There can be lots of reasons an electric commuter car isn't an option. Range would be a primary one, access to charging is another and I'm sure there are many other reasons. Cost is why I don't have one.
They're going to stick it to you anyway. If you don't take every opportunity to get all of it back you can you are just a sucker. It's the way the system is designed.
NATO purchased F-16s. That was the big market they were designed for. It was designed to be cheap and incorporated a lot of what we learned from the Mig in Vietnam. As an export fighter it was great. It can't hold a candle to the F-15 though which with 2 engines has a great safety record and ruled the skies during it's heyday. I really think though that the future is aircraft like the X-47B.
They've been trying to replace the B-52 for decades and it's still the best they have. Maybe they should just make a modern version? I can't believe corrosion isn't more of a problem with them.
That's pretty much the same sentiment they had just before the Vietnam war. And then took a big bloody nose from the inferior Migs. The worst thing about the F-35 though is it's a single engine fighter. In war redundancy is everything. When the engine on the 35 gets damaged the only option is to pull the ejection handle and hope for the best. That's a hell of an expensive lawn dart. If you want to see an example of how bad it can be just look at the F-16. It's nickname IS lawn dart. When the F-15 loses an engine they turn around and go back to base. That's how you live to fight another day. After the debacle with the F-22 and the F-105 I can't believe they bought another single engine fighter.
That's part of the problem. The money never makes it to the classroom. I can't believe the overhead nowadays. The teacher/student ratio is about 32 to 1 which is too high but somehow the office staff has more than quadrupled in the typical school. This is despite the fact that when I attended they used typewriters instead of word processors. We got by with a principal while now they have 3 assistants. They've quadrupled the number of counselors as well and added all kinds of staff positions. This is fine if you have the money for it but books and supplies and teachers should come first. As with most things government related the tail wags the dog.
Where I live the per capita spending on students has risen over the years far ahead of inflation. The results have remained largely unchanged. Money is important but a lot can be done cheaply if you have good management. Without support from a solid family structure money will make little difference. One thing I am glad to see is schools serving breakfast now. For far too many children the only meals they get are at school. Libertarian though I may be free food for children is an exception I make. It's horrible that children in this country go hungry. I don't know what the solution to America's education problems are. I know we've had numerous Governors in my state attack the problem with money and it's accomplished zilch.
The basics are largely the same. Math, English and Science are key the rest of the tripe they waste time on I could do without as well. Still I remember there were 500 students in my child's elementary school and the PTA meetings were lucky to have 40 people in attendance.
I went to school to speak with my daughter's teacher when she was in the third grade and struggling. We discussed her situation at length for about 30 minutes and covered a lot of possible actions to help her improve. At the end of that time her teacher thanked me profusely for coming to the meeting. I was rather surprised and stated that I was thankful to her for her time and help and would not have dreamed of failing to come. She then told me that over the past week she had scheduled 7 meetings with parents and I was the only one to actually show up. Parents are the biggest shortcoming in the education of children today. If parents do not get involved then no amount of money spent on education will accomplish much. When I was a child my parents involvement consisted of beating my ass when I had problems at school. This method, while crude, was effective. It would have been much better if they had taken the time to do more but what they did do was better than the apathy so many parents exhibit towards their children's education.
From South Carolina's point of view it was ridding their territory of an occupying force. Once they seceded they felt that it was time for the US army to leave. Failing a voluntary departure they forced one.
It's what everyone does. The Cherokee Indians in Georgia got screwed unbelievably. More civilized than their white neighbors they had the bad luck to have gold discovered on their land. Off to Oklahoma on the trail of tears. No one gave them anything. US history is filled with such stories. What's done is done and there is no way to fix it now without even bigger injustices. Eventually you have to move on.
I will say that when the Southern States seceded from the union it was technically not treason. At the time there was no provision against secession. That's basically what the war ended up being about. Slavery was a key reason for the war but far from the only one as it's painted in today's revisionist history. In all reality the rich bastards that drug the South into the war were responsible for slavery ending at least 2 or 3 decades earlier than it would have otherwise. The one good thing to result from the war was the end of slavery. Sadly so much else was lost. They set the stage for the monstrous bastardization that is today's Federal government.
I'm guessing that they're going to try it by the rules for 3 years and see how it works. If, as I suspect, they make a killing they'll decide it was a good decision. If they don't make the money they'd like it'll be "we tried."
