Trump won the primary because it was good for liberal media to have an opponent they could demonize. Now that he has, public opinion of him will undoubtedly shift more negative.
You sound like a kid demanding money from his parents with a bunch of "necessities" with inflated dollar amounts in order to extract as much money as possible from them. The government isn't your mommy and daddy. I don't love you as the special little snowflake like your parents do. You don't get to buy designer jeans and live in your own apartment without flatmates so you can bring chicks home on my dime. Fucking ingrate
How about everyone who wants basic income all get together and make it happen? There is nothing stopping you all from pooling your money together, and letting the ones that don't want to work live off the humongous surplus of cash your system is bound to create. I mean if basic income is feasible, that is.
You're being passive aggressive. You didn't just scribble that "evidence" randomly on a wall. You responded to a thread about whether it was justified to throw a man in jail indefinitely without a trial, and heck without even being charged! You even stated the evidence was "compelling"... Compelling in deciding, if not guilt, than what?
The only reason that would matter is if you are, as I stated, presuming him guilty before a being convicted in a court of law. If not, then it would be irrevelant, and hence not valuable to the discussion. Right or wrong?
Well, you basically regurgitated part of the article, which amounts to just what the prosecution said. What importance is this, especially considering he wasn't even charged with anything? If you don't have an opinion, then why point out such one-sided information?
If so, since obviously no one is going to take a minimum wage job, then the minimum hourly wage anyone will work for would be greater, right?
So that means, effectively, you could sit on your ass and get something, or get a job to earn more, right?
So effectively, how is it different from the current welfare system? Either don't work, and get money (from welfare or basic income), or do and lose the welfare, but earn more?
Think about the figures you just threw out. 10k for every person in the usa. 300 million people = a 3.19 trillion dollar program. The entire tax revenue of 2014 is less than that!
A single master root password that is used to derive all other passwords that you need. You can put it on an android device that isn't connected to the internet, and go from there.
Since it's stateless, it doesn't matter if the device you use is destroyed. And as long as you remember this one password, you will be able to derive all the rest.
So the solution to a terrorist blowing up a bunch of innocents is to blow up more innocents? Why don't we respond that way to the terrorist attacks today, then? Should we have blown up the tower of Dubai in response to 9/11?
Trump won the primary because it was good for liberal media to have an opponent they could demonize. Now that he has, public opinion of him will undoubtedly shift more negative.
What is this "studio.h" file you speak of? A header file for landlords?
You can tell how big a problem this is by the lack of television programs aimed at women.
Surly given the time and cost involved ...
Yep, definitely, Joe Six Pack is going to be surly after you've tried to teach him all that...
You sound like a kid demanding money from his parents with a bunch of "necessities" with inflated dollar amounts in order to extract as much money as possible from them. The government isn't your mommy and daddy. I don't love you as the special little snowflake like your parents do. You don't get to buy designer jeans and live in your own apartment without flatmates so you can bring chicks home on my dime. Fucking ingrate
You're advocating systemic theft and I'm the asshole?
How about everyone who wants basic income all get together and make it happen? There is nothing stopping you all from pooling your money together, and letting the ones that don't want to work live off the humongous surplus of cash your system is bound to create. I mean if basic income is feasible, that is.
So, now not only need to keep track of and charge a phone and a watch, but also jave to remember to charge a ring as well?
Don't cry into your keyboard, you'll short it out that way
You're being passive aggressive. You didn't just scribble that "evidence" randomly on a wall. You responded to a thread about whether it was justified to throw a man in jail indefinitely without a trial, and heck without even being charged! You even stated the evidence was "compelling"... Compelling in deciding, if not guilt, than what?
The only reason that would matter is if you are, as I stated, presuming him guilty before a being convicted in a court of law. If not, then it would be irrevelant, and hence not valuable to the discussion. Right or wrong?
Well, you basically regurgitated part of the article, which amounts to just what the prosecution said. What importance is this, especially considering he wasn't even charged with anything? If you don't have an opinion, then why point out such one-sided information?
So, tl;dr is it's ok to presume him guilty without a conviction because he probably did it anyway. And you don't see a problem with this?
Dusting off old history books to try to predict the outcome of the invention of strong AI and robots is ludicrous!
Do you have a mental block that you shit?
If so, since obviously no one is going to take a minimum wage job, then the minimum hourly wage anyone will work for would be greater, right? So that means, effectively, you could sit on your ass and get something, or get a job to earn more, right? So effectively, how is it different from the current welfare system? Either don't work, and get money (from welfare or basic income), or do and lose the welfare, but earn more?
What do you think people create after stuffing their maw all day?
Think about the figures you just threw out. 10k for every person in the usa. 300 million people = a 3.19 trillion dollar program. The entire tax revenue of 2014 is less than that!
Unfortunately, you are taxed for renouncing your citizenship, too.
They've dissuaded *countless* terrorists. Countless, as in, we can't count them because we made them up and you have no proof they don't exist
You are overestimating the perceived estimation by the establishment of the intelligence of the average voter.
Check out Master Password:
https://github.com/Lyndir/MasterPassword
A single master root password that is used to derive all other passwords that you need. You can put it on an android device that isn't connected to the internet, and go from there.
Since it's stateless, it doesn't matter if the device you use is destroyed. And as long as you remember this one password, you will be able to derive all the rest.
Wow, a new way to make purchases, restaurant reservations, and travel bookings! Truly, the new beginning.
So the solution to a terrorist blowing up a bunch of innocents is to blow up more innocents? Why don't we respond that way to the terrorist attacks today, then? Should we have blown up the tower of Dubai in response to 9/11?
Because Rube Goldberg wouldn't be satisfied