I mean a 300*300 km area of that tech suffices for all of humanity’s needs right now. With no rare materials, complex error-prone technology, or high costs. I call that a pretty sweet deal.
Of course we will optimize it by the use of the right collector/core (imagine placing something else in the middle, like a special material or solar cell). But hey, until then, we’re very good with what we got. And the price... oh the price... Energy for next to nothing!
Well, I doubt that, and think you’re giving them too much credit. ^^
Also: Did you also like Hellboy, the 2008 Hulk (as compared to the 2003 one, Fantastic Four, and similar default trash? ^^ (Well, default trash to me. If you like them, have fun. I'm just not OK with being forced to have no other choice in movies, because of people who actually pay money to see them. But hey. People still vote for the big parties, despite knowing exactly to get raped in the butt by them, as soon as they are voted in.)
Sorry, but first of all, your lack of arguments to back your statement, means that you obviously don’t know SHIT. Second, your writing style assumes that you’re an ass. But I will overlook that.
Now for the facts: UHT-milk is heated to 150 degrees Celsius. Something that most proteins and vitamins, etc, can not stand. The molecules denature. If you remember: We humans take meds because above 42 degrees Celsius body temperature, our proteins denature to the point where it becomes deadly. Then that cooked liquid is blended extremely fine, which destroys the lumps of fats, but unfortunately also some molecules. So UHT-“milk” is as much milk, as your cooked and blended finger is still alive.
But I agree, that all this still does not have to be bad. (Although it is obviously very likely.) Unfortunately those proteins, being complex molecular machines, (that would now be sparking and dragging parts behind them when they were normal machines,) work in a different way in our body, when they are destroyed in that way. The effects are very different. Of course we still can use them for energy. But where they are used as-is, they cause bad effects for our health.
But I do not even expect you to believe me. Test it yourself. But beware that many diseases caused by processed food result in diseases only after some decades of doing it wrong. It’s what we call “age-related diseases”. But really they don’t come because of the age, but only with the age.
That was nearly my exact thought. (Of course a citation — just as on Wikipedia — actually means nothing and is just a obfuscation of the fact, that there still is no proof. [Argumentum ad populum])
I don't see some real differences. I just see some people believing that there are differences, because of some people saying that there are differences, because of either some other people saying that there are differences [circular reasoning] or because they made it up (including favorable interpretation) as part of their job [viral marketing/PR].
That's your problem, my friend. Firefox is very stable. Let me say this: FLASH crashes like shit here. And it's FLASH that causes the most problems for Firefox users. Chrome prevents this by wrapping FLASH in a separate area that gets dumped with it, or something like that.
But Firefox runs very fine here. So first FIX YOUR COMPUTER, before complaining about software stability.
Actually, every software is free to normal users! Either you download and crack it yourself, or you have a friend who does it for yo. That is the main point free software hasn't taken off, and everybody knows it.
Oh, and under Linux, the culture is quite different. 1. Because not everything runs fine under Wine. 2. The abilities to combine Linux tools into scripts and a mesh, glued together with bash. Which I absolutely love. I could never go back. I'm officially spoiled.:)
We'll go to SIP, XMPP with Jingle & Co. I certainly couldn't care less, as I never saw the point in yet another video-capable instant messenger or alternatively another proprietary SIP clone.
Yes and no. It's how it was and is in the first place. Only through some total mindless retards that have never seen or understood the Internet, is it, that many sites now fear of being sued for the shit that *their users* do (as opposed to them). Which is about as stupid as to sue the company that maintains a road, for the people that get harmed by other people while being on that street.
But of course, when for once someone gets it, and does it right, someone like you comes along and has to poop out his mindless rant.
Thank you for keeping the Internet fucked up, mr. jmanforever. Yeah, man... forever fucked up. THX. 5.1. Digital Surround.:P
Oh boy, you can’t believe how much I do agree on that one.
But why does anyone think preparations like white flour, sugar or that liquid of heat-wrecked proteins called "UHT-milk" (no matter from what mammal) are even food?
EA is doing this since... well, I think they are pretty much defined by those methods.
I know that at least five years ago, the German Game magazine Gamestar was the only one not to have a story on some EA game, because they refused to rate it above 90% in order to get access to “exclusive” images etc. I think they even wrote about how EA offered them a pre-written “test” to print practically verbatim.
But this is not the only area where they are shady. If you remember the lawsuit, where the wives of EA programmers (or should I say “code monkeys”) sued EA, because their men never came home. Apparently, the internal rule was, to work until at least 8 PM, and never have free weekends or ask for holidays. If you would go home on the weekend, your boss would tell you, not to ever come back.
I also remember that everybody from Bullfrog (don’t dare to not remember them! ^^) quit the company, to found a new one, as soon as they were bought by EA. That company was again bought by EA. And that time, still 60% of the employees did quit on the spot.
Then their whole process of making games — from my perspective as a game designer — is just disgusting. It’s just like those Hollywood plastic fantastic default movies with ten writers. To them it’s just a production process. No heart, no soul, no free creativity. You just create a mass-product. Never a piece of art, how it should be. They are an insult to the whole business, dragging the reputation of us all down with them.
