The article isn't about the Internet getting owned, it is about government agencies
I never said 'the internet getting owned', but rather people. The same people who would be involved in any decision made, be it in a city council office or over the internet. You know...regular people.
The fact that you're proposing to run the world's business and decisions over the Internet, in reply to an article about people and computers on the Internet getting pwned via botnet, is especially funny.
If I'm arrested (not convicted, nor even charged), you don't get to perform a random search on my house without my consent. Why is a small, handheld electronic device any different?
Just because it happens to be able to make phone calls?
Don't you have to prove your innocence in military trials? No presumption of innocence? That's my understanding, anyway.
Your understanding is quite wrong.
You could read it for yourself. But I'll enlighten you a little Manual for Courts Martial 2008 (PDF and.mil warning) p. 461
851. Atr 51. Votings and ruling
(c) Before a vote is taken on the findings, the military judge or the president of a court-martial without a military judge shall, in the presence of the accused and counsel, instruct the members of the court as to the elements of the offense and charge them---
(1) that the accused must be presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by legal and competent evidence beyond reasonable doubt; (2) that in the case being considered, if there is reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused, the doubt must be resolved in favor of the accused and he must be acquitted;
(IANAML - emphasis mine)
What jury? Manning is in military jail. Military trials don't work anywhere near the same way as civilian ones do.
And it is quite clear you have zero clue. Yes, they are different. And quite often there is a 'panel' (consisting of officer and/or enlisted members), which is equivalent to a civilian jury. And if by 'barbaric' you mean an automatic appeal process in serious cases, well then go with that.
They're not trying to protect anyone: they reveal everything and let the consequences be responsible for themselves.
On their terms and their timetable. They most definitely have not 'released everything'.
Also, Wired releasing this supposed info could influence an eventual jury (one way or the other).
Put up a 6' (2 m) privacy fence. Now some dude walks by with a camera on a 12' (4 m) pole and takes pics of your front yard, and posts them online. Still fair game?
Take a look at the google street view cars. That camera is pretty high up.
Even ignoring the fact that the woman's underwear was apparently visible from the street in the first place....
That's not necessarily true. The cameras on a Google van are much higher than the average person. What is visible from the cam truck is much more than what is visible from standing in the street or on the sidewalk.
global standards for policing the internet Otherwise known as least common denominator. Say what you want about the US, but do you really want China and Saudi Arabia defining global internet standards?
How can an encyclopedia taint a verdict? Isn't it the task of a court to understand the vocabulary used in a trial?
The definition of 'rape' in a Wikipedia article may not be the same as what is on the Florida books. And they had been instructed, as is usual, not to do any research on their own.
Not to go OT, I was trying to find where I can chop the upper and lower black portions of 4:3 video footage for a true 16:9, all the sites I found are bankrupt forums describing using the crop mode in Adobe Premeire (which doesn't work) or useless answer such as "google for instruction manual" (there is none).
Here Put in 'crop 4:3' in the search bar. Have fun.
Cox Cable also has a (unadvertised) bandwidth meter. Currently, I get "We're sorry. Your bandwidth information is unavailable at this time. Please try again later."
as it happened that very day to when they forced the fourth plane to crash.
While we will probably never know, I don't think/believe they forced it to crash, but in the fight for control of the cockpit, no one was in positive control of the craft and so it crashed.
1.5 yrs until people will not be using Blender, Flash Pro, Visual Studio,
You are an anomoly. 'People' don't create, they consume.
or want to engage in some high-end 3D FPSers?
iPad v4.0, Wii/xBox/Playstation.
What about the 720p files I shoot on my phone? Store my digitized photo albums, or keep a backup of all the individual songs I bought in case my iPod battery dies?
Somewhere in the cloud, or the central house NAS.
Having said that, I agree. My PCs won't be going anywhere anytime soon. But for a lot of people, their little portable device works just fine.
Slashdot Mirror
The key to a Chevy Charger
A what?
I'm all for funding a project to put something on the mood.
May I suggest some Bolero? Or maybe Luther Vandross.
The article isn't about the Internet getting owned, it is about government agencies
I never said 'the internet getting owned', but rather people. The same people who would be involved in any decision made, be it in a city council office or over the internet. You know...regular people.
The fact that you're proposing to run the world's business and decisions over the Internet, in reply to an article about people and computers on the Internet getting pwned via botnet, is especially funny.
By insufficient data, I mean there is no word in any human language that would express the value of "No" strongly enough.