A bunch of big banks isn't everything. Banks don't share the wealth when they're swimming in money. Why should we bail them out of their fuck ups when their greed causes them to go tits up? They continued handing out huge bonus checks to executives right on through the bailouts. I could vomit. Thousands upon thousands of houses empty and the only people that got hurt were the people on the bottom. The fuckers that caused the entire problem were shielded from their bad decisions. That's wrong, pure and simple. The surest sign it was wrong was the bipartisanship of the entire thing. Any time both sides of the farce that is the American Political system band together you can be sure the American people are going to get fucked over.
Man....how about letting me use your car for a month. I don't have one and obviously you have more money than me because you have a car. You will get it back in a month and still have your asset and your money.
You think all property owners are Republican? Besides that obvious idiotic statement there is a bigger problem. Land owners can ask for whatever rent they want but that doesn't mean they'll get it. Why would I rent a house for 1500 dollars if I can find one like it for 1100? They have to rent for what the market will bear unless they want it to stay vacant.
And that's the wrench in the cogs of a free market. When you prop up companies and banks that "are too big to fail" it's not really a free market. If the dickheads would have let the banks collapse like they were supposed to then after a few years of pain everything would have corrected. Instead they propped the losers up and kept all that wealth from spreading back out. Why did GM get to survive as a reward for fucking up for the last two decades while Ford, who had their shit at least partially together basically gets to compete now with a government subsidized corporation? For a free market to be free companies have to be free to fail.
That's how a free market works. They rent places for what the market will bear. If people want to buy it's not hard, there are plenty of places to buy. In fact, it's much cheaper to buy than rent because the market for buyers is much better than renters. Lots of places for sale compared to qualified buyers. Renting is very lucrative if you have the disposable income to enable you to acquire property.
Yes. But the people to get mad with wouldn't be the French but the people responsible for making sure the office isn't bugged. You can bet the French and everyone else with the capability will try to bug the oval office. I'd be shocked if they weren't. Hell....it may be bugged. That's what spies do.
Always boring to read the bullshit of trolls pathetically trying to annoy people. If buggy hardware causing problems seems like mental gymnastics to you it's because you're mentally crippled.
Slashdot Mirror
There can be lots of reasons an electric commuter car isn't an option. Range would be a primary one, access to charging is another and I'm sure there are many other reasons. Cost is why I don't have one.
They're going to stick it to you anyway. If you don't take every opportunity to get all of it back you can you are just a sucker. It's the way the system is designed.
When they get there I'll happily buy one.
Music is not free! Someone stole this music and should be locked up as a thief. All music belongs to members of the RIAA.
NATO purchased F-16s. That was the big market they were designed for. It was designed to be cheap and incorporated a lot of what we learned from the Mig in Vietnam. As an export fighter it was great. It can't hold a candle to the F-15 though which with 2 engines has a great safety record and ruled the skies during it's heyday. I really think though that the future is aircraft like the X-47B.
They've been trying to replace the B-52 for decades and it's still the best they have. Maybe they should just make a modern version? I can't believe corrosion isn't more of a problem with them.
It depends. If you can pay for the Mazda 3 with taxpayers money then hell yes!
That's pretty much the same sentiment they had just before the Vietnam war. And then took a big bloody nose from the inferior Migs. The worst thing about the F-35 though is it's a single engine fighter. In war redundancy is everything. When the engine on the 35 gets damaged the only option is to pull the ejection handle and hope for the best. That's a hell of an expensive lawn dart. If you want to see an example of how bad it can be just look at the F-16. It's nickname IS lawn dart. When the F-15 loses an engine they turn around and go back to base. That's how you live to fight another day. After the debacle with the F-22 and the F-105 I can't believe they bought another single engine fighter.
That's part of the problem. The money never makes it to the classroom. I can't believe the overhead nowadays. The teacher/student ratio is about 32 to 1 which is too high but somehow the office staff has more than quadrupled in the typical school. This is despite the fact that when I attended they used typewriters instead of word processors. We got by with a principal while now they have 3 assistants. They've quadrupled the number of counselors as well and added all kinds of staff positions. This is fine if you have the money for it but books and supplies and teachers should come first. As with most things government related the tail wags the dog.
I like Apple propaganda. It's much better than that awful Windoze propaganda.
Where I live the per capita spending on students has risen over the years far ahead of inflation. The results have remained largely unchanged. Money is important but a lot can be done cheaply if you have good management. Without support from a solid family structure money will make little difference. One thing I am glad to see is schools serving breakfast now. For far too many children the only meals they get are at school. Libertarian though I may be free food for children is an exception I make. It's horrible that children in this country go hungry. I don't know what the solution to America's education problems are. I know we've had numerous Governors in my state attack the problem with money and it's accomplished zilch.
