Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Dollar Reaches Parity with US$

boxlight writes in to mark the occasion when the Canadian dollar hit parity with the US dollar for the first time in 31 years. The article notes that Canada has run a budget surplus in each of the last 10 years. "This is actually bad for the profits of Canadian corporations that sell their products to the US for US dollars (Canada sells far more to the US that the US sells to Canada); but it means us Canucks will get cheaper Macs as the Canadian prices get closer to US prices with every new release."

702 comments

  1. Article is useless without a graph! by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone got a graph handy that shows how the two dollars reached parity?

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      A lot of people don't have graphs and Iraq such as and.

    2. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jamie · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by mrslacker · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ask and ye shall Receive. Here's the link to the graph and data on Yahoo Finance. As of my posting, it appears that the US dollar has bounced back a bit, and is worth 1.0095 Canadian dollars.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a graph with two lines. Now imagine those two lines converging until they meet.

    6. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A graph of currency values isn't going to show you 'how.' It would be better to look at graphs of budget deficits and current account deficits (together they are larger than $1 trillion/yr).

    7. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by kebes · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Here's a graph.However it doesn't show parity because different markets trade at slightly different values, as explained in this news item:

      "Currency trading is an over-the-counter market," a Bank of Canada spokesperson told CBCNews.ca. "It's not like the TSX." So there can be small discrepancies depending on the trades the data source monitors.
      However that article mentions that "The loonie briefly reached $1.0003 US on foreign exchange markets shortly before 11 a.m. ET, the Bank of Canada said." and TFA says "The Canadian dollar reached $1.0002, before retreating to trade at 99.93 U.S. cents at 11:01 a.m. in New York." So that narrows down the approximate moment when parity was reached.

      At present it's just below parity (0.9986), but the expectation is for the Canadian dollar to exceed the US dollar in the near future.
    8. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jessiej · · Score: 2, Informative

      or, just as accurate with a different twist http://finance.google.com/finance?q=USDCAD

    9. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In order to see anything useful, you should also plot the Euro and the Yen. While the CAD has increased slightly in buying power in recent years, the bigger news is that the USD has plummeted, likely due to bad fiscal policy (war debt).

    10. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This graph might be a little more useful, as it goes back 30+ years:

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/economy/loonie.html

    11. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The really amusing (and pathetic) twist on all of this is watching Canadian retailers try to twist out of pricing their goods based on parity or near-parity. They simply want to keep ripping Canadians off even as goods coming in from the states are effectively dropping in price. The real scam is for automobiles.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by MouseR · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here:

      _______________________________________________

      (gosh I hate the lameness filter... ruins the fun...)

    13. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh clueless economist. The drop in the dollar's value was instrumented.

    14. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by s.bots · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a short blurb in the paper the other day about how you could buy an Audi S4 in Great Falls for around $48,000 USD, and here in Calgary the same car will set you back $72,000 CAD. There were a couple other examples (Nissan Murano $35,000 USD vs. $50,000 CAD, BMW something $58,000 USD vs. $68,000 CAD)

    15. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer meassuring the dollar as how many engraved pictures of Paul Kruger they will buy. I have used this particular art form as a meassure of comparison for decades and it seems to work well.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    16. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by donutello · · Score: 2, Informative

      The USD is plummeting because of the trade deficit, not the budget deficit.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    17. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by xs650 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "In order to see anything useful, you should also plot the Euro and the Yen. While the CAD has increased slightly in buying power in recent years, the bigger news is that the USD has plummeted, likely due to bad fiscal policy (war debt)."

      Yes indeed. My first thought was that the title should have read "US dollar reaches parity with Canadian dollar."

    18. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by dajak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or http://finance.google.com/finance?q=CADEUR to compare against the euro: it is exactly where it was last year at the end of the summer. This shows us two things: 1) it is the US that is sinking, and 2) Canada is valued highest in the summer, which makes complete sense to me.

    19. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by technicalandsocial · · Score: 0, Troll

      Although like most US policy of the last 6 years, instead of fixing the issue they plan to take over others. Soon Canada, the U.S. and Mexico will share the "Amero" as currency within the North American Union.

    20. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! Hang onto those Canadian coins!

    21. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x-rates.com? Could it look any more like porn?

    22. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by diskis · · Score: 1

      Electronics in europe.
      A certain 24" LCD-screen is 971 euros in europe.
      In USA the exact same model is 669 dollars, which equals 477 euros.

    23. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      Big Macs also seem to work well. http://www.economist.com/markets/Bigmac/Index.cfm

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    24. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am dim. Why is this funny? Is it a Bush quote?

    25. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found a decent graphic depiction of the value here. This "graphic" depiction is what the average Canadian investor in American stocks is dealing with now that the Loonie is so close in value to the US dollar.

    26. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Although like most US policy of the last 6 years, instead of fixing the issue they plan to take over others. Soon Canada, the U.S. and Mexico will share the "Amero" as currency within the North American Union."

      Dream on. Canada hasn't had a federal budget deficit in more than a decade, and social security is fully funded on an actuarial for the next 75 years (that's right - 75 years, its not a typo). Contrast that to the US deficit, and the unfunded mess that is known as social security, with off-the-book intra-government "lending" totalling 75 trillion.

      You can have our loonies when you pry them from our cold dead hands! Actually, not even then! There's more of a chance of switching to the Euro as the greenback slowly does its imitation of SCO stock.

    27. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      In order to see anything useful, you should also plot the Euro and the Yen. And that would look something like this. Which mostly shows exactly what you say, save for the fact that the Yen has not been quite as strong against the USD as the Euro and the Loonie. We can lump a bunch of currencies in like so and the fact that it is the USD that is moving is more clear. The general trend is clear, and with the Fed dropping interest rates right now that's going to put considerable downward pressure on the USD, so expect to see things get worse over the next month or so.
    28. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by WhyDoYouWantToKnow · · Score: 1
      Yeah

      http://www.xxx-rates.com/
      (Probably not safe for work)

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex. I could pinch them."
      Marvin the Martian
    29. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dream on. Canada hasn't had a federal budget deficit in more than a decade, and social security is fully funded on an actuarial for the next 75 years (that's right - 75 years, its not a typo). Contrast that to the US deficit, and the unfunded mess that is known as social security, with off-the-book intra-government "lending" totalling 75 trillion.


      You seem to think you'll have a choice. No, the EU won't be able to save you if we decide you belong to us.
    30. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The USD is plummeting because of the trade deficit, not the budget deficit.

      Both. The huge budget deficit means that the U.S. will probably have to print more money to cover it (i.e. inflation). The prospect is spooking foreign investors, thus worsening the downward spiral of the U.S. greenback.

    31. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amero what the?!

      Look, maybe Mexico would like to join the US, but Canada and the US are better off apart. First of all, politically we are left and the US has been right in the past 8 years. If Canada joined the US, your looking at about a 10% increase in left leaning politics. I don't know about you, but the right doesn't take too kindly to that.

      Canada likes it's sovereignty. Joining currencies would go against that fact. Ask any Canadian, "are you American?". You'll get "a response" for sure. 2nd and REAL REASON why Canada wouldn't join is because we would no longer control our own monetary policy. Canada and US have very different economies, and a one size fits all monetary policy would destroy Canada. We wouldn't be able to change interest rates or infuse more cash into the economy. While it's true Canada and American interest rates TEND to move in tandem, there is really nothing keeping it that way.

      Plus Canada is financially sound, why would we give that up for trillions of dollars of debt?

      It just doesn't make any sense for creating a unified currency. It's simply the talk of people who don't understand how things work.

      FYI! I am not an economist, I just play one on TV

    32. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Think "Miss Teen South Carolina."

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    33. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We can lump a bunch of currencies in like so and the fact that it is the USD that is moving is more clear. The general trend is clear, and with the Fed dropping interest rates right now that's going to put considerable downward pressure on the USD, so expect to see things get worse over the next month or so.
      Bear in mind that the reason the Fed dropped interest rates so low in the first place from 2002-2005 was to shake the Yuan off the dollar (China used to have it sell at a fixed value relative to the dollar, instead of traded on the open market). A significant portion of the dollar's drop during that time period was due to this. The two were decoupled (in a fashion) in 2005. In theory the dollar should've recovered some afterwards, but Katrina, things going badly in Iraq, and now the credit crunch (which traces its roots to the Yuan being tied to the dollar) have all kept it heading down.
    34. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      And in England, it probably costs £48,000 ($96,000).

    35. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
    36. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you are an idiot.

      The European nations went from having currencies which represented the economic power of small countries to one currency that represents the economic power of the entire European union. Of COURSE it's going to become more valuable compared to the US dollar as it is more widely used.

      read a book before you embarrass yourself further...

    37. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by denison · · Score: 1
    38. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US has been right in the past 8 years. Reading that out of context I thought I'd wandered into the twilight zone.
    39. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > You seem to think you'll have a choice. No, the EU won't be able to save you if we decide you belong to us.

      From the US? Most of you can't even find Canada on a map ... just ask Miss Carolina.

      The last Canadian political party to suggest union with the US died a while back ... it ain't gonna happen. More likely is that one or more US States will secede from the union and either petition to join Canada or be independent rather than stay in JebusLand.

      Sure, it might be illegal under the US constitution, but so was the suspension of habeus corpus and posse comitas. The precedent has been set, so look forward to at least someof the US splintering off as it continues its economic decline and people vote to bail out of (as opposed to bailing out) the sinking ship.

    40. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by roaddemon · · Score: 1

      Or, more succinctly: imagine a graph with two non-parallel lines.

    41. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I just thought "has" was a typo for "hasn't".

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    42. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by CodyRazor · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct title is "the iraq"

      Perhaps if you were to help south africa and the iraq and the asian countries youd be able to build a better future for your education.

      --
      So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    43. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in Europe you can't just drive to to the USA and then cross the border in a town with a population of 100 and not worry about getting caught not paying customs.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    44. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by stinerman · · Score: 1

      But don't forget the VAT. As I understand it most European countries have a VAT which isn't quoted separately from the price of the item. In the US, our sales taxes are added in after the purchase price. At the point of sale, that $669 item is about $700.

      That doesn't make up for the large discrepancy, but it's not as bad as you think.

    45. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      It takes months - even years - for price changes to move through the system. The goods that retailers are selling you now may have been bought by them a year ago. Many Canadian manufacturers have long-term contracts - priced in loonies - for basic feedstock.

      Food and electronic goods from the U.S. should, of course, reduce in price quicker, but it can still take many months.

    46. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by cooley · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the US? Most of you can't even find Canada on a map ... just ask Miss Carolina. Please, please tell me you didn't just reference a non-existent American state whilst making a crack about how bad Americans are at geography.

      "Carolina" isn't an American state any more than "Columbia" is a Canadian province.
      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    47. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's fine. Most of the Canadian population live within easy driving distance of the border. Big purchases will just go south until Canadian retailers lose the attitude. Not to mention mail order.

    48. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      I thinks Americans would oppose it. They wouldn't take to seeing the Queen on their currency, never mind a beaver on their nickels.

    49. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I would suggest that a sufficient number of Canadians heading south for bargains will disrupt that particular line of thinking. I think it's time that retailers figure out that consumers want them to step up to the plate.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    50. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      It certainly accelerates the process (at the expense of the retailers), but it can't prevent it entirely. Economies are massive things with huge momentum - pricing can't turn on a dime, much less a loonie.

    51. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jafuser · · Score: 1

      More likely is that one or more US States will secede from the union and either petition to join Canada or be independent rather than stay in JebusLand.

      Reading this excited me momentarily until I realized how unlikely it is. =/

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    52. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know you are right. The last time this happened was in 1976 - right at the end of a U.S. spending spree called the Vietnam war.

      The U.S. borrows to pay for a war, and our currency goes to SH*T.

      And now we have tons of middle eastern enemies, just like then, plus we're cresting hubbert's peak. I wonder if we'll have another 1980's stagflation real soon, or if the Feds will be able to keep the ship running smoothly..

      We're also going to be selling the T bills we bought to store the Social Security Surplus in in order to pay for retiring Baby Boomers.

      What's next? Who knows..

      --
      ...
    53. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, I imagined two nonparallel colinear lines

    54. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USD is plummeting because of the trade deficit, not the budget deficit.

      So the problem is not that you are printing too much of it but the fact that you can't actually buy anything with it?

      How about we split the difference and say that it is the inevitable consequence of a fiat currency + human nature?

    55. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Googling for Miss Carolina returns 16 million hits. the only "state" Miss Carolina is in is the state of confusion. Don't ask her if its north or south carolina - she won't be able to tell you even WITH a map.

      Now, as the US recedes in economic importance, and the "brain drain" between the US and Kanuckistan reverses, expect to see the US map redrawn in the next 2 decades, with several states seceding.

    56. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1
      Actually, secession is becoming more and more likely. Economic unrest usually leads to political instability, and the US is in for one heck of a lot of economic bad news.
      1. GM and Ford bankruptcies;
      2. The continued shrinking value of the greenback - probably to 2 to the Euro within 10 years;
      3. The "made in the USA" recession/borderline depression;
      4. The baby boomer bust and the inability of SocSec to meet expectations because the fund has been pretty much raided;
      5. The monetizing of the real inflation rate over the last decade, putting further downward pressure on both the dollar and the economy;
      6. The desire of international lenders not to hold on to dollar reserves that decline in value;
      7. Significant portions of the US population disaffected because they feel disenfranchised and/or that the current retrograde policies of the federal government have become more or less institutional and systemic;
      8. Jobs continuing to leave the US as the US federal government no longer is able to borrow to invest in infrastructure, and US business is no longer able to borrow to finance investments that enhance competitiveness;
      9. Population pressure as the US becomes the ONLY economy unable to cap their population growth, and runs into Malthusian limits;
      10. Environmental pressure from vast tracts of the south become uninhabitable, unproductive desert, with summer daytime temperatures routinely passing 120F - 130F, resulting in years of crop and cattle failures

      The dystopian future predicted in SF in years past, with a government that plays the fundy religion card, limits on freedom and the suspension of constitutional rights (like habeus corpus), and continued surveillance, is looking more and more accurate. Who'd want to live or invest in the US in 20 years, at this rate?

      Look for the same political solution that happened in the 1700s, when the US declared independence from England ... only this time, it will be various states declaring their independence from a funancially and politically bankrupt US government.

    57. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Funny
      You can have our loonies when you pry them from our cold dead hands!

      Oh yeah? Yeah? Well you guys don't even have a decent health care sys... OK, well, but you guys don't have a democr... Well, you don't have real bee... Damn. Just never effin' mind, OK.

      --
      That is all.
    58. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha...

      Lets just say I wouldn't kick HER out of bed for not knowing the capital city of Thailand.

    59. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food and electronic goods from the U.S. should, of course, reduce in price quicker, but it can still take many months.

      Strangely though price increases happen overnight. The price of gasoline that is already in the storage tank at the local gas station & convenience store increases despite the fact that said inventory was purchased at a lower price.

    60. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books are worse. Perhaps it is just a case of supply vs demand but the MSRP for books is typically almost twice as much in Canada vs US.

    61. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

      I noticed the same thing out in Alberta earlier this summer. Everything seemed whacky expensive, at least 20% more than what I would pay in the states. Anything from a bottle of soda to cars seemed outrageous. The dollars were essentially equal at the time, so that wasn't factoring in to my surprise.

    62. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, as the US recedes in economic importance, and the "brain drain" between the US and Kanuckistan reverses, expect to see the US map redrawn in the next 2 decades, with several states seceding.

      Let's not be too hasty. Our current prime minister is aleady pretty anti-democratic so we sure as h*** don't need Ohio piling on and if Alaska wants to come they're going to have to promise to clean up after their (former) senators. In fact we think Alaska is pretty like-minded: we would take them in a second if they promised to set Stevens and Murkowski free in the Noatak Nature Preserve.

    63. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memo

      TO: The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
      FROM: THE WORLD

      Hey USofA, your policies have proven to be biased and detrimental to global harmony. As such, we [the rest of the world] has decided to devalue your currency. If you can learn to play better with the others, we will consider returning your currency to values previously enjoyed.

      Don't take it personally,

      The World.

    64. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      cross the border in a town with a population of 100 and not worry about getting caught not paying customs.

      You shouldn't have to pay duty on computer hardware anyway. That's part of the FTA which became NAFTA.
    65. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Although like most US policy of the last 6 years, instead of fixing the issue they plan to take over others. Soon Canada, the U.S. and Mexico will share the "Amero" as currency within the North American Union.

      Excuse me. Sorry to bother you, but um, seeing as how our dollar is probably going to be worth a bit more over the next little while, we've been thinking... shouldn't the unified currency start with the first letter of OUR country? You know, a "C"?

      We plan to call it the Camero.

      Disclosure: I actually AM Canadian.
      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    66. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to analyze the retail price of gasoline versus the spot market price for gasoline or oil. Does the retail price react quicker to increases or decreases in wholesale prices?

      Someone must have done this. Wouldn't be difficult, since the information is easy to come by. Such a study might support or dispell the constant paranoia over gasoline prices.

    67. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Printing money" (by which I assume you mean expanding the money supply) does not cover the budget deficit, as the government does not get the money. It is widely understood to encourage inflation, though it is not itself inflation as your "i.e." would imply. We borrow money to cover the budget deficit, not print it.

      The trade deficit is a big problem, with complex, hard to summarize causes.

      The budget deficit (and resulting national debt) is a big problem, with straight a forward, easily summarized cause: the election of idiots, particularly the last 3 Republican ones.

    68. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Daedone · · Score: 0

      Try it.

      We'll just burn your capitol.... again.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington

      (cue the flamebait, which in this situation would be kinda ironic)

    69. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >never mind a beaver on their nickels

      Oh, I wouldn't be too sure about THAT: I'd be willing to bet that many American Slashdotters, at least, would take beaver on legal currency.

    70. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Daedone · · Score: 1, Funny

      You are coming to a sad realization, cancel or allow?

    71. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a fellow Canadian, i agree. maybe we should update our combined nation anthem too

      Boys in the bright white sports car, anyone? (Trooper IS Canadian afterall)


      posting anon cause i got bitchslapped in an overrated/funny loop

    72. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We borrow money to cover the budget deficit, not print it.

      And you have never killed a cow in your life, you just buy the beef from the butcher. Practically and morally however, the two actions are equivalent.

      So it is with deficits. The U.S. could repay its debt, but let's get real. The nine trillion dollars will never be repaid, it will just be inflated away. The presses (speaking figuratively here) will be running red hot for decades, printing more and more dollar bills of less and less value. Inflation will be rampant.

    73. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by pipingguy · · Score: 1
    74. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      The Iraq and such as notwithstanding, I also neglected to and "US Americans" for the children.

    75. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    76. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Practically and morally however, the two actions are equivalent."

      No, they are not. Expanding the money supply does not create one dime that the government gets to spend, nor reduce the debt at all.

      Borrowing money gets the government money to spend, but it doesn't magically create it. They owe it to someone, whether me or the government of China. The US Government owes me some of the debt, and I expect it to be repaid, with interest greater than the rate of inflation. When people do not have this expectation, they will stop lending the US Government money.

      Sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about.

    77. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by mstahl · · Score: 1

      No. BadAnalogyGuy is just living up to his name.

    78. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by mstahl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Were you thinking of non-parallel skewed lines? These would be lines which are not parallel because the perpendicular distance between them is variant over their length, but which are not coplanar, and I believe must be members of parallel planes, so necessarily do not intersect.

      Two lines can't really be colinear without being the same line. Not in euclidean geometry anyway (and actually, now that I think of it, not in more exotic geometrical systems either).

      If two lines describe the same set of points, though, and you're calling them two separate lines, they would necessarily also be parallel even as they intersect one another throughout their entire length. Consider a definition of "parallel" meaning the perpendicular distance between the two lines is constant throughout their length.

      I really hope I don't get modded (-1, Pedantic) for this one....

    79. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by achurch · · Score: 1

      Of course, Japan is doing its best to hold the yen down so it can keep up its exports. Silly governments.

    80. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by mbrubeck · · Score: 1

      As of my posting, it appears that the US dollar has bounced back a bit, and is worth 1.0095 Canadian dollars.
      Great. What am I going to do with .95 of a Canadian penny?
    81. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The store where I work has been matching US prices for several months and offering discounts compared to our competitors for about two years, all because of the change in the exchange rate. It seemed fairer to our customers, but it didn't hurt us. Our profit margin hasn't changed from 4 years ago, even though we are now effectively giving a 20-60% discount.

      Meanwhile, we've had a huge increase in sales on the items that were overpriced, something like 300-500% (I don't know exactly, since I'm not privy to sales numbers). While that increase might fade as the excitement wears off, it definitely helped allay the bosses' fears that giving up that high margin would hurt business.

      I got to talk about this for about 5 seconds on CTV. It was very exciting.

    82. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by DavidShor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Iraq war spending is rather low when compared to the Vietnam War, at least in comparison to the size of the economy. We still have a large deficit without the Iraq war anyway; our deficit is mostly due to Medicare and Medicaid.

      As for your stagflation fears, there has never been much evidence that small deficits (as a percentage of GDP) have a large effect on inflation (though I admit, these kind of things are very hard to test empirically). Moreover, unemployment has been persistently low for the last decade; I do not see how that will change in the near term without a rather severe supply shock. Of course, I am assuming that we have a rational Fed, something the last couple of days has shaken my faith in.

      The real reason Canada's currency has achieved parity is the same reason as 1976; Canada produces a massive amount of commodities. In 76 Canada rode a speculative run on copper, and oil prices were still very high. Today, oil is at an all-time high, and commodities have surged.

      Wake me up when we achieve parity with the Yen.

    83. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll trade you Quebec for Alaska and Washington state.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    84. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jamstar7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hang onto it for a year & it'll be worth an American nickel.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    85. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      The last Canadian political party to suggest union with the US died a while back ... it ain't gonna happen. More likely is that one or more US States will secede from the union and either petition to join Canada or be independent rather than stay in JebusLand.

      Sure, it might be illegal under the US constitution, but so was the suspension of habeus corpus and posse comitas. The precedent has been set, so look forward to at least someof the US splintering off as it continues its economic decline and people vote to bail out of (as opposed to bailing out) the sinking ship.

      Last time that happened was about 155 years ago. It didn't turn out that well, either.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    86. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Expanding the money supply does not create one dime that the government gets to spend, nor reduce the debt at all.

      You don't know what you're talking about. Inflation is primarily a means for a government to cheat on its debt. If I owe you $10,000, but in five years I manage to make it worth $2000, then I win and you lose. You were a sucker to lend me that $10,000 in the first place.

      The U.S. government is running out of suckers. But it still has these incredibly expensive wars to finance. So it starts printing money, the kind of money that has no economic activity backing it up. Because there are no more suckers, this excess money goes directly into inflation. Do you understand?

    87. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by mattgy · · Score: 1

      Here's a good graph (cbc.ca).

    88. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miss Carolina returns 16 million hits. Actually, it's 82,100...or do you not know how to search?

      It's only 16 million if you ignore the "South" in between the words in those other results, after knocking off the millions that don't have anything to do with anything except the words "miss" and "Carolina" appearing on the same page.

      Let's not even discuss your moronic economic comments.
    89. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      "GM and Ford bankruptcies;"

      So? Manufacturing is a rather insignificant sector of our economy, though the falling dollar should give it a boost.

      "The continued shrinking value of the greenback - probably to 2 to the Euro within 10 years;"

      You are assuming the Europeans would allow such an appreciation. They, and Germany in particular, would not want to kill their manufacturing sector, and would do something behind the scenes to reverse the trend.

      "The "made in the USA" recession/borderline depression;"

      huh?

      "# The baby boomer bust and the inability of SocSec to meet expectations because the fund has been pretty much raided;"

      So we will decrease benifits and possibly increase taxes, Your point on how this effects the overall economy?

      "# Population pressure as the US becomes the ONLY economy unable to cap their population growth, and runs into Malthusian limits;"

      US population growth is very low, as is our population density.

    90. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by DavidShor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Bear in mind that the reason the Fed dropped interest rates so low in the first place from 2002-2005 was to shake the Yuan off the dollar (China used to have it sell at a fixed value relative to the dollar, instead of traded on the open market). A significant portion of the dollar's drop during that time period was due to this. The two were decoupled (in a fashion) in 2005. In theory the dollar should've recovered some afterwards, but Katrina, things going badly in Iraq, and now the credit crunch (which traces its roots to the Yuan being tied to the dollar) have all kept it heading down."

      And here I thought that they dropped rates so low in order to decrease unemployment and shake off a recession. Silly me.

    91. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      agreed the US government gets money by making dollar bonds worth $1+interest, to the purchaser. It is however possible (if congress has the will) to allow the government to simply spend money into existence. Lincoln did this to finance the war, and it is one of the easiest ways in existence to massively transfer wealth from the rich to the poor, and to value work above capital wealth.

      --
      --meh--
    92. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      The last Canadian political party to suggest union with the US died a while back ... it ain't gonna happen. More likely is that one or more US States will secede from the union and either petition to join Canada or be independent rather than stay in JebusLand.

      Sure, it might be illegal under the US constitution, The actual US constitution is actually silent on the subject of succession, However there was a big bloody war fought over it and since then it has been de-facto illegal. Kinda like Our unwritten constitution which is established from British historical precedence.
      --
      --meh--
    93. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Look for the same political solution that happened in the 1700s, when the US declared independence from England ... only this time, it will be various states declaring their independence from a funancially and politically bankrupt US government.

      Assuming that such a project would get to the actual civil war phase - the federal government isn't going to just let the states leave - which seems unlikely, since the federal government is pushing so hard for more and more total surveillance and would likely just incarcerate anyone working for segregation, there is a simple problem with your proposal:

      Washington is not separated from the rest of the country by an ocean and 1700s ships. There would be nothing stopping the federal government from simply retaking the segregated states by force.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    94. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      The first page of results is ALL Miss South Carolina "maps ... for the children ... in Iraq". That's all I need to know ...

    95. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Harper's finding out the hard way that Canada will NOT follow his natural instinct to shove his head up Bush's arse so far that he can see the guy's tonsils.

      Canadians like Americans. We don't like Bush's politics, and those of us who think about it see the meltdown of the US as pretty inevitable over the next generation or so. The doubling of the US population in defiance of malthusian resource limits will turn it into another Bangladesh. Canada has the resources to double its population - the US doesn't even have the resources to support its current population. No complicated math there, even Miss South Carolina should be able to figure that one out without a map.

      I can see Alaska coming back home to Canada :-)

    96. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      "Washington is not separated from the rest of the country by an ocean and 1700s ships. There would be nothing stopping the federal government from simply retaking the segregated states by force."

      Alaska would be imossible to keep by force. And once Alaska goes, other parts will jump ship too. And last I looked, Hawaii was an ocean away.

    97. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Of course, once a body secedes, its no longer, by definition, governed by the US Constitution. If you look at a map, Alaska is a natural fit to join Canada, impossible for the US to prevent/take back by military force, and there's enough discontent with the lower 48 that, once the pork stops because the US is beyond broke, ..

    98. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      The Euro and other currencies can safely appreciate against the US dollar without too much fear from US manufacturing.

      You seem to forget, the US gutted many of its' industries over the last few decades because they weren't profitable enough. Look at basic industries like steelmaking - whole plants sold, dismantled, and shipped overseas.

      Is the US going to start manufacturing TVs again? DVD players? Can't be done. the infrastructure to supply those plants is all overseas as well. To build new. competitive plants, would require new investment, at a time when lenders would be looking at the US as being not credit-worthy.

      This is what happens when you overspend - you can no longer borrow to "bootstrap" yourself back into competitiveness.

      Heck, look at the auto industry. The US has the "home field" advantage, and even then, Toyota is mopping up the floor. Ironically, Toyota conducts tours where they show off to the competition all their processes. Why? Because they know that even if the competition knows how they do it, they can't match it.

      The US population is slated to double ... check out the figures yourself. Going to start issuing bicycles to all the surplus population since there won't be enough energy to go around?

      "> So we will decrease benifits and possibly increase taxes, Your point on how this effects the overall economy?"

      Decreased benefits means people go without. They also have less to spend, so the local economy contracts. Multiply by 50 to 100 million. As for taxes, if the government couldn't reduce the deficit during boom times, all it did was delay necessary tax increases, so that they will come when it really hurts.

      The US is bankrupt. Morally and financially.

    99. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Civil war nowadays is unwinnable by the federal government, if only because everything is so interconnected. If a state was determined to secede, repeatedly destabilizing the power grid would get results, as would other tactics.

    100. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1
      ">We'll trade you Quebec for Alaska and Washington state."

      Let's do one better - in return for not making them take Quebec, they also give us, in addition to Alaska .... how about Hawaii and throw in a few border states, as a "buffer zone".

      Oh, and we'll take the UN off their hands, since they hate it so much.

    101. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      my own experience with succession (Quebec) indicates that there is not nearly enough dissatisfaction in ANY of the states, to cause it to separate. there needs to be a massive demographic change sustained for at least a full generation before any state would even attempt to remove it self.

      --
      --meh--
    102. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Quebec didn't separate for one reason - economics. Heck, Quebec secretly amassed a war chest of $100 billion dollars to help prop up the Canadian dollar in the event of a Oui/Yes vote - (for a population of 6 million quebecers, that would be the equivalent of the US buying up, on a per capita basis, 5 trillion dollars). This would have allowed Quebec to state that it was going to continue using the canadian dollar as its de facto currency, and with the threat of being able to dump that much back into the market, they would have been able to negociate an economic union.

      It will be the same with the US - economics will drive those who want to secede. The first to go will be Alaska - its a no-brainer. Once the feds can no longer pork-barrel Alaska, its gone. Alaska's entry into Canada would strengthen Canada's claim (and Alaska's, as part of Canada) to all the north-west passage. Watch for it by 2025 - 2030.

    103. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Alaska would be imossible to keep by force.

      Why ?

      And once Alaska goes, other parts will jump ship too.

      Sure, if every state and the army stop listening to the federal government, the government is fucked. But that's a collapse about equal to that of the Soviet Union, and unlikely to happen spontaneously.

      And last I looked, Hawaii was an ocean away.

      Hawaii has a bit over million people. I doubt very much it could put up effective resistance to occupation, and even less to blockade. Even if it could, it is, frankly, not important.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    104. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Seriously, do you really believe that the US can just go in and "occupy" Alaska? Or Canada, for that matter? When they can't even get enough boots on the ground to control a country that's been bombed into the prehistoric age?

      Lets look at one scenario ... Alaska joins Canada in some sort of union, and claims all the northwest passage, etc.

      The 48 lower states make grumbling noises ...

      ... then ... what?

      Nukes? Most of the Canadian population lives within 100 km of the border - too much danger of contaminating your own people. So, scratch the nukes. Fuel-air explosives? Kind of risky, unless you first round up all the canucks living amongst the general population ... and all the other immigrants, since Mexico would definitely join in since they would see themselves as the next step ...

      Close the border to trade? There's one Katrina's worth of oil immediately unavailable. If Mexico (looking at Texas?) and Venezuela (payback time?) join in, that's 3 Katrinas worth of production gone ... and you can be sure that the electricity stops flowing as well, so 50 to 150 million people sleep in the dark. Don't do it in the winter, or they'll also freeze to death.

      Armed invasion? Can't be done - not enough troops.

      Economic sanctions? Its a two-way street, and with the US dollar declining against ALL world currencies, any economic sanctions will trigger massive dumping of the greenback, resulting in even higher costs for imports of essentials.

      Nope - if Alaska ever decides to leave the US, they can just walk away with impunity. Its not like a couple of hundred years ago. The consequences of any sort of "civil war action" now would be immediate and massive.

    105. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yes, I understand. Your argument depends on the assumption the interest paid on government debt is not enough to compensate for inflation and still provide a positive return. That assumption is false. Moreover, it's falseness is amongst the most trivially verified facts about the US economy you could choose. Even beginning to research any topic somewhat related to what you are discussing would reveal such basic information as a matter of course.

    106. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Seriously, do you really believe that the US can just go in and "occupy" Alaska? Or Canada, for that matter? When they can't even get enough boots on the ground to control a country that's been bombed into the prehistoric age?

      Yes. It might - and likely would - end badly, but the US - or, rather, the federal government - would have little choice than try anyway. As you said, if a state shows it can secede with impunity, what's stopping other states from following ? And if they follow, what does the federal government rule over ?

      Besides, would Canada actually risk it ? I think that Alaska would be standing alone.

      Nukes? Most of the Canadian population lives within 100 km of the border - too much danger of contaminating your own people.

      [...]

      and you can be sure that the electricity stops flowing as well, so 50 to 150 million people sleep in the dark. Don't do it in the winter, or they'll also freeze to death.

      If Alaska is allowed to leave the United States and join Canada, the USA is finished, because the federal government has shown that it can't control the territory it claimed. Which do you think the US government cares more about, keeping their power or 50 million dead ?

      Maybe I'm being more cynical, but I firmly believe that if the US government has to choose between letting the union splinter and dropping a nuke into New York, then pop goes the apple.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    107. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Maybe I'm being more cynical, but I firmly believe that if the US government has to choose between letting the union splinter and dropping a nuke into New York, then pop goes the apple.

      Of course, if that's what it takes to "keep the union together", then its already a failure by any reasonable measure. The way we dealt with secession in Canada was two-pronged

      On the legal side:

      1. recognize that it is a right
      2. make it clear that it would have to be done in a legal and fair manner

      On the political/social side:

      1. get the groups most pressuring for secession deeply involved in the political process, so they can't stand outside the door and throw rocks
      2. devolve more power to all the provinces
      We're stronger because we were able to face the boogey-man of secession, and adapt (Canada is good at coming up with compromises) rather than try to use force. Its like a marriage - using force to keep someone with you who doesn't want to stay is a bad idea, whereas recognizing that they have the right to leave might just encourage them to stay, since its a show of fairness and equal treatment between partners.
    108. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      Socialism isn't free.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    109. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      That assumption is false.

      Not always false, and that is the point. You are lying if you try to imply that inflation never hurts a holder of U.S. treasuries. When inflation spiked in the mid 1970s, people holding T bonds with the low pre-inflation yields got hammered.

      And that is the risk today. Nobody wants to be the sucker who gets caught in the next inflation spike. But the shortage of suckers pretty much guarantees that there will be such a spike, because the Republicans still need to finance those expensive wars somehow, along with the subprime Ponzi bailout and the sacred tax cuts. Look for heavy inflation and serious pain to come.

    110. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you bought just the wrong sort of government debt at just the wrong time in the early 70s, you lost money. Of course, if you invested in something else over that same period, you probably lost money. If you stuck the money in a mattress, you lost a lot more money.

      Arguing from that that the Fed will engage in continual rate-cuts (a close as I can guess to what you mean by "printing money") in order to intentionally spur inflation so as to reduce the real value of the nation debt is just not sensible. It doesn't make sense, wouldn't work, and is entirely contrary to actual Fed policy.

