about whether or not US drug companies that had patents on AIDS vaccines should be forced to allow generic drug manufacturers from India and other countries to make cheaper copies of the drugs for use in Africa where AIDS is running rampant.

    Of course US Administration policies toward international family planning groups isn't really helping, nor did their oppostion to opening up the patents initially. Anyhow, I'm going to stop in the interest of keeping this a-political.

  144. the real cost of.. sex? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >It would stain your teeth some ugly color like #006666, and you would never get a date and you would die cold and alone, a pitiful 30 year old virgin.

    Which of course makes you wonder the true cost of other things, oh like sex.

    Date 1: Fairly cheap lunch/coffee: $20-30

    Date 2: Evening movie, dinner: $60-70

    Date 3: Concert and light bar hopping (parking, tickmaster tax): $50-70

    Non-Date: did relative/friend a favor to get on her good side: roughly $30-50 lost opportunity cost (more if you include your hourly rate)

    Date 4: Simple night in, beer/recreational drugs: $25

    Score.

    Not only shouldn't you drink the ink, you should at least have $200 if hoping to score.

  145. Ink vs Drink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ink is a hell of a lot more fun to drink than vintage champagne. Gives you a better high. See? I'm writing (ink) and I feel good about myself.

  146. MARVELOUS!! by EinarH · · Score: 1
    FINALY I UNDERSTOOD WHY OOG_THE_CAVEMAN HAD TO CARRY AROUND HIS OPEN SOURCE CD!!!

    This insight into the life off OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN came from intelligent comments on Slashdot!!!

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  147. Its Not Just Ink by Betelgeuse+on+Ice · · Score: 1

    I don't much like the printer companies either, but not ALL of the money you spend is on the ink. For HP printers at least, the cartridge includes the actual print head, which is a fabbed semiconductor. HP doesn't even fab their own printheads, so there is some overhead there as well. This is the reason (generally) that HP carts are somewhat more expensive than, say, Canon, which uses a fixed print head on their bubblejet printers.

  148. Saffron by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Saffron (a spice made from crocus flowers) is more costly than gold!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  149. Yeah and try buying a cheap laser printer by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's bullshit. My Lexmark 4039-10 died and I wanted a new low end laser printer because I knew that laser printing is waaaaay cheaper than inkjet. But guess what? There's like 3 laser printers below 300 bucks. A Casio, an Olivetti and an HP. One doesn't have Win95 drivers anymore and two are USB only. Leaving one with what can best be described as drivers that were basically written to be traded for crack.

    So it's back to the inkjet route. And while I love my Epson C82 I know each page is costing me a fortune. At least I get toss out two Canon BJC-4200's now (well, one goes to college with Kid) And will soon toss out a Canon BJC-600.

    BTW Canon printers are pretty high quality. They all go obsolete and you can't get ink for them way before they break beyond repair, unlike my HP LaserJet5 which suffered a torqued chassis in the paper path and died a horrible 'pick up 10 sheets of a paper at a time' death. And the Lexmark actually died from the combination of a blown clutch and a failed paper sensor in the tray.

  150. On the other hand... by Pac · · Score: 1

    I doubt these most of these modern $100 inkjet printers can live to the 3000th page. Usually they will break well before that and there is no economic sense in fixing them.

  151. Please see Penn & Teller, "Bullshit" by jridley · · Score: 5, Informative

    They did an episode on bottled water. It turns out that bottled water is NOT tested or regulated by any government agency unless it crosses state lines, but tap water is constantly tested. The federal government has over 100 people that test tap water, but less than one person to test bottled water.

    In an independent study that they quoted, more than half the brands of bottled water would not have passed tap water quality specs.

    The funny part of the ep was when they went to a NYC restaurant and had a "water steward" BS'ing people into paying $8 for a bottle of water from the hose in the alley with a phony label on it; people were making up all kinds of BS about how "sparkling" and "crisp" it was, and how they each had a different character even though we knew they all came from the same hose.

    Around here (Ann Arbor, MI), the tap water is VERY good tasting; I bought some bottled water in Chicago a couple of weekends ago and it tasted FAR worse than what comes out of the tap here. I actually think the tap water tastes better than the bottled stuff, but people still buy the bottles.

    Also, Aquafina/etc is NOT distilled, it's merely filtered. Taste distilled water sometime; it's nasty. Aquafina is just Pepsi with no carbonation or flavoring; really, it comes from the same lines, it's the water that they normally use to mix soda. So you can pay $1 for a bottle of Pepsi, or $1 for a bottle of Pepsi without the additives.

    1. Re:Please see Penn & Teller, "Bullshit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from what I understand, Aquafina *is* distilled; this is why it tastes rather poor. Coke's Dasani is also distilled (remember, distilling is just evaporation- it should be *cheaper* for them to distill than to use membrane filtration), but they throw in some electrolyte salts to differentiate the product, and important to a schmuck like me, improve the flavor.

      I'm addicted to soft drinks, and grew up with hard water; as such, overly 'pure' water tends to give me heartburn (stomach acid pulled across the osmotic gradient, with nothing to digest to neutralize it). Real mineral water is on par with the tap water from home; Dasani's not bad when you're dying of thirst and willing to blow a buck to *not* have something corn-syruped (I think the potassium gives it a little sweetness, go figure).

