Wouldn't you have to circumvent CSS encryption and violate the DMCA to do this?
He probably failed to mention that this was a porno video store. As far as I know (and in my experience), pornos don't use CSS encryption. Just copy over the VOB files and you are done.
Also, Bollywood (Indian movies) and probably other foreign film makers don't use CSS encryption. I think its only those Hollywood jackasses that pull that crap.
One other difference, though: the woman is getting hers from a real live partner. The guy who's eating pizza, drinking beer, and using the computer while getting a blowjob is using one of those silicone molds of some porn star's mouth. When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention. Whether or not my partner considers it "necessary."
Well, this girl I know said she wanted to come into where I work and give me a blow job while sitting under my desk. Unfortunately, that would not work as I would get busted easilly with the way my desk is arranged.
So I was at her place one evening. We were drinking. Her computer was acting funny and she asked me if I'd fix it (she wanted to show me some pics that were on there). I really didn't feel like fixing the computer, it was some annoying WinXP problem that I didn't really have a clue about. But then a light bulb went off in my head. I said "I'll fix it if you get under the desk and suck me off."
Being the crazy nympho, she was happy to do it, and it fulfilled the fantasy she had before, so it worked out nicely. And at the same time, I was trying to fix the computer, and drinking wine at the same time. Well, ok, I was pretenting to try to fix the computer, but still, I was multitasking for the most part, and had the computer been working properly, I might have been browsing some porn (though it wouldn't be necessary, this girl is seriously hot; too bad she doesn't live in the same city anymore).
I admit, throwing the slice of pizza into the mix would be a little extreme. But I'm sure its been done by someone, somewhere.
Except that girls are better at multitasking than guys. =D
Actually, that is not entirely true. A guy can be receiving a blowjob, using the computer, eating a slice of pizza, and drinking a beer, all at the same time. A woman would have to sit there and concentrate while getting head, and would not be able to do anything simultaneously.
Drug dealers and people who commit fraud aren't going to go away becuase they can make money ding what they do. We still despise them and send them to jail when we find them.
Drug dealers is not really good for this analogy. Drug dealers include those who sell marijuana. And we certainly don't despise those who sell marijuana; they are putting themselves at risk and doing a service to the community. Most of them are not doing any harm to anyone.
A better analogy would be theives. They steal our stuff, and that annoys us.
But then, if I'm not mistaken, spam is still legal if they follow the rules. But its all the illegal spam, and crime that surrounds spam (forged e-mail, worms, cracking and using other peoples machines to send it, etc) that is making it a huge problem and making it difficult to deal with. If all spammers followed the rules for sending spam, it would probably be a lot easier to deal with (we could opt out of it, know where its coming from, etc).
After the opening of his New Hampshire campaign headquarters last night, U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) told medical marijuana advocate Linda Macia, who suffers from nerve damage, fibromyalgia, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and degenerative arthritis, that he favors legal access to medical marijuana for seriously ill patients and a study to determine appropriate federal policy. That makes two of the Democratic contenders (Kucinich is the other) who support medical marijuana.
On the other side....
Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who worked to kill a medical marijuana bill in Vermont last year, has said he favors an FDA study but has refused to protect patients from arrest. In May, U.S. Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) told the San Francisco Chronicle he has no objection to the Justice Department's arresting patients. U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-MO) have previously supported legislation condemning state medical marijuana laws. The rest of the Democratic field has yet to take a position.
It will end up being a 'just wanna be friends' detector.
My question is will it distinguish between love and lust? Will girls be able to use this to determine that I just want to fuck them, and feel nothing else other than that urge, despite all the bullshit I've been telling them?
Just compile the most expansive possible kernel. Package it and "sell" it to cnet as the p2p app to have. Include boot loader. No one reads warnings/lisenses anyway... And voila! 85% linux on the world's desktops overnight!
You have smoked yourself retarded.
Re:Best examples of heresy I can think of
on
What You Can't Say
·
· Score: 1
But would you rather drive with a drinker than someone who was high?
