Slashdot Mirror


Obtaining Legal MP3s Outside of the U.S.?

frankkubiak asks: "I recently bought the new iPod with 40GB. I understand the arguments of the record industry, that I should buy the music I want to hear. Alright. So I don't want to get MP3 files by file-sharing. But here is my problem: I live outside the U.S., in Germany to be exact. iTunes only offers service to those inside the U.S. (see this related Slashdot article). I don't want a CD, vinyl record, tape or minidisc. I simply want to listen to the music. Even if I decide to buy a legacy audio CD, it is often copy-protected and won't load in my PC. So, strictly speaking, it is not even an audio-CD. Heise keeps a database of those un-CDs (German language. English speakers can use this fish-translated page). It sounds incredible, but even after hours of research on the web, I don't see a legal way to use this device with new songs. The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it, I'll have to [break the law and] download the MP3-file via file-sharing. I believe there are more people like me out there who want to listen to their music, without feeling guilty. Why is there no one meeting this demand? How does Slashdot feel about this?" Before you mention Napster, let's note that it has similar restrictions (see the "International Considerations" section). So where can non-U.S. internet users go to download the legal MP3s that they want?

623 comments

  1. MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    MP3 = Terrorism.

  2. This may sound stupid but.... by commo1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could buy the CD, download an MP3 from a site and play it. You own a legal copy, you're not technically stealing.

    1. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by RexHowland · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is theoretically true in America, but IP and fair-use laws are different in Europe. It's a pretty bad situation to be in, but hopefully somebody here will know how to handle it.

    2. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Lucky+Tony · · Score: 5, Informative

      In a place like Australia, is considered stealing even if you own a copy.

    3. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by ebsf1 · · Score: 1

      Actually...you may be 'technically' stealing. Although I agree it does seem like the logical way to go about things. That doesn't make it legally right tho.

    4. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by grennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this would be indirectly supporting the recording industry's CD copy protection scheme.

      It would counter-productive to the whole spirit of his intent.

    5. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that would be "copyright infringing" if you want to be technical about it. ;)

    6. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by nocomment · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could you use an american proxy server to make your connection appear to come from here?

      http://www.atomintersoft.com/products/alive-prox y/proxy-list/

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    7. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You could buy the CD, download an MP3 from a site and play it. You own a legal copy, you're not technically stealing.

      No. Don't. I don't care if it is legal in your area, but don't do this. This has two effects: You give money to the record label, and you bump up their 'piracy' rate. Given their unlogic on the issue, that will just make them put DRM on more of their CDs.

      It sounds like your best bet is to check with that list before you buy the CD. (And sorry, you'll have to buy the CDs.) If there is a CD on the list that you want, sorry. Send the record label a copy of your question, and tell them it is why you didn't buy the CD.

      If this is too much work, or you just can't get enough music to be worth it, sell the iPod (or return it if you can...), and tell Apple why. At that point you are an unsatisfied customer, who will tell others, for something that is not their fault. They may have the influence to fix it, even if you don't.

      Just don't hurt yourself. Support those who support you; the labels and artists who let you do what you want. Tell the rest why you don't support them. Maybe they'll listen. After all, it is their profit you're talking about.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    8. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by zuzulo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Internationally rights to songs are an interesting issue. On the bright side, before the internet many US companies sold the rights to thier song libraries for international distribution quite cheaply, so now there are various organizations in other countries that have legal rights to thier back catalogs. One good example is

      www.allofmp3.com

      which is a russian site. high variable bit rate encoding of songs from quite a large catalog for about .90 US a CD. Read the FAQ to look at their legal position.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    9. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

      the RIAA allows iTMS, but the EURIAA equivilent has not yet cut a deal. So go to ebay, buy american giftcerts, winning pepsi codes, or prepaid cards using paypal (so you don't need a US CC number) and have fun. eBay

      --
      Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    10. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And if I burned 10,000 copies onto CDR media and started handing them out in Times Square, that wouldn't be stealing either.

      I can't believe the propensity of people here to equate "copyright infringement" with "stealing," considering they aren't even in the same class of crimes, carry significantly differently penalties, are prosecuted at different levels of the court system, etc...

    11. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Downloading music is never technically "stealing", its copying. The words "theft" and "stealing" have only been introduced into the MP3 debate by the RIAA and the uninformed media.

    12. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Abjifyicious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I may be misinterepereting things, but my impression was that the problem was one of guilt rather than one of legality. The laws are different, but does that change the morality of the issue?

    13. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by wfberg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, in the US it does make a difference what the source of the copy is, as mp3.com found out the hard way.

      Here in The Netherlands, anything you download as a private person is legal; how about that for fair use? (Putting stuff up to be downloaded is a different game; that's where the dues should be paid (and they make it hard enough))

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    14. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Repeat after me: copyright infringement. Also I don't think the police will be going after you if you rip your own CDs, they have bigger fish to fry. Finally the minute the copyright holders try to go after this practice which is *very* widespread certainly in Australia, the minute the law will get changed.

      So you should rip your own stuff, and see if "they" care.

    15. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to have a credit card with US billing address in order to buy songs on iTunes. Proxies will not help.

    16. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      Apparently profit is all that's about. If Apple insists on selling songs on 0.99$CURRENCY_UNIT, UK and Europe iTunes users might move to chinese proxies ^_^

    17. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can't believe the propensity of people here to think that the difference in definitions is sufficient to absolve them from paying for music.

    18. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just to clarify, while mp3.com required you to have a copy of the CD you were downloading mp3s for, and while you are allowed to make copies of your CD, the court ruled that YOU are allowed to make copies of YOUR CD, but are not entitled to copies from someone elses CD.

      This is why the law is so stupid.

      But believe me, I have downloaded many things I own in one format or another, and feel no guilt.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    19. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The same is true for Norway.

      After the Napster.no case (nothing to do with the US-napster), where Nordic Copyright Bureau, EMI, BMG, Sony, Universal, IFPI Norway and several others lost after they sued a guy for dstrubuting url's it became clear that it's legal to download mp3's from the net.

    20. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I object to the way you phrased your comment. It may not be LEGAL, but it is right. The end result is the same wether you used legal or illegal means, the law is wrong in this case.

      The only reason RIAA objected to mp3.com, even though adequate steps were taken to ensure someone who downloaded was in possession of the CD, was that they weren't in on the revenue stream. They used a strict interpretation of copyright law, instead of the spirit of the law.

      I wouldn't abolish copyright law, but that particular phrasing is bad, IMO.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    21. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

      However, unlike downloading a few songs, handing out 10,000 copies would be criminal infringement under the current definition.

    22. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well in a sense the real people to blame are the people who called intellectual property 'intellectual property'. It's a stupid name. Property is a mechanism for dealing with scarce resources by allocating them to a person called the 'owner' who then has the exclusive right to use them. IP is quite different as there is no scarcity. I guess the inventors of the concept tried to emulate the physical property situation by causing an artificial scarcity but it still seems different enough to me to warrant a different name. The moment someone called it 'property' the use of the word 'stealing' is inevitable.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    23. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      And I can't believe the propensity of people here to think that the difference in definitions is sufficient to absolve them from paying for music.

      As a matter of fact, I have big problems with people who infringe music copyrights. My solution is to not listen to music except on the radio. However, I feel it is extremely important to be clear that stealing and copyright infringement are not equivalent in any sense, except that they are both crimes.

      You might as well have said "Well Linux and Windows are both operating systems, thus it doesn't really matter what you call it." Quit being an ignorant ass.

    24. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could you use an american proxy server to make your connection appear to come from here?

      This doesn't solve the legal problems, I'm afraid.

    25. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by ebsf1 · · Score: 1

      It may be 'right' but it is still not 'legal' which is damn stupid in my opinion. The law is an ass.

    26. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by divesnob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, this is the same effect as using a p2p service. You're not authorized to distribute the media.

    27. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by niko9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Would this also apply to vinyl? I have lot's of rock on the dead wax, but I don't have the CD.

      Would I be breaking any laws for downloading and MP3 of a song I have on vinyl?

      If you think about it, vinyl is superior to both the CD and the MP3, so downloading the lossy MP3 should not be a problem.

      Comments?

      --

    28. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He never claimed that it absolved him from paying. Copyright infringment is a very different crime to stealing. If I steal something from you, you no longer have it, if I infringe your copyright you still have the copyright and the item copyrighted.

      My personal opinion on copyright infringement is that copyright should not be transferable. The artist should be able at any time, regardless of contract, be able to enforce the rights given to them under copyright law. This would prevent music companies from extorting artists who have no choice but to sign over their souls if they want to be famous. It would also give them bargining position on the amount of money they receive for each sale.

    29. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Although I'd agree ripping your own stuff is a very low-risk activity in australia, I doubt that laws will change for the interests of the individual any time soon around here.

      Currently with the Free Trade Agreement negotiated with (or forced on us by) the U.S., australia is set to introduce the "mickey mouse" clause into copyright and bring the whole place more in line with ill-considered U.S. laws. The Sharman networks raid caught me by surprise, but there has been very little said about it in official political circles. It's an election year here too and Australian political parties aren't really known for their tech-saviness at the best of times. It will be extremely difficult for the current government politically if the FTA isn't accepted.

      As far as copyright goes, there's a reason it was sacrificed on the altar of free trade: it's expend- extendable..

      --
      click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
    30. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Um. The law isn't stupid. It's just that you misunderstand it.

      The law is called "copyright." It concerns itself with who has the right to make copies. The law says, in general, that the only person who has the right to make copies is the person who holds the copyright. (Duh.) There are exceptions, situations in which the right to make copies is granted implicitly. For example, if you buy a CD, you have the implicit right to make copies of the music on that CD for your own use.

      That does not mean that anybody else gets the right to make copies on your behalf. That would be crazy. "Some guy in Topeka bought the new Britney Spears CD, so now we have the right to make copies of it." That's just not logical.

      You might disagree with the law (though, frankly, it's hard to see how you could unless you just adopt the extremist, info-anarchist, "rights are dumb" position), but you have to admit that at least it's grounded in internally consistent principles.

    31. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by k98sven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is theoretically true in America, but IP and fair-use laws are different in Europe. It's a pretty bad situation to be in, but hopefully somebody here will know how to handle it.

      Please explain, how are they significantly different? All countries have signed the Berne treaty.
      In my (humble) experience, most european have broader definitions of 'fair-use' than the US.

      Can you name a European copyright legislation which is stricter? I certainly can't.

    32. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Could somebody please explain to me why "vinyl is better"?

      Don't get me wrong, CDs are not ideal, and I melted many a tape back in the 80s, but no one who's a proponent of vinyl has ever given a more concrete endorsement than "the sound is warmer."

      I want answers dammit!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    33. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always hook your CD player up to your PC's sound card and capture the songs through your PC's analog hole.

    34. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that really makes one think. Since a person is legally allowed to make copys and backups of CDs, Software, etc they buy, how can it be legal to put anti-copy devices in such things?

      --
      I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
    35. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the solution: A friend of mine who lives in madrid shops in i-tunes all the time. Here is how:
      He asks some friend who has a US credit card to buy a gift coupon from i-Tunes. He pays back his friend an uses the coupon freely from Madrid.

    36. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Buy an iTunes gift certificate off ebay?

      It's marked up a little though. I still don't quite understand what the big deal is about ripping cd's. It takes only a couple minutes to rip and. Putting on a pair of shoes is a bigger hassle. New music is not "often" protected as stated in the AS; in my experience it rarely is. If it is, they probably don't deserve your patronage anyway.

    37. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by OzTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is not correct. In Australia we also have a blank media levy which is applied to all tape ( audio and video ), CD-R, DVD-R and similar media. You are permitted to make a copy for personal backup use.

      What irks me is that most blank media is probably being used to record and copy original content and data, yet the vultures and leeches are getting paid via this levy for non-licensed works.

      I just wish that someone in a position of power would realise this.

      Sadly they don't have the faintest idea. Only recently John Tingle a member of the NSW Parliament wrote a letter to the Editor of a local Electronics Magazine. It was a few months ago and I don't have the article handy. From memory; In the letter he mentioned how distraught he was that a huge classical collection of CD's he owned was deteriorating now that they are some 15 years old. He was complaining that he couldn't buy replacements and had to resort to copying them although some were beyond recovery and the recording label could not sell him replacements.

      What he missed was that he has already paid for a perpetual license to listen to this material. Therefore by offering to buy new copies, he would have been paying twice to listen to music he has already licensed. He also failed to realise that he is also paying a media levy for the blanks he is now using to duplicate his collection on, and therefore the recording company are once again, effectively charging him twice for the same license.

      With goons like this passing legislation, what hope have we got.

    38. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by one-dub · · Score: 1

      I have a site that serves House Music Mp3 and CD quality WAV or AIF files. The files come in .zip format.

      http://www.digibag.com

    39. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... he asked where to get a legal copy, not a moral copy.

    40. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      If you can't rip the CD, you can record it through the line-in jack on the back (or front) of your machine. Quality is going to be pretty good, trust me.

    41. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      IIRC there are still some holdouts on the Berne Convention. Given how amazingly awful it is, I'm still upset that the US finally caved into it after rejecting it for so long.

      Copyright law is best handled domestically without international agreements of any sort.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    42. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by DaOneJT · · Score: 1

      Vinyl has a greater dynamic range than CD does so you get a better quality sound.
      SACD format is getting close though and this only really applies if you have a good quality turntable and not some crappy $50 Radio Shack thing with a sewing needle for a stylus.

      --

      Mines a pint of the black stuff.
      You can't drink a pint of Bovril!
    43. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Informative
      Even though it's legal to make such backup copies, the publisher is not legally required to make it easy or even possible for you to do so.

      This came up during the one of the DMCA cases - the court asked about what happens when the protected content enters the public domain if it's illegal to distribute a mechanism to circumvent the protection. Under the current law, even if you have every right to the content, it's apparently illegal to take the necessary steps to get access to it.

      This effectively gives the publisher an infinitely long copyright.

    44. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's two separate things. Fair use allows you to make personel copies. There's no requirement that the companies make it easy for you.

      In fact, thanks to the DMCA (thanks Bill Clinton, Fritz Hollings (D-Disney), and others), it became illegal to try and circumvent copy protection.

      Yes, some claimed that DMCA infringes on fair use, but the fair use says you are allowed to do something... it doesn't require companies to willingly allow you to do it.

      What's worse, of course, is that part of the price of CDs and DVDs is the copy protection. In other words, the people paying the penalty are the ones who buy their content legally, and they are more restricted in it's use. It's really backwards.

      I'll go off on a tangent here and compare current copy prevention mechanisms to the software copy prevention mechanisms from the eighties. Who remembers things like "off disk copy protection", or disks that were purposely damaged to as to be uncopyable? Every game like that I bought I immediately went online, found the hex codes to change, and "fixed" the software. I was saavy about it, but most people weren't, and had to put up with looking up codes in manuals or long load times (because of drives choking on bad sectors). There was a backlash, and now you don't see that anymore - what you see are games where companies go way beyond simply providing you with a game to make it valuable to purchase the product legally. They might include a huge manual, maps, minatures, etc.

      The music and movie industry amazingly manage to make money despite themselves. Everytime a more versatile format comes out (cassettes, VHS/Beta, CDs, DVDs, mp3s and other various file formats that can be delivered over the internet) the industry whines and complains and goes running to the governemt for protection.

      They claimed, for example, VHS would destroy the industry, and then it actually revived it and opened new revenue streams.

      Cassette tapes made listening to music more convenient, so people bought MORE MUSIC. Go figure.

      CDs brought us amazing quality for very cheap prices, and the industry was worried that cassette copies would be of very high quality. When the discman came out, that became a moot point. Again, people bought MORE music because they were getting better quality with more convenience (skipping tracks, for example, or creating a program as compared to listening to a tape or record) with great quality. People bought MORE music!

      DVDs accomplished the same thing for the movie industry. Given a format that doesn't wear out and degrade after many viewings, great quality output, less space than VHS tapes, no rewinding - and now we have things like multi disc players, not to mention the sound options with DVDs (hey, I don't care about Spanish or French, but sometimes I do get portuguese, which is great for me).

      Now we have MP3s. Good quality can be had (excellent quality can be had, really), in a solid state form that's easy to store and recall, gives us many hours of music in relatively little space, easy to manage a whole collection of music - it literally takes no extra space in your house. Again we have ability to program from lists of possibly hundreds or thousands of songs. And the industry wants to make it difficult to listen to music the way you want to listen to it. They are not making friends.

      I'm not going to be ignorant about the problem of piracy by claiming it's not a problem at all, it's the methods of preventing it I question... the current methods only hurt the honest consumers, not the pirates, and it's the honest consumers that ultimately have to pay for the copy prevention that is keeping them from listening to music or watching movies the way they want to. It's just so stupid. And it IS counter to fair use, but there's no laws requiring content providers to make fair use easy. And now the DMCA makes attempts at fair use illegal.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    45. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In canada you can lend an original to a friend, they can make a copy, lend the original to someone else, they can make a copy, and then return the original to you. This is all perfectly legall, as long as no one makes a copy of a copy. So what happens if it is a legal mp3 that u pay for and d/l in canada. Can someone else legally make a copy (ie obtain it via p2p). I wonder if the same rules apply. Because in that sense it would be legall to have that original downloader to p2p share it to anyone else.

    46. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I disagree. I am not an information anarchist, and I do believe in copyright, even if I think the current system is bad.

      Congress explicitely spelled out fair use, and I believe that the wording does not really support the INTENT of fair use provisions.

      Your example of a somebody making copies on my behalf is wrong, and misses the point entirely. I'd change it to be something like: "We have BS's new CD and ripped it to mp3s. Some guy in Topeka also purchased it, so it should be OK for him to have a copy of our mp3s as a matter of convenience."

      In the case of mp3.com, the person had to put the audio CD in the drive so that the software could verify possession of the CD before "unlocking" those mp3s for that user. So the end result is the same... the person purchased the content from the content provider. Why should it be illegal for him to have that content in other formats? It's not! It's only illegal when someone else makes it available to HIM in those formats.

      Can you tell me, if this person is allowed to download the mp3s of music from a CD he is in possession of, how the copyright holder is hurt any more so than if that person ripped his own mp3s (which is perfectly legal)?

      I generally make it a rule not to reply to anonymous trolls, but it simply sounds like you didn't understand the argument.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    47. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If Apple insists on selling songs on 0.99$CURRENCY_UNIT, UK and Europe iTunes users might move to chinese proxies ^_^

      I'd try Bali: 1 in US dollars (noon) equals 8,561.29 Indonesian rupiahs.

    48. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Yeti7226 · · Score: 1
      In the Netherlands downloading a copy for personal, non-commercial us is legal. Irrespective of wether you own the CD or not.

      This may change under the new EU Copyright directive.

    49. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by kantai · · Score: 1

      CD's suffer from what is called digitalysis, as a result of the sampling rate, the highs and lows become unsycned, or something like that... much better explained here...
      Look at the Background section

    50. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Vinyl is analog, so there is no loss of quality you would have with CDs, which are digital. It means that the sound waves can be reproduced continuously, as opposite to the waves in CD, that are re-created through a sampling of discrete values that are only an approximation (although a very good one to untrained ears) of the original, continuous, sound wave.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    51. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I didn't pay the premium for an iPod. It's pure marketing over value.

      http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/335/C2564/

    52. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by babyrat · · Score: 1

      According to the RIAA (and of course they are the ones that will be suing you) this is absolutely without a doubt illegal. Now according to the courts, well, that decision hasn't been made yet.

      This was covered in one of the interviews with some RIAA head honcho a few months ago (linked from salshdot somewhere)

    53. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

      Set up a credit card from a US PO Box? Have a friend in the states set it up and check it for you... give you the PIN number or anything u need. Then just pay your credit card bills online. As a bonus, i figure this would build ur credit here in case you'd ever come the the US and wanted a loan or credit card?

      Or you could just pay someone u trust via paypal to buy you gift certifcates.

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    54. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would really like to know who has hearing that is so good that they would instantly know when a CD is being played and say "That sounds like crap, its not vinyl". And then there's the fact that vinyl is only better when you are playing a perfectly preserved album on an excellent turntable with a top quality stylus. One spec of dust or one little scar will make it sound like a scratchy old record.

    55. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He he, analog hole. I captured something through my own analog hole today.

    56. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      You are right that the FTA (not Free as in speech or as in beer, that's for sure) is a huge worry.

      I'm actually worried by the lack of ways for the common person in Australia to challenge the power that be in some kind of court. If the FTA gets signed on, and people in the US realize how detrimental the DMCA is after a while, we could be faced with an implementation of the DMCA in Australia that wouldn't exist in the US anymore but that we could not get rid of over here.

    57. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1
      I was going to reply that there are ways... but I can't find any anything to support me...

      Now I'm worried!

      --
      click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
    58. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by jwlidtnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Totally untrue. Vinyl has a *much* lower dynamic range (and a much lower SnR) than does 16bit/44.1kHz PCM.

    59. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your use of "untrained ear" is amusing.

      The bogeyman of "infinite resolution" with regard to vinyl is just that; it isn't true, and it really oversimplifies what's going on. "Sampling of discrete values" makes it sound as if you're only getting a summary of the information contained in an original waveform, which isn't true.

      Yes, the data on a CD is made up of samples. These *represent* the waveform, but are not *the* waveform. The DA step converts these samples back into the original waveform. There is no continuity "lost" in this process, depending on the frequency response and SNR of the original signal.

      For example, say you have an analogue tape that has data of up to 16kHz. By Nyquist, 44.1kHz is more than enough room to encompass *all* of that data, and the 16bits gives (going by memory, so I'm likely wrong on this figure) 96dB of dynamic range; far more, in other words, than vinyl ever had.

      I'd really like to find an audiophile someday who'll admit to liking the inherent analogue distortion in records. It's pleasing! Great. It isn't enough to elevate audio *above* science, somehow.

      Check out sites like Maple Shade Records for prime voodoo. As the same people who believe that analogue is always inherently superior to digital believe that a glorified hatrack "improves soundstage, makes highs livelier, and sounds like a blanket has been removed from your speakers"...I can't say I have much to do with them.

    60. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      This doesn't solve the legal problems, I'm afraid.

      Really? How so? He's still buying the music. Just because the host company doesn't want to sell to foreigners doesn't mean it's illegal in the target country to buy such things.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    61. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by DaOneJT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok you got me there. I used the wrong terminology.
      I meant sound fidelity. I.E. an actual recording of the music rather than a 16-bit interpretation of one;-)
      This is obviouly why when digital recording is used in most studios (Home or professional) 24bit/96kHz is now used.
      Also the quality of the machine you're using to play the music on is a factor.
      $50 CD player Vs $500 turntable and vice-versa. Who wins?
      You get what you pay for.

      --

      Mines a pint of the black stuff.
      You can't drink a pint of Bovril!
    62. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Popageorgio · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's an excellent point. Of course, it doesn't matter in the U.S., because Congress will give publishers infinitely wrong copyrights in any case.

      It amazes me how little the laws matter. Anyone can circumvent CD protection with a bit of research. It's illegal, sure, but it's easy.

    63. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gothzilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      When people say vinyl has better quality than cd's, they are speaking strictly about quality, not performance. For an extreme example, humans can hear up to around 22kHz. A 22kHz sine wave converted to 44kHz digital then back to 22kHz sine wave becomes horribly distorted. The distortion becomes less as the frequencies drop.
      People who say they can hear the difference are primarily speaking about analog music, like classical. I personally have heard the difference between a perfect quality vinyl and a cd in some classical music. With music thats digitally created and never really becomes analog you most likely won't be able to hear any difference at all.
      This difference in quality also was much more apparent when cd's first came out since AD/DA converters were not the quality they are now. If you can find a perfect vinyl record of classical music, a high end turntable, high quality amp and speakers and compare it to one of the first cd players that ever came out playing the same music, you could hear the difference quite easily.
      Performance comes into play when you start talking about scratched records and cd's. Cd's hold on to their quality much better than vinyl.

      When the cd format was first being worked on, one of the rules was that Beethoven's 9th had to fit on a single disc since it was 74 minutes long. The engineers found that for a disc to hold beethoven's 9th and have the quality of vinyl, it had to be sampled at 16 bit and was 12cm in diameter. This was too big to make portable cd players realistic so its size and sampling rate were decreased, resulting in lesser quality than vinyl. (http://www.urbanlegends.com/misc/cd/cd_length_ske ptical.html)

    64. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Danj2k · · Score: 1
      Can you name a European copyright legislation which is stricter? I certainly can't.
      So, you've not heard about the new European Union Copyright Directive, or the even newer IP Enforcement Directive then? (sorry I don't have links to these).
    65. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nyquist is referenced and the post only gets a (Score: 1...) That's bogus. This is science! Look it up folks! What the original poster was referring to, btw, is the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem(wikipedia). Rock the science!

    66. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by stewwy · · Score: 1

      Just a thought...but as you are paying for the copy protection.. doesn't fair use allow you to break it?

    67. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Gabrill · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The laws are different, but does that change the morality of the issue?


      One of the very basic parts of morality is following the laws where you live to the best of your ability. So, yes, having different local laws can have a very big affect on morality.
      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    68. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that works, but stating an address other than your own on a credit card application is (IIRC) illegal, so it doesn't really address the problem.

    69. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by LuYu · · Score: 1

      ...you're not technically stealing.
      You are not stealing in any sense of the word.

      Infringing != stealing.

      In order to steal something, you have to deprive someone of something. For this, the record industry generally argues their loss of "potential profits". However, if you would not have paid for it in the first place, there was no "potential profit", hence no theft.

      "Theft" and "stealing" are misrepresentations stated to give you the impression that ideas are property. They are improper analogies that stand up to neither factual nor legal analysis.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    70. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by jwlidtnet · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, "sound fidelity" is still wrong, and hopelessly vague.

      Once again: it isn't a 16-bit interpretation. Sampling does not involve taking "pieces" of music and then throwing them back, hoping it's going by too fast for you to hear. Sampling involves getting a collection of samples that, when converted back into analogue, represents the input waveform (up 'til the threshold your current sampling specification allows) almost exactly.

      As for digital recording, 24bit is used precisely because DSP is so popular. 24bit does give you a greater dynamic range (although popular music doesn't tend to use it), but it also removes the amount of dithering you have to do on a signal, as you have many extra bits being used for various digital process computations.

      Sampling rate is another story entirely. Nyquist states that 44.1kHz should be adequate, but I understand the idea of leaving room for error; consequently, 96kHz is certainly appropriate. Anything higher than that, though, and studies show you're probably actually degrading the signal.

    71. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by aziraphale · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A sound scientific argument - based, unfortunately, on the unproven assertion that the only part of a soundwave that's of interest to the human ear is that part composed of superimposed sinewaves with frequencies up to and including 22KHz.

      Yes, it's true that humans can't 'hear' pure sinewaves at frequencies exceeding about 20KHz, but the mechanisms in the human ear that convert mechanical vibrations into electrochemical responses in the brain and then into conscious sensations or emotions are... well... not exactly trivial. Just because when you turn the frequency dial up, there's a point for every person where they say 'nope, can't hear it any more' doesn't mean there's no signal processing going on.

      Case not proven, I'm afraid.

    72. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The newest law in the EU specifically diffrentiates between who copies for profit and who shares file on a non commercial basis.

      Basically, in the EU, you may use peer-to-peer to share your MP3's, and if you have purchased the CD you would seem to have the right to listen to it.

    73. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 1

      allofmp3 is illegal to use in Denmark, along with weblisten.com.

