Slashdot Mirror


Geek Eye for the Average Guy

Yxes writes "Fortune designed an experiment: give three geeks US$15,000 and three days to bring a family of four up to date with technology. The average family doesn't know which DVD player to buy or how to setup a wireless network. What happens when even the geeks can't get it to work?"

507 comments

  1. No Fair by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    3 days?! What a blatant anti-Gentoo bias!

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:No Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you can't do it in 3 days, it's not suitable for the average user anyway.

    2. Re:No Fair by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You just have to have your priorities right. Spend $5k of it on a bitchin' dual opteron and you can have gentoo, kde, and gnome built in three days, easy. Hell, maybe even two days. This is assuming the broadband is installed on day one...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:No Fair by anthonyclark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking as someone who just installed gentoo on a dual opteron*, I can tell you that it'll take a lot longer than 3 days to make the necessary code changes for kde and gnome to compile.

      That said, less than 2 hours to bootstrap and emerge system is most wonderful.

      * The dual opteron now has suse back on it, due to the opteron/clisp clusterfuck.

      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    4. Re:No Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must love to punish yourself (masochist) if you like to do those stage 1 or 2 gentoo installs, (like watching paint dry)...

      i like Linux and use it everyday, but if i can not get it installed/configured in less than 1 hour it wont be running on my computer, i rather use Slackware or Redhat and yes they both run just as good as any gentoo can...

    5. Re:No Fair by ch3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Raah, I can't bear this... I've just re-installed my Gentoo Laptop this week-end and it took me only 7 hours to get a full GNOME 2.4.0 desktop up and running from stage 3.
      (Of course I protected myself of the evil QT/KDE dependencies...)

      This is a message for the Gentoo Advocacy movement.

    6. Re:No Fair by beebware · · Score: 1

      That's nothing: when I reinstall Windows, I can (from a blank formatted hard drive) be up and running in less than 3 hours: fully patched - without any of those OpenSSH flaws which seems to plague Linux.
      Bah - just shows how large, slow and bloated Linux is ;)

    7. Re:No Fair by Shivaji+Maharaj · · Score: 1

      Miles off topic.!!
      Seems you haven't got bored with installing :-). I got bored reinstalling - so now I use Norton ghost. Reinstall in just 18 minutes :-). Upgrade your motherboard and get norton ghost and and antivirus free.
      N.B: Not associated with newegg - just love shopping there.

      --
      We do not have a history of profitable operations. Our future SCOsource licensing revenue is uncertain.
    8. Re:No Fair by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, even installing from stage1's, it never took my 2GHz P4 more than a day to compile Gentoo and KDE.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:No Fair by drivers · · Score: 5, Funny

      you can have gentoo, kde, and gnome built in three days, easy. Hell, maybe even two days.

      Because as we all know, gnome wasn't built in a day.

    10. Re:No Fair by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I can (from a blank formatted hard drive) be up and running in less than 3 hours: fully patched

      Really? It takes 3 hours for XP?. I can (and have) get a Linux box up and running and fully patched in about an hour, if I use RedHat 7.3. That is for a full install from a blank disk, using CDs, not a ghost. I haven't tried RH 8 or 9, so they may be equally as fast.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re:No Fair by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      sweet mother mary! what a troll.

      I can too, but the only application I could use would be notepad. Sad, that you don't have to compile the system, none of the apps are installed, you have to reboot half a dozen times for the changes to take effect, AND you have to tend the foul beast the entire time; contrast that to (say) debian (a 'difficult' non-source distro), from scratch (netinst), with only a little tending at the beginning, with a full compliment of applications, getting installed in roughly half the time (depending on how fast your disk is, how much ram you have, and the speed of your proc. mainly disk and network speed, though). I do that fairly regularly on a 550MHz athlon w/ 386M and an IBM Deskstar (13G).

      If only apt were able to concurrently download and install packages, the time would be significantly less.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:No Fair by lithiumcloud · · Score: 1

      and my pentium 133 no more than a week and a half... (from stage1)

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    13. Re:No Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sweet mother mary! what a troll.

      Hello, pot? This is kettle. Yeah, listen - you're black.

      What the hell are you talking about, reboot half a dozen times? Tend a foul beast? Seriously, what the fuck? As for your half the time, it takes about 40 minutes on a computer similar to yours - PIII 600, with 256, and a western digital 10 gig, 5400 rpm. I seriously doubt you're installing jack shit in 20 minutes.

      People like you is why open source goes nowhere - you can't seem to make a point without distorting reality all to hell and back. Great job, asshole.

    14. Re:No Fair by sfire · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you want, you could use the jigdo images, and either have a bunch of cds burned, or a dvd. Of stable, testing, or unstable. I just used this because at work we only have a T1, but at my school we have a much faster connection, so I burned the first unstable cd. While almost a week old, it still had quite a few of the packages up-to-date, and an install straight to unstable was not that difficult or time consuming.

    15. Re:No Fair by brad-x · · Score: 1

      But... it builds in about four hours on here.. :P

      --
      // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- //
    16. Re:No Fair by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      That's nothing: when I reinstall Windows, I can (from a blank formatted hard drive) be up and running in less than 3 hours: fully patched - without any of those OpenSSH flaws which seems to plague Linux.

      Oh sure. However the reality is you'll likely wind up plagued with one of the many dozen maladies that's presently afflicting said platform before you can run your second round of Windows Updates.

      Quoth Homer; D'oh!

      Seriously, though. It's called the Gentoo Reference Platform. I can download and install a fully-functional KDE system in a matter of hours. At that point I can add/remove functionality and re-compile (optimize++) apps at will.

      (Sorry 'bout that. I see how firmly your tongue was planted in your cheek and I apologize for dislodging it. :P )

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    17. Re:No Fair by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Seems you haven't got bored with installing :-). I got bored reinstalling - so now I use Norton ghost. Reinstall in just 18 minutes :-). Upgrade your motherboard and get norton ghost and and antivirus free.

      Funny how you mentioned "Upgrade your motherboard" and "Ghost" in a thread discussing Windows XP. Ever tried to simply "Upgrade your motherboard" whilst running Windows XP? It's not pretty. :P

      The fix, I must say, is as elegant as any Microsoft solution; "(R)epair" your installation (the second, not first "(R)epair" option) which brings you back to a fresh-installed, pre-SP1 level at which point you must re-download the SP and all security and critical updates that've been released since the inception of that dreadful XPerience.

      Microsoft's answer? Windows 2000 and XP are so "optimized" that they store all your driver information in one file which needs to be re-initialized. The method of re-initializing same? Re-install or repair (essentially a full re-install, but your users, preferences, and applications remain (mostly) in-tact).

      Boy, I love that company. Used to be a motherboard upgrade was 1 billable bench hour. Now we get to ding people for two; sometimes two and a half or even three! Woo!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    18. Re:No Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rebooting only half a dozen times on a windows install would be an incredible feat. Last time I was home i did the various exploit-patches on my parents comp and it took at least 3 reboots just to get it patched. half the patches say you can only install it by itself (and have to reboot after the install), and every time you install one patch, you then have to get the patches for that patch. it's insane. that's not even counting how many times you have to reboot for the installation process, and installing applications. why the fuck do I need to reboot just to play a fucking video game? and to think this is 100 times better in windows XP than in windows 98. it's ridiculous.

      on my gentoo install (im not any of the people from before on this thread) I had to reboot once, and that was when i recompiled my kernel...something you can't do in windows even if you wanted to.

    19. Re:No Fair by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Go back, and try to count those reboots again. Add one to your count every time you perform a task that requires a reboot. That's probably 3 for the initial install (depending on whether or not it wants to play nice with your hardware), and then another 4+ (conservatively) for all the patches from Windows Update. And that's on an XP box. Double it for Win2k, etc. easily.

      How about MS Office? DirectX? Etc. etc. You'll need to reboot for each of those.

      We're talking about a day-long event to get a windows system back up and running, here. Not just the OS - that's a fairly trivial matter compared to the whole picture. I dread reinstalling my windows system - not because of the time investment of installing the OS, so much as the application reinstallation.

      Install an app, reboot: wash, rinse, repeat. Sure, you can cheat and install two apps at a time, -sometimes-. But still, I find that I've forgotten (or neglected) to install one of my applications from CD. It takes freaking forever: enter serial, wait w/ the window forceably on top, reboot. sit. repeat. I'm sure that, in your case, this process takes less time, since you're not using the actual products.

      Add all those things up, and then combine it with the fact that a fully-functional install of any distro is probably under 3G, while an average install of Windows 2k+ is over 7G, while a comparable install to that of a linux distro is over 10G (not including games), should tell you something about the time investment required. Especially when you consider the 'individual installation' requirements of most windows apps.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  2. Some things for most people: by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Funny
    For the Audio Visual setup:
    1. Get them down to one remote - Nice receiver, learning remote - properly programmed, buttons all labeled
    2. DVR - TiVo or Replay TV, its a must have. Enable the 30 second skip button on the TiVo remote.
    3. Adjust the TV properly - turn the sharpness the whole way down, go through all the test patterns and balance the colors.
    For the computer:
    1. Open source software - Install software from the Open CD, Linux if they are up for it..
    2. Decruft the mouse and keyboard (although even most geeks could use this)
    3. A decent home network, add more computers as needed.
    4. A nice office chair and good ergonomics - switch them over to the dvorak keybord and make them practice.
    For the kitchen:
    1. Print out list of all pizza delivery options
    2. Stock fridge with Mt. Dew and Guinness.
    Personal grooming:
    1. Pocket Protector ;-)
    1. Re:Some things for most people: by hornrimsylvia · · Score: 1

      you forgot culture! -lord of the rings dvd's -anime dvd's -dr. who dvd's -some spoon cd's for that nerdy indie rock intellegencia -hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy -some sort of rpg computer game

    2. Re:Some things for most people: by andyrut · · Score: 4, Funny

      switch them over to the dvorak keybord and make them practice.

      In three days? They'd have to have quite a bit of motivation to accomplish this - I'd suggest breaking one of the family members' hands and forcing them to learn right- or left-handed Dvorak.

    3. Re:Some things for most people: by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      How many geeks themselves use a DVORAK keyboard? Myself, I've never seen one in person, let alone used one.

      If I wanted one, where (preferably in Canada) could I get one, how much should I expect to spend, and how long should it take me to get used to it, considering I've been using a QWERTY for close to 9 years?

    4. Re:Some things for most people: by Throtex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're supposedly technologically illiterate. I somehow doubt it'd be 'switching over' so much as 'learning to type from scratch'. Might as well give them the typing skills that will confuse the heck out of them when they sit down in front of good ol' QWERTY at any other computer. ;)

    5. Re:Some things for most people: by DeadSea · · Score: 1

      The change is almost always done in software. I myself use the dvorak layout with a regular qwerty keyboard. You really have to know how to touch type as looking at the keys only confuses you. ;-) I am a real geek because I do this and I dare you to say otherwise.

    6. Re:Some things for most people: by Throtex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FORTUNE's requirements: The products needed to be practical, easy to use, fully installed, basically idiot-proof, and very, very cool. I'm sorry, but did you recommend Linux? I don't think that meets any of the above requirements for the typical home user. ;)

    7. Re:Some things for most people: by ivan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Enable the 30 second skip button on the TiVo remote

      Ick. Fastforwarding is faster, easier, and more accurate. I hate the 30 second skip.

    8. Re:Some things for most people: by PD · · Score: 1

      You need a supply of T-shirts that were acquired by begging them at computer shows.

    9. Re:Some things for most people: by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      About the one remote... it's handy, but sometimes turning stuff on is like playing a damned instrument. I have a 8 way programmable RCA job (low end, maybe $60), and to watch a DVD I have to push.

      1.TV mode
      2. TV power
      3. DVD mode
      4. DVD power
      5. Tuner mode
      6. Tuner power
      7. Tuner, select DVD input
      8. DVD play
      9. Tuner, adjust volume as needed

      That said, I still keep my DVD remote handy, as it has a buncha speeds of ffW/rew that I never programmed.

      One really cool thing my remote has is macros. I hit one button and (for example) it powers on the tuner and switches it to CD input, powers on the CD player and hits play. 1 click tunes...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    10. Re:Some things for most people: by ibpooks · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of my co-workers uses a DVORAK keyboard. We, of course, ridicule him to no end.

    11. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTHERWISE

    12. Re:Some things for most people: by olim · · Score: 1

      The only definition of decruft I could find had to do with pulling unnecessary characters out of text strings. Why would you do this to a keyboard, or, moreover, a mouse?

    13. Re:Some things for most people: by mechugena · · Score: 1

      Well, if you like the Dvorak layout but get confused, then why not switch the keycaps around?

    14. Re:Some things for most people: by sahala · · Score: 1

      I grew up learning querty (learned to touch type when I was 9 I believe). When I started college I switched over to Dvorak in about 2 weeks. It's not that hard to jump back and forth, and most Dvorak-typers I know say the same thing.

    15. Re:Some things for most people: by Schwartzboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      For some reason, I'm reminded of "Query Eye for the Database Guy" (anyone read Foxtrot? Bueller? Bueller?). Remember, a null pointer doesn't have to be a dull pointer!
      But really....
      "and stacks random CDs behind the TV and on top of the dryer."? *shudder*
      Pearls before swine, says I.

      --
      "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    16. Re:Some things for most people: by ichimunki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why would you buy a new keyboard? Just rearrange the keys on a QWERTY and choose a new keymap file (or change your Control Panel settings). Should handle most of the differences. I haven't tried this myself, but now I'm tempted. :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    17. Re:Some things for most people: by ePhil_One · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Ick. Fastforwarding is faster, easier, and more accurate. I hate the 30 second skip.

      Agreed. I think most of the fans of the 30 sec skip feature haven't really used Tivo, or somehow think even seeing flashes of commercials will corrupt them. Heck, FF twice, count to 8, and hit play works shockingly well, but often I spot a comercial I WANT to see and go watch it. Often times, its more entertaining than the show I'm watching. (Say, last nights Monday Night Football)

      But make sure you get them DirecTiVo with a 120GB drive upgrade. Ah, the joy! (and cheaper, too :)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    18. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not that hard to jump back and forth, and most Dvorak-typers I know say the same thing.

      hmmmm....

      DvorakTypers == Liars;

      Thanks, that's useful to know!

    19. Re:Some things for most people: by Jetson · · Score: 1
      Get them down to one remote - Nice receiver, learning remote - properly programmed, buttons all labeled

      These things rarely work for me. Even after finding all the codes to add the DVD, VCR, stereo, etc., the "mode" orientation of the remote drives me crazy. When I press the buttons I often don't know what box is going to react -- I want to change the channel on my digital cable box but since I last used the remote in "TV" mode (for the on/off button) the TV switches away from video-in to RF-in and changes channel. After I switch the TV to video2-in and turn on the VCR and hit "play" I have to reselect the "TV" mode or "Stereo" mode to change volume levels. Most of the time I just leave the "all-in-one" remote in a single mode and keep the other three or four remotes next to the sofa.

      What I need, I guess, is a Palm-type remote with the ability to add/remove buttons according to need and to arrange them in pages according to the way *I* think instead of forcing me to work in "modes". Hmm. Maybe I should just buy a Palm and use the IR port.

    20. Re:Some things for most people: by DeadSea · · Score: 1
      You need to get the Reciever. I bought a nice Onkyo reciever. There are several different price points for similar models based on how many devices you want to connect and how good you want the sound and video quality to be.

      The best thing about a good reciever is that you don't have to do your nine button thing to watch a DVD.

      1. Plug your TV into a switched outlet on the back of the reciever. At this point you never use your tv remote again. The TV is basically a monitor and it turns on and off with the reciver.
      2. Plug each of your players into an input on the reciever.
      3. The reciever comes with a learning remote. Program it for each of your devices.
      Now to watch a DVD I have to do the following.
      1. Power on the reciever, the tv turns on.
      2. Put the remote into DVD mode
      3. Switch the reciever input to DVD
      4. Press play
      The only gripe I have is that steps two and three are separate. Pressing the button on the remote to switch the input to the DVD should also switch the remote mode. The best part is that I have the switching buttons in either mode so you can do steps two and three in either mode. Similarly for the volume, the volume adjusts the volume on the reciever no matter what mode the remote is in. This is all possible because the remote is a learning remote and I've overridden a lot of the default button functionality such as the volume for each device and the mode input button for each device to all operate the reciever.
    21. Re:Some things for most people: by 2short · · Score: 1

      On every keyboard I've ripped apart (several) the keys slope differently between the different rows, giving the keyboard a slightly dished shape from top to bottom. You don't notice it until you rearange the keys and they're all wonky.

      Relabeling the keys is an option, but most labeling methods don't hold up well. And it's a pain, considering you can buy a Dvorak labeled keyboard for not too much money.

    22. Re:Some things for most people: by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      That's not fair man... make me drool over the waaaaay nicer receiver...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    23. Re:Some things for most people: by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't know about 30 second skip for the first year and a half that I owned a TiVo. I turned it on and for me there is no going back. It is much easier to skip over the commercials with it. No counting, no being annoyed when TiVo changes the fast forward speeds with an update (yes they did this once). With the replay button, it is easy to go back if you overshoot, so accuracy isn't a huge issue for me. I don't see any of the commercials, but then there are none that I want to watch. None. Whatever works for you, I'm glad there is a choice in the matter. Three cheers for configurability.

    24. Re:Some things for most people: by atheken · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I grew up learning querty (learned to touch type when I was 9 I believe)."

      and they didn't teach you how to spell it?

      QWERTY - it's on the keyboard if you've forgotten.

      This is slashdot, of course I am going to split-hairs! :-D

    25. Re:Some things for most people: by clmensch · · Score: 1

      I disagree...I LOVE the 30 second skip on my ReplayTV. I especially like that I can hit a number and then the skip button and it skips that many MINUTES ahead. Nice feature. In the end it's really just a matter of personal preference, so who cares?

      What I like most about my ReplayTV 5080 is the AUTOMATIC commercial skip. It works surprisingly well, and when it doesn't it's usually because it doesn't realize commercials have started...so I just do it manually. It hardly if ever goes too far into the show from a commercial break.

      --
      There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    26. Re:Some things for most people: by Santos+L.+Halper · · Score: 1

      I have a Dish Network PVR that includes a 30 seconds forward skip and a 10 second rewind skip. After a fair amount of testing, I've found that the fastest way for me to get through commercials is to keep skipping forward until I see the show, then hit the 10 second rewind button once or twice.

      --

      "Ask not for whom the bone bones. It bones for thee." --Bender
    27. Re:Some things for most people: by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, if you're gonna attempt to turn them into dorks, go all the way and move them into their parent's basement. THEN you can have some extra money in the budget for pron!

    28. Re:Some things for most people: by sharkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I picked up an IBM Model M off Ebay for ~$12US + S&H. Not only is it THE keyboard, but the keycaps are made to be moved. Easy to rearrainge to match whatever keymap you choose in software.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    29. Re:Some things for most people: by A+Naughty+Moose · · Score: 1

      If you're using an ergonomical keyboard, such as the MS Natural keyboard, keycap positions are not interchangable.

    30. Re:Some things for most people: by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you have an optical mouse, flip it over, twist open the ball cover and remove the ball and all the dirt, and other stuff we'll not examine closely, out. Put the ball back, and close the cover. You have now decrufted your mouse. The process is simlar for trackballs, though even optical trackballs collect cruft, though it doesn't affect performace in that case.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    31. Re:Some things for most people: by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      DVORAK isn't an acronym, it's a proper name. I don't think August Dvorak spelled his last name in capital letters.

      (now you can ridicule me. :)

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    32. Re:Some things for most people: by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well it is a valid complaint. You do have to go out of your way to misspell qwerty.

    33. Re:Some things for most people: by jimsum · · Score: 1

      If you have macros, why are you pushing all those buttons? Shouldn't you program a macro to do it? I have programmed my Philips Pronto to do similar functions for each device in two completely separate stereo systems.

      With the Pronto, you can program as many macros as you wish and assign them to any remote "button"; and since it is a touch-screen remote, your buttons can have any labels or arrangement you want. You can program all the different speeds for your DVD player or the surround modes on your receiver, and label them so that you can remember which buttons to press. This remote doesn't just learn any code, it can use codes that other people have learned and posted on the Internet!

      There are only two downsides to this remote, the price ($200-$400) and the time it takes to program it exactly how you want (about a week). But despite trying about 8 different remotes over the last 10 years, the Pronto is the first remote that allowed me to put ALL my other remotes away; I never have to use anything but the Pronto.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    34. Re:Some things for most people: by sahala · · Score: 1
      and they didn't teach you how to spell it?

      hah...I stand corrected. yeah unfortunately pressing the actual QWERTY keys gives me this: ',.pyf

    35. Re:Some things for most people: by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd give him the finger too, if it weren't for that damned carpal tunnel.

    36. Re:Some things for most people: by jd · · Score: 4, Funny
      Look, if I decrufted the keyboards and mice I've
      used over time, they'd need to open up a new
      landfill site.


