Slashdot Mirror


Sam Ramji, Microsoft's Open Source Guru, Is Moving On

barking_at_airplanes writes "Some called him crazy a few years ago when he joined Microsoft to run the Open Source Software Lab, but Sam Ramji endured and made real differences to how Microsoft treats open source and how open source people view Microsoft. Ramji is now heading back to Silicon Valley to join a cloud computing startup. Sam comments in his announcement: '46 months later, I am amazed at the changes that have occurred for the company, for the team I belonged to, and the sentiments of the industry.' It's a statement which, 46 months ago, few Slashdotters would have thought could come true! With Sam leaving, can Microsoft's positive momentum into open source continue successfully? Bill Hilf says they're 'actively seeking someone to fill Sam's shoes.'"

155 comments

  1. I know! by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hire Stallman!

    1. Re:I know! by NoYob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just had this image of Stallman and Ballmer in a room together.

      Then, I had this thought of them becoming the best of buds and ruling the World.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin?

      Sincerely yours,
      Stevie B

    3. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just had this image of Stallman and Ballmer in a room together.
      Then, I had this thought of them becoming the best of buds and ruling the World.

      1. ???
      2. ???
      3. Profit!!!
    4. Re:I know! by FunPika · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even scarier would be Stallman, Ballmer, Gates, Jobs, and Torvalds all together in the same room planning to take over the world...

      We would all be screwed.

      --
      After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    5. Re:I know! by Errtu76 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Better yet, have Microsoft 'ask Slashdot'. I'm sure there'll be lots of people with ideas on how to continue/improve things.

    6. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even scarier would be Stallman, Ballmer, Gates, Jobs, and Torvalds all together in the same room planning to take over the world...

      They already did. Haven't you noticed?

    7. Re:I know! by Norsefire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stallman: We must only use free-software, by my definition
      Ballmer/Gates: We must use only Microsoft products
      Jobs: I don't care what we use but it has to look cool and have shiny logos on it
      Torvalds: I don't care as long as it does one thing and does it well.

      Yeah ... I wouldn't be too worried.

    8. Re:I know! by moon3 · · Score: 1

      And RMS just helicoptered from his grave.

    9. Re:I know! by Timosch · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just had this image of Stallman and Ballmer in a room together.

      Uhm, the chairs would propably get caught in Stallman's beard.

    10. Re:I know! by aetherworld · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait... so we would get free Microsoft products that look cool and only do one thing, but they do it well? Can we please lock those guys up in a room already until they come up with that idea?

    11. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not dead yet. (A pity, I know.)

    12. Re:I know! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

      If getting a job offer from Microsoft didn't kill him, I'm not sure what would. Ninjas?

      No, wait, that's been tried. (http://www.yale.edu/ypu/blog.html)

    13. Re:I know! by moon3 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pity? RMS is a legend and OSS has its place.

    14. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would get a streamlined Mac OS X with a Microsoft logo on the box released as freeware that can run on any PC.

      Hum, please DO lock them all together!

    15. Re:I know! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bull, meet china shop!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    16. Re:I know! by shentino · · Score: 1

      I swear there's a Chuck Norris joke in there somewhere...

    17. Re:I know! by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you really attribute the Unix philosophy to Torvalds? I mean, the fact that Linux started as a Unix clone kind of goes against attributing that to Linus.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    18. Re:I know! by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because as soon as you mentioned Stallman and Ballmer in a room together the only thing I could envision happening is some kind of antimatter detonation.

      At least the world will be rid of both their odious presences. ;)

    19. Re:I know! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait... so we would get free Microsoft products that look cool and only do one thing, but they do it well? Can we please lock those guys up in a room already until they come up with that idea?

      They have already written FDISK decades ago...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, because as soon as you mentioned Stallman and Ballmer in a room together the only thing I could envision happening is some kind of

      sweet sweet lovemaking.

      Appropriately enough, my captcha is "apology".

    21. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He's the only one of the four who understands and follows it.

    22. Re:I know! by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      No kidding. To be rid of the two biggest proponents of the two worst extremes of software philosophy.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
    23. Re:I know! by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      He certianly did not create it, but he does understand it (see git).

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    24. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do we know he wasn't looking at his recently purchased cemetery plot when he read the comment? Perhaps with his helicopter?

    25. Re:I know! by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, git is awesome. I'm looking forward to a time when no one uses SVN anymore.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    26. Re:I know! by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      I swear there's a Chuck Norris joke in there somewhere...

      You mean something like.. "Underneath Chuck Norris's beard is another fist, but underneath RMS's beard is the source code for Hurd?"

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    27. Re:I know! by erebus24 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I smell a sitcom!

    28. Re:I know! by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even scarier would be Stallman, Ballmer, Gates, Jobs, and Torvalds all together in the same room planning to take over the world...

      I'd rather see them in a room playing D&D. That would be interesting.

    29. Re:I know! by gmrath · · Score: 1

      "What are we going to do tonight, Brain?"

    30. Re:I know! by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bullshit.

      Best Regards,
          Larry E.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:I know! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Stallman would never accept the position.

      They should hire Larry Wall. Maybe then we could get a proper Perl (complete with working CPAN.pm) on Windows without Cygwin.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    32. Re:I know! by jonadab · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't want to put Jobs and Stallman in a room together, trust me. Gates and Stallman would probably just give eachother the cold shoulder (what would they have to say to one another, after all?), but Jobs would probably do something to get Stallman riled. Could get messy.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    33. Re:I know! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I don't think that'd work. They'd run out of food and we'd come back a week later to find broken chairs laying around the room, Jobs dead in a corner from blunt impact, Balmer self-hung in the middle of the room, with Torvalds and Stallman arguing about who gets the last morsels of Balmer's legs.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    34. Re:I know! by arndawg · · Score: 1

      Or stallman would conviently duck from the flying chairs because of a new tasty treat under his foot. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I25UeVXrEHQ

    35. Re:I know! by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      I'll take the fist then. Go ahead and mod me down but yes, i would take a Chuck Norris beard-punch to Hurd.

    36. Re:I know! by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      Even scarier would be Stallman, Ballmer, Gates, Jobs, and Torvalds all together in the same room planning to take over the world...

      We would all be screwed.

      Nah, Team America would come kick millionaire geek ass and save the day.

    37. Re:I know! by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Even scarier would be Stallman, Ballmer, Gates, Jobs, and Torvalds all together in the same room planning to take over the world... We would all be screwed.

      Ballmer: "Gee Bill, what do you want to do tonight?"
      Gates: "The same thing we do every night, Balmy - try to take over the world!"

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    38. Re:I know! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Really? What one thing does Linux do well? A kernel following the UNIX philosophy isolates software from having to know details of the underlying hardware. Does Linux do this? Maybe if you confine yourself to block devices and serial ports, but if you go anywhere near the sound or power management subsystems you find the kernel leaking abstractions right up to userspace. On *BSD (including Darwin), you have the same userspace interfaces for power management on every architecture, on Linux you have one for x86, one for PowerPC, one for ARM, and so on. Porting code between Linux/x86 and FreeBSD/x86 is generally easier than porting it from Linux/x86 to Linux/ARM.

