Slashdot Mirror


SCO Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Can you say "the SCO, the" in German? writes "Trading of SCO's stock has been halted on news that SCO has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. This move just so happens to fall on the eve of SCO's trial with Novell. One would think that their prior boasts were mostly bluster, that they believe they have almost no chance of prevailing at trial, and that they're now desperate to protect their executives from SCO's creditors while seeking yet another delay. From the release: 'The SCO Group intends to maintain all normal business operations throughout the bankruptcy proceedings. Subject to court approval, SCO and its subsidiaries will use the cash flow from their consolidated operations to meet their capital needs during the reorganization process. "We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group. "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."'"

421 comments

  1. Sad, sad news by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know I'm going to be crying myself to sleep tonight.

    1. Re:Sad, sad news by snowgirl · · Score: 5, Funny

      YAY! Party at my place everyone! Champange for all! :)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    2. Re:Sad, sad news by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Karmas a Bitch

    3. Re:Sad, sad news by inode_buddha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn... not only did I *just* use up all my mod points, I also submitted a similar story just minutes before this one...

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Sad, sad news by Romancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You will be when they have no real consequences from this whole sordid episode. When they are back at it again spweing out the FUD and dragging people through court having learned no lessons since the system is pretty much in their favor. They can drag this out another ten years and still come out with capital and the exectuives will never have to pay the people they are hurting by doing all this.

      Rant/

      Just look at all they have learned by going through the courts with no evidence and being laughed at by the people who review the case and get the facts instead of reading their press releases. They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME! No reasonable company would be so immune to shame, so ignorant of the mocking thats going on right in front of them, and still be able to tell people that everythings OK. That these bottomdwellers are still making a living, still giving themselves bonuses and trying to protect their stock is a slap in the face for american justice. This is another Enron, this is another corporation exec scandle happening right now, at this very moment. They are telling us that they don't care that they are wrong and have taken the courts time and our money and threatened people, intimidated customers, extorted from innocent and ignorant law abiding citicens and companies who only wanted to avoid doing the wrong thing and pay whatever license fees to whoever owned the code they were using. They have either planned this and acted accordingly to draw it out, or they employ the most ignorant legal councel out there to advise them. No proof, no problem, No evidence, no problem, No case, no problem. Lets all make a bunch of money! Dirty rat bastards. And we will as a nation let another one get away with it. The people who made these decisions will walk away with millions. We'll complain and let them walk. Accomplices to the raping of this country. /Rant

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    5. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will seriously. I just bought stock in the company today! I got 85 shares for .64 and now they are worth .37. This is my first experience investing in anything. My thinking was that with the +/- 30% swings, I might be able to make about fifty bucks. I knew it was a stupid thing to do. And I have no love for SCO! I lost $40. today including commissions. Can I write it off on my taxes? What happens to shares that I own when a company files for Chapter 11? I'm a total newb at this.

    6. Re:Sad, sad news by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time...

      Ah, but it's easy to placate your customers when you don't have any.

    7. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was modded informative? A post with snowgirl's address so we could actually get to the party would have been more informative. ;)

    8. Re:Sad, sad news by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      It would seem to me that any business that went forward with such a stupid series of law suits is no fit to remain in business. It is one thing to blunder but to blunder over and over again with mistakes larger than most planets is just too much for the public to endure. I don't think I would hire SCO to clean a toilet. Somehow they would mess up the job.

    9. Re:Sad, sad news by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the safest thing for you to do is buy more SCO stocks

    10. Re:Sad, sad news by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME! Ummm... maybe you don't understand what Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings are. It's a reorganization of the company, not a dissolution.

      That isn't to say that SCO is safe, but news that they're filing for bankruptcy doesn't really mean anything.

      You want an example of companies that go bankrupt while maintaining operations?
      See: US Airline Industry
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    11. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your research showed the stock was worth 64 cents per share, then the fundamentals have not changed much; in fact, if you saw a "buy" opportunity, they should be in somewhat better shape now as they have some protection against creditors foreclosing on their servers or other assets. So, 37 cents per share, with that reasoning, is a BARGAIN.

      Your shares originally cost you about 50 bucks. Now's the time to increase your holdings. If the stock keeps plummeting, you could wind up owning it all for a few thou. Just think -- you might get a seat on the board and be able to fire Darl.

      Also, those stock certificates will make good-looking wallpaper....

    12. Re:Sad, sad news by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      True, but most airlines don't have a judgment hanging over them that basically says Novell owns revenues that exceed the company's current on-hand assets.

      I suspect this also means no more stock kiting schemes, if today's reaction by NASDAQ is any indication.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    13. Re:Sad, sad news by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It seems to me like the likely outcome of all this is that novell and/or IBM and/or the other parties that have been fighting sco will end up as the largest creditors and therefore through the chapter 11 bankrupcy end up owning most of sco.

      That does not however mean that any profitable parts of thier buisness will not continue either through IBM/Novell/whoever keeping them running or through being sold on. Assuming selling sco unix licenses and support is still profitable I can't see why it wouldn't continue.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Sad, sad news by analog_line · · Score: 4, Funny

      You want an example of companies that go bankrupt while maintaining operations?
      See: US Airline Industry


      I see you haven't flown anywhere this summer...
    15. Re:Sad, sad news by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I don't think I would hire SCO to clean a toilet. Somehow they would mess up the job.


      No they would do it. But they'd surely find their precious IP in your crapper and sue you for it.
    16. Re:Sad, sad news by Romancer · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll reply to these posts since it looks like there is a common misunderstanding going on about what I am trying to get across.

      Saying that other companies have done and are doing the same thing is a main part of my problem and shows that you don't understand what I'm talking about when I say that we continue to let them escape the consequences that they create from their own decisions.

      The fact that they are using the bankruptcy to escape the stock plummet that would follow the judgements that are comming is a cop out of their responsibility for the actions they have taken. I never said that they were going out of business, closing operations, or filing a different type of bankruptcy that would leed to those outcomes, and if you read that somewhere it was your assumption not mine. The problem I have with the simultanious assurance to their customers is that they are using a restructuring tactic to avoid the fallout of their horrible choices and appear to be a reliable company to anybody. It's a joke and it's on US ALL for allowing it.

      Maintaining operations necessatates that your operations can be maintained. In this case they are losing battle after battle over their offerings being theirs to offer. Telling their customers that they can be relied on is a blatant lie if they have done any forecasting, which they probably have since they are filing for a chapter 11. These last ditch options were not created for companies like these, they were a legitimate tool for allowing the companies that suffered from circumstances beyond their control or from reasonable made but poor judgement decisions. NOT outright evil business practices like using the arm of law as your own goon.

      From your own post:
      "news that they're filing for bankruptcy doesn't really mean anything."

      And from your own link:
      "A chapter 11 filing, on the other hand, is usually an attempt to stay in business while a bankruptcy court supervises the "reorganization" of the company's contractual and debt obligations. The court can grant complete or partial relief from most of the company's debts and its contracts, so that the company can make a fresh start."

      Is this deserving of the company that started all this?

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    17. Re:Sad, sad news by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Good point. The same could be said for employees. I would have been out of there long ago.

      qz

    18. Re:Sad, sad news by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      I live at:

      1234 5th St.
      Hell, Michigan, 67890-1234

      So, I figure, if you want to come to the party, you can go to hell... (God... that pun was BAAAAAAD!)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    19. Re:Sad, sad news by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

      I would have gone if the address was 6969 Bendover Pl.

    20. Re:Sad, sad news by badasscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      YAY! Party at my place everyone! Champange for all! :)

      There's nothing to cheer about here. This is SCO's way of weaseling out of their legal liabilities. They conceivably now will not have to pay Novell, or at least not for a long while. It gives them time to continue their court cases without having to settle their debts.

      It's a tactic. They're not out of business, at least not yet.

    21. Re:Sad, sad news by Cathbard · · Score: 1
      This has made my day. Isn't come-uppance such a beautiful thing.

      Now if they could just get at McBrides personal possessions as well I think I'd have an orgasm on the spot!

      --
      "A cynic is what an idealist calls a realist" - Sir Humphrey Appleby
    22. Re:Sad, sad news by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I think you've not been keeping up with this topic. Their stock's in the toilet. I believe they're about to be delisted, if they're not already delisted. They have no customers left, or none that will admit to it. (When's the last time you saw SCO UNIX anywhere, or any other SCO product?)

      Their only business for the last 3 years was the same model that the RIAA is following: sue your customers.

      Even if they were relived of their debt, they've already been relieved of all of their current claims of copyright and IP ownership, so should they ever come out of bankruptcy, there will be nothing for them to do business with, or even sue over.

      They're dead, it's only a question of who's going to sweep up the ashes and throw them in the litter box.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    23. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew that if one held those few shares of this shit long enough that this despicable outfit would die. Now it is going through the motions. It is not dead yet. First it is going to screw all its small shareholders out of their money by 'cancelling' their shares. In this it is in goo0d company, the likes of WorldCOM and K-Mart. They fukked their shareholders too. The 're-organized' company will grant large share blocks of new stock to the executives. In this way capitalist organizations show that they are truly corrupt to the very core of their being, and that all capitalist economies are ultimately based on greed, fraud, and outright armed theft.

    24. Re:Sad, sad news by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "Assuming selling sco unix licenses and support is still profitable"

      I have a lovely bridge to sell you...

    25. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After of the SCO bankrupcy, ...

      Who will own the UNIX Source Code??? Will owns it the U.S. government forever? After of 40 years of awful history???

    26. Re:Sad, sad news by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... As if it were that simple. Bankruptcy doesn't wash away Lanham Act violations... They'll go after execs and principals if
      needs be for those.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    27. Re:Sad, sad news by watchingeyes · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you do realize that the bankruptcy stays all of the litigation, right? The IBM and Novell cases will come to a complete stand-still now, at least for 90 days, possibly longer.

      --
      http://watching-eyes.blogspot.com/
    28. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose that SCO enterprise doesn't exist.

      And there are stolen UNIX Source Code put in Internet.

      Who claims against who?

      Bankrupted SCO against anyone? HAHAHAHA

    29. Re:Sad, sad news by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The problem I have with the simultanious assurance to their customers is that they are using a restructuring tactic to avoid the fallout of their horrible choices and appear to be a reliable company to anybody. It's a joke and it's on US ALL for allowing it. Again, see the US airline industry.

      shows that you don't understand what I'm talking about when I say that we continue to let them escape the consequences that they create from their own decisions. I understand exactly what you're trying to say, however I think it is based on a flawed and emotional argument. The main flaw is this: "These last ditch options were not created for companies like these, they were a legitimate tool for allowing the companies that suffered from circumstances beyond their control or from reasonable made but poor judgement decisions." You're completely wrong. Chapter 11 is not limited to "circumstances beyond their control or from reasonable made but poor judgement decisions." It is an option for any company, even companies dealing with criminal charges. Chapter 11 is there to help companies escape the consequences of their own decisions. Go back to the wikipedia link and look at the first sentence under the Criticism section

      I could quote from several other places in your rebuttal post, but you're still essentially making the same emotional argument, talking about "evil" and "deserving", which really has nothing to do with Chapter 11 or business in general.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    30. Re:Sad, sad news by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

      Its the intarweb, she is actually a he :)

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    31. Re:Sad, sad news by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let this be a lesson to all of you.

      Personal responsibility is for suckers and fools.

      Smart people form corporations so they can lie, cheat, and steal with impunity.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    32. Re:Sad, sad news by aneeshm · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean I Pee, right?

    33. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You do realize this is /. where the men are geeks and the sheep are scared?

    34. Re:Sad, sad news by lotsofsand · · Score: 1

      It ain't over till the fat lady smiles ... I'm sure Darl McBribe will make a last appearance in true Hans Gruber style. Or was it Heinrich? Can't remember.

    35. Re:Sad, sad news by stevencbrown · · Score: 1

      Correct response was 1060 West Addison.

    36. Re:Sad, sad news by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Since it looks like sco never owned it in the first place I suspect novell will keep ownership of it. Scos exclusive distribution agreement is likely to be voided because of the way they violated it.

      As I said there is a good chance IBM and/or novell will end up owning large parts of the reorganised sco anyway.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    37. Re:Sad, sad news by wwphx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's both direct and indirect employees. A friend of mine installs vertical app systems based on SCO. The software was developed by his employer ages ago before SCO was anywhere near buying Unix from Novell, much less the McBride invasion. He works for a legitimate company who based their business on an OS provider who basically went evil. Now Richard is in a slightly precarious position. He has lots of systems to maintain, but now all of these customers are edgy because they hear bits and pieces regarding SCO, and they know their business depends on it.

      Rich's employer sells a similar package based on Windows, but just the two platforms. Care to guess which is the more stable platform? It might have been wise of the company to port their system to a Linux distro, but they are a small company and probably didn't have the resources.

      It's not like Rich is in danger of losing his job next week, but it adds to the tension at the office and makes work life that much more unpleasant.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    38. Re:Sad, sad news by Gothmog+of+A · · Score: 1

      Their stock has plummeted by a whopping 43% before trading in SCOX has been stopped altogether. A judge now has to agree to SCO's further business plans. But sure filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy doesn't really mean anything as in "just a flesh wound".

    39. Re:Sad, sad news by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Using Google....

      Wrigley Field? You do realize I'm a girl right? and that any sort of sports metaphor would likely be outside of the bounds of my personal experience...

      That being said, I still don't really get the joke... :(

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    40. Re:Sad, sad news by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      (God... that pun was BAAAAAAD!) No, this is baaaaaad.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    41. Re:Sad, sad news by SchmellsAngel · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to get any SCO on my toilet.

      --
      We must repeat.
    42. Re:Sad, sad news by mpe · · Score: 1

      Ummm... maybe you don't understand what Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings are. It's a reorganization of the company, not a dissolution.

      In many places the term "bankruptcy" means much the same as the US "chapter 7". Something similar to the US "chapter 11" would be called something different, such as "administration"...

      That isn't to say that SCO is safe, but news that they're filing for bankruptcy doesn't really mean anything.

      Especially given that they have only filed a petition with a court, not that it has been granted.

    43. Re:Sad, sad news by ckd · · Score: 1

      You might find a movie relevant to the joke.

    44. Re:Sad, sad news by mpe · · Score: 1

      Even if they were relived of their debt, they've already been relieved of all of their current claims of copyright and IP ownership, so should they ever come out of bankruptcy, there will be nothing for them to do business with, or even sue over.

      But they could probably still be sued. Even if the bankruptcy court were to dismiss all existing judgments and court cases.

    45. Re:Sad, sad news by mpe · · Score: 1

      Again, see the US airline industry.

      These airlines had the potentially profitable business model of transporting people and cargo. With real world examples of other companies doing so sucessfully.
      Where is SCO's potentially profitable business model? Which solvent companies currently exist which are using this business model?

    46. Re:Sad, sad news by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Currently they're on a 52 week low at 37c a share.

      Pick 'em up now whilst they're cheap!

    47. Re:Sad, sad news by ross.w · · Score: 1

      So,
      How can they continue with no money to pay their lawyers when no-one will lend them any?

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    48. Re:Sad, sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you honestly think they have not already leeched all the assets somewhere else, or to someone else (like lawyers) that had stake in the company. I really never envisaged that Novell, Sun or IBM would be compensated if and when the decision went against SCO.

    49. Re:Sad, sad news by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHA... Love it!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    50. Re:Sad, sad news by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      I see you haven't flown anywhere this summer... That doesn't count - they are out of Bancruptcy protection now, so they don't have to actually provide service any more......

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  2. Get out the violin by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    And tell the fat lady to start warming up.

    It's been a long time coming, but still they had to know this day would arrive. If shareholders weren't really in it for the crapshoot of beating IBM and Novell for $Billion$ they'd have a case against Darl and his lot for running the business into the ground pursuing frivolous lawsuits.

    SCO's income from normal opperations must be down to a trickle with Linux and Windows Server vying for most of the market.

    Emerge from Chapter 11? I can't see how, unless somehow there was a reversal of court decisions and they're doing nothing to grow their product market.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Get out the violin by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Emerge from Chapter 11? I can't see how, unless somehow there was a reversal of court decisions and they're doing nothing to grow their product market.