      I too am concerned for the future of our economy given the fiscal insanity of recent Republican administrations. But the problem will not be addressed by arguments derived from ignorance. If you talk about the "the government" "printing money" in connection with the budget deficit, you are not saying anything meaningful about American fiscal and monetary policy.

    111. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      And on top of those two axes, imagine a couple more lines, meeting in a different part of the graph.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    112. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      There's more to pricing than just the price of the dollar.

      First of all, the dealer probably purchased that vehicle with USD (or some other currency) when the C$ was at a different price. They might have even locked in to a price a few moths or years ago (I know that in their contracts with the artists the local Blues festival locks in the exchange rate at the signing of the contract, a year in advance, so that they don't have to worry about further fluctuations down the road).

      But aside from that, there's also market and distribution costs. When you've got a market a tenth the size of the US spread out as sparsely as in Canada, it costs a lot to distribute, and you have less economy of scale when selling.

      Canadian car buyers are also more finicky than US buyers, and won't pay as much as their US customer counterparts. So many cars aren't available in Canada because the profit margin wouldn't be as big. I realize this point goes in the other direction to the price difference you mentioned, but it does go to show that the two markets are noticeably different.

      There's also all the vehicle safety testing, which has to be done for every model with Canadian testing regulators, independent from any tests done in other jurisdictions, which adds some more price to vehicles that must be distributed over fewer vehicles than can be done in the US.

      There might also be tax implications in there somewhere, too.

      Some food for thought, and it may be well that auto dealers are gouging their customers. Book dealers do it. But it's not all greed.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    113. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      Quebec did not separate October 30, 1995 The cities of Montreal, and Hull had good weather.

      http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climateData/hourlydata_e.html?timeframe=1&Prov=QC&StationID=5415&Year=1995&Month=10&Day=10
      http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climateData/hourlydata_e.html?timeframe=1&Prov=ON&StationID=4337&Year=1995&Month=10&Day=10

      How is that for democracy. 50.5% ha, it could have easily gone the other way.

      p.s. A large portion of Quebec economy is generated with North-South Trade with the USA.
      Quebec would do alright if separated. it would take quite a financial hit but it would bounce back. It has the resources and positioning to do so.

      --
      --meh--
    114. Re:Article is useless without a graph! by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      > Quebec would do alright if separated. it would take quite a financial hit but it would bounce back. It has the resources and positioning to do so.

      Quebec is the second-worst province in terms of economic performance, and has been for a LONG time. The only place worse is Newfoundland. Quebec is the pig at the trough of equalization payments - this is what you get for kicking out half a million anglos - a have-not economy.

      Quebec doesn't have the resources. Take out Churchill falls (the long-term deal with Newfoundland) , and Quebec is a net importer of electricity - and you can be sure that, in a separate Quebec, Newfoundland would be in the legal position to charge an export levy. BTW - Quebec has been a net importer of electricity during the winter for more than 15 years.

      Add to that the fact that people still want to leave ... I'm leaving in the next year, and my younger daughter and her bf also plan on leaving once she's completed university. 3 of my sisters have left ...

      And do you really believe that Quebec could negotiate a better deal than NAFTA?

      I don't care any more, so f*** it, tabernac!

  2. what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by peter303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Answer: Change them to "American dollar jokes"

    1. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Tackhead · · Score: 1, Funny
      > Answer: Change them to "American dollar jokes"

      Hey, didn't you mean "Change them to 'American dollar jokes', eh?", you hoser?

      So, anyways, today will be a day long remembered, eh? It has seen the end of the the US Dollar, it will soon see the end of the Empire, eh?

    2. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Answer: Change them to "American dollar jokes" Yeah, but then you wouldn't get as much out of it.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      I, personally, prefer the term USAlien.

    4. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must mean United Statesian dollar jokes. America includes all of North America and South America, including Canada, the US, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, etc.. This is not a fight you are going to win. "United Statesian" sounds stupid. If we were speaking Spanish we could say estadounidense or if we were speaking French we could say États-unien. These don't sound so bad and roll off the tongue quite easily. But native speakers of English aren't going to suddenly change to start calling citizens "United Statesians" (which doesn't roll off the tongue easily) when they could just say the much simpler "Americans." As the only people who want the term "American" back are geography police and since the term doesn't conflict with the naming of any nationality in the Americas there is little motivation for Americans to change their method of speech.

      Btw, when I speak Spanish I use estadounidense to describe a US citizens and americano to describe a resident of the Americas. But when I speak English I use American. I have yet to have any problem with anybody not understanding what I am speaking.
    5. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the name of our country isn't "United States." It is "The United States of America." So I'd prefer if you called me a "United States of American." Or just American for short.

    6. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't get too comfortable with this state of affairs.

      What will happen when we stop digging sand for oil to pipe to the US?

      What will happen to the value of all those homes in Alberta when this highly inefficient short term industry dries up? Because there are a ton of young people out there who have two mortgages on those highly overvalued homes, expecting that they are going to have some long term worth. Will anyone want to buy them and live in them later? Probably not.

      Every barrel of oil we sell the US from those sands represents a vast amount of human effort by Canadians that doesn't do anything to further the interests of our country, and actually leaves us a polluted mess of land that we'll later have to clean up.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    7. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, why not, but just remember, you're still stuck with Quebec

      And the changing value of the US $ will never alter that.

    8. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by king-manic · · Score: 1


      What will happen when we stop digging sand for oil to pipe to the US?


      I'll be celebrating my 415th birthday.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    9. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Supergood-ape · · Score: 1

      "America includes..."

      No it doesn't. The Americas do, but that's not what you claimed.

      Now that you being wrong is dealt with, explain why "America" is not an acceptable abbreviation of "United States of America".

    10. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Offtopic: had a friend once who thought that there were penguins in Canada. When I disabused her of that notion, she said, "there go all my Canadian thanksgiving jokes."

    11. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ashitaka · · Score: 1, Troll

      Always someone brings up this point but it doesn't reflect the reality of common parlance. In a myriad of languages and dialects of English anything "American" is from the States and the question "Are you American?" implicity specifies a citizen of the United States of America. Someone from Canada is Canadian, from Bolivia is Bolivian, from Peru is Peruvian. None of these people will refer to themselves as American. (And a lot are more than happy not to do so)

      A citizen of the USA in various languages:
      French: Américain
      German: Amerikanisch
      Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, etc.: Americano
      Japanese: (A-meh-ri-ka-jin)
      Chinese: (Mei-gwo-ren) (Mei-gwo = Transliteration of America + "Beautiful Country" characters)

      I think you get the picture.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    12. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who's never partied in Montreal.

    13. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy belated 375th birthday then.

      And in response to the GP, we'll be thankfull that we've used up our oil and they no longer need to invade once the resource wars really flare up.

    14. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Spanish has the word "estadounidense". América means the whole of the Americas.

    15. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Happy belated 375th birthday then.

      And in response to the GP, we'll be thankfull that we've used up our oil and they no longer need to invade once the resource wars really flare up.


      The middle east has a 40 year deadline. Canada has a reserve estimated to last 350+ years at current usage increase patterns.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    16. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only reason we want Quebec to stay is that if they leave, we'd fall to 5th place in the list of largest countries, behind China, the US, and Brazil.

    17. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That should teach me to rely on Google Translator. Spanish is the one of the two languages in my list I didn't know.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    18. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by hb253 · · Score: 1

      From which country? Mexican Spanish is different from Cuban Spanish which is different from Argentinian Spanish, etc etc.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    19. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Even better, most of the profits are not going through Canadian owned entities.

      Gotta love it. Come to Canada, where we'll gladly GIVE away our future for you to profit off of!!! Grrr.

      --
      No Comment.
    20. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by GeckoX · · Score: 1, Troll

      Um...do you have any idea how fast we've been blowing through the oil sands in Alberta?
      In 2000, there basically was NO oil export coming out of Alberta. Take a look at a recent satellite image of northern Alberta...go ahead, I'll wait...

      So how old did you figure you'd be by the time we've finished selling our soul?
      Sorry, it's already sold. What I meant was, until we've finished delivering the soul we've already sold.

      --
      No Comment.
    21. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by thegnu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Btw, when I speak Spanish I use estadounidense to describe a US citizens and americano to describe a resident of the Americas. But when I speak English I use American. I have yet to have any problem with anybody not understanding what I am speaking.

      You could say "US Americans" like Miss Teen North Carolina.

      I always thought it was funny living in a proud country like Mexico (Estados Unidos Mexicanos) calling Americans estadounidenses, when it's in THEIR title, too. I much prefer gringo or gabacho, especially since I am so clearly one myself. When I worked with my friends, if an American came in, I'd always (jokingly) say to the person waiting on him, "Chingalo, guey. No hay pedo, es gringo." People always thought that one was great. :-)
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    22. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a troll sig

    23. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      in many South American countries (like Venezuela): Norte-Americano

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    24. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      I hear China's in the market to buy oil ...

      There are 7 economies that are set to surpass the US in terms of size over the next 50 years ... including China.

    25. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Q. Why did Canada get Quebec and the US get Bush?
      A. Because Canada got first pick.

      I think Canada got the better part of the deal ...

    26. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by burndive · · Score: 1

      Um... that's because the full name of this here country is "The United States of America".

      If Canada was called "The Canadian Provinces of America", you might have a point.

      But you don't.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    27. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or skied in Quebec

    28. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      "In 2000, there basically was NO oil export coming out of Alberta."

      A half million barrels a day was "NO oil"?

      http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/11-621-MIE/11-621-MIE2006047.htm

      Sorry man, even in the 90's when I worked at Syncrude, they were pumping 100k barrels per day. So was Suncor. And that's not counting conventional Oil.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    29. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Offtopic: had a friend once who thought that there were penguins in Canada. When I disabused her of that notion, she said, "there go all my Canadian thanksgiving jokes."

      I'm sometimes asked if there are penguins in Finland. I'm still trying to figure out a snappy answer that involves Linus and Tux.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    30. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by moranar · · Score: 1

      They're not that different in this particular issue. Estadounidense is a word understood by most all to mean "someone from the USA". The different Spanish variations are not too separated, they mostly diverge in nuances, and accents.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    31. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Eh, it's not worth arguing with them. The "America is a continent" thing is motivated by politics, not logic. Nobody really has any problem understanding what's being referred to by 'America' and 'Americans,' especially since there's little cause to refer to 'people from the Americas' generally (at least compared to the regularity with which Americans are discussed). And also, there's no problem in non-English languages either, making it a non-issue for most of the non-US, non-Canadian population of the Americas.

      The whole thing is a manufactured controversy.

      'North America' is a continent.
      'South America' is a continent.
      'Central America' is either a subcontinent or an isthmus or a region, depending on who you want to believe.
      These three areas can be referred to collectively as 'the Americas.'

      'the Americas' != 'America', but fat chance convincing those who are politically motivated to believe that.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    32. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Alberta is taking a reasonably long term view of things. Big parts of the giant budget surpluses are going into savings and programs to encourage high tech and R&D development in the province. I get a $10,000/year scholarship for informatics research designed to lure top Canadian grad students to the province.

      Still, I've held off buying a house in Calgary.

    33. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Supergood-ape · · Score: 1

      "Eh, it's not worth arguing with them."

      I totally agree, but something about this particular argument and it's obvious incorrectness cries out to me.

    34. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Wow, your sig just made me piss myself laughing.

      (Code drone / wannabe hacker talking)

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    35. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... that's because the full name of this here country is "The United States of America". Considering that there are other countries in the Americas that are composed of states, calling yours "The States" is not entirely accurate. How about "SOME United States of America"?
    36. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Darby · · Score: 1

      America includes all of North America and South America, including Canada, the US, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, etc..

      What do you know, you're wrong.

      "The Americas" is what you described.
      "America" is an informal term referring to the United States of America.

      Seriously, that's a tired old nonsense pile of poop you're spreading around.

    37. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      What will happen to the value of all those homes in Alberta when this highly inefficient short term industry dries up? Well, I don't know the specifics of these homes, but I'll let you in on a secret - the population of the Earth is increasing, and the habitable surface area isn't. Cost = Demand / Supply, you see, and Demand is increasing while Supply remains constant. Long term, land prices do not fall, and they do not stay constant.

      Also, remember that income from oil will be constant regardless of production volume, until said volume falls by a *substantial* percentage.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    38. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      Sorry, did you say $10,000/yr for a grad student? I thought my funding was bad... Here they give you that much extra if you can bring in a gov't scholarship. A basic research assistant in eng/sci/math gets $17,000/yr + ~$5000 for teaching assistants. Although that's taxable and your scholarship's not so it might be the same thing in Canada...

    39. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a top up. You only get one if you get a scholarship from the national research council. Those range in value from about $25k to $35k. The $10k is an extra incentive Alberta is using to swipe more than their share of nationally funded grad students.

      Actually, the $10k is for a PhD. The national scholarships for masters students are smaller so the Alberta top up is bigger. Can't remember exactly how much though, it's been a while since I had one. $15-$20k I think.

      Scholarships, including the top up, are not taxable in Canada now, though they used to be. All combined, if you're a PhD student in Alberta who gets a Canada Graduate Scholarship plus the top up you can make more than some entry level professors.

    40. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      'Strain: Seppo

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    41. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      But Canadian Graduate Scholarships get awarded to maybe 3% of PhD students and the second-level NSERC scholarships are considerable less (21k vs 35k). Many universities in Canada are currently offering a top up to external scholarships (here it's 10k on top of national or provincial awards). While the "extra" money sounds good, remember that most of these scholarship values were nearly the same 30 years ago. They've only very recently become tax free and tuition values have rising significantly since the values were set.

    42. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Tuition isn't all that significant, it's the cost of living that makes or breaks it.

      But the actual amount isn't what we're discussion... Alberta is reinvesting some of the surplus in luring those top 3% of students to the province. Your individual university or supervisor may also top up the amount, in addition to the government programs.

      I agree though, grad students are sadly underpaid, particularly the 97% who don't get major awards. I think my university guarantees science research grad students $17k a year. Which is not really enough to live on anymore, and that is NOT tax free (not that you have to pay much tax on such a paltry income).

    43. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      They're not that different in this particular issue. Estadounidense is a word understood by most all to mean "someone from the USA". The different Spanish variations are not too separated, they mostly diverge in nuances, and accents.

      I learned Castillian Spanish in high school from a guy who had spent a few years living in Argentina. My accent is so bad that the local Mexican population where I grew up couldn't understand me at all, nor could I them. But I was listening to an Argentino newscast one day and I almost understood it, 30 years after graduating high school.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    44. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by moranar · · Score: 1

      I _am_ Argentine. I can understand Mexican Spanish perfectly well, unless they start using very heavy slang (and this would be the equivalent of an English speaker who didn't understand slang "fo' sheezy", and the like; or of one that didn't understand Australian English phrases). Same for the other Spanish variations, although they do not show as much derive as the Mexican, as far as I know.

      Actually, the difference between the UK, American and Australian variations of English is very much like the one between all of the Spanish variations.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    45. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Apparently nobody realizes I was trying to make a joke.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    46. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by c_sd_m · · Score: 1

      I see we're on the same page. At least it's good that the governments and schools are starting to see the need for further investment. Taking the local cost of living into consideration would be a big step forward. $17k is the same guarantee for funding at my university (although only for PhDs) and it's enough to manage to scrape by. I can see how it wouldn't be sufficient in Alberta these days.

    47. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      We're not doing this because it's a good energy investment, because it's not. It's a piss poor energy investment.

      If it wasn't for the large install base of vehicles in the US that are being driven by this fuel and couldn't otherwise be used for anything without refitting, it wouldn't be happening.

      We're not doing this because it benefits our country, because none of that oil is doing anything for our nation. It's all going to the US.

      We could be investing in building renewable energy sources. The prairies would be a great location for the wind-tunnel-greenhouse-generators that they were testing in northern Europe and are now rolling out in Australia. That would feed our grid indefinitely. Same thing with oceanic current power technology.

      We could entirely devalue the energy sector in Canada if we were smart about what infrastructure we built, and start looking at other ways to improve the quality of life here with the relieved manpower.

      We are being fucked up the ass.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    48. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      "Cost = Demand / Supply"

      Maybe in simplistic econ 101 classes, otherwise no. Price is a function of demand and supply, but the relationship tends to be empirically complicated.

    49. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Jeff+Carr · · Score: 1

      Answer: Change them to "American dollar jokes" If you wait a bit, you'll be able to exchange them for two or three American dollar jokes...
      --
      The television will not be revolutionized.
    50. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Darby · · Score: 1

      Apparently nobody realizes I was trying to make a joke.

      It's tough to pull off as a joke, repeating the same exact thing people say in all seriousness without doing something to distinguish yourself from them.

    51. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      When I first came here I managed on $20k, which was enough, barely. Of course, that's more like $15k once you pay tuition. Today with rental vacancies in the city at 1% and no rent control laws? I can see why graduate students are some of the biggest users of the food bank.

    52. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Well ok, cost ~ f(demand, supply, price) * demand / supply

      I didn't mean to overcomplicate things, but simply to make a point. As you say, things aren't that easy, yet long term I think the overall equation gives a good idea of what's what.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    53. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but I'm a gringo. Around me, they started using a lotta slang, made it almost incomprehensible to me.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    54. Re:what to do with "Canadian dollar jokes"? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with you.

      But for the grandparent to say things like 'we shipped no oil' or in other places in this thread 'all the environmental damage happened since 2000' is inane. Syncrude shipped it's one billionth barrel of crude long before 2000. One billion barrels of crude is a lot of moved earth. If you look at the sat photos, all the strip mining south and west of the plant occurred before 2001.

      And Leduc #1 went online in the 1950's. Are people to believe we just sat on all that oil for 50 years?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  3. USA Today? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I guess the original article wasn't in USA Today if there wasn't a graph.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:USA Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This sort of behavior isn't really unexpected. See here for some cogent analysis on the Canadian problem. I suspect they are undercutting honest American enterprises by manufacturing kilts and other socialist goods ;-)

    2. Re:USA Today? by kwandar · · Score: 1

      That cogent analysis of the Canadian problem was ... hilarious! :) Thank you!!

    3. Re:USA Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, this link you posted about kilts is hilarious.

      (...)It is understood, that while the sodomite would unnaturally embrace the feminine attributes of a man-skirt or kilt, the main purpose is that it grants them easy and quick access for fornicating.

    4. Re:USA Today? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      other socialist goods http://shelleytherepublican.com/2006/04/20/linux-a-european-threat-to-our-computers-by-tristan.aspx ;-

      Err, this ShellyTheRepublican site is a spoof, right? I mean it's even got the minimalist necessary evidence of slack-jawed-yokel illiteracy and inability to understand the English language :

      Osama uses Linux because he knows designed to counterfit DVDs,

      in addition to the usual dribbling insanities.
      Do all the rest of American lunatic asylums have Internet access?
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" joke by CyberSnyder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And I'll be saving the occasional Canadian quarter. Thanks George Bush.

  5. Yeah but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our economy is strong, and always growing. At least that's what the preznut keeps telling me.

    Three jobs! Uniquely American, isn't it.

    1. Re:Yeah but.... by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our economy is strong, and always growing. At least that's what the preznut keeps telling me.

      Actually, it is the economists that keep saying it. They get their data from economic indicators such as the stock market, GDP, inflation rate, consumer confidence, unemployment etc. The President just repeats it.

      Of course, since it does not jive with your politically colored glasses, I don't expect you to understand.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Yeah but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people just never get tired of defending failure.

  6. What's the obsession with 1 to 1? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    What with all the new American dollars flooding the market at the moment, is it any wonder that its value would sink considerably?

    1. Re:What's the obsession with 1 to 1? by JackHoffman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These things are called psychological barriers. Likewise with the $1.40 per Euro mark that was reached at about the same time. If these barriers fall, people take extra notice of the trend, not because there's much of a difference to the day before, but because humans pay more attention to round numbers. On your 20th birthday, you're just one day older than the day before, but you don't celebrate the day before or after your 20th birthday. It's kinda stupid, but that's the way it is.

    2. Re:What's the obsession with 1 to 1? by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      the obsession with 1:1:

      Before, one was more worth, now it's the other. US dollars "won". Now, Canadian dollars "win". That's a big difference.

      Sure, it's not really that important. But this stuff kicks right into the primitive parts of our brain that loves to divide the world into "winners" and "loosers". Even when it doesn't apply all that much.

      --
      I lost my sig.
    3. Re:What's the obsession with 1 to 1? by GBuddha · · Score: 1

      I thought the 21st birthday was a bigger deal :-)

    4. Re:What's the obsession with 1 to 1? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Why? Because you could legally drink? I could do that years before that, at 16 actually...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  7. About time by rockabilly · · Score: 1

    ... and there is nothing wrong with this either IMV. The industry is very adaptive. It will adapt to this and we will be stronger from it.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > ... and there is nothing wrong with this either IMV. The industry is very adaptive. It will adapt to this and we will be stronger from it.

      "This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it."

    2. Re:About time by rockabilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, I listened to an industry expert on the radio who stated that the high Canadian dollar was not the result of the stronger Canadian economy, but rather a weakening American economy. I guess those who are bailing from the greenback are viewing Canada in a different light...

    3. Re:About time by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I still want to know why all the books in the book store, and magazines, have the US price at 2/3 of the Canadian price, when the exchange rate hasn't been that bad in years.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:About time by rockabilly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the problem right there. Companies will make win-fall profits from this. You won't start seeing any real changes made to pricing of Canadian products until the Canuck dollar stabilizes and industries are pressured to do so.

    5. Re:About time by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's absolutely the case. The American dollar is falling in comparison to a number of currencies, in particular the Euro.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just fyi: The term is "windfall"

    7. Re:About time by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
      The main reason is because books take years to produce. Their price, layout and covers are set long before they hit the shelves-- and the policies that govern those aspects are set even longer before that. So the decision to set the book at US/CAD=US+30% was made something in the region of two to three years ago.

      BUT, the argument goes, even two to three years ago, the CAN/US ratio wasn't that bad. Sure, but years ago the rate had been that bad years ago. Yes, the dollar was improving (or de-improving, depending on which side of the 49th you're on)-- but would it keep up that trend? If the bookmakers kneejerked and switched all their pricing right then and there-- what would happen in a few years when the books came out? Would the market reflect their prediction?

      Setting prices that far in the future is risky and uncertain. The book publishers have to follow policies, and trends, and make huge guesses. They're usually pretty accurate, but as the radical currency value shifts we're seeing now indicate-- they sometimes get it wrong. Maybe since the dollar has been shifting so dramatically for so long, the next "generation" of books will reflect a more reasonable gap. Or maybe the market will shift back to a 30% exchange rate. Who knows? But you can bet the book publishers are spending a lot of money paying people to give them their best estimate.

      Oh, and as a sidenote: There's not much use complaining to the bookstore about it. They don't set the prices. In fact, they are just as hard done by. They paid (numbers guesses) $5USD to sell a book with a tag of $10USD, and now that $10USD is only worth $6.50 in comparison to the original currency.

      A second sidenote: No, your local book seller won't let you pay in USD for the USD price. See above.

      Another sidenote: No, they won't be manually changing the prices. Given thousands of items they have in store, can you imagine the logistics of sending around Betty Minimum Wage with a price gun, the financial page and a calculator to reprice them-- every single day?

    8. Re:About time by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually the Chapters here in Vancouver has had a sign up for a while that stated the true Canadian price would be given at the till. Maybe they've even started putting price stickers on the books.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    9. Re:About time by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      For that matter, how often do you actually end up paying MSRP for books? Personally, I haven't for years. Generally I get them for at least 30% off.

      When I considered it, I often figured that the extra 30% price for canadian had at least some to do with taxes/import duties/canadian distribution company costs.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:About time by KillerCow · · Score: 1

      I still want to know why all the books in the book store, and magazines, have the US price at 2/3 of the Canadian price, when the exchange rate hasn't been that bad in years.


      Because they are following the cardinal rule of production and selling: charge what the market will bear.
    11. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'until the Canuck dollar stabilizes'

      The 'Canuck dollar' is not the unstable one.

    12. Re:About time by statusbar · · Score: 1

      While that is true, This graph of CAD vs EUR shows CAD slightly gaining ground on the EUR.
      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    13. Re:About time by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Nice. Go and buy stuff from them. Somebody there is smart enough to realize they're a hop skip and a (short) jump from the border.

      There's a law that says the lowest sticker price has to be honoured... I wonder if you could make a case that the US price is the lower sticker price? I'd be willing to pay in US dollars to make that point.

    14. Re:About time by Vacuous · · Score: 1

      I buy the Forgotten Realms AD&D novels from my local bookstore and I found that prices have decreased dramaticly on them (I can get one for $9 now rather than $12) and this was a month ago.

    15. Re:About time by Pope · · Score: 1

      True, and parity is not a good thing for a large number of Canadian business areas. The sweet spot is aound US$0.85 to the CAN$1.00: it's not so weak that Canucks can't go abroad or purchase out of country items, and not so strong that our exports suffer.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    16. Re:About time by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We're buying a few new computers and doing some upgrading where I work. If Canadian retailers won't sell at par with what I can pull up off of US sites, then I'll just goddamn well take my budget south of the border. Eat that, local computer dealers. Bring your price down or just go tits up. I will no longer accept FUD and excuses from Canadian retailers. If they won't bring their prices in line, they can all go bankrupt for all I care.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by MLopat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This is actually bad for the profits of Canadian corporations that sell their products to the US for US dollars (Canada sells far more to the US that the US sells to Canada); but it means us Canucks will get cheaper Macs as the Canadian prices get closer to US prices with every new release."

    Somehow that seems like little comfort for us Canadians that realize the impact this has overall on our economy. Anyone that isn't into business or economics up here gets excited about the CDN dollar being stronger because it translates into better cross border shopping for a very small minority, cheaper vacations, and some discounted consumer items like Macs. But take a look at how this impacts the country as a whole and we don't have much to celebrate as an exporting nation.
    1. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      we don't have much to celebrate as an exporting nation.

      Hockey, Beer and Maple Syrup! What's not to celebrate?

    2. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by pokerdad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      we don't have much to celebrate as an exporting nation.

      Our economy is stronger than it has been in my entire life. At .70 US, .80 US and .90 US there were people predicting the imminent collapse of the economy, but as a whole it has just gotten stronger.

      And while we may export resources, we largely import manufactured goods, so for some one looking to buy just about anything, this is good news.

      Its also worth noting that while the loonie has gotten a little stronger, this is largely a story of the US dollar weakening and the Canadian dollar not following (as it has often done in the past). This means that the price of Canadian goods have not increased globally, leaving plenty of opportunity to sell to other markets.

    3. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by king-manic · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Somehow that seems like little comfort for us Canadians that realize the impact this has overall on our economy. Anyone that isn't into business or economics up here gets excited about the CDN dollar being stronger because it translates into better cross border shopping for a very small minority, cheaper vacations, and some discounted consumer items like Macs. But take a look at how this impacts the country as a whole and we don't have much to celebrate as an exporting nation.


      Dont' over estimate the crunch on our export industry. A significant amount is via oil which is a commodity that does not reduce in demand linearly with price. Manufacturing etc... has been on a steady decline for the last 8 years as well as the dollar rose. That has hurt the eastern Ontario economy. At the same time sky high oil prices and an increase in demand world wide has lead to a super heated economy in the west. The west gains from this as our commodity is in demand and we are at capacity to provide. so a Price increase helps the western provinces while it hurts the eastern provinces. Our trade with the US is immense but it hasn't ever been about selling them large quantities of manufactured goods. There is also a time lag related to the effects as contracts signed when the dollar was weaker will remain for a while. So it'll be a while before we see how parity helps or hinder us. As a westerner I don't mind a big crunch in the eastern economic power block.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    4. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone that isn't into business or economics up here gets excited about the CDN dollar being stronger because it translates into better cross border shopping for a very small minority...


      Small minority?

      In 2001, most of Canada's population of 30 million lived within 200 kilometres of the United States. In fact, the inhabitants of our three biggest cities -- Toronto, Montréal and Vancouver -- can drive to the border in less than two hours.
      link
    5. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not at all. To our economist's surprise, the Canadian export economy is coping with the rapidly rising dollar very well. One theory is that the dollar has been rising for such a long time that all the weaker companies have already been weeded out. Canadian organizations are using the high dollar as an opportunity to purchase equipment from the states to make themselves more competitive.

      In fact, Canadian economists were also VERY worried about the impact of the American housing market collapse on our economy. This turned out again to be a false alarm. Lumber exports have fallen, but aside from that, the economy just keeps trucking along to everyone's surprise.

      You're right. The high dollar shouldn't be good for Canada. But for some reason, it isn't hurting much.

    6. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between "lives within a couple hundred kilos of the US" and "goes to the US for a non-trivial percentage of their shopping".

    7. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Kristoph · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually the value of the CAD has as much to do with the fact that Canada is an exporting nation as anything else. The CAD hit bottom against the USD in 2002 and has been climbing ever since almost in lock step with the rise in value of the commodities it exports. The continued fall of the USD will likelly push commodities higher and so companies exporting commodities will not feel a great impact. That, in turn, should prompt more foreign investment in comodity producers which (directly and through a knock on effect) will increase the number of Canadian jobs.

      To be sure, the impact on the Canadian economy from the downturn in the US housing and car markets is going to cost jobs but that has less to do with the dollar then it does with the weakness in those markets in the US.

      ]{

    8. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by lintmint · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Canada being damaged by the high dollar is a myth.

      We are a nation of exporters but what are we exporting? Natural resources. China can't just decide to produce copper, aluminum, or oil. You have to buy that stuff from the nations that have it and most of these things have static prices anyway. An ounce of gold or a barrel of oil pretty much cost the same anywhere in the world no matter what currency you are using.

    9. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Canadian organizations are using the high dollar as an opportunity to purchase equipment from the states to make themselves more competitive.

      I'd like to use this to make a point - The USA has had a trade deficit for a long period of time. We've been importing more goods than we've been exporting. This couldn't be sustained forever. Then there was the outsourcing trend - the loss of US jobs to foreign competition.

      The weakening of the dollar is a natural consequence, and has the positive impact of making US labor and goods less expensive in the global market, which will have the effect of increasing our exports, decreasing our imports(foreign goods are now more expensive compared to natively produced goods), and otherwise promoting native industry.

      Heck, I heard of an Indian company exporting some programming work to the USA.

      In a way, a weaker dollar can help produce a USA not as reliant on foreign imports.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      You wrote it yourself, but still completely missed the kicker.

      We largely import manufactured goods.

      What we export is resources, and we're not even the ones profiting off of most of the resources we're exporting. Once the current resource bubble bursts, then where do you think we'll be? How much more primary forest do you think we have left to give away? How much longer do you think we can sustain raping northern Alberta? (Hint: Look at a recent satellite image...all of that, done since 2000) Our fishing industry is already gone. The US is piping water out of the great lakes at an astonishing rate. And best: Most of our resources are controlled by foreign companies, we're making next to NOTHING on all of this, and leaving NOTHING for the future.

      --
      No Comment.
    11. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All true, but two things need to be remembered.
      First of all, our primary exports are raw materials, not finished goods. As a resource exporter, countries can't afford _not_ to buy our products. They can't in-source the mining of bauxite, for instance, if they don't have the stuff.
      Secondly, this is a measure of the US dollar sinking. Canada has grown modestly against other currencies: ~22% against the pound, ~15% vs. the Euro, and a rather large ~46% against the Yen, in just under five years. Those aren't dangerous numbers, they're a sign of a country growing in the international marketplace. The weakness here, of course, is that our biggest trading partner (by far!) is still the US, and if they go under, it's going to be rough on us.

      I wish this had happened a bit slower so that Canada could disconnect their economy from the US a bit more, but the writing on the wall has been there for ages-ever since the invasion of Iraq, and really probably since Bush first got pushed into power by PNAC.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    12. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by debrain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not at all. To our economist's surprise, the Canadian export economy is... Damn that Canadian economist.
    13. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by nodrogluap · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head here. The real story is that while the U.S. dollar has been dropping, the Canadian dollar has not followed suit as it historically has (against the euro, etc.). Economists are saying we're less tied to the U.S. economy now than we used to be, through economic diversification and high commodity prices.

    14. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Cross border shopping is a massive pain in the ass.

      It's one thing to be treated as a potential terrorist once every few years to travel on vacation to the states...but doing so regularly? Things are not the same as they were in the 80's. I don't know any Canadians that even remotely enjoy crossing into the US anymore.

      Thanks for making us feel so very welcome George! But hey, whatever, enjoy our resources anyways.

      And we're supposed to be the US's closest allies Lol.

      --
      No Comment.
    15. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by LoneGNUman · · Score: 0
      we don't have much to celebrate as an exporting nation.

      Hockey, Beer and Maple Syrup! What's not to celebrate?

      Lumberjacks and curlers!!!!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jc1lDv5KYCQ

    16. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by pokerdad · · Score: 1

      You wrote it yourself, but still completely missed the kicker.

      Oh I get it, I just happen to see profit differently than you do. I see anything that makes the average Canadian have a better quality of life as profit and the high dollar does that.

      What you seem to miss is that the dollar is high because the economy is strong; if that changes so will the dollar.

      And before I address any of your other points individually, how would any of your concerns be different if the dollar was weak? Would we be taking less oil out of the ground if it were cheaper to do so? No, of course not.

      Once the current resource bubble bursts, then where do you think we'll be?

      If we continue to lean on a low dollar between now and then, when it happens we'll have nothing left going for us except the exchange rate. If the government manipulates the dollar to push it down to say .80US for the next twenty years, then expect the news headlines in 2032 to read Cdn$ on par with Peso.

      If one is to presume, as you do that the dollar is high only for a short time, then it is the best thing that could have happenned to us. The reason Canada does far less manufacturing than the US is that while the US has been able to take advantage of newer technologies to keep its manufacturing competive(relative to us); Canada's manufacturing has had the worst of both worlds; more expensive than a third world country, but less advanced/efficient than a first. Having industries subsidized by a low dollar does not create strength, it creates a dependency on said dollar.

      we're not even the ones profiting off of most of the resources we're exporting

      And thirty years of a low dollar did not solve that problem, so how would thirty-one years solve it?

      How much more primary forest do you think we have left to give away?

      I have no idea. I have never been part of the forestry industry nor followed it closely. How much do you think, and based on hearsay or can you actually link to some numbers?

      How much longer do you think we can sustain raping northern Alberta? (Hint: Look at a recent satellite image...all of that, done since 2000)

      Hint, oilsands is an ugly, ugly business. Don't count on the ugly pictures to get your reserve estimates. According to the Alberta Energy website aproximately 2% of the oilsands have been extracted to date. There is an estimated 174 billion barrels in the oilsands alone; there is more oil under Canada than any other country in the world except Saudi Arabia. The oil won't last forever, but don't act like we're going to run out any time soon. (or to put it in your term, we'll be raping it for at least the next 30 years)

      Most of our resources are controlled by foreign companies, we're making next to NOTHING on all of this, and leaving NOTHING for the future.

