Slashdot Mirror


Girls in the Gaming World

dkleinsc writes "The BBC is running an article about life as a female gaming squad. There's some discussion about the welcome or lack thereof women get in the gaming community, and arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches."

639 comments

  1. Great... by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Swell.. now that this the existence of female gamers is common knowledge, the most common messages in Counter-Strike will be "A/S/L?!" and "w4nna g0 c4mp1ng 0n 7h47 r00f709?!!!"

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Great... by eidolons · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is an interesting article, but the article misses the point. It's great that you have an exception to the rule and see women playing quake / counterstrike / gibbing-death-kill games but the truth of the matter is that online gaming, in general, is being swamped by female gamers but not in these kinds of games.

      They're playing Sims, Dance Dance REvolution, and other social, simulation and interactivity-based games. That's where the real interest lies and the market is huge. Sims 2 will BLOW AWAY Far Cry and Pain Killer and maybe even DOOM 3 because 51% of the population that own a computer and play games are going to buy it.

    2. Re:Great... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You can play Dance Dance Revolution online now? When did that happen?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Great... by srichand · · Score: 0

      oh hell, even my 65 year old grandma frags me in Quake every damn time, this considering i've been fragging away since i was 10. man, trust me, she is GOOD !

    4. Re:Great... by cableshaft · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, you can. It's the XBox version of the game that allows you to do so, on Live.

      --
      Creator of the popular web game Proximity
    5. Re:Great... by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're playing Sims, Dance Dance REvolution, and other social, simulation and interactivity-based games

      I would have to agree with this, I know a lot of females that play games and it seems that they all prefer to play ones like Sims, DAOC, or Everquest. My wife for example is totally addicted to DAOC, and prefers to play this rather than play half-life/unreal/quake with me. Which is fine with me since every time we have played this I get my ass kicked.

      --
      Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
    6. Re:Great... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      http://www.xbox.com/en-us/ddr/default.htm

    7. Re:Great... by RedK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh yes... but this article is about Counter-Strike competitions where females don't get the participate in the same brackets as male, and don't get to try and win the big cash prizes. Now please enlighten us as to how this is justifyable by saying girls prefer other games genres. I guess because the game is not targetted at them, they can't play it at the same level as men ?

      It's a load of crock if you ask me. It's men afraid that their testosteron levels will be going down if they get beat by a girl. Get over yourselves. Even if only 1% of Counter-strike gamers are girls, it doesn't mean that they are the worst 1% of players. And it also doesn't mean that they can't play in a "no-girls allowed" tournement (you know the kind, where 8 year old boys don't want to catch cooties and stuff). And that they can't win the same prize money. This is not a sport where physical differences would tip the scale. Girls and boys handle mices and keyboards with the same skill.

      I personnally don't see why women can't participate at the same level and even against men in this type of event.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    8. Re:Great... by Shinglor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's a 'rooftog'?

    9. Re:Great... by kwelch007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use to play Tribes (and Tribes 2.) My Clan in Tribes had a few female members. When scrimmaging against them, I don't ever recall thinking "Oh she's a girl...I don't have to worry about her killing me."

      That says to me that the girls can be just as good as the guys. Why should they be limited from playing in any particular bracket in a tournament? I can't think of a good reason...unless I didn't think I could beat them.

    10. Re:Great... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're playing Sims, Dance Dance REvolution, and other social, simulation and interactivity-based games.

      I still vividly remember the first time I saw people playing DDR. Because one of them was an 18 year old girl with Double D Cup breasts. Mmmmmmm.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    11. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Read the article you fucking moron.

      Girls REQUESTED to be placed in a seperate bracket than men.

      Take your self-loathing metrosexuality elsewhere. You won't be scoring any poon on the slashdot forums pretending to be a sensitive pussy. Then again, I'm positive you don't get laid anyways.

      The moderators are even more fucktarded than you. They have their heads so far up their ass they'd need a floodlight to read the article and find out your comment is the antithesis of "Interesting".

      I'd go with -5, Pussywhipped or -5, Kneejerk (For a more politically correct rating.. wouldn't want to offend you and take your attention away from the Oxygen Network. I'm sure Opera is fucking fascinating.)

      PS: Faggot.

    12. Re:Great... by Choc_Salties · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I help setup and run a local LAN event in Cape Town, South Africa, and we are starting to see a definite increase in female gamers in both FPS and strategy. By an increase, I mean from none in late 2001 to over a dozen now. They are quite able to hold their own in games such as CS and Warcraft 3, and are well respected for their skill. Negative commentary is near non-existant (restricted mainly to "Damn, Vixen 0wnz0red in that last MOHAA stage"!) All I can say to Girl Gamers is You Go Girl!! Still working on getting my girlfriend to play Warcraft, though...

    13. Re:Great... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That says to me that the girls can be just as good as the guys. Why should they be limited from playing in any particular bracket in a tournament? I can't think of a good reason...unless I didn't think I could beat them.