Well, considering that I'm driving, I'd rather drive with the drinker if she is a hot female since being drunk she is likely to go down on me while driving. Don't worry, I'll pull over somewhere as not to be a threat to the roadways.
In fact, most studies performed on the question demonstrate that marijuana users are much, much safer than alcohol users
But seriously.. this is very true. Non-users never realize this. They just assume that it impairs you. I've argued pro-legalizing it and the person I'm arguing with would say "if it's legalized you'll have people driving around high" which I could respond with two points:
1) Driving on marijuana is relatively safe. 2) You already got people smoking in their cars because they don't have any place they can do it without get caught.
And another thing, it wears off quicker, unlike alcohol. So 20-30 minutes after smoking you should be fine to drive. An hour later, you definitely should be ok. And just like it improves your video game skills, it might improve your driving as well.
Mushrooms are a cleaner trip than LSD usually, and coming down is painless. The downside is they can make your stomach hurt when you are digesting them. If you take too much it can be bad just like any other psychadelic drug. Personally, I don't recommend either, as they do make you temporarilly insane.
LSD is man-made and depends on who makes it. If you take a man-made drug, you are trusting who ever made it. When people say "chemicals" in this context I think what they really mean is "man-made chemicals"
The thing about "natural" drugs like marijuana or mushrooms is that they can be clearly identified by looking at them. Not so with the man-made stuff -- LSD, pills, powder, etc. Of course, even with the natural stuff you have to trust your source not to have added something to it.
What's also hilarious is to listen to people defend pot as 'natural', and say how they would never use 'chemicals' like ecstasy, etc, etc. What, THC isn't a chemical? There's not HUNDREDS of chemicals in pot? ARgh.
I'll admit, that is a poor defense and not one that I would use (something being natural doesn't make it safe). But marijuana is relatively harmless compared to many drugs, including the legal ones such as caffeine and alcohol. If you eat it (e.g. cooked in butter), you avoid the harmful effects of smoking the plant.
Why should we trust the MD5 sums?:-) I mean, if you'd hack into their servers, wouldn't you think of calculating sums for the hacked files and replace those with them?
If he had enough access to modify the MD5 sums, wouldn't he modify the Mozilla binaries as well? Otherwise the checksum would be failing on the legit binaries.
Seems to me, if you were telling the truth, you obviously had the tools to go out IN REAL LIFE and get a girl. Instead of a fist and a netslut.
You're right, and I did. Incidentally, for my videoconferencing I was using an actual video camera connected to a capture card. Now, that video camera also came in handy when I had a girl over (in real life), and I have a nice collection of videos to reminisce about the good ol' college days.
Just because a guy gets laid in real life, doesn't mean he can't wank with a bunch of sexy webcam sluts and enjoy that too.
Where are webcam sluts these days? Not the whores, I'm talking about the ones who give it up for free.
Most average people were still getting their net connection thru work or school. Not all schools were quite so liberal as to carry a full feed and most businesses didn't carry _any_ alt groups. One of the reasons r.a.e was so popular, it slipped in under the radar.
You're probably right, though my local university had a full feed, totally uncensored. They had more porn newsgroups on there than the local commercial ISP's even did, and their archives were bigger as well.
I never did get into downloading anything from Usenet binary groups. To me it was a fantastic waste of time. I suppose if you had some program to download all the parts and put it back together it would be fine, but I never had anything like that. So manually downloading picture part 1 of 256 (where parts 30, 55, and 75 were probably missing), uudecoding them, and then cat'ing them back together was pointless.
One of the UNIX newsreaders was pretty good for this. I can't remember whether it was nn or tin or what. You only had to select all the posts for a particular file, then when you saved it it would be automatically decoded. I think it could even handle more than one file, so you select all the posts you want decoded. It did take a little work, but it was most certainly worth it when you're a teenager with no other good porn sources.
Then when I started using PPP and ran Newsrobot, it was like the flowing tap water I was talking about. Newsrobot would go in and download everything, and automatically decode it all. No work necessary, all you had to do was select what newsgroups you wanted. Of course, there was the problem of sorting through the mess afterwords. And some people would intentionally post some things you really didn't want to see (much worse than even Goatse).