      Duh! Haven't you listened to Darl? Their mobile SCO Me scam is going to make BILLIONS!!! It's to teh moon!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Get out the violin by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      My take...

      SCO is doing this to make Novell into a creditor with respect to the
      money SCO owes to Novell.

      I dont know if this is something to celebrate or not.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Get out the violin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Finally the question is answered: why didn't IBM just buy SCO? Because SCO's liabilities exceeded its worth! Why pay for something of negative worth?

    4. Re:Get out the violin by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "SCO is doing this to make Novell into a creditor with respect to the money SCO owes to Novell."

      Won't work. Novell's claim isn't as a creditor. Their claim is "equitable", meaning that SCO is holding theor property ($$$), not that SCO owes them money. When you go bankrupt, anyone who can show that they own property you're holding on to can claim it from the trustee.

      This happens a lot with vending machines, for example, when a plant goes bust. The owner proves that the machine is theirs (not leased or anything - it really is theirs), and they then get to pick it up.

      Since Novell already has a judgment saying that SCO is guilty of conversion, and the question is "how much", they have a prior claim to the property (money) in question. SCO is dead.

    5. Re:Get out the violin by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, when's the last time that SCO tried a legal strategy that did work?

    6. Re:Get out the violin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > SCO is dead.

      Such sweet words!

    7. Re:Get out the violin by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      I can't find the violin. It's much, much too tiny.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    8. Re:Get out the violin by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      When I first read your note, my thought
      was "he/she/it is probably right, this
      all seems reasonable". A small doubt in
      my mind, as SCO does *not* seem reasonable.

      But I just read the
      "Kimball Denies SCO's Motion for Reconsideration/Clarification"
      story on Groklaw. The "Please Further note..." parts.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  3. w00t!!!! by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think PJ needs to send the red dress to the cleaners, so it will be ready when she needs it!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:w00t!!!! by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 0, Troll

      What about the blue dress Monica?

    2. Re:w00t!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For those of us who aren't regular Groklaw readers, what is the red dress?

    3. Re:w00t!!!! by Slicebo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "red dress" reference pertains to a comment that Groklaw's PJ made a long time ago, saying she was looking forward to putting on her red dress and partying when SCO loses their case in court.

      I'm afraid a "black dress" for wearing to the upcoming SCO funeral will be more useful now.

    4. Re:w00t!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually belongs to Bill Clinton, which is why his semen stains were on it...

    5. Re:w00t!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the 'red dress' is a reference to someone wearing a red (as opposed to black) dress to a funeral, as a show of complete disrepect towards the dead.

      If it was me, I'd show up in a clown suit with a case of whoopie cushions and silly string.

    6. Re:w00t!!!! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      No, that's still a party.

  4. Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's my tiny violin?

    1. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.
      I'm more in the mood for a jaunty polka, actually. And maybe building a parade float.

    2. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you'll need a tunneling electron microscope to find this particular violin :)

    3. Re:Oh man... by bookgirlimoen · · Score: 1

      Your tiny violin is the property of SCO Group, Inc. and may not be played without the renewal of your hardware license. Please review the EULA included with your tiny violin for further information.

  5. Dear Darl, by middlemen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good things come to those who wait !
    Regards, Destiny

    1. Re:Dear Darl, by IP_Troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but this is not good. Bankruptcy is like a protective cocoon that keeps businesses with cash problems safe from creditors. It is a way for SCO to stall further.

      Bankruptcy prevents an entity's creditors from forcing liquidation of the entity's assets. If Novell won it's case against SCO, Novell could enforce it's judgment against SCO and force SCO to dissolve. If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear. Now that SCO has filed for bankruptcy it is protected from its creditors. Therefore Novell cannot get the licensing fees SCO owes it, and SCO can continue to exist.

      Filing for bankruptcy is not SCO tossing in the towel, it is more like SCO knows it is going to lose, and is now trying to bite off Novell's ear to get Disqualified instead of Knocked Out.

    2. Re:Dear Darl, by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with this theory is that Novell is not a creditor.

      The court ruled that the money *belongs* to Novell. That's a far different legal issue than SCO owing money to Novell.

      It's like a burglar trying to claim bankruptcy in order to keep the stuff he stole. Since the stuff isn't actually his (and in this case has been declared so in a court of law), bankruptcy doesn't protect it.

    3. Re:Dear Darl, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many "creditors" are lawyers ... man this story just keeps feeling more warm & fuzzy the more I think about it!

    4. Re:Dear Darl, by shaitand · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear.'

      That would be a bad thing, we don't want the IBM case to disappear, we want IBM have a very strong favorable ruling. Any other outcome means this was all a waste of time with no precedents set.

    5. Re:Dear Darl, by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      SCO being bankrupt, even under Chapter 7, does not make the cases go away. The BK trustee may try to settle, however IBM proberly wants Darl's head on a pike and has already files counter climes that go after him and the other directors personally.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    6. Re:Dear Darl, by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Bankruptcy prevents an entity's creditors from forcing liquidation of the entity's assets. If Novell won it's case against SCO, Novell could enforce it's judgment against SCO and force SCO to dissolve. If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear. Now that SCO has filed for bankruptcy it is protected from its creditors. Therefore Novell cannot get the licensing fees SCO owes it, and SCO can continue to exist.

      However from what I understand Novell isn't a creditor, instead Novell is a property owner. Even in bankruptcy a property owner gets his property back.

      Falcon
    7. Re:Dear Darl, by phoenixwade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear.'

      That would be a bad thing, we don't want the IBM case to disappear, we want IBM have a very strong favorable ruling. Any other outcome means this was all a waste of time with no precedents set. I disagree.

      The Novell ruling removed any chance of a precedence being set. once Judge Kimball said "Novel owns the copyrights, and Novell did have the right to prevent you from suing IBM" the IBM case was dead. There was no chance a precedence would be set as far as Open Source code and the Free Software community was concerned.

      This result has no effect on IBM except to limit the additional outlay of money IBM has to spend to defend themselves. There is obviously no money in SCO to pay IBM for the litigation expenses the bogus suit has given them.

      The only three things I believe are left to discover are 1; can Novell be first to the Buffet and 2; can they pierce the corporate veil, and 3; is there a prosecutable criminal case here.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    8. Re:Dear Darl, by Curtman · · Score: 1

      The only three things I believe are left to discover are 1; can Novell be first to the Buffet and 2; can they pierce the corporate veil, and 3; is there a prosecutable criminal case here.

      You forgot:
      4; will they sell us out to Microsoft again if there is
    9. Re:Dear Darl, by IP_Troll · · Score: 1

      If you have precedent to back up your assertion I will tip my hat to you. But as far as I know, everyone who is owed money is a 'creditor', the legal basis of your claim is irrelevant. The order of creditor satisfaction in a liquidation is: 1. UCC secured creditors, 2. judgment creditors, 3. unsecured creditors, 4. (lots of other people), 5. shareholders are given any leftover assets.

      Bankruptcy trustees are appointed based on their reputation. The bankruptcy trustee isn't going to do anything unless the law tells him to, because going against the grain damages one's reputation. Therefore the bankruptcy trustee is going to be a real pain in the ass trying to protect 'the SCO group' (the corporation) while simultaneously fighting creditors and 'the SCO Group' management.

      So really the bankruptcy trustee has his work cut out for him, fighting off Novell and trying to figure out how Darl & Co. got the corporation into such a pickle.

      Your burglar analogy is nice, but doesn't apply because this is a civil case, not criminal. A criminal never had the right to take something on your behalf, SCO could collect money for Novell, they just held onto it too long. But maybe Novell should talk to the Utah US attorney....

    10. Re:Dear Darl, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes but try getting anything functional done when ur this far under - recruiting / maintaining staff, getting suppliers to deliver etc... all next to impossible without cash up front...also customers will find alternatives and stop paying and start debating bills.

    11. Re:Dear Darl, by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
        4; will they sell us out to Microsoft again if there is I'm far from a fan of Microsoft, but I can't believe that Microsoft could possibly be that stupid, Right?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    12. Re:Dear Darl, by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      I can't supply a reference, but an armoured car company which goes into bankruptcy can't count the cash and items in it's trucks as it's own. They must be returned. A vending machine owner still owns a machine located inside a bankrupt business.

      The contract specifies SCO as Novell's "agent", which is a carefully chosen term which Novell's lawers used to protect their revenue stream against this. 100% of the UNIX fees are paid by UNIX customers to Novell, with SCO as the collection agent. The 5% to paid SCO is a collection free paid to SCO after Novell gets it's 100%. At no point is any of the UNIX license fee SCO's. They do not "keep" 5%. The money is never part of SCO's assets, and so cannot be part of the SCO assets which are owed to it's creditors. Oh, and because they failed to do this, they "breached their ficudiary duty", there is a real chance that they may not even get paid that 5%.

      The fact that SCO kept the fees and treated this money as theirs is called "conversion" and has been ruled to have taken place. The hearing starting on Monday that this BK pre-empted was due to set the amount which SCO kept from Novell, and that amount would probably have been greater than SCO's current assets.

  6. Let me be one of the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It couldn't happen to better people. SCO has a long history of being run by crooks (the original Doug and Larry Michaels boys were complete crooks, even screwing the original employees when they could), and Daryl and company are cut from the same cloth.

    I wish that I could say that this was the last that we've seen of SCO, but I doubt it.

    1. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I wish that I could say that this was the last that we've seen of SCO, but I doubt it.

      the evil that corporations do...

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Let the SEC investigation and the shareholder lawsuits begin! Actually, I think the shareholders are getting their just deserts. Maybe in the future they won't invest in a company whose business plan is "We're gonna sue people and extort licensing fees."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still the board of Directors. They don't seem to have done their job, and they have money.

  7. One word by lurker412 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you say Schadenfreude in English?

    1. Re:One word by hpa · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Wikipedia the English term is epicaricacy.

    2. Re:One word by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Yup, you say schadenfreude. Yet another word taken by the Borg.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    3. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not exactly, but Gloating is close, and in which schadenfreude appears as a See reference. Also, if not limited to one word, "malicious glee" might fit.

    4. Re:One word by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you say Schadenfreude in English?

      Yes. It's pronounced "ha HA!", preferably in a high-pitched, somewhat nasal voice reminiscent of a certain cartoon character.

    5. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way it's written reads like the way Nelson laughed when Homer was tripping.

    6. Re:One word by thsths · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > According to Wikipedia the English term is epicaricacy.

      Isn't that just a Greek word instead of a German word? (And one that nobody understands, too?)

    7. Re:One word by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Can you say Schadenfreude in English?

      Great, now you put the song from Avenue Q in my head.

      Wait, what am I complaining about?

    8. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to read the article - that word is a Greek loanword (as opposed to a German one) that doesn't appear in modern dictionaries and the last mention appears to be in a 1727 etymology dictionary.

      More importantly, the only Google definition for Epicaricacy is a Wikipedia page redirected to Schadenfreude. There are several Google definitions for Schadenfreude.

    9. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schadenfreude
      Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Cite This Source

      is a German word meaning 'pleasure taken from someone else's misfortune'. It has been borrowed by the English language and is sometimes also used as a loanword by other languages. The German pronunciation of the word is [adnfd] (IPA).

      It derives from Schaden (damage, harm) and Freude (joy); Schaden derives from the Middle High German schade, from the Old High German scado, and freude comes from the Middle High German vreude, from the Old High German frewida, from fr, (happy). In German, the word always carries a negative connotation. A distinction exists between "secret schadenfreude" (a private feeling) and "open schadenfreude" (Hohn). Usually, it is believed that Schadenfreude has no direct English equivalent. For example, Harper Collins German-English Dictionary translates schadenfreude as "malicious glee or gloating." An apparent English equivalent is epicaricacy, derived from the Greek word , epichaerecacia. This word does not appear in most modern dictionaries, but does appear in Nathaniel Bailey's Universal Etymological English Dictionary (1727) under a slightly different spelling (epicharikaky), which gives its etymology as a compound of epi (upon), chara (joy), and kakon (evil). A more common English equivalent than 'epicaricacy' might be the expression 'Roman holiday', which means pleasure derived from watching someone else's suffering, and is derived from the delight of Roman citizens' at the gladiatorial spectacles in the Colosseum. In English, the word sometimes is capitalized, because of the German grammatical convention of capitalizing all common nouns in addition to proper nouns; however, as a loanword in English, it is typically left uncapitalized, following the rules of English orthography. The Buddhist concept of mudita, "sympathetic joy" or "happiness in another's good fortune," is often cited as an example of the opposite of schadenfreude.

    10. Re:One word by owlstead · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia the English term is epicaricacy. So the short answer to "Can you say Schadenfreude in English?" - for most of slashdot - is: NO.
    11. Re:One word by CatoNine · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the translation in my native tongue is easy and literal: "leedvermaak".
      I used to use a nice UNIX dialect called SCO XENIX, which could support 13
      simultaneous users on a 386 with 8 MB RAM, plus FAX, Telex, Email and News connections.
      I wondered why anyone could use this piece of crap called Windows.
      Now I know better...... (controversy intended)

    12. Re:One word by miniver · · Score: 1

      Yes we can, because ... "English not only borrows words from other languages, it mugs other languages in dark alleys for their lexical treasure."

      --
      We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    13. Re:One word by mink · · Score: 1

      Thats what they get for going into the lexicographical equivalant of The Shades alone at night.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  8. Yay... by Inferger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ding dong the witch is dead!

    1. Re:Yay... by lottameez · · Score: 2, Funny

      [gurgle] I'm not quite dead.

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    2. Re:Yay... by abb3w · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Do you think we should drive a stake through his heart just in case?" — Peter Lorre to Vincent Price at Bela Lugosi's funeral

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    3. Re:Yay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  9. It's Been Fun by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wait ... no it hasn't.

    For those of you who bought SCOX stock in hopes that they would win this case, you had better sell it. In the past 20 minutes, it has dropped from $0.66 to $0.37 cents (and still is dropping).

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations. Would you care to list those products, support & services?

    According to your market data your net income was a $16.6 million loss. And when your total revenue was under $30 million, you really shouldn't even try to keep operating. Why is this Chapter 11? I guess it's going to come down to one unkillable lawyer with SCO tattooed on his chest. At that point, we'll have to call an exorcist.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Been Fun by arth1 · · Score: 1

      For those of you who bought SCOX stock in hopes that they would win this case, you had better sell it. In the past 20 minutes, it has dropped from $0.66 to $0.37 cents (and still is dropping).

      I thought chapter 11 protection included an immediate halt on stock trade?
    2. Re:It's Been Fun by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      yeah, apparently reading the first few words of the summary is above some...

    3. Re:It's Been Fun by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too late. Your stock price feed most likely has a time delay built in. Trading will have been halted as soon as the news comes out. This is the insiders dumping their stock before the news gets out.

    4. Re:It's Been Fun by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn. I read the post and figured I could by out the company tommorow for $15-20. Not that I want it but wouldn't it ROCK to give someone SCO as a gag gift for Christmas?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:It's Been Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought chapter 11 protection included an immediate halt on stock trade?

      Not according to google finance.

      There was a trade of 100 shares at $0.61 at 13:08 pm (worth $61) and then somewhere after 15:30 people started unloading (and other people were foolish enough to buy) tens of thousands of shares as the price fell to $0.37/share (10,000 shares at $0.37/share would be worth $3,700). The total volume traded was 490,000 - which at the closing price would be worth $181,000.

    6. Re:It's Been Fun by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Could be a big win for Red Hat, Novell, and maybe Sun.
      There are some big companies that are using SCO for mission critical applications. The logical way for them to go is to Linux or Solaris.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:It's Been Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Chapter 11 hasn't been granted yet either, just filed for?

    8. Re:It's Been Fun by muadda · · Score: 1

      > At that point, we'll have to call an exorcist.