      The problem I see is with the article rather than with the tournaments. This is the first time I've heard of a tournament that had seperate brackets for males and females. In most cases, men and women competed on the same ladders with mixed or unmixed teams, their choice. As far as I'm aware of, the push for female-only ladders came from female-only clans, not from male-only clans (and to my knowledge, few clans are male-only by choice of the members). Each clan I've participated in has welcomed any female member that was up to the normal membership requirements of the clan, which has resulted in a handful of female members over the years between the 3 clans. The only reason there weren't more female members is because there weren't more female players looking to join (one exception in my memory being a point at which membership closed while a female was being actively recruited, because the clan decided to stop playing the game rather than bringing in 6-10 new players).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    14. Re:Great... by Greedo · · Score: 1

      I don't see why one of them hasn't yet filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    15. Re:Great... by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Its not so much that women can or can't participate in the same brackets as men.

      The point is that the winnings of any competition are distributed by the mandates of the competitions holders, not those participating in it. We live in a capitalist society (well most of the world anyways) and that means that the man with the money makes all the rules. If the competitions holders want to discriminate then that is their prerogative. Its not like you are forced to participate in that competition if you feel the policies to be discriminatory. There are plenty of other competitions that aren't discriminatory.

      Likewise, those admins on public servers that wish to be can be as discriminatory as they want. Discrimination is not illegal, only more expensive. A company that wants to maintain its right to be selective about its employees without regard to equal opportunity simply have to pay fines and be marked as such. The government isn't going to put them out of business because of this.

      But then again I don't really see the point of playing to the point that you are so good to warrant going to any of these competitions. That's just too much time invested in a practice that can't pay the bills for the majority of those who participate. Its not like professional sports where all the athletes still make a living whether they lose or not.

      The bottom line is, if its not yours then you have to live by the edicts of its owner when using it. Pretty simple concept really. Its surprising to see as many people as I do feeling entitled to equal access to someone else's holdings.

    16. Re:Great... by Mateito · · Score: 0, Funny

      Even if only 1% of Counter-strike gamers are girls, it doesn't mean that they are the worst 1% of players.

      No, I'm in the worst 1% of players, and I'm a bloke.

    17. Re:Great... by Camulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, signing up for a privately run tournament that happens to have a male and female ladder is such discrimination. I mean the we should merge the NBA and WNBA or the PGA and WPGA. Granted, there is a big difference between a keyboard and mouse and playing basket ball, but still the point stands. There is segregation all over the place. In fact, most of the time there if a female tourny, they can also play in the "open" tournament. It's okay to have the Black Enterntainment Network, but if I started the White Entertainment Network I would be a racist. It's okay to have a female tourny and a open tourny, but if you have a female and a male, people bust a fucking gasket. I'm not against female gamers either. I like them. Gamer chicks are cool. I have several as friends. However, not every thing is a horrible injustice requiring a lawsuit.

    18. Re:Great... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      It all seems a bit backwards to me - we have a mixed team here and we turn up to LANs without anyone batting an eyelid.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    19. Re:Great... by SeXy_Red · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a male gamer, I agree with this poster in saying that women women should take part in the same tournament as the men. There is no logical reason to support seperate tournaments for women and men; I for one would welcome the additional competition.

      --

      This sig was generated by a barrel of trained kittens for SeXy_Red (550409).

    20. Re:Great... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Ditto. My wife is througly addicted to Never Winter Nights. When she's not playing that, it's Kingdom Hearts or Sly Cooper or Rachet & Clank.

      She has no interest in FPS's at all.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    21. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an avid gamer
      i do not know of these girls that they are talking about

      no girl has ever wanted to play with me

      this is why i game =)

    22. Re:Great... by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny
      I for one would welcome the additional competition.

      For a moment there, I thought you (for one) were going to welcome our new female gamer overlords. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    23. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason women don't compete with men in sports like basketball, they aren't good competition. I dont know much about counterstrike, but I have played quite a bit of quake1/2/3 and followed the major competitions. When was the last time a all woman team placed in the top 5? Top 10? (feel free to post evidence if you know otherwise). Same goes for 1v1 events. I agree these competitions are not about physical ability but if the women cant compete on the same level I dont see any reason why there shouldnt be different competitions for each.

      Advanced players dont play in the beginers bracket, that isn't fun. Having a seperate womans tournament allows them to play with people that are closure to their level of play. It is no suprise that the womans tournaments dont draw as many sponsers (and by extension prize money) than the tournaments with the top skilled players just as how MLB players get payed more than local teams.

    24. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women gamers is an absurd liberal myth. Those so-called woman gamers are just 33 year old gay slashbots looking for love in all the wrong places, namely in some 13 year olds poop chute.

    25. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am glad you put "Double D Cup" at the end of your sentence... I wouldn't have made it to the end otherwise.

    26. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Swell.. now that this the existence of female gamers is common knowledge, the most common messages in Counter-Strike will be "A/S/L?!" and "w4nna g0 c4mp1ng 0n 7h47 r00f709?!!!""

      For those who are avid fps (first person shooters), a genre where females are scarce, it turns into a damn chatroom when a girl signs on. Of course, it's all a one sided conversation, with the girl ignoring them (or sometimes defending herself).

      This often shows off the non-serious gamers.