In 1994 it was hard to find any good free porn sites..
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica. It was like porn flowing out like tap water from a sink.. And you weren't paying for the water, but you needed a big enough bucket to catch it all before downloading it from the UNIX shell account to your home PC. There was also a newsgroup with video that was also pretty good. It was a good time to be a teenager.
I probably heard of her at some point or another.. but forgot who or what she was among the 2000+ other "JenniCam's" that popped up. The name "Jenni" is so common, I even remember a series of porno pics with this girl named "Jenni" and they were semi-amateurish (she had small tits, with tanlines). But then again there were a ton of other porno pic chicks named "Jenni"
In any case, I was getting girls naked on their webcams well before her site even existed (but of course, that wasn't a public thing). It was fucking great. It would range from girls I was webcamming with to randomly flash their tits without me even asking, to girls that would masturbate with me on a regular basis (and these were hot chicks!). And they would do it FOR FREE!!! These days, all the girls out their with cams expect you to pay for that.
The only problem back then was my dialup connection was kinda flaky and I'd lose the connection in the middle of the action, man did that suck. But surprisingly, dialup provided enough bandwidth for videoconferencing.
Flashing my dual 2.0 ghz g5 hasn't gotten me laid yet, I guess I was wrong!
I've got a different problem, I'm a PC user trying to pick up chicks who have Macs. Needless to say, it hasn't gone so well. But man do I want access to that sweet, delicious, lucious, sexy, curvy GUI. I guess I'll just have to pay for it. *sigh*
So how else am i supposed to smoke the ganga? Cooking with it just tastes nasty, and those nice 18" water pipes have some beautiful artwork.
I understand your dilemma. Except for the part about it tastes nasty. The cookies I bake taste just like regular cookies, you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. Though, I'll admit, if you just take weed butter and put it on some toast, it can taste a little weird.
Here's what I do to make the cookies: 1. Break weed up into small pieces (like you're rolling a joint) 2. Simmer in butter and water for 2 hours. The water is used to prevent the butter from burning. Add just a little water, if it evaporates, add more. 3. After 2 hours, kick up the heat slowly. Eventually, let the water boil away so that you're basically sauteeing the weed in the butter. You don't have to do this for too long. (An optional step here is to strain out the weed. I don't do this, as I feel you lose some of the goods by doing this. It might be a good idea if you're worried about getting caught with these though, as little specks of weed in your cookies will give you away.) 4. Let butter cool, since you don't want to put hot butter in cookie dough. 5. Make your cookies (or whatever recipe) like you normally would. 6. Eat 7. ??? 8. Profit
Also note that the best time to eat it is with a meal. I usually eat one before a meal. The idea is when you eat a full meal, your body is digesting faster than it normally would, so the cookie gets digested faster as well. When I do this, it comes on a little quicker. Though eating it as a snack without eating a meal can be good too, though you may not feel it until later (sometimes 2 hours later). It just really depends on how digestive system handles it. They are great for movies. Your typical stoner will have sobered up by the end of a 2 hour movie. By eating these things, you can stay high through an entire movie (and even afterwords), even a 3 hour movie like Lord of the Rings.
would you care to explain? i run linux, and i smoke like a madman! and yes, i am very cool! i am! (grinning like a maniac)
I hope you're smoking something healthy, like marijuana. Personally, I like to cook it in butter and eat foods that were prepared using this butter (baked goods usually). Its a lot cleaner (and healthier), comes on nice and slow, and I actually think you get more out of it. Also, its easier to consume in public that way.
Slashdot Mirror
Wouldn't you have to circumvent CSS encryption and violate the DMCA to do this?
He probably failed to mention that this was a porno video store. As far as I know (and in my experience), pornos don't use CSS encryption. Just copy over the VOB files and you are done.
Also, Bollywood (Indian movies) and probably other foreign film makers don't use CSS encryption. I think its only those Hollywood jackasses that pull that crap.
Someday, when you finally have sex for the first time, you'll realize just how wrong you are.