    74. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by JayWalkin · · Score: 1

      I've always found it interesting to look at this from the bio/anatomy perspective. Even with all the analog-to-digtal and digital-to-analog conversions, you still end up with a digital signal. For it's not the vibrations of your brain that you interpret, rather the neuro-electrical signals fed to your brain from your inner-ear.

      Now if we could just keep it digital all the way to the inner-ear...

    75. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by P-Nuts · · Score: 1
      Who remembers things like "off disk copy protection", or disks that were purposely damaged to as to be uncopyable? ...most people ... had to put up with looking up codes in manuals or long load times (because of drives choking on bad sectors). There was a backlash, and now you don't see that anymore...

      Pretty much every PC game these days comes with a CD you need in the drive when it runs, probably using something like SafeDisc or SecuROM. Admittedly, you can often get round the protection by finding a crack or a program like Alcohol 120%, but not an awful lot has really changed. And these protected discs usually end up breaking the CD-ROM standards, so people can have problems if their hardware is slightly unusual, or they scratch the disc slightly.

    76. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      So, you've not heard about the new European Union Copyright Directive, or the even newer IP Enforcement Directive then?

      How are these stricter than US legislation, exactly?

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    77. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by ArseneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here in The Netherlands, anything you download as a private person is legal; how about that for fair use?

      Last I checked, The Netherlands are in the EU. And since Tuesday, we now have this nasty new law which makes all kinds of IP infringments (including "private copy" and also patent infringments) illegal, punishable by the death penalty (several countries had to change their constitution because of this, because they've abolished the death penalty long ago, and needed to re-introduce it for this new scary directive...)

    78. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the parent was refering to in his scientific argument, was that superimposed soundwaves up to and including 22khz are sufficient to represent *all* the information present on the tape, not in the original live setting.

      So if, as you suggest, the lack of higher frequencies is somehow detracting from the experience, then this was done when the tape was recorded, not when it was digitised afterwards.

      i.e. Case proven.

    79. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, everybody in the world has american morals.

    80. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Congress explicitely spelled out fair use": what's this got to do with Europe...oh hang on we're part of the United States. Not

    81. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by robin_j · · Score: 1
      The DMCA does not apply in this case as the poster is in Europe not the US. As far as I am aware there is no law in Europe which prevents you from hacking the copy protection on CD's.

    82. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by iainl · · Score: 1

      One thing is for sure, though - any mysterious voodoo reason for vinyl being superior than CD is promptly lost if you're then converting the thing to MP3 as the original poster was suggesting.

      Personally, I do really like vinyl still, but it is a case of liking the smoothly rolled-off top-end (most new CD mixes these days sound slightly too tinny to my vinyl-accustomed ears) and all the faff of putting a needle on the deck, rather than anything technical.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    83. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem to be talking about aliasing but they're using a made up word "digitalysis" instead. If the things that their illustrations show are actually happening then CDs would be intolerable to *everyone* not just folks with good ears.

    84. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Some guy in Topeka bought the new Britney Spears CD, so now we have the right to make copies of it." That's just not logical.

      Actually, that is exactly the law in Canada right now. The guy in Topeka is not allowed to make a copy and give it to me (distribution), but I can borrow the CD and make a copy, or I can copy a copy of his CD (including MP3s). So it's legal for me download.

      In fact, it does make (some) logical sense. This law was made to recognize the common act of making mixed tapes/CDs and sharing among friends. It is a recognition that sharing is not inherently immoral. (In fact, saying that sharing is immoral seems more illogical.) Sharing is something that should be encouraged. On the other hand, music creators need to make a living, so to (supposedly) compensate them, we pay a levy on recordable media.

      This isn't a black & white issue. It's definitely a shade of grey.

    85. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the 22khz filter was applied before recording that tape, and in that case, the higher frequencies have already been lost, and of course you are right they cannot be lost a second time.

      However, the point is not about losing them the second time. It is about losing them the FIRST time.

    86. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, no, that is completely false. Morality and legality are two entirely different issues.

      The whole issue of civil disobediance and immoral laws is based on the fact that morality and legality are not related to one another. Slavery, Nazi era laws against Jewish people, Jim Crow voting laws and poll taxes, etc... are all cases where the local law would often put most people into a direct conflict of their morales.

      This is such typical /. non-sense where whatever you believe to be true is true by virtue of you expressing it regardless of whether you are expressing a learned or a lay opinion. There are several hundred books that address the issue of morality v. legality and I doubt that you have read any of them.

      For those people seriously interested in this topic it generally falls under the subject of Jurisprudence or Legal Theory and the best beginner book is Ronald Dworkin's Taking Rights Seriously.

      You should pay particular attention to his description of rules v. principles (Riggs v. Palmer) and the difference between the LAW and the desires of man with a gun (otherwise known as the army or police force).

      But please do not spout such non-sense without having read anything on the subject.

    87. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      You know, though, if the game will play and all it requires is the disc in the drive, then I don't have a big problem with this unless you can't make a backup of the disc.

      I do have children and they are brutal with their games. I've lost several simply because I didn't back them up. Now I back them up, and they play the backups. I haven't had the experience yet that I couldn't copy one of their games. I don't game much myself these days, but what little I have I haven't encountered something that actually makes it difficult to play the game.

      And that's the cruxt of the matter - those protection schemes made it difficult to play the games, but only for the honest customers who didn't know how to cripple the copy protection.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    88. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Frit+Mock · · Score: 1


      Hm ... so, if there is no leagal way to use the device, then even buying this device *must* be illegal in Germany!

      If you buy it, then you are actually preparing to commit a crime, and that itself is a crime. ;)

    89. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by pqdave · · Score: 1

      Most of the "better" isn't part of the format, it's how the music is processed/mastered before it is placed on the media. Vinyl takes careful preperation to get maximum dynamic range, signal to noise, etc.. If bass levels are too high, the needle will skip on many turntables. The physical playback limitations of vinyl are fairly well correlated with pleasing sound.

      In the early days of CD, many record companies thoguht that mastering wasn't necessary for the format. Result: Crappy sound. Nowadays there is another problem: "Louder is better". When comparing two otherwise equal sounds, the louder one usually sounds "better". CD's are now mastered in an attempt to "sound louder" than all other CD's when played back at the same setting of the volume knob. Unfortunatly when taken to extremes as is now usual, this processing severely degrades the sound without making it physically unplayable.

    90. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by MrBlint · · Score: 1
      I have a (layman's) theroy about the difference between analogue and digital signal distortion.

      Imagine you are listening to someone in the next room playing the piano, or sitting in a concert hall with noises from the heating system and passing traffic. In these situations The human hearing system is quite capable of seaprating the distortion and noise from the signal and ignoring it. I suspect that this is because the distortion and noise making processes can be represeented by a continuous function. The ear and brain are adapted by thousands of years of evolution to separate signal from noise but only if the noise is generated by a continuous function.

      In the case of digital audio the distortion function is discontinuous. This is a situation which would not occur in nature and so we have not evolved the ability to ignore it.

      Like I said this is just a layman's theory. I would be interested to kown what someone who actually has a clue thinks about it.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    91. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Frit+Mock · · Score: 1


      Oh, I am clicking faster, than I can think ...

      An if you are preparing to comit a crime at that moment, you buy such a device, then the store and even Apple itself is helping you to comitt a crime, that again is a crime in Germany ...

      Perhaps one should tries to sue all stores and Apple for that ;)

    92. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by frankkubiak · · Score: 1
      I may be misinterepereting things, but my impression was that the problem was one of guilt rather than one of legality. The laws are different, but does that change the morality of the issue?

      Actually you are right. I don't want to feel guilty (in a moral-kind-of-way). And I also don't want to be guilty (in a legal-kind-of-way).
      I am a businesman myself. I don't want people to be stealing from me and I don't want to be stealing myself.
      I am just angry that aparently I dont have any other choice than to break the law to use my iPod.
    93. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by hyphz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it's a bit more subtle than that.

      It is *not* illegal, not even under the DMCA, to break copy protection for the purpose of making fair use, or for work with expired copyrights. The DMCA only makes breaking protection a crime when it's done with intent to break copyright law, and making fair use isn't breaking copyright law.

      The *problem* however is that the DMCA still bars the distribution of *tools* for breaking copy protection, no matter what they're used for. So, yes, you *can* break the protection on that CD if it's for a fair purpose, but *only* if you do all the work of doing so yourself. This was why the "making it easy" issue came up.

    94. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Zak3056 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the very basic parts of morality is following the laws where you live to the best of your ability.

      Give me a break! I offer you three cases, two factual, one fictional, that completely destroy your premise:

      1. 1930s-40s Germany. I don't think I really need to elaborate on this one, but here's a hint: Oscar Schindler was breaking the "law." Do you suggest that his behavior was immoral?

      3. Rosa Parks was "immoral" because she sat down in the front of the bus, instead of moving to the rear.

      2. Orwell's 1984. By your reasoning, the party was RIGHT in that anyone who dared engage in thoughtcrime or overt acts against Big Brother was not only a criminal, but defective and immoral.

      What's legal, and what's moral are too entirely different kettles of fish. If you're too blind to see that, I feel sorry for you.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    95. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by JudicatorX · · Score: 1

      exactly where in the article does it say that the EU can now execute people for copyright infringements?

      before any reasonable person believes such an outrageous claim, you'll have to back that up.

      until then: -1, Troll

      --
      "It is a good divine that follows his own instructions" - Portia, The Merchant of Venice
    96. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Shipwack · · Score: 1

      Depending on how you define "American Morality" (the morality of the bozos who control the media? The morality of the average person in Peoria? The morality of the current paleo-conservative ruling junta?), this is either a good thing, or a tragic thing.

    97. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Currently with the Free Trade Agreement negotiated with (or forced on us by) the U.S., australia is set to introduce the "mickey mouse" clause into copyright and bring the whole place more in line with ill-considered U.S. laws.

      Don't blame us, blame the Europeans! Our "Mickey Mouse" law was designed to bring us into parity with Europe's copyright laws.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    98. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Kaa · · Score: 1

      One of the very basic parts of morality is following the laws where you live to the best of your ability.

      Err... no.

      You've got it backwards: laws have to reflect morality, not vice versa. If a law conflicts with individual ethics, individual ethics should win (within reason, of course).

      Consider two things: (1) If I move to another country, say to work for a couple of years in Hong Kong, should my personal morality change? and (2) How about people who live in, say, North Korea? or used to live in the Soviet Union?

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    99. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, German copyright law guaranteed consumers the right to make archival copies of purchased media for their own private use (this is the "Recht auf Privatkopie" that's often mentioned in discussions on IP and copyright in Germany). Downloading MP3 copies of songs you own the CD version of, even via a legally dubious channel, should still be covered by fair use; unfortunately, as far as I know there hasn't yet been a court decision in such a case to establish a precedent.

    100. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      Actually, RIAA cronies have said that is illegal!!

      But they are talking out of their ass, because downloading mp3's (even if you don't own any CD's at all) isn't really illegal. The laws only say "distribution" of copyright materials is illegal, and all of the lawsuits so far have beem people sharing.

      It's true we don't have the Canadian law that specifically says we can download copyrighted mp3's, but quietly, is seems that way

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    101. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The morality of the current paleo-conservative ruling junta?

      Ah yes, the self-righteous poster. Using big words no one understands to make himself look smarter to the plebs. No, "administration" isn't a confusing enough word... Hey, here's a suggestion: when you are talking to people, use words that people actually know. (Yes, I know what they mean, that's not the point.)

    102. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      The engineers found that for a disc to hold beethoven's 9th and have the quality of vinyl, it had to be sampled at 16 bit and was 12cm in diameter. This was too big to make portable cd players realistic....

      What are you smoking? 12cm is the actual size of a CD, and it is 16 bit sampling. Perhaps you meant that they originally wanted to sample at > 44.1kHz and the disc would have been 12 inches?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    103. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by k98sven · · Score: 1

      So, you've not heard about the new European Union Copyright Directive, or the even newer IP Enforcement Directive then?

      Yes I have. And although I think they stink, they're still not as bad as the DMCA.

    104. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      My bad, I meant 12 *inches*. It was the same size as a vinyl record. This is what happens when an american tries to switch to metric. :o)

    105. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by chefren · · Score: 1
      24bit does give you a greater dynamic range (although popular music doesn't tend to use it)


      This is a bit of an understatement. CD has a dynamic range of close to 100db. Even high-end quality classical recordings like Telarc's 1812 Overture use about half of that. "Modern" cd-sound often has less than 15db of dynamics. So even if DSD or 24bit allows greater dynamics, what's the point when recordings are compressed (dynamics compression) anyway?

    106. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      There are several hundred books that address the issue of morality v. legality and I doubt that you have read any of them.

      Given that you describe a popular take on highly complex moral issue as being "completely false", I would say the same about you. For example, when Socrates refused to be freed from prison and instead chose to accept his death sentence because violating the law does harm to the state, and the state is like a parent that we must respect, were his beliefs "completely false"? Was his philosophy "non-sense (sic)"? If you want to take the Lyons position on this issue (or maybe something less exreme), that's fine and I would actually agree with you, but being insulting to someone because they take the other side in a philosophical debate thousands of years old is obnoxious and arrogant.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    107. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Quixadhal · · Score: 1
      I was saavy about it, but most people weren't, and had to put up with looking up codes in manuals or long load times (because of drives choking on bad sectors). There was a backlash, and now you don't see that anymore
      Actually, you certainly DO see that nowadays. Not only do most game CD's use draconian copy protection mechanisms (SafeDisc, et.al.) which often result in originals not being readable in many drives... but the software itself tries to check for disc emulation software... so even if you DO manage to copy the disc (preventing 2 year-olds from destroying it -- and putting yourself in DMCA hell), you can't use it easily.

      The reason you saw copy protection disappear for a short time was that CD's were a format that "couldn't be copied" for years, due to limitations of hard drive size, and burners costing many thousands of dollars. Once hard drives exceeded the 10G mark, and cd burners dropped below $300, copy protection started appearing again.

      As a side note to any game industry management types who have the ability to make these kinds of decisions.... copy protection is COSTING you more money than you know!

      By putting things in place that diminish the general public's enjoyment of your product, and lower their confidence in its quality (flaky cd protection often reports errors that aren't there), you are driving away your customers. At the same time, most pirates have no such difficulties, and find their efforts rewarded, since more people will go looking for cracks or pirated copies that "just work".

    108. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Caveat: I am repeating someone else's opinion, I personally do not have a good enough record player to test it.

      A few years ago I was working in moderately high end audio. I happened to be in high quality piano reproductions, but I got to read a lot of comments by audiophiles. Something that is immediately apparent is that there are a few people who really know what they are talking about, and a lot of people who are remarkably good at parroting them, without having a clue what they're saying -- reminds me of alternative medicines actually.

      Anyway, one physicist challenged an audiophile to justify their support of records instead of compact discs. Their answer (paraphrased) was that their records will have a greater echo at even number harmonics (2x freq, 4x freq, etc) while conversion of a CD to a waveform will cause it to repeat more at odd number harmonics (3x, 5x,) and they consider the even numbered harmonics more aesthetically appealing.

      Now, I don't know if this is complete BS. But it caught my eye because, like you, I had worked out the nyquist frequency and concluded that 24 bit 44.1 had enough accuracy for even the most subtle variations.

      I do know that the human ear, particularly in some people, is extremely sensitive. There is a popular anecdote about two violinists arguing over A# vs Bb (needs more context to actually make sense, google if interested). Also, the difference between say a 7th and a 13th (getting a bit more into my field here) causes some really interesting harmonic interactions that really affect the music -- try running some low freq (say 300Hz) music through a filter dropping frequencies over say 15kHz and you'll begin seeing what these people are talking about. Carrying on, there is well studies and very obvious interactions between the harmony of the notes and the melody at F_0 (base freq.), but every intrument has a 'voice' which is the percentage of energy given to every frequency. Specifically the piano has a peak on F_4 (its 5th harmonic, i.e. at 32x the base frequency) -- the amount depending on the piano.

      Now, tying back in to the origonal subject. The interactions between these harmonics is one thing which gives music its depth ('mistimings' is another). So I am not willing to write off as uninformed ranting the idea that the different harmonics produced by an analogue device are more pleasing than those produced by a digital device.

      Phew, sorry for going on for so long.

    109. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by DaOneJT · · Score: 1

      OK, I bow to you're greater knowledge.
      I worked in an expensive Hi-Fi shop a couple of years ago and I got beaten over the head with the Vinyl is better than CD argument too many times I suppose.
      They used to sell Turntables costing upwards of $2000!!!

      --

      Mines a pint of the black stuff.
      You can't drink a pint of Bovril!
    110. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Renegrade · · Score: 0

      > I'll go off on a tangent here and compare current copy prevention mechanisms to the software copy prevention mechanisms from the eighties. Who remembers things like "off disk copy protection", or disks that were purposely damaged to as to be uncopyable?

      I remember this all too well, and it's unfortunately coming back. Many CD based games use copy protection techniques to encode marginally readable bits and such, and look for these bits as coming back randomly on successive reads. This makes the game impossible to copy without modifying the executable to skip over this protection, as well as requiring the CD in the drive to play. So much for backing up my software! I'm of the mind that such games should come with two or three copies of the CD, all in their own seperate jewel case, for backup purposes. (The hilarious thing is that the pirates have already created solutions for these schemes, it only really stops legit users from making backups at the end of the day)

      > I'm not going to be ignorant about the problem of piracy by claiming it's not a problem at all, it's the methods of preventing it I question...

      Actually, I have a suspicion that most pirates wouldn't buy if they couldn't copy anyways. They'd just go without or tape from the radio, I bet.

      Then, there's always that patch cable from the CD player to the Mic In jack on the back of the machine, plus the old sneaker net....

    111. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point. The point wasn't that copying without a license is lawful or unlawful. The point is that the laws that govern the United States are, in fact, logical in their construction. They're not just stupidly arbitrary. They make sense. They're reasonable. Even if you disagree with the intent behind them.

      The whole idea of taxing media to subsidize art is a typically socialist solution to an acknowledged problem: people copying stuff instead of paying for it. In the United States, we have a different solution, but the problem is the same.

    112. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Valar · · Score: 1

      All audio equipment-- analog or digital-- loses information/quality when capturing/reproducing a signal. In vinyl, it is lost due to mechanical processes in the lathe and in the turntable, as well as in the electronic equipment used to record and master the audio. Also, any professional mastering to tape, vinyl or cd is going to include a filtering process, because even higher/lower frequencies than can be heard can still interact with the waveforms you are actually trying to get (i.e. in the audible range).

    113. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually CDs have a dynamic range og about 90dB, due to the fact that LSB is used for dithering. Otherwise you are correct. The most amount of dynamics I've seen in a CD, is about 60dB. The only advantages SACD/DVD-A offers, is surround sound.

    114. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All AD/DA conversion these days is done using some form of DS/hybrid and oversampling. So the point about sine waves are mute.

      But you touch on the core reason for the vinyl/CD debacle. The first CD players were flawed, and people still throw that argument into the debate. I whish they would stop doing that...

    115. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What noise are you refering to, in the case of recorded music?

      Anyhow, as one with a background in analog/digital signal theory, your argument doesn't make any sense. Are you somehow suggesting that the signal after DA conversion is discountionus?

      Sorry, but I just don't get what you are saying.

    116. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is correct, 2nd order harmonics are more pleasing to the ear (usually described by by audiophiles as "warmth"). This is incidently also the argument for tubes amps. The tubes have a 2nd order harmonic distortions, rather than 3rd order you get from solid state devices.

      The argument from the objectivists is that the sound should be reproduced exactly (i.e. no distortions should be added to the sound), while the subjectivist wants pleasing sounding distortion added (you often find subjectivist using tubes, and turning up the volume to achieve clipping, which produces 2nd order harmonics).

      So it depends on what you like. Exact reproduction or a more pleasing-to-the-ear sound.

      I prefer exact reproduction, put I have no problem with the people going for the more pleasing-to-the-ear sound. But when people start claiming the the sound reproduction is superior with thing like vinyl or tube, then i've got a problem.

    117. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by CuriHP · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if more people used those nice erudite words, the plebs would actually know them.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    118. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Gabrill · · Score: 1
      I'm only writing one reply to all my responses.

      When I said, "to the best of your ability", I naturally assumed that your judgement was one such ability. Not all government policies are on the scale of genocide, and copyright infringement is nowhere in the same class of "civil disobediance". Your attempt to escalate the scale and importance of this issue cheapens the tragedies you mentioned. Shame on you.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    119. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Perhaps if more people used those nice erudite words,

      Perhaps we should use suitable common words instead, to refine our language to get rid of obsolete & redundant words. Dunno.

    120. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, they are both crimes. I'm sorry for hurting your poor feelings and implying you were defending your right to "infringe copyright" when you download MP3s. I just hear too many times here on /. that, because it technically isn't stealing, it's perfectly fine to download MP3s. Or, because the RIAA is evil, it's perfectly fine to stick it to them.

      Again, profuse apologies for my ignorant thinking.

    121. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by CuriHP · · Score: 1

      Those words are not redundant or obsolete. That's one of the beauties of the English language; there's dozens of words with the same general meaning but a myriad of subtle nuances.

      "A myriad of" and "a lot of" have the same overall meaning, that there is a large number of what ever object is being referred to. But they are not identical. A myriad implieas a larger number and also small differentiation between each of the objects. Just one example.

      If we removed all redundancy, then awful, terrible, revolting, bad, hideous, and attrocious can all be replaced with "doubleplusungood." At least in my opinion that would be a doubleplusungood thing.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    122. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      The *problem* however is that the DMCA still bars the distribution of *tools* for breaking copy protection, no matter what they're used for. So, yes, you *can* break the protection on that CD if it's for a fair purpose, but *only* if you do all the work of doing so yourself. This was why the "making it easy" issue came up.


      Not disputing your point about the DMCA at all (AFAIK it is true), but does anyone else find it interesting that Office Max is still allowed to distribute Sharpies? Yet more proof that this is, in essence, an unenforceable law.

    123. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by MrBlint · · Score: 1
      Take the original analogue wave and subtract the output from the DA converter. What remains is the noise I am talking about.

      The anti-aliasing filter will remove any out of band noise but quantisation noise still remains. This noise is a direct result of the discontinuous quantisation function.

      This noise is by definition below the signal to noise ratio of the system which for a 16 bit sample size is 96 Db.

      The question is, how is this noise perceived?

      Take the case of (say) piano + violin + analogue surface noise. The brain can (magically?) perceive the piano the violin and the noise as separate entities and focus attention on one or another as it pleases.

      Now replace the analogue noise by digital quantisation noise. I am just wondering if the brain has the necessary mechanisms to analyse such noise and successfully disentangle it from the other elements.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    124. Re:This may sound stupid but.... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Apparently you can sue the government and even win if you prove some law has do you harm somehow. This is the essence of Mabo, but you have to be in there for the long haul, I think it took Mabo more than 10 years to have "Terra Nullius" revoked, and he was dead before he learned of his victory.

      In the case of the FTA there should be reviews at regular intervals, I think the Democrats are heading down that path.

      Eventually when we vote for the Republic again we must *insist* on a Bill of Rights.

  3. simple answer: you don't. by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the music is owned by its copyright holder. if they don't want to offer it to you, you can't get it legally.

    them's the ropes, and our just desserts for allowing the hegemony of major labels to monopolise music for so long.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:simple answer: you don't. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the music is owned by its copyright holder. if they don't want to offer it to you, you can't get it legally.

      This is exactly right. There's no "electronic" fair use in most nations. If you want to listen to this music electronically, return your iPod to the store and find a music player that's WMA compatible. Or, just buy a CD player.

      Alternatively, create a business where European consumers can purchase electronic music.

    2. Re:simple answer: you don't. by DarkKnight · · Score: 1


      Thats certainly the case in Australia. For a long time, the labels have turned a blind eye to copying even for personal use.

      Certainly you can start your own business or hit your favourite search engine for companies that already do sell music online without restriction i.e. magnatune.com, mp3.com.au or emusic.com. Note I've not used any of these companies.

      --
      /* Andrew Fong - rogue programmer */
    3. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how fucking dare he? To dream of listening to the music he buys in the manner he wants is just contrary to all the laws of man and nature.

      You vill buy the music ve sell, listen to it on the technology ve support and you vill like it!

      Heil! Heil! Heil! RIAA!

    4. Re:simple answer: you don't. by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely.

      I have been pretty lukewarm about boycotting the RIAA, mainly because prior to the internet, there really wasn't a viable alternative, and there are a lot of good non-mainstream bands that managed to get contracts. Most of the music I listen to falls into this catagory, and I never felt like I should boycott a musician because he took the best opportunity he could get. That, and I don't want to stop listening to all my favorite bands :) So instead, I have just become more proactive in discovering what indepentant music is out there, and supporting them in addition to the musicians I already know.

      On the other hand, it has always boggled my mind how eager consumers are to adopt these online music services formats which are more restrictive, lower quality, and have a smaller selection than the existing standard. No thanks, I will stick to CD. I had no idea copy restriction on CD's was getting so bad in some places, but if the day ever comes that I cannot buy music from an artist in a non-drm'd format, then that will be the day I stop listening to them. That's my limit - if they don't want me to listen to their music then I won't.

    5. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      status among peers mainly .. especially apple guys .. and their elite chic 'designer' player .. its no wonder the new smaller model and its smaller memory sells more .. form over function.. or something. heh

    6. Re:simple answer: you don't. by interiot · · Score: 1
      That's always been the case with copyright, no? People can copyright things (well, it's automatic AFAIK) just for protection, but that doesn't mean that they can't choose to limit distribution however they want. Authors can choose to not release books, software license can state that the licensed programs can't be used for commercial purposes, etc etc. Is it a bad thing that a writer gets to control whether their work is released or not?

      (yes, it's a problem that there's a monopoly, but anybody should get to choose to not offer their stuff to you)

    7. Re:simple answer: you don't. by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      If you want to listen to this music electronically, return your iPod to the store and find a music player that's WMA compatible.
      How would being WMA compatible help? Is there some other service that provides legal WMA's outside of the US?

      If you're referring to Windows Media Player's ability to rip into (only) WMA, iTunes can rip into AAC or MP3, at least the Mac version can.
      I like the idea of someone making a business for this, though... I doubt it'll get off the ground, as Apple's been in negotiations to do just that for some time.

    8. Re:simple answer: you don't. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Is it a bad thing that a writer gets to control whether their work is released or not?

      No, but OTOH, it is appropriate to only grant copyrights to authors who distribute their works in appropriate ways. E.g. I think it would be reasonable to prohibit EULAs from applying to copyrighted works. In fact, EULAs are probably worth banning altogether. We might also only allow copyrights for published works, rather than unpublished ones.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    9. Re:simple answer: you don't. by interiot · · Score: 1

      I'd think you'd still want some sort of protection for unreleased works, since unlike normal property, once someone takes it, the horse is out of the barn and not coming back. I'm not enough of a lawyer to be able to say if trade secret law is applicable to unreleased books or not.

    10. Re:simple answer: you don't. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Trade secret law might be applicable.

      I'm willing to allow something akin to the common-law copyright of old, but the protection ought to remain minimal, and expire at about the time of publication, requiring the author to apply for a real copyright quickly, or yield protection, much like the statutory bar for patents.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:simple answer: you don't. by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      I suspect he thinks WMA would help because a lot of these fscking "audio CDs" have a data track on them which contain DRM'd WMAs.

      Now, since they are DRM, I highly doubt they'd play on the portable music player.

      And if you did return the iPod for a WMA player, you'd simply feeding back into the system, providing the music industry with incentive to strip even more of your rights away.

