Slashdot Mirror


Lab-Grown Meat Chunks - It's What's For Dinner

jonerik writes "CNN has this story on a NASA-funded project being conducted at Touro College in New York. In the experiment, segments of muscle are cut from large goldfish and placed in a vat of 'nutrient-rich liquid,' with the fish chunks growing by 16% within a week. It is hoped that future developments will permit astronauts on long-term missions to include fresh meat in their diet without having to bring along actual animals and fish into space. New Scientist is also reporting the story."

483 comments

  1. one word... by phungus · · Score: 1


    eww

    1. Re:one word... by kevinl · · Score: 1

      Eww was exactly my first reaction.

      Ignoring soy allergies for the moment, wouldn't it be easier (and maybe safer) to eat tofu?

      No, I'm not vegetarian.

    2. Re:one word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      don't act so repulsed...i think Kentucky Fried Chicken has been using this technique for years, minus the "nutrient rich liquid" of course...

    3. Re:one word... by AikenDrumGotWired · · Score: 1

      Anyone hear the marketing flaks tossing the term "DoublePlusGood" around? /me shivers

    4. Re:one word... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Ignoring soy allergies for the moment, wouldn't it be easier (and maybe safer) to eat tofu?

      Considering that tofu is nutritionally inadequate (there are essential proteins that you just can't get from vegetable sources), it's probably "six of one, half-a-dozen of the other." (This also assumes that the test-tube fish is nutritionally equivalent to one that was raised in the normal manner.)

      I don't think the nutrient solution they're using would be particularly harmful as long as you're not getting it from Europe (that's where all the BSE problems have popped up). This process doesn't sound all that appetizing, but neither does the idea of processing excrement (among other things) to get the water out for other uses (which I think is something they're already doing).

      It seems strange that they used goldfish, though...why not a fish that's more commonly used for food? (Yes, I know there are some people who are into swallowing whole live goldfish, for sport, entertainment, or whatever...these people are commonly known as "freaks." :-) )

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:one word... by Katharine · · Score: 1

      It seems strange that they used goldfish, though...why not a fish that's more commonly used for food?

      Goldfish are a type of carp. Large carp are edible-- they just aren't particularly popular now in the U.S. because of all the small bones. My father used to eat them all the time when he was growing up as it was a relatively inexpensive fish. He claimed that they are quite tasty, and if you fry them crisp enough you can eat them bones and all like a big anchovy.

    6. Re:one word... by kyosan · · Score: 1
      Considering that tofu is nutritionally inadequate (there are essential proteins that you just can't get from vegetable sources)

      You need to learn more about nutrition!

      Try reading the American Dietetic Associations paper

      Vegetarian Diets -- Position of ADA

      Here is a quote from the paper

      It is the position of The American Dietetic Association (ADA) that appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful, are nutritionally adequate, and provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases.

    7. Re:one word... by kyosan · · Score: 1

      I don't take troll bait. Get a life instead of trolling and become educated.

    8. Re:one word... by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      MMMMMMMmmmm. Animal protein grown in bovine amniotic fluid! Just like mom used to make!

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    9. Re:one word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pohl & kornbluth - space merchants - chicken little keeps them fed down in bellyrave

    10. Re:one word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, are you retarded, or do you just pretend to be?

    11. Re:one word... by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      No, soy is a complete source of protien, just like how avacados contain mostly satruated fat, which is unusual for plants to have a lot of. In good ol' 9th grade biology, we like to consider these plants that offer animal protiens and nutrients 'defective animals.' The only thing missing from a completely vegetable diet is vitiman B12. I have heard some instances of people who became violently ill suddenly, after they had gone vegetarian for several decades, because of a defecit of B12 over the years. Most vegetarians don't have this problem, but many of them take suppliments just in case. I've actually heard that certain bacteria in your intestine produces trace amounts of this vitiman, but I'm not at all sure. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  2. I wonder by chainsawed · · Score: 0, Funny

    If they could grow a new left testicle for me in a lab...

    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:0, Funny)

  3. They are so late. by YoPt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Taco Smell has been doing this for years.

    1. Re:They are so late. by Chundra · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But using raw sewage as a nutrient solution has its drawbacks. That's why they cook the shit out of everything at taco bell. I mean this both literally and figuratively.

  4. reminds me of something by adjusting · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a Science Fiction story in which a major plot element was a large hunk of chicken flesh grown to feed a community?
    Anyone else remember this, or is it a product of my imagination?

    1. Re:reminds me of something by majestyk2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dunno, but I read a story once about a single fish and a loaf of bread expanding to feed a whole community...wait, that was the Bible.

    2. Re:reminds me of something by TrentTheWiseA · · Score: 1

      Yep, if it's the one I'm thinking of, I can't remember the name of it, but the gist of it was this guy discovers this abandoned terraforming ship and goes around doing 'jobs' for different civilizations to earn money to have the ship completely repaired. One of the jobs was for a society that had so many people that they couldn't feed them all, He gave them a 'meat beast' (dunno if it was chicken) that would continually grow in their basements. Just go down and hack some off for dinner.

    3. Re:reminds me of something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It was the 1953 classic "The Space Merchants" by Pohl and Kornbluth about a world with advertising gone mad. "Chicken Little" was a major plot element.

    4. Re:reminds me of something by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're thinking of Arch Obeler's "Chicken Heart" episode of Lights Out. Bill Cosby did a bit about how he freaked out upon hearing the story on the radio as a kid.

      Robert Heinlen makes reference to the actual case somewhere in one of his Lazarus Long stories.


      Apparently, the actual experiment has been repeated many times. Although I can't track down the longest lived one.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:reminds me of something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the story you are talking about is _Methuselah's Children_ by R. A. Heinlein. They had a piece of chicken flesh that they had managed to keep alive for more than a hundred years. They didn't eat any of it, but I seem to remember that it one one of the oldes "members" of the Howard family.

    6. Re:reminds me of something by maggard · · Score: 2
      Wasn't there a Science Fiction story in which a major plot element was a large hunk of chicken flesh grown to feed a community?

      It's a SF cliché; any number of stories refer to vat-grown meat blobs. Asimov, Heinlein, Bova, Niven, Pournelle, lots of folks have this in stories from the 1950's on, maybe before.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    7. Re:reminds me of something by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

      Yes. I think the Title was The Merchant's War by Fredrick Pohl.

      An advertising executive gets kidnapped and shanghi'd into working at a factory in a third world country where they tend to a great mass of chicken muscle, which is fed by a lot of pipes.

      One of my favorites - it identifies what would happen in a world where advertisers were let run rampant.

      Mythological Beast

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    8. Re:reminds me of something by adjusting · · Score: 1

      That's it! Thank you. That would have bugged me all day.

    9. Re:reminds me of something by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1
      I believe you're thinking of The Space Merchants by Pohl and Kornbluth.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    10. Re:reminds me of something by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

      I believe that the Space Merchants was the sequel to The Merchant's War. That's the one where the advertising executive gets addicted to Moke cola and winds up stopping the fleet of ships attempting to addict Venus to various products. He spends a bit of time in a rehab camp, but it's the previous book where they first send people to Venus.

      Mythological Beast

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    11. Re:reminds me of something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is obviously from the space mercahants by braht and polh (?)

    12. Re:reminds me of something by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1
      Other way around: Merchant's War was written 30 or so years later by Pohl alone after the tragic early death of Kornbluth. Haven't read it myself: any good?

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    13. Re:reminds me of something by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1
      (And to continue courting my first offtopic mod:)

      The plot you describe is that of The Space Merchants

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    14. Re:reminds me of something by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1
      Oh, no it's not. I'm an idiot. SM did come before MW tho'.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    15. Re:reminds me of something by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      > Haven't read it myself: any good?

      Yea, it's about as good as the original story. It's even more insightful about the ability of advertisement to mislead, because it has the Venusians (who have outlawed any form of hype or advertising) to compare with.

      Mythological Beast

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    16. Re:reminds me of something by row314 · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of Tuf Voyaging, perhaps? FWIW, he gave the Suthlamese a lot more than meat beasts - he also gave 'em Just Desserts. :)

    17. Re:reminds me of something by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      It's not SF, but I heard that the Carib Indians (the first settlers of the Caribbean islands) were cannibals. Since they didn't have refrigeration, and meat tends to spoil quickly in that climate, they would tie up their victims, and hack off non-vital pieces as needed, thus keeping their food source alive as long as possible.

    18. Re:reminds me of something by SandsOfEarth · · Score: 1

      One of my favorites - it identifies what would happen in a world where advertisers were let run rampant.

      Which is totally unlike our world, where advertising is so restrained as to be barely noticeable ;-)

      I love The Merchants' War . . . it is a favorite of mine, too.

  5. ARRRRRGH by death_denied · · Score: 0

    Now they can GROW SPAM!

  6. That's just not right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I just ate lunch.....Excuse me while I go hurl.

  7. The Matrix? by dimer0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting closer to the "single-celled protiens packed with amino acids" that the guys from the Matrix were eating..

    Why don't we just skip all this inbetween crap and go straight to that? .. As long as it has a zesty orangle flavor, I'm all over it.

    1. Re:The Matrix? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but at least it doesn't taste like "Tasty Wheat".

      I figure one day there will be a big market for vat-grown filet mignon at one-third the price of the real thing. Of course, it will probably be cost-prohibitive for many years.

      Forget Soylent Green, just reach into the vat and scoop out a couple of pounds of boneless filets, grill and eat. I'm sure the animal rights fanatics would like that.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:The Matrix? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting
      > I figure one day there will be a big market for vat-grown filet mignon at one-third the price of the real thing. Of course, it will probably be cost-prohibitive for many years.

      I could go for that -- for non-steakeaters, the filet is a prized cut because it's tender. The filet's tenderness is a function of the fact that it's a muscle that doesn't get much use.

      Before I commit to a lunch of vat-grown meat, I'd like to know how the hunks of meat develop a grain or texture.

      Part of what makes "fish" meat good is the flaking and separation of the rows of flesh created by the intervening bones; likewise, the fibers of muscle that comprise the filet are organized in a grain. Steak are cut across the grain to allow any spices/marinades the maximum ability to penetrate the steak, and so that (after cooking), the chunks you cut off the steak are more easily-processed by the molars.

      Cuts of meat cut cross-grain (i.e. steaks) are also perceived as more tender because the grain is parallel to the direction of the motion of your teeth, facilitating the work of your molars. (This also applies to your incisors; if you're hungry enough, skip the fork, and if you're really hungry, skip the cooking.)

      I have no idea what kind of structure a large mass vat-grown steak (fish or beef) would develop, but I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone to provide an initial alignment.

    3. Re:The Matrix? by wings · · Score: 1
      dimer0 says:

      ... As long as it has a zesty orangle flavor...

      Orangle?

      Did I miss the announcement of a new flavor?
    4. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I figure one day there will be a big market for vat-grown filet mignon at one-third the price of the real thing. Of course, it will probably be cost-prohibitive for many years

      For many, many years. To get muscle tissue to grow in culture, it has to be fed all the hormones an animals other organ systems generate. That means purifying those hormones and growth factors from some other source and dumping them in the soup. Our lab supplements culture media with 10 ng/ml IGF-1 to get muscle cell growth, we can grow about 1 mg muscle under 3 ml media, and we have to change the media every 2-3 days. To get a dinky 1/4 pound of 'meat', your last incubation would need 300 liters of media, containing 300 ug IGF-1. IGF-1 runs about $10/ug, so (using current culture techniques, that'd be at least $3000 for meat with no texture and less flavor.

    5. Re:The Matrix? by ottffssent · · Score: 2


      Why don't we just skip all this inbetween crap and go straight to that [single-celled beasties]?


      Nasty little buggers have DNA in them that has to be filtered out. Of course, muscle tissue has DNA in it too, but the ratio of DNA to usable protein and other nutrients is much lower, and one can get an actual meal without stones (I think that's what it is you're trying to avoid here...) if it's made from meat rather than single-celled organisms. I assume that's what you meant by "single-celled proteins" which is obviously wrong. One way to tackle the problem is to take the excess DNA out (something about a gram per day max rings a bell), and the other way is to make something without that much in it to start with. A logical way to go about it would be to grow bigger cells (have you seen how much bigger animal tissue cells are than your average bacteria? That's why macrophages can eat 'em up by the hundreds.), and as it turns out meat is something people want and it has nice big cells too.

    6. Re:The Matrix? by GungaDan · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone..."

      Woohoo! Inanimate carbon, er, ceramic rod! Is there anything this guy can't do?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    7. Re:The Matrix? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Orangle?

      "Orange" is too hard to rhyme...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:The Matrix? by borzwazie · · Score: 2
      here's another thought:


      Part of the reason that meat tastes good (to those of us that like it) is the fat content. Would vat-grown meat have fat content?


      If it didn't, it would be pretty dry and nasty-tasting.

      --

      "We apologize for the inconvenience."

    9. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could go for that -- for non-steakeaters, the filet is a prized cut because it's tender.

      Screw the traditional cuts of meat. Just by analyzing what makes meat taste good (as you point out in your post), we could make _even_ better tasting meats. It seems reasonable to me that in the future, meat the highest quality meats would be lab-grown.

      I don't know about the whole vegan thing though, the culture has to be organic in some way so animals would still be killed probably...

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    10. Re:The Matrix? by MeepMeep · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the whole vegan thing though, the culture has to be organic in some way so animals would still be killed probably...

      Since plants are also organic, you might be able to make the culture out of soybeans or something.

      Just pointing out the glaringly obvious...

      MeepMeep

    11. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of what makes "fish" meat good is the flaking and separation of the rows of flesh created by the intervening bones..

      As a Tuna scientist from the Maldives, I would have to disagree with that. Flaking of fish meat does not happen due to bones. Infact there few bones on a fish compared to the amount of flesh (mostly protein). For example, take the baracuda or better still the shark, if you ever tried to cook one, you'd immeditaly notice the absence of bones that should be there in the first place :) This is one feature that gives sharks great flexiblity.

      The flaking as far as we know is an evolutionary feature, required by the medium they have to swim through (in other words, they were born with genes that tell their flesh to flake).

      I have seen other marine organisms that do not flake, such as O-pus, Kaneeli, Faru Findu and Nagookendi (sorry Native names here).

    12. Re:The Matrix? by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2

      Just by analyzing what makes meat taste good (as you point out in your post), we could make _even_ better tasting meats. It seems reasonable to me that in the future, meat the highest quality meats would be lab-grown.

      Going slightly OT here, but isn't this what the majority of the agriculture industry doing this to some degree already? Talking to my roommate who is an agri major at our school, I found out the most common fruits and vegitables we find in the supermarket are direct clones of each other. The same corn plant that produces one stalk will be the exact same strain that another grower uses in the next state over.

      Now if they start using the same type of technique for producing meats, wouldn't it get rather bland after a long time? One of the best things is the slight differences in taste from one plate to the next, to compare one meal to the previous one. If everything tastes the same after awhile, it no longer becomes a treat to have a nice medium-rare filet mignon.

    13. Re:The Matrix? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
      I have no idea what kind of structure a large mass vat-grown steak (fish or beef) would develop, but I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone to provide an initial alignment.
      I think it'd be simpler than that; post-processing of chopping it up minutely and repacking it in familiar textures should be the easy part. Sounds gross, but in practice, I bet it could be pretty good :-)

      -me
      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    14. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Since plants are also organic, you might be able to make the culture out of soybeans or something.

      So is coal but that doesn't mean you can grow meat in coal.

      The point is that since the culture medium is not inorganic, it must come from a living source. I would expect the /. crowd to be smart enough to figure out that the only via organic culture medium would come from some kind of animal by-product.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    15. Re:The Matrix? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I think it'd be simpler than that; post-processing of chopping it up minutely and repacking it in familiar textures should be the easy part. Sounds gross, but in practice, I bet it could be pretty good :-)

      You've just reinvented hamburger! :)

      OTOH, if vat-grown filet were cheap enough, you could get some very lean cuts. Given that our hypothetical vat-grown beef would have no actual "blood" supply, I'm now leaning towards calling it veal...

      Ah, got it! "Vealvat! For that vealvatty-smooth tenderness that only comes from vat-grown veal!"

    16. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do that for fake crap meat. Cheap reformed chicken bits, hot dogs, meat loaf, hamburger are ways of serving retextured meat. Yum !! :(

    17. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organic culture does not imply animal. Plants are the first step of fixing carbon dioxide to organic sugars.

      Coal is mostly carbon plus hydrocarbons and some other organic materials.

      Actually you make tofu out of soybeans. It is essential congealed soya milk made with calcium sulphate.

      There are a lot of tofu based oriental vegetarian dishes for people in poor farming communities where meat is a luxillary item. The soyabeans provides the necessary protein...

      The trick of cooking tofu is knowing the fact that it doesn't have favours on its own. It takes on whatever spices and favours you add.

    18. Re:The Matrix? by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      They could just retexture it. Have you ever had retextured turkey? (I'm sure you have. Deli turkey, cafeteria turkey, all retextured) When done well, retextured turkey is just about indistinguisable from regular turkey.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    19. Re:The Matrix? by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Nasty little buggers have DNA in them that has to be filtered out.

      DNA itself isn't harmful in any way, shape or form. I don't care if you eat the DNA from anthrax bacteria. All the base pairs are broken down by enzymes. After your enzymes get through with it, it is only base pairs of adenine and thymine, or cytosine and guanine.
      In fact, we need DNA to provide us with valuable bases, phosphates, and deroxyribose so we can make more DNA for cell replication.

      One way to tackle the problem is to take the excess DNA out (something about a gram per day max rings a bell)

      Actualy, unless you are an anorexic, you are gettin WAY more than a gram of DNA a day. DNA is about 10% by weight of all living organisms. If you eat 2 pounds of food a day, you get over 3 ounces of DNA. Don't worry about it. You need it anyway.

      Anyway, I think using single-cell bacteria or other microorganisms as food is a great idea. In the future, perhaps we will be able to take raw protein and carbs from an abundant source such as kelp, and transform it into just about any food. Like in 2001: A Space Oddesey. We may have to work up somthing like that. The world population will be over 10 billion in 2050.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    20. Re:The Matrix? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I didn't put an tag at the end. The last paragraph is mine.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    21. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to McDonalds

    22. Re:The Matrix? by I+have+nutsack · · Score: 1

      Ah, righto chum, I see your point. What's even more intriguing is that perhaps we're even closer to a solution that may save our domestic sack and satchel industry (specifically the sector relating to the storage and transport of nuts).

      If a system similar to this were developed to would allow widespread commercial growth of such transitory satchels ("nutsacks", for the layman), perhaps our domestic nutsack industry would be able to escape the dire straits within which it is currently mired.

      --

      -------------------
      I am a highly intelligent squirrel
    23. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Actually you make tofu out of soybeans.

      The simply fact is that it far easier to provide essential proteins via meat than it is to provide them through plants.

      More importantly, we have evolved to eat meat. It is part of being human. Embrace it, enjoy it.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    24. Re:The Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That line from the Matrix always bothered me as scientific gibberish in movies usually do.

      1. Proteins are not composed of 'cells'. Cells, being the basic functional units of living things are composed of many things, proteins included, but also a whole slew of macromolecular machinery and lipids. Not the other way around. That the writers add to this the statement by specifying "singled-celled proteins", perhaps in some attempt to give it the pretense of legitimacy, is more baffling, not to mention irritating.

      2. Proteins (or polypeptides) are, by definition polymers of amino acids. Thus, to say that a particular protein is "packed with amino acids" is redundant as every protein is "packed with amino acids".

    25. Re:The Matrix? by MeepMeep · · Score: 1

      So is coal but that doesn't mean you can grow meat in coal.

      It's funny you say this...since you are pointing out that coal is organic, yet you claim that you can't grow meat in it, did you know that petrochemical industry is the main source for fertilizers, which are in turn used to grow plants? Look it up.

      Some animals (such as cows) use only plants (ie. grass, hay, etc) to make their proteins. 'Cow meat', in it's natural state (ie. a cow), only needs 'plant material' to grow.

      So, logically, it should be possible to use only plant material to 'feed' a growing meat culture.

      Wow. Maybe it wasn't so obvious.

    26. Re:The Matrix? by Arker · · Score: 2

      Part of the reason that meat tastes good (to those of us that like it) is the fat content. Would vat-grown meat have fat content?

      Absolutely. In fact, care would likely have to be taken to stimulate the growing tissue relatively, working it to keep it from getting TOO fat. Depending of course on the initial genes selected, but every animal has fat, and conditions like being grown in a sea of nutrients, with no need to work for food, would surely cause any of us to get fat, no?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  8. Next goatse.cx? by qslack · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or will this become the next generation's goatse.cx?