Someday, when you finally talk to an actual girl about sex, you might find that I'm right.
My apologies if you ARE an actual girl.
One other difference, though: the woman is getting hers from a real live partner. The guy who's eating pizza, drinking beer, and using the computer while getting a blowjob is using one of those silicone molds of some porn star's mouth.
When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention. Whether or not my partner considers it "necessary."
Well, this girl I know said she wanted to come into where I work and give me a blow job while sitting under my desk. Unfortunately, that would not work as I would get busted easilly with the way my desk is arranged.
So I was at her place one evening. We were drinking. Her computer was acting funny and she asked me if I'd fix it (she wanted to show me some pics that were on there). I really didn't feel like fixing the computer, it was some annoying WinXP problem that I didn't really have a clue about. But then a light bulb went off in my head. I said "I'll fix it if you get under the desk and suck me off."
Being the crazy nympho, she was happy to do it, and it fulfilled the fantasy she had before, so it worked out nicely. And at the same time, I was trying to fix the computer, and drinking wine at the same time. Well, ok, I was pretenting to try to fix the computer, but still, I was multitasking for the most part, and had the computer been working properly, I might have been browsing some porn (though it wouldn't be necessary, this girl is seriously hot; too bad she doesn't live in the same city anymore).
I admit, throwing the slice of pizza into the mix would be a little extreme. But I'm sure its been done by someone, somewhere.
Except that girls are better at multitasking than guys. =D
Actually, that is not entirely true. A guy can be receiving a blowjob, using the computer, eating a slice of pizza, and drinking a beer, all at the same time. A woman would have to sit there and concentrate while getting head, and would not be able to do anything simultaneously.
This is slashdot.
You can break the law if it's disobedience against Microsoft, RIAA labels, Disney or any other mean big business
Don't forget marijuana-related "crimes."
"You can break the law as long as you honestly believe that it is wrong." -Gandhi
Drug dealers and people who commit fraud aren't going to go away becuase they can make money ding what they do. We still despise them and send them to jail when we find them.
Drug dealers is not really good for this analogy. Drug dealers include those who sell marijuana. And we certainly don't despise those who sell marijuana; they are putting themselves at risk and doing a service to the community. Most of them are not doing any harm to anyone.
A better analogy would be theives. They steal our stuff, and that annoys us.
But then, if I'm not mistaken, spam is still legal if they follow the rules. But its all the illegal spam, and crime that surrounds spam (forged e-mail, worms, cracking and using other peoples machines to send it, etc) that is making it a huge problem and making it difficult to deal with. If all spammers followed the rules for sending spam, it would probably be a lot easier to deal with (we could opt out of it, know where its coming from, etc).
Ok, this is the graph of STD transmission among high school students.
Check out that stud on the left who is banging like 8 different girls.
Firefox is old now!
The new name is monkeyfox! Ok sure its the same browser and still uses the "phoenix" directory when installing but its A MONKEHFOX now!
Sorry, Monkeyfox is the name of my open source automated porn downloader.
After the opening of his New Hampshire campaign headquarters last night, U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) told medical marijuana advocate Linda Macia, who suffers from nerve damage, fibromyalgia, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and degenerative arthritis, that he favors legal access to medical marijuana for seriously ill patients and a study to determine appropriate federal policy.
That makes two of the Democratic contenders (Kucinich is the other) who support medical marijuana.
On the other side....
Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who worked to kill a medical marijuana bill in Vermont last year, has said he favors an FDA study but has refused to protect patients from arrest. In May, U.S. Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) told the San Francisco Chronicle he has no objection to the Justice Department's arresting patients. U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-MO) have previously supported legislation condemning state medical marijuana laws. The rest of the Democratic field has yet to take a position.
Nuff said...
It will end up being a 'just wanna be friends' detector.
My question is will it distinguish between love and lust? Will girls be able to use this to determine that I just want to fuck them, and feel nothing else other than that urge, despite all the bullshit I've been telling them?
Just compile the most expansive possible kernel. Package it and "sell" it to cnet as the p2p app to have. Include boot loader.