      The other thing you've got to teach them is that
      if you pour coffee down the keyboard, it runs down
      the wires and into the network, attracting spam.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    37. Re:Some things for most people: by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of those goofy 3-in-1 20 dollar jobbers from Best Buy.

      There are cool touchscreen based uber-remotes for hundreds of dollars which do exactly what you're talking about. The interface changed for each device, you can program macros (switch tv to component in, adjust home theater to appropriate movie watching settings, start dvd) and do all kinds of wonderful magical shit.

      And if you have a puppy, it will just LOVE the taste of it. I've discovered that puppies love to eat remote controls (because they smell people on them).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    38. Re:Some things for most people: by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

      One of my co-workers uses a DVORAK keyboard. We, of course, ridicule him to no end.

      I'll bet you guys and your anti-DVORAK jokes are a real riot.

    39. Re:Some things for most people: by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in reading the article(s) I linked it looks like relabeling might be a nice short-term option for trying it out, but not a long-term solution.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    40. Re:Some things for most people: by bellings · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't get it. Why the hell would I want to program my remote?

      I want a button that says "go".

      I really don't care if I'm using VCR, Tivo, DVD, cable, broadcast, satellite, baby monitoring cam, or anything else.

      I just want a "go" button.

      After that, if I can fast forward, or rewind, or pause, or get a closeup, or change the volume, I suppose those buttons could light up, so that I know that they'll do something.

      But, other than that, I'll be happy with "go".

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    41. Re:Some things for most people: by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Have you tried the 30 second skip on football? I managed to watch the entire Dolphins / Bills game in 30 minutes on Sunday. It was amazing, just like watching the cut tapes when I played college football (for game film they only record the plays, thus the "cut tape"). I left my apartment wondering if I had actually watched a game or not it went by so quickly. Definitly not good for my A.D.D.

    42. Re:Some things for most people: by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Unless your devices have discrete remote codes, macro programming is going to be tough. For example, if you're going to make a macro that switches all your devices on, you'd better hope for more than an on/off toggle feature. If one f your devices is already on, you'll see what I mean. :)

    43. Re:Some things for most people: by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      only 3 macro buttons :( Like I said, it's a low end remote.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    44. Re:Some things for most people: by DragonWyatt · · Score: 1

      ...for ~$12US + S&H

      So your total cost was about $75?

      (Geeks who've picked up this keyboard will know what I mean...)

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    45. Re:Some things for most people: by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      What happens when you want to put on mood music? you have to go over and turn off the TV.

    46. Re:Some things for most people: by Cut · · Score: 2, Informative
      I used to have those problems too. I learned, though, that I'd been using not particularly good all-in-one remotes. With a good all-in-one remote, you can program it to reduce a ton of those issues.

      In my case, I have the Home Theater Master MX-500. To get around the problem you run into, I have it programmed so that my TV mode is only used for rare functions (sleep, changing to RF-in, etc.). I have a "TV watching" mode that changes channel through my TiVo, turns the TV power on and off, and controls volume through my receiver.

      I think the key is thinking of the "modes" as actions (watching TV, listening to music, etc.) instead of objects (TV, receiver, ...).

    47. Re:Some things for most people: by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I want hot japanese women to swoon over me. Life's a bitch :)

      No, seriously... having the ability to program a remote is about the only way you can get it to work with all devices. Even the best non-programmable remote doesn't cover all makes and models.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    48. Re:Some things for most people: by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Well, it's all pretty much semantics since we're talking about a layout rather than a proper person. At least, in my opinion.

      Happy? ^^

      On a side note, I think I need to sit down and shoot myself-- I recognized your sig quote on sight, without even having to think about it.

    49. Re:Some things for most people: by bellings · · Score: 1

      Yeah, remotes suck.

      I trust that some company with a heavy market share, a strong commitment to user experience, and a proven trackrecord of providing useful functional specs will get the A/V market in line within the next five years.

      But, until Microsoft fixes it, I'll just keep having three remotes on my cofee table.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    50. Re:Some things for most people: by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Screw that. Sony learning remotes (like they sell on think geek). I don't have one myself, but I've used one. One button turned on the TV, receiver, dvd player, tivo, and vcr. Personally I have a VCR I never turn off, so I just power on the tv with my $8 remote, switch to vcr and go from there.

      DVD Player is the computer.

    51. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he RIDICULED his coworker for USING his DVORAK keyboard shortly before he TALKED about putting on his O-FACE.

    52. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that mean? Grr...zrr.graam? Just curious... Thanks

    53. Re:Some things for most people: by gregmac · · Score: 1
      Plug your TV into a switched outlet on the back of the reciever. At this point you never use your tv remote again. The TV is basically a monitor and it turns on and off with the reciver.

      Too bad this doesn't work with most moden TV's. If it even turns on when the power comes back, a lot of TV's try to force you to do an auto-setup before you can even watch anything.. and a lot default to channel 2 or something, and not A/V input.

      Pressing the button on the remote to switch the input to the DVD should also switch the remote mode.

      I have a Kenwood reciever that has a learning remote (with a small LCD display at the top) that does this. It's quite handy. I would love to get a Palm or something and program it as a touchscreen remote. I know a couple remotes actually exist using a touch-screen LCD, but I've never used them . It's an expensive solution, but it's really the best there is right now, I think. Buttons are always labelled properly, you can totally change the layout depending on what mode you're in..

      --
      Speak before you think
    54. Re:Some things for most people: by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even after finding all the codes to add the DVD, VCR, stereo, etc., the "mode" orientation of the remote drives me crazy.

      So its EMACS then is it?

      --
      Why not fork?
    55. Re:Some things for most people: by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      "Grr... Zrr... Graam!!!" were the highly curious last words of "Zeromus", A.K.A. "Zemus," the evil final boss in the SNES classic Final Fantasy II.

      Why did he scream those particular syllables? We may never know.

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    56. Re:Some things for most people: by localghost · · Score: 1

      I tried it for about 2 weeks. I got reasonably proficient with it, I could type at a solid 40 wpm, but switching back and forth between dvorak at home and qwerty at school, I'd get really confused. My other problem is that my keycaps can't be moved, because they're angled for a specific row. If you mix them up they get all weird.

      The other problem I had is that a lot of applications have shortcut keys designed for a certain layout. Try doing ctrl-c and ctrl-v in Dvorak. Then you get into stuff like GtkRadiant, where practically every button on the keyboard does something, and it's just a nightmare.

    57. Re:Some things for most people: by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      And if you have a puppy, it will just LOVE the taste of it. I've discovered that puppies love to eat remote controls (because they smell people on them).

      Which just goes to show, never, ever, ever trust your pets, especially the cute ones, because they will eat your entire family given half a chance.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    58. Re:Some things for most people: by chavo+valdez · · Score: 1

      I managed to watch the entire Dolphins / Bills game in 30 minutes on Sunday
      Dude a regulation football game is made of four, fifteen minute quarters. 4 x 15 = 60 minutes in a "complete" game.

      Now what we really want to know is what happened to the other 30 minutes.

    59. Re:Some things for most people: by SirPrize · · Score: 1

      I'm just switching over to Dvorak at the moment. Have been a QWERTY touch-typer for over 10 years now, and have finally convinced myself to switch. Swapping the keytops on the keyboard I use at the moment has made it a bit awkward, since the keytops have a slant which depended on the QWERTY layout, and now I've gone and screwed that, so the keys have all kinds of different slants. I'm waiting for my Touchstream LP to arrive any day now.

    60. Re:Some things for most people: by SirPrize · · Score: 1

      Replying to self :-) Of course, I mean the Dvorak Version

    61. Re:Some things for most people: by ballestra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried Dvorak for a few weeks in college. I popped off all the keys on my keyboard and put them back in the Dvorak both-hands layout. It did seem to be faster, once I adjusted, but I never got to the point where it was easy to switch back and forth to QWERTY, which is essential because we live in a QWERTY world and you'll eventually (often) have to use someone else's keyboard. I ended up switching back to QWERTY.

      Today it would be harder for me to switch. It's not that I'm so set in my ways, although I'm a much faster typist than I used to be. No, today I do most of my work on a laptop, and those keys are NOT so easy to remove and rearrange. They are actually quite difficult to get back on if they ever accidentally get pryed off. Plus now I use Emacs, and the Ctrl-key commands would really be awkward using a Dvorak layout.

    62. Re:Some things for most people: by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      But you miss the beer commericials!

      Great Taste
      Less Filling
      GREAT TASTE!!!
      LESS FILLING!!!

      and the breasts go bouncing, b-eautiful

      Seriously, skipping commercials is not always great!

      --Joe

    63. Re:Some things for most people: by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      The other thing you've got to teach them is that if you pour coffee down the keyboard, it runs down the wires and into the network, attracting spam.

      I'd love to tell some people that, but I don't think I could keep a straight face.

    64. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The switched outlet is rated for 120 watts. Many TVs use more power than that. Also, most TVs don't return to their prior power state when you plug them in.

    65. Re:Some things for most people: by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I have a microsoft "un-natural" keyboard. I can't very well re-arange my keys.

      I know exactly what you mean though.... I remember an old IBM keyboard I beliece was stock on the PS/2 which had shells around each key. Before I donated a large batch to goodwill I re-aranged the keys on the keyboard.

      remaping a series a keys can be done by the end user by using the following technique

      1. Use sandpaper to remove the old letters (220 grit, 400 wet/dry grit, 600 grit

      2. Apply clear coat with flex adheasive to the letters. While this is best done with a paint gun / compressor, you can often find paint shops that will sell you cans of spray paint custom mixed, I believe the cost is about $12.00 a can. So long as you pick a brand that will dry without an activator you should be cool. There are also small airbrushes you purchace that are nothing more then a glass bottle, compressed air in a can, and applicator.

      [Note, the laws on professional spray paint need to be researched. For example, in my region I don't need a license nor a booth so long as I buy my paint in quarts and use a HPLF gun or limit my painting to 9 cubic feet daily.]

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    66. Re:Some things for most people: by Osty · · Score: 1

      Ah, crap. I hit preview. It looked right. Then I broke it. Bad me!

    67. Re:Some things for most people: by BRTB · · Score: 1

      One word: Crestron. Programmable touchscreen, wired or wireless, back-end processors and modules to control just about everything and then some. I don't even WANT to know how much some of that stuff costs.

    68. Re:Some things for most people: by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      > Plug each of your players into an input on the reciever.

      Hmm...

      TiVo, VHS, DVD, PS2, GameCube, Xbox, and Dreamcast.

      Anyone do a reciever with 7 video inputs?

    69. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can assign the ctrl+key commands to different, more easily executed keys if you desire. More trouble I suppose, but after ripping your keys off, putting them back on, and re-mapping them, it really isn't much more most likely.

    70. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hmm, your local thrift store might have an IBM Model M, which is a VERY nice QWERTY keyboard for a few bucks used, and you can EASILY swap the keys into a DVORAK layout, and then use the Linux/Windows keymap utility to switch to DVORAK.

    71. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's called Model M. All the keys are slanted the same.

    72. Re:Some things for most people: by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      My son never bothered to rearrange the keys.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    73. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Goodwill where? I'm interested. I've got a great Model M, but I want some more - they're GREAT keyboards.

    74. Re:Some things for most people: by peterarm · · Score: 1

      If you think your keyboard choice makes you a geek:

      I use a modified Dvorak layout with the fabulous Kinesis keyboard. I say modified since I have remapped the Ctrl key to be where the Kinesis puts its backspace key, the Esc key to where Kinesis puts the delete key (both of these changes are for emacs, of course--it's nice to have ctrl and esc available w/o moving your hands :-), the backspace to the caps lock, moved the caps lock to one of the Alt keys and the delete to one of the ctrl keys.

    75. Re:Some things for most people: by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      You mean this? PalmRemote
      Edit: Google it

    76. Re:Some things for most people: by dkragen2002 · · Score: 1

      What happens when you want to put on mood music? you have to go over and turn off the TV.

      Mood music???? Am I still on Slashdot???

    77. Re:Some things for most people: by Lev13than · · Score: 2, Funny

      DVORAK isn't an acronym, it's a proper name. I don't think August Dvorak spelled his last name in capital letters.

      I think it stands for Dumb Version Of Retardedly Arranged Keys.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    78. Re:Some things for most people: by jd10131 · · Score: 1
      I would love to get a Palm or something and program it as a touchscreen remote.

      Only if you want to sit < 3 feet from the TV.

    79. Re:Some things for most people: by boinger · · Score: 1
      10-13 audio with 8-10 video isn't uncommon.

      I don't think Denon makes one with less than 11/8 these days (not counting the welfare offshore models). Though, you're spending $1000 for a good deal on the cheapest "good" model.

      Kenwood has something like 11/10 on their Sovereign series. Sony and Pioneer both have receivers that fit these specs, too, I believe.

      There are many choices, look around.

      I usually end up at activebuyersguide.com, myself.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    80. Re:Some things for most people: by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was ~$22-25 total, IIRC. I know it wasn't over $30. Pretty good deal, grey logo from 1991, has the long detachable cable.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    81. Re:Some things for most people: by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Amazing what a monopoly can accomplish with respect to standards setting, isn't it? I understand the Romans did great things for standardizing land transportation, too :).

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    82. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was probably spent letting the clock run down and setting up for plays.

    83. Re:Some things for most people: by ebh · · Score: 1

      I use a Home Theater Master remote and it's as good (and as expensive). The geeks in the FA tried configuring their remote using only preprogrammed code sets (and they may not have had any choice).

      I tried that with mine, and after about ten minutes decided that programming each function manually would be the best way to go. (It was a lot of work; it'd be nice if there was a way to back it up.) The nice thing about that is that I assigned the buttons the way I wanted to, not they way someone else thought I should, and I could take into account things like my habit of leaving all the gear on all the time except for the TV itself, so that no matter what mode it's in, "power" always controls the TV.

      The only thing I wish it had, and I don't know of anything that can do this, is the ability to detect the state of a device. Some functions (like TV power) are not idempotent, so when my four-year-old turns the power off using the front panel button, the TV is now out of phase with the "power everything down" macro.

      I suspect that a complete single-brand solution would have a two-way remote so that each device could broadcast any state changes back to the remote (hope it's not stuck between the sofa cushions).

    84. Re:Some things for most people: by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      If I wanted one, where (preferably in Canada) could I get one, how much should I expect to spend, and how long should it take me to get used to it, considering I've been using a QWERTY for close to 9 years?

      Simple. Google for something to give you a Dvorak layout. Then take out all of the keys on your qwerty keyboard and replace them in the Dvorak setup. Then change your OS keyboard layout to Dvorak. It's really not *that* hard.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    85. Re:Some things for most people: by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      pckeyboard.com . I ordered two, but only got one delivered. They refunded the undelivered keyboard, luckily.

      Not sure if the "Model M" is the same as the "Classic 101", but I think it is.
      Great keyboard indeed.

    86. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I KNOW they sell the Classic 101 (which I've heard feels somewhat cheaper), but it's $50. The Model M is cheaper (because it's used), and better quality.

    87. Re:Some things for most people: by sahala · · Score: 1
      Well it is a valid complaint. You do have to go out of your way to misspell qwerty.

      Typing qwerty on a dvorak keyboard is akin to typing dvorak on a qwerty keyboard. Did you go out of your way to not read the parent post?

    88. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats QWERT for those of us using a MS Natural Keyboard

    89. Re:Some things for most people: by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to help. I like my Classic 101, it doesn't feel cheaper, not to me at least. Let's just say it's the best tradeoff after killing my Model M. (I once had a real one, came with a real IBM PC)
      Since when is 50$ much for a keyboard? Well, okay, I know you can get one for 12$, but those *really* feel cheap.

    90. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      When the most you can pay for a PC is $50. (Free is good - especially when it's because of a dead PSU, and I can get a good working PSU for free)

    91. Re:Some things for most people: by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      Damn, I kinda feel like a dumbass for not thinging of that. Ah well, live and learn. Thanks.

    92. Re:Some things for most people: by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that meets any of the above requirements for the typical home user.

      Sure in the hell meets more of those requirements than Windows does. Lets see...

      1. practical - Having to call Microsoft to activate your OS is very impractical. Having to wait on a vendor to provide (on their own schedule!) patches for security holes is very impractical
      2. easy to use - Since this is subjective, I think it's safe to say that ALL OS'S ARE EASY TO USE.
      3. fully installed, - Debian GNU/Linux has 10 (count 'em) installation CDs. That means it can definitely be more fully installed than Windows. In fact, with most Linux distributions you will get a greater variety of software installed than you get with Windows. Therefore, out of the box a user is much more likely to have all of the applications they need (and all of the ones they don't need) with Linux than with Windows.
      4. basically idiot-proof - Considering how many idiots' broken Windows installations I've fixed, I'd have to say that Linux wins this one hands down.
      5. and very, very cool - What's cooler than Penguins? I mean, really, they fucking live in Antarctica!
      6. Need any other reasons to use LInux over windows?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    93. Re:Some things for most people: by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      Hey, last PC I got was for 25$ (actually 25Euro, but I won't be splitting hairs), with a working PSU. Guess, you have been ripped off ;-) Where do you get free PSU's? I'd really like to know that.
      The PC in question is a P-II 350, with 64Meg RAM, but I had another 64 lying around so.... Makes a fine office machine. I'm typing on it right now, from Mozilla and running W2k. Not too shabby for this machine.

      For cheap PC's just look at friends/relatives that have a very slow PC (due to Windows installation gone bad). Tell them that they should buy a new one and that you'll take their "piece of crap" away for some spare change. Most accept, you would be surprised.

    94. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. You sir are the first paint geek I have come across.

    95. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most effective security feature on our domain controller where I work is the fact that it has a UK keyboard mapped with a US layout. Even if you know the password you can't get in without this little piece of information.

    96. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I said mine was free. (it was free because I fixed it) I got the PSU for free because my school had some dead PCs of the same model. Mine's a Celeron 466 with 256MB RAM. Opera and Win2K work wonders on something like this - even when a webserver is running :-) (I'm running my site off of this box)

    97. Re:Some things for most people: by TGK · · Score: 1

      Yea, but besides the roads, what have the Romans ever done for us?

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    98. Re:Some things for most people: by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      They've provided a fine model of government--panem et circensem, anyone?

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    99. Re:Some things for most people: by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1
      OT:

      "I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!"

      What do you think you are... a frickin ladies man?!?!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    100. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Keymaps don't cost anything.
      I switched in June, I believe, and I'm already faster on SVORAK (swedish Dvorak) than QWERTY, although I have to admit writing common words like "QWERTY" can be almost as hard as writing the uncommon word "minimum" and such on QWERTY. ;)

    101. Re:Some things for most people: by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm typing on a Dvorak keyboard now.

      Abe d.p.-o m. yflcbi ao cu cy ,ao a ',.pyf t.fxrapev Oam. ol..ev

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    102. Re:Some things for most people: by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How many geeks themselves use a DVORAK keyboard? Myself, I've never seen one in person, let alone used one.

      The Apple IIc had a switch on it to kick its keyboard into Dvorak mode...presumably, the keycaps could be pulled off and shuffled around if that's what you wanted to use. Other than that, I've run across bugger-all since that uses Dvorak.

      If I were so inclined, I could pull off and shuffle the keycaps on the IBM Model M I'm using right now...but I'm not about to take the huge hit in typing speed that a switch away from QWERTY would entail.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    103. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it comes from Carol, an obnoxious semi-fat guy wearing a wifebeater in 'Aqua Teen Hunger Force'. 8bit aliens from the moon lose their 'forigner belt' to him, and he shouts out the phrase when the aliens mention that not having the instructions, he's not a threat to them.

    104. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lookie...
      http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/layout.h tml :)

    105. Re:Some things for most people: by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      This was a couple of years back. I can't remember if they were model M, they were attached to PS/2s, had a ps/2 interface with a detachable cable and flat pin connectors. Telling you the location now would be pointless. Needless to say I still see them from time to time. many were donated with the keys rearanged to say "keyboard" probally about 10 out of 100 or so.

      Boeing suplus though, in case you are interested, did at one point have this series of keyboard, but I think by now they are dumping all their replacement keyboards.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    106. Re:Some things for most people: by Cipster · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the clock is sometimes running after the play ended or the refs will start it before the QB takes the snap. So really those 60 min. are not all football.

    107. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? They spend every Friday and Saturday night thinking them up!

    108. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what this system needs is a way to mod *up* good flamebait posts

    109. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man runs Windows 2000 web server, announces on slashdot - I assume cause of death would be listed as "suicide".

    110. Re:Some things for most people: by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      how about OS X?

      that would work well with the new high end digital camera, highend MiniDV camera, and a huge MP3 colection

      then get them the Tivo home entertainmnet package so Tivo can give them access to their MP3s through their home stereo and their pictures through their TV.

      make sure you get a high end Home theater and a plazma screen TV, or mabye a digital projector with a movie screen :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    111. Re:Some things for most people: by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the oldskool model M.