      Too late. The opposite camp already called an exorcist too kill SCO. The ceremony happened in Finowfurt, near Berlin, August 11th, 2007. You can see photo and video:

      http://fr.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=2A7134DBF1CA1B5A
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/7851269@N04/1087199641/
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/7851269@N04/1087199509/
      http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=sco+ccc&m=text
      http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=sco+ccc2007&m=(...)

    9. Re:It's Been Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the insiders dumping their stock before the news gets out.

      I don't think so. Insider trading is serious (just ask Martha Stewart).

      If the insiders were going to dump they would have dumped days (or even months) ago. An insider unloading tens of thousands of shares a few minutes before the chapter 11 filing was announced would be just way too blatant.

      The drop in the share price that happened in the last half hour of trading today was the general public (non-insiders) responding to the chapter 11 filing announcement.

    10. Re:It's Been Fun by Gyga · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need a box big enough to mail it to Linus.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    11. Re:It's Been Fun by ferat · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried for the large number of people that shorted the stock and haven't cleared the short yet.

    12. Re:It's Been Fun by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Too late. Your stock price feed most likely has a time delay built in. Trading will have been halted as soon as the news comes out. This is the insiders dumping their stock before the news gets out.


      Isn't that horribly, horribly illegal? Will we get to see the SEC frog-march Darl and the crew for insider trading?

    13. Re:It's Been Fun by drew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common misconception. Insider trading is not at all illegal, otherwise it would be impossible for company executives to buy or sell their stock, and and stock or option grants for high level executives would be worthless. You could forget about Steve Jobs $1 salary...

      There are just a very strict set of rules that you have to follow when you buy or sell stock as an insider, or with insider information. The main thing, AFAIK, is that you have to file paperwork with the SEC announcing your intention to buy or sell your stock, but I believe that there are other restrictions too. The paperwork that they file is public information, so if you see all of a companies executives filing to significant chunks of their stock on date X, you might want to consider selling any stock you have before that date as well.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    14. Re:It's Been Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read somewhere that it IS halted for 30 minutes. So the halting was from about 3:25 to 3:55 PM Eastern Time - and it was open again for the last 5 minutes of the trading day.

    15. Re:It's Been Fun by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      At that point, we'll have to call an exorcist.

      It's already been tried.

    16. Re:It's Been Fun by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only people still running mission-critical stuff on SCO are people who have been unable to port, either because of their own technical incompetence or because the app is an utterly inscrutable horror of non-portability. About the only the SCO's impending death does to them is force them to face up to the imminent pain coming their way.

      Chris Mattern

    17. Re:It's Been Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it was open again for the last 5 minutes of the trading day.

      Make that 15 minutes. It appears that the first set of trades after the news hit was at about 3:45 (with volume of about 40,000 shares).

      BTW, where are the mods on this? At the moment, there are +5 comments making bizarre claims that the drop represented insiders trading just before the announcement or that trading was halted permanently at the moment SCO filed for chapter 11 - both obviously false.

    18. Re:It's Been Fun by acvh · · Score: 1

      "I'd be more worried for the large number of people that shorted the stock and haven't cleared the short yet."

      Why? You sold shares you don't own, you already got the money from the sale, and now you don't have to buy them back. You won.

    19. Re:It's Been Fun by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      wouldn't it ROCK to give someone SCO as a gag gift for Christmas? is the word.
      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    20. Re:It's Been Fun by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      I thought that was Sergey Brin and Larry Page who managed to get in the news for a "$1" salary while simultaneously creating and selling millions of $ in stock.

    21. Re:It's Been Fun by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs does it too. As do a shitload of other CEOs.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  10. OMG FIRE THAT MAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They haven't fire Darl yet?!

    1. Re:OMG FIRE THAT MAN by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Of course not. As long as there's a sliver of bone on that dead horse to whip, Darl has a 'job'.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  11. What SCO told the court by rewt66 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to recall[*] that SCO told the court that there was no need for a constructive trust to protect Novell's money, since they (SCO) were in no danger of bankruptcy.

    Now SCO is facing the exact same judge on Monday morning over the issue of how much money they owe Novell. I predict an interesting day in court ;-)

    * OK, I was reminded of it by something someone (anonymous, so I can't give credit) said on Groklaw.

    1. Re:What SCO told the court by LouisJBouchard · · Score: 2, Informative

      There will be no court case on Monday. The Bankruptcy filing effectively stays the lawsuit until SCO is reorganized or the Bankruptcy judge removes the stay.

      I am thinking the later will happen. I am sure the Novell will file that SCO is really a fiduciary for their assets under the contract and as such, they get first dibs on SCO's assets. In order to find out how much Novell gets though, the case will have to be heard and ruled on. Therefore, the Bankruptcy court judge will lift the stay on the trial.

    2. Re:What SCO told the court by rewt66 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I suspect that there's a court case on Monday unless Judge Kimball says that there isn't, and I suspect that he is quite unlikely to do so. Remember, about all that's left of the case is how much of Novell's money is SCO holding and refusing to give to Novell. SCO going bankrupt doesn't alter the case, it merely adds more urgency to it.

    3. Re:What SCO told the court by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      I am sure the Novell will file that SCO is really a fiduciary for their assets under the contract and as such, they get first dibs on SCO's assets.

      Maybe we'll even get to find out how much Darl's pr0n collection is really worth. As far as I can tell, that's about the only 'asset' SCO has left...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:What SCO told the court by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      If SCO can't get out of court with Chapter 11, perhaps they'll try saying "Mr Kimball I have to go to the bathroom" to which the thunderous reply will come "There IS NO BATHROOM!"

      --
      I hate printers.
    5. Re:What SCO told the court by mpe · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I suspect that there's a court case on Monday unless Judge Kimball says that there isn't, and I suspect that he is quite unlikely to do so.

      Isn't Justice Kimball a woman? Anyway I doubt any judge would take the day (or even week) off, in such a situation. If the Novell/SCO case is suspended they'll simply be assigned another case.

  12. Obvious by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    They're trying to avoid get dismantled bit-by-bit by the Novell suit. The Chapter 11 reorg will protect them from getting decimated by Novell when they win their countersuit. So even if Novell wins, they don't get to take it out of SCO's hide until and unless the bankruptcy judge says os.

    1. Re:Obvious by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure what they are trying to do, but it isn't what you said.

      They have already been found to be guilty of conversion - taking something that Novell owns (the royalties they were owed) and keeping it for themselves (TSCOG).

      Bankruptcy or no bankruptcy, they have to give Novell what ALREADY belongs to Novell.

      They were obligated by contract to give the royalties to Novell BEFORE any bankruptcy, they are still required to give them AFTER any bankruptcy.

      The only point to be determined by the court is HOW MUCH TSCOG kept that they should not have kept. Whatever that amount, bankruptcy has not effect on their LEGAL REQUIREMENT to GIVE IT BACK TO NOVELL.

      If - which is NOT the case - Novell had gone for punatitive damages or any other kind of damages, then the bankruptcy would have had some effect. As it is, it doesn't (at least not in reguards to Novell).

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    2. Re:Obvious by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not quite. In the case of the royalty money, the rulings thus far are that the royalties are Novell's, not SCO's, money. There's a question of the dollar amount to be determined, but that money isn't a debt owed to Novell so bankruptcy doesn't shield it. Read up on "conversion", which is the term the judge used. If you steal money from someone, you can't use bankruptcy protection to retain it since it's not yours in the first place.

    3. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if SCO does not have the royalty money anymore (if say, they blew it all on hookers and blackjack) then it is probably now a debt that is owed to Novell. I don't know all the legal implications of that scenario (which I believe is the likely case). At any rate, I'm going to assume that will have a major impact on whether or not they can successfully avoid chapter 7.

    4. Re:Obvious by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      Novell's latest court fillings state that they want all the money that the judge decides that the contracts are worth to them. That SCO should forgo their 5% as SCO breached their duty to Novell. Novell also want 7% compounded annually as punitive damages. I'm not sure of the status of damages under bankruptcy but the rest of the money comes before the creditors.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    5. Re:Obvious by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      I can't see it working out that way. IANAL, but let's use the same scenario as the GP. I doubt I'd be protected if I stole money, spent it and THEN filed chapter 11. In fact, others above mentioned preparatory behavior would be considered fraud. If SCO spent the money that is due Novell, I'd be surprised if the court let them out with their hide intact.

      SCO: Sorry judge, we've spent it all.
      Judge: Really? Hmm, you've got that nice building there. All that nice furniture.
      SCO: Erm... Ummm...

      Anyone know if it was determined that SCO had taken prepatory action whether or not Darl and Co. could face charges themselves? It would bring a grin to my face to see the monies due to Novell paid in SCO assets, and Darl wearing orange.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  13. Darn . . . by div_2n · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I'll have to change my sig soon?

    1. Re:Darn . . . by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

      May I suggest:
      "Don't just bitch about OOXML and patent trolls, put your money where your mouth is.
      Donate to Groklaw today."

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  14. And now, ladies and gentlemen... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    the tune you've all been waiting to hear.

    *drum rolls*

    Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
    Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.
    Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
    Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead.

  15. Chapter 11 by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chapter 11 is bankruptcy protection. A company can emerge from chapter 11 (SGI did), but it's usually a preamble to a chapter 7, which means liquidation and game over, pal.

    1. Re:Chapter 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's not. Chapter 11 is reorganization of credit, usually done by businesses or individuals with large assets. It's in no way a preamble to chapter 7. If you can't prove that you will be able to reorganize your credit / business and keep your financial obligations, you cannot file chapter 11. It's not like you pick chapter 11, give it a shot, and when you fail, liquidate. It's one or the other. The only thing you said that makes any sense is the word protection - chapter 11 is commonly referred to as protection because you are being protected from involuntary bankruptcy (i.e. your creditor initiated the proceedings after non-payment) while you determine a strategy for payment / growth.

    2. Re:Chapter 11 by peragrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is because Novell recently claimed that it should recieve 100% of the Sun & MSFT Sco Source deals plus 7% interest. The APA SCOX loves so much says Novell recieves 100% with Novell refunding 5% back as adminstrative fees.

      Either way 95% is roughly 5 million dollars more than all of SCO's value Liquidated. I wonder if the bankruptcy trustee can declare Darl Mcbride's million dollar bonus for those two sales as invalid and ask for it back? I do hope so.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Chapter 11 by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 2, Informative

      United Airlines is another prime example of acompany that came out of Chapter 11. UA declared bankruptcy to give them better control over their assets and to give them better leverage to renegotiate contracts with vendors and unions. Neither of those apply to seem to apply to SCO in this case, so I'm doubting they'll come out as well...

    4. Re:Chapter 11 by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      SCO probably loses its administrative fees as a result of the conversion. It's not impossible to take those fees from a fiduciary if you set your mind to it (IANAL, but worked a in a law office), and that's with an honest, responsible fiduciary.

      The only question with the licenses is to what degree they reflected a UNIX license and to what degree they also covered SCO's copyrights independent of UNIX. And interest is a factor, as you mentioned. That 7% probably reflects a lower interest rate over 3 years or so. Otherwise, if it's 7%/year, then SCO owes 100-125% of those license fees.

    5. Re:Chapter 11 by kilgortrout · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC over 90% of Ch11 bankruptcies wind up in liquidation either through the filing of a liquidating plan or conversion to a Ch7.

    6. Re:Chapter 11 by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Is there a deadline of any kind for emerging from Chapter 11 before they declare that the company is too completely screwed and deserves to be liquidated? Or is this the sort of thing determined case-by-case in the bankruptcy courts?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:Chapter 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't prove that you will be able to reorganize your credit / business and keep your financial obligations, you cannot file chapter 11.

      This is interesting. Since a large chunk of SCO's "assets" have been found to belong to Novell, SCO will have an impossible time proving that it is able to restructure its debts until Kendall's court determines the amount that belongs to Novell. The financials that SCO submitted to the Delaware court are not accurate since they cannot reflect the amount of Novell property that SCO has been illegally calling a part of its assets.

      The lawyers involved in this scheme need to sanctioned, possibly disbarred, and ideally charged with felony crimes as accessories in a conspiracy to steal money from Novell. In addition, there is at least one Certified Public Accountant who has violated his oaths in preparing the financials who should definitely face criminal charges.

      This whole mess is exposing a lot of corruption, and stupidity, in the legal and accounting professions.

    8. Re:Chapter 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem that Darl's bonus came from his participation in an illegal conversion of assets, a theft, and would therefore be part of what needs to be delivered to its rightful owner, Novell.

      On the face of it, Darl, SCO's CFO, the CPA who has been certifying recent SCO financial statements, and a number of lawyers should be personally charged with felony conspiracy to commit theft. Each of these individuals knows how to interpret a contract and what obligations SCO has had toward Novell, yet all of them have been conspiring to avoid meeting those obligations. This recent Chapter 11 ploy is the latest and clearest example: SCO is still claiming in its financials that they own assets that Kendall's court has shown belong to Novell.

  16. FSCK YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The following is completely uninformative, but I have waited quite a while to post this:

    FSCK YEAH! Knew this was going to happen the first moment SCO started claiming Linux. Bite me SCO!

    1. Re:FSCK YEAH! by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is the internet...you can say "FUCK" here. In fact, when discussing SCO, I believe it's mandatory.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    2. Re: FSCK YEAH! by mec · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is mandatory, because SCO probably claims ownership of a trademark on "FSCK".

    3. Re: FSCK YEAH! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      ...SCO probably claims ownership of a trademark on "FSCK".

      Dunno ab't the trademark, but the copyright credits say the Linux version came from Ted T'so:

      AUTHOR
      Theodore Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu)

      FILES
      /etc/fstab.

      ...from the fsck man page.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  17. Ahhhh.... Good times. by mpaque · · Score: 1

    Good times. Bankruptcy, so SCOX stock gets written down as worthless, and I never have to cover.

  18. DFWT by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't Fuck With Tux

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    1. Re:DFWT by wikes82 · · Score: 1

      yeah, It's about time... This is a victory for Linux and Open Source

    2. Re:DFWT by Andrei+D · · Score: 1

      Don't Fuck With Tux Only this fellow did it and got away with it!
      --
      We often refuse to accept an idea merely because the tone of voice in which it has been expressed is unsympathetic to us
    3. Re:DFWT by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now he's dying!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:DFWT by XSforMe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More like Dont Fuck With the Nazgul

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    5. Re:DFWT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said it man!
      However, it's actually more like: Don't fuck with THE Tux.

  19. Who are these people? by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations

    Aside from the lawyers for whom SCO is a source of billable hours, who relies on SCO for any products, support, or services? Are these the same folks looking to George W. for stategic planning? The masses going to Michael Vick for pet care tips? OJ for public relations?

    1. Re:Who are these people? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just two weeks ago:
      Sberbank (Savings Bank Of The Russian Federation) Chooses SCO's OpenServer 6 to Upgrade Thousands of Servers.
      They must be feeling really good about that decision now.

    2. Re:Who are these people? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Sberbank (Savings Bank of the Russian Federation) is the leader of the Russian banking industry, accounting for over a quarter of national banking assets and remains the largest bank in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe in terms of Tier I capital and assets.

      Wow. That's just...wow.

    3. Re:Who are these people? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Umm.. Sounds to me like the bank needs to review the employment of their IT director.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Who are these people? by konohitowa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You also forgot "Liberals for reason and logic?"

    5. Re:Who are these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're the ones looking to Britney Spears for career advice...

    6. Re:Who are these people? by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      Feel good? - Da!

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    7. Re:Who are these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just too good to let pass ...

      In Soviet Russia, SCO owns the bank.

    8. Re:Who are these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonald's USA has probably 13,000 or so SCO OpenServer 5 systems in their restaurants, but I don't believe there's any significant money going to SCO at this point - no or minimal support contract, no upgrades, just new licenses when new locations are opened.

    9. Re:Who are these people? by konohitowa · · Score: 0

      Thank you moderators. The fact the I got mod'd flamebait nearly immediately quite clearly makes my case for me.

    10. Re:Who are these people? by vic-traill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm.. Sounds to me like the bank needs to review the employment of their IT director.