      Short term, sure it's fine, but long term, we're all screwed because of some people's inability to think more than 5 minutes into the future.

      --

      Moof!

    12. Re:simple answer: you don't. by tweel.2 · · Score: 1

      Ethically, you can. If the @holder chooses to forego your compensation and his property is not damaged and the @holder has in the past made copies available to others (either free or compensated) the @holder does NOT have the right to deny you what has been granted to others.
      Do not confuse the MP3 issue with the book/collectable issue. Unauthorized/additional copies do indeed damage the original in value.

    13. Re:simple answer: you don't. by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      I should also note that just because a player can play WMA doesn't necessarily mean it can handle DRM. My old Muvo (original version) can do WMA, but according to Creative it chokes on DRM. I'm not sure about modern players, however.

    14. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Finland it is perfectly legal to download music from P2P services, copy and rip library CDs (the Helsinki metropolitan area has good public libraries with extensive music departments), and to provide copies of boughts CDs to one's circle of acquaintances.

    15. Re:simple answer: you don't. by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      The music is owned by its copyright holder. if they don't want to offer it to you, you can't get it legally.

      Wrong. If they offer it to someone, somewhere, just go there and buy it. There are no laws prohibiting transport of intellectual property across borders so you can take it home with you. You bought it, you own it - just like if they had offered it to you directly.

      Now, the real mystery is why they wouldn't want you to buy their product in the first place. A sale is a sale and profit is profit, right? - So why not embrace the global economy and let everyone buy whatever they want?

      Sometimes I suspect those cocaine-soaked VIP-parties have caused serious brain damage to those record execs... They sure behave like they they're seriously retarded in any case.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    16. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some copyright holders do release stuff.
      http://www.fivetrees.com/radio_fivetrees.h tml
      http://www.stevedix.de/sinistrals/downloads.h tml

      "Inyo" has a good site of his own recordings but is currently over bandwidth quota. I hope more amateur musicians do the same (I mean to when my playing gets better) and the labels get the economic result they deserve.

    17. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Roger+Wernersson · · Score: 1

      Will www.allofmp3.com do?

      I've been using it for a few months now.

      --
      temporarily sigless
    18. Re:simple answer: you don't. by grahamm · · Score: 1

      How often is it the arist who is imposing this restriction? Is it not normally the record label? So might it help to write to the arists (if that is possible) and tell them the reason they have lost a fan.

    19. Re:simple answer: you don't. by grahamm · · Score: 1

      It is not a bad thing that a writer get to control whether their work is released. However, I believe that once the copyright owner has authorised a copy to be made then they should have no control over what happens to that copy (apart from restricting further copies being made). So once a CD or DVD pressing has been authorised, the copyright owner should have no control over where (or for what price) that copy is sold, nor over what equipment is used to 'play' the work.

      I know that the law (in at least most countries) does allow the copyright owners to exercise such control, but I beleive that this should be changed.

    20. Re: simple answer: you don't. by gidds · · Score: 1
      Is it any good? I spotted it a while back and it looked promising.

      People here (UK) seem to have various views on it I suspect that, although using it might be legal under the laws of the hosting country, using it here might be against UK law. Also, it doesn't seem as if the artists get to benefit. So there are both legal and moral questions marks over it. Anyone know more?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    21. Re:simple answer: you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. But to play the copy protected audio "CDs", they'd need some way to play these DRM'd WMAs. The music companies stick DRM WMAs in a data track on the "CD".

      The annoying thing is that a lot of component (well, component + portable + automotive) CD players won't play these things either.

      Yes, these guys deserve to be defended. Especially when you look at the latest barrage of "Pop" music.

    22. Re: simple answer: you don't. by Roger+Wernersson · · Score: 1

      It's excellent. I haven't used Gnutella since.

      It's so cheap, and I can choose compression level.

      I do think the artists get paid, but I would think the payment is more in line with broadcast than albums.

      Their selection is really good, and growing.

      The one thing I miss, is being able to view a list of an artist's songs alphabetically. It's too album oriented right now.

      --
      temporarily sigless
  4. Is it illegal? by patdabiker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it illegal to download [and not share] the mp3's of an album if you own that album?

    1. Re:Is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yes

    2. Re:Is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know about the rest of the EU, but in the UK at least it's actually illegal to make your own copies (MP3 or otherwise) of albums you own, even if you don't share them with anyone.

    3. Re:Is it illegal? by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Even if it was (which it probably isn't) legal, it sure as hell isn't legal for the person you're downloading it from....which probably means you're participating in the crime. IAObviouslyNAL.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    4. Re:Is it illegal? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed it is - without explicit permission from the copyright holder, we UKians do not have the right to make any copy. That includes format shifting, backups, etc.

      Kinda sucks, really - I guess that 260GBP iRiver I bought is just a nice USB hard-drive with built-in mic and FM tuner, as I certainly can't buy electronic versions of the music I like (ebm, goth, etc). Hell, some of the stuff I like is hard enough to get on CD...

      On the plus side, the law is effectively unenforceable - I don't know a single person who doesn't have some sort of audio device, be it cassette, mp3 player, minidisc, or whatever. I suspect that the vast majority of people in the UK have broken this particular law at some point, most likely right now.

      On the minus side, that really means that, should they want to investigate you for some reason, that's another line of attack they can take. Remember, they *wanted* Al Capone because he was a gangster. They *got* him for tax evasion...

      Paranoia aside, it damages the Law as a whole to have unenforced/unenforceable laws on the books. I don't see it changing any time soon, though - in fact, in light of recent events (the EU "super-DMCA"), I can only see it getting worse.

    5. Re:Is it illegal? by phillyclaude · · Score: 1

      in the US, it is not. when you buy an album, you are buying the right to listen to that music. That is why it is legal to record songs/shows off radio/tv. The same fair use law applies to mp3s, regardless of what the RIAA would have you believe

      --
      A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
    6. Re:Is it illegal? by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Piracy is not a crime that requires two or more people. You can legally download a file while the person uploading it to you can be breaking the law. The fact that they (not you) are doing something illegal does not make you an accessory to the crime. For example, if you have sex with a 15 year old, you are guilty of statutory rape but the 15 year old is not an accessory to that crime, even if she initiated the sexual conduct (by flirting and saying she was over 18 and asking for you to fuck her).

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    7. Re:Is it illegal? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Why download? You own the CD, so just rip it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Is it illegal? by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      Is it illegal to download [and not share] the mp3's of an album if you own that album?

      Depends on local laws. Here in Canada that would be legal; in fact, it would be legal even if you didn't own the album. In the US, it would be illegal. In Germany, I have no idea.

    9. Re:Is it illegal? by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Technically, you're right, in that 'media-shifting' or otherwise private copying is not included amongst our enumerated fair dealing rights, only 'time-shifting' for later use.

      That said, transient or otherwise ephemeral copies which are required to actually use the content you're purchased are allowed, so it's arguable that in order to listen to the music on the device of your choice, in this case an iriver, you need to make a transient copy to mp3 in order to actually use the product, and thus are within your rights.

      Making a CD-CD copy to stick in your car, so it doesn't matter if it gets scratched is definitely illegal though. CD-tape you might get away with under the law though...

      I suspect though, the music companies are much happier corrupting CD's away from the red book standard, thus removing our ability to listen to said CD in whatever device we like, when we like - this back door method is far simpler for them than trying to prosecute the hardware companies in a court case they'd likely lose (see tape record buttons on radios and VCR's). Oh, and DRM'ing legal downloads to the hilt while they're at it.

      Fortunately on the paranoia side, copyright infringement is primarily a civil matter, (you need to be in the big leagues before they hit you with criminal penalties) thus the CPS wouldn't prosecute you, the BPI (UK equivalent of the RIAA) would have to. Avoiding your taxes is a much more serious offence in the eyes of HMGov... until the newest bit of euro legislation gets drafted for the UK, anyway, at which point it doesn't matter if you're al copone or his neighbour's little daughter downloading britney, you can be hit with same criminal penalties, search and seizure, etc etc.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    10. Re:Is it illegal? by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it wasn't for SuprNova I wouldn't know about Icon of Coil, and then I wouldn't be seeing them play in London later this month with Swarf (excellent ebm industrial techno band) supporting.

      So I support the bands by visiting their gigs, and buying merchandise there. I'll never see the CDs in the shops for these bands anywhere near where I live either. So ... the music labels aren't missing out by me previewing the music, liking it, and then buying it when I finally see it somewhere.

    11. Re:Is it illegal? by flacco · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Paranoia aside, it damages the Law as a whole to have unenforced/unenforceable laws on the books. I don't see it changing any time soon, though - in fact, in light of recent events (the EU "super-DMCA"), I can only see it getting worse.

      it's actually a clever way to get near police-state powers. simply make something illegal that everyone does, and then selectively enforce it should you want to nail someone, for whatever reason.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    12. Re:Is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim's right. There seems to be an assumption in the UK that if you own the CD, then you have the right to do whatever you like with the content, but this simply isn't true. Which Magazine (AKA the Consumer's Association) are currently running a campaign to bring a bit of common-sense into the law, but they're up against some pretty powerful lobbying in Brussels by the vested interests.

  5. Why is there no one meeting this demand? by LochNess · · Score: 1

    Because the record companies don't want it.

    1. Re:Why is there no one meeting this demand? by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some record companies have no problem with it.

      Audio Luncbox also allows you to have unrestricted mp3 or aac. Enjoy!

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Why is there no one meeting this demand? by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Indeed, some major artists have no problem either.

      Well, George Michael anyway.

    3. Re:Why is there no one meeting this demand? by DonGar · · Score: 1
      Magnatune is another excellent label that sells music in most any format you want.

      There are also a number of free sources for legal music on the web, especially if you aren't into mainstream pop. Band sites are good.

      The difference is that you end up listening to music that is not on the radio, has never been on the radio, and never will be. If this is a plus or minus is up to you.

      A few selections:

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    4. Re:Why is there no one meeting this demand? by inquisitor · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Warp Records either; excellent label, excellent music, supplies VBR MP3s. And it definitely works in Europe.

  6. I couldn't live without by adamgreenfield · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... my music. It keeps me sane on a daily basis. Why do people like iTunes and Napster restrict service like that? Isn't the general idea to market to as many people as you can. Are the anti-copyright laws in Europe that incompadable with the ones here in the US?

    I know we've got a few over-bearing laws here, but I'm sure other copyright protections are more than sufficent to cover this sort of thing.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
    1. Re:I couldn't live without by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Would the VAT be applied to music downloads as well?

      I would guess iTunes and Napster restrict their services for the reason of simplicity because some labels may not want to give these services the right to sell in certain markets. As the idea of paying for music is a relatively new enterprise, at this early stage it's alright, buisness wise, to do this. But if/when the market takes off, expect these services to expand their markets or die.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    2. Re:I couldn't live without by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> Why do people like iTunes and Napster restrict
      >> service like that?

      Do you think for a moment that either of these companies wouldn't jump in to an otherwise untapped market for their product if they could?

      Both companies have publically acknowledged they're fighting to launch in Europe

      More Info!

  7. Break the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead -- being bad never felt so good...

    1. Re:Break the law. by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      Actualy, as you tried to sound funny, it might be even true.

      Me, personaly, I was looking from the same angle as the guy who posted this topic. I bought over 170 DVDs and never watched DivX. But after movie companies started to define Linux playing as illegal (actualy I have Windows or three but for the last two years I never booted in (let's say I like my nerves loosed), I even owned 3 G4s but QT and Apple DVD player sucked major for watching movies, and yes I could buy DVD player in that time, but having 10 computers at home is already too much of cables and no movie is good enough to get more of them for that, the only way I could legaly watch DVDs is PS2 but that one I bought last month), I stopped buying DVDs and now I even watch DivX or two (more or less I even feel some kind of satisfaction of retribution), but hell no, I'm not gona buy another DVD after being mistreated in such way.

      Music is still something that is completely legal (2000cds) in my domain, but as soon as they would proclaim Linux as illegal, they would suffer same consequences.

      As I see it, that kind of pain can be bothersome but sometimes retribution of being bad never felt so good....

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  8. I gave up and ripped my CDs by PktLoss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have the same issue living in Canada, Puretracks has a small selection, but I haven't found anything I want there yet, and my discman only plays MP3s not WMV.

    I gave up and resorted to buying CDs, ripping them, then burning them. Most CD ripping software seems to be capable of working around the 'copy protection' on the CDs I have had experiance with. Its horrible because I live in tiny student housing and generally end up leaving the jewel cases and discs at my parents to save space and clutter.

    The music industry's grim determination to stop me from listening to music I have paid for has yet to cease amazing me.

    1. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by bach_m · · Score: 2, Informative

      did u miss this article?

    2. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Medgur · · Score: 1

      You're in Canada, the copyright board has ruled that it's legal for you to download music over P2P services. What are you doing buying CDs anymore? Just be careful not to upload, they still haven't yet ruled on that.

    3. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by SheldonYoung · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If you live in Canada this is a non-issue for you as you can download freely from almost any source. This is due to the levy paid on blank media and the sanity of the Canadian Copyright Board.

      From http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml:
      However, unless the legislation is changed or the courts interpret matters differently, it appears that making a private copy for your own use of a musical work downloaded in any manner from the internet is not an infringement of copyright. In their decision, the Copyright Board states:

      The regime does not address the source of the material copied. There is no requirement in Part VIII that the source copy be a non-infringing copy. Hence, it is not relevant whether the source of the track is a pre-owned recording, a borrowed CD, or a track downloaded from the Internet.
      The more complex answer to the question posed above is you cannot post a song on the internet in any manner, but you can make a private copy of any songs you find on the net.

    4. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by PktLoss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think stating that while it may be said that it is legal to download music you have not paid for, that is reading the letter of the law rather than the word of the law.

      And more importantly I see no ethical standing for stating that downloading someone elses work for free is fine.

    5. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Wow. A sane copyright law...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    6. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      Thats what CD albums are for.

    7. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by gobbo · · Score: 1

      In Canada, you have paid for it in advance, whether you download or not, so long as you've bought goods with the levy on it. Downloading is legal and ethical, so is copying a friend's CD. Redistributing it en masse is neither.

    8. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .end up leaving the jewel cases and discs at my parents to save space and clutter.

      This is what we in the information technology trade refer to as an "offsite backup."

      If it's no skin off your parent's nose to safely store a box of CDs somewhere it's a Good Thing, and your backups are the full, uncompressed version.

      There are certain benefits to ripping your own. Another of which is to buy used. This last not only saves you money, but has the added benefit, in the case of the copy protected "CDs," of not directly supporting the protection scheme with your dollars.

      KFG

    9. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      letter vs word of law? do you mean the letter/word vs the spirit of the law?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    10. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I gave up and resorted to buying CDs, ripping them, then burning them.

      Personally, I like having the disks around. If nothing else, they're useful as a zero-effort backup or if I want to switch audio formats. (If space is a consideration, you could invest in a vertical CD rack like I did or, alternately, put the disks and inserts into a binder and throw away the jewel cases.)

      I haven't run into many DRM'd CDs that I care about yet so I don't know how that will affect my life. However, CDDA-XTractor had no trouble ripping the one I bought, although I couldn't find a way to make cdparanoia rip it correctly.

      The only real problem with buying CDs is if defeating the DRM is illegal under laws like the DMCA. Canada doesn't (yet) have such a law but I don't know what Germany is like. Of course, you could just do it anyway, based on the assumption that you'll probably never get busted for it.

    11. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Troed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly the same is currently true for Sweden, although our implementation of the EUCD (delayed, will probably go through Jan 1 2005) will "correct" that.

    12. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Puretracks has crap AFAICT and their site does not even work with Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox... :(

      DRM (Digital Rights Management) - the future SCO... Sad.

    13. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      The more complex answer to the question posed above is you cannot post a song on the internet in any manner, but you can make a private copy of any songs you find on the net.

      Wow. A sane copyright law...

      You call that sane? It looks more like a compromise that satisfies nobody to me.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    14. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      Then do what I did and stop buying it.

      As soon as they said 'we're making CDs you can't rip or listen to in your only CD player (my computer)' they lost me.

      I don't 'do' MP3s, so that is not a issue to me. But I do rip all my CDs to Ogg Vorbis, as quite frankly I'm a clutz and don't want to have all those CDs to sift through.

      Besides, there are plenty of artists not on RIAA-sponsoring labels that are more then happy to let their listeners exersize their legal fair use rights. And a quick trip to the RIAA radar before you head to the store is most helpful. ;)

    15. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by AtomicApple · · Score: 1

      Hey, a fellow Canadian, and I am just really annoyed at i - tunes. They have no reason not to open up a Canadian web presence. The levy's on blank median like CDs and hard drives exist here too? What is stopping I-tunes in Canada? Does anyone have a clear answer?

    16. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by brucmack · · Score: 1

      You call that sane? It looks more like a compromise that satisfies nobody to me.

      It satisfies me just fine, since I can listen to just about anything I want, and I don't buy blank media either.

    17. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by TrancePhreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is incorrect. The law states that you cannot download music. The law allows you to borrow a CD from a friend and make a copy. A friend cannot copy the music for you, you must do it yourself. That is what the law for Canada states.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    18. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by ratboy666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you *can* download music (in Canada). The other party may, of course, be in violation, but *that* party has to suffer the consequences.

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    19. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Shiifty · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, you *can* download music (in Canada). The other party may, of course, be in violation, but *that* party has to suffer the consequences.

      No, you can't legally download mp3's. In Canada, you can ONLY make a copy of an original, not of a copy. mp3's are copies of the original and therefore its illegal to download them.

      Of course its very unlikely you'll get caught, however, it is still illegal.

    20. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by PyromanFO · · Score: 2, Informative
      In Canada, you can ONLY make a copy of an original, not of a copy.
      The regime does not address the source of the material copied. There is no requirement in Part VIII that the source copy be a non-infringing copy. Hence, it is not relevant whether the source of the track is a pre-owned recording, a borrowed CD, or a track downloaded from the Internet.
    21. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, well Apple has been advertising iPods and iTunes on TV a lot lately, advertising a link to apple.ca

      And would you look at that:

      http://www.apple.com/ca/itunes/

    22. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, looks like you might not be able to buy songs through it though. Not having one, I have no idea.

    23. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already own the rights! That's why that spindle of disks cost so d%$& much!

    24. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's also what the blank media levy is for.

    25. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Interesting news article.... I wonder why they are going after file traders then? It's one big mess. I don't think anybody knows how Canadian laws really work ;)

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    26. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by jsneveu · · Score: 1

      They spot them based on the number of tracks they share. So the end result is they only catch those who **publish** the tracks. Not those who download them.

    27. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by jsneveu · · Score: 1

      They spot them based on the number of tracks they share. So the end result is they only catch those who publish the tracks. Not those who download them.

    28. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly I see no ethical standing for stating that downloading someone elses work for free is fine.

      Did you read the article he pointed to? It's not downloading for free - Canadians pay a levy on each blank CD bought to cover this copying (whether the CD is used for music, data, coasters, etc).

    29. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      In Canada (or at least in Quebec, I don't know if it's available to all of Canada), there's the Archambaultzik service selling legal mp3's one song at a time. I never really checked if it had a wide selection (I tend to buy whole CD's), but if it's anything like the selection in the store, it's gotta be huge.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    30. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Shiifty · · Score: 1
      You are correct, thanks for the clarification. You can legally copy mp3's and copies of a copy, however you must make the copy yourself. Someone cannot give you a copy.

      Linky: http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/news/c19992000fs-e.html
      The amendment to the Act legalized copying of sound recordings of musical works onto audio recording media for the private use of the person who makes the copy (referred to as "private copying").

    31. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      If someone places music on-line, there are two possibilities -- the first is that the person has permission to do so (copyright), the second is that the person does not.

      If the person *has* permission, then you have the right to download and burn. The thing that you are copying *is* the original.

      If the person does NOT have permission, they have broken copyright. Not you... As an example -- if there is a legal music download service, and they have a single illegal track (no copyright granted), the people who download that track are not liable. Only the provider. Big time.

      Now -- if you download music from sites that are not located in Canada, it becomes murkier. Are the download sites even part of the Berne Copyright agreement? If so, the Canadian personal copying provision still holds. It is, of course, impossible to tell if the source is legal or not. One presumes that sources that DO NOT have copyright have been or will be shut down by actions of the copyright holder.

      All CDs are "copies" to begin with. There is no such thing, effectively, as an "original" (there is the original performance, of course, and there is a part of the Canadian Copyright Act that deals with that).

      If the user is ALSO responsible, we have much larger problems. Example -- a teacher copies some pages out of a textbook. The students are later fined for using the material. You would have to verify the copyright of every item that you buy or are given.

      Reading this way -- leach away, my Canadian friends!

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    32. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by PktLoss · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly mon francais c'est horrible

    33. Re:I gave up and ripped my CDs by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      Si ton francais est terrible... then click on the "English" link top right corner of the page...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
  9. And the music industry... by archevis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... wonders why people are drawn to illegal file sharing...

    1. Re:And the music industry... by zurab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think they wonder, they know. The submitter asks a valid question:

      Why is there no one meeting this demand?

      The answer is because RIAA and similar organizations within other countries/regions operate a cartel. This means that in order to more efficiently control the market, among other things, they divide it in regions among themselves, sign or enforce non-compete agreements, enforce trade restrictions, engage in price-fixing, deceptive accounting practices, acquire or eliminate any competition, and purchase favorable laws to gain even more control over their markets. The main objective is to minimize competition through the above means while having the ultimate control over revenues.

      Meeting customer demands, coming up with new types of products, delivery methods, competition, and these types of things are not very high on their list. Operating cartels is illegal in many European countries, but nobody cares about it. People only see black and white, just like the U.S. elections.

  10. German Kazaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Perhaps you could use Mein Kampfzaa?

  11. How does Slashdot feel about this? by caston · · Score: 3, Funny
    How does Slashdot feel about this?

    Slashdot has feelings? Next I am expected to give her flowers, say nice things and nibble her ear...

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    1. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by psycht · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has feelings? Next I am expected to give her flowers, say nice things and nibble her ear...

      I would, if the OP is that German girl from "Eurotrip"... yum.

    2. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by rocjoe71 · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...how predictable!

      Try saying nice things about ears and nibble on the flowers instead.

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    3. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      All I know is that she is a harsh mistress!

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    4. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

      Judging from the guys that flock around her, I'd say just perspire a lot and talk about how the computer on the Enterprise runs a GPL operating system.

    5. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has feelings? Next I am expected to give her flowers, say nice things and nibble her ear...

      I don't think she's that sort of girl... Actually, she strikes me as the "ram her in the ass and call her dirty names" type.

      Just my two cents.

    6. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Chlamidia is not a flower.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    7. Re:How does Slashdot feel about this? by caston · · Score: 1
      Brings new meaning to the term "Is Linux ready for the Enterprise?"

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
  12. Don't feel guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When you download music. Illegal is not immoral. Better music than the dross the record companies push is available on www.iuma.com all nice and legal anyway.

    I do find it ironic that people masquerading as capitalists come out with the ultra-socialist "it's important that creators are guaranteed compensation" when I"P" is discussed.

    1. Re:Don't feel guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Is it illegal in the same way that murder is illegal? Federal or civil? Will the police raid your home and take you away like they would a murderer? Or is it up to the copyright owner to sue you first?

      Don't feel guilty they can afford it.

    2. Re:Don't feel guilty by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the Capitalist claim that property ownsers should be compensated for the use of their property, no matter what kind it is. It's the Socialist idea that everything should be shared and what belongs to you also belongs to me.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:Don't feel guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when I use MY COPY of some information I'm not using YOUR COPY. The problem is treating all copies of some information as some platonically ideal one - if anything, I'm being made to "share" (in the stalinist sense) MY COPY with you under terms that you decide via copyright law enforced by the central bureacracy.

      If I use MY COPY I'm not using your property, at least for things I recognise as property - you stiill have YOUR COPY.

    4. Re:Don't feel guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why the hell should you "own" my copy of some information just because it's similar to your copy. Your copy is not diminished by my copy. It's quite simple: I'm not using anything that could rationally be considered your property when I use my copy, despite what the law might say. Now, if I broke into your house and erased your copy, THAT should be (and is) a crime, but the mere act of having the same information as you should NEVER be a crime, even if you [think you - but that's another argument about the nature of inspiration] "created" the information yourself.

  13. Situations like this... by Pidder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Situations like this is why you shouldn't feel guilty about downloading "illegal" music.

    1. Re:Situations like this... by Valegor · · Score: 1

      Situations like this is why you shouldn't feel guilty about downloading "illegal" music.

      Um, I don't think anyone that downloads illegal music feels guilty about it. I know I never did. I don't really download anymore not out of guilt and it definately isn't out of RIAA fear, but because there hasn't been anything new that I've wanted in a long time.

  14. Copy protection non-issue? by Kupek · · Score: 1

    I haven't had a problem ripping any of the CDs I've purchased. Is it really that much of a problem?

    1. Re:Copy protection non-issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Crippled CDs are much more common in Europe than the US and Canada for some reason. Still, they're not all of the CDs last time I checked and they can still be ripped with a little know-how.

  15. Can't? by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it

    Did they create a WORKING copy protection scheme yet? i.e. one you can't circumvent by shift key or just by using the CD under Linux???

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Can't? by chefren · · Score: 1
      Many cd:s have corrupted cd-rom or even audio layers which cause cd-roms trying to read them to malfunction and refuse to read the disc. They also cause a lot of "real" players to refuse to read the disc. I've heard of cases where a person would buy a cd. It would *not* work in his real cd-player, but it *would* work in his computer. So he would copy the cd, keep the copy and return the original. So, no. There are no working copy protection schemes.


      SACD has watermarking which is much better: It allows you to rip the DSD stream through firewire (i-link) but an SACD-drive will not play discs without watermarking so it makes manufacturing of "pirate discs" harder. Of course, it means you cannot burn your own SACD:s..

  16. 40GB by savagedome · · Score: 1, Funny

    I recently bought the new iPod with 40GB

    40GB with no access to legal music. Not that's gotta hurt. iPod mini might have been a good start ;)

  17. Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is illegal to rip but not share mp3s!

  18. Here dude.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me your money and I'll send you "legal" mp3s

  19. Screw the law! by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 0

    Install a gnutella client, or e-mule and be done with it.

    If you are really worried about the law, only download those songs you already own on CD.

  20. Copy protection? by Mose250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems like there's hardly a mode of copy protection that hasn't been broken - whether via sharpie or shift key, there's usually a way around these things.

  21. Record off the radio... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last I checked, recording songs that are played off the radio is still fair use. Just hook any headset radio to the Line-in port of your sound card...

    1. Re:Record off the radio... by Yeshua · · Score: 1

      Fair use as law doesn't always exist in countries outside the U.S., for example, here in Australia, we are technically not allowed to record anything off the radio, or off television. Also we can't make any copies of a CD to protect it etc.. We can make one copy of a cassette or vinyl record, as they are easily damaged.

      However these laws are generally ignored both by the citizenry and police.

    2. Re:Record off the radio... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Fair use where, though? Here in the UK, for example, it is legal to record a broadcast for the purposes of time-shifting, ie watching/listening to it at a more convenient time.

      You are explicitly not allowed to keep it, though. I don't know the situation in Germany, and certainly I've never heard of anyone here in the UK being prosecuted for it, but if you want to be completely legal, this may well not be the way to go.

    3. Re:Record off the radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually in the US this is only legal if you record onto a storage device that has had the "RIAA tax" paid, which currently are only analog media devices. So, it's legal to record the radio onto a cassette tape, but not to record it as an mp3 onto a hard drive.