Now you’ve got an image of what kind of company EA is. Microsoft’s ethics are a freakin’ joke, compared to EA’s. I wish I would be exaggerating.
Interesting, how not Linux dies for getting king of the desktop, but the desktop dies (allegedly) and Linux becomes king of everything else. Phones, settop boxes, netbooks, you name it...
I'm very pleased with the development.
But of course I'll wait for Netcraft to confirm it.;)
But one must say, that levitation because of gravitational effects is not the same as that of (electro)magnetic effects. One can not use the one to study the other, for example. (Although some "scientists" attempt it nonetheless.)
On the other hand: Put them in a microwave and shoot them with a industrial-strength laser, and they will not have cancer too... because they will be a heap of ashes.
I understand your argument and I specifically agree with it. But by putting yourself in the opposite extreme position, you're not much better than them. Even if it happens for dubious humoristic purposes. ^^
Why does everyone think it's normal for mice, to eat partially digested and rotten (with the help of bacteria) cow milk? What do you think they do without humans? Suck on tits of dead cows? ^^
Sir, we have chosen YOU to be the star of our next experiment. Being the oldest Slashdotter still not officially declared completely dead, you fit perfectly! Please sign here. Oh, and here... It's just a minor thing about getting frozen and then ripped apart by a giant laser. Nothing that should distract you. Here, a new/. article for you! *takes out his tiny victim-catching net*
So it's the media reproduction and artist extortion industry's wet dream: You never actually own anything, and really pay every time you listen to the track. And I still wonder if any of that money is actually going to the artists. Because I think they don't see a cent and that that is the main point over actually selling stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
And this being bad exactly how?
I mean a 300*300 km area of that tech suffices for all of humanity’s needs right now. With no rare materials, complex error-prone technology, or high costs.
I call that a pretty sweet deal.
Of course we will optimize it by the use of the right collector/core (imagine placing something else in the middle, like a special material or solar cell). But hey, until then, we’re very good with what we got. And the price... oh the price... Energy for next to nothing!
Why? Was he just terrible? http://pictureisunrelated.com/2009/05/21/lex-luther-is-just-terrible/
Well, I doubt that, and think you’re giving them too much credit. ^^
Also: Did you also like Hellboy, the 2008 Hulk (as compared to the 2003 one, Fantastic Four, and similar default trash? ^^ (Well, default trash to me. If you like them, have fun. I'm just not OK with being forced to have no other choice in movies, because of people who actually pay money to see them. But hey. People still vote for the big parties, despite knowing exactly to get raped in the butt by them, as soon as they are voted in.)
Sorry, but first of all, your lack of arguments to back your statement, means that you obviously don’t know SHIT. Second, your writing style assumes that you’re an ass. But I will overlook that.
Now for the facts: UHT-milk is heated to 150 degrees Celsius. Something that most proteins and vitamins, etc, can not stand. The molecules denature.
If you remember: We humans take meds because above 42 degrees Celsius body temperature, our proteins denature to the point where it becomes deadly.
Then that cooked liquid is blended extremely fine, which destroys the lumps of fats, but unfortunately also some molecules.
So UHT-“milk” is as much milk, as your cooked and blended finger is still alive.
But I agree, that all this still does not have to be bad. (Although it is obviously very likely.)
Unfortunately those proteins, being complex molecular machines, (that would now be sparking and dragging parts behind them when they were normal machines,) work in a different way in our body, when they are destroyed in that way. The effects are very different. Of course we still can use them for energy. But where they are used as-is, they cause bad effects for our health.
One very real proof I got, is a good friend of mine. Who literally got completely free of his “incurable” asthmatic allergy, as soon as he stopped consuming such proteins. Usually he had to use the inhalator trough the whole summer. But that summer he used it exactly once. And the next summer, it was gone. Finito. That’s it. he couldn’t believe it.
But he got the idea from a German doctor called “Dr. med. M. O. Bruker” who was the head of a clinic for about 30 years. According to him, what I stated is proven through all the thousands upon thousands of patients he treated during his career. And, well, testing it for ourselves, and actually seeing it being true, is a convincing argument, wouldn’t you say?
But I do not even expect you to believe me. Test it yourself. But beware that many diseases caused by processed food result in diseases only after some decades of doing it wrong. It’s what we call “age-related diseases”. But really they don’t come because of the age, but only with the age.
So who is “fucking ignorant” here?
That was nearly my exact thought. (Of course a citation — just as on Wikipedia — actually means nothing and is just a obfuscation of the fact, that there still is no proof. [Argumentum ad populum])
I don't see some real differences. I just see some people believing that there are differences, because of some people saying that there are differences, because of either some other people saying that there are differences [circular reasoning] or because they made it up (including favorable interpretation) as part of their job [viral marketing/PR].
That's your problem, my friend. Firefox is very stable. Let me say this: FLASH crashes like shit here. And it's FLASH that causes the most problems for Firefox users. Chrome prevents this by wrapping FLASH in a separate area that gets dumped with it, or something like that.
But Firefox runs very fine here. So first FIX YOUR COMPUTER, before complaining about software stability.
