User: Adolf Hitroll

Re:Retarded Slashdot

On: Overture Search Terms Showcase Piracy Desire

exactly !
and propz to me too :-)

Re:Funniest geek joke evar!

On: RMS Replies to "The Stallman Factor"

that's 31(oct) and Christmas, you m0r0n.

Re:GNUArt misses the point

On: Creative Commons

WTF are you talking about ? Are you trolling or are you offtopic ?

Re:Pinochet?

On: The Case for the Empire

BTW, compare him with the felon Bush...
This guy is dangerous for the whole humanity !

news for what ?

On: The Case for the Empire

yous uck, how do you expect me to join the masses in order to wooow at the fscking mpaa nullshit that this film is ?

There's no interest in seeing these studs and their romance expect when the guy gets his arm cut... ahr ahr ahr ...

towards the slashdot moderation tax :-)

On: Verisign Ordered to Stop Deceptive Renewal Notices

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = -1 ; $i 6 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = int(abs((3 + $vote * ($from - 1.5)) / 4) +1 );
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
-1 +1 1 -1 -1 2
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1
5 +1 2 5 -1 1

first interesting post !

On: Bitter Java

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = -1 ; $i 6 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = int(abs((3 + $vote * ($from - 1.5)) / 4) +1 );
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
-1 +1 1 -1 -1 2
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1
5 +1 2 5 -1 1

mod'him down !

On: Prestigious Art Gallery To Exhibit Video Games

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = -1 ; $i 6 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = int(abs((3 + $vote * ($from - 1.5)) / 4) +1 );
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
-1 +1 1 -1 -1 2
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1
5 +1 2 5 -1 1

important stuff

On: EA Cites MS Bullying, Says No Xbox Online Games

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = -1 ; $i 6 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = int(abs((3 + $vote * ($from - 1.5)) / 4) +1 );
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
-1 +1 1 -1 -1 2
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1
5 +1 2 5 -1 1

moderation is buggy !

On: Tapping the Alpha Geek Noosphere with EtherPeg

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = -1 ; $i 6 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = int(abs((3 + $vote * ($from - 1.5)) / 4) +1 );
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
-1 +1 1 -1 -1 2
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1
5 +1 2 5 -1 1

Re:Excellent independent game

On: The Indie Game Jam

yep, even you look nice, compared to him !

scheise filters !

On: Ultra Efficient Chip Cooling Passes Boeing Tests

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :

It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :

#!/bin/perl

print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n";
for ($i = 0 ; $i 5 ; $i ++) {
print " $i +1 " . cost($i, 1) . " ";
print " $i -1 " . cost($i, -1) . "\n";
}

exit 0;

sub cost {
$from = shift;
$vote = shift;
$cost = 1+ int(abs(($from - 1.5 + $vote) / 2));
return $cost;
}

which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost
0 +1 1 0 -1 2
1 +1 1 1 -1 1
2 +1 1 2 -1 1
3 +1 2 3 -1 1
4 +1 2 4 -1 1

Re:Heh

On: Ultra Efficient Chip Cooling Passes Boeing Tests

I have a simple idea regarding slashdot moderation :
It should cost more moderation points to upmod an already highly modded (>=+3) post or to downmod a post that has already been modded to 0.

perl code :
#!/bin/perl print "From Vote Cost From Vote Cost\n"; for ($i = 0 ; $i which displays as a result:
From Vote Cost From Vote Cost 0 +1 1 0 -1 2 1 +1 1 1 -1 1 2 +1 1 2 -1 1 3 +1 2 3 -1 1 4 +1 2 4 -1 1

Re:Excellent independent game

On: The Indie Game Jam

I saw the Key Largo movie yesterday, when the mob-ruler told they'd launch a new Prohibition a few years later, I actually thought they managed to do it today as you are more and more buried under anti-criticism laws such as the French Fabius-Gayssot (and I don't mention the numerous anti-privacy devices)...

BTW, about your sig, did this gain you more or less foes than JonKatz ? ;-)

Re:Excellent independent game

On: The Indie Game Jam

Hey Ralfie, how's life ?

wtf

On: The Indie Game Jam

who fucking cares about your sci-fi schissdreck ?!
you're a consumoron.

US rejection of Kyoto climate plan...

On: The Indie Game Jam

Britain will today launch its strongest attack on George Bush's rejection of the Kyoto climate protocol, as the government warns that Washington's actions threaten to make the planet "uninhabitable".