    "Don't click the link to the growing goldfish muscle!"

    "^^ GOLDFISH MUSCLE LINK ALERT ^^"

    Well, whatever. I just ate. Thanks Slashdot.

  9. Oh great... I can see my next year spam header... by tcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    GROW YOUR PENIS 16% BIGGER IN JUST A WEEK WITH THIS NEW HIGH-TECH CREAM DEVELOPED BY NASA blablabla

    The scary part about this is... you know it will happen :).

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  10. First of all... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This doesn't have to be for 'astronauts and the like'. How about hungry people right here on earth? I imagine these meat cubes would be easy to store and cook (due to the uniform size and shape) and no bones = no waste...

    --


    Do a google search before posting.
    1. Re:First of all... by Amarok.Org · · Score: 2

      And you think this will be less costly than the other method of meat production - you know, actually breeding the bloody fish?

      Uniform size and shape isn't an issue... just ask Van De Kamps or Gorton's.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:First of all... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't food supply, it's distribution.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    3. Re:First of all... by GMontag · · Score: 2

      If you can get the armed thugs that are starving people right here on earth to stop:

      1. Attacking UN and other humanitarian organizations from delivering the PLENYFUL food we already have

      2. Stop the other nonsensical organizations that keep blaming the West for every ill in the world as they watch us attempt to feed the world

      then...

      You will not need this new process right here on earth and it can go into space where it belongs!

    4. Re:First of all... by Eryq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would probably be cheaper and easier to just give those hungry people soybean products, which:

      - contain protein (the best thing about meat),
      - can be textured/flavored in a number of ways, and
      - are a hell of a lot cheaper/easier to produce in large quantities than 'fish muscle in a can'.

      But in agreement, I do think it would be a great way to create meat products which are cruelty-free, untainted by BGH (one would hope), and free of bacteria picked up on the killing floors.

      --
      I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
    5. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but then again, why would you want to feed the world. You're just moving the baseline worst to a whole new level, making your own life shitty as hell.

    6. Re:First of all... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I mentioned the stackability of the cubes. You could pack a cargo plane full of these things.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    7. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This doesn't have to be for 'astronauts and the like'. How about hungry people right here on earth?

      Wait a minute... That's not capitalist thinking! You must be a communist^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H terrorist!

    8. Re:First of all... by danro · · Score: 1

      Damn right!
      What is so bad about being a vegetarian in space?
      Does the craving for real meat justify research fundings when they can already do amazing stuf with soy beans. So amazing that they actually turn my stomach, because they taste so real! (I am a vegetarian.)

      I am positive that there are more important matters concerning space travel that this money could go to.
      Something that makes a real difference.

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    9. Re:First of all... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      "are a hell of a lot cheaper/easier to produce in large quantities than 'fish muscle in a can'"

      Why would it be easier to grow soybeans than to cultivate meat in a vat? It strikes me that you would need a lot more space to grow soybeans hydroponically that you would need to grow blobs of meat to get the same amount of protein. The meat would probably need less user intervention as well. Open the vat, cook, and eat. With soybeans there are other time and energy intensive processes that must occur in order to turn soybeans into those textured/flavored forms.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    10. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UN is just a larger version of the typical Red Cross and United Way, except has the potential to be dangerous.

    11. Re:First of all... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      It's a common misconception that there isn't enough food in the world to go around. According to a recently published book the name of which I've forgotten (sorry), world food output averages out to something like 4 pounds of food per day per person, worldwide. That statement is grossly oversimplified, of course, but the point is that the world, on average, has a pretty significant food surplus.

      The problem with hunger is that there are places in the world where one of two things is true: either the place is so far from arable lands that getting food to the people there is expensive and difficult, or the people who live there are so poor that they can't acquire the food that's already available to them.

      So finding new ways to produce food isn't really going to help the problem much, unless we reach a point where food production is so cheap that you can literally give food away to anybody that asks for it. (If you look at the segment of the world's population that is directly engaged in food production activities, it sinks in what an unthinkable economic disaster it would be to make food production that cheap. Something like three billion people would be immediately without income.)

      The real solution to the world's hunger problem is going to be one of distribution. If we can get food from Buttwad, Iowa, to Mogadishu, Somalia, for fractions of a cent per pound, the hunger problem suddenly gets a lot easier to solve.

    12. Re:First of all... by MouseR · · Score: 2

      There was a Dilbert anime episode where he accidentally discovered a growing meat substitute which, on top of it, resembled a cow furr, which he thought could be mass-produced and sold to poor countries like Elbonia (the mud-covered country).

      Anyhow, from that story, growing meat substitute would be unmarketable.

    13. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably be cheaper and easier to just give those hungry people soybean products, which:

      - contain protein (the best thing about meat),
      - can be textured/flavored in a number of ways, and
      - are a hell of a lot cheaper/easier to produce in large quantities than 'fish muscle in a can'.


      You forgot:
      - taste like ass

    14. Re:First of all... by fataugie · · Score: 1
      Damn right!
      What is so bad about being a vegetarian in space?

      You're kidding me right? Do you think Capt'n Kirk was a vegetarian? Not bloody likly what with screwin the ailen princesses and kicking some alien ass.....I don't think so!

      --

      WTF? Over?

    15. Re:First of all... by saider · · Score: 1

      Poor nations cannot afford these cargo planes to distribute enough food. There already is more than enough food to feed the world. The problem is getting it from the producers to the consumers before it spoils.

      In developed countries, roads and rails are sufficient enough to allow rapid transport of food so that it gets to people before going bad. In poor countries, with dirt roads, lawlessness, and war, the food doesn't stand a chance of making it to the people.

      Airplanes are not really an option because they are so friggin expensive to operate. Imagine if you had to have all of your groceries delivered by air mail. Do you think you could afford food? Also, space efficiency doesn't matter as much as the weight of the cargo. The volume only becomes a concern for low density cargo. Meat has a relatively high density, so the weight limit would be reached before space became a concern.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    16. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: - taste like ass

      I thought the problem most people had with soy is it doesn't taste like ass. Or loin.

    17. Re:First of all... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      "...turn my stomach..."

      You mean like how the very smell of things like broccoli and many other vegetable items turn my stomach? Your statement goes to show how much of preferred tastes are experiential and cultured. Every time a vegetarian tell me to try a given meat-substitute, they tell me it "tastes like meat". Which meat? They all taste different. Keep in mind that for many of us, raised on meat-centric meals, the alternatives make our stomachs' turn just as much as the illusion of meat makes yours.

      I do agree that it doesn't seem to be the best use of space research dollars.

    18. Re:First of all... by TooTallFourThinking · · Score: 1

      I would guess growing soybeans would require less exotic compounds then vats of fish muscle. With soy you need dirt, water and fertilizer. The astronauts can produce plenty of the latter without a problem. Or we can just start shipping cows into space. Even pigs. ;)

    19. Re:First of all... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      i've read alot of things along the same lines, in (recent) high school text books even (not alot, but some). most talk about how the kansas/plain states are the "breadbasket of the world", and that area alone could feed/meet the entire world's supply of carbohydrates/sustinance. and that doesn't even count california's orange and fig crops, and god knows how many acres of untilled land in montana, where the government PAYS farmers not to produce more food, as to keep prices about right.

      get the farmers to do more soy farming, package the soy up in 5 gal. square plastic buckets (plentiful, we used to pick them up from behind grocery stores, clean out the "frozen" egg whites, and use them for packing food/clothing for scouting trips, and as "cheap" drybags for boyscout/personal canoe trips.

      pack these buckets up, attach an extremely cheap parachte to the top, and an oversized kazoo on the outside so people don't accidentally get hit by these things falling @ ~10-15mph out of the sky. oh yeah, and 2 sporks per bucket, preferably near the top. fly them to somolia in our currently sitting on the ground fleet of b-2/b-52 bombers, and toss them out the back as they fly over impovershed countries.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    20. Re:First of all... by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1
      Except for that soy isn't all that good for you:
      http://www.nexusmagazine.com/soydangers.html

      Raises your estrogen levels, which causes loss of muscle tissue and development of feminine features. (not covered in the above article)

      (But hey - if you're into man-breasts, be my guest)

    21. Re:First of all... by trixillion · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for many parts of Africa and several other countries, ruling warlords do not allow food distributions to take place due to petty rivalries between clans. This is probably the primary cause of starvation in Africa. Sociopolitics is THE root of world hunger. We have the means to feed one another... we simply lack the ability to get along with each other enough to do it.

    22. Re:First of all... by trixillion · · Score: 1

      The main problem with your plan is that most of the people living in most of the places desperate for food... do not know what to do with soy products. Frankly they would likely make them sick. Westerners have some incredibly hardy stomaches as we are accostommed to eating foods from all over the world. most populaces eat the same staple of food for their entire lives. Rice and Wheat are what is needed most places.

    23. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can be textured/flavored in a number of ways,

      Every one of which taste like shit.

    24. Re:First of all... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      The ingredients for soy might be simpler, however the real limiting factor in space flight is going to be space and weight. The question is, for a given volume of space, which method returns a product with the greatest nutritional density? I think the meat vats would be more efficient in this regard. Also, I don't think the meat vat compounds are that exotic. It's just a nutrient bath, which could be prepackaged before flight. The whole system could be self-maintining. It might even be possible to package the nutrients in a powder form, so you just add water and you get nutrient soup for you meat blobs.

      Question - would astronauts name their growing meat blobs and feel affection toward them?

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    25. Re:First of all... by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      And how are you going to grow Soybeans without acres of land and sunshine. As would be the case for someone traveling to the far reaches of the solar system?

    26. Re:First of all... by TheNarrator · · Score: 1
      Soy has been heralded as the greatest food to ever come into existence. Have you read some of the research done on it though?

      "What was once a minor crop, listed in the 1913 US Department of Agriculture (USDA) handbook not as a food but as an industrial product, now covers 72 million acres of American farmland."

      "Two senior US government scientists have revealed that chemicals in soy could increase the risk of breast cancer in women, brain damage in both men and women, and abnormalities in infants. "

      " While even in 1966 there was considerable research on the harmful substances within soybeans, you'll be hard pressed to find articles today that claim soy is anything short of a miracle-food. As soy gains more and more popularity through industry advertising, we are moved once again to raise our voice of concern. "

    27. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So amazing that they actually turn my stomach, because they taste so real! (I am a vegetarian.)

      I'm a meat eater who's occasionally tried those fake meat products and let me tell you -- its like eating that circular pink rubbery stuff they fed to Capt. Picard when he was captured by those weird alien dudes.

      When a vegetarian says "that tastes like meat!" about a tofu product, I understand what an audiophile feels like when he hears someone say "I bought BOSE because they sound the best!".

      BTW: If you think the smell of meat turns your stomach, I once puked over artichokes, and almost again over cinnamon sauce. Ugggh.

      Meat For Life!

    28. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is enough food to go around already. the only problem is you cant give food away or capitalism gets screwed up.
      we dont need any new technology to feed the people, we jsut need to get rid of capitalism.

    29. Re:First of all... by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >You're kidding me right? Do you think Capt'n Kirk was a vegetarian?
      >Not bloody likly what with screwin the ailen princesses and kicking
      >some alien ass.....I don't think so!
      >
      As Kirk and the rest of the off-duty bridge crew members sat down for dinner after leaving Space Station K7 they avoided meeting each other eyes even though
      they all knew where the surplus of meat came from when the kitchen
      served apricot-glazed tribble, tribble teriaki, lemon pepper tribble,
      tribble tacos, tribble schnitzel, tribble wurst, tribble Kiev, tribble
      cacciatore, cajun blackened tribble, tribble Creole, tribble quiche...

    30. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea here is GROWING IT IN SPACE, which obviously you missed by making that 'fish muscle in a can' remark.
      It would not be canned. If that were the case, they could just send up some Starkist.

      ...and who the hell is 'scoring' these things?
      This gets a 5 for insightful?!? please.

      oh, this doesn't seem very cruelty free if it has to be grown in FLUID EXTRACTED FROM THE BLOOD OF UNBORN COW FETUSES!

      -dnahelix

    31. Re:First of all... by colmore · · Score: 2

      You're forgetting the bizarre engineering constraints that NASA faces.

      It's cheaper for them to use 1 pound of $10,000 material than 10 pounds of free material

      Lifting a hydroponic greenhouse large enough to sustain a whole ship's crew into orbit would be ridiculously expensive, not to even mention the inertia it would add, making actually getting anywhere that much harder.

      so yes, a 100 pound multi-million dollar experimental meat vat makes a lot more sense than a cheap, regular, garden.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    32. Re:First of all... by danro · · Score: 1

      You statement is true, of course.
      But I was raised on a meat-centric diet too. (I'm still no fan of broccoli, btw)
      The point is that you can change your taste.

      And, honestly... do you think that someone who can master all the necessery skills to be an astronaut can't do this?

      Sure, it may be harder for some, but astronauts should be dedicated to their work. If you won't go to space without your BigMac, you are not fit to be an astronaut.
      Sad but true.

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    33. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a vegetarian I prefer beeing with chicks myself instead of watching Capt'n Kirk do it on TV.
      You should try it sometime. (Either one, girls or vegetarianism, your choice...)

    34. Re:First of all... by danro · · Score: 1

      Well, growing soy beans would probably take about the same land area as growing meat, and it would be far less complicated.

      I just think this "growing meat" business is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
      There is simply no need to produce meat in space.

      There might be a market for this cruelty free meat here on earth though.

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    35. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But I was born a meat-eater. If you try to make me change, you're just as bad as those folks who try to get homosexuals to become hetero.

      You...you...you meataphobe!

    36. Re:First of all... by RFC959 · · Score: 2
      And, honestly... do you think that someone who can master all the necessery skills to be an astronaut can't do this?
      Come on. There's a big damn difference between "learning how to fly the space shuttle" and "changing what foods you like to eat" and you damn well know it. Yes, you can acclimate yourself to things, but this is not necessarily desirable, for reasons I'll go into below...
      Sure, it may be harder for some, but astronauts should be dedicated to their work. If you won't go to space without your BigMac, you are not fit to be an astronaut.
      OK, so if this applies to meat, why doesn't it apply to everything? Why don't you tell them, "If you won't go to space without any reading material, you are not fit to be an astronaut"? After all, they don't really _need_ it. How about, "If you won't go to space without anything but flavorless (but nutritious) paste from a tube, you are not fit to be an astronaut"?

      Fact is, morale is important, and it's only going to get more so as trips get longer. Keeping people happy is an important factor in getting them to work well, and if we want space travel to ever be anything more than the domain of a very select few, we've got to work at making it less of a chore. If I were given the opportunity to go to Mars, but I couldn't have any meat for the whole trip...I'd do it, but I'd be pretty cranky about having to eat mother-loving SOY PROTEIN the whole damn time.

    37. Re:First of all... by danro · · Score: 1
      OK, so if this applies to meat, why doesn't it apply to everything? Why don't you tell them, "If you won't go to space without any reading material, you are not fit to be an astronaut"? After all, they don't really _need_ it. How about, "If you won't go to space without anything but flavorless (but nutritious) paste from a tube, you are not fit to be an astronaut"?
      I understand your argument about the importance of morale. But if space travel is ever to be, there are more pressing needs than growing meat.
      It's simply a complicated (and expensive) problem. For example, the meat you grow will consume oxygen, while plants would provide it. Thus every piece of meat you bring will make it harder to have a self sustaining spacecraft, or increase the amount of oxygen you'll need in a non self sustaining craft. This will increase the inertia of the craft, meaning bigger engines, more fuel etc. And all for the taste of a BigMac?
      In one sentence: Not Worth It!
      I'll rather have us in space without meat than stuck on earth with it =)

      As for reading material, it'll work just fine the way we do it at earth, so there is no need for expensive research, no problem, and not really a valid argument. They can just bring their bits along, or beam them up from earth.
      And "flavorless (but nutritious) paste from a tube" hardly describes all non meat protein sources.
      Anyway some tradeoffs has to be made, you won't fly to Mars in your livingroom (at least not anytime soon...)

      Disclaimer: I have my own agenda in this, since I would _love_ to see a vegetarian mars mission. But producing meat inflight is really not a good idea.
      However, cruelty free meat here on earth would be something else entirely.
      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    38. Re:First of all... by TooTallFourThinking · · Score: 1

      Of course, we are assuming the meat vat weighs less than carrying the soy and what not, even over extended trips.

      I am all for choosing the most effecient way for space travel. I am curious as to what weighs less, bring enough nutrients to grow meat or bring enough seeds and water to grow plants.

      The plants can keep on generating new plants but they take up a lot of space. The vat of meat could take up less space but seems to be limited to the amount of nutrients on board. And it might not be as expensive as creating an ecosystem in space.

      Why not just pack a lot of "liquid" nutrients and "eat" that? I can't stay it sounds appetizing but were looking for functional. *laugh* And we are neglicting the long terms effects of anti-gravity on the body (and plants and meat vats for that matter. ;).

      Either way, I see each one as having some advantages and disadvantages.

      I also hope in 20 years they can figure out a cheaper way to get a payload up in orbit. We should be putting our more money in that.

    39. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research?

      mercola.com looks like Just Another Crackpot Health Site.

      Good litmus test for a crackpot site? Anti-vaccination material.

      I'll keep eating soy...

    40. Re:First of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a vegetarian for eighteen and the smell of cooking cauliflower even now is enough to almost make me throw up!

      Don't mind broccoli, tho1

  11. Effect on Fast Food? by commonchaos · · Score: 1, Funny

    One has to wonder also, how will this fast food, if this is a way to lower prices another cent, i'm sure a few places will try this out at one time or another... ewww

    1. Re:Effect on Fast Food? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      For anywhere near terms (many decades), this will be far more expensive than simply raising cows. Kinda like the amusing urban legend that KFC uses "headless, feetless, featherless mutant chickens fed by IV". I'd buy that urban legend if KFC's chicken suddenly cost $500 a piece.

      Then there's the really frikkin annoying "fact" taught by a local community college (I thought the guy telling me had taken bad notes, but it was in the professor's handouts) that "all deli meats are pureed into a thin fluid and packed into cubes", and are thus unhealthy (this is from a heath class. While many classic deli meats *are* prepared that way (dating back hundreds of years, so what's so sinister about it), I held out a piece of niceley grained and threaded roast beef and said "how do they get that texture back into the meat, then?". The guy refused to believe me, insisting that "the professor told him so". (FWIW, I went to a US college, and they aren't all that bad - but the so called "community colleges" seem to be of a rather lower quality)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  12. Great! I welcome it by WetCat · · Score: 1

    I would be able to eat that meat in fasting! Seriously, TOFU is good but those eat-healthy-dumbheaded make it unsalted! I want salted tofu! Mushroom food is good too.

    1. Re:Great! I welcome it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't tried spicy deep fried slightly fermented tofu... It is so good that it would give anyone a heart attack. ;)

      Remember tofu was a meat substitute - not meant to be a punishment.

  13. There's actually no need for meat by October_30th · · Score: 0, Insightful
    It's well documented that man can very well live without eating the meat of other sentient creatures.

    Unfortunately meat eating has not (so far!) been categorized with other atrocities like murder and rape which are just as cruel and barbaric acts like killing sentient creatures simply for food.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if we can't kill animals to eat, why should we allow them to kill each other to eat?

    2. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Tranvisor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The problem with this attitude is ... Meat tastes good.

      That and 'sentient' animals kill each other all the time. Save yourself anxiety and worry about 'self-aware' lifeforms please. If you think that eating a 'sentient' creature is murder, what do you think about chopping down a tree to build your house? Trees release chemicals into the air to warn other trees when they are being attacked by insects and the like. Why don't you consider them sentient as well? Trees, cows, lettuce, chickens, potatoes, I place them all on the same level.

    3. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got some meat right here you can eat, troll moron. 8" of tubesteak coming right up.

    4. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should really start killing human beings recreationally. Solves overpopulation, stress, 3rd world hunger and other stupid problems. Cannabalism would be good if humans weren't such a dirty animal to begin with. eew, the stuff we eat just makes me shudder.

    5. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you're saying there is a difference in kind, not just degree, between humans and other animals? what is your main criteria for the difference in kind?

    6. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, people just don't like to be told what to eat. Especially myself. So, fuck off, vegeterian weenie! Don't push your fucking stupid morals on us!

    7. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove that animals don't have a choice, where is your all encompasing proof. Where is the proof that every animal on the entire world can't choose, and that only humans can actually make a choice in what they eat.