    27. Re:Great... by Debian+Apollo · · Score: 1

      You know it's articles like that that make it hard for girls like me to ever be treated the same as a guy. I don't want to go in girls only matches, i don't want to rip it up on Brittany's Dance Beat and i sure as hell don't want you to go easy on me because i have boobs. Being female in the IT industry means i have to be 10X better than any guy to get the same recognition as he does. Is it fair? Hell no, but in reality its not all equality and fluffy little duckies. It shits me no end to be singled out from the majority. What the heck does boobs have to do with how well you can play CS? Why SHOULD there be a different competition for females? is there a comp for people with wikkid cool 9800XT's and another for those struggling along with a GeForce 2? No, that's retarded. So is seperate gaming for girls.

      --
      Unusually Average.
    28. Re:Great... by qirien · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a little bit of an over-simplification . . . I agree that females tend to enjoy these kinds of games more, but that's no reason to ignore the women who play less "traditional" games like CS.

      Also, for more information and discussion on this type of topic, see WomenGamers.com.

      --
      -- Qirien, Academy of Defenestration
      "Who do you want to defenestrate today?"
    29. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPN? Uhmm no. Enterprise is what we refer to as the "token white show" on that channel.

    30. Re:Great... by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm completely against male games disrespecting the chicks. If the little ladies want to try playing with their husband's/boyfriend's computer then what's the harm in it as long as they're supervised?

      Come on guys, they have enough problems with being driven by hormones and general scattiness, let them have a little go! It'll save you getting dragged around the shoe shops if nothing else!!!

    31. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best comment ever.

    32. Re:Great... by whittrash · · Score: 1

      In my experience, most people are respectful of women online and don't discriminate. There are a few obnoxious, racist, bigots, cheaters out there, but they are a minority. I have seen clans of all sorts; black clans, white clans, kiddy clans, Texan clans, even gay clans (although they are usually trolls). But I have never met any women who would enjoy playing 6 hours a day, 7 days a week or have played 18 hours without stopping in order to perfect their skills and become the undisputed master of the world. The men also outnumber women at least 10:1 and are likely to have a much deeper talent pool of naturally gifted players. If I had to guess, women shooter fanatics are probably outnumbered 100:1, and so they aren't represented in the same way as men.

      I wasn't aware of any these groups banned women from competing. If thats true they should be boycotted. I see no reason to keep women out. I suspect the real reason there aren't as many women in the top echelons of the shooter world is because there aren't many of them out there to begin with.

    33. Re:Great... by gaijin99 · · Score: 1
      She has no interest in FPS's at all.
      Its not just a female thing. I'm a gamer, male, and FPS and fighting games bore me. I suspect that there are several men who have my attitude towards those types of games. I do wonder what the breakdown is on strategy and god sim games (my two favorite game styles). I know that the female market is strong towards games like The Sims (which I enjoyed as well, I class it as a god sim), but what about StarCraft, WC3, Massive Assault, etc?

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    34. Re:Great... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I wandered into a Quake 2 server just last night. It was late and most of the Gamespy WOD servers were deserted. I found one with a nice ping and maybe seven or eight people playing. As soon as I connected and fragged a couple of people I was politely told that the server was hosting a "Ladies Only event--check your penises at the door."

      After a little humerous banter about how I would be willing to pop out my downsized guillotine in order to play with them, I left. Before going I noticed that I had played with almost all of them before and had had my ass handed to me on different occasions by each of them. Furthermore, I realized that in the past I had learned quite a bit from these ladies by watching them in the process of said ass handing.

      Oddly enough, up until that moment I have never really paid attention to nicknames or claimed or percieved gender when playing online games or even chatting. It is too easy to pretend to be something you are not while hiding behind the anonymity of the interent. That and the image of an old, sweaty, overweight, balding, semi-toothless, naked pervert sitting in front of his jacked up old x386 in a trailer park in the middle of Iowa, passing himself off as an 17 year old girl so he can get his jollies, has kept me from ever taking anyone at their word as to their sex on the net.

      I guess because I have been purposefully oblivious to gender I never noticed that women were kept from playing, or kept out of tournaments. I mean if it wasn't for the proximity of the LAN, a quake or CS tournament would be just like sitting at home at your PC, never knowing if someone was a girl or the old perverted Iowan.

      Anyways, I was a little disappointed to not be able to play with those ladies last night, and I felt like I was being rejeced because of something I couldn't control. I relly would have liked to stay and at least spectate, but out of respect I left. I guess I got to feel a little of how they feel when they are set apart, restricted, or discriminated against, and I can say that I did not like it at all.

      The main thing I would liked to have seen is how they play and compare it to other people(guys). I think that the unique perspective of the female mind is fascinating. Plus, the sado masochist in me likes getting beat on by women!

      What is the matter officer? I have obeyed all of your silly Earth laws!

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    35. Re:Great... by mysticalreaper · · Score: 2

      People have different interests? I'm flabbergasted and amazed. C'mon now, use your head. This fact is obvious. What's being proposed is a general trend that emales tend to prefer different games. Just as they prefer different movies, TV shows, clothing, music, etc. But, as all generalizations, they're false in an absolute sense, and have no application upon an individual.