    112. Re:Some things for most people: by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, I don't think you say degress when talking in terms of Kelvin. It is just 291 Kelvin.

    113. Re:Some things for most people: by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      But why use opensource software when you can buy retail software? Any why put linux on a computer for novice users. I think the idea for this was to give a geek money so he could set up a house with all the electronic gadgets and nice computers, so why does this have to become a soapbox to push opensource software when these people are clearly not the people who it should be marketted to right now? If I didn't have to pay for it, I'd take office xp and windows xp over open office and linux anyday.

    114. Re:Some things for most people: by BigAl_nz · · Score: 1

      When I changed over to dvorak, I physically remapped my keys. However, during an upgrade of my computer, I got a different keyboard, and since now I touch type no problem at all, I left the keys arranged in qwerty. This means I don't get the different hight problem with keys, and also people can't use my computer unless I'm there :)

      I've lost count of the number of people that sit down at my home machine and type ",,,v" (that's what www. is remapped to for those that are wondering :)

      Reason I switched to dvorak: I was unemployed and bored, so I did it for the hell of it. Reason I've stayed with it: my wrists don't bother me nearly as much with this keyboard map, as well as I'm faster than I was on qwerty. Plus, the aforementioned fun with people trying to use my computer.

      --
      --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
    115. Re:Some things for most people: by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      I want a button that says "go".

      What you really want is a button that says Start. Then you could use it to shut everything off.

    116. Re:Some things for most people: by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Get one of these Comes with a cable to program it from a windows box (sw works great in wine) you can have shifted keys, macros on any button, and custom keymaps.

    117. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy's name is Carl, and I am fully aware of this. The quote I used was one of his from another episode :\

    118. Re:Some things for most people: by discovercomics · · Score: 1

      Whats the point of having a plasma screen if you run the signal thru the Tivo (DTV)? Dont get me wrong I love my Replaytv (Showstopper no subscription required) but I cant see buying a PLASMA screen until the DTV makers support HDTV recording and full audio signal out to the stereo. AM I missing something that is currently available in the US market?

    119. Re:Some things for most people: by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0

      a nice big picture that sits on the wall.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    120. Re:Some things for most people: by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      funny, i remapped my keyboard, but never stuck with Dvorak (i know, but i'm still slow with Dvorak!) so i type in QWERTY on a Dvorak mapped keyboard. (i've gotten used to my "home" keys being C and Y ;) )

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    121. Re:Some things for most people: by GreggyBUIUC · · Score: 1

      Suave.

    122. Re:Some things for most people: by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      It's been analyzed, football is basically an anarobic exercise. You spend an average of 7 seconds on a given play, and 33 seconds between snaps. The play clock does not start until the ball is down. That means that ON EVERY SINGLE PLAY at least 33 seconds OF CLOCK runs down with nothign going on. I skip over that. I also skip over commercials. I play the punts and kickoffs in fastforward. Football != Soccer, in soccer the play does not stop.

      Think of it another way. A teams offense runs an average of 80 plays a game. So you have 160 total plays. Times that by 7 seconds a play of actual movement, divide by 60 to get number of minutes. You arrive at 18.6 Minues of actual PLAY (read movement) in a given football game. It took me 30 minutes to watch it in fast forward because I messed up with the fast forward a few times, sometimes I watched commercials, sometimes I re-ran plays, and sometimes I paused it to go to the bathroom.

      MLB.com offers a feature where you can watch JUST the pitches and plays of a baseball game. I hear you can watch an entire game in around 12 minutes.

    123. Re:Some things for most people: by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Skipping commercials alows more time for downloading / viewing porn.

    124. Re:Some things for most people: by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      and the breasts go bouncing, b-eautiful

      Seriously, skipping commercials is not always great!

      Seriously, dude, you need to get laid.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    125. Re:Some things for most people: by slinkyredfoot · · Score: 1

      holy f*ck this thread is pathetic! get a life people. i sit here, compelled, reading in expectation and hope that you shitbats will get hold of yourselves and get back to the original discussion. its amazing really.

    126. Re:Some things for most people: by fatmidget · · Score: 1

      okay, I know, my very first comment on ./ and already seriously off-topic, but I couldn't resist.

      so, here we go:

      Actually, puppies don't love the taste of your remote. And they certainly don't love to eat it because they smell people on them. That's quite a scary thought actually, puppies loving to eat anything that smells like people.

      But anyway, they like to "play" with the remote control as a puppy for two reasons:
      1) puppies tend to bite on almost anything, regardless of what smell it has
      2) puppies and dogs in general are very observing. they see you holding that remote control all evening, flicking channels like your life depends on it.
      Now, dogs don't see our hands as "hands" or "paws" but as a mouth. So, we're actually three-headed creatures to them.
      Anyways, in their eyes we're "playing" with the remote control all evening, so that thing must be something very fun to play with. Once you put it down, they will certainly try to have a go at it too, which will result in some heavy chewing.

      enjoy this off-topic jummyness!

    127. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All my workstations have dvork hardwired keyboards.

      Not surprisingly, no-one at work ever borrows MY cube to type anything out.

      The best side effect of all is that my keyboards NEVER get filled with crumbs-of-unkown-origin by the office slobs.

      -lh

    128. Re:Some things for most people: by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      For running a small site (like yours and mine), even a smaller box would amply do. My "site" (meaning, there is nothing to see) runs on a P-I 166Mhz with 256Meg RAM. It runs Apache under OpenBSD (it also runs other services like sendmail, dhcpd, ntpd, NAT/firewall). Even with X running (got a coulple tail -f on some logfiles) it never uses more than 45Meg RAM (load averages: 0.16, 0.12, 0.09).
      So you see, even with a smaller machine you can easily host a website. I have also webmail on it, though the perl running that is kinda slow, but still acceptable for me an my family.

      If you have time and are not scared of change, try it out someday. It was actually fun to setup.

    129. Re:Some things for most people: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One "splits hairs" without a hyphen... ;-)

    130. Re:Some things for most people: by mi · · Score: 1
      You mean this? PalmRemote

      From the link:

      Computer style infrared (IrDA) ports have been designed to reduce interference for more reliable data transfer. To achieve this, the infrared beam has been designed to be very narrow (5 degrees). This means you will need to aim the IrDA port directly at the target device (TV, VCR, etc). The infrared beam has a reach of about 2 meters ( 6.6 feet ) with good battery condition. Infrared beam power of SONY PEG(IrDA1.2) is weak and has a reach of about 1.5 meters ( 4.9 feet ). Distance and height are important in making this remote work. Vary the height, distance and angle to find what works for your environment.

      2 meters is rather close. My couch is about 4 meters away from the TV and the rest of the electronics... So nothing using the regular Palm hardware will work for me.

      Worse -- although the "PalmRemote" is also available for WinCE devices -- those, according to the site, have the same hardware limitations.

      Not sure about Win95 -- PalmRemote is available for it too, but even the smallest Win95 laptop will not be small and energy efficient enough to act as a remote...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    131. Re:Some things for most people: by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      If you want to get a universal remote that actually works you'll have to spend some money, and some time, getting the right one.

      I'd highly recommend the HTM MX-500/600/700/800 line ($100-400) - I replaced my Pronto with a MX-700 and it's wonderful. If you want a touch screen remote, then the answer is the Phillips Pronto line ($100-1600), but there's some pretty severe drawbacks to touchscreen remotes IMO.

      I'd go into it more, but instead go read Remote Central, which has reviews on all of the major remotes, decent forums, and a good files section.

    132. Re:Some things for most people: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The most effective security feature on our domain controller

      ... Is swapped keys? If that's the most effective security you've got, you're in trouble. What if someone connects to it from a different computer & not on the server itself? Then the keymapping doesn't make a damn bit of difference.

    133. Re:Some things for most people: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Did you go out of your way to not read the parent post?

      I doubt it, but you seemed to have gone out of your way to ruin a good joke. Jerk... That's my job.

    134. Re:Some things for most people: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > On every keyboard I've ripped apart (several) the keys slope differently between the different rows

      I (just now) have switched to the dvorak style, and I didn't have that problem. I am using a Keytronic 3601 and all the keys are sloped the same way.

      Unfortunately, Mozilla has not picked up on the change yet, and it still prints out QWERTY (',.py) characters.

    135. Re:Some things for most people: by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft had fixed it already; they sold a fully programmable touch screen remote, the TC1000. I think it is now discontinued. The Philips Pronto, which is still available, is better.

      There is no reason to suffer with multiple poorly designed remotes any more; you can buy fully programmable remotes that will replace all your remotes, no matter what.

      I don't think we need to wait for a solution to user control of A/V devices; but computer control of A/V devices is a bigger problem. Without feedback about the state of a piece of equipment, there is no way to reliably control it by computer. If that is important to you, you'll have to wait (probably longer than 5 years); but you'd be amazed what you can do with macros on a remote to automate an A/V system.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    136. Re:Some things for most people: by jimsum · · Score: 1

      A surprising number of devices have discrete codes; in fact I think all of my devices happen to have them, even my 15 year old Sony TV. That's actually a very important reason to get a Philips Pronto remote, since you can download those codes from the net; very few remotes have discrete buttons.

      Even the toggle problem can be overcome. I believe the Harmony remote tracks the state of devices (or at least which buttons have been pressed on the remote), and determines whether to toggle power or not. The remote has a special mode to update the internal state to reflect the state of the system, if they get out of sync.

      I find that source or option selection is a much bigger issue. For example, most TV remotes have only a TV/VIDEO button to cycle through multiple inputs. Without discrete codes for video input, I'd have a much harder time programming my macros. Another similar problem is automated programming of a VCR; a lot of them start from the current clock time and have up and down buttons to set the date/time. That's useless for automation. It's also usually impossible to set the volume to a discrete value; I wish all my devices could be set to start at a specified volume level.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    137. Re:Some things for most people: by jimsum · · Score: 1

      The Harmony remote tries to track the state of devices for you, I haven't tried a Harmony remote but it sounds like they have a good solution to the problem.

      The other solution is to try to find the discrete power IR codes for your device. Just about every device I own has the capability to accept separate "power on" and "power off" codes that do not toggle. Even my 15-year-old Sony TV accepts these codes.

      The problem is that these codes don't normally appear as buttons on a remote. I have a Pronto remote, so I was able to download these codes off the net. The Pronto is the best universal remote I have owned, (and I've used at least 6 different ones over the last 10 years or so) but it is expensive. There may be cheaper remotes that are capable of loading IR codes from the net; or you can just find someone who owns a Pronto and use it to program your learning remote.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    138. Re:Some things for most people: by atheken · · Score: 1

      thanks for the backup hesiod... I DID read the post, and I thought my post would garner laughter, not irritation.. sorry.

    139. Re:Some things for most people: by TecDragon · · Score: 1

      I just switched for the hell of it, but my browser keeps kickin it back to QWERTY. just use the good old ctrl-insert and shift-insert

    140. Re:Some things for most people: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I laughed, so it succeeded. No need to apologize for a joke.

    141. Re:Some things for most people: by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      I've been typing Dvorak for about ten years now, but I've found it virtually impossible to use just dvorak. Too many other people wind up using my machine. For the fun of it, I refer to my keyboard as being "encrypted" when it's in the dvorak mapping.

      Reason I switched: Because it would be cool. However, I agree that it bothers my wrists a whole lot less, although I don't really notice a typing speed difference. I haven't actually tested in a while, but last I checked my qwerty speed was over 100. After a while, it just doesn't matter.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  3. Dear Fortune, by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I enjoyed your article immensely, especially when the Geek starts calling everyone 'bitch'. However, I can't quite get the gist of it.

    Please repeat your experiment of 4 guys installing 15,000 dollars of equipment at my house, so that I may understand *exactly* the trials of learning to use technology.

    Many Thanks,
    Teamhasnoi

    1. Re:Dear Fortune, by sharkey · · Score: 1
      especially when the Geek starts calling everyone 'bitch'

      OK, bitch, this is your Yamaha stereo client. You can listen to .38 Special while you do the laundry, bitch.

      What's that, bitch? You want to watch Dora the Explorer? The remote isn't programmed, bitch. Go tell your bitch mommy that we'll get the bitch programmed and then you can watch that bitch Dora. You got me, bitch?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. Average Eye for the Geek Guy by blchrist · · Score: 5, Funny

    It should be the other way around. A group of average people can tell a geek how to shower. They can teach him that long greasy hair in a ponytail is not a fashion statement. They could even take him shopping to buy clothes that aren't just t-shirts with nerdy slogans or anime characters on them.

    1. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by Angram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like the same concept as "Queer Eye" - getting some slob laid.

      --

      GL
    2. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

      Never! I'll die before I give up my nerdy slogans!

    3. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can teach him that long greasy hair in a ponytail is not a fashion statement.

      It's not??? Aw crap, thanks for ruining my dream of being fashionable.

    4. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by kmo · · Score: 1

      They can teach him that long greasy hair in a ponytail is not a fashion statement.

      Um.., I think it is a fashion statement, but perhaps not the intended one.

    5. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the dude with the greasy hair making TWICE as much money as the non techie is going to listen to him..especially if he's already getting laid lol

    6. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by Shadestalker · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that, got the t-sh... oh wait, that was part of the problem, wasn't it?

    7. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by taernim · · Score: 1

      Would they then explain that news can be obtained on places besides websites? Blasphemy... ;)

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    8. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      t-shirts with ... anime characters on them.

      Hey, those are cool right now, just look in Cyberdog, my latest clothes shop choice.

    9. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by El · · Score: 1

      They can teach him that long greasy hair in a ponytail is not a fashion statement.

      Somebody tell that to Steven Seagal!!!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    10. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Hey, those are cool right now, just look in Cyberdog, my latest clothes shop choice.

      "right now"?
      You do know that true coolness knows no timeframe.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by _randy_64 · · Score: 1

      But make it a real test - send them to RMS!

      --
      I mod down all the "free iPod"-sig losers.
    12. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by SanLouBlues · · Score: 1

      . . . because image over substance is what we're all going for.

    13. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Substance is an illusion. Illusion is just an image. The image is the substance.

    14. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by HeX314 · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! My friend is exactly like this. The guy stinks and wears nothing but T-shirts from Newtek and other apparel he picked up at Siggraph.

    15. Re:Average Eye for the Geek Guy by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Hey, you tell him! The man's got a temper...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  5. A grim outlook... by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 5, Funny


    "Ok, the first thing you need on your PC is Linux. And forget a GUI, you need to do everything in text. Windowed interfaces are so not cool. Once you're set up with this, we'll go to the de-tanning booth to get your skin a nice white pasty color..."

    1. Re:A grim outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will that work for me too as a geek with genetically dark skin?

    2. Re:A grim outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add the eyewear fashioned by Coca-cola and the removal of genitalia - they won't be needed..

  6. "But why..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "But why is my homepage www.slashdot.org? What is this site? What's it good for? Are there games? Oh wait, I see the games section!"

    1. Re:"But why..." by KillerHamster · · Score: 4, Funny

      "And what's with all this Goatse stuff? What is that, anyway?"

      *Click*

      "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH"

    2. Re:"But why..." by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are "these" and why should I be imagining a beowulf cluster of them?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:"But why..." by Patrick+Lewis · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot the "AAAAH! MY EYES! MAKE THE BURNING STOP!"

      foogely foogley stupid lameness filter...

      --
      "If I am such a genius, how come that I am drunk and lost in the desert with a bullet in my ass?" --Otto (Malcom ITM)
    4. Re:"But why..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Real geek don't put the www in front of slashdot.

    5. Re:"But why..." by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, I just thought of how the movie "The Ring" could have been ten times scarier.

      "When you see the Goatse... you die."

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    6. Re:"But why..." by Xeth · · Score: 1

      They'd probably have the same reaction looking at the games section...

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    7. Re:"But why..." by japhmi · · Score: 1

      But why is my homepage www.slashdot.org?

      what's this www doing in front of /.'s address?

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  7. Alright, but only if... by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the last few paragraphs of the forthcoming Fortune article are dedicated to the team of geeks sitting around a monitor on the other side of town, packet-sniffing the new network for leaks and shreeking at what horrible things the new users are doing to the whole system.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Alright, but only if... by LinuxMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. Not only that, but ever tried to suggest to a non-technical person that they get something high-tech? I made that mistake. I told my grandfather to get my grandmother a TiVo. All I can say is: let me just die in peace. Giving an "average" person all the high tech toys is not always the best thing to do, they can't understand them usually it seems! I suppose if I were a paid technical consultant it might not be quite as bad, but when it comes to recommending new technology to non tech people, I recommend the SIMPLEST, least-featured items, because it is guaranteed they will have me over for a half an hour for each feature, trying to teach them. And my patience is not that good, sorry to say. I love technology, I hate teaching technology when I keep hearing, "You are going to have to slow down, you keep going too fast" when I am trying to lay things out as sllllloooowwwwllllyyy as possible.

      40g iPod

  8. cool! by dustmote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where do I sign up to (pretend to be) technically illiterate, so I can get this kind of electronics budget? The sad thing is that these days I probably wouldn't be pretending, I've been so broke lately. I have no idea what is cutting edge on anything.

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
    1. Re:cool! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think there was a RAM upgrade for the TRS 80 and network cards so you don't have to use the modem anymore. Um I thinks thats about it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  9. What's new? I'm always doing this for friends. by MurrayTodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The $15K money would be a nice change, but I'm always spending my free time setting up WiFi home networks, etc.

    The same problem would exist for both the "Geek Eye" and it's original "Queer Eye"... given a few months without supervision and the recipient will revert back into low-tech chaos. Maintenance is much harder than configuration.

    --
    Murray Todd Williams
    1. Re:What's new? I'm always doing this for friends. by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a lot easier to revert back to old jeans and picking your nose than it is to ignore a 42" plasma screen and a 7.1 surround system.

      Maybe they'll go back to doing grocery lists on paper instead of Grocer XP 2.0 but they won't give up Tivo.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:What's new? I'm always doing this for friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maintenance is much harder than configuration.

      Yes and no. If it is configured to maintain as much of itself as possible, then this experiment may work. That is to say, when configuring the PC, have the geeks harden the OS, leave certain features disabled like showing system files, etc. Also,set up automatic/install updates without notification for the OS, AntiVirus, OfficeSuite, Router firmware, software-based firewall, etc. Furthermore, schedule routine maintenance jobs like defrag, etc. And for goodness sake, install and schedule a backup mechanism for their data and throw in a few extra backup tapes. This is by no means an end-all fix to maintenance problems, but it will help.

    3. Re:What's new? I'm always doing this for friends. by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      I like the implication that without a cluster of Linux boxen, these people will just be hitting each other with clubs. : )

    4. Re:What's new? I'm always doing this for friends. by adam872 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Unless the new tech is embraced as a lifestyle choice, the gloss of the gadgets will wear off and they will sit unused in a corner. I also blame the manufacturers for this. So many devices are put on the market that have an initial "gee-whiz" factor, but wear thin after a while. Think of how many supposedly "indepensible" tools/gadgets/toys you have in your house and how many *actually* get used...

      One of the things I like about the show "Fresh Gear" on TechTV is that they aren't afraid to say "this sucks" or "this has limited use". Many times I have found myself agreeing with their conclusions.

      Having said all of that, some of the stuff installed for the family in the story made me wanna drool :)

  10. Look ma! by soren42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Woo hoo! Nerd chic!

    I'm popular! People love me!

    Can I leverage a TV show from this?

    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    1. Re:Look ma! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,
      we at our organization wish that you would consult a dictionary next time you post on this forum. "Leverage" does not have the meaning that you intended to use.
      Sincerely,
      Mr Blinky

  11. Requirements? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Funny

    No wonder the project failed. Where was the Requirements Document? The simple statement: "bring a family of four up to date with technology" is not a proper requirement. Did they want to make home movies? Send email to Grandma? Walk in the house and have the lights turn on automatically? What were they trying to do with that $15k?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:Requirements? by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Ahem. From page 1 of the article...

      Heistad grilled them on their tech needs--really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma.

      Short, succinct...ah, if only all requirements documents were so sweet.

    2. Re:Requirements? by windex82 · · Score: 1

      RTA:

      "Heistad grilled them on their tech needs--really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma."

    3. Re:Requirements? by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's the requirements from the article:

      "really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma."

      Of course, it continues on with:

      "Heistad came back with a shopping list that would get them that, plus a home theater, a wireless network, new computing, a tricked-out music system, and GPS positioning capabilities"

      HA! You think a group of geeks would only buy a camera and maybe a new PC? HA! GPS is definitely needed to send photos to grandma.

    4. Re:Requirements? by OrderOfSemprini · · Score: 1

      The project didnt fail entirely because of the requirements. They realized that if they outsourced the project to India, they could do it for 5,000. However, they didnt consider the relocation costs and quickly blew the budget.

    5. Re:Requirements? by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that's half of the problem, most geeks spend more time tinkering with and configuring their machines than actually using them.