      I'd say that actually animals choose all the time. Only one example is needed to debunk your entire statement, and here is just one of may possible examples:

      Put a cat infront of either
      1) Dry catfood
      2) A live mouse

      Cat has a choice, most likely going to go after mouse.

      It's not like a cat never chooses what to eat, why do you think that there are so many finiky catfood commercials, if they don't choose what they eat. My grandmother had a cat who wouldn't eat for a couple of days if he was offered a different kind of food; the animal is making a effort to choose it's food.

    8. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the post you'll see that I did give you an all encompassing proof that your statement is incorrect. Having just one animal in the entire world making a choice as to whether it kills another animal or not proves that animals do have a choice, which proves *your* statement incorrect. For you to prove your statement, you'd have to list every animal in existence, for me to disprove your statement only one contrary statement is necessary.

      From what you have said, I gues *you* have decided what my morals should be. Looks like you are one of those... probably want to legislate your morals onto the rest of the world. Want to take a stab at slapping your morals as to whether life starts at conception or not?

      Human societies have clearly NOT decided that eating meat can not be tolerated. A minority of people have decided that it cannot be tolerated and are trying to FORCE their moral values onto everyone else... just like another group... do you also like to apply your so called morals onto crying, pregnant girls as they go into clinics?

      People like you trying to force your morals onto the rest of the world piss me off to no end. Care to respond?

    9. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Squalish · · Score: 1

      This sounds suspiciously like a George Carlin-coined meme. But I digress...

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    10. Re:There's actually no need for meat by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      IANAV, but I think we're supposed to be more morally and ethically evolved than "animals." Case in point: We are animals, but when we speak about "animals," we don't intend that to include us. What is good enough for animals is not necessarily good enough for us.

      Why do we still allow animals to kill each other? Well, once we have a Human society that is entirely vegetarian, then we can think about trying to impose that on animals. In a lot of cases, animals are not omnivores like us, so there's probably a biological barrier. Because we are so mentally evolved, I think we also have to question whether it's ethical to force our morals onto other species. Even if we believe it's wrong to kill other species for food, does that mean we should prevent other species from doing so, beyond defending our own species' lives?

      But the biggest problem facing this idea is probably logistics. Try to get a tiger to eat a salad...

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  14. hydroponic meat? by myc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    would any vegans care to comment on what your views would be on "hydroponic" meat? That is, meat grown from cloned cells and/or DNA, instead of that harvested from live animals. I think that hydroponic meat will be the wave of the future. "Growing" meat using livestock is simply not environmentally cost effective.

    --
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:hydroponic meat? by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason people are "vegans" are that meat is not "healthy" and it has a high fats and such.

      Then, if we'd just genetically engineer it so that it doesn't have those fats then, I'd probably be just like tofu.

    2. Re:hydroponic meat? by ari{Dal} · · Score: 2

      Vegetarian-approved meat.
      Now there's a fascinating concept.
      It might help with the moral vegetarians (who, i'm sorry but sometimes are just totally obsessive), but not much with the ones who just don't like meat.
      Sounds weird... but most of the vegetarians I know fall into the latter category. They're just grossed out by the taste and texture of meat.
      On a personal note, this article turned my stomach.. I'm allergic to seafood and the thought of chunks of goldfish brewing in nutrient broth makes my stomach churn.

      --
      Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
    3. Re:hydroponic meat? by mattdm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd probably be just like tofu.

      Hmm. Bringing new meaning to the phrase "you are what you eat", I see.

    4. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not vegan, but I'm lacto-ovo vegetarian...

      Sounds like a great idea, actually. Maybe hard-cores wouldn't agree with me, but my reasons aren't "because it's cruel" but because of the other socio-economic implications.

      As for cruelty - how did they get the muscle from the fish?

    5. Re:hydroponic meat? by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, since I publish Vegan.com, that request for comment seems tailor made for me.

      You know, I'm not sure there are any ethical considerations to growing "hydroponic" meat. The stuff would not have a brain or the ability to feel pain and fear any more than plants do. It'd be creepy, for sure. But not nearly as creepy as having to kill an animal back here on earth.

      The better question is, why would NASA want to create this stuff in the first place? It's obvious that, barring undreamable technology breakthroughs, putting livestock into space is unworkable -- sheesh...it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion ;)

      One thing that's also obvious is that space food is gonna suck...no matter if it's vegan or made from synthetic veal calves. There are some superb vegan recipes available now, and I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce. It's not like the 1970s, when plant-based foods were blobs of tasteless brown rice and tofu. I think this NASA meat idea is a holdover from 1950s thinking, when everyone thought meat had to be the center of the meal, for both taste and nutrition.

      I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved synthetic meat. Spending money developing weird meat substitutes seems like a gross misappropriation of this agency's funds, when better and cheaper food alternatives are available. After all, shouldn't Nasa's money, as much as possible, go to space exploration?

      --
      I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    6. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meat is a low-residue food and that is very important when in space! The proessed foods currently eaten on the shuttle are largely animal protein. I love to eat vegtables, esp. peppers and onions but I doubt I would love them so much on a cramped spacecraft. I'm sure my companions would not enjoy it either.

      Mike

    7. Re:hydroponic meat? by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

      I'm a vegetarian.

      I really don't like meat. I'm _also_ an environmentalist, and I admit that I have moral issues with the way animals are raised in factory farms. Of course there are health benefits to not eating lots of meat, too.

      But if healthful, cruelty-free meat were to be introduced, I still wouldn't want to eat it. After nearly six years of no meat, I have no desire to go back.

      I'm a little worried that people will give me a hard time: "There's no rational objection why you shouldn't eat it! Now you're just being a picky eater..." - as if it wasn't hard enough being a vegetarian in our society already.

      Still, I think this is a good idea - in my mind the potential environmental benefit outweighs any other objections I can think of. If people can choose between meat that contributes directly to the destruction of Brazilian rainforests to make room for more cattle, and meat that comes from a lab, some will choose the lab meat. That's one step in the right direction.

    8. Re:hydroponic meat? by sane? · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Simple really, would you like to share a confined space with someone who only would only eat beans and pulses?

      I mean really ?

      Confined space; says it all really.

    9. Re:hydroponic meat? by EFGearman · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      2) Fats are a useful dietary substance, containing a good amoung of 'food energy'. But like with all things, it is important not to consume too much.

      3) Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well.

      Eric Gearman
      --

      --
      Atomic batteries to power! Turbines to speed!
    10. Re:hydroponic meat? by Chundra · · Score: 2

      I don't know which gives me a stronger feeling of disgust: Classifying myself as a lacto-ovo vegetarian, or as someone who eats slabs of lab grown flesh.

      Me, I'm a vagitarian. :-P (|)

    11. Re:hydroponic meat? by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The better question is, why would NASA want to create this stuff in the first place?

      Face it, people like meat. To a large portion of the population, it tastes good, and is an easy way to get a large amount of protein.

      it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion ;)

      I don't think so. You do realize that right now an incredibly large amount of food goes to waste due to a number of sociopolitical reasons. I'd say that a huge amount of hunger is caused by corruption, not livestock.

      There are some superb vegan recipes available now, and I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce...I think this NASA meat idea is a holdover from 1950s thinking, when everyone thought meat had to be the center of the meal, for both taste and nutrition.

      I partially agree with you here. Most meals for long space trips are going to be plant-based, and justifiably so. Once again, though, most people like meat, and so a low-impact way to create something that will more than likely be an occasional treat will be a great morale booster.

      I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved synthetic meat. Spending money developing weird meat substitutes seems like a gross misappropriation of this agency's funds, when better and cheaper food alternatives are available. After all, shouldn't Nasa's money, as much as possible, go to space exploration?

      The people working for NASA are no fools, they're not putting all their eggs in one basket. Sure this one research lab is working on ways to create meat suitable for space travel, but the lab down the hall is probably working on good tasting vegetable-based meals. It's all a matter of personal preference and taste.

      Besides, there are people who do develop allergies to plant-based proteins as well; I think you'd agree that it's a good idea to have a contingency plan in place before any problems develop. This, if anything else, could be a contingency plan if someone were to develop an allergy to the primary protein source - just move them over to a fish-based diet and let the mission continue without many worries about allergic reactions.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    12. Re:hydroponic meat? by RobertAG · · Score: 2

      I would imagine it's because that meat is higher in energy, pound for pound. With spacecraft, weight/storage considerations are of paramount importance.

      When you talk about sending people to live in space (either in the ISS or on a trip to Mars), you want to be able to pack as much nutrition into as small a space as possible. With launch costs somewhere around $10000 per pound, taking several extra pounds in vegetables means NOT taking several extra pounds in fuel, air or equipment more so than it means spending more money.

      When you're in as hostile an environment as space, survival dictates what you do. Tastiness takes a back seat to that.

      As for the ethical considerations of killing animals, you could just as easily take tissue samples. As for the nutritional downsides of eating meat, that's where genetic engineering (still in the future) comes in.

    13. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Simple really, would you like to share a confined space with someone who only would only eat beans and pulses?

      I would rather share a space with someone who eats beans than someone who eats a Big Mac. I'm sorry, but Beer-n-Burger and Beer-n-Brat farts beat out bean farts any day of the week in terms of vileness. Don't get me wrong, my vegan ass stinks too. However, there's nothing like going into a bathroom right after someone who had 2 double-bacon cheeseburgers for lunch and washed them down with Pabst.

    14. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You eat vagita?

    15. Re:hydroponic meat? by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      No, cholesterol does not exist in plants. Eating just fruits and vegetables can be unhealthy if you don't balance them carefully to make sure you get proper amounts of the eight amino acids that the human body needs but can't make on its own.

      I'm not a vegetarian, BTW.

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
    16. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. You do realize that right now an incredibly large amount of food goes to waste due to a number of sociopolitical reasons. I'd say that a huge amount of hunger is caused by corruption, not livestock.

      I don't completely agree with you. By far the single biggest consumer of food and water is the meat/dairy industry. Animals require a great deal of food and water in order to grow; most of this is used up as the animal matures. In other words, most of the crops grown in America do not go to humans; instead they are feed crops for animals.

      Unfortunately, this is a really ineffecient process. The amount of arable land required to produce enough cow to feed one person, would feed 6 people if you grew corn on it and fed the corn directly to humans (instead of the cow). The same land would feed 30 people if you grew soybeans on it, instead.

      Admittedly, I think one of the main reasons we still grow and consume large amounts of animals, is entirely a socio-political reason: the Meat Board, Dairy Board and Poultry boards have huge lobbying groups with a lot of money. These industries have spent tons of money trying to convince people to buy their products. Really, these industries have the tobacco companies beat: they have managed to convince people that their products are necessary for your survival. Of course I will buy some milk - I know that milk does a body good! So, yes, in a sense, a great deal of hunger is caused by "corruption": corruption of governmental officials, corruption of scientific information, and especially greed and corruption within the meat and dairy industries.

    17. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      baga vagita, baybee

    18. Re:hydroponic meat? by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      +1, Insightfully Funny

      There's a reson I don't go to the bathroom for #2 purposes whilst at work...

      ...there's nothing like going into a bathroom right after someone who had 2 double-bacon cheeseburgers for lunch and washed them down with Pabst.

      Ahh yes, that was it...

      GTRacer
      - It's bad enough standing at a urinal and having to make stupid small talk with a clueless V.P....

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    19. Re:hydroponic meat? by cperciva · · Score: 5, Funny

      it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion

      Once the population reaches 10 billion, we don't have to *keep* livestock any more. It's already there. 10 billion worth, in fact.

    20. Re:hydroponic meat? by NOT-2-QUICK · · Score: 1

      To address some of the comments made above:

      "The better question is, why would NASA want to create this stuff in the first place? It's obvious that, barring undreamable technology breakthroughs, putting livestock into space is unworkable -- sheesh...it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion ;)"

      Perhaps you misunderstand the point of this exercise or the significance of this advancement in bio technology - this new methodology for "growing" meat is intended to allow for the consumption of meat during prolonged space travel without carrying the burden of taking actual living animals into space. I believe it is the wide consensus that taking livestock into space is unrealistic - although the thought of a cow wearing a space suit is quite comical...

      "Spending money developing weird meat substitutes seems like a gross misappropriation of this agency's funds, when better and cheaper food alternatives are available."

      While at the surface this investment may see quite frivolous and unnecessary, one could likely have said the same when the agency was working on the development of Velcro when something as common as zippers was already available. However, that advancement (regardless or how seemingly insignificant and wasteful at time) later became marketed to the masses and today holds tight the shoes of many a geek!!! Ultimately, whenever there is a perceived need someone will attempt to develop a solution - it is then up to the public at large how we leverage the resulting technologies...

      "After all, shouldn't Nasa's money, as much as possible, go to space exploration?"

      The concepts of good nutrition and regenerative food sources are all important to the long-term goals of prolonged space inhabitance and travel. With the refinement of this technology, it is conceivable that this could prove as a sustainable source of food and provide necessary nutritional benefits to an astronaut. Just because this activity doesn't involve a space shuttle or big bad moon rocket does not mean that it is not tightly linked to the strategic direction of space exploration...

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
    21. Re:hydroponic meat? by maxume · · Score: 1

      the problem is, for each pound of meat that you grow, you need some source of energy. I like my cow as much as the next guy, but it takes a cow more than several pounds of whatever food you feed it to make one pound of meat, so the savings in weight are probably not driving the research.

      As a side note, I don't really buy into the fact that you could feed the world if you converted farms from cow production to vegetable production, seeing as cows can subsist on a bunch of stuff that humans wouldn't be able to stomach, and that stuff also happens to grow where human grade consumables won't. Of course, I am too lazy for facts, so this is just my opinion. Of course, if I did get all motivated and found some nifty facts, I bet that they would just be opinions with a biased study attached, and not quite the actual truth.

      I heard about this guy a long time ago, who claimed that the entire population of the world could fit/live in Texas. I don't think he knew what sewage was, but he did have like seven children, so hey, he needed that 'fact' to feel good about all that screwin...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    22. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      There are several problems with your statement. First, here in the midwest, most meat eaters do not eat balanced diets. Meat quickly becomes the focal point of the meal to the exclusion of virtually everything else.

      Second, research has shown that you do not need nearly as much protein in your diet as you have been led to believe. Most of the research in this field has been funded by the meat and dairy industries (see "Diet for a New America" by John Robbins for some excellent sources). Regardless, all forms of protein required by humans are available in plant forms.
      Third, meat is unhealthy when consumed in normal portions. It contains large amounts of saturated fat and is high in cholestoral. The rate of heart disease is 3-5 times higher in meat eaters than in strict vegetarians (vegans).


      Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well.

      Unfortunately, that is a blatantly false statement. Cholesterol only exists in two plant products: palm oil and coconut milk.

    23. Re:hydroponic meat? by wedg · · Score: 2

      Strangely enough, synthetic meat is the same meat as regular grown meat. Hopefully they'll perfect it.

      What I think it mostly is directed to is the idea of getting a little variety. If I were stuck in space for 6 months, I wouldn't want to be living off freeze dried neopolitan icecream and protein paste.

      I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce.

      Oh yeah. You'd be amazed at how incredibly difficult it is to do something like a stirfry without gravity. Or even cook a piece of tofu (why would it even stay against the pan? They couldn't velcro it). It's one of those fundamental problems that makes it so bloody difficult to cook anything resembling real food for astronauts. They basically end up living off of the equivalent of frozen dinners and ramen.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    24. Re:hydroponic meat? by EFGearman · · Score: 2

      Me:
      "Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well."

      Him:
      "Unfortunately, that is a blatantly false statement. Cholesterol only exists in two plant products: palm oil and coconut milk."

      Yes and no. I wasn't attempting to be misleading. It's what happens when you code and think about food at the same time. Plants contain fats.

      Borrowed from Indiana University Health Center Page (and no, I can't include a link, as I went through AskJeeves to get there, and I can't break the link out.

      Saturated fat is the main dietary component associated with raising cholesterol. Saturated fats are found mainly in animal products and the tropical oils. The following foods are high in saturated fat and should be used sparingly in the diet: beef fat, lamb, pork fat (lard), butter, cream, whole milk dairy products (whole milk and cheeses) coconut oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, and cocoa butter

      Monounsaturated fats are the best fats to consume. They can help decrease total cholesterol without affecting HDL cholesterol. The two fats highest in monounsaturated fats are canola and olive oil.

      Polyunsaturated fat tends to lower total cholesterol but high intake has been associated with increased risk for cancer. It is recommended that these fats be consumed in moderation. Examples of fats high in polyunsaturated include: corn, cottonseed, sunflower, safflower, and soybean oil.

      Hydrogenated fats are formed by adding hydrogen to unsaturated fats. This makes the fat more firm and makes the fat more durable. Hydrogenation increases the saturation and therefore makes it more harmful to the body. Therefore limiting the use of hydrogenated oils is recommended. Hydrogenated oils are commonly found in fast foods, margarine, peanut butter, and snack crackers.

      Eric Gearman
      --

      --
      Atomic batteries to power! Turbines to speed!
    25. Re:hydroponic meat? by btellier · · Score: 2

      Really? Funny how they can make things like corn oil and olive oil.

    26. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/FCS/FlaFoodFare/ Avocado.htm

      Nutritional Value: Florida avocados are lower in calories and fat than other varieties and are rich in vitamin A and potassium. However, avocados are one of the highest sources of fat (unsaturated) in the fruit and vegetable group. One-fourth of a Florida avocado (approx. lb) contains: 85 calories, 6.8 gm fat, 1.3 gm saturated fat, 1,2 fm protein, 6.8 gm carbohydrate, 371 mg potassium 1.6 gm fiber, 465 IU vitamin A. An interesting nutritional value comparison of Florida and California avocados showed for 3.5 oz of each: calories - FL avocado 112 calories, CA avocado 177 calories; fat grams FL avocado 8.87 gm, CA avocado 17.3 gm. Other nutrients were of similar value between the two.

    27. Re:hydroponic meat? by btellier · · Score: 2

      BZZZT. As I stated in an above post many vegetables have fat (and thus cholesterol). Ever cook with Olive Oil? Ever eat an avocado? From an above poster:

      Nutritional Value: Florida avocados are lower in calories and fat than other varieties and are rich in vitamin A and potassium. However, avocados are one of the highest sources of fat (unsaturated) in the fruit and vegetable group. One-fourth of a Florida avocado (approx. lb) contains: 85 calories, 6.8 gm fat, 1.3 gm saturated fat, 1,2 fm protein, 6.8 gm carbohydrate, 371 mg potassium 1.6 gm fiber, 465 IU vitamin A. An interesting nutritional value comparison of Florida and California avocados showed for 3.5 oz of each: calories - FL avocado 112 calories, CA avocado 177 calories; fat grams FL avocado 8.87 gm, CA avocado 17.3 gm. Other nutrients were of similar value between the two.

    28. Re:hydroponic meat? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Take a look at the nutrition labels on your corn and olive oil.

      "A cholesterol free food."

    29. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Um, dunno about you, but I lift weights. I enjoy lifting large, heavy things. And in order to do so and thrive, I need to consume 1+g of protein per day per pound of bodyweight. That as it stands right now is 250g/day.

      Notwithstanding the fact that soy protein has a crap amino acid balance, and the fact that in order to get any reasonable amount of protein I'd have to become one of those guys who can eat 50 hot dogs in 5 minutes to cram that much bean into my face per meal, I am NOT eating that much ESTROGENIC substance. That's right, ESTROGENIC.

      Meat, on the other hand, builds heme levels, red blood, you know, the kind that gives you a real man's build.

      So carry on with your tofu ice cream or whatever. Just by breathing, you're killing billions of bacteria. You can't win. As far as I am concerned, it is evil to cause suffering to an animal. But rearing it, caring for it, and then SUDDENLY killing it is not evil.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    30. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However not all plant based foods are really good for you. For example, the avacado. Its very high in fat and shouldn't be overly consumed.

      Another interesting bit. The taco bell 7 layer burrito has more calories than a burrito supreme.

      The 7 layer burrito has beans, guacamole, beans, cheese, rice lettuce, tomato. Where the burrito supreme has no rice or guacamole but has meat instead.

      Yes occasionally I read the nutrition information at fast food places.

    31. Re:hydroponic meat? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      ...it...is an easy way to get a large amount of protein.

      But remember, we're talking about hydroponic space meat. They are growing meat by immerse it in fluid that contains nutrients.

      Why not drink the fluid?