    36. Re:Great... by WiggyWack · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's men afraid that their testosteron levels will be going down if they get beat by a girl.

      My testosterone level goes down when I get beaten by an eight-year-old.

      --
      Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
    37. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does when people figure out they're girls-I know a couple female players who go out of their way to hide their gender. Then you end up with a situation where most of the girls who announce that fact are just looking for attention, and nobody can identify the other girls.

    38. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you're wrong, just being in the IT industry you have to be 10x better than the next 'guy' to get any kind of recognition. Depending where you work it may actually be easier for a woman or a man to earn promotions or recognition, but it looks to me like grass is always greener for most part.

    39. Re:Great... by Debian+Apollo · · Score: 1

      Im in .au (tasmania to be exact, not exactly the most forward thinking place to live...) And thats one of the things i hate, why SHOULD it be easier? i want a promotion/raise/recognition because i DESERVE it, not because im a girl. I don't want to be treated better, i don't want to be treated worse, i want to be treated the same. Too bad that its very unlikely that the world will never exist without gender favouritism, whether it be in favour for either gender.

      --
      Unusually Average.
    40. Re:Great... by danila · · Score: 1

      So much for free markets in the US... In other countries, in BETTER countries, I should say (including a good deal of Europe, most of South-East Asia, Japan, Russia and probably many countries in South America and Africa as well), there are laws against consumer discrimination, and they are enforced. Companies may be trying to get away with that sometimes, but the law is usually quite clear - no discrimination is allowed, unless specified otherwise by the law (needless to say, the law allows it only in very limited circumstances). I like to think that if someone tries to pull the "private property, we refuse to serve you" on me, I can shove the article 426 of the Civil Code in their faces and if they still refuse, sue them under the article 445. And no "private club, members only" shit, since by law they can't restrict the membership anyway.

      It was a huge mistake, my American friends, to grant your corporations the same rights as you grant humans... A rabid dog should sit in the cage, I say, no sense in letting him free.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    41. Re:Great... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      I would guess that RTS games are slightly more popular than FPS's among females, but not by a lot. A lot of females don't feel the need to be dominating and have a lot of control, which is a big part of what RTS feeds on, and primarily a male trait. OTOH, RTS's don't rely on the bloodthirsty, lightning-quick-reflex, blood-pumping action that seems to attract men more than women.

    42. Re:Great... by Xeed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Statistically, I think women with smaller breasts would be better at 'athletic' games because there is less to get in the way. I bet her score sucked...

      Oh wait, you weren't watching her score, you were wanting to score...

      Sorry for the misunderstanding.

      --
      ...don't question it!!!
    43. Re:Great... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Statistically, I think women with smaller breasts would be better at 'athletic' games because there is less to get in the way. I bet her score sucked...

      You would lose that bet. She even scored higher than the small breasted woman who was there. She consistantly scored higher than the males, but maybe because they were distracted while they played.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    let me know when they go wild

    1. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the only funny comment in the entire thread. Of course it's modded down.

      I'm waiting for the first ubernerd to post his LORD OF THE RINGS HILARIOUS JOKE comparing girls playing CS to the ring of mordor or some lame ass shit. As soon as the nerdmods read it, they get little nerdboners and it instantly gets modded up.

      Fuck, I really REALLY hate you all. You're so unfunny it literally makes me sick. I think I need to go throw up. Every joke here is recycled a million and a half times even though it wasn't funny the first time because you all follow your nerd leaders with the most karma.

      Don't even get me started on karma.

      In conclusion: I hate everyone except the AC who posted the above. Now go die, you worthless faggots.

  3. Apropos cartoon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  4. Sepatate female matches? by John+Gaming+Target · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are "gamers" that insecure about their masculinity/sexuality/gaming prowess/dick size/pick something else that they're afraid of playing against girls?

    My girlfriend loves Mario Kart: Double Dash and it makes me happy it's one of the hobbies we can share.

    If playing against girls makes you uncomfortable, don't play games at all!

    1. Re:Sepatate female matches? by wjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One would hope not, But unfortunaty Pennis Envy is all too common in the gaming world. When some guy is playing in a tournament and they get schooled by a girl it gives them that feeling of insecuirty.

    2. Re:Sepatate female matches? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      my wife can be just as obsessive about games as I can be. She's been sick most of the last month, and while she's been off of work, she's filled up her time by playing RPGs on our PS2 near-constantly. We've also played a lot of co-op on games that support it.

    3. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You got it wrong. The girls are in their own competition, not because the males have a problem with playing against them, but because if the 7 female teams played in the male league, together with the 50 male teams, they would very likely end up grind into dust.

      Sorry, but it's true. I'm not saying they'll nessecarily finish places 51-57, but my guess is that they would all be in the bottom half, and most of them in the bottom quarter.

      I agree there's no reason why females, in principle, couldnt't play FPS games as well as or better than males. In the real world that's rare though. The reason being that fewer girls play, and those the play play less on the average.

      The same is true in any number of other sports where physical size and strength in principle should not play a role. Snooker. Dart. Shooting. Racing, hell even Chess.