    6. Re:Requirements? by willith · · Score: 2, Funny

      GPS is definitely needed to send photos to grandma.

      Well, what if you can't find Grandma?

    7. Re:Requirements? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      Fortune is for PHB. Did you see requirements written by PHB?

    8. Re:Requirements? by karlandtanya · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma."

      $15K? No Problem!

      Hello, B&H? I'd like:

      D2H

      WT1-A

      +5 Diopter eyepiece corrector

      SB800

      SB29

      20mm f/2.8D

      50mm f/1.4D

      105mm f/2.8D Micro

      80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR AF

      Oh, yeah--Some POS computer with USB & a dialup modem.

      THERE Now you can send her some pictures!

      /wiping drool off of keyboard

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    9. Re:Requirements? by astroboy · · Score: 1
      HA! You think a group of geeks would only buy a camera and maybe a new PC? HA! GPS is definitely needed to send photos to grandma.

      Grandma's going to be awful surprised when she's told she has to go geocaching to get those pictures of little Johnny.

    10. Re:Requirements? by daeley · · Score: 1

      Better yet, just hide little Johnny and make Grandma geocache him. Kid gets some fresh air and Grandma gets some time with him too. Eventually.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    11. Re:Requirements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what if you can't find Grandma?

      Find her will?

    12. Re:Requirements? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What were they trying to do with that $15k?

      Sell advertisments.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Requirements? by Hentai · · Score: 1

      Did you check at the bottom of the stairs?

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    14. Re:Requirements? by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      That's because there's nothing to do with them once we stop tinkering and configuring.

    15. Re:Requirements? by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      Oh, why do people always have to give away my life's story on Slashdot?

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    16. Re:Requirements? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Sir, that's not 'half of the problem'. That's the whole answer.

  12. What about shipping time? by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

    Never had anything delivered in less than 3 days, and I don't shop at circuit city for computers (perhaps DVD players, TV, etc)

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:What about shipping time? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      Then you've never used newegg.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:What about shipping time? by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      Apparently I haven't... damn, newegg looks a lot like Amazon!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
  13. programmed my vcr by avandesande · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was pretty proud of myself, i set the clock on my vcr. Too bad a blown lightbulb tripped the circuit breaker. Now its flashing 12:00 again.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:programmed my vcr by The+Mayor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got my TiVo, VCR, & TV on a UPS. That solves the flashing 12:00 problem most of the time.

      --
      --Be human.
    2. Re:programmed my vcr by sharkey · · Score: 1
      on a UPS. That solves the flashing 12:00 problem most of the time.

      Wow! How'd you get it to program your VCR? My UPS just sits there giving off heat and beeping sometimes.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:programmed my vcr by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      How about letting me reprogram it for you? It'll only cost you $15,000. Small unmarked bills only.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:programmed my vcr by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      You still have a VCR?

    5. Re:programmed my vcr by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      i've got a $25 garage sale vcr that I use as an a/v receiver for among other things, tv-out from my $250 vid card, xbox and dvd, it's the only thing with enough inputs/outputs to do it.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    6. Re:programmed my vcr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a blown light bulb tripped your breaker, you've got bigger problems than not being able to program the VCR.

    7. Re:programmed my vcr by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      What size TV?

    8. Re:programmed my vcr by atrader42 · · Score: 1

      I've got my TiVo, VCR, & TV on a UPS. That solves the flashing 12:00 problem most of the time.
      But it's an absolute disaster for the acronym challenged.

    9. Re:programmed my vcr by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      It's just an old 50" rear projection big screen...no HDTV, but a good enough picutre for the TiVo. I don't really use the VCR any more. But I do use the DVD. Perhaps DiVX will be in my future....

      --
      --Be human.
    10. Re:programmed my vcr by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      At that price, yes.

    11. Re:programmed my vcr by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Well what size UPS then? I have a 350VA and it's too underpowered for my Pentium 2 system, but I was going to use it for my 19inch TV and stuff.

  14. Hmm. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Does the $15,000 include the $699 for SCO?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the $15,000 include the $699 for SCO?

      Thats probably what the linux geek will say when he's installing the gear, but just end up pocketing the money - plus enough for a few extra licenses.

    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why this bullshit have to appear in almost every articles?

  15. ya, I can just see it... by Sonnenschein · · Score: 1

    "no no no, these shades of white have gotta go, we're gonna glue up a thousand natalie pr0tman so you can gizzzzz all over the walls... How about that ? Ohhh it'll be so delectable, now for that chartreuse tinted wardrobe !"

    "**SIGH** ... Still brushed your teeth, I'll show you how to do it the geek away... Here, throw the tooth paste into the garbage and wait a few weeks. Teeth are actually self cleaning."

  16. Keeping it in the family by pgrote · · Score: 1

    Most people can avoid issues with compatibility and getting things working if they buy their equipment from one vendor. As long as you're not trying to buy the best of everything you can do this very effectively.

    Also, most people have never considered this, but don't care about connecitivty at home.

    Is it a education problem or is it that things haven't reached critical mass?

  17. A waste of $15,000 by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article, "really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma. Heistad came back with a shopping list that would get them that, plus a home theater, a wireless network, new computing, a tricked-out music system, and GPS positioning capabilities."

    Pathetic. How about a 6 month followup (honestly reported)? After all, what are the odds that most of this equipment will just be gathering dust by then?

    Alright, probably not the Tivo... but still...

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:A waste of $15,000 by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Gathering dust?

      If it were me I would have put what I didn't use up on E-bay.

    2. Re:A waste of $15,000 by zelurxunil · · Score: 1

      Perhaps fortune should instead of giving 3 geeks 15,000 to fix up their whole house. They should pay 3 geeks 6 months wage to teach a family of four to do it on their own...

      --

      What's another word for Thesaurus?
      -Steve Wright
    3. Re:A waste of $15,000 by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      If you were a non-techy, you might not have heard of ebay. At least you wouldn't have used it, and it does take most people a while to get comfortable with things.

    4. Re:A waste of $15,000 by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Even a crack whore could get it to the pawn shop.

  18. $15,000 by BlackBolt · · Score: 2, Funny

    $15,000 = ONE REALLY FAST POWERMAC G5.

    Buy it and you're done. Everything else is uncivilized.

    1. Re:$15,000 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      $15,079, to be exact. Includes 8GB Ram, 2 23" displays, 500GB hard drives, 1 40 GB iPod, and lot of other junk.

    2. Re:$15,000 by davechen · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. It's $2999 for the PowerMac, and $12,001 for the house repairs with it blows you away.

    3. Re:$15,000 by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      And you still got some room to spare...

      Dual G5 8 gigs of ram
      Radeon 9800
      2x250 gig drives
      2x 23" cinema displays
      5.1 Klipsh Speakers
      Airport extreme + Basestation
      Bluetooth .Mac subscription
      iSight
      3year warranty
      Oh, and a modem, incase something happens to your internet connection (like you updated to 10.2.8)

      for around $14,000

  19. Daylight savings time by MountainLogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mine blinks 11:00 now

  20. Easy universal answer by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?

    Blame it on Windows : it always works with budget overruns as well as questions about technical problems. Tell the family you told them about Linux but they wouldn't hear. Make sure you use a patronizing tone.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  21. Simple! by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
    If the avarage family doesn't anything about the stuff or how to install it, they won't miss it if they don't have it.

    1. Install cardboard box with "Really Neat Box!" written on it.
    2. Pocket $15,000.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    (I think ??? involves running away very fast, but doesn't it always?)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Simple! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      (I think ??? involves running away very fast, but doesn't it always?)

      Wouldn't that make step 4 be, "Wake up in Emergency Room because the geek tried physical exertion"?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Simple! by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Close but here's the ethical way:

      1. Get requirements (send pictures to Grandma).
      2. Meet requirements (digital camera, iMac, DSL).
      3. Pocket $12,000.
      4. Profit!

      No running, the family is happy, lotsa $$.

      Okay, maybe throw in a TiVo.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:Simple! by gurumeditationerror · · Score: 1

      "Wake up in Emergency Room because the geek tried physical exertion"

      for that amount of money you will find new resources of strength and endurance..

    4. Re:Simple! by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Three grand for a disposable camera, a box of envelopes and a book of stamps?!?
      Even if you pre address them for for them that would be maybe 20-30 bucks.

      So $14970 for your trouble. Not bad.

  22. Typical problems by moehoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main problems here are compatability and demand. First, demand... The people don't need it. So, they won't use it. That's easy. The people in this article were all wrong for this stuff. They will NEVER use 20% of it.

    Second, compatability. We all know and it is obvious to most people that this stuff all becomes 10 times cooler when it works with other stuff. When I buy a new X, it would be totally awesome if it will integrate with my Q, R, S, and V. Well, open standards certainly won't make much money for the manufacturers, so they don't work very well together. Heck, even all my Sony stuff has problems playing nice together. And especially the really cool features will never integrate.

    Last, but not least, they kids are gonna ruin it all anyway. So to hell with it. Read a book. Take the $15,000 and put it in the kids' college funds.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Typical problems by Shadestalker · · Score: 1
      First, demand... The people don't need it.

      People didn't used to need telephones. Go live without one for a while, let us know how that goes. Or sanitation. Outhouses were good enough for our forebears, were they not? Handwashing is for sissies!

    2. Re:Typical problems by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well, open standards certainly won't make much money for the manufacturers, so they don't work very well together.

      Actually, the companies tend to be quite fond of open standards. The trouble is, they like standards they own a little bit more, and don't communicate too well, so end up with lots of competing standards. When they do come up with a proper open standard, they actually do quite well. DVD, PC hardware, TVs ae all based on fairly open standards, and have done very well. Non-standards e.g. DVR-R/+R/RAM, have trouble being accepted, so don't do as well.

    3. Re:Typical problems by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Riiiiight. The phone is in no way equivalent to listening to music or watching Sex in the City in such high resolution that you can see the plaque on their teeth.

      Here's how stupid you sound: "There was one type of technology that became ubiquitous and necessary. Therefore, all technology will follow in that exact same path and all technology will become ubiquitous and necessary."

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    4. Re:Typical problems by barks · · Score: 1

      Take the $15,000 and put it in the kids' college funds.

      You're right I'm sure the salesman husband could've found other worthy investments.

      My one and only question is, since Fortune was running this story is it fair to say this family is well off? The husband was soooo busy he only had 2 precious hours to learn about his new presents....[before jumping back in his Porche and meeting is busty blonde secretary?]

      Only speculation now...but don't leave town.

  23. If that's geeky, then you can have it. by waxmop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that being geeky is seen a cool trait, marketers are now buslily redefining the label to describe people that spend lots of money on high-fashion electronics.

    Why are we letting this happen? Which is more impressive: owning a lot of expensive hardware, or turning outdated junk into useful tools?

    1. Re:If that's geeky, then you can have it. by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is more impressive: owning a lot of expensive hardware, or turning outdated junk into useful tools?

      Translation: Having a bigger dick, or knowing how to use it?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:If that's geeky, then you can have it. by segfault7375 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now that being geeky is seen a cool trait, marketers are now buslily redefining the label to describe people that spend lots of money on high-fashion electronics.

      This is a good thing. If the marketers make it look sexy, more people will buy high tech stuff which pours more money into the tech sector which leads to lower prices of current items and the introduction of newer tech.

      Segfault

    3. Re:If that's geeky, then you can have it. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. While marketers might be latching onto and redefining the "Geek" label, true geeks have shed this 80's vintage title for the more up-to-date moniker. Bitch!

      Heistad starts sweating through his shirt and has long since begun calling everyone "bitch."

      I don't see the marketers adopting "bitch" any time soon.

    4. Re:If that's geeky, then you can have it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a big dick, AND I know how to use it. I think that's really the optimal solution.

  24. It's a sham by Eponymous+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article:
    On the way out they pick up a MAG Innovision 17-inch CRT monitor for a hundred bucks, hop in the Chevy Malibu rental, and floor it back to the Burkes'.
    I, too, had a 17" MAG CRT monitor--in 1990. These so called "geeks" should be able to do a heck of a lot better than a 17" CRT if their goal is to bring the family "up to date." I lost all faith in them after reading that. As far as I can tell, they did nothing more than buy whatever was on page two of the Best Buy circular that week.

    The idea as a whole is intriguing, but with posers instead of real geeks, it's pretty pointless.
    --
    It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
    1. Re:It's a sham by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      Remember, they only had $15000 to spend... That Plasma TV probably ate up about ten grand of the budget.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    2. Re:It's a sham by SoVeryWrong · · Score: 1

      If they settled for a 17" MAG CRT, the Plasma was probably less than stellar also. Think $3200 Sampo "brand".

    3. Re:It's a sham by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, it just supports the idea that they were incompetent. You can get a very nice plasma screen for 5 or 6 grand. Certainly enough for the family. Spend $400 or so on a LCD instead of a CRT and you've just saved them a few cubic feet of space.

      If they went out and got a plasma for 10 large and then turned around and got the shittiest CRT they could come up with, well why not just throw in a Segway and be done with it. It's not like they knew what they were doing.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    4. Re:It's a sham by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      The article said it was a Panasonic 42-inch plasma TV. Not what I would call an el-cheapo brand.

      That being said, even Best Buy seems to have some prices in-line with the $3200 above. Price Match had them at $3799 from Best Buy. The prices have really come down since I've looked; that's almost reasonable.

      After a bit more research, buying a POS monitor is less excuseable. Hell, my fairly nice ViewSonic A90f+ 19" monitor was only $299 full CompUSA retail.

      Perhaps it was the geek penchant for "We're in a hurry, buy whatever the fuck is cheap" shopping...

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    5. Re:It's a sham by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yep, I revised my opinion in another response in this thread.

      In short, I looked at plasmas about 18 months ago, and they were in the $15k range at the "high-end" store down the street. I figured about $7500 to $12500 at a more reasonable retailer. They've definately come down considerably since then.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
  25. uhm, I'm a luddite, geek me up! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    So i'm behind the times and they'll come in and replace all my old 386 class and 2x CDR crap with SOTA gear??

    Yes, that will work. Fab 3, please email me, I'm stuck in 386 hell...

    Please hurry!

  26. The common user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it remarable how the average technophobe fails to comprehend that they're basically out of their element when it comes to technological gadgets. I don't profess to be an expert so I won't install my own dishwasher, but instead contract someone to do it.

    Why should computing be any different?

    Which is nice.

  27. All they need to know: by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 1

    "Don't blame me, it's a software problem." Hope I didn't just put too many people out of work...

  28. Screamin Deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where'd you order that? What a DEAL!!!!!

  29. What happens when even the geeks can't get it work by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    ..he isn't a very good geek?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  30. Linux for the Average Guy by barryfandango · · Score: 5, Funny

    [Geek] Okay, now you're running Linux! Your computer will run faster and be more stable. Also it's politically and morally superior, and the software is all free!

    [AverageGuy] Awesome, thanks! So what games are on here?

    [Geek] I have to go now.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Linux for the Average Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha, yes, this is a funny post, but it does make me wonder...

      why don't linux programmers make any games?!

    2. Re:Linux for the Average Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Geek] Let me teach you mounting

      [AverageGuy] Mounting? I thought we were talking about linux.

    3. Re:Linux for the Average Guy by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Please tell me I am not having a bad case of deja vu and that this is some form of meme...

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    4. Re:Linux for the Average Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source programmers don't usually make any (good) games, because games require:
      - Graphical design skills.
      - Music composition skills.
      - The ability to construct an immersive storyline.
      - Level design skills.
      etc.

      Big game companies can afford a team of designers to do all this. Open source games can't.

  31. i call shenanigans! by aceh0 · · Score: 1

    they like HPs and Dells. what kind of geeks are these?

    1. Re:i call shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh but did you ever install one of those HP (formerly Compaq) 19" servers? It's a geek's wet dream.

    2. Re:i call shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just cheap geeks. they didn't say they liked HPs, just Dells. And for the money, Dells are a great deal. I've built a lot of systems for myself and friends, and it's just not worth it anymore -- even throwing out the cost of my own time, and assuming I get the best pricewatch deals for everything I can't beat dell's prices

  32. Nerds verses Geeks? by frankmu · · Score: 1

    "These geeks--as different from nerds as orcs are from trolls"

    huh? I didn't know there was a difference.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:Nerds verses Geeks? by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      "Nerd" tends to refer to the socially inept, hygenically challenged stereotype, while a "Geek" is somebody who's good at geeky stuff.

      Example: A Geek might have a high-paying job, while a Nerd would passionately explain to you the difference between an orc and a troll.

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Nerds verses Geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're synonyms. Dweeb, loser, lamer, twit, moron, douchebag, teabagger, and turdburglar are also synonymous with 'geek'.

      It's like black folks proud to call themselves "nigger". They can say it means whatever they want it to mean, its still a derogatory insulting term.

    3. Re:Nerds verses Geeks? by freebfrost · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that orcs are 1HD sword-fodder, and that trolls regenerate all but fire/acid damage.

      I believe it is a requirement for nerds and geeks to have played Dungeons & Dragons.

      Unless we are talking Tolkien, in which case orcs were "copies" of elves and trolls were "copies" of Ents that turn to stone in the sunlight...

    4. Re:Nerds verses Geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have the same interests, live in roughly the same conditions, but you want to stay away from trolls an order of magnitude more.

  33. I can just see it now by Risto · · Score: 2, Funny

    >There isn't time to order a new PC from Dell
    >--the geeks' PC maker of choice--
    >so they head to Best Buy and pick up
    >a $679 HP Pavilion Home PC.

    Now what kind of geek would do something like that
    It should have read:

    There isn't time to order 100 RM1-4U cases from Koolance --the geeks' waatercooling provider of choice--
    so they head to the industrial compound and get an industrial fan to cool down the Beowulf cluster of
    the bleeding edge AMD Athlon 64 systems that they plan to blow the $15,000 on.

  34. Ha! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most Geeks dont know what DVD player to buy.

    Pioneer Elete series? Or do we go for the Carver Studio series? or do we go for even better? or are we happy with the sub $400.00 junk at best buy?

    Most of the decisions are made based on preference as is you went for the "best" based on research and actual reviews $15,000.00 is not anywhere near enough money.

    I can spend $15,000.00 on the PC,home netowrking and home server alone.

    for the average Joe, the best DVD player to buy is the $59.00 APEX cheapie.. they will be happy with the picture on their 29 inch tv. and it's the one I reccomend to all my relatives as it's dirt cheap / throw away type appliance if the kids break it. plus it does a better job than the playstation2 or Xbox.

    unless you have a HD tv or projector that can handle the progressive output buying a "good" player is a waste of money.. and most "geeks" wont admit that buying the cheapest is the best for the average joe.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Ha! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Pioneer Elete series? Or do we go for the Carver Studio series? or do we go for even better? or are we happy with the sub $400.00 junk at best buy? [...] for the average Joe, the best DVD player to buy is the $59.00 APEX cheapie..


      Makes me wonder... the other day I walked into the MediaMarkt and picked up a DayTek DVD player for 50 Euros. The picture, sound, ease of use and available features are all just as good as my supposedly good Pioneer player (and before you ask, I have it hooked up to a good TV and a good amp&speaker setup). So why did I spend 500 Euros on the Pioneer, or is that cheap player really supposed to be that cheap? Are we being lured into the 'cheap printer/expensive ink' trap? Hell, my friend bought two of them, he figured one would make a neat gift to someone who didn't have a DVD yet. That'll make for a few more people who will buy new expensive DVDs like the good little consumers that they are.

      Heh, incidentally I picked up a refill color cartridge for my OfficeJet there as well. Guess which was more expensive: the ink refill, or the DVD player? We live in a silly world.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Ha! by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      $59.00 APEX cheapie

      Hey, i have that dvd player. And i got it on sale for $53.95.

    3. Re:Ha! by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'll agree with that. For myself I bought the Denon DVD-2900 which came it at just around $1100. I use this to it's fullest (DVD A/V, SACD, MP3, etc.), but for my parents they have my original Pioneer DV-525 that I bought over 5 years ago and they are perfectly happy with it.

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    4. Re:Ha! by karnal · · Score: 1

      It also depends on your view of how important money is.

      For instance, I would love to have the high end of everything. Would it really make my experience that much more pleasing? possibly.

      But right now, I don't have the money. Sub 400$ junk at best buy will do.

      However, if I had won the lottery, I would definitely take a mil (out of 10 or so after tax) and "blow it". Keep in mind, most of the stuff would be things I'd always wanted, but 10 years down the road, it'd be worth diddly.

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:Ha! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why buy a dvd player at all when you can buy a DVD-rom and a tv-out card? Combine that with a 200G hard drive and xvid, and you can keep all your movies online for instant access. Of course, that's a geek solution.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Ha! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      remember.. this "challenge" was to outfit the family with "state of the art" and that mean's expensive...