      There are taste concerns, of course, but setting those aside, all you are doing is wasting energy - converting sugars to CO2 and H2O. 2nd law of thermodynamics tells you this, and any student of ecology (SURELY a required discipline for anyone studying long-term space trips, since you have to build a small ecology) could tell you that there is energy and nutrient loss everytime something (ie fish slabs) eats something else (ie broth).

      Drink the broth.

    32. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1

      And in order to do so and thrive, I need to consume 1+g of protein per day per pound of bodyweight. That as it stands right now is 250g/day.

      *sigh*

      First of all, I don't think most men in this country weigh 250 pounds.

      Second, we should also be considering females in this discussion; many of whom weigh far less than 250 pounds.

      Third, the idea that you need to consume 1+ grams of protein per pound of bodyweight to maintain weight and thrive is a myth. Specifically it is a myth produced and propagated by and for the meat and dairy industries. Please see "Diet for a New America", by John Robbins - specifically, Chapter 7: "The Rise and Fall of the Protein Empire", pages 170 - 202. While there is not a precise agreement on the amount of protein necessary for the human body, most scientific calculations fall within the range of "2.5% of our total daily calories up to a high estimate of over 8%" (Robbins 173). Who benefits from higher estimates of protein needs? Specifically the people who sell meat, fish, cheese, eggs, chicken, and other expensive sources of protein. Furthermore, nature seems to agree that this range is a reasonable conclusion: "human mother's milk provides 5% of its calories from protein" (ibid 174).

      Fourth, meat is far from being the only source of large amounts of protein. The following items provide more than 25% of their calories from protein: soybean sprouts, mungbean sprouts, tofu, soy flour, soybeans, soy sauce, broad beans, lentils, split peas, kidney beans, navy beans, lima beans, spinach, watercress, kale, broccoli, brussels sprouts, turnip greens, collards, cauliflower, mustard greens, mushrooms, chinese cabbage, parsley, lettuce, green peas, zucchini, green beans, and wheat germ. Spinach, for example, provides 49% of its calories from protein.

      The belief that protein from animal sources is superior to that from vegetable sources dates back to studies conducted in 1914 by Osborne and Mendel on lab rats. Later research in the 1940s, which continued to look at rats rather than humans, produced the theories regarding the 10 essential amino acids. Unfortunately, there wasn't any way, at that time, to generate similar tests for humans (idid 178). At this point, it truly isn't known whether or not these theories hold true for humans, since most of the related research has been funded by the meat/dairy industries.

      Notwithstanding the fact that soy protein has a crap amino acid balance

      That may be true fom some soy protein supplements, but there is absolutely no basis for that when examining natural plant sources. In "Diet for a Small Planet", Francis Moore Lappe demonstrated that eating combinations of vegetables can easily provide the same pattern of amino acids as found in animal sources.

      I am NOT eating that much ESTROGENIC substance. That's right, ESTROGENIC.

      Frankly, I'm not sure where you got this idea. Soy is not a particularly estrogenic substance. Indeed, it is very healthy for women to consume and has been shown to help reduce the risks of breast and cervical cancer, not to mention reduce menopause and menarchal related problems. But that does not mean that when you consume it you suddenly turn into a women. All men have estrogen in the bodies - we all produce estrogen in varying amounts, just as all women produce testosterone.

    33. Re:hydroponic meat? by jbayes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You advertize the Great Slashdot Blackout, yet you're posting on March 22? What's up with that?

      --

      "It sure was strange to see something on Usenet about me that didn't involve Klingon gang rape." -- Wil Wheaton

    34. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: Third, the idea that you need to consume 1+ grams of protein per pound of bodyweight to maintain weight and thrive is a myth.

      Well, if you sit around all day doing nothing, sure. But WEIGHT TRAINING ATHLETES participating in STRENUOUS EXERCISE have been shown in RECENT studies to need AT LEAST 1g/1lb bodyweight PER DIEM.

      RE: scientific calculations fall within the range of "2.5% of our total daily calories up to a high estimate of over 8%" (Robbins 173). Who benefits from higher estimates of protein needs?

      Weightlifters, powerlifters, football players, manual laborers.... people who don't sit around on hemp mats all day living off rice and ambient moisture in the air.

      RE:Fourth, meat is far from being the only source of large amounts of protein.

      I agree. I prefer fish. It's leaner. And chicken. And whey protein, which is 92% protein. http://www.proteinfactory.com

      RE: Spinach, for example, provides 49% of its calories from protein.

      Excellent! But you have to understand that just saying "protein" isn't enough. There are lots of amino acids, and you have to have them all.

      RE: At this point, it truly isn't known whether or not these theories hold true for humans, since most of the related research has been funded by the meat/dairy industries.

      So what? So long as the research is sound...

      RE: That may be true fom some soy protein supplements, but there is absolutely no basis for that when examining natural plant sources.
      In "Diet for a Small Planet", Francis Moore Lappe demonstrated that eating combinations of vegetables can easily provide the same pattern of amino acids as found in animal sources.

      I don't have the time and energy to go out and eat fifty kinds of bean. A steak tastes better, is more filling, provides heme iron, balanced amino acid profiles...

      RE:Frankly, I'm not sure where you got this idea.

      Research. That's why soy protein is out of favor with weightlifters. They're trying to max testosterone and be manly, not mince around with tons more estrogen in their systems. Maybe that's why vegans are more in touch with their feelings, and don't know how to use a car in reverse gear.

      RE: Indeed, it is very healthy for women to consume and has been shown to help reduce the risks of breast and cervical cancer,

      So's the birth control pill, which is pure estrogen and progesterone.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    35. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1

      BZZZT. As I stated in an above post many vegetables have fat (and thus cholesterol).

      BZZT yourself.

      There is a difference between containing cholesterol and raising cholesterol. Fat does not necessarily equal cholesterol. As Mr. Gearman mentions above: "Saturated fat is the main dietary component associated with raising cholesterol." Many (not all, I realize) vegetables do have fat, yes, but it is predominately unsaturated fat.

      It is important to understand that there are two main forms of cholesterol: high-density lipips (HDL) and and low-density lipids (LDL). High levels of HDL are associated with an increased risk of heart disease. LDL seems, to a certain degree, to restrict the levels of HDL within the body. In other words, total cholesterol is not the only important factor: relative levels of cholesterol types are also vital. And individual with an average total cholesterol, but a high level of HDL has an increased risk factor than an individual with a higher total cholesterol level, but a lower HDL level.

      Ever cook with Olive Oil? Ever eat an avocado?

      As Mr. Gearman also points out: "Monounsaturated fats are the best fats to consume. They can help decrease total cholesterol without affecting HDL cholesterol. The two fats highest in monounsaturated fats are canola and olive oil." Also, according to your repost, avoacodo has approximately 6.8g fat, but only 1.3g of this is saturated.

      I still stand by my original statement: Cholesterol only exists in two plant products: palm oil and coconut milk. Some plant products contain saturated fat, which is associated with increasing HDL cholesterol levels.

    36. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lift weights too, and bike for about an hour a day. Oh, and I'm vegetarian. I don't weight 250lbs, but I'm healthy and have plenty of energy. Now, you're right that soy beans are not a complete source of protein, but if you include a good variety of vegetable protein source in your diet, you'll be fine. And the comments about hurting bacteria, etc... I don't particularly care, this is for my health, not because I think some gross little dead animals look cute.

    37. Re:hydroponic meat? by Wolfier · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure there are any ethical considerations to growing "hydroponic" meat.
      The stuff would not have a brain or the ability to feel pain and fear any more than plants do.
      For more information on this, I recommend the following lyrics: Carrot Juice Is Murder
    38. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      I'm not trolling you, I'm just curious.

      What's your max for the bench press/squat/deadlift/snatch/clean and jerk?

      Any other stats?

      Interested to hear the result

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    39. Re:hydroponic meat? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Again, we have more than enough food, even when feeding it to dairy/meat animals. It's simply that there are corrupt governments around the world who take the food donations intended for poor people and sell it to pad their own coffers. It makes sense too, in a perverse way, because if you keep your population hungry, you can control them better. Were we to get rid of the dictatorships in the world, hunger would be eliminated extremely quickly as well, as it's much more of a distribution problem than a supply problem

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    40. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chop his head off and take his job. Speaking in the bathroom is a big no-no.

    41. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also need to consider the psychological/morale effects. If the people get depressed from drinking goo all the time, they won't be able to perform their mission as well, so then why were they sent there in the first place? Actually, I think robotic space exploration is much more useful at this point in time anyway.

    42. Re:hydroponic meat? by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

      Muscle loss is bad enough already in space, I'd think that anything you could do to get more protein into their diets would help.

      Lack of food is not the cause of world hunger, currently (or as of a few years ago) only a lack of food distribution causes the starvation of ~600mil people.

    43. Re:hydroponic meat? by gimlix2 · · Score: 1

      1) As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      What he's talking about is that there are basically 20 amino acids in which all proteins can be synthesized from (amino acids = protein building blocks). There are eight essential amino acids that the body CANNOT sythesize on its own and must come from an outside source. Meat is a convenient source for all eight amino acids in one food.

      No fruits, vegetables, plants, etc. that I know of contain all eight (I might be wrong). However, like the poster said, a balanced diet is a key factor. Certain combinations of foods can provide all eight. Common "ethnic food combinations" can provide them, like beans and a corn tortilla (only one I can think of off the top of my head).

      For a list of the eight essential amino acids and some common food sources for them, go to
      http://www.puttingitright.com.au/aminoacids.htm

      For the chemists, see http://www.nidlink.com/~jfromm/chem301/chem302r.ht m

    44. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point.

    45. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1
      I'll do my best to ignore the flamebait in your response...

      RE: Third, the idea that you need to consume 1+ grams of protein per pound of bodyweight to maintain weight and thrive is a myth.

      Well, if you sit around all day doing nothing, sure. But WEIGHT TRAINING ATHLETES participating in STRENUOUS EXERCISE have been shown in RECENT studies to need AT LEAST 1g/1lb bodyweight PER DIEM.

      You need to look at who sponsored the studies you are referring to. Since you don't cite a paticular source, I will assume this is just something you "heard somewhere." Often this common knowledge is derived from studies funded by the Dairy Research Council (a PAC supporting the dairy industry) and the National Egg Board. From everything I have read, many scientists seriously doubt that virtually anyone really needs 1g protein per pound per day.

      RE: scientific calculations fall within the range of "2.5% of our total daily calories up to a high estimate of over 8%" (Robbins 173). Who benefits from higher estimates of protein needs?

      Weightlifters, powerlifters, football players, manual laborers.... people who don't sit around on hemp mats all day living off rice and ambient moisture in the air.

      Two thoughts: First, I would like to take this opportunity to point out that I don't "sit around on [a] hemp mat all day living off rice." In fact, I am a 150#, vegan triathlete; in the summer I generally bike 10-30 miles a day, swim 1/2-1 mile every other day, run 5 miles every other day, as well as basic weight training every day for my upper body.

      Secondly, you missed my point. I certainly agree that people with far more active lifestyles have different dietary requirements than people who lead sedentary lives. Most people do not need really high intake levels of protein. Most people who want to increase their protein intake by 30% generally increase the consumption of meat, dairy and eggs. If a supposed study suggests that people need a 30% increase in their protein intake, who benefits? The meat, dairy and egg industries benefit because people go out and buy 30% more of their products then before. If a study is published by a research group funded and supported by these industries, it becomes very difficult to believe that the study does not have an inherent bias.

      RE: Spinach, for example, provides 49% of its calories from protein.

      Excellent! But you have to understand that just saying "protein" isn't enough. There are lots of amino acids, and you have to have them all.

      And as I said before, you can derive any and all of these amino acids from plant sources. On page 22 of "Vegetarian Times" issue 43, Nathan Pritikin, the famed dietition responsible for the pritikin diet, stated that he was concerned that people had the "impression that vegetable proteins don't have sufficient percentages of amino acids." Many of his clinical studies clearly demonstrated that this is not the case: vegetable proteins provide enough necessary amino acids.

      RE: At this point, it truly isn't known whether or not these theories hold true for humans, since most of the related research has been funded by the meat/dairy industries.

      So what? So long as the research is sound...

      Once again you missed my point. The research is clearly not sound! Look back at my previous post: all of this original research was based off lab rats. Not humans. Rats need to increase their body mass far more rapidly than humans: rats double their birth weight in 4 days, while humans double their birthrate in 180 days. The research on rats simply doesn't transfer to humans.

      I don't have the time and energy to go out and eat fifty kinds of bean. A steak tastes better, is more filling, provides heme iron, balanced amino acid profiles...

      I never said anything about eating fifty kinds of beans. I simply said that food combining is a very effective way of acquiring amounts of balanced amino acids. If you have time to eat, you have time to eat. Classic food combinations include: rice and beans, tortilla and beans, bulgar wheat and garbanzo beans, pita bread with hummus (made from garbanzo beans), rice chapatis with dal (lentils), soy with rice, soy with millet, and soy with barley. Instead of eating a steak, have two bean burritos.

      Furthermore, it's just not healthy to eat a steak and nothing else. This is especially true of someone with an active lifestyle. Amino acids should not be your only concern. A person also needs to be heavily concerned with their intake of other nutrients: Vitamin A, Vitamin C, the Vitamin B complex, Calcium, Iron, etc. Eating a steak does not provide you with necessary levels of all of these nutrients.

      RE:Frankly, I'm not sure where you got this idea.

      Research. That's why soy protein is out of favor with weightlifters. They're trying to max testosterone and be manly, not mince around with tons more estrogen in their systems. Maybe that's why vegans are more in touch with their feelings, and don't know how to use a car in reverse gear.

      Two words: What research?

      As far as vegans are more in touch with their feelings and don't know how to use a car in reverse car... I don't know if you were abused or neglected as a child or if you have difficulty satisfying your partner sexually, but you obviously have some deep seated emotional issues you need to work out and my only recommendation is that you should probably see a therapist. Frankly I don't see what your hangups about what it means to be a man has to do with eating a healthy, balanced diet.

      vegans are more in touch with their feelings

      You say this as if it were a bad thing. Why? And again, what does this have to do with your diet?
    46. Re:hydroponic meat? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      If the entire world did live in Texas the population density would be less than that of Tokyo. I'm not going to do the math as I've done it before but you can feel free to.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    47. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're talking about very high fat meat, or only looking at meat vs. vegetables, meat is generally NOT higher in energy (KCal), pound for pound than carbohydrates if you're looking at the densest forms of these foods you're likely to put aboard a space ship.

      For data, see:
      http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/cgi-bin/nut_sea rch.pl

      For example:

      100grams of cooked white tuna in water = 128 KCal
      100grams of cooked extra-lean ground beef = 265 KCal
      100grams of cooked regular ground beef = 292 KCal

      100grams of uncooked white rice = 365 KCal
      100grams of dry spaghetti = 371 KCal
      100grams of granulated sugar = 387 KCal

      To be fair, cooked pasta/rice and fresh veggies have a lot less calories for a given mass since they're mostly water.

    48. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. I wasn't attempting to be misleading. It's what happens when you code and think about food at the same time. Plants contain fats.

      I know the feeling. Mmmm food.

      Anyway, you are absolutely correct. Some plant-derived foods do contain saturated fats, which has been shown to increase cholesterol levels. My bad for not mentioning this in my original post. See my other comments below for a more detailed discussion of HDL and LDL cholesterol.

    49. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: I'll do my best to ignore the flamebait in your response...

      But you won't succeed (see below)

      RE: You need to look at who sponsored the studies you are referring to.

      You don't. All you need to do is look at the science. And strangely enough, even back in the 20s, weight trainers realised if they upped their protein intake, they'd also up their body size. Grimek et. al. did this. They drank gallons of milk, ate tons of meat and fish, and bulked up.

      RE:Since you don't cite a paticular source,

      Because I don't have the time or trouble to remember it. It wasn't the egg council in the 20s, though.

      RE: In fact, I am a 150#,

      That's proved vegan=anemic stick boy better than I ever could

      RE: vegan triathlete; in the summer I generally bike 10-30 miles a day, swim 1/2-1 mile every other day, run 5 miles every other day, as well as basic weight training every day for my upper body.

      Dutch, you're not a hardcore weight trainer. You're mostly an ENDURANCE ATHLETE. And guess what? You guys need a more vegetable based diet. Vegetarians do WAY better in endurance sport. But weightlifting, powerlifting etc is NOT an endurace sport.

      RE: Most people do not need really high intake levels of protein.

      Nor did I say they did.

      RE: Most people who want to increase their protein intake by 30% generally increase the consumption of meat, dairy and eggs. If a supposed study suggests that people need a 30% increase in their protein intake, who benefits? The meat, dairy and egg industries benefit because people go out and buy 30% more of their products then before.

      Actually, I get most of my protein from supplements.
      RE: If a study is published by a research group funded and supported by these industries, it becomes very difficult to believe that the study does not have an inherent bias.

      Look up "ad hominem". Then get back to me.
      RE: And as I said before, you can derive any and all of these amino acids from plant sources.

      Or you can just eat meat like a normal person.

      RE:The research on rats simply doesn't transfer to humans.

      Gosh, then I guess all animal testing is pointless!

      RE: Classic food combinations include: rice and beans, tortilla and beans, bulgar wheat and garbanzo beans, pita bread with hummus (made from garbanzo beans), rice chapatis with dal (lentils), soy with rice, soy with millet, and soy with barley. Instead of eating a steak, have two bean burritos.

      I have cubicle mates, a life, and that's too much starch. I have type O blood, that stuff makes me ill.

      RE: Furthermore, it's just not healthy to eat a steak and nothing else. This is especially true of someone with an active lifestyle. Amino acids should not be your only concern. A person also needs to be heavily concerned with their intake of other nutrients: Vitamin A, Vitamin C, the Vitamin B complex, Calcium, Iron, etc. Eating a steak does not provide you with necessary levels of all of these nutrients.

      I didn't say that either.

      RE: I don't know if you were abused or neglected as a child or if you have difficulty satisfying your partner sexually,

      Told you so. I knew it :) (see above)

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    50. Re:hydroponic meat? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > First, here in the midwest, most meat eaters do not eat balanced diets. Meat quickly becomes the focal point of the meal to the exclusion of virtually everything else.

      True.

      > Second, research has shown that you do not need nearly as much protein in your diet as you have been led to believe. Most of the research in this field has been funded by the meat and dairy industries (see "Diet for a New America" by John Robbins for some excellent sources).

      You mean

      Virtually all the advocates of "alternative" medicine share this view. In Reclaiming our Health, John Robbins, a New Age devotee, vegan, and animal rights activist, states that "many conditions, including most forms of cancer, viral infections, allergic and autoimmune disorders, and most chronic degenerative diseases . . . are more effectively handled with alternative approaches." This is statement is startling, but he provides no evidence to back it up.
      ...that John Robbins?

      I look forward to the Quackwatch review of Reclaiming Our Health.

      (Before you accuse the maintainer of quackwatch.com as being some kind of protein industry co-conspirator, he's just as hard on the low-carbohydrate diets (e.g. Atkins Diet) as he is on other forms of quackery.

      > Third, meat is unhealthy when consumed in normal portions. It contains large amounts of saturated fat and is high in cholestoral. The rate of heart disease is 3-5 times higher in meat eaters than in strict vegetarians (vegans).

      But you just finished telling us that most meat-eaters don't eat balanced diets! So even if there were such a thing as a "normal portion" (odd, I'd define "normal portion" as "that portion of meat which makes a balanced diet - it's rather tautological, no?), you've just finished telling us that the typical carnivore overconsumes it anyways. So of course they're not going to have a normal heart disease profile.

      Perhaps the risk of heart disease among meat-eaters is higher, not due to something inherent in meat, (a normal portion of which causes ventricular fibrillations!), but due to other factors in the lifestyle of the typical carnivore -- such as an unbalanced diet, or a higher tendency of health-conscious people to do other things that reduce the risk of heart disease.

      When was the last time you saw a vegan come home from work to plunk himself down in front of the TV before lighting up a cigarette, cracking open a six-pack of beer, and munching on a bag of potato chips for dessert?

      While I'll agree that the typical American doesn't eat a balanced diet, if that's the strength of his evidence, John Robbins is hardly a source to be taken seriously.

    51. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even this is too wasteful, I they should just have nutrient pills!

    52. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're posting on Slashdot, but you can't tell the difference between March and April? What's up with that?

    53. Re:hydroponic meat? by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Steve Jobs is a vegan??

      Since when?

      You learn something new every day.

    54. Re:hydroponic meat? by jbayes · · Score: 1

      Oops.