      Well, like North American banks and Caribbean branches that have a *tonne* of legacy code running on AS/400's, business apps are still out there running in SCO environments, apps that are critical to the business, but which scare the shit out of the organisation in terms of even thinking about unwinding them out of their businesses.

      SCO had a solid biz app developer network out there one upon a time, with a lot of re-seller support, a holdover from when they were *the* PC-based UNIX, long before daryl and his prick henchmen decided to pursue a new 'business model' [cough]pump-and-dump scheme[cough].

      But I guess they're fsck'd now, and looking at a whole different risk - they'll *have* to start working on it.

      And no, I'm not painting a tech-equivalence between a modern AS/400 installation and intel hardware running openserver 6. But the business process analogue is solid, I think.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    11. Re:Who are these people? by shanen · · Score: 1

      SCO made them such an offer they just couldn't refuse.

      Joke is that the Russian's *KNOW* how to do these deals, and they have assured SCO that the Czech is in the mail. Oh wait. You mean SCO wants a check?

      Seriously folks, it's sort of a shame to feel schadenfreude at someone's misfortune, but SCO is just *TOO* deserving. I'd wager it will be converted to Chapter 7 next week. The only way that Chapter 11 should even be considered is on the back of Darl's letter of resignation.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    12. Re:Who are these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a bunch of small business clients who use SCO as their legacy operating system to support specialized business applications. This sucks for them, because they will now need to move to much more expensive platforms to continue running their systems.

  20. Use SCO's bandwidth... by zoikes · · Score: 2, Informative

    read about the Chapter 11 filing here:
        http://ir.sco.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=264124
    ...and put a *wee* bit more pressure on their dwindling bankroll. ;)

    1. Re:Use SCO's bandwidth... by e6003 · · Score: 1

      Minor nitpick but SCO's Investor Relations site is outsourced so you won't directly use SCO's bandwidth:

      host ir.sco.com
      ir.sco.com is an alias for cald.client.shareholder.com.
      cald.client.shareholder.com is an alias for webcenter360.shareholder.com.
      webcenter360.shareholder.com has address 170.224.5.57
      ir.sco.com is an alias for cald.client.shareholder.com.
      cald.client.shareholder.com is an alias for webcenter360.shareholder.com.
      ir.sco.com is an alias for cald.client.shareholder.com.
      cald.client.shareholder.com is an alias for webcenter360.shareholder.com.

      host sco.com
      sco.com has address 132.147.63.12
      sco.com mail is handled by 10 mail.ut.sco.com.

    2. Re:Use SCO's bandwidth... by zoikes · · Score: 1

      d'oh! The thought was good, but the execution flawed...
      Thanks for the info.

      /. http://sco.com/...

    3. Re:Use SCO's bandwidth... by 6031769 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to note that despite all the coverage SCO has had on /. over the past year, their own news page seems to indicate that nothing of note has happened to the company since October 2006.

      I wonder why that would be ...

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
  21. come back? nah by PureCreditor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    even if SCO emerges from Chp 11 with a nice updated product line, they've already lost their credibility, good will, and confidence of customers. Who wants to buy anything from a company who might ending up suing you for no particular reason?

    There are tons of good Unix and Linux distributors out there... no reason to choose SCO anymore.

    You want free and good? Linux and BSD. You want enterprise level? IBM and Sun. You want Windows-based? Dell and HP. You wanna convert your entire revenue stream into attorney fees billed at $400/hr? Take SCO.

    1. Re:come back? nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction,

      You want Enterprise UNIX? IBM, Sun, _AND_ HP Dammit!

      Thanks,
      A Certified HP-UX System Administrator

      HP-UX lives, you know, on those big ass servers?

    2. Re:come back? nah by cching · · Score: 1

      HP-UX lives, you know, on those big ass servers? Really? Bigger than IBM? :-P
    3. Re:come back? nah by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can bring Xenix back.

    4. Re:come back? nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yah, Superdomem, 512 procs, P595, 64. So, Bigger

  22. Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    Why does this remind me of the little sister who smacks her big brother then immediately crys "mommy, he's picking on me" when he pushes her back?

    We scrapped all our remaining SCO stuff and completed converting to Linux. There will be no tears here when SCO is dead and buried.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      That happened to me all the time, but it was my big sister, who took shameless advantage of my dad's ironclad rule, "You don't hit girls. Period."

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by Pojut · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I would never....EVER hit a woman, man, never...but I'll shake the shit outta a woman." -Chris Rock

    3. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My coworker tells the same story, but with a different ending. His father made his sister promise NOT to pinch him (sharpened fingernails, drawing blood), and told Larry, in her presence, that he was never to hit his sister, because she was a girl. The penalty would be a whipping with a peach switch.

      15 minutes later, she struck again, and Larry punched her in the afce as hard as he could, knocking her down and bloodying her nose. His father, as he was preparing to whip him, ebmoaned Larry's lack of control. Larry responded that he hadn't lost conrol; on the contrary, he had considered it in depth and decided that the punisment was worth it. His Dad said he respected his decision, even though he believed it was the wrong one, and proceeded to whip his ass soundly.

      But his sister never went near him again.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Kids these days...

      Who needs to hit anyone, when you have a nine-volt battery and a 500F capacitor?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I had a mu before the F, but it didn't show up. Can't slashcode's 'plain old text' mode handle extended characters?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      You gotta admit, the 500F capacitor would have a much bigger effect. Don't think the 9-volt would quite be enough.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    7. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, a 500F capacitor would be just as good if your battery held enough juice to fully charge it. Of course the end result might be a bit more shocking. BOFH-modified cattleprod anyone?

    8. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Well, I for one would be intimidated by someone wielding a 500 degree capacitor. If they can hold that, they probably have no pain receptors, so what could you do short of fatally wounding 'em?

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    9. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by jcr · · Score: 1

      what could you do short of fatally wounding 'em?

      Well, you could try sarcasm...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Oh, your sarcasm wounds me so...

      *weeps*

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    11. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    12. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Been (quite) awhile since since I took basic electronics, but IIRC, anybody that could wield a 500F capacitor probably bench presses Volkswagons for a hobby...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    13. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

      if your battery can do 1 A for 500*9 seconds, yes. (100 minutes) it may take a few batteries. oh and (probably incorrectly as I don't want to work with the time part of charging capacitors) using P=IV: 4.5V * 500 A over 1 second = 2 KJ 2 KJ is enough energy to instantly vaporize 1 gram of water at body temperature. Definition from wikipedia The farad is defined as the amount of capacitance for which a potential difference of one volt results in a static charge of one coulomb. It has the base SI representation of s4 A2 m-2 kg-1. Since an ampere is the rate of electrical flow (current) of one coulomb per second, an alternate definition is that a farad is the amount of capacitance that requires one second for a one ampere flow of charge to change the voltage by one volt. Further equalities follow: [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/5/9/859ee7dd873594f37c1a6d79a71c4a0c.png[img]

    14. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      If you can hit someone with a 500F capacitor, it doesn't even need to be charged.

      Really, it's easier to hit such a capacitor with a person than the other way around.

    15. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Much simpler: Energy = 1/2 * Capacitance * Voltage^2

      Stored energy for a 500F capacitor at 9V: 1/2 * 500F * 81 V^2 = 20.25 KJ.
      Average power for a one-second total discharge: 20.25 KW (obviously).
      9V battery energy: about 2.5 amp-hours (varies widely) or about 80 KJ.

      You should be able to charge the capacitor off a single 9V battery, provided you can keep the voltage stepped up (which you can do at a fair efficiency with a single IC these days) and avoid losing too much to heat. It will take a lot longer to charge the capacitor than to discharge it, though, due to the battery's internal resistance. I doubt you could get a sustained 15W out of a standard 9V battery without an elaborate cooling system -- less when you consider losses in the step-up power supply -- and even then you'd need to run it for over a thousand hours to fully charge the capacitor at a constant current. Once it was charged, though, I wouldn't want to be anywhere near those leads. Even a partial charge could easily be deadly, particularly if one somehow managed to bypass the normal skin resistance in imitation of this Darwin Award winner.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    16. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

      thanks for the correct formula, I guess then it would be able to vaporize 10mL of her making a TON of 100 degree steam. If you managed to do this by that jabbing method in above, you would not only stop her heart, but basically vaporize the water in a line going from electrode to electrode through her chest which would cause a massive buildup of pressure and explode her.

    17. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I didn't even have to push my sister back. I'm bony enough that when she punched me she'd hurt her hand and start crying, getting me in trouble.

    18. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That happened to me all the time, but it was my big sister, who took shameless advantage of my dad's ironclad rule, "You don't hit girls. Period."

      I guess we had that rule, too. But I was a little wimp with asthma who sneezed a lot when my nose was tickled by dust. My older, bigger sister used to pin me with my arms spread out so I couldn't reach my nose to scratch it. Then she'd keep telling me my nose was itching. It drove me nuts. I nearly turned around inside my skin to reach it.

    19. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a mu before the F, but it didn't show up. Can't slashcode's 'plain old text' mode handle extended characters?

      Obviously the muFuckers can't.

  23. customers? by Sczi · · Score: 0

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations

    I'm sure both customers are greatly comforted by those kind words of encouragement.

    I imagine more of the low level workers must have to drink themselves to sleep at night.. and I bet they're having an epidemic of office supply theft right about now =]

    1. Re:customers? by allthingscode · · Score: 1

      Both customers: Microsoft and Sun (depending on the day of the week). If Novell takes all their money, then they can no longer be a front. "Maybe we can recover from bankruptcy and sue again." - Darl

  24. Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Informative

    The original SCO, the Santa Cruz Operation, made some good software. We had several servers running it many years ago, along with a few with re-branded "Dell Unix." It's a shame that the original company will be forgotten because of this current abomination.

    1. Re:Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I designed a system using XENIX and we got uptimes of 1 year or more at dozens of sites on Dell 483/33 machines well before Microsoft had ANY 32-bit O/S (early 90's). The old SCO products were excellent, if not a bit pricey. It is a shame that The SCOG is dragging the name SCO through the mud but "the evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft buried with their bones".

    2. Re:Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The original SCO, the Santa Cruz Operation, made some good software. We had several servers running it many years ago, along with a few with re-branded "Dell Unix." It's a shame that the original company will be forgotten because of this current abomination.

      Agreed!

      Falcon
    3. Re:Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by HAKdragon · · Score: 1
      You do realize that Xenix was Microsoft's Unix, right? From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix:

      Xenix was a version of the Unix operating system, licensed by Microsoft from AT&T in the late 1970s. The Santa Cruz Operation (SCO) later acquired exclusive rights to the software, and eventually began distributing it as SCO UNIX.
      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Shudder

      Seriously I got my MCSE after seeing Xenix err openserver in action and supported NT. Everything kept going haywire and was very complex and broken.

      Today I know better and like FreeBSD and Linux but old SCO left a bad taste in my mouth and almost turned me into a unix hater straight from the unix haters manual.

  25. Acronym... by BUL2294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO = Someone Cashed Out

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  26. Caldera?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm, can /. finally get rid of that Caldera logo? Maybe the articles that are only in that category can be archived somewhere. Now what would be a good spot? Me thinks /dev/null will do fine -.-'

    1. Re:Caldera?! by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Send them all to the giant Goatse in the sky.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  27. "The SCO" auf Deutsche, bitte... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should be translated as "Die Strittigen Bastarde"

  28. One Liners by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    1) I guess I was the only one who sent my $699 for my copy of Kubuntu.

    2) They can sell their furniture to Microsoft -- I hear they could always use more chairs.

    3) Two words, guys -- "bake sale"

    I'm just glad these extortion deals about copyrights and patents are sorted out -- I mean after this, nobody's going to strongarm linux distros into signing patent protection agreements...ever...right? Um...right?

    Incidentally, where are the folks from Yankee Group (Laura Didio, etc) who were so damn sure SCO was right? Wonder if their credibility has been appropriately damaged in all of this.

    1. Re:One Liners by Billy+Emu · · Score: 1

      Laura Didio changed her mind apparently.

      From http://www.itnews.com.au/News/59752,sco-could-face-cash-crunch-after-novell-trial.aspx:

      One analyst says SCO's future looks bleak. The lawsuit "was a bet the company strategy, and it doesn't look like they're holding the winning hand," said Yankee Group's Laura DiDio. "Whether SCO can survive remains to be seen, but it doesn't look good," she added.

  29. In their own words .. by talexb · · Score: 1

    And here it is, in their own word. SCOX is now trading at $.37, down from an open of $.65. Geez, and the whole thing seemed like such a good idea almost five years ago.

  30. Pump and dump by l2718 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the point of view of SCO's execs, this has been a pump-and-dump scheme: they filed the IBM (and Novell) lawsuits, got the stock to soar on the hype and in the years since have been quietly selling their stock. But there are others with a stake here (remember all the cash infusions MS arranged?), who probably want the lawsuits to continue. I wonder what the judge thinks now about Novell's motion for a constructive trust?

    1. Re:Pump and dump by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If the execs did sell their stock during the high period, then I expect the SEC already knows of this. If the shareholders can't recover some of their losses due to bankruptcy, then I would expect that they will soon enough investigate this sort of thing, and it's quite possible that McBridge and company may still see the inside of a jail.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Pump and dump by kcornia · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately probably not. It's hard to prove that the sales of their stock weren't part of normal executive stock sales. Unless a pattern emerges where they were selling right before important announcements/court decisions/etc., these guys will likely not have to give back a dime of that money.

      Keep an eye on sub-prime mortgage execs, you'll see the same thing. They knew the loans they were selling were unsustainable, but they just kept selling stock at regular intervals and all walked away with multiple millions of dollars, and its the market that's eating the loss on the bad loans.

    3. Re:Pump and dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "remember all the cash infusions MS arranged?"

      That's the part that I have never understood...

      MS pays money to SCO to keep the case going. SCO goes after Novell like a rabid pittbull. Microsoft then offers a deal to Novell. Novell signs. MS does NOT call off the dogs!

      Does anybody at Novell read Slashdot, Wikipedia, or the 100s of other sites which explain this fact? Do they not realize that the company that's kissing them is the same one pissing on them? Or are they kinky and like that sort of thing?

      CAPTCHA: wolves. well, pittbulls, wolves, whatever.

  31. what about their not bankrupt statements? by poetmatt · · Score: 1
    I'm questioning how this comes into play after statements like this one or this one? ?

    Is Novell going to have an even stronger case against them since they never said once anything about bankruptcy? Beyond the judge having to make some calls on monday due to this, does this get SCO off the hook? (I'd hope not)

  32. Um.... what? by MrToast · · Score: 1

    Title: "SCO Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy" Quote from SCO CEO: "We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations." Have I missed something?

    1. Re:Um.... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chapter 11 -> Re-organization
      Chapter 7  -> Liquidation

    2. Re:Um.... what? by morcego · · Score: 1

      Probably the punchline :)

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:Um.... what? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      This is chapter 11 not chapter 7. Afaict for a company badly in debt chapter 11 basically means that some contracts may be converted into debts and the creditors then take over the company. Chapter 11 exists because of the realisation that a buisness that wen't bankrupt because of bad debt or mismanagement (sueing IBM on a dubious case using money that sun and microsoft payed for stuff you don't really own can probably be considered mismanagement) is often worth more to it's creditors kept as a going concern than the sum of it's parts would be worth. It is also a better choice from the point of view of customers and employees.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  33. Good Job Darly! by SloWave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now he's available for the Head of FEMA position.

  34. Stock plummetage by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Note too that the stock plummeted by nearly half at the tail end of today's trading day owing to the news, and at last report it is at thirty seven cents.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Stock plummetage by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it plummeted as the insiders and people with inside knowledge traded out- trading is halted as soon as chapter 11 is filed. It might be interesting to see who actually sold today in the minutes prior to the announcement. The SEC has been known to take a close look at that in the past.

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    2. Re:Stock plummetage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, that's not true. See here: SEC Bankruptcy FAQ

      It says:

      A company's securities may continue to trade even after the company has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. In most instances, companies that file under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code are generally unable to meet the listing standards to continue to trade on Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange.
    3. Re:Stock plummetage by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      trading is only halted for 1/2 hour upon filing. If they wait until the end of trading anyway, as I suspect they had since google news doesn't show any articles more than 1 hour old, then trading is effectively halted for the weekend.