      I love the foreign ownership debate, mostly because its a load of crap. If its true that companies with foreign holdings are ripping off the countries they are doing business, just plundering and taking all the loot home, then we're in great shape; Canadian companies have greater foreign holdings than foreign companies have in Canada. (I however, tend to think its largely irrellevant to the local economy who owns the company)

    17. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by AgentPaper · · Score: 1

      The US is piping water out of the great lakes at an astonishing rate.
      Who is this mythic "The US" you speak of? Michiganders have been screaming bloody murder about people screwing up the Great Lakes for ages - last year we shut down a multi-million dollar Nestle bottling plant when the few hundred thousand gallons they asked for turned into a few hundred million gallons, and we've been a major part of every Lakes protection initiative, group and legal body to date. Seeing as we border four of the five Lakes, anything that screws with them screws with us even worse.

      Of course, seeing as we'll probably be first in line for annexation once your economy completely pwns ours, let me be the first to welcome our maple-leaf-toting overlords. *(:-)

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    18. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      We had lots of time, we just didn't do it. All those people whining after 2001 about how the US is our biggest trading partner and we'd better do what they say. What an EXCELLENT reason to gain an arms length.

    19. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, that is not the case.

      Many (mine included) Canadian companies sell their products everywhere in the world...in US dollars.

      So, the dollar going up like it has just sucks.

    20. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      We took Detroit once and gave it back. I'm sure the auto companies would retreat if we tried to take it again, so we're probably best served by not bothering.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    21. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Don't know that I agree. I actually wrote a letter to my MP around 2003, expressing my concern with our dependence on a single country (ANY single country is bad--the US is a particularly bad choice right now). To my surprise, I found that the government had been quietly and steadily working towards diversifying our trading partners for some time.

      The thing is, these things _do_ take time. Four years ain't enough. Neither are six. two decades is more like what it would take to decouple our majority trading levels with the US. I was hoping the southern collapse wouldn't start for another five or ten years, but it's moving faster than almost anyone would have imagined.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    22. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You're right, it will take time. I'm glad to hear they're at least willing to SAY they've been doing something. There were an awful lot of trade missions to Asia a few years ago.

      I wish they'd stop using the-US-is-our-biggest-trading-partner to justify doing whatever our big neighbor orders us to, though.

    23. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      What resource bubble? There is no resource bubble.

      There may have been a US housing bubble, but there is no resource bubble. Resource prices have increased in response to the demand from China and India and other nations. US is not the consumer of these resources anymore. Unless you are forecasting that Chineese economy will collapse, resource prices will stay just where they are.

      Furthermore, while price for copper has gone up from $0.60 (that is 60 cents, Verizon!) to $3.5, the price of oil has gone up similarly from $20 to $80. I don't think that the prices for resources are overvalues as much as these prices have not yet managed to go through the system and trigger inflation, as they will.

      And finally, these prices are in USD. These same prices in EUR are completely different. Copper has been going down in price as well as oil for a number of months now. It is only because USD is depreciating that we are seeing these record highs. It is only a matter of time until inflation will correct the current problem with US prices though.

      Anyhow, as one said it, there is no bad fiscal policy. There are just consequences. What USD vs. CND is just an example of an unbalanced budget + trade deficit vs. balanced budget + trade surplus over most of the decade. These are the consequences of the policies. More to come.

      The only issue is that CND should not see ANY inflation and USD should be seeing it. Prices are really screwed - NAFTA anyone?

    24. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more with this statement.
      The manufacturing facility that's employed me for the last 15 years hasn't experienced any significant production cost changes over the years (electricity, chemicals, oil/gas have gone up, we've made things more efficient) however, our monthly EBIDTA used to average +$24 million.

      At 92 cents... we only broke even.
      This month.... We're predicting a negative EBIDTA of $7 million.

      Makes you wonder how long it will be before I'm collection UI?

    25. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Actually for the company I work for this is a good thing as now we can access wholesalers in the US and we can now purchase the same items from the US at 10%+ saving over local wholesales even after shipping. With the buying power of 9 stores we can now lower our prices to kill the competition and still make better profit then before.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    26. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time having sympathy for those exporters that are going to have nobody to sell to except Canadians with money to burn: Just because the money is no longer coming from one source doesn't mean there isn't a new source...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    27. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by e-scetic · · Score: 1

      Canadians will be in a better position if they are less dependent upon exports to US markets, especially when the US economy tanks from all the bad debt. It's all about risk management. It's a good thing if Canadian exporters can start looking elsewhere for profit and dollar parity would certainly help ecourage this.

    28. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      We may export our goods, but as has been suggested by some economists and politicians, we import a lot as well - so instead of crying about how our manufacturing profits are gone, we should take advantage of the strong dollar and use it to modernize our industry, manufacturing and otherwise. Are we really a nation of whiners, complaining because we suddenly have to compete against American companies instead of just getting a handicap via our weak dollar?

      Buy more technology! Modernize industry, automate factories, train workers upwards. Now that our dollar is worth more, we can bring in skill and tech from around the world much easier. One would think that on Slashdot, that would be a noble goal.

    29. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore this, replying to undo erroneous moderation.

    30. Re:Screwed economy but cheaper Macs?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our trade with the US is immense but it hasn't ever been about selling them large quantities of manufactured goods.

      This is completely untrue. Our largest export is cars and car parts. Aviation (Bombardier) also ranks above oil/gas. Keep in mind, oil and gas exports are also hurt by a high Canadian dollar.

  9. Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People assume that the dollar falling in value in relation to foreign currency is a bad thing. This is not necessarily the case. Here are some benefits:
    * American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.
    * Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.
    * It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.

    I could go on, but you get the idea.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Informative

      It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.

      Yes. $4 per hour in Canada would be illegal. The lowest allowable minimum wage in Canada is $7, and it is typically around $8 depending on what provincve you live in.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    2. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by benzapp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is we have no native industry for the vast majority of things Americans desire. We also are a net importer of food and energy.

      Someday, countries like Canada with lots of wheat will want something besides debt instruments in exchange for their goods. So too will countries like Saudi Arabia want something of tangible value in exchange for their oil.

      Rapidly rising prices of foreign goods may someday bring back American industry, but that is a generation away. We have too few engineers and no manufacturing infrastructure. We will have to train a whole new class of workers and build many new factories. This doesn't happen overnight.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... * It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country. ...

      Considering 1 US Dollar(USD) = 10.969 Mexican Peso(MXN) that aint gonna happen any time soon.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    4. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Nexx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless the relative buying power of 1USD = 1MXN, that statement's meaningless without comparisons to previous exchange rates.

    5. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Seumas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Huh? How are these good?

      * American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.

      American products are cheaper. American employees paid less or offshored.

      * Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.

      Most products sold to American consumers are foriegn products. American employees being paid less because of the first point above also have more difficulty affording most products they buy, because of the second point.

      * It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.

      Doesn't matter, because we don't need them to come to America. We can just oursource and offshore to them in their own country.

    6. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 0

      Yes, and when our silly Milton Friedman experiment reaches total failure, businesses will have plenty of native, English-speaking cheap labor to employ.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      * American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have. Is that "good" in the same way as being forced to sell something cheap is good?
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't believe that the parent was modded insightful:

      American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.

      What consumer products are manufactured in the U.S. nowadays? (This is part of why you have a trade deficit.)

      Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.

      I don't understand economics, but I *think* this leads to inflation.

      It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.

      I don't *think* a lot of Canadians are sneaking into the US for $4/hr jobs. That's my thoughts.

    9. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      Very true, there are some benefits. The main people it sucks for are people who need to spend money from a USD account overseas (as in your imports example). I know this because I live in the UK, where the dollar hit half a pound a few months ago (it used to be £1.65 when I first started traveling to the UK - oh how things have changed). Spending dollars here is not recommended if you can avoid it.

      Of course while this affects Americans who want to travel or live abroad, it makes tourism to America a lot cheaper. So if you don't mind waiting in abysmal lines to be fingerprinted and harassed by the DHS, seeing the Grand Canyon and going on shopping sprees just got cheaper. That could be a nice side benefit for the US.

    10. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not the fact that it's cheaper that is the story. It is why it is cheaper and how the dollar's value is dropping. One word inflation.

      This is not a good thing for Americans. Our oil merchants have already started abandoning the dollar starting with UAE and Kuwait. If they don't they will have some serious inflationary effects in their own economy. The pressure is on and Americans are about to get a drop in living standard. But don't worry, at least our Social Security and free health care for all will save us... right? Just add a few more zeros to that deposit from the Fed and everything will turn out alright.

      As Gore Vidal once quipped "We live in the United States of Amnesia. Everything is a blank after Monday morning."

    11. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We have too few engineers and no manufacturing infrastructure. We will have to train a whole new class of workers and build many new factories. This doesn't happen overnight.

      I think you vastly underestimate the existing base. Part of the reason that there are fewer people in manufacturing in the US is because US manufacturing increased in productivity. People that spent a lifetime as high school grads doing rote tasks were obsoleted by robots. Manual machinists were replaced by fewer people that operate faster and more accurate CNC machines, and those CNC machines get more productive every year.

      While China's manufacturing output is huge, $3T+/yr, US manufacturing is still a $1.5 trillion dollar/yr industry.

      Consumer Electronics is the one big non-native industry, but they can be made in the US. It's moved out primarily due to cost issues, competitors can make them cheaper, but I doubt that will really come back in significant numbers.

    12. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by fm6 · · Score: 1

      American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have
      Let me guess, you're a Republican, right? So to you, higher prices for imports is a Good Thing, because of the trade imbalance. But if you're a blue collar family struggling to live on an income that's stagnant at best, higher prices are just higher prices.

      The fact is, a weak dollar is a Bad Sign. It means that there's less demand for the goods the U.S. sells abroad, and thus less demand for the currency needed to buy those goods. The "positive" effects you cite are just the feedback mechanisms built into any semi-stable economy.
    13. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

      The idea is that instead of buying a 15k Civic, you'll buy a 12k American Cobalt or Neon.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    14. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by PPH · · Score: 1, Insightful

      American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.

      What American products? Do we still make anything here (besides Brittney Spears albums)?

      Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.

      As do the imported components and raw materials used to build the few 'American made' products left.


      Generally, its a wash, except that the declining dollar is just another way of cutting your wages and encouraging you to spend what little you have left at the 'company store'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    15. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The peso and dollar were closer together 10 years ago, and slowly slipping apart again.

      It's hovered around 1:10 / 1:11 for awhile now.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by bentcd · · Score: 1

      The lowest allowable minimum wage in Canada is $7 In other words, the minimum minimum wage? Yay for meta-laws :-)

      We should get this into WTO treaties - then we could have a minimum minimum minimum wage . . .
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    17. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      American products are cheaper. American employees paid less or offshored.

      Actually, the opposite happens. While it used to be cheaper to pay Canadian workers in CDN's, that is no longer a benefit. It is not as advantageous to open a foreign factory because you have to pay those foreign workers MORE, not less.

      Most products sold to American consumers are foriegn products. American employees being paid less because of the first point above also have more difficulty affording most products they buy, because of the second point.

      As I've said, increasing the wages of foreign workers helps American workers. It also means that made in America products are now more affordable and more in demand. How does increasing the demand for American products hurt American workers?

      Doesn't matter, because we don't need them to come to America. We can just oursource and offshore to them in their own country. /sigh... read my first point again.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    18. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Harlockjds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Most products sold to American consumers are foriegn products. American employees being paid less because of the first point above also have more difficulty affording most products they buy, because of the second point.

      the only reason that most products are forign products is because they are priced lower. If they become pricier because of weakening dollars (or other currency's becoming stronger) then American products will bounce back.

      It's not like we no longer know how to manufacture in this country... it's just that it's cheaper to import.

    19. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People assume that the dollar falling in value in relation to foreign currency is a bad thing. This is not necessarily the case.

      Sure, and people assume that playing in traffic is a bad thing but that's not necessarily the case either.

      The problem here is risk - both collectively and individually. Collectively, there is a danger that the process can accelerate and the currency can collapse which screws everyone (in the USA at least). Individually, you get people saving for their retirement who aren't smart enough to be scared into avoiding dollar based investments by the Bush administration's massive deficit spending who suddenly find that their lifetime retirement savings aren't actually worth much anymore.

      The interesting thing to me is that this data point gives additional support for the hypothesis that massive deficit spending causes significant devaluation of a country's currency (not that this was really a secret - but modern Republicans seem to be in denial on this point). To the extent that Republicans lose their life savings through devaluation of the US dollar, I don't have much sympathy because if you support Bush you deserve what you get. On the other hand, there are probably some hard working Americans that didn't support Bush but who were also not smart enough to realize that the Bush administration' massive deficit spending was going to cause serious devaluation of the US dollar. I do feel kind of sorry for them.

    20. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Znork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, true, there are many advantages to currency fluctuations. For the US in this case I think it's a bit more painful than usual tho.

      The declining dollar will drive a sharp inflationary pressure, which severely limits the Feds ability to moderate the economy. The Fed might want to lower interest rates, but every lowering will result in a rapid inflationary hike, leaving it with the choice of either letting property prices collapse with associated pain of bank runs and failures, or by letting the dollar continue in free fall which means letting everyone holding US assets pay for the irresponsible behaviour of some.

      And of course, if the Fed shows it's going to let the dollar tank, that'll just cause everyone to dump even more dollar assets, driving the dollar down further.

      Long term there will be a correction, and there will be advantages such as a resolution to the trade imbalances. But the fundamental problem is that large parts of the next decades consumption has already been done, paid for by borrowed money secured with overinflated real-estate prices. Adjusting to paying interest rather than shopping luxuries will suck badly.

      On the bright side, perhaps the economists will bang their little heads together hard enough this time to come up with numbers for GDP growth and asset values that are actually based in reality.

    21. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by joshv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me guess, you're a Republican, right? So to you, higher prices for imports is a Good Thing, because of the trade imbalance. But if you're a blue collar family struggling to live on an income that's stagnant at best, higher prices are just higher prices.

      Sure, until enterprising individuals build plants in the US to make the goods we were previously importing, but at a lower price. And those plants start hiring US workers.

      Yes, I agree, that would be a catastrophe - let's just continue buying all our stuff from other countries and let our workers keep losing their jobs. Outsource everything - eventually the world will just pay us American's to sit around and watch ads for their products.

    22. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... Unless the relative buying power of 1USD = 1MXN, that statement's meaningless without comparisons to previous exchange rates. ...

      Unless the Mexican economy is growing at a whizz bang rate(unlikely for any economy) then a 1:10 ratio is a pretty big gap and therefore has meaning.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    23. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Someday, countries like Canada with lots of wheat will want something besides debt instruments in exchange for their goods.

      According to this the US produces 3 times as much wheat as Canada.

    24. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by xmedar · · Score: 1

      Given US debt, it'll be hyper-inflation, with the USD no longer being the worlds reserve currency, so think 1930s Germany in about 2-5 years, you'll be trading your McMansion for a Big Mac over in Europe, buh bye America, it was nice knowing ya!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    25. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't believe that the parent was modded insightful

      That would be because - as you said - you don't understand economics.

      What consumer products are manufactured in the U.S. nowadays?

      Food, textiles, clothes, wood products, paper, printing, chemicals, plastics, cement, metal, machine and building parts, machinery, ...

      Each of those has hundreds of thousands of people employed in the US, and there's lots more - I just got bored listing them. The whole "there's no manufacturing in the US!1!" meme is popular, but that doesn't mean it's true.
    26. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Merk · · Score: 1

      And Canada has 1/10th the population of the US...

    27. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Trojan35 · · Score: 0

      "We have too few engineers and no manufacturing infrastructure. We will have to train a whole new class of workers and build many new factories."

      Those two functions have proven that they generally go to the lowest bidder. There is no value proposition to having those functions domestic.

      We're lucky, in America. We're the Microsoft Office of the world. The big companies are here, which means executives are here, which means service-oriented products are here. When the Forbes 500 relocates their headquarters to other countries, then we worry.

    28. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you're a Republican, right? So to you, higher prices for imports is a Good Thing, because of the trade imbalance. But if you're a blue collar family struggling to live on an income that's stagnant at best, higher prices are just higher prices.

      Actually, making foreign products more expensive is more of a Democratic ideal.

      Let's say you are a blue collar family, living in Lansing MI working for GM making Grand Ams. That Grand Am that you are producing is now suddenly in more demand overseas because it is cheaper for overseas car buyers. At the same time, Nissans become now more expensive in the US, so the Grand Am is now more in demand in the US as well. The result, GM sells more Grand Ams. Not only does this help with job security, GM is more profitable and can pay you more. How is this a bad thing again?

      Of course, since Democrats hate oil so much, you'd think it would be a good thing that oil is now going to be more expensive as well. This means more research into fuel efficiency as well as alternative fuel sources. Would you call this a Republican ideal?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    29. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      It's illegal in America too. People still sneak across the border and people still pay them under the table wages. But I doubt many Canadians have had to sneak across the border just for work so it's not much of an advantage.

    30. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by compro01 · · Score: 1

      you'll buy a 12k American Cobalt or Neon.

      Which was imported from Taiwan. ;)

      Though seriously, "domestics" are not necessarily domestic anymore, nor are "imports" necessarily imported anymore.

      Most of this continent's Honda Civics are actually built in East Liberty, Ohio, and Alliston, Ontario.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    31. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by apankrat · · Score: 1

      I am really curious who is sneaking out of Canada into US to work for $4 an hour.
      Sounds deviously clever.
      Especially if, for example in Vancouver, a dishwasher job pays $8-10 an hour.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    32. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that the badge on the front of the car matches where it was made. If it was a Honda Civic in the UK, it'd probably be from Swindon. I thought that US Civics were US-built.

      Also, whether people will buy X rather than Y rather depends on X being any good. Although Chrysler used to sell the Neon over here (Europe) it didn't exactly set the world on fire, and GM don't try importing many US cars (or indeed any? UK Cadillacs are Saab-built I think). GM use the Chevrolet badge in Europe on the cars formerly known as Daewoos.

      A collapsing exchange rate from the 60s to the 80s didn't save the UK car industry, it just prolonged the inevitable while they kept making cars that no-one actually wanted to buy. What comprises the mass-market UK car industry now is a series of largely successful plants built on green-field sites from the 80s on by the likes of Honda, Toyota and Nissan. There are a couple of exceptions - BMW seem to be doing OK with the former Morris plant at Cowley and Ford or whoever-owns-Jaguar-now with the former Ford plant in Liverpool. That quality from the last of these was so bad that early 90s Escorts from there couldn't be exported.

    33. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by dcavens · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someday, countries like Canada with lots of wheat will want something besides debt instruments in exchange for their goods. So too will countries like Saudi Arabia want something of tangible value in exchange for their oil.

      Actually, Canada exports more oil and gas products to the U.S. than Saudi Arabia. We're your number one source for oil imports, which is one reason our dollar is so strong.

    34. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to work for a plastics manufacturer in the U.S. Both us and our competitors manufactured most of it in the U.S.--Rubbermaid, Iris, Sterilite... The rising cost of labour and production was offset by the cost of importing low density/low cost equivalents from China, and by automation in American factories. Also, the reliability and availability of sufficient-quality raw materials in the U.S. was far greater than in China. Overall, it was a bit of wash between manufacturing plastics here and there, with the advantage to local manufacturers in the U.S. because of tooling production for just-in-time manufacturing and low inventory costs.

      Unless the foreign manufactured product is a high cost/high density item like a laptop, where the air freight cost is a minimal portion of it, shipping the product is literally shipping it, taking 4-6 weeks to cross the Pacific, which incurs significant costs in order fulfillment and inventory management.

      The hysteria about the flight of manufacturing from the U.S. isn't entirely wrong, but it's far too simplistic. Lots of basic good manufacturing still goes on here, and the devalued USD definitely favours that.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    35. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Another reason people have that impression is that most of the cheap consumer grade stuff that they buy at the big box retail outlets. They pick whatever has the lowest price and that will usually result in something made in a 3rd world nation. If they were shopping for quality, then they may be able to get something made in the US (even at WalMart - I bought a US made can opener there a few months ago).

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    36. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Try reading the rest of my post. I'm not saying these financial mechanisms don't serve a purpose. I'm saying they're just mechanisms.

      Having a weak currency is a Bad Thing. It's a sign that fewer customers want the output of the factories we do have. If we can't sell shit, we need to work on ways of making more desirable shit, not count on the Economic Correction Fairy to bail us out.

    37. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The Federal minimum wage in the USA was $5.15/hour for years.

      However, FICA/Social Security taxes are 7.65% of an employee's income, so $.39/hour goes to the .gov, leaving $4.76 for the employee.

      However, the whole 'sneaking' part implies illegal labor, working 'under the table'(IE for cash each day), so violating minimum wage laws wouldn't exactly be a concern of the employer. Include the payroll taxes, a minimum wage employee costs the employer at least $5.55/hour.

      Take a chunck off to make operating illegally worth it - $4/hour is doable for an immigrant used to longer hours for even lower pay, with a limited quality of life. IE living 9-12 people to a 3 bedroom house isn't considered a hardship for them. Especially if they commit welfare fraud at the same time.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    38. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ksheff · · Score: 1

      How much would the price of the Nissans, Toyotas, etc that are made in the US change? Would the parent companies decide to start exporting more of these vehicles to other markets or are they just for the US?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    39. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Yes. $4 per hour in Canada would be illegal. The lowest allowable minimum wage in Canada is $7, and it is typically around $8 depending on what provincve you live in.

      It's illegal here, too. But illegal migrant workers often work for illegally low wages. And you've got that minimum wage partially because your taxes are higher, I think. But I'm not 100% sure. I made $20,000 last year, and paid $250 in taxes after the standardized deduction. Plus sales tax. And all the other taxes. But I'm trying to make a point here. :D
      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    40. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Is that "good" in the same way as being forced to sell something cheap is good?

      Good for the consumer, at least.

      It's good in the sense that the US made Gizmo A costs about the same* in USD as it did before the international value of the dollar dropped. The Asian made equivalent of Gizmo A, which used to cost 95% of the US version, now costs 105%. Before, the US made Gizmo A wasn't really competitive, costing more than the asian version. Now, it's cheaper. Since people tend to buy the cheaper product, people in the USA start buying the US version. This reduces a bit of the trade deficit, results in more jobs in the USA(the factory for the gizmo has to increase production), more tax monies, etc...

      The foreign company ends up either finding other markets for their product or reduces/eliminates production. If the switch is bad enough, their company might end up buying the US made gizmo, which is now being exported by the USA.

      *It gets complicated if it uses foreign made components or resources.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    41. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1:10 ratio in and of itself means absolutely nothing. We could revalue the dollar by chopping two zeroes off the end and dividing everything by 100. It wouldn't make the dollar smaller, it would just make the numbers all smaller.

    42. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the small fact that an unstable and declining dollar is not an attractive currency to price commodities in, especially for international markets. (I should rephrase, it is attractive to the US and the Buyers, but not for the seller, who wants their real income to drop when they can avoid it?) If raw materials and oil start being priced with say Euros then it becomes a disaster. Here is why;

      No one will want to hold dollars, they are not useful for exchange, they will get rid of them and replace them with Euro's - net result? The dollar loses more value
      US Manufacturers will find that the resources to make their products are more expensive, and not stable in price, as such they will find it difficult to export (even if the dollar is low, because they need to exchange dollars for a higher value currency in the first place to produce their product) as their prices will be higher. This also impacts on the US market, foreign goods will become more expensive and so will US products.
      Fuel will become more expensive *and* there may be issues with supply, after all the US will need to acquire foreign currency to buy it in the first place, not easy if you already have a trade defect and no chance of changing it, you need to pay for your oil before it gets to you to be refined, if you haven't got the cash you wont get the oil.
      If fuel is more expensive that will further drive prices of goods and food up, most things require fuel or oil derivatives at some point in their manufacture or in their transport to consumers.

      That's a middle case (not worst case by far) scenario, but its possible. The only good news is that with a bit of luck the move away from the dollar as a reserve currency will hit other countries too, (they currently hold it) so there is some incentive not to allow the American economy to tank, more over many of the other interconnections between global economies will be impacted by a US economy collapse (or)bump. Of course if it does happen, the global economy post collapse will be quite different, the US will find that much of its economic clout (and hence its ability to maintain its military capabilities) will be gone. Frankly I am worried what an economically declining, military powerful America (with the prospect of losing that military power) would do, this is the kind of thing that starts major wars.

    43. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      What American products? Do we still make anything here?

      Food products, we're still the worlds #1 exporter. Farm equipment, manufacturing equipment in general*, entertainment, vehicles to include cars and planes, chemicals, medical drugs, etc...

      As do the imported components and raw materials used to build the few 'American made' products left.

      But at a certain point it becomes cheaper to build those components and produce raw materials here rather than elsewhere. For example, we do have a number of steel plants in the USA, it's just that they're not very competitive against plants in other countries that don't have to deal with minimum wage laws, unions, EPA, OSHA, and such.

      *a lot of the equipment used to make the goods imported into the USA were made in the USA

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    44. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by bladel · · Score: 1

      All true, but it does make our primary import more expensive: Oil.

      --


      Information wants to be Free. Useful Information will cost you.
    45. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Don853 · · Score: 1

      Or I just won't visit Europe until it blows over? I mean, not being able to travel internationally on the cheap is an unfortunate side effect, but it's not the end of the world. That sort of hyper-inflation of course won't occur. Maybe if the Euro becomes the de-facto world reserve currency, China can fix its currency against yours instead of ours.

    46. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      the only reason that most products are forign products is because they are priced lower. If they become pricier because of weakening dollars (or other currency's becoming stronger) then American products will bounce back.

      It's not like we no longer know how to manufacture in this country... it's just that it's cheaper to import. Sure, but manufacturing industries don't spring up overnight, and there are a number of imports which the US relies upon which just aren't that negotiable -- oil being at the top of that list. So yes, American products will bounce back, but there may be a somewhat unpleasant adjustment period as the increasing cost of imported oil (from a weakening dollar) forces up the costs (via increased transport costs) of all the increasingly expensive manufactured imports, prior to US industry kicking into high enough gear to actually satisfy the demands of US consumers.
    47. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      How much would the price of the Nissans, Toyotas, etc that are made in the US change? Would the parent companies decide to start exporting more of these vehicles to other markets or are they just for the US?

      Foreign cars "produced" in the US are usually still made from parts that are imported. The cars are merely assembled here from parts manufactured in Japan or elsewhere. Still, these cars would be cheaper in foreign markets compared to cars assembled abroad, with no real change in the price in the US except that the parts that are still being imported and would cost more,=. This would still mean an increase in the price of the car, but not as much of an increase for a car assembled overseas. If anything, it would increase the benefit for parts to be manufactured here as well as the assembly.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    48. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Chrysler cancelled the Neon and I can't recall what they're making in the Belvidere, IL plant at the moment. Probably one of the 'crossover' or mini SUVs.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    49. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Of course, since Democrats hate oil so much, you'd think it would be a good thing that oil is now going to be more expensive as well. This means more research into fuel efficiency as well as alternative fuel sources. Would you call this a Republican ideal?
      Actually many prominent conservatives* are warming to the idea of a gas tax, Andrew Sullivan being one that comes to mind immediately.

      I don't mind making gasoline expensive as hell, but for the fact that it's demand is incredibly inelastic. I'm from a relatively rural area. Changes in gas prices hurt these people more than the city-dweller who can simply jump on a train or take the bus, which, when I was in college, I enjoyed taking (but then it was only cheaper once gas was over $2.75, but I digress). When your job is 30+ miles away, you have to pay whatever the price is.

      Of course, the answer to all this is a mass exodus from bedroom communities and back to living near one's job. Unfortunately, no one planned for expensive fuel. I think we're going to see it's implications come to full fruition by 2010.

      *a bit of sleight of hand on my part. You specified Republicans, which don't completely overlap with conservatives.
    50. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by dargon · · Score: 1

      The question is, how long will it be till US Americans (as per Miss Teen South Carolina ;) ) start sneaking across the Canada/US border to work for better minimum wages here :)

    51. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by evilviper · · Score: 1

      We also are a net importer of food and energy.

      Energy is a difficult problem. However, the development of future power sources like solar, wind, and nuclear is happening in the US, as are the world's large installations, so we're well positioned for the not very distant future. Besides that, nobody seems to be complaining that China is a large importer of energy and materials... it certainly hasn't slowed them down.

      Rapidly rising prices of foreign goods may someday bring back American industry, but that is a generation away. We have too few engineers and no manufacturing infrastructure. We will have to train a whole new class of workers and build many new factories. This doesn't happen overnight.

      That's incredibly, laughably wrong. In 2005, the US was the #1 manufacturer in the world BY FAR, almost 2X ahead of #2 (China was a distant #4). We have the best trained engineers anywhere, and a great many of them. There is absolutely no shortage of infrastructure either, unless perhaps you're talking about one specific field, and even that I'd doubt.

      When some company starts laying some people off, and some jobs go over-seas, people get scared, overreact, and blow things way out of proportion. The fear that the US is can't manufacture anything is just that, irrational fear, not at all based in reality.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    52. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      I wrote about this prospect back in 2004 -- it all seemed on the cards then, and I was surprised that no-one was really talking about it. Of course not too much happened -- the Fed raising interest rates steadily since around that time managed to keep things in check and everything puttered along happily. Eventually, though, the higher rates cut in, and the housing market went down, and so finally the chickens are starting to come home to roost.

      What is remarkable, to me, is that this was all clearly an issue 3 years ago (more than that really), and not only was little or nothing done, little or nothing was ever really said about it as a problem. Since I wrote that pretty much all the numbers in that piece have gotten significantly worse as the US continued blithely on its economic course. This really should have been an election issue in 2004, and it definitely should have been an election issue in 2006. Why exactly do so few Americans seem to know or care about the very serious issues here?

    53. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yes, it takes time for manufacturing to spin up. Still, you might be suprised at just how quickly we could set up factories if the economic market called for it.

      As for oil - same deal. Like canada and their oil sands, we have oil shale, the extraction of oil is about the same. Let the pain get high enough we'll shut the greenies up and start exploiting it.

      Personally, I'd be building a nuclear plant there right now to hopefully take advantage of heat colocation and power generation for extraction processes.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    54. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      In which case, the American Cobalt's price will raise to $14,900 for no reason other than the fact that they can, and still have it be cheaper..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    55. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but have you actually ever taken an economics course? The weakening of the currency MAKES our products more desirable and increases demand for them because they are now comparatively less expensive.

      Let me give you an example. In 2005, x product cost $100 CAD in Canada while only costing $85 USD in the United States. With the exchange rate, this made the product equivalent and the Canadian had no incentive to import it. Now that the currency is on parity, the same item still costs $85 in the US, but is relatively $15 cheaper for a Canadian to import than to buy locally. So the demand for the imported item increases, and the demand for the local item decreases.

      Likewise, the flip side is true. For example, in 2005 it costs $15,000 USD to import a car from Korea, but costs $16,000 to buy one built locally. Now that the currency is worth less comparatively, it now costs $17,000 to import the same car while the locally produced one still costs $16,000. Therefore, the demand for the locally produced car will increase and the demand for the imported car will decrease.

      So, all in all, it's not a Very Bad Thing. It is a transitory phase. If inflation were to increase dramatically, this could become a serious issue - but right now the CPI (the average cost of a basket of goods for consumers) is at -0.1% and the PPI (same, but for producers) is at -1.4% (and a lower PPI is indicative of a future lower CPI). So prices are very moderately decreasing, not increasing.

    56. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by jamesborr · · Score: 1

      This is big problem, and we are doing little to help ourselves here. We currently import significant stocks of refined oil products because we haven't built a refinery here in decades (with the regulatory approval processes here and rampant NIMBY, it's tough for organizations to justify the risk). So while it might be possible to build and run such industry profitably (relative low labor input), we have chosen to let other countries (primarily Europe) refine our additional demand. Same goes for oil production. We have known, proven and potentially profitable oil reserves which are politically unobtainable (ANWR, off the coasts of California and Florida at a minimum). Again, our political establishment has chosen to have us increase our imports instead. We also have additional oil contained in shale deposits in a number of western states, which due to environmental risk, will probably remain untouched until the precipice gets oh so close. Canada certainly has similar issues re: environmental issues for their oil sands based products -- just have chosen to mitigate and proceed. When gas gets to $8 to $10 a gallon, we will make the same decisions of course (it will be surprising to see how fast the oil derricks and refineries go up actually...).

    57. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      >but there may be a somewhat unpleasant adjustment period as the increasing cost of imported oil (from a weakening dollar) forces up the costs (via increased transport costs) of all the increasingly expensive manufactured imports, prior to US industry kicking into high enough gear to actually satisfy the demands of US consumers.

      any change has an unpleasant adjustment period (just ask the areas that lost manufacturing jobs to china etc) but also opportunity. I don't see short term 'pain' as an serous issue.

    58. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ratio is utterly meaningless in itself. 1 US Dollar is worth around 114 Japanese Yen. Do you think that means that Japan has to grow "at a whiz bang rate" to catch up with the Mexicans? The thinking behind this is horribly horribly wrong.

    59. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Nothing short of a true militia (henopoly on coercion) or total economic collapse will discourage foreign workers sneaking into the USA.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    60. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Sure, until enterprising individuals build plants in the US to make the goods we were previously importing, but at a lower price. And those plants start hiring US workers.

      You assume that's possible in the first place. Where's the profit to be made in building a factory here and paying an order of magnitude higher salary for fewer working hours with more breaks and benefits? How are we going to get $5 t-shirts from an American factory?

      The fact is, Americans have had an asymmetric economic relationship with lots of foreign countries, essentially trading our higher standard of living for the low cost labor of people in other countries. In a closed economy it's much harder to do that. Not everyone can be middle class when the factories require cheap grunt work. The smaller middle class means fewer luxuries will be purchased, meaning the upper classes feel the impact just as bad as everyone else. Who's going to buy overpriced CDs, movies, computers, and iPods when they can only get a $5/hr factory job?

      Returning to an industrial society is not a viable goal for the U.S.

    61. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by DavidJSimpson · · Score: 1

      Someday, countries like Canada with lots of wheat will want something besides debt instruments in exchange for their goods. So too will countries like Saudi Arabia want something of tangible value in exchange for their oil.

      I know you are giving examples, but did you know that the US imports more oil from Canada than from Saudi Arabia? I'm sure that most Americans do not realize this.

      http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html

    62. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Sure, until enterprising individuals build plants in the US to make the goods we were previously importing, but at a lower price. >And those plants start hiring US workers. If I can only stop eating for 10-15 years till the enterprising individuals build the plants, I'll be ok.

    63. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Falling currency value isn't a good thing, no matter how you spin it. Ask Mexico. Sure you get more exports and jobs--but your standard of living falls to shit and you end up virtually enslaved by richer countries.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    64. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      At this rate the more likely future scenario is Americans sneaking over the Canadian border, not the other way around.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    65. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      Sure, until enterprising individuals build plants in the US to make the goods we were previously importing, but at a lower price. And those plants start hiring US workers.