      Or maybe you're talking about git? I'm not sure what one thing it does well; everyone who uses it seems to tell me it's great as long as you hide it behind a few other third-party tools.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    39. Re:I know! by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just had this image of Stallman and Ballmer in a room together.

      1. ???
      2. ???
      3. Profit!!!

      You mean as in:

      1. RMS leaves for Google
      2. Chairs get airborne
      3. Gravity takes its toll
      4. Profit for the furniture store?
    40. Re:I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry Google will save us.

  2. Really? by kubrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sam Ramji... made real differences to how Microsoft treats open source and how open source people view Microsoft.

    [Citation needed]

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
    1. Re:Really? by minsk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe it.

      A few years ago, Microsoft was ignoring Free Software and Open Source. Now Microsoft has moved onto misleading branding, false marketing, patent threats, and courting developers with what traditionally turned out to be empty promises.

      So, the same way they treat other competition.

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Now Microsoft has moved onto misleading branding, false marketing, patent threats, and courting developers with what traditionally turned out to be empty promises"

      [Citation needed]

    3. Re:Really? by minsk · · Score: 1, Funny

      [Citation needed]

      [1-999]

    4. Re:Really? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Microsoft has made a big push into opening their source code and helping spearhead community-led projects. Two examples:

      Granted, the first one isn't a true open source project in that they don't accept patches from the community, but I think that if you compare today's Microsoft and their culture toward sharing source code with the community is quite a bit different from what it was, say, 5 years ago.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    5. Re:Really? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      That was nearly my exact thought. (Of course a citation — just as on Wikipedia — actually means nothing and is just a obfuscation of the fact, that there still is no proof. [Argumentum ad populum])

      I don't see some real differences. I just see some people believing that there are differences, because of some people saying that there are differences, because of either some other people saying that there are differences [circular reasoning] or because they made it up (including favorable interpretation) as part of their job [viral marketing/PR].

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Really? by wampus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry if I don't trust your source. It's always been a little slanted...

    7. Re:Really? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I'd even say it's always been a little slanted, period.

      Hint to humorless mods: it's about the website name.

    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "âoeAdditional Use Rightsâ specifically excludes the right to distribute the software outside of your company and, because the software is a pre-release version, also excludes the right to disclose the results of any benchmark tests of the software to any third party without Licensorâ(TM)s prior written approval."

      "use of the software within your company as a reference, in read only form, for the sole purposes of debugging your products, maintaining your products, or enhancing the interoperability of your products with the software, and specifically excludes the right to distribute the software outside of your company."

      So, not only can you not share the code, you can't even change it yourself. They may as well just call it viewable code, or read-only code.

      Doesn't look terribly open to me at all.

    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for a citation, I've heard him in a couple of occasions and his speech is totally along the lines of we do it better and FOSS is crap.

      No big loss, simply a politically correct PR left M$.

    10. Re:Really? by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Well, he did direct three Spider-Man movies, that has to count for something!

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    11. Re:Really? by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      Look, another Micropologist buying the "we like open source" bullshit used as a cover for Microsoft's EEE approach to FOSS!

      Have you even READ the shared source licenses?

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
    12. Re:Really? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "[Citation Needed]"

      Actually, citations aren't really needed for common knowledge. For example, if I say the Earth is spherical, I don't need to provide a citation to back it up.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Really? by someone1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Single patent system, so they could effectively fight Open Source (which is not centered in a single country)
      http://politics.slashdot.org/story/09/09/02/2036227/Microsoft-Pushes-For-Single-Global-Patent-System?from=rss

      Failed attempt to sell out a small portions of less useful patents to patent trolls
      (this was most likely a tentative attempt and the next one will have a bigger impact)
      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/08/213217/Microsoft-Letting-Patents-Move-To-Linux-Firms?from=rss

      Suing TomTom because it is using the FAT filesystem
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/25/232212

      'Releasing GPL drivers' after found violating GPL
      http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/23/1327205

      'training' BestBuy employees with false facts
      http://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/09/05/195219/Microsoft-Attacks-Linux-With-Retail-Training-Talking-Points

      I hope you are satisfied by the citations.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    14. Re:Really? by fyrewulff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Granted, the first one isn't a true open source project in that they don't accept patches from the community

      There's nothing about open source that says that the original maintainers have to accept patches from outside the initial group.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    15. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you have to explain the joke, even to those willing to moderate, then it's not worth it. LET THE EASY ONES GO

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Really? by Skim123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Granted, the first one isn't a true open source project in that they don't accept patches from the community

      There's nothing about open source that says that the original maintainers have to accept patches from outside the initial group.

      True. Although I prefer Jeff Atwood's definition of open source:

      • The project must use an OSI approved license
      • The project must use a commonly available method of public source control
      • The project must provide public evidence that it accepts and encourages code contributions from the outside world.
      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    17. Re:Really? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Have you even READ the shared source licenses?

      Did you even read my comment? I said "To be fair, Microsoft has made a big push into opening their source code and helping spearhead community-led projects."

      No where did I say that Microsoft was using OSI-compliant licenses or that they were even working on open source projects. Just that they were opening their source code (making it available) and helping and encouraging community-led projects. Those are two undeniable facts, regardless of whether you're a "Micropologist" or "Microhater."

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    18. Re:Really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      To be fair on the Best Buy thing, remember we are talking Best Buy. Does anybody think that Joe Average shopping at Best Buy would have a snowball's chance in hell with Linux? If you haven't been into Best Buy lately, I would suggest going in their with a pen and paper, writing down names/model #s, and actually looking up which items are supported under Ubuntu. You are looking at MAYBE 30% supported, and that is if you count "support" as wireless where you can't get WEP, much less WPA2, or where the "driver" is something for a completely different piece of hardware and YOU are supposed to "hack it" to make it work. Does anybody think Joe could pull that off?

      In short, trying to sell Linux on boxes at Best Buy would be a nightmare from hell. Which printers on sale this week work? Will this laptop be fully functional INCLUDING wireless in Ubuntu? How about this wifi stick? You don't know, I don't know, the poor kid working the counter at Best Buy sure as hell don't know, which is why he needs talking point about Windows 7. Linux shoppers shop online, where they can do their research first. Buying Linux anything at a retail shop like Best Buy is just doomed to failure as there are just too many pieces of funky Chinese PC junk being sold there with zero support for your OS. It would be like going to a MSFT store and expecting everything to support your new Macbook, it just ain't gonna happen, captain.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Really? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      Not all of the Best Buy material was a lie, but i find applying security updates on Linux way easier than on Windows.
      I also find Linux safer than Windows.
      Those parts where they say Windows is safer/easier to update are blatant lies.

      They could have written the truth and only the truth.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    20. Re:Really? by wampus · · Score: 1

      I was actually referring to the SaaR (Software as a Religion) crowd, but a horrible pun works, too.