Typical PEBKAC. ^^
Actually, every software is free to normal users!
Either you download and crack it yourself, or you have a friend who does it for yo.
That is the main point free software hasn't taken off, and everybody knows it.
I mean, when instead of Gimp, you can get this: http://btjunkie.org/search?q=adobe%20master
Then who cares about Gimp?
And instead of OpenOffice, you get this: http://btjunkie.org/search?q=microsoft+office
I mean, it's obvious.
Oh, and under Linux, the culture is quite different. :)
1. Because not everything runs fine under Wine.
2. The abilities to combine Linux tools into scripts and a mesh, glued together with bash.
Which I absolutely love. I could never go back. I'm officially spoiled.
Except if the software is open-source and free. Like with Firefox.
(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
We'll go to SIP, XMPP with Jingle & Co. I certainly couldn't care less, as I never saw the point in yet another video-capable instant messenger or alternatively another proprietary SIP clone.
They decided to keep only the good and profitable stuff.
Yes and no. It's how it was and is in the first place. Only through some total mindless retards that have never seen or understood the Internet, is it, that many sites now fear of being sued for the shit that *their users* do (as opposed to them). Which is about as stupid as to sue the company that maintains a road, for the people that get harmed by other people while being on that street.
But of course, when for once someone gets it, and does it right, someone like you comes along and has to poop out his mindless rant.
Thank you for keeping the Internet fucked up, mr. jmanforever. Yeah, man... forever fucked up. THX. 5.1. Digital Surround. :P
Woha... at least it's stable and sure not to fall over.
What? Read TFA? I haven't even read TFS.
Yes, I'm not from the USA. Why? ;)
Oh boy, you can’t believe how much I do agree on that one.
But why does anyone think preparations like white flour, sugar or that liquid of heat-wrecked proteins called "UHT-milk" (no matter from what mammal) are even food?
EA is doing this since... well, I think they are pretty much defined by those methods.
I know that at least five years ago, the German Game magazine Gamestar was the only one not to have a story on some EA game, because they refused to rate it above 90% in order to get access to “exclusive” images etc. I think they even wrote about how EA offered them a pre-written “test” to print practically verbatim.
But this is not the only area where they are shady. If you remember the lawsuit, where the wives of EA programmers (or should I say “code monkeys”) sued EA, because their men never came home. Apparently, the internal rule was, to work until at least 8 PM, and never have free weekends or ask for holidays. If you would go home on the weekend, your boss would tell you, not to ever come back.
I also remember that everybody from Bullfrog (don’t dare to not remember them! ^^) quit the company, to found a new one, as soon as they were bought by EA. That company was again bought by EA. And that time, still 60% of the employees did quit on the spot.
Then their whole process of making games — from my perspective as a game designer — is just disgusting. It’s just like those Hollywood plastic fantastic default movies with ten writers. To them it’s just a production process. No heart, no soul, no free creativity. You just create a mass-product. Never a piece of art, how it should be. They are an insult to the whole business, dragging the reputation of us all down with them.
Now you’ve got an image of what kind of company EA is. Microsoft’s ethics are a freakin’ joke, compared to EA’s.
I wish I would be exaggerating.
Did you say “pubic optio...” No? Oh... OK... :/
Interesting, how not Linux dies for getting king of the desktop, but the desktop dies (allegedly) and Linux becomes king of everything else. Phones, settop boxes, netbooks, you name it...
I'm very pleased with the development.
But of course I'll wait for Netcraft to confirm it. ;)
Well, I hope you (Motorola) can put a bit of fire below Nokia's and Samsung's asses again... you know, for a better market. :)
Did you hear someone scream something like "eye foam"? ;)
No?
Me neither.
But one must say, that levitation because of gravitational effects is not the same as that of (electro)magnetic effects. One can not use the one to study the other, for example. (Although some "scientists" attempt it nonetheless.)
On the other hand: Put them in a microwave and shoot them with a industrial-strength laser, and they will not have cancer too... because they will be a heap of ashes.
I understand your argument and I specifically agree with it. But by putting yourself in the opposite extreme position, you're not much better than them. Even if it happens for dubious humoristic purposes. ^^
Why does everyone think it's normal for mice, to eat partially digested and rotten (with the help of bacteria) cow milk? What do you think they do without humans? Suck on tits of dead cows? ^^
Sir, we have chosen YOU to be the star of our next experiment. Being the oldest Slashdotter still not officially declared completely dead, you fit perfectly! Please sign here. Oh, and here... It's just a minor thing about getting frozen and then ripped apart by a giant laser. Nothing that should distract you. Here, a new /. article for you! *takes out his tiny victim-catching net*
If you ever tried to eat a hot pocket that just came out of the toaster in under 10 seconds, while being alone, you will understand.
Irrational... pah! :P
So it's the media reproduction and artist extortion industry's wet dream: You never actually own anything, and really pay every time you listen to the track. And I still wonder if any of that money is actually going to the artists. Because I think they don't see a cent and that that is the main point over actually selling stuff.
No thanks. I'd rather die.
Well, FSF hates them because they are the evil ones, and Microsoft hates that *they* can't be the evil ones. ;)