      The problem is: that won't happen until the US dollar falls so much that one man-hour of US labor costs less than one man-hour of Chinese labor. The cost of that one man-hour of Chinese labor is largely the result of the fact that said labor is largely (though not always, of course) slave labor. Slave labor is the cheapest labor possible because a slave's standard of living is, by force, barely subsistence level -- in other words just enough to enable said laborer to work and no more.

      For US labor to compete with that, the dollar will have to drop so low that it compensates for that very real price difference. In short, it'll have to drop so far that an economic collapse of massive proportions occurs.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    66. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by cuby · · Score: 1

      yes, but you are importing inflation because foreign products are more expensive.

      Also, every American is poorer because currency has less value... Is a covert way to reduce salaries without complains. Before the euro, in my country, devaluation often served this purpose.

      Also... here in Europe, despite of the continuous rise of oil prices, because of the dollar devaluation, the oil price in euros is cheaper compared to the beginning of the year.

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    67. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In 2005, the US was the #1 manufacturer in the world BY FAR, almost 2X ahead of #2 (China was a distant #4).


      Where does this figure come from? Its certainly not a per-employee figure, and to be so high I think it is being slippery on the definition of manufacturing. It could be including foreign operations by US-based multinationals (ISTR some US jobs data was guilty of this) for example. Or there could be manufacture for domestic consumption - however the claim seems off the wall simply in regards to the trade deficit.

      I tried to find some corroboration of your figures but came up with nothing.
      http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_econindicators_tradepict20050210Here are some deficit numbers

    68. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The US eats most of that wheat, it has 10x the population of Canuckia. Canuckia on the other hand exports most of its high quality wheat, what it doesn't eat, for premium prices.

    69. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by photomonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      * American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.

      What is it that we produce again, beyond credit products and consulting. I'm talking in the range of consumer or industrial products.

      * Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.

      ...But at the same time further weakens the American economy. We cannot, under the present economy, 'make' stuff as cheap as other countries (China, Slovenia, Turkey, etc.) can. Computers are 'cheap' in the US now because Chinese workers assemble the PCBs for literally dollars a day, where we can more adequately measure skilled labor costs in dollars per hour.

      So by the time we retool our now closed factories to start making stuff again, and buying the raw materials to do so with a weaker currency, we're at a pretty huge economic disadvantage. And before the skilled laborers required to run machines for $3-$4/hour instead of the $15-$30/hour they presently see, the economy is going to have to get even worse. Otherwise, something has to give.

      * It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.

      So long as it's better in any way to be in the US, they will continue to come. And frankly, we need them. It is true that the 'just-crossed-the-border' immigrant will work a lot harder and a lot dirtier for the money than the average American suburbanite will. And they have no recourse not to work because going on welfare is not an option. Right now, you can make more on welfare (if you have children) than at basically any entry-level or unskilled labor job.

      I'm not suggesting that we should marginalize or enslave immigrants, or treat them as indentured servants, but it is their 'deregulated' nature that allows them to operate as they do, and fulfill a niche in the economy. In the And we as a society have come to rely on them to do so. Throughout the history of ALL 'successful' (US, British, Roman, Egyptian, Greek, Japanese, Chinese, etc.) civilizations, those same successes have always relied on an economic substrate or underclass to support the inordinate affluence of the upper class. I'm not saying I'm against it. Just stating fact.

      As we begin to regulate immigrants, we 'up' the street value for those that jump through the hoops to become legal.

      So as the economy in the US weakens, we gradually start calling for the regulation and naturalization of hitherto 'illegal' immigrants. We do so in the name of preventing terrorism and not 'stealing jobs' from Americans. It has yet to get to the point where illegal immigrants compete with a significant number of Americans for jobs. However, as the economy weakens, eventually Americans will be competing with illegals for the same jobs. At that point, we've, as usual, already trained our replacements. At that point, the economy is basically fscked anyway.

      As Americans, we carry so much debt that it won't take much for the economy to tumble, and fall hard.

      It is my hope that some of those who made vast fortunes in the time after WWII, the Carnegies and Goulds of the modern era in the form of Gates and Frick have the hindsight and the progeny (genetic or otherwise) who can capitalize on this weakened economy, and put the US back on track.

      Sadly, I think that we will continue to Visa ourselves to death on an individual level while the government throws away money on unwinnable wars and aimless other projects.

      Now is a time for strong leadership, and cautious economic policy. But with no real industrial infrastructure remaining, I don't see any good coming from a weakening US economy.

      --
      Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
    70. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The problem with that reasoning is that you assume Chinese labor standards and living standards are static and will remain static. As more and more Chinese are getting rich from running export factories there is a trickledown effect and Chinese are becoming richer. Further they have a strict 1 child policy so their population will start falling soon and the shortage of labor will be at an exponential rate. So this phenomenon of cheap Chinese imports is a temporary one and soon there wont be any differences in cost of labor between US and China. This is good as then companies can compete based on innovation rather than exploiting cheap labor while at the same time a toilet cleaner in the US wont be getting paid more than a Phd Rocket Scientist in China (as it is now)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    71. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      But if USD vs JPY is 1:114, and Japan has a strong economy, isn't that a set up for one heck of an imbalance?

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    72. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by mvfranz · · Score: 1

      What are the reason for a stronger dollar? If these are all good reasons, why hasn't the US government tried to weaken the dollar years ago? I think, in general, having a stronger currency is better than a weaker one.

    73. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      The problem with that reasoning is that you assume Chinese labor standards and living standards are static and will remain static. As more and more Chinese are getting rich from running export factories there is a trickledown effect and Chinese are becoming richer. Further they have a strict 1 child policy so their population will start falling soon and the shortage of labor will be at an exponential rate. So this phenomenon of cheap Chinese imports is a temporary one and soon there wont be any differences in cost of labor between US and China. This is good as then companies can compete based on innovation rather than exploiting cheap labor while at the same time a toilet cleaner in the US wont be getting paid more than a Phd Rocket Scientist in China (as it is now)

      Well, "temporary" here likely means "not within our lifetime", thanks to the very sizable Chinese population, even assuming your analysis is correct. But I see little reason to believe your analysis is correct.

      You place far too much faith in the trickledown effect. That effect exists, but it's not a strong effect. One can examine the history of the U.S. itself to see this. It wasn't until after fairly strong labor laws were passed in the U.S. that the middle class started to grow to the relatively large size it is now (and it's in decline even now). Prior to that, wealth was highly concentrated in the hands of very few people. Much like the direction we're going now, actually.

      But China is a police state. There are no unions. Those in power control the country with a gloved iron hand, so there will never be unions, or strict labor laws, or anything of the sort that takes power away from those who already hold it. This is a marked difference from the historical situation in the U.S., where even the poor could still vote and could, at the time, exert influence over the political process. In China, the average person has no influence at all, and I see no reason at all for that to change.

      That difference is crucial. If the average person cannot gain a voice in his daily lot in life, then the middle class cannot grow and any trickle down effect will be minimized, if not eliminated outright. This will keep labor costs to a minimum because as I've said before, you cannot get labor any cheaper than slave labor. This makes China as a country more competitive than other countries, which gives it more wealth and control over the world than it would otherwise have, so that situation is very much in the interests of those who hold power in China. In other words, there's every incentive to keep things that way and no incentive to change it.

      This is what the U.S. (and the rest of the world's, for that matter) labor pool has to compete against, and there's no way for it to be anything other than a losing proposition in the end, even for those who own and run the big corporate conglomerates, because eventually they'll have few people to sell their goods to.

      The existence of the middle class is crucial to the healthy functioning of the economy, because the middle class represents the proper balance between labor costs and standard of living. Remember that a person's standard of living is determined by the amount of resources he commands in excess of that barely necessary to survive. Slave labor by definition has a minimum standard of living, which is why it's cheaper than any other form of labor.

      Those who hold power rarely share that power willingly. Similarly, those who hold wealth rarely share it willingly. But sharing wealth is exactly what drives economies, and is why a strong middle class is the most beneficial to the economy. Because of the reluctance to share power and wealth, a strong middle class cannot come into being on its own. It only happens as a result of the ability of the average person to affect the political process, which can only happen in relatively free countries. That means it cannot, and thus will not, happen in China.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    74. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by joshv · · Score: 1

      Modern plants have become so highly automated that labor costs are a minor portion of production costs. This is why many Asian car manufacturers build their cars here, despite higher labor costs, other costs simply outweigh the benefits of lower labor costs.

      "Not everyone can be middle class when the factories require cheap grunt work. "

      Sure they can, when the owners of the factory share some of the profits. Witness Germany. Blue collar workers are well respected and have a high standard of living.

      "Returning to an industrial society is not a viable goal for the U.S."

      I am afraid we must re-industrialize. World wide labor costs will eventually equalize (dollar devaluation is a step in that direction), and it will become simply too expensive to import everything. If we had a lack indigenous raw materials you might have an argument, but we've got most of what we need to make most things, right here, in the US.

    75. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by joshv · · Score: 1

      "The problem is: that won't happen until the US dollar falls so much that one man-hour of US labor costs less than one man-hour of Chinese labor. The cost of that one man-hour of Chinese labor is largely the result of the fact that said labor is largely (though not always, of course) slave labor. Slave labor is the cheapest labor possible because a slave's standard of living is, by force, barely subsistence level -- in other words just enough to enable said laborer to work and no more."

      You assume that labor is the only cost involved in making a product. Most processes are highly automated these days, so once you account for the sunk cost of the plant, material, energy and transportation costs dominate.

      What happens to material, energy and transportation costs when the dollar devalues? Well, if you are purchasing from foreign countries, in US dollars, you have to pay more. But if you buy materials mined and processed in the US, energy derived from US coal or nuclear, and only have to transport your goods within the US, your costs don't rise. Even with higher labor costs you can still be competitive with foreign producers.

    76. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Where does this figure come from? Its certainly not a per-employee figure

      2005 Manufacturing:

      USA $1.79 Trillion
      Japan $990 Billion

      As reported by CBS News on Dec 06th, 2006

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    77. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, there is no meaning to the numbers in the ratio.

      If you go and get your dollars exchanged into yen, you will get 114 times as many yen.

    78. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by joshv · · Score: 1

      "Well, "temporary" here likely means "not within our lifetime", thanks to the very sizable Chinese population, even assuming your analysis is correct. But I see little reason to believe your analysis is correct."

      It took about 30 years in Japan.

    79. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      It took about 30 years in Japan.

      But Japan has a much, much smaller population relative to the rest of the world, so any trickle down effects would take much less time to occur. It also has had a democratic form of government during all that time, which means the average person has had some influence over the political process.

      You can't draw conclusions about the development of a totalitarian state from the developmental results of a democratic state, because the amount of influence the average person has is generally vastly different between the two. That difference is crucial.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    80. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      You assume that labor is the only cost involved in making a product. Most processes are highly automated these days, so once you account for the sunk cost of the plant, material, energy and transportation costs dominate.

      You need to think this through.

      Trace any transaction all the way back as far as it goes. What you'll find in the end is someone doing work. Human labor, in other words.

      The cost of energy isn't in the materials, it's in the human labor required to extract those materials, convert them to a usable form, and convert that to energy. The same thing is true of the plant. The cost of the plant isn't the cost of the materials that comprise it, but the cost of the labor required to extract those materials, transform them into something you can build a plant out of, and to put the plant together.

      The cost of transportation isn't the cost of the fuel, it's the cost of the labor to extract the raw materials, the cost of the labor to transform them to fuel, the cost of the labor necessary to build the plant that accomplishes that, and the cost of the labor to make use of it (to drive the vehicles, to manage them, etc.).

      Every single transaction thread ultimately terminates in human labor.

      So ultimately, labor is the only cost in producing a product. It's just that much of that labor is indirectly paid for. That is, you don't directly see the labor involved. But it's there.

      And so, my statement about slave labor is much more relevant than you might otherwise think.

      Oh, and the costs of automation? That's the human labor required to engineer, build, and manage that automation.

      Automation is quite a different beast from cheap labor, by the way. Automation is a human labor multiplier, and is the only thing (aside, perhaps, from specialization) that significantly raises the average quality of life, and is by far the largest human labor multiplier we have. It's the biggest reason the average quality of life is so much higher for technologically advanced countries than for technologically backwards countries, and is almost solely responsible for the improvement in the quality of life over time.

      Automation is one of the big reasons I favor a relatively large minimum wage. A large minimum wage increases the incentive to automate, which ultimately reduces the real cost (man-hours) of producing a good, and thus increases the average quality of life.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    81. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I am really curious who is sneaking out of Canada into US to work for $4 an hour.
      Sounds deviously clever.
      Especially if, for example in Vancouver, a dishwasher job pays $8-10 an hour.


      I was talking about the "other" US borders. There are few "snowbacks" in the US. Mexico does not have the generous minimum wage laws that we enjoy in the US and Canada.

      Note and disclaimer: I feel comfortable calling them snowbacks as that is a term I picked up from an illegal Canadian who married my downstairs neighbor to gain legality. If you feel it's just a modified racial slur against our neighbors to the south, it's not. My wife and child are dependents from those that crossed from the south.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    82. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by joshv · · Score: 1

      Oil, gas and nuclear fuels have stored potential energy. Sure, they have to be mined and refined, but the number of people required to accomplish this for a particular unit of energy has fallen exponentially.

      "The cost of transportation isn't the cost of the fuel, it's the cost of the labor to extract the raw materials, the cost of the labor to transform them to fuel, the cost of the labor necessary to build the plant that accomplishes that, and the cost of the labor to make use of it (to drive the vehicles, to manage them, etc.)."

      No, the cost of labor to extract the materials is the cost of labor to extract the materials. The cost of transportation, on any large scale, is mainly dictated by the cost of fuel. Shipping jets are flown by a few people consuming thousands of gallons of jet fuel an hour. I don't think their salaries come close in comparison.

      "Every single transaction thread ultimately terminates in human labor."

      Except when it terminates in stored chemical or nuclear energy, or with captured solar energy.

    83. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      Oil, gas and nuclear fuels have stored potential energy. Sure, they have to be mined and refined, but the number of people required to accomplish this for a particular unit of energy has fallen exponentially.

      If the number of total man-hours per unit of extracted energy has fallen without a corresponding drop in the price, then there is some other market force at work which is artificially propping the price up.

      No, the cost of labor to extract the materials is the cost of labor to extract the materials. The cost of transportation, on any large scale, is mainly dictated by the cost of fuel. Shipping jets are flown by a few people consuming thousands of gallons of jet fuel an hour. I don't think their salaries come close in comparison.

      You're not getting my point.

      The cost of fuel is the cost of the labor required to acquire the raw materials, process them into usable fuel, distribute that fuel to outlets, pay for administration, etc. The fuel itself isn't what you're paying for -- you're paying for all the labor that went into the production and distribution of that fuel, plus any market inefficiencies (which you get as a result of cartels and such).

      If that were not so, then the price of a good in a competitive market would be independent of the amount of labor required to product that good -- in other words, it would be independent of the amount of automation used to produce that good. But instead, we see the opposite: the more automation is used to produce a good in a competitive market, the less expensive that good becomes.

      If producing and providing a particular fuel required no labor at all (which means no equipment, no automation, or anything -- the fuel just magically appears at the customer's location at the customer's request), then the price of that fuel in a competitive market would be, basically, zero. Of course, there is no such thing -- there's always human labor involved, if only to handle the transaction between customer and provider. But the less human labor involved in providing a good or service in a competitive market, the less expensive said good or service will be in that competitive market.

      So the cost of the fuel is the cost of the labor required to produce that fuel. The cost of transportation is the cost of the fuel plus the cost of the transportation equipment plus the labor required to perform the transportation. And the cost of the transportation equipment is the cost of the labor required to produce that equipment (which includes acquisition of raw materials, conversion into usable form, etc.).

      Your mistake is to assume that goods and services have intrinsic value in a competitive market. But a competitive market makes that false by definition.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    84. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Chinese are definitely getting richer. You only have to visit any Chinese city to find that out. Sure not everyone is getting rich equally but we have a name for everyone having the same amount of wealth- its called communism and whatever China is it is definitely not communist, hell its more capitalist than the US they dont even allow trade unions.
      And once people get rich they tend to demand other kinds of rights and get them too. For example look at the Blacks and Women in the USA. Till just a few years back they couldnt vote in the US nor could the poor who could not afford poll taxes. But they were allowed economic freedom by the rich white New England and California nobility and once they had enough economic power they used that as a base to demand political power too and got it. I dont think China will be any different. The references to slave labor are somewhat disingenous and hypocritical. What China does is use prisoners for working in factories without pay but so does the US- a lot of made in USA products would not be as cheap if they were not being produced by prison labor who get paid cents a day. And USA imprisons a far larger proportion of its population than China does (though thats probably because China executes a lot more than it incarcerates ). So slave labor apart there is cheap labor in China where people from the countryside move to the cities and work cheaply by city standards as it is still better than the village but they dont do it for long as they move on to better opportunities. Now till now there has been a continuing pool of villagers to replenish the workforce but now as development is finally reaching the western provinces the pool is drying out and salaries are rising in China. Salaries in Chinese factories have risen at 2 or 3 times the rate in US factories over the last 10 years and its simple math that the salaries and living standards will catch up. The joker in the pack is the 1 child policy which will speed up this phase for China and they will take a far shorter time than US took to make the transition.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    85. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Gen.Anti · · Score: 1

      Very interesting, though neither China nor US are ideally competitive markets, neither the international trade is (at least not on the financial "level"). I can't also help thinking that you should specifically explain the military power balance (at least, if you discuss fuel at particular) in terms of labor and check if the approach still works.

    86. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      Very interesting, though neither China nor US are ideally competitive markets, neither the international trade is (at least not on the financial "level"). I can't also help thinking that you should specifically explain the military power balance (at least, if you discuss fuel at particular) in terms of labor and check if the approach still works.

      Well, the use of the military to secure natural resources obviously adds to the cost (and what you're paying for in terms of the military is in the end all labor, too, just like everything else), but the problem there is that the military is paid for completely separately (and at gunpoint, at that), so the amount of additional cost it represents winds up being hidden from the end buyer, though he generally still winds up paying it one way or the other (that will depend on how much, if any, federal taxes he has to pay).

      But all of that really detracts from the primary point, which is that money is a representation of human labor, and the human labor costs are what matter in the end, and that the total human labor costs of a slave are lower than for any other kind and therefore it's folly to attempt to compete against slave labor. If you attempt to compete against slave labor you will lose in the end one way or the other, so the only thing you can do is slap massive tariffs on anything that was produced with slave labor so that purchasers in your market will gravitate towards products that were made using labor that operates under the relatively strict labor laws that have made the middle class strong.

      The total number of man-hours of work available to the economy on a per-person basis is roughly the same whether it's slave labor or not (slaves can be forced to give you more man-hours per day than non-slaves, so they win slightly in that respect, too, but it's not a massive win). The only difference is how much of a labor exchange (which is usually represented by money) the laborer gets in return for his labor. In all societies, the closer an individual is to the top of the "food chain", the greater the amount of labor (money or otherwise) he receives in exchange for the labor he gives. In a society with strong labor laws, the distribution of this wealth tends to be more even than in societies that lack such laws.

      The U.S. is going in the wrong direction in this regard, with greater and greater wealth being concentrated towards the top. Improvements in technology (which have the effect of multiplying the effects of labor) would cause this to happen in almost all cases regardless, and have managed to at least allow those towards the bottom to more or less stay where they are if not improve their lot somewhat, but the improvement in the lot of those at the bottom is less than the improvement in technology. Worse, the size of the middle class in the U.S. is shrinking, with most of that shrinkage transferring people out of the middle class and into the poor. In short, the middle class is getting poorer, not richer, while the very rich get very much richer -- the rich are getting richer at a pace that outstrips the rate of technological improvement, and that can only happen if someone else is getting poorer in a real sense.

      I think that situation is very strongly tied towards the general direction the country as a whole is going: towards fascism, and towards totalitarianism as well (though the resulting form of totalitarianism may wind up being something new).

      The ultimate point to be taken from all this is simple: once you factor technological advancement out, economics is a zero-sum game on a per-person basis, because economics is ultimately about the exchange of human labor, and technology is the only thing that significantly increases the productive output that an individual can generate per unit time. That means that generally speaking, once you factor out technological improvement, for one person to get richer, someone else must get poorer.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    87. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Gen.Anti · · Score: 1

      Thank you for all your thoughts. I'd like to comment on the general issues of money, labor, power and fear. (Hardly pleasant subjects ;-) ).

      I keep thinking about how different people would be willing to fight in a war over something. Consider the Middle-Eastern suicidal fanatics and their _rich_ sponsors. This is similar but different than the suppossed Chinese slave labor and the rich Chinese businessmen (the difference being the Chinese worker's will to live, and a fanatic's will to die), but my point would be that the difference of attitudes might possibly be explained though theoretical labor that was or was not done by or in relation to their ancestors. Such an approach probably wouldn't be reasonable. It's even worse if you have to account for the pure luck of someone being in the situation of controlling an area with natural resources, which in the case of a state and its depended organizations means both presence at a location and power to keep it. It's relevant, because a group of insane lazy maniacs with cheap guns can dictate prices to peaceful and productive (or how to define productive) people who also have other interests beyond this trade.

      If you are robbed by a man with a gun... It's kind of an effort for both of you, and money changes hands. What kind of labor is that? The money in his pocket represents your yielding to a threat. When you institute tariffs on imports, you (some group of people) compete on a psychological, but eventually military level against other group within your country that would rather have those cheap foreign goods, and against the other country which you deprive of access. Now to take this to the extreme: this is what you say made the middle class strong. I would tend to think that power games were not what made the middle class strong: in the meaning that Soviets--to try to find an example--had been terrorizing the other half of the world for many years, yet had not developed strong middle class...

    88. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Geminii · · Score: 1
      * American products become cheaper to foreign markets


      I got some spare change. Might get me a couple of senators.

    89. Re:Benefits to a cheaper dollar by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... there is no meaning to the numbers in the ratio ...

      So what dies that do to the meaning of this article???

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  10. Re:There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" j by gn0min0mic0n · · Score: 1

    And just think: when the plans for the North American Union are finalized, we can add the power of the Peso to our combined economy, which will unite us all under the shadow of the Amero!

    --
    What is understood, need not be discussed.
  11. How strange by ohzero · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was just up there for a conference, and I stayed in the Royal Hotel. I hope this isn't all my fault.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
    1. Re:How strange by zCyl · · Score: 1

      ... Exactly how big was your room service bill?

    2. Re:How strange by ohzero · · Score: 1

      The partner and customer dinners were pretty significant. But I think what really drove it over the top was the fact that it was a payment card industry conference. Gotta watch those interest rates. :)

      --
      -- http://www.criticalassets.com
  12. The glass is half full or half empty? by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another way of looking at this is that the US dollar is in freefall against the Euro and other major currencies. The shift between the US and Canadian dollars reflects this new reality. That said, I suspect Forex traders are caught up in the euphoria of parity. The Canadian dollar might well dip significantly below $1 American again as the rush of breathless media attention dries up and currency traders take their profits and run. This certainly isn't good news for Canadian manufacturers - I run a little electronics company that sells 90% of our goods in the USA. We have raised some prices by as much as 30% over the past five years, just to maintain margins. However, our customers don't necessarily see it that way - they think we're getting greedy. To keep things from getting out of hand, we've moved some production to China and started to source North American components in the USA, rather than dealing with Canadian distributors. That's not good news for our economy.

    1. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by rockabilly · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, its not so great when you have the largest market in the world and all other countries use your dollar as the defacto standard, comparing theirs to yours.

      By dropping your own standards, you create instability in the marketplace since there is no longer a stable standard to reference.

      This is also why the price of gold has skyrocketed. People tend to fall on to precious metals as a form of stability in situations like this.

    2. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another way of looking at this is that the US dollar is in freefall against the Euro and other major currencies. The shift between the US and Canadian dollars reflects this new reality. That said, I suspect Forex traders are caught up in the euphoria of parity. The Canadian dollar might well dip significantly below $1 American again as the rush of breathless media attention dries up and currency traders take their profits and run. This certainly isn't good news for Canadian manufacturers - I run a little electronics company that sells 90% of our goods in the USA. We have raised some prices by as much as 30% over the past five years, just to maintain margins. However, our customers don't necessarily see it that way - they think we're getting greedy. To keep things from getting out of hand, we've moved some production to China and started to source North American components in the USA, rather than dealing with Canadian distributors. That's not good news for our economy.

      Primary resources have been our #1 industry (Oil, Wood, uranium etc..). The increase in dollar values hurt manufacturing most as many of the primary resources we export are constantly in high demand and will not diminish in a linear relationship to price. It's a toss up at how the increased dollar will effect us. It may not be negative uniformly. It is detrimental to the manufacturing industry but that industry has always been secondary and heavily concentrated in Ontario. It might diminish prosperity in Ontario but it will increase prosperity in the west.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company that I used to work for had that same impression, and they are still marketing to the US, however all prices have been converted and advertised in Canadian Dollars, to maintain the image of a stable price. (They did the switchover over Christmas)

      And I am seeing more and more places avoiding pricing and conversion equivalents to USD because it's purely psycological -- even if the dollars are at parity -- people will perceive something costing $700CDN cheaper than $700USD because that's the way it's always been. It will be a while for the reality that the US dollar is as weak as it is to sink into the majority of the purchasing market.

    4. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Increase prosperity in the west, which in almost all urban centres, has the most inflated land, housing and resource prices anywhere in Canada?

      Sure, if we continue to let the west sell off our resources to the highest bidder and pocket all the profit.

      Things are not heading in a good direction in Canada. It's mostly foreign interests that are walking off with the money from our resources we're basically giving away. Example: Gas prices in BC are consistently amongst the highest in Canada...but the oil we're allowing to be pillaged is right next door. Tell me that makes any bloody sense whatsoever.

      We are not in control of our resources whatsoever and this is not a good thing. It's the wild west right now, and the 'gold mines' are already starting to dry up. Taken a look at satellite images of northern Alberta recently? Compared to 5 years ago? Yeah, almost 1/4 of Alberta has been visibly scarred by strip mining for oil in FIVE YEARS.

      It is a vast mistake to look at this as if our dollar has risen...it hasn't. The USD has fallen. There is a big difference. We're heading for a recession like we've never seen before, and this time, we won't have the resources left to easily sell off to bail ourselves out.

      Grr. I love my country, but there's not going to be much left of it if we let things continue on the way they are.

      --
      No Comment.
    5. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Increase prosperity in the west, which in almost all urban centers, has the most inflated land, housing and resource prices anywhere in Canada? Prices in Edmonton and Calgary are nowhere close to the prices in Toronto but on par with Ottawa. Vancouver is the highest overall but being a mild climate with a coastal view it's on par with cities along the coast.

      Sure, if we continue to let the west sell off our resources to the highest bidder and pocket all the profit. Constitutionally all resources are provincial. So you have no choice. The only thing to be done is transfer payments and income tax which redistributes the wealth. You can't do much more then that without sparking another western populist revolt.

      ?We are not in control of our resources whatsoever and this is not a good thing. It's the wild west right now, and the 'gold mines' are already starting to dry up. Taken a look at satellite images of northern Alberta recently? Compared to 5 years ago? Yeah, almost 1/4 of Alberta has been visibly scarred by strip mining for oil in FIVE YEARS. Projections are that we can exist at current capacity for another 400 years. The increase in activity is not a increase in exploration with a level capacity like int he middle east but instead simply expanding capacity. In the last 5 the tar sands have dramatically increase output. We do sit on 33% of the world oil supply. The US and the middle east is less then what we have, and we have a better social and economic infrastructure to get at it then Venezuela's 33% (venezuala and Canada make up 66% of the worlds known oil supply).

      It is a vast mistake to look at this as if our dollar has risen...it hasn't. The USD has fallen. There is a big difference. We're heading for a recession like we've never seen before, and this time, we won't have the resources left to easily sell off to bail ourselves out. Due to a strong over all economy out dollar has risen slightly against most other currencies as well. The free falling US dollar just makes it more dramatic.

      Grr. I love my country, but there's not going to be much left of it if we let things continue on the way they are. It's generally been a good 2 decades for Canada. You want that to change?
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      It's been a good 2 decades for Canada yes. But if you really believe it'll last for 400 years...you've been snowballed completely. That number isn't even remotely based in fact whatsoever. That's just the comparative line to 'Just a little pin prick, won't last a moment...'

      --
      No Comment.
    7. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Considering the reserve is 33% of the worlds reserves (multiple independent sources) and that our current utilization is very low, we have some time. 400 might be big. Might be closer to 120 with growth in capacity. Still 80 more then what is projected for the middle east.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    8. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Show me something with some substance that says we're going to run out of oil in Canada anytime in the near future. Remember, Saskatchewan has barely started development of its northern oil sands, and then there's a big find in SE Saskatchewan as well. Sure, there's a lot going on up north, but they are no where near exhausting the supplies... hell they're still expanding the projects because there is so much supply.

    9. Re:The glass is half full or half empty? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself, but figured I should provide a source:

      "At rate of production projected for 2015, about 3 million barrels per day, the Athabasca oil sands reserves would last over 400 years."

      Thats from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_Tar_Sands

      We're not going to run out of oil in Canada for a LONG time.

  13. Oh dear, by dwalsh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... all the Slashdotters who were moving to Canada to escape their totalitarian state will be whining about how dear everything is up there now.

    You did all move to Canada right?

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:Oh dear, by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Funny

      .. all the Slashdotters who were moving to Canada to escape their totalitarian state will be whining about how dear everything is up there now. You did all move to Canada right?

      Apparently, it was just the ones that can do math.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    2. Re:Oh dear, by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      You know, umm, those that moved up there are now earning CAD and so all the geek stuff their buying in the US is getting cheaper by the day so ... yeah!

      ]{

    3. Re:Oh dear, by dwalsh · · Score: 1

      But their savings are in US$ and their income is in US$ too 'cos they didn't move, 'cos they didn't do anything about it, same as no-one is doing anything about the underlying issues they threatened to move over, 'cos they are scared, and now I have have no Slashdot karma 'cos of poor moderation, 'cos no-one got it but I am not worried about moderation any more 'cos there is no moderation specifically for having a run-on sentence.

      --
      ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  14. U.S. Dollar to Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate by dsmark · · Score: 1, Redundant
  15. Book Prices? by senor_burt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can the book publishers start to change their book prices, then? It made sense before when they priced them out relative to currency, but at this point, to spend $32 CDN versus $21 USD for the same book, well, as far as I'm concerned, Canadian book vendors are going to go out of business as I start to buy more from Amazon.com rather than Amazon.ca - and Amazon.com frequently offers free shipping.

    1. Re:Book Prices? by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      Keen thought.
      I was thinking it would be about time to order some stuff from the USA that I'd put off, but I'm going to have to keep an eye open for things like books that have two fixed prices - so long as it's not something like vehicles that gets taxed so hard in Canada to cancel out any saving.

      I always get a chuckle out of video game magazines with demo discs - like I'm going to pay $15 for a monthly newsrag and some demos, haha...

    2. Re:Book Prices? by mousdahl · · Score: 1

      A couple of the comic shops I go to have already started charging me the US price listed on the back. Mighty kind of 'em, I think.

    3. Re:Book Prices? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Just don't expect the price of anything in Canada to drop - greed lives on...

    4. Re:Book Prices? by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're in a tough position: They bought that stock with non-par currency, and are now eating the cost of the rising CAD to keep customers happy. As a small business, they don't have a lot of cash reserves to wait out the inventory turns until they're purchasing at par as well.

      If you want to support them, thank them for the offer, and then pay the full CAD price, at least for the next couple months.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    5. Re:Book Prices? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It will, if Canadians start shopping in the states, which even some members of government are suggesting if Canadian retailers continue stealing money from consumers. It will be good news for border towns like Bellingham, WA where the town went into a bit of an economic freefall when the Canadian dollar really began its dive in the late 80s.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Book Prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that books usually have the price listed in both US and Canadian dollars, I wonder if I could walk into Chapters and demand that they ring up the American price on the book. I would imagine that they would have to legally do this or get nailed with false advertising. FYI, IANAL.

    7. Re:Book Prices? by senor_burt · · Score: 1

      Well, the price to produce the book hasn't changed. Most of the books I own with CDN and US prices are printed in the US. I'll acknowledge additional shipping expenses can be tacked on to the price, but it is just gouging to mark it up by 30%, plus CDN taxes - when I can buy it for the US price, without taxes. If publishing houses and Canadian book stores can't change their model, well, then they're going to lose my business. There is simply no justification for the markup.

    8. Re:Book Prices? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I think you're mistaken; this has nothing to do with production costs, and everything to do with the change in the relative value of the currencies involved. The comic store bought from a distributor who charged them a price based on the difference in currency 3-6 months ago at least--the comics store isn't the one establishing the difference in price due to non-par currencies, it was established long before it got to them. By selling now at par, they're the one eating that difference in price rather than the customer.

      Ultimately, that market will decide, and a comics store that sells at par is taking a hard step to keep their customers until the situation works itself out. But don't kid yourself that the comic store isn't suffering from the change in the value of the CAD against the USD by doing this, and as a small business, that suffering can be fatal.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    9. Re:Book Prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, there are laws about the pricing of books (dual priced books must be within some percentage of the actual conversion rate at the time of printing), but you must remember that books are priced when they are printed, and then bought at that price. How the dollar changes since the books printing cannot affect the actual number of dollars paid for it.

      If a $20CDN book was paid $15CDN for, and the dollar appreciates, so that the cover price of $14USD/$20CDN no longer makes sense, you cannot expect for the store to begin selling the book at a loss because the currency has since changed. Same would be the effect later on should the US dollar do better. Newer books will have a $14USD/$14CAD pricing, and if the $14USD is now worth $20CAD, they can't really change the pre-printed value to make more money.

    10. Re:Book Prices? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      One clarification to my point below: this situation is caused by the lag in production with respect to changing currency exchange rates, and will shortly work itself out by bring the CAD price closer to or identical with the USD price. But there's an unavoidable lag, and someone eats that cost. And it's the nature of business that it gets passed down to the smallest, least powerful player.

      My suggestion is simply that, if you want to help out the small businessman who serves you directly, and who's suffering from a larger economic effect than he can meaningfully affect, you can do so with relatively minor pain by paying the higher price for a short time.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    11. Re:Book Prices? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      In a word, no.

      The dual price actually means that in Canada, you pay the Canadian price; and in the US, you pay the US price. This is established as fair advertising.

      Besides, if they rang up the US price, would you expect them to take US currency? They don't have to do that ever.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    12. Re:Book Prices? by senor_burt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > this has nothing to do with production costs, and everything to do with the change in the relative value of the currencies
      That was my point exactly. The only way I would accept the deviation in pricing is if they were produced by Canadian printers at a higher cost due to lower production runs.