      In all these sports there's no big reason why females couldn't compete in the same class with the boys, except in general the result would be a few females on the bottom-quarter of the result-list. Which ain't very inspiring and migth aswell lead to more sexism as to less.

      I'm sure someone will jump at me, for being politically uncorrect or something. Those people should instead tell me the names of women who can actually hold their own agains say the top 20 males in chess, snooker, racing or dart.

    4. Re:Sepatate female matches? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My experience is that yes, most male gamers are, although this will vary by genre. You'll find more of it FPSs, say, then in racing sims, but it's present to some degree everywhere.

      Girl gamers who are good are especially to be feared ( as they are often elswhere), because they empiriaclly demonstrate the invalidity of the argument that they don't belong because they somehow unsuitable for the task.

      Personally, if I were a girl gamer, I'd take a certain amount of delight in kicking dickwad ass for the above reason and consider it something of a social duty, but given the realities of life and human nature if a group of the girls justs wants to not have to deal with the bullshit for a while and have a friendly game of killing their girlfriends I can't say I'd gainsay them the choice.

      It's a shame, because computer gaming is often held up as the paragon of fields where one is judged solely on merit and no one even knows if you're a 6 year old confined to a wheelchair or a 50 year old marine hand to hand combat instructor.

      I think you'll find there's a large number of girl gamers who are not known to be girl gamers, i.e. they are "passing", just so they can be given this right.

      KFG

    5. Re:Sepatate female matches? by proj_2501 · · Score: 3, Funny

      personally i can't imagine any sort of results from a darts tournament being very inspiring.

    6. Re:Sepatate female matches? by peragrin · · Score: 2, Funny
      I remember once about 5 years ago, I came across a 17year old girl in a quake 2 room. After beating the crap out of each other, we joined forces and kicked the crap out of anyone else who entered the room.

      I still smile when I remember one shot we were standing next to each other, when some one came around a corner, we both let loose rockets and he didn't stay long after that.

      All said and doen a woman can compete with 90% of the men players with practice, the top 10% will take a while for them to penetrate simply due to skill level but that day can and will come.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember once about 5 years ago, I came across a 17year old girl in a quake 2 room

      I still smile when I remember one shot we were standing next to each other


      Okay. Unless you went on to marry this girl, that's pretty weird. You need better life experiences!

    8. Re:Sepatate female matches? by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Well, everyone who has replied so far to you is full of crap, both for and against, since nobody has posted any stats. Let's see some people who know the inside scoop post actualy stats.

      I don't do the online gaming thing beyond flight sims, so all I have to go on is the only real world equivalent to FPS: paintball. In my experience in paintball, as well as real firearms competitions, while women can often be far more accurate shooters than most men, as far as agression and tactics go they generally lag, unless you have at just one authoritative and agressive woman to lead the squad. More than one, and you have major problems with teamwork. If you don't have one, the women get rolled over by male opposing teams.

      Please, can someone with real stats give us some objective reality?

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    9. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      The reason being that fewer girls play, and those the play play less on the average.

      It turns out that men a women do have differently structured brains, and do tend to think differently.

      In any sort of 3 dimesional game, a male might have an unfair advantage do to his mind being structured to process spatial relations quickly.

      Physical strength is not the matter: this same thing would translate into a machine simulation.

      It not sexism or anything, because there are many mental tasks that women excel at (more than men) as well. (multitasknig is one)

      It would be interesting if someone designed a multiplayer game which required a man/women team for maximum efficiency.

    10. Re:Sepatate female matches? by theskipper · · Score: 1

      You'd be wrong if you added professional pool to the list. I've watched it for a long time and am convinced that there isn't a male that could consistently beat Allison Fisher in snooker or 9-ball.

      There's a bevy of others, too. Try to catch the 9-ball tournaments on ESPN sometime and compare the men against the women. It's surprising what you'll see.

    11. Re:Sepatate female matches? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      In FPS's, men do have a slight advantage over women. Men's hand eye coordination and reaction time are little better on average than women's.

      Women's concentration and teamwork are a little better than men's, so depending on the gaming and which are stressed more can end up giving a slight advantaged to one group. I remember reading somewhere that women make better snipers, but men are better handgun marksmen.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    12. Re:Sepatate female matches? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      All said and doen a woman can compete with 90% of the men players with practice, the top 10% will take a while for them to penetrate simply due to skill level but that day can and will come.


      And there have been great female players in most FPS games, I've even played alongside (and against) a couple of them. The point, though, is that 10-20% of the online audience for most FPS games is female, and 10% of that (if that many) is willing to play in clans (roughly the same percentage as the rest of the population, maybe smaller for females but that isn't figured into the 10%). Maybe 10% of the clans will compete in LAN tournaments. These numbers work the same way for males, but since 80-90% of the audience for online FPS games is male, the percentages are in their favour.

      Women can be very good at FPS games, and sometimes are. There are many tournaments out there that allow them to participate equally with the males, given that 80-90% or more of the attendence is going to be male. If one particular tournament decided to segregate, it was either through stupidity, by request of the males, or by request of the females. In my experience, the males that would request such a thing don't have the communication skills to actually get such a request through any intelligent organizer of such an event, thereby leaving stupidity as the only option other than by request of female participants.