      I know it was nothing but a lame publicity stunt for Circuit City and some poser wannabe geeks (their "geeks" were really uneducated and knew nothing based on the stupid decisions they made)

      I personally would go your way, but because I did get a HD projector I decided to actually use the danged thing so I got a good DVD player and a Line Doubler/scaler to get killer movies on my 10 foot screen. (P.S. got the projector for $50.00 at an auction... it needed a bulb only and was marked as "broken")

      If you go with what they said they were set out to do, you need to go high end to be "state of the art" and most plasma TV's or projectors that are HD would eat 50% of that budget instantly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Ha! by karnal · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at projectors for a while -- the only one that I've found in range is the infocus x10(correct me if I'm wrong -- I'm going off of memory) that sometimes you can find on sale for 800$ or so. I would love to have one, but to find one that would suit me would cost $$$ new, and I doubt I could run into a find such as yours....

      I've also looked at 52" widescreens to replace my tiny 27" TV. Now, since I've got other things to take my time and money, I may just go with a 32-36 inch TV... I don't have the money to spend on top shelf equipment just yet... maybe someday....

      --
      Karnal
  35. I'll take three, please by Slur · · Score: 1

    With XCode running distributed compiles I can get my work done yesterday.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  36. Imposters!!!!!! by Kruid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Day Two The now fully assembled geek team pulls up to the Burkes' house at 9 a.m. " No real geek, given $15K to play with for 3 days, is going home/hotel to sleep!! Who are they trying to kid??? -k

    --
    Your mind moves quicker than a nun's first curry. - A. Rimmer
  37. Geek Eye for the Average Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just getting a few tech toys and setting them up
    with few geeks is fun for the geeks, but not for
    those who need to use them everyday. What happens
    when one of the stuff gets hungup, or something that
    needs reprogramming because the power went out, or
    because there was a glitch in the power supply.
    What is lacking in today's tech toys is not the
    innovation, but the intution(to continue to use it
    and fix it as it happens, without having a geeky
    attitude). If such a project is ever attempted,
    a custom programmed consoles at various places
    (using a single board linux computer), that would
    control all the devices on the network would do
    a better job, even if someone has to learn how
    to use it. Hooking up different stuff is not
    simple(just as a harmony central remote!).

  38. Damn, it's time for lunch when... by justMichael · · Score: 5, Funny

    You read the end of the article as

    They pause. Ross fingers his goatse...

    instead of

    They pause. Ross fingers his goatee...

    Damn you /.

    1. Re:Damn, it's time for lunch when... by crisco · · Score: 1

      Yeah I made the same mistake, except I just got to this article after lunch. Bad, very bad mental image to finish eating to.

      --

      Bleh!

    2. Re:Damn, it's time for lunch when... by Ack_OZ · · Score: 1

      lunch? that made you think of LUNCH, of all things?

      ewwwwwww ;)

    3. Re:Damn, it's time for lunch when... by justMichael · · Score: 1

      I knew that was going to happen... I got to lunch and this thought popped into my head, "Boy did you word that subject poorly, maybe nobody will notice."

      $subject =~ s/lunch/a break/;
      would have been better

      I figured I would stay quiet and see if anybody pointed that out.

      You got me.

  39. why it doesn't work by spoonyfork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heistad grilled them on their tech needs--really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma. Heistad came back with a shopping list that would get them that, plus a home theater, a wireless network, new computing, a tricked-out music system, and GPS positioning capabilities.

    Not only did the family not want the technology but had what they didn't want "forced" on them. This is the problem with mass consumerism of entertainment technology. You don't need it. It isn't even cool if you think about it.

    • Crappy pop music doesn't sound any better on outrageously huge speakers and expensive audio system.
    • The TV show "Friends" certainly isn't any funnier on a 90" plasma HDTV.
    • GPS is only helpful if you don't know where you and you know where you want to go. Besides, who needs to know the lat/lon of the dry cleaners?
    • Computer and console games like Grand Theft Auto X, Everquest, Star Wars Galaxies, and Sims still suck and disconnect you from society whether on a slow computer or fast one.
    The parents should do their kids a favor and sell all that crap. Keep a decent notebook and digital camera around for the pictures to grandma and email. Buy the kids some books, take them to the parks, get them involved in their community.

    All of that useless tech is going to kill your culture.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:why it doesn't work by Bugmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Technology is like a knife. It's not inherently good or bad; it all depends on how you wield it.
      • Trance sounds better on an expensive audio system
      • Anime and The Matrix sure look better on a 90" plasma HDTV
      • GPS is very helpful if you're planning to go to that hacker convention three cities away
      • Computer and console games like Tetris will bring you hours of joy
      See what I mean ? I just rearranged your list a bit, and now it sounds a lot better, doesn't it ? So what's the conclusion: only geeks deserve the latest tech gadgets ?

      No. The conclusion is that you shouldn't be so arrogant as to assume that you're the final arbiter of what kind of toys other people deserve. If I want to watch Friends and listen to Celine Dion, you bet your ass I want to be able to enjoy it full-size, full-color, with high dynamic range. It's not your place to stop me.

      --
      >|<*:=
    2. Re:why it doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded flamebait? This is 100% dead on. Even if you don't agree, people can have a different opinion than you without being wrong.

      Hauling my kids away from the gamecube is like pulling teeth. I ask them to take the puppy out in the yard and play with it, they're back inside within 30 seconds saying "we're done".

      Just telling them to quit playing, go outside and make friends incites endless whining and complaining. Because I'm up against a formidable foe: a media culture shoving the need for TV and video games down their throat. Pokemon, yu-gi-oh, and all these other consumeristic piles of crap. And all their peers at school do the same thing.

      When I was a kid, I'd get booted outside, where there'd be a dozen other kids in the street to hook up with and find something to do. Now everyone keeps their kids indoors mindlessly glued to the TV - which is, in part, thanks to the TV induced hysteria that it's dangerous outside, what with all those kidnappings and lunatics on the loose.

      It's pathetic. Several times i've resorted to switching off the main breaker and saying "well kids, looks like the power is out, guess you'll have to go call on some friends"

    3. Re:why it doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All of that useless tech is going to kill your culture."

      Or modify it?

      OoOoOoh, cHaNgE, scary! Oh the humanity! Someone turn on a Happy Days marathon, our culture is at stake! Quick kids, get in the car, we're going to Sonic Burger!

    4. Re:why it doesn't work by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Trance sounds better on an expensive audio system

      This is something the queers and geeks can agree on! But make sure it is Tiesto not Oakey. Hello, 1998 just called and wants you to go back to Ibiza! It's all about Hvar now, brave^H^H^H^H^Hdear heart.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  40. The more things change... by geekwench · · Score: 1
    My dad -- a geek's geek, to be sure -- pulled a stunt like this on our family, once upon a time. It all started innocently enough, with him taking an updated home electronics course. This was all a clever ruse to cover his ulterior motive -- building the big-screen TV for which he had been lusting. Add the 2 VCRs, one BetaMax (to copy protected VHS tapes), the cable box, the Atari, and the switch box to run them all; you finally has a conglomeration which required an E.E. to operate, four remotes, and rarely worked according to plan.

    Heh. I'll never forget the look on his face when Mom walked over to me and said "Here! You fix it!!"

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  41. Not real geeks by gdarklighter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No self-respecting geek watches Enterprise.

    1. Re:Not real geeks by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...for the story.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:Not real geeks by tommck · · Score: 1

      I watch it for the theme song!

      "It's been a loooonng road.... Gettin' from there to here..."

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  42. It'd certainly explain... by go3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?

    It'd certainly explain why four out of every ten IT guys are unemployeed.

  43. I'm not sure those guys qualify as geeks... by AEton · · Score: 1

    Kids need their own PC if possible, Larson explains, "because kids' software has, like, this uncanny knack for wrecking a PC. They introduce all kinds of weird fonts, and the thing just crashes all the time."

    Like, yeah. All those kids installing those nasty, like, fonts are just a pain in the neck, aren't they? Like, yeah, the big purple gorilla thing is cool and the green lizard thing that saves their passwords, but those custom fonts will crash a pee-see for sure.

    sigh

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
  44. LAME by HazMathew · · Score: 1

    That was one lame article. The goof balls couldn't even do the job. Give me a break.

  45. next month, in Fortune by Schwartzboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why, in my ideal world, in a few months we'd see some restrospective "Queer Eye" shows and a follow-up article doing a sort of "where are they now" that details all of the stuff that's fallen by the wayside and/or been destroyed by small children as compared to the geek-toys that are still in use. I have to agree with other posters here, once you've got your plasma TV and Tivo, I seriously doubt you're going to revert on purpose.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:next month, in Fortune by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a 53" widescreen HDTV (not plasma) about eight months ago, after much bribery and pestering of my wife.

      It was the greatest thing since sliced bread for a month or two, but now it's just a TV and I wish I still had the 5 grand and say a 30 inch regular tv.

      We don't watch any more TV or movies than we ever did. Turns out that the programming is just as lame and pointless with a high def picture and cinematic surround sound. "The Hot Chick" was a retarded movie, even in its full 16:9 progressive scanned format. Who could have imagined such a thing.

      While it was cool playing video games on the big screen for awhile, I realize now it just gives me eyestrain and a headache. My consoles have all moved to another room with the displaced 29" set.

      I spend more time laying in bed watching the little 17 inch I have in our bedroom. The HDTV is a neat toy that impresses guests, nothing more.

      If you gave someone a plasma, but they had no way to know its value, and you told them it was worth 400 bucks instead of 8-10 grand, would they be as impressed?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:next month, in Fortune by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      That's why when my wife and I had to get a new TV (to replace an ancient 27" model that gave up the ghost), we thought about what would make a nice step up, but not bust the budget. We ended up getting a 32-inch flat screen for about $500, and couldn't be happier.

      While not up to the standards of HDTV, just the fact that this set took component inputs coming out of our satellite system rather than just coax meant a major upgrade in picture quality, not to mention the larger, flat screen. Sometimes, a relative improvement is every bit as satisyfing as getting something on the cutting edge...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:next month, in Fortune by mal3 · · Score: 1

      If I paid $5000 for 53" widescreen HDTV 8 months ago I'd be pissed too. I bought my 42" widescreen HDTV around the same time and paid $1250. The 53" inch version of my TV couldn't have cost much more than $2K.

      It's a very nice Toshiba by the way.

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    4. Re:next month, in Fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents have been wanting to get a new TV for last few years, yet I keep delaying them. My dad wanted to spend $5000 on a TV, but I keep saying its not worth it, and to wait or buy something inexpensive. So now the TV he wanted a few years ago is half the price ($2500), but he wants to get this newer $5000 TV now. I personally think they should get a nice big regular TV, something in the 35" range. They have a 27" that is like 15 years old, but it works great. Why spend a fortune on something that will be worth very little in a few years?

    5. Re:next month, in Fortune by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I paid extra for a quality set so that I wouldn't need to worry about burn in, since it'd see more time playing video games than movies.

      It also included the surround sound system and stand. The set itself was around 3000.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:next month, in Fortune by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's worth paying extra if you're actually going to use it, which was sort of the point I was going for.

      If you're a hardcore gamer who constantly plays games on his PC, a $400 video card makes sense. If you aren't, it's a waste of time.

      I let myself get sucked into the whole "man if I had one of those TVs, the family would all get together every night and watch movies, we'd save tons of cash by not going to the theatre, console games would kick ass" thing. Next-gen console marketing of HDTV and digital surround sound sucked me in, being a fan of console games.

      It's not so much that I regret it, it's cool to have. I financed the whole rig and it costs me less per month than my cable does. Guests come over and we'll all sit and enjoy a movie, or whatever. But it hasnt revolutionalized my life or my TV viewing habits. I could have replaced the major kitchen appliances instead - that would have shut my wife up for roughly a week or so which would have been money well spent.

      For about two months, we'd go to blockbuster every weekend, eager to enjoy our uber-setup. Every weekend we'd realize that there was nothing we wanted to watch.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:next month, in Fortune by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 2, Informative

      We don't watch any more TV or movies than we ever did. Turns out that the programming is just as lame and pointless with a high def picture and cinematic surround sound. "The Hot Chick" was a retarded movie, even in its full 16:9 progressive scanned format. Who could have imagined such a thing.

      The problem is that you're watching "The Hot Chick." First of all, as you said it is a bad movie. Second, DVDs don't do "high def picture." I'm guessing you don't watch Monday Night Football or the Stanley Cup Finals. No Nova on PBS HD either. Etc, etc. And that's just OTA broadcasts.

      I don't watch a lot of TV which is maybe why I appreciate it more. I don't just flip something on for background noise. That and maybe the fact that for the last 7 years all I had was a 17 inch trinitron with dipole antennae, VHF and UHF dials and volume knob that doubled as the power when you pulled it. Of course it did get cell frequencies at the high UHF bands...

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    8. Re:next month, in Fortune by aliens · · Score: 1

      What do you have the refresh rate set to if it's giving you eyestrain ::)

      And it shouldn't make you want to watch more TV/Movies it should just enhance the experience.

      Of course I'd say sell the Plasma & setup, maybe you can still get a good amount and go away on a nice vacation. Money better spent.

      (I'll give you $500 for the plasma, I don't want to see you hurt your eyes any further)

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
  46. Queer Eye + Geek Eye = ???? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Helloooo...1997 called, they want their Moo Cow Gateway back!"

    "You call this a wireless mouse? More like a wireless HOUSE!"

    "Hmm. I like what you've done with this cabling - it's very Feng-Schwing!"

    "I hope you're going for a grainy, 'Kiss me Deadly' sort of thing with this greyscale monitor!"

    "Nice X-Box! Can we move in? And the controllers...I haven't seen anything that big since we did Kevin Mitnik..ss house... ahem.."

    1. Re:Queer Eye + Geek Eye = ???? by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

      BUWAHAHAHA!!! Now THAT is funny!

    2. Re:Queer Eye + Geek Eye = ???? by bvk · · Score: 1

      Email guy- "Oh, how cute, they're saving all their spam! Maybe they're planning to donate it to needy people in Tunisia who don't get enough email?"

      Internet guy- "Wow, they have Gator, Internet Optimizer, Cydoor, Aureate, *and* Comet Cursor, all on the same PC! Every 10 bytes of outbound data generates 20K of spyware logs!"

      Security guy- "2 worms, 2 trojans, and 6 viruses. This disk shouldn't be reformatted, it should have a stake driven through it while immersed in silver-laden holy water, before being placed in a Chernobyl-class containment dome."

      Hardware guy- "A Pentium 90 running Windows XP. That's only about, oh, 3 orders of magnitude below the recommended spec. I have a toaster that has more processing power, and all it needs to do is change the color of bread!"

  47. Geeks like Dell? by naarok · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but it seems wrong for a geek's preferred computer vendor to be Dell (or to even consider walking into a Best Buy).

    Being a geek myself, I'd never consider getting a name brand computer (unless the name is Alien Ware (shamelessly copied from a previous article).

    Having said that, some of the choices for tech are cool (like the Yamaha musicast).

    1. Re:Geeks like Dell? by sharph · · Score: 1

      Personally, I say make your own box... Big computer vendors usually make adding, taking stuff out (physically) really hard, and they put Windows on your system, and its hard to get a refund on Windows, etc.

    2. Re:Geeks like Dell? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      You have 3 days to do a project... you really don't want to fuss around with installing parts, operating system, software. This takes time.

      Your local indy shop usually requires 2 days min for a custom machine. Even their stock specials decent parts often also take 2 days.

      An off the shelf system is decent enough these days, comes with software pre-installed, and saves you a hell of alot of work.

      You could go with someone other then dell, but that leaves

      Gateway... Ouch! I just cut my self on the case
      Compaq.... what the hell where they thinking
      HP.... stupid missing agp port
      Sony... poof

      Dell usually uses decent quality cases, usually intel produced motherboards, and on the whole not actually very remarkable but stable and predictable.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  48. Short-sighted approach by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Do it as fast as possible.

    Throw money at the problem.

    Don't think long term. Remain fixated on the short-term.

    I've taught basic Internet and computer skills classes to a wide variety of people, all over the US. In doing so I've found that the only way to really make something stick is to actually sit them in front of the computer and have them learn by doing. The "three geeks and $15k" method is like a Microsoft Windows wizard. It may help you with the problem at hand, but it's not revealing anything about the hows and whys behind the problem.

    In short, the end user isn't learning. They're still beholden to the geeks, because as soon as the carefully orchestrated setup hits a snafu, Abbie Normal won't know how to fix that problem.

    Immersive, hands-on teaching works. It takes time and patience. Unfortunately neither are in ample supply these days, so everyone keeps on looking for silver bullet "solutions". This attitude is everywhere, even in large corporations, where managers want the latest shiny packaged product, because they actually believe that they can get results without having to learn anything first.

    The computer industry is a victim of its own hype. Or rather, society is a victim of the industry hype. If we actually acknowledged the value of learning, we might collectively be able to harness the power of computers instead of spending huge chunks of time dealing with trivial annoyances.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Short-sighted approach by hornrimsylvia · · Score: 1

      yeah they gotta think of some way to spike the technology with something like CRACK. that will get thim hooked!

    2. Re:Short-sighted approach by KiDas · · Score: 1

      Well said.. I second that notion.

      --

      A distinctive mark, characteristic, or sound indicating identity
    3. Re:Short-sighted approach by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      In short, the end user isn't learning. They're still beholden to the geeks, because as soon as the carefully orchestrated setup hits a snafu, Abbie Normal won't know how to fix that problem.

      I want to take this a step further by adding ...

      Most consumers are of the opinion that there shouldn't be a snafu that they'd actually have to be educated for solving. They just want a button to make everything work. It can be done, but not for $15,000. There has been lots of discussion about "do we educate the user, or just build more robust products?". I think it's a function of both, but more-so we need to educate the user. After their educated and fixing their own stupid problems we can get back to our Everquest, damnit.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    4. Re:Short-sighted approach by echucker · · Score: 1

      I'll give the mods that the parent is insightful, but I also don't think it's applicable in this case.

      Fortune blew 15k on a lark to write a cute article. No one said anything about long-term benefits, usage, or comprehension. I'd say they accomplished exactly what they set out to do- give a couple of guys a wad of money, let them spend it on toys, and see what happened. Simple as that.

    5. Re:Short-sighted approach by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      'Larson is the only guy in the bunch who actually reads directions.'

      That about sums up the whole problem. Three geeks, one family, and a couple dozen unread manuals.

  49. It took them 3 days? by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why didn't they just stick with all Macs? I mean we are talking about non-techies, that are going to be using them, and the Mac is one of the easiest systems to use for a newbie. Not to mention stable. Also why did it take them so long? I've setup simular set-ups (everytime I move) in under a day.

    --
    Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    1. Re:It took them 3 days? by hoytt · · Score: 1

      Because you already programmed your remotes. That took them two days.

    2. Re:It took them 3 days? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      No doubt.

      iMac 17" - main computer
      eMac - for the kids
      iBook 14" - roaming around (2 of 'em)
      Airport Extreme network

      some sort of file server...?

      Canon S400
      nifty photo printer

      TiVo - add 2nd hdd for max recording
      DVD player
      surround sound
      nice TV (plasma or otherwise)
      digital cable TV service (2 cable boxes - watch 1 while Tivo records the other - some training required)

      iPod 40GB with dock

      Yamaha music thingy

      Nextel walkie-talkie phones (2 of 'em)

      decent handheld GPS (2 of 'em)

      --

      Make sure the GPS' work with OS X.

      The network will take 5 minutes to set up (plug it in and go). Make sure all the computers are maxed out (RAM, hdd, AE cards, Apple Care, etc). Run software update for the latest of everything.

      Set up TV with surround sound, DVD, TiVo, and 2 cable boxes. Train them that red light on TiVo = recording something. Make sure surround sound receiver has changeable mode names ("TiVo" "TV" "DVD" "VCR" etc). Make sure kids watch when set to "TV" only.

      iPod and S400 just work with the computers from the get-go. Yamaha music thingy works fine, once wifi is up and running (according to the article).

      The only real question regards Dad and work, does he want a file server so he can save his work on a password protected machine that the kids can't bork?

      Phones just work. Same should be for the GPS, with some practice. Find a unit that mounts in a car nicely, works good as a handheld, and has software that works with OS X.

      Seems to me that this could all be done in a day.

  50. Sounds like fun but ... by JSkills · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'd end up being one of the geeks of course - and that has some inherent problems. I've ended up performing a service like this for many of my family and friends (helping to choose and set up computers, stereos, and home theatre systems, etc.) The problem is the fact that you now become the defacto tech support person for a group of people you basically like (friends and family). But being a tech support person makes you dread the ring of the phone and basically not want to talk to any of them any more.

    Hopefully, the geek-eye guys have unlisted phone numbers ...

    1. Re:Sounds like fun but ... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1


      me too.
      </aol>

      The problem is deeper than that, actually. You see, to get everything installed/set up, I chose to read the directions/manuals. Now I know what the features are, how to make them work, and have a pretty good idea of how to troubleshoot things if there's a problem.

