You are mistaken in that assumption. The American nutsack industry (and indeed that of the world) is well on its way up, due to the much-needed stimulus package employed by Bush's Republican administration.
President Bush recognizes the importance of the protective satchel within which one may transport nuts, and is said to frequently enjoy the use of multiple nutsacks on a daily basis, depending on his schedule for that particular day. His most-used model is part of a retro series, which is meant to evoke the feeling of the satchel used by President Harry S. Truman. We in the industry refer to it as the "Harry nutsack".
It's quite popular, especially amongst the ladies and small children. I'm quite surprised you're not familiar with it.
Perhaps he should have done more research
on
Chase the Rabbits
·
· Score: 0, Troll
A lot of problems similar to his are typically caused by the usage of an inferior sack or satchel within which one transports what we call in German "die Nüsse".
Perhaps, instead of making due with the sack provided him by his parents, he should have considered upgrading to a military-grade solution. Perhaps one similar to the one discussed here.
By all means, this is not a requirement, though it would go a long way towards increasing one's stamina and endurance. In addition, it would have the effect of bolstering the national economy during these tough times.
Ah, righto chum, I see your point. What's even more intriguing is that perhaps we're even closer to a solution that may save our domestic sack and satchel industry (specifically the sector relating to the storage and transport of nuts).
If a system similar to this were developed to would allow widespread commercial growth of such transitory satchels ("nutsacks", for the layman), perhaps our domestic nutsack industry would be able to escape the dire straits within which it is currently mired.
America's nutsack workers have brought this upon themselves. You state that America's nutsacks are the most skilled in the world? If they were, they wouldn't need assistance.
It is indeed a shame that you feel this way. America would not be the great nation it has become without the blood and sweat of our domestic nutsack industry. Perhaps you would repay this great industry by shutting it out in the cold? By hanging it out to dry?
No, you must support not just your local nutsack manufacturer, but also your local nutsack vendors and retailers. Vote with your dollars, but also vote with your common sense:
Do you really want to be dependent on foreign nutsacks?
Do you want your children to be dependent on foreign nutsacks?
Perhaps you would be interested in my "cybernetic nut transportation device". It is a simple device, really, though the way it accomplishes its end goal is really quite elegant.
Though it was first used following the tragic accident of Astronaut and test pilot Steve Austin, it has since evolved into a much more accessible and consumer-based solution. It integrates the most advanced cybernetic technology with cell cultures gleaned from one's own perenium.
Through the combination of these elements, using some of the same techniques as Professor Warwick, my firm has been able to develop a stronger, more versatile satchel with which I may transport nuts. A "super nutsack", if you will.
Perhaps, with your blessing, I may outfit you with one of your own someday.
Since when is it the government's job to promote public interest in a certain area?
I'm glad you asked that question, friend.
President Bush recently announced his decision to impose temporary safeguards to help give America's sack and satchel industry (specifically, the sector which manufactures containment units for the storage, transport, and resale of both consumer and industrial-grade nuts) and its workers the chance to adapt to the large influx of foreign products. This relief will help "nutsack" workers, communities that depend on "nutsacks", and the "nutsack" industry adjust without harming our economy.
These safeguards are expressly sanctioned by the rules of the World Trade Organization, which recognizes that sometimes imports can cause such serious harm to domestic industries that temporary restraints are warranted. This is one of those times.
Bush took this action to give our domestic nutsack industry an opportunity to adjust to surges in foreign imports, recognizing the harm from 50 years of foreign government intervention in the global nutsack market, which has resulted in bankruptcies, serious dislocation, and job loss. In addition, he has expressed a commitment to urge our trading partners to eliminate global inefficient excess capacity and market-distorting practices, such as subsidies.
The U.S. nutsack industry must use the temporary help this action provides to restructure and ensure its long-term competitiveness. Restructuring will impact workers and the communities in which they live, and will help hard-working Americans adapt to changing economic circumstances. President Bush has proposed a major expansion of the National Emergency Grants program to assist workers affected by restructuring with effective job training and assistance, as well as direct assistance with health insurance costs that will be available to workers and retirees who lose their employer-provided coverage. Furthremore, Mr. Bush supports coordinated assistance for communities and a strengthened and expanded trade adjustment assistance program. America's nutsack workers are the most highly skilled in the world, and with effective training and adjustment assistance we will help them find better, higher paying jobs to support their families and boost our economy.
Unfortunately, that would have the unfortunate "chilling effect" on my future acquisitions of patents relating both directly and indirectly to sacks within which nuts may be stored.
While such a chilling effect may be acceptable in other areas of the economy, in the sack industry (specifically sacks and satchels which are used for the storage and transport of nuts), this would no doubt would effect irreparable damage.
Thank you for your insightful, yet witty response. I would reward you with karma had I moderator points to give, but as yet I have none. I wish you well on your journeys.
Have I mentioned my recent acquisition of a rather nice sack, within which I may store nuts?