      Now.... you could put an mp3 on a cassette *as data*. People used to use cassettes as data disks in the olden days of computing (large storage space, low cost). I have no clue how this would be interpreted under the current laws. It would be a pretty hilarious hack, actually.

    4. Re:Record off the radio... by snillfisk · · Score: 1

      Then get a DAB radio, here in Norway there's at least four (or five) stations (and we're 4.5m people in a quite large area) broadcasting on DAB. Not sure about the general coverage, thou. The quality is dependent on the station, but is mainly 128kbps or 160kbps IIRC.

      WorldDAB for more information about DAB. Another option would of course be to just get music from online broadcasting services, the norwegian public radio broadcasts are available for free on the net (http://radio.hiof.no/) f.ex.

      --
      mats
      One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
    5. Re:Record off the radio... by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

      Just hook any headset radio to the Line-in port of your sound card..

      Just a curious question for those sound engineers...
      Doesn't headset radios still have a small amount of amplification? Wouldn't the gain in the output make the recording sound a little saturated? (I don't have a Walkman...) Wouldn't it make more sense to record off a clean, non-amplified output?

    6. Re:Record off the radio... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the gain in the output make the recording sound a little saturated?

      If your radio's output is more than your sound card's gain control can handle, then wire up an attenuator with some resistors.

    7. Re:Record off the radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also use streamripper to record most internet radio stations

    8. Re:Record off the radio... by planetk · · Score: 1

      Streamripper (http://streamripper.sourceforge.net/) is the opensource answer to your problems. Available for Windows, MacOSX, Linux. You can record .mp3's from streaming mp3 web stations. There are hundereds of stations to choose from. Shoutcast is a good start http://www.shoutcast.com/

    9. Re:Record off the radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Streamripper is great and all, but the files it creates are frequently begin / end at the wrong points. I'm pretty sure this is because the changeover from saving to file A to file B is triggered by the stream info changing - thus it's the fault of the website streaming the music, that the files get messed up like this. There is always the option of just ripping to a single massive file, but it is then a hassle to chop it up yourself.

      Anyone else experience this ? Any way around it, other than noted above ?

    10. Re:Record off the radio... by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      Ideally you want a line-level output, but I'm pretty sure that even those are amplified by the reciever. Those radio signal levels are pretty low when they come in. ;)

      I believe that you could achieve the same thing by fixing the volume knob of your radio at a constant low level.

  22. Fuck Em by Wehesheit · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Buy the cd and download the unrestricted mp3's. Or just donate directly to the artist if you can, or buy some merchandise from their website. I was pissed when I bought my 10GB iPod and was unable to use iTunes in Canada.

    --
    This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
  23. Opsound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You get them at http://opsound.org !

    Licenced under Creative Commons licence...

  24. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    especially with the new EU resolution, this is an interesting prediicament..... luckily in canada i'm allowed (by law) to DL music

  25. News Flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it, these "legal" mp3s are a real pain in the ass. Why deal with all of this legal bullshit when you can use kazaa? Recording companies you say? Modern-day versions of legal gestapo in germany? Pfff, the chance of getting your comp raided by those greedy bastards is almost 1/5 million+. Screw that restrictive Itunes shit, rip your own cds or use the not-so-legal p2p apps. Just my 2 cents.

  26. Bad Business Model/Law? by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 1

    Does it mean that the current business models and laws are flawed? Or that 'other' consumers just have to put up with it until such time that it is legal to obtain the product?

    Imagine if you want a Cuban cigar, but you can't get it in Canada, and nobody can sell it to Canada, should you try to smuggler some in, or wait for it to become available in your local friendly shop?

  27. Legal Issues by PktLoss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To be honest, I would love to see a case where someone downloaded MP3s for CDs they owned end up in a non-american court (and hense free from the majority of direct RIAA lobying). Once you own the CD, fair use should give you the right to listening to it on your PC, discman, or other portable electronics, and as such you should be able to legally use whatever means are at your disposal.

    Hopefully the precedent setting case would come down on the side of the consumet.

    1. Re:Legal Issues by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fair use is a nice idea, but as a legal concept it doesn't necessarily exist.

      I agree wholeheartedly that I should be allowed to rip any CD, cassette, LP, etc that I have bought to whatever format I like, in order to be able to listen to it more conveniently. Eg, I should be legally allowed to convert my entire CD collection to oggs to play on my nice, shiny new iRiver HP-120.

      Unfortunately, I live in the UK, where doing so without explicit permission is copyright infringement. Oh sure, no-one is ever going to get sued for it, much less lose a court case over it, but that's not the point. I do not have explicit permission from the copyright holders to do what I have done, so I have broken the law.

      Just ending up in a non-US court would guarantee nothing. Each country has its own version of the RIAA, and its own copyright laws, not all of which have any concept of fair use.

    2. Re:Legal Issues by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      Unfortuanately, the record companies are being slick and are only going after those providing mp3s for others to download. So this argument doesn't apply. I wish they would make the mistake though.

    3. Re:Legal Issues by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      > I do not have explicit permission from the
      > copyright holders to do what I have done,
      > so I have broken the law.

      Always remind yourself that the entire civil legal system is first and foremost a way of resolving disputes, not a fixed body of commandments that represent justice.

      Also remind yourself that if anybody who has ripped their own CD for their own use eventually goes to court, that the law itself, in the Anglo-Saxon system, goes to trial.

      Also there are reasons that are perfectly legitimate, fair and non-damaging to the copyright holders for you to rip your own CDs and listen to them any way you want. Many other countries like the USA and Canada allows their citizens to do just that.

      In other words, bring it on! Let's see if the copyright holders can justify this law.

  28. legal mp3s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i get a bit tired of listenting to all the holier than thou itunes mess Ya just gotta learn to quit caring and savor the current internet for all you can....... usem while ya gottem.

  29. www.allofmp3.com by budmur · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fine folks over at Allofmp3.com will sell you MP3s for a wide variety of artists. They don't seem to care what country your're in. As far as being legit, they say that they're registered with the Russian copyright authority and that they're authorized to sell what they're offering. I haven't heard about any independant verification of that, though.

    1. Re:www.allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Werd, I use allofmp3.com also, it is the easiest way. But i would really like to know the laws regarding it. I also like the fact that I can choosed the bitrate my songs get encoded in, and the average cost per album is like $.88 cents

      Werd,
      AnalogRithem

    2. Re:www.allofmp3.com by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I'll just second that I've used them sucessfully, but I don't know the legality.

      But they do let you pick the encoding parameters, and even the encoder! And I believe ogg is available, too.

    3. Re:www.allofmp3.com by pbox · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to them, when you purchase those songs you legally own them in Russia. Buying it from outside of Russia means that you are importing those songs. Usually laws differ for importing it commercially or for personal use (not for resale). The US law says that you can import music legally for personal use, as long as you don't import multiple copies of the same music piece (even on multiple trips). However it is clear from the text of the law that it was written with the intention of regulating physical importation of the music on media. (See amazon.com, where US residens can buy legally imported foreign CDs). However importing it via the Internet, the law might or might not apply. We would not know until after it has been tested in a court of law... It is clear that it is in the best interest of RIAA to shut down this kind of importation (they have tried to sue allofmp3 in Russia, however got nowhere, since it is all according to the laws of the land). They will probably try to A) sue allofmp3 users if they see a chance of winning (might even do it without the chance of winning, just to inflict pain and fear and confusion, they can spend the money, end users are not in the same disposable income category, ie. $100-$500 mil) B) coerce Internet gateways to block intercontinental access to these sites (there is always workaround for that, ie. proxy)

      This is all my opinion, and based on my own shoddy research, take it with a grain of salt, on the rocks, shaken and mashed...

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    4. Re:www.allofmp3.com by infolib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At this conference I heard a lawyer call it "semi-legal". I suspect it's just cause no one paid him to give a firm opinion.

      As far as I'm concerned, I already downloaded Robbie Williams' "Escapology". Picked "256kbit .ogg" - works like a charm. I think Robbie should get more than the microcent or so he got of the 50 cent I paid - but then again I don't really feel sorry. I was in the record store, had the record in my hand - and then I saw the copy protection label. If I can't really own what I buy it's not worth it in any way. Now if only there was some allofmp3-style thing in Denmark - with fair compensation to the artists - I'd be their customer in a heartbeat. As it is, I'm stuck waiting for certain executives to retrieve their heads from certain orifices.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    5. Re:www.allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to them, when you purchase those songs you legally own them in Russia.

      That makes sense. After all, outside of Russia, the songs legally own you...

    6. Re:www.allofmp3.com by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that you're not importing them. Importation is a form of distribution, but that would require the copy to already exist.

      When you're downloading, you're creating a new copy on the downloader's end. This is a form of reproduction, not distribution (though the uploader making it available is distribution).

      Since the reproduction is likely happening within the US, Russian copyright holders don't have authority to permit it.

      RIAA may have a difficult time doing anything about this, but that doesn't make it legal.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:www.allofmp3.com by pbox · · Score: 1

      Would you be able to point me to the direction of this law or ruling. A very interesting distiction, which means that my ownership is completely different for times when I walk into the corner CD shoppe vs. when I click my way into an album at iTunes. Seems unreal, but laws are...

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    8. Re:www.allofmp3.com by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, the statute on importation is 17 USC 602, and IIRC permits some importation to occur without violating the distribution rights of the US copyright holder. The Napster case in the 9th Circuit pointed out that the direct infringements by users which Napster was contributorially and vicariously liable for were distribution (making files available for download) and reproduction (downloading the files).

      And no, your ownership of a copy doesn't hinge on whether you're buying an extant copy or legally making a copy.

      It's just that allofmp3 seems to be claiming that what they're doing is altogether legal because they're distributing in Russia under Russian law (which for all I know is true) and users are importing copies which in the typical allofmp3 scenario would be legal. But this argument relies on the users importing, not reproducing. If they're reproducing, it's a different ballgame, and the exemptions in 602 won't help.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    9. Re:www.allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldnt it be said that the reproduction happens when allofmp3 custom encodes the mp3, and then its distribution when the user downloads it and allofmp3 deletes it

    10. Re:www.allofmp3.com by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Given that the MAI v. Peak decision is widely followed (despite being wrong), and holds that any of the reproduction that occurs in the normal operation of a computer -- e.g. reproduction on disk from packets coming down from a network, or reproduction in RAM of files loaded there from a disk -- qualifies, I don't think that would fly.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  30. Re:My Comments on your Dilemmia by Eneff · · Score: 1

    Much of the copy protection testing happens in Europe, and a larger portion of copy-protected CDs are sold there.

    Myself, I'd suggest expanding your horizons of music. There are plenty of legal sources of mp3s out there - they didn't all die with mp3.com.

  31. Get a decent ripper by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any decent CD ROM drive, paired with one of very many good ripper applications, can rip the CD regardless of any copy protection scheme. Just get yourself a good ripper and enjoy your music. The music labels want you to believe their copy protection schemes are more than just FUD, but they're not. They're useless and easily cirumvented by anyone willing to spend just a little time getting their environment optimized.

    1. Re:Get a decent ripper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yep... if you can hear it thru your computer's cd-rom drive, you can rip it digitally... no matter what the copy-protection scheme is or ever will be.

  32. Good place by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Informative

    muzik.agnula.org All of it is Creative Commons licensed music.

    1. Re:Good place by Trogre · · Score: 1

      It's good to see more of these places cropping up.

      Another good one is Magnatune, the "We are not evil" guys.

      Now if only more artists would add content to places like this...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Good place by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      I've got a rock and roll band, and as soon as we can get some decent songs written and equipment together you can expect to hear some punk rock popping up on them. If you have friends that play instruments, playing music with them will be some of the best fun you ever have.

  33. I use the following.... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use mp3search.ru. They have a deal with the Russian equivalent of the RIAA, so these downloads SHOULD be legal where ever you are. They tend to have the CDs we in the US pay more for because there "imports". Lots of B side selections and remixes. Downloads are around 10 cents a song.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I use the following.... by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that Apple iTunes Music Store doesn't work everywhere in the world? If international borders meant nothing in trade then there would be no problem. They do though, so no using mp3search.ru is not legal. Stop fooling yourself into thinking it is.

      Also do you really think artists are being fairly compensated at 10cents a song?

    2. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do you really think artists are being fairly compensated at 10cents a song?

      I have serious doubts that they're ever fairly compensated by RIAA. What does the price have to do with it? This is paid in Russia at Russian music prices, where legal CDs cost only $3-4 to compete with piracy.

    3. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >I have serious doubts that they're ever fairly compensated by RIAA. What does the price have to do with it?

      Perhaps he should have said "Do you think the artists are being compensated at all at 10 cents a song". I seriously doubt they see a single penny of that dime, but I know the RIAA does give them at least some money from each sale (or perhaps simply a bulk price for the entire album, it depends on their publishing deal).

      Personally, I'm a game developer, and games has a piracy problem similar to music, in that people are making illegal copies of my works all the time. I never see any money from those illegal copies (even if you pay someone 10 cents or $1 for a burned CD of the copy), and it hurts the sales numbers from the games I make. If those sales numbers are low, not only do I see lower compensation from the game overall, but I'll also have a harder time convincing a publisher to put out the next game I make - so not only am I not making any money, but I won't be able to make any money in the future, either. All because someone wanted to 'stick it to the man' or thought that 'the industry wasn't giving me what I deserved for my work', so they decided to steal it.

    4. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, your low sales are because of the pirates, not the crappy game. The only people hit hard by pirates are those popular enough to not have a problem putting out a second piece of software (software being a game, a song, or a movie) regardless of the pirates.

    5. Re:I use the following.... by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They do though, so no using mp3search.ru is not legal. Stop fooling yourself into thinking it is.

      Interesting thing: I've just spent the last hour tooling around on mp3search.ru. Spent 20 bucks to download a bunch of old stuff that I hadn't heard for years or never heard before.

      Guess what? I just realized I have to go out and buy the original CDs for the stuff I downloaded, because I want higher quality.

      Why does it take a 'dubious' Russian website to accomplish this?

      I think it's safe to say that I have no respect for the RIAA. Nor do I for lazy artists that bitch about their music being 'stolen' after selling their sole to the devil because they had $$ signs in their eyes.

      Legal or not, we are at a state of flux and as far as I am concerned, the RIAA can go fuck themselves. When all this is sorted THEN we'll see what's illegal and what's not.

    6. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russian RIAA has different rules of inforcement. Usually involves breaking peoples legs.

    7. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do though, so no using mp3search.ru is not legal.

      Nuh uh. For mp3search to *sell* you an mp3 and deliver internationally may contravene their contract details, by no means is it illegal for you to *buy* the mp3. Just as it is perfectly legal for me to order a CD from amazon.com and have it delivered to the UK, as long as I volunteer to pay the relevant import tax and duties. How many of you have bought software online from outside the borders of your own country? Same thing.

    8. Re:I use the following.... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Nor do I for lazy artists that bitch about their music being 'stolen' after selling their sole to the devil....

      I wouldn't worry about the ones that sell the bottoms of their shoes. Now the ones that sell their soul to the devil - well, that's a different story.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    9. Re:I use the following.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yeah, your low sales are because of the pirates, not the crappy game. The only people hit hard by pirates are those popular enough to not have a problem putting out a second piece of software

      Well, you might have had a point, except for 2 things. First, I see so many people post here about how they download hard to find or non-popular music/games/etc.

      Second, we see our games on Kaaza and other P2P distribution networks the very day they are released (yes, we install these programs and do searches simply to see if pirated copies are being distributed).

      So, are you stupid, or just plain in denial? How would you like it if, instead of making whatever wage you currently make, you get 15% less because someone runs off with a bunch of your product (whatever it may be) without paying. How long can you afford to stay in business like that? What if it's 20% less than you should be making? And so on. Piracy hurts the people who made the product, never forget that.

    10. Re:I use the following.... by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      :-) Sorry... My spelling sucks, and English is not my native language.

  34. Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy patent license from mp3licensing.com. Note that you must first become a company - they don't sell to end users. Consumers must go to Best Buy and pick up a copy of MP3 Encoder Pro(R) for Windows(R) for $29.95.

    2. Obtain content. Sing into a microphone. /dev/urandom. Find "open music." You can't copy from a CD though.

    3. Use lame. The license you buy allows you to use an "in-house" encoder. (which must be compiled to become an MP3 encoder)

  35. Easy: CD-Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have yet to find a CD which protection cannot be defeated. Remember DMCA's only jurisdiction is USA (or at least it should be), so you are free to break the protection.

  36. Chappelle's show!!! by bangular · · Score: 1

    Chappelle's show demonstrated it best. The internet was a shopping mall. The legal pay music store was tiny with no selection. The free music was a giant store with a huge selection. Then Dave had some net sex, ashy larry was there too I think.

    1. Re:Chappelle's show!!! by themurph17 · · Score: 2, Funny

      what did the 5 fingers say to the face? SLAP!! i'm rick james...bitch!

  37. Damn foreigners ripping us off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn foreigners, always looking for a loophole. How about lowering the prices for BMW spare parts first?

    RIAA is monitoring this thread, by the way, so post all you desire.

  38. mp3.com and similar by phorm · · Score: 1

    mp3.com is gone... but I'm sure there are some similar sites out there. The music isn't the same as in the stores, but much of it was good. Anyone got suggestions (bonus points to those who find good non-RIAA sites).

    I personally have a collection of about 3GB worth of music including alternative/rock/etc, techno/trance, darkwave, and some old amiga stuff. I believe most of it is free to distribute in a not-for-profit manner (old mp3.com stuff)... contact me if interested (and if you like some of it, but the CD for a friend).

    1. Re:mp3.com and similar by lullabud · · Score: 1

      mp3.com was pretty damn cool. i have some linkin park songs, coldplay, no doubt, foo fighters, and a bunch of legal mp3's i downloaded from mp3.com before it went out, not to mention a TON of good jazz, classical and oldies music.

      a good alternative, if you're looking for non mainstream artists, is http://iuma.com/

      and while i was looking for that link, i found that http://www.mp3.com.au which apparently doesn't have [m]any good american artists... at least, afaik, which ain't much when it comes to that site.

  39. Hrm... by ferralis · · Score: 1

    How likely are you to get ambushed by RIAA (or European equivalent) goons?

    Since you aren't planning to distribute the MP3's, IMHO you are ethically free to record them again in the medium of your choice.

    So- obtain a (legal) copy of software than can record from your sound card's Line In jack, then play the CD into it, convert the stream to MP3, then save it on your device. This way (passing through an analogue phase) you loose a tiny bit of quality but effectively strip copy protection.

    That is, of course, if your question is as it seems. If instead you're trying to point out how stupid and counterproductive such things as the DMCA and its ilk are, I wholeheartedly agree, but you're preaching to the choir (as no doubt the other responses will confirm).

    Good luck and happy listening!

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
  40. It's simple, really... by Heissenbuttel · · Score: 1

    Have someone in the States buy you an iTunes Gift card. The only requirement is that the billing address for the ITMS is a US address. You should have no problems using the gift card outside the US.

    Alternatively, buy iTunes/Pepsi codes or gift cards from eBay.

    1. Re:It's simple, really... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think that Apple is smarter than that. It's not that hard to know which IP subnets originate outside the USA.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  41. This is the problem by Rexz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any answer there is to this question will be at the best unobvious and at the worst massively convoluted. If the average consumer wants to use their digital technology effectively, they have no choice but to break the law. The lack of insight that has brought about this situation is the primary reason that the music industry is seeing such a massive downturn: it's the financial results of a cultural backlash against narrow-minded profiteering.

  42. Shouldn't you ask the Apple people? by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I seriously wonder what they would say.

    You have a device and nothing to fill it with. You ask them for songs and they tell you...what? Encourage you to break the law?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  43. Digital Downloads at Amazon.com by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    I know they're questionable due to privacy and patent concerns, but they have a lot of music you can buy for download.

    What's more, they have a lot of music you can legally download for free.

    You're not going to find Top-10 and latest releases there, but there's at least a start...

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:Digital Downloads at Amazon.com by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add in a good reference page:

      http://mp3.about.com/cs/buymp3music/

      They list a lot of places where you can buy music in MP3 format.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  44. Civil Disobedience by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Do what you feel is morally right and damn the torpedos.

    1. Re:Civil Disobedience by frankkubiak · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable.

      But as you might know, we Germans are not into civil disobedience. Looking into history books I think there were times when that blind prussian duty-fulfilment got us into quite some trouble.

    2. Re:Civil Disobedience by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm not touching that one. Good point though!

  45. Hmm by pclminion · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Sounds to me like American music companies aren't really interested in selling you their music. So why are you so eager to give them money for it?

    Why not listen to German music? Why is everyone so hooked on the (utter shit) music that comes churning out of American record labels like so much cat vomit...

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you but you are about a mile off the topic. The problem is there is no music to buy, german or other.

  46. Piracy is king in Venezuela by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    You can get cd's on the newspaper on even in street corners. Price is like 0.5-1$

    Sometimes you get a "mp3 cd", so audiophiles can notice the decrease in quality

  47. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is, buying an iPod is a reasonable thing to do. The implication that iPods are useless for law-abiding Europeans is, as the author puts it, incredible, and merits discussion.

  48. emusic by FrkyD · · Score: 2

    they don't restrict your use, will sell to people outside of the U.S. and have a decent selection of non-U.S. artists. Of course, if you are looking for Bravo Charts or something from the Dome you are most likely SOL. If you are more into the types of music on the soundtrack to Herr Lehmann, you should feel right at home.

  49. Count youself lucky by sholden · · Score: 1

    In Australia you aren't allowed to create an mp3 from a non-protected audio CD that you own. Or copy your CD to a tape for playing in the car.

    Of course there are ipod ads on TV and mp3 players can be bought everywhere a portable CD player can.

  50. Simple solution... by J-B0nd · · Score: 1

    "I believe there are more people like me out there who want to listen to their music, without feeling guilty."

    It's easy, just don't feel guilty about downloading music. The music companies are screwing over consumers and artists alike, and have been for years. Download the music you like, and support the artists more directly by going to see concerts when they are in town, buying T-Shirts, etc.

  51. Read c't by Quo_R · · Score: 2, Informative

    The mentioned magazine c't actually has a test of like 8 or 10 legal online music stores which are accessible from within Germany in its current issue..

  52. How about Bleep.com? by Yer+Mum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    100% legal MP3s, but you'd better like the music on the Warp (as it only sells that label's catalogue).

    1. Re:How about Bleep.com? by perhans · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't like Warp?

  53. bleep.com by ydnar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Warp Records entire catalog, including rare and out-of-print, and vinyl-only stuff available at Bleep.com.

    Good quality VBR, and whole-song preview too.

    y

  54. Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Remember the little old lady that the RIAA busted? She claimed she owned all the music on CD already so it didn't matter if she downloaded all the music off the net? RIAA checked the checksums of the files vs her CDs and they were different. She was only able to use MP3s of the songs SHE RIPPED HERSELF from her CDs. You only get the right to own that particular copy of the song, not someone elses ripped copy. Silly, but true.

    1. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering the fact that MP3 compression is lossy and you can't get the original data back, how did they compare checksums? Of course the data is going to be different.

      Sounds like BS to me. }:)

    2. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that lawsuit dropped?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    3. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by eean · · Score: 4, Informative

      No I don't remember.

      That sounds bogus, if ship ripped MP3's you can't check checksums. MP3 is a lossy format.

      Doesn't mean they can't figure out in some manner, not via checksums.

    4. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember the little old lady that the RIAA busted? She claimed she owned all the music on CD already so it didn't matter if she downloaded all the music off the net? RIAA checked the checksums of the files vs her CDs and they were different.

      Bullshit. Checksums would never survive compression.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    5. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

      Nice troll, apparently fooled the hell out of the mods that gave it +4 Info.

      And out of the people who took it seriously enough to debunk.

    6. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by panic911 · · Score: 1

      That's not true. For one, if you did a digital rip from any machine (as long as the settings were identical) to a raw audio file, the checksum should always be the same. That's what's so great about digital. Second, once that raw audio file was compressed, the whole checksum would be lost. What if you changed the id3 tag in the mp3? Again, the checksum would change.

    7. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got this story wrong. They didn't compare the checksums against her CDs. The checksums of her files matched the checksums of files that were known to be widely traded through file-sharing systems. It's impossible to compare the checksums of MP3s versus CDs because of the nature of lossy compression.

    8. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      One program ripping a song from one CD may produce a different image than that program ripping the same song from a different CD, depending on the pressing.

      But you were right about one thing. It is BS if that's true.

    9. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by mysidia · · Score: 0

      I think it sounds pretty cruddy, that they could use a checksum like that.. a checksum not matching doesn't necessarily mean that it didn't come from the same CD.

      A checksum works great for files with low error rates. You can use it to show that two pieces of _digital information_ are different.

      But you could easily rip the same song to MP3 several times... and the result could easily have a different checksum each time, because the data you ripped doesn't necessarily match bit-for-bit..

      Maybe you forgot the options you supplied to your MP3 encoder, the speed you read at, or maybe your CD drive decided to do something differently at the time (or has degraded since then); In any case, it may not be possible to reproduce a MP3 with the exact same checksum

      Sporadic single byte errors which would be totally unacceptable when reading data on a computer hard disk are unlikely to be noticed when listening to an audio CD, so i'm doubting that readers totally eliminate errors.

      At 44Khz, you have... ~16*24000 bits per second or 46 Kilobytes per second

      I don't know a whole lot about all the details CD format, but I do know there's not very fine-grained structural or positioning information available.

      Even if there's just a 0.001 chance of a single bit error, when your drive is performing perfectly, in the process of reading out a track, then you still expect 40 or so single bit errors per read.

      Which is plenty to throw off most checksums. God only knows what that translates to when you convert it to MP3, or what happens if you have a cdrive that tends to skip or glitch, when you're reading at high speed (i.e. >16x) .

    10. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      They ran checksums on the MP3 files, not the audio CD. MP3 compression is lossy and files will be different depending on encoder and options, but once ripped the MP3 files that are traded will be identical byte for byte. There's not that many different rips of the same song being traded so the RIAA has SHA or MD5 sums of the song files being traded online. If the woman's files were identical to the ones on Kazaa, then she must have downloaded them from Kazaa or (less likely) ripped them from her CD with the exact same encoder, bitrate and options as the person who first uploaded it.

    11. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Remember the little old lady that the RIAA busted? She claimed she owned all the music on CD already so it didn't matter if she downloaded all the music off the net? RIAA checked the checksums of the files vs her CDs and they were different. She was only able to use MP3s of the songs SHE RIPPED HERSELF from her CDs. You only get the right to own that particular copy of the song, not someone elses ripped copy. Silly, but true."

      The RIAA didn't bust ANYONE for DOWNLOADING songs. They busted those that were UPLOADING a lot of songs. I don't know what you're trying to prove by making up facts.

    12. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, this is the RIAA, a little old lady, and the US court system we're talking about.

      Not a single one of them is technologically saavy.

    13. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but that's not what the original poster said. He said that they compared the MD5s of her mp3s to those of her CDs, which would not work.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    14. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Jotham · · Score: 2, Insightful

      then she must have downloaded them from Kazaa or (less likely) ripped them from her CD with the exact same encoder, bitrate and options

      less likely? I use my computer as my stereo, and transfer my music from CD to it. To do this I just pop in the CD, it looks up the name for me, and I press one button to encode the albumn.
      bitrate... options... all default.

      Now if Kazaa has a copy of the exact same song, with the exact same title and the exact same MD5 sum, Is it really that obvious that I must have downloaded it from them.