No one reads warnings/lisenses anyway...
And voila! 85% linux on the world's desktops overnight!
You have smoked yourself retarded.
But would you rather drive with a drinker than someone who was high?
Well, considering that I'm driving, I'd rather drive with the drinker if she is a hot female since being drunk she is likely to go down on me while driving. Don't worry, I'll pull over somewhere as not to be a threat to the roadways.
In fact, most studies performed on the question demonstrate that marijuana users are much, much safer than alcohol users
But seriously.. this is very true. Non-users never realize this. They just assume that it impairs you. I've argued pro-legalizing it and the person I'm arguing with would say "if it's legalized you'll have people driving around high" which I could respond with two points:
1) Driving on marijuana is relatively safe.
2) You already got people smoking in their cars because they don't have any place they can do it without get caught.
And another thing, it wears off quicker, unlike alcohol. So 20-30 minutes after smoking you should be fine to drive. An hour later, you definitely should be ok. And just like it improves your video game skills, it might improve your driving as well.
Marijuana is way easier to give up than caffeine.;)
But considering how harmless it is, why would you want to? =)
Mushrooms are a cleaner trip than LSD usually, and coming down is painless. The downside is they can make your stomach hurt when you are digesting them. If you take too much it can be bad just like any other psychadelic drug. Personally, I don't recommend either, as they do make you temporarilly insane.
LSD is man-made and depends on who makes it. If you take a man-made drug, you are trusting who ever made it. When people say "chemicals" in this context I think what they really mean is "man-made chemicals"
The thing about "natural" drugs like marijuana or mushrooms is that they can be clearly identified by looking at them. Not so with the man-made stuff -- LSD, pills, powder, etc. Of course, even with the natural stuff you have to trust your source not to have added something to it.
What's also hilarious is to listen to people defend pot as 'natural', and say how they would never use 'chemicals' like ecstasy, etc, etc. What, THC isn't a chemical? There's not HUNDREDS of chemicals in pot? ARgh.
I'll admit, that is a poor defense and not one that I would use (something being natural doesn't make it safe). But marijuana is relatively harmless compared to many drugs, including the legal ones such as caffeine and alcohol. If you eat it (e.g. cooked in butter), you avoid the harmful effects of smoking the plant.
Why should we trust the MD5 sums? :-)
I mean, if you'd hack into their servers, wouldn't you think of calculating sums for the hacked files and replace those with them?
If he had enough access to modify the MD5 sums, wouldn't he modify the Mozilla binaries as well? Otherwise the checksum would be failing on the legit binaries.
Seems to me, if you were telling the truth, you obviously had the tools to go out IN REAL LIFE and get a girl. Instead of a fist and a netslut.
You're right, and I did. Incidentally, for my videoconferencing I was using an actual video camera connected to a capture card. Now, that video camera also came in handy when I had a girl over (in real life), and I have a nice collection of videos to reminisce about the good ol' college days.
Just because a guy gets laid in real life, doesn't mean he can't wank with a bunch of sexy webcam sluts and enjoy that too.
Where are webcam sluts these days? Not the whores, I'm talking about the ones who give it up for free.
Most average people were still getting their net connection thru work or school. Not all schools were quite so liberal as to carry a full feed and most businesses didn't carry _any_ alt groups. One of the reasons r.a.e was so popular, it slipped in under the radar.
You're probably right, though my local university had a full feed, totally uncensored. They had more porn newsgroups on there than the local commercial ISP's even did, and their archives were bigger as well.
I never did get into downloading anything from Usenet binary groups. To me it was a fantastic waste of time. I suppose if you had some program to download all the parts and put it back together it would be fine, but I never had anything like that. So manually downloading picture part 1 of 256 (where parts 30, 55, and 75 were probably missing), uudecoding them, and then cat'ing them back together was pointless.
One of the UNIX newsreaders was pretty good for this. I can't remember whether it was nn or tin or what. You only had to select all the posts for a particular file, then when you saved it it would be automatically decoded. I think it could even handle more than one file, so you select all the posts you want decoded. It did take a little work, but it was most certainly worth it when you're a teenager with no other good porn sources.
