Just wanted to point out that now there's a jazilla binary (win32 for now) at ftp://ftp.jazilla.org/pub/windows-native-exe/ Also interesting is this project to embed gecko in a java canvas: http://members.cts.com/sd/k/kbaker/
I don't understand why there is a linux camp bashing BeOS and a BeOS camp bashing linux. There are quite a few people who feel that it's a good idea to use both-linux as a server and BeOS as a desktop. In fact, http://bemagazine.com/ was created by the same people who brought us Linux Journal. So use both OS's-each have their strengths and weaknesses just as both development models have their strengths and weaknesses. Open source is a good development model. So is a highly focused bunch of brilliant engineers. Beats decisions by dopey PHB's any day of the week (hint: Microsoft)
cyrix was always the ugly duckling of the cpu world. They should stick to real innovations like the webpad instead of chips with phony mhz ratings. We need competition to intel and AMD is the only one with a chance. It needs to be stronger.
unfortunately they didn't keep up with the project (and I got an email from them saying that they don't have the resources to work on it). So I need to know if there are others who are working on it.
ah might as well speak up here: Is anyone working on a qt mozilla that's designed to work well with kde? The "official" mozilla uses gtk+ but there's no reason why we can't have a qt version as well
is that it will take a long time for the thousands and thousands of apps (that even the mac has let alone windows) to come to linux. And that's a good point until you realize that your choice in Windows apps may be threatened by MS. Want another word processor like Lotus or Corel? Tough-MS Word is the standard. Want a choice in financial software? Right now there's Quicken and MS Money but don't be surprised if MS finds a way to kill Quicken too. If MS makes an app, that probably means that you won't be able to as well. Linux is more than another unix. It's a unix that's winning. It's a unix whose users really try hard (_try_ is the operative word here) to make easier to use. And people are finally paying attention to it.
Dogs may be cute but who wants to clean up after them?
you can neuter it by installing Win98 on it
I wonder why I haven't heard anyone working on integrating mozilla with qt/kde? I guess kde users will have kfm and Opera
you mean they actually fix bugs?
please submit the bug report (but I tried cbc.ca and had no problems.
including keyboard shortcut "themes" to make it easier for those coming from IE or Opera or whatever
Just wanted to point out that now there's a jazilla binary (win32 for now) at ftp://ftp.jazilla.org/pub/windows-native-exe/ Also interesting is this project to embed gecko in a java canvas: http://members.cts.com/sd/k/kbaker/
try x86rel/apprunner.exe
if you use what's best you wouldn't use Win98. You'd use unix :)
ya but Windows doesn't work very well. There's a need for competition in this department
I don't understand why there is a linux camp bashing BeOS and a BeOS camp bashing linux. There are quite a few people who feel that it's a good idea to use both-linux as a server and BeOS as a desktop. In fact, http://bemagazine.com/ was created by the same people who brought us Linux Journal. So use both OS's-each have their strengths and weaknesses just as both development models have their strengths and weaknesses. Open source is a good development model. So is a highly focused bunch of brilliant engineers. Beats decisions by dopey PHB's any day of the week (hint: Microsoft)
cyrix was always the ugly duckling of the cpu world. They should stick to real innovations like the webpad instead of chips with phony mhz ratings. We need competition to intel and AMD is the only one with a chance. It needs to be stronger.
unfortunately they didn't keep up with the project (and I got an email from them saying that they don't have the resources to work on it). So I need to know if there are others who are working on it.
ah might as well speak up here:
Is anyone working on a qt mozilla that's designed to work well with kde? The "official" mozilla uses gtk+ but there's no reason why we can't have a qt version as well
XSL isn't finished yet. XML linking isn't finished yet. Are you saying we should wait for those things to be finished before Mozilla 1.0?
100,000 million? huh???? Anyway, I'd say 100 million linux users in 5 years is pretty good
Can somebody say...SGI? Blows away those marshmallows any day of the week
btw IBM java is free
let's see how it compares to IBM'snew java (of course, IBM is still at 1.17 vs Sun's 1.2)
mozilla.org also did that with the Wang suit
What happened to Ms Linux (aka la femme nikita)? hmm where's that article...
boycott id? people would rather sell their soul than give up their quake deathmatches
is that it will take a long time for the thousands and thousands of apps (that even the mac has let alone windows) to come to linux. And that's a good point until you realize that your choice in Windows apps may be threatened by MS. Want another word processor like Lotus or Corel? Tough-MS Word is the standard. Want a choice in financial software? Right now there's Quicken and MS Money but don't be surprised if MS finds a way to kill Quicken too. If MS makes an app, that probably means that you won't be able to as well. Linux is more than another unix. It's a unix that's winning. It's a unix whose users really try hard (_try_ is the operative word here) to make easier to use. And people are finally paying attention to it.
hmm remember that Netscape invested in Redhat. So now AOL owns a part of Redhat
check out www.doczilla.com www.neoplanet.com http://jazilla.org/