Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Hacks For Fun and Money

An anonymous reader writes "There's a new BusinessWeek article looking at some of the cool hacks coming out of Amazon's open API and XML feed policy. Some nifty stuff - 27,000 developers have apparently signed up to build hacks on Amazon data. It seems '..most are only part-timers and hobbyists, but a growing number are serious programmers who seek to make a living selling products based on the data Amazon is offering on a silver platter.'"

249 comments

  1. How long until... by dafoomie · · Score: 3, Troll

    How long until Amazon patents "software to provide price comparison on cell phones and other portable devices". Surprised they haven't put out a patent already.

    1. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have already applied for the patent, but it won't be granted until 2012! Mike

    2. Re:How long until... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suspect it's already been done. A quick USPTO search on "software and price and comparison and internet" yields over 1000 results.

      Side note: How can a patent with over 20 references be considered new and innovative? Seriously, that's not genius or inspiration, it's adding 1+1. Looking through the software patents, it's a joke that most of them got granted - the Cheif Patent Officer must be Obvious Guy.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:How long until... by inertia187 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why doesn't some OSS body patent Two-Click purchaces? Really, no one wants a One-Click process. They want "Buy, Confirm" process.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    4. Re:How long until... by saden1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is really even more sad is how incompetent the people at the USPTO are. There lot of competent software engineers out of work out there who should be hired by the buffoons that run the place. Maybe then will shit like one-click get rejected at the first glance.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    5. Re:How long until... by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you now have prior art.

    6. Re:How long until... by uberchicken · · Score: 1

      How exactly was this doom-and-gloom prediction "Insightful"?

      We need a new moderator classification:
      "predictable bash" or "boring" or "cliche".

    7. Re:How long until... by dafoomie · · Score: 1

      It's a valid point considering their history. How exactly is your post not modded "troll" or "offtopic"? Get a life.

    8. Re:How long until... by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because one has nothing to with the other. The number of references or the existence of prior art does not speak to the degree innovation or novelty. Any article in any modern scientific journal can easily have 20 or more references. Heck, a letter to the editor might have a dozen.

      Itâ(TM)s called acknowledging your sources. Letâ(TM)s say I come up with some new, innovative way to clone mammals that is 100% successful. Letâ(TM)s say I want to patent my new, innovative process. Letâ(TM)s say the first step of my process involves cleaning and sterilizing the apparatus is a way that has been documented previously. Rather than 1) restating a procedure that has already been documented, and 2) taking credit for someone elseâ(TM)s work, I would reference the original publication of the sterilization procedure. In the jargon of patents, that is prior art. And it in no way affects the patent-worthiness of my innovation.

      If someone devised a method of delivering food over the internet with TCP/IP, I bet that would be a good candidate for a patent. There doesnâ(TM)t seem to be any obvious way to transport physical food by TCP/IP. But part of the patent application would have to reference the prior existence of TCP/IP. Itâ(TM)s called prior art. Its existence does not automatically invalidate the patent.

      Seriously dude, everything you read on /. about patents and intellectual property is wrong. Including this post.

    9. Re:How long until... by Togra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The USPTO must get a huge number of patent applications, both in software and all other fields. You can't really expect them to hire experts to analyse every request for "obviousness", search for prior art, and basically judge each application.

      Even if they were to do that, do you think corporations would just go "oh, okay, you think it's not innovative, fair enough". They'd sue, claiming the analyst was biased, incompetent, or just plain wrong. I'm sure Amazon could easily find a few "experts" to claim one-click shopping was innovative and worthy of a patent.

      The current system is at least somewhat workable. Anyone can get any patent they want, then if they try and enforce it the victim has the option to dispute it and go to court, where they could bring up prior art or their own experts to point out the obviousness of the patent.
      Of course that'd be very hard for small fish to do against these big powerhouse corporations with as many patents as they have lawyers, but that's a flaw in the American legal system as a whole in its current state, not the patent system specifically.

    10. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google.com/search?q=two-click-ordering

    11. Re:How long until... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      If I am not mistaken even O'Riely said that the more he looked into it the more he felt it was innovative.

      But also the more he felt that allowing a patent on software was a bad idea.

      I read it on slashdot (an interview maybe) so it must be true.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:How long until... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Side note: How can a patent with over 20 references be considered new and innovative? Seriously, that's not genius or inspiration, it's adding 1+1. Looking through the software patents, it's a joke that most of them got granted - the Cheif Patent Officer must be Obvious Guy.

      Sorry, but your post is in clear violation of my adding two numbers together patent.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    13. Re:How long until... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is wrong with investigating a patent fully? If it isn't the job of the patent office, then under whose jurisdiction does it fall?

      You note that a patent can be challenged in court, and the fact that this process exists is a good thing, however, you also point out that this would "be very hard for small fish to do against [...] big powerhouse corporations", which flies against the spirit of fairness! Since the legal process is so obviously flawed in civil cases of this nature, the responsibility must pass to the institution that grants these patents in the first place, i.e. the USPTO. You correctly point out that it is not the fault of the patenting process, but that of the legal system. Should one just accept that though? Should the patent system be modified to address this shortcoming?

      Naturally, it would be unfair for the US tax-payer to front the charges for the profits of private enterprise, so what should be done? Forcing a charge on a per-patent basis would only harm the spirit of invention for individuals, which would be an awful tragedy.

      I get frustrated when witnessing large businesses patent "obvious" and otherwise-harmful ideas whilst those inventors with true commercial and innovative spirit are exploited for the simple reason that they lack the power to defend themselves.

      Time to dismount for the high-horse, me thinks. Sorry.. :)

    14. Re:How long until... by smalhotra · · Score: 1

      Maybe then will shit like one-click get rejected at the first glance. Sorry, but Amazon already patented one-click technology.

    15. Re:How long until... by saden1 · · Score: 1

      It should be obvious from my remark that I already knew this.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    16. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big problem with getting a job with the patent office is the looooooonnnnngggg time between putting in an application, and hearing back from them. It's a standard thing with government orgs, but it sure makes trying to get a job a pain in the arse... You start looking for a job, put in an application, and then what? You can't sit around twiddling your thumbs for 6 months, so you get a job somewhere else. You finally hear back from the USPTO, and you're not in a position to quit the job you just got... What to do?

    17. Re:How long until... by Greedo · · Score: 1

      You can't really expect them to hire experts to analyse every request for "obviousness", search for prior art, and basically judge each application.

      Why not? That's their feckin' job! Otherwise, they are just a bunch of rubber-stamping monkeys.

      Even if they were to do that, do you think corporations would just go "oh, okay, you think it's not innovative, fair enough". They'd sue, claiming the analyst was biased, incompetent, or just plain wrong. I'm sure Amazon could easily find a few "experts" to claim one-click shopping was innovative and worthy of a patent.

      Good. Let them.

      That's the burden that should fall on Amazon in the first place. Not on the poor guy who tries to claim prior art and gets met by Amazon's juggernaut of lawyers.

      If their a greater burden of proof for applicants, and if the USPTO hired some folks who could at least spot the obvious prior art or lack of innovations, I bet you dollars to donuts that there would be fewer frivolous patents.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    18. Re:How long until... by Daz3d · · Score: 0, Funny

      If someone devised a method of delivering food over the internet with TCP/IP, I bet that would be a good candidate for a patent.

      Can't wait to download a roast chicken off Kazaa!

    19. Re:How long until... by Togra · · Score: 3, Informative

      They get over 300,000 patent applications a year, so it'd require a hell of a lot of experts to properly analyse each one. The USPTO site claims they have 6000 employees, half of which are examiners.

      Can you, in lets say a day, read and understand any given patent (in your field of expertise) and all of its references, search for prior art (which you can prove was created before the application date and is significantly in common with the patent idea to classify as prior art), and prove to a quality acceptable in a court of law that the patent's idea is not original?

      Take one-click-shopping for example. Could you find and verify proof that there exists prior art (the results of a quick google aren't proof), or that the technology is obvious ("it's OBVIOUS to any coder!!!" isn't proof)?

      For the record I think the US patent system is a mess, I lament the steps my own country (Australia) takes towards the American way, I have a big problem with the current structure of IP in general (or rather the corruption of it), and while I don't have a solid stance on how software IP should be handled I certainly don't like what's going on at the moment. But opinions and righteous indignation stated on /. mean nothing, it's just preaching to the choir, the physical reality of the situation is that the current system is in place because big money likes it how it is, and politicians have no reason to change it until voter pressure arises or a big donator starts lobbying.