Then when I started using PPP and ran Newsrobot, it was like the flowing tap water I was talking about. Newsrobot would go in and download everything, and automatically decode it all. No work necessary, all you had to do was select what newsgroups you wanted. Of course, there was the problem of sorting through the mess afterwords. And some people would intentionally post some things you really didn't want to see (much worse than even Goatse).
In 1994 it was hard to find any good free porn sites..
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica. It was like porn flowing out like tap water from a sink.. And you weren't paying for the water, but you needed a big enough bucket to catch it all before downloading it from the UNIX shell account to your home PC. There was also a newsgroup with video that was also pretty good. It was a good time to be a teenager.
I probably heard of her at some point or another.. but forgot who or what she was among the 2000+ other "JenniCam's" that popped up. The name "Jenni" is so common, I even remember a series of porno pics with this girl named "Jenni" and they were semi-amateurish (she had small tits, with tanlines). But then again there were a ton of other porno pic chicks named "Jenni"
In any case, I was getting girls naked on their webcams well before her site even existed (but of course, that wasn't a public thing). It was fucking great. It would range from girls I was webcamming with to randomly flash their tits without me even asking, to girls that would masturbate with me on a regular basis (and these were hot chicks!). And they would do it FOR FREE!!! These days, all the girls out their with cams expect you to pay for that.
The only problem back then was my dialup connection was kinda flaky and I'd lose the connection in the middle of the action, man did that suck. But surprisingly, dialup provided enough bandwidth for videoconferencing.
Flashing my dual 2.0 ghz g5 hasn't gotten me laid yet, I guess I was wrong!
I've got a different problem, I'm a PC user trying to pick up chicks who have Macs. Needless to say, it hasn't gone so well. But man do I want access to that sweet, delicious, lucious, sexy, curvy GUI. I guess I'll just have to pay for it. *sigh*
So how else am i supposed to smoke the ganga? Cooking with it just tastes nasty, and those nice 18" water pipes have some beautiful artwork.
I understand your dilemma. Except for the part about it tastes nasty. The cookies I bake taste just like regular cookies, you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. Though, I'll admit, if you just take weed butter and put it on some toast, it can taste a little weird.
Here's what I do to make the cookies:
1. Break weed up into small pieces (like you're rolling a joint)
2. Simmer in butter and water for 2 hours. The water is used to prevent the butter from burning. Add just a little water, if it evaporates, add more.
3. After 2 hours, kick up the heat slowly. Eventually, let the water boil away so that you're basically sauteeing the weed in the butter. You don't have to do this for too long.
(An optional step here is to strain out the weed. I don't do this, as I feel you lose some of the goods by doing this. It might be a good idea if you're worried about getting caught with these though, as little specks of weed in your cookies will give you away.)
4. Let butter cool, since you don't want to put hot butter in cookie dough.
5. Make your cookies (or whatever recipe) like you normally would.
6. Eat
7. ???
8. Profit
Also note that the best time to eat it is with a meal. I usually eat one before a meal. The idea is when you eat a full meal, your body is digesting faster than it normally would, so the cookie gets digested faster as well. When I do this, it comes on a little quicker. Though eating it as a snack without eating a meal can be good too, though you may not feel it until later (sometimes 2 hours later). It just really depends on how digestive system handles it. They are great for movies. Your typical stoner will have sobered up by the end of a 2 hour movie. By eating these things, you can stay high through an entire movie (and even afterwords), even a 3 hour movie like Lord of the Rings.
Enjoy!
We should just let everyone go then
We should at least free all the people imprisoned for marijuana-related "crimes"
would you care to explain? i run linux, and i smoke like a madman! and yes, i am very cool! i am! (grinning like a maniac)
I hope you're smoking something healthy, like marijuana. Personally, I like to cook it in butter and eat foods that were prepared using this butter (baked goods usually). Its a lot cleaner (and healthier), comes on nice and slow, and I actually think you get more out of it. Also, its easier to consume in public that way.