      Of course, you're most likely to catch me with a SoBe or a Gatorade.

    2. Re:Please see Penn & Teller, "Bullshit" by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      less than one person to test bottled water.

      Is he missing an arm, or something?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    3. Re:Please see Penn & Teller, "Bullshit" by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Another laugher is Dasani [sp?] brand bottled water, which has minerals added for "optimum flavour" or some such nonsense. One of said added minerals is magnesium sulphate (Epsom Salt). The doubtless-intentional effect is that while the water temporarily quenches your thirst, it also leaves your mouth feeling dry (a normal effect of MgSO4) so pretty soon you need to buy another bottle of water!

      BTW, high levels of magnesium salts are the primary cause of the awful-tasting ground water in parts of the midwest.

      Fresh distilled water has no flavour of its own, but it does tend to feel "flat" and "dusty" on the tongue, which makes it undrinkable for most folks. What we think of as the good crisp taste of fresh water comes from a variety of dissolved minerals and oxygen.

      When city water tastes bad, it's most often due to bad local pipes (especially the effect of chlorine-treated water on plastic pipes -- gross!!) NOT due to the water itself. You can often demonstrate that by letting the tap run until your house's water lines are completely cleared out (wait for the final temperature change to tell when it's cleared) and then taste the water. You may be astonished at how good it really is.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  152. Have a Banana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that Monkey George? Your printer is out of ink. Yes, they make lots of ink in Europe. Yes, Monkey George. We will invade Europe.

  153. Refill ink prices by Ogerman · · Score: 1

    What I find even more shocking (and annoying) than the artificially high cartridge prices is the fact that even bulk refill ink (and refill toner for that matter) is also way overpriced. There seems to be some sort of very-well-kept secret on where all the toner and ink refill vendors buy their supplies. Taking a recent example: a mere 90 grams of refill toner should not cost anywhere near $17. And that was the best price I could find anywhere. It sure beats paying $70 for a new cartridge, but it's still a scam. Inkjet ink is far worse a scenario.

    So who's the "OPEC" of ink and toner? Any why isn't anyone fighting this nonsense?

  154. Why buy name-brand ink? by Cinematique · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got tired of paying $30 per cart for my Epson Color Stylus 777, so I checked out Google and discovered that there are a handful of (Chinese?) manufacturers producing generic ink WITH microchips included. This is important because several Epson printers have chips on their replacement ink specifically made to thwart generic ink manufacturers... my model included.

    The old way of refilling these carts was to buy a chip flasher and a bunch of ink, refill the original carts, flash the chip, then reseal the carts... major pain in the ass.

    That's no longer necessary.

    So I ordered a few carts at around $7 each from eink4u.com and paid $40 for 3 black and 2 color carts with shipping. No problems to report thus far.

    Fuck Epson.

    Oh, and there are MANY places other than eink4u selling cheap ink. Look around on Foogle, or better yet, go to BizRate.

  155. Distilled Water by whig · · Score: 1

    I have to disagree with you on this point. Freshly distilled water is extremely tasty, though if it is left to sit in cheap plastic containers for a long period of time, it will absorb chemicals from the bottle which are poor tasting and possibly harmful to you.

    Anyone who thinks that distilled water tastes bad should try a glass of freshly distilled water at room temperature. You will be amazed at how much better it is than any bottled water, much less tap water.

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
    1. Re:Distilled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who thinks that distilled water tastes bad should try a glass of freshly distilled water at room temperature.

      Not too many of those glasses, though. The same way distilled water will leach 'flavor' out of a plastic bottle, it will leach the calcium out of your teeth.

    2. Re:Distilled Water by TheLink · · Score: 1

      You must be one of those ppl who hold distilled water in their mouths for hours to savour the vintage or something...

      Sheesh.

      --
    3. Re:Distilled Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try taking a good multivitamin.

  156. Arrgh why do you refuse it?! by slaida1 · · Score: 1
    So many people here seem to get it but you stubbornly refuse, WHY!? Look, ink and champagne, ink and champagne. Think.

    If you don't want to think, let me lay it out for you then: we, them, our dogs and mommies, everybody are fed up with expensive inks. We want low cost stuff but can't have it because most people are so stupid that they can't count 1+1 before bying a new shiny sub-$50 inkjet. Manufacturers on the other hand can count 1+1 and shift all productions costs and then some into ink prices.

    Every mfger doing consumer products are trying to tie consumers into expensive replacement cycles. We get useless "new" features with useless "new" products everyday. New models of printers for every year, just for the sake of new looks and to get an excuse to make older models obsolete. People don't want that but tyranny of the masses force it anyway.

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  157. New spam by fr0z · · Score: 0

    Explains why I get daily spam about toner, but none at all for booze!

    Great...now we know the next lot of spam will feature booze...

    --
    Never underestimate the predictability of human stupidity...
  158. HP is not any better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a bunch of HP ink cartridges, which the printer insists are empty when they are far from it. I even have one that is nearly full. Rather than give the consumer the option of using ink past a certain date, I suspect that the printer falsely claims that it is out of ink.