      The family/friend person just sits down to play or work once I'm done, has no idea what they're doing, and never bothers to read the documentation to know what they've actually bought. When they're not calling me for tech support, they're doing things the dumbest and least efficient way and complaining about what a piece of crap I made them buy.

    2. Re:Sounds like fun but ... by JSkills · · Score: 1
      Well said and so true.

      I have one friend who had me get him a "family" PC. His wife does her shopping and online banking, games are installed for the kids, and late at night - daddy surfs the pr0n sites, clicking on anything and everything in sight. Between that and the various Outlook viruses AND the fact that they removed Norton Security (since I set it up too restrictively) - they've been hit with about 7 viruses in the past 3 years. At least 5 times, a complete Winbloze install was in order. All on my time (and on my dime).

      After the last time, I had to declare that I can no longer lay a finger on their PC. Sad, but true.

  51. I would need to spend $15k.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would take a year vacation in some exotic country.

    These toys are cool, but spending $15k on these is IMO ridiculous.

    1. Re:I would need to spend $15k.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A year on $15k?!? More like a few weeks. Unless, of course, your idea of an exotic country is rural Somalia.

    2. Re:I would need to spend $15k.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Thailand you can live quite comfortable for $1000 a month.

  52. Utter failure. by sahala · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The 3 geeks were setting up stuff that they themselves would enjoy. They didn't focus on what the family really desired, nor did any analysis of any real goals. That's not to say that other "improvement" shows do any better...most of them overlook this obvious, but important, step in the process.

    Ahh...and the remotes. This is the kind of stuff that has ALWAYS needed a lot of work. Check out this Cooper article on an elegant solution.

    1. Re:Utter failure. by AaronStJ · · Score: 1

      Everything is a channel, from HBO and ABC to the DVD player and VCR.

      Sounds like it's the Unix of remote controls.

      --
      Stupid like a fox!
  53. The fortune... by Zep1a · · Score: 0

    ...at the bottom of todays page.

    Ever feel like you're the head pin on life's bowling alley, and everyone's rolling strikes?

    Actually, the 3 Pin for rightys (or the 2 pin for leftys) take the headon hit.

    Zep
    -5 offtopic

  54. oh where is my game console by Stalyx · · Score: 1

    Damnit!!! No game console, I dare say that its probably time for the two year olds gaming education to start. An X-box with Halo would do nicely.

    Think about it.. you need talent to make headshots, teach em young and before they hit 5 they will be "owning joo noobs!!!"

  55. Harmony vs. Pronto by clmensch · · Score: 1

    I just got a Harmony remote b/c my Pronto is a pain. It takes long to program, but most importantly, it's impossible to use without looking. And the screen isn't very sensitive so you have to touch a button a few times to get it to "take".

    The Harmony is a generally good concept, but its major downside...like all universal remotes with hard buttons...is the fact that you have to remember where you mapped all the "special" buttons. For example, my cable remote has an "info" button that is separate from a "guide" button. I had to arbitrarily map it to an asterisk button because there is no "info" button on the Harmony...much to the chagrin of my wife.

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    1. Re:Harmony vs. Pronto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all you need

      http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=900498 56

  56. Coming next week on TDC/TLC by irving47 · · Score: 3, Funny

    MONSTER DATA CENTER!

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
    1. Re:Coming next week on TDC/TLC by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Then "Trading Class As", followed by "A BTO Story".

  57. Three days? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    I could blow $15,000 in a single afternoon at any electronics store.

    Sure, it might take me two days to set everything up, but any self-respecting geek could master this task by themselves.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  58. Disappointing by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    "Handheld PC with built-in GPS"

    The iQue is a PalmOS device. They're making it seem like its above what it is. Trust me, I want one, but there's something unsettling about not saying "A Palm with built-in GPS" as opposed to the archaic name used for PPCs.

    Besides if they were real geeks, they'd know they could easily use the iQue as a master-remote and eliminate all their troubles. Any Palm device can use one of about 3 different programs to emulate any IR hardware. Pity they're going to mis-use the iQue as just a GPS, just like most people will mis-use the Zodiac as just a gaming device.

    But this is all for not, these people will probably break something 30 seconds after the guys leave and be unable to reboot their computer. There's no respect for these guys("BITCH!"?), and honestly, you have to be pretty bad to start off with to be picked for this, I assume. /animosity toward luddites? Maybe. . .

  59. Why, Scarecrow, you've been a tech guy all along by Neillparatzo · · Score: 1
    Larson smiled. "You know what, Mike? You've really been a tech guy all along!"

    Mike was taken aback. "No way!"

    "Yes," Larson said. "You're only missing one thing."

    "What's that?" Mike asked quizzically.

    "FIFTEEN THOUSAND FREE FUCKING DOLLARS!"

    Mike beamed.

  60. Three days?! by Mordant · · Score: 1

    Hell, I could spend $15K at the Apple Store in about 30 minutes.

    1. Re:Three days?! by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      and i could pretty much do it on one item. just throw in some software.

  61. more like Free Shi+ for the Sales guy by netsavior · · Score: 1

    Damn, I want all that free stuff

  62. Suggested Steps Towards Geekdom by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instant Street Cred:

    1. Install Linux on a killer laptop (slackware or gentoo for brownie points)
    2. Get decent entertainment center (TV, DVD, PVR, speakers)
    3. Get a dvd movie collection stocked with LoTR, Matrix, BTTFuture, Monty Python, Alton Brown cooking DVD's, Star Wars (only to comment on how much of a sell-out Lucas is), and if you're l337, RevolutionOS and Freedom Downtime.
    4. Get a handful of books. O'Reily ones. None of that "For Dummies" series except if it's the RH9 one written by Mad Dog.
    5. Get them on Slashdot...but PLEASE initiate them with AYB, Beowulf Clusters, In Soviet Russia, Welcoming Overlords, Profit!, etc.
    6. If the Slashdot crowd doesn't already get them to do it, have them chant Microsoft Sux and SCO Sux until they absolutely wholeheartedly believe it.
    7. Abuse them by asking them to fix their relatives' computers and explain to their AOLer friends what FTP is.
    8. ...ah screw it, you can't TEACH geekdom.
    1. Re:Suggested Steps Towards Geekdom by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      You forgot #9:

      9. How to associate themselves with Trolls, FistPists and the GNAA.

      I know I'll get modded down for the this.. But oh well...

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  63. A lot of AOL CDs by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    For 15,000USD You get a lot of AOL CDs!

    Ups sorry, AOL is definitly not geekish enough. Maybe MSN 8.0 on a Pentium 90 with 32MB of RAM and a Mediaplayer 9.0 Update.
    Is this geekish enough? :-)

    NoSuchGuy

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  64. GPS? by donutz · · Score: 5, Funny

    HA! You think a group of geeks would only buy a camera and maybe a new PC? HA! GPS is definitely needed to send photos to grandma.

    GPS: Know your exact location in your own home!

    Without GPS:
    Wife: "Kids, dinnertime!"
    (no answer)
    Husband: "Maybe they're in the toy room, dear!"

    With GPS:
    Wife: "Kids, dinnertime!"
    (no answer)
    Husband: "Kids are at 33 56' 52" N, 118 8' 5" W, dear!"

    1. Re:GPS? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Feh. Real geeks use UTM.

    2. Re:GPS? by demonbug · · Score: 1
      With GPS:
      Wife: "Kids, dinnertime!"
      (no answer)
      Husband: "Kids are at 33 56' 52" N, 118 8' 5" W, dear!"


      Real men use UTM coordinates.

    3. Re:GPS? by suss · · Score: 1

      Husband: "Kids are at 33 56' 52" N, 118 8' 5" W, dear!"

      What are they doing at Paramount Blvd. and 6th?

      Are you sure they didn't just strap their GPS to a dog and let it loose or something?

  65. How it might go.... by davidsheckler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just think of the fun!

    Joe Technophobe: "There's muh cumputer, it's uh winders three kind, but the cup holder
    on it is durn broke".

    Techno Geek1 : "Dear god, something from the Jurasic period, Just look at this fossil, a 286SX
    and the cdrom, I mean 'cup holder is jammed with... , oh no that's sooo
    sooo soooo very wrong.'

    Techno Geek2 : "There are wires everywhere, have you even heard of zip strips? Keeps your layout
    nice and tidy, and you don't even have to trip over them."

    Techno Geek3 : "Let's talk about Product, it's all about the preparation and the hardware,
    I think we can get you a nice durable all steel case, that's coffee proof and
    and with lots and lots of RAM."

    Techno Geek4 : "You god damned ignorant hilljack! How can you treat hardware this way, didn't
    your mother teach you to wear anti-static wrist guards? Where did you grow
    up? The third world?"

    Joe Technophobe: "Nope, uh work fer Marketing in the Racing business"

    Techno Geek2 : "Say no more, well take it from here"

  66. Geeks? by zeroclip · · Score: 1

    Next up: getting the Apple PowerBook G4 to work. A mac?! geez what kind of geeks is this??

  67. SONY RM VL900 learning remotes... by mekkab · · Score: 1

    I too prefer traditional buttons (you can feel 'em in the dark (wow, did that sound dirty))

    And the Sony RM VL-900 learning remote is the SCHMOKINEST. Why? Because it works. How? That list of codes they give you on that index card written in 2 point font? useless, don't even bother with it.

    Its remote-to-remote learning function is sooo good, the only thing you have to worry about is forgetting to record a button.

    I'll admit, it takes a little getting used to, hitting (TV) then (POWER), instead of just hitting the (POWER) button, but if you have more than 3 components (TV, Cable box, VCR, DVD) there is no excuse for having 4 stupid remotes.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  68. What happens when the Geeks can't get it working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get better geeks. Duh.

  69. neither..Knowing how to use it in 1st place wins!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ideally.

  70. Powermac G5 by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    ...Everything else has at least one too many mouse buttons.

    Hmm...how to mod a funny troll?

  71. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work

    Shaaarron!!

  72. MOD PARENT TO INFINITY by the_Upsetter · · Score: 1

    very, very insightful

  73. $15k wasted by r_j_prahad · · Score: 4, Funny

    These turds blew $15,000 on gizmos and gadgets for a family that only wanted to send pix of the kids to Granny? Talk about scope creep....

    1. Re:$15k wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bet Gramma didn't even want anything to do with computers anyhow.

    2. Re:$15k wasted by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Or she may be an 802.11a-toting geek, who knows?

    3. Re:$15k wasted by Hatta · · Score: 1
      They only had limited expectations because of ignorance of the possibilities. If you read the whole article, you'd find that the family (well dad mostly) was pleased and surprised by the possibilities:
      Throughout, of course, Mike is thrilled. ("Terrrific!") Having DSL in his house is "a total miracle." After only a few minutes, he declares that "TiVo has already changed my life." ("Twilight Zone?" he says, scrolling through a list of shows he could now record. "Why wouldn't you tape all the Twilight Zones?")

      Mike seems to be a quick study. At the end of the walk-through, he programs the Yamaha to play Heart's "All I Wanna Do Is Make Love to You" and imagines out loud the idyllic possibility of sitting at the table in their backyard with his wireless laptop, downloading big PDF files from work with no long delays.
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:$15k wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic! Because we all know, the only use for technology in North America is for the possibility OF WORKING MORE! *AT* _HOME_!!!
      Fucking FOOLS! What happened to the leisure society?

  74. Easy. by sfgoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?

    You know they didn't buy a Mac, that's what.

    Seriously, get 'em DSL, an AirPort base station, iBooks and iSight for each family member, and now they have high speed wireless internet with videoconferencing.

    Pile on a TiVo, any DVD player, and a $1000 30"+ CRT TV, and a decent sound system.

    Total cost: way under $15k.

    The key is, don't buy the best of everything, buy the stuff that's proven to work.

    1. Re:Easy. by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      With 15k, i'd ge them powerbooks. the ibook is a great budget laptop, but 15k to spend means you don't have to buy anything budget. Plus, i would go for a better TV. Maybe even a projector if they don't mind paying for bulbs.

    2. Re:Easy. by farmgeek · · Score: 1

      And we know you didn't read the article.

      THey did buy a mac.

    3. Re:Easy. by orpheus2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fucktard, RTFA. That's what they *did*!

      They got DSL, Powerbook G4, Airport Extreme, 2 TiVo's, plasma tv, and yes a killer sound system (among many other things).

      They failed in their execution only with the remotes. That's the "it" in your quoted text.

  75. Advertise that you just got $15k worth of gear... by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who wants to lay bets as to when they first get robbed?
    Did they get them some high-tech security?

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  76. Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket... by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1

    [AverageGuy] Awesome, thanks! So what games are on here?

    xBill & Nibbles. 'Nuff said :-)

    Quite frankly, if I was kitting out a family with a games machine, it would be a PS2 or similar console system. The idea of any family not familiar with keeping a PC up and running would use it for gaming is pretty funny. Wait until they have to install their first Windows SP, update Direct X or their box gets overrun by Sven, Welchia and Blaster. It would actually be easier to install UT2k3, Quake3, Savage, Orbz, Thinktanks and half a dozen other native Linux games and LOCK DOWN THE BOX. The average user (note: not the average PC gamer) has little enough clue about these issues in the first place. As has been postulated elsewhere, maintenance is the tricky part. At least with a console, the effective locking down has already been done and the average person can find games in future shop or wherever.

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  77. wet 11??? by Grimlock88 · · Score: 1

    "the Linksys EtherFast five-port switch and a Linksys Wireless Ethernet Bridge. (Those in the know refer to the last item as a "Wet 11." Naturally.)" Wet 11? No man! Hell no! I do believe you could get your ass kicked for saying something like that!

    1. Re:wet 11??? by Flower · · Score: 1

      Alas! For want of a mod point.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  78. the geeks by corian · · Score: 4, Funny
    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?


    If that happens, they send someone out to buy them a preposition.

  79. It's not TOO easy, thats why it requires ambition! by snatcheroo · · Score: 0

    "Toward the end of their time together, the geeks ponder over the lessons they might pass on to ambitious digital do-it-yourselfers. They pause. Ross fingers his goatee, and tentatively offers, "Don't expect it to be too easy?" " Ambitious digital do-it-yourselfers don't buy prebuilt hp, dell or other computers and would make their own all-in-one remote from the garage worth of scrap electronics they've accumulated.

  80. in case of slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last page of article:

    Day Three
    The pressure is on. Larson has to leave at 2 p.m., Ross at 5 p.m. The subject of the day is, of course, whether they can get the remotes done in time. It's not looking good. There are also the two TiVos and the home entertainment system left to set up.

    At about 11 a.m., Heistad admits that with respect to the remotes they are "sucking wind, bad." The house is in chaos. The kids are everywhere. Heistad starts sweating through his shirt and has long since begun calling everyone "bitch." There is dissension in the ranks:

    Heistad: "Call the guy [from customer service]! Say, 'This is really hard to understand! Can you please walk us through it?' "

    Ross: "But--you should really be able to ..."

    Heistad: "Call him, bitch!"

    Adding to the pressure is the not-small task of teaching the Burkes how to work everything in so little time. Mike, who has been traveling for work all week, can get away for only two hours today, at lunchtime.

    At noon he shows up. Mike is very much the sales guy. He is upbeat and apparently interested, though he has a tendency to cut explanations short by saying things like "Terrrrific!" and to fawn over his kids and the gadgets at the same time, as in, "Oooh! TiVo! Want to give daddy a kiss?"

    The geeks start walking him through his house. Larson shows Mike how to hook his camcorder up to the PC and make movies that he can send to his brother in Japan. He explains the difference between "slurping" (video), "ripping" (music), and "shoving" (the camera's media card into the PC media server). Larson tells Mike that when he wants to print a photo, he should simply "connect the squiggly one to that thing-a-ma-doodle." (Larson also refers to the PC media reader as a "front-loading deelie bopper.")

    Throughout, of course, Mike is thrilled. ("Terrrific!") Having DSL in his house is "a total miracle." After only a few minutes, he declares that "TiVo has already changed my life." ("Twilight Zone?" he says, scrolling through a list of shows he could now record. "Why wouldn't you tape all the Twilight Zones?")

    Because Jenny had gently suggested earlier that Mike sometimes gets lost in D.C., the geeks take some time to show him the Garmin GPS unit, which he can't help but compare with the Hertz Neverlost system. ("She talks to you," Mike says of the in-car navigation system's computerized female voice. "She's nonjudgmental. She corrects you nicely if you screw up.")

    In fact, despite being "so pre-Clinton era" in the realm of home electronics, Mike seems to be a quick study. At the end of the walk-through, he programs the Yamaha to play Heart's "All I Wanna Do Is Make Love to You" and imagines out loud the idyllic possibility of sitting at the table in their backyard with his wireless laptop, downloading big PDF files from work with no long delays.

    Finally, in a state of shock and awe, he says: "Hey! We're going to bypass the 1990s and jump straight into the new millennium!"

    "I can tell you're a wannabe tech guy," Larson say. "You're going to pick this all up pretty quick."

    Mike beams.

    As the day winds down, however, it becomes clear that the geeks are not going to get everything done. The plasma TV, DVD/VCR player, surround-sound speakers and speaker stands are a breeze for Ross to set up. But the remotes never quite work.

    Instead of saddling the Burkes with a dud, Heistad makes a last-minute switch to the Prontos and offers to install them on his own time over the next couple of days. (Which he does: four hours on Saturday and a few more on Sunday, with plans to stop by a few times later during the week.)

    And maybe that's what a perfectly seamless digital life requires. Not a limitless array of stuff, necessarily, but a lifetime supply of Heistad.

    Toward the end of their time together, the geeks ponder over the lessons they might pass on to ambitious digital do-it-yourselfers. They pause. Ross fingers his goatse, and tentatively offers, "Don't expect it to be too easy?"

  81. Yes, you need a '486 and a Betamax by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    I don't know where the rest of the money went...

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  82. Perhaps it is impossible by EnterpriseNCC-1701 · · Score: 1

    There are some people out there that are inordinatly technologically impaired. I have often tried explaining computers to such people in on case while trying to help someone with a computer they asked me if the strange silver/grey box on the floor was nessisary for the computer to work. Lauren.

    --
    "Most interesting how often you humans seem to obtain that which you do not want" -Spock
  83. And on Animal Planet by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Beowulf Hunter!

    (CRIKEY! Here's a 1100 node cluster of Athlon 2200s running Linux! Be warned though, it's bluetooth is razor sharp and the combined heat output can cook 'er arm clean off! Danger danger danger!)

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:And on Animal Planet by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 1

      And me without my mod points ;p

      --
      -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
  84. Tired of the whole "Queer Eye" thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just reverse discrimination..."Ooo look at us we're gay and therefore have magical powers to make you look good"

  85. This isn't a show. by Elvisisdead · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's me at my parent's house.

    --

    "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
  86. Front-loading deelie bopper? by queevert · · Score: 1

    If these 3 are the best that Fortune could find, I'm ashamed to call myself a geek. "deelie bopper?" "wet11?"

    Sheesh.
  87. That's what I was wondering - why GPS? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Unless your house is mobile and in Kansas, chances are you don't need a home GPS unit.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's what I was wondering - why GPS? by zoombat · · Score: 1

      From the article: "Because Jenny had gently suggested earlier that Mike sometimes gets lost in D.C., the geeks take some time to show him the Garmin GPS unit"

      I actually thought that was one of the better toys for people living in a large metro area like DC.

    2. Re:That's what I was wondering - why GPS? by The_Pey · · Score: 1

      So you can geo-stamp your pictures.

      Duh!


      --
      Hmmm...
  88. Double Blind experiment by jgregs75 · · Score: 1
    Psych experiment on how long a non-nerd family will last before turning into a quadruple suicide or just a chance for Paul Ross, (32, owns Sound Integration Singular) to expand his maintenance contracts????

    • Universal remote batteries die and now nothing works. Tech support "bitch" is nowhere to be found for reprogramming.
    • All the hardware was mistakenly purchased w/o Integration Singular's 30 day service warantee.


    • Poor midwest family ends up with a "consulting" bill of $25K to "maintain" existing hardware and "update" software as necessary just so they can watch the evening news and email grandma.
  89. I call BS by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the cheapest is not best for the average joe.

    The best for the average joe is the most reliable, and the best bang for the buck.

    Did they need progressive scan? Well, if you're going to blow $4k on a TV, get the people the equipment to carry the best signal and hook em up with a nice sound system as well.

    When someone who doesn't know anything about DVD asks me what to buy, I tell em Sony. Sony's aren't the cheapest, but they make a nice $100 or so model and those stand up over time.

    I had a Toshiba that burnt out in a year. I know three different people who bought those $69 Apex pieces of shit and the best one lasted six months.

    You get what you pay for, and suggesting Apex to your friends or family will just make sure they don't ask you for your advice ever again...

    1. Re:I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a total of 20 of them that I reccomended in service and they all work still...

      in fact a couple of them have been in use for 3 years now (APEX brand)

      I have seen no troubles with them and everyone has been very happy.

