Lack of empathy has nothing to do with this. We can think it's sad and pity her, but that doesn't mean we're going to tolerate her poor choices being used as an excuse to foist laws and regulations on us.
they're not banning it. the summary is incorrect. they're just talking about banning cocktail painkillers because people are accidentally OD'ing. instead if the doc wants you to have both they'll tell you to take both.
Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".
No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.
we've already had that degree or two.. it didn't increase arable lands.. it decreased them.. the rain patterns changed and the prime farm lands get less rain, and desertification started in marginal lands.
was on the science channel, don't remember what show.. some show about geo-engineering.
the proceedure was simple. Drop a bunch of dry ice down into a few hundred feet of water. they had it wheels of it mounted on a little torpedo that reduced hydrodynamic drag so it fell to sufficient depth faster.
interesting factoids that get my down modded by political hacks aside, that is actually a very good idea.
if you close the carbon cycle by making all combustion fuels biofuels then then all the carbon our cars emit will have been first taken out of the atmosphere. this will allow natural carbon sinks to start removing the excess from the atmopshere and bring us back down to pre-industrial equilibrium.
not saying we couldn't help speed up the process of removing the excess carbon.
They demonstrated that if you take dry ice and drop it under several hundred feet of ocean water it stops sublimating. they also loaded it onto an impactor that would drive it into the mud at the bottom.
I don't disagree with your last sentence there, i was just pointing out something interesting about dry ice.
strange then how they demonstrated clearly that if you take DRY ICE [not gaseous CO2] and drop it to the bottom of a few hundred feet of water (in the Mediterranean no less.. this is warm water) it stopped sublimating.
Dry ice stays solid if you drop it down the bottom of as little as few hundred feet (maybe less) under ocean water.
transport it all out to the Marianas Trench and drop it. not going to hypercarbonate the water because it'll stay solid below the right depth [which is reached rapidly if you put them on something that decreases hydrodynamic drag]
1) Yes NCLB is an excuse to close down public schools - it was designed as such, and they intentionally fabricated a study [exposed as a fraud 2 years later] to get congressional support
2) Defunding them further with vouchers (most of which would be going to religious indoctrination centers that masquarade as schools) is not a solution
3) "Failing schools based on geopgrahy" is a problem with two things
a) How we fund schools [how about pool money state wide and dole out as needed instead of tying funding to their service areas land values.. that kidn of funding arraignment was obviously designed to serve only the rich neighbors]
b) home lives in disadvantaged areas are more often than not are harmful to getting an education.
The NEA would CORRECTLY resist #2. They would support repleaing NCLB and getting all schools funded better.
Vouchers are not a solution, they're just a furtherance of stripping funding from public schools so that they fail.
you are correct in that it is unfair to pin it ALL on the fundamentalist christians, it is also partially the fault of their close allies the "private industry does everything better than government!" (despite evidence to the contrary on education and other subjects)
Slashdot Mirror
which just means fatbodies will have more effect on its city fuel efficiency than it's highway fuel efficiency.
most energy usage in highway driving is overcoming aerodynamic drag and friction.
wrong. they're not.
you can call someone an idiot and be sympathetic at the same time
"That was REALLY fucking moronic bro, let me take you to the hospital to get that broken arm taken care of"
Lack of empathy has nothing to do with this. We can think it's sad and pity her, but that doesn't mean we're going to tolerate her poor choices being used as an excuse to foist laws and regulations on us.
It was HER POOR CHOICE, IT DOESN'T EFFECT US.
Even if we feel sorry for her.
STFU or learn to not argumentum ad hominem
It's clear that you're an insensitive bastard who has forgotten what peer pressure is like.
Or like a lot of us he's not a weak minded sheep unable to resist negative peer pressure.
It's her fault, don't blame it on anyone or anything but HER OWN DAMN FAULT.
About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography and smoking
One of these is not like the others, one of these does not belong.
they're not banning it. the summary is incorrect. they're just talking about banning cocktail painkillers because people are accidentally OD'ing. instead if the doc wants you to have both they'll tell you to take both.
A) i'm in the states, i have no problem
B) try a different DNS
the difference is usually it's the user blocking them outside of china via adblock or whatever
Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".
No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.
Your rock, go back under it.
unless the iranian government pumped out noise on the sat phone freq.. like they already do on sat tv freqs at times.
we've already had that degree or two.. it didn't increase arable lands.. it decreased them.. the rain patterns changed and the prime farm lands get less rain, and desertification started in marginal lands.
was on the science channel, don't remember what show.. some show about geo-engineering.
the proceedure was simple. Drop a bunch of dry ice down into a few hundred feet of water. they had it wheels of it mounted on a little torpedo that reduced hydrodynamic drag so it fell to sufficient depth faster.
interesting factoids that get my down modded by political hacks aside, that is actually a very good idea.
if you close the carbon cycle by making all combustion fuels biofuels then then all the carbon our cars emit will have been first taken out of the atmosphere. this will allow natural carbon sinks to start removing the excess from the atmopshere and bring us back down to pre-industrial equilibrium.
not saying we couldn't help speed up the process of removing the excess carbon.
the amount of mercury in a CFL is less than the amuont of mercury you get when you eat tuna.
That post is neither "Flamebait" nor "overrated"
Stop using moderation as "-1 I don't agree with you politically"
If you're incapable of doing that REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THE MODERATION LOTTERY. NOW.
They demonstrated that if you take dry ice and drop it under several hundred feet of ocean water it stops sublimating. they also loaded it onto an impactor that would drive it into the mud at the bottom.
I don't disagree with your last sentence there, i was just pointing out something interesting about dry ice.
strange then how they demonstrated clearly that if you take DRY ICE [not gaseous CO2] and drop it to the bottom of a few hundred feet of water (in the Mediterranean no less.. this is warm water) it stopped sublimating.
i'm not wrong, this has been demonstrated. proven. it's simple university physics.
there is a reason why triple points of substances are given at temperature AND pressure.
100 degrees = the temperature change of a toyato of water produced when you burn a toyota of wood under it.
which then re-emit it. using it to carbonate drinks isn't sequestering it.
Dry ice stays solid if you drop it down the bottom of as little as few hundred feet (maybe less) under ocean water.
transport it all out to the Marianas Trench and drop it. not going to hypercarbonate the water because it'll stay solid below the right depth [which is reached rapidly if you put them on something that decreases hydrodynamic drag]
1) Yes NCLB is an excuse to close down public schools - it was designed as such, and they intentionally fabricated a study [exposed as a fraud 2 years later] to get congressional support
2) Defunding them further with vouchers (most of which would be going to religious indoctrination centers that masquarade as schools) is not a solution
3) "Failing schools based on geopgrahy" is a problem with two things
a) How we fund schools [how about pool money state wide and dole out as needed instead of tying funding to their service areas land values.. that kidn of funding arraignment was obviously designed to serve only the rich neighbors]
b) home lives in disadvantaged areas are more often than not are harmful to getting an education.
The NEA would CORRECTLY resist #2. They would support repleaing NCLB and getting all schools funded better.
Vouchers are not a solution, they're just a furtherance of stripping funding from public schools so that they fail.
That is a rather accurate indictment of
1) Social promotion
2) Precious Snowflakism.
you are correct in that it is unfair to pin it ALL on the fundamentalist christians, it is also partially the fault of their close allies the "private industry does everything better than government!" (despite evidence to the contrary on education and other subjects)