      Perhaps the most vocal slashdotters on this topic should join together, write a clear and concise statement/s on intellectual property as it relates to software (or the patent system as a whole), focussing on benefit to business, creators and the public as well as the original intent of the system, and then deliver it to all relevant politicians/officials. Perhaps include with it a list of all registered voters from /. and various other communities who are in support of the statement and will vote for any politician who will work towards making the changes it suggests.

      "Here is a list of X thousand voters in your region who will vote against you because of your damaging actions regarding IP" is the easiest way to get a politicians attention short of a large donation.

    20. Re:How long until... by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to see a file that is actually pr0n, when you are downloading "chicken_soup.food".

      Would that make the pr0n edible?

    21. Re:How long until... by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Can't wait to download a roast chicken off Kazaa!

      I think you're looking for ChickTorrent. (or was that the pr0n version?)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    22. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forcing a charge on a per-patent basis would only harm the spirit of invention for individuals

      Uhm, hate to break it to you, but you already have to pay for each patent you apply for. In fact, there is a charge for EVERYTHING you ask the USPTO to do regarding your patent or patent application.

    23. Re:How long until... by MrLint · · Score: 1

      heh food over tcp.. hey scotty webfax me a boloney sandwich:)

    24. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not incompetence.... its being overworked. When 1 person has to do the work of 5 and your continued employment is based on the number of patents you process each biweek, its no wonder some things get through.
      You are right about buffoons running the place, but leave the examiners alone.

    25. Re:How long until... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant that requiring individuals to pay for the increased cost necessary to ensure eliminating "pointless" patents might harm the spirit of invention. I'm well aware that one must already pay for the patent process.

    26. Re:How long until... by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      In any event, a lot of patents *do* reference other patents.

      What most people (read "dogmatic patent bashers") don't realise is that many companies regularly trade patent licenses. They often develop patents so as to trade with each other. This can lead to some ugly scenarios, such as building a barrier whereby Company A requires 10 innovations, but Company B has control of one of them.

      So it can be still be ugly, but can also encourage an idea market. The moral is don't fall for the misconception that patents are just about MegaCorp crunching FreshStartup.

    27. Re:How long until... by Mikeytsi · · Score: 0

      Let's do the math, shall we?

      ~300,000 patents a year, / 3,000 examiners=300 patents per examiner a YEAR. so, each examiner only really has to examine ONE PATENT A DAY.

      Must be tough.

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    28. Re:How long until... by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen a patent application? I don't know about you, but I can't go through 200 pages of legallese with supporting documentation in a day without missing something.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    29. Re:How long until... by Togra · · Score: 1
      Can you, in lets say a day, read and understand any given patent (in your field of expertise) and all of its references, search for prior art (which you can prove was created before the application date and is significantly in common with the patent idea to classify as prior art), and prove to a quality acceptable in a court of law that the patent's idea is not original?

      Yes, I did the math, and I think its insufficient time. Repost when you've got your day-long analysis of a typical patent (as another reply to my post states, we're talking hundreds of pages of legalese for the patent itself, plus all its references) ready.

      Here is Amazon's one-click patent. It's actually rather short, though it does have a lot of references. See if you can prove it unworthy of a patent in a day of analysis. Keep in mind the patent was granted four years ago and still stands, and that two years ago BountyQuest gave in on anyone finding prior art.
    30. Re:How long until... by Jaap+van+Ganswijk · · Score: 1

      300,000/3000 is 100 and people normally work about 200 days per year, so each examiner has TWO days to handle each patent.

  2. O'Reilly book on Amazon Hacks by jefflinwood · · Score: 4, Informative
    O'Reilly is publishing a book on these Amazon Hacks in August, to go with Mac OS X Hacks, Linux Server Hacks, Google Hacks, and Tivo Hacks (upcoming).
    It's mentioned in the article, but this is slashdot....

    Amazon Hacks

    1. Re:O'Reilly book on Amazon Hacks by Snoopy77 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you'll now be able to compare the price of Amazon Hacks using Amazon hacks.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    2. Re:O'Reilly book on Amazon Hacks by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1

      The only hack they seem to be missing is XBox Hacks

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
    3. Re:O'Reilly book on Amazon Hacks by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I hear the next book they publish will be O'Reilly Hacks in a Nutshell, to be followed shortly afterwards by O'Reilly Hacks Examples in a Nutshell, which uses 80% of the content from the first book.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  3. Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Okay, when I read the title I pictured a busty female warrior sitting infront of a computer hacking away at some hapless souls files. She was sexy too.

    1. Re:Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the preceding post was modded down by the only computer literate (and extremely ugly) woman on earth.

    2. Re:Amazon by Discordantus · · Score: 2, Informative
      hmmm. busty and beautiful? An Amazon warrior? I suppose you don't realize that they lopped off their right breasts when they become warriors. Presumably to make archery easier...

      Well, I suppose some guys might think that's sexy.

    3. Re:Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well, I suppose some guys might think that's sexy.

      Please do keep in mind that your average female amazon warrior is very capable and experienced in the handling of large hairy beasts...

  4. insert tech company here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    has begun to allow others access to its private data, its most valuable asset after the collapse of the technology industry. It looks like Amazon is just the latest in this trend.

    --
    Getting too much pr0n?

    1. Re:insert tech company here by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      businessweek has another opinion:
      All of which makes the e-commerce giant an early adopter in the march toward Web services.
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
  5. I wonder by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they include their highly advanced "one-click" technology in with this? It would truly be a gift to experience a technical achievement of this magnitude.

    I mean, who would have thunk it? "one-click"! This certainly is the pinnacle of innovation and ingenuity. Sure is a good thing they patented this... otherwise who knows what might happen if such power was available to mere mortals? Inconcievable!

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sure is a good thing they patented this... otherwise who knows what might happen if such power was available to mere mortals? Inconcievable!


      I do not think this word means what you think it means.

    2. Re:I wonder by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Hmm hasn't anyone patented a zero-click buying technology yet? It should be pretty simple using JavaScript's onmouseover event, and if you're afraid someone might accidentally trigger it because their cursor accidentally flew over the hotspot, JS also has a timer/wait event.

      Imagine that, no clicking required. "Move your cursor over this surface to purchase this item". Someone patent this before Jeff Bezos does.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    3. Re:I wonder by skraps · · Score: 3, Funny

      I do not mean to pry, but you don't by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand?

      --
      Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
    4. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i before e except after c

      inconceivable

    5. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:I wonder by jonatha · · Score: 1

      It's also not spelled that way...

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    7. Re:I wonder by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean *this* gate key?

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    8. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun storming the castle!

  6. The Mcdonald analogy by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Imagine mcdonald wanting to be a better franchise and hired annoying teenagers to cause problems in and outside the restaurant to see how they can improve.

    Give amazon some credit, cause few businesses nowadays besides financial institutions would go the distance to improve themselves.

    Now... if they can get rid of that Jeff Be...

    1. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Peridriga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Imagine mcdonald wanting to be a better franchise and hired annoying teenagers to cause problems in and outside the restaurant to see how they can improve.

      Somewhat off topic... But, imagine the fun of a job where McD's paid you to reak havoc in Burger King and Wendy's resturants :-P

      I wonder what the interview for that job would consist of...

    2. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by alptraum · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Give amazon some credit, cause few businesses nowadays besides financial institutions would go the distance to improve themselves.


      Utter BS. More so than ever companies are realizing that continuous improvement is neccesary to remain competitive. Do a google on "six sigma", an process improvement methodology which started out at Motorola after a Arizona State Univ. PhD came up with the program and has balooned in the number of companies that use the six sigma methodology. For many Deming, Juran and Taguchi, the classic gurus of quality, are praised as gods. Or check out www.asq.org (American Socity of Quality) Engineers are just starting to realize the power of Experimental Design (DoE) and statistics, which current computer technology now allows even those with just basic statistical backgrounds to perform advanced statistical tests and interpret the results easily. The list goes on. Improvement is the norm, not the exception in countries such as Japan, which were in a full on quality revolution in the 60's-70's with the help of Deming, leaving America aghast and having American companies beg for his help after turning him away in the 50's and 60's. Only fairly recently has America started to catch on to quality.
    3. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by zwoelfk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Somewhat off topic... But, imagine the fun of a job where McD's paid you to reak havoc in Burger King and Wendy's resturants :-P

      It already happens. All of the big chains (PepsiCo (i.e. TacoBell, PizzaHut, HotNNow, etc.), McDonalds, etc.) use simulations+data/video to improve their drive-through /walk-in throughput.