    21. Re:Really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I have never had a security update in Windows bork sound, but one of the reasons I gave up Linux on my laptop is that it seemed like every other update totally broke my sound, causing me countless hours trawling forums and punching in loads of arcane Unix CLI crap. So again, we are talking about Best Buy customers, not IT admins, and do you honestly believe Joe average could have pulled that off? For me the final straw was when I ran updates and the wireless got so borked that after nearly 4 days I was ready to fling my laptop against the wall, and I have 15 years of IT experience. What are the actual odds that a guy that shopped at Worst Buy could have pulled it off?

      Linux is a damned fine OS if you are running a server, where companies like Red Hat spend millions making sure everything "just works". It is also damned good for embedded projects, as you can hack it and tweak it to fit just about anything, see Gumstixx for an example. It is also okay for a desktop (not great, not fine, just okay) if you have loads of IT experience, don't mind hours on the CLI, and are willing to do loads of research before every purchase so you don't get a paperweight. Again, what are the odds the above applies to someone shopping Best Buy? Probably 0.01%, if that. That is because long term IT guys do their shopping online, from places like Newegg and Monoprice.

      So I would argue if you looked at the slideshow from a Joe User perspective and NOT from an IT Admin perspective, then it all makes perfectly reasonable claims. Remember just because YOU find something easy, or I find something easy, doesn't mean that Joe Average will find something easy. Hell I have had customers give me money to fix problems that would have been trivial for them to fix, just because the fix would have involved using control panel, and they aren't comfortable going there. The odds of those kinds of people finding Linux a workable solution? About 0.000001%, if that.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:Really? by unity · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the fact that the .net framework source is available nowadays is a HUGE change, a positive change.

    23. Re:Really? by mspohr · · Score: 1
      Funny, my anecdotal experience (probably as worthless as yours) has been that I have never had a problem with sound on any of my Linux installs or updates. For that matter, I haven't had a problem with WiFi either. It has always just worked.

      Then again, I have 35 years of IT experience which unfortunately includes much pain with Windows systems. The Windows pain has changed over the years from problems installing and finding drivers to now dealing with infestations of malware (and still drivers for Vista/7).

      I don't do daily corporate IT any more but I did happen to sit in our our corporate IT problem meeting last week (large multinational organization) and the entire time was spent on the problems of dealing with Windows malware which has severely compromised security and stability. (We are an exclusive Windows shop except for a few renegades such as me who use Linux on their corporate Dells to avoid malware... one trip to Africa and your Windows box will be compromised.)

      Linux is a great desktop. Solid, stable, free of malware and I have lots of free software to do everything I need (the usual corporate stuff plus graphics and video).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    24. Re:Really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are on Wikipedia, since most of the editiots don't know the difference between common knowledge and original research.

      For example see this concerning colour contrast on roadsigns. The last sentence is clearly true to anyone who holds a driving license or has even walked down a street, yet some 'dromer has tagged it [citation needed]

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:Really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But you just proved my point! You have 35 years of It experience, and thus have NO problems dealing with the CLI when problems arise. Now surely you DO admit that sound and wireless have been two major problems in Linux, yes? I mean all it takes is a trip to any Linux forum to find post after post of "my wireless don't work!" or "can only get WEP to function". And of course pulseaudio have been giving lots of folks all kinds of nasty problems, like what I experienced where the sound would just 'die" and it would take hours or even days of fiddling to get it to work.

      So again I would point to the target demographic-folks that do most if not all of their electronic shopping at Best Buy. Do YOU buy most if not all your electronics at Best Buy? I'm willing to bet that is a big fat HELL NO! as you know their prices suck compared to what you can get online. But Joe Average don't shop online, as he doesn't know shit from shinola with regards to most electronics and therefor wants to buy it in person and have somebody "help" him to decide. And THAT is what that slideshow was designed for, and I would argue that in that context it is perfectly reasonable. After all, Joe Average can't even use control panel half the time, the CLI heavy nature of Linux would be simply too complex and hard for them to understand. To them the PC is a "magic box" that they go "clicky clicky" on things and if it don't work they take it to someone like me and say 'fix it". Not exactly the core demographic for Linux adoption, wouldn't you agree?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:Really? by mspohr · · Score: 1
      I did say that I had no problems getting sound and WiFi to work on initial install or on updates on all of my installations. That means that it has just always worked (for me) out of the box without any CLI magic.

      As far as forums... I can find lots of Windows forums where people are having problems with sound and WiFi (and much else) so this anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much.

      A clueless user will be clueless on Windows or on Linux. However, if you give either one a box with the OS and software installed, they will be able to use both without having to use the Control Panel or CLI.

      The advantage of Linux is that they won't get infested with malware and that is a big plus.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    27. Re:Really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Wow, I guess denial isn't just a river in Egypt,huh? Oh and one last BIG difference between your "A clueless user will be clueless on Windows or on Linux" is this-the clueless user in Windows has literally thousands of mom & pop repair shops just like mine, most likely having one near his home, and in this case the Best Buy geek squad, sucky as they are. This makes solving problems completely tech free, as they can just hand it to us and say fix it. The clueless Linux user only has a blinking CLI and a forum somewhere. No really the same, is it?

      And sorry, but we repair shops, like most retailers, refuse to sell or support your product. if someone brought in a broken Linux box and said "fix it" I would offer to sell them a copy of Windows or show them the door. Why would I do that? Because lack of hardware certification and a standardized ABI makes it damned near impossible to buy products that will work on your OS at retail without studying your ass off. Now you DO admit that you have to "research" your purchases, yes? Now imagine you are an ordinary user just walking into Best Buy-Which of these wifi sticks work in Ubuntu? Which all in ones are fully functional? If I buy this particular laptop will ALL the hardware, INCLUDING wireless, not only work now but continue to work in the future?

      The simple fact is this...even with 35 years of IT experience you simply can't answer ANY of the above questions without doing serious research first. You can't answer them, I can't answer them, and the poor kid behind the counter at Best Buy sure as hell can't answer them, which is why like me they don't carry Linux. You see with Windows we have this nice little "certified for Windows x" logo, which means it "just works" and takes all the studying away. Linux doesn't have anything like that, certainly not with any of the hardware currently being sold at Best Buy.

      So again I point to the target demographic-folks that shop at Best Buy. Now can you HONESTLY say, that without any research AT ALL, that shopping at ONLY Best Buy, the average Joe would have the same kind of miraculous luck that you have had, on any kind of consistent basis? Really? Because if so frankly you are either trying to troll yourself or you have seriously drunk too much of the Kool Aid. So what would YOU say to the pissed off customer that comes up to YOU at the service dept of Best Buy, with the "broken" Linux and shows you the non functional Broadcom wireless or Lexmark all in one or any of a dozen other products currently being sold in YOUR store,hmmm? Would you tell him "too fucking bad, should have done your research"? I'm sorry, but anyone not drinking the Kool Aid will tell you that shopping for Linux devices without research is walking into a minefield filled with worthless paperweights, sorry but it is true.