      By your logic, me admitting that, "No, I encoded this file from my CD", would imply that I must have been the one to place it on Kazza... because what are the odds that someone choose the exact same encoder, bitrate, options and even named it the same name.

    15. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by parksie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Audio CDs ignore a lot of the error-correction you'd have on a data CD, so just ripping it twice on the same machine (to .wav files or something else lossless) may very likely produce different checksums.

      Scratch repair employed by CDex/cdparanoia and suchlike tends to mangle small differences before you even get round to encoding anything.

    16. Re:Wrong! RIAA already got someone for doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But there are not **that** many ripping programs around, and they are **mostly** used with the same default setting.

      Rip from a CD with the same ripper, with the same encoder settings, you get the same checksum.

  55. Why not just record it by cyril3 · · Score: 1
    Even if I decide to buy a legacy audio CD, it is often copy-protected and won't load in my PC

    Just record the CD from a player through your sound card and then compress to mp3.

    In most cases the listener will not be aware that the track wasn't ripped digitally from a CD. Its not like there are artifacts in the recorded sound like there were in the viynl days.

    In fact with a good turntable most people can't tell the difference between a ripped cd and a recorded lp.

    But in your case, yeah just record the cd and compress.

    1. Re:Why not just record it by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Futhermore, most CD drives still have the headphone port in the front and an audio wire in the back that can output CD audio. That'll let you have the recording start at the exact same time as the track playback...

  56. It's probably impossible by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    Then again, it's impossible to do plenty of fair use things without breaking the law. Need a backup of your favourite CD for when it gets scratched? Oh no you can't! That DVD? Forget it.

    Welcome to the free market - enjoy your stay. And don't get caught.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  57. bleep.com by gasgesgos · · Score: 1

    If you're looking for anything on warp records, check out bleep.com...
    They don't have any international restrictions...
    Of course, don't go there expecting anything too mainstream. But, it's still an option for non-American music downloaders...

  58. That's what you get... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    for buying an iPod. You should have researched this before buying it, then you would have realized what an annoying situation the whole music industry is.

    The simplest solution is to not buy any music, ever. Plenty of local bands make great music as a hobby rather than as a way of supporting themselves.

    I guess it boils down to whether you'd rather support artistic expression or big business.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:That's what you get... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I was noticing (since I picked up a roll in an auction lot that I now have to find a buyer for) that Player Pianos aren't very expensive on eBay. One person had one listed that said 'if nobody bids on this, get in touch with us about taking it for free.'

      So listen to 'real' music instead of recordings of music.

      --
      ---
  59. Try Magnatune by kfishy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Magnatune is a record company that offer music licensed in the Creative Commons license. You are able to hear the music before you buy.

    Granted, it doesn't have Britney Spears or Moby, but you may be surprised at what you can find there.

  60. Whats the problem by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "I believe there are more people like me out there who want to listen to their music, without feeling guilty. Why is there no one meeting this demand? "

    Ok....so nobody is meeting this demand. I have two suggestions. Either try to start such a service that DOES meet those demands, and hopefully profit off it while you get your music fix, or just go ahead and break some laws. How can you feel guilty if they offer you no legal option for getting your music this way? You really have no alternative, so there is no reason to feel guilty, especially after you have decided you want to do things legally, and they have failed to provide you with a way to do so.

    Before I get people giving me arguments about things like "well, I wanted them to give me a way to smoke pot legally, but they failed to provide me a way to do so", I would just like to state that this isn't an issue about whether you can use something or not, this is a format issue and a license issue, which is quite different.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  61. Answer don't feel guilty by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In certain american states the record companies had to pay fines for price fixing. Since the same prices apply in europe this means the same price fixing is going on overhere just that our legal system is as bought and sold as the american states that did not pursue this.

    I don't know about germany but in holland it is a legal right to make a copy. Copy protection denies that right so again it is the music industry that is acting against the law.

    So why should I feel guilty when I download music?

    Asnswer I don't. Poor musicians starving to death? Awh, best artists in history were poor. I am doing art a favor. I didn't see music artist protest when changing technology made miners unemployed or when thousands of factory workers lost their jobs to robots.

    For years people have been making suggestions of how the music industry could easily sell its entire catalog without the expense of keeping cd's in stock by burning on demand. They didn't want it. Voting with your wallet is the only thing that works. Any who buy copyrighted cd's and then jump through hoops to get it to work on their player are pawns. You are sending the message that the current business model is fine with you.

    Since in holland you pay a tax on dvd's and cassetes anyway that goes to the music industry I see that as my payment. No more wrong then them getting money for my linux install cd's.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Answer don't feel guilty by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

      I didn't see music artist protest when changing technology made miners unemployed or when thousands of factory workers lost their jobs to robots.

      Let's be fair here. Many artists have raised this and other social issues through music. Granted most of them were country artists like Alan Jackson's Little Man. But checkout Billy Joel's Allentown. There are many more. Music has always played a major role in shaping social values and the best artists have not just had a cool sound but something powerful in the words as well. Lets not deride musicians to make our point against the corporations.

  62. hmm... by jimmyCarter · · Score: 1

    It sounds incredible, but even after hours of research on the web, I don't see a legal way to use this device with new songs.

    Perhaps this research should have taken place before you shelled out the money for your new iPod? :)

    --

    -- jimmycarter
  63. Not Exactly a Solution, But... by Flamingcheeze · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... I've succesfully (and legally) avoided spending any money on music for months, while downloading hundreds of new artists and songs. I've just been scouring for free downloads from artists' websites, etc.

    One of my favorite sites is Epitonic.com. I've found so many great artists there...

    --
    The Philosophy of Liberty | lewrockwell.com
  64. Quality by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, it's fair use, but the SNR of normal FM transmissions is less than 50 ...

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Quality by Mipmap · · Score: 1

      How about Sirius or XM Satellite Radio?

    2. Re:Quality by hattig · · Score: 1

      What about Satellite radio / Digital radio (DAB) or Cable radio?

      Yeah, they are compressed formats, so you lose there, but maybe there is a way to capture the stream directly (MP3 streams for Satellite and Cable digital radio) so no more conversion is necessary...?

    3. Re:Quality by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what with all the DJ prattle and advertising noise, the quantity of music signal is pretty low...

  65. allofmp3.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple - allofmp3.com - they're located in Russia, where the royalty laws for downloading music work similarly to those for radio airplay in North America. Because of this, they are able to offer a HUGE selection of music without having to hammer out deals with the major labels.

    How much does all this cost? How about $0.01 US/megabyte downloaded? What if I told you that the vast majority of their catalogue was available in high quality formats, that you can encode to your file format of choice (including LAME with --alt-presets, or OGG)? Would that sweeten the deal?

    Frankly, I don't know why these guys havn't taken off in North America, aside from a lack of publicity. I suppose there is some fear of giving your credit card to a Russian company, but their processor is highly reputable, and they now also accept PayPal.

    Here's some reviews and FAQs about their setup and its legitimacy:

    http://www.techimo.com/newsapp/i9599.html

    http://www.techimo.com/newsapp/i9599.html

    1. Re:allofmp3.com by Idealius · · Score: 1

      Whoa! Bookmark/Favorite!

      Awesome man, if it wasn't so late after this story was posted I would ask someone to mod up.

  66. there are some sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did you do a google search?
    I'm in france and found loads of sites and recently saw them advertised. typically 1 a song.
    radio stations also offer the 'service'

  67. CD... Baby, ermm. by igrp · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's always CDBaby which has a an awesome collection, at least, as far as I am concerned and does kick back a good percentage of its profits to the artists themselves (and not their labels). As far as I know, international users are just as free to purchase songs as domestic users.

    Looks like Apple's itunes won't be available in Europe anytime soon (apparently Napster seems to want to come back in Europe though).

    1. Re:CD... Baby, ermm. by metamatic · · Score: 0, Troll

      At $15 a CD plus shipping they're no less overpriced than the RIAA.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  68. For a start. . . by munpfazy · · Score: 1

    . . . you could avoid buying hardware from companies that support unreasonably restrictive licensing schemes. At the risk of being modded a flame, I've got to say that it's people who are willing to pay hundreds of dollars to companies that take away their rights that make this sort of thing possible. Want to legally own your music? Here are three easy steps: 1- Take your ipod back to the store and ask for your money back. 2 - Buy a player from another manufacturer that handles mp3 and ogg formats without any nasty licensing restrictions. 3 - Take the hundred bucks you saved by not purchasing a nifty Apple logo, and use it to subscribe to emusic.com, or to buy albums from magnatune.com. Or, go to your neighborhood music store and buy albums from distributors that don't add copy protection to their CD's. The only thing sillier than shooting yourself in the foot is paying someone else to shoot your foot for you and then complaining about it on slashdot.

    1. Re:For a start. . . by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

      you could avoid buying hardware from companies that support unreasonably restrictive licensing schemes.

      Gee.. I lucked out and got an iPod that plays all my mp3's just fine. In fact, it even runs a GPL OS if I want it to.

      Perhaps you would feel better about life if you reread the post and realized that its not the iPod, or even the ability to play music that is at issue here.

    2. Re:For a start. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that you, HrothgarReborn, SMOKE the POLE!

  69. Don't jump the gun! by PCM2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    You Europeans are getting way ahead of yourselves. "Legal" MP3s are not proven technology yet. Stick to the file-sharing for now, and leave the other stuff to the early adopters in the U.S., at least until the bugs get ironed out.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  70. Sounds like a business opportunity to me! by z00z · · Score: 1
    This could be interesting, assuming of course it is legal.

    Someone in the US can set up a website where they offer to buy iTunes music (for 99 cents) for people located outside the US, and selling it to them (for $1, say). Is there anything illegal with this?

    Needless to say, IANAL.

  71. MP3.Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got about 15Gig of stuff I snarfed from MP3.com while they were online.

    Since they're offline now, what are my requirements for the music? Besides just keeping it, of course. Can I make it available to others? For downloading? For fighting the system, muahahahah?

  72. Catch 22 for Apple? by serutan · · Score: 1

    I guess if there's no legal use for an iPod in Germany, then Apple is trafficking in technology whose sole use is to steal intellectual property. Are they looking down the barrel of the European DMCA?

    Uh-oh.

  73. illegal or otherwese by Un0r1g1nal · · Score: 1

    according to the new stuff thats been passed through the EU though, as long as you only have the MP3s for your own use, and not to make money out of them, then they won't do anything about it. Sometimes it is good to live in the UK :P RIAA style tactics cannot be employed over here until that gets changed

    --
    If at first you DON'T succeed, Skydiving is NOT for YOU!!
  74. Are you using Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far I haven't had problems ripping any audio protected tracks with cdparanoia, including two cds imported from germany which claimed to be copyprotected. Windows couldn't deal with them, though.

  75. Are we missing the point? by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people saying that its easy to defeat copy protection. I think the issue is that a court has just ruled in the case of DVD's that it is illegal to circumvent copy protection under DMCA. Of course we can do it. Can we do it leagally?

    Perhaps the biggest problem here it the question of how can it be done and not feel guilty. Maybe that is at the heart of the problem. If a law is unfair should we feel guilty about breaking it? Should Rosa Parks stay at the back of the bus until the courts or the legislator deside she can sit in the front?

    I am not advocating file sharing. But if I purchase a movie, a song, or a video game, I will use it any way I see fit, in any format I choose. If the powers that be choose to make that illegal then I will join a long line of tradition of dumping tea into harbors, and drinking from the wrong water fountain. I will face my day in court should it come and pray our system will be fair enough to see justice through. But I will not feel guilty.

  76. I have no problem... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    .. ripping every CD I buy to vorbis and uploading them to my Zaurus.

    Pity the money still goes to the RIA*, not the artist, but what can you do when they've signed contracts?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  77. Rip your own MP3's.. by demonic-halo · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this sounds stupid to you guys, but it's an easy alternative where you'll probably never get caught.

    At the public library (at least the one in my area) they do have a section for people to rent CDs and DVD videos. I just bring my iBook and have a few CDs ripping while I'm reading their magazines.

    I guess there's a sortage of teeny pop songs there, but they have a wide variety of classics and old rock.

  78. A few "musical" notes by David_R · · Score: 1

    Firstly, iTunes.com doesn't sell MP3 files -- their music is in AAC format, which is only authorised to play under some circumstances.

    Secondly, it depends on what you mean by "legal". Does anybody know anybody who has been successfully prosecuted for transferring CDs they own to MP3 format? Because what matters when you talk about "legal"/"illegal" behaviour is any precendent which is applicable to your situation.

    It seems inevitable when you hear someone describing something like this as "illegal", they're either a member of the RIAA or Apple or somebody with a distinct interest in making sure you buy separate copies for every purpose, or somebody who is under the impression that any copying is wrong (I'm looking at you, Grandma) and that "fair use" is bollocks.

    This is all a bit hijacked -- I think what you mean to ask is whether there are places you can buy MP3s from on the internet. The answer, as posted elsewhere, is "Yes".

    These points are small and probably uneccessary corrections, but this is /. and if it weren't for petty corrections, the signal-noise ratio would be way better. The usual IANAL/YMMV disclaimers apply to this situation as well.

  79. Look at it this way... by doublebackslash · · Score: 1

    Look at it this way:
    Your hard-drive, flash memory, cd-R's, etc all may have had a tax added to them to pay the music companys a royalty for any music that may be copied to them.
    Morpheus for what you want, and if they come after you, tell them that you paied, just not through normal channels. Present recipt as nessary.

    --
    md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
    d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  80. Re:Sorry by ex-songwriter · · Score: 1

    The iPod is not useless for law-abiding Europeans. I bought one a year and a half before the iTunes music store was around in the US. I took my MP3s (that I had burned from my CD collection into iTunes) and dumped them onto the iPod. I don't see how that is so difficult.

  81. Line in -- make an analog copy by DotDotSlasher · · Score: 1

    You can always take the line-level output, and record your songs that way. Record a 60 min CD in 60 minutes to a 600MB WAV file, then split it up by hand to individual WAVs, then encode each to MP3 and label them yourselves.
    Yes, it's a pain but it is a legal copy of your music in a format you can use.

    1. Re:Line in -- make an analog copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the first thing I thought of when I read this question. I don't know why it took this long for anyone to suggest an analog copy. Sure it's not perfect, but with a decent setup, it would sound fine.

      If I weren't an AC, I'd mod you up. ;)

  82. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey Slashdot, I'm in Holland, and I just bought this gun only to find out that I can't get bullets, nor can I legally use it here!"

  83. Story is -1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You forgot to mention that the only computer you have to use with the iPod is an Amiga 500 running NetBSD.

    Seriously, this story is just a troll. He's just trying to infuriate you.

  84. Buy iTunes Gift Certificates! by tcgwebs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in the U.S. and I sell gift certificates to the iTunes Music Store at a small premium. Please e-mail me at sales at rossonwebs dot com if you're interested. Most of my sales come from European countries, and the gift certificates work like a charm on iTunes. It's not a TOS violation either, believe me, I have checked and rechecked.

    --
    Domain name registration for $8.79 per year
    879domains.co
  85. innocent until caught by plams · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it wasn't for services like Soulseek and Suprnova I probably wouldn't know half of the good music I know now. My policy is to download the music, evaluate it, and buy it if it's something I want to keep. Since the music I listen to rarely get any air time on the radio, I don't have much choice.. short of blindly wasting money on random CD's. And no, I don't believe that 30 second 32kbps/22khz mp3 previews does music any justice.

    So well, it sucks to break the law, but as long as you can avoid getting prosecuted I believe the moral question is up to yourself: "Is what I'm doing wrong?". I mean, in my case the record industry is actually getting more money from me because I've got access to fileshare networks.

    Eventually, the record industry will have to move with the flow.. I believe we'll see many more "iTunes sites" in the future.

  86. easy solution by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    1. give the recording industry the finger 2. download whatever you want artists get most of their money from the signing bonus, not from cd sales (unless they're platinum, in which case they're rich and the music probably sucks) -m

  87. Some legal sites (some french, sorry) by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2, Informative

    European music and artists : independent (mp3).

    ecompil : universal (wma)

    a cool label

    epitonic : good independent site (mp3)

    This is just a selection from google

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  88. www.weblisten.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used www.weblisten.com in the past. They have a very good selection of legal music downloads in unprotected MP3 and WMA format. They are based in Spain and pay royalties to the Spanish music performers body.

    They offer a number of payment options; per song, or an all-you-can-eat option either for a month or a weekend.

    The only problem I've found is that occasionally downloads could hang part way through. Apart from that though they are very good and I would recommend them.

    1. Re:www.weblisten.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A warning to the folks that care about proper tagging - don't use Weblisten. 90% of the stuff is improperly (or not at all) tagged, judging from my previous experience.

  89. Weak copy protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it using the copy protection scheme mentioned here? If so, it seems that its not very hard to just buy the CD you want, and rip it, regardless of whether it is "copy-protected".

  90. smells like bullshit by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The RIAA lawsuits were against heavy *uploaders*. The cost of downloading a song is already established -- $0.99 at iTunes, $1--$2 if you buy a CD and rip it yourself. Downloading isn't necesarily illegal (fair use allows you to copy from someone else, not make a copy for someone else).

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:smells like bullshit by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 1
      The cost of downloading a song is already established -- $0.99 at iTunes, $1--$2 if you buy a CD and rip it yourself.

      Well, I don't know about iTunes, but buying a CD alone costs around $20.00 (CDN), and the time spent finding a decent ripping program (or writing one). Much easier to just download the music, who really cares if it's illegal, since its only the uploaders who get persecuted (AFAIK).

      --
      I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
    2. Re:smells like bullshit by s2k577 · · Score: 1

      if you have Windows, you can use the excellent CDex ripping program. Or you can use iTunes, or Windows Media Player...

  91. downloading no more illegal than ripping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Downloading music via file sharing, if you own that exact track in CD form, is no different than ripping it from your CD onto your computer. Either method is to obtain a copy of your music in another format, the only difference is RIAA-clones can detect it. The question is wether you are legally allowed to own your CD-bought music in another format, something not nearly as clear as it should be.

    In reality though, it doesnt matter anyway. If you own the CD, you are never going to be sued for downloading the same music in MP3 form.

    FWIW, people in the UK can use "My Coke Music". I have no idea if it is available for people in Germany.

  92. Weblisten by paugq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's in Spain, it's legal and their site is both in English and in Spanish: Weblisten.

  93. don't you wish you figured this out BEFORE hand? by webperf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean.. wasting all that money on a iPod, only to figure out you don't have any method of inputting songs into it? just do what everyone else does.. rip the CD, and boycott people who use copy protection.

  94. WWJD by slash-tard · · Score: 5, Funny

    In these situations I always ask myself What Would Jesus Do?

    I think he would buy the the cd, rip it with audio hijack, and then load them up onto his iPod.

    1. Re:WWJD by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, no, no.

      He would start his own touring band, and let anyone bootleg it. When the lawyers and businesmen cornered him and asked if people should pay for copywritten music, he would answer "Give unto the laywers what is the lawyers, but live your life for others, for it is not your own but God's". After that the RIAA left outraged because he had not fallen into their trap.

      hmm, that started out as a joke :)

    2. Re:WWJD by Stormie · · Score: 1

      Actually, Jesus uses an iGod.

    3. Re:WWJD by RevAaron · · Score: 5, Funny
      That's interesting. In these situations I have a pretty similar routine... I guess you could call it WWJD, but instead I ask myself
      WHAT WOULD JEHOVAH DO?
      And, of course, there is only one answer to that: SMITE THEE!

      Man, I should get a tshirt with that.
      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:WWJD by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Nah, Jesus was the original filesharer.

      He turned water into wine and he made copies of fish and then distributed them to all his friends.

      The FWGAR (Fish and Wine Growers Association of Rome) weren't too happy about Jesus infringing on their IP rights.

      Jackus Valentius, the head of the FWGAR released a statement which said "Certain Sons of God have been illegally duplicating our fish and not paying for them. We will do everything we can to prevent this blatant theft of our goods."

      He then made a reference to the Strangler Of Babel.

    5. Re:WWJD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends what religion you are.

      Catholic: Jesus would make sure it was really really easy to load illegal music, but give you incredible guilt if you do. Try wrapping your rosary around your hand before downloading.

      Protestant: Jesus would remind you that only those dirty Catholics do that!

      Evangelist: Jesus would want you do have all the music you like, but only after sending a donation to Father Joe-Bob.

      Jewish: Jesus doesn't count, and since you run the music industry anyway it doesn't matter.

    6. Re:WWJD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually Jesus was crucified for copying a bunch of fish and bread. He really learned his lesson on copyright infringement.

    7. Re:WWJD by Radish03 · · Score: 1

      /me throws a rock at RevAaron.

    8. Re:WWJD by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      That throws a 403.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
  95. Why no one is meeting the demand... by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    Simple. Laws vary country to country. What may be legal and enforcable in the US or Canada might not be legal or enforcable in Japan or Germany or wherever.

    The result of this is that a company will pick either the biggest viable market (the US), or their local market (Japan for a japanese company), and roll out there first. Where a product or service gets rolled out next depends on which markets are most compatible (language and law wise).

    Its not that the companies would not like to part you and your money. Its just that other customers are more convenient right now.

    END COMMUNICATION

  96. Frank kubiak- I have an iTMS solution by Sockpuppetofdoom · · Score: 1

    Email me at flamingmonkeyofjustice@hotmail.com, and I'll help

  97. I'm not sure exactly how this works... by zakezuke · · Score: 1


    Pardon me for thinking in pre 1990s terms, and not having direct experence with audioCDs that won't play on the PC. For the moment, I'm going to assume you can't play audio CDs on your PC digitaly, and assume you can either play them on your CD drive just with the analog output, or get an external portable CD player jacked into your sound card.

    In theory, one can do a digital to analog copy, and have it considered to be fair use. I'm not sure where you live, you'll have to check to see if it's legal to copy a CD to cassette for example. While the process is slow, as in you have to record in real time, you can get a very decent copy via digital to analog back to digital. You'll need an application to either record .mp3 in real time, or convert .wav to .mp3. You can use "windows recorder" and "save as 44.1 stereo" before you start recording. I think that feature is supported pre win2k, but don't quote me, i'm not sure.

    Things I don't know.
    1. Can you do this even with a new protected CD, as in will your average CDrom drive play it independent of the PC, or must one do this with an external player.

    2. Can one record CD content via an analog to digital converter, or are there new forms of copy protection that prevent this.

    3. Would this be legal if the intended application is to get the damn music on the ipod.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  98. So let me get this straight ... by Hi,+I'm+Troy+McClure · · Score: 1
    You bought a $500 device without quite knowing how you were going to use it?

    And now you want us to solve your problem?

    Ok, here's the solution. You send that nice, new bit of plastic to me along with a list of songs you want and money to buy them with. I'll be sure to get it right back to you.

    Oh, and since you seem to have some extra cash, I have a nice bridge I'd like to sell you...

  99. Simple: Use iRATE by metal_priest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    iRATE gets you free & legal mp3s without disriminating in regards to your location in the world. It also promotes the little guys and tries to save the world from sucky radio.

    1. Re:Simple: Use iRATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...tries to save the world from sucky radio.

      It fails miserably. Everything it gave me to listen to sucked just as much (although in different ways) as any trite radio crap. Are there any tracks out there which are atually decent songs, performed by musicians who use real instruments and know how to play them, sung on-key, and produced by someone with a bit more capability than a monkey hitting "Record"?

  100. CD Storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use large 200+ albums for the disks themselves. Software and music stored the same way but seperately. The jewel cases I packed in xerox boxes, and kick those up onto a shelf I built over my garage door opener (tallish garage).

    For the music, since I don't like to take hundreds of cd's everywhere, I've indexed with post-its (what aren't they good for), and I brake those into smaller traveling cases or CD holders that hang off the visor in the car. For the software that needs it, I take either the insert in the jewel case, or snap it apart if need be, and stick those in with the disks. For the software with more elaborate instructions, I have a section of hanging folders just for them.

  101. Convenience doesn't count: breaking the law sucks by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    I'm not the RIAA or anything like them, but until there's a service that works in .de, you can't do what you want to do. Music isn't free unless the artist says it is. Certainly it's an inconvenience to buy CDs, but that's what you're stuck with. If ripped-off music (not your own rip) is more important to you than being legal, then use a p2p and suffer the consequences-- if there are any.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  102. Learn to use ripping programs by rtilghman · · Score: 1

    I don't really understand the problem you're talking about. I have yet to encounter a copy protected CD that good ripping software couldn't just bypass in error recovery or secure mode. In fact, I cazn generally bypass any protection on a CD with the NORMAL ripping more at like 6x or so for accuracy.

    Some of the programs I use include:

    - Easy CD-DA Creator
    - EAC

    ECDDA is the easiest and most robust tool I've found, and it rips straight to any of about 10 different codecs including Ogg, MP3, AAC, WAV, FLAC, WMA, etc. EAC is nice in that it has a secure mode that "guarantees" you get an exact copy of the music file, but it doesn't rip straight to certain standards and can be a bit irritatingly complex.

    In the case where I did encounter a protected CD I couldnt bypass I would just return it to teh store and tell them that I couldn't use it per my rights under fair use (i.e., it didn't work) and I want my money back.

    -rt

    1. Re:Learn to use ripping programs by RenatoRam · · Score: 1

      Here in Italy every single CD from Virgin, EMI, and I am sure many others is protected by "Copy Control" and has an ugly circular logo on a sticker.

      On the back of the cd, in very small print and often only in english there is a notice saying that the media MIGHT refuse to work with car-stereos, personal computers, etc.

      Oh, and obviously there is no "Compact Disc" philips logo anywhere to be found on the disc...

      I tried every single ripping technology I'm aware of (cdparanoia, cdda2wav, eac, easy cd ripper), and NONE of them can rip the cd. On windows it is even difficult to obtain a full TOC of the audio cd!

      The extracted wav contains very very audible clicks and disruptions of the music content.

      If you know a method to bypass this (without resorting to analog ripping) please let me know: I'm tired of bringing with me my Blind Guardian double Live album in the car risking every time to break or scratch it.

      Bye, Renato

      --
      Ciao, Renato
  103. archive.org and the furthur net by bscottk · · Score: 1

    if you want legal, free, live music-go to archive.org (the music section) or furthurnet.org to get SHNs and MP3's via p2p or ftp. good luck

  104. It might be illegal by Skapare · · Score: 1

    It might be illegal to rent a virtual server in the US, with a US assigned IP address, and run a private proxy server there for your own web access use. So for that reason you shouldn't do it.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  105. OD2 biggest in europe by arkhan_jg · · Score: 3, Informative
    OD2 are the largest european online distributer, with at least some tracks from all the 'big 4' labels. They sell in germany through a number of resellers, or branded versions.

    They're primarily a WMP9 shop, but I believe at least some of the resellers use mp3's, which should work on your ipod.

    iTunes itself is coming to europe, in theory the first half of this year; but it's anyone's guess as to when they'll actually launch.

    Personally speaking, I prefer to still buy CD's, as I get to choose the rip quality (high quality ogg's for my PC, 128vbr mp3 for my flash mp3 player).

    I just refuse to buy the corrupt disks, and stick to the smaller labels, especially the indie's. If you do want to import (cheap) CD's, I can personally recommend CDBaby for non-label music, and cd-wow are insanely cheap for more well known artists.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  106. Try the Library... by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
    no it is not legal, but, I get a large amount of my music by borrowing CD's from the Library and ripping them. They never seem to have anything to current, but I have gotten a ton of just about anything over about 5 years old that way.