      Nasdaq will have sent a delisting notice, and will delist SCOX next Friday unless SCO requests a review hearing.

      faq

    4. Re:Stock plummetage by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Some of this sort of activity is caused by automatic trades set up previously by savvy people who aren't necessarily relying on insider knowledge. The SEC can't touch them.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    5. Re:Stock plummetage by mce · · Score: 1

      The SEC has been known to take a close look at that in the past.

      Which is exactly why this is not a case of insiders dumping in the last minutes before the press release. Such insider trading is perceived very very very badly and ruins one's career forever when discovered. Totally. In a high profile case like this one, no insider, no matter how utterly braindead, would trade before a chapter 11 filing is made public. It's just the reaction to the press release, possibly involving some insiders trying to sell some stock after the news had gone public. But the latter is not "illegal insider trading".

    6. Re:Stock plummetage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps these traders had a reuters feed and read it off the wire before it was released on the web or through the major news sources?

    7. Re:Stock plummetage by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      I would think most people wouldn't try it.

      But yes, there is someone brain dead enough to do it.

      And, being that they seem to be oblivious to repercussions, its not totally unlikely that some of the SCO management would do it.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  35. NEWSFLASH by thrillbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Emerald City, Oz. - It was announced today that Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group has conceded his defeat regarding the Copyright Infringement case against IBM a few years ago and will file for Chapter 11 protection. Mr. McBride was quoted as saying "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."

    When asked about these future plans, Mr. McBride announced his intention to sue every single internet user, based on the fact that the Internet became as popular as it did due to traffic running on products that were based on SCO intellectual property. "I personally was the creator of these tubes and filed for a patent back in 1956". Mr. McBride became irritated when this reporter informed him that the Internet did not in fact run through tubes, rather through optical lines and copper cables. "Where have you been? You must have missed my good friend Ted Stevens describing how the internet was a series of Tubes, just stick to what you know, which is ... ah.. whatever it is you reporters do.."

    Reporting live from Emerald City, this is T. Bert signing off.

    1. Re:NEWSFLASH by mikael · · Score: 1

      For some reason after reading the word "tubes" and the claim of property ownership, I just thought of that scene in the movie Brazil. Moral of the story: Don't mess with the tubes

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  36. Since there's many distros out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it would more properly (and politely) be said:

    "Don't Mess With Tuxes"

    (sorry, couldn't resist... and yes, I am in the Lone Star State ;-)

  37. How about they do something to suprise us all? by drspliff · · Score: 1

    When SCO goes into insolvency and eventually gets liquidated - what happens to the operating systems they've developed.

    Ideally they could do something to suprise us all and release everything under a BSD or MIT style license (or even public domain), but presuming no executive there is sane enough to do that... what will they do?

    I know it's just speculation, but it'd be nice to have another real UNIX derivative open up to the community along the same lines as Solaris and (I know it's not UNIX and not really open source) QNX.

    Just my two pence :) - Dr.

    1. Re:How about they do something to suprise us all? by e6003 · · Score: 1

      Apart from OpenServer, which is SVR3.2-based, they don't have much. The Court ruling is that Novell owns the copyrights to SVR4 and the general consensus on Groklaw and Investor Village SCOX board is that SCOs old and new added very little new to UNIXWare post-1995 that they can claim copyright on. Even if they did, part of their whole problem is that SVR4 is a mess copyrights-wise with lots of Intel, Microsoft and even unattributed BSD code in there. Forget open-sourcing it, it's not going to happen.

    2. Re:How about they do something to suprise us all? by drspliff · · Score: 1

      Well those are my hopes out of the window :\

      I presume, when you say Microsoft you really mean the real SCO and their (Microsoft copyrighted) Xenix?

    3. Re:How about they do something to suprise us all? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Even if they did, part of their whole problem is that SVR4 is a mess copyrights-wise with lots of Intel, Microsoft and even unattributed BSD code in there. Even if they did, part of their whole problem is that SVR4 is a mess.

      There, fixed that for you. The only thing in System V/R4 that's not in modern Unix derivatives is STREAMS and there's a reason for that.
  38. "the SCO, the" by Scooter[AMMO] · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that don't get the reference to "the SCO, the" in German, it comes from Episode 9F22 "Cape Feare" of the Simpsons.

    Sideshow Bob is applying for parole claiming that he wouldn't pose a danger to Bart:

    Lawyer: "Don't you have a tattoo that says 'die, Bart, die' on your chest?"
    Sideshow Bob: "No! That's German. It means 'the Bart, the'".
    Parole Officer 1: "No one who speaks German could be an evil man!"
    Parole Officer 2: "Parole granted!"

    --
    "There is no knowledge that is not power"
    1. Re:"the SCO, the" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But since Bart is male, shouldn't it be "der Bart, der"?

      Unless he's talking about several Barts, but then you'd have to conjugate the noun as well and it'd become something like "die Barten, die". Or "die Bärte, die"?

      Actually Bärte means "beards" in German, with the singular "Bart" which is masculine. So my best guess is that the tattoo was a badly written German version of "the beards, the".

      So what's Sideshow Bob's interest in beards anyway? As possibilities we have Jasper Beardly, the Sea Captain, but most interestingly, Krusty's father: Rabbi Hyman Krustofski.

      My guess is that Sideshow Bob is either a latent Nazi with a hatred for Hyman, or he is one of these wusses who cannot grow a decent beard and is taking it out on Krusty.

      An alternate theory is that I have too much time on my hands.

    2. Re:"the SCO, the" by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Crap, I wish I had some mod points now. I just wasted all of them yesterday.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:"the SCO, the" by lordtoran · · Score: 2, Funny

      When the Simpsons were first aired in Germany (I was a kid then), I actually wondered why Bart did not have a Bart (beard).

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    4. Re:"the SCO, the" by wronzki · · Score: 2, Funny

      But since Bart is male, shouldn't it be "der Bart, der"?
      Well, Nancy Cartwright (Bart's voice) is female, so maybe they're just being meta.
    5. Re:"the SCO, the" by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1

      Well, you used them because they expire quickly. So you blow them off left and right. Just like I and everybody else does.

      I don't understand why /. doesn't have something like mod point credits. Often, I would gladly use a mod point today for the price of five mod points next week. Soooo many times I've modded useless crap simply because I knew the point would expire, and the next day when it's all expired something actually modworthy appears buried deep in the comments and I can do nothing.

    6. Re:"the SCO, the" by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      but then you'd have to conjugate the noun as well and it'd become something like "die Barten, die". Or "die Bärte, die"? Bart (in this case) is not a German word, so it's "die Barts". Otherwise it would be "die Barte".
  39. Thanks for the mods. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    I appreciate the 'Funny' mods for my snarky comment, but seriously, does this company have any customers left?

    I guess you have MS using SCO as a proxy for fighting Linux, but other than that?

  40. They're buying a bit of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had the choice of going into chapter 11 now or being forced into chapter 7 next week. The advantage to them of chapter 11 is that the management team stays intact. I'm not sure how much good this will do them though. It's a pretty transparent move and the judge in the IBM and Novell cases has indicated that he is fed up with them.

    My guess is that he will grant Novell's request for a constructive trust on Monday or Tuesday. That basically means that Novell owns all the money that SCO has. Bankruptcy doesn't protect against a constructive trust. It isn't money that SCO owes to Novell, it is actually Novell's money that SCO is holding for them. It's like you lent your friend your car for a day and he went bankrupt. It's your car and the bankruptcy trustee can't touch it. Anyway, the moment the constructive trust is granted, Novell will sue SCO into chapter 7. The trustee will then kick Darl and co. out the door and change the locks.

    How much time has this little trick bought SCO. Not much I'll bet. Oh yes; just going into bankruptcy doesn't stop the court cases although we may or may not see some delay. Monday's trial may turn into a hearing about the constructive trust.

    This whole thing will be over when the bankruptcy trustee settles with IBM and Novell on whatever terms they dictate. Then the judge will slap sanctions on SCO's lawyers and the SEC will finally step in to investigate a possible pump and dump stock fraud and Darl has to worry about Lanham act violations and ...

  41. STILL claiming UNIX in the press release! by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The press release http://ir.sco.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=264124 says:

    "SCO owns the core UNIX operating system, originally developed by AT&T/Bell Labs and is the exclusive licensor to UNIX-based system software providers."

    Those SCO guys are a real pantload! Hahahahah

    1. Re:STILL claiming UNIX in the press release! by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      Well actually SCO does 'own' UNIX... except for copyrights and trademarks. That's what their agreement with Novell said - literally.

  42. Wrong word by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The Chapter 11 reorg will protect them from getting decimated by Novell when they win their countersuit"

    "Decimated" means destroying 1 in 10. IIRC, if a unit in the Roman Legion was cowardly|treasonous|bad, they counted off by 10's, a number was picked, and whoever had that number was beaten to death by the otehr 9 "luck ones".

    I don't think Novell or IBM want SCO "decimated". I think "obliterated" is more appropriate.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Wrong word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as we arrange things such that we pick whatever number Darl counts off, I think decimated is a-ok.

    2. Re:Wrong word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It almost seems that the word decimated has been changed into something else. I'd say a good compromise would be to redifine decimate to have 1 in 10 left, destroying 90% in other words.

    3. Re:Wrong word by morcego · · Score: 1

      "Decimated" means destroying 1 in 10. IIRC, if a unit in the Roman Legion was cowardly|treasonous|bad, they counted off by 10's, a number was picked, and whoever had that number was beaten to death by the otehr 9 "luck ones".


      Actually, in my dictionary, "decimated" means destroying 9 out of 10 (leaving 1 in 10).
      --
      morcego
    4. Re:Wrong word by Squozen · · Score: 1

      My Oxford dictionary agrees with the parent - which dictionary are you using?

    5. Re:Wrong word by morcego · · Score: 1

      One from another country, in another language.
      We just goes to show how much the meaning of a word can change from place to place.

      --
      morcego
    6. Re:Wrong word by morcego · · Score: 1

      Interesting fact.
      I just checked other dictionaries here, all local editions.

      2 agree with my assertion.
      3 others agree with the 1 out of 10 assertion.

      I don't think I can blame anyone for being confused on that one.

      --
      morcego
    7. Re:Wrong word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We just goes to show how much the meaning of a word can change from place to place.

      Actually it only goes to show that some places just can't get it right.

      The word really means killing off one in ten as an example to the remaining nine not to screw up.

      I may not be Doctor Science, but I do have a B.A. Classical, so it still means I'm smarter than you.

  43. Do they have any customers? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    "The SCO Group intends to maintain all normal business operations throughout the bankruptcy proceedings. Subject to court approval, SCO and its subsidiaries will use the cash flow from their consolidated operations to meet their capital needs during the reorganization process."

    I haven't heard of anyone running SCO since the early 90's. Does reorganization mean "moving our stuff out of the building"?

    1. Re:Do they have any customers? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Don't forget SCO Mobile Server and HipCheck -- whatever the fuck they are.

  44. As Ace Ventura Says... by rockabilly · · Score: 1

    YES! YES! YES!

    1. Re:As Ace Ventura Says... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the pelvic thrusts.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  45. Ummm by pionzypher · · Score: 1

    "We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group.

    Anyone still running on SCOs stuff is, I'm sorry... either a moron or so deep in legacy systems that they need a snorkle. This isn't a sudden turn of events. So just who is Darl trying to reassure? The people who have migrated away from SCO? Or the people who can't?

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  46. MOD PARENT UP by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Ah, OK. Thank you for the insight. If I had mod zorch, I'd +1 informative you. =)

    --
    This sig no verb.
  47. Truly the right time... by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    to use the tag so often used inappropriately.

    "haha"

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  48. Judge Kimball has next week off by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect that there's a court case on Monday unless Judge Kimball says that there isn't,
    Bankruptcy automatically stays all other civil proceedings. Which is, when you get down to it, what today's filing is all about.
    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Judge Kimball has next week off by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting but will it still be a civil matter? If they made the statement in court that there was no need to put Novells money in a trust because there where not going to file for bankruptcy isn't possible contempt of court or perjury?
      If so then then this may not be a civil matter.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Judge Kimball has next week off by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I believe that bankruptcy law specifically exempts certain events/actions from being protected by bankruptcy proceedings, if the creditor can show that the person/entity engaged in a preparatory act (like borrowing additional money) with the expectation that the debt will be subsequently discharged.

      Yes, I know that's a long and run-on statement. But as an example, pretend that:

      • You are already a candidate for bankruptcy, or considering it.
      • You go out and borrow a lot of money with no collateral, probably at a high interest rate to reflect the risk.
      • You declare bankruptcy, expecting that the debt will be discharged or at least reduced substantially.
      Under US bankruptcy law, this is considered fraud -- and the creditor can ask the court to not discharge that particular debt.

      SCO may have set themselves up by claiming they weren't going to file for bankruptcy, and then doing so. But, the bankruptcy court may have to decide if it was fraud -- and even then I don't know if it's a civil or criminal matter.

    3. Re:Judge Kimball has next week off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The primary purpose of bankruptcy is: (1) to give an honest debtor a "fresh start" in life by relieving the debtor of most debts, and (2) to repay creditors in an orderly manner to the extent that the debtor has the means available for payment.

      (quoted from this article)

      Doesn't big government make you feel like such a team player?

  49. Too bad that Darl has likely pocketed millions. by Maul · · Score: 1

    While it is nice to see that SCO is likely going under after all the crap Darl & Co. have pulled, it is likely that the corporate executives have already pocketed millions while letting the computer crash under the weight of their bogus lawsuit. Hopefully criminal fraud charges can be brought against the SCO execs, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  50. Does anybody find it odd... by br1an.warner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That in their press release, they say "SCO owns the core UNIX operating system..." ? Maybe they missed what happened in August? Link to the article on Groklaw

  51. Typos. Re:Do they have any customers? by Erris · · Score: 1

    The press release contained some typos. It should have read:

    "We want to assure our customer and partner that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride.

    You know how these commercial software operations like to hype things.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  52. Executives by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    "and that they're now desperate to protect their executives from SCO's creditors while seeking yet another delay"

    Executives have no risk from creditors unless criminal conduct can be shown, or it can be shown that SCO did not operate as a corporation. It is very rare for these conditions to occur. The only thing Darl and his buddies are at risk for is unemployment.

    The main reason to form a corporation is to protect the owners and principals of the corporation from personal liability. This is why you see phrases like 'Limited Liability Corporation'.

    1. Re:Executives by Shados · · Score: 1

      I beleive that, while somewhat poorly worded, what that part meant was that they'd get SCO's creditors off their backs for a bit while they try to get some work though (lol!), not protect them directly.

  53. Bullies begone by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

    Let this be a lesson to Microsoft and all other technologies companies looking to use the legal system to unfairly bully and intimidate the true innovators of the industry.

    We make technology, not lawsuits.

  54. Buh-BYE! by patmandu · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in unrelated news, SCO has filed to trademark any portrayal of water swirling around in a toilet bowl, as that is their new corporate logo.

    1. Re:Buh-BYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! They'll be suing Debian then...

    2. Re:Buh-BYE! by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose it beats the Mickey Mouse's ear that Caldera had.

  55. I'm pretty sad... by tyroneking · · Score: 1

    ... because for the grief that SCO caused the pressure brought out the best in the Linux supporting community and made some of us (well me, anyway) sit up and think about the freedom of software.

    It's interesting how this case is coming to a successful conclusion just as GPLv3 is starting to cause even more waves (e.g. Stallman's comments on Linux and Linus (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/12/1227220)).

    Personally I think we need to keep being vigilant in protecting free and open software and maybe start to go after those who might destroy that ideal.

    Props to Groklaw (for everything), Stallman (for the ideology), SCO (for a very long laugh), Maureen O'Gara (for getting her just desserts), Microsoft (for helping me to identify which companies I should avoid - I.e. anyone they partner with), and Mindjet (for p***ing me off so much that I'm switching to Freemind).

    OK - the last two are just because ribbons have screwed my world ...