    2. Re:I call BS by swilver · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...suggesting Apex to your friends or family will just make sure they don't ask you for your advice ever again...
      That's perfect, I'll recommend it to all my friends and relatives right away!!
    3. Re:I call BS by bobobobo · · Score: 1
      You get what you pay for, and suggesting Apex to your friends or family will just make sure they don't ask you for your advice ever again...

      Well not always the worst thing.

    4. Re:I call BS by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Mine has worked great, too. Though today I replaced it with a DVD player that has mpeg4 decoding. The ability to disable Macrovision and change regions with a "secret" menu is just a bonus.

    5. Re:I call BS by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 1

      My family and friends wont call to ask computer or electronic advice ever again? I think you may be onto something.......

  90. True stories from real houses by Tacoguy · · Score: 1

    Selling and installing C-Band dishes to average consumers for several years in the mid '80s makes me appreciate this story! There is such a difference working in your normal environment than in some family's home. No matter how prepared you are ... "you can't get there from here" Everything goes wrong, from not enough electrical outlets to the 2 year old dropping the remote control into the the fishtank. We won't talk about the dog digging up the newly buried cable cause he thinks you buried a bone :-) Ahhhh ... the memories

  91. what most of us really need is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What most of us really need is a job that pays real money but I'll accept a 15k line of credit at the moonlight Bunny Ranch as a consolation gift.

  92. Stupid. by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Funny


    So for a family of complete techo-illiterates, they bought a PC _and_ a Mac. That way they'll never figure out how to use anything. Bravo.

  93. Score - 1, Elitist Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of shit. If you piss away $15k on a home computer, you're a fucking moron. Sorry, you aren't developing new weather models in your spare time. Perhaps spare cycles, but you're going to spend $15k on that?

    The Apex is a cheap piece of shit. Spend another $30 and get something that wasn't built from a Korean scrapheap. I hope your family beats you to within an inch of your insulent life for saddling them with such garbage (I know from what I speak, I've had two.)

    Pioneer Elete series? Or do we go for the Carver Studio series? or do we go for even better? or are we happy with the sub $400.00 junk at best buy?

    Or do we understand that this little device, known as the transistor, has made very high quality electronics available to the masses. Sorry to burst your bubble, but most people aren't going to notice the differences without the help of electronic measuring devices. And just wait until presbyopia and presbyauria catch up on your lame ass. Mother nature will take away more of your listening pleasure than you could hope to notice between a mass market and an expensive piece of kit.

    $15,000.00 is not anywhere near enough money.

    To be able to send pictures to grandma? Read the fucking article, moron. You must be a government employee or contractor. Only someone with his head so far up his ass couldn't buy a digital camera and docking station for less than $15,000.

    Oh, that's right. You store your goatse pr0n on your $15,000 'home' server. You are so cool.

  94. Focus, Grasshopper. by Population · · Score: 1

    Split into teams.

    Team 1: Install the biggest TV they can buy, hookup the TiVo and spend the rest of the time showing everyone how to erase everyone else's shows. Before leaving, hack TiVo and put in 200GB disk.

    Team 2: Install the GPS in the SUV. Show mom the basics.

    Team 3: DSL to firewall to airport. New PC's with wireless cards installed. Test with camera. Teach 4 year old how to run camera and send movies to granma.

    Team 4: Keep the house stocked with pizza and beer and go around putting the tech support phone numbers on all the devices.

    1. Re:Focus, Grasshopper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "putting the tech support phone numbers"

      except for the Tivo number, right ? because hacking the Tivo will get you zilch support.

      how about dsl-firewall-nocatauth machines-airport...all we need is another hackable 802 net.

  95. Nerd-eye-for-geek-guys by mabu · · Score: 1

    This is appropriately characterized.. only "geeks" would get excited about a Best Buy shopping spree to set up a home entertainment system. NERDs on the other hand, would take an existing setup and hack it and make it more functional, without any need for extra money. While the geeks would go to Circuit City, the nerds would be all over ebay picking up skeleton equipment uber-cheap to repurpose.

    If you want to do a reality show properly, you have nerds go into peoples' houses and do stuff like:

    * Take the kids' X-Box and show how it can be turned into a home-monitoring alarm system

    * Hack the DVD player to disable macrovision and country code restrictions

    * Modify a refrigerator to be used as a wine cellar

    * Hack the TIVO to be more functional

    * Switch the phone service to VOIP

    * Modify the existing air-cooled air conditioning system to be water-cooled and more efficient

    * Implement a wireless mp3 broadcasting stereo system throughout the house

    * Create a black box that disables all television commercials from the tv screen automatically

    * Turn a normal array of home speakers into a custom 5.1 setup

    * Show mom how you can override the diagnostic codes in her new car's electronics and tweak performance parameters

    * Jack into the neighbor's wireless LAN for free Internet access

    Now we're talking nerd-eye-for-geek-guys

  96. misreading by EZmagz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Some folks are misreading what's really going on here. Of course it's a 3-day bootcamp to throw $15K worth of high-tech gear at this family. The whole setup is modeled after Queer Eye For A Straight Guy, and as anyone who has watched that show can tell you, it's not about long-term retention with the new goodies that they person at hand received. Hell, it's a GIVEN that this family won't know what the hell to do once they have a power outage and their stereo resets to the default settings. Or when the 4 year-old decided to piss on their WAP. Or when Verizon cuts off their DSL because they're about to get a supoena from the RIAA for sharing all their mp3s stored on their new music server. That's not the point.

    The point is that these guys were SUPPOSED to go overboard. Hell, on Queer Eye the only thing really wrong with the guys are that they're messy and slobish. All they really need is a maid to swipe through and vacuum their apartment and do the dishes. Is that where the show stops? Of course not, where's the fun in that? It's more entertaining to see a guy's guy get totally redone by a bunch of flamboyant fashion kings/queens going the whole nine. New pimpish wardrobe, new interior decoration, a preplanned meal that rivals most 5-star restraunts', etc.

    Sorry for the rant. It just seems that a lot of people read too deeply into the whole purpose of this "experiment". Have fun, enjoy. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go find the family's address so I can sniff their wireless traffic and blackmail 'em for that plasma tv.

    --

    "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for SEGA. ..."

  97. Show this on TLC ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope TLC shows something like this rather than those marathons of home improvement shows.

  98. All Hail the "pre-packaged"!!! by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

    I've been through that.
    But the key line over here is not "throw money at the problem"; it is "Any price that will take the problem off our hands". Perversely, it may not be the highest.

    We once had to buy, for regulatory reasons, a specialised software for the evaluation of financial options. Of the three contenders, one was good, the others were on the rainy side of lousy. Problem was, the guys building the best programs, which was the priciest, actually INSISTED on seeing their program used well, which meant trying to see how well our company knew the matter, meeting with the PHB responsible, the operatives guys, etc.

    Now guess: the field is down to two contenders, and they are not one of those two.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  99. Are they really geeks? by KiDas · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. From skimming thru the article (which was pretty dull) it seems to me that these fellas are more yuppies than geeks. Guess they didn't look to slashdot when they were recruiting.

    Plasma screens aren't really the best thing to spend your money on considering the high price and the fact that they loose brightness VERY fast. It didn't say what they paid for theirs but seems like it was a LARGE percentage of their budget.

    They bought a G4 powerbook. hehe.. ;)

    They didn't even build a custom pc. HP Pavilion.. bah!

    What to speak of the rest of it all.

    --

    A distinctive mark, characteristic, or sound indicating identity
  100. The Real Difference between Queer Eye and Geek Eye by taernim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Queer Eye doesn't just fix their problems and say "Here is what you need to wear to not look like a slob. By the way, your hair sucks" ... they actually take the guy and say "Hey, this would look good on you, this would look good in your house... and here is how to do it from now on." They give tips, pointers, and no-no's.

    Geek Eye just said "Here's a bunch of technology, which you have no idea why you need it and not something else... now use it." There was nothing beyond the How To UseExpensive Technology for Dummies crash course that they were given.

    If you want people to actually grow and learn, you need to explain why. Honestly, technology is a more difficult beast to master than fashion... although looking at many /. readers, I'm sure that may be relative. ;-)

    *prepares for mod down*

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  101. They were almost there. by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They did buy a Powerbook and Airport base station - which they designated for use in reading email!! Then they bought a $699 Best Buy PC to handle the tasks of camera mounting and digital video editing. Madness!!

    They should have gone one way or the other (I'd have gone Mac myself), but introducing a mixed system to non-tech people is not a good plan. They basically demonstrated no degree of ability to interconnect systems, where all the REALLY cool features you could have nowadays come from.

    The interesting thing to me is that these guys, being geeks, must read /. - where is the post from them outlining more detail?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They were almost there. by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      I too almost choked when I saw the mixed system.

      Get a nice 17" iMac with SuperDrive as the media hub

      Swap the Powerbook for an iBook since it's more durable

      Set them up with IMAP e-mail so they can read it from either machine and stay synchronized (use Mail.app since it's idiot simple and integrated with iPhoto)

      Give them an external media reader for the camera (simpler than plugging in a USB cable) and a scanner for film pictures

      Buy a second keyboard and a trackball for the kids, keep the primary ones out of range

      Turn on Tivo Desktop so you can watch slideshows and home movies from the sofa

      Spend an hour walking them through iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, and iDVD; show them how to open Help and where the various companion tutorials are

      Buy them AppleCare so you don't have to visit them when the iBook is accidentaly left within range of the kids and give them directions to the nearest Apple Store

      Buy them a game console and mount bass shakers in the sofa

      Thank the team at Apple for actually doing research on how and why the average Joe uses computers

  102. 3 Days???? 3 Seconds by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    Pioneer "50 Plasma HDTV

    Everyone will forget about a wireless this or gizmo that, when this baby fires up and lights the room.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  103. Re:A waste of $15,000? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, yeah - but does it *ever* really work out well when you send a group of people into someone's house (on a tight schedule, no less), and start making buying decisions for them?

    This was money spent for the sake of writing a story... not for the sake of ensuring the family's goals are achieved.

    It's no different than the shows where they remodel your house for you. People following up on it later find that at least 50% of the time, the homeowners undo all the remodeling work shortly after they're done being on TV.

    I think, all things considered, they didn't do TOO badly. I mean, almost anyone can enjoy a large screen TV set, "technology-impaired" or not. They were already using the net for email, so they'll at least use the DSL connection for the same things as before. (Yeah, they might not need the speed, really, but it's nice having an "instant on" connection, and none of the dropped carriers in the middle of sessions.) It looks like they'll mess around with the digital camera too. I don't think I've ever met someone who got a digital camera, learned the basics of using it, and then let it collect dust - opting to go back to the film camera instead. They're not THAT tough to figure out, really - unless you dig in to the advanced features, and saving hassle and money on film developing is usually motivating enough to keep people using them.

  104. Security by hikerhat · · Score: 1

    I'm sure their wireless network security was overlooked in the time crunch. These folks will never know the guy next door is sharing mp3's over their network, and their kides are going to be sued for a million dollars each. Terrrrrific indeed.

  105. They asked 3 geeks !!?!?!!?! by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

    Right there is the problem. If you want a straight answer, you ask only one. With two, or more, they'll spend all their time arguing about the merits of various bits of technology.

    --
    un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
  106. nice terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    "He explains the difference between "slurping" (video), "ripping" (music), and "shoving" (the camera's media card into the PC media server)".

    "a Linksys Wireless Ethernet Bridge. (Those in the know refer to the last item as a "Wet 11." Naturally.)"

    With terms like that, who needs females? oh wait..I forgot this is slashdot

    1. Re:nice terms by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > With terms like that, who needs females?

      You failed to mention my favorite term from the article... When he started calling everyone "bitch." :)

  107. Low maintenance? Time to mention the "M" word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux or even upscale Windows is absurd for the nongeek. What they need is several iMacs and maybe a G5 connected wirelessly.....and an assortment of iPods, PDAs and other toys scattered about.

    Barry

  108. Are you serious? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    Do you not understand the definition of profit??? Oh yeah, I get it, the question marks are necessary to get the Funny points. Soon we will be seeing posts like this:

    1. Have an idea
    2. Form company
    3. Have revenues exceed expenditures
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

    Come on now.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Are you serious? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      No No No! It's really like this:

      1. Write open source software
      2. Give it out free
      3. Bitch about microsoft
      4. ???
      5. ???
      6. Profit!

  109. What's that? by dmayle · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The PC sports a 2.08GHz XP processor"

    XP processor, what's that? Is that what I use to run Windows 97 for my Outlook Explorer?

    1. Re:What's that? by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      Athlon XP.

      I have this nagging feeling that you knew that anyway.

  110. Linksys Wireless Ethernet Bridge?? by rob10405 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article states that they used a Linksys Wireless Ethernet Bridge to connect the PC to the DSL connection?? They also bought an Airport Base Station. Why not just buy a Linksys WRT54G and use it to connect both the PC and Powerbook. Seems like these geeks might need to go back to geek school.

  111. Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one whole-hearedly welcome our Geek Overlords and their $15,000 make-overs.

  112. outsource it by Rock+Ridge · · Score: 1

    That is the answer. They should have outsourced a $7500 time and materials budget, then pocketed the spare $7500. Am I not right? OK, might have outsourced a $5000 budget, then kept $10000. Any lower bidders out there?

    Going, going, sold American!

  113. Re:Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The average user learns by doing, just like you did, you arrogant twit.

    I'm sick of hearing how regular folk are just too dumb to use a computer like an elite genius such as yourself.

  114. Dell does have its uses... by tugrul · · Score: 1

    Its not always worth the effort of researching then ordering parts only to deal with the occasional DOA part and various sources of support for hardware issues when prepackaged prevalided machines using essentially the same components you would buy are available for about the same or lower price point.

    I keep an eye on sites like Ben's Bargain Center, where really good deals from vendors like Dell are brought to the budget conscious geek's attention. I recently picked up a pair of 2.4Ghz 800Mhz FSB dual channel DDR P4s from Dell for less than 500$ each, and I'm very pleased with the machines. They are petite yet expandible, made of standard quality components, neat, silent, stable and fast. The one I use as a Windows box boots into XP before my monitor warms up. Which is another thing, essentially free Windows licenses, which is nice when I need to use Windows. And Linux has no problems on the machine, aside from a bit of difficulty during install since most of the hardware is quite new compared to the aging Debian install disks, like a new unrecognized rev of the Intel eepro.

    My main machine is an upgraded Compaq W8000, which was a great deal back when I bought over a year ago. For 700$, I had picked up a great case with a 500W power supply, an i860 SMP motherboard worth at least 500$ itself, a P4 Xeon 1.7Ghz which was at least 150$, 18GB 10k SCSI drive which was over 200$ at the time, and the other necessary parts short of memory and video.

  115. Hmmm...New Rules Folks by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit -- real geeks don't have to call tech support....Let alone spend hours online with tech support. They must be at one with the gadgets. The gadgets must be an extension of them.

    ** Plus if you are going to get geeks to spend 15K to supply a family with the latest gadegts....Make sure it is geeks who have had 15K to spend themselves. A true geek does not just read about it...he lives it.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  116. must exterminate geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    must kill them....

  117. What average family needs all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How does this help anyone? What I think would make this cool would be to form it more into This Old House, or Trading Spaces. Take the tech guys, move into the house and actually do what they need. maybe make a show on how to properly network your house. Here's an idea to fit the needs that the AVERAGE family needs.

    I mean they get this fancy music system. screw that, take the money and give them a normal cd player. Chances are they can actually use it.

    Give them DSL, can they afford it? is sending email instantly really that important to someone who can't figure out how to program a VCR?

    Buy them a new computer... once something breaks their going to be calling tech support having the conversation: "Can you open Internet Explorer please?" "ok... now internet explorer... what is that... I don't think i have it, i'm on 2000XPME." (acutal response i've recieved lately)

    If you can get along without downloading the newest strongbad email within 5 seconds, or God forbid having to get out of bed to check your email, WHY DO YOU NEED IT NOW?

    I'm all for getting new high tech toys, but if a tech guy has a hard time figuring it out to get it set up, what happens when it breaks?

    I consider my parents to be relatively average with technical things, they put their computer togeather without help, but when it come to trading in 5 remotes for one, the concept of pushing the TV button before controlling the TV is sometimes hard to grasp. Some people are better off keeping the 5 remotes knowing the Black on means TV, the White one means VCR and the Grey one means DVD player.

    1. Re:What average family needs all this? by SpookyCat_Laughter · · Score: 1

      AC has a good point. I'm not sure how most of the technology changes enhance this "average" family's life.

      Just as an example: A 42 inch plasma TV is certainly exciting, and I'm not a bit surprised the father in the family found it to be "Terrific!", but as a mother of two (who once were toddlers themselves,) I can sum up what that TV will be in just two words: "Handprint magnet." I definitely have better things to do with my time (like read Slashdot, for instance!) than to spend it endlessly wiping grimy peanut-butter and dirt laced handprints off 42 terrific inches of plasma scren.

      Here's an idea: Fortune should look for geeks who are experienced both with technology and actual families. Their efforts should not focus solely on what's "really neat" in technology, but also on what's "really useful". For this family, half of which consists of small people with curious hands and no real judgement skills, I would have suggested quiet, super-efficient cooling systems in the computers that would allow them to be shut behind doors or cabinets, safely away from little fingers that love to poke the "reboot" buttons. A TV that mounts on the wall rather than a desktop model. (as the Panasonic specs indicated.) Plenty of children's software to install on the "kid" computer. (That separate system *is* an absolute necessity.)

      FORTUNE said the purchases needed to meet the requirement of "practical", among others. I don't think the geek team gave the practical needs of the Burke family enough consideration.

      --
      The tree was toppled, tinsel and ornaments everywhere, and in the distance, the unmistakable echo of spooky cat laughter
  118. Home Invasion for the Average Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is fantastic! From the article:

    "Mike and Jenny Burke live in a two-story brick house in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., with a pretty, postage-stamp lawn and a crape myrtle tree out front, and a little handwritten sign taped beside the door that reads Doorbell Doesn't Always Work."

    Shouldn't be too hard to locate this place. From the sounds of it the Geeks forgot to spend a little of that cash on a decent burglar alarm (assuming Mr. and Mrs. Technodope already have one the PIN is probably a default or their house number). Who wants $15,000 worth of new toys? The only drawback? They probably "forgot" to tell their insurance agent about the geeks' visit so it would be back to the Eighties for the Burkes'.

  119. I think the odds are against them... by dspfreak · · Score: 1
    What the poor geeks don't know is that they'll be asked to help these guys and their kids!

    --
    "Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." -- G. K. Chesterton
  120. "Dell?the geeks' PC maker of choice" ??? by JDevers · · Score: 1

    Since when?

    I thought most geeks built their own PCs or atleast bought them white box...

    They ended up buying them a damned Pavilion, my BB has quite a few PCs I would buy before I bought ANYTHING from HP.

    While we are at it, why buy them both a Powerbook and a P4 desktop system? They should have either stuck with x86 hardware all the way through or went completely Mac. Having two different systems is going to end up confusing them needlessly.

  121. most important PC feature? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    "The (PC's) major selling point: a front-access six-in-one media-card reader" (worth $9)

    Are you sure these are geeks? They're buying PCs based on nifty $9 features, sounds more like something a Average Guy would do: "Oh look, the mouse glows red! I want this PC!"

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  122. Meh on plasma. by Eneff · · Score: 1

    At the risk of -1, redundant...

    The projection TVs are cheaper and better for the size, even when replacing bulbs is considered. (After all, with American habits that plasma screen is only going to last 8-10 years...)

  123. Harmony Remotes are great by jesup · · Score: 1

    These 'geeks' had trouble with the Harmony Remotes. It's not clear why, but I've found Harmony remotes are wonderful, and are great for the non-geeks in your life.

    One of the very nice things compared to most multi-device remotes is that you don't have to spend time programming macros, worrying about which items need to be turned on or off or which input selected. You tell the website what devices you have, and which is connected to what, and it sets up "activities" like "Watch Television" or "Play a DVD" or "Listen to Radio". When you select one, the Harmony turns on or off all the boxes that need to be, and does any required switching automatically. No macros to program. It also changes the remote so that the buttons are all relevant to what you're doing (in "Play a DVD", the play button is the DVD play button, etc).

    It's also a learning remote, so if you have truely oddball equipment like my Unity Motion big-dish satellite HD receiver, you can learn the codes in a few minutes.

    And if you're a _true_ geek, you can reprogram it in XML.

    (I had Mod points I could have used on this thread, but I couldn't resist posting.)

    1. Re:Harmony Remotes are great by mi · · Score: 1

      I'm sold. Almost -- can the buttons be labeled in Cyrillic? My grandmother's English is not that good...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Harmony Remotes are great by jesup · · Score: 1
      Sorry, the hard-buttons are pre-labelled, and while the LCD appears to be dot-matrix, I haven't seen any way to add graphics to the XML.