      Best Buy Corp isn't gonna blow the cash required to compile lists of everything they sell that does/does not work in Linux, and then pay to have those lists updated. So until there is a way for the kid behind the counter to say "look for the penguin on the box" it would be suicide for them to sell Linux. Sorry but those are the "facts" whether you enjoy them or not. And the slideshow in that context is a perfectly valid set of talking points. Remember, just because you, with 35 years of IT experience, could discern which items would be functional in distro x before purchasing, probably by doing some serious research into the subject first, doesn't mean that Joe just walking in off the street would have that kind of "luck" by just putting items into a shopping cart based on features/price.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    28. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example see this concerning colour contrast on roadsigns [wikipedia.org]. The last sentence is clearly true to anyone who holds a driving license or has even walked down a street, yet some 'dromer has tagged it [citation needed]

      NO, the last is not clearly true unless you have made a fairly comprehensive tour of the world observing roadsigns. Which most people haven't done.

  3. What are you smoking? by Grokmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article claims Ramji has improved relations between Microsoft and open source people? Since when have relations between Microsoft and open source been anything but negative? We read stories on here almost every day about some new point of conflict.

    1. Re:What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article claims Ramji has improved relations between Microsoft and open source people? Since when have relations between Microsoft and open source been anything but negative? We read stories on here almost every day about some new point of conflict.

      Hang around Groklaw much?

      "OMG! Microsoft is teh EVIL! Did you see Psystar is suing Apple! They're REALLY trying to destroy the GPL! Somebody (hint... hint...) really wants to destroy the GPL!!!!"

      Think I'm kidding? Yeah, I know the Groklaw legions will mod this down. But seriously, read Groklaw with the same skepticism PJ aims at, say, SCO, and you'll see what I mean. For someone who basis her entire site on respect for due process, she sure doesn't need due process or even any evidence to put on the tin foil hat and start seeing Microsoft goblins behind every tree and rock.

    2. Re:What are you smoking? by rattaroaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article claims Ramji has improved relations between Microsoft and open source people? Since when have relations between Microsoft and open source been anything but negative? We read stories on here almost every day about some new point of conflict.

      In all fairness, Microsoft has been spreading misinformation the whole time Sam Ramji has been working there. Why would they stop now that he's leaving?

    3. Re:What are you smoking? by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      It sort of feels like Microsoft's relations with OSS are "less negative" now, so I guess that's an improvement. It is, of course, possible that they've merely moved from denial to trying "embrace and extend". But due to the way OSS works I doubt that tactic will even work - in the end - if they try it.

    4. Re:What are you smoking? by Locutus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      that Microsoft Linux Lab is just a training facility for Microsoft upper management so they can be exposed to what open source is and so they can then be moved into other positions within Microsoft and use what was learned to advance Microsoft Windows or at the very least, protect its position. It's not about making money of open source, it's about understanding it and the people behind it. They go to open source conventions, not to sell Microsoft open source products but to see what others are doing and talk to them to learn their strengths and their weaknesses. They join open standards bodies not to move open standards forward but to move them in directions which leave holes open for Microsoft to leverage and to slow down or distract the committees while Microsoft embeds similar technologies into Windows or their other desktop or server apps.

      Do pay any attention to the man behind the curtain. Microsoft's Linux Lab is a travesty. It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. And then some. IMO

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:What are you smoking? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Why would they stop now that he's leaving?

      Out of sight, out of mind? If he was their primary supply of FOSS news...

    6. Re:What are you smoking? by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      No, I just direct all of Microsofts "warm fuzzy" PR directed at the FOSS community with a sizable boulder of salt. I saw no sign that Ramji was anything but a pretender int he first place. If Microsoft were truly pro open source, they wouldn't FUD it so much.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
    7. Re:What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when have relations between Microsoft and open source been anything but negative?

      If you look beyond the FSF, Groklaw, and Boycottnovell, you'll find things aren't as negative between MS and open source as the aforementioned noisemakers want you to believe. They see Microsoft behind pretty much everything, and don't do a good job of separating fact from speculation.

      What often happens at those sites is that someone speculates that Microsoft is behind some particular thing they see as anti free software. That speculation then gets mentioned on other sites. Eventually, it gets mentioned on a blog at one of the major tech news sites. Then back on groklaw or BN, someone reports that, saying that news site has confirmed the original speculation! The notion then spreads among these sites and the blogs that follow them that reporters from the news site have verified the story.

      BN goes even farther, and often cuts out the middleman. BN will make some speculative claim. Then in a future story, they will mention it, and cite the first story. A third story repeats the claim, but not calling it speculation, and cites the second story. It's amazing how much of the claims at BN evaporate if you try to follow the cites all the way back to an original source.

    8. Re:What are you smoking? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      Hang around a world full of ponies and lack of reality much?

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    9. Re:What are you smoking? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Well, any improvement would be a huge one when your relationship is at the very bottom.

      So I guess Microsoft is causing fewer points of conflict since he started working there.

      Oh wait.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  4. Microsoft's Open Source Strategy by sk999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here is how Bill Hilf explains Microsoft's Open Source Strategy:

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=203100965&pgno=3
    ".. our PREFERRED plan is to LICENSE ... versus LITIGATE."

    Gee, where have we heard that before? Oh yes. Darl McBride, CEO of The SCO Group:
    http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2003/07/59701

    "We would PREFER LICENSING to LITIGATION,"

    Such a nice bunch of guys.

    1. Re:Microsoft's Open Source Strategy by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In all fairness, Bill Gates used to brag how Microsoft never sued anyone (before the TomTom fiasco). They use FUD, but they didn't follow through on threats. I'm curious if the TomTom suit was an isolated incident, or the future direction of Microsoft.

      One of the major failings of the United States is that money can trump justice in civil suits. Simply bankrupting another company in a lawsuit can guarantee you victory, which is why TomTom rolled over, rather than fight a battle they likely could have won in court.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Microsoft's Open Source Strategy by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. Every so-called "pro-open source" move in Microsoft can too easily be seen as a way to lull gullible fools into a false sense of security.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
  5. Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft has announced Microsoft CodePlex, its new Open Source foundation.

    "We want to be more responsive to your needs," said Sam Ramji of Microsoft during a Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit panel this week as he wiped rotten tomatoes off his suit.

    "We want all open source innovation to happen on Windows. In practice, Windows is too slow, and just putting Linux underneath the same software stack triples performance. So we're running the Windows versions of the software on Linux using Wine. We'll also be funding the Wine on Windows initiative."

    The new Microsoft Amazingly Open And Genuine Public License allows you complete freedom to use, modify and redistribute the software provided that every copy comes with a DVD of Windows Vista Ultimate, you acknowledge that Microsoft's FAT patent protects a remarkable and valuable innovation in computer science and all accompanying documentation is in OOXML. Also, all your data belongs to Microsoft.