      About par for the course, don't you think? :)

      --

      "It sure was strange to see something on Usenet about me that didn't involve Klingon gang rape." -- Wil Wheaton

    55. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure there aren't some dietary supplements you can take to improve your sense of humor?

    56. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're crazy if you eat meat... is that what you're saying...?

    57. Re:hydroponic meat? by Sabriel · · Score: 2
      But remember, we're talking about hydroponic space meat. They are growing meat by immerse it in fluid that contains nutrients.

      Why not drink the fluid?

      There are taste concerns, of course, but setting those aside, all you are doing is wasting energy -

      Ask yourself what eventually happens when all you do is drink liquids...
    58. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those second kind of beans taste a lot like sour cream.

    59. Re:hydroponic meat? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Apart from taste concerns I think just the euugh! factor would be enough to put most people off.
      Q. Oh - what are you having to drink?
      A. Oh - just the juices of some rancid meat

    60. Re:hydroponic meat? by Decimal · · Score: 2

      1) Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      Right. As simple as it may seem, a lot of people don't understand that humans are *supposed* to be omnivores. Not herbavores, not carnivors, omnivores. It's the diet that humans evolved on. If eating meat did happen to be extremely unhealthy and thus impaired our chances for survival, we would have abandoned meat as soon as developments like farming allowed us to.

      Strangely and disturbing enough, the healthiest meat that a human could find to eat would be from other humans. I wonder if several thousand years down the line, a product called HumoBurger (Lab Grown!) will be available in stores.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    61. Re:hydroponic meat? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'll agree, no problem. I am sure it wouldn't be that bad. Point is, the entire world cannot be supported by an area the size of texas. It would fit really well, but there would be a big pile of shit that you had to sleep in, and you could have a tasty drink whenever someone around you had to take a piss...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    62. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1) Meat is not unhealthy.

      In which respect?

      Meat is:

      1) The decomposing carcass of a dead animal
      (animals might consider it unhealthy, seeing as it ends in their death)

      2) The #1 source of food poisioning, such as by salmonella or campylobacter in factory-farmed chickens, certain e. coli strains in pieces of cows, listeria in nitrate-laden hot dogs (which are SO dead they start out blue and need red food coloring), etc.

      3) The main source of cholesterol in your diet (the rest being other animal products), and causally linked to the #1 killer: heart disease, and the #2 killer: cancer, especially colo-rectal and stomach cancer (colo-rectal cancer is almost as deadly as lung cancer in men and breast cancer in women. Yeah, women eat the same crap and get the same colon problems).

      4) Thanks once again to factory farming, a major source of environmental destruction

      5) A major consumer of grain (70% of the grain in the U.S. goes to feed livestock) and WATER. Using animals to convert grain into meat is essentially a way to feed 1/100th to 1/10th the number of people as the grain could feed directly. As for land usage, one acre of grazing land can product 250 pounds of meat or 20,000 pounds of potatoes.

      If you stopped showering for a year, you'd conserve about the same amount of water as it takes to produce a single burger.

      6) Meat has no carbohydrates, is typically high in fat, and has NO fiber.

      7) Meat contains concentrated amounts of all the pesticides present in all the plants the animal ate while it was alive. If you're worried about washing pesticides off produce, there are hundreds of times more residues present in the tissues of the animal which ate them.

      8) Meat also contains hormones which are injected into animals to make them grow faster, and hormones naturally present. For example, milk comes from pregnant cows and cows which recently gave birth -- lactating females produce large amounts of estrogen and progesterone.

      IF you mean that in moderation, meat will take a long time to kill you, sure. We're talking about chronic problems. Smoking a little also takes a long time to get ya. However, neither one is actually "healthy" compared to NOT consuming the various toxins/carcinogens contained therein.

      > As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy
      > skin, hair, and nails.

      Animals contain useful amounts of all the essential amino acids needed by humans. So do plants. Soy contains useful amounts of all the essential amino acids. Other plants contain useful amounts of some of the essential aminos, and eating two plant sources of complementary aminos (typically a grain and a bean) provide all the essentials.

      Soy also has a GREATER percentage of its calories in protein form. Meat is about 33% protein (by calories), soy is 35%-40% protein (by calories).

      > 2) Fats are a useful dietary substance, containing a good amoung of 'food energy'.

      It's not hard to get plenty of dietary fat from non-meat sources. Nuts, seeds, avocados, etc. all contain large amounts. Olive oil is mostly unsaturated fat. Flax seeds contain Omega-3 fatty acids.

      > 3) Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants.

      I think you actually mean saturated fat. Some plants contain saturated fat, but cholesterol is from animals.

      > And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant
      > cholesterols can be unhealthy as well.

      Actually, no cholesterol (as above).

      Eating ANYTHING without understanding what's in it COULD be unhealthy. It depends what you eat. Eating a wide selection of plants is quite healthy. Eating a wide selection of meat isn't.

      Not to mention, your dietary choices don't JUST affect YOU. You have to consider the resources needed to provide what you eat. The pollution caused by factory farming (notably groundwater contamination from massive cesspools of animal excrement) and environmental destruction (I hope you really like asphalt/concrete/deserts, we're cutting down rainforests) make the world you live in not quite as nice for you as it was. And, of course, the animals don't seem to like being murdered, either.

    63. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Face it, people like meat. To a large portion of the population, it tastes good, and is an easy way
      > to get a large amount of protein.

      An even easier way is to use TVP. You can rehydrate it and cook it however you wish. Excellent vegan Chinese restaurants soak TVP and then use it for fake beef, chicken, etc. All the flavoring is in the spices and preparation -- real chicken and fake chicken don't taste like much by themselves.

      > You do realize that right now an incredibly large amount of food goes to waste due to a number
      > of sociopolitical reasons. I'd say that a huge amount of hunger is caused by corruption, not
      > livestock.

      No, the majority of plants grown for food in the U.S. go to feed livestock, not humans. This is horribly inefficient. Just as a thought exercise, consider how much food you've eaten over your life and then how much edible meat you have on your body. You'll eat food equivalent to your entire adult bodyweight in 2-3 months.

      The only "corruption" going on is people being brainwashed into thinking they NEED to eat meat, or being culturally conditioned to ignore the systematic torture, mutilation, and slaughter of billions of animals annually.

      There's no way to justify meat-eating on ethical, moral, health, or practical grounds, so you do so solely due to custom.

      > Once again, though, most people like meat, and so a low-impact way to create something that will
      > more than likely be an occasional treat will be a great morale booster.

      "Oh boy, kids, today we're going to eat Sparky! Sparky, come here, boy!"

      "Dad, even though we're eating our pet dog, my morale is going to get an incredible boost when I feel him coursing his way through my digestive tract, filling me with essential amino acids and saturated fat! Then when I excrete him into the toilet, I'll be thinking one thing: This is the greatest family EVER!"

      If you want a morale-booster, you want food that tastes GOOD. You can have lousy meat dishes (which is why many people like restaurants instead of cooking at home) just as easily as great vegan dishes (soy ham and potatoes, soy grilled fish, soy beef, soy pork, etc.).

      > It's all a matter of personal preference and taste.

      Actually it's a matter of cost. If you're going with fully-hydrated meat dishes, you can substitute gourmet non-meat dishes. Soy is WAY cheaper than petri-dish lab meat. If you really want fresh meat, take Sparky into space and murder him when you get hungry. YOU'LL KNOW HE'S FRESH! IT'LL BE A GREAT MORALE-BOOSTER!

      > Besides, there are people who do develop allergies to plant-based proteins as well;

      Good thing there's so many plants! Soy, wheat, rice, lots of beans, nuts, legumes, kamut, quinoa, mushroom, etc., etc.

      People tend to develop allergies as teenagers. Most astronauts are adults. Long-term manned space flight will have a large selection of foods for kids to eat who are born in transit to non-allergic adults. Hooray.

    64. Re:hydroponic meat? by EuroChild · · Score: 1

      The problem with just eating vegies is that you have to eat so much more to get your "daily requirements". To get enough iron you can either eat a 500g steak or about 10 kilos of spinach. Granted, you could substitute meat for pills but that would mean you'd have to either produce your own iron pills or take a crap-load of pills with you. So in the long run it would probably be more cost effective to grow meat.

      Damn I'm hungry,

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
    65. Re:hydroponic meat? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      First of all. I'm not saying that meat is unhealtly. But when humans where evolving to be omnivores. We didn't have the ride range of non-meat products that are avalible now. Or the scientific experties to go along with it.

      Evolving to be an omnivore was a good way to get what we needed. Now we have other ways to get what we need.

    66. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why create it in the first place?

      Well, maybe not for eating. Imagine if lab grown meat wasn't rejected by the body?

    67. Re:hydroponic meat? by Xemu · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not sure there are any ethical considerations to growing "hydroponic" meat.

      Sure there are. Just because the meat has been grown in a tank doesn't mean it's OK to eat it.

      What if I would grow a piece of my own muscle in this, and then sell the hydroponic human flesh to a fast food chain...

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    68. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Part of the reason people are "vegans" are that meat is not "healthy"

      Wow! I always thought people are "vegans" because they are complete nutcases. Go figure.

    69. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I would grow a piece of my own muscle in this, and then sell the hydroponic human flesh to a fast food chain...

      Nothing wrong with that.

      Samuel L. Delaney had people eating the cultured flesh of their own species in Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand

    70. Re:hydroponic meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meat tissues can synthesize some of the end result proteins from the nutrients. So there's actually a nutrient gain, at least for certain nutrients.

  15. Better still... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    They should give the astronauts all the spam we have down here. There's plenty.

    /This only looks like a sig.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  16. Smells like.... by Yoda2 · · Score: 1

    Smells like fish....tastes like, crap?

    1. Re:Smells like.... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2

      Carp, actually, goldfish is a kind of carp.

      I suppose now would be a good time to point out, however, that the only difference between carp and crap is a vowel movement.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Smells like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smells like fish, tastes like.. _/\#/\_

      Female "parts"

    3. Re:Smells like.... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      That is an *awful* pun. Kudos. Someone +1 Funny that dude.

    4. Re:Smells like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Crap is the romanian name for Carp

  17. cut out the middle man! by totro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't the astronauts just drink the "nutrient-rich liquid" and save some effort?

    1. Re:cut out the middle man! by diablochicken · · Score: 1

      Because the nutrient-rich liquid is fetal cow extract. Not exactly an ideal beverage.

      The only thing worse might be a glass of Clamato.

    2. Re:cut out the middle man! by BLAMM! · · Score: 1

      Damn! I was going to suggest the same thing!
      Funny as it is, it makes some sense as well. How much of this stuff is needed to grow a meal sized fishstick? Common sense says you need more of the media than what you will get out of it. So do you want to bring 100 liters of media to grow 10 fish, or just bring 10 freeze dried fish? What's the point here?

    3. Re:cut out the middle man! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Woohoo! We got Jon in the hizzouse! Is Philip here too?

  18. For how long? by bravehamster · · Score: 2
    cut from large goldfish and placed in a vat of 'nutrient-rich liquid,'

    And how will these astrounauts replenish this supply of 'nutrient-rich liquid'? I don't know how long one vat will keep a piece of goldfish flesh growing, but you're gonna run outta nutrients sooner or later. There are some things you can't get from recycling your own feces. Let's face it: any manned long-term space missions are gonna be munching on algae steak.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:For how long? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      The idea is to get "fresh" meat into the mission.
      algae steak would also require a vat of nutrients.
      Your going to have to take the nutrients with you some how, cearly a vat of netrients(algea or otherwise)is a very eonomical way to go.

      Of course you could always just take a bunch of chikens with you, but there noice will give you away to the fire giants..oh wait, thats DnD..

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. This is awesome. by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

    Maybe one day, this would allow the poor poor vegetarians out there who choose their diet based on moral objections to killing animals able to eat a big juicy steak. Now those smug bastards won't be around longer than us when we all keel over from cardiac arrest at age 55.

    Just imagine giant cubes of laboratory-grown chicken meat, sliced into perfect cubes by machines and then battered and fried. Chicken McNuggets are abandoned in favor of Chicken McCubes. If they were cubes, the fast food industry could make packaging for them to fit perfectly in.

    "We need the packages to hold 10 cubic inches of smeat."

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    1. Re:This is awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "based on moral objections"

      Most vegetarians I know are irrational and intellectually inferior folk, but at least they can read, unlike yourself.

    2. Re:This is awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industrially produced meat smells mostly like urine and crap

      You obviously have never smelled or tasted an Angus Ribeye Steak cooked rare. Delish!

    3. Re:This is awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cuz :
      1] it tastes good.
      2] all humans are omnivores and need balanced diets with meat.
      the above assumes youre human.

    4. Re:This is awesome. by October_30th · · Score: 0
      need balanced diets with meat

      This is just plain wrong and nonsense. Meat is easy to replace.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    5. Re:This is awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least those of us vegetarians who don't choose our diet based on moral objections to killing animals will still be around.

  20. Why not use full grown cattle? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    I thought if you made a large trip in space, having cattle would be like a biosphere. You would grow plants and tend animals, which would also keep you sane doing routine chores.

    And wouldnt you want to have the ship spin, so you can have some artifical gravity? Then you could slaughter the animals, and not worry about the mess.

    BTW, slaughtering might sound bad, but doesnt stop you from eating at McDonalds.

    1. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by WetCat · · Score: 1
      Actually, cows produce a lot of methane.

      What will you do with that gas onboard the ship?

    2. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 1
      What will you do with that gas onboard the ship?

      Use it for thrust, of course!

    3. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Rocket fuel, baby...

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    4. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would that be the first herd shot around the world?

      Sorry, could not resist!

    5. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the methane might prove to be a problem

    6. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by gatekeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> BTW, slaughtering might sound bad, but doesnt stop you from eating at McDonalds

      Actually, for quite a few of us it does. Scroll down to the part about vegetarians and vegans.

    7. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that 'you' referred to Slashdot users with IQ's above 20 ...

    8. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW, slaughtering might sound bad, but doesnt stop you from eating at McDonalds.

      See this comment. I'm pretty sure they don't slaughter because that meat just can't be real. And that's exactly what stops me from going there (ick).

  21. Just what I've always wanted. by Kibo · · Score: 2

    Spam 2.0, another white meat.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:Just what I've always wanted. by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      err, it is sort of... pink, actually :-)

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  22. Now just need injections... by A+Commentor · · Score: 1

    They need to sell it as an injectable solution for people to grow their muscles..

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  23. Chicken Little... by jacobcaz · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else think of Chicken Little when reading this story?

    *shudder*

    The last thing I want is to end up in a world like Mitch Courtenany.

    1. Re:Chicken Little... by anti-snot · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only person to have read that. My marketting goon ex roomate would never listen to my rantings about his kind and their damned propoganda... I don't think anyone who hasn't read it has the whole advertising/propoganda correlation stuck in their head...

  24. yknot by avandesande · · Score: 0

    Just have them drink the nutrient rich liquid.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:yknot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my, i just spit soda all over the monitor after reading that comment, thanks!

  25. Oh yeah!! by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Funny
    You think this "Nutrient rich" fluid for growing muscles is just for food... Wait till the spammers get a hold of this!

    Forwarded mail follows:

    From: bigwhopper@yahoo.com
    Subject: Increase your penis size by %16 in one week!!

    Ever take a shower? Now you can give your penis a bath, and have it grow 16% in one week!! How does it work? We don't know! But we're all REALLY happy around here!

    WARNING! Don't leave penis unattended. Potential side affects include: Better Sex, Longer Sex, and mothers no longer saying "There's plenty of room in the crotch."

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  26. That's no 'nutrient-rich liquid'... by lennygrafix · · Score: 0

    it's Tjernobyl spring-water!

    --
    ----------------------------------
    it aint all _that_ bad,.... right?
  27. Practical Growth Limits? by RobertAG · · Score: 2

    Aren't there limits to how many times an animal cell can divide, before it just stops dividing, lives out it's life and dies?

    IANAB (I am not a biochemist), but there have been different articles on this subject over the years. Wouldn't that be an impediment to large scale implementation of this?

    Just asking....

    1. Re:Practical Growth Limits? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I had the same problem. There are two ways around this that I can think of:

      a) take multiple biopsies of animals and grow from that, as the animals are still alive and healthy, most of the ethical issues go away.

      b) find a cancerous growth and grow from that- cancers are immortal

      I have a feeling that b) is pretty safe; but I have a stronger feeling that nobody would allow you to feed fish cancers to humans, even though humans immune system would deal with it with ease.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Practical Growth Limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just like we deal with the viruses that come from ducks and pigs..er wait. Ok, just like we deal with the monkey viruses that just happen to cause cancer in humans..err, never mind.

    3. Re:Practical Growth Limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMMM. CancerBurger!
      Really that would solve a lot of issues there. Cancer tends to go off on its own and devide and conquer. Just keep bathing it in a nutrient rich solution of feces and urine and you'll never have to kill anything again! Just make sure you sterilize it first.

      Reminds me of Red Dwarf "15 tons of irradiated haggis!"

    4. Re:Practical Growth Limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more concerned about where they are going to get the "fetal bovine serum" they mention in the article. common sense tells me it will be obtained from, you know, pregnant bovids, and that they will need large quantities of the stuff.

      In fact, you are neither eliminating the need for cruelty nor for growing live animals, you are only another layer of indirection. Something tells me that's not a good idea, but maybe you can save some space with this system.

      Damn thermodinamics.

  28. It would be great if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they could also grow brains with which we could feed the zombies? This would be a good way to reduce the number of people killed in zombie attacks.

  29. They'll tell you it's "Fish" by maggard · · Score: 2
    Sure they'll tell the folks it's "fish", bit it'll really be Soylent Green.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  30. Kibo has prior art on this one by caffeineboy · · Score: 2

    Anyone who reads a.r.k will see this as pepsico finally admitting that they have Animal 57

    This is freaking creepy. Maybe less creepy than Quorn, which is made from slime mold (mycoprotien) but it's far too creepy for me.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
    1. Re:Kibo has prior art on this one by wren · · Score: 1
      For more accurate reference, see the Quorn Website, or listen to the Real Audio version of today's (3/22) Morning Edition segment about Quorn. IIRC, Alex Chadwick and another NPR staffer said that it was quite tasty stuff. In any case, NPR commentaters were alluding to a future where the world is overpopulated and arable land is scarce...where this foodstuff would be a Good Thing.

      I'll take fungus over soylent green anyday.

    2. Re:Kibo has prior art on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Edgar Rice Burroughs (author of the original Tarzan novels) thought of this much earlier. Check out "The Synthetic Men of Mars" (1940 or 1938, depends on who you ask). While you're at it, read his other (vastly under-appreciated) Martian novels.

  31. Already done! by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Already done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but it wastes alot of energy in the process, and creates some nasty byproducts (like tons of methane)

    2. Re:Already done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all right, We're Working On It.(tm)

      -- Your neighborhood genetic company.

  32. Why Not Just Give the Astronauts the Nutrients? by Nightspore · · Score: 1

    This is an inefficient way to deliver nutrition to those very short of space and resources. Slabs of dead fish muscle fed in nutrient baths are not going to give you anywhere close to 100% efficiency in conversion. This is the same thing as generating a pound of beef from 30 pounds of grain fed to a cow. It's wasteful and stupid.

    Yeah, beef tastes better than grain, hahaha. Enjoy your colon cancer.

    Night

    1. Re:Why Not Just Give the Astronauts the Nutrients? by nochops · · Score: 1

      I thing the main goal was not to make the astronaut's energy uptake more efficient. They already get plenty of nutrition from the tubes of goo that they eat right now. The idea was to make their energy uptake more palatable, so that maybe dinner would bear some semblance to normalcy.

      --
      "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    2. Re:Why Not Just Give the Astronauts the Nutrients? by kyosan · · Score: 1

      I think you may be right. Eating meat my be normal for most people but it isn't normal for vegetarians and vegans. I think, spending the US taxpayers money on this is very wasteful. People in space can be healthy without eating meat; vegetarians and vegans do it all the time.

  33. no waste? by donutz · · Score: 2

    The CNN article makes it sound as if this technique produces no waste whatsoever. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but won't these muscle cells be generating plenty of waste as they use up the nutrients provided to them. Granted, you won't have fecal matter to dispose of, but you're still going to need to filter the cell waste out of this serum that the muscles are grown in...

  34. Nice cheapshot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...really... *rollseyes*

  35. screw that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you could just give me a shot to increase capilary vascularity and increase them cute fibers and mitochondria! Then, maybe add some more receptors, and I will have all the speed and endurance needed. Remember kids Velocity is squared so gives more power.