      Check out the Harmony SST-768 at www.harmonyremote.com. They also have a new Harmony 659 with perhaps slightly better ergonomics for non-geeks, but not quite as powerful as the 768. (The 768 isn't bad for non-geeks, but the 659 has more pre-assigned buttons for things like "Watch TV" instead of having to select it on the LCD with the scroll wheel). Not to mention the built-in program guide (useful mostly if you don't have a sat/cable box with a guide, or if it's a slow, painful guide like the TVGuide guide).

      Both of them will control PVR's, etc. The "Geek Eye" people were using the 768, which is overkill for that household - the 659 would be a better choice.

    3. Re:Harmony Remotes are great by jimsum · · Score: 1

      You might want to look into using a Pronto remote. These things have a touch screen that you can program using a Windows program. Although the only font it has is English (plus a bunch of baffling symbols), you can use whatever graphics you want for buttons; which could include Cyrillic characters. You can also make the graphical buttons and text extra big, if that helps your grandmother.

      I think a Pronto remote is harder to set up than a Harmony remote, but it is probably more capable for around the same price. If you want Cyrillic, you will have to go with a touch screen remote.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
  124. Re:Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The idea of any family not familiar with keeping a PC up and running would use it for gaming is pretty funny.

    Not necessarily.

    Our decidedly non-Geek gaming family bought a mid-line Dell, our first "real" computer, and moved to broadband cable service last fall. On a friend's advice, the only change I made to the plain vanilla install (which includes Norton A/V) was to add the freeware Zone Alarm firewall. I don't understand ports and didn't want the problem of configuring them manually. SP1 was our first cable download and went off without a hitch, since then the process has been pretty much automated.

    Filtering at the ISP level is very effective, the few examples of Sven and the like that slip through scarcely rate as an annoyance, though the kids seem a little disappointed when they don't get a chance to "squash" a bug themselves!

  125. What happens when even the geeks can't get it work by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    You stop getting low-grade geeks. "What do you mean it doesn't taste like a burger? Grade F meat is still meat!"

    It hasn't been hard to set up consumer electronics for years. When I bought a commodity box for my mother, I plugged it in, hooked the color-coded picture-demarcated mouse and keyboard plugs into the back, and hooked the monitor into the back. Then, I plugged the monitor in, and wham! Done. EVerything was magically ready to go. Even had a little bit of music on the machine.

    Might want to spend $15,000 on getting a writer that doesn't have to bum ideas from Bravo!.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  126. ReplayTV Rocks by jesup · · Score: 1

    So it's not Linux... it rocks (so does Tivo, so no flames please). Both are wonderful for skipping commercials, backing up after "what did he say?", dealing with "Honey, can you come here for a second?", etc. Not to mention effortlessly make sure that you don't miss Crash on Junkyard Megawars.... :-)

    1) 30 second skip button without having to reprogram
    2) Instant replay, skip forward/back N minutes, skip to minute N of the program
    3) Can use all free disk space for buffering live TV
    4) Networking - unlike Tivo, networking is built into the base unit. Stop playing on one, go to another room, resume playing there - way cool. Tell it to record something on the other Replay, easy.
    5) DVArchive (open source java program) - make your Replay(s) think your PC is a Replay, and stream/download shows to it. Even better, the PC can serve them back to the Replays. And you can burn the files to DVD's or VideoCD's.
    6) Trivial to add larger drives to.
    7) Great IPG, and Replay Zones are great (preset searches/lists of programs, like SciFi movies)

    ReplayTV (or Tivo) will change the way you deal with TV. No doubt about it.

  127. What is the opposite of 'geek'? by OECD · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Geek Eye for the Average Guy? It seems like we need a term for the opposite of geek (I'm not ready to concede 'average guy', though you could make an argument there.) Preferably, it'd be a single syllable word, like "gay" or "straight" or even "geek".

    I'm going to suggest "mug". It seems to have gone unused since the 40's--"Hey, you mug!"--so we might as well dust it off. Plus, it suggests "Muggles".

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:What is the opposite of 'geek'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose that we simply use a term that is already fitting: "mook".

    2. Re:What is the opposite of 'geek'? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest "athlete?"

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:What is the opposite of 'geek'? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really like that: "Mug." It has a nice, dull sound to it. And it's concise! Thanks!

      I believe that I'll incorporate it into my vernacular.

    4. Re:What is the opposite of 'geek'? by steveorama · · Score: 1

      The article used the more appropriate term, luddite.

    5. Re:What is the opposite of 'geek'? by Clith · · Score: 1
      Stolen from filk: "mundane".

      Can be used as an adjective in a pinch: "mundane user".

      Usual use as a noun: "I was out with a bunch of mundanes the other night.."

      --
      [ReidNews]
  128. Amen to that brother by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that now my wonderful employers can afford to buy stuff again they are doing exactly what they did when they could afford to buy stuff last time ( immediatley before they realised they were totally inefficient, burning money and with far too much "wastage in the middle management tier".

    Yes they are once again spending an awful lot of money on, occasionally, very nice enterprise systems which they don't bother training anyone how to use ( or even finding out what it can or more often can't do beyond the shiny advertising which presumably causes them to buy this stuff )

    Consequently all the main IT infrastructure in my company ( ironically enough a company which claims to advise or outsource IT know how for other less fortunate companies - victims ) are either very nice but only used up to around 5% of their potential usefullness or totally useless and forced on everyone to use for everything.

    That turned into a rant. Sorry.

  129. Re:What happens when even the geeks can't get it w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Q. What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?

    A. Someone has to RTFM

  130. 15k$ is A LOT of money.... by tadd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... you can do your average family's house for 1/3 of that maybe less... these are not geeks/audiophiles/experts we are talking about by definition... wal-mart and kmart grade stuff would do the job... or generic taiwanese stuff... come on people be realistic!

    --
    [what?]
  131. Setting up is not really the problem by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a geek who has set up AV and computer systems for 'average' family members, I've found that getting the thing working is by far the easy part.

    It's when you say goodbye and leave the house that the problems start happining. Computer drivers become muddled. Wifi networks magically stop connecting. Stereo settings become off.

    And you end up dreding answering your phone because you're going to have to do tech support.

    To the average person, keeping a hi tech setup in good working order is difficult. (My stereo doesn't work. After hours of troubleshooting over the phone, you discover it's because they hit the 'a' speaker button while cleaning the recevier).

    Keeping a computer system in top condition is even harder. "Of course I clicked on that attachment. It said it was from microsoft and it would clean the virus out of my computer".

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  132. $15k? That's it!? by Mondain98 · · Score: 1
    Ok so that covers 1 good TV, 1 good computer, and a handful of other toys like surround sound, tivo, consoles and games. They havent even gotten to rack-mounted gigabit networking, print and file servers, gbics, and a nice laser printer.

    I look around my apartment and it would take a lot more than $15k to bring myself back up to speed, let alone a family.

  133. All right by Flower · · Score: 1
    Why the heck buy a printer for the digital camera? From what I've been told, even if you buy the paper to get decent printouts they aren't going to last as long as regular photos.

    Get them a decent DVD/CD writer and let them take the disc to WalMart to get quality pics. Probably cheaper too. IMHO.

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  134. Re:Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly me. I assumed you meant a real computer, The IBM PS/2... Why would anyone ever need more than 1 Mb of memory and 20 Mb of hard disk?

  135. Shenanigans!! by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was bored this summer and bought like 4 or 5 low-end DVD players to see which really is the best and could play VCD/SVCD/XSVCD/wmv and my findings were in general, cheaper was better.

    My friend has an expensive Toshiba piece of crap which only plays SVCDs and barely at that, it doesn't even attempt to play any other format.

    My parents thinking they were smart or something.. went out to get the cheapo APEX/MinTek and thought they'd get the next model up cause it looked better.. Turns out the processor is crappier and won't play any VCD/SVCD without major artifacts.

    The latest to market cheapo has the latest asian low-end technology to bring cost down and end up playing more formats and doing a better job. Oh, and *SCREW* Sony if you want it to play anything other than DRM, special-branded media, licensed DVDs from your region. /rant off

  136. Re:"Dell?the geeks' PC maker of choice" ??? by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    I thought that myself. I hate Dell, every time I ask someone if they want me to build them a PC they say they've already ordered a Dell. I hate most name brand PC's to be honest.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  137. Disappointing by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt the geekness of these guys.

    I expected to see them wasting the 3 days in a vicious debate over which Linux distribution they would install on each of the family's new PCs.

    Then over Window Managers, and then over retraining the family to use Mozilla, Konqueror, or Lynx.

    Instead, they start by doing the sensible thing and getting them Powerbooks. Ok, not so bad here...

    But then, they want to buy them a DELL?! And their second choice is an HP Pavillion?

    What self-respecting team of geeks can't find a decent custom-built barebones, or put one together themselves, in 3 days with 15K? Or at least go for an Alienware or something like that if you want a "brand".

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  138. Send grandma M57 by im+a+fucking+coward · · Score: 1

    For 15k, buy @ least a 20" telescope with 0 chromatic aberration, and send granma a picture of the ring nebulae big enough for her to make a hat out of. Screw kiddie pictures!

    Or how about we treat this like a project in the REAL world and grant 2.15 hrs billable from inception to implementation, give the geeks $500, a deadline that's already two weeks late, and wait for the miracles. It's sadistic as hell, but I actually prefer my projects this way. If it bombs, hey, tough shit, failure was imminent. If it works, you're a freakin' genius, and you ARE a genius, right? No pressure there bitch.

  139. Re:The Real Difference between Queer Eye and Geek by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    I know it's really DIFFICULT to find hardware that even the luddite can get a grip on.

    One printer i've noted that seems to have the average user in mind is the HP psc 950, though this particular model is a few years old... I'm sure there is something newer that is equilivent. Among it's features are printer, scanner, fax, copier with nice buttons ontop that allow you to "scan" to "fax, printer and PC save". Easy peasy. Further, it takes smart memory / memory sticks, further more it prints out a proof sheat of your photos and to enlarge one you don't even need a PC. Just using a #2 pencil you fill in the bubbles on the proof sheet and it takes that input on the scan bed. While I see some advantages to having solid state removable media accesable on your PC... I find that this solution is far superior to the inexperenced user who pretty much wants hardcopy of their images without any fuss.

    ----

    Home theater I setup for a family member who had the following plan in mind. They wanted DVD, replacment of their big ass speakers with small bookshelf varity to maximize on space, the ability to access their legacy media (vinyl, cassette, video tape), as well as reducing the size of the stack. All with the ease of pushing a button. To this end I went with a bargin bin solution offered by Circuit city. They had a Magnavox 5 disk home theater with smallish speakers and 5.1 sound. The important feature I was looking for was line level input and output as well as independent buttons for each fuction. What it lacks is video input for each fuction, which detracts from the intuitiveness of it. The existing amp cross wired into the tape input and output so the aux fuction would listen to whatever the old amp was listing to, which seemed to make the number of button pressing minimal. I also went with a simple radio shack switchbox which has one very important feature, not only does it accept svideo input, but will output both svideo and composite, making it ideal to pigtail to the vcr's input and record what ever you happen to be watching. (Note: recording something diffrent then what you are watching is an advanced concept). Also since I had a seperate amp, I set it up in a diffrent room, made a wire run and picked some jenson bookshelf speakers.

    Thigns added... 5 disk DVD player, two bookshelf speakers, switchbox, 4 small speakers and subwoofer.

    Things subtracted FM tuner, 4 large speakers.

    -----

    Ease of use....

    Remote controls.... the stock digital cable remote doesn't control the sound levels, and it's common for the user to use the "wrong" remote to adjust the sound levels. There are three places to adjust the volume, the cable box, the TV, and dvd home theater amp. [not to speak of the aux amp with turntable and tapedeck]. In theory the next version of the Motorola cable box will come with a remote that handels the home theater. If I was doing this professionaly, i'd make sure to BUY a remote that supported all the above. For now, the instructions are clear, use the dvd remote for sound, use the Cable remote for channel.

    Manual controls...

    One thing important to people is a manual control for volume when they can't find the regular remote. This home theater unit has a traditional volume control.

    Also, the whole system is dependent on the TV being on aux 1, and the VCR being on aux for recording and such. When ever anyone changes the station, the whole thing doesn't work and a phone call is needed. This would be resolved in a couple of ways

    1. Have a menu option on the TV to disable the Turner and other unused inputs so people don't get confused.
    2. Have a Home Theater amp that accepts video input so the buttons on the front that say "TV" will show you TV.

    While the home theater offers 4 speakers and a sub... there really isn't an option like there is on other older amps to just output stereo to all 4 speakers. There is the prologic decoding that makes a valued judgement of what i

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  140. Did You Do It On Purpose? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    What happens when even the geeks can't get it work?

    I think you answered your own question.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  141. Perhaps this is ... by trashyspaceman · · Score: 1

    Geek Pride ??

  142. Did you even bother to read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did the family really desire?
    "Heistad grilled them on their tech needs--really, all they wanted to do was send digital pictures of the kids to Grandma."
    "Because Jenny had gently suggested earlier that Mike sometimes gets lost in D.C., the geeks take some time to show him the Garmin GPS unit, which he can't help but compare with the Hertz Neverlost system. "

    If they bothered to focus completely on that, they would have only gotten them digital cameras, PCs, GPS, and the DSL connection. What would you have suggested they do? Get them interactive Barney? Slushy machine?

    Instead they focused on general improvement of their condition: big TV, music in every room, Tivo, etc..

    In terms of "improvement" shows, you seem to think more along the lines of "Ask this Old House" where they go and fix 1 problem and only 1 problem. Whereas shows like "Queer Eye" try to improve on a bigger and more general view. Sure the guys will probably revert back into slobs, but unless people are willing to submit to psychological breakdown and brainwashing, it's up to them to step up and be held accountable for their own self-improvement.

  143. The geek business plan by rune2 · · Score: 1

    $15000(??!) minus $199 for a Walmart Lindows PC = $Profit!

    I'm going to Disneyland!

    1. Re:The geek business plan by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Disneyland? Outside? Sunshine? People? What kind of geek are you talking about? Maybe a trip to comdex, maybe.

  144. well duh... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    In fact, despite being "so pre-Clinton era" in the realm of home electronics, Mike seems to be a quick study. Finally, in a state of shock and awe, he says: "Hey! We're going to bypass the 1990s and jump straight into the new millennium!" "I can tell you're a wannabe tech guy," Larson says. "You're going to pick this all up pretty quick."

    Well of course he is now that he has an excuse to buy all these cool gadgets the wife would never let him buy!

  145. Geeks? by ninjaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The qualifications of these "geeks" seems questionable. It sounds more like they had typical executives from technology companies (an IT executive at Time Inc., A former CTO, and an audio store owner) calling shots in their standard fashion:

    1. Buy expensive things based on the brochures,
    2. Yell when the standard lack any due diligence or research left them in a jam,
    3. Demand a bonus for staying on the sinking ship! / Get the geeks to come up with a workable interim kludge. -- omitted

    However, in this case, they didn't have actual geeks to pick up any slack. And, they also were forced to omit their core competency of writing memos "We are excited to announce the strategic alliance with $VENDOR! We will be rolling out $BROKEN_PRODUCT beginning next month!"

  146. The article points to a larger issue by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Fortune blew 15k on a lark to write a cute article. No one said anything about long-term benefits, usage, or comprehension.

    Excellent point. I agree that this was just a lark on Fortune's part. But I think it's also indicative of a larger fixation in American business and society at large.

    People discuss computers in megahertz, but not ease of use. They talk about Java this and Java that without ever finding out exactly how Java is really going to provide any benefit beyond what their existing languages/apps/infrastructure/whatever are providing them. They look for the silver bullet when the answer isn't that easy.

    Actually, Fortune isn't an exemplar of long-term thinking anyway. Although some of their columnists are pretty sharp, they tend to play up the latest trends and fads in investing and business, rather than focusing on what works over the long haul. But then, when public companies are only looking quarter to quarter in a frantic effort to placate shareholders, what should we expect?

    OK, I'm getting way off topic. Time for me to find that old stash of Quaaludes...

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  147. Oohh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...oohh...oohh, you know... oohh.

  148. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Gashdot.orgasm

    Please choose your mood music:

    (1): Barry White
    (2): Massive Attack
    (3): Eric Cartman

    Please choose your object of desire:

    (1): Broadcom wireless chipset support for Linux
    (2): Beowulf cluster of Dual Proc G5s
    (3): Natalie Portman

    Please choose your accessories:

    (1): ?????
    (2): Profit!
    (3): Hot grits!

    Thank you, and please enjoy your stay.

  149. The last page... by phrogeeb · · Score: 1

    The last page is where it gets real funny:

    "Call tech support, bitch!"

    If I heard the Fab 5 on the real Queer Eye saying that, I'd just die.

    --

    ------

    "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

  150. Re:The Real Difference between Queer Eye and Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC Load Letter

    Paper Cartridge, Load Letter Sized paper

  151. Choice Quote from the Article: by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Heistad: "Call the guy [from customer service]! Say, 'This is really hard to understand! Can you please walk us through it?' "

    Ross: "But?you should really be able to ..."

    Heistad: "Call him, bitch!"


    Ha hahaha. That's classic. I can just imagine this long haired chubby guy with red hair, glasses, and a goatee on the computer, saying that to a skinny short brown haired guy with freckles. hahaha

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  152. It was too complex and poorly thought out. by nycbrujah · · Score: 1

    Thats more of an insiteful comment than funny one.

    An average family doesn't need half the stuff they were given to become a digital family.
    Why were they given a full multimedia center? The Geeks themselves didn't really do enough research into what they were giving the family.

    Would a family really need a GPS system? YahYahYah I know trips. Was that much of a home theatre necessary? Especially with the 4 year old and 2 year old, I have visions of sandwiches and peanut butter in the DVD player, kid prints on the plasma TV. Perhaps all that was needed was to run the current TV through a Stereo and add a DVD player, if one wasn't already there.

    All the devices should have been working with a universal remote. It's not that hard to do a quick look to see what devices have compatibility issues with other devices.

    To get this family to the digital age all that really needed to be done was install a new computer, a digital camera, DSL, and a photo quality printer. They were right on regulating a separate computer for the kids' games. Wireless is good, very good, but there can be signal crosses from fun things like cordless phones.

    New Technologies are great and wonderful...for geeks. For the average user who just wants it to work, waiting for the second or third revision of a new product is probably the best bet.

    --
    'Pleasure is the Disease, Pain is the Cure' - Lilith
  153. Re:Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket.. by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone ever need more than 1 Mb of memory and 20 Mb of hard disk?

    I see we wear the same model of digital wristwatch! :-)

  154. Pet peeve alert! "setup" = noun, "set up" = verb by ml10422 · · Score: 1

    > "how to setup a wireless network"

    That should be: "how to set up a wireless network"
    "Setup", "login", "logout", "logon", "logout" are nouns.
    "Set up", "log in", "log out", "log on", "log out" are verbs.

  155. Re:Why, Scarecrow, you've been a tech guy all alon by benjamindees · · Score: 1
    FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS

    ...to buy a Cisco certification, an MCSE, an A+, and a RHCE.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  156. Re:Don't leave with that PS2 in your back pocket.. by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1

    The average user learns by doing, just like you did, you arrogant twit.

    I'm sick of hearing how regular folk are just too dumb to use a computer like an elite genius such as yourself.

    Must ... not ... feed ... the ... trolls ....

    ***failed***

    Look, my opinions are the result of working with normal people trying to use their machines. They don't result from some ivory tower view of the world. Computers are HARD TO USE. Period. Most people find their computers baffling at least some of the time, and downright frustrating and impossible when things stop working.

    And yes, the average user does learn by doing. But doing what? Most people get better and more experienced at using their systems by being able to ask someone for help when the proverbial hits the fan. If the family in question was not previously technical and they are given a computer as part of their high tech make-over, they will need help a lot in the first month, fairly regularly for the next 6 months and after that most things will be okay and fixable by themselves. If you are trying to introduce the family to computer games (which was the point of this thread if you hadn't noticed) why burden them with a bunch of system admin? They don't need the hassle.

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  157. PCMCIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People Can't Manage Computer Industry Acronyms...

  158. "Mundane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could steal a word from science-fiction fandom: the opposite of a SF fan (or computer geek) is a "mundane"). If you want one syllable, it abbreviates to "'dane".

    (Of course, this may not please actual Danes, so I had to link to one of their sites to appease them.)

  159. A matter of geek priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, too, had a 17" MAG CRT monitor--in 1990. These so called "geeks" should be able to do a heck of a lot better than a 17" CRT if their goal is to bring the family "up to date." I lost all faith in them after reading that.


    The 17" MAG was for to mod into a fishtank. They got a 23" Apple Cinema display for the computer.
  160. Buy a Mac!!! by WAW401 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but if geeks can't figure this one out, we all have no hope. I run mainstream services on Mac OS X ... and never did before Mac OS X, so you might consider me a newbie to the server admin arena. BTW - I just had a meeting yesterday at a law firm whose computers could NOT print-out an Excel file for me, so I don't want to hear how easy MS OSes are to use.