      Some corps decided that a pure FIFO is best on average, where McD decided to let people get out of line and wait (if the order is unusual) -- So it has been reported that some McD people (who knows? franchise owners? managers?) send people out to nieghboring places with large custom orders at rush hour that totally screw up a pure FIFO system.

    4. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... methinks someone didn't RTFA.

    5. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Note to parent and all those that modded this up:

      RTFA!

      The analogy makes no sense at all. In fact I'm at a loss as to how any analogy involving Macca's and annoying teenagers would work in this situation.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    6. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by abulafia · · Score: 1

      Soooo....

      All of that crap? maybe you said? Might be true.

      I'm just going to go over here, for a while, and stand next to these tires and explosiives.

      What, you like puppies now?

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    7. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I hadn't already posted I could have used my mod points for good and modded this crap down.

      What have I done? Am I to blame for it's unnatural existence at +5?

    8. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by magores · · Score: 1

      On an unrelated note...

      I used to work for a small, but sorta national, bookstore chain.

      Some of the other managers in my district used to go into the nearby Borders and B&N and mix the shelves around. After we (... Oops .. after THEY) were done, you would find dog training books in the cook book aisle. THe #10 bestseller was placed in front of the #1, so that you couldn't see it, etc

      I had nothing to do with this idea, I swear.

    9. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      Imagine mcdonald wanting to be a better franchise and hired annoying teenagers to cause problems in and outside the restaurant to see how they can improve.
      cut the improvement part and you'll see:
      it already happens!

      can't remember when the last time was, a mcdonalds employee got my order right the first time...
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    10. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      when you read "the big u" (by neal stephenson) you will observe that there is plenty of opportunity to start an enterprise with mixing books in university libraries!

      there were some clever folks, taking important textbooks to completely irrelevant positions in the million+ book collection, carefully noting its new place and selling it to the highest bidder! ;)

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    11. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      and:
      What is the point of a library full of books that you've already read? -- Voltaire Magores
      to serve as a reference? to read them again after a few years? to give them to your kids with the intention to establish a moral system similar to your own? to show off?

      but maybe i'm talking to the wrong guy. give me the email adress of this... this... voltaire, will you?

      ;-)
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    12. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I use Six Sigma to leverage my core competencies in a forward looking manner while at the same time providing first class turn key solutions in the B2B sphere, in both the tactical and strategic senses, providing a large return on investment in a fast based bear market enviroment?

      Wait...BINGO!

    13. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by bartlog · · Score: 1

      OK, so there are ways to improve quality. Big deal. You can easily spend too many resources trying to improve quality beyond where it's useful. Japanese software shops are famous for trying to make things nearly perfect before they ship - one of the big reasons why they're not competitive worldwide. One of the key insights that Motorola had in deciding to implement six-sigma was that by achieving this level of manufacturing reliability they would be able to get rid of many of their downstream testing costs. But it doesn't automatically follow that everyone will benefit from trying to do that, or even from paying the costs to move from two-sigma to three-sigma quality. LCD manufacturers are a good example of an industry where the reject rate is huge (I'd say that for big screens they're at about *one* sigma quality) but they are still successful because they have enough downstream testing to compensate.

    14. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgt to throw in the word "synergy"

    15. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to believe sometimes, but just about all those buzzwords like six-sigma were invented by extremely smart people, and there is usually real substance behind them... But the reality is that once some well thought out method shows its usefulness, begins to gain popularity, and is spread by management consultants, journalists and other pundits, it is doomed to lose all substance and becomes the dreaded new buzzword. The buzzword lives on, devoid of near all meaning, repeated without thinking, and smothers all chances of the original intelligent ideas ever making it.

    16. Re:The Mcdonald analogy by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha! You said "McDonalds" and "restaurant" in the same sentence!

  7. amazon's strategy by Tancred · · Score: 5, Informative

    They've known for the last couple years at least (at least since that's how long I've known insiders) that selling their own merchandise would be a small part of their long term strategy. It did get them the infrastructure, though. After that came the hosting of other large e-commerce sites. Now they're recruiting an army of channel sales / resellers. Very smart people over there. Wish they'd stop patenting business processes though.

    1. Re:amazon's strategy by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Very true - they've moved beyond pure retail to being a fulfillment operation for an industry. And by the way, here's a link to the Amazon Hacks book...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:amazon's strategy by krelian · · Score: 1
      Very smart people over there. Wish they'd stop patenting business processes though

      Well, that's one of the things that makes them smart...

    3. Re:amazon's strategy by buddha42 · · Score: 1
      Go figure right?

      Wasn't this whole e-business thing supposed to help us cut-out middle men?

    4. Re:amazon's strategy by DustMagnet · · Score: 1

      It's a great strategy. Now when I search for certain items on google, I get hundreds of hits for stuff I can buy from amazon.com. It's pretty hard to find items from anyone else. Of course amazon didn't carry the item I was looking for anymore, but these fly-by-night amazon affiliates don't always stay up to date.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  8. How long... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Funny

    until some federal genius decides to label O'Reilly as a terrorist organization due to their sponsorship of "hacking"?

    1. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, their book promotes using your brain to think, and that'll be a security risk in Rumsfeld's New World. Just sit there, and do what we tell you to do.. just consume, consume.

    2. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an original criticism.

  9. Is it genius? by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...or were they just too stupid to do this earlier?

    Basically they are letting independent developers come up with new ways to sell their stuff, without Amazon having to pay those developers.

    Why weren't they doing this already?

    1. Re:Is it genius? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part, I think, of the reason they weren't doing this before is the question of "name recognition" and their desire to build a brand.

      By first establishing themselves as a complete "product", i.e. "Amazon", people will now recognize these portal'd Amazon links as something new but still part of the Amazon-whole.

      If they had simply introduced this ability from the beginning, they risked other companies somehow taking advantage of it to make it appear as if the "store" was the secondary-site, as opposed to Amazon itself.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  10. Uses... by idontneedanickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can think many useful things can come out of this. For exaple, a product which let you access/search the vast amounts of information they have on each of their products could be quite useful. (Although this could be constructed as a simple (well, sort of) script that retrieves certain parts of the pages Amazon has on each product.) Now, let's hope no disputes arise between Amazon and the people who want to use their information. This could range anywhere from people not giving credit to Amazon for the information, or claiming as their own, to disputes about money that's made selling products to access this information in the certain way. This could be viewed by some as selling the information. (Don't you think Amazon will want in on large amounts of money that's made from their own data?)

    1. Re:Uses... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Don't you think Amazon will want in on large amounts of money that's made from their own data?

      They would be seriously bucking the trend if they didn't. I don't know people can bet their finances on "terms and conditions which may change without notice". What's to stop Amazon from taking someone's idea and implementing it themselves? After they do, why would someone want to use the "other" site when they can stay within the Amazon.com domain?

    2. Re:Uses... by mr_e_cat · · Score: 1

      For example, Netflix could use Amazons film reviews and info. I often surf Amazon to find a film and then switch over to Netflix to rent it.

    3. Re:Uses... by WaKall · · Score: 1

      Of course, by supporting the WebServices interface to access the parts of the data you really care about (search, reviews, descriptions), you get that data easier, and Amazon doesn't have to serve up all the other shit on the page as well. And your session doesn't get tagged as a robot and sent off to the humor-the-script-kiddy boxes.

      Amazon looks good for providing this, but it gets rid of the legitimate-use scripted site access killing any trend analysis they do, and reduces the load for parts of the page that your script would never use (recommendations, listmania, etc). And thats good for their operations.

    4. Re:Uses... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      For exaple, a product which let you access/search the vast amounts of information they have on each of their products could be quite useful.

      Tomorrow's Slashdot headline:
      Amazon Dot Com Patents Google.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  11. Will Amazon own the "hacks"? by Cirrius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since it's all being created from/based on their data?