    I use #10 cartridges on my HP 2000 C.

  159. Milk is more expensive than fuel (in US) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about priorities I suppose :-)

  160. Use cost has little to do with production cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aftershave costs more than the finest scotch. Presumably because very little liquid is required for aftershave, compared to even a single drink. The production cost of aftershave must be much lower than scotch - ever seen 12 year old aftershave?

    That's why I stopped using aftershave, and started slapping on the finest scotch. It's cheaper. The scent is more subtle. Highly recommended, but you have to make sure you don't start drinking it or the whole system falls apart and you find you are spending a lot more on your budding alcoholism, than you ever did on aftershave.

    The reason people with substance abuse problems drink aftershave is cuz it comes in small bottles - like ink. You can't buy, and you'd never use a magnum of ink for your printer, but a magnum of champagne might not be enough; you better get two.

  161. Not the Ink by Orlando · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think we're missing the point here, it's not the ink that's expensive it's the fact that the print mechanisms are now built into the cartridge, at least in the case of an ink jet printer. So each time you buy a cartridge you are also buying a print head. The ink itself must be a small amount of the price.

    HowStuffWorks explains more.

    The real scandal here is that the heads can last far longer than one batch of ink. Refilling should be properly endorsed and encoraged by the printer manufacturers, and practices like these should be stopped.

    Of course what should actually happen is that people get out of the habbit of printing unless it is absolutely necessary. Most printed pages in the companies I've worked in end up in the bin fairly quickly anyway. What ever happened to the paperless office?

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  162. Aquafina: Filtered, not distilled by jridley · · Score: 1
    http://www.beverage-digest.com/editorial/970801.ht ml


    How produced? "It's reverse osmosis and carbon filtered. Reverse osmosis takes out impurities and carbon filtration (removes) any odors ... Aquafina is (produced at) 11 sites in the US. (Not all) soft drink bottlers can run it ... It's a high tech, state-of-the-art purification system."

    All that said, I gotta tell you, I bought a case of Aquafina in Michigan City, Indiana a couple of weekends ago, and it was pretty vile. By contrast, the Aquafina here in Michigan is fine, though I generally buy a bottle when I'm hard up for some water, then refill it out of the tap, since the tap water in Ann Arbor tastes just as good as the Aquafina.

    The stuff I like best is the unsoftened stuff out of our well. It's a little chunky (high minerals incl iron) but I like it like that. The city tap water at work is OK too, tastes good, not nearly the mineral content.
    1. Re:Aquafina: Filtered, not distilled by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My well water is so hard that.. well, remember the biblical story about having to make bricks without straw? We can make bricks without mud! I cleaned half an inch of calcium salts (which do indeed taste salty) from the bottom of my swamp cooler this spring, and that's only 6 months' accumulation. There's also a fair amount of iron, enough to shade the lime deposits red. (It's a new and fairly deep well, over 400 feet -- not unusual in the SoCal high desert.)

      Yet the water tastes quite normal. A little more mineral flavour than a purist might wish for, but not at all nasty, and even in extended storage, it never seems to go completely "flat".

      Doubtless not only better flavour than ink, but also better for you -- no one here suffers from calcium deficiencies :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  163. If a laser printer is suposed to use a laser.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the perfect solution, instead of a laser printer heatig ink, etc. Have the laser hit the paper directly and heat it up

  164. "Evian" == reverse "Naive" by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    "Evian" is "Naive" spelled backwards.

  165. Only on Slashdot... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0

    ...do advertisements get modded +2, Informative.

    1. Re:Only on Slashdot... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      It's a testimonial actually. Advertisements are from people that have some relation to the company. I don't, I'm just a happy customer.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  166. Evian-les-Bains by marnanel · · Score: 1
    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  167. nah by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    You can buy whole-house filtration systems. Sort of like those filters you sometimes see people put on their kitchen faucets, only put on the house's main water supply. Not quite as good as distillation, but not bad either. But they're not particularly cheap.

  168. Stupid? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Uh. The water that leaves the treatment plant may be great. I'm sure it is.

    But where I live it's not always the same water by the time it has travelled through the various pipes and waterworks and comes out the tap. I'm sure that also holds true in many places in the USA. Shit happens.

    I drink distilled/RO water because the filtered tap water in my house doesn't taste nice to me. I do drink the filtered tap water but when I have a choice why drink something I don't like the taste of?

    I may be an idiot, but there are people who spend about the same amount or more on Cola because they like the taste or the caffeine etc. Just think of distilled/RO water as yet another "bottled drink". I'm sure it's healthier than Cola. Sure won't make you insulin resistant for one.

    And not all distilled bottled water tastes the same either - some seem to still have traces of acetone or something. I don't like the taste of mineral water either (chalky/powdery taste). I prefer to get my minerals from food.

    Anyone who believes that the water will remain just as good after travelling many many miles of probably decades-old pipes and worse - old _domestic_ water systems is just as stupid as those drinking bottled water if not more so.

    --