i wish they would just drop the code already and let their traffic go there rather than hammering their sad ci page. It looks like they didn't tune or cluster their database very well
template < class H > struct V { void operator()() { H()(); } }; template < class H, class T > struct V<P<H, T> >{ void operator()() { H()(); V<T>()(); }; };
int main() { V<M>()(); // cout << '\ n'; // Edit: if I escape the backslash, an extra space appears between \ and n; if I don't then the 'n' is invisible? } source: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/bj10p/c_template_metaprogramming_mindblown/
the output is: GOOGLE FOR TEMPLATE META PROGRAMMING
Would any one in their right mind imagine this?
I am sure python has to be capable of this kind of convolution. If not, then ruby has a one up on py. I am too lazy to convert this c++ demon into a ruby script. I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader. EDIT: when I try to post this, it is giving me a too few characters per line issue. What is up with slashdot these days? I don't mean to go on a rant, but some of their validations is insane?
because having multiple computer vision systems with different focuses is not a bad thing.
For instance OpenCV has nothing in the way of Waldboost classifiers.
Opencv seems to be mostly focused on haar-like feature classifiers.
How much does this ACTUAL cost? Can I still get the same results with GENERIC?
I am surprised you are modded funny. +1 seeing through reality distortion field
That is assuming they let you turn it off.
If they are going to allow multitasking, then it seems to me fluxbox or some other window managers are now more viable.
Now that it is in the cloud, does that mean there will be some restful api library for it in ruby?
Then again, this is really more of an nx question than anything else. amazon already has ruby libraries.
have a mirror of this data.
If it was stout enough to have wikileaks taken out, then there must be something they really did not want us the people to see.
Thank God They are partnering with T-mobile.
T-mobile is the only cell company who was not in on the NSA wiretapping scandal.
Yes I know Qwest was also not party, but they don't provide cell service as far as I know.
But if ISPs are found messing with the neutrality of the connections, then they should be held liable for all content that comes across their lines.
It would establish one of two senarios.
A) they leave the traffic flow alone and thus avoid a ton in liability.
B) they go into complete china lockdown mode and allow nothing even slightly questionable through.
If B occurs, then there will eventually be enough resentment to eventually re focus on why telecom is a big monopoly.
Right now average joe doesn't care.
As long as average joe can watch Utube and porn, the status quo remains.
This whole net neutrality issue wouldn't even exist if the free market wasn't botched/hijacked in this country.
Slashdot Mirror
can't tell if you are a troll or being genuinely stupid, but .onion are tor links.
I'm inclined to think you are trolling.
more like a center. It is trivially easy to add a second or n++ remotes to a git repository. github is hardly the biggest threat to open source.
because one is the operating system and the other is the kernel. Every linux distro does the same thing. Ubuntu 13.whatever uses linux 3.8.
Android Package (apk): Go home. You're Drunk!
because if I could have vim inside emacs and get to have emacs ORG Mode, all the better!
Yeah, it turns out that the guy uses alcohol to grow. It also grows on anything unhealthy. So, it's baked kale chips for you.
i wish they would just drop the code already and let their traffic go there rather than hammering their sad ci page. It looks like they didn't tune or cluster their database very well
Granted, these mocks look awesome. However, could they possibly rip off OSX any harder? I am really surprised that Apple hasn't tried to sue Gnome.
What about an article about the top 8 things apple looses?
I know Ruby and c++ are certainly capable of meta programming.
// cout << '\ n';
Has this simple fact entered anyone's mind.
Take the following example for instance:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
template < size_t N > struct Q {
ostream & operator()() { return Q<(N>>6)>()() << ((char)(30+N%64)); }
};
template < > struct Q<0> { ostream & operator()() { return cout;} };
template <class H, class T> struct P { };
typedef P< Q<0x29c71a6e>,
P< Q<0x270a8c74>,
P< Q<0x2da7bf2>,
P< Q<0x2e8f69c2>,
P< Q<0x2f9f68c2>,
P< Q<0x32d31a74>,
P< Q<0x23befaf0>, Q<0x29082082> >
> > > > >
> M;
template < class H > struct V { void operator()() { H()(); } };
template < class H, class T > struct V<P<H, T> >{ void operator()() { H()(); V<T>()(); }; };
int main() {
V<M>()();
// Edit: if I escape the backslash, an extra space appears between \ and n; if I don't then the 'n' is invisible?
}
source: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/bj10p/c_template_metaprogramming_mindblown/
the output is:
GOOGLE FOR TEMPLATE META PROGRAMMING
Would any one in their right mind imagine this?
I am sure python has to be capable of this kind of convolution. If not, then ruby has a one up on py.
I am too lazy to convert this c++ demon into a ruby script. I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader.
EDIT: when I try to post this, it is giving me a too few characters per line issue. What is up with slashdot these days?
I don't mean to go on a rant, but some of their validations is insane?
Slashdot: news for nerds. Stuff that matters.
... is it just me or do these style devices remind you of One of RMS' essays: the right to read.
because having multiple computer vision systems with different focuses is not a bad thing. For instance OpenCV has nothing in the way of Waldboost classifiers. Opencv seems to be mostly focused on haar-like feature classifiers.
http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/12087/1/Barnich2009ViBe.pdf There is the paper in question. I despise the fact that I still have to pay for papers in IEEE silos when I am in fact a member.
Yeah I could upgrade my subscription, but bah.
RANT.YML
rant:
information should be free
much less laws like this would bring back the iodine deficiency problems we use to have.
How much does this ACTUAL cost? Can I still get the same results with GENERIC? I am surprised you are modded funny. +1 seeing through reality distortion field
That is assuming they let you turn it off. If they are going to allow multitasking, then it seems to me fluxbox or some other window managers are now more viable.
All 10 cars, yes.
2 cars? It is okay to not write numbers in binary.
all in all, they just ran into a wall.
all in all, it's just another pay wall.
Now that it is in the cloud, does that mean there will be some restful api library for it in ruby? Then again, this is really more of an nx question than anything else. amazon already has ruby libraries.
Did anyone else ready this goatse api? /do not want
If this data is that secret, it would be instant go to gitmo card.
have a mirror of this data. If it was stout enough to have wikileaks taken out, then there must be something they really did not want us the people to see.
Thank God They are partnering with T-mobile. T-mobile is the only cell company who was not in on the NSA wiretapping scandal. Yes I know Qwest was also not party, but they don't provide cell service as far as I know.
But if ISPs are found messing with the neutrality of the connections, then they should be held liable for all content that comes across their lines. It would establish one of two senarios. A) they leave the traffic flow alone and thus avoid a ton in liability. B) they go into complete china lockdown mode and allow nothing even slightly questionable through. If B occurs, then there will eventually be enough resentment to eventually re focus on why telecom is a big monopoly. Right now average joe doesn't care. As long as average joe can watch Utube and porn, the status quo remains. This whole net neutrality issue wouldn't even exist if the free market wasn't botched/hijacked in this country.