      Well to be fair the pricing reflects a CDN $ at $0.65 - which it hasn't been in a long time. I've spot-checked my books, which span from the 1980's to now (the ones I checked - I've got plenty predating 1980) - you're right, that currency does seem to play a bit of a role in pricing, but it is updated VERY slowly - pre 1997 books, I can understand. But post-1997, with the option to buy online at currency value, well,

      Here's an example:
      K&R's C Programming Language in Amazon.com is $40 (rounded)
      http://www.amazon.com/C-Programming-Language-2nd/dp/0131103628/ref=pd_bbs_2/105-0648757-4344429?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190309328&sr=8-2

      The same book from Amazon.ca is $60 (rounded)
      http://www.amazon.ca/Programming-Language-Brian-W-Kernighan/dp/0131103628/ref=sr_1_1/701-4896514-8538726?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190309304&sr=8-1

      Both are shipped free.

      Why, as a consumer, would I spend $20 more for the same book? In today's world, it makes no sense for books which have currency-based price deviations to have static prices, or prices updated so slowly.

      I'm sorry that the small store suffers - $20 more in my pocket means that I've got disposable income to spend - or invest - elsewhere. It's the publishing houses which pocket the difference - I can't imagine how the book stores take a larger margin. The Canadian book and comic stores need to petition the publishing houses to have a more sensible and more dynamic pricing strategy. I don't mind if their prices are out of date if it's a small deviation, but raising prices by 30% which doesn't reflect the currency state for quite some time.

      I don't know how the publishing houses would reflect currency rates for books already in stock - as a consumer, I hate to say that this is just not my problem. I would buy Canadian if the price was equitable, but only a fool would spend 30% more as a matter of national pride, when a more sensible corporate policy could address this. They've been pocketing the currency difference for years - sorry, but with the internet, they've got to change their business model if they want to keep their Canadian stores open.

      For comics, which are produced monthly (more or less), they can update the pricing accordingly - who knows what they can do for subscriptions, but that's their problem.

    13. Re:Book Prices? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about mon-and-pop outfits here. We're talking about big retailers; Sears, the Bay, Chapters, car dealers and the like. You always expect to pay more at a small mom-and-pop bookstore, and I do sometimes take my business that way. But folks' blood is boiling because they can go to an American web page and see the product they want at substantially less money then the identical product in Canada, despite the Canadian dollar being close to par (and probably stabilizing at or above par within the next week or two).

      To a certain extent one can buy the "We've got this inventory we bought when the Canadian dollar was at xx% of the US dollar", but it's not like the Canadian dollar just started performing well in comparison to the US dollar yesterday. This has been a trend going on for some time, and if you have a ton of inventory left over from when the Canadian dollar was 0.85 USD, then I'd suggest your a crappy business, and deserve to go broke.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Book Prices? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The storekeepers in Bellingham say that the expected surge of Canadian dollars has been subdued thus far, due to the fact that Canadians loathe the long lines at the border. 2 hrs or more of waiting during peak times plus over-inquisitive border patrol agents tend to drive away business.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    15. Re:Book Prices? by dargon · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was just announced (here in Calgary anyway) that book publishers are going to be looking at their prices and adjusting them every few months (I think it was 3, but I can't find the link right now.

    16. Re:Book Prices? by debest · · Score: 1

      They bought that stock with non-par currency

      I hold in my hand a copy of "Asterisk: The Future of Telephony (2nd edition)" by O'Reilly. Published last month, delivered a couple of weeks ago. The dollar was 0.95 to 0.96 at the time of publication.

      The price printed on the back is $44.99US, $53.99CDN. Thats 83 cents on the dollar. How does that make sense?
      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    17. Re:Book Prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am thinking I should go an get some US dollars and buy some O'Reilly books at my local book store. They'll say oh that'll be $65.00 and I'll say oh, wait I have US, so what is the US price... um $40.00 you say... perfect :)

    18. Re:Book Prices? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I don't work in publishing, and I don't intend to defend the book industry from charges of price gouging (of which they've been repeatedly guilty in the past), but I remember an O'Reilly blogger talking about the production pipeline for their books being at around six months long.

      I know from my own experience in plastics manufacturing that once production decisions are made, mid-stream changes are costly and difficult and typically avoided if at all possible. It wouldn't surprise me to find that the price differential was set when the dollar was $0.85, the artwork committed, and the printing presses rolling. Last month's exchange rate is probably two or three months too late to make a non-costly change in the publishing of the book.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    19. Re:Book Prices? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Print on demand publishing would certainly be an answer to this sort of problem, though.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    20. Re:Book Prices? by isaac · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, nobody's discovered the Aldergrove/Lynden and Abbotsford/Sumas crossings.

      Peace Arch and Blaine are for chumps.

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    21. Re:Book Prices? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that they're doing roadwork for the road to Lynden for the next 2 years. Sumas will be the only wide open road, but it's too far for me since I tend to go to Vancouver proper for the most part.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  16. In other news... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    In other news, Apple stock soared on the account that Canadians only spend their dollars on Macs!

    1. Re:In other news... by milwcoder · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, PCs running Windows and Linux is also cheapened by the same percentage.

  17. Here you have a graph: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. We need a northern wall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or our culture may be destroyed.

    They speak a different version of the english language (and even French) and we let their trucks on our roads.

    We allow their rampant bacon and beer imports despite their higher labor and environmental standards.

    Their people are infuriatingly polite and respectful and I think they may be benefiting from global warming.

    I fear we are building our wall on the wrong border.

  19. Remember the good old days, Yen versus Dollar? by Shivetya · · Score: 0

    Whose economy tanked? Japan's.

    The dollar has always been overvalued. Yet the doom and gloom isn't for the US when the dollar's value comes down, its usually for the other side. Usually its the other side who does the majority of exporting. Exporters to the US will take it on the chin.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Remember the good old days, Yen versus Dollar? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      But if the US dollar is the only one tanking, and they don't actually produce the products themselves, they have no choice but to buy it form outside the country.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Remember the good old days, Yen versus Dollar? by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      The other choice is to not buy it at all.

      Don't make the mistake of assuming economic transactions will occur at the same rate even if conditions change.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    3. Re:Remember the good old days, Yen versus Dollar? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Thats all fine and dandy if you have the ability to sustain yourself, but as far as I know the US relies heavily on imports to keep going.

  20. Sorry but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to break it up to canadians, but as a european, I still haven't seen computer prices reflect the 1:1.4 ratio between the us$ and the euro, nearly all prices are translated 1 us$ : 1 euro, and it really sucks.

  21. Price difference... by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, for instance, a Honda Goldwing is US$20'000 and CAD$30'000, same thing for almost all cars, especially sports car like the WRX STi or others...

    It's time we all go shopping in USA, I live in Montréal so I am 45 minutes from NY state and often go to Plattsburgh or even Burlington in VT, just to buy stuff sometimes 60% cheaper than here.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Price difference... by yanos · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I just bough a nice pair of headphones, a pair of Grado SR80. They are 95USD / 150CND. That made sense some time ago but now it's just ridiculous. I'm all for buying from local stores but even when you factor shipping and duty charges I ended up saving about 35$ by ordering them from a US online store.

    2. Re:Price difference... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I just bough a nice pair of headphones, a pair of Grado SR80. They are 95USD / 150CND. That made sense some time ago but now it's just ridiculous. I'm all for buying from local stores but even when you factor shipping and duty charges I ended up saving about 35$ by ordering them from a US online store.


      And I recommend as many Canadians as possible do precisely that. Don't buy books from Chapters, go to amazon.com. Don't buy a car in Canada, head down south (and don't buy into the bullshit about GM Canada not honoring warranties, greedy Canadian retailers are really starting to spread the FUD to justify theft). For those living close to the border, go grocery shopping south of it.

      A real irony of this is that it will likely kill those goofy plans to restrict cross-border movement between Canada and the US. US retailers could see a real boon if Congress doesn't fuck it up.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Price difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US retailers won't see a real boon because Congress will fuck it up.

      FIXED.

    4. Re:Price difference... by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate here: For a while, I believe, the average Canadian income in CDN has been "higher" than the average American income in USD. That is, the average Canadian income may be something like 40,000CDN while the average American income may be something like 30,000USD (I don't know the actual numbers but those sound vaguely familiar). When the loonie was low these would be more or less equal once the currency conversion is done. But now with the higher loonie, the average Canadian income really is higher.

      So here's the point. Companies don't sell things at a fair price and strive to make prices equal to all people in all lands. They sell at the highest price they can. If goods cost more in Canada, that's just because Canadians make more and are willing to spend more. So it makes more sense to first look at the price of a car/computer/whatever as a percentage of the average income. If it's still higher, that just means the people there want it more.

      I recently moved from Canada to the UK, and I'm starting to get sick of people here bitching about how much electronics cost compared to in America. Well, no shit they cost more here, you Brits make twice as much money as they do. Might as well complain about how rice in your country costs more than it does in some random 3rd world country.

      I actually do believe all of what I just wrote. The reason why I calling it playing devil's advocate is that, despite what I just wrote, I too will be complaining if electronics and books still cost more in Canada by the time I move back there :)

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
  22. the way things are going... by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    it wont be long until the US Dollar reaches parity with the Mexican peso...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:the way things are going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an illegal alien joke in there somewhere.

  23. This has been going on near the border for years by Enlarged+to+Show+Tex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Various establishments (hotels, restaurants, etc) have been taking CAD at par for many years, although most of them stopped doing so once 1 CAD dropped below 0.75 USD (and there have been times in the past 10-12 years where it was as long as 0.59 USD/CAD. The only difference now is that soon those establishments that take CAD at par will start making money from the forex conversion instead of losing it... Also, here in Minnesota, Canadian coins have always been easy to spend as if they were US coins...

  24. Meanwhile by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, while I sit in Europe trying to irk my way through grad school living off of dollars I saved while I was in the army(and a part-time job doing IT stuff for a small business), I watch their value and my immediate standard of living drop.

    For everybody on a fixed income, including retirees and people like me, this sucks. Seriously, parity with the CAD? No, this is not a good thing.

    As for the idea that discouraging foreign workers is a good thing, might I ask in what universe you live in? Do you actually want to pay 25 bucks for a meal in a cheapish restaurant? That is what will happen if the immigrant labor leaves.

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:Meanwhile by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile, while I sit in Europe trying to irk my way through grad school living off of dollars I saved while I was in the army(and a part-time job doing IT stuff for a small business), I watch their value and my immediate standard of living drop.

      I'm sorry that has happened to you. Unfortunately, anytime the value of something changes, someone wins and someone loses. I know hindsight is 20/20, but how far did you expect to get living in Europe with US dollars in the bank? Why would you not change those over to Euros when you decided to live there?

      As for the idea that discouraging foreign workers is a good thing, might I ask in what universe you live in? Do you actually want to pay 25 bucks for a meal in a cheapish restaurant? That is what will happen if the immigrant labor leaves.

      I have no problem with immigrant labor. What I have a problem with is illegal immigrant labor. Sure, it helps me get a cheaper burger at Chili's, but when I have to pay $50 for an aspirin at a hospital, I figure I'm not saving all that much. Besides, slavery allowed for cheap food and clothing as well, but that doesn't make it right. When an illegal is working at a plantation.. I mean farm, they are more or less owned by that farm. Only instead of being shackled by chains, they are shackled with the thread of deportation or imprisonment. I expect foreign workers in the US to get a fair wage. When that worker is here illegally, enforcing minimum wage or any other labor laws is impossible.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Meanwhile by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, anytime the value of something changes, someone wins and someone loses. I know hindsight is 20/20, but how far did you expect to get living in Europe with US dollars in the bank? Why would you not change those over to Euros when you decided to live there?

      The real lesson here is the value of diversifying your investments. It's impossible to tell which currency is going to do better in the future. Therefore, it makes sense to hold assets denominated in all major currencies you have access to. Exchange rates are a zero-sum game, so if you get the proportions right, then every time one currency loses, well, you already hold an equivalent amount in assets of the currencies that won, so that, if you sell them and convert the proceeds to dollars, you get more dollars than you'd have gotten before the loss.

    3. Re:Meanwhile by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Why would you not change those over to Euros when you decided to live there?"

      If he had at the time, he would have made a 2x increase in his investment. I bought some euros about 8 months ago and am just holding onto them to see how much i can make.. same with some pesos (from a cruise i took) but that's not paying off as well as the euros. :(

    4. Re:Meanwhile by sholden · · Score: 1

      You're in grad school but you couldn't see that the US dollar was going to drop like a stone?

      It's been pretty obvious, for many years. It's amazing it's taken so long to get this far - the virtual printing presses have been running hot for a long time, there's a reason they stopped publishing M3 and it's got nothing to do with cost. And it's going to go further, much further if Bernanke keeps bailing out his mates in Wall Street.

      If your are living off savings and those savings are in a currency other than that of where you live you are playing the forex markets, if you don't want to gamble on them convert it when you move - that way your "income" in local currency won't change. If you want to bet on currency movements then keep it elsewhere - turns out you bet wrong.

      And yes for those with lots of their investment in US currency or US companies (other than those that have a lot of non-US revenue) this sucks. And it's going to suck harder before it gets better.

    5. Re:Meanwhile by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Exchange rates are a zero-sum game

      Except if you're smaller than a bank (like most individuals are), in which case you have to pay through the nose for someone else to handle the actual currency exchange for you. Then you have to weight the cost of a single currency transaction with the potential future gain from it, and... now you're a trader. And most traders don't make money.

    6. Re:Meanwhile by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with immigrant labor. What I have a problem with is illegal immigrant labor. Sure, it helps me get a cheaper burger at Chili's, but when I have to pay $50 for an aspirin at a hospital, I figure I'm not saving all that much.


      I'm all for raising the immigration quotas, and dealing with the illegal immigration problem by reforming our immigration system so that a reasonable path to immigration exists for the reasons you list. However, I have yet to see a single study that shows that illegal immigration has any perceptible effect upon the cost of healthcare. If you want to complain about the state of healthcare in the US, I'd turn to the corrupt insurance lobby.
      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  25. Don't forget the federal debt by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    That right, bond-holding suckers, we'll be paying back your 9 trillion dollars, just as soon as the dollar is worth so little that we can afford to do so. Crisis averted!

    1. Re:Don't forget the federal debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > That right, bond-holding suckers, we'll be paying back your 9 trillion dollars, just as soon as the dollar is worth so little that we can afford to do so. Crisis averted!

      Now do you understand why those of us who oppose Social Security describe the filing cabinet full of non-market-tradeable bonds as "worthless"?

      We never tried to argue that the US would renege on its promise to pay those bonds. Social Security will pay you every dollar you thought you were promised. Problem is, those dollars won't be able to purchase the toilet paper they'll be printed on.

  26. U.S. Economic Decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Currencies are adjusting to the prospect of a U.S. economic decline because of its non-competitiveness from the LACK of
    health care costs externalization through universal health care.

    1. Re:U.S. Economic Decline by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Currencies are adjusting to the prospect of a U.S. economic decline because of its non-competitiveness from the LACK of health care costs externalization through universal health care.

      So, there's economic decline when companies spend their money on employees' health care, but not when the government takes that money and spends it on employees' health care.

      Interesting.

    2. Re:U.S. Economic Decline by servognome · · Score: 1

      So, there's economic decline when companies spend their money on employees' health care, but not when the government takes that money and spends it on employees' health care.
      The idea is that government has the power to better manage health care costs since it also controls health care regulation. Government can pass laws to cap prices, litigation payments, etc. which private insurance companies cannot do.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:U.S. Economic Decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, there's economic decline when companies spend their money on employees' health care, but not when the government takes that money and spends it on employees' health care.

      There is economic decline when companies spend their (ie. the companies' money) on employees' health care, but not when the government takes the employees' money (ie. NOT the companies' money) and spends it on employee's health care. That's the difference between private and universal health care and why it makes us so much less competitive. Universal health care makes the PEOPLE pay for their health care via higher taxes and takes the burden off their employers. This is also true with public pensions.

    4. Re:U.S. Economic Decline by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like government health care is the way to go. Most of the industrialized world has been saying (and doing) that for years.

  27. Freefall.... by downix · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find it funny how it is always put "the Euro rsing against the dollar" or "the Canadian dollar rises against the US dollar" when the truth is the US dollar is in freefall, loosing value hand over fist. I wonder how long before the Peso overtakes us?

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Freefall.... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone never studied basic relativity. In relation to the Euro, the US dollar is falling. In relation to the US dollar, the Euro is rising. Currency trading works the same way as physical motion in this respect. Now the root cause is indeed the same, but that doesn't make it incorrect to say that other currencies are rising against the dollar.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    2. Re:Freefall.... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If all currencies were created equal, you'd be right. But in fact, the U.S. dollar is the closest thing we have to a global currency. It's the preferred currency for big international transactions, and when the U.S. is where a lot of people like to stash their money. Some countries even tie their currency to the dollar — in effect, they have no currency of their own.

      You can, of course, convert your yen directly to rupees, or your euros directly to yuan. But when you go to currency exchange to find out how much your currency is worth, the value will be quoted in dollars.

    3. Re:Freefall.... by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
      Looks like someone never studied basic relativity. In relation to the Euro, the US dollar is falling. In relation to the US dollar, the Euro is rising. Currency trading works the same way as physical motion in this respect. Now the root cause is indeed the same, but that doesn't make it incorrect to say that other currencies are rising against the dollar.

      Either you're exceptionally right, and proving your own point, or you're so deep in theoretical physics you've lost touch with the real world. If I jump, I can easily say that I've risen (defining "up" is easily accepted here) -- clearly every reasonable frame of reference, from the room around me to the ground below me, has not been pushed away from my feet. A theoretical physicist, of course, is free to change his frame of reference and define me as "staying still", but the math gets hard to compute everything else in the known universe moving with respect to my static body when my legs are moving like that. Similarly, if a reasonable person says the dollar is falling, a reasonable person understands that the average other currency is staying still. If a reasonable person says that Canadian dollar and the Euro are rising against a static dollar, but it turns out every other currency in the known world is also rising by the same amount, it turned out to be less misleading to state the dollar was falling.

      Put another way, if the Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Australian dollar are all rising at the same rate against the US dollar, then it's in fact the dollar that's falling, indicating that the US can't keep up with parity. Unfortunately, due to Chinese policy, we can't directly interpret the Yuan's exchange rate.

    4. Re:Freefall.... by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      At present, the US dollar is the de facto international currency exchange target--most (but not all) of the countries in the world reference their own currency against the US.

      However, more countries are starting to question that. The fact that the Canadian dollar is on par with the US dollar is very relevant, given that the US is Canada's biggest trading partner. However, countries are starting to look at the Euro as a more relevant and stable exchange target; and many are no doubt looking at the EU as a more stable trading partner. Late last year the Euro passed the US dollar in terms of total cash in circulation.

      Sooner or later the US dollar is going to have to stabilise, or the rest of the world will cut their strings and let the US economy spiral downwards on its own. I'm not sure what's more likely, but the world is in for a bumpy ride for a few years.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    5. Re:Freefall.... by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

      Look out trees, there is a forest all around you!!

      Your observance on relativism misses the point. The dollar and the euro aren't getting stronger against the buck because they are doing so much right with their economy. Nay, it is we who are initiating the action, cheapening our currency to keep the lalala circus of an economy we have propped up. .com bust? hmm.. let's go bananas over housing! ooh.. giving out huge loans to poor people might have been fiscally irresponsible. HELP, HELP!! Government shovels money into the market and drops the interest rate a 1/2 percent to fan the flames of a dieing fire.

      The basis of our markets is a "upward, onward, dancing, fattening!" collectively agreed upon fantasy. Problem is, you can only keep lauding the quality of the champagne on the Titanic for so long.

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    6. Re:Freefall.... by hercubus · · Score: 1

      I find it funny how it is always put "the Euro rsing against the dollar" or "the Canadian dollar rises against the US dollar" when the truth is the US dollar is in freefall, loosing value hand over fist. I wonder how long before the Peso overtakes us?


      hmm, didn't Uncle Dick (Cheney) tell us that "deficits don't matter" some time ago? is the "Slam Dunk" administration wrong on another topic?

      say it ain't so...

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    7. Re:Freefall.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that you care, but the 'Slam Dunk' quote comes from a person carried-over from the previous (D) administration. IF you're going to be dick, at least be an informed dick.

      *sheesh*

    8. Re:Freefall.... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Ok, but it's not a two-body problem. When you look at the Euro and Canadian dollar, they're both slightly rising or static relative to other currencies, but the US$ is definitely falling relative to other currencies (including the C$ and the Euro). So while "Euro rising" and "dollar falling" both explain the difference between the Euro and dollar, but only "dollar falling" correctly identifies the overall trend (across the whole currency market).

    9. Re:Freefall.... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I was using physics as an analogy. We don't fundamentally disagree--the reasons for these fluctuations are more due to the US dollar than to the other currencies--but if your frame of reference is the US dollar, the other currencies are rising, and if your frame of reference is the Euro, the US dollar is falling, and there's nothing fundamentally untrue about stating it either way. Unlike physics, currency trading makes it all but impossible to find a "good" frame of reference.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    10. Re:Freefall.... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The dollar and the euro aren't getting stronger against the buck because they are doing so much right with their economy.

      I agree. The CAD and EUR are still rising in value relative to the USD. That's not a false statement.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    11. Re:Freefall.... by Rufty · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    12. Re:Freefall.... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      All I know is that I wouldn't go hunting with him.

    13. Re:Freefall.... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That does not mean the CAD is not rising, relative to the USD.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    14. Re:Freefall.... by hercubus · · Score: 1

      Not that you care, but the 'Slam Dunk' quote comes from a person carried-over from the previous (D) administration. IF you're going to be dick, at least be an informed dick. *sheesh*


      is that you Karl?

      Karl Rove, i know that's you! come out from behind the AC shield and take it like a man

      i know you've got some time on your hands now but going on /. to bait liberals is beneath you

      (oh fsck me, what am i saying...)

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    15. Re:Freefall.... by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Some countries tie their currency to the Euro too. And in fact, the USD is rapidly losing ground for international transfers to the Euro - if the current development continues, the Euro will be more widely used than the dollar in just a few years.

      You can, of course, convert your yen directly to rupees, or your euros directly to yuan. But when you go to currency exchange to find out how much your currency is worth, the value will be quoted in dollars.

      If you go to a US exchange, perhaps. The places I've seen quotes from currency markets they've been far more loking to quote prices in the local currency.

    16. Re:Freefall.... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      the truth is the US dollar is in freefall, loosing value hand over fist

      But the US dollar is not losing value in the US. Domestic inflation remains low. The US falling against foreign currencies may make imports more expensive, but they will probably have to cut prices to meet US domestic competition, or simply be replaced with US domestic competition. Imports from cheap labor countries like China have a lot of flexibility in pricing, foreign imports to the US from advanced economies such as Europe will face bigger challenges, but they can automate more.

      Given that we are in the middle of a pretty expensive war, the US should be happy with low inflation, low interest rates, low unemployment rates, and a couple of percent GDP growth. Of course, if we weren't in the middle of a war, we'd probably have 3% or 4% GDP growth.

    17. Re:Freefall.... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the Dollar has been rising relative to the Japanese Yen since 2005 (although it has lost a bit of ground in the last few weeks).

      The dollar is also up versus the Venezuelan Peso (black market trading) and the Zimbabwe Dollar :)

      Looking at things another way, the EUR is up strongly over the CAD over the last few months.

    18. Re:Freefall.... by downix · · Score: 1

      "But the US dollar is not losing value in the US. Domestic inflation remains low. "

      It's not?

      **looks at his mother in laws house, inflated 140% in 5 years, the gas I bought yesterday, up 120% in 5 years, the loaf of bread I bought this morning, up 110% over the past 5 years, the can of Chef Boi R Dee, up 80% in 5 years, the roll of film I bought monday, up 75% in 5 years**

      Come again?

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    19. Re:Freefall.... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The CPI excludes stocks, bonds, and real estate :) Rent is included, and as you may have noticed the uptick in real estate prices have not been matched by a similarly large increase in rental prices.

      http://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homch17.pdf

      Here is a graph of the CPI:

      http://www.inflationdata.com/Inflation/images/charts/Annual_Inflation/annual_inflation_chart.htm

      US inflation has remained around 3% since the 1990s. Information on how the BLS computes the CPI is here:

      http://www.bls.gov/bls/inflation.htm

      While things like gas are up, other things (like the Department Store Inventory Price Index) is down over 10 years. Clothing is cheap, computers are cheap, etc.

    20. Re:Freefall.... by downix · · Score: 1

      Actually, my rent has gone up. In 2001 I was paying $449, today I pay $799. The average rent around here has gone up approximately 50% since 2001. But this is Florida, after all.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    21. Re:Freefall.... by Gen.Anti · · Score: 1

      Just an unoriginal remark about one thing--that something is not included in some index does not change reality, but makes one wonder why is it not included. Also, one could argue that a war gives "artificial" boost to domestic defense industry.

  28. Wouldn't it be more accurate ... by xednieht · · Score: 0, Redundant

    to make the statement that the US Dollar has sunk to a new low?

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  29. Re:There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" j by Amouth · · Score: 1

    i wonder if the vending machines will start excepting them now.. always annoying when you think you have enough change and one of the damn things slips in........

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  30. Not bad for Canadian Business by saterdaies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It isn't necessarily bad for Canadian corporations. When something like this happens, it changes things. Canadian companies now get less money for final goods and services provided to Americans because of the exchange rate. BUT, Canadian companies can get intermediate things for cheaper. So, let's say that Bombardier (a Canadian train/plane manufacturer) buys components (like Aluminum) from the US. They get that cheaper. Then they sell that plane to the US which they earn less money for. That comes out as a wash. It really just shifts income from those who export to those who import. But in the long run, it doesn't even change that. As the demand for American goods in Canada rises, the price level of American goods will rise and along with it the currency. Things in economics tend toward equilibrium in the long run.

    1. Re:Not bad for Canadian Business by dami99 · · Score: 0

      Not even close to being a "wash"... I work for a business very similar to one you describe, and we are losing a ton of money. We've been hedging with CD futures for awhile... but that's up soon.

    2. Re:Not bad for Canadian Business by king-manic · · Score: 1


      Things in economics tend toward equilibrium in the long run.

      Zero?

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  31. New US $100 bill by stox · · Score: 1

    to have a parachute built in. If we still had a $1000 bill, it would need retro-rockets.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  32. Imagine the day all currencies are equal by maillemaker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Imagine the reduction in social strife that will come the day that all the world's currencies are of equal value.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Imagine the day all currencies are equal by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Why do you expect that this would have any effect on social strife?

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Imagine the day all currencies are equal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single world currency? HA!
      Unless it's backed by a gold standard it really means global inflation by World Bank, which will hurt the purchasing power of everyone, especially in the third world. Strife won't just disappear!

    3. Re:Imagine the day all currencies are equal by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "Imagine the reduction in social strife that will come the day that all the world's currencies are of equal value."

      You know I am not in favor of one world government, or even an "American Union," but a single world currency would put an end to unfair monetary policies.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    4. Re:Imagine the day all currencies are equal by g4sy · · Score: 1

      Why is this moderated flamebait? The US dollar has been the closest thing to a gold standard the world has had in recent years. Now that it's leaving that role (much like the roman Denarii abdicated its role with the upteenth sacking of Rome) everyone is going to clamor for a unified currency.

      On a side note I make income in both countries in both currency and these changes DO affect which side of the border I put my effort.

      --
      somewhere, on a Big Red Sign:
      if(color==blue){speed--;}
  33. Speaking as a Canadian by boudie2 · · Score: 0

    I can't understand why our dollar went from 62 cents
    to parity (with me losing my good paying manufacturing
    sector job) without any real fundamental changes in
    the economy, or for that matter, the cost of things.
    But then again, when you think of a "floating currency"
    that doesn't make a lot of sense either.
    So what, it's worth what people think it is? It's worth
    one dollar U.S. because people are willing to pay that
    much?
    I do know one thing, every time it goes up or down,
    SOMEBODY makes money. That's all I know.

    1. Re:Speaking as a Canadian by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

      I can think of the following potential causes. Note however, that I am not an economist. I am a Canadian though, so its all good.

      1) With the Euro gaining in populatity, alot of US dollars that were held in reserve are now circulating. More US dollars in circulation diminishes their value.

      2) There was a real, fundamental change in the economy. Oil got very expensive. Canada has Oil. To buy that oil, at some point, they need to spend Canadian dollars. More demand for our dollar means our dollar is worth more. (This is why we have also been rising against the Euro / Yen, though not nearly as much).

      END COMMUNICATION

  34. CDN book prices are a rip-off by diodeus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I grilled my local independent bookseller on this. She blamed the publishers, which are all in the U.S.

    Complain about it here: http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/

  35. Just got back by stuntpope · · Score: 1

    I was in Ontario and Quebec last month, and though the official rate at the time was about 1 CAD = .94 USD, if you used US cash the vendors/businesses would treat it as 1 to 1, no change. But I noticed on the way home that the tollbooths in New York state had signs stating that Canadian currency would be treated as 80 percent of a dollar!

    And by the way, I'd consider moving there, even given the currency parity.

    1. Re:Just got back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been? We've been trying to keep the Canadians out of NY for years.

    2. Re:Just got back by moofo · · Score: 1

      Just don't do it.

      It'S a BAAAAD country for geeks. We're always ten years behind the US.

      --
      "I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary." Through the looking glass and what
    3. Re:Just got back by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      We even gladly accept draft dodgers.

    4. Re:Just got back by redi6 · · Score: 1

      yup. my father being one of them. he dodged the vietnam draft with a couple hundred bucks in his pocket and never looked back.

    5. Re:Just got back by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Come over to Saskatchewan. we're one of the few places on this continent rolling out VDSL2, which is considerably ahead of most of the US and also an ever-improving terrestrial microwave broadband network in rural areas.

      Sasktel also doesn't do any transfer capping or traffic shaping/throttling crap. you pay for the bandwidth and you do what you want with it, using as little or as much per month as you like. i know several people who have been deliberately maxing out their connection 24/7 for months on end, without so much as a peep from Sasktel.

      Buying higher-end computer gear locally is often an exercise in futility, but that's what online stores are for.

      (sheesh. I'm sounding like a government commercial!)

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Just got back by moofo · · Score: 1

      Buying higher-end computer gear locally is often an exercise in futility, but that's what online stores are for.

      Equipment for which you get charged to death at the customs. Even finding store that will ship here is a challenge.

      Ebay? "Will ship to United States only" on all interesting listings.

      --
      "I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary." Through the looking glass and what
    7. Re:Just got back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about that, I'm making CA$80K doing networking in "Winterpeg"

  36. buying a car by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    We live in Toronto, my parents need a car and now I think they should go to the US and get one there. The interest rates there are very low, 1 our dollar can buy 1 dollar US and US car prices were always cheaper anyway. Now it looks we should buy everything in the States instead. Little headache on the bordre = probably 10-15K saved.

    1. Re:buying a car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to look into it further. Depending on the price of the car, it may not be worth it. For example, a BMW 328i, which is ~ 32,000 USD and $41,000 CAD, will be subject to 14% gst/pst if you bring it into ontario (based on the CAD MSRP), as well as a 6.2% Duty since it's not built in North America. You also have to get the car certified, and a bunch of other paperwork (which often costs money). For this car, it works out to be about $2500 cheaper, which isn't worth the hassle imho, when spending close to $50k on a car...

    2. Re:buying a car by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Your going to pay US sales tax and then your going to pay both the GST and sales tax in the provice where you take the car. Then you might have to pay the luxury car tax (depending on what you buy). Your not going to save that much on importing a car ... if you did, there would be a secondary market doing it already.

      ]{

    3. Re:buying a car by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      found this

      Yes, 14% taxes apply (6% GST at the bordre with US and 8% PST in Ontario during registration.) However the same would be the case when buying a car in Canada, what's the difference?

      Besides, they are going for a Japanese car built in the US, then the duty does not apply.

      All of a sudden they can save over 10K.

    4. Re:buying a car by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      My criterion for buying something in the U.S. is it must be a steal (50% off the Canadian price is my usual target), or just plain unobtainable in Canada. This applies to all things, not just cars.

      New cars from the U.S. can be difficult, because dealers often have franchise agreements that only permit them to sell to U.S. customers. Used cars are another matter, and then the RIV folks get involved. Consider also dealer support: a Canadian dealer may not be thrilled with providing warranty coverage on a U.S. car.

      Buying cars from other countries gets even more interesting. My van is imported from Japan and has metric instrumentation, which a U.S. import will not have.

      Computer stuff is actually cheaper in Vancouver than in Seattle, unless you hit a sale at Fry's.

      ...laura

    5. Re:buying a car by burgerbone · · Score: 1

      bad example BMW will not sell you a brand new car if you are a Canadian resident :). this is a good read if you plan on importing a car. http://www.redflagdeals.com/forums/showthread.php?t=307601&highlight=Import CAD MSRP and US MSRP are like comparing apples to oranges. You really dont know what kind of savings you will have until you actually bargain with the US dealers. $20k on a Subaru Outback is a huge savings IMHO for a couple hours of work.

    6. Re:buying a car by SirSmiley · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure they instituted duty fees for taking an american bought, new vehicle over to canada to prevent things like this. It was on the news a few months ago because of all the people going to detroit and buffalo to buy cars 33% off

    7. Re:buying a car by jguthrie · · Score: 1

      My Ford Freestar has an odometer that can be switched from miles to kilometers. What other instrumentation would you need? Of course, it's not as cool as your van, but YMMV.

    8. Re:buying a car by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Duty of 6.2% applies to cars that are not assembled in North America, but to the rest of the cars only GST/PST applies.

    9. Re:buying a car by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian and I bought a 3 series BMW in Canada. It was assembled at a plant in South Carolina and shipped here so it qualifies as a "built in NA".

      One thing to be wary of when buying the vehicle in the US is that BMW Canada will not do warranty maintenance on the vehicle, although they will do warranty repairs.

      Plus you'll have the speedometer in MPH thing going on too.

  37. Best chart is not CAD versus USD by dada21 · · Score: 1

    For me, I keep track of all the various currencies and commodities, and plot my own charts based on comparing two currencies in what they can buy in a given commodity. My favorite 4 commodities are gold (1 ounce), silver (20 ounce), oil (1 barrel) and a barrel of goods I created.

    Every currency, over time, is being inflated via credit expansion or money expansion. This inflation of new currency or credit causes prices to go up in various markets. The graphics I talk about above show the destruction of money by the various scheming central banks. Some of my charts also recalculate currencies based on the daily trade ratio, so you can actually see when currencies trade at par, and the commodity graphs show all currencies falling moreso in the last 3 years.

  38. Online shopping that ships to Canada? by gravyface · · Score: 1

    Would love to get an early start on xmas shopping but alot of places won't ship to Canada -- amazon.com does, and I think bestbuy.com does too, but I can't think of anymore. Anyone have a list of sites or directory of sites that ship/sell to Canada?

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:Online shopping that ships to Canada? by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Many people ship now, and I can bet many more will as the US economy slows and the CAD strengthens, just be weary of 'customs brokerage' fees. I bought a book in the US once and had it shipped to Canada by UPS ground and the fees was larger then the cost of the book (but paradoxically, had I shipped it by UPS 3 day express or whatever, there would be no fee so you need to do your homework).