      All-female clans, simply by numbers of people available to join them, are by far rare, but all-male clans which forbid female entry are almost non-existant (then again, it's perfectly possible that an all-male clan is so obnoxious or pathetic that no female would wish to join them). Why would it make sense for a tournament to follow a model which is not followed by the player base to which it owns it's existance? (in other words, why would the tournament be seperated by sex by the request of the portion of the population that does not otherwise seperate itself that way?)

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    13. Re:Sepatate female matches? by rlafflick · · Score: 0

      You are wrong about the pool and snooker stat you quote. try checking the likes of stephen davis, steve hendry, jimmy white, ron sullivan

    14. Re:Sepatate female matches? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but it's true. I'm not saying they'll nessecarily finish places 51-57, but my guess is that they would all be in the bottom half, and most of them in the bottom quarter.

      There are several problems, but first remember that separate is rarely, if ever, equal.

      There's no problem separating players by skill, the way baseball has a major league, a minor league, and other finer divisions. This allows players to improve among others of similar ability, rather than just getting clobbered all day. However, note that it's entirely possible for a baseball player to advance from the minors to the majors, simply by improving.

      Next consider golf and its widespread handicap system. The system allows players of unequal abilities to compete directly.

      The reason you're wrong is not because you think lowly of female gamers or athletes (for which I really can't be bothered to research and debunk). It's because you want to mitigate the problem by putting them in a separate league with no hope of movement. In general, they cannot become men even after the best female players improve vastly.

      The correct way to do it is either to score by handicap, or separate players into leagues by skill (obviously with some rules for promotion or demotion). A FPS game has a most obvious handicap system: either give lower skilled players more powerful weapons, or stronger armor protection. Sex doesn't even have to enter into it.

    15. Re:Sepatate female matches? by lazyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This looks like a troll. I'll answer anyway.

      if the 7 female teams played in the male league, together with the 50 male teams, they would very likely end up grind into dust.

      Perhaps, but even assuming so, that's not because they're female. It's because they don't have the skills. They don't have the skills because they don't practice as much. It has nothing to do with gender.

      but my guess is that they would all be in the bottom half

      50% of male teams in an all male tourny would finish in the bottom half also. Yet that isn't used as a argument to disqualfy them from playing. So what's your point? All of your arguments for not letting girls participate can also be applied to guys who suck. By your arguments, "guys who suck" shouldn't be allowed to play in these tournemnts. Good luck implementing that rule. If there are going to be any divisions at all, then they should be based on skill, not gender. i.e. There should be beginner, intermediate, and advanced level tournements; none of which should discriminate based on gender. Divisions based on gender make absolutly no sense.

      The same is true in any number of other sports where physical size and strength in principle should not play a role. Snooker. Dart. Shooting. Racing, hell even Chess.

      And all my arguments apply in those cases as well. If I was active in any of those sports, and had free time, I would lobby to have the situation changed.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    16. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In any sort of 3 dimesional game, a male might have an unfair advantage do to his mind being structured to process spatial relations quickly.

      There has never been a valid, peer-reviewed study anywhere that indicates that men process spatial relations better than women. In fact, it's a well established fact that women tend to be better marksmen than men with the same level of experience.

    17. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Men's hand eye coordination and reaction time are little better on average than women's.

      Do you have an objective study to back that claim up?

      Women's concentration and teamwork are a little better than men's

      Or that? Frankly, both comments sound to me like broad generalizations (or perhaps you could say, "generalizations about broads.")

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Golias · · Score: 1
      The reason why separate leagues for women is the more popular option for almost every event is because the men who do not qualify for the best leagues don't like getting beat by women. Give them their own league, and crappy male players can have their "C" and "D" league tournaments without ever having to acknowledge that there are women out there who can show them up.

      This sort of machismo is mostly absent from modern Western society, but has been slowest to evaporate in the world of sports. A good example is men's fastpitch softball: The sport is slowly dying in the US because of a lack of pitchers, but there are plenty of female former college players who throw well enough to play on C or B amateur softball league... However, bringing such pitchers on to teams is extremely rare, even though the rules do not prohibit it, largely because of the attitude that becoming a "co-ed" league rather than a "mens" league implies a lower level of competition.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Sepatate female matches? by bwcbwc · · Score: 1
      If playing against girls makes you uncomfortable, don't play games at all!
      Or better yet, if playing against girls makes you uncomfortable, go play with yourself. I mean AGAINST yourself.

      Besides "on the internet no one knows you're a ...", so how can they tell if you're a girl, boy, dog or hermaphroditic alien from the planet Wombo?

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    20. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember once about 5 years ago, I came across a 17year old girl in a quake 2 room ... and she said "Ewww! Dude, that's gross!"

      *rimshot*

    21. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, WTF do you think "penis envy" is? It has nothing to do with men.

    22. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      There has never been a valid, peer-reviewed study anywhere that indicates that men process spatial relations better than women.


      There you are wrong. There are many explicit references in the comments to this story alone.
      Its a well known and well documented fact.