  36. Red or White by blamanj · · Score: 3, Funny

    This presents a serious problem. Since they started with fish muscle tissue, you might assume that the resulting "tissue" was fish, but since it was grown in "a vat of fetal bovine serum", would that make it beef?

    What to serve, red wine or white?

    1. Re:Red or White by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Does it matter? It'll still *taste* like chicken.

    2. Re:Red or White by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And can Catholics eat it on Fridays or not?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Red or White by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Neither. Serve it with NearBeer.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:Red or White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep fried it and serve it on a bun with a order of fries and a coke.

  37. Miracle my eye!! by crawdaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So THAT'S how Jesus did it! Now I'm all anxious for the scientific procedure that shows us how to turn water into wine!

    -Craw

    1. Re:Miracle my eye!! by glwtta · · Score: 2

      use the water to water your grape vinces, press out the juice from the grapes, store the juice in wooden barrels for a while - voila, water to wine!

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Miracle my eye!! by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

      But that takes so much work! I want some sort of "Insta-wine"...you know, just add water? Something as easy as throwing meat into a vat.

      -Craw

    3. Re:Miracle my eye!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for MD 20/20 Kool-Aid.

  38. I hope that McDonalds doesn't see this by wackysootroom · · Score: 3, Funny

    When burgers are dropped on the floor, the meat is usually thrown away. Maybe instead they will break them up and put them into the 'Burger Vat'.

    Oh well, the food can't get *that* much worse, can it?

    1. Re:I hope that McDonalds doesn't see this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When burgers are dropped on the floor, the meat is usually thrown away

      Spoken like a person who never worked at McDonald's.

    2. Re:I hope that McDonalds doesn't see this by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      Thrown away? You've never worked fast food before. I'll just say don't be so trusting next time you bite into your 1/4 pounder w/cheese... you have no idea where it's been.

  39. What a meal! by L-Wave · · Score: 1

    Waiter, can I get a lab-grown fish chunk, a side of Genetically enhanced tomatoes, with some lab-grown pigs feet, and and order of bug-resistant corn, and a diet coke. YUM. =)

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    1. Re:What a meal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewww...Diet Coke!

  40. Vegetarian, but not vegan... by GeekLife.com · · Score: 2

    People are vegetarian (and vegan) for lots of reasons. Cloning clearly would not help solve any of the health problems associated with meat-eating.

    It does seem to help solve a lot of the ethical problems, although there are definitely animals being killed to research the technology, as well as initial animals that are killed to begin the meat farms.

    Most likely, the crossover between the animal rights crowd and the anti-food-modification crowd is large enough that there won't be much of a decrease in veganism/vegetarianism.

    1. Re:Vegetarian, but not vegan... by MrRogers2 · · Score: 1

      I'm having a tough time thinking of ways this could get out to contaminate natural populations. Bleh, as if the initial image of non-mobile, sterile meat blobs wasn't bad enough.

      --
      MrRogers(2)
  41. The real question is... by nochops · · Score: 2

    The real question is:
    What do you get if you let the meat continue to grow?

    With 16% growth in 1 week, I wonder what you'd have in a year? A huge blob of "living" meat, or something similar to a complete fish?

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    1. Re:The real question is... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Well duh, it will keep dividing into the same type of cell [unless it mutates].

      Not all cells can turn into anything else. I think [not sure] its "stem" cells that can be triggered into growing into other forms of cells.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  42. Tofu?! by Cadre · · Score: 3, Funny
    eat tofu?

    Eww

    Sorry. :-) I couldn't resist...

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    1. Re:Tofu?! by Chundra · · Score: 2

      Tofu can be good if it's prepared well. Chinese Buddhist vegetarian style is generally regarded as the best. It's pretty much indistinguishable from real meat, including the texture. Unfortunately, most people eat it in the slimy, scrambled egg style...which is definitely an acquired taste.

    2. Re:Tofu?! by sulli · · Score: 1

      You may want to ask CaptTofu what he thinks about that...

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:Tofu?! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      I recommend only getting packages of 'extra-firm' tofu. Cut them into cubes or strips and fry them in some peanut oil over medium-high heat until golden-brown (this takes a while). Add to your favorite recipie.

      It comes out better in flavor and texture than the mystery chicken that a lot of restaurants put in oriental dishes.

    4. Re:Tofu?! by kyosan · · Score: 1

      You are right; tofu is good (at least it is to many people familiar with it). My wife (a Vietnamese) knows how to prepare tofu and makes several very tasty dishes with it. Even though I never ate tofu growing up, I now love it.

  43. What's the point?? by multipartmixed · · Score: 2

    Okay, so you take some fish up, and it gains in mass by 14%.

    But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

    So, where's the savings? Seems to be they'd be better off shipping up 14% more freeze-dried goldfish.

    During launch, you put in a big box full of ice. After launch, you tie the fish to the outside of the spaceship (like beer, when ice fishing), melt the ice to use as drinking water, and collapse the box into a corner somewhere.

    Seems pretty straightforward to me.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:What's the point?? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you relized there is no tempurature in space?
      and when the particle from a star hit it, it will get hot?
      the advantage ot this is, its easier to maintain a vat of nutrients.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What's the point?? by mikeee · · Score: 2

      you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

      If the lost mass *isn't* exactly equivalent, then this research is definately worth NASA's time...

    3. Re:What's the point?? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

      The final aim of the project is to grow these in a mushroom based growth medium. Mushrooms could possibly feed on the waste product of both the humans and the growth vats, and you have a cycle (I'm sure not lossless, but you're just looking at trying to minimize loss, not eliminate it).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:What's the point?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

      Uh, no. These were cows that were being slaughtered to feed you. After the kill, they find out that the cow is pregnant and obtain the fetus. Unfortunatly, at this time, FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum) has a miracle growth medium that allows cells to grow. Nobody has figured it out yet, but for most indepent cells to grow it is needed.
      It has been 20 years since I have worked in the genetic field(for DOD), but there is no financial incentive for the producers (con-agra, etc) to try and find and alternative (FBS was >USD$ 200/mililiter then). Hopefully something like this will spur the research to find alternatives.

  44. in other news... by llamalicious · · Score: 2

    researchers finally got up the nerve to try some... and it tastes like chicken.

  45. Eh? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    without having to bring along actual animals and fish into space.

    Fish aren't animals?

    --
    Why bother.
  46. It's the growth medium, stupid! by JoeSilva · · Score: 1

    I'm all for growing meat in vats instead of having to grow a whole beast and then processing it, but it seems there is a big problem with this particular method: It requires a bit vat o growth medium that is itself not so easy to supply.

    The NewScientist article states "..immersed them in a vat of fetal bovine serum, a nutrient-rich liquid extracted from the blood of unborn calves"

    Certainly an easier to obtain growth medium is needed for general use in growing food.

    For NASA's low volume needs it's OK to rely on big vats of this stuff.

    I've seen ads for this stuff in various biotech rags, and I do know that it is used in bioreactors for growing up batches of genetically modifed microbes, but I doubt we'll be able to cheaply grow meat at home as needed with technique.

    Eventually we will all be doing it that way as it is theoretically cheaper and can provide a consistently high quality meat. Only thowbacks and meat snobs will insist on meat from whole animals!

  47. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Telastyn · · Score: 2

    Though NASA's probably one of few orginizations I'd expect to actually enlarge my penis 16%

    Maybe then they could fund ISS! =]

  48. /enter nit-picking mode by 56ker · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the title of this be Lab-Grown Fish Chunks - It's what for dinner as they're made from goldfish? /leave nit-picking mode

  49. Just a little heads-up about Chicken McNuggets by Lendrick · · Score: 2

    Next time you buy some mcnuggets, take a good look at them. You might notice that they only come in three different shapes. Chicken McNuggets are actually made out of smaller chunks of meat, which are then "glued" together using a special enzyme. (You may have noticed that the grain of the meat inside a mcnugget goes in all weird directions).

    At any rate, the point of all this is that they're not likely to start making them cube-shaped. They could do it now--they just don't, because it betrays the fact that their meat isn't entirely natural. Go fig. :)

    1. Re:Just a little heads-up about Chicken McNuggets by GoRK · · Score: 2

      They also cook faster and more evenly being flat. As far as a special enzyme goes, there's really no need to do that. Just take the liquefied chicken, press it together, batter, fry. It will hold its shape after that. They ship nuggets to area distributors liequefied in buckets since it's cheaper - they press and freeze the nuggets and send them the 'last mile' to McDonald's.

    2. Re:Just a little heads-up about Chicken McNuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YUMM

  50. SMEAT by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    "SMEAT, its whats for dinner!"

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  51. Nah -- let's go with 2001. by Deagol · · Score: 2
    I like the food David Bowman discovers in 2001 (the novel). If I remember correctly, it was a blue-colored stuff that takes on the properties (taste, texture) of the food you think it is. It's been maybe 15 years since I read it, so my recall might be off.

    I thought it was pretty cool, anyway.

  52. Human Flesh? by kramer · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, what happens when we can vat-grow large amounts of meat from small pieces of human flesh? Will human flesh become an item on the menus? Eh, it'll probably taste like chicken -- everything else does.

    1. Re:Human Flesh? by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      Actually, criminals arrested for cannibalism have said that human tastes like pork.

      If they could laboratory grow it, I'd try human flesh. I'd eat anything if it was honey barbecued.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  53. Stroutrup suggests ADA! [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found that on the web!

    He said:"... so I really recommend ADA for large programs, C++ is good for the average programs which are too big for C...''. It was on an interview for the IEEE.

    Man. I want to ask him "why did you invent C++ Mr Stroutrup?
    How is your name pronounced?
    Could it be "stru-stru-p"?
    Have you sold 1000000 copies of your book? How many then?
    How did you think about it and if you remember whan you were doing at the time?
    My friend bob, told me the other day that C++ is a subset of C, is that true?
    Who is god, does he own C++ and what do you think?
    Will my questions be part of the next FAQ you're working on?"

    And more:
    http://www.research.ATT.com/~bs/bs_faq.html

    1. Re:Stroutrup suggests ADA! [OT] by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      If you just go to his website, all those questions and more will be answered. Be prepared though, the answers are completely dull and without controversy...

      http://www.research.att.com/~bs/homepage.html

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  54. Self Defeating by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    They say that this chunk of tissue was kept in a nutrient rich liquid. I don't understand. The tissue would then be composed of the nutrients in this liquid. Therefore, consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the meat. However, it would much less wasteful to consume the nutrient liquid rather than the meat - which people would desire to cook and of course, would not be as well digested.

    So for a space mission, you're talking about bringing a few thousand liquid tons of nutrient to produce a substantially lower quantity of food. Am I getting this wrong?

    Why not just consume this nutrient liquid directly - something I'm sure a human body would digest better than meat. Space travel requires practical designs. I'm sorry the astronauts will not get a juicy Texas steak every now and then. :)

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Self Defeating by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      So for a space mission, you're talking about bringing a few thousand liquid tons of nutrient to produce a substantially lower quantity of food. Am I getting this wrong?

      Yes. As I pointed out earlier, the eventual aim is to use a fungus based nutrient medium - which would be replenishable, presumably off of the wastes of the people and growth tank.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  55. You Fools! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Soylent Green is PEOPLE! You're eating PEOPLE! AHHhhggg... The Humanity....

  56. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by garcia · · Score: 1, Troll

    let's just hope it doesn't start smelling like fish.
    Then you may no longer have a penis ;)

  57. Less food variety by oscarm · · Score: 1

    The only downside I can see is that the potential for the genetic diversity of our food/meet supply could get dramatically smaller. But overall I think the benefits are worth it,

    Although, I guess know people could just clone gorilla/lion/spotted-owls for meat and not feel bad about eating it.

  58. Annotation by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Therefore, consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the meat.

    Yes, obviously this is true. I meant to say "consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the liquid."

    Sorry... my revision skills are lacking... but no more than CmdrTaco's.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Annotation by geekoid · · Score: 2

      there is the issue of taste and texture. This would be for long trips, and you do have to try to keep the astronauts sane.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Annotation by Lethyos · · Score: 1

      This would be for long trips, and you do have to try to keep the astronauts sane.

      That's why HAL has many stimulating relationships with humans. So the astronauts have someone to talk to.

      --
      Why bother.
  59. McFood? by kurt555gs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All i have to say on this subject is:

    Soylent Green is made of People !!!!!

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  60. smells like fish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""They said it looked like fish and smelled like fish, but they didn't go as far as tasting it," Benjaminson said in a statement."

    I have also made similar statements to many a girl.

  61. Bill Cosby by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's next? Growing a chicken heart in a vat?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Bill Cosby by Speare · · Score: 2

      Growing a chicken heart in a vat?

      It's OUTSIDE YOUR DOOR.

      And it's going to eat YOU up!

      ... when Bill was pitchman for Jello, I always wanted him to have a great big Philco radio (with 675 knobs, of which only two worked) somewhere in the background of a scene. Just enough for the inside joke.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Bill Cosby by sharkey · · Score: 2

      It's OUTSIDE YOUR DOOR.

      Oooooohhhh! I got my Jello, start smearing! I set the sofa on fire! You won't come near a smoking fire and Jello!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  62. Homer quote... by jvl001 · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm... vat grown meat.

    --
    /. is to journalism as graffiti is to a bathroom wall
  63. Illegal? by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration must approve the mutant meat before people can legally consume it, according to NewScientist.com, which first reported on it on Wednesday.

    Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?

    Time to start arresting some children if you ask me.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:Illegal? by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      Naaahhhh ...

      That's Natural Selection at its finest. Think about it ... if a kid does something stupid and makes him/her self impotent (eating something, drinking something, placing crayons up their noses, etc), then nature takes her course and prevents that behavior from happening in the future ...

      Fortunately, play-doh is non-toxic, and makes a "perfectly good donut".

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    2. Re:Illegal? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?

      Eh, no, because those things are not sold as food. By "legally consume", the article is implying that it can be legally sold as food.

    3. Re:Illegal? by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      If only that were true. Thanks to all the help that we give outselves, any man that can produce more then one sperm and any woman with an egg in her can reproduce. Natural selection is going down the toilet.

    4. Re:Illegal? by ender81b · · Score: 1

      You forgot play-doh.

      God I used to love that stuff.

    5. Re:Illegal? by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      I know you're being silly, and I'd mod you +1 funny if I hadn't lost my mod rights in "the big fiasco" (i'm sure everyone knows what that one is).

      BUT...

      What they mean is it's illegal to sell it for the purpose of food, not illegal to eat it.

    6. Re:Illegal? by Glorat · · Score: 2
      "Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?"

      +1 Funny... just. Since it's currently marked interesting by mods who haven't thought too far ahead, I suspect the Food administration must approve the stuff to be safe before people can legally advertise and sell the stuff as food. Crayons and the like are sold for a different purpose and whether or not you eat them is a "fair use" of your purchase.

      Hmm... wonder if there will ever be a FMCA (food millenium copyright act) making it illegal to circumvent anti-eating restrictions such as disgusting tastes and protective wrapping to actually eat certain food stuffs (-1 Offtopic) Apologies

  64. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either that or you'll develop some blooming colonies of bacteria.

  65. Goldfish! by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    The only goldfish I'd ever eat are the little cheesy crackers made by Pepperidge Farm... Otherwise its like eating Carp, nasty bottom muck feeding fish. I'd say stick to freezing your meat if your planning to go on a long trip into space... I see less of a sanitation risk to that than dealing with fluid to grow meat in.

  66. Bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the experiment, Benjaminson and colleagues sliced up muscle from large goldfish and placed them in a vat of nutrient-rich liquid. Within a week, the fish nuggets had become 16 percent bigger.

    Water can do the same thing, and is *much* cheaper. AC#589962

  67. A special request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grow me a cow thats 100% prime rib.

    I guess now I can go down the street and throw raw synthetic meat at the vegans and peta members for being cruel to vegtables.

    SAVE A TREE! EAT A COW!!

  68. It has a name by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    If it was me, i would call this stuff:

    Meat_0.85-BETA

    and .. if it was freeze dried it would be:

    Meat_0.85-BETA.tar.gz

    lol!!!!!!!

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  69. Re:The Matrix?, yeast, [sic] by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

    Because yeast tastes wrong, and mushrooms are cheaper. When quoting bad science from movies, the thing that goes after the close-quote is [sic]. Yeast, incidentally, is eukaryotic (big cells, like what we're made of). Blue-green algae, an even faster growing variety of slime, is prokaryotic/bacterial (little cells, such as cause diptheria and the beubonic plague.) Although we (almost entirely) share our genetic code with bacteria, after the code is used to generate protein sequences, the proteins undergo post-processing which is very different, so a given gene (a sequence of DNA that codes for a particular protein) from, say, a Cow, may not "work" in yeast and probably will not "work" in blue-green algae; i.e. the gene will not produce the same result-protein as in Bessy.

    Actual meat has blood cells and blood vessels; it has proteins (with distinctive scents/tastes) which are unique not only to animals, but to animal muscle tissues (likewise liver or kidney, if that's your taste). It contains a highly distinctive mix of small molecules. It has a texture which it is difficult to duplicate (even ground), especially if you start out with powder or ooze. If you want to know the state of meat-texture duplication technology, from powder, buy a can of Hormel chili and see if you can differentiate the meat and the textured vegetable.

    Anyway, you could clone the proteins into a yeast or a mushroom (see above). You'd have approximately the same chance of success either way. However, mushroom's already form tissues, which single celled organisms (yeast, pond scum) don't. Ground, textured, flavored mushroom products don't taste a whole lot like meat, but the approximation of the texture is pretty good.

    Now, Yeast or Algae is easier to cultivate in (say) hydroponics. So, if you wanted to duplicate the (much derided, unfairly to my mind) nutritional properties of meat, and did not concern yourself with taste or texture, it would be the way to go. However, the post-processing to texture it into something meat like (instead of a slime, powder or slurry) would, almost certainly, take up more space than the extra support facilities to grow a mushroom.

    The best solution, from a synthetic meat standpoint, would be a cube of fillet minion that just kept growing forever in a nutrient bath, complete with blood vessels and whatever components you throught your meat needed (not, for example, nerves). Tumor, it's what's for dinner. This is a (probably) technologically easier proposition that churns out beef grown in tanks. I presume that this is what the group in the article is moving towards.

    Of course, trying to do any of this in space is pretty silly. It seems like a frivolous thing to use up weight/space on; unless the beef industry is willing to pay for the space program as an advertising stunt.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  70. Or even Quorn by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's also Quorn, which according to NPR is a popular european meat-substitute. It's made from fungus (not mushrooms, lower than that), and doesn't even require being farmed like soy beans. It can simply be made in a fermentation plant.

    Sounded interesting, and apparently it tastes pretty good.

    (Mmmm... Quorn Dogs...)

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Or even Quorn by cowbutt · · Score: 2
      Quorn's OK. I've been eating meat almost continuously (bar a period during mid-1995 when I lived off cheese for 6 months before I stopped worrying about BSE :).

      Quorn works pretty well in Bolognese and Chilli, though you need to add a fair amount of seasoning and PLENTY of tomato juice & puree for it to have any flavour. That said, chilli made using Quorn seems to have a harsh chilli heat that beef chilli doesn't.

      Quorn used as chicken works quite well, too, but like chicken, doesn't really taste of much apart from the marinade/coating.

      --

    2. Re:Or even Quorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it ain't vegan.

      boca burgers; yve's ham, garden patties, salami, & sausages; unsteak out; unchicken; tofu; tempeh; tofurkey...lunchtime

    3. Re:Or even Quorn by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2

      Quorn is really good if you marinade it in lemon juice and garlic for an hour or so then chuck it in a frying pan. Anyone know where you can get it in the US ?

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    4. Re:Or even Quorn by John+Ineson · · Score: 1
      There's also Quorn [quorn.com], which according to NPR is a popular european meat-substitute [...] Sounded interesting, and apparently it tastes pretty good
      Don't believe everything you read. It tastest of very little, and the texture is spongy -- not very appetising. You'd certainly never mistake it for meat.
    5. Re:Or even Quorn by haggar · · Score: 1

      I think what once looked as science fiction in "Soylent green", is becoming really feasable.

      --
      Sigged!
  71. Mmm.... carniculture by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    Long a staple of sci-fi,coming soon to your dinner table. But what type of meat will give the best yield?

    The story I remember best about this (can't recall title or author) was about a father and son from a colony planet trying to correct a bureaucratic mistake in the spelling of their world's name.

    It turned out that regular barnyard animal tissue just took far more resources to grow than the tissues used by the medical establishment...and Earth was incredibly overpopulated.

