Slashdot Mirror


User: Curtman

Curtman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,446
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,446

  1. Re:Are you telling me... on The Canadian Taxman Goes Browsing on eBay · · Score: 1

    Not every sentence - just the one's ending with questionmarks.

    Plus some that don't. As in: "Pass me a beer 'eh"
  2. Re:Boom on First New Nuclear Plant in US in 30 years · · Score: 1

    It did not say anything about having plenty extra to sell. It did not say anything about the ability to produce much more, and in fact, most good hydroelectric sites are already producing. There aren't any more.

    Conawapa is one. "Conawapa will require no significant water storage upstream and will cause limited flooding, approximately 5 sq. km, of land almost entirely within the natural banks of the Nelson River."

    It didn't say anything at all about solar and wind.

    Because that particular site is from a hydroelectric producer. See here for a more general view.
  3. Re:Boom on First New Nuclear Plant in US in 30 years · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hydroelectric is one of the most environmentally destructive ways we can produce power.

    Bullshit.
  4. Re:Boom on First New Nuclear Plant in US in 30 years · · Score: 1

    At this time, it's better than a coal plant that pumps tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. I rather my waste is buried than floating in the atmosphere.

    We've got plenty of hydroelectric, solar and wind power to sell you, and the ability to produce much much more.

    I'd rather you bought that and leave our air and water alone.
  5. Re:Boom on First New Nuclear Plant in US in 30 years · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reprocess it and generate mopre power is tho.

    Where is that being done currently? All I found was this:
    • The West Valley plant was deserted by its owners in 1972, leaving 600,000 gallons of high-level liquid waste and 30,000 gallons of radioactive sludge as a legacy to the State of New York. Solidification of this waste has been estimated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to cost about $500 million, once they solve the associated technical problems, which (it is estimated) will take a minimum of 14 years.
    • Occupational exposures to radiation were very high at West Valley. In 1971, almost 1000 transient workers were hired to keep exposures to the 162 full-time workers down. Nevertheless, over three-quarters of the full-timers were over-exposed.
    • Radioactive effluents into the environment from West Valley were very high. Concentrations of strontium-90 in local creeks were from 1000 to 10,000 times higher than projected. Over 65% of all the available Iodine-129 (half-life 17 million years) was released, either as a gas of liquid, showing up in the thyroids of wildlife and in cow's milk.
    Yummy.
  6. Re:Boom on First New Nuclear Plant in US in 30 years · · Score: 1

    I think the real dangers of modern powerplants is the pollution although I'm also certain that they can deal with that now.

    For some values of 'deal with' maybe. Bury it underground, and hope for the best. That's not a sustainable plan.
  7. Re:Who? on How Burmese Dissidents Crack Censorship · · Score: 1

    That would take years, and a lot of individual, personal, risk.

    And complete and total reversal of beliefs. In a predominantly Buddhist society, taking up arms against an oppressor isn't an acceptable way to express dissent.
  8. Re:They SHOULD... on Will China Beat the United States Back to the Moon? · · Score: 1

    Which the gov't can repudiate at any time, or (as is the current case) pay off with inflated dollar bills.

    That's going to be harder to do while your dollar is dropping like a stone.
  9. Re:Article is useless without a graph! on Canadian Dollar Reaches Parity with US$ · · Score: 1

    cross the border in a town with a population of 100 and not worry about getting caught not paying customs.

    You shouldn't have to pay duty on computer hardware anyway. That's part of the FTA which became NAFTA.
  10. Re:Ooh, Can we Down That Here in the USA? on Massive Canadian Class-Action Cellphone Suit Is Approved · · Score: 1

    I bet there's a case to be made there, for 12 BILLION DOLLARS!

    Is that U.S. or Canadian dollars? Or right, it doesn't matter anymore. :)
  11. Re:Caldera to SCO: Backing the wrong source on SCO Blames Linux For Bankruptcy Filing · · Score: 1

    I thought Torvalds only owned the copyright to the Linux Kernel, not to Linux.