      ]{

    2. Re:Online shopping that ships to Canada? by boudie2 · · Score: 0

      Regarding brokerage fees, recently I bought a front wheel for my motorcycle from the U.S. It was shipped by UPS, and when it arrived, the taxes and duties were $80. AND they charged a $60. brokerage fee. They had me over the barrel this time, but next time I will know better. Never heard of something like this in thirty years of buying items from the U.S.

    3. Re:Online shopping that ships to Canada? by redi6 · · Score: 1

      lesson learned.. don't use UPS for cross border shipping. stick to usps if you can (though i understand this isn't always possible). I've gotten raped by UPS brokerage fees before when ordering stuff stateside to ship up to toronto before.

    4. Re:Online shopping that ships to Canada? by Monkey · · Score: 1

      I too have often wondered where this "Free Trade" they speak of is.

    5. Re:Online shopping that ships to Canada? by fizzup · · Score: 1

      If you live in or around Vancouver, try TSB Shipping in Point Roberts. They will accept your delivery for a few dollars.

  39. Cost in Dollars to Alberta's Royalty income by mpetch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an Albertan in the middle of Canada's oil country one statistic with regards to the Loonie is how much of our provincial Gov't loses in royalties for a given rise in the Canadian dollar. It is estimated that for every One Cent increase, there is a 100 million decrease in royalties/revenue at the provincial level. Now Alberta faces the Oil Industry to claw back some of that money - a potentially dramatic change in royalty structures - that has CEO's of major oil companies fuming mad that we intend to cut into their bottom line. http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2007/09/19/royalty-reaxn.html

    1. Re:Cost in Dollars to Alberta's Royalty income by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Wah wah wah. My thoughts to the oil companies, as an Albertan: You got a few years of record profits through no actual overarching cleverness on your part. Consider yourselves lucky that you even got that much. You got your cake, now it's our turn.

    2. Re:Cost in Dollars to Alberta's Royalty income by Arivia · · Score: 1

      And then Quebec will get it all twice! Gotta love "equalization" payments!

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
  40. Re:This has been going on near the border for year by joshv · · Score: 1

    Even in Southern MI, Canadian change consitutes about 25% of the change in circulation. I expect to it all disappear if the dollar sinks any lower.

  41. Cheaper Macs, eh? by NuclearKangaroo · · Score: 1

    Sure, they're cheaper... as long as we don't buy them in Canada! I checked out the price difference on the Canadian Apple Store vs. the U.S. alternative the other day. The prices on the Canadian store were about 15% higher, after taking the exchange rate into account.

    Consequentially, Apple Canada isn't going to see a dime of my money until they rectify their rectal-cranial inversion, and lower their prices. If they haven't done it by next month, I'll still be picking up my new 8 core Mac Pro, but I'll be doing it in Seattle!

    1. Re:Cheaper Macs, eh? by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      If you go to WA you'll also pay the WA sales tax. If time is not an issue for you, go to Oregon for the ultimate deal!

      Remember that you'll also pay the GST and PST on your way back in Canada.

      ]{

    2. Re:Cheaper Macs, eh? by NuclearKangaroo · · Score: 1

      Good point, Kristoph. A morning in the dunes, and an afternoon of Mac shopping in Oregon it is! =-)

      And, while I do still have to pay the GST and PST when I shop in the U.S., I'll pay less of it, because the sale price of the Mac will be lower without the 15% premium associated with the Apple Store's Canadian prices.

    3. Re:Cheaper Macs, eh? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      I'll pay less of it, because the sale price of the Mac will be lower without the 15% premium associated with the Apple Store's Canadian prices Uh, that 15% premium is mostly GST and PST, and the remaining 2% or so would be more than eaten by the cost of gas.
    4. Re:Cheaper Macs, eh? by NuclearKangaroo · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      The prices I'm quoting are, indeed, pre-tax. The same 8 core Mac Pro, identically configured, is $7904 on the Canadian site, but only $6753 on the U.S. site. Assuming dollar parity, that means it costs me over a thousand dollars more, just because I'm Canadian... a difference of 17%!

      I'll be hit with the GST (6%) and PST (7%) whether I buy online in Canada, or drive up from Oregon. I'll pay less on the American purchase, however, as it's a lower sale price; $877.89, vs. $1027.52 in taxes on the Canadian purchase price.

      All in all, a difference in total of $1300.63!!! Apple Canada needs to give its head a shake if it thinks Canadian consumers will put up with that kind of premium. I know I won't.

  42. cheaper Macs by denisbergeron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not at all !

    Goods are allways at higher price in Canada.

    Look at cars, even if no border tax exist for foreing company to import car in Canada (or in the USA) all car have better price and better warrenty in the USA than in Canada. Go to jeep.ca or toyota.ca and try to build a car and then compare it with jeep.com ou toyota.com for a 30k car in the USA you will buy 36K in Canada (plus taxes).
    Samething for everything from Apple, you got 10% to 30% of foreing charge when you buy in Canada.

    And don't try to buy it at Amazon.com, they don't send thing like that in Canada, you must buy at Amazon.ca.

    Try this Ipod Nano at future shop 219$ (or BestBuy.ca)

    Same Ipod nano at BestBuy.com at 149$

    Even if the Can$ is higger thant the US$ price a cheapper in USA, That's before taxes, and the overall business etablishment price is lower in Canada.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:cheaper Macs by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that's been the problem for years here since our dollar has been on a rampant rise.

      Until the Canadian consumer actually demands more price parity on our goods why in gods name would a manufacturer decide to charge less if we are willing to pay a 15% premium on the item simply because we are in Canada?

      I mean I'd do something, but I'd hate to start a fuss and all...

      --
      I Like Pie...
    2. Re:cheaper Macs by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      I buy in the USA. And I tell the seller.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    3. Re:cheaper Macs by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine recently bought a 60" TV at Best Buy. When he questioned the staff on the much lower US prices, they immediately dropped the price to match.

      Companies that are based in the US and buy everything in US dollars anyway aren't going to care that much. Of course, they'll fleece you if you give them the opportunity, but if you threaten to walk out or import it from somewhere in the US, they'll match the US price.

    4. Re:cheaper Macs by Emetophobe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this Ipod Nano at future shop 219$ (or BestBuy.ca)

      Same Ipod nano at BestBuy.com at 149$


      I'm surprised no one else noticed this mistake, but you're comparing an 8GB ipod nano on those Canadian websites to a 4GB ipod nano on the American website.

      Here's a correct comparison:

      Bestbuy.ca 4GB ipod nano: $169.99 Canadian
      Bestbuy.com 4GB ipod nano: $149.99 American
    5. Re:cheaper Macs by mgblst · · Score: 1

      To be fair it takes a while for these changes to filter through the system. If I buy a 1000 Nanos at last weeks price, I can't suddenly offer you this weeks price, can I, until I have sold all the machines I bought last week.

  43. Re:There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" j by Phisbut · · Score: 1

    And I'll be saving the occasional Canadian quarter. Thanks George Bush.

    There was a time when, whenever I got an american coin in my change, I would say (only half-seriously) "Woohoo! I'm rich!". Now it'll be more like "Hey! Are you trying to screw me?"

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  44. Re:There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" j by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    Vending machines have always excepted them ;)

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  45. Now will the right wing by Bullfish · · Score: 0, Troll

    believe that Bush is running your country into the ground?

    1. Re:Now will the right wing by Bluesman · · Score: 0, Troll

      The right wing has believed this since the beginning. See Pat Buchanan, et. al. The Republican partisans who make up about 20% of the population are the ones who believe Bush can do no wrong, and nothing will change their mind.

      Those of us who used to be Republicans and paid the slightest attention know that Republicans and Democrats are both socialists at the core. You can see this just by looking at the terms of debate about health care. There's no argument that universal health care is a bad idea, unconstitutional, etc., although some Republicans still give lip service to that (except Ron Paul). They're all arguing over who has the better plan to implement it.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    2. Re:Now will the right wing by king-manic · · Score: 1

      here's no argument that universal health care is a bad idea

      Thats news to the rest of the western worlds. You know the ones out performing your currency and economy, with lower levels of poverty and spend 1/2 as much over all per person for a better service on average.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Now will the right wing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No argument? unconstitutional? Uh, there is argument, and the unconstitutional thing is just weird

    4. Re:Now will the right wing by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      I meant there's no argument among the candidates. I wasn't asserting that it's a bad idea.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  46. Whose deficit is it, anyway? by fm6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anybody else think it's ironic that at a time when people are resisting government run health care because of the expense, the Canadians are running a budget surplus — despite have government run health care?

    1. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by man_ls · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Their military budget is a joke when compared to ours. That's why they're able to run a surplus -- it's not being spent on defense.

      Whether that's a good thing or not is a matter of opinion, but their lack of a military being the reason they can be more socialized is a matter of fact.

    2. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by pcgc1xn · · Score: 3, Funny

      The US is spending money on defense? Oh yeah, forward defense.

    3. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Mothinator · · Score: 1

      This is interesting point since the average Canadian only paid 11.18% in income taxes in 2002 http://www.taxtips.ca/statistics.htm, while the average American paid 13.5% the same year http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/02in01tr.xls.

      Of course this doesn't account for all the other forms of taxation, but still Americans pay a higher income taxes but still have yearly budget deficits.

      It's hard to keep our (American) current political situation out of it, but which is more important affordable healthcare for all or seemingly cheaper oil prices and the occupation of foreign nations?

    4. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by poindextrose · · Score: 1

      Since when is the US military budget spent on "defense"?

      --
      Karma: Raspberry Kiwi
    5. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by ShieldWolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It depends what you mean by a 'joke'. :P

      The US spends more on its military than the rest of the world COMBINED. As a matter of percentage of GDP the Canadian government spends less than other NATO members on average, but we spend more than Israel does in dollar terms (bet you wouldn't have guessed that one).

      Truth is Canada spends less on our military because WE DON'T HAVE TO. With the cold war over there is no immediate threat to our country. Unlike the US we don't try to project our national policies externally for the most part so we don't need 12 nuclear powered aircraft carriers etc.

      Having said that to address your main point this is not the reason why we have a budget surplus. Canada used to have a small military AND a budget deficit because we had lots of wasted spending on social programs and not enough revenue. We increased some taxes and ALSO cut spending and now everything is golden (similar to the state of affairs in the US in the late 90s). That you guys blew the opportunity to be in a smiliar situation by massively cutting taxes and increasing discretionary spending is your own fault, don't blame it on military expenditures.

      --
      just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    6. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, you do have a good point. On the other hand, do we really need as big a military as we have? Right now, we could fight a conventional big-battlefield war with the rest of the planet, and probably win.

      Except there aren't going to be any more CBBWs. Just nasty little quagmires like Iraq. And maybe the odd terrorist attack or nuclear exchange. Having a huge military is not all that useful for that.

    7. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Truth is Canada spends less on our military because WE DON'T HAVE TO.
      > With the cold war over there is no immediate threat to our country.

      One of the reasons (but not the entire reason) Canada does not "have to" is because the US does. Canada benefits from the US umbrella.

      This isn't meant as a "the US is great and you suck" type of post, just a statement of a fact. The US played a needed part in the second half of the 20th century. Perhaps the roles will change moving forward. I'm just saying imagine a world where the US did not exist and what affect that would have on our allies. Likely some of them would be more like we are now.

    8. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you look a quarter of the comments on here, it talks about the COST OF GOODS in Canada being 30% more than the States. Why do you suppose that is, hmmm? It's to pay for some of their social-welfare system. Yes, you can pay for it, and make it work, but it's less than ideal.

      We have a massive welfare system as it is already. But I've seen how the medical industry here in the US is, and nobody in the industry seems to care a flying hoot what anything costs. You ever ask a doctor how much procedure X costs? Not a clue. A nurse? Naw, nobody has a stinking clue - yet they order them all "just in case" all the time because it's risk mitigation for THEM. The only people that has an idea is the finance department, and they'll quote you inflated numbers because of the illegal-alien subsidy that normal people are forced to pay due to how the system is setup (turn no one away, money or no) and you end up with the disaster that is the current medical industry.

      Government definitely IS the problem here, and not a very ideal solution for a situation they caused, now is it? At least if they controlled the whole system it would have to answer for it's own blunders instead of making the citizenry deal with it. But I, myself, prefer making my own decisions and would likely never set foot in any government run clinic if I could find any reasonable alternative.

      Subsidies, corporate welfare, or even welfare to citizen classes is plain immoral.

    9. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Isn't a budget surplus also known as "your taxes are too high?"

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    10. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Wish you hadn't posted that AC. It was a very good comment.

    11. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      ...which is more important affordable healthcare for all or seemingly cheaper oil prices and the occupation of foreign nations?
      Do remember that Iraq was supposed to be a bargain war. Go in, topple Saddam, hand over power to the peace- and democracy-loving Iraqis, get out. So the fact that we're spending ungodly sums on the war in Iraq has more to do with ignorance and wishful thinking than with oil prices.
    12. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can use more direct numbers than that. Most (or all?) of the Western world pays less for universal government health care than the US does for it's private system and get better quality care to boot.

    13. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So when we run a deficit it means we're spending too much money, but when the Canadians run a surplus it means their taxes are too high? Why doesn't it mean that we're not taxing enough or that Canada is thrifty?

    14. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Depends what you do with the surplus.

      Many provinces have savings funds, some of the interest from which is used for scholarships and encouraging new industries. Alberta is building new roads and hospitals with some of it's surplus. A couple of years ago they did decide to use some of the surplus to give a $400 refund to anyone who filed a tax return in the province.

    15. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      If they're using it, doesn't that mean it should be included in the budget?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    16. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      If Canada is thrifty, they can afford to lower their taxes. Also, when we run a deficit, it DOES mean we're spending too much money. It could also mean we're not taxing ourselves enough, though I suppose that depends on ones frame of reference, and that's a different discussion. Not a big fan of W's cut taxes AND increase spending. Pick one. They're supposed to be mutually exclusive.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    17. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US spends the highest percentage in the world of it's GDP on healthcare. I don't think military expenses or not has anything to do with it.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    18. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No. The budget is made in advance, detailing what the government will spend in the coming year. When you have money left over after you've taken care of all the planned expenses, that's a surplus. You can either refund that money, spend it on new projects, pay down a debt, or save it. When you're making up your next budget if you believe you're likely to have money left over again you can either lower taxes, increase spending or run another surplus.

      It works with personal finances too. I only spend about one third to half of my income every month so what's left over is a surplus, that gets invested. I have the same options, I could tell my employer he's paying me too much (lower taxes), I could plan to spend more each month, I could go on a big trip or buy one-time items, or I can continue to run a surplus and save it.

      The items the surplus gets used for aren't planned, they're decided on purely after the money is in hand and everything else is paid for. "Hey, we've got money left over, anyone want a hospital?"

    19. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Zebedeu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Canada benefits from the US umbrella. That's not entirely true. Canada also benefits from being geographically positioned in a island-continent, with neighbouring countries that do not represent a threat, as do the US.
      It also benefits from a large number of years of good foreign policy that insures that, unlike the US, there are not many people who would like to see Canada burn just as a matter of principle.

      While I am sure that every ally of the US benefits from the high values of defence expenditure, I believe that if that were not the case, at least Canada wouldn't have to increase it's own expenditure, if any.
    20. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Why isn't military spending referred to as 'the socialized military'? It's tax dollars being spent on a government program, right? You hear people go on about socialized medicine or socialized housing, but nobody says anything about the socialized military. :P

      (Steven Brust brought it up in his blog. I think he's got a good point.)

    21. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by gfilion · · Score: 1

      This is interesting point since the average Canadian only paid 11.18% in income taxes in 2002

      But healthcare is provincial jursidiction, so you should consider provincial taxation too. I live in Quebec with a slightly above average salary and I've about 30% income tax (federal+provincial) + 14% sales taxes (federal+provincial).

      To be fair, I think that I'm the most taxed individual in North America.

      :-(

    22. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by gfilion · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons (but not the entire reason) Canada does not "have to" is because the US does. Canada benefits from the US umbrella.

      Exactly! I would even go further and say that Canada benefits from the NATO umbrella. Any country that attacks Canada would get a declaration of war from every NATO country (USA, UK, FR, DE, etc.).

      Terrorism is another story though...

    23. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      I see what you mean. I just look at stuff a little differently. Thanks for the reply.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    24. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


      | Their military budget is a joke when compared to ours.
      | That's why they're able to run a surplus -- it's not being spent on defense.

      so you're saying it is: army vs health-care -- americans would rather
      spend their money killing people (and its ruining their economy), whereas
      canadians would rather spend it on healing people (and they're economy
      shows stronger). hmmm.... (he thinks from toronto)...

    25. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Truth is Canada spends less on our military because WE DON'T HAVE TO. With the cold war over there is no immediate threat to our country. Unlike the US we don't try to project our national policies externally for the most part so we don't need 12 nuclear powered aircraft carriers etc.

      Not sure the US and Russia agree with you entirely. Putin and Bush seems to have been working real hard on relighting the good old cold war for a round two.
    26. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Before we start using this as a reason to promote a universal health care solution, keep in mind that the United States is probably one of the least healthy countries in the world. If there were fewer people who drink, smoke, and do other drugs and more people who ate healthy and exercised I think we'd see dramatic decreases in the amount that we're spending. A lot of the problems we have are self-inflicted and results of poor lifestyle choices.

      It's also private citizens who are paying for the healthcare. He's saying that because Canada's government isn't sinking loads of money into a military, it has something else to sink it into. If we cut our military down to something similar to the size the Canadians have, we could probably have budget surpluses as well. At least until the politicians found something else to waste it on anyhow. I'd rather just have them trim that fat and give me back more money and cut taxes, but maybe that's just me.

    27. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      I had to do some googling to find out whether you were telling the truth or not. I managed to find this CBC story from 2004. Here's a quote from that CBC story:

      Compared to other countries with similar economies, Canada's spending is in the ballpark, according to a report from the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. The latest figures on what countries spend on health care come from 2002, when Canada spent 9.6 per cent of GDP on health care:

      * France 9.7%.
      * Germany 10.9%.
      * Denmark 8.8%.
      * Sweden 9.2%.

      At the high end of the scale is the United States, which spent 14.6 per cent of GDP on health care.

      The story is from 2004 and they're quoting statistics from 2002, but I'd imagine those are still pretty close to what they are today. So it looks like you were correct, Canada spent around 9.6% our GDP back in 2002 while the United States spent around 14.6% of their GDP. My question is, does that ~15% of US GDP spent on health care take into account things like prescription costs? I know prescriptions can cost a lot more (sometimes 2-3 times more) in the States then they do here in Canada. Would perscription costs be enough to increase United States health care spending by that much or is there other factors?

      Also, I found this Wikipedia entry, Canadian and American health care systems compared. Here's a quote from the "Wait times" section:

      Canadians pay 9% of GDP to insure 100% of citizens, compared with 14% of GDP to insure 85% of Americans.

      Here's a quote from the "Price of Health Care" section of that wikipedia article:

      Health care is one of the most expensive items of both nations' budgets. The U.S. government spends more per capita on health care than the government does in Canada. In 2004, the government of Canada spent $2,120 (in US dollars) per person on health care, while the United States government spent $2,724.[5]

      However, U.S. government spending covers less than half of all health care costs. Private spending for health care is also far greater in the U.S. than in Canada. In Canada, an average of $917 was spent annually by individuals or private insurance companies for health care, including dental, eye care, and drugs. In the U.S., this number is $3,372.[5] In 2004, health care consumed 15.4% of U.S. annual GDP. In Canada, only 9.8% of GDP was spent on health care.

      Finally, I think the section on malpractice litigation is fairly interesting aswell:

      Malpractice litigation

      The extra cost of malpractice lawsuits accounts for some of the difference in health spending in the two countries. In Canada the total cost of settlements, legal fees, and insurance comes to $4 per person each year, but in the United States it is $16.[68] Average payouts to American plaintiffs were $265,103, while payouts to Canadian plaintiffs were somewhat higher, averaging $309,417[69]. However, malpractice suits are far more common in the U.S., with 350% more suits filed each year per person.[68] While malpractice costs are significantly higher in the U.S., they make up only a small proportion of total medical spending. The total cost of defending and settling malpractice lawsuits in the U.S. in 2001 was approximately $6.5bn, or 0.46% of total health spending.[70] Critics say that defensive medicine consumes up to 9% of American healthcare expenses.[71][72] In the same year in Canada, the total burden of malpractice suits was $237 million, or 0.27% of total health spending.[68]

      I had to look up defensive medicine as I've never heard of that term before. That s

    28. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      I had to do some googling to find out whether you were telling the truth or not.
      I wish more people would do the same with things they hear.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    29. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      it's not being spent on defense I think you meant to say: 'it's not being spent on offense'.
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    30. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      It's not how much you spend, it's how you spend it.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    31. Re:Whose deficit is it, anyway? by Geminii · · Score: 1
      Their military budget is a joke when compared to ours.

      Their budget, your leadership. Glass houses?

  47. Flamebait? by dwalsh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ah come on! It is such a meme on sites like this to say "fuck it, I'm off to Canada" in humans rights related discussions. Thought it would be funny to pretend they really did.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  48. Euro as a precursor? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Would how the Euro has affected the European marketplace/ community be a precursor?

  49. Wait until China unloads dollars! by nate+nice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our beloved, once great country (the USA) is in serious financial trouble. China has been acquiring dollars for awhile now with the trade surplus they've had with the USA for some time. Usually this isn't a problem as the trading country reinvests these dollars into the USA's markets and businesses. This is good for the USA as you can imagine. In theory it should also raise the value of the trading countries currency because their GNP should be higher. But imagine the trading country keeps its currency artificially low so it can export things cheaper and cheaper and acquire more money (dollars) faster to build more and more factories, etc. It does this by sending the dollars back to the USA in the form of treasury bonds.

    Now imagine the USA expected a surplus and made a huge tax cut because of it. And then the surplus never happened so a huge debt was created. Someone has to pay this debt off. Imagine if the people paying this debt off are the ones you are running a trade deficit with. Hence, our trading partner buys treasury bonds at an alarming rate.

    This works great for the USA short term because we get cheap goods from China (because their currency is still of low value because they invest their profits right away) and save a little bit on taxes. Well, a lot if you're rich.

    But as you're probably starting to realize, this can't go on forever. Eventually it's going to collapse. At some point the debts will have to be paid and this will be done by raising taxes and INTEREST RATES. So now not only is the dollar worth less because everyone has a ton of them around the world, but it costs a ton to borrow them so no one wants them.

    All of a sudden the value of your house is half of what it was, the value of your paycheck is half, etc. A domino effect is created because no one can afford to borrow money any longer. American business doesn't take risks, people can't take risks, and money is tight. We haven't experienced this in a long time. Money has been cheap. It's been the USA's biggest seller. The dollar was valuable and it was available. That's prosperity. Imagine the dollar being expensive and worthless. That's a depression.

    So expect the Canadian dollar to become more and more valuable against the USA dollar for awhile.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Did you take into account that "huge tax cuts" tend to pay for themselves down the line, given enough time? We saw it in the '80s, and we're seeing it now...if it wasn't for the government's fiscal irresponsibility (even outside the military spending), we'd be able to put more money back into the taxpayer's pocket.

    2. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      It appears the plan now is to inflate the hell out of our currency to make the debt less relevant. This typically doesn't work, but it doesn't mean Congress won't try.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      You're not taking into account that the money people are "saving" from these tax cuts are being sent over to China to invest in treasury bonds. The wealthy who got huge sums of money back didn't go out and buy things with it. They bought bonds. The government gave them money they sold right back to the government.

      We're in a different situation than in the 1980's. We didn't have the global threat of China undervaluing their currency to expand faster and faster while maintaining a trade deficit larger and larger. They aren't investing their money into our companies. They are investing it into t-bonds here you and I will have to pay back.

      The tax cuts of a few years ago were a critical mistake. They were based on a faulty assumption that there would be a surplus. There wasn't and our deficit is accelerating in growth. The main problem?

      We owe this money to another nation(s) and not to ourselves.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by stinerman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Using your line of reasoning, if tax cuts pay for themselves we should simply abolish all taxes. The government would be awash in revenue!

      if it wasn't for the government's fiscal irresponsibility
      You can thank our "limited government" Republican friends who held both houses of Congress and the Presidency from 2002 - 2006.
    5. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by khallow · · Score: 1

      Not worth blaming China. They are after all destroying a lot of value in China in order to keep their currency locked to the US. And if they become jerks and dump their debt? Well, the first problem will be that they effectively lose all that debt.

    6. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the reality of a fiat currency. It doesn't mean anything except someone else's willingness to accept it. Hard money (gold) always has some intrinsic value. It has valuable properties in and of itself.

    7. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I'm not blaming China, I'm blaming US policy for allowing it to happen.

      China is losing a lot now but they are also bankrolling infrastructure and very quickly. There will be plenty of markets left for them to dictate after they dump the dollar and start selling to the world at a real profit after being built up by the greedy USA.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    8. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      China wouldn't care about that debt if they could gain something. What about Taiwan, or, from a Chinese perspective, the rogue island of Taipei? If the US would refrain from defending Taiwan, we, China, will keep you economy afloat till next elections by holding on to those bonds of yours? What will the average POTUS do on confronted with such a deal?

      I'm pretty sure this scenario will play out in the next five years.

    9. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point the debts will have to be paid and this will be done by raising taxes and INTEREST RATES.

      Does that mean my ADJUSTABLE Rate Mortgage rate might increase? Those swindlers at the bank never told me that my ADJUSTABLE Rate Mortgage rate could change. I think they're only in it for the money. It's not fair. It's like they want me to lose my house or something.

    10. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by wallior · · Score: 1

      USA is in really trouble if China start dumping USD, but I don't think that will happen for a while yet. China is trying to buy as much gold as possible, without putting the price up - which is hard with the USD crumbling.

      It is my belief that China won't dump the USD until they have accumulated sufficent supplies of gold, so that when they do dump the USD, they will actually make money on the huge surge in gold prices.

      Things will get even more interesting when USD is no longer the currency for oil.

    11. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

      Most of my investments have switched from American companies to commodities such as gold, silver and other intrinsic things. They aren't necessarily as high yield as some stocks are, but when the dollar really crumbles, I expect my gold to be worth a lot of "money". Who knows, in 10 years if the dollar is ruined and the Fed collapses (as all money schemes do eventually) maybe $1000.00 in gold today will be worth $20,000.00 of todays value then.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    12. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Try studying something called the "laffer curve." There's an equilibrium where taxes at a certain low level keep money in an economy, but not as much come out.

    13. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I know what the Laffer curve is. I will remind you that it is just a theory and no one has any conclusive evidence that tax revenue actually works that way.

      That isn't to say that tax revenue won't be a concave down function with respect to income tax rates. 0% obviously nets 0 revenue, but 100% doesn't net 0 revenue. All I'm saying is that we don't know on what side of the curve we are on, if it is a quadratic function, or anything much else about the middle. I have a feeling the maxima is a lot higher than it's proponents believe.

      Even then, the laffer curve is actually designed to maximize tax revenue. This puts it at odds with the standard Republican line (starve the beast) on how to best reduce government spending. Republicans have almost certainly been using "starve the beast" as their strategy since 2001.

      I prefer limiting the federal government to it's constitutional prerogatives myself, but I'm smart enough to know that high taxes and high spending is preferable to low taxes and high spending.

    14. Re:Wait until China unloads dollars! by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      I know what the Laffer curve is. I will remind you that it is just a theory and no one has any conclusive evidence that tax revenue actually works that way.

      To a point, you're correct, but if you're going to make this statement, you have to address the rate cuts and the ensuing increase in the government treasuries AND the positive effect on the economy both in the 1980s and in recent years. It's the evidence that supply-side theory IS practical.

      The problem in combining it with the "starve the beast" mentality is that you have to have politicians willing to spend less money. TOO many people try and equate sound supply-side economic theory - which seems to work - with idiots in DC spending too much of our money. They're SUPPOSED to be two separate animals.

  50. Canada is the US's biggest customer... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

    Canada is the US's biggest customer

    and,

    The US is Canada's biggest customer.

    I remember a time when I was a kid when the Canadian dollar was actually a little more valuable than the US dollar.

    Even with the equal exchange rate, US gasoline and many foods are still cheaper Down South - at least it is between BC and Washington.

    It will be interesting to see how this will affect our relationship with our Southern cousins.

    Ed

    1. Re:Canada is the US's biggest customer... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Everything is relative, I suppose, but it hurts my head to think of anything north of the Mason-Dixon line as "Down South." For goodness' sake, man, at least don't CAPITALIZE it. You make this Louisianian's head hurt.

    2. Re:Canada is the US's biggest customer... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

      >it hurts my head to think of anything north of the Mason-Dixon line as "Down South"

      To Canadians, that's 'way Down South' or 'Deep South'.

      And New Orleans is of course 'The Big Easy'.

      It is also true that The US is also favorite shopping and holiday destination and will continue to be so until Bush & Friends make it too dangerous, too difficult and too expensive.

      Ed

  51. Re:There goes the "How much is that in Canadian" by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Hehe.

    Waiting for the pedants to show up and miss your wink.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  52. Let the reverse brain drain begin! by guysmilee · · Score: 1

    Let the reverse brain drain begin! Many of canada's best a brightest left for the US in the late 90's for the promise of higher salaries etc ... now witha dollar at parity ... will america's brightest now move north to canada? Especially those with families ... public health care, simlar/better standard of living, a thriving economy, etc etc etc ...

    1. Re:Let the reverse brain drain begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Begin?

      Its already been happening for some time. While perhaps not that many academics have left the US directly for Canada, the Canucks have been out-competing the US for foreigners is several cutting edge fields for some time now. I was just in Ottawa in June for a conference, and one presenter said
       
       

      We love George Bush. Every time he opens his mouth we get a flood of additional overseas job applicants
    2. Re:Let the reverse brain drain begin! by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right.

      I wouldn't move to Canada unless Hillary gets a elected and the US gets a universal health-care system. For the same reason that I will never join a union. I don't believe in tying myself to the lowest common denominator. For instance, please see the quote below regarding cancer treatment in Canada, taken from the Globe and Mail.

      "There is an unofficial postal-code lottery, in which patients in less populous, poorer areas of the country, like the Atlantic region and the Far North, get short shrift," André Picard

    3. Re:Let the reverse brain drain begin! by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      Won't happen. Canada is not a high tech Mecca because the revenue is primarily based on primary industries (o&g, forestry, agriculture.) So unless you want a real boring IT job, don't expect the homecommings and the migrations.

      Many of my buddies went to Silicon Valley in the 90s. They all have those magic $900k 100 year mortgages. Its hard to walk away when you're locked in to the area and the lifestyle.

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  53. fiat money sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The value of currency is bullshit anyway as long as the currency is by fiat.
    The fact that our money is all "elastic" makes it purest BS.
    What's really sinking the U.S. dollar is strong inflation. You DO realize that's why they changed the inflation index to not include food anymore, right? They don't want to paint a real picture of what inflation is like because they don't want to cause a panic. If you include housing and food you get a double digit inflation rate over the last umpteen years.

    What's worse? Now that the U.S. subprime crisis is in full-swing, the FDIC/Fed Reserve are propping up lenders by giving them money. (Remember the news about this a few weeks ago about opening up billions of dollars?) Where does that money come from? Nowhere! It's made from an elastic currency, which is the same as saying it is really coming indirectly from the people in the form of inflation as the money supply is diluted.

    Now if only we had a gold standard again.... If banks weren't given government guarantees with fiat money all the time, they wouldn't have incentive to make shady loans in the first place for fear of going out of business if too many default. i.e. we wouldn't have a subprime mess in the first place. And even if we did, the cost of Countrywide going out of business isn't nearly as big as inflation across the entire populace.

    And then there's that whole national debt thing...

    1. Re:fiat money sucks by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now if only we had a gold standard again....
      The US would have been bankrupt decades ago, and there would have never been near the same level of economic growth. The gold standard doesn't prevent economic mismanagement.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  54. Yikes! Do the math by donutello · · Score: 1

    It's not a wash. Simplistically,

    Profit(P) = Sales Price(S) - Cost of US input(U) - Cost of Canadian input(C)

    Imagine all those figures staying constant in their respective currencies. In USD terms, S and U are the same but C has gone up so P is smaller than it used to be in USD. Convert that back to Canadian Dollars and P becomes even smaller.

    Things in economics do tend towards an equilibrium but that doesn't mean the same state as before. The reason for the fall in the USD is because the previous value meant foreign imports were a lot cheaper than local production, which resulted in the trade deficit, which in turn causes the USD to fall in value.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  55. PS# by king-manic · · Score: 1

    I've been saying for a longtime that the PS3 isn't over priced relative to the PS2 since in Canada the launch price adjusted for inflation is within $50 of the PS2 launch price. Whats happened is the US's dollar has fallen. The relatively equal Japanese, European, Canadian price is close to the launch PS2 price. What Nintendo did was aim lower and what MS did was subsidize heavily. Which makes the PS3 relatively expensive compared to them. That is why the PS3 is doing well in markets outside the US.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:PS# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it? The PS3 has shipped about 1million units in Europe where there's a population of 800million and 2million in the US where there's 300million people.

      The PS3 is rediculously expensive in Europe.

  56. Cost of Walmart by chazard · · Score: 1

    When you talk about building a manufacturing infrastructure, this is a classic example of the cost of having so many consumer goods made offshore.
    When these goods are manufactured there, sure there are points made on the retail sale, but the cost to the economy for cheap consumer goods results in a lower paying service jobs and reliance on foreign countries for most goods.

    If the foreign manufacturers started adding a 10% fee to everything shipped to the USA, then you have a HUGE increase in inflation and a further devalue of the dollar and this puts the entire economy at risk.

    This is the cost of shopping at the big box stores and being pleased at buying your offshore manufactured goods at discounted rates.
    As for the comment about service jobs, the scary thing is that continue to see those shipped offshore too, have you called a tech support line in the last few years??

    C

  57. 1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents by JamJam · · Score: 3, Informative

    What goes up usually comes down. Here's a little history: The Canadian dollar has seen some steep ebbs and flows in its history. In 1864, the greenback traded at less than 36 cents (Canadian), an all-time low for the U.S. currency. In 2002, by contrast, the loonie traded as low as 62 cents Quoted from http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070920.wdollar0920/BNStory/robNews/home

    1. Re:1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's always reasons.
      Despite smaller economy giving it less weight to throw around, Canada has improved fiscal policy while US has been fucking up theirs.

      The 36 cents was just after US decoupled from gold standard for the first time.

    2. Re:1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents by jax9999 · · Score: 0

      We used to peg our currency against the pound, at the time the Canadian Dollar was worth 2 American dollars.

    3. Re:1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents by Hemogoblin · · Score: 1

      At that time in 1864 it looked as if the Union was losing the civil. That was the reason the greenback was trading so low. That is hardly comparable to the present day situation.