    Ahh the sound of a thousand rushing patents...

    1. Re:Will Amazon own the "hacks"? by jamestedrick · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the creator retains the property, according to Amazon's Web Services Licensing Agreement (Section 2). If you submit any info to Amazon (like "in use" shots of products), they are given an irrevocable license to use.

  12. This looks interesting. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I think I can do something with this.
    I suppose I'll have to look into this.
    I was not aware of this at all before.
    Thanks folks!

  13. RIAA Radar by Stormie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    RIAA Radar is a site which may be of interest to Slashdotters, which I presume is done using this Amazon API.. check if a CD was release by an RIAA member label before you buy it!

    1. Re:RIAA Radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the truth shall kill you

    2. Re:RIAA Radar by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Actually it states right on the page that indeed, it is done using amazon's webservices.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    3. Re:RIAA Radar by Stormie · · Score: 1

      Damn, so it does. I am officially a d0rk.

    4. Re:RIAA Radar by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, I was surprised to read the fine print the other day, and notice that Enhanced CD is an RIAA trademark. So even when I was buying from what I thought was a smaller label or an indie band, the ECD logo on it definitely meant that money went to the RIAA for some certification process. Not that I will stop buying all such CDs, it's just good to be aware of it.

      So as to not go completely offtopic, the Web Services idea is pretty great. I use .NET, and I don't anyone has yet linked to O'Reilly article describing how to use Amazon's WS here. I can't wait for other companies to start following suit - some of the more useful ones would have to be shipping (FedEx/UPS) and Web email providers with no POP3 access. As for shopping, I really wish DVD Price Search would start offering it, as I like to shop around before just buying something off of Amazon.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    5. Re:RIAA Radar by nutsy · · Score: 1

      Of course, even if an album is RIAA-released, the site helpfully gives you a link to buy the album which, of course, is an Amazon referral-kickback link. Greed makes strange bedfellows!

  14. Web Services Ignition by jimmyCarter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love how the industry first hypes and then later wonders where the surge in web services is.

    They still don't get it. You can't force an industry. It's usually the guys on the ground level making cool things with the technology that drive it's success.

    Becaus of this, the Amazon and Google services are going to be huge in driving the web services industry.

    --

    -- jimmycarter
  15. hmm interesting by jr87 · · Score: 1

    I think it is nice that they are trying to improve themselves but I think that they would have profitted more by doing this earlier.

    1. Re:hmm interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who knows?

    2. Re:hmm interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i do. but i'm not going to tell you. trance music is best on X

  16. For example this site... by wherley · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gold-Stores seems to use the XML interface to allow the user to shop seamlessly at Amazon yet use payment mechanisms, such as Moneybookers, e-gold, E-bullion, Pecunix, and EvoCash, that Amazon does not directly accept.

    Neat!

    1. Re:For example this site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing prices on computers!
      Look at these deals:

      Manufacturer: Toshiba
      List Price: $1,099.99
      Our Price: $1,099.99


      Wow! they're selling laptops at list price! They should patent that! Oh... wait, I found an even better deal:

      Manufacturer: Apple Computer
      List Price: $1,300.00
      Our Price: $1,294.99

      That's $5.01 off a $1300 purchase! Amazing, the deals just keep coming.

    2. Re:For example this site... by smallpaul · · Score: 3, Funny

      This site is powered by something called "StoreBuilder." I love what StoreBuilder has to say about how they chose to use Amazon's XML over HTTP interface rather than the SOAP interface: "XML over HTTP, no SOAP interaction overheads"

    3. Re:For example this site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that website for survivalist crazies that refuse to deal with paper money?

      You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorn. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold!

  17. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Amazon hacks YOU!

  18. Cool hacks by MrWa · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Regardless of what you think about Amazon opening up its API and inventory data, this is a nifty product. Scan something anywhere and get the Amazon data on it. Now I comparision shop Amazon with BestBuy, Circuit City, or B&N while I am at the store. Wait?! Is this illegal under the DMCA?

    This would be great if they guy hooked it up to Froogle and made it work on a PDA - you could buy anything you saw, anywhere, for the cheapest price you could find on the web, while you were in a real store!

    (runs off to fill out a patent form...)

    1. Re:Cool hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ipilot would be cool if it actually existed as a product. It looks like vaporware for now. They just have a little flash demo which doesn't actually do anuthing

      I have been contacting them for 2 months now and they keep saying they will have the scanners or the DSK available really soon.

    2. Re:Cool hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Regardless of what you think about Amazon opening up its API and inventory data, this is a nifty product. Scan something anywhere and get the Amazon data on it. Now I comparision shop Amazon with BestBuy, Circuit City, or B&N while I am at the store. Wait?! Is this illegal under the DMCA?

      This would be great if they guy hooked it up to Froogle and made it work on a PDA - you could buy anything you saw, anywhere, for the cheapest price you could find on the web, while you were in a real store!

      (runs off to fill out a patent form...)


      * Moderating...

      Let's see:

      - Bashed DMCA... Check (pointlessly, but all the better)

      - Bashed Patents... Check

      - Bashed SCO... FAIL

      - Bashed Microsoft... FAIL

      - Bashed **AA... FAIL

      - Referenced "Good Technology (tm)", eg. Linux/Google/GNU/GPL... Check

      - Referenced Geek Toy... FAIL (Close, but "PDA" is not "Zaurus")

      You had a good post, but it could have looked like this:

      --------------------

      Regardless of what you think about Amzaon opening up it's API and inventory data, this is a nifty product. Scan something anywhere and get the Amazon data on it. Now I comparision shop Amazon with BestBuy, Circuit City, or B&N while I am at the store. (Ha! I bet the bigwigs at M$ would LOVE if I comparison shopped Linux vs. XPee, let's not even MENTION SCO!)

      This would be great if they guy hooked it up to Froogle and made it work on a Zaurus - you could buy anything you saw, anywhere, for the cheapest price you could find on the web, while you were in a real store! (I bet the RIAA would object, though, what with their PRICE FIXING WAYS. Bastards.)

      (runs off to fill out a patent form... before Amazon does!)

      Oh, also, I HATE THE DMCA!!!! VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!

      --------------------

      Learn from the master.

    3. Re:Cool hacks by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

      funniest. anonymous post. ever.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
    4. Re:Cool hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the funniest post I have seen on slashdot. Sums up what Slashdot is all about.

    5. Re:Cool hacks by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it even includes a direct copyright violation, in that it contains the majority of the parent post!

    6. Re:Cool hacks by MadJo · · Score: 1

      it's funny that you even left the spelling errors intact ;)

    7. Re:Cool hacks by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      you could buy anything you saw, anywhere, for the cheapest price you could find on the web, while you were in a real store!

      No, bad. If everybody did this, the real stores would go away. It's self-defeating. You owe the real store something for allowing you to fondle the item you've found in a lighted air-conditioned space. I'm not saying you owe the real store a whole-number multiplier, but you can't expect the service and not expect to pay for it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  19. From the Amazon licensing agreement by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We may modify any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, at any time and in our sole discretion, by posting a change notice or a new agreement on our site. If an modification is unacceptable to you, your only recourse is to terminate this agreement. Your continued use of amazon.com web services or the amazon.com properties following our posting of a change notice or new agreement on our site will constitute binding acceptance of the change.

    Given Amazon's track record I suggest you developers check the license daily.

    1. Re:From the Amazon licensing agreement by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Given Amazon's track record I suggest you developers check the license daily."

      No kidding...I can already see the next business method Amazon is going to patent:

      1.Release your code to developers and let them do truly amazing things with it while letting them think they own it
      2.Change licensing agreement once truly valuable software has been developed to state that you own it.
      3.PROFIT!!!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:From the Amazon licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... why does it not say when the licence was last updated? What's the point of checking this (and dozens other agreement-type pages) daily... do you have to have photo memory?

    3. Re:From the Amazon licensing agreement by Fazlazen · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is cron a job to wget the license agreement, run an MD5 against it, and then compare the MD5 against the MD5 the last time you read it. If they mismatch, time to read.

  20. That's how Amazon beats Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This has already been done! Amazon already advertises on their Web Services page products that were designed to help their sellers for example.