  56. Can't short them anymore by marcus · · Score: 1

    Made some decent returns doing that over the last few years...

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  57. SCO PR department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations"

    if they had a PR department they would list those ... partner and customers.
    can u say "chain reaction", prolly not.

    maybe somebody can but in a wikipedia entry for "how to get rich dumb".

    p.s. creditors, start asking for code, instead of owned money? save what u can ...

  58. Chickens came home to roost by Interested+Bystander · · Score: 3, Funny

    But since I work for IBM, I think I can be forgiven for gloating!

    --
    If I was deep this is would be profound, if smart then wise, if a poet then verse. Here it is, you judge!
  59. Maureen O'Gara / G2 Computer Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "G2 Computer Intelligence" is listed as a debtor by SCOX in their filings, so now we know she's the paided little whore we always suspected her to be.

    That's right Maureen, you're fucking out of the fucking closet.

    1. Re:Maureen O'Gara / G2 Computer Intelligence by nuzak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you mean creditor, but yeah there they are / she is as a creditor.

      What's funny is how many restaurants are in the list of unsecured creditors. Don't these guys even pay their restaurant tabs?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  60. Did you see Darl's face? by rockabilly · · Score: 1

    The look on Darl's face in the Wired article is simply priceless. Definitely the face of someone who has been beaten time and time again...

    http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/09/battered-sco-fi.html

    1. Re:Did you see Darl's face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Definitely the face of someone who has been beaten time and time again...

      Huh...when I saw that pic, my first thought was "definitely the face of a greaseball mafioso-wannabe..."

    2. Re:Did you see Darl's face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Did you see Darl's face? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "Definitely the face of someone who has been beaten time and time again..."

      Not nearly enough...

    4. Re:Did you see Darl's face? by sweepkick · · Score: 1

      Yeah... looks like the mug shot it should be.

      Also, has Darl taken up trepenation these days? That pinhole in his forehead seems to suggest so...

  61. But I couldn't kill you by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I've grown accustomed to your faaaaaace

  62. Mod Parent Up. by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bankruptcy judges and trustees have carte blanche to deal with creditors, and limit the effects of ongoing litigation. On Monday, everything changes in front of Judge Kimball, who will put the suit into stasis, and give at least a 60 day cooling off period to everything.

    It might turn into a Chapter 7 filing afterwards, and SCO might be forced to liquidate. This is unlikely, however. In the interim, they'll try to convince a judge or referee that they have IP assets that need protecting, along with their agreements with various companies, and will produce a lot of smoke in their quest to simply survive.

    Much attorneys fees will be spent by many companies. Much continued incivility and plain poo will continue to be the hallmark of SCO's perhaps brief existence. Like others, they don't quit until they're just dead. Don't look for much come-uppance. This ends badly, just as it began badly.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up. by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for Darl and Co. The first thing the BK trustee will do is read the court transcripts and the second thing he'll do is ask to see the documentation showing transfer of ownership of the UNIX copyrights to SCO.

      When SCO say Wot. S/he will probably file to be removed as the trustee with the BK court and recommend a Chapter 7 filling.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
  63. Ja... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...und schliesslich ist die SCOhexe tot.

    rj

  64. "Schadenfreude in English" by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    That was easy.

    Seriously, no need to translate. Schadenfreude crossed from German to English.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  65. Obligitory Simpsons Quote by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    Note to Darl and friends:

    It is not about how many stock options you have, it's about how much copper you can pull out of the walls on the way out.

    HaHa.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  66. Awwww Yeeee-aaaah by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This sure looks like the beginning of the end-game scenerio for SCO. It will have zero effect on the Novell claims, since they are "equitable" and basically just amount to an embezzelment/conversion charge, not a "debt". It's a return of improperly held property, so bankruptcy doesn't provide any cover there. Actually, it may make it easier for Novell in a couple of weeks to force it into a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding instead, since the case will already be in the Bankruptcy Courts. They are SO toast now.

  67. Slashdot German article began: "Die SCO, die ..." by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there some German article that appeared on Slashdot some years ago, about how some German judge crushed the puny SCO ant under his thumb after SCO tried to ... I forget what they tried, but the German judge laughed them out of court. The German article was linked in Slashdot, and quite a few slashdotters were rather appreciative of the first three words of the article. (It began, "SCO, the company that ... [whatever]", but I guess in German, even proper nouns are preceded by the article, so it literally said, "The SCO, the company that ...")

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  68. Someone you hate by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    The bankruptcy is unlikely to end the lawsuits (though it may put them on hold for a bit). SCO and its execs and owners are likely still in big, big trouble. Frankly, I wouldn't take SCO as a gift at this point.

    On the other hand, the trademark might be interesting. I imagine that with all the ill-will SCO has garnered over the last few years, the value of the trademark is pretty minimal at this point, so the bankruptcy admininstrators might be willing to let it go for a song, and that would be a pretty entertaining thing to own. Though I suspect it would be risky to try to use it for its intended purpose. :)

    1. Re:Someone you hate by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmm...

      SCO Vacuums - They suck!

      SCO Sexual Enhancers - Get screwed by the best!

      SCO Toilet Paper - Absorbs shit like no other!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  69. Ok... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
    Where's the 'haha' tag??? We were promised the 'haha' tag. We want our 'haha' tag.

    (Props to Avery Brooks)

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  70. ...minor correction by Xodmoe · · Score: 1

    Ding dong the witch is dead!

    "Bitch" is correctly spelled "B-I-T-C-H".

    1. Re:...minor correction by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Witches and bitches are two different things. The former implies actual magic powers, as there were in the Wizard of Oz.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  71. Re:Slashdot German article began: "Die SCO, die .. by lordtoran · · Score: 1

    No, proper nouns are not written with an article in German. It's simply "SCO".

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  72. The question I want answered by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    is when will we see Darl McBride being arrested.

    It's not possible to present so much false information about SCO and the IBM lawsuit so publicly and so vocally with the obvious intent to defraud investors and to damage the business of its competitors and not break any law.

    Better yet, I would love to see some DA offering him to rat his friends and supporters in exchange for gentler punishment.

    Sad as it seems, I predict he will land a very nicely paid job at Microsoft or, more discretely, some of its puppets just as happened to Rick Belluzzo.

    Redmond knows how to reward its allies.

  73. Re:fuck a Troolkore by lordtoran · · Score: 1

    Hello Darl! It was a hard day, wasn't it?

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  74. Re:Use SCO's bandwidth... with prejudice! by brindafella · · Score: 1

    While reading SCO's Ch11 woes, use even a bit more of their bandwidth.

    Just for fun, click on the links to:
    Print page,
    Email page, and
    Download PDF.

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  75. I sang it then, I'll sing it now: by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    Originally posted in August, 2003

    SCO sometimes reminds me of a certain song... many of you may already know it. For those that don't...
    (shamelessly ripped off from The Dead Milkmen's "Stuart", from the album "Beelzebubba".)

    You know what, Laura DiDio? I LIKE YOU! You're not like the other people, here, in the Lindon trailer park! Oh, nonono, don't go get me wrong. They're fine people, they're good Americans. But they're content to sit back, fire up their Windows XP boxes and surf a little Internet on AOL, maybe chat a little on MSN. They're good, fine people, Stuart. But they don't know ... what the penguins are doing to our code! [...]

    You know that Johnny Werzner kid - the kid who ports apps in the neighborhood? He's a fine kid. Some of the neighbors say he smokes crack, but I don't believe it. Anyway, for his 10th birthday, all he wanted was a Sourceforge page. "Dad, get me a Sourceforge account. I'll never ask for anything else as long as I live". So the guy breaks down and set him up with a Sourceforge page.

    Anyway, 10:30, the other night, I go over next door, and there's the Werzner kid, looking up something on the 'net. I say, "What are you looking for?" He says "I'm looking for the source code to add to this new app."

    I said, "Jumping Jesus on a Pogo Stick! Everybody knows the source code is proprietary! Under NDA! In a vault! Why the hell do you think they call it 'source code' anyway!?"

    Now Laura, do you think a kid like that is going to know what the penguins are doing to the code!? I first became aware of this about ten years ago, the summer my oldest boy, Darl Jr. died. You know that trade show comes into town every year? Well this year IBM came through with a Demo called The Parser. The man said, "Keep your links, and dependencies, inside The Parser at all times!" But not Darl Jr - he was a DAAAREDEVIL, just like his old man! He was banging out code, saying "Hey everybody, Look at me! Look at me!" POW! He was decapitated! They found his head over by the Microsoft .NET concession! A few days after that, I open up the mail - and there's a pamphlet in there - from Pueblo, Colorado ! And it's addressed to Darl Jr. And it's entitled: "Do you know what the penguins are doing to our code!?"

    Now, Laura! If you look at the soil around any large US city where there's a large underground kernel hacker population. Portland, Oregon - perfect example. Look at the soil around Portland, Stuart... You can't build on it; you can't grow anything in it. The government says it's due to poor farming. But I know what's really going on, Laura. I know it's the penguins! They're in it with the aliens! They're building landing strips for code-stealing Martians! I swear to God!

    You know what, Laura DiDio? I like you! You're not like the other people, here in the Lindon trailer park...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:I sang it then, I'll sing it now: by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Darryl (This is my brother Darryl *and* this is my OTHER brother Darryl) remind you of "Bagdad Bob", the ex-Iraqi communications minister? If Darryl ever got smacked with a clue-stick, he'd bust the clue-stick... All I can say is "ABOUT TIME THIS HAPPENED!"... Next up, Darryl McBride is arrested and introduced to his new "husband" in PMITA prison....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  76. The Santa Cruz Operation Was A Cool Company... by hoak · · Score: 1

    While this outcome was inevitable and just effect; what's sad about it is the Santa Cruz Operation was originally a pretty cool company that made a pretty cool UNIX -- one of the first that ran and ran really well on a PC with a lot of feature 'firsts'. It's unfortunate that a more functional and collaborative approach to UNIX and just doing business wasn't taken by SCO's new owners... It's hard to feature why more UNIX Developers and Partners don't work together to standardize UNIX and with it Linux, and in turn to better distinguish their products. This wouldn't just be healthier, better business practice; it's a lot more FUN for all involved. I can't imagine someone like Darl McBride or any of his legal cronies go to work anticipating a fun filled day of innovation, value creation or excitement about the what they're helping sustain and foster...

    1. Re:The Santa Cruz Operation Was A Cool Company... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      what's sad about it is the Santa Cruz Operation was originally a pretty cool company that made a pretty cool UNIX -- one of the first that ran and ran really well on a PC with a lot of feature 'firsts'. My experience with SCO came in 1995/1996 and cool isn't exactly how I would describe it. Bunker buster resisting rock solid kernel (in a sense that people who have only experienced Microsoft Windows cannot begin to imagine), oh yes[*]. Worthy X11 and userland? Nope.

      [*] We hosted a process control system on SCO Unix which was capable of killing people if the O/S ever crashed. I slept at night. I take back the above. I guess it was pretty cool that we could do that safely.
  77. don't let the door ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear SCO,

    Please don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out.

    Because I don't want ass-prints all over my new door!

    Sincerely,
    Unix

  78. at last! by pbjones · · Score: 1

    how is /. going to fill it's pages? That would also make my copy of SCO software much more valuable.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  79. I'm dumping my SCO stock for Uranium by LM741N · · Score: 1

    Just as long as "Uranium" isn't copyrighted.

  80. Wait wait, what wasthat? by downix · · Score: 1

    let's try this:

    "We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group. "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."'"

    Hold on a second.. future plans? Dude dude, you have no plans, you never did. You came in with the thought to make a quick buck, to flip the company and jump with your golden parachute, and it fell to pieces because you decided on fighting the tide with your sword, that tide being the future itself.

    Do not cry for Darl, for his ruin is of his own making, and may whatever gods he holds dear take pity upon his soul, for noone else shall.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  81. Funny Excerpt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070830/lath046.html?.v=101

    About SCO

    The SCO Group (Nasdaq: SCOX - News) is a leading provider of UNIX software technology and mobile services. SCO offers UnixWare for enterprise applications and SCO OpenServer for small to medium businesses. The SCO Mobile product line focuses on creating mobile platforms, services and solutions for businesses and enhances the productivity of mobile workers. SCO's highly innovative and reliable solutions help customers grow their businesses everyday, especially into the emerging mobile market. SCO owns the core UNIX operating system, originally developed by AT&T/Bell Labs and is the exclusive licensor to Unix-based system software providers.

    Headquartered in Lindon, Utah, SCO has a worldwide network of thousands of resellers and developers. SCO Global Services provides reliable localized support and services to partners and customers. For more information on SCO products and services, visit http://www.sco.com./

    SCO and the associated logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of The SCO Group, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group.

    Source: SCO Group, Inc.

    HAHA ... Someone's in denial!

  82. sale of all assets? by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    I guess this means they need to start selling their assets like all those 'patents' and copyrights they have.. maybe IBM or novel should buy them and release them into the public domain to finally put to bed this ugly beast.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:sale of all assets? by denim · · Score: 1

      Novell is going to end up with most, if not all, of SCO's assets. There's nothing worth anything to buy which they haven't already lost. Well, maybe office equipment, but that's trivia.

      --
      Being quick to take offense is not a virtue.
  83. Rats jumping off the ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. What do you mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say "the SCO, the" in German?

    der/die/das SCO, der/die/das ?

    You know, in german, we have three articles instead of just one :-)

    (of course i get what the submitter means, it's just not as good a joke as he/she/it might think... at least from the perspective of a german native speaker :-) ).
  85. How about updating UnixWare by christurkel · · Score: 1

    Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans
    Like maybe updating UnixWare? No major releases since 2004. No new enterprise apps released for it. Out dated userland tools. X11R5 (no R6, forget X.org. Yes you can run X11R6 via Linux emulation--the laughs never stop). Imagine millions poured into UnixWare instead of litigation.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:How about updating UnixWare by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Unixware is old and is dead.

      Linux and .. hell even NEtBSD can run circles around it. Linux used to have support for running unixware binaries doing 2.0x if I remember correctly. Its gone now because their is no demand.

      Besides unixware hardware support is very and I mean very limited. Even solarisx86 has 10x more hadware support and you dont need an ancient scsi-3 or ultra to boot unlike Unixware.

  86. Darl McBride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I probably said it before, but.... if not... Hey Darl, Suck My Dick!

  87. Black Knight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Look you stupid bastard, you've got no arms left"

    "Yes I have"

    "Look!"

    "It's just a flesh wound"

  88. SCOX graph by flyingfsck · · Score: 1
    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  89. Need to Look at the Big Picture by still-a-geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if SCO loses for good, there is Novell. While it's great that Novell will get the rights to Unix, in the meantime, Microsoft has a vested interest with the company. There may be a day when Microsoft will just buy out/absorb Novell, and MS will own the Unix rights. And MS being a company with really deep pockets and ever more resources, may actually pull off lawsuits ala RIAA against any Unix/Linux user. MS funded SCO indirectly to "help" with the lawsuit. It seems that MS knew SCO was going to lose. Thus, a partnership with Novell with a sweet deal it could not refuse was made. MS does not lose here. MS wins either way. I don't believe this is over by a long shot.

    --

    "Happily lived Mankind in the peaceful Valley of Ignorance." -- Hendrik Willem Van Loon
    1. Re:Need to Look at the Big Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh. Just go away, you're so wrong it's not even funny.

      Learn about the GPL first. Then about "unclean hands" and "promissory estoppel" and finally about "Anti-trust".

      Mods, you're idiots.

    2. Re:Need to Look at the Big Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster was thinking about Unix not Linux.
      If Microsoft were to buy Novell (and the remnants of SCO for $0.01 on the dollar) then they would be in a very good position to really scare the shit out of anyone using Linux.
      However they dare not sue as the first item to be subpoenaed on the countersuit will be ALL copies of the windows source code going back to V3.0 so that the FOSS team can see if somehow, microsoft used GPL code in any shape or form and thus made themselves liable for literally billions of $, yen , Euro, Pounds of damages. If so much as one line of GPL code is used in any windows product without the proper usage (Attribution etc etc) then they are a literal dead duck and the SCO schenaganins would be very paltry by comparison.
      There is a case for actually asking for Microsoft to be wound up and an illegal cartel/business.
      Therefore, the thousands of Lawyers that microsoft have on retainer or in direct employ would be offering caution to anyone in Redmond who was foolish enough to want to buy Novell. That (IANAL) is a disaster waiting to happen.

