because they are useless. If they were any good they would have been hired by google already. so you've got the geeks that google rejected... kind of like the john west ad;-)
I've got some spare 'regular' DECT phones.. can I use them instead of the linksys one?
and if so.. does anyone know if you can buy the USB dongle seperately?
TIA
the article hinted at something bigger
on
Trust in a Bottle
·
· Score: 1
In it mentioned that politicians are marketing folks can do things so that people start producing oxytocin.
so you don't need to go around and start spraying people per se.. you just need to get them feeling a certain way and their brains will start generating the stuff.
I mean.. wasting all that money on a iPod,
only to figure out you don't have any method of inputting songs into it?
just do what everyone else does.. rip the CD, and boycott people who use copy protection.
If they want to pay for a service which pings them once a second let them, just remember they pay you money to host them, not to tell them what they can and can't do.
as for up your logs, obviously your own monitoring is lacking, as nagios/mon/whatever should be able to alert you when a disk gets 75% full.
note: I don't think that the monitoring service is effective don't get me wrong, i'm just saying you shouldn't be butting in here.
what you could do:
- change your acceptable use policy
- provide bandwidth caps/megabyte charging
- provide a better monitoring service to your clients (so they don't need this shit)
- upgrade your machines (disks are cheap) so that your servers don't fall over
- upgrade your access reporting script to filter out high-user IP's or robots (a nice value add?)
- educate your users on what a proper monitoring service is like.
is to put your wireless LAN *outside* of your corporate LAN, and force the wireless users to use a VPN (PPTP or IPSec) on their clients to access the corporate internals.
that way your not relying on the 802.11b standard at all but on SSH or IPSEC for encryption.
We just finished some benchmarking on our internal app-server. we found that tomcat ran 2-4 times slower than BEA/resin.
Before we knew about resin, the cost of buying the extra hardware for tomcat was greater than paying for the extra BEA licences.
That said.. we found resin, it is just as fast as BEA in our tests, and we are looking at using it and saving some $$$
one more point.
these pages utilize mod-include VERY heavily.
we found a EXPONENTIAL increase in speed in relation to decrease in the number of includes on the page.
Slashdot Mirror
A round of thanks to all the hard work done by the HTTPD team.
you guys ROCK
and special thanks to paul who pushed this through!
because they are useless. ;-)
If they were any good they would have been hired by google already.
so you've got the geeks that google rejected... kind of like the john west ad
I've got some spare 'regular' DECT phones.. can I use them instead of the linksys one? and if so .. does anyone know if you can buy the USB dongle seperately?
TIA
In it mentioned that politicians are marketing folks can do things so that people start producing oxytocin. so you don't need to go around and start spraying people per se.. you just need to get them feeling a certain way and their brains will start generating the stuff.
fwd.pulver.com it has clients on all platforms. the other one is called asterisk
I mean.. wasting all that money on a iPod, only to figure out you don't have any method of inputting songs into it? just do what everyone else does.. rip the CD, and boycott people who use copy protection.
now I need to comb my hair before I watch tv ;(
for anti-competitve behavior.
some kiddie modded the website so it goes to goatxx.cx
If they want to pay for a service which pings them once a second let them, just remember they pay you money to host them, not to tell them what they can and can't do. as for up your logs, obviously your own monitoring is lacking, as nagios/mon/whatever should be able to alert you when a disk gets 75% full. note: I don't think that the monitoring service is effective don't get me wrong, i'm just saying you shouldn't be butting in here. what you could do: - change your acceptable use policy - provide bandwidth caps/megabyte charging - provide a better monitoring service to your clients (so they don't need this shit) - upgrade your machines (disks are cheap) so that your servers don't fall over - upgrade your access reporting script to filter out high-user IP's or robots (a nice value add?) - educate your users on what a proper monitoring service is like.
but they dont have all the brands under com.com..look at shopper.cnet.com or www.zdnet.com
because the AOL users you are refering to are customers who are paying money (or viewing ads) that this website wants.
is to put your wireless LAN *outside* of your corporate LAN, and force the wireless users to use a VPN (PPTP or IPSec) on their clients to access the corporate internals. that way your not relying on the 802.11b standard at all but on SSH or IPSEC for encryption.
they have a shitty returns policy, and they Quality control really sux. I've had mine in 4 times. spend the extra $$ and buy a named-clone
this is what you get after you put your details in
We have received your information; unfortunately, we cannot provide you with this download at this time.
they should put this BEFORE you register.
see what happens when you legalize it??? all these crooks get in and screw it over.
We just finished some benchmarking on our internal app-server. we found that tomcat ran 2-4 times slower than BEA/resin. Before we knew about resin, the cost of buying the extra hardware for tomcat was greater than paying for the extra BEA licences. That said.. we found resin, it is just as fast as BEA in our tests, and we are looking at using it and saving some $$$
Hi Isaac. can you provide us with a bit more info ? like solaris patch level GCC/forte CC version as/gas uname -m etc etc
I suggest you look at http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html for a great description on all the different types of architectures there are for webservers
one more point. these pages utilize mod-include VERY heavily. we found a EXPONENTIAL increase in speed in relation to decrease in the number of includes on the page.