    My local branch seems to have a heavy empahsis on blues and country, but if I drive across town, it changes to classical and more middle of the road fare. not sure if this is available out side of the US though...check with your local library.

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    1. Re:Try the Library... by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      I live in Sweden and get most of my music from the public library system which has a wide section of everything from children's music to opera (with pop, jazz, and world music in between).

      This is legal, (IMHO), since you have already paid for that material via the taxes that support the library system.

  107. Are you smoking crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In india, I purchased 3 CDs in Indian Rupees 100, roughly equal to 2 bucks. And my penis is already larger than yours, so sit quiet and let me do your wife.

  108. Use TotalRecorder by rnakamot · · Score: 1

    Record the sound through Total Recorder:

    High Criteria

    This doesn't address the problem of ripping from your computer, but you can if you get a line (either directly from the CD drive or through the MIC or INPUT line from a CD player) to your computer, the Total Recorder program can record the sound in MP3 or Ogg Vorbis.

    1. Re:Use TotalRecorder by Mose250 · · Score: 1

      Well yes, you could do this - and you could use any sound recording application, like audacity or sound forge or microsoft's sound recorder. There'll be a significant degradation of quality in most cases, however, unless you've got a really nice sound card and/or a firewire / usb external capture device. The hiss from most soundcards' line in or microphone jacks combined with the compression afterwards will give you a decent quality hit. In addition, you have the problem of essentially recording at 1x rather than ripping at multiple speeds. Actually, it's probably faster just to circumvent the copy protection.

  109. music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people like me out there who want to listen to their music, without feeling guilty.

    See now that's your problem. The guilty part I mean. Start off by ripping the CD's that all your friends own. Then move up to the world of P2P. After that you can even start using warez FTP servers to swap music. Pretty soon, you have a fairly impressive music collection, and by that time all the guilt has worn off!! Tons of music and zero guilt. You know you want to.

  110. Sheesh by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it, I'll have to [break the law and] download the MP3-file via file-sharing.

    Go look in the back of your computer. Specifically, at your sound card.

    There are two "in" jacks, and one "out" jack. Even if somehow the technology to record directly escapes you, you can resort to the time-honored and unpluggable analog hole to make an electronic copy.

  111. Play fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just sucks hard when you move on and play by their rules and pay for music, and then it's still wrong.
    Let's say fuck it and hooray for piracy. Cmon, it's like communism!

  112. What's with the moral crusade? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Just get them with via P2P and save your head from exploding.

    If you like the CD, buy it. If not, don't. Simple, really.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:What's with the moral crusade? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      And remember, they're going after people who share/distribute them, not people who download them. You can download till you're blue in the face and you won't be touched.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  113. Bleep! by Blic · · Score: 3, Informative
    Warp Records' Bleep has unencrypted MP3s and it's good music too! Well, at least to me it is... =)

    Studio K7 has some limited offerings in MP3 as well.

    I think both sell internationally - Warp is in the UK and K7 is in Germany.

  114. Support non-RIAA music by El+Volio · · Score: 2, Informative

    Other than looking for non-RIAA music CDs, there are sites with legally downloadable music. It's not the pop hits of the day, but sites like Epitonic.com have great music that you can download in MP3 form legally. Google can help you find lots more sites if that's not to your liking; these are just the ones I have bookmarked.

    --

    "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  115. The Guardian has some sources... by Wolfbone · · Score: 1

    There are some links on this page you might find useful. There's plenty of free stuff too: some student radio stations like icradio.com archive their shows and make them available for free download and some artists provide a few downloadable mp3s on their own websites - Kate Rusby for example.

  116. Nupha by youdontcare · · Score: 1

    Check out Nupha, an international cross-platform (win & mac) music store.

    0.99 per song
    8.99 per album

    Unlimited burns,
    unlimited transfers to mp3 players,
    compatible with iTunes & Media Player 9.

    Sounds good, but I have yet to try it. Someone to sponsor me an iPod ? :)

  117. iuma.com by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    Just go to www.iuma.com

    Or - email the artists you are interested in and tell them you want to buy some of their music please and that you just want an ogg vorbis format that you can play on your ipod.

    Personally I won't support the recording industry but my reasons are probably at variance of most people. I just do not like the music they are trying to stuff down our throats!

  118. I'd recommend Web Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Web Listen is based in Spain and lets you download MP3s and WMA (no DRM). MP3s are 192kbps.

    They're licenced by Spain's licencing body - meaning they have access to all music (like radio stations), though they don't tend to have stuff thats not been released in Spain. Bit more expensive than the Russian offerings but that probably means more goes to the copyright owners. I've bought from them. There are no country restrictions.

    For europeans only there is also OD2. OD2 did deals with the major labels and provides music to other outlets, Like MSN. You might be able to get to some services from the Premium Services button in Windows Media Player. Its more expensive than Web Listen and has DRM because the labels have control.

    Letting the same licensing bodies that collect royalties from radio play do the same for downloads is definitely the way forward.

  119. Downloading the MP3s of music you own by Logicdisorder · · Score: 0

    I have been buying CDs for years and it was always been my understanding that I could make a copy for backup so if my CD can no longer play then I have a copy can still listen and as long as I keep the CD I am covered, just like software.

    Now with that in mind if the person who a CD that has CD Protection(Which you can get around by using CDEX or Easy CD Extractor) then I can not see how someone that downloads the MP3s of the CD that he or she owns is breaking copy right. After all these people have spent there money to buy CD and wish to listen to it on there MP3 player.

    If I am wrong please let me know

    On a personal note:
    Now I would sooner buy CDs then buy music on-line becasue the audio quality of a CD is better than most of the on-line music stores offer and then you can rip the CD down to an MP3/OGG/FLAC(which is what I am going to be doing with all mu CDs)or what every format you wish. It gives you the freedom of choice which is something I think they are trying to take away from us.

    --
    "The most dangerous creation of any society is that man who has nothing to lose." - James Baldwin, American author
  120. Ethics vs. Legality by arrianus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a difference between ethics and legality. You cannot legally use MP3s in your country. You've been conditioned to think of copyright as "intellectual property," rather than a social contract between creator of content and the consumer, which associates concepts like stealing and piracy with what is, in the end, not theft but copyright violation. This brings with it the feeling of guilt. You've also been conditioned, probably by the German society, that laws were meant to be followed and that ethical people follow laws.

    The reality is quite different. Laws are, at best, an attempt to codify and enforce ethics by committee. The committee is usually right, but does, on occasion, make errors. In those cases, there is sometimes no compelling reason to follow the laws. Worse, as in the case of Eastern Europe under Communism, the committee maybe corrupt, in which case, the ethical thing to do is often civil disobedience, and intentionally breaking laws. To me, this feels like one of those cases.

    You should strive to follow ethics, not laws. I would argue that there is a compelling ethical argument not to give money to record companies, so they can better buy off governments to pass acts like the DMCA mandating DRM, and destroy your right to write free software capable of interacting with the mainstream world (you cannot, right now, write free legal DVD players, or players for DRMed CDs, even if they have zero uses for copying content). If this is allowed to continue, in short time, GNU/Linux computers will no longer be able to legally access music and video, followed by books and electronic texts, and eventually, mainstream documents. Once this happens, GNU/Linux and free software will have been effectively legally banned from any sort of desktop use (and quite possibly, eventually, server use).

    I would sidestep the issue of benefiting personally from illegal action by making sure you do not benefit. Donate the money you would have spent on CDs to either the artists, or organizations like the FSF, the EFF and similar. Make sure you donate at least as much as you have in illegal content. Then, gather the content illegally, and use it as you see fit. I believe this is the second most ethical course of action (the most ethical being that you only boycott all mainstream music, and listen only to independent labels uninvolved in the push for DRM).

    1. Re:Ethics vs. Legality by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      You should strive to follow your morality, but at the same time, part of the morality should be to even follow laws that you may not agree with. Otherwise, if people didn't compromise at all, there would be more chaos than civility. The question is whether the issues are important enough to you that civil disobediance (and whatever punishments may follow, regardless of how unjust they are) are worth dealing with.

      As you well put, the issues go far beyond music to control of ideas and their distribution. So I would imagine it is quite important.

      On the flip side is stuff that's legal but may not be moral. For example, allofmp3.com is legally allowed to distribute and I'm legally allowed to download (heck, RIAA can't pursue downloaders but sharers). The question in that case is whether it's moral since while russian artists may be paid (since allofmp3.com has an agreement with Russian Organization for Multimedia & Digital Systems), how about the non Russian artists? I'm not sure they will, so am I trying hard to escape my own moral guidelines? I mean, am I doing the same thing that I see many others do that makes me sick, stay with the technical rule of law but skirt every moral issue. So I haven't used their services. It's good to know that others also try to stay both legal and moral even when doing so may be difficult.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    2. Re:Ethics vs. Legality by pruss · · Score: 1

      Well, on an Aristotelian account of private property, on which you have a natural right to the product of your labor, there should be little difference between intellectual and tangible property. On a Thomistic account that makes all private property a matter of social contract (though a social contract that one has an ethical duty to obey), there is also little difference, unless society has ruled otherwise.

      There may of course be accounts of private property on which the two cases are handled differently, but it is not obvious to me that any such account is right.

      Besides, one might reasonably think that one has a duty to obey authorities, when these authorities are not commanding anything immoral. Socrates thought so. :-) Since it's not immoral to obey copyright law (things might be different if someone's life depended on it, as in the case of medicine patents), one should obey it.

  121. in germany? Nothing easier... by ccozan · · Score: 1

    there are already download services at
    www.saturn.de
    www.mediamarkt.de
    i think they offer pretty much songs, also in the ebm or gothic area.

  122. Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Informative
    You need to read my article Links to Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads. It has been the #1 hit at Google for the query legal music downloads for several months.

    From the introduction:

    You don't need to worry about getting sued by the Recording Industry Assocation of America or arrested by the FBI if you download legal music. Many independent and unsigned musicians offer downloads of their music in hopes of attracting more fans. Here's some music from my friends Oliver Brown and Rick Walker's Loop.pooL.

    If everyone started downloading legal music instead of violating copyright with the file sharing programs, we would make short work of the RIAA, because people would start buying CDs directly from the artists and seeing their shows instead of enriching the major labels by buying CDs from the bands the labels have chosen for us to listen to. The RIAA would also have no cause to complain - these music downloads do not infringe copyright because the artists give you permission to download them.

    In particular, you should be listening to iRATE radio. It downloads and plays those legal MP3s that the artists have on their websites, so you don't have to go hunting for them. If you've already tried out iRATE, note that version 0.3 was just released, so get the update if you don't already have it.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      While I like iRate and free mp3s, I doubt that the submitter is looking for off label CDs.

    2. Re:Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Dude, your page is missing a link to bleep.com.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a ton of MP3's because of iRate and I wouldn't say that they are all "off label." There are quite a few that do play on ClearChannel and the like. Plus, there a ton of bands that I really like now becuase of iRate. Just give it a try. It is a great app.

    4. Re:Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad in Holland, an ISP (xs4all) was sued by the equivilant of the RIAA because they put online MP3s of artists, WITH the permission of the artists, because they stated that the music industry owns the rights NOT the artist, so they cannot decide wether a company can put their songs online for free. Yes i am an anonymouse coward, too lazy to create an account :)

  123. EU Parliament proposal: make P2P legal by mah! · · Score: 2, Informative
    Seriously!

    As on La Repubblica.it (use the fish if necessary) today, the EU Parliament approved a proposal for regulating P2P stating that acts committed in good faith by consumers - such as downloading music from Internet for personal use - won't be prosecuted. It still has to go through the EU Council, but it's a good start...

  124. Re:I recommend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS that eNGRISh?

    huh?

    wha?
    hoo?
    asd?

    I STICK IT IN YOU!

  125. allofmp3.com by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

    check out www.allofmp3.com

    its got lots of mp3s on their in multiple formats and its only 1 cent/mb IIRC.

    its in russian but theres an english version on the site. hooray

  126. Magnatunes by StarWreck · · Score: 1

    Magnatunes.com lets you download music in 128kbit MP3 and VBR MP3 ("virtually" lossless quality). Not exactly mainstream music though.

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  127. Music Industry business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Produce CDs as crappy as possible : at most one track worth listening, annoying copy protection, outrageous price.
    Nobody wants to buy a crippled CD for only one track,...certainly at that price. This will ensure dismal sales.
    - wait for the track to appear on P2P networks.
    - scream bloody murder, claim huges losses, sue everyone for pirating.
    - income:
    collect money from outrageous settlements ( US ),
    or from taxes on blank CDs, Hard disks, CD burners..( a few other countries )
    - cost reduction:
    no need to pay the artists ( not enough sales )
    no need to pay (much) the CD manufacturer ( same reason ).
    - Profit ! ! !

    And think of it : the lower the CD sales, the higher the income, the lower the costs, and the higher the PROFITS ! ! !

  128. Repeat after me: Never Been Tested by Politas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No copyright owner or agent for same has ever sued an individual in Australia for making any kind of copy for personal use. The legislation has never been tested in court. It may well fail against Common Law fair use rights.

    The fact that it has never been tested must give you some idea of the Australian music and film industries' level of confidence that it would be upheld. As long as they never test it, they can continue to claim that it is illegal to tape shows off the TV, rip CDs to MP3, etc, etc.

    Don't believe everything the Copyright Council says.

    --

    Politas

  129. Ditto in Australia by trawg · · Score: 1

    We're also stuck with the not-in-the-US-then-you-can't-get-this-cool-thing problem here in .au. Its especially annoying with services like iTunes, which for me, is something that I'd use regularly. I'm about to invest in an iPaq with the goal of buying a lot of eBooks (actual softcover paper books cost like AU$25 now - the new Tom Clancy was _$50_ in hardcover when it was released, are you kidding?!). I forgot to check to see if I can buy eBooks online, so hopefully I can.

    If not, I'm giving up on waiting for the world to get their ass into gear about it, and I'll do whatever I can to get these eBooks (and iTunes/Napster/whatever is best at the time tracks). Fortunately I have relatives in the US, so if worse comes to worse, I can get them to run a proxy there and use their billing details to do it all. Still, I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO. The whole point of this stupid Internet thing is that its global.

    Incidentally, there are a few online music retailers in Australia. Destra Music and BigPond Music. Both of these only supply heavily DRM'ed WMA versions (which I've heard are at a fairly low bit rate), so most people with a clue aren't interested (not to mention their range of music is extremely limited).

    I've spent a good chunk of time in the last couple of months trying to figure out what is involved in setting up a legal online music distribution thing - either for streaming/Internet radio or to sell music - our company is one of the largest content distributors (via our mirrors sites) in Australia so I think it'd be something we'd be good at.

    However, it is practically impossible to find out what you need. While APRA, the company responsible for licensing the musical work, have been quite helpful, that is only half of what licensing you need - you also need to license the mechanical work (the recording). At this point in time, no one in Australia represents record companies to do this (eg, there's noone like the Harry Fox Agency in Australia). There's the Phonographic Performance Company of Australia, but they don't issue licenses for online applications (apparently, they will be "in the next few months"...).

    So, as far as I'm aware, your only option is to try and contact the record companies (each one) individually (this is what APRA told me almost straight off the bat, but I didn't believe them, so kept researching). Of the several I've tried to contact, I've had no reply (not just email - even leaving phone messages with the appropriate licensing department and not getting called back). I've contacted the Harry Fox Agency - apparently they do international licensing - but haven't heard back from them either.

    To me, its no wonder the state of the industry is in such a state of shenanigans. You probably have to drive a dump truck full of money up to these guys to actually get their attention. The pathetic options available everywhere outside the US are obviously not enough to stop people pirating music - why would you bother when you're going to get a superior product (if you don't mind a bit more searching, of course) for free?

  130. iRate by The+Raven · · Score: 1
    iRate radio

    Didn't see it mentioned, which surprises me. This may not be a solution to find all the legal commercial MP3s you want, but it is a great way to find all the legal indie music you might like.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  131. hmm...how to have cake and eat it too.... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    buy the cake and then eat it.

    So just buy the CD and then use file-sharing to get a digitized version (mp3) of it (just don't share it). One would think they'd be covered if they legally own a legit copy that they should be able to obtain a digitized version without hassle.

    You can always go and buy USED cd's (older CD's aren't un-CD's). Or you can try getting them from a consumer friendly region (import them). Finally, don't forget to b*tch to your local national politician and to b*tch to the media about your dilemma. And don't forget to rally the "troops"...err...I mean your neighbors and friends and ppl on the street, etc. Public awareness is the double-edged sword to the industry (e.g. CSS as a "trade secret" or Microsoft and it's "vulnerabilities" vs product awareness, tv ads, etc.).

  132. NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by Politas · · Score: 1

    You are talking about copyright infringement, not piracy.

    Piracy is when you illegally board a ship at sea by force and take either the entire ship or the cargo. It usually involves violence, and often death to the crew of the ship being boarded.

    Not really the same as having a copy made of a piece of art, is it?

    --

    Politas

    1. Re:NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      The word 'piracy' has more than one meaning. Look in a dictionary if you don't believe me. One of those meanings is: "The unauthorized use or reproduction of copyrighted or patented material."

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    2. Re:NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by Politas · · Score: 1

      Some dictionaries may have picked up on this dysphemism, but that doesn't make it accurate.

      It is certainly not an accurate description of the activity, and personally, I consider it a blatant usage of linguistic psychological manipulation. Making copies of copyrighted or patented works is not even in the same category as piracy.

      One is a crime of violence, the other is a breach of a government-granted monopoly.

      Are we thinking beings, or are we sheep? Don't let a wealthy minority force you to think the way they want you to. Resist their self-serving manipulations.

      --

      Politas

    3. Re:NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      It is certainly not an accurate description of the activity,

      It was certainly more apposit as a description when it was co-opted as a term for naughty musical activities when radio stations blasted into mainland Europe and UK from ships at sea to avoid the licencing fees or outright banning of new stations.

      It wasn't chosen for copying cds as a prejoritive or for any mind games. The popular press invented it and have carried it over into all activities of musical copyright. Unfortunately it may be applicable to organized crime rings mass production of CDs that are supposed to look like the real thing but does seem overkill for me copying my mates cd. That's about as pirate as homosexuals are gay.

      Don't let a wealthy minority force you to think the way they want you to. Resist their self-serving manipulations.

      Yes Master.

    4. Re:NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Some dictionaries may have picked up on this dysphemism, but that doesn't make it accurate.

      Unfortunately, the English language is what we call an evolving language and therefore words take on new meanings, new words are introduced, etc. So while you may not wish to call this activity piracy, it is 100% valid use of the English language.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    5. Re:NOT PIRACY!!!!!!!!!! by Politas · · Score: 1

      Yes and if enough people start calling the sky green, then we'd have to change the dictionary. Would it be right? Would it cause anything other than confusion?

      I've got nothing against the evolution of language, but this particular evolution has emotive overtones that are not justified, and I think it's worth fighting against it.

      Intellectual property is a misnomer. Copyright infringement is not theft, nor is it "piracy".

      --

      Politas

  133. free music here by Foaf · · Score: 1

    http://www.nzmusic.com/downloads.cfm

    have a nice day

  134. VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't you VPN to a computer in the US, buy your songs and ftp them to Germany? Is it illegal to transport your songs out of the country?

  135. Summary by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

    To summarize this question: "There are several ways to get legal music for an iPod, but I don't want to use them. How can I get legal music for my iPod?"

  136. allofmp3.com by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

    Well, I stumbled upon allofmp3.com, make sure to click "english" up at the top if you're not a native russian speaker! They offer 100MB of MP3's for $1, easily the best price on the web so far and ontop of that you can get them encoded pretty much whatever bitrate you want in whatever format you want!

    They seem to be licensed through their russian multimedia and internet society, legality outside of russia is suspect but I doubt that as an end consumer you'd be liable for anything in most western countries.

  137. cumbersome but it works and is legal by mre5565 · · Score: 1

    I got a $20 MasterCard gift card in the mail
    as part of some travel rebate program.
    What to spend $20 on? Amazon wants $25 orders
    before they give free shipping, restuarants
    will try to add a 20% charge to the authorization
    total, etc. I ended up buying a bunch of 88cent tracks on Walmart.com.

    Of course you get Windows Media (.wma) files
    from Walmart, and they have DRM, and it is not
    worth $20 to hack. But the license with
    Walmart's .wma files does allow 10 or so burns
    to audio CD format on CD-R or CD-RW. So what I
    did was burn them to a CD-RW (seems to be
    much more reliable to burn to CD-RW than CD-R),
    and then copied the CD-RW to a CD-R. From there,
    there are lots of tools that will let you
    burn mp3s (for your own use of course).

    What is really needed is a pseudo device driver
    for Windows that looks like a writable
    CD-RW disk to the operating system, but instead
    is a file or folder on a hard drive. This way,
    the "burns" would be guaranteed to succeed.\

  138. Just break the law by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like you, I once (recently) set out on this Quixotic quest to discover a set of self-consistent rules within society, whereby one can function adequately. My conclusion that, while "society" says one thing, in reality it conspires to produce "law-breakers". Societies do not care so much about producing law-abiding citizens, their primary purpose is to produce law-breakers, who they will then punish.

    Since "society" cannot realize this about itself, it often leaves most criminals unpunished. Therefore it is better to be a criminal.

    You'll go insane the other way.

    1. Re:Just break the law by tourettes · · Score: 1

      Kind of like Parking meters, cities don't want you to pay the parking meters, that's why they put them there.

      --
      tourettes
    2. Re:Just break the law by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      To introduce a religious analogy - that's what Christianity says about the laws in the Old Testament: they're there to show you that you can't follow them (i.e. you're not perfect, and you can't 'work' your way to God by following them.)

    3. Re:Just break the law by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Society is like a herd of sheep. It sits on a prairie and happily eats away what it can find. All it takes to discipline them are a couple of dogs. Sheep are all good law (dog) abiding citizen. Unfortunately, they'll never discover other green pastures by themselves. They need authorities (shepherds) that will do that for them. At the end of the day (well, the season), they'll be great meat for their masters.

      The biggest leverage of law makers is that they are never enough people to challenge the laws.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:Just break the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard the news? The dogs dead.

      (Pink Floyd - Sheep)

    5. Re:Just break the law by rembem · · Score: 1

      I don't follow like a sheep.
      I don't police like a dog.
      I don't lead like a shepherd.
      I'm that lone wolf howling from a mountain top,
      looking down on the herd.

    6. Re:Just break the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that's what Protestant Christianity says about the OT laws, since they're always trying to "prove" that salvation is based only on faith and not on works. But that's not the viewpoint of the Catholic Church - the OT laws are meaningful, except where their strict interpretation disagrees with the simplified versions delivered by Jesus (ie, the Golden Rule and Two Commandments).

  139. Surprised no one has suggested this yet by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    Download the MP3's off P2P.
    Send a few bucks (whatever you think the album is worth) direct to the artist.
    Voila. RIAA foiled, artists get compensated, and you feel better.

  140. iRATE 0.3 for Mac OS X is in testing by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    iRATE's 0.3 version for Mac OS X is not yet listed in the stable downloads page, but the version that I'm quite sure will become 0.3 is in iRATE's testing downloads page.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  141. free content for you in the EU and outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looking for content for your pod in the EU? Here's a very good starting point for y'all legal heads and your portable media:

    Tokyodawn Records

    There's still some free AND quality content out there, thank god!

  142. So which dot com was yours? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you didn't do a whole lot of thinking about this before you grabbed an iPod or you might have bought a Diskman instead.

    If it is bugging you that much just return it.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  143. Why not use free mp3s? by dasunt · · Score: 1

    iRATE

    If the mainstream music organizations want to make their music difficult to listen to, why take the extra effort?

  144. www.HearsayMusic.ca indie, small, and new by warren69 · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    Shameless self promotion. www.HearsayMusic.ca Canadian indie music. We have a whopping 11 artists thus far.

    --
    =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
    Daniel
    http://people.cinn.ca/daniel/
  145. Re:Ethics vs. Legality -- Mod parent up by andy55 · · Score: 1


    Well said and bravo--mod the parent up. I always enjoy reading a post that focuses on the issue and its nature, not on feelings or rehashing on what we already know (and what's already been posted).

    Separately, I wonder about the new video CD standard. Wheather it's 1, 3, or 5 years from now, some new disc format is gonna appear. Now, for all those yahoos out there who feel it necessary to own every film they like on DVD, they're screwed in that the $18 they paid for a title won't carry over to the new disc format. And since they're dedicated movie people, they'll no doubt start to buy all their beloved titles on the new format, shelling out $$ the same publisher/distributor. (This is why I tell peolple, amoung other reasons, why netflix is the way to go).

    Andy

  146. here's what i'd do by flacco · · Score: 1

    1) return the iPod and explain why.

    2) get a no-strings-attached music player that supports OGG format - free, unpatented high-quality audio format (better than mp3).

    3) buy the cd's you want to listen to - used. rip them to high-quality OGG files.

    4) enjoy.

    true, you have to buy the CD. but you're doing the right thing, used CD's will be cheaper, and you won't put more money into the pockets of the industry that refuses to sell music to you in a convenient way.

    you also have the cd's on-hand if you want to rip at another quality level or in another format.

    if you splurge for a huge, cheap IDE RAID array, you can have your entire music collection available digitally in your home so you never have to hunt down and load a CD again. this is what i do at home. i put an icon on my wife's debian desktop that does the following:

    - rips the cd currently in the tray to lossless FLAC and to highest-quality OGG.

    - transfers the FLAC copy to archive storage

    - transfers the OGG copy to our massive music server.

    the cd is then immediately available throughout the house via web browser using a remote X connection.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  147. Lack of paid downloads(n laws) in other countries by xot · · Score: 1

    With the lack of paid services there is also a lack of laws in other countries.I live in India and i havent heard of anyone getting sued for mp3 downloads or any law wwhich prevents us from doing so.Of course US laws have no jurisdiction over here.
    So theres nothing to stop us downloading from kazaa besides the guilt feeling (and adware).It would be nice to have something like iTunes especially as these services are very affordable.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  148. Pre-paid ITMS cards should do the trick by mrmez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you have friends in the US, you could ask them to purchase cards - or an allowance - for you. This is quite possibly what the fellow suggesting you email him will offer to do. I should think it's legal - there's no law I know of preventing me from buying a CD and sending it to you.

  149. not necessarily breaking the law by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
    The only way I see to use this device is to buy a CD, and if I can't rip it, I'll have to [break the law and] download the MP3-file via file-sharing.
    I have no idea about the laws in Germany, but here in the U.S. that would almost certainly be considered fair use, and not breaking the law.

    The copyright owner does not have any right to prevent you from listening to the music on the CD you've purchased, nor to require you to listen using only "approved" equipment. If you have to download the (mostly) equivalent bits on the internet in order to listen to the music you have purchased, so be it.

    Even the DMCA does not override fair use, though media companies claim it does. The DMCA, U.S. Public Law 105-304, specifically amends 17 U.S.C. 1201 to state:

    Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title.
  150. oh, just download! by danharan · · Score: 1

    Mod me a parasite but...

    Seriously, if you can not legally download the songs you want, consider that pirating them forces the record labels to get their act together.

    It sends a clear and unmistakable signal to the recording industry: it's time to actually offer these songs in mp3 format.

    Nota Bene: You will have to buy legal copies of those songs when they are available. But while you can't, you need not feel guilty. A music lover's got to do what a music lover's got to do...

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  151. If You Buy It, They Will Come by windside · · Score: 1

    I can't say that I'm an expert in iPods or mp3 commerce or anything like that. I have one and I am pretty happy ripping the songs I need from my existing CD collection. Plus I live in Canada so if I'm really hard-pressed, I can always take a day-trip South.