The basics are largely the same. Math, English and Science are key the rest of the tripe they waste time on I could do without as well. Still I remember there were 500 students in my child's elementary school and the PTA meetings were lucky to have 40 people in attendance.
I went to school to speak with my daughter's teacher when she was in the third grade and struggling. We discussed her situation at length for about 30 minutes and covered a lot of possible actions to help her improve. At the end of that time her teacher thanked me profusely for coming to the meeting. I was rather surprised and stated that I was thankful to her for her time and help and would not have dreamed of failing to come. She then told me that over the past week she had scheduled 7 meetings with parents and I was the only one to actually show up. Parents are the biggest shortcoming in the education of children today. If parents do not get involved then no amount of money spent on education will accomplish much. When I was a child my parents involvement consisted of beating my ass when I had problems at school. This method, while crude, was effective. It would have been much better if they had taken the time to do more but what they did do was better than the apathy so many parents exhibit towards their children's education.
From South Carolina's point of view it was ridding their territory of an occupying force. Once they seceded they felt that it was time for the US army to leave. Failing a voluntary departure they forced one.
It's what everyone does. The Cherokee Indians in Georgia got screwed unbelievably. More civilized than their white neighbors they had the bad luck to have gold discovered on their land. Off to Oklahoma on the trail of tears. No one gave them anything. US history is filled with such stories. What's done is done and there is no way to fix it now without even bigger injustices. Eventually you have to move on.
I will say that when the Southern States seceded from the union it was technically not treason. At the time there was no provision against secession. That's basically what the war ended up being about. Slavery was a key reason for the war but far from the only one as it's painted in today's revisionist history. In all reality the rich bastards that drug the South into the war were responsible for slavery ending at least 2 or 3 decades earlier than it would have otherwise. The one good thing to result from the war was the end of slavery. Sadly so much else was lost. They set the stage for the monstrous bastardization that is today's Federal government.
I'm guessing that they're going to try it by the rules for 3 years and see how it works. If, as I suspect, they make a killing they'll decide it was a good decision. If they don't make the money they'd like it'll be "we tried."
A bunch of big banks isn't everything. Banks don't share the wealth when they're swimming in money. Why should we bail them out of their fuck ups when their greed causes them to go tits up? They continued handing out huge bonus checks to executives right on through the bailouts. I could vomit. Thousands upon thousands of houses empty and the only people that got hurt were the people on the bottom. The fuckers that caused the entire problem were shielded from their bad decisions. That's wrong, pure and simple. The surest sign it was wrong was the bipartisanship of the entire thing. Any time both sides of the farce that is the American Political system band together you can be sure the American people are going to get fucked over.
Man....how about letting me use your car for a month. I don't have one and obviously you have more money than me because you have a car. You will get it back in a month and still have your asset and your money.
You think all property owners are Republican? Besides that obvious idiotic statement there is a bigger problem. Land owners can ask for whatever rent they want but that doesn't mean they'll get it. Why would I rent a house for 1500 dollars if I can find one like it for 1100? They have to rent for what the market will bear unless they want it to stay vacant.
And that's the wrench in the cogs of a free market. When you prop up companies and banks that "are too big to fail" it's not really a free market. If the dickheads would have let the banks collapse like they were supposed to then after a few years of pain everything would have corrected. Instead they propped the losers up and kept all that wealth from spreading back out. Why did GM get to survive as a reward for fucking up for the last two decades while Ford, who had their shit at least partially together basically gets to compete now with a government subsidized corporation? For a free market to be free companies have to be free to fail.
That's how a free market works. They rent places for what the market will bear. If people want to buy it's not hard, there are plenty of places to buy. In fact, it's much cheaper to buy than rent because the market for buyers is much better than renters. Lots of places for sale compared to qualified buyers. Renting is very lucrative if you have the disposable income to enable you to acquire property.
Yes. But the people to get mad with wouldn't be the French but the people responsible for making sure the office isn't bugged. You can bet the French and everyone else with the capability will try to bug the oval office. I'd be shocked if they weren't. Hell....it may be bugged. That's what spies do.
Seriously? If they're that stupid cameras are the least of the problem.
Always boring to read the bullshit of trolls pathetically trying to annoy people. If buggy hardware causing problems seems like mental gymnastics to you it's because you're mentally crippled.