    Check out Seller Engine

    It uses the data feed from Amazon to allow Amazon sellers to create new listings and to reprice their current inventory by getting uptodate data from Amazon. You can just enter an ISBN number and you can see the sales rank of that book, the minimum price on Amazon, the availability, the list of sellers offering it, etc...

    I sell books on Amazon and have been using this for about a year now. It is a lot easier than selling on Ebay because it is much faster to put your inventory for sale, you don't have to pay to list something for sale and you can make sure your products are always competitive by using a tool like SellerEngine.

  21. Compare it to Ebay by dmoynihan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Whose API charges beacoup fees, and makes it pretty much impossible to, say, write an open source shopping cart that'll sync with Ebay auctions (for the 10-50,000 people that sell on ebay and our own sites and might want to keep track of stock).

    They (meaning idiot analysts for the most part) always say the real battle is between Ebay and Amazon for the future of online commerce. Amazon's got the right idea here, at least when it comes to getting their brand out free. Too bad it costs so much to list...

    1. Re:Compare it to Ebay by Yawning · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't really cost anything to list on Amazon. When you start out as a seller you only pay Amazon a comission if you sell something. You can list as many items as you want for free.

      If you sell in volume then you pay 40$ a month to list and have access to inventory tools etc... If you would list on Ebay you would pay much more than 40$ a month in listing fee for the same volume of listings.

    2. Re:Compare it to Ebay by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use French words, you could at least spell them correctly. It's "beaucoup".

  22. Are they still... by dafoomie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are they still doing different prices for different regions? If so, can you check out the prices for each of the different regions with this?

  23. I'd rather scrape... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in storing Amazon.com Properties for longer than 24 hours, you may only do so with the written consent of Amazon.com. If you fail to obtain written consent, Amazon.com reserves the right to take legal action.

    Sorry, I'd rather scrape the data. Then I can keep it for longer than 24 hours.

    1. Re:I'd rather scrape... by jesser · · Score: 1

      I think they mean "don't distribute old data". I doubt they care how long you keep data in your browser cache or PDA. You don't have permission to distribute scraped data, so I don't see how scraping gives you an advantage.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    2. Re:I'd rather scrape... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You don't have permission to distribute scraped data

      Facts can't be copyrighted.

      As for what they mean, I'm sure when I start running a price comparison site or a site competing with Amazon they'll mean one thing: you gotta go.

  24. You know it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, a league of hackers who took up Amazon.com's challenge to "hack" its web services have announced a new technology called "zero-click."

    Said m0rp3us, leader of the group "3y3 0f th3 d0g," "zero-click" will order various items automatically using already stored in a user's billing info.

    "All they have to do is sign-in once and they're done. The stuff basically orders itself after that," he said, " and delivered to your home. It's like Christmas every day!"

    When asked if he will patent the new technology, Jeff Bezos declined comment, but did mention that the technology was responsible for three new automobiles and a new town that he was going to play with later.

    Amazon.com's shares were up with the news.

    1. Re:You know it... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      Said m0rp3us, leader of the group "3y3 0f th3 d0g," "zero-click" will order various items automatically using already stored in a user's billing info.


      I wish Amazon would let me correlate delivery addresses with birthdays with cash limits with wish lists, and submit orders automatically whenever everything aligned, so I could completely automate gift-remembering.

    2. Re:You know it... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Said m0rp3us, leader of the group "3y3 0f th3 d0g," "zero-click" will order various items automatically using already stored in a user's billing info."

      I know you were only joking...but sadly Bezos can't patent this because its already been done, and was posted on slashdot Sunday the 22nd. Here's the link. Scary shit indeed.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:You know it... by JWhitlock · · Score: 1
      I wish Amazon would let me correlate delivery addresses with birthdays with cash limits with wish lists, and submit orders automatically whenever everything aligned, so I could completely automate gift-remembering.

      Send me your login info, and a list, and I'll send them an Amazon gift certificate at the appropriate time. I'll also do it for a reasonable fee - and make sure it gets paid every month.

  25. Query? by MadBiologist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've got a ton of books, CD's and assorted merch (VHS tapes, Games, DVD's) that I'd like to catalog. These items all have barcodes, and theoretically Amazon sells a good chunck of them. Is there an app that would sync to Amazon and gather all the pesky details for these items from a simple barcode swipe? I know the there exist such a product as DVD Profiler for my DVD's... but I'd like to stop duplicate purchases if possible. If there isn't, how hard is it to program with Amazon's API? Many Thanks!

    --
    'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    1. Re:Query? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does anyone remember the cuecat? radioshack tried to seell them as the wave of the future that could be used on any barcode and special barcodes in magazines that would lead people directly to a website. too bad they had spyware built in to the hardware of the cuecat (which could be declawed if anyone remembers that issue of 2600) but even though the company and system is defunct, the hardware still will print whatever barcode u scan to notepad if u have it connected and have notepad open when u run it over a barcode
      maybe someone could ghetto rig one of these to do what you were suggesting. it takes a S2 keyboard port tho. and they look kinda dumb shaped like a cat

    2. Re:Query? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I recently wrote a program that uses a cuecat to scan barcodes/cds/games to use with Guzzlefish.com

      And I riced out my cuecat, added an on/off switch, disabled the serial number, and put a Type R sticker

      (kidding about the type r sticker)

    3. Re:Query? by hsmyers · · Score: 1

      Yes, I wrote a perl app to convert my ISBN's to biblographic database entries ala BibTeX. It handles CDs as well. Try: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=261033

    4. Re:Query? by tchansen · · Score: 1

      email me offline - I may have a solution for you.

    5. Re:Query? by Henry_Doors · · Score: 1

      From the article;

      ...scanner company iPilot, which makes a pocket-size barcode scanner that can upload universal product codes (UPCs) onto a computer. With a simple software script, anyone can upload those UPCs into Amazon and get product information on those specific items.

      Sounds like it would meet your requirement though posts elsewhere suggest it is vapourware.

      --
      "I deny nothing, but doubt everything." Lord Byron
    6. Re:Query? by jea6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How, pray tell, does an offline e-mail occur? Fax, sorta? What if I draft the message and print it out then mail it to you? Is that an offline e-mail? :-)

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  26. Perl by pirodude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any perl programmers looking to play around with this should checkout the Net::Amazon module.

  27. I wish Google would listen up. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While Amazon allows (mostly) free and open access to its API and data, Google, on the other hand, limits everyone to 1000 queries a day.

    This means that coders who have tools that are based on Google results (say, some sort of link popularity checking tool) then have to either grab Google the regular way and try their darn best to pretend they're a regular visitor.. or get multiple API keys, which is against the T&Cs.

    Of course, I can see why Google is doing this, simply because there's no benefit for them if people just leech their results, but....

  28. Re:Slashdot post formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you forgot:

    (strstr(submission, "Linux") || (strstr(submission, "patent") || (strstr(submission, "case mod"))

  29. useful and fun stuff by slothdog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a lot of cool things you can do with their API. I wrote a script to look up CD cover art, then ran it against my webradio station's playlist, and came up with a nifty "now playing" box. Check it out....

    1. Re:useful and fun stuff by resprung · · Score: 1

      I hope someone builds a WinAmp extension which reads the ID3 tag and fetches album cover art and info...

      There's one for iTunes already... :-)

      One of the downsides of the MP3 revolution is that most people seem to listen to scrambled playlists of tracks, not whole albums sequentially as originally intended by (most) artists.

      Fast access to album information and liner notes might strengthen the album format in MP3-land.

      -Resprung

      --
      Now is the winter of our disco tent
    2. Re:useful and fun stuff by slothdog · · Score: 1

      I hope someone builds a WinAmp extension which reads the ID3 tag and fetches album cover art and info...

      The minibrowser already does something like this by default, I believe. If it's open when a song starts, it gives you all kinds of info. Not sure off-hand if it does album covers; I haven't used it for a while.

  30. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

    DEAR GOD MODDERATOR! Do you know what you have done? by modding a Soviet Russia joke up, you have defied the very laws of the universe, thereby causing them to collapse into themselves creating one giant implosion the will engulf the entire universe, destroying us all! jerk ;p

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  31. Use of "Hacker" by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Nice to see the word "Hacker" used properly, to mean someone pushing the limits of X tech, as opposed to the usual "Hacker = Criminal".