    3. Re:Need to Look at the Big Picture by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But that event will scare the crap out of any paranoid liability scared company from using Linux.

      I would not want to run Linux if I would be employed in an environment where a single letter from a legal department could be automatic termination. Its not worth risking my job even if MS has no right like you claim.

      Liability scares everyone in this day and age and could do some big damage. As its been mentioned several banks have anti gnu/foss and linux clauses in their IT deparments thanks to SCO. Fud worked.

  90. Re:Dear Darl, Butt.. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    This is not QUITE unpossible. The burglar IS bankrupt. Morally bankrupt, that is...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  91. Thank you for flying SCO by ballmerfud · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is your captain speaking.

    For those of you on the left side of the plane, please disregard the flames coming out of the engine. This only a slight malfunction and in no way presents any real danger to people in Tahiti. We have plenty of power to compensate for the engine that just fell off, as those of you on the right side may have just noticed. I assure you that this is still, in fact, a plane, and that it is currently in the air, so technically we are still flying. Furthermore, I want to assure all of you that we will continue to fly until we reach the ground, and I guarantee that all of you will reach the ground. So, technically, there is no problem at all folks. No problem at all. Everything is fine. Just fine.

    Again, my name is Darl McBride, and thank you for flying SCO.

    --
    http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Steve_Ballmer
  92. No justice by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    What is really too bad here is that IBM and Novel will not be compensated for what this frivolous law suit has cost them. It is really too bad that the personal assets of the management of SCOX cannot be taken.

    Then, it is really too bad they can't be tossed in jail as well.

    1. Re:No justice by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      IBM's counter claims include Lathem(sp?) Act claims. I believe thats where it gets personal :-)

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    2. Re:No justice by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      Oh, they very well might get jail time for this case. I saw a veiled threat in their notice to Judge Kimball...

      "PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that contempt proceedings may be initiated against any party who participates in any violation of the automatic stay, and, pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Court may award actual damages, including costs and attorneys' fees (and, in appropriate circumstances, punitive damages) to compensate the Debtors for loss arising out of violations of the automatic stay."

      In other words... "Judge, you will put this case on hold, or we'll sue YOU and press contempt charges!"

      It's the ultimate in guts to write threats like that to a Federal judge. They can REALLY find a way to mess up your life, and Kimball is a REALLY good one.

  93. Funny date of the BK was yesterday by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    Wonder why they allowed the stock to trade today at all. Seems very funny to me.

  94. Translation of "protecting our assets" by porkrind · · Score: 1

    We know we're about to get sued up the wazzoo for all our fact-free claims from the last 4 years, and we just wanted to take a moment to tell you future litigators that our money is now behind closed doors, so bugger off, suckers!

  95. seeking bankruptcy and still in business by falconwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME!

    That's what Chapter 11 bankruptcy is all about. It allows you to reorganize your business and liabilities so you can stay in business.

    Falcon
    1. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, although I'd say SCO will have a hard time with this. Obtaining financing to sustain operations through bankruptcy is generally required and I suspect this will be exceptionally hard for SCO. Who would finance them considering that Novell and IBM pretty much own them now? Any remaining assets will be claimed by creditors one way or another.

      Given the tightened credit markets and the small likelihood of profitable operations even after bankruptcy, this Chapter 11 will soon turn to a Chapter 13 (liquidation).

    2. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by Romancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I'll reply to these posts since it looks like there is a common misunderstanding going on about what I am trying to get across.

      The fact that they are using the bankruptcy to escape the stock plummet that would follow the judgements that are comming is a cop out of their responsibility for the actions they have taken. I never said that they were going out of business, closing operations, or filing a different type of bankruptcy that would leed to those outcomes, and if you read that somewhere it was your assumption not mine. The problem I have with the simultanious assurance to their customers is that they are using a restructuring tactic to avoid the fallout of their horrible choices and appear to be a reliable company to anybody. It's a joke and it's on US ALL for allowing it.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    3. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll reply to these posts since it looks like there is a common misunderstanding going on about what I am trying to get across.

      And in my reply I specifically included the part of your post I was replying to, namely this:

      They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME!

      Though it may not be true in this case often businesses will file for chapter 7 bankruptcy so they can reorganize and by telling customers along with suppliers they are okay they are saying they are in it for the long term. That's what some airlines did, such as United, Delta, Northwest and US Airway. Regarding the airlines I think they should of been desolved, but with SCO, though I want it to end I also would like to give them the rope they'll be hung with.

      Falcon
    4. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by Romancer · · Score: 1

      First, from your last post:
      "often businesses will file for chapter 7 bankruptcy so they can reorganize and by telling customers along with suppliers they are okay"

      I don't know why you changed to talking about chapter 7, in another posters link above "In chapter 7, the business ceases operations and a trustee sells all of its assets and distributes the proceeds to its creditors"

      I'll chalk that up to a typo unless you can clarify.

      Second, your quote of my post still misses the point I am trying to get across.

      "They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time"

      This statement is being made knowing about the type of bankruptcy that they are filing. This is not a mistake or misprint.
      My point is that this is allowed. Not that it is currently illegal or outside normal practice. I am not arguing this point any longer if you keep trying to point out that my post is correct and somehow still correct it. I am not denying that this is happening, just that IMHO it is not "Just" in these cases where the company has no one else to blame other than itself. And this is not "market fluctuation" "sudden unforeseeable development" or any of the hundreds of reasons or circumstances that would make this a legitimate move by a company. This was too long in comming and they knew it, didn't change, and let it come. The companies Management drove that company directly here and are now trying to escape the consequences for themselves. (Again, using legally permissable venues)

      From the same resource mentioned above:
      "Some critics have claimed that Chapter 11 bankruptcy is excessively lenient in giving a needless "escape hatch" to the incompetent management of a failing company, damaging the efficiency of the economy as a whole and allowing poor managers to continue managing. It is unusual for the management of a company in Chapter 11 to be fired, as it is usually assumed that the present management team knows far more about the company and its customers than would a new set of management. These critics note that in Europe, bankruptcy law is far less lenient for failing companies."

      This text also admits that it is currently an acceptable process and is a completely legal option, BUT I think that it is being abused by these types of companies that expect the option equivilent to a "Get out of jail free" card for running their business into the ground to be available after so blatant a stratagy comprised of outright lies and deception. They could have mada a case in a month if they had anything to begin the lawsuit with in the first place. Present evidence to sustain further disclosure and discovery. that's a legitimate process they avoided at all costs and now the people who made that decision are trying to walk away unscathed by the natural market consequences of having a bluff like that finally called.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    5. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      In fairness to at least two of those airlines though, they declared bankruptcy not because they had to at the time, but because the bankruptcy laws were about to change and it was *much* more beneficial to both companies to declare when they did, rather than take the chance that they *might* have to declare later when the law wouldn't be nearly so favorable.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you changed to talking about chapter 7, in another posters link above "In chapter 7, the business ceases operations and a trustee sells all of its assets and distributes the proceeds to its creditors"

      I made a mistake and meant chapter 11 not chapter 7.

      From the same resource mentioned above:
      "Some critics have claimed that Chapter 11 bankruptcy is excessively lenient in giving a needless "escape hatch" to the incompetent management of a failing company, damaging the efficiency of the economy as a whole and allowing poor managers to continue managing. It is unusual for the management of a company in Chapter 11 to be fired, as it is usually assumed that the present management team knows far more about the company and its customers than would a new set of management. These critics note that in Europe, bankruptcy law is far less lenient for failing companies."

      Oh I agree. I even stated the airlines should been be allowed to fail, well should of been "desolved". This country, the US, makes it easy for businesses to declare bankruptcy but makes it hard for people to do the same. Government will even bail out a company, as Reagan did for Chrysler. Seems big business is more important than people, unless they own stocks.

      This text also admits that it is currently an acceptable process and is a completely legal option, BUT I think that it is being abused by these types of companies that expect the option equivilent to a "Get out of jail free" card for running their business into the ground to be available after so blatant a stratagy comprised of outright lies and deception.

      See above.

      Falcon
    7. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      In fairness to at least two of those airlines though, they declared bankruptcy not because they had to at the time, but because the bankruptcy laws were about to change and it was *much* more beneficial to both companies to declare when they did, rather than take the chance that they *might* have to declare later when the law wouldn't be nearly so favorable.

      Ok. I didn't know the change in laws made it harder for businesses to declare bankruptcy, I thought it only dealt with person bankruptcy.

      Falcon
  96. Big capacitors by mikeb · · Score: 1

    Used to be that 1F was a beast of a thing but now they sell 'em in the motor shops to beef up your bass when the wiring can't deliver
    100A on peaks

    500 of them is heavy, but not THAT heavy - seriously, go take a look at your local auto hi-fi store

    For something lighter:
    http://www.referenceaudiomods.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=RAM&Product_Code=ELNA_1F

    That allegedly weighs just 0.02 pounds, so 500 of them is 10lbs the lot.

  97. Looking backwards by DVega · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's what they said ...

    Forbes - What SCO Wants, SCO Gets
    By Daniel Lyons, 06.18.03, 12:00 PM ET

    [ ... ]

    In other words, like many religious folk, the Linux-loving crunchies in the open-source movement are a) convinced of their own righteousness, and b) sure the whole world, including judges, will agree.

    They should wake up. SCO may not be very good at making a profit by selling software. But it is very good at getting what it wants from other companies. And it has a tight circle of friends.

    [ ... ]

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
    1. Re:Looking backwards by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Let's what they said ...

      They should wake up. SCO may not be very good at making a profit by selling software. But it is very good at getting what it wants from other companies. And it has a tight circle of friends.

      I wonder if someone should ask Mssr. Lyons where those 'friends' are at the present moment? *snicker*

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Looking backwards by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      Maybe the guys that Darl gives his fruit cups and cigarettes to for protection?

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  98. MARTICOCK DIED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH MY GOD

  99. This isn't a victory by bjorniac · · Score: 1

    The whole SCO thing has been a disaster. What most people don't seem to realize is that SCO weren't playing to win lawsuits. They were playing to spread FUD, taking money from M$ to make people think twice about using Linux. They've had five years of hoodwinking people. Just think how much damage they've done to IBM with their BS - millions of dollars in legal fees etc, and all the time trying to make people think that using Linux was putting their business at risk of being sued. They've done their job, and I reckon they'll be reborn in some new fashion to continue.

  100. Justdeserts tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which ones - Sahara? Atacama?

  101. for a good laugh by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    If anyone wants a laugh, check this out: Google Finance: SCOX. I laugh, point at SCOX, and slap my knee.

    I note that both Reuters and Google finance have this summary of what SCO does. In light of their losing their case, when is SCO going to revise this summary?

    The SCO Group, Inc. owns the UNIX operating system technology and is a provider of UNIX-based products and services. The Company's core business is to sell and service its UNIX software products to small to medium-sized businesses and franchisees or branch offices of Fortune 1000 businesses. The products that drive the majority of its UNIX revenue are OpenServer and UnixWare. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 (fiscal 2006), the Company had two segments: UNIX and SCOsource. The UNIX business sells and distributes UNIX products and services, and the SCOsource business enforces and protects the Company's UNIX intellectual property. The products offered by the Company in its UNIX business include OpenServer, UnixWare and UNIX-related products, such as SCOoffice Server, a UNIX-based e-mail and collaboration system, and other UNIX system add-ons
  102. Interesting list of creditors by slashflood · · Score: 1
    Check out their list of creditors!
    • Bajio Grill
    • Cabo Grill
    • California Pizza Kitchen
    • Chili's
    • China Lily
    • Costa Vida
    • Einstein Brothers
    • Fazoli's
    • Gandolfo's
    • Happy Sumo
    • Honeybaked Ham
    • Jasons Deli
    • Macaroni Grill
    • Nicolitalia Pizzaria
    • New York Burrito
    • Panda Express
    • Shirley's Bakery
    • Smoke House Pizza BBQ
    • Taste of Punjab
    1. Re:Interesting list of creditors by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, you'd think Darl could pay his restaurant tabs...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  103. Nah. They're not that good... by crovira · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try:

    SCO Potato Chips, comes in douche flavor, instead of just salt and vinegar.

    SCO the newest Windows' Vista Reseller.

    SCO retailers: Going to Vietnam to compete with Wall*Mart.

    SCO Foods: Made with cyclamates, triglycerides and all the hydrogenated denatured vegetable oils you crave.

    SCO Soap: Made with extra lubricating oils and gentle soothing lotions. Suppliers to the US Penal System since we found out what we could expect.

    SCO Coffee: 'Crap'pucino, Made from what Starbuck's threw away.

    SCO Greeting Cards: Made specially for mothers' in law and other people you don't really care about.

    SCO Theme Park. Its like "Six Flags" without the rides or any of the fun. Basically, think of the lousiest fair run by the most crooked grifters on the most run down equipment, showing the worst flea-bitten, urine-smelling animals (Gerty The Wonder Rat!) and down-on-their-luck geeks (we're talking REAL geeks, Glauman geeks here,) that its ever been your displeasure to encounter outside of their tent. That's the SCO Theme Park.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Nah. They're not that good... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Hey, I Liked cyclamates you insensitive clod. The research linking intestinal bacteria desulfonation was never substantiated. Wikipedia has an article, natch.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Nah. They're not that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fat?

  104. Alberto Gonzales, The Honorable Attorney General by slashflood · · Score: 1

    ... is also on the list of creditors!

  105. delay delay delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SCO strategy has always been to spew FUD and delay the actual trial. Bankruptcy is just one more step in the delay strategy.

    Just like the USA's goal in Iraq is not to foment democracy there (the goal is to establish more military bases in the heart of the middle east so we can protect our oil that just happens to be underneath their desert), SCO's goal has never been to actually win the court case. SCO's strategy has always been to spew anti-linux FUD on behalf of Microsoft for as long as possible. Declaring bankruptcy was probably in the plan all along.

    Poor Novell -- their case to determine exactly how much SCO owes them is now stalled.

  106. Form filer is "SCO Operations" not "SCO Group" by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what that means.

    A poster on InvestorVillage.com (atul66) makes a good point:

    The BK filing alerts us to the existence of another entity, "SCO Operations, Inc.", a legally distinct subsidiary of the SCO Group proper. If I'm reading the creditor list properly, SCO Operations is one of SCO Group's creditors, so they basically owe money to themselves, at least on paper. I'm no corporate law guru, but this smells bad. Mysterious shell companies, money and possibly assets flowing around. Piecing together what's been going on under the hood could get really... interesting.

    As PJ noted over on GL, S2/Anderer contracted with SCO Operations, not SCO Group, way back when. Here's their contract: http://contracts.onecle.com/sco/s2.svc.2003.07.01.shtml

  107. The good news is... by Vancouverite · · Score: 1

    that Novell is not on the list of creditors. Yep, that's right - that is the good news. Why, you ask? (Even if you didn't ask, play along, or this post is fairly pointless.) You see, the judgment that SCO needed to forward payments to Novell related to the MS and Sun deals has already been put on the books. Barring appeal, it means that the monies due Novell do not belong to SCO, and are not any part of the assets to be distributed by a bankruptcy. After all, if a thief goes bankrupt, it doesn't mean that your stolen property is not still your property. The thief can't legally sell it to raise funds for the bankruptcy. Neither can SCO use the funds owed Novell, since those funds do not belong to SCO. Personally, I think that's pretty good news - the bankruptcy does not change SCO's loss in summary judgements to a rained-out game.

    --
    We are the Music Makers, and We are the Dreamers of Dreams...
  108. Will the issue of UNIX code in Linux be resolved? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Or, can scox delay until there is nothing left for anybody to sue, and then leave the issue unresolved?