    The overwhelming dominance of Microsoft was assured, he said, pointing to their success in paying netbook manufacturers to use Windows XP and paying US retailers not to stock the Linux versions of the computers. "We're also enforcing our patent on right-clicking. And on the number seven." Ramji reassured journalists of his absolute faith in the power of Microsoft's vision, just before quitting to work somewhere -- anywhere -- else.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by minsk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't knock it... someone porting Wine to Windows might just be the only way to get old applications to work properly :)

    2. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by minsk · · Score: 1

      So, *you* porting Wine to Windows might just be the only way... :)

    4. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft actually said after Vista's release that emulation/virtualization was likely the future for Windows, as they planned to seriously break APIs moving forward. They said instead of a full virtual-PC, they'd be able to do low-level emulation or virtualization per application. Since 7 was so rushed, we didn't get to see this fully realized. Instead 7 ships with Virtual PC. But I think something like Wine on Windows to intercept old Windows API calls will literally be a part of the next (post-7) OS from Microsoft.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    5. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by Cheesetrap · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But I think something like Wine on Windows to intercept old Windows API calls will literally be a part of the next (post-7) OS from Microsoft.

      So... we wait another 6 months or so? /duck

    7. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by Cheesetrap · · Score: 0

      On a side note (sorry for offtopic), I wonder how many people will be blocked from going to that page since it says "make bombs"? :P

      ALLAAAAH

    8. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by cenc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS "embracing" open source I believe is the ultimate nuclear option for MS to take open source apart from the inside out. Watch them put on the sheep's clothing, and then try and run it in to the ground.

    9. Re:Microsoft promises to play nice *this* time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 will not run Civilization 2, even in compatibility mode. Unfortunately, neither will wine :( vmware or virtualbox FTW

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Well, I guess by ffreeloader · · Score: 0

    that all depends on what Ramji means when he refers to MS's "positive momentum". Did MS become viewed more as more positively against open source because they tried to sell patents to patent trolls? Did they become viewed more positively against open source when instead of joining the existing open source community at large they created their own "open source" foundation?

    I would have to say, yes. So, in that aspect Ramji is correct. MS has created increasing distrust of them. So, I guess that is a positive movement, as it is an increase, not a decrease.

    --
    "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
  7. This is the first I've heard of him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the first I've heard of him. If I had heard of him before now, I sure as hell didn't remember him.

    "Success", "open source" and "Microsoft" can only come together in one way: the release of ALL of Microsoft's source code under the BSD or MIT licenses. We're talking .NET, Windows, Internet Explorer, Office, SQL Server, and all of their lesser-known business software.

    That clearly hasn't happened, so there hasn't been any success here.

    1. Re:This is the first I've heard of him. by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      For me, three things have to happen before I buy Microsoft's pro-FOSS bullshit:

      1. They gotta open something substantial (Windows? Officer? Internet Explorer?) under a license NOT of their making and NOT because they got busted violating said license (The GPL virtualization drivers they recently opened are an example of "getting busted," not that they were substantial in the first place).

      2. They have to genuinely help an open source project directly without conditions such as having to use .NET or the like.

      3. They have to MAINTAIN this course for at least five years, a decade being preferable.

      Technically they did "open" .NET by making it an ECMA standard, however since the OOXML fasco showed ECMA to be in their pocket, and the fact that standardization does not magically indemnify everyone, AND the fact that legally Mono is only allowable under Novell FOSS projects I wouldn't really treat .NET as an open standard.

      As for SQL Server, there's already a superior open source SQL implementation out there.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
  8. !change by should_be_linear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they still do all these "little things" like screwing Grub after Windows installation, something they can fix in one person/day. Not to mention "big" things, like document formats etc. I don't know what this guy is really talking about...

    --
    839*929
    1. Re:!change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an open source issue. They screw anything in the MBR, open source or otherwise.

    2. Re:!change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use EasyBCD to get Windows to play super-nice with Linux and BSD.... The Windows boot manager can do magic!

  9. as John gotti was to the garment district.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fauxking fiddles is to the softwar 'business'. ie; a threatening parasite with just one goal.

  10. Spiderman 4. by BlahSnarto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just hope he doesnt screw up Spiderman 4..

    Er... Wait..

    1. Re:Spiderman 4. by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this got modded down. Their names are strangely similar.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  11. Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The overall direction of the company is evil. They have done plenty of evil things. Balmer is still a patent troll. But Microsoft is a giant company win tons of divisions. And many of their employees are real, decent human beings. Not all Microsoft divisions agree with patent trolling, FUD, extinguishing open standards, etc. In fact I talked to a Microsoft employee who once said you have to realize this is a company that doesn't have the management or foresight to have the Exchange team directly tied to the Outlook team, because Exchange is a separate server product, where as Outlook is merely part of the Office team.

    I think a lot of people fail to notice that Microsoft is LESS EVIL than they were before. No doubt, guys like Sam Ramji played a part in that. For that, I am grateful.

    Kudos to you, sir.

    That being said, does his non-compete kick into effect since Ray Ozzie said Microsoft's future 100% lies with cloud computing, and Ramji is going to a competing cloud computing company? And do you want to run a start-up trying to compete with a multi-billion dollar behemoth that likes to crush competition?

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a lot of people fail to notice that Microsoft is LESS EVIL than they were before. No doubt, guys like Sam Ramji played a part in that. For that, I am grateful.

      How are they less evil? All they have done is simply went from ignoring OSS to attempting to embrace and extend it. All they have done is realize that OSS is in actual competition to their software and if they don't at least make improvements to their software, people will chose OSS over MS software.

      And do you want to run a start-up trying to compete with a multi-billion dollar behemoth that likes to crush competition?

      One way MS likes to crush competition is by buying them. When you get millions for your company for doing very little, I'd say its a success. Yeah, if your an employee things might not be as good, but if you are owning the company? Its a great thing and you get a pretty early retirement if you so choose.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      How are they less evil? All they have done is simply went from ignoring OSS to attempting to embrace and extend it.

      They've made patent pledges not to sue, allowing others to use their patented technologies for free. Old Microsoft would never have done that.

      The IE team has worked to better respect web standards. The IE team even sends open encouragement to Firefox, saying they welcome innovation and competition. I read an interview with an IE developer who said his daughter accused him of breaking the internet. Since IE 6, the IE devs have made several positive strides for far more compliant rendering.

      Microsoft is assisting the Mono developers, but again Mono owns all copyright on all the code, and the code is GPL. Microsoft is also assisting the same developers with Moonlight.

      When you load IE, it prompts you to choose a search engine. Firefox and other browsers simply give you a default with no choice.

      Microsoft has released a boat-load of technical documentation, enabling the Samba devs to reach 100% feature parity for better interoperability.

      Microsoft just released GPL code directly for the first time. It was Hyper-V drivers for Linux, which is self-serving, but it does benefit interoperability. It is possible in joint ventures like these to have a win-win. I'm fine with that.

      There are plenty of examples like this. It is entirely possible that Microsoft is only playing nice because the EU is demanding it. Or it could be that they honestly want to start playing nice. Either way, the result is that Microsoft is less evil than before.

      Is Ballmer still a patent troll? Yes. Is Microsoft brainwashing Best Buy employees with FUD? Yes. Was the OOXML fiasco illegal? Yes. (It is against US federal laws to bribe foreign officials). Was it illegal when Microsoft used bribes to block foreign Mandriva deals? Yes.