    He owns neither. "Linux" (not the kernel) isn't a real product, it's just what a GNU distro running on the Linux kernel is called. The copyright on Linux the kernel isn't in one persons hands. Many many many people collectively have copyright on the kernel itself. You have to look at individual files within the source tree to see who has copyright on what.
  12. Re:Caldera to SCO: Backing the wrong source on SCO Blames Linux For Bankruptcy Filing · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used Caldera for a while and it certainly wasn't too bad. I remember the install being rather easy

    Yeah, and it let you play pacman while you waited for it to install. That was the most innovative thing Caldera ever did as far as I'm concerned.
  13. Re:Dear Darl, on SCO Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy · · Score: 1

    The only three things I believe are left to discover are 1; can Novell be first to the Buffet and 2; can they pierce the corporate veil, and 3; is there a prosecutable criminal case here.

    You forgot:
    4; will they sell us out to Microsoft again if there is
  14. Re:Sad, sad news on SCO Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy · · Score: 1

    I don't think I would hire SCO to clean a toilet. Somehow they would mess up the job.


    No they would do it. But they'd surely find their precious IP in your crapper and sue you for it.
  15. Re:Calling the kettle black? on QNX "Opens" Source Code · · Score: 1

    What evidence? The only evidence I've given you is anecdotal. It has nothing to do with what the reality is. The word "free" to many people equates to cheap crap. There's nothing you or I can do about that except use other words instead. At least to begin the discussion anyway.

  16. Re:Sweet! on AMD Releases 900+ Pages Of GPU Specs · · Score: 1

    I also will be moving to ATI cards just as soon as I can type "emerge ati-driver"

    More likely you'll want to "emerge xf86-video-ati", that's the free one, and the one we need to stop sucking.
  17. Re:Calling the kettle black? on QNX "Opens" Source Code · · Score: 2, Informative

    but that doesn't have quite the marketing value that "Free Software" does.
    That would be a good thing. "Free Software" still has a stigma associated with "shareware" and other useless crap. Whenever you mention free software to people not familiar with it, it immediately puts you on the defensive about its quality. Most people seem to glaze over when having the free as in freedom discussion. Open source may mean a different thing, but people respond to it much better than free software.
  18. Re:What GNU/Linux gaming area? on AMD To Open ATI Specs · · Score: 1

    Lets see, ~2% of the users run linux. What fraction of those are actually gamers?

    Gamers aren't the center of the universe. Sorry to burst your bubble.
  19. Re:What GNU/Linux gaming area? on AMD To Open ATI Specs · · Score: 1
    Well that should be next week then according to this

    They confirmed the rumors reported earlier on Slashdot, that everything necessary for community-driven and -maintained 2-D and 3-D drivers for ATI Radeon X1000 and HD 2000 graphics will be made available next week.
    ...

    A formal press release regarding the open sourcing of the ATI drivers is expected from AMD after market close today.

    Best news so far this year.
  20. Re:Thank God on Facebook Exposes Advertisers To Hate Speech · · Score: 1

    Makes you wonder what folks are afraid of.

    Being recognized as a bigot maybe? Or maybe being mistaken as one based on a facetious remark?
  21. Re:Linux has always had "safe mode". on New Failsafe Graphics Mode For Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    That's 1% of the market that is happy without a GUI.

    So you figure that home users are the most lucrative part of the market. You're a fool.
  22. Re:Can I declare the Pope Evil? on Will the Pope Declare Google Evil? · · Score: 1

    Without sex, existence can't really be called life, its just survival. You suffer emptiness and lack of meaning, wondering why you continue to exist when all you feel is pain.

    Wow. You watch too much television. That's the only explanation.
  23. Re:Can I declare the Pope Evil? on Will the Pope Declare Google Evil? · · Score: 1

    Well that's the choice that each individual has to make. According to the pope, if you have sex then expect children. I think the pope is a lunatic personally, and I would hope other people can recognize that when they hear him speak about the evils of contraception. I hope he keeps saying it too, it helps validate my opinion of him.

  24. Re:Welcome to 1995 on New Failsafe Graphics Mode For Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    Let's hope that in another 12 years, Linux will have caught up to Windows XP.

    Strange how it's already surpassed Vista isn't it?
  25. Re:Linux has always had "safe mode". on New Failsafe Graphics Mode For Ubuntu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply put, to 99% of users the GUI is the OS, and to hell with facts.

    To which users? Linux is strongest in the server room/data center. Why would you bother with running X on your db server when you can just ssh in and use GUI tools from a desktop that is running X? That desktop might even be a Windows box running cygwin/Xorg. X is not Linux, and Linux is not X.