      In fact, it's a well established fact that women tend to be better marksmen than men with the same level of experience.
      I could beleive this: Marksmanship, when done on a simple firing range does not require any guessing of the targets location or predicting its motion. Nor does it require picking the target out of a crowd: those things would give an advantage to males. On the firing range, the main advantage is having very steady hands, which a female would have an advantage with.

    23. Re:Sepatate female matches? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Read some later threads. Several people have posted references.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    24. Re:Sepatate female matches? by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I remember learning about how treating everyone equally is NOT the same as equality, mainly because it ignores various factors that give some groups an advantage.

      In gaming I would say that one advantage is sponsorship. The top clans get sponsored, with free gear and maybe some money, which allows them to spend more time playing and on better hardware. The top clans are currently all male. If you were to put the female clans in and they all finished in the bottom half of the tourney, then some people would take that as women just aren't as good as men, and sponsors would be less likely to support them. Plus, the female clans wouldn't get much prize money and it would discourage other female clans. It's setting them up for failure.

      Now, if they get their own tourney, there is a better chance for more prize money, and the top female clans and especially the winner are much more likely to get noticed and get sponsorship so that they can spend more time practicing and get free gear. All this aside, I don't see why they have to have all-female clans.

      Why not just have the best players you can get? Aren't there any clans that would take on a female if she was good enough to be a starter or at least an alternate? Aren't there any females that don't mind being the only girl (or two) on a clan? Let's face it, it's hard for anyone of ANY gender to be good enough for the top clans (which are all currently all-male). The proportion of guys who are good enough is very low compared to the total number of male players, and there are fewer female players. It's an accomplishment for anyone to get on these clans, and a female doing it would attract a lot of mostly positive attention. That said, would an all-girl clan be willing to take on guys if it would take them to the top? Or would it be seen as women needing men to make it? I'd love to see a clan that STARTED as mixed male/female get to the top so there wouldn't be any doubt.


      As a side note on the how men do better at things in which physical strength shouldn't be a barrier (snooker, darts, etc.), I notice that men tend much more to extremes than women do. We get much more fanatical about things (sports, cars etc.) and focus on whatever we're good at more (sometimes to the exclusion of all else). Of course, this isn't always a good thing, but does anyone else think that men tend to extremes more than women? Is this why at least *a* man (one individual) tends to be the top of the field? Can men simply get more obsessive than women can?

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    25. Re:Sepatate female matches? by |_uke · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually, there was a study done recently about 3d spacial processing in both men and women. (Heh, done by microsoft actually)

      On average, men have a better time processing, and virtualizing 3d information on a computer screen. But it turns out that, if you give a women a wide screen, or multi screen environment.. they can process 3d information just as good (and some times better), than men

      Just thought I would put that 2c in =)

      --
      Luke
    26. Re:Sepatate female matches? by jonhuang · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My sister was the highest-placed girl at a big video game tournament (Smash Melee) at UT Austin recently. She said that an uncomfortably large amount of her defeated opponents.. tried to feel her up in an "after game hug" (wtf?).

    27. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1
      I play Unreal Tournament, and am in a clan called The Black Legion. We play with the Zark Assault Rifle mod.

      I can tell you right now that if you give a woman an assault rifle with a scope on it, you had better hope she's on your team!!! My wife is in our clan and regularly kicks ass against men who have been playing much longer than she has!!! Hat's off to her!!!

      Good frags to you all, men and women alike. Hey, once we connect, who cares? Just give me a Zark, and get out of my way!!!

      -{BL}Ticklemonster

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    28. Re:Sepatate female matches? by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Actually it's how women process information and how their brains are wired that is the main reason women don't play them.

      99% of the women that have watched me play FPS games get turned around or even dizzy when I jump through doors, turn and fire killing a few people, do a 180 and do the same thing then bust a move down the next hall into a field filled with snipers or nade spammers.

      They [females] think I've traversed across the map when in reality, it was the same room and one room over.

      The ability to process spacial information isn't natural for many women. this includes imaging 3D places in their heads which is what FPS makes you do...

    29. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. do you have pics of your sis? does she have a webpage? I just got to meet her!

    30. Re:Sepatate female matches? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Any man that is intimidated by girl gamers needs to consider the following phrase: Strip Counter-strike.

      Of course, perhaps many of them already have, considered the talents of the girl in question, have taken a good look at their own physique, and decided the risks wasn't worth it.

      Yeah, if I was getting beat by a girl in that situation, I could understand the intimidation factor. ;)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    31. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      So, what you are saying is that separate female leagues in basketball is wrong, and they should instead play in the minor league aslong and try to compete their way into the main league by playing well enough ?

      The problem with that theory is that basically no woman would ever play in say the top 5 leagues. There are large, obvious, physical differences. The female national champions in basket would probably get their asses kicked by the average male junior team.

      This ain't sexist. This is true. I *know* that being politically correct is all the vogue these days. But it goes to far when you start insisting on ignoring reality.

      REALITY is that without female-only leagues, no female (or close enough as makes no difference) would be able to hold her own in most professional sports, ESPECIALLY those where size and muscle-mass plays a large role, like basket.