    4. Re:1864 the greenback traded at less than 36 cents by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      While the high you mentioned was a million billion years ago in market terms, the low of 62 cents was only four years ago.

      In four years, the relative value of the Canadian dollar to the US dollar has risen by over 60%.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  58. Why? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oil.

    1. Re:Why? by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      "Oil".

      How very simplistic. RTFA. While commodities are certainly hugely important, they don't tell the whole story.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  59. Exporting is only one aspect of the economy by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Importing is another aspect.

    If your economy starts importing stuff from the US in a major way, the Canadian dollar will also fall until the imbalance is removed. There's a tendency for trade to balance out unless like China, one currency is locked to a different rate than the other.

    --
    Deleted
  60. Parity error by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    I don't expect Canadians will see much benefit from this for a while, in terms of trading with the US.

    Case in point: I live in Canada. I want a new cordless reciprocating saw that works with my Home Depot-brand Ryobi cordless tool set. So I went to the American homedepot.com website and looked it up. I discovered it was available for $50. Great, the price should be about the same in Canada, I thought. I went to the Home Depot closest to where I live and found the saw - where it was selling for $80. There's no excuse other than price-gouging to sell an item for that kind of markup when the Canadian dollar and American dollar are almost equal.

    Conclusion: It's going to take a while for prices to equalize while American companies with footholds in Canada will gouge as much as they can out of us to pay for that stock they imported when the dollar was worth less.

    And for the record, for all the Americans who don't think this is important, the US is Canada's biggest trading partner, but Canada is the US's biggest trading partner, too. Look it up.

    1. Re:Parity error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "excuse other than price-gouging"

      Well, I thought liked your "free" health care.
      I guess it is not so free, after alll ...

    2. Re:Parity error by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      did you calculate the tariffs you pay on imports? In the USA we don't pay tariffs on most foreign imports. I'm guessing Canadians do with this kind of price difference.

      America's goal is to supply as many consumer goods for as cheap as possible. I'm not sure your country has that same goal. You probably wouldn't have anywhere near a surplus if you didn't have tariffs.

      Canada, from what I know, is far more protectionist than the USA. Check if that saw is imported from somewhere that has a tariff. Also, assume that the good hasn't caught up to the quickly changing currency value.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    3. Re:Parity error by Monkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a relevant comment if he cuts off his hand with the saw, but otherwise I don't see how Home Depot marking up an item by 60% is a result of the Canadian health care system.

  61. You are correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low dollar is good? Ok, let it fall to zero. Everybody is wiped out. Great!

    The low dollar scam was perpetrated by liberal propaganda outlets to distract the public from the fact that the dollar fell while the liberals were in power.

  62. Wrong on the Portuguese, too by r_cerq · · Score: 1

    It's "norte-americano" (literally "north-american"). Still innacurate (last time I looked, our new Canadian Overlords were located in North America, too)

    1. Re:Wrong on the Portuguese, too by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > It's "norte-americano" (literally "north-american").

      Not really. If you tell someone in the Caribbean, South America, or Central America that you're 'norteamericano', they're going to think you're Mexican. Just like the term 'iberoamericano' -- it technically COULD be a generic Spanish equivalent for "Hispanic" or "Latin American", but it's not -- the only people who EVER use the term to refer to themselves are Mexicans.

      The official name of Mexico is "Los Estados Unidos de Mejico" (literally, "The United States of Mexico"). Just try using "EE.UU.", "Los Estados Unidos" (without "de Mejico" at the end), or even "The United States" (without "of America" at the end) to refer to Mexico in a Mexican courtroom. First, you'll be laughed at. Then, if you persist, you'll be charged with contempt of court for being pedantic and annoying the judge.

  63. Lopsided == Bad by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The traditional economic theories of Adam Smith and D. Ricardo under-stated the increased risk associated with free trade, especially lopsided trade. Sure, the average return on free trade is higher than protectionism, but like just about any investment, higher returns also means more risk. I think the US should have a policy that prohibits or discourages lopsided trading. The more lopsided our trade is with a given country, the higher the tarriffs on their goods. We need to balance things out somewhat. A little lopsidenedness is okay; a lot is just too risky.

    1. Re:Lopsided == Bad by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      There is a proposition to put a 27.5% tariff on imports from China. This is mainly because China keeps its currency artificially low in value. It's really hurting American manufacturing, etc. Wal-Mart makes money I guess. But it creates a beyond unfair market for American companies. The tariff would in effect make China's currency value relative to what it should be. It's a good thing.

      The current American administration is against it. They look at the short term benefits that insanely cheap Chinese imports create. Of course they don't care about the long term destruction this is causing our economy. We really are like a drug addict who sacrifices long term health and stability for a short term high.

      But they have the upper hand because what are people going to listen to? Someone proposing that we charge more for consumer goods imported form China because it will benefit Americans in the long term? Or, someone who says we want it cheap now! Most people don't have a clue in hell about economics. They always listen to the stupid short term thing that makes them feel good now.

      Allowing China to load up on dollars by keeping their own currency artificially low is just bad policy.

      I seriously hope then that the plan is to let them pay our debt for years and when it comes time to pay them back we just nuke 'em.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:Lopsided == Bad by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      and when it comes time to pay them back we just nuke 'em. Good luck with that. China's favorite new ally is Russia, and unless your government has managed to secretly produce hundreds of thousands of new nukes, mounted them on shiny new rockets, built the magic space shield, and dug bunkers under all the cities, the Russians would beat you hands down in a nuclear exchange. Given that their population is spread out and not as reliant on a power grid and the internet as Americans are a fair number of them might not even notice a war had taken place.

      As for the odds that the US government has done any such thing in secret...well I wouldn't bet on it.
    3. Re:Lopsided == Bad by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't actually want to nuke anyone. That was more or less absurdity.

      However, in a war I'm not in fear of the USA's ability to win a traditional or nuclear war with anyone. In the traditional sense, Iraq was toppled in a couple days. That is, their government and ability to wage war was destroyed in days. Russia might take 3 weeks.

      Russia wouldn't be able to afford the fuel necessary to send a rocket over the ocean. Russia is more or less irrelevant in today's global economy. They're broke and it isn't looking better for them. As for not noticing a war even took place, you're probably right. Plenty of Russians live in such poverty and in ruins, it looks like they were just recently bombed.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Lopsided == Bad by n+dot+l · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't actually want to nuke anyone. That was more or less absurdity. Understood. But if China really did do something hostile over the trade imbalance it could escalate into war so it bears some discussion.

      Russia wouldn't be able to afford the fuel necessary Huh? Have you read anything at all about the Russia starting up all of its old Soviet-era air force exercises? Heres's one example and you can Google for more (BBC had a good story on this a couple of months ago, this is just the first one Google news brought up). Not exactly the sort of thing a country with no fuel reserves would be doing...

      more or less irrelevant in today's global economy Russia's now one of the world's biggest energy producers/exporters. Europe buys a lot of energy from them these days. And much of what Russia doesn't produce, it controls, since many of the pipelines to Europe run through the former soviet block.

      Plenty of Russians live in such poverty and in ruins, it looks like they were just recently bombed. Please don't mistake a lack of civilian comfort for national poverty. They're still running an economy that's very similar to what they had in the Soviet days. Back then in many cities the power would go out at 11PM. It wasn't that the plant shut down, it's just that the electricity was all diverted to munitions plants because they were an economic priority. Today resources are being diverted into the exploitation of strategic resources (like energy).

      Oh, and keeping the Soviet-style economy in mind, Russia wouldn't have to "buy" anything to sustain a war effort. They'd simply order their people to build it - and that would work because the Russian mentality is nothing like ours is here. For one thing ultra-patriotic nationalism is normal and encouraged in Russia, rather than a silly notion as it is here. For another, not much time has passed since the bad old days when you did as you were told or you simply vanished in the night. People remember that too, and they have no illusions about their leaders not resorting to that kind of pressure in a time of war.
    5. Re:Lopsided == Bad by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Russia wouldn't be able to afford the fuel necessary to send a rocket over the ocean. Russia is more or less irrelevant in today's global economy.

      Russia is the number 3 (or so) oil exporter in the world. As oil reserves go down and the price rises, Russia will have no problem getting what it needs or wants. A very different scenario will play out in the US.

      --
      That is all.
    6. Re:Lopsided == Bad by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, oil has approached a level in cost where drilling the Gulf of Mexico is now profitable. Chevron holds a lot of drilling rights to this area.

      This reserve is thought to be the largest oil reserve in the world. It's the USA's wild card. These reserves have been known about for years but it wasn't profitable to drill them. Now they're finding there is more there than they ever thought.

      Expect to be able to walk to Cuba on the tops of derricks in a few years.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    7. Re:Lopsided == Bad by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      'Never get involved in a land war in Asia'
      --The Princess Bride

      After the immense success of Iraq, are you sure you can conquer China and/or Russia, and hold on to it?.

      Russia is not broke, they have recaptured control of their immense oil reserves and are back on the international playing field. They've kicked out Shell, BP, and Exxon, and are now a force to reckon with. They are far from broke. The US is broke however.

    8. Re:Lopsided == Bad by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      Expect to be able to walk to Cuba on the tops of derricks in a few years. Maybe. If you can shove your way past the throng of Cubans that'll be running the other way...
    9. Re:Lopsided == Bad by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      Russia might take 3 weeks.

      I seem to recall seeing this very "prediction" about the ability of those silly, impoverished Russians to defend themselves somewhere else before .... first made by a short little dude from France, and then by another one with a funny moustache and a cow-lick hairdo from Germany .... you wouldn't know how it went for the both of them, per chance, would you?

    10. Re:Lopsided == Bad by TheSync · · Score: 1

      There is a proposition to put a 27.5% tariff on imports from China. This is mainly because China keeps its currency artificially low in value. It's really hurting American manufacturing

      Actually US manufacturing output is at an all-time high. Manufacturing in the US is doing fine, it just is becoming more automated and productive, thus needs fewer workers.

      http://www.rutledgeblog.com/askrutl/archives/000340.html

  64. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

    "The Canadian Dollar is taxed much more then the American Dollar."

    "Socialism is great till you run out of other peoples money."

    Oh really? Care to show some evidence of this?

    As for the tired claim of socialism, please show how many governments in Canada are socialist, including the current federal government.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  65. Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by MacDork · · Score: 1

    People assume that the dollar falling in value in relation to foreign currency is a bad thing.

    Where'd you learn that, TV? It is a bad thing. The US Dollar is the world's reserve currency. To quote the Wiki:

    The United States dollar is the most important reserve currency in the world today. Throughout the last decade, well over 50% of the total allocated foreign exchange reserves of countries have been in US dollars. For this reason, the US dollar is said to have "reserve currency status", making it possible for the United States to run higher trade deficits (financed by seigniorage) with limited economic impact (see currency crisis) as long as the major foreign holders of dollars continue to hold them.

    How long do you think foreign nations are going to continue to hold dollars as dollars plummet year after year? Bernake's 50/50 rate cut on Tuesday told the world the dollar is nowhere near finished devaluing. What do you think happens to the dollar when all those foreigners get fed up with their devaluing dollar reserves and decide to dump them on the open market? Interest rate cuts didn't save Japan's real estate market in the 90's. Interest rate cuts won't save America now. If those dollar reserves start to flood the market, America is seriously fucked.

    1. Re:Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said in September 2007 that the euro could replace the U.S. dollar as the world's primary reserve currency. It is "absolutely conceivable that the euro will replace the dollar as reserve currency, or will be traded as an equally important reserve currency."

      Seems like Greenspan thinks it might happen.

    2. Re:Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Seriously, people don't realize how seriously fucked we are if/when this happens.

      And do they think that other countries won't jump on this? Wait for Argentina to stop selling us fuel. Now the price of fuel is $6.00/gallon.

      Everything will go way up in price except peoples income. But it won't even be worth driving to work because you'll only be paying to get to and form work, back to the shelter or where ever.

      The one thing that can save us is our massive investment in the military. Our research will have to continue to be top notch and our spending in the military will have to continue to be huge. We will be protection for hire. But even that's a nightmare. We become the nastiest country on the planet at that point.

      Also, I guess our farms too. We do indeed have a ton of farms and create a lot of food.

      So, food and guns is what we become.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    3. Re:Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      No the US needs fuel to both carry out farming and to distribute food.

      The US would become a country with a huge military and a need for resources.

      You where right the first time, its a potential catastrophe.

    4. Re:Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      We become the nastiest country on the planet at that point.

      A lot of people think you already are.

    5. Re:Does "reserve currency" mean anything to you? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You think China and Japan dont know this? They never expect to be paid back for all th treasury bonds they buy. They consider subsidizing the US consumer as a cost of doing business with the global cop. The huge military enforcing Pax Americana on the world needs to be paid for and as it maintains worldwide peace it is paid for by worldwide contributions via the use of the US dollar as a reserve currency. It was the same during the cold war except there were two economic block - those who used dollar as the trading currency and those who used ruble as the trading currency ergo the cold war was never about communism as otherwise communist countries like China and Yugoslavia would not have been on the American side as they were and capitalist countries like India would not have been on the Russian side. The US won that economic war and now the USD is the trade currency everywhere and as long the American military maintains Pax Americana, Americans can afford to consume all the luxuries they want and pay for it with worthless pieces of paper. This is very similar to the situation under the British empire where Britain exported very little but imported a lot from its colonies but could afford to do so as the colonies were not allowed to trade outside the pound sterling system. The brilliance of this is America has turned the entire world into its economic colony without having to deal with the negative repurcussions of holding political colonies. The only way this Golden Age of American consumerism could come to an end is if America loses in Iraq. If the world stops fearing the American military Pax Americana and the Dollar economy breaks down just like Pax Brittania and the Sterling economy ended after WW2. The bottomline is if Americans want to continue their luxurious lives victory in Iraq is necessary.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  66. our christmas parade uses penquins by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For unclear resaons our local Xmas parade started incorporating more and more penquins each year on its floats. I guess it might have something to with all the penguin movies rather than Linus. Santa must have a really bad GPS, is all I can say.

    1. Re:our christmas parade uses penquins by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not so much that his GPS is out. I expect that he's just getting preparing to move shop to the south pole. With global warming melting his ice/land, he'll need something more solid to operate from. Plus I hear that the elves have unionized, and penguines are still willing to work for herring.

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
  67. A Cheaper Dollar Harms Most Americans by mpapet · · Score: 1

    All of the moderators that rewarded this simplistic thinking haven't thought this one through enough.

    * American products become cheaper to foreign markets. This helps with the trade imbalances we currently have.
    Maintaining the view that reaching some sort of trade parity is a common good is still fiercely debated in economics. How many years has this been going on with no apparent harm? Don't get side tracked into other issues related to, but not dealing specifically with trade imbalance.

    If it were the case that the U.S. had a booming manufacturing segment, you would indeed be correct. Long ago the common wisdom was the U.S. economy was becoming a service economy. Let's agree it is for a minute and keep reading.

    * Foreign products become more expensive to American consumers, also helping with trade deficits.
    Devaluing currency sets off an inflationary cycle. It makes everything imported more expensive. As a result, you will do some combination of buying less and demanding higher wages. Except, I thought a cheaper dollar was supposed to make it easier to sell american products?

    * It discourages foreign workers from sneaking into the US. Getting $4.00 an hour is suddenly not so much compared to what they get paid in their home country.
    Okay, enough with the veiled immigrant bashing. Americans don't take jobs that pay $4/hr. Instead of considering the idea that the huge number $4/hr jobs might be a problem, we all accept immigrants (illegal or otherwise) who work for $4/hr.

    IMHO, cheap credit is a crack pipe the U.S. economy has been living off of for decades. The financial world knows that. They've been exporting investing dollars too. Americans won't control their own spending/saving and this is one of the consequences. China's economic/political policies have a role in this too, but the first place to look for blame is in the mirror.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:A Cheaper Dollar Harms Most Americans by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Canada, Japan, the UK, the US, France, Germany, Australia, etc are all largely service based economies if you look at the percentage of their GDP that's due to services.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:A Cheaper Dollar Harms Most Americans by mpapet · · Score: 1

      And? A cheaper dollar still sets of an inflationary cycle that, wait for it...... Raises prices!!!!

      So, the notion that our goods become cheaper is temporary at best.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  68. Watch out for UPS rip-off by chifut · · Score: 1

    Beware of using UPS for shipping from USA to Canada.. UPS will charge you like $30-$40 on a $50USD product. That's because UPS charges you "convenience fee"(brokerage fee) of $20 for a $40 product. (http://www.ups.com/content/ca/en/shipping/cost/zones/customs_clearance.html) [UPS.com] USPS charges you a $5.00 flat fee.

  69. Damn that exchange rate! by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

    As someone who lives in Canada and works in the US, all I have to say is "I miss 2001 and the days of $1CDN = $0.65US" :)

    --
    Have EVDO, will travel.
  70. and the euro is winning-- i by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    in part cause the DEA got $500.00 bills quashed years ago...

    I knew I'd read this before- and I found details readily.. multiple sources exist,
    this is a good one from 2004
    http://slate.com/id/2111504/

    "But among a subset of global cash connoisseurs, the dollar is losing ground to the euro--"

    "Finally, in the past two years, euros have also become easier to carry, store, and hide than dollars. Generally, the largest denomination of U.S. currency readily available is the $100 bill. But in the past two years, the European Central Bank has started to print 200-euro and 500-euro bills. These larger bills thus allow for the concentration of wealth in smaller packages. At today's rates, a 500-euro note is worth $682."

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  71. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by g8oz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >>Socialism is great till you run out of other peoples money.

    So are budget deficits. Wait until the Chinese get sick of funding yours.

  72. Blatantly obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's piracy.

  73. Overtaxed by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Canada has run a budget surplus in each of the last 10 years.

    This goes to show that the Canadian people are overtaxed, and that Canada is doing nothing significant to rectify that.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Overtaxed by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

      Canada has run a budget surplus in each of the last 10 years.

      This goes to show that the Canadian people are overtaxed

      How so? We still have a huge national debt, which the surplus is being (at least partially) directed towards reducing.

      I'm not saying we're NOT overtaxed, but the simple fact that we've had a decade of budget surpluses doesn't prove anything one way or the other.
    2. Re:Overtaxed by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 1

      We'll be overtaxed if rates stay the same after the national debt is paid off. Ours is actually going down a few thousand CAD every second after all, rather up a few tens of thousands USD every second.

    3. Re:Overtaxed by jfp51 · · Score: 1

      I agree but you can be sure that it has been allocated for future health care, social security, etc costs whereas in the United States....

    4. Re:Overtaxed by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      This goes to show that the Canadian people are overtaxed, and that Canada is doing nothing significant to rectify that.

      No, this means that Canada has a graying population (like most of the Western countries) and is taking prudent fiscal steps to ensure that it can meet its obligation to those who helped build the Commonwealth. I suppose you'd like the government to do away with taxes and put the old folks out on an ice flow?

      --
      That is all.
  74. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm sorry. Federal government in Canada has been running surplus's for 10 years.

  75. Not really by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1

    In order to see anything useful, you should also plot the Euro and the Yen. While the CAD has increased slightly in buying power in recent years, the bigger news is that the USD has plummeted, likely due to bad fiscal policy (war debt).

    Not really. The US$ hasn't fallen with respect to the Yen (graph) or the Mexican Peso (graph), and it's fallen only slightly (5%) against the Chinese Yuan (graph). So of its top four trading partners, it's only Canada that the US dollar has seriously fallen against, and in general it's mostly the CDN$ and Euro that've increased so much against it.

    The US$ and Euro are major trading blocs - each about 20% of the world economy - but they're not the only story.
    1. Re:Not really by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      Of course, it should be noted that all three currencies you note are considered to be rather undervalued compared to the dollar. The US has been complaining loudly about China in particular keeping the yuan artificially undervalued for some time; had China complied, the dollar would have fallen much further against the yuan.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  76. Same for the UK. by Xest · · Score: 1

    It's sad, because I can get a lot of books cheaper from Amazon.com than I can from Amazon.co.uk even with international shipping. The only downsides really are that it takes a little longer for delivery and I feel a little more guilty about having it shipped all that way. The same goes for some computer games or DVDs, if I buy a couple at once even with import duties it's still cheaper.

  77. Umm.. by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    Higher taxes perhaps? Canada is a welfare state afterall (a good thing in my book).

  78. Hey American exporters..stop ripping us off! by BigCanOfTuna · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian, I love to see our Dollar gain in strength. We get our hockey players cheaper and vacationing in the States becomes more attractive. However, I decided to cancel my iPod Touch because it is still priced $40 more than what US citizens can get it for. I can accept a small premium because of shipping and handling, but $40!! Come on!

  79. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by ttapper04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was astounded to find that you are right. Federal tax in Canada caps out at 29% http://www.taxtips.ca/fedtax.htm Where the United States caps out at 35%http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/article/0,,id=164272,00.html. One could probubly make an argument that the US federal rates are lower for low income, but there is no doubt that they are higher overall.

    Sales tax may be a diffrent story however. The rates in Canada range from 6% in one province, to 13%-16.6% in all the others. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provincial_Sales_Tax I have never seen a US sales tax rate over 7% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the_United_States

    In any event I thank you for pointing out the Federal rate difference.

  80. Because... by burndive · · Score: 1

    they can.

    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  81. Isn't This One Of The Signs Of The Apocalypse? by bc90021 · · Score: 1

    I remember making poking fun at the Canucks on alt.geek and mentioning how their money couldn't buy much... now that wouldn't work! Pretty soon the US will be importing Poutine...

    1. Re:Isn't This One Of The Signs Of The Apocalypse? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. Poutine is delicious. Just don't eat it every day... no, wait, it's probably better than Big Macs, so go ahead.

  82. Parity not in the stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Canucks will get cheaper Macs as the Canadian prices get closer to US prices with every new release."

    It's actually surprizing, how prices in the US are generally still cheaper - I guess Canadian companies are making some extra cash, by not passing on directly and immediately the very similar exchange rate.

  83. Maybe for macs ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    but it means us Canucks will get cheaper Macs as the Canadian prices get closer to US prices with every new release

    It may or may not be true that Macs have become cheaper as the Canadian dollar has risen (I don't know).

    But, the prices we pay for most consumer items is still vastly out of whack. Sticker prices still show the exact same higher value which accounted for the exchange rate when we traded much lower.

    We're not suddenly gaining the advantage of a higher-purchasing power of our dollar. We effectively pay the same sticker price domestically as we have all year. So, effectively, we're paying more for goods.

    Cheers
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  84. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

    Don't suppose you've got a tax rate on the middle class handy do you? Didn't think so there sport.

    So I pay around 30% in taxes here, and I'd pay around 25% in the US...

    We have a massive surplus (remember those?) that goes in to renewing our health care and infrastructure. Sort of a help out the community approach, that might be difficult for some people to understand but I'm sure no one here.

    Yea.. You've certainly got us on that 5% though.. Wow. We are socialist pigs!

    --
    I Like Pie...
  85. Bachelor Party by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    I had mine over 6 months ago in Vancouver. Good times.

    My friend just had his in Vancouver last week. Those dollar bills aren't as desired as before...

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  86. I'm am not at all surprised by cdn-programmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not at all surprised to see parity. Canada has a strong economy and Alberta especially so.

    There are many reasons for weakeness in the US currency including but not limited to a massive government debt and a glutonous appetite for foreign oil.

    Yesterday T. Boone Pickens was on TV on the business channel I sometimes watch. He made a number of interesting comments:

    1) World oil production is about 85 million barrels per day and T. Boone does Not think it can be increased. The best information I have comes from expertize within the Geological Survey of Canada, but this expertise is certainly not limited to the GSC, and we are now pegging the peak of work oil production at September 2006. If production increases above that level then it will not be by much. T. Boone commented that the estimated demand for 4th quarter 2007 is 88 million Barrels per day.

    Hence we will see the oil price driven up in order to destroy demand. In all likelihood it will get worse.

    2) T. Boone says he favours nuclear and pointed out that General Electric says they can build a reactor in 3 years plus the friction added by the regulators and dealing with opposition. Probably this is correct.

    3) Canada is ramping up Tar Sands as fast as we possibly can which explains why our economy is so strong. We cannot increase production has enough to make much of a difference. Currently we are investing billions per year.

    Currently the USA consumes about 23 million barrels of oil per day.

    Any way you want to slice it - this is not good news. It is clear the US dollar will continue to weaken is decades of political scrapping and decades of economic mismanagement finally face their day of reconning. As has been said many times, in order to avoid the melt down of our economies due to lack of energy availablity and high cost, we have to build at break neck speed an infrastructure that can replace oil and gas. We needed to start about 15 years before the peak of world oil production. We have not done so.

    If the peak really was last year, then all hell is about to unfold and it will not surpise me to see gas rationing in the not too distant future.

    Some things to remember.

    Ethanol will not solve the problem. 100% of the US corn production will provide less than 2 weeks of liquid fuel. Next, ethanol from any source lives by the equation that 1 tonne of dry plant mass yields the equivalent of about 2 barrels of oil and this if we can do the conversion for free. This includes cellulostic ethanol.

    We don't have the plants build anyways.

    Industry runs under much tighter constraints than consumers. A consumer will simply give up a dinner at a restaurant in order to save the money to pay for his next tank of gas. Industry shuts down the plant and lays everyone off. We have already lost most of the North American fertilizer industry and plastic feedstock production (IE the pellets that go into injection moulding machines) is also going to die. Electricity production from Natural Gas is not threatened yet but expect power costs to continue to climb as this sector pushes out weaker sectors. In all cases jobs are lost and expensive infrastructure goes idle.

    If one looks at the mortgage crisis and factors in the job loses precipitated by energy issues, then it becomes clear that this picture is not yet well understood.

    Next consider how a government deals with recession? They print currency. Faced with the choice of inflation or recession, which do you choose? People on fixed incomes will lose their retirement.

    Of course - one way to look at this is that its the retiring generation that lived beyond their means and created the mess. Their children certainly didn't. So maybe its poetic justice. However I do not think that people realize how bad its going to be. I watched my father-in-law lose his retirement because of the inflation Pierre Elliot (Idjot) Trudeau and his henchman Jean (Cretin) Chretien during the 1970's.

    In part this

    1. Re:I'm am not at all surprised by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Ethanol will not solve the problem. 100% of the US corn production will provide less than 2 weeks of liquid fuel. Next, ethanol from any source lives by the equation that 1 tonne of dry plant mass yields the equivalent of about 2 barrels of oil and this if we can do the conversion for free. This includes cellulostic ethanol.
      It's also a net-negative energy fuel. The process of converting the corn to ethanol takes up more energy than the ethanol provides.
    2. Re:I'm am not at all surprised by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Your essay would have more credibility without the spelling and grammatical mistakes.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:I'm am not at all surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      World oil production is about 85 million barrels per day and T. Boone does Not think it can be increased.
      He said the same thing about 84 million, so he's not what you might call a reliable source.

      Currently the USA consumes about 23 million barrels of oil per day.
      If by 23 you mean 21, then yes.

      I watched as a man and his wife who had worked hard and lived fruggley say their nest egg which was at they time they retired worth a little more than the value of a house erode away while they sat on low interest long term mortgage investments
      Then why the hell did he stay in those investments?

      Saudi Arabia currently produces in the vicinity of 10 million Barrels of oil per day
      And has had rock-steady production equal to its OPEC quota for all of 2007. And has just announced an increase to that quota starting in November.

      Rumours of its demise are not terribly well substantiated at this point. But, hey, why let that stop a good rant?

      Where does it go from here? Maybe oil will be priced in Euros? Maybe foreign investment will decline as the dollar drops?
      Maybe the world doesn't end, much like it didn't end due to Y2K. No matter what peakers like Kunstler predicted:

      "we are in for a serious event. Systems will fail, crash, seize up, cease to function....Y2K is real. Y2K is going to rock our world."

      So forgive me if I'm a little skeptical of your more apocalyptic assertions. Especially when the US could be 90% of the way towards being an oil exporter by simply reducing petrol consumption to European levels.
  87. I, for one... by LoneGNUman · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new on par overlords...

  88. Natural gas is very limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But natural gas is needed to melt the oil off the tar sands. And there is already a crunch all over North America on supplies of the gas. The practical limit on the tar sands is probably 20 years or less.

    1. Re:Natural gas is very limited by king-manic · · Score: 1

      But natural gas is needed to melt the oil off the tar sands. And there is already a crunch all over North America on supplies of the gas. The practical limit on the tar sands is probably 20 years or less.

      A nuclear power plant is going up. Canada is one of the largest sources for uranium as well.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Natural gas is very limited by compro01 · · Score: 1

      But natural gas is needed to melt the oil off the tar sands

      no, we just need a good supply of thermal energy. nuclear energy would work good, especially as we have decent reactor designs and lots of uranium to run them.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  89. Translation: The US Dollar is worth dirt. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I can buy more with 2 dead horses than 2 dollar bills.

  90. Explanation by BoredAtWorkWhatElse · · Score: 1

    I am dim. Why is this funny? Is it a Bush quote?
    Enjoy! (Work safe ... if you can stop laughing anyway)

  91. Yet another way to look at it by Solandri · · Score: 1

    When I was growing up in Michigan in the 1970s, the USD and CAD were so close everyone just used both interchangeably in stores. So another way to view this is that after 30+ years, the Canadian dollar has finally made it back to where it was in 1976.

    1. Re:Yet another way to look at it by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but from what I read, it's the USD which has fallen to CDN levels... Compare the USD with the Euro and the Yen and you'll see what I mean.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Yet another way to look at it by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My point is the USD has not "suddenly" dropped. The USD rose over the past few decades relative to Canadian dollar, and is now dropping towards levels seen in the 1970s (admittedly right after the Arab oil embargo).

      http://www.oanda.com/convert/fxhistory

      At 5 year intervals, Jan 1, beginning 1976. US$1 =

      British Pounds
      1976 = 0.4943
      1981 = 0.4186
      1986 = 0.6923
      1991 = 0.5165
      1996 = 0.6445
      2001 = 0.6696
      2006 = 0.5781
      curr = 0.4980

      Canadian dollars
      1976 = 1.0168
      1981 = 1.1945
      1986 = 1.3985
      1991 = 1.1604
      1996 = 1.3645
      2001 = 1.4988
      2006 = 1.1641
      curr = 1.0134

      Japanese Yen
      1976 = 305
      1981 = 203
      1986 = 200
      1991 = 135
      1996 = 103
      2001 = 114
      2006 = 117
      curr = 116

      German Mark / Euro (1 Euro = 1.95583 Marks)
      1976 = 1.3398 Euro equiv (2.6205 German Marks)
      1981 = 1.0021 Euro equiv (1.9600 German Marks)
      1986 = 1.2510 Euro equiv (2.4468 German Marks)
      1991 = 0.7627 Euro equiv (1.4917 German Marks, post-reunification)
      1996 = 0.7348 Euro equiv (1.4371 German Marks)
      2001 = 1.0620 Euros (2.0771 German Marks)
      2006 = 0.8446 Euros
      curr = 0.7100 Euros

      So if you look at just the last 6 years, yes it looks like the US dollar is crashing. But compare over 30 years and you see that the British Pound and Canadian dollar first dropped against the US dollar, and are now returning to levels seen in 1976.

      The Yen rose during the 1980s when Japan became an economic powerhouse, and has held pretty steady during the dollar's recent drop. In other words, the Yen is dropping right along with the dollar relative to the Euro, Pound, and CAD.

      The German Mark and Euro have been up and down in 30 years, but the current rate is really not that far off from historical rates against the Mark.

      Claiming that the US dollar is dropping into obscurity like some have been saying is like looking at a sports team's last 6 games and seeing that they're 0-6 and claiming they're dying; all the while ignoring that in the previous 24 games they were 15-9. Yes there are serious problems, but it's probably better characterized as "coming back down to earth" rather than crashing.

    3. Re:Yet another way to look at it by Splab · · Score: 1

      The thing is, there is nothing hindering a total collapse of the US dollar, the dollar is not tied to gold prices or anything like that. Also the difference between now and then is the US debt is almost unpayable and the dollar is no longer setting the benchmark.

      And what the hell are you talking about rates against the Mark? There is no longer such a thing, and comparing the Mark with the Euro is downright stupid since the Euro will be traded at an almost fixed rate where the Mark stood in relation to the dollar.

  92. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for that day myself. They're going to unload the USA dollar big time and we're going to see serious drops in the value of that thing. We're talking mega drops.

    We keep selling those treasury bonds to them and it's going to eventually come time to pay the piper. China is in effect subsidizing our war with Iraq.

    Out of curiosity, does Canada have a tariff on imports from China? That's the one thing the USA could do right now to really help themselves. A tariff would level the playing field and force China to value their currency at correct levels.

    Of course American consumers wouldn't go for this because then the garbage Wal-Mart sells would cost more. But it would save us from crippling ourselves even more.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  93. Obiligatory Simpsons quote... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Funny

    In response to both your post and your sig, this really is obligatory:


    Singer: The trading gap shuffle, we're in a heap of trouble, doing the trading gap shuffle!
    Bart: He already sang this song!
    Marge: No, that was about the budget gap. This is the trading gap.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  94. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're going to unload the USA dollar big time and we're going to see serious drops in the value of that thing.


    Oh really? Unload them to whom? I keep hearing this bullshit but have yet to hear who the hell could absorb them.

    They're stuck, and we're stuck.

    I do agree with forcing China's hand on currency valuation though...
  95. From the department-of-DUH. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    This is actually bad for the profits of Canadian corporations that sell their products to the US for US dollars (Canada sells far more to the US that the US sells to Canada);emphasis mine.

    Why, I submit that that is, in fact, the feedback mechanism responsible for the leveling of the currencies.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:From the department-of-DUH. by jax9999 · · Score: 0

      part of the article that you missed is that the canadian dollar isn't losing ground along with the other world currencies... which means that if the markets aren't there down south there are still plenty of happy consumers with money to purchase our goods.

  96. Obligatory! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    All your LOONIES are belong to US!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  97. LETS get it straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) we have massive resource based economy, which translates to what exports to NON american places where our dollar is not changed much.
    China, russia need oil. Other countries need our wheat.

    B) The real issue is the borrowing habits of the american public and its shameful real estate rules.
          When you spend 300-400 BILL /year on war, you aren't looking after the socail and economic needs at home. Its enriching those that already have money and htey arent doing anything for you.

    C) Our budgets are in surplus which means we have cash to spend.

    D) oh my lets migrate all our govt computers to linux and have what a 5% increase in federal spending to play with oh you could really put that to keeping htings going.
    -federal govt savings by migration from MS liscenses 10 Bill, provincial another 7 Billion
    -municipal savings about 3 billion.
    The above would be enough to whethar ANY mass serious downturn in america.

    E) Ever since you yankies screwed with us over the softwood lumber deal we have been quietly diversifying our need of american good.

    F) China followed by russia very shortly will suplant america as our main buyers of oil.
    Add to that a proposed russia canada northern oil idea and you have america in 50 years as a 3rd world country.