    That said, I am pretty sure that online retailers like Amazon have native-currency retailers in countries all over the world, including France, Japan and Canada (and probably Germany). This company's overarching strategy seems to be waiting for a market to "ripen" then pluck it up - even at a premium - and take over. (Example: Remember when Amazon was basically just a book store and there was an online music retailer called CDNOW? And there there was one.)

    I anticipate that if the MP3 player market continues to pick up steam, companies like Amazon will start to recognize the potential of the international market and scoop up some quasi-independant online store, assimilating them into the fold. Of course, this is all speculation, but I would say it's pretty realistic.

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
  152. maybe illegal but not punishable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAL, but I read the new German copyright laws (being a German myself) and they say that private non-commercial circumvention of copy/access protection is not allowed but it also is not considered a crime. There is no punishment, at least not by the government.
    Now, the copyright holder still can come after you for damages but in Germany we also already pay for private copying when we buy empty media, copiers, etc. Depending on the lawyer or judge you ask up to 4 or 5 copies to friends and relatives are considered fair use. So, there is no damage, especially if you only copy it for yourself and bought the original.

  153. Ripping services... by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps not a solution for the original post, but some reading this thread may be interested in RipDigital. You mail them your collection of CDs and they mail back your CDs along with ripped MP3s on a data DVD they burn for you...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:Ripping services... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the site: "RipDigital supports a consumer's privilege to enjoy their music in all formats."

      PRIVILEGE??? Screw that! It's my RIGHT to enjoy my music in all formats.

    2. Re:Ripping services... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " RipDigital delivers digital music in MP3 format at 224kbps, a bitrate that offers superior sound quality"

      224? where the feck did they pull that bitrate from? i'd suggest should be LAME -aps unless customer (has the knowledge to) reqest otherwise. 224kbps CBR.. strange bitrate! and no mention of the encoder. However they got the next part right:

      "The MP3 file format is the only standard supported by all media devices (e.g., Apple's iPod, Creative's Nomad, Dell's DJ, Gateway's Jukebox) and software players (e.g., Apple iTunes and MusicMatch). Other file formats do exist, such as AAC and WMA, but these are more platform specific."

  154. There are free legal MP3s on the internet by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't support copyright holders who want you to consume under restricted circumstances. There is plenty of free music out there.

  155. Buy mp3s from Warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confine your purchases to Bleep - Warp's online store You can buy mp3s from anywhere in the world in GBP, EUR or USD. No DRM either.

  156. Answer: Just wait a few months by geekee · · Score: 1

    Legal music downloads may be available in Europe as early as 2nd quarter 2004, according to this 2 month old article.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  157. etree.org by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those interested in obtaining legal copies live music by bands that support free trade of live music, check out www.etree.org. The traders there use the SHN format (lossless), and you can frequently get any show you want for free (either via FTP or sending a blank disc and a self addressed stamped envelope - B&P) if you ask nicely. For personal use, you are allowed to transcode the SHN o MP3, but please don't trade any shows in MP3 format (and likewise, don't turn an MP3 show into a SHN).

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  158. Laaaught by peu · · Score: 1

    he said guilty, haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, guil haaaaaaaaaaaa, I can believe what I'm reading... hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    Sorry I can help it
    greetings form Argentina

  159. My Suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) If the music you want comes on CD...buy the CD. If it doesn't work, exchange it and try another. Repeat until you don't feel like it anymore then return the CD for real. If they refuse to give you a refund on the grounds that it was meant (not) to work that way, you probably have a case for fraud as the product was deceptively packaged to appear to be a Digital Compact Disc. If sufficient people were willing to do this, retail music stores would be forced to make changes to the way that they package and market prescratched digital media.

    2) Explore music. There are many fabulous bands that, for whatever reason, have control over their own music. Most of these artists will distribute their music in MP3 form (which is really what mp3.com was all about). This method has huge benefits both to you and the artist because of the nature of your relationship to the band and their music. Music is about communication. Buying a CD from the band directly (at the show or online) lets the band and yourself communicate at an entirely different level and gives each of you a better understanding of the other. A band like Metallica, OTOH, has about the same relationship to their audience as the guy who fills peanut butter jars at Kraft.

  160. What's all this about MP3? by prestidigital · · Score: 1

    I've tried iTunes and Napster. Neither downloads MP3s. They both download wma, and iPod has those m4as. In either case, it was my observation that, in order to get mp3s, one must use a 3rd party file format converter. Of course, to do so would be a violation of the licenses for those services. Maybe there is a feature I of which I am unware and perhaps someone will tell me about it. This is inside the U.S., BTW.

  161. what about www.allofmp3.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and why hasn't anyone else mentioned it?

  162. Here's the best solution. by Paddyish · · Score: 1
    This is a touchy issue for me...(see my journal).

    Screw 'em. You aren't really hurting any artists by downloading the music from the net. Only the mega-super-duper-stars actually end up in the black from a record deal with one of the music cartels, and they're the ones that don't need more money. Support the artists you like by going to their concerts and buying merchandise there. Or get music from artists that didn't sign away their souls. Indie records generally assume that the common consumer is an honest person, and trust you enough to allow you to listen to the music the way you want to.

    My favorite sitelist (not sure about international relevance, but whatever):
    www.downhillbattle.org | www.eff.org | www.boycott-riaa.com

    1. Re:Here's the best solution. by Paddyish · · Score: 1

      Meant to mention - legality and morality sometimes deviate from the same course. In this case, I'm pretty sure morality is the path to follow.

  163. missing the point by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1
    Yeah, how fucking dare he? To dream of listening to the music he buys in the manner he wants is just contrary to all the laws of man and nature.

    You vill buy the music ve sell, listen to it on the technology ve support and you vill like it!

    Heil! Heil! Heil! RIAA!


    Um that was kind of my point, funny you mention the Nazis since they put Hitler into power in the first place, much like we have put the RIAA in power.
    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  164. Legal MP3s inside and outside of the US by Eythian · · Score: 1

    Check out iRATE radio. It is a collaborative rating system that downloads music from groups that have explicitly permitted their music to be released for free. It also has the nice effect that it gets things based on how much you say you liked the other stuff, and what other people thought of it. As time goes on, what it picks for you gets better and better and you find out about all kinds of artists (and styles!) that you wouldn't have otherwise heard of.

    It is an open source project, so if you feel like hacking some code for an entertaining project, developers are welcome.

    After a while, you end up with a nice "I'm not supporting the RIAA labels" feeling, also :)

  165. It's possible and easy to rip EVERY CD by TekGoNos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just put the CD into your normal CD player (not your computer)

    Plug your players output into your computers input.

    Record.

    Granted, you loose some quality, you loose the convenient automatic retrievel of the song-titles, you may have to seperate songs by hand and ripping is only at single speed.

    Convenient? Sure not! But it works. Always.

    And it should be legal in Germany.
    While it is illegal to circumvent a copy-protection, I would argue that you play the CD on a device that can play it and record it on a device that can record it, so you're not circumventing anything.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:It's possible and easy to rip EVERY CD by cpghost · · Score: 1

      What about CD and DVD players with digital output ports? The specs of the digital stream are surely open (or they leaked somewhere), so it may be relatively easy to catch good digital data, thus avoiding the lossy D/A <-> A/D conversions.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  166. mp3.com.au by farfisa69 · · Score: 1

    Check out mp3.com.au

    They have heaps of tracks for free and for sale. It is an Australian site run by Destra who have been one of the first companies to sell legal music downloads in Australia. They have a lead on Apple because their is still wrangling with local record companies over the lax DRM of AAC.

    Pssst... while your there, check out my band's mp3s at mp3.com.au/JeffMarni

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
  167. Exact Audio Copy by BagOBones · · Score: 1

    There aren't many CD's that can't be riped with 99 - 100% quality with this program.

    You can also set it up to use LAME to encode to mp3 as it rips.

    http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  168. Copy-Protected cd's equals No Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply buy the cd's, copy protected or not, and rip them. Most copy protection is broken before are soon after it is introduced mainstream.

  169. magnatune & epitonic by lavaface · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may want to seriously consider alternatives like magnatune.com and epitonic.com. There is a great deal of quality, free music. In my opinion, anything with DRM is not worth owning anyway. Seriously.

  170. What do you want to hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Every time someone brings up the topic of "illegal mp3s" (which does not make much sense), dozens of slashdotters respond with links to music services that either sell their music digitally or give it away for free. Here are some of these links:

    http://www.warprecords.com/bleep/
    http://www.dm usic.com/
    http://www.freeplaymusic.com/
    http://m agnatune.com/
    http://www.metropolis-records.com/
    http://www.ninjatune.net/home/

    The big "list", though, is at:
    http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/9/5/05113/ 70314

    There's also an insane amount of free stuff in other formats (usually MOD-like, but you can usually convert to WAV and then compress to whatever format you need) at
    http://www.scene.org/ and http://www.hornet.org/ plus one of the more involved scene artists, Bjorn Lynne, has lots of his stuff available for download, too: http://www.artistlaunch.com/artist4.asp?artistid=5 229

    So, if you want to listen to mostly electronic music, the internet is your playground. If you want to hear the "pop" stuff that plays on the radio, well, listen to the radio! (I'll trade you a radio walkman for that iPod of yours)

  171. Change your music preferences by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    If the recording studios don't sell music under terms you like, simply don't do business with them. There's plenty of good music you can get for free or from independent records. Expand your horizons.

    Try time-shifting... just download and save to disk one of the radio streams from icecast.org or shoutcast.org

  172. shouldn't feel guilty, buddy by JW+Troll · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's a citizen's civic duty to ignore bad laws and challenge the evil within the system.
    You can disagree, but you'll never see change unless somebody takes a stand. Civil disobedience gave Rosa Parks a seat on the bus just like everybody else, and, FAR MORE IMPORTANTLY, it empowered every single black person in America to do the same.
    Ideas aren't property, even though the RIAA/MPAA wish to uphold the regime; copyright has its (limited) uses, but that doesn't make it morally imperative for every single citizen to follow along blindly.

    It's good that you're thinking about the issue, but the fact is that downloading music isn't wrong - it might be illegal, depending on local laws (I live in Canada, different rules apply here) but it isn't wrong. That's an opinion. Follow your own best judgement.

    --
    just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
  173. Geez by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    CDs are now legacy????

    1. Re:Geez by frankkubiak · · Score: 1

      Ain't it? ;-)

  174. The Fitehouse General Public Music License by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The band Fitehouse recently released an EP called The Bomb.

    Both tracks are available for free download. Furthermore, The Bomb's first track, Running Scared is released under the new Fitehouse General Public Music License, which goes further than the Creative Commons or EFF Open Audio Licenses in that it requires the release of the studio master tracks from which a piece of music is composed: also on The Bomb's download piece are uncompressed WAV files with the raw, unmixed audio of each of the instrumental and vocal parts.

    So if you like, you could record yourself singing and mix it with the other tracks from Running Scared.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:The Fitehouse General Public Music License by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      Great group out of Baltimore. For $18 (including shipping) I bought both their CD and their EP. I ripped both and the songs live on my laptop and my home server (not on the 'net). Definately a well spent $18 -- the money went directly to the group and not a cent to the RIAA. The best part is that you can download their MP3s and see if you like their music, then support them if you like what you hear.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
  175. What RIAA Doesn't Understand! by TekMonkey · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you very little options as to how you can download mp3s legally. The RIAA thinks we're stealing from them, that we just don't want to pay for songs. I would gladly pay for songs . . . if I could get them. The RIAA either needs to shutup or give us something so we can download all music that's available on CDs. Its the convenience factor that has got me wanting to download songs, not the price factor.

  176. Borrow a CD and copy it, its legal in Canada by Shiifty · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In Canada, I can borrow a CD (from a friend or the library), copy it and return the CD, and keep the copy for myself. This is legal and is what we pay levy fees for. However, you cannot have someone else copy it for you, and you cannot copy a copy. You must make the copy yourself from an original.

    Other countries have a similar law in place, you should check it out.

  177. Irritation Squared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. A story that combines argument about how oppressed we are by the RIAA with Apple's music appliance. We could cube this baby if someone would chime in with an exegesis of the ways in which a 40GB iPod is actually cheaper than an FM radio...

  178. Allofmp3 misrepresents the quality of their music by Kevin143 · · Score: 1

    I'm very happy with the sound quality of allofmp3, for the most part. It's definitely better than iTunes or any competitor. However, they most definitely misrepresent the quality.

    All of their CDs are stored in their database as a 384 kb/s LAME encoded mp3, not in a lossless form. So, you're pretty much wasting your time if you use extremely high quality ogg or mpc encoding since the quality can never be higher than the original mp3, and whatever you use will have been reencoded at least once, with whatever associated quality losses that entails.

    Allofmp3 is trying to resolve this quality issue, fortunately. Right now, they have about fifty of their most downloaded CDs (White Stripe's Elephant, Outkast's epic album, REM's greatest hits, etc.) available online to be encoded losslessly. You have to check the box that says "use original cd data" and you also have the option of getting SHN, FLAC, or APE encoded music. It's not worth it for me though; it gets expensive downloading such large files. What is beneficial is that these albums are capable of being encoded into any of Allofmp3's formats (ogg, mpc, aac) from the original source. See this interview with someone working for allofmp3.

    The interview also reiterates some of the legality issues, but of course, it's straight from the mouth of allofmp3 which certainly isn't a non-biased source.

  179. That's patent law by tepples · · Score: 1

    you cannot, right now, write free legal DVD players

    True, but this has nothing to do with copyright law and everything to do with patents on decoding MPEG-2 video and AC3 audio. Public domain works do not fall within the scope of the DMCA's circumvention ban, which applies only to "work[s] protected under this title". There exist public domain works published on region 1 DVD, such as pre-1923 works and works of the United States Government; any DeCSS implementation could advertise itself only with respect to those works.

  180. True, but he may like them if he tries them by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    While I like iRate and free mp3s, I doubt that the submitter is looking for off label CDs.

    Very likely you're correct, but a myth I'm working hard to dispel is the notion that the only bands worth listening to are the bands signed with the major labels.

    I've discovered some great bands by listening to iRATE, or exploring the websites I list in my article.

    Why is it, do you think, that in arguing its side of the debate over music downloading, that the RIAA and its member labels never mention the option one has to download music both legally and for free? Why is it that all the major press articles I see about legal downloading are about services which charge a fee, like iTunes and BuyMusic?

    Why are the kinds of downloads I discuss in my article never mentioned? Wouldn't it solve the controversy if everyone downloaded the music I listen to? No one's copyright would be infringed.

    But you see, if that were to happen, the RIAA labels would make no money at all, because in general the artists who provide free, legal downloads are not signed with RIAA member companies. If a fan likes an MP3 so much that she buys a CD, the major labels won't be making money.

    Interesting, isn't it, how the RIAA has framed the debate to completely exclude the option I discuss in my article. Interesting, indeed.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:True, but he may like them if he tries them by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Fight the good fight but you have millions of teeny boppers ( the ones with all the dispoable income and the ones the labels focus on ) who don't want to listen to some weird band a guy on a website talks about. They want to listen to what their friends are listening to, and that is mostly music broadcast thru ClearChannel and the like.

      Why the 'mainstream' media does what it does is a topic that could take on its own section here at /.

  181. Audio Lunchbox - No DRM and Global by audiofan2004 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Audio Lunchbox, an indie-only digital music store has made their entire catalog of music available globally. Cross-platform (Linux, PC and Mac compatible), No DRM, the option to choose either Ogg Vorbis (Q6) or high-quality MP3 (192 kbps VBR) and an excellent selection of music (Sasha, Death Cab for Cutie, Mozart and even Jimi Hendrix) is worth checking out. To quote from the About section: 'Audio Lunchbox was founded in April 2003 by 4 individuals with a common vision: to increase exposure and availability of great independent music.'

  182. Wow, a whole page and noone answered the question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. As usual, lots of rants about "just rip it" etc etc - but they guy wanted somewhere else to DOWNLOAD PAID FOR music.

    So: try Amplifier (http://www.amplifier.co.nz/amp/home) - tones of New Zealand music, in most genres, and usually about $2.50NZ (which is about $1.50US)

  183. You get over charged on the iPod anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe go with something where you can just drag and drop the files: http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/335/C2564/

  184. iTunes by madamimadam · · Score: 1

    Isn't music store available some time this month in Europe???

  185. Buy the CD. by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    If current markets aren't working for you, just buy the CD and rip it. I think you already know this will work, but for some reason you won't do it. Your loss. Until Germany starts its own version of Itunes Music Store, you're out of luck. Grow a pair and buy the CD.

  186. CDBaby, too by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
    If you want music without connections to the RIAA, you can also try CDBaby. Although I live in the US (and thus can't vouch for out-of-country shipping), I can say I've bought a few disks and had no problems.

    I first saw a link on Slashdot, and I think others have pointed to CDBaby in this thread.

  187. Plenty of free MP3s out there by richieb · · Score: 1
    There is plenty of free music out there. You just have to find it. For example Soundclick.com.

    --
    ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  188. I can't speak for Slashdot, by DeVilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I think it's obvious. They don't want your business. Mine either. So I don't buy from them. I concentrate on dealing with more ethical companies that demonstrate that they do want my business. To keep buying from the music cartel when in your position does not make you a consumer or even a fan. It makes you an abused junky.

  189. This is the 21st century, sue the recording by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    industry if they do not cater to your needs. If they do business in your country, you can sue them. Check with a local lawyer. The only way they are going to cater to markets outside of the USA is if people outside the USA take legal action. If your country permits you to have an MP3 copy of the music, and there is no way you can get one, then sue so that there can be a way.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  190. True in theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True in theory, but this isn't really much of an issue in practice. There is a balance to be struct, but when you look at society (and, especially, German society), the dominant problem isn't that people follow their ethics over the laws, but rather, the opposite.

    Crime is a very serious problem, but when you look at crime, it is almost never people following their ethics over the law. The few cases that exist, one could argue, overall do more good than harm (from the purely good, like the free DVD player implementations for GNU/Linux, to the partially good, like some of the occasional vandalism of immoral corporations by organizations like ELF, to the purely bad, like the occasional psycho).

    The only case that I am aware of where this causes very significant harm is in some cases of terrorism. That case, however, is far enough from copyright violation that it is not really relevant here.

  191. No. It's DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To play back DVDs, you need to decrypt CSS. A tool that breaks CSS is illegal under the DMCA, whether or not it is advertised for playing Disney movies, or for pre-1923 works. You can read the law. That's why everyone is pissed off about it -- it bans the tool, rather than the act, and as a result bans a very large number of very useful tools.

  192. trax2burn.com by evil_liam · · Score: 1

    http://www.trax2burn.com sells dance/house music.

  193. I'll be adding a lot of links soon by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    I've seen quite a few sites posted to this discussion that belong in my article. I'll be adding them soon, just not tonight.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  194. Today music sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the artists today have one or two good songs on the cd. And all the rest of the songs are just fucking garbage. And then riaa wonders why the fuck they are losing money! Nobody wants to pay $20 to listen to 1 or 2 songs. Fuck that shit.
    What you should do is, download the songs you like, put them on your iPOD, and lose the guilt. I bought 10s of cds in past few years, and I paid a lot of money for them. On every 10 cds I got, there were only 10 or 15 good songs. So the moral is, fuck riaa and get your money back. Thats all there is to it.

  195. Re:Convenience doesn't count: breaking the law suc by kwandar · · Score: 1

    Actually the artists on I-rate radio have approved the release of their music. After rating, I've come up with some really great music. Go try it yourself and see!

  196. Misunderstanding of Aristotle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The basic premise behind property is that if I build a house, there is one house. If you take my house, I no longer have it, and I am deprived of my property. It is, in economic terms, a scarce good.

    Information, in contrast, is in economic terms a free good. If you create information, and I take it, you still have the information.

    As a result, the two are fundamentally different. Information is not property (except in the legal sense -- which has a much broader definition of property than what we normally associate), and property is not information.

    The concept of copyright is based on the idea that if we reward creators of information, we will have more of it. It is not based on some concept of property or control over one's creation. If you follow that path, you eventually run into contradictions. It is strictly a contract between society and the creators of information -- it is not a concept of control or ownership, but rather one of compensation for doing something that benefits society.

    (One disclaimer: the economic definition of 'free good' and 'scarce good' is different than the common one, so please don't argue that point unless you're familiar with the economic definition)

    In terms of Aristotle on property, I cannot see where you are coming from. Aristotle's view was that the natural way of generating property was through household management (which included managing slaves -- and he does, at length, argue for the merits of slavery), rather than one's own labor. He viewed trade as an immoral and unnatural way of aquiring wealth, and hated merchants. He viewed professions like banking as the lowest and most immoral way of aquiring wealth, since they were dealing in something abstract and non-physical. The concept of intellectual property did not exist at the time, but if it did, I cannot see him agreeing with it.

  197. Magnatune.com by iabervon · · Score: 1

    If you happen to like John Buckman's taste in music, Magnatune.com is perfectly happy to sell to anyone anywhere. You can also feel good about where your money is going, since half goes to the artists and the other half goes to the people who give the first half to the artists.

  198. I don't know about Germany... by NickRipley · · Score: 1

    But in the U.S. you can have a digital copy of something as long as you legally own the original. This has to do with the Home Taping Act. So if I buy the new Red House Painters Cd and it is copy protected, I can legally download it from someone else. I already own the album... right? --Nick P.S. You can always do an analog rip. If you are compressing the music, the little bit of additonal signal degredation isn't noticeable, and a lot of software supports this.

    --
    http://cassettefetish.com
  199. Every country has its own laws by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1

    Each country has its own laws and music publishing companies (as opposed to record companies) which complicates things.

    Apple (or whoever wants to start this sort of service) needs to make separate deals with the music publishing companies in each country they want to roll out their service to.

    Trust me - the record companies and Apple would roll it out internationally if they could - but they can't until the legal complications are sorted out in each country.

    Expect to see new countries coming online as these deals get made.

  200. Solution To Using Napster Internationally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just thought of a solution that all us, non-U.S music listners can use. Take a trip down to your US embassy, because remember... that is American soil, therefore you are still accessing the Napster client from IN the U.S!

  201. Is this for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this guy for real?

    It sounds like he wanted on Slashdot so bad to impress his friends that he wanted to post anything to create some fuss.

    Really, guy, you knew what services were available before you purchased the hardware (and 40GB at that, so you must have intended to put a LOT of mp3s on it somehow). So why question it now?

    Do you somehow want to legitimize it in your mind to use file sharing methods because these "big bad new CDs" don't even constitute as "CDs" ??? You must have thought about it beforehand especially buying so much space (40GB is a lot of music).

    "I don't want a CD, vinyl record, tape or minidisc." You are kind of cutting out your options since you are being so demanding and also knew you couldn't (legally) use iTunes and friends.

    So what gives. You want to legally listen to new music? Buy the CDs are the only way pal.

    You can rip it and put the music on the device yourself, legally....I didn't know that the DMCA transcends borders into Germany, but hey, you wanted to be on Slashdot so why not forget about that point and beat the old "fair use" (or anti-DMCA/circumvention/blah) drum.

  202. Who is John Galt by bwy · · Score: 1

    One day soon will be known as "the day the music died."

    It just won't be worth it anymore. There will be no legal way to listen to music at all. The radio stations will shut down, audio equipment will be taken off the market, and CD stores will close. All the musicians will move to San Francisco where bum payouts from the government are the highest.

    P.S. If the nation's largest railroad also shuts down, a prophecy is being fufilled so watch out.

  203. You need a US based Credit Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived in Germany for a year and used the iTunes Music Store all the time. The key was having a US addressed credit card account. So if that's an option...

  204. This is so Apple... by nazsco · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After a computer you can't find apps and games for, they release a mp3 player you can't get music for...

  205. Re:WWJD should be WWBBD by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1
    WWBBD as in What Would Brian Boitano Do. Seriously, what would Brian Boitano do? If I lived in South Park, he would probably kick some RIAA butt while doing a tripple toe loop, double axle combo. But I don't live in South Park, so I don't know.

    Back to topic, I personally would look into some of the Russian sites previously mentioned here. Most countried have laws in place that force the copyrights to be recognized across borders so if you purchase it in one country legally, then it is legally bound in the other country as well. A while back there was a big discussion about some of these sites on /. and the overall consensus was that those songs would be legal in the US if you purchased them from some of those Russian sites, as those sites legally obtained the rights to distribute the content in accordance with Russian copyright laws.

    Even though it works out to about $.90 an album, it is a legally obtained album. Most news networks/sites in the US will not cover this topic because many are fully or partly owned by many of the big media corporations, and they don't want you to know that you can do this legally.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  206. You can download music in Australia - legally by Sampizcat · · Score: 0

    at http://www.bigpondmusic.com/

    From what I remember, they've recently made a deal with Universal. I'm pretty sure they've got deals with other big names too. Don't know if this is Australia-only though.

  207. Try out these guys by raju · · Score: 1

    These guys are offering mp3 at ridiculously low prices: mp3search.ru. They do not have most things that I want but that might be due to my twisted taste rather than their selection. They claim that it is all legit. You decide. Their network speed has been good in the past and pretty much kept up with my cable connection speed.

  208. emusic by rggoldie · · Score: 1

    www.emusic.com is one option you have. Some albums are restricted to North America, but most aren't. If you live in Australia you can try Telstra's new music download service, but I haven't yet found a track I want to buy.

  209. I will now quote the statute by tepples · · Score: 1

    A tool that breaks CSS is illegal under the DMCA, whether or not it is advertised for playing Disney movies, or for pre-1923 works. You can read the law.

    I have already read the statute. I will now quote the statute:

    (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -
    (A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
    (B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
    (C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

    All three prohibitions refer to "a work protected under this title." How is a work of the United States Government, a work first published in the United States before 1923, or a work first published in the United States before 1964 whose copyright was never renewed, "a work protected under this title"?

  210. Foreign music for US residents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you live in the US and want to listen to music from another country, what do you do? Say you like, I dunno, Japanese music. That's all I listen to. I don't listen to ANY American music. No BS.

    Can't go buy much of it in stores, can't download it from Napster 2.0 or iTunes, so where do I go? Kazaa?

    Sure, iTunes is about to launch overseas stores in Japan and other places, but what do you want to bet that will be for the local residents only?

    What about US residents who want to listen to music from other countries? Here we are a country full of immigrants and none of the online music plans has addressed that. They just assume American music is it. But it's not, dammit.

  211. WebListen.com in Spain provides (legal) MP3s. by tliet · · Score: 1

    weblisten.com provides relatively new albums on MP3, and a fair percentage, but not everything on Windows Media.

    I've tried their service a couple of weeks ago and was able to obtain about 3 Gb of music over a weekend. They sell a night pass for a little more than $6 (Eur 5) or a night pass (GMT+1) or a weekend pass for less than $20 (Eur 15).

    All you can eat downloads during a night or a weekend. Sadly it's mostly IE/Windows only and some of the MP3s (the older ones) are of questionable quality. But for trying it out the weekend pass is a steal.

  212. Yes, it is our duty by Baki · · Score: 1

    Indeed, sometimes it is ones duty to break the law: if the law is injust. Just like civilians in Nazi germany should have broken the law, we have the same duty in these times.

    In my view the proponents of "intellectual property", the concept alone is hostile to civilisation and humanity, are the real criminals. Civilisation is marked by sharing of information and not withholding it. Those who try to implant ideas and laws that prevent information sharing are perverting civilisation and are enemies of humanity, at the same level as terrorists and other enemies of ours.