Slashdot Mirror
You are mistaken in that assumption. The American nutsack industry (and indeed that of the world) is well on its way up, due to the much-needed stimulus package employed by Bush's Republican administration.
President Bush recognizes the importance of the protective satchel within which one may transport nuts, and is said to frequently enjoy the use of multiple nutsacks on a daily basis, depending on his schedule for that particular day. His most-used model is part of a retro series, which is meant to evoke the feeling of the satchel used by President Harry S. Truman. We in the industry refer to it as the "Harry nutsack".
It's quite popular, especially amongst the ladies and small children. I'm quite surprised you're not familiar with it.
A lot of problems similar to his are typically caused by the usage of an inferior sack or satchel within which one transports what we call in German "die Nüsse".
Perhaps, instead of making due with the sack provided him by his parents, he should have considered upgrading to a military-grade solution. Perhaps one similar to the one discussed here.
By all means, this is not a requirement, though it would go a long way towards increasing one's stamina and endurance. In addition, it would have the effect of bolstering the national economy during these tough times.
Ah, righto chum, I see your point. What's even more intriguing is that perhaps we're even closer to a solution that may save our domestic sack and satchel industry (specifically the sector relating to the storage and transport of nuts).
If a system similar to this were developed to would allow widespread commercial growth of such transitory satchels ("nutsacks", for the layman), perhaps our domestic nutsack industry would be able to escape the dire straits within which it is currently mired.
America's nutsack workers have brought this upon themselves. You state that America's nutsacks are the most skilled in the world? If they were, they wouldn't need assistance.
It is indeed a shame that you feel this way. America would not be the great nation it has become without the blood and sweat of our domestic nutsack industry. Perhaps you would repay this great industry by shutting it out in the cold? By hanging it out to dry?
No, you must support not just your local nutsack manufacturer, but also your local nutsack vendors and retailers. Vote with your dollars, but also vote with your common sense:
Do you really want to be dependent on foreign nutsacks?
Do you want your children to be dependent on foreign nutsacks?
Ah, chum, I see we cross paths again.
Perhaps you would be interested in my "cybernetic nut transportation device". It is a simple device, really, though the way it accomplishes its end goal is really quite elegant.
Though it was first used following the tragic accident of Astronaut and test pilot Steve Austin, it has since evolved into a much more accessible and consumer-based solution. It integrates the most advanced cybernetic technology with cell cultures gleaned from one's own perenium.
Through the combination of these elements, using some of the same techniques as Professor Warwick, my firm has been able to develop a stronger, more versatile satchel with which I may transport nuts. A "super nutsack", if you will.
Perhaps, with your blessing, I may outfit you with one of your own someday.
Since when is it the government's job to promote public interest in a certain area?
I'm glad you asked that question, friend.
President Bush recently announced his decision to impose temporary safeguards to help give America's sack and satchel industry (specifically, the sector which manufactures containment units for the storage, transport, and resale of both consumer and industrial-grade nuts) and its workers the chance to adapt to the large influx of foreign products. This relief will help "nutsack" workers, communities that depend on "nutsacks", and the "nutsack" industry adjust without harming our economy.
These safeguards are expressly sanctioned by the rules of the World Trade Organization, which recognizes that sometimes imports can cause such serious harm to domestic industries that temporary restraints are warranted. This is one of those times.
Bush took this action to give our domestic nutsack industry an opportunity to adjust to surges in foreign imports, recognizing the harm from 50 years of foreign government intervention in the global nutsack market, which has resulted in bankruptcies, serious dislocation, and job loss. In addition, he has expressed a commitment to urge our trading partners to eliminate global inefficient excess capacity and market-distorting practices, such as subsidies.
The U.S. nutsack industry must use the temporary help this action provides to restructure and ensure its long-term competitiveness. Restructuring will impact workers and the communities in which they live, and will help hard-working Americans adapt to changing economic circumstances. President Bush has proposed a major expansion of the National Emergency Grants program to assist workers affected by restructuring with effective job training and assistance, as well as direct assistance with health insurance costs that will be available to workers and retirees who lose their employer-provided coverage. Furthremore, Mr. Bush supports coordinated assistance for communities and a strengthened and expanded trade adjustment assistance program. America's nutsack workers are the most highly skilled in the world, and with effective training and adjustment assistance we will help them find better, higher paying jobs to support their families and boost our economy.
If only that were the case, dear chum.
Unfortunately, that would have the unfortunate "chilling effect" on my future acquisitions of patents relating both directly and indirectly to sacks within which nuts may be stored.
While such a chilling effect may be acceptable in other areas of the economy, in the sack industry (specifically sacks and satchels which are used for the storage and transport of nuts), this would no doubt would effect irreparable damage.
Thank you for your insightful, yet witty response. I would reward you with karma had I moderator points to give, but as yet I have none. I wish you well on your journeys. Have I mentioned my recent acquisition of a rather nice sack, within which I may store nuts?