    (No it wasn't "Make Room Make Room" - which was immortalized in film as "Soylent Green". This was a short story and mostly satire)

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  72. But would it be edible? by FXSTD · · Score: 1

    I left some hamburger in the fridge for a couple of months in a "nutrient rich" environment (hamburger helper) and it grew to almost twice it's original size. I was not about to eat it tho. Hamburger helper is not supposed to be green and fuzzy......

  73. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would vegetarians have to complain about? Where would their moral superiority go?

  74. Chicken Little... YUM! by Bolen · · Score: 1

    YES! It was the first thing that popped into my mind when I saw the headline. But, aside from vivid memories about Chicken Little, I'll be darned if I can remember what story it was from.

    For those who don't know, "Chicken Little" was the term used in a SF story about an artificially grown hunk of meat. It was kept alive by being hooked to a device that kept it feed and growing indefinitely. Once in a while, when someone wanted a steak or whatever, you simply cut a slice off the thing.

    Sounds like Science is close to catching up with fiction.

    1. Re:Chicken Little... YUM! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my local kebab house.

    2. Re:Chicken Little... YUM! by jacobcaz · · Score: 1

      The book was "The Space Merchants" and the sequal was "Merchant Wars"

      Great books. Go check them out of the library and enjoy them. They are pretty quick reads.

  75. Soilent Green is made of people!!!!! by plasticpixel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soilent green is made of people!!!

    :)

  76. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > Though NASA's probably one of few orginizations I'd expect to actually enlarge my penis 16%

    "Sure, just stick it out this airlock. The cold hard vaccuum of space will do the rest!"

    (One problem with this approach is that when you're done with the space's cold hard vacuum, your hardness will vary inversely with your hardness' coldness :-)

  77. Remember "The Shining"? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

    This sort of research and experiments would apply to manned missions to other planets: Places the trip would be measured in years.

    If I'm not a vegan (and I'm not) on this trip, and all I get is vegan food, no beef, chicken, or fish, I'm gonna' go ape shit. I mean, it's gonna' be one ugly scene. Sorry, but I'm making a big enough sacrifice (possibly even dying in the effort) to go on this 3 year journey to Mars. Come Saturday night, I want a goddamn steak. Period. More meat, for the meat eaters.

    Also, (offtopic) a good way to keep the population from reaching 10 billion is to bomb Africa and South America with condoms. Maybe the odd instructional pamphlet.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I'm making a big enough sacrifice (possibly even dying in the effort) to go on this 3 year journey to Mars. Come Saturday night, I want a goddamn steak. Period. More meat, for the meat eaters.

      And I don't want my tax dollars to pay for someone to have a heart attack half-way there. In the US, heart attacks are the single-biggest killer - nearly 40% of all deaths are directly related to heart problems. Red meat, in the quantities normal meat-eaters consume, is one of the best sources of cholesterol and saturated fat. Furthermore, eating that steak will probably mean that you, the astronaut whom my tax dolloars are paying, will probably not eat sufficiently large quantities of other sources of nutrition.

      P.S. The sprig of parsley on top of a steak does not count as a good source of nutrition.

    2. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by MouseR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Also, (offtopic) a good way to keep the population from reaching 10 billion is to bomb Africa and South America with condoms. Maybe the odd instructional pamphlet.

      Actually, the most populous area of this dirt ball is asia.

      And birth control isn't necessary the solution. There are still vast regions on this planet which are still inhabited.

      Before getting rid of people, I'd get rid of frontiers.

      (case to the point: I don't always write funny comments)

    3. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But me, the American who loves meat of all kinds and isn't planning on going to Mars, *wants* Mr. Astronaut to have nice juicy steaks whenever the fuck he feels like it.

      A forced Vegan diet undoubtedly qualifies as 'cruel and unusual punishment', at least to anyone who isn't a blazing PETA fanatic. God knows, I'd probably flip out and eat a fellow astronaut if I didn't have any meat for three freakin' years.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2

      I think that crappy food and the like probably go with the territory when it comes to space. The astronauts are in it for the glory, honor, and adventure. I think they can tolerate eating veggies for a few years.

      The key issue is getting enough complete protein, but soy pretty much solves that problem.

      Personally, I love my meat, have no problem raising and killing animals for food, and understand that the entire population of the word can live comfortably in the state of Texas. But that's not the issue. The issue is how to get the astronauts the nutrition they need in an economical way.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    5. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Harvard professor and medical dude showed that dietary cholestorol is negligible. The real problem is that the body tries to plug its own leaks if it's vitamin deficient.

      So yeah, you can eat that steak.

      Besides, we want our astronauts to be the kind of guys who are tough and ready to get the job done, not some anemic sandal-wearing pond scum drinkers.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    6. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by MulluskO · · Score: 2
      There are still vast regions on this planet which are still inhabited.


      Deapite the best efforts of scientists and world leaders, despite birth control, vast regions of the planet remain populated.

      If we're going to reach your goal, we'll need bombs of another variety.
      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    7. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      and understand that the entire population of the word can live comfortably in the state of Texas.
      The following is simply some math to help people in their analysis of the above statement. I'm not rendering an opinion on it, but I know this thread will erupt into a flame war in which no one bothers to actually DO any math on it. so here is the math, now you guys can flame each other.

      Here are the relevant numbers:
      261,914 square miles of LAND (that does not include the 5K odd square miles of water)
      Population of the earth: Roughly 6,200,000,000.
      That is 23671 people per square mile. By contrast, Tokyo has a population density of 33,232 people per square mile.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    8. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by prisoner · · Score: 1

      How can this be? If there are 261,914 sq mi of land shouldn't there be somewhere around 800,000 sq mi of water? I thought 3/4 of "Earth" is under water...?

    9. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      The area is for TEXAS, thought I had made that clear but as I go back it seems that I am implying that the area of the earth is that. Which is not true. That is the square mileage of TEXAS ONLY.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    10. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Actually, the most populous area of this dirt ball is asia.

      WOW!

      You mean the continent with the LARGEST AREA also has the LARGEST POPULATION?

      You sure straightened out THAT guy!

    11. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A forced Vegan diet undoubtedly qualifies as 'cruel and unusual punishment'


      Especially for everyone in those little living quarters. Veggies are smelly bastards.

    12. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People as mentally unstable as yourself would jeopardize a mission, and should not be allowed to be astronauts.

    13. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > And I don't want my tax dollars to pay for someone to have a heart attack half-way there

      Yeah, yeah. And I don't want my tax dollars to pay for abortions. But how much control over that do you think I have?

      By the way, I love how most vegans are all worried about killing a pig, but are the first to line up to allow doctors to kill pre-humans.

  78. Two Fish, Five Loaves by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1

    Just like the fantasy story where a scruffy revolutionary fed five thousand people with two fish and five loaves of bread.

  79. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by saider · · Score: 1

    From the article...

    He acknowledges that some diners might consider the current concoction unappetizing: fetal bovine serum, which is extracted from the blood of unborn calves. The liquid is a staple food for hungry cells in lab experiments. But there are concerns that the substance might transmit mad cow disease to humans.

    Stick your dick in that. Also forget about any blowjobs.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  80. nutrient rich liquid by blugecko · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Call me crazy, but instead of growing meat, why don't they just consume the nutrient rich liquid instead? seems to make more sense, but that is coming from a vegan, so meat (and dairy, honey, animal products/byproducts in general) are icky to me.....

    --
    Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, not just chemistry, reality!
  81. Dear Mr. Stupid Moderator by Emugamer · · Score: 2

    FLAMEBAIT? He answers the question then adds a truthful insightful addition... you should be dragged out and shot. please read up on some basics of Systems Theory it does make a lot of sense...

  82. Re: zero-g pens? by johnrpenner · · Score: 2

    | I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to
    | making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space
    | environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved
    | synthetic meat.

    NASA spent several million dollars and years of research
    to make a Pen that works in Zero-G...

    the russians just used a pencil...

    typical. :-\

    storm's nest

  83. Your Turn To Cook by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    Why not just cut out the middle man (or fish):)? With stem cell research, couldn't one of our multi-generational space cadets just give up an arm or leg for dins and then regen the limb?

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  84. Re:Soilent Green is made of astronauts!!!!! by plasticpixel · · Score: 1


    Actually it occured to me that Soylent Green
    could be made of Astronauts in the future.

    If they send three astronauts up but two
    well fed astronauts come back... I think
    we have our proof.

  85. one ethical viewpoint by scrawny · · Score: 1

    as a 13-year vegetarian for ethical reasons, i can loosely define ~my personal~ rules in this manner:

    i will not eat ~or consume~ any product that contains animal or animal by-products that were killed for the sake of consumption.

    accidental killing (e.g. road kill) or natural death (e.g. old age) are acceptable as food to me, but i haven't had the nerve or opportunity to scrape up some squirrel or raise my own cow.

    i would love the opportunity to surgically remove a small t-bone, but alas, i can find no DVM's willing.

    am i against the research? yes, there is killing. will i eat a lab grown fish stick? yes, if the killing has stopped--that is not likely.

    1. Re:one ethical viewpoint by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      What if you cut off the leg of a pig and had a nice ham without killing the pig? Just curious as it seems like this would fit into your personal rules.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    2. Re:one ethical viewpoint by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Cutting off a pig leg kills the pig leg.

      Pig legs are animal byproducts.

      He clearly states we will not eat animal byproducts that are killed.

    3. Re:one ethical viewpoint by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      I clearly stated that the pig in question would not be killed. It would be a medical-grade amputation performed by a vet.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    4. Re:one ethical viewpoint by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, just like one can clone an animal from a few cells, one would vat-grow meat the same way. No killing or amputation involved.

    5. Re:one ethical viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      by scrawny (skinny@skinny_dot_net) on Friday March 22, @02:40PM

      as a 13-year vegetarian for ethical reasons, i can loosely define ~my personal~ rules in this manner:

      i will not eat ~or consume~ any product that contains animal or animal by-products that were killed for the sake of consumption.


      The origin of the nickname 'scrawny'. You don't put meat on yer bones with lettuce, and you don't win friends with salad.

      You don't win friends with salad...
      You don't win friends with salad...

    6. Re:one ethical viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      accidental killing (e.g. road kill) or natural death (e.g. old age) are acceptable as food to me, but i haven't had the nerve or opportunity to scrape up some squirrel or raise my own cow.

      You're better off remaining a vegetarian than to eat any animal that has died of old age.

  86. They expect people to eat this carp? by iabervon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that this is a promising idea. The various foods we like to eat are often made in the bodies of animals, but there's no reason that the cells that do it have to be in something with a nervous system. Of course, it couldn't have evolved that way, but the reason that meat is an inefficient food source is that it tends to wander around and look for food. We've just replaced the rest of the fish's body with a vat.

    If this sort of research continues, we ought to be able to build what amounts to an ecosystem with the routing between various animal organs done with pipes instead of the rest of the animals.

  87. Ranch in my basement! by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Nothing like tossing little "Kipper" on the grill after a hard days work at the office. Grew him this morning I did! Just hate the way they scream when you take them out of the vat though...

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  88. funny by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    reading this - I just had a vision of some student rubbing this nutrient liquid all over his privates hoping for that 16% in a week....

    but maybe im just sick....

  89. A perfectly good waste of funding... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    When NASA could be bringing one of these to life!

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  90. Space Meat. Shades of Invader Zim by Jeffery+McGrew · · Score: 1

    "But because we didn't have the formula for SPACE MEAT, we made ours out of napkins"

    What's next, the Scary Monkey Show on prime time? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love Invader Zim and All, but I didn't think it was REAL!

    AGGGHHHH!

    (P.S. I'm dancing like a monkey)

  91. Vat-grown stuff? by Kaa · · Score: 2

    "Because he had a good agent, he had a good contract. Because he had a good contract, he was in Singapore an hour after the explosion. Most of him, anyway The Dutch surgeon liked to joke about that, how an unspecified percentage of Turner hadn't made it out of Palam International on that first flight and had to spend the night there in a shed, in a support vat.

    It took the Dutchman and his team three months to put Turner together again. They cloned a square meter of skin for him, grew it on slabs of collagen and shark-cartilage polysaccharides They bought eyes and genitals on the open market The eyes were green."

    William Gibson Count Zero

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  92. How about lab-grown skin? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Imagine giant, lab grown sheets of leather. We can genetically engineer the cells to mimic the tanning process. Leather jackets and such will no longer cost 100-200 dollars. Cool :)

  93. No waste products? I don't think so. by nosse_elendili · · Score: 1

    "But live animals generate biological waste, and slaughter on a spaceship would be a complicated affair. By growing just edible muscle, Benjaminson's breakthrough eliminates those steps altogether."

    I can see no reason why these living cells should cease to produce waste products. While we can certainly see an awful lot of correlation between human brains and waste products, the nervous system is not an organism's major source of biological waste.

    The creation of biological waste products is just a fact of life. It happens in the simplest cells and it would certainly happen in these living, eating, growing tissues.

    Without a circulatory system, how are these waste products going to be taken out of the "meat"?

  94. Dear NASA, Please Cease-and-Desist... by Wntrmute · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Dear NASA,

    I am writing to you on behalf of my client, the Fishing Industry Association of America. (FIAA) My client is higly concerned that your new method for growing fish chunks in the laboratory infringes on their buisness method patent for "a process for making human-consumable foodstuffs from biological material of aquatic origin."

    We fear that your new technique is also a circumvention device under the DMCA. We can not allow you to continue to develop this "biological crowbar" which infringes on our intellectual property rights. Please cease and desist from this reseach, and turn over all material related to this research to my client, or we will be forced to take more serious action.

    Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

    John Dewey, Senior Partner and lead council for the FIAA.
    Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe, Attorneys at law.

  95. NASA fishcam by Eric+Seppanen · · Score: 1
    For some reason, the idea of fish in space seems really funny to me. I'm imagining a fishtank in zero-g, where some of the fish a swimming rightside-up, some are swimming upside down... better watch out when you take off the cover to feed them, though, because fish might head for the food and then pop out of the water and go sailing across the room. Of course, the water is fairly likely to go sloshing across the room as well, so presumably someone would have to design a zero-g airlock (waterlock?) for food and fish to enter and leave the tank. Or perhaps just spin the whole thing like a centrifuge to get gravity-like effects.

    Screw men on mars. I wanna see Fish In Space.

    Now that's offtopic.

    --
    314-15-9265
  96. Beefamato by Indomitus · · Score: 1

    What about Beefamato? It's the beef juice cousin of Clamato and the only thing I've ever found to sound more disgusting than Clamato itself.

    I've never tried either I have to say, but I'm not going to either. To quote Jules: 'sewer rat could taste like pumpkin pie but I'm not going to eat the filthy mutherfucker.'

  97. PEOPLE MY GOD ITS PEOPLE. by CDWert · · Score: 2

    Goldfish my butt,

    Remeber Soylent Green,

    There was also Soylent Red and some other colors I dont remeber,

    This is the first step, Soylent GOLD !!!!

    Soylent-Green for the masses

    Its people my god, SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE !

    Does this mean human self cannibalism is a profitable possibility, they say the meat is kinda sweet and all.

    Seriously, Do you want to eat something thats GROWN in a "nutrient rich" (thats the people part I bet) , this is just so wrong to my pallete, mind, and sense of what is natural I cant see it.....

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  98. for you talmudists out there by jbaltz · · Score: 1

    But is it kosher?

    --
    I am the Lorvax, I speak for the machines.
  99. Re: zero-g pens? by Grayraven · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, but that's an urban myth. See this for more information.

    --
    "Source... The Final Frontier" -- keepersoflists.org
  100. Hmm... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

    Dude, this is like living spam.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  101. The taste is familiar... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Everything tastes like chicken!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  102. Re: zero-g pens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try doing some research before you make a fool of yourself in a public forum.

    NASA used pencils too, until a privately funded company spent their own money to develop the space pen. Once they were on the market, NASA began using them, because they solved a very real problem with pencils in microgravity: tiny airborne graphite shards.

  103. Freeware by houdini · · Score: 1

    Seems like a Rudy Rucker book where beings are created from gene-tweaked molds and algae and the flesh is sold at fast food restaurants.

    Freeware

  104. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    which makes me wonder, if this nutrient rich mix makes muscle grow, what's the difference between this nutrient bath, and a carcenogen? (which ultimately causes unchecked tissue growth)

    more importantly, would you want to handle this "food"?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  105. They're not as dumb as you think by sadclown · · Score: 1

    Actually, NASA is already experimenting with contemporary vegan cuisine. This article describes the project. Another example of how space research creates technology fit for every day use: they're working on an automatic tofu-making machine.

  106. weight vs. benefit - plants win by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    I would imagine it's because that meat is higher in energy, pound for pound. With spacecraft, weight/storage considerations are of paramount importance.

    OK let's think about this. You want to provide the maximum amount of food per weight in space. The ideal solution is nothing but canned chili. Obviously this provides 100% weight devoted to food. Chemicals for growing meat are extra; the conversion is not 100% efficient.

    But the balancing consideration is the psychology of eating. The main thrust of this research is to provide food that maintains psychological well-being on a long trip.

    Offhand, I'd say that green plants would be much more pleasant than a mutant extra passenger, a blob of vat-grown flesh that I'm sure I'd grow to hate.

    The researchers should start by examining which foods are nutritious and can be grown in space with solid efficiency. I doubt that meat is one of them. Water used by plants is ultimately recycled; plants implicitly clean the air.

    1. Re:weight vs. benefit - plants win by jafuser · · Score: 1
      The ideal solution is nothing but canned chili

      I can just see a bunch of chili-dining astronauts confined to a small space together for weeks or months.

      "Fuck cable, that's pay-per-view!" -- George Carlin

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  107. Patent Infringement? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Won't McDonalds sue NASA for infringing on their secret for hamburger patty production now?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Patent Infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rofl, I think they will, I was thinking the same thing.

      "I'd like to order a #5 combo, the McMeatchunks burger, super sized with coke"

  108. Don't know what to think! by Ravensign · · Score: 1

    I read this news story and had about 10 simultaneous reactions...

    This is cool, or no, it's gross, or no, its distrubing, or no, its a god send, or no, its the end of the world...

    The big question is how does it taste?

    --
    "Sig free in '03!"
  109. Sam Kinnison said it best... by fred911 · · Score: 1

    SEND THEM U-HAULS!

    Not Food.... not money... U-HAULS. They live in a place where NOTHING GROWS!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  110. No more Chopped and Pressed? by Zapdos · · Score: 2

    Will they will grow chicken nuggets in the shape of dinosaurs, and fish that is square.

  111. Save A Step by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Place the humans into the nutrient rich broth.

    It's probably more efficient.

    Any activist vegetarian could probably give you a full lecture about the relative efficiencies, probably in terms of acres/hectares required to feed humans different diets.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  112. Soylent Yum! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Mmm... Soylent Green...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Soylent Yum! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verde soylent esta gente! Esta gente! Aaiiiii! No es bueno!

    2. Re:Soylent Yum! by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      Witch brings up the yukky point: If you take a sample of your own muscle tissue, grow it in culture and sell it to cannibals, is it unethical, immoral or just silly?

  113. KFC beat them to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    moreover, KFC has been growing chickens in a lab at dartmouth ... er ... is that old news now?

  114. Perfect! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Funny
    They basically end up living off of the equivalent of frozen dinners and ramen.
    ...which is why NASA needs to start launching geeks into space!

    Really, we're used to freeze-dried diets, Tang and total isolation from the rest of humanity!

    --grendel drago
    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Perfect! by wedg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but eating all that Ramen gives you the schlitz, and you really don't want that in zero gravity.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    2. Re:Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think they launch right now?

  115. Fungus Burgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NPR was reporting this morning on a vegitarian meat alternitive that's very popular across the pond which is based on a lab grown fungus. Sounded pretty good actually.

  116. My brother would starve by dscottj · · Score: 1
    Now, I'll admit I'm a fussy eater (seafood gives me the willies), but I guess I'd eat this if there was enough BBQ or Ketchup involved. As long as I didn't end up growing boobs or something (I'd never leave the capsule!)


    My brother only eats cheese, hamburger, and bread (and has the colesterol to prove it). I really do think he'd starve unless he could freeze-dry McD's or something.

    --
    AMCGLTD.COM. Where cats, science fictio
  117. Meat Trees Anyone? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

    It would be so right, meat grown on trees.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  118. I can see the state of Meat in the future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're made out of meat." ---o--------oooooo---
    "Meat?" ----o-oo-----oooooo----
    "Meat. They're made out of meat."
    "Meat?" --------------
    "There's no doubt about it. We picked several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."