If I'm arrested (not convicted, nor even charged), you don't get to perform a random search on my house without my consent. Why is a small, handheld electronic device any different?
Just because it happens to be able to make phone calls?
Like if you are not going to take off right away, why put us on board, fucktards.
Because they need that gate space for the next load of unfortunates.
Don't you have to prove your innocence in military trials? No presumption of innocence? That's my understanding, anyway.
.mil warning)
Your understanding is quite wrong.
You could read it for yourself. But I'll enlighten you a little
Manual for Courts Martial 2008 (PDF and
p. 461
851. Atr 51. Votings and ruling
(c) Before a vote is taken on the findings, the military judge or the president of a court-martial without a military judge shall, in the presence of the accused and counsel, instruct the members of the court as to the elements of the offense and charge them---
(1) that the accused must be presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by legal and competent evidence beyond reasonable doubt;
(2) that in the case being considered, if there is reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused, the doubt must be resolved in favor of the accused and he must be acquitted;
(IANAML - emphasis mine)
Theories are frequently wrong.
What jury? Manning is in military jail. Military trials don't work anywhere near the same way as civilian ones do.
And it is quite clear you have zero clue. Yes, they are different. And quite often there is a 'panel' (consisting of officer and/or enlisted members), which is equivalent to a civilian jury. And if by 'barbaric' you mean an automatic appeal process in serious cases, well then go with that.
Charo has a couple of appreciable talents.
They're not trying to protect anyone: they reveal everything and let the consequences be responsible for themselves.
On their terms and their timetable. They most definitely have not 'released everything'.
Also, Wired releasing this supposed info could influence an eventual jury (one way or the other).
"Windows has found unknown hardware and is installing the software for it."
wait...what? If you don't know what it is, what SW are you installing?
Put up a 6' (2 m) privacy fence. Now some dude walks by with a camera on a 12' (4 m) pole and takes pics of your front yard, and posts them online.
Still fair game?
Take a look at the google street view cars. That camera is pretty high up.
Even ignoring the fact that the woman's underwear was apparently visible from the street in the first place ....
That's not necessarily true. The cameras on a Google van are much higher than the average person. What is visible from the cam truck is much more than what is visible from standing in the street or on the sidewalk.
If this guy manages to successfully breed then Darwin might have been wrong but I think it also would weigh against "intelligent design".
This fool will outbreed you. And make you pay for it.
global standards for policing the internet
Otherwise known as least common denominator. Say what you want about the US, but do you really want China and Saudi Arabia defining global internet standards?
I'm guessing a dictionary would be okay?
A dictionary does not go into the definition of 'rape' or 'rape trauma' as it exists in Florida law.
How can an encyclopedia taint a verdict? Isn't it the task of a court to understand the vocabulary used in a trial?
The definition of 'rape' in a Wikipedia article may not be the same as what is on the Florida books. And they had been instructed, as is usual, not to do any research on their own.
Possibly a dumb question, but is information published in the NYT still 'classified'?
Publishing in the NYT or anywhere else does not automagically 'unclassify' it.
Not to go OT, I was trying to find where I can chop the upper and lower black portions of 4:3 video footage for a true 16:9, all the sites I found are bankrupt forums describing using the crop mode in Adobe Premeire (which doesn't work) or useless answer such as "google for instruction manual" (there is none).
Here Put in 'crop 4:3' in the search bar. Have fun.
Cox Cable also has a (unadvertised) bandwidth meter. Currently, I get "We're sorry. Your bandwidth information is unavailable at this time. Please try again later."
Unfindable, unknown, or broken....fail.
Mildred can probably get a low use, local only line if she wishes. Billed per call.
as it happened that very day to when they forced the fourth plane to crash.
While we will probably never know, I don't think/believe they forced it to crash, but in the fight for control of the cockpit, no one was in positive control of the craft and so it crashed.
1.5 yrs until people will not be using Blender, Flash Pro, Visual Studio,
You are an anomoly. 'People' don't create, they consume.
or want to engage in some high-end 3D FPSers?
iPad v4.0, Wii/xBox/Playstation.
What about the 720p files I shoot on my phone? Store my digitized photo albums, or keep a backup of all the individual songs I bought in case my iPod battery dies?
Somewhere in the cloud, or the central house NAS.
Having said that, I agree. My PCs won't be going anywhere anytime soon. But for a lot of people, their little portable device works just fine.