    For many years I've seen the negative responses, as a self-confessed computer hacker. Its only in the past few years I've noticed more recognition of the true meaning of hacker from people.

    Jonah Hex

  32. feels like amazon coming home by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you are up on your amazon history, it's greatest business move was hooking up with all of the mom and pops out there in the mid-90s, and having them link back to the mothership that was the amazon bookseller

    this is that, all over again

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:feels like amazon coming home by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Wow...I'd almost forgotten about that - the old Amazon Used Book service. It helped me track down a few things. Made it a lot easier than having to pop around to tons of used book stores, some which were a pain to deal with for various reasons (annoying owners, no ac, etc...)

  33. This is interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon becomes a platform. The web site turns into infrastructure.

    I'm impressed. Really impressed. I feel compelled to play with it, see what comes out of it.

  34. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    I dunno...I'll be out and about and will see a sign some where like "saves you 20%" and the first thing that pops in my head is "In soviet russia 20% saves you" or something.

    Anyone know the origin of these?

  35. Amazon is one of many by yintercept · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They've been doing this from the start with an open associate program. People have been able to link to Amazon.com books and get a commission since the 90s.

    The idea of product datafeeds isn't really that new either. You will find the hotel industry allowing datafeeds and other low level integration.

    Amazon is giving better quality lower level access to data than many others. But are not as many leagues ahead as the Business Week article seems to indicate.

    I guess I should mention the annoying thing. The people playing this amazon datafeed game are creating millions upon millions of web pages with different terms optimized for the search engines. The general result is a marked increase in the number of webpages to index, and a decrease in the quality of search engine results.

    1. Re:Amazon is one of many by mr_e_cat · · Score: 1

      The search engines need to keep up with the game, which they aren't doing very well right now. There could be options like "exclude amazon datafeed" etc.
      Oops, maybe I should have patented that.

    2. Re:Amazon is one of many by yintercept · · Score: 1
      There could be options like "exclude amazon datafeed" etc.

      Unfortunately, a lot of good sites with good information have integrated amazon into their programs...meaning that if you exclude the datafeed, you would exclude a lot of good sites.

      I still think you should go for the patent, if you give it sufficiently ambiguous wording you might be able to use it as a defensive patent, or claim that it applies to some unknown whatever that gets invented in the future.

      I find it best just to file a large number of sufficiently ambiguous patents, then I can just hang around, see what gets popular then claim my vague wording means that--saves mental effort.

  36. Seller Engine will do that by Yawning · · Score: 1

    Seller Engine will do that for you.

    When you buy the software you get a CueCat for free and you can go ahead and scan them in one by one and see on the screen the details that you want about those items. You can also export the data in a tab delimited text format.

    The program is actually more directed towards people who sell on Amazon.

  37. Since when... by KU_Fletch · · Score: 0, Troll

    When did we start calling programming hacking? Am I missing something. You took an XML feed and made an aplet to manipulate it. OOOOOOH. It's ccalled programming. Hacking implies that it is forbidden, agressive, or both. Stupid mainstream press with their coopting of our phrases.

    --
    It's not stupid. It's advanced.
    1. Re:Since when... by JesterXXV · · Score: 5, Informative
      Hacking implies that it is forbidden, agressive, or both.

      No, it doesn't.

      --
      Yo mama so fake, she failed the Turing Test.
    2. Re:Since when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be a Troll you just fell for

    3. Re:Since when... by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      Hacking is an all through positive phrase. It says more about what has been done than 'programming', because it is highlighting the aspect of altering or using an existing system in an unconventional way. (Hmm, is that clear?)

      I highly appreciate their usage of the term 'hack'. But, since it's BusinessWeek, maybe it was just a blind hit.

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
  38. This is my favorite Amazon hack by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Clutter from Sprote Research. It does live cover lookups of CD's playing in iTunes from Amazon's music site. Very cool and an easy way to find the cover art for CDs to put into your MP3 tag info.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  39. Actually... by Dthoma · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...speaking seriously, a rich pro-open-source organisation should patent that and then get it legally made public domain (if possible). At least then we know that a large corporation will actually patent that first.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  40. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by crazysim · · Score: 0

    Read the title, doesn't it already say that? "Amazon hacks for fun and money"

  41. allconsuming.net by tornadron · · Score: 1

    AllConsuming.Net makes great use of the amazon APIs, along with those provided by google, and various blog interfaces.
    ...its sort of like an All Music Guide for books.

    1. Re:allconsuming.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like what Books1st has done, kinda cool.

  42. eBay Strikes Me As Very Vulnerable... by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    eBay Strikes Me As Very Vulnerable... to a distributed auction service run through Kazaa or something. Probably the only thing that stops someone from totally killing eBay with distributed auctions is a silly patent; but even silly patents will run out within most of our lifetimes.

    Of course, verifying who is who on a p2p network is a challenge, but picture this: The RIAA et. al. may force p2p networks to provide user identification.

    Don't see that as a crisis--see it as an opportunity. An opportunity to kill PayPal.

    Of course eBay has tremendous brand recognition, but what happens if somebody starts streaming price comparisons (from Amazon?) through a p2p? Commision-free auctions are just one click from there, if you'll pardon my pun. Then, the patent issue devolves into what it really is, which is just a brawl between corporate legal budgets. Amazon/p2p/hackers vs. eBay/Paypal sounds like a great main event after all the warmup fights we've seen.

    Of course eBay has brand recognition. So did Studebaker and DuMont.

    I'd better hurry up and patent my business method of taking online wagers based on the size of corporate legal's payroll. Oh... wait... a bunch of online brokers have prior art.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  43. I predict the death of SOAP by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    "...either SOAP or XML over HTTP..."

    and given this free choice, I predict that SOAP will quickly become a second choice to XML over HTTP (presumably XML/RPC).

    Never liked SOAP, so this is a gloat. /gloat

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:I predict the death of SOAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah XML is so much better than SOAP.

      erm...

    2. Re:I predict the death of SOAP by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      Don't use soap? Yup, you're a nerd alright.

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    3. Re:I predict the death of SOAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should read the history of SOAP - XML-RPC was its older brother. http://www.xmlrpc.com/stories/storyReader$555 and http://davenet.userland.com/2001/03/02/meAndMicros oft
      The open source community has discovered SOAP's older brother, XML-RPC, and embraced it. If we can all work together, Microsoft and Sun can split the developers who want to be spoon-fed, and the adventurous developers who want to achieve the promise of the Internet can work together. This is my hope.
  44. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see the wikipedia's entry on slaaahdot trolls

  45. My site uses Amazon XML feeds by Tide · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quite frankly, they rock. Almost anything they sell is available and the team is flexible on what all you can do with it. Many of the developers offer their code as examples, and they have examples themselves in the 'kit' of just about any platform you want out there, from ASP to PHP, via SOAP or XLST. Here's my spin on it:

    DVD Jones
    It's a DVD cataloging (and sharing) site that offers recommendations from Amazon filtering out what you already own.

    --

    People think Microsoft is the answer. Microsoft is just the question, "No" is the answer.
  46. galeon crash by ljoas · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I suppose everybody in slashdot uses IE/windows these days. That site crashes Galeon under Linux for me....

    /L

    1. Re:galeon crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crashes in phoenix on Linux too. Doesn't crash when I run it in gdb, though. Figures. At least I can RTFA now.

    2. Re:galeon crash by yatest5 · · Score: 0
      I suppose everybody in slashdot uses IE/windows these days. That site crashes Galeon under Linux for me....

      Report it to the developers of Galeon then, jesus.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
  47. Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by captbunzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This strikes me as interesting. In some ways, what Amazon is doing here is basically an Open Data initiative. I am trying to draw an analogy between this kind of thing and the Open Source Software movement.

    It is useful to consider the long-term implications of this.

    Let's say that lots of people, sites, companies, etc, start using this lovely, free Amazon data. Then Amazon turns around and tells the world in 3 years that people have to start paying for the data. Kind of a suck-you-in-seeming-"open"-but-not-really kind of trick.

    Makes me think that if Debian was to make a judgement on this, the Debian Free Data Guidelines would declare this as NON-FREE (tm) as Amazon can at any point "change the license".