      But Microsoft is more open than they were before. They used to be 99% evil, and now they're more like 90% evil.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Cheesetrap · · Score: 1

      a multi-billion dollar behemoth that likes to crush competition

      To be more exact, they tend to half-kill things and then eat them.

      I'm a bit of a noob when it comes to comprehending licensing and related issues, but as far as I can tell Microsoft's biggest contribution to the Open Source / Free Software Movement has been the continued tendency to obscenely restrict and retard peoples' ability to use their computers and software as they see fit (I'm thinking primarily of 'premium content protection' in Vista onward), thus waking more and more people up to the alternatives (by motivating them to look elsewhere).

      Here's a link to an audio podcast of the article (actually starts at 5:52): Cost Analysis of Vista Content Protection by Peter Gutmann.
      And the source site (please don't try to download the PDFs, the useful info all appears to be on the HTML page and the site seems to be speed throttled): HERE.

    4. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Cheesetrap · · Score: 1

      Mirrored the PDF Here for anyone interested (though as I mentioned, the HTML page has the useful info). :)

    5. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They've made patent pledges not to sue, allowing others to use their patented technologies for free. Old Microsoft would never have done that."

      Oh you mean the cross patent deals, particularly the one with Novell which stated Novell's the only one authorized to actually use Mono? Or did you mean the unenforcible "community promise" PR, neither of which are exactly reassuring to those who know better than to blindly trust everything Microsoft says except for apparently people who buy all of Microsoft's PR? Microsoft has made promises before. Not one of them, no matter how altruistic they look, were upheld. It'll take more than a document on their website saying "we won't patent troll FOSS developers" to convince most FOSSies these days.

      "The IE team has worked to better respect web standards. The IE team even sends open encouragement to Firefox, saying they welcome innovation and competition. I read an interview with an IE developer who said his daughter accused him of breaking the internet. Since IE 6, the IE devs have made several positive strides for far more compliant rendering."

      Funny that, despite the IE team's best efforts that you claim they made, IE8 scored the absolute lowest of all web browsers in the Acid3 tests. They made lip service to standards and kept on doing what they've always been doing at best. As for the IE devs sending "encouragement" to Mozilla, that's just more PR. They'd clap happily if they could find a way to wipe the Mozilla foundation off the map like they did Netscape.

      "Microsoft is assisting the Mono developers, but again Mono owns all copyright on all the code, and the code is GPL. Microsoft is also assisting the same developers with Moonlight."

      Beware when Microsoft begins assisting your development. Everyone they've helped ended up with a knife in their back. And frankly I see Mono as nothing but a patent trap. Just because Microsoft "helped" the Mono developers doesn't mean they'll come after them later. And they likely will. The GPL is not going to protect us from them.

      "When you load IE, it prompts you to choose a search engine. Firefox and other browsers simply give you a default with no choice."

      Interesting, when I first open Firefox, it gives me a choice, Google being among them, but when I open IE for the first time, it immediately takes me to MSN without a word. Are you just pulling crap out of your ass now?

      "Microsoft has released a boat-load of technical documentation, enabling the Samba devs to reach 100% feature parity for better interoperability."

      With most their documentation still remaining secret, and the only reason they did this much was due to EU intervention, not out of the "goodness of their hearts."

      "Microsoft just released GPL code directly for the first time. It was Hyper-V drivers for Linux, which is self-serving, but it does benefit interoperability. It is possible in joint ventures like these to have a win-win. I'm fine with that."

      Did you even RESEARCH that point? The only reason they released them under the GPL was because someone caught them in the act of violating the GPL in the first place and was about to make it public. It had NOTHING to do with interoperability.

      "There are plenty of examples like this. It is entirely possible that Microsoft is only playing nice because the EU is demanding it. Or it could be that they honestly want to start playing nice. Either way, the result is that Microsoft is less evil than before."

      Microsoft IS only playing nice because the EU is demanding it, or they are pretending to lull gullible morons like you into thinking Microsoft is suddenly wanting to be helpful to FOSS. They're still evil, and their CodePlex and Mono work is merely an example of Microsoft trying to hook cgullible morons like you into thinking they are while also getting their IP hooks into as much FOSS as they can.

      "Is Ballmer still a patent troll? Yes. Is Microsoft brainwashing Best Buy employees with FUD? Yes. Wa

    6. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has made promises before. Not one of them, no matter how altruistic they look, were upheld

      Outright lie. Microsoft has made a number of patent pledges. The EU demanded they work on interoperability. Not only had Microsoft maintained these promises, but I'm not sure they can afford to break them in the future because of the EU. However, keep wearing that tin hat. I prefer to operate in reality.

      Funny that, despite the IE team's best efforts that you claim they made, IE8 scored the absolute lowest of all web browsers in the Acid3 tests.

      Another lie. IE6 can't handle the test at all. IE7 scores a 10/100. IE7 was an improvement on IE6, and IE8 scores higher than IE7. Firefox, Chrome, Safari, etc. are still MUCH MORE compliant, but it shows that the IE team has made progress on a more compliant browser. Again, this was a pledge they made, and honored despite your statement otherwise.

      And frankly I see Mono as nothing but a patent trap.

      Well, that is your paranoid opinion. The facts are that Microsoft made a patent pledge to protect Mono. Again, that pledge is part of the EU deal.

      Interesting, when I first open Firefox, it gives me a choice, Google being among them, but when I open IE for the first time, it immediately takes me to MSN without a word. Are you just pulling crap out of your ass now?

      Reading Comprehension 101 - I said search engine, not home page. Firefox defaults to a search engine without asking. IE asks you to pick one.

      Did you even RESEARCH that point? The only reason they released them under the GPL was because someone caught them in the act of violating the GPL in the first place and was about to make it public. It had NOTHING to do with interoperability.

      Again, a lie. Microsoft developed some code, which they had not released yet. They asked someone for advise. That person told them they had to license the code under the GPL to get it in the Linux kernel. Given that they hadn't released up to that point, there was no GPL violation. Had they modified GPL code, released a compiled version while denying access to the source code, or refusing to license it under the GPL, that would be a violation. Microsoft made no violation. They just didn't understand how the GPL worked initially, but did in fact comply.

      Did you even research the point?

      Apparently not. Fucking ACs. Grow a brain, and also grow a pair and post under your name.

      Microsoft IS only playing nice because the EU is demanding it, or they are pretending to lull gullible morons like you into thinking Microsoft is suddenly wanting to be helpful to FOSS.

      Or, perhaps the possibility exists that all these employees who spoke out against past Microsoft practices, said they don't believe in them, and wanted to move Microsoft in a more open direction. And note I didn't make a definitive statement, because we can't know peoples' motives for sure, but you pretend to know for sure. Wonderful assumptions on your part. You assume every Microsoft employee is a liar, and malevolent.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The IE team has worked to better respect web standards. The IE team even sends
      > open encouragement to Firefox, saying they welcome innovation and competition.