    G) you have 8 million slave laborers er mexicans, and slowly as they get the boot or have to pay mroe you take another hit. Would have been better to not let em in EH?

    H) albertans are now asking for higher proceeds of oil profits and if you dont want the oil im sure russia and china will. When you can't fuel that tank or copter or plane then you finished for warmongering.

    I) Alberta, BC, saskatchewan all are growing economies due to oil and other resources look at double digit growth
    example: 14$/hr to work at tim hortons
    Prices: are only about 5% on avg higher then elsewhere.
    300-400K jobs expected in alberta alone in next ten years.
    And in passing, if americans dont want canadian oil where else you going to get it.
    Neat how things change eh.
    J) we also WILL be leaving afghanistan in 2009 , better find a country with balls to take the lead , seems the UN said no one wants to do it.

  98. Proof that travelling pays by mendax · · Score: 1

    I was in Paris on Euro Day on 1/1/2002 when the Euro was at US$0.88 and came home with about 40 euros. I still have them and they're worth a lot more now. I was in Canada two weeks ago and still have CN$30 in my wallet. I've made a little more profit that covered the conversion fee (I went to a credit union ATM and used my credit union ATM card so no ATM fee). I need to travel more so I can retire. ;-)

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
  99. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The idea, or theory, and it's just that and nothing more, is that as the dollar slides because it becomes more and more common, countries holding a lot of them are going to dump them. And then more countries will dump them, creating a chain reaction. So the people on the bottom holding the dollars end up being the losers. Who are these people? American's of course. We hold them every day. We work for them, our houses are paid for in them and we owe them to people.

    This is tied to us too. We don't save money in this country. The average person doesn't have a savings any longer. They have a debt. And as individual's debt climbs more and more, the value of the dollar becomes less and less.

    There's a lot of forces at work making the dollar worth less and less. From our lack of savings and increase in personal debt to foreign countries paying off our debt via t-notes. And then of course countries we deal with artificially keeping their currency low.

    You do realize that if China did push their currency up, our goods would go up in price too. That would make the dollar more valuable of course, but not short term. So Bush isn't pushing for it because his Wal-Mart voter base doesn't want to pay more for cheap imports.

    So with all these forces at work lowering the value of the dollar, the theory is big spenders like China are going to eventually say "screw the dollar, lets sell them now while they're worth something" setting off a chain reaction of dollars. The dollar becomes very much so worthless at this point.

    So then interest rates go up because no one can pay their debts. High interest rates are bad of course.

    This is one situation but it's increasingly more likely as we continue down this path.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  100. student loans by ksheff · · Score: 1

    For the Canadians that are working in the US, how has this affected your student loan payments? Have you been following the exchange rates and making the appropriate adjustments in what you've been paying, or have you just been paying them off in US$ units and using the currency exchange advantage to pay off the principle sooner?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  101. Not so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, it is the economists that keep saying it. They get their data from economic indicators such as the stock market, GDP, inflation rate, consumer confidence, unemployment etc. The President just repeats it.

    Actually, only some economists are saying rosy things. Bush is cherry picking the favorable predictions, so he is basically stating his own opinion -- or what he wants us to believe is his honest *cough* opinion. And he is responsible for whatever he says, like everyone else, but even more so, because of his position. When he lies (which is most of the time he's in public), I will call him a liar.

  102. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by jpbelang · · Score: 1

    The sales tax in Quebec is 7.5 %. This is the provincial sales tax.
    6% extra on top of this is Federal sales tax.
    The kicker on this is that they charge provincial sales tax on federal sales tax.

    --
    JP http://www.wearerite.com
  103. Cars still have HUGE price disparity by necro2607 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You think that's bad? It's the exact same thing with cars, too. When you're looking at buying a $49k car (Subaru WRX STI) and you see it's only $33k in USA, well, that's just pure bullshit. I have yet to read ANY reasonable explanation for this extreme disparity.

    I've been looking at buying a car for months (hoping the price would drop on 2008 models but no they are exactly the same) and I WAS going to just buy it in USA and import it to Canada and save myself $5000+, but Honda has just emailed all their US dealership managers stating that if a buyer does this, the warranty is VOID for the vehicle in both US and Canada - your car won't be serviced under warranty even if you drive back down to the US to get it serviced. Obviously they are trying to protect their fucked up excessively-disparate market. Frankly, I don't even want to buy a car at all, now - I'll be paying 30% more than people a mere 20 minute drive from me will be paying for the SAME FUCKING VEHICLE.

    On a more fortunate note, Toyota has stated rather loudly that they WILL honor the warranty of a vehicle purchased in the US and imported into Canada. So, obviously I am considering them at this time. Of course that still doesn't make me feel any better about the fucked up price disparity.

    1. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well I can only think that the size of the market or maybe they require different certification?
      My company does sell software in Canada. We just charge them the US price in dollars and let the customer deal with the exchange rate. Probably not the most convenient system for them but the market for us is very small and it does mean that we don't charge them any more then they would pay in the US.
      Maybe that is why the seem to like our product so much.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by Dorceon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's worse is when you consider how many cars are now made in Canada. You're paying a premium for them to _not_ ship it across the border.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    3. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      How much of a hassle is it to import a used US car into Canada? I know there are some hoops to jump through when importing from Canada to the US, but it can be done. I'd be tempted to go this route, even though I prefer to buy new, with such a large price disparity--with a used car, you're not paying for a warranty you can't use, and with a Honda or Toyota, you're not likely to need it (exception: V6 transmissions on some 1999-2003 Honda/Acuras).

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    4. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      It's a total pain in the ass, to put it simply, making it not worth the hassle unless you're saving some serious coin. You can read the a guide on importing a car to Canada here.

    5. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by necro2607 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, like the manufacturing plant that Toyota opened in Ontario fairly recently.

      I wonder if Ontario residents get screwed as badly as us over in BC. I'm guesing the MSRP on cars is country-wide, here. Pretty damned amazing. Can you imagine paying 30% more for a vehicle built 15 minutes from your own home, compared to what people in a seperate country pay? Jeez..

    6. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by ccguy · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at buying a car for months (hoping the price would drop on 2008 models but no they are exactly the same) and I WAS going to just buy it in USA and import it to Canada and save myself $5000+, but Honda has just emailed all their US dealership managers stating that if a buyer does this, the warranty is VOID for the vehicle in both US and Canada

      Audi, Peugeot and BMW tried to do the same thing in the European Union... fortunately this was investigated and they got a huge fine.
    7. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Saving around $15 K would be saving some serious coin. At least as far as I see it. I probably wouldn't make sense if you bought a Ford Focus, but if you're buying what would be a $50,000 car in Canada, it's probably worth the extra effort.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Cars still have HUGE price disparity by Kahm-Hime · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to me when I wanted to buy a gas cook-top(?) - Dual gas burners. They weren't sold anywhere in Canada, and the explanation was that they weren't CSA approved. We finally find a store in the US who will ship us one for an outrageous price (plus the duty/shipping, etc).

      It was manufactured in Ontario, and has CSA certification listings *all over it*!

      Bah!

  104. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by servognome · · Score: 1

    So with all these forces at work lowering the value of the dollar, the theory is big spenders like China are going to eventually say "screw the dollar, lets sell them now while they're worth something" setting off a chain reaction of dollars.
    Sell them to who? They have to spend all those dollars they are holding on something, which would mean purchasing US goods.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  105. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a pyramid scheme. They sell them to someone willing to assume a risk on them. They sell them below market value. Others in turn do the same. Eventually enough people will have gotten out and not want anything to do with the USA dollar. It's like a bad stock.

    Eventually someone at the bottom gets stuck with them. That person is you and I.

    What you're saying is they're stuck with them. I disagree. They can find buyers (lets face it, it's a USA dollar. It will always be worth something) who will pay below market values for them. Others will do the same, creating a domino effect of devaluation of the dollar in circulation.

    What goods are they buying? Do you know what China is doing with all the dollars they have? Stashing them away by buying USA t-bonds. They're not investing in American companies, they're funding the war on terror. Essentially paying us off to build factories and infrastructure on the cheap.

    They're going to get sick of holding worthless dollars and start selling their goods to emerging countries that can give them something of value back.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  106. Since you mention PRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When an asset is not performing well, the typical response is to replace it with another asset that is doing better.

    From a business perspective, dumping USD would be stupid. A slow transition would make more sense.

    But from a military perspective, the global economy is just another potential battleground - and China's overall holdings in USD is quite an arsenal.
    Put another way: The USA may be the strongman, but China is holding his genitals. It could switch partners (EU), or it could squeeze.

    Also, their holdings are just above that held by Japan - if China wanted to be spiteful, they could dump the USD to hurt Japan indirectly.

    When the adjustment takes place, I just hope that the business-minded prevail.

    1. Re:Since you mention PRC by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I agree, they would certainly be selling low.

      But the idea is, is selling now low, but as high as it's going to be for a long time? If you think the USD is going to tank worse and worse, selling low right now could be in effect selling high. If you suspect others are going to sell, you get out now. This has happened in history before.

      It only takes 1 nervous investor to start a chain reaction.

      What we have going for us is the USA is a stable country. The Euro is performing well but how reliable is it that the honeymoon of the EU is going to last? Eventually something will happen that will split them and make skeptics of investors in the Euro. How long has Europe traditionally gotten along? The USA is still the most stable country in the world, mainly due to its infinite military might and alliance with other stable countries. The USA will back its dollar. You can say that with a degree of certainty more than anything else.

      The USA farms a lot and has a lot of natural resources. Oil is at a price that drilling the Gulf of Mexico is worthwhile. This is the largest oil reserve in the world. Break will be put on tables one way or another here. The worlds largest infrastructure is in place as well. There's a lot of "real" assets here.

      We need to export more than culture and guns though.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  107. Voided Warranty by phonicsmonkey · · Score: 1

    If you buy a Honda in the states, they will not honor your warranty in Canada. Free trade only applies when the corporations benefit, not the consumer.

  108. So import one! Re:Parity error by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    You can just import one.

    You need to really watch the couriers because they are experts at ripping people off. I know. I'm an importer and have imported millions of dollars of merchandise.

    However if you are buying into Ryobi then IMHO it doesn't matter really what you pay because you're being silly. Still maybe its better to pay $50 bux for a POS than $80.

    Good brand names include Makita, Hitachi, Bosch, and of course others.

    Now I bought a Delta bench belt sander. There is a plastic belt in it that was about 1/8th of an inch wide. The plastic drive wheel had been designed to handle a belt that was about 1/4 of an inch wide.

    How much do you think that company saved by putting in a plastic belt 50% of the width of that should be there? But then... what of the plastic drive wheel? I can buy metal drive wheels for a few bux. Of course they don't fit since they were not designed for the Delta.

    You know... I paid for quality and I didn't get it. My response... in part warning others... and of course Delta no longer gets my business.

    I have two (2) dead Black and Decker pad sanders and a dead Black and Decker belt sander and a dead Black and Decker router. Funny thing.... when I go and look at a construction site and see what the pro's are using... why don't I see much in the way of Ryobi, Black and Decker, Delta power tools?

    What do I see?

    Makita, Bosch, some Hitachi... there are some others of course.

    So it says a lot IMHO.

    BTW... you can import these other brands as well and with the net its pretty easy to find good pricing.

    Hmm. I suppose for that matter I could start my import business again. But I don't think it is really worth it for $50 items. What I imported before typically retailed over $12,000. Its hard to get enough people together to organize as a $12,000 shipment of power tools. (I would expect this to be the case anyways). Note one would list $12,000 on a B3 the same as one would list $50 bux. Note that its the same number of trips to Customs and the same number of pages of paper work and the same issues with payment of GST and so forth. The only thing that changes is the size of the numbers.

    Be very careful with UPS. With Air transportation they gouge but are up front but at least clear customs at an included cost. With ground transportation last I used them and I will not in the future... they try to apply a clearance tax based on the value of the item. If you were to ship say $12,000 via UPS ground your shipping costs will include a brokerage commission and hey typically don't quote this as a "shipping cost". Next, all they do is write a number on a piece of paper which is called a B3. The cost to UPS to clear an item costing $50 bux is the same as $12,000 and it takes a clerk no more than about 5-10 minutes to do it.

    Think about this. The number they write on teh B3 is the cost of the item in USA currency. Then they multiply this number by the conversion rate which they have to look up for the shipment date. Then they add to this any duty and probably there is none. After that they multiply by the GST rate and add sales tax if applicable. They total these costs and you need to pay this to them if they paid the customs bill for you. The most difficult part is figuring out the classification category. This does not change regardless how much you are importing. For instance I think all power tools fall into one category.

    So... I called UPS and I DO know what to ask them... What is the "Brokerage commission"?

    0-20: free
    20-40: $7.: $19.45
    etc.
    5,000: $69.03
    $5,000 and up: add $5.38 per thousand.

    IE. ground transportation of say $12,000 will cost $(69.03+ 7*5.38) = $106.69

    Remember, the paperwork is identical in all cases. Its one (1) B3 that you need to fill in.

    Well - if you add an unexpected $100 to a $12,000 shipment its maybe ok but an additional unquoted $20 bux for a $50 shipment is quite the gouge especially since you can buy i

  109. That's why I use USPS. by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Fedex and UPS will gouge for all the "brokerage fees" they can get their grubby little mitts on, but the USPS doesn't.

  110. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What you're saying is they're stuck with them. I disagree. They can find buyers (lets face it, it's a USA dollar. It will always be worth something) who will pay below market values for them. Others will do the same, creating a domino effect of devaluation of the dollar in circulation.
    The problem with that is that China would be shooting itself in the foot, as they then destroy the economy of the main trading partner.

    What goods are they buying? Do you know what China is doing with all the dollars they have? Stashing them away by buying USA t-bonds. They're not investing in American companies, they're funding the war on terror.
    At the same time they are not investing in their own economy, so that if the US economy falters it will take China with it.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  111. Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not because he replied to FP this time, but because he is a C-A-N-A-D-I-A-N bacon bit!

  112. Not net EROI -ve Re:I'm am not at all surprised by cdn-programmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was David Pimental from Cornel and others who first proposed this myth. Its simply not true. In fact the energy return is quite decent.

    The thing is that an individual farmer could do quite well running his farm machinery on ethanol that he produces himself. In fact, the average farmer has lots of free time all winter long and could produce all of his required summer fuel and still have lots of time for curling, hunting, fishing and bitching about why there is no money in farming... when in fact there is.

    How do I know? I grew up on a farm and brewing and making wine is something I have done since I was in grade 11.

    I do know what the input costs are and I can assure you Pimental did not. He made many assumptions that are not supported by facts. Nevertheless one of the things they were doing back then was running coal fired distillation and pushing it past the Aseotrop. To be energy +ve you need high efficiency vacuum distillation.

    My point is that its not practical to do this from starch sources which is basically beer making. I think from cellulose it might make sense. The cellulose costs are going to be low, but we are still talking about 1 tonne of dry plant matter is equivalent to 2 barrels of oil once we do the conversion. With oil under $200 per barrel I do not think the economics look good. Next we do not have the technology in place yet.

    The best ideas seem to involve enzymes derived from Trichoderma reeshi. This is a fungus isolated in Gaum during the 1940's. It is used for Stone Washer blue jeans since it does digest cellulose and it loves it in fact. The thing is most of the plant matter we have as feedstocks are not pure cellulose. They also contain pentosans and liganins and T. reeshi doesn't like these. There are other fungii which do like them. I work with some of these but not in the area of fuel production.

    My point is that we are facing a bad bad problem and we do not at this time have in place technology which will do for us what we need. I for instance will not invest in an ethanol plant other than as a trade into the hype - and I have made quite a lot of money doing this.

  113. Nitpick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your general sentiment, I have a few nitpicks..

    You do not get richer by artificially holding your currency lower. You get more manufacturing infrastructure (what China values more than money really) because it's a better buy to invest and build there. It's the same theory as "dumping", tighten your belt now and sell products at a very low profit (or loss) to drive your competitor out of business so you can reap the reward later. Only China's intention is to supplant the US as the new leading country, something they are certainly capable of doing if the US continues on it present road. Historically though, a peaceful change of reigns is very unusual. I would predict a nuclear war to occur before the US will give up it's throne. Let's hope I'm wrong. As an American, it concerns me a good deal.

  114. You can't eat service industry. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That "service industry" is just economic masturbation. I sell services to you, you sell services to somebody else, they sell services to a third guy, around and around ... until somebody decides that they'd like to eat today, or buy a DVD player, or whatever, and buys something that's imported. Suddenly that money is gone from the economy.

    Relying on a bunch of corporate headquarters isn't how you maintain a civilization. Sure, they'll be the last thing to go, but when they do, there won't be a damn thing left. We'll have lots of service industry left, but no real exportable-wealth creation.

    Service industry can act almost like manufacturing, when it 'produces' and 'exports' intellectual property, but as much as US politicians have fastened onto the idea of the 'information economy,' it's not a panacea. I don't see the US exporting enough music, movies, and microcode to make up for the amount of Canadian pressboard furniture, Chinese electronics, and Saudi oil that we consume.

    Right now, we make up for this by issuing debt: we import (and in many cases, irreversibly consume) things that have real, intrinsic value, in return for scraps of paper (or, more likely, ephemeral digits in an account somewhere) that are only worth something because they're backed up by the US economy. When people decide that the US economy ain't what it used to be, suddenly those scraps of paper aren't worth much, and not only can we not buy any more, but the people who we've bought stuff from already are going to come calling for whatever we have of value left.

    I've been asking for years how exactly the current US path is sustainable, and I've never gotten anything particularly reassuring. The current crop of politicians and financiers is selling the entire country up the river for enough gains today to them to retire on. But at some point in the future, the rest of us are going to be stuck holding the bag.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:You can't eat service industry. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Its sustainable because US debt is backed not only by the largest economy in the world but by the strongest miltary. When the time comes for debtors to come calling they would have to deal with the fact that maybe the US just refuses to pay and then proceeds to bring democracy to your country (Iraq style). Looking at it that way the debtors would gladly not call in debt and in fact issue more worthless debt just as a price for survival. Basically when you owe the bank a million dollars you are in trouble , when you owe the bank a trillion dollars and you happen to be the mob the bank is in trouble. This free lunch is the reward Americans get for winning WW2 and establishing the USD as the international trade currency.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  115. Better Graph by whtmarker · · Score: 1

    Google and Yahoo can't give you a 30+ year graph.

    Trust a canadian news site for that.

    ------------------
    During the Stanley Cup Playoffs last year, canadian playoff tickets were sold out and auctioned for as much as $500 for crappy seats. It became cheaper use canadian money to get a flight down to some small market US team, and get watch the canadian team at a playoff game there.

  116. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by anethema · · Score: 1

    Ugh responding to an AC, but I believe he was talking about the American's deficit, not the Canadians (a surplus as you say).

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  117. OLPC? by Plekto · · Score: 1

    I guess the OLPC will soon hit the $200 a unit mark.

  118. No Surprise by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    The US federal government is $9 trillion ($9,000,000,000,000) in debt.
    Interest on the debt amounted to $406 billion ($406,000,000,000) last year.
    Compare that to NASA at $15 Billion, Education at $61 Billion, and Department of Transportation at $56 Billion.
    [from federalbudget.com] Look past the American flag lapel pins to find the true Patriots, if there even are any. This is simply treasonous fiscal mismanagement.

    1. Re:No Surprise by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      To put it another way... As of 2005, the Canadian national debt was $499bn. The US National deficit was $508bn.

      That is to say that the US national debt increases each year by a value greater than the total Canadian national debt, every year.

      That might have something to do with why the US dollar is plummetting in value and the Canadian dollar is on the rise.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  119. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are talking about marginal tax rates. Not much of a comparison. Let's say your salary is 100K and exchange rate is 1:1. How much would Canadian government would keep from your salary? In the US, Federal tax + state tax (Colorado) would run into effective income tax rate at about 10%.

    What about sales tax? Is it still 15%?

  120. food costs? Go on a diet by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    While I understand what you write I say for most Americans they have no reason to complain about inflation in their food costs because they eat too much anyways. So if you think your food bill is too high, then go on a diet.

    How is this all that much different than a drunk complaining about the cost of his bar bill?

    eh?

  121. all your loonies are belong to US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well I think that does it, this probably finally tips the scale toward the inevitable annexation of Canada. I just hope this happens peacefully.

  122. Value of your MORTGAGE will be 1/2 by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    The value of your house will not decline because of inflation. Its the value of debt that declines.

    In fact you win big time. If the value of your house goes up 10x and the value of your salary goes up 9x then you are probably way ahead because you now only need to pay off 10% of the cost of your house.

    OTOH, the retired folks across the street who were told by a financial advisor to invest in high quality long term mortgages because they are too old to take the risk... it is these people who find the mortgage instrument and the income from it no longer has much value. They lose their retirement. They win somewhat on the value of their home of course but will find they need to sell it (usually by way of a reverse) mortgage in order to survive. So they tighten their belts and in the end their children lose their inheritance.

  123. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by HexaByte · · Score: 1
    Yes, the American dollar does go farther. Look at all the Canucks reporting on how they buy things here because it cost 20-30% more north of the border.

    They also have tighter regulations on many things, making them more expensive. Some may argue that it's good for the environment, or whatever argument you want to insert, but that's not the point being made here, value of the Dollar/Loonie is.

    Canadians also spend a lot more on home heating then Americans do, albeit less on cooling. The harsher climate also is harder on autos and other equipment.

    There's also the fact that all the good vacation spots are in the States (not my thinking, my Canadian friend's thinking, but you have the better side of the Falls!).

    As to taxes, don't look at just income taxes, look at all the hidden taxes, from sales tax to excise taxes to govt. mandated permits to do anything from fishing to building office complexes. That all adds up. Americans pay over 40% in taxes, and many Europeans pay over 60%. What's the real tax burden in Canada?

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
  124. M Coupe Ripoff by xtal · · Score: 1

    Cdn price: $78000
    Usd price: $51000

    Eeek.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:M Coupe Ripoff by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Just for "fun", I checked what that puppy costs around here (Finland)... The price list says roughly 88000 EUROS, which comes to about 123000 USD :(

  125. Are you even aware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of the SPP? If not, you should be, google for it, it is obvious you don't have clue one yet. The US, Canada and Mexico are MERGING, right in front of everyone's faces, and no one outside the elite system is having any say in the matter right now, the powerful goons are implementing it, right on schedule.

    Oh, you aren't reading about it in the controlled press, the press who gets their reporting orders from billionaire bilderburgers? Gee, wonder why not....

    So go look it up, it's happening. It makes NAFTA look like a casual exchange of phone numbers. And along with that, you can fully expect to see the bulk of governmental/public/we all paid for it necessary and common infrastructure sold off to the highest bidder, globalist capitalist pig run north american union in other words.

    And your cute but naieve views on "left versus right" are 20th century. There is no left and right, it is globalist party, who give all the orders and call all the shots and are the top leadership of ALL major political parties in the US, Canada and Mexico, then everyone else. All that other stuff is political psychodrama for those who think voting still makes any difference. To the elite, it gives the rabble something to occupy their time with, but it doesn't change a single thing in power politics.

  126. W00t cross border shopping ftw... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... Always nice to see Canadians pumping money into the Buffalo-area economy...

  127. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Not true on both accounts.

    China would lose their biggest partner, right now. This is true. But with the Euro gaining more and more and India emerging as well as its own country creating more and more demand, they would be left with many other partners they aren't using much of right now. Money doesn't disappear. And if the USD isn't worth anything that means something else is. China will gladly sell to whoever has the money. And whoever has the money will probably want luxuries.

    They are indeed building an infrastructure. This is why they have kept their currency devalued for so long. It means it's very cheap for them to build and since their exporting a ton they can keep expanding faster and faster. They have a tremendous infrastructure being built as we speak. And it's being funded by the USA's desire for cheap crap.

    If we were to just stop today, China would hurt. But in 5-10 years, it could and very well might be a different story. China is being very frugal with their export money and allowing American companies to make huge profits right now off of them. A time will come where China wants to get paid and the trend will reverse.

    Don't be surprised when "Made In The USA" is something that foreigners see on their clothing, etc one day.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  128. Cars. by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    One problem, we still pay too damn much for the same car. And, they don't want us driving to the US to buy one, either.

  129. I cannot understand this attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. I just can't understand it. OK, I'm not Canadian, I'm Australian, but we have a government health system here and it's brilliant. I'm not joking, it's fantastic. Sure, it costs a lot, but so does everything good - I don't mind pay tax if I think it's being spent well.

    Let me give an example - 3 weeks ago my wife had sudden pain in a gland. We went to emergency:

    2pm arrived at emergency. Waited about 20 minutes, but nurse was already giving painkillers and taking measurements before being admitted

    2:30pm in a bed, blood tests, detailed questioning and examination

    3:00pm on a drip, pre-op, scheduled for theatre at 7pm

    4:00pm met the surgeon, nice lady

    5:30pm i was kicked out as she went into pre-op

    9:30pm they called me to say i could come up to recovery

    10:00pm free dinner

    11:00 she is feeling fine, discharged herself because she wants to sleep at home .. all over

    Total cost: $0.00

    The staff were professional, obviously expert, efficient and just great. I honestly cannot imagine how it could have been any better. Sure I pay for this in my tax, but I'm totally happy with that, knowing that I can just walk in, anytime something's wrong, and get the best healthcare available. I just can't imagine why Americans have this philosophical problem with what seems to be to be a great arrangement.

    So, sorry, know nothing about Canadian healthcare, or British, but the Australian socialised health care system is first rate. You should copy us.

  130. Fine. You can have your privately-run healthcare. by Glytch · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have the healthcare system that just gave my grandmother a heart valve replacement by a world-class surgeon, a private hospital room, and fully-staffed 24/7 nursing assistance, all paid for by Canadian universal health insurance. (Well, we did have to cover the cost of gas to drive her to the hospital, but that's it.) I'm perfectly happy to have my taxes pay for Medicare, and to have the government administer the system. I know that if I ever need the same kind of help, it will be there for me and I won't go bankrupt in the process.

    Denying life-saving help to one's fellow citizens merely to save a few dollars on one's taxes, or out of some outdated "every man for himself" wild west nonsense, is what's immoral. Do you feel any empathy towards other human beings at all? Are you some kind of robot?

  131. some kind of robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you some kind of robot?

    AFFIRMATIVE!
    Binary solo:
    0000001
    00000011
    0000001
    00000011
    0000001
    0000001
    0000001
    0000001

  132. I guess I should have proofed it by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    I see lots of typos in other posts and just correct them. I'm quite tolerant of such things. Besides I had other things to do.

    Alas, you are kerrect I guess.

    1. Re:I guess I should have proofed it by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Treat it as constructive criticism (which it was). A little extra effort polishing the prose usually pays off with interest.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  133. Infrastructure by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
    I think you vastly underestimate the existing base.

    One word: infrastructure. It takes a generation to build up your ability to make the tool that makes the tool that makes the widget you want to sell. China has an incredibly dense manufacturing infrastructure now, and the U.S. mostly doesn't anymore. No matter what, the U.S. is probably looking at decades of serious pain, thanks to the Republicans.

    1. Re:Infrastructure by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      I actually work in the CE market, and this is patently false. The tools to make the tools are made in the US and the EU. They're shipped to China to use, where we train their tooling engineers, and send over the IGES files of what the tool is to look like.

      Tooling design, and machine design, is still the near-exclusive baliwick of the US and the EU. Additionally, we heavily out-produce China, the EU, and any other country.

      Anyone decrying the state of US manufacturing really needs to look at the realities. We do not have a problem with building things here; in fact, most of the prototypes, first-runs, and even first-assembly lines are made here. Then we export the design or the line to a country where workers are a lot cheaper. Seems like we still have the know-how and ability to execute right here.

      That's my view from the actual day-to-day trenches of the CE market.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Infrastructure by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      By "CE" I assume you mean the Consumer Electronics market. I have news for you, Rooster: the iPod and its ilk are not the world. In the global rankings of machine tools producers, the U.S. is not even in the top 5 these days, so I see nothing that justifies your aggressive tone.

      You have no idea how threadbare the U.S. industrial infrastructure is these days. There is no way for it to be fixed in less than a generation -- which means the U.S. is in for a world of hurt, thanks to the Republicans' insane economics.

  134. Moderation abuse by dwalsh · · Score: 1

    Does the metamoderation still work around here? Some simple minded mod seems to think I am Dick Cheney or something, rather than someone poking fun at what has almost become a Slashdot meme.

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  135. now we're stuck with Budwieser by gearloos · · Score: 1

    O man! Now I'll have to save up for that case of Molsen and those hockey pucks I was looking at.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  136. monopoly money by aichpvee · · Score: 1

    I'm so glad I got all those "monopoly money" jokes in over the last two weeks. I'd been hoping it'd take a little longer, good thing I didn't wait to make those jokes.

    Come brothers, now it's time for a new joke. We must come up with something short and witty to taunt them for still paying prices that reflect a much lower exchange rate!

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  137. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by gfilion · · Score: 1

    The kicker on this is that they charge provincial sales tax on federal sales tax.

    Yep, taxing taxes, now that's a distinct society!

  138. New Benchmark Needed. by sc0ob5 · · Score: 1
    The US dollar has been in trouble for some time now. Not to say that using it as a comparison to the Canadian dollar in this case isn't vaild, but we use it here in Australia as well as the benchmark for some reason when clearly it should be a more stable currency such as the Euro, Yen or Stirling.

    This is pretty bad news for both the exporters in Canada and for the importers of Canadian goods in the US.

  139. As for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Canadian overlords!

    (Come on, somebody had to say it.)

  140. Get Nexus by neile · · Score: 1

    At the risk of spoiling the fast lane for the rest of us... www.getnexus.com. $50 for five years, and you can even do your application on-line now. You'll blast past all the suckers in the slow lane.

    Neil

    1. Re:Get Nexus by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      But the Nexus card:
      - only works for the car that you register
      - only you get to blast past all the suckers, not the other passengers in your car with you
      - need to drive all the way up there for an interview

      I just stop by the duty free shop, pay $1.50 for a pack of gum, and blast past 75% of the suckers.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:Get Nexus by neile · · Score: 1

      The Nexus pass isn't actually tied to your car. It used to be when it was the PACE program, but not anymore. True on the passengers, but if they don't have a card, why are you driving with them!? :) As for the interview, but it's a onetime hassle for a big payback.

  141. Re:Article is useless without PRODUCTIVITY by aqk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>You shouldn't have to pay duty on computer hardware anyway. That's part of the FTA which became NAFTA.

    (LOL) Oh. Really.
    The last time I brought a "USA" product thru Canadian Customs, they looked at the Seagate hard drive and said "Hmmm 'MADE IN CHINA' "
    I had to cough up a lot of duty AND GST.
    So much for this NAFTA bullshit.
    HELLLOOOO! Haven't you heard? The USA does not MAKE anything anymore!
    They just move stuff around and re-sell it.

    How long you think this crappy biz model will last?
    And Canada is not that much further behind.
    I give us about seven years, maybe less...


  142. Nafta currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would'nt this be a good time to combine the two currencies... maybe even throw in some pesos making the NAFTA equilant of the Euro.

    1. Re:Nafta currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I can imagine, William Shatner's head on the new buck.

    2. Re:Nafta currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's end this thread here; Chuck Norris on the obverse and his fist on the reverse.

  143. General Jim's by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

    Why isn't military spending referred to as 'the socialized military'?
    Because there's no need to distinguish it from non-socialized military unless the latter actually exists (or is being considered).

    Are you suggesting that maybe we should have a commercial military force, a la General Jim's Defense System? Oh, wait -- we already do.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  144. Perspective by adityamalik · · Score: 1

    To put this in perspective,

    The current account balance on a country describes whether it is a net importer or a net exporter of goods. Similarly, the current account balance of Canada with the US describes whether Canada is relatively a net exporter or net importer of goods from the USA.

    Now, Canada has a net positive current account balance of around 2% GDP (IMF 2005) which means, overall, a stronger Canadian currency is a good thing for Canada (compared to the rest of the world).

    However, the situation here is more about the dollar falling vis-a-vis all other currencies. And since the USA is the world's biggest net importer of goods with a current account balance of -6% (deficit) (IMF 2005), a weaker US currency is bad for the US, leading to inflationary pressure (All things become more expensive), which is further exacerbated by profligate spending by the government (essentially, the government prints money to spend, which reduces the value of ALL dollars).

    At the same time, the natural correction is (as some readers point out), more manufacturing being done inside the USA to counter the current account imbalance. Less imports to the US, more exports from the US, more jobs in the US etc. etc. The challenge is to keep inflation in control at the same time.

    The US is, however, exceptional in the global macro-economic context because it has the largest economy, and the de-facto world standard currency. The US currency is heavily supported by Asian banks which moderates the drop in it's value somewhat. All in all, a very interesting and complicated situation to learn about - you may wish to start with these:

    http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/dtt_GlobEcon07_091506.pdf
    http://www.jcif.or.jp/pdf/e_outlook2006.pdf

  145. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by servognome · · Score: 1

    Money doesn't disappear. And if the USD isn't worth anything that means something else is
    Money isn't zero-sum, it reflects relative exchange rates. If the dollar falls it doesn't necessarily impact the relative exchange of other currencies against each other.

    And whoever has the money will probably want luxuries.
    Which opens up markets for US goods that didn't exist before.

    Don't be surprised when "Made In The USA" is something that foreigners see on their clothing, etc one day.
    The US doesn't have to decline precipitously for China, India, and other emerging markets to rise.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  146. Re:American dollar still goes much futher by jpbelang · · Score: 1

    Ontario does the same.

    --
    JP http://www.wearerite.com
  147. Need long time above parity for price equalization by guidryp · · Score: 1

    The Fall of the USD has been so fast (as it is not the rise of the CDN dollar at work), that prices will need quite some time to equalize.

    Also if you are a foreign good producer, you want the Americans to pay Canadian prices, not the other way around.

    Say a few years ago (simplification):

    Profit point was:

    $100USD, Canadian had to pay $140.

    Now with the Fall in the USD, the profit point is:

    $140 USD, $140 CDN.

    but goods are priced at:

    $100USD and $140 CDN...

    This is a simplification, but you see the problem, US prices have to rise more than CDN prices have to fall.

    Where prices finally settle will be determined by acceptable profit margins etc, what the US market will bear etc.

    Meantime Canadian will have to travel to the USA to buy under priced goods, where they can save thousands on Automobiles for instance.

  148. "Newfoundland" is not a province, either by bjbest · · Score: 1

    We haven't had a Province of Newfoundland for at least a few years. The official, legal name is now "Newfoundland & Labrador".

    1. Re:"Newfoundland" is not a province, either by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      We haven't had a Province of Newfoundland for at least a few years. The official, legal name is now "Newfoundland & Labrador". News flash: Just because "Newfoundland" is no longer a province, it doesn't mean that "Newfoundland" is no longer a place.

      It's the big fucking island on Canada's East coast.

      With all the people who talk funny.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!