    If the issue is left unresolved, the scam will be a slam-dunk victory for msft, scox, and BSF.

    As it is, the scammers have already won in many ways. Scox was as good as dead before the lawsuit, so scox had nothing to lose.

    I think the issue will be resolved. I hope it will.

  109. Customer? Are you counting Daryl's mom? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ..or is he suing her too?

  110. Bad Faith by maz2331 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cross-post from Groklaw... I did a quick Google of "bad faith" in regards to bankruptcy filings, and there is apparently precident regarding exactly the same situation as SCO is in. Using bankruptcy just as a tool to thwart other litigation is apparently a BIG no-no. From a non-authoritative source: http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/usdc/bnkrptcy/briefs/bnk45.htm "One area ripe for a bad faith dismissal is when the debtor is using a bankruptcy filing as a litigation tactic to either forestall litigation or seek a forum perceived to be more friendly. In Marsch, the court upheld a 'bad faith' dismissal where the chapter 11 petition was filed solely to delay collection of a judgment and avoid posting an appeal bond where the debtor had the financial means to pay the judgment." Also, in addition to dismissing the bankruptcy case, the bankruptcy courts may well impose the "nuclear" sanction - barring SCO from asserting another bankruptcy claim in the future. This would leave them totally exposed to the full wieght of any other judgements, with no way out at all - not even Chapter 7 liquidation. In other words... "you're on your own, Darl..." Is anyone with any expertise in bankruptcy proceedings around to help the community figure out exactly how this works? Something tells me the bankruptcy filing is not going to fly for long, but may expose SCO's legal team to some serious malpractice liability. And... maybe after this little road bump is resolved we'll finally see Kimball bring some real sacnctions down on the SCO side too. This is just getting beyond ridiculous.

    1. Re:Bad Faith by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I sensed Mcbride was already looking at real estate in the carribean when I read this headline. My guess is that since SCOX has been taking down from dow would be the most excellent time to raid the company of its assets and run! By the time the filing is over all the executives and his McBides brother(who is one of the lawyers) will be sitting on a few million dollars in cash in a mansion in Jamaica or Canada and retire.

      Civil suites can not really be brought agaisnt someone outside the US unless its an international contract.

      Bad Faith indeed.

  111. Wait! There still may be a chance! by aqk · · Score: 1

    When in doubt, sue the bastards!

    >> Other companies such as Delta Airlines, Texaco, Dow Corning, K-Mart, United Airlines, Toys R' Us, Macy's Department Stores and others have emerged from Chapter 11 protection after restructuring themselves for success. We intend to do the same.

    >>We value our relationship with you and want to provide the assurance that you can continue to order product, and receive exemplary service and support from us during this restructuring period.

    >>We invite you to consult with your SCO representative if you have any questions or concerns.



  112. Re:for a good laugh, ask for loose change by aqk · · Score: 1


    ... Plus a change, plus c'est la même chose.

    Who knows.. Perhaps Google is next.


  113. Re:Slashdot German article began: "Die SCO, die .. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    SCO is an acronym, not a proper noun. The Santa Cruz Organization. The is appropriate.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  114. The Chapter 11 hearing should be short by symbolset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let's see... you took $500 million in paid in equity and in nine short years managed to parley that into a princely sum less than $5 million. In the history of your company your only profitable quarter a judge has found that some if not all of your revenue was the proceeds of conversion that you have spent and can no longer pay back. Your liabilities include the counterclaims remaining from baseless lawsuits you have filed after your claims have been revealed to have no substance.

    Liquidation cannot cure your victims, but it should help prevent you from finding any more.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The Chapter 11 hearing should be short by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "Liquidation cannot cure your victims, but it should help prevent you from finding any more."

      While I agree with what you are saying with the rest of your post, I have to dispute this comment.
      "There's one born every minute." comes to mind (an old one)as well as "You can fool some of the people..."...you get my point I hope.

      There seems to be a reason that there are only 7 basic plots to any possible story, and we seem to have to re-learn history to keep it fresh and alive.

      Some of us study/remember history, and some of us have to re-learn it.

      "Hey you kid!! Get off of my lawn!!!!"

      My wife got an email that claimed it was examples of humorous Canadian billboards that had a lot of images), one of them was a depiction of the old Daisy Red Ryder BB Gun (tm) with the caption of something like this (from drunken, senile memory!):
      "Keeping Lawns Kid Free for 77 Years!" or something real similar. LOL!!!

      I resemble that remark!! (No, I have never shot at ANYTHING but 'official' targets that I have not intended to kill!)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  115. Darl in Orange by BanjoBob · · Score: 1
    Maybe we're getting closer to seeing Darl in Orange !

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
    1. Re:Darl in Orange by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      That suit looks very good on him.

  116. You know Silverman's "Jesus is Magic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Linux is Magic"

    Why do I always have the same captchas.

  117. This is Wonderful! by harlequinade · · Score: 1

    The best news I've heard all day! This calls for a block party, with pizza, beer, gallons of ice cream, and a cake larger than Kirstie Alley's butt!

    On behalf of Penguinistas everywhere, may I just say to SCO: "Gotcha! Cowards!!"

    / We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming...


    --
    Help feed homeless animals - Free! www.theanimalrescuesite.com
  118. Re: Use SCO's bandwidth... with prejudice! by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
    I thought that "cfm" looked weird in those URLs, so I checked it out. Behold:

    $ HEAD ir.sco.com
    200 OK
    Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:40:12 GMT
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
    [...]
    Doesn't even SCO use their own operating system?
  119. Still no Enderle quote? by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why, oh, why can't we have a comment from the quintessential blurbmeister here? Rob, where are you in this historic moment to weigh the subtle issues and deliver some clarity in fifteen words or less?

    Will you all please give him some hits on his blog at ITBE and let him know we need his insight at this trying time?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  120. However, Judges don't like cheats by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    Chapter 11 won't protect these guys from Novell, IBM, sanctions or jail.

    Chapter 11 won't protect you from fraud or other crimes.

    You can't use Chapter 11 to evade the law.

    It will soon be evident that SCO has done this with unclean hands.
    Judges don't like it when people do bad things with the courts. Filing bankruptcy
    was a big mistake for SCO. The SCO officers have been loose and fast with
    the reins of a company whose stockholders' interest they were responsible to
    look after. If it turns out, it has all been a scheme to enrichen a few select members,
    then bankruptcy won't save these guys from jail. Now that they are in bankruptcy,
    someone outside the company and lots of others outside the company are going to be looking at
    all the facts about these lawsuits and goings on. I think this has been they're biggest mistake yet.

    You'll see, these guys are in for it now. The SEC will be looking over they're finances,
    as will a bankruptcy judge, and that judge will be talking to the other judges, and all the courts'
    cases SCO has been involved with, not to mention getting with Novell and IBM. Oh, it's
    going to be a HELLUVA party.

    Images of John Belushi dancing on the graves of SNL folks are playing in my head. Only this time
    it's McBride dancing on the graves of Linux, IBM, Novell, et al. We all know how that really played out,
    with John Belushi.
    [Father Guido Sarducci voice] I predict, SCO folks, going to be in the Big House. Really Soon.

  121. As Zonker said when Uncle Duke was committed: by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

    "Our long national nightmare is finally over." (This particular one, anyway.)

    1. Re:As Zonker said when Uncle Duke was committed: by LauraW · · Score: 1

      "Our long national nightmare is finally over."

      The original quote was from Gerald Ford's speech when he took the oath of office as President after Nixon resigned, believe it or not. Trudeau (or Zonk) was poking fun at Ford.

      -- Laura, feeling pedantic

  122. Re:Dear Darl, have paitence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Good things come to those who wait !
    >
    > Regards, Destiny

    Let me fix that for ya:

    Patience: Good things come to those who wait

    Don't worry, Darl, you're almost out of money, and it'll be all over soon. I'll give your bondholders a buck for your office nameplate. My office washroom needs a new urinal mint holder.

    Regards,
    A Vulture Capitalist

  123. Is too by allthingscode · · Score: 1

    They couldn't even do the job Microsoft hired them to do.
    1. To spread FUD to make people think twice about Linux - sure they scared off some people, who were just looking for an excuse not to adopt Linux. But a larger number of people and companies not only adopted Linux as their OS, but actually switched to doing FOSS development.
    2. Damaged IBM - this probably cost IBM more in the time its lawyers spent dealing with SCO rather than going after IP violators itself. But, IBM demonstrated beyond a doubt what happens if you go after them with a frivolous lawsuit.
    3. Scare FOSS developers - Rather than scaring developers, the community created and supported Groklaw, discussions on /., and put the heat on other writers that liked to make up information. Now, there are defenses in the FOSS community for dealing with legal threats, the press, and public opinion.

    Don't give too much credit to Darl, though. Microsoft was playing to keep people on Windows. Darl, on the other hand, was hoping IBM would pay him to go away. Pure greed on his part

  124. To Darl, O'Gara, Lyons, and Enderle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck it.

    Suck it hard.

  125. Well deserved, Just, and yet Sad. by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    The implications are that real people are going to lose their jobs, their cars, their homes, and their financial futures. I imagine that a few greedy people, making a few foolish actions brought about the end of SCO, and the rest of the employees, who had no say, are going home to pick up the pieces of their lives. Its as if the entire world willed SCO to perish, perhaps justly so, but if I may get Taoist on you all for a moment--victory is celebrated with a funeral.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Well deserved, Just, and yet Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgive me for getting Sartre on you, but those people all made their own choices.

    2. Re:Well deserved, Just, and yet Sad. by stm2 · · Score: 1

      "Real people are going to lose their jobs, their cars, their homes, and their financial futures."

      They deserve it.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    3. Re:Well deserved, Just, and yet Sad. by z-vet · · Score: 1

      Are these real people live in vacuum? Do they read news? Did they know what the company they working for is doing? If yes, why didn't they found other job before it was too late? And if no, well, they are stupid and these are results of their stupidity. You may have no say but you always have an option to quit your job and find another when the company you work for is making a foolish actions.

      --
      326684
  126. Ahh, before he was Fake Steve by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    It's important to remember who people are, and what they wrote. Even if they're very clever and funny about it now.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  127. Time for a poll by shanen · · Score: 1

    Rather than dupe the SCO story (even though I'd forgive them this time), how about recycling it as a poll. Perhaps "What's the best use for your SCO stock certificates?" They should try to be creative with the answers, not just variations of things you do in the head. (That's the bathroom for you landlubbers.) Really, there aren't like to be many future developments in this case.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  128. For the love of God, don't... by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    ...opensource the code on your way down the drain! :>

    (Talk about one small step for man, one giant stumble for penguin-kind...the stuff has to be run on "certified" motherboards, FCOL...)

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  129. The filing by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    seems to be a way to attempt to create a catch-22 in the legal works. At least it's a way to stall the proceedings, even if it's only for a few days allowing Darl McBride & co to have time to duck out. Maybe it's time to place a lock-down on all paper shredders in the vicinity of SCO...

    Anyway - the filing seems to be too early since the assets of SCO currently exceeds the debts. So in my opinion the filing should be rejected, possibly with the catch that it can't be re-filed.

    So - if it is decided that SCO has been working with Novells money is it possible that the control of SCO is transferred to Novell and the current shareholders are going to be left out in the cold?

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  130. Read on - Darl & SCO are gone in either case by CharonX · · Score: 1

    "Often, if the company's debts exceed its assets, then at the completion of bankruptcy the company's owners (stockholders) all end up with nothing; all their rights and interests are terminated and the company's creditors end up with ownership of the newly reorganized company."
    And as the debts are by far greater than the assets, Darl & SCO won't be able to pay up. Chapter 11 only prevents the immediate liquidation, but Novell will end up owning SCO (and the stockholders - including Darl - will end up emptyhanded, with nothing). So either way, SCO is now as good as done for.

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  131. WHAaa?? by jon287 · · Score: 1

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group.

    Customers? Business operations?! SUPPORT?! SERVICES?!!!?
    Man, I don't know what that guy is smokin' but it must be some hella-good shit!
    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  132. Re:Dear Darl, Butt.. by owlstead · · Score: 1

    IMP!

  133. Sue your IT customers and send your into bankrupcy by likes2comment · · Score: 0

    HA HA HA. What a businss plan they had........ :) :) :)

    When they first started their lawsuits, that's when the company I know made plans to convert their thousands of SCO store machines to Linux.

  134. SCO finally dead! MS next? by aim2future · · Score: 1

    If someone is not too bored to read blogs about it, here is mine
    SCO finally dead! MS next?

  135. I just gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yippee! LOL! ROFL! and all that.
    What goes around, comes around.

    ahhh satisfaction.

  136. Re:Slashdot German article began: "Die SCO, die .. by lordtoran · · Score: 1

    OK, you got me. The use of articles with company/organization names is quite incoherent in German, or I just don't know the exact rules. But I know that names of IT companies are never written with an article. Companies written with their full name like "Santa Cruz Organization" or "Deutsche Bank" however always have an article, as well as noncommercial organizations (NGOs, political parties, universities) even when the name is abbreviated. An exception is "Greenpeace" for example, which has no article.

    On the other hand we say "der DPD" which is the abbreviation of Deutscher Paketdienst ("German Parcel Service") and it is a commercial company.

    My theory, after thinking about it, is simply that the article is omitted when it would be in the neuter ("das" as opposed to m. "der" oder f. "die"). Hmm, I may be right with that. Or not. Even as a native speaker, I don't claim German is a particularly easy language :-)

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  137. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS and Novel (and IBM) (not to mention Sun!), would very much like it for SCO to kill linux.

    After they saw SCO was going down they decided to take credit for the "victory". At least somebody would look good and they would get something out of this whole story.

    Yes. Its true. I was there. The deal was:

    "If SCO kills linux that's great. If not, we'll present our selfs as the good fellars. The plan requires $100M and it will make somebody look like the bad guy (SCO) and we'll redirect the hatedress there. Then, we'll create a linux distribution named butundu which will only supply trojaned binaries and a disappointing experience to the new user...."

  138. It ain't over tilll the .... by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    THe question really is:

    Is PJ a fat lady and will she sing at the party?

  139. Justdeserts? by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

    Which ones? I think Sahara, Gobi and Kalahari

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
  140. I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    as if millions of geeks suddenly cheered and were not silenced. I knew something inevitable has finally happened.

  141. Zombie corporations by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Could the bankrupt SCO drag things out for years as a zombie corporation shielded by bankruptcy law and financed by the shadow banks of their puppetmaster?

    Oh, the horror.

    A little light fiction might make it more palatable.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  142. Yupiii by ezonme · · Score: 1

    <embed>
    Fireworks.avi
    </embed>

  143. Say it ain't so Darl by DaveInAustin · · Score: 1

    On September 3, in this interview, Darl states clearly that he could do some "licensing deals" and sell their mobile business to raise cash. Where are the media comments on this? Are there no companies that want to own "shout postcard" and "hip check" or "Scamp"?

    --
    --- http://davidnehme.blogspot.com
  144. GREAT PUN by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    Can you say "the SCO, the" in German?
    Or, to actually say it in German: die SCO, die.
  145. Not everything SCO says is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best comments on the Chapter 11 filing were made months ago, by SCO themselves. Quoting from the Risk Factors section of their most recent 10Q filing:

    "We may not prevail in our lawsuits with IBM, Novell and others, which may adversely affect our ability to continue in business."

    "If Novell prevails in whole or in part on its summary judgment motions, some or all of our cash and cash equivalents could be encumbered and our claims against Novell and IBM may be substantially reduced or eliminated."

    " In the event we are not successful with the IBM or Novell motions, or the continuing litigation requires more cash than expected, our business and operations would be materially harmed."
    That's a pretty good summary of why they filed for Chapter 11 protection!

  146. Horrible development by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 1

    I'm breaking about three years of /. silence to say, "SCO, you should get down on your knobby, Latter-Day knees every single day and thank your lucky stars that there isn't a just corporate God, for if there were, you and all your minions would be struck down with some corporate equivalent of advanced syphilis, except for your minions, who would get a real form of advanced syphilis, and a nasty case of herpes just for good measure."

    It just needed to be said.

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}