      They should welcome it, because there wouldn't *be* an IE team if it weren't for Firefox. Work on IE6 had been essentially halted for a while. Microsoft put the IE7 team together more or less from scratch *because* they were afraid that Firefox was going to take over completely.

      Other teams at Microsoft, such as the Office team for instance, might not care so much for competition. Microsoft makes money from selling new versions of Office and Windows, so there are going to be Office and Windows teams whether upper management thinks there's any viable competition or not.

      But IE is a free download. Microsoft doesn't make money when people upgrade to the new version of it, so there's no incentive to pay programmers to work on a new version, unless there's a competing product that's going to actively draw people away. The IE team *needs* competition. Without it, they'd all be reassigned to other teams, or else they'd just be out of a job.

      Let me know when the Office team starts sending the OOo people birthday cakes, or when the Windows kernel team sends one to the Linus.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    8. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by steelfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft management, starting with Bill Gates, has always been evil. Gates is an evil genius, if there ever was one. And part of his genius is looking good to the public eye despite all the crap he's pulled.

      Sure, he's done a lot of good things, like consolidate the IBM PC industry into one platform, resulting in the rise of the computing age. And he's not nearly as evil as Jobs. But that's like saying, without WWII, the American industrial complex would've never developed, and Stalin is worse than Hitler (yes, I know I just Godwinned the thread), but that doesn't invalidate the fact that he's one evil bastard.

      Ballmer is more of an oaf. He's Bill Gates' lackey, and not much more. He's competent, but hardly the genius that Gates was. Microsoft's current situation reflects this, and this is not necessarily a bad thing. After all, there's really little need for them to pull their old stunts, now that they're the 800lb gorilla in the IBM PC market. Remember that the last time Gates tried to play hardball, they got hit with an antitrust lawsuit. So it's probably a good thing for them.

      But don't think that anything's actually changed. Management is still management. Employees may be human, but the officers and upper management are nothing short of sociopaths. And if they are threatened, they'll bust out their old play book and go right back to their old tactics, especially if they know they can get away with it.

      Some companies are inherently good. Their founding principle is to primarily benefit society, while making a whole lot of money along the way. These companies do a lot of good things for society, improving it, forming a bond of trust between them and the people who use their products. Google is trying to be this kind of company, and I'd say they're pretty successful. Microsoft is not one of them. At best, they're dormant right now.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    9. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And many of their employees are real, decent human beings."

      [Citation needed]

      If you were a "real, decent human being" would you have chosen to work there?

      Even if we went Godwin, and assumed there may have been a nice person or two working for Hitler, well, they were forced to.

      But who is forced to work for a particular corporation? Did Washington State impose slavery when we weren't looking?

    10. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

      You assume every Microsoft employee is a liar, and malevolent.

      And in what way is that wrong? ... OK, maybe most of them are simply greedy and venal, not malevolent. On the other hand, venal can screw you just as badly as malevolent. If MS-employees seem to be truthful, it would be a safe bet that something important has been warped and perverted, or left out altogether. That may not be malevolent either, for some people, like sociopaths, the truth is whatever they want it to be. Malevolent? Maybe, mabe not, Venal? Unquestionably. Truthful? I'd not bet my life on it. Feel free to bet yours on it.

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    11. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is basically an engineering company headed by marketing and sales types (i.e. Ballmer). I think it's pretty much to be expected that they've turned out the way they did.

      I'm sure most of the actual MS engineers aren't too happy with the business decisions that the higher-ups make.

    12. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Very good point.

      Tangentially here, people often wonder why Microsoft would spend money developing IE as a free product. IE is free, but it generates revenue in that it encourages developers to develop on other Microsoft platforms like ASP, ActiveX and IIS.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    13. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      If you think the core evil of Microsoft is Gates, then Microsoft should be less evil since Gates isn't in charge of day-to-day operations anymore.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    14. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what part of MS's "patent pledge" concerning Mono is legally binding? None of it.

      Just how much trust do you place in the non-legally-binding word of someone who has lied to you repeatedly over a period of decades?

      It seems you place a lot of trust in known liars, and I call that stupid.

    15. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is that Bill Hilf is still there and continuing the work that he started. I met him many years ago and he gets a large platefull of bullshit from forums like this but he is the one who turned microsoft around. i'm glad he is still there.

    16. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be joking. That article was thoroughly discredited a long time ago.

      Read.

    17. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The patent pledge is binding in that it is considered part of the EU deal. The EU has dropped the hammer on them twice, and said if they don't comply, they will drop the hammer again.

      It is legally binding.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    18. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Trogre · · Score: 0

      Really? Ray Ozzie said that?

      That's great news, and here's why: Given that Cloud Computing is a hype bubble waiting to burst, we can only hope Microsoft gets fully on board before this happens. Then the rest of us can watch from afar as they implode.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    19. Re:Not ever Microsoft employee is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've made patent pledges not to sue, allowing others to use their patented technologies for free. Old Microsoft would never have done that.

      Yet, they have also recently sued TomTom for patent violation.

      The IE team has worked to better respect web standards. The IE team even sends open encouragement to Firefox, saying they welcome innovation and competition. I read an interview with an IE developer who said his daughter accused him of breaking the internet. Since IE 6, the IE devs have made several positive strides for far more compliant rendering.

      They were essentially forced into improving IE because of the competition (particularly Firefox).

      Microsoft is assisting the Mono developers, but again Mono owns all copyright on all the code, and the code is GPL. Microsoft is also assisting the same developers with Moonlight.

      If Microsoft really cared to help with this they'd let the Mono devs port their .Net/Sliverlight code. I think the reasons they are doing this is because of the deal with Novell and to give them good PR, but this way it still leaves many .Net and Silverlight apps as not being usable under Linux and they can say it's not their fault since they aren't porting it themselves.

      Microsoft has released a boat-load of technical documentation, enabling the Samba devs to reach 100% feature parity for better interoperability.

      I'm pretty sure this is the result of the EU anti-trust action, rather than what they wanted to do.

      If you want to argue that MS is more open, you may have a case, but primarily because MS have realised it is better PR if they appear to be more open. But I don't think they are any less evil than they always have been, and I don't think that will change while Ballmer is in charge.

  12. Just like the US in Vietnam... by riffzifnab · · Score: 0, Troll

    Declare victory and get out.

    1. Re:Just like the US in Vietnam... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Would you prefer it to be like the US in Germany or Japan -- declare victory then stay forever at the behest of a puppet government? ... wait, what are we talking about again?

    2. Re:Just like the US in Vietnam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than the US in Iraq -- declare a draw, give up and go home.

    3. Re:Just like the US in Vietnam... by turing_m · · Score: 1

      LOL... So true.

      But here, who is leaving whom? AFAIK, Ramji left Microsoft. But I would think that Microsoft fits the mold of the US much more so than Linux - Microsoft being a very well funded, top-down, conventional type force and FOSS being an underfunded but extremely resourceful, often ideologically motivated and relentless opponent with whom fighting resembles playing a game of whack a mole. And if we cast the role of FOSS as Viet Nam, also receiving some funding from other large conventional powers (e.g. IBM), and has the public onside.