    Therefore, those who do not break these criminal and dangerous laws, are collaborating with an evil system.

    1. Re:Yes, it is our duty by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Nah. The structure of your argument is: "Position B is antithetical to Position A. Position A is fundamentally wrong and Position B is fundamentally right."

      I'm arguing sideways from that, more like a sociologist: I am describing the structures of society, the strange things monkeys do in groups, without passing judgements on the values of the positions.

      In particular I do not share your views. My argument is more with the structure of the need of a group of monkeys to call some things right and some things wrong.

      For instance, should the vast majority of the monkeys start to ascribe to your views, you would find the need to "punish" some law breaker who tried to charge money for something. We have historical exmamples of this after the 20th century.

      I offer no solutions, just a bemused sociological interest. I certainly advocate no "cause." (at least not yours). I don't agree with you.

  213. iTunes Download Germany by wroemer · · Score: 1

    Hi there, it is very easily possible to download music with iTunes evenif you live in Germany. You just need an AOL (aim) account. If someone needs information about this, just mail me. Wolfgang

  214. Avoiding copy protected CDs by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    If the CD you want isn't copy protected, no problem. Just by the CD.

    If it is copy protected, you could protest the use of copy protected CDs by not buying it. Otherwise you could possibly rip it with cdparanoia, or you can always do an analog copy. You could also download the MP3s off the net if you already own the album. I'm pretty sure that's not illegal anywhere.

    Of course, if you only want single tracks and not full albums, then buying CDs won't help.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    1. Re:Avoiding copy protected CDs by a24061 · · Score: 1

      How does one tell which copy-protected CDs are really protected, and which ones can actually be ripped with cdparanoia?

  215. Small but okay German Mp3 site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.mediamarkt.de

  216. All you need is a U.S. credit card by frostycellnex · · Score: 1
    If you have any friends in the U.S. who wouldn't mind getting some credit card mail on your behalf, all you actually need to use iTunes is a credit card for which you applied with a U.S. address. I've been living in Germany now for about 5 months, also have an iPod, and get new music through iTunes all the time. In fact, I have my credit card set to autopay. Since I don't use it here in Germany, and I buy my music from iTunes a few songs at a time, I don't worry about overdrafting my bank account. I would imagine that a large German bank with branches in the U.S. would also be able to set up this kind of automatic transfer. Bingo! iTunes for Europe.

    1. Re:All you need is a U.S. credit card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a "US credit card". Any valid credit card can be used. You just have to give them a fake US address. They don't check whether the US address is valid. They simply charge the given credit card if it is valid.

  217. Illegal under (A) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CSS is a "technological measure that effective controls access to a work protected under this title." It protects access to Terminator 2, and a number of other movies. It was designed for this purpose.

    The fact that other works exist that are not "works protected under this title" is completely irrelevant. So long as the measure was designed to protect a work, and that work matches the definition of this title, you cannot circumvent it.

    Quoting the law doesn't change it. Just because there are legally unprotected works controlled by DRM doesn't give you rights to break the DRM. Otherwise, to have legal permission to break a DRM, all I'd need to do is convince someone to release any piece of public domain material undr it.

  218. Emusic by mad27 · · Score: 1

    Check out www.emusic.com (with which I'm not affiliated, but use regularly) They sell mp3's for 22 cents a piece and have a nice collection. Some albums can not be sold outside the US though because of regulations (different record companies for the same cd inside and outside the US), but this seems to be a small percentage.

  219. GNUArt by mirko · · Score: 1
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:GNUArt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of useless if he doesn't speak French. Yeah, they link to the horrible Google English translation of their page, but I think I'd be better off trying to muddle through the French, at least it's likely to be grammatically correct.

      Then again, there ought to be plenty of folks in Germany that learned French from their grandparents, who of course acquired it while strolling through the streets of Paris picking up nice free rifles (never fired, only dropped once).

  220. There ARE alternatives! by spungebob · · Score: 1

    There are PLENTY of sites where you can legally download unrestricted mp3's and most are less "dubious" than allofmp3.com. Try eMusic. No... they don't have the latest Disney Factory clones such as Britney Timberlake or Justin Spears, but they have damn good music nonetheless.

    Spend your money on the service that gives you exactly what you want - and let the rest know exactly why they can't have your money.

    This is the best way we consumers can take control back in ANY market. It's all about the benjamins. If you're all willing to support the businesses that GIVE US WHAT WE WANT then it won't be long before services like eMusic will be able to offer us the Clear Channel Approved Top-40 artists as well (providing anyone even gives a damn about them by then).

    --
    It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  221. Illegal in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but allofmp3.com is, of course, illegal in Germany.

    http://www.mp3-world.net/d/news/dienste/1centmus ic .shtml

  222. iTunes music store by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

    The iTunes music store will be available in Europe later this year if everything goes well, according to Apple.

    --
    Martin
  223. Music for the medium by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate to give a touchy-feely answer to a serious question, but it also involves a bit of human engineering. The Record was created at the turn of the century to reproduce classical recordings. From the point that music was recorded it was recorded with the intent of being played back on vinyl. Horns, violins, etc were used to tune the recording system and the recording system was used to tune the records that came out. Elvis still sounds better on vinyl.

    Now, I while I can't say that modern music sounds terrible on a record (I have a disk here by Kosheen that would attest to that), most of the poppy, clippy... sharp modern recordings sound better on CD. They were recorded with CD's in mind, tuned for CD's, and released on CD. I can't guarentee that Janet sounds better on CD, but most of the modern, non-jazz or instrumental recordings I have heard recently sound much better on disk. Wayne Shorter seems better on Vinyl, but he makes for a more classical sound.

    There another touchy-feely answer for you. Recordings sound best on the medium that they were styled, mixed, and recorded for, because they have been optimized for the strengths and weaknesses of that medium.

    1. Re:Music for the medium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of one modern recording that I think sounds better on vinyl than CD. Nine Inch Nails, "Pretty Hate Machine".

  224. Check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.allofmp3.com is a legal site that sells music and pays to the artists. This is a companybased in RUSSIA. ROMS (The RIAA of Russia) obtains the rights of hall music autmatically. This is in the agreement that ROMS obtained when Russia was communistic but still aplies today. Though that kind of agreement is insane to sign, it atleast at that time meant that some of the money would go to the artists. The RIAA has tried to shut down the site allofmp3.com but ROMS adviced that it would be a waste of time and would be thrown out of court before it even reached there.
    Cheers

  225. Move to Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's legal to download, but not to share to other than friends ( you need to own the original to share it ). Well buddy, you look like a fiend to me :)

    Losses caused by sharing to friends have always been payed for by special taxes on all analog recording media. These days the law is under pressure due to changed habits.

  226. Copy protection does not apply to iTunes by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 2, Informative
    Even if I decide to buy a legacy audio CD, it is often copy-protected and won't load in my PC.

    All of the "copy protected" CDs that I ever bought were perfectly readable by iTunes, and are now nicely stored in MP3 format on my iPod.

    Oh, maybe this is because I have a Mac :-)

    1. Re:Copy protection does not apply to iTunes by a_peckover · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. I don't seem to have a problem ripping copy-protected CDs (that I bought legally, Slashdot reading RIAA people) with my Windows XP-running latop's DVD-R/RW drive and iTunes.

  227. Weblisten by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Weblisten offers about 150,000 MP3s and WMA for download, and pays royalties to the music industry. They claim to be legal around the world. They have about 150,000 songs available. Uses a simple web interface (I had problems using it with Mozilla, works with Opera, though), and various payment options.

    Another one I have used is Allofmp3. They pay license fees in accordance with Russian legislation, so artists do get compensated, but I am not sure about the legality of downloading from them in Germany, or the USA for that matter. They have low prices, a nice site, and a large collection. Songs are available in various format, including Ogg Vorbis, MP3, and WMA, at various bitrates, through their Online Encoding program.

    HTH

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  228. Just take it and make a donation by steveorama · · Score: 1


    I live in Germany too, and as far as I know it's still legal (or better, not illegal) to download files off of P2P networks, etc.. There is legislation currently under discussion to do away with this, but it's not finalized yet. My advice to you is to just take the songs you want and if you like them and don't want to feel guilty, kick back a few bucks directly to the artist.

  229. Get hold of the US/Canadian version of the CD by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    and then rip it. Unlike us docile Europeans, the 'merkins don't stand for that copy protection crap.

    Unfortunately Play.com and CDwow have done an out-of-court deal with the BPI (British Phonographic Industry) which effectively stops them selling non-EU CDs. They used to be the best source of uncrippled stuff. You may need to order direct from the US, but there should be no Customs charges for such a small item.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  230. I use club.mp3search.ru - much cheaper! by stepna0 · · Score: 1
    great selection, could look little outdated but more albums get added everyday. 4 to 7 cents a song. As they say,
    "All audio-visual materials are placed on Club.MP3Search.Ru according to conditions of the license agreement (# LS-R,V,Z-01-17 from 31-07-2001) between company "X-Media LTD." and "Russian Organization For Multimedia and Digital Systems" (ROMS). Company "X-Media LTD." makes license deductions for use of all materials, getting under action of the above-stated license agreement.

    ROMS is Russian analogue to RIAA, it does pay artists for selling their materials, as much copyright law in Russia specifies. So, in my oppinion, it is barely legal to buy songs from them wherever you live. Talks about fair compensation for artists, i leave to loosers buying unworthy $1 tracks.
  231. Listen free music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may give a chance to some artists that publish their music for free. An example is Machinae Supremacy (www.machinaesupremacy.com)

  232. Reason is.. by superhoe · · Score: 1
    .. that the pioneers of MP3 sales (ITunes etc.) are proving their business model in the States, and won't take the expansion risk until proven successful enough.

    And the European companies who plan to do a similar thing won't go for it yet, as they are inspecting closely on how the US businesses will do and hope to learn from their possible mistakes before putting in any real money.

    So, basically.. let's just think that they are participating in a closed beta test in the States. It'll come to Europe.. eventually.

    --

    -el

  233. try these for legal mp3s by bleed · · Score: 1
    well why dont you download from one of the zillions of free netlabels? you find them here:

    archive.org
    netlabel catalogue
    netlabel reviews

    there is even torrents for whole archives:
    legal torrents

    or to keep yourself updated subscribe one of these mailinglists:
    netlabel releases
    netaudio

  234. Without enforcement , the law is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are laws and there are laws. But without enforcement , the situation is never going to change.
    The problem here is that whats right and whats wrong have not been clearly arrived at and interpretations differ from country to country.If the RIAA and other music labels arent going full steam ahead with enforcement, it shows that they are still happy with the money they make. The moment they realise a threat to their survival, they would come up with concrete plans for defining laws acceptable by all. And then enforcement will follow.

  235. Where's the problem? by Catan · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but there quite some site you can download from legally if you're ready to pay for it. http://rtl.musicload.de/ (don't wanne comment on prices & quality & choice;), http://www.mycokemusic.com/ should do it as well.

    I'm bit suprised since the author seems to be a "Heise.de" reader which actually means that he should find a lot of usuful references ...

    Just my 2 cents ;)

  236. All you need is Microsoft Media player! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what there is in Germany, but in Italy there are several "offical" sites that allow you to download music for payment like iTunes, for ex:

    http://www.messaggeriedigitali.it/home_download. ph p?partner=kataweb

    Under EU law they cannot stop you from buying anywhere in Europe.

    There is a catch.....you can only listen to them with Windows media player!

  237. I think my political party may be your answer by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    You may be interested in my political party (see sig).

    Based on the internet, tech savvy, and certainly knowledgable about copyright concerns. Jump into our forums, become a member and actually shape our policies.

    All Australians are welcome to become members and all international citizens are free to post in the forum and give your own views on subjects.

  238. Warp Records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Warp make all new releases available electronically via their online store Bleep.com. It's based in the UK but sells worldwide. They are also ripping their back catalogue as quickly as they can.

    You might also try Epitonic. Hasn't been updated for a while but they have lots o'stuff, catgeorised, reviewed legal and free to download.

  239. Just download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get your mp3s of Kazza or other p2p like everyone else. If the record companies aren't selling then its their own fault. Actually this is the reason they are in the shit they are in now... too much hunger for control. Now their industry is bust, what can you say? Ha Ha. Go download and stop feeling so guilty over another idiots misfortunes.

  240. see the current c't by klaus_g · · Score: 1

    Heise c't article has an abstract of the article. Note: the link points to a german site.

  241. spanish legal mp3 site by johnnyreb · · Score: 1

    why not use http://www.weblisten.com - it's a fully legal mp3 site where you can purchase as many mp3's or wma's as you like. It's great value with lots of different subscription rates. I can't understand why no one ever talks about this site, it's been around for 3 or 4 years - way before itunes etc.

  242. The answer is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't buy audio CD's that don't follow the red book standard

  243. Re: no British "fair use" exception by pbhj · · Score: 1

    This register story gives the situation.

    In Britain we have fair dealing, but it is quite restricted in scope, use appears to be limited to less than a "substantial part", ie if you can recognise the track from the clip it's substantial! Journalists it seems can do what they like (Copyright-wise) and claim it's research for a story.

    The UKPO has this to say:


    Do I always need permission to copy or use copyright material?
    No, there are certain exceptions to the rights given to the copyright owner. For example, limited use of works may be possible for non-commercial research and private study, criticism or review, reporting current events, judicial proceedings and teaching in schools. But if you are copying large amounts of material and/or making multiple copies then you may still need permission. Also it is generally necessary to include an acknowledgement of the name of the copyright work and its author.

    But if I've bought something, can't I use it however I like?
    Just buying a copy of a book, CD, video, computer program, etc. does not necessarily give you the right to make further copies (even for private use) or play or show them in public. The right to do these things will generally remain with the copyright owner, whose permission you would need. You should note that photocopying a work, scanning a work to produce an electronic copy and downloading a copy of a work which is in an electronic form (eg. on a CD-ROM or an on-line database) all involve copying the work so that permission to copy is generally needed.

  244. only worn out old style musicians? by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

    there's so much free music on the net - why not listen to some new stuff, instead of airplay music ;) besonic.de mp3.de nachwuchsbands.de ......

  245. All the legal music you could ever want....... by melvynadam · · Score: 1

    Once more The Register comes to the rescue: http://theregister.co.uk/content/6/36178.html

  246. A credit card with a US billing address by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    is all you need. Read the iTunes disclaimer more carefully.

    I live in London and have a credit card with a US address. I use a friends snail address for my initial application and statements.

    This card is backed by a deposit ($500), and initially your credit limit is slightly less than the deposit. Over the limit is increased.

    You also earn interest on your deposits.

    So you can purchase music from the iTunes store; they don't check IP or anything like that.

    Apple just wants you to have a credit card with a US billing address.

  247. Re:A credit card with a US billing address (whoops by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    posting from work...links should be

    www.apple.com/support/itunes/s_allowances.html

    www.providian.com

  248. Wippit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try www.wippit.com, not the most complete selection of music but a fairly comprehensive system.

    R

  249. Some Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought we already covered this topic. Alas...

    In my attempts to kick my Kazaa habits, I find that many artists offer mp3s on their homepage. Also, try some of these sites:

    Most mp3s available on the 'Net are from Indie groups. Definately check out band webpages, and label webpages (ex. Kill Rock Stars always is offering up the goods)

    Don't be scared of buying cds though. It's by far the best way to aquire mp3s.

  250. Opportunity by DLG · · Score: 1

    It seems like this is an opportunity to someone to, using the somewhat wild and bumpy experience of US companies attempting to properly distribute legal software, to enter the European market. Now I know that atleast part of the issue is differing licensing and copyright legislation in different markets, but isn't part of the purpose of the European Common Market to create a unified set of regulations to allow easier trade?

    Now if there is no legal way to digitize music in your country, you don't have a technical issue, you have a legislative issue, one which has to be addressed. I know it can't be purely because American music companies won't allow it because I do not believe we have all that many music companies, what with Sony, Bertelsman and others.

    Obviously Apple and others are going to work to tap such a large market. Eventually there will be a solution.

    Until then, there might be an opening for some European companies (likewise the rest of the world) to develop their own methods and get their own distribution licenses.

    Beyond that, I am surprised about the copy-protected CD issue as I haven't yet bought a CD I couldn't RIP (I don't have an IPod and I don't download music (although my wife does use Apple's ITunes Music Store) but I do rip my entire music collection for convenience.

    Perhaps the reason we don't have a problem ripping CD's is that we use Macs. So there is your answer:)

  251. Downloading is not illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In spite of what the RIAA would have you believe, downloading music is not illegal (in the U.S.). Uploading is.

    Try binary newsgroups.

    Of course neither newsgroups nor P2P work if there is not someone willing to break the law and upload copyrighted files; but if the files are already there, you might as well benefit.

  252. more conspiracy theories by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    The reason why iPod headphones are white isnt fashion, its so that when we get the new totalitarian fascist dictatorship laws in the police will be able to just go on the streets and arrest white headphone wearing dissidents.

    As i type im watching the news about the latest terrorist attack in spain, FFS why cant they target the politicians! if they really have to bomb someone theres no-one more deserving than the pig-fucking assholes who are responsible for half of everything thats wrong in this world.

    Yeah go on, mod me down, ive got karma to burn and a lower UID than you've had women and thats low!!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  253. If you're that worried... go analog by tbase · · Score: 1

    Buy a cheap portable audio CD player, a mini 1/8" Stereo male/male cable (asuming you don't have these items already), and rip it through the audio in on your sound card. I don't imagine that you'll notice that much loss in quality assuming you adjust the levels properly and considering the degradation of the inherent in the mp3 format.

    Or, go to your local embassy and see if they'll let you borrow some bandwidth for downloading... you'll be on "US Soil". ;-)

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  254. What's your problem? It's legal. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    If you're german, I don't quite see where your problem is.
    The new law explicitly _permits_ copying for private use if the source of the copy is legal. On top of that, it even explicitly _excludes_ market-restriction-technologies (Marktbeschraenkungsmassnahmen) from protection by the new law!
    Apart from the fact that this law is designed by politicians who all over the world won't get that there is no thing as 'digital copy protection'and that that in fact is a contradiction in term and has no place in the plaintext of a law, I find the new german law not all that bad. There were just to many tech-savy people and german jurists stating that a german DMCA would be impercise, technically false and unconstitutional. This luckyly prevented the goverment from releasing the piece of crap their first draft was into the wild.
    The law needs a serious redoo, no doubt, and it should have never be released, like lot's of other crap our politicians come up with these days, but what you're planning to do is currently perfectly legal nonetheless.
    Borrow your CDs from the local library or a friend or close relative and make a private copy to your iPod. Voila. As long as you don't trade online or with others and don't play your collection in public your not breaking any current german law.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  255. Well, it is MPThursday! by jasongraphix · · Score: 1

    Ooo! Here's your solution. You can download "Legal" versions of songs on MPThursdays(9 per week) from ORock 105.9 in Orlando, FL. I guess it's still legal from Germany as well. :)

  256. really smart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buying a 40GB iPod and realizing that you don't have any Music.

  257. True by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Although, I still illegally download music and have no intention of stopping. RIAA be damned! The author brings an interesting point.
    I feel that since you have the iPod, you want to buy the media yet there is no medium in place for you to legally do this. I suggest as you have stated, buy the CD rip it to your PC, should the CD prove unrippable download the songs. I submit to you that having purchased the CD, under current DMCA laws you have a legal right to a backup of youor media. If the CD is non-rippable, then I would feel no guilt having downloaded what I've already paid for.

    SIDENOTE: I do download illegaly, but if I like what I've heard I will purchase the CD down the road to support that artist. If I don't like it, I simply delete it. I like to think of it as a try before you buy type deal.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  258. How to rip a copy protected CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To rip a copy protected CD press shift while inserting the CD and release once the CD is finished spinning up. Or use anything but ms w*ndows.

  259. Vitaminic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  260. Re:My Comments on your Dilemmia by frankkubiak · · Score: 1

    Big dumb kraut!

    Watch it pal! I am NOT big! ;-)

  261. Its not that ilegal by gothmog666 · · Score: 1

    I heard in TV from a lot of brazilian artists that they are totally fine with downloading mp3.
    (i'm brazilian)

    What they dont like is when someone starts to make pirated CDs to sell.
    There is particulary Chorao, Charlie Brown vocalist, who said: "I think this is great when someone buy a cd and copy it for his friends."

    --
    I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
  262. Re:no one who speaks german could be evil by frankkubiak · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are right. And my iPod is filled with 40 GB of German marching-music. ;-)

    Herr Kubiak

  263. Amen! by SuperChuck69 · · Score: 1
    I am a firm believer in the MP3 format.

    At home and work, I use the MP3 format on computers.
    At the gym, I use the MP3 format on my handheld player.
    In the car, I use the MP3 player on my MP3 CD player.
    All MP3 all the fime.

    According to the RIAA, this makes me Public Enemy Number One. According to the RIAA, I should go out and purchase an overpriced CD (the RIAA has been successfully sues 5 times for price fixing) full of songs I just plain don't want.

    So I go looking for a way to get my MP3s legally. Hmm. Lots of options for legal online music. crapPod, Crapster, buy.com, even Walmart sell online music. In special formats. Namely, not in MP3 format.

    So what you're telling me is, when I download a music file at work from, say, Walmart, I get a WMA file, which can only be played on THAT machine.

    Wait! Wait! Didn't I purchase it? Don't I own it? Why the bloody hell can't I take it home and listen to it? Why can't I listen to it at the gym or in the car? I own it, don't I? If I bought a CD, wouldn't I be able to take it out of my home CD player and put it in my car? Why not with digital music, then?

    Solution? Give the RIAA the finger. Challenge copyright. Share MP3s! Tell the recording industry you want your MP3!

    A bunch of guys in Boston dress up like Indians, trespass on a privately-owned ship, and proceed to dump its cargo into the harbor. We consider them heros for their act of defiance against a tyrant. Seeing a parallel yet?

    --
    :wq
  264. If it can then you can.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going on my premise that ANYTHING that you can hear, see, or read on a computer can be copied no matter what copy protection they institute. So the CD is rip protected but you can still hear it. Simply download SoundRecorder from their site. Google it, free reg. Record the song into wav format and compress to mp3. You have just circumvented the rip protection.

  265. It's simple by fireweaver · · Score: 1

    Let's put it this way: Some laws were just made to be broken and this is one of them. Sounds to me like you're on a guilt trip or something. Besides which, most MP3s are so inferior to the original that I have always wondered what the fuss is all about anyway. So rip away and enjoy yourself.

  266. Free (as in freedom or beer) music by holizz · · Score: 1

    Protest Records specifically says at the bottom of its mp3s page `use 'em yrself, give 'em to friends, just don't sell 'em'. There's some good music there. Unfotunately I don't think I know of any sites with lots of free/legal music other than Protest Records. Free is, unfortunately a very common word so it's not easy searching for `free music'.
    You can often get an mp3 or two from a band's website too.

  267. It's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even accepting the theory of why analog is better (which I do), it is moot since people do not play LPs once and throw them away.

    Once you play a vinyl record, you introduce pops and scratches, losing the benefits of analog.

  268. Hold down shift by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    Simple solution - take the "protected" cd and hold down shift while putting it in the drive

  269. Warp Records by Canis · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...they offer the Bleep Music Store. All files are high-quality (VBR with the settings cranked up) MP3s, unprotected -- they *gasp* treat you like a customer instead of a serf. Also you can preview tracks -- not just 30 seconds of a track, but all of it (albeit in 30 second chunks, so you can't just rip the whole track to a .wav file before buying). Also there's Magnatune (tagline: "We are not evil" ;-} ). Warp have the advantage of 'famous names' though, like Aphex Twin or LFO.

  270. Where's your free music? by fugue · · Score: 1
    If you don't like the copyright restrictions placed on music, then start releasing music under copyright terms that you like better. In other words, stop complaining and start acting!

    So I don't seem hypocritical, here are my free classical music recordings!

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  271. You bought the iPod already? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't you have asked this question before you bought the $500 iPod?

    1. Re:You bought the iPod already? by frankkubiak · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have bought it already.

      And Yes, I should have thought about ist first.

      But I didn't expect this at all. And I still can not believe that my somehow not completely educated decision to buy the device now forces me (and all the other iPod-users) to break the law to listen to music I can't rip from new CDs.

      Somehow I expected that a device made by Apple, sold in a store that also sells Music could bring me into conflict with the law.
      Imagine you bought an expensive car, say a BMW, only to find out that you can not legally buy fuel to make it run. OK, lame comparison, but still has some truth.

      But let me tell you: It is a great little toy. My MP3-Collection (made off ripped CDs) is rather large so it is still cool to have the iPod. I do not regret buying it.

  272. emusic.com by natts · · Score: 1

    Not all the MP3 material on emusic.com is licensed for outside the US, but most of it is. http://www.emusic.com

  273. Should only be a short wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should only be a short wait and whatever country you're in will be annexed by the US. Iraq and Haiti are already enjoying the benefits of the iTunes music store.

  274. Obtaining Legal MP3s Outside of the U.S.? by guinea+pig+C · · Score: 1

    I admire the way that you are trying to find an ethical solution to your dilemma and hopefully I might be able to help.
    I have recently helped a number of European customers shop for audio visual products at the Chinese AV scrap markets, where the major labels dump all their surplus and tax write off stock. So far, I have been helping mainly French nationals who are interested in rescuing surplus that has been dumped my companies such as Fnac, Carrefour and Virgin but there is a great deal of German music and movies too with BMG being particularly well represented. If you would like more details please check out this link at the Boycott RIAA site http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/8915
    or email me direct at 'wenshidi (do I really need to tell you what to write here) yahoo.co.uk'
    Here are a few more relevant links to give you some background on the situation on the hidden entertainment industry practice of disc dumping.
    Further background reading about sawgash CDs

    'Zombie Discs' by Neil Gough
    www.time.com/time/asia/news/column/0,9754,1 00067,0 0.html

    or for those where Time is blocked by the great firewall
    http://www.sonicchina.org/r/r1-6.htm

    The Sinic Savant: Saw-Gashed CDs
    www.chinanow.com/english/features/sinic/sawga shed. html

    Wudaokou: Shopping Heaven for the Backpacker & Student Set
    www.chinanow.com/english/beijing/city/feature s/wud aokou.html

  275. Copying protected CDs without circumvention by engpjp · · Score: 1

    I have several music CDs with protection mechanisms, and I have learnt the hard way that they easily get so damaged that they're non-playable.

    Therefore, when I buy a protected music CD I immediately make a personal "working" copy. How? I play it on an old 1-speed external CD-ROM drive and make the copying via MacOS 8.1.

    I'm not trying to circumvent the protection in a technical sense, and since it is permitted under Danish law to make personal safety copies I'm completely legit.

    I could have made a straight rip from the original, but I prefer playing the CDs at home - even top bit VBR compresssion is clearly detectable on my system

    Regards

    Peter J. Pedersen

  276. International music services by GatorMan · · Score: 1

    This should pretty much cover your apetite for music. Take a look and I think you'll like what you see.

    Myglobalsound.com - "Myglobalsound is the premiere portal for all genres of independent music. Our mission is to combine cutting edge technology, ingenuity, creativity, customer satisfaction and overall pristine product quality to provide our clients with the best means to get their music heard globally. Myglobalsound provides our clients with a wealth of resources and tools that provide the opportunity to interactively grasp a real world understanding of the music business and its interworkings, without having to experience any of the consequences. It is our goal to make you a success whether you decide to be part of a record label or if you decide independence is the only way to go. Whether you're selling, buying, or just learning, Myglobalsound is the only site, the only sound, that you will ever need."