    "That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars."

    "They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."
    "So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."
    "They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."

    "That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."

    "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat."

    "Maybe they're like the Orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."

    "Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take too long. Do you have any idea the life span of meat?"

    "Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the Weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."

    "Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads like the Weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through."
    "No brain?"
    "Oh, there is a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat!"

    "So... what does the thinking?" -----ooo------

    "You're not understanding, are you? The brain does the thinking. The meat."

    "Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"

    "Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you getting the picture?"

    "Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."

    "Finally, Yes. They are indeed made out meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."

    "So what does the meat have in mind."

    "First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the universe, contact other sentients, swap ideas and information. The usual."

    "We're supposed to talk to meat?"

    "That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there? Anyone home?' That sort of thing."

    "They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"

    "Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."

    "I thought you just told me they used radio."

    "They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."

    "Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"

    "Officially or unofficially?"

    "Both."

    "Officially, we are required to contact, welcome, and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in the quadrant, without prejudice, fear, or favour. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."

    "I was hoping you would say that."

    "It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"

    "I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say?" `Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"

    "Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they only travel through C space, which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."

    "So we just pretend there's no one home in the universe."

    "That's it."

    "Cruel. But you said it yourself, who want to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you have probed? You're sure they won't remember?"

    "They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them."

    "A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream."

    "And we can mark this sector unoccupied."

    "Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?"

    "Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotation ago, wants to be friendly again."
    "They always come around." -------oooo---
    "And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the universe would be if one were all alone."

  119. As a vegetarian (although I rarely eat dairy) who eats almost all organic foods... I can't think of anything more disgusting.

    Well, I probably can :)
    Scientifically it's interesting, but I think this money is spent better other places.

  120. Weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Touro (from L. Taurus) means Bull.

    I wonder if this is:

    A) a "planted" news story (sorry!);
    B) a college funded by India;
    C) one of that name-coincidences (in that the ultimate goal is to produce meat);

    In anycase, it's a good idea if we can stop killing live beings and still be able to enjoy tasty food.

  121. Here's an idea by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

    Why not just feed the nutrient rich liquid directly to the astronauts?

    1. Re:Here's an idea by RFC959 · · Score: 2

      Maybe for the same reason we feed the grass to the cows instead of eating it directly ourselves... (Assuming a cow that gets fed grass these days, as opposed to soybeans, fish, and bits of other dead cow. :-P )

  122. Re: zero-g pens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention practically everything burns in a 100% oxygen, especially things that burn well in our polluted out mostly nitrogen atmosphere.

  123. Enough all-fscking-ready! by cmkrnl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Listening to self righteous Vegans is nearly as bad as having to put up with the bollocks spouted by the wilder christian sects, endless moronic repetition that we are all destined for hellfire because we are catholic, protestant, gay, black, white, jewish, hindu, moslem, having sex before marriage, single mothers, shopping on Sundays/whatever.

    You cannot rationally argue with these headcases, its a religion, an article of faith, they are fscked in the head every bit as bad as members of the LCC, CoS, Moonies or any other cult.

    The nonsense that we cannot be meat eaters if the planets population reaches [INSERT LARGE FIGURE HERE] has been repeated by their ilk for well over 150 years now. I believe the figure originally started at a billion and has to be adjusted up each time the the past assertions have been exposed as utter bollocks.

    Any person who would take the rantings of Peter Singer seriously should be made to pay dearly for advocating the fascism of the 'animal rights' movement.

    No animal tested drugs, no medicines, no welfare benefits paid out of taxes raised by folks and their businesses you would destroy in the name of cute little animals, for you or any hellspawn you breed.
    You want to condemn the world back to a medieval hell where a simple infection ment death, its only fair that you should be hoisted on your own petard and try that road yourself first.

    The cure for the comfortable urban middle classes who make up the vast majority of proselytizeing Veganism (Note I did not say vegetarian), is to be dumped say for 18 months onto an Ant/Artic island full of 'Ohhh So Cute' seals/penguins armed with nothing but a blunt hatchet.

    Homo-Sapiens, like a lot of members of the ape family is an omnivore, live with it.

    Curmudgeon

    1. Re:Enough all-fscking-ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I guess you've got an axe to grind.

      It seems like a bunch of people that feel very insecure about their diet. (The weight-lifter guy and the parent of this post).

  124. Hrrrm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, but I think I'd rather become a vegetarian than eat meat that never had the chance to be hunted, shot, and finally cooked and gnawed on..

  125. Fat != cholesterol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why everyone is confusing this.

  126. Healthy vs. healthful by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    "Meat is not unhealthy."

    Meat (or any other inanimate thing) _can't_ be "unhealthy", or "healthy". What you're saying is that "Meat is not ill", which is wrong. The correct word is "unhealthful".

    1. Re:Healthy vs. healthful by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      Meat (or any other inanimate thing) _can't_ be "unhealthy", or "healthy". What you're saying is that "Meat is not ill", which is wrong. The correct word is "unhealthful".



      Depends on whether you're talking American English or English English.
      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    2. Re:Healthy vs. healthful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The correct word is "unhealthful".

      Read definitions two and three, you cocky ass.

      unhealthy (adj)
      1: not in or exhibiting good health in body or mind; "unhealthy ulcers" [ant: {healthy}]
      2: detrimental to health [syn: {insalubrious}, {unhealthful}]
      3: not conducive to good health; "an unhealthy diet of fast foods"; "an unhealthy climate"

  127. ewww.. but cool :) by ceethree · · Score: 1

    I think it is gross but ... hey what if something bad was to happen .?. it is a way to get more meat .. but yea .. i agree that is gross .. i kinda see the whole tofu thing .. yeah that seems like a better thing to do .. but my scientific side feels this is interesting .. but my logical food side sees this as gross ... hmm ... which will win ? my food side or my scientific ? ... ahh food won !!! YUCK THIS IS SICK ! WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF NEXT !!?!?!?

    --
    Yours Truly, Wes -- Owner ... http://www.geekish.net
  128. Soylent Green is People! by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    I was thinking the same thing. Guess we've both got sick minds. I suppose the only real worry would be that if some deranged person acquired a taste for it, they might get the urge to try the real thing (One instance of cannibalism and that stuff is off the market so fast it'll make your head spin).

    Steve Varley suggested something similar in The Ophiuchi Hotline, except that they were growing meat on trees there (including an illegal human variety).

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  129. not surprised by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    CNN has this story on a NASA-funded project being conducted at Touro College in New York.

    A college?
    Why does this not surprise me?
    Have you seen the kind of stuff they serve to you in college cafes?
    Yuck!

    Magius_AR

  130. "Venus, Inc" by DrCode · · Score: 2

    This is straight out of Pohl & Kornbluth's "Venus, Inc" story from, I think, the late 50's. There was a giant hunk of chicken culture sold as "Chicken Little".

  131. Never gonna happen by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

    I have no idea why NASA is even looking at this. The weight of the growth medium will necessarily always be much greater than the weight of the meat produced, so there is no reason to grow the meat in space. You might as well just ship out with the meat flash frozen and shrinkwrapped.

  132. Re: zero-g pens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space capsules do not have a 100% oxygen enivornment. That would be very dangerous, and probably lead to accelerated aging due to all the free radicals. Oxygen is bad for your health, it's just that a lack of it is much much worse. Anyone want to come up with a healthier oxygen-substitute???

  133. Blasphemy! by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Let the common fools have their synthetic steak, but they'd better not assimilate The Keg Steakhouse and their Keg Size New York. Some things must be left sacred!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  134. Try human meat now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people at Manbeef have been offering a human-meat service for quite a while. If you have enough cash for the minimum order, check 'em out. I guarantee you'll love it.

  135. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  136. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  137. Rudy Rucker said it first. by jeda · · Score: 1

    Well, somebody may have said it before him, but he said it best. This reminds me of his excellent "ware" series of novels. I highly recommend them to anyone who likes Bruce Sterling or William Gibson or Neal Stephenson. Check out his website. Lots of interesting stuff. I think he brought up vat grown meat in Freeware. "Wendy Meat" still makes me laugh thinking about it.

    On a sidenote, I always though spirulina would be useful for growing food in space. Which sounds more distasteful, eating algae or vat meat? ;)

  138. Using protein to grow protein by Guppy · · Score: 2

    Even if we ignore the cost of media components such as hormones and growth factors (requirements that can probably be engineered out at our current tech level), there are basic problems with the metabolism of animal tissues (requirements that cannot be engineered out at our current tech level).

    Probably the biggest stumbling block is that animal cells lack the ability to synthesize many amino acids, and even some of the ones that can be synthesized require other amino acids as the starting material. So, you end up needing protein to grow protein. From an efficiency standpoint, you'd be much better off just drinking the growth media.

    In the case of growth factors (hormones, cytokines, etc), a change in one or two proteins can take care of things. For some growth factors, you can even see this happen spontaneously if you serially passage cells repeatedly. The problem with amino acid requirements is that you'd need to engineer in whole new metabolic pathways, which is much more difficult. Probably one of the most sophisticated examples of putting in a new pathway was in the example of beta carotene synthesis in "golden" rice. This was barely doable with something like three steps. I don't know how many steps would be required to cover all amino acids, but I'm guessing it would be several dozen at least.

    A much better idea is to use lower organisms that can manufacture all 20 essential amino acids already. A good example is Quorn, a fungal meat substitute that is already available. To grow Quorn, all you need is water, ammonia, some minerals, and a carbon source such as glucose. The fungus can synthesize all necessary amino acids from carbohydrates, with the ammonia supplying the necessary nitrogen. What's more, it can be grown in a continuous process (as opposed to batch), which you can get a huge amount of a small reactor.

  139. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  140. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  141. Re: zero-g penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe there is a typo in your post subject.

  142. Shit in the meat? by gotih · · Score: 1

    I am not a biologist, can someone please explain where the cell waste would go if there is no blood system taking wastes away? Or maybe there is no waste -- there's no digestion and the cells process the nutrients without waste (beyond CO2). Krebs was a long time ago.

    not that it matters to me, i'm vegan and since the research involved slicing hunks of flesh from living animals i'm not interestd in the product.

    --

    fear is the mind killer
  143. Well by greenrd · · Score: 1
    I think human meat falls in the same category as kiddie porn. We just don't want to encourage demand...

  144. MOD PARENT UP - GOAL OF PROJECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

    The final aim of the project is to grow these in a mushroom based growth medium. Mushrooms could possibly feed on the waste product of both the humans and the growth vats, and you have a cycle (I'm sure not lossless, but you're just looking at trying to minimize loss, not eliminate it).

  145. more importantly... by eviltor · · Score: 1

    It means that someday I might be able to eat a hamburger without feeling sorry for the cow.

  146. W.T.F.? by DickScratcher · · Score: 1

    ...which would imply that men eating East Asian diets have a greater tendency towards growing breasts and developing scrotal cancer.

    They don't.

    This is pure B.S. diet pseudoscience. What fucks you up is red meat and saturated fat, the cause of 'Western' diseases such as bowl cancer and cardio-vascular diseases.

    1. Re:W.T.F.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the average Japanese man eats about 10 grams of soy a day. The soy-heavy diets that North American health freaks consume run into hundreds of grams a day. In short, eating a stir-fry with soya sauce, or even the occasional tofu meal is okay. Replacing all meat and protein sources in your diet with soy (i.e. soy meat, soy milk, etc.) is not.

  147. Too much work by modemboy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it just be easier to have the astronauts drink the 'nutrient-rich liquid' and save a step?

  148. Mmm tastes of chicken by eoinatstraylight · · Score: 1

    When can they grow up lumps of me? Cannibalism is kinda frowned upon these days, but this could be the next big thing!

  149. Don't they have enough to do? by fatbastard10101 · · Score: 0

    Now they have to come up with a space vineyard, a zero-g fermenter and bring a load of Italian peasants with them to stomp the grapes.

    They should just bring carbonated merlot in a can.

  150. Vat grown protein is old news by petark · · Score: 1

    Vat grown protein has been around since before the mid 1980's. Scientists (and Pythagoreans) are already able to produce yeast/fungi based meat substitues, so why would NASA want to waste its time and money on vat grown muscle tissue.

    If they want to grow tissue in vats, why don't they work on organ tissue, i.e. for transplants.

    1. Re:Vat grown protein is old news by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 0

      Yes, my favorite meat substitute is vat grown bread. It's made from yeast. I believe the Arabs were the first to specialize in the vat grown bread. I'm quite fucking pleased with the stuff, particularly the british flavors of liquid bread.

  151. Larry Niven and his lovable food beasts! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    Figuring prominently in Larry Niven's (excellent) Known Space collection of books is a creature known as a 'Bandersnatchi'. This creature was genetically engineered to be big, easy to herd, and non-sentient. The brain of this creature was huge, since it was higly prized as a delicacy. May I suggest "Ringworld", and "World of Ptavvs", both by Mr. Niven. I would put a link to Amazon here, but it seems that people think I'm trying to get a referral. :P Go find them yerself.

  152. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  153. Bad Joke [OT] by Wildcat+J · · Score: 1
    Q: What do you call a bodybuilder with a big penis?

    A: A beginner.

    Come on, I know you're all smirking... ;)

    -J

  154. Go vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go vegan bitches!

  155. Cooking in space - needs more research by meldroc · · Score: 2

    What NASA really needs to do to make space journeys livable is bring a master chef to the space station with a Progress ship full of raw ingredients and some space-adapted cooking tools. You can't stir ingredients together in a bowl, so you'll have to have a closed sphere with openings to add ingredients and a cranked stirrer thingy. You can't stir fry in zero-G, so maybe you can spin fry - have a hot cooking surface shaped like a cylinder & spin it so the food is held onto the surface by centrifugal force. You can't bake bread in zero-G and expect it to come out the same as it does on earth, so you may have to make bread spheres that "rise" outwards as they bake. The space kitchen is going to have to have a killer fume hood & ventilation. It also needs lots of fire supression (kitchen fires in a closed environment are BAD!!!)

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  156. Cornell is working on space food by sunhou · · Score: 2

    I remember reading in various Cornell newsletters/newspapers that some people here are doing research on foods for space, mainly vegetable-based stuff.

    A quick search turned up two articles: the first one, with photos, and a more recent follow-up.

    Among other things, they're trying to develop taco-like things, carrot drumsticks, and some kind of chocolate substitute. Oh well, I don't think astronauts are expecting gourmet meals...

  157. FRIED AFTERBIRTH by DickScratcher · · Score: 1

    There was a celebrity chef programme in the UK where some bumpkin toff concocted a meal from afterbirth. Highly nutritious apparently. What do you yanks reckon of that? Might come in handy on a long Mars trip.

    Here are some recipes, including Plancenta Pizza:

    http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/etplcnt2.htm l

  158. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blowjobs? Where we're going we won't need blowjobs.

  159. There are many living examples by kyosan · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. Hopefully some day humans, as a whole, will be more sensitive to animals suffering and take futher steps to prevent it. Vegetarianism and veganism is an obvious first step. Humans don't need to kill the other animals to eat, so why do we do it when it causes them suffering?

  160. The real question is... by wedg · · Score: 2

    Who would want to eat GOLDFISH?

    OH NO! MR. FLIPPER! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...
    etc.

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  161. BOOGER by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

    Super!~!READ POKEY megafun hooray hooray hooray Hooraay hooray hooray hooay./
    Lameness filter a;asdlf zxc,
    DFn. asdfl . Wer. asdf. Lasdflk .,wef xclvk oiux oxw blko sfkx fslefj buxcvjsd sdf xvcljkd. Ooiw nfkl weonb lksd we.gb dsjkl xjsd ekjgiob sfnbuq qjk g . # reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting # describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illeg #
    roblems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
    wser type User IDNickname or AC What steps ca

  162. Porn industry would love it by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    Now you could get real Penis enlargers

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  163. Is anyone else expecting Charleton Heston... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to pop up here and start yelling, "NASA fish is people!"

    Eh. Big deal. I wanna know when we get those cool replicators they have in "Star Trek" that can make you whatever you want whenever you want. Now THAT'S something I'm looking forward to!

  164. Don't want it by kyosan · · Score: 1

    I'm one of those poor poor vegetarians and have no desire to eat meat. I'm happy just eating plant derived food. I'm sure some vegetarians would eat meat if it didn't cause animal suffering, but many wouldn't because they have no desire to eat it.

    I'm sure that most meat-eaters wouldn't eat human flesh even if it could be grown without killing humans. I (and I'm sure many other vegetarians) feel the same way about animal flesh.

  165. austin powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who sees the connection between the title of this article, and fat bastard's line from austin powers 2?

  166. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfirend asked me once, "Does it really taste like chicken?". In a crowded supermarket. Loudly.

  167. how do you say...... by leoaloha · · Score: 1

    Soylent Green....

  168. taste? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    does unused cultured muscle taste better or worse than muscle that has been used by the animal in question?

    1. Re:taste? by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

      You mean like veal?

      --
      Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  169. HeLa cool new snack? by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

    Are we sure they simply haven't found a tasty new use for Henrietta Lacks's eternally reproducing cells? Goldfish indeed!

  170. This is such old news by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

    I have been eating miscellaneous pieces of flesh laying around the lab for years now...

    Igor - hand me that thing that looks like a chicken wing!

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  171. I am so glad I am a vegetarian by fialar · · Score: 1
    Maybe more people should start buying organic, non-GMO food. That will send a clear message to Monsanto, and other GM companies that think they can muscle their way around with the way our food is produced.

  172. Imagine a Beowulf CLuster of these? by Drake58 · · Score: 1

    Mmm... multiFish processing.

  173. WHAT THE FUCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm due for a good olde fashioned rant. I'm at my wits end with these jackass hypocrite vegans and vegetarians.

    I'm going to make an assumption, that most of you veg-heads are liberals. I realize that not all of you are; but most of you are, and for the purposes of this rant, that's good enough.

    Year after principleless year you throw your money and support behind a political party that holds the line unborn humans are not people, and not worthy of the protection of the law. Now I am seeing them cry for the poor bovine fetuses that are killed so that the fluid for this process can be extracted from them? Please, give us a break.

    -Too Lazy To Log In

  174. Easy, just add grapes!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then let it do the work...

  175. Mix 'n' Match? by Tekgno · · Score: 1

    Different body parts produce different proteins, the liver for example produces vitamin A (I think IANAB(iologist)). Would this fish meat produce the omega-3 fatty acids that fish contain and is a good brain food?
    Or do we need specific parts of the fish to produce different proteins. So instead of taking a few slabs of meat, we chuck a few fish into the blender, add a packet of jell-o to help bind it together a bit and then chuck it in the fat.
    While we're at it, why stop at grinding a few fish, we could make it more interesting by throwing in a cow, a pig, a few sheep.
    We could even take it to the point where we could have a Naoh's ark in a can.

  176. Colonel Sanders has been doing it for years by g8oz · · Score: 1

    Thats why they're calling themselves strictly KFC rather than Kentucky Fried Chicken.

    Its more like Kentucky Fried Lab Tumors.

  177. Animals *and* fish? by foxmajik · · Score: 0

    Aren't fish animals..?

    --
    Majik Fox fox@foxcub.nospamremovethis.net
  178. Meat is fine, you I'm a little worried about. by Arker · · Score: 2

    An even easier way is to use TVP. You can rehydrate it and cook it however you wish. Excellent vegan Chinese restaurants soak TVP and then use it for fake beef, chicken, etc. All the flavoring is in the spices and preparation -- real chicken and fake chicken don't taste like much by themselves.

    Maybe it tastes close enough to fool you, but for many people the above is utterly false.

    The fact is that if you're not poor, and you don't mind some work, you can now get a good, balanced diet without meat. This is good. It doesn't mean that some of us don't prefer meat though, and it doesn't mean that it's healthy to go vegetarian if you can't or won't spend extra time and money to make sure that your diet has enough of the right proteins.

    There's no way to justify meat-eating on ethical, moral, health, or practical grounds, so you do so solely due to custom.

    Absolutely false. Ethical? Moral? Wtf are you talking about? Health - it's healthy to eat less meat than most americans do. That doesn't mean that no one should ever eat meat. Huge jump. Practical? It's quite practical, it provides not only a lot of protein (we don't really need a lot after all) in a small package, it's also a good mix of proteins - something often difficult to assemble from plant sources. It's not difficult to get, and most of us like the taste, at least if it's cooked right.

    If you don't like it, that's just fine, but enough with the silly overdramatic oversimplified juvenile nonsense about how everyone who doesn't agree with your taste in food is unhealthy and immoral.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.