Can't speak for Canada's tax laws but that's entirely consistent with US tax law. Capitol gains are taxable. Bartering is taxable. The only news is that by specifically naming bitcoin they're further legitimizing it.
every user gets a random salt. If you know the salt, you can generate a rainbow table for it. But, again, every user has a different salt so you need to generate a rainbow table for every user.
Generating a one-time rainbow table that cracks every password ever is easier than generating a rainbow table per password.
There was a time that table salt - NaCL - was a valuable commodity worth it's weight in gold. Personally, my demand for salt exceeds my demand for gold. Anyhow, today salt is a commodity. Hell, the Bloombergs of the world think there's too much of it.
Google is a member of MPEG-LA. As part of that, they agreed to put their patents in the MPEG-LA pool. When Google bought Motorola, those patents went in the pool.
Oracle now owns ZFS. They could relicense it if they wanted to. BTRFS was started before the Sun acquisition but it seems strange* to develop BTRFS as a GPL file system with ZFS-like features while ZFS is mature and reliable today.
* Yes, they're a large corporation and right hand doesn't know what left hand does... but isn't this more like the index finger not knowing what the middle finger is doing?
I think we need to talk about the oracle in the woodpile - ie, Oracle. BTRFS is an Oracle project. What happens when it goes the way of MySQL? Will Monty Wideanus appear on a white steed to save us?
Amazon has been beefing up their video services lately (see the pilots they released yesterday) and will be releasing a set-top box for amazon video. It's well known that they fuck over 3rd party sellers (monitoring what's popular and then selling it themselves). If I was Netflix, I would find somebody else to do business with.
Case in point: one of the Boston marathon bombers was upset because his wife wouldn't fist his asshole. The other was upset he couldn't get a girl to shit on his face.
You can freely distribute clang. You can contribute back to clang. It's probably easier to contribute back since the code isn't a monolithic mess.
It makes no difference to me as a user whether my compiler is GPL or BSD licensed. But those license decisions affect the compiler architecture which affects the compiler. Clang/LLVM are modular for technical reasons. They don't care if you "steal" a component. GCC is monolithic for political reasons. RMS is afraid you'll use it without giving back. What if you want to use a real C++ parser and auto completer in your text editor? Clang is fine with that. GCC was designed to prevent you from doing that. What if you want to generate javascript from your C++ parse tree? Clang is fine with that. GCC was designed to prevent you from doing that.
I'd prefer a fool-proof gun over a smart gun.
httpd isn't a config file; it's the apache executable. Tripwire or other such utilities would catch it.
Can't speak for Canada's tax laws but that's entirely consistent with US tax law. Capitol gains are taxable. Bartering is taxable. The only news is that by specifically naming bitcoin they're further legitimizing it.
every user gets a random salt. If you know the salt, you can generate a rainbow table for it. But, again, every user has a different salt so you need to generate a rainbow table for every user.
Generating a one-time rainbow table that cracks every password ever is easier than generating a rainbow table per password.
Stackoverflow is moderated completely unlike Slashdot, so the best answers will usually bubble to the top.
Food for thought. Take with a grain of salt.
Google is a member of MPEG-LA. As part of that, they agreed to put their patents in the MPEG-LA pool. When Google bought Motorola, those patents went in the pool.
Do you mean the layoffs, more layoffs, and $250 million a quarter in losses?
* Yes, they're a large corporation and right hand doesn't know what left hand does... but isn't this more like the index finger not knowing what the middle finger is doing?
I think we need to talk about the oracle in the woodpile - ie, Oracle. BTRFS is an Oracle project. What happens when it goes the way of MySQL? Will Monty Wideanus appear on a white steed to save us?
States used to have their own copyright laws. The 1976 copyright act nullified them going forward but they may still apply for older works.
It's a honeypot to trap people that can't tell the difference between copyrights and patents.
Amazon has been beefing up their video services lately (see the pilots they released yesterday) and will be releasing a set-top box for amazon video. It's well known that they fuck over 3rd party sellers (monitoring what's popular and then selling it themselves). If I was Netflix, I would find somebody else to do business with.
Case in point: one of the Boston marathon bombers was upset because his wife wouldn't fist his asshole. The other was upset he couldn't get a girl to shit on his face.
Cheap is relative. There will always be "cheap" labor, if only due to division of labor and specialization.
Do you think orange growers in Alaska complain about the "cheap" oranges from Florida?
That's a brilliant strategy -- spend 12 billion on a has-been phone manufacturer and then lose all the patent lawsuits you file.
what part of "part of" do you not understand?
MIPS and Alpha ask power pc to get off their lawn.
Rumor has it the Cleveland Show was canceled.
yes, he wants a touch hole, not a touch pad.
You can freely distribute clang. You can contribute back to clang. It's probably easier to contribute back since the code isn't a monolithic mess.
It makes no difference to me as a user whether my compiler is GPL or BSD licensed. But those license decisions affect the compiler architecture which affects the compiler. Clang/LLVM are modular for technical reasons. They don't care if you "steal" a component. GCC is monolithic for political reasons. RMS is afraid you'll use it without giving back. What if you want to use a real C++ parser and auto completer in your text editor? Clang is fine with that. GCC was designed to prevent you from doing that. What if you want to generate javascript from your C++ parse tree? Clang is fine with that. GCC was designed to prevent you from doing that.
If it's like the Swartz case, she'll settle if he pleads guilty to littering (the backpack, blood, and body parts) with 6 months of jail time.
It is an easy fix that should be done immediately. Unfortunately, they posted the job on dice.com... Poster child for the danger of dogfooding.
these ones?
It's a bridgestone golf hat.