Angered by the US government's decision to rule out signing up to Kyoto for the next 10 years, the environment minister, Michael Meacher, writes in today's Guardian that the world is running out of time. "We do not have much time and we do not have any serious option. If we do not act quickly to minimise runaway feedback effects from global warming we run the risk of making this planet, our home, uninhabitable."

The minister's intervention came after Washington's chief climate negotiator, Harlan Watson, said in London earlier this week that an independent US initiative to cut emissions of greenhouse gases would not be assessed until 2012. "We are not going to be part of the Kyoto protocol for the foreseeable future," he announced.

Mr Watson's remarks prompted an outspoken attack on the US by Mr Meacher. "I am so disappointed that this week the US refused to reconsider coming back into the climate talks for 10 years. The need for action is urgent," he writes.

Tony Blair also admitted last night that Britain and the US were at odds over the Kyoto protocol, the international agreement drawn up to help slow, and mitigate the effects of, climate change.

In an interview on BBC2's Newsnight, the prime minister said: "On Kyoto, there is a difference of opinion. We have made that clear."

Mr Meacher takes a swipe at the US's apparent complacency when he warns that there are strong reasons for "doubting the comforting US picture that there's plenty of time to deal with the problem". The minister adds: "One reason is that climate change may be not steady but abrupt; the other is that the pressures we inflict on the climate may trigger wholly unexpected developments from feedback effects."

Latest scientific evidence suggests the impact of climate change on Britain could be "faster and sharper" than expected, says Mr Meacher. Almost two million homes in England and Wales are at risk from floods, and Britain will experience a 65% increase in river flooding if defences do not account for climate change.

"The UN intergovernmental panel on climate change ... has forecast that global average temperatures will rise by between 1.4 to 5.8 degrees Celsius by 2100.

"That may not sound much. But it is worth remembering that the last ice age, when much of the northern hemisphere was buried under an ice pack thousands of feet thick, was triggered by a fall in temperature of only some five degrees Celsius."

A rise in temperature of just 5.8C could melt glaciers and Greenland's ice sheet, causing a rise in sea water that could submerge island nations.

Mr Meacher's intervention comes after the deputy prime minister, John Prescott, said he would not attend an environmental summit at a Bali resort next month.

Mr Prescott was criticised for considering attending the summit, a preparatory meeting for the Earth Summit in Johannesburg this September. Amid reports that the trip would cost taxpayers 250,000, he said Margaret Beckett, the environment secretary, would be the only cabinet minister attending.

Speaking to the parliamentary Labour party, the deputy prime minister said: "I'm not going to Bali. But I live in hope."

Re:I am no longer a virgin

On: The Indie Game Jam

do you mean your virgin islands citizen passport got eaten by the v.c. ?

/. mod idea...

On: The Indie Game Jam

I mean I had an idea regarding slashdot moderation :
it is simple : from +3 onwards and from 0 downwards, it should cost 2 moderation points to respectively up and down mod a post

yawwwn !!!

On: The Years of Rice and Salt

'nuff said

allo ?

On: Handspring Treo 270 Leaked

normal qu'il y ait une fuite avec un téléphone...

Re:Toasted Post

On: Napster Execs Resign, Company Appears to Teeter

good riddance...

Re:The point being?

On: Atari Announces an Official Portable 2600 System

Name one single atari 2600 game that actually has a decent plot, good replayability, long shelflife and non-repetitive gameplay.

• basic programming
  
• warlords (4-player with roller-joysticks)
  
• berzerk
  
• millipede
  
• keystone kapers
  
• star wars: the empire strikes back
  
• pitfall
  
• mario bros
  
• joust
  
• most games with more than 1 active player at a time :-)
  

you're a moron, you don't know what is good.

Re:Hmm cool

On: Atari Announces an Official Portable 2600 System

could be cheaper, we all only need one game :

it would display random uninteresting stories
and we'd have to get the first post toeach of these while managing to stay at -1 :-)

Re:1st

On: Atari Announces an Official Portable 2600 System

Scheise, for the first time I agree with the story and I could almost praise infogrames for this initiative...
(if there's a way to play a 4-player warlords with it, of course)

but these rascals could at least have built their shite around a cbs colecovision (I loved venture, and zaxxon, and donkey kong junior :-)

who gives a shite anyway ?

let's ring me up when it'll be easy to upload some warez atari roms to it, okay ?