Basically apps don't have an installer, they are distributed in a directory, with all the binaries, files, etc. in a directory that you copy to install. The Finder treats the App Directory as one file (Dbl click on the app dir, it launches the program). You drag it to the trash to delete it, drag it to the desktop or applications directory, or home dir, or what have you to "install" it.
But doesn't NATing kind of force you to have a firewall in a sense? At least for machines behind the NAT? How do you route incoming connections unambigously? Pick a random box on the NAT LAN? Duplicate the packet and send it to all the machines? I think to have NAT you must have a firewall at least for new incoming connections.
its not really acceptable for a home computer either. If those lines are in a cron job apt can't ask you the questions it occasionally needs to ask you.
Wouldn't you also have to prove Nietzsche wrong, or IOW that god is still alive? Or at least he died recently enough for his copyright to still be in effect?
ah yes Linux is the most secure os ever. And bzImages work with every bootloader too. (funny, yaboot doesn't seem to like them. I guess when your computer doesn't boot at all its pretty secure).
Re:Um, have you ever actually read the novels?
on
Bay of Souls
·
· Score: 1
He's description is extraneous. You could just read it as imagine if William Gibson wrote a Bond novel.
I think he is aware that's a Bond-esque plot he was just describing the plot of this particular novel.
much as the windows world has zip? How can you compare rpm and zip? rpm = packaging system, zip = archive / compression format. It would be better to compare rpm with MSI.
Really? That seems I dunno, counter-productive. Look Cocoa! Objective-C! Oh, but the finder is still based of off OS9-era APIs. But what do I know. I still don't actually have one of my very own.
* Isn't afraid of computers ok... * Willing to use a command line Not neccessarily * Knows what a partition/hard drive is As above. * Comfortable with various GUIs You don't have to be comfortable.
You'd be suprised at the number of non-techie friend's computers I managed to sneak various distros onto. (Mostly Debian). But its definitely reaching the point where if you don't want to think about most things you can pop a Mandrake or redhat CD in and click next a couple of times.
iptables + nmap -O? Maybe...
You could write some overly-complicated script. When someone goes to connect have nmap do an OS fingerprint scan on them and then if you don't like the results add an iptables rule based on their host.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank Jebus!
This has nothing to do with Linux. Of course you're probably trolling anyway and I fell for it. Shrug.
Basically apps don't have an installer, they are distributed in a directory, with all the binaries, files, etc. in a directory that you copy to install. The Finder treats the App Directory as one file (Dbl click on the app dir, it launches the program). You drag it to the trash to delete it, drag it to the desktop or applications directory, or home dir, or what have you to "install" it.
Speaking of which I think the solution should probably be ROX / OS X style App Dir type installions.
Even after finding all the codes to add the DVD, VCR, stereo, etc., the "mode" orientation of the remote drives me crazy.
So its EMACS then is it?
Doncha mean:
Gemini: You're gonna die a virgin, twice.
Apologies to Chris Rock.
But doesn't NATing kind of force you to have a firewall in a sense? At least for machines behind the NAT? How do you route incoming connections unambigously? Pick a random box on the NAT LAN? Duplicate the packet and send it to all the machines? I think to have NAT you must have a firewall at least for new incoming connections.
You could conceivibly build galeon for W2K.
its not really acceptable for a home computer either. If those lines are in a cron job apt can't ask you the questions it occasionally needs to ask you.
Wouldn't you also have to prove Nietzsche wrong, or IOW that god is still alive? Or at least he died recently enough for his copyright to still be in effect?
ah yes Linux is the most secure os ever. And bzImages work with every bootloader too. (funny, yaboot doesn't seem to like them. I guess when your computer doesn't boot at all its pretty secure).
He's description is extraneous. You could just read it as imagine if William Gibson wrote a Bond novel. I think he is aware that's a Bond-esque plot he was just describing the plot of this particular novel.
According to Mplayer its DivX. It does play in mplayer btw. I don't know ab out Xine or anything else.
yes it is. Did you not notice the play video button? Sheesh. Here I'll make it easy: mms://windowsmedia.dvlabs.com/adcritic/ibm-linux-p rodigy.asf
You can also just dop rodigy.asf
$ mplayer mms://windowsmedia.dvlabs.com/adcritic/ibm-linux-
much as the windows world has zip? How can you compare rpm and zip? rpm = packaging system, zip = archive / compression format. It would be better to compare rpm with MSI.
ksh, bash, zsh, tcsh, etc..? Which one is standard? (Ok, practically every distro has bash by default, but still.)
Really? That seems I dunno, counter-productive. Look Cocoa! Objective-C! Oh, but the finder is still based of off OS9-era APIs. But what do I know. I still don't actually have one of my very own.
Thats a nifty trick. Thanks.
Could probably make it headless for that matter. Just have it in the session startup scripts and it would exit when everything else did.
ok...
* Willing to use a command line
Not neccessarily
* Knows what a partition/hard drive is
As above.
* Comfortable with various GUIs
You don't have to be comfortable.
You'd be suprised at the number of non-techie friend's computers I managed to sneak various distros onto. (Mostly Debian). But its definitely reaching the point where if you don't want to think about most things you can pop a Mandrake or redhat CD in and click next a couple of times.
iptables + nmap -O? Maybe... You could write some overly-complicated script. When someone goes to connect have nmap do an OS fingerprint scan on them and then if you don't like the results add an iptables rule based on their host.
It was obviously a typo. He probably meant Windows 200K.
Enthuisum == Flamebait?
go pchdtv.