    Now, who knows if Amazon will ever do this. And no, I don't really read all these bad things into it. I think it is cool for them to make the data (and all) avaiable.

    It just makes me think.

    Maybe we need a GNU General Public License to cover "Open Data". Hmmnn...

    1. Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by corbettw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Excellent points. It's worth remembering the CDDB debacle in light of this.

      For those just awakening from a coma, CDDB started by encouraging people to voluntarily build up their database of music CD fingerprints. Then, when they had enough, they started charging people (developers, mainly) to access the data other people had collected for them. There's nothing keeping Amazon from letting people develop cool hacks over the next few years, then either turning off the service or modifying the terms to such an extent that noone uses it anymore, but using those hacks (developed by others) themselves.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by fruey · · Score: 1
      Except that Amazon will make sales on a high amount of people using the data, and raise brand awareness on a number of sites. People might end up clicking back to the Amazon site, or prefer shopping on another site which may become more and more of a "skin" on top of the Amazon e-commerce engine anyway.

      I cannot find a better online shopping experience than Amazon, although the version localised to where I currently live (France) hasn't got anything like the range of the UK site which I used to use, and I don't know if there's a way to transfer my wishlist and all that (haven't looked though)

      It's not open data, it's open access to proprietary data.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Let's say that lots of people, sites, companies, etc, start using this lovely, free Amazon data. Then Amazon turns around and tells the world in 3 years that people have to start paying for the data. Kind of a suck-you-in-seeming-"open"-but-not-really kind of trick."

      If only the laws for 'bait-and-switch tactics' applied to this.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the localized versions of Amazon really suck. The .ca version is still pretty damn bad.

    5. Re:Comparisons between Open Source & Open Data by barton · · Score: 1

      WOW. That's a powerful concept. Create a XML document type with its own GNU license built in...

      Wouldn't that give embrace and extend a kick in the teeth...

  48. MOD PARENT DOWN by Andorion · · Score: 1

    The post makes no sense, the poster obviously didn't even read the article. Whoever modded it up didn't read the article either.

    ~Berj

  49. Maybe not so stupid... by glassgnost · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the game plan at USPTO is to approve everything, lest someone sue the gov't, and letting the applicant's laywers duke it out.

    1. Re:Maybe not so stupid... by Alidar · · Score: 1

      No one can sue the government unless the government allows it.

      --
      HTTP Status 418
    2. Re:Maybe not so stupid... by rhombic · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much it, but it's not sue the government, it's sue each other. Pretty much, the patentor has to sue an infriger, who will then do everything they can to have the court decide that the patent is invalid. Net cost to the USPTO: $0

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  50. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by forkboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's roughly based on the "humor" of 80's standup comic Yakov Smirnoff. He used that joke over and over. (In soviet russia, television watch YOU, etc) Then they made fun of that routine in an episode of Family Guy (the one that was on Cartoon Network tonight, coincedentally) then some /. nerd started saying it, and it stuck.

    That's about what I can piece together knowing what I do about slashdot, television, and bad 80's comedians.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  51. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a wanker with no life, that just sits on /. post the same fucking shit over and over again...

  52. READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE! Come on Moderators, don't be stupid. Meta moderation is going to kill you guys. The parent post made no sense in relation to the article.

    Hey superpulpsicle, suck my meatsicle you whore.

  53. Great for Affiliate Programs by oaf357 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The one problem I've seen with Amazon's affiliate program is that while it covers customization and can display ads based on keywords, those ads aren't very attractive. The best way to target your customers (I've seen) is through very subtle, individual item links. It's not too hard to manage but it's another thing on the list of stuff to check every week (out of stock, discontinued, etc.).

    This could easily solve that. Someone should be able to write a script that can display X number of items fitting these keywords and that listing can be totally customized and worked into your existing web pages quite well resulting in more sales for Amazon and a bigger referral check every quarter.

    I praise Amazon for doing this.

    1. Re:Great for Affiliate Programs by cybaea · · Score: 1
      The one problem I've seen with Amazon's affiliate program is that while it covers customization and can display ads based on keywords, those ads aren't very attractive. The best way to target your customers (I've seen) is through very subtle, individual item links. It's not too hard to manage but it's another thing on the list of stuff to check every week (out of stock, discontinued, etc.).

      Ehm, but that's exactly the point! That's why the Amazon Web Services (which is what we are discussing here) is so useful: by giving you an API to the Amazon database and shopping functionality, it allows you to make the ads in the way that works best on your site, and to maintain them automatically.

      You did read the ar.... nevermind. Slashdot. I forgot :-)

      --
      Hi!
    2. Re:Great for Affiliate Programs by oaf357 · · Score: 1
      I don't think you understand what I meant and yes I did read the article.

      I was referring to the Amazon Associates Program's ugliness. Not the beauty of Amazon Web Services.

      Comprehension is key.

  54. OH PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I promise to mod up any post of the first five people to mod the parent into /. anonymity.

    Simply mod parent down, reply to this post notifying me of your most excellent use of moderation points and I'll mod your next post up (even if it is a first post troll linking to goatse).

    1. Re:OH PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      please tell me, you are joking...

  55. Not you too, Wierd Al! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1


    I hate the RIAA Radar...it just told me that Wierd Al is on Volcano records...and that's an RIAA label...[sniff]

    Oh well, off to KazaaLite to get the album then.

    If the RIAA wants my money at this point, they'll have to sue me for it.

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    1. Re:Not you too, Wierd Al! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another way to get your Weird Al without funding the RIAA is to buy it used (at a record store or online)... at least until selling CDs second hand is made illegal.

  56. NOOO! by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

    We were going in the right direction .... down to 4 .... then some tool brought it back up to 5. And all this time superpulpsicle still thinks he's insightful.

    Where is -5 Didn't RTFM when you need it!

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  57. God Damm the Pusher Man! by gmby · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the old "Get'em Hooked and they'll come back for more."

    1.Give it away free.
    2.Wait for them to get hooked.
    3.Change the rules.(EULA)
    4.Charge big bucks for it!
    5.Profit!

    Sounds like: .gif .mp3 coke speed weed... take your pick.

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  58. In other news... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amazon announced today, two years after they first opened their data for harvesting and scrutiny by 3rd parties, that they have been purposely salting that data for the last 18 months, for the purpose of skewing any results gleened by said 3rd partiers.

    Amazon will be selling their own un-skewing software, for anyone that wishes to know the truth behind what they thought they knew the truth behind before.

    This process of releasing skewed data has been patented, and is known as 'Salty Skew 42-Click'.

    hut!...hut!...hut!

  59. Have been busy... by antek9 · · Score: 1

    ... trying to find out why that businessweek.com page keeps crashing my mozilla.

    What the ...?!

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  60. Wrong kind of hack... by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    Here I was expecting to see a police car on Amazon's banner, or a watermark of Artoo in the background, or a magic pi ball somewhere.

    Dammit.

    P.S. Go here if you don't get this post.

  61. Semi-OT: Article link kills my mozilla by mperrin · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else having this problem? The Business Week page is consistently fatal to Mozilla on both my Red Hat desktop and Debian laptop. It gets about a third of the way through the page load and then
    *poof* no more Mozilla - instant vanishing act.

    Normally I'd just chalk this up to isolated Mozilla suckage, but it happens on both my boxes, every single time I try to load that page. Anyone else encountering this?

    1. Re:Semi-OT: Article link kills my mozilla by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      No idea about Mozilla, but works fine in Konquerer.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  62. lightweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story has no substance. There are no 'hackers', there is not story. It reads like an ad for a failing .com; I'm surprised slashdot would run such tripe.

  63. patent posts by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of the posts about Amazon's one-click patent should be moderated off-topic. Maybe this one too, but I'll risk that to make a point in favor of Amazon. It's really too bad Amazon got painted as bad guys for the one-click patent, even if that was a trivial and laughable patent.

    I advocate buying from Amazon to reward their giving so many features to end users. We take Amazon for granted now, but we should be thankful for their accomplishments. Amazon is chock full of cool features that might have existed in labs or in peoples imaginations, but weren't available for real users until Amazon put them out there: purchase circles, user reviews, multiple competing industry reviews, page previews, author interviews, people-who-bought-this-also-bought info, real-time best seller lists, real-time popularity indicators, wish lists, user-created theme lists, recommendation agents, used book stores/zshops, great searching and great sorting of results... all on the same site, in one place, easily navigable -- fantastic. Really, it's one thing to have an idea and hack it up for a few geek friends to use, it's another thing to put such a powerful toolset as Amazon is in the hands of millions of ordinary users. Not only does Amazon lead the industry, it really created online book selling the way it is today. If it were not for Amazon, the Barnes & Noble online site would probably look a lot like bookstore.com, or worse maybe even B Dalton's web site.