      But perhaps the domino theory does apply more to MS than to Viet Nam. If MS didn't fight Linux, I wonder what the installed base of Linux would be today. e.g. "Here! We'll document all our proprietary protocols so you can build a nice competitor for exchange, samba etc., we'll end the Microsoft tax, we'll let you have the netbook market and while we're at it we'll make ODF the standard save option in Office."

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    4. Re:Just like the US in Vietnam... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Strangely, Donald Trump made that exact same quote word for word when interviewed about solutions for Iraq.

  13. I feel like I'm in a time warp here by coryking · · Score: 1

    It is like I stepped into a time warp or something. The exact location on the hard disk holding the timestamp field for your comment must have been hit by some neutrino or something and fiddled the bits so instead of "Sept. 12, 1997" it read "Sept 12, 2009".

    I mean seriously, comment is *ancient*. It is like those hippies on Height and Ashbury who are still all dressed up for the 1960's--same signs, same slogans, same everything. Like they are trapped in time.

    All they have done is simply went from ignoring OSS to attempting to embrace and extend it.

    Move on man. Update your slogans and chants. Embrace and Extend was awesome for its time... back in 1998. It is 2009. The world has moved on. Reading your post fills me with sadness and pity. Find something else to protest or at least come up with pithy new lines. ... PS: You should be ever so thankful that the neutrino didn't flip the bit so it was "Feb 31, 2009" or "00-00-0000" because those perfectly valid MySQL dates aren't so valid in the real world :-)

    1. Re:I feel like I'm in a time warp here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove they're not just doing embrace, extend, extinguish. Microsoft has too much of a history of this madness for us to outright trust them without something more substantial to back up their claim.

      Sorry, but I'm not about to blindly think Microsoft's suddenly not threatening FOSS anymore. The Halloween Documents (Which spanned a great deal of time.) made their stance quite clear.

  14. Also JQuery by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

    Don't forget their involvement with JQuery.

  15. Might I suggest by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In recognition for his outstanding achievements in bridging the gap between FOSS and Microsoft, let me suggest Miguel de Icaza. I doubt there's another human who's done more to embrace Microsoft patented technologies and extend them into popular Linux distributions. With his advocacy on OOXML, his dedicated efforts on Mono and Moonlight he's proven himself a capable mimic who can transform Free and Open Source Software from the type of innovative cauldron that gave us our current rich selection into a uniform platform that consistently replicates Microsoft, only perpetually two years behind.

    They should get him - if only they have what it takes to lure him away from Novell.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Might I suggest by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but de Icaza could go work for Microsoft, his lifelong dream.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
    2. Re:Might I suggest by Blice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Head of Gnome, right? Lead developer in bringing Microsoft .NET to Gnome, worked in Novell as vice president of development (which is partnered by Microsoft) and now is a director for Codeplex, Microsoft's new opensource foundation.

      If that isn't unsettling enough, he's a /b/tard. Look at this post from his twitter:

      "That last picture from @abock is photoshopped. I can tell because of the pixels and having seen a lot of shops' myself."

      holy shit

      I just think this guy is a massive troll. I can just picture him doing all this Microsoft shit with a troll face.

      The entire development cycle of Gnome suddenly makes sense to me now.

      Gnome developers: Look at all this cool stuff we can do for Gnome!!! We'll be way more awesome than Microsoft now with this stuff!
      Miguel de Icaza: No. I want to keep Gnome stable and unimproving. *trollface*
      Miguel de Icaza: But lets go ahead and bring .NET to Gnome. *trollface*

      Another gem:
      http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Sep-10.html

      "I hope that I can last more on this foundation than I lasted at the FSF, where I was removed by RMS after refusing to be an active part of the campaign to rename Linux as GNU/Linux."

    3. Re:Might I suggest by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Miguel has enough money and lots more power ru[i|n]ning GNOME than he would as Microsoft's poster child.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. You forgot one... by ichbineinneuben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You forgot to add corrupting an international standards body...

    1. Re:You forgot one... by minsk · · Score: 1

      I'm a cynic. Figure we just never noticed before.

  17. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I visited Microsoft and listened to spiels from their open source group, Sam Ramji was the only one with a clue. This is Microsoft's loss.

  18. -1, Obvious Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does the above post do anything but spew outright bullshit?

  19. All about the $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most companies attract talent with grants of restricted stock which matures to unrestricted shares over the course of about 39 months. He made his money its time to move on. The rumors blowing in the winds of Redmond indicate that there will be considerable organizational changes announced before this thread scrolls off the 'Older Stuff' page. I am guessing many golden parachutes will deploy in the coming weeks.

  20. What's up with the summary? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    I am amazed at the changes that have occurred for the company, for the team I belonged to, and the sentiments of the industry.'. It's a statement which, 46 months ago, few Slashdotters would have thought could come true!

    So, the point is that nothing changed?

    With Sam leaving, can Microsoft's positive momentum into open source continue successfully?

    What are you smoking?

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  21. Re:My turn!!!! by porl · · Score: 1

    My turn!!!! -1 Flamebait.....

  22. Reality show... by marciot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But you have to admit, it would make for an awesome reality show.

  23. WIRED: Linus hired by M$ ;-) by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    Seriously ;-) still a great read: The Microsoft Memo

  24. Re:My turn!!!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    No Schnoogs. You're just a jackass. I wonder if you are same 'Schnoogs' who has been banned from gaming forums (like this one) for similar asinine behavior?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  25. Re:My turn!!!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Do you know why you consistently get modded down? It's not for the content of your posts; as there are other people who pose the same or similar opinions who regularly get modded +1. It's because of the combative, insulting, and generally petulant nature of your posts.

    There are those who read all of your posts and start down-modding them just because they get tired of reading your misdirected rage. I would recommend that you stop posting on /. (since, as you have so often mentioned, we are all morons anyway), or start articulating your opinions without attacking those that disagree.

    We are not your enemy.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  26. Re:My turn!!!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    you have no idea what you're talking about

    That much is obvious.

    I rarely post here

    If 'rarely' is defined by you as nearly daily and often several times a day, then I guess I agree.

    When I do it's most often in articles where I share anecdotes as opposed to jokes.

    Again, I do not know what you are calling an 'anecdote', but I have read through all your posts and cannot find a single one. Mostly just you saying something like 'HAHAHA You are teh moron and I love Sony and you are such a loser!!!!'. Can you provide a link to a post you have made proving me wrong here?

    I've been modded down for...

    There is no grand conspiracy here. You are not being modded down for speaking out against the consensus. I lot of other people do that are not modded down. It's is only your apparent inability to disagree without being a total jerk that gets you modded down.

    Noone wants to have the boat rocked so to speak so the easiest way to deal with that is to silence people like myself

    Buddy, you are not being silenced. You are not being oppressed. You are just being a dick.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  27. Re:My turn!!!! by Itninja · · Score: 1

    That's why I said: "Can you provide a link to a post you have made proving me wrong here?". Of you course you did not. Because you could not. Because there are none.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.