Slashdot Mirror


User: Curtman

Curtman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,446
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,446

  1. Re:BTRFS? REALLY? on Ext4 Advances As Interim Step To Btrfs · · Score: 1

    It's a good analogy for FOSS after all. Great software, robust and all, but her face...

    Was a good analogy... Maybe.

    Compiz shot us way out front in the looks department.

  2. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 1

    Thanks. I didn't feel like beating my head against the wall anymore.

  3. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 1

    You're a very strange person.

  4. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 1

    Good enough code doesn't mean what I said. You can write fantastic code, but if it doesn't do something useful, and by useful I mean something that the project maintainers deem as useful then it's not getting in. Even then, typically it's not getting in without several revisions.

    Point is, it's not easy to get code in. You are wrong.

  5. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 1

    You said the only thing you would need to insert code in to an open source project was an email address. That isn't true. You can have an email address and submit patches all you like. They won't go anywhere but sit on the mailing list unless they actually do something useful, and aren't coded in a horrible fashion. It's not easy to get code in to a project even when you have a really good idea. People argue about how you chose to do it, and which whitespace you chose to use.

    Why would I quote the whole thing? The rest of what you wrote had nothing to do with anything worth mentioning.

  6. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All you need to contribute to most open-source projects is an email address

    If you think its that easy, you are wrong. You need a contribution that is worthy of being accepted.

  7. Re:Don't bother on Bringing OSS Into a Closed Source Organization? · · Score: 5, Informative

    What processes are in place to protect users from malicious code?

    The same ones that protect us from malicious proprietary software, execept there is many many more people doing it, and it is a hell of a lot easier to do.

  8. Re:Hmmm. Could it be ..JESUS? on Al-Qaeda Web Sites Go Offline · · Score: 1

    Scary, isn't it?

    It's very scary to see people like you get brainwashed this way.

  9. Re:Heh, not so sure on Researchers Claim To Be Able To Determine Political Leaning By How Messy You Are · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's the American Democrats who have taken the term for their own, despite the fact that they continually clamp down on liberty just as the Republicans do.

    Actually it doesn't matter which party started it. You're all Americans from where I'm standing.

  10. Re:Heh, not so sure on Researchers Claim To Be Able To Determine Political Leaning By How Messy You Are · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Furthermore, I'm sick of the label 'conservative'. ... I'm as liberal as any Democrat"

    I'm sick of you people misappropriating the word 'liberal'.

  11. Re:Exccept.... on National Debt Clock Overflowed, Extended By a Digit · · Score: 2

    Hey, at least living in Texas is good for SOMETHING!

    We have no idea what, but we are pretty sure about it anyway.

  12. Re:What's the solution? on National Debt Clock Overflowed, Extended By a Digit · · Score: 1

    these are not bad times if you are smart and not stupid and buy into their stupid panic stories.

    Good luck with that one. Most of this century so far has been one big stupid panic story.

  13. Re:I like Mono, but... on Mono 2.0 and .NET On Linux · · Score: 2, Informative

    If Orkut and Google Docs are .Net 3.5, how can I run them from my linux box?

    You aren't running them. They run on servers somewhere down the series of tubes, and your browser displays their output.

  14. Re:point to point on Replacing Fiber With 10 Gigabit/Second Wireless · · Score: 3, Funny

    sweet now i can have my chicken and porn in ten seconds or less

    Believe it or not, there is already franchise opportunities available in this market.

  15. Re:Should lead to possibly great advertisements on How Kernel Hackers Boosted the Speed of Desktop Linux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kudos to you sir, for reducing the time it takes to type congratulations by instead using grats!

    I prefer 'c13s'.

  16. Re:That's ok on IOC Trademarks Part of Canadian National Anthem · · Score: 1

    Singing the national anthem in school is really an American thing, no?

    I'm afraid its much more rediculous in parts of Canada. We first sang the national anthem, then "God save the Queen" (why in the world we would want to do that, I'm not sure), then we said "The Lords Prayer" (even if we weren't Christian).

    In public school in Winnipeg during the 1980's.

  17. Re:That's ok on IOC Trademarks Part of Canadian National Anthem · · Score: 4, Informative
    Also try googling "Manifest Destiny". You'll find this at Wikipedia:

    Before 1815
    During the American Revolution and the early years of independence there were both peaceful and violent attempts to include Canada in the United States. The Revolutionaries hoped French Canadians would join the Thirteen Colonies in the effort to throw off the rule of the British Empire. Canada was invited to send representatives to the Continental Congress, and was pre-approved for joining the United States in the Articles of Confederation. In the Paris peace negotiations, Benjamin Franklin attempted to persuade Britain to cede Canada to the United States. Canada was invaded during the War of Independence, and again during the War of 1812. None of these measures proved successful in bringing Canada onto the side of the Thirteen Colonies.

  18. Re:That's ok on IOC Trademarks Part of Canadian National Anthem · · Score: 2, Informative

    But you never saw Canada going, "Oh, no, the US has this terrible weapon, what are we going to do?

    Why would we do that? The U.S. gave us a whole bunch to point at the Russians.

  19. Re:That's ok on IOC Trademarks Part of Canadian National Anthem · · Score: 1

    You can have Quebec. Please, take them. Please.

  20. Re:Dear Constituent (a letter from your government on US House Limits Constituent Emails · · Score: 1

    Way to use the "Preview" button. You need to use '<' to do a '<'.

  21. Re:Cheap. What's the point? on Designing The Ultimate Netbook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the point? If all you've got is a low end CPU you aren't going to be doing any serious graphics anyway.

    I thought the point was to be small and portable with long battery life. Get a Nintendo DS if you want to play games. The most "serious" graphics I expect are some desktop effects, and maybe watching a movie.

  22. Re:What the problem with Gmail? on Good Email For Kids? · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I, and others, want is a feature that says "Gmail: we trust your spam filtering, and are prepared to risk a false positive, so please make anything you think is spam completely inaccessible"

    That sounds a lot like "GMail: I'm too lazy and or busy to watch what my kid is doing, so I'd like you to do it for me"

  23. Re:Huh-whuh? on Slashdot's Disagree Mail · · Score: 5, Funny

    I missed that. Holy fuck, he is good.

  24. Re:Huh-whuh? on Slashdot's Disagree Mail · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever get the impression that maybe people are submitting this mail so they might see it appear here on Friday?

    Call me optimistic but I just don't believe that people are this stupid. Close to it, but this is over the deep end stuff.

  25. Re:LSB - just say no on How the LSB Keeps Linux One Big Happy Family · · Score: 1

    That's a lot of stuff. Enough to run a nice EEEpc. But not enough for the general Quicken-using public to use.

    Bullshit. The quicken using public doesn't care about Windows, they just want to use Quicken and not be harassed by malware, viruses, anti-viruses, spyware, spyware removers, etc, etc..

    They can do that in Linux.