False. Early PowerPC chips had POWER compatibility (some support was dropped in later models, but it's still mostly there). The Macintosh's 68k emulation was provided in software.
Maybe, but then again, if it's something like medical records they potentially liable for big fines and jailtime. Assuming it's a private company. The above disclosure laws don't apply to governmental agencies.
Actually, it was due to the lawsuit and corresponding consent decree. After Steve Jobs left Apple and created NeXT, he hired away quite a few Macintosh programmers. Apple filed a lawsuit, and a lot of their agreement dictated certain UI differences.
actually, Objective C allows you to add new methods (or override existing ones) without access to the original source code. So you could compile the above code (well, override NSScrollView tile) into a.so and use the LD_PRELOAD variable to specify it be loaded. Thus,any Cocoa program would be modified. Carbon wouldn't be affected.
You know that My Mac Sucks troll about taking 20 minutes to copy a 17 meg file? I was using vista yesterday with a friend of mine, trying to rearrange some files and folders, at it was that bad. Copying files, deleting, even exploring a folder. It was ridiculous.
The end user is in the same position [insert joke about bending over and grabbing ankles] if MS uses BSD code or if MS writes the code themselves. The original BSD code is still freely available to anyone that wants it. If the user wanted your "freedom" they wouldn't be using a closed source product in the first place.
Let's say Microsoft takes some BSD code. I'm no worse off. You're no worse off. BSD is no worse off. Nobody is worse off. And nobody has lost any freedom because of it.
Since the latest cdrtools packages look to be a combination of GPL'd code and incompatibly licensed code, Debian is removing crtools (not shunting it to non-free), because they feel they can no longer distribute the work.
The official fsf position is that:
CDDL is a free software license (but not copyleft)
"there is a practical reason not to use copyleft. [Jorg Schilling] does an important job for the community in maintaining [cdrecord], and the benefit of copylefting our changes would be less than the harm done by a fork in development. So it is better to work with the [Jorg Schilling] and not copyleft our changes on these programs.
Google checkout has a fee structure similar to normal credit card processors. It's designed for c2b, not c2c. They do allow donations for 501c3 tax exempt organizations. It's not designed for sending a couple bucks to a guy living in his parents basement.
Development work has always been done primarily by paid aol/netscape/mozilla employees. That's true of a lot of closed source/commercial projects which are open sourced -- SLASH, Firebird, blender, etc. Certainly, anyone can send in patches, but the amount of work required to understand larger, more complicated source trees prevents sandal-wearing volounteers from participating.
The decision was made a long time ago to treat explicit CDATA sections like
these in HTML as comments () instead of text. IIRC HTML 4.01 is silent
on what to do with them. Do we want to reverse direction and display them as
text? is one of those things that never really saw the light of day
anyway in HTML UAs.
Looks like they haven't fixed it yet. They haven't even decided if they'll fix it. They handle it better than IE, (which is completely broken), but Opera, khtml, iCab, hell, even lynx handles it correctly.
Slashdot Mirror
False. Early PowerPC chips had POWER compatibility (some support was dropped in later models, but it's still mostly there). The Macintosh's 68k emulation was provided in software.
That's exactly what it was designed for.
a-Opener is a real eye-Opener.
Maybe, but then again, if it's something like medical records they potentially liable for big fines and jailtime. Assuming it's a private company. The above disclosure laws don't apply to governmental agencies.
ScuttleMonkey and Zonk are to blame, IMO. CmdrTaco has stated that he thinks Roland's "submissions" are shit.
RoboEditors that posted links for popular digg stories would be more effective (and have less dupes).
Actually, it was due to the lawsuit and corresponding consent decree. After Steve Jobs left Apple and created NeXT, he hired away quite a few Macintosh programmers. Apple filed a lawsuit, and a lot of their agreement dictated certain UI differences.
actually, Objective C allows you to add new methods (or override existing ones) without access to the original source code. So you could compile the above code (well, override NSScrollView tile) into a .so and use the LD_PRELOAD variable to specify it be loaded. Thus,any Cocoa program would be modified. Carbon wouldn't be affected.
which hand does she masturbate with?
My assembly class use 8086 (with Microsoft's assember... I prefer nasm). I think 32-bit ARM is the cleanest real world instruction set I've used.
The end user is in the same position [insert joke about bending over and grabbing ankles] if MS uses BSD code or if MS writes the code themselves. The original BSD code is still freely available to anyone that wants it. If the user wanted your "freedom" they wouldn't be using a closed source product in the first place.
yes. http://www.fsf.org
Let's say Microsoft takes some BSD code. I'm no worse off. You're no worse off. BSD is no worse off. Nobody is worse off. And nobody has lost any freedom because of it.
Yes. They need the 99.9999% uptime (6 9s) that only sourceforge can provide.
If I write code under a BSD license, anyone can use make use it. GPL, BSD, CDDL, even proprietary closed source code. Everyone has freedom.
GPL code is only free for use with other GPL code.
GPL gives you freedom the same way segregation gives you freedom -- freedom for some, not all.
Since the latest cdrtools packages look to be a combination of GPL'd code and incompatibly licensed code, Debian is removing crtools (not shunting it to non-free), because they feel they can no longer distribute the work.
The official fsf position is that:
Google checkout has a fee structure similar to normal credit card processors. It's designed for c2b, not c2c. They do allow donations for 501c3 tax exempt organizations. It's not designed for sending a couple bucks to a guy living in his parents basement.
in that situation, server side includes are just as useful, but faster and more secure.
That explains David Souter, doesn't it?
I think you meant to say "IE7 is ripping off several FireFox features (tabs, etc.) that FireFox ripped off from Opera"
Mozilla foundation/corporation has revenues of > 75 million (from google and affiliate searches) and over 120 full time employees.
hardly "a bunch of cowboys that do stuff for fun with a few paid employees."
Looks like they haven't fixed it yet. They haven't even decided if they'll fix it. They handle it better than IE, (which is completely broken), but Opera, khtml, iCab, hell, even lynx handles it correctly.