You can bet that nobody wants to watch my home videos.
No kidding. Homespun nerd TV shows would be like having tubgirl as Slashdot's background image. You'd have to look at something vile in addition to it spewing a bunch shit.
Re:Offtopic...but in good will. Need a Gmail accou
on
Web Search Garage
·
· Score: 1
so.. desperate.. for gmail.... need gmail...
Perfect chore for google. Search groups for "gmail invite", sorted by date, email the most recent people offering invites. I got my account in less than an hour that way. Milage may vary.
Re:Google hacks a better option...
on
Web Search Garage
·
· Score: 1
Do you know any good way to search for a review of a piece of electrical equipment by model number
Try groups.google.com (of course, you will trade commercials for diode flamewars but you can get a lot of useful info.)
What I learned there is that any system that you don't have to show up and identify yourself before you vote is very easy to defraud...It's also why absentee ballots are scary.
I agree internet voting would be harder to protect against fraud, but:
In Washington state, you identify yourself by no other means than your signature.
At the polls, you sign your name on the voter registry, get a ballot and vote.
With absentee ballots, you put your ballot in a 'security envelope', then in another envelope which you sign. They verify you by an existing copy of your signature. You do not have to show ID at any point.
It looks that way because of how the liberals and Kerry have been making such asses of themselves lately. The libs had it...and then they threw it away. -1 Troll.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey, pudge, you're an editor. Could you do us all a favor and kick michael's ass? Oh, and maybe key taco's car too.
Thanks
When Slashdot first started [slashdot.org] these political stories, they promised to "do [their] best to be fair with story selection."
However, when stories like this are posted I begin to wonder if they truly had any intention of being fair in the first place.
Tell me about it. The hardly accept any of my submissions
Orignal Submission Text
FAQs have been around since the beginning of the web & most of them still suck
While I agree with the second part of this statement, FAQs significantly pre-date the web.
Maybe he should have said, "The really started to suck at the beginning of the web." Most usenet FAQs I have read tended to be very good.
You can bet that nobody wants to watch my home videos.
No kidding. Homespun nerd TV shows would be like having tubgirl as Slashdot's background image. You'd have to look at something vile in addition to it spewing a bunch shit.
Call me when they have something to cure a slashdot addiction.
I have a one year cure - Post the output of this:
perl -e 'print rand($_) for (1..1000)'
To slashdot every two minutes for about 20 minutes. You will get banned for a year, able to only view a but ugly pink page saying as much.
I would spend hours upon hours trolling every used record store in the Bay Area
How? Were you slipping goatse printouts in the liners?
A paper in town of 46,000 people makes an endorsement? Who cares if it's Bush's 'adopted' home town?
nt
so.. desperate.. for gmail.... need gmail...
Perfect chore for google. Search groups for "gmail invite", sorted by date, email the most recent people offering invites. I got my account in less than an hour that way. Milage may vary.
Do you know any good way to search for a review of a piece of electrical equipment by model number
Try groups.google.com (of course, you will trade commercials for diode flamewars but you can get a lot of useful info.)
http://google.com
The end.
Oh, wait, I don't suck that bad. It's just the threading threshold. (../waiting for 30 day ban on last shell account)
Ok, I really suck at links.
void liberal_hatred( void ) {
return liberal_hatred();
}
# 2004-10-01 21:17:00 Dems Panicking, Resort To Scare Tactics, Theft (Politics,Politics) (rejected)
"Books for Dummies"
Damnit, where am I going to get 10 million dollars?
A book review on HTML standards posted on Slashdot.
(Google News: Beta Not Make Money) really bad grammar? Do they have editors over there?
I think it's a pun for Google News Better Not Make Money (or there will be serious ramifications.)
It was only a matter of time before O'Reilly used them all up.
What I learned there is that any system that you don't have to show up and identify yourself before you vote is very easy to defraud...It's also why absentee ballots are scary.
I agree internet voting would be harder to protect against fraud, but:
In Washington state, you identify yourself by no other means than your signature.
At the polls, you sign your name on the voter registry, get a ballot and vote.
With absentee ballots, you put your ballot in a 'security envelope', then in another envelope which you sign. They verify you by an existing copy of your signature. You do not have to show ID at any point.
I received about 10 automated phone calls from some hotly contested positions in the Washington State primary. (democrats only, no republicans.)
They didn't leave it open to any 'rinux' jokes.
It looks that way because of how the liberals and Kerry have been making such asses of themselves lately. The libs had it...and then they threw it away. -1 Troll.