    Amazon rocks, and the APIs are just one more example of that.

    1. Re:patent posts by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Are you the same guy who writes the reviews for all their products?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:patent posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon also runs entirely on Linux...

    3. Re:patent posts by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      If it were not for Amazon, the Barnes & Noble online site would probably look a lot like bookstore.com, or worse maybe even B Dalton's web site.

      Uhhhh, B Dalton's is owned my Barnes & Noble. Here's the press release. Also, just because someone did a good job, doesn't mean they deserve a monopoly on that. If Amazon could patent all that stuff you mentioned, then Barnes & Noble would not have those features unless they licensed them. For very innovative things I think people deserve patents, but one-click is something any programmer would come up with if someone wanted a quicker and simpler way to buy books. Even if the were the first ones to market it as a big feature, patent it, and license it. The idea is nothing special.

  64. This gives me an idea by spakka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like a button on the Mozilla toolbar to initiate a p2p search and download of an album while I'm browsing its page on amazon.

  65. thunk? by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

    :) ...in a way... i like it.

    --
    the computer is online
    i am not at it
    what a waste of ressources
  66. A cool Amazon demo for Mozilla by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ever wanted to know the potential of XUL in Mozilla? Try here for the Mozilla Amazon Browser.


    Mozilla also has support for various web services, SOAP, XML-RPC and more making it ideal to capitalize on burgeoning amount of raw data in XML sites such as Amazon are offering these days.

  67. Re:How long until the excuses stop.. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

    you are just making excuses.

    You can't really expect them to hire experts to analyse every request

    That is the entire point of having Patent Offices in the first place. If they're not gonna bother analysing every suggestion then we should do away with them completely and just use an automated submission system and let the courts decide the legality of any patent. If they don't have the time or people to analyse a request thouroughly then shouldn't it be by default denied rather than granted? Especially since the situation you describe in the courts is the same the world over (big companies are basically un-touchable)

    As for companies sueing when their patent is denied....well if you have a clear and sensible patent system in the first place they should never be in that situation.

    Patent offices in other countries manage to work fine without all these ridiculous patents coming out. I'm not saying they're perfect but it does seem to be mainly the USPTO causing controversy..

  68. Inverted Amazon - Syndication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon is a great data source but is still one-dimensional. The real value to the user is when many great data sources are combined together interestingly. These guys have adopted the newspaper syndicate model and combined Google and Amazon with events from a theatre so you can search for CDs of musicals and get tickets.

  69. USPTO Job Opening by Digital+Mage · · Score: 1

    There must be at least 1 out of work /. reader who can fill this position in Arlington, VA.

    http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ahrpa/ohr/jo bs /jobs.htm

    USPTO Job #: 03-050
    Closing Date: 12/31/03
    Description: Patent Examiner (Computer Engrg, Elec Engrg, Computer Science)
    Salary: $32,819 - $70,959

    Hoping to tip the scales in our favor.

    1. Re:USPTO Job Opening by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Trolls need not apply. :)

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
  70. Anyone tried using the web services yet? by wirde · · Score: 1
    I've played around with the HTTP/XML variant and it does not appear to work the way it should...

    The example taken from the developer kit:
    http://xml.amazon.com/onca/xml3?t=webservices-20&d ev-t=[developerâ(TM)s token goes here]&AuthorSearch=Tom%20Clancy&mode=books&type=li te&page=1&f=xml

    Returns:
    There are no exact matches for the search.

    and the search: http://xml.amazon.com/onca/xml3?t=webservices-20&d ev-t=[developerâ(TM)s token goes here]&AuthorSearch=Isaac%20Asimov&mode=books&type= lite&page=1&f=xml

    Returns a bunch of CD's (seems like the search is made for music instead of books)

    --
    in GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUin GNUSegmentation fault
  71. Readerware does this! by edspunky · · Score: 1

    check out readerware. it does all of this for you: you scan in your cd's, books, or dvd's, and it goes to amazon, tower, etc. to pull up the relevant info and populate your database for you. it can decode and use cuecats, as well. i wouldn't have been able to catalogue my 1500+ cd's without it!

  72. oh, moderators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly people mistake humor these days as something that is "interesting" and "insightful". Grab that funny stick (slight variant of the clue stick) and bop your noodle with it a couple times.

  73. uh... Sc0re:5, Funny? Now, really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so it's a typo. But clearly a bunch of dumb-ass virgin moderators who wouldn't know sex from their right hand marked this up as funny because they thought it had something to do with conception, contraceptives, or some other such thing as would pop into their pr0n-infested minds.

    Inconceivable means exactly what the original poster meant. Namely:

    1. Impossible to comprehend or grasp fully: inconceivable folly; an inconceivable disaster.

    2. So unlikely or surprising as to have been thought impossible; unbelievable: an inconceivable victory against all odds. ... dumbasses!

  74. Even better.... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I do not think this word is spelled the way you think it is spelled.

    Sean

  75. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, this joke is at least as old as Bob Hope's 1964 book "I Owe Russia $1200". Hope traveled to Russia, and on his return was asked by an interviewer "Do they have television there?" Of course, he replied, "Yes, but it watches you."

  76. They mostly work... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    I've been using their web services for a while now for BooksUnderReview.com to grab review info and while the interface and XML over http are great, Amazon's web services servers have a tendancy to become overloaded 20-30% of the time. I finally had to write into my scripts to do extensive error checking to make sure we really did get a completely valid response before processing any of the info.

    There are entire websites based around the premise of using dynamic AWS (Amazon Web Services links), but with the AWS unreliability most of us have found that "local pre-caching" works best. For places looking for product info in an easy to get fashion, AWS works great as long as you plan around it's non-available times.

    Some of their restrictions are very annoying (1 second between accesses and content storage time restrictions), but understandable. Still, it's something I'd love to see more and more major sites using.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  77. Not the same at all by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    But in this case Amazon is not using us to collect data (here I treat user comments as a separate issue as they are not put in through the external web service I believe)... they are just offering us a window into a datastore they require to run their business.

    I liken it to putting in the biggest window possible in your storefront so people can see what you have to offer and be drawn to you for sales. They are extending that concept in N dimensions to provide a fractal multi-dimensional storefront window, if you will, that lets many many people see in to various parts of the store.

    With that analogy in place, you can see that for Amazon to close this window to the public (like shutting down access or charging fees) is roughly equivalent to putting boards over all the windows of the shop and then trying to convince people to come in and buy.

    CDDB is more like a freelance photogrpaher taking pictures of all of us, then selling the pictures for a huge profit and not giving us any of the cut.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  78. Re:uh... Sc0re:5, Funny? Now, really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... dumbasses"

    And you're the one who's missing the bleedingly obvious Princess Bride references.

    Pot, Kettle, Black and so forth...

  79. some stuff i'm working on by gnurb · · Score: 1
    Both interact with amazon's xml streams

    passthelove.com lets people find dvds, books, and music to 'share the love' on and save 10%.

    tunebounce.com is a music reccomendation and rating engine that uses Amazon's similiarity search to find related artists.

    AWS kick ass!

    --
    hooray! it's a sex wiki
  80. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Slashdot America, Soviets televise YOU =p

  81. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's about what I can piece together knowing what I do about slashdot, television, and bad 80's comedians.

    Only on /. can you get a level 5 informative post with that knowledge

  82. MS Bash Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, judging by the grandparent post, they are a windows user, in that case you beg an plead to Microsoft to make an application that will check the license for you, and then when MS discover that it could be used to check on their own licenses, they decide to put in DRM to not allow reading the license, or denying the license, only knowing it changed, and accepting it.

    OK I'm done.... for now. (Thank goodness for the "Post Anonymously" Box.

  83. *REAL* Amazons by fm6 · · Score: 1

    The Amazons on TV do no such thing. Those are the only ones we care about. Forget all that Greek myth crap!