      I already said I see no reason, in principle, why we couldn't have one class only in sports where such issues play no role. I honestly don't know why women do poorer for example in shooting. Still, they do. I witnessed the last Norwegian national championship in field-shooting. You migth not *like* it, but the fact is, if everyone competed in one class, the females there would all be in the bottom half of the result-list, most in the bottom quarter. Infact, there where several males good enough to beat the top woman who where nevertheless not even qualified to participate in the male class.

      Separating people into leagues by skill will ensure, in most sports, that no female can do professional sports. Because with the same effort, her chanse of ever reaching the higher leagues is close to zero. Separating with handicaps will ensure that few or none of the females or female teams ever get a low handicap.

      As I said; in some sports this migth function. In many many others, such as those where it's an advantage to be big and strong, your "solution" would only manage one thing; to get rid of the top women alltogether.

    32. Re:Sepatate female matches? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      So, what you are saying is that separate female leagues in basketball is wrong, and they should instead play in the minor league aslong and try to compete their way into the main league by playing well enough?

      No, I'm not saying that all-female leagues are wrong. I'm saying that excluding females from dominant leagues (i.e., NBA, NFL, etc) is wrong. There are no equivalents to these when you consider the prestige and paychecks involved. If no woman can play at NBA levels, fine. That's the reality you speak of. If there is just one who could, but is forced to play in the WNBA instead, you've done her an injustice.

      Put another way, if the WNBA suddenly started to make a great deal more money than the NBA, then I think it should change its name and allow male players in. Point is, a male player who is good enough to play in the WNBA but not the NBA still has choices like the CBA. A hypothetical female player good enough for the NBA has none.

      (I use money to simplify the discussion. I realize sports isn't entirely about money, yet.)

    33. Re:Sepatate female matches? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I understand what you say. But I'm afraid I'm still not convinced.

      Thing is, how do you justify letting "stronger" females play in the male league without also letting weaker males play in the female league ?

      And if you allow that, the effect would be precisely what I predicted above: The top *5* leagues or so would be filled with males, from strong to medium, and only thereunder would the top women have a chance at competing against the medium to weak males.

      I'm just not convinced that'd help the status of female sports.

      Unless you really think that equality demands that females have access to all areas, all leagues, all competitions, but excluding males from certain leagues, competitions and areas are perfectly ok.

      That is, however a sorta odd definition of "equality".

      Why is it so freaking hard to accept that males and females are different in some areas ? Everyone knows that with equal training, a male will almost always beat a female in sports requiring lots of muscle-strength and/or being large. I really don't see why that is so controverisal. It's *really* *REALLY* obvious to even a casual observer.

      There migth be sports where with equal training, males and females would do similarily well, I have no objections to joining the leagues there. Perhaps chess, shooting, pool and FPS belong in this class of sports. (I said *perhaps*, I consider it possible that less femals FPS-champs is only a result of less players and/or less training, but I also consider it possible that there are physiological differences that play a role.)

    34. Re:Sepatate female matches? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Unless you really think that equality demands that females have access to all areas, all leagues, all competitions, but excluding males from certain leagues, competitions and areas are perfectly ok.

      It is okay under certain conditions. One such condition is when female leagues are not as prestigious or lucrative as the male leagues. The WBNA is one such example, with players making as little as $30,000, compared to rookies in the NBA who are paid at least $300,000. The crucial question is whether a male player can make similar amounts elsewhere. (True for WNBA, false for NBA.)

      Like I said, if the situation is reversed (WNBA makes more money), then the league should permit male players to play.

      That is, however a sorta odd definition of "equality".

      Not really. Americans instituted a (controversial) program known as Affirmative Action, where African-Americans are given preferential treatment in college admissions and other areas. This inequality was deliberately introduced to level the playing field, so that they can catch up literally from slavery. (I don't mean to argue the merits of AA, just to say that inequality can be seen as necessary, even at the expense of European Americans who benefited from slavery.)

      Why is it so freaking hard to accept that males and females are different in some areas ?

      It's not. It's just that this has been used as an excuse more often than it was used honestly. Some WWII-era politicians tried to cite "scientific studies" that African-Americans have smaller brains, and were not fit to operate complicated machinery like aircraft. It's simply a sensitive topic that should be examined with great care.

      Put another way, what does the NBA possibly lose if it allows women in? Now compare that with what the WNBA could lose if it allowed men in.

      (I said *perhaps*, I consider it possible that less femals FPS-champs is only a result of less players and/or less training, but I also consider it possible that there are physiological differences that play a role.)

      Exactly, which is why (back to the topic now) sexually differentiated leagues should not be instituted until this is proven or at least widely accepted.

  5. Why? by herrvinny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches."

    Why? This isn't real life, where men have more muscle than women do (I'm not being sexist, just take an intro biology course), and are therefore superior to women in terms of pure strength, speed, etc. Online, everybody's equal, the characters can be tuned to roughly equivalent stats, the only thing that matters is reflexes to move the mouse and hit the keyboard.

    1. Re:Why? by transient · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Your comparison of men and women's physical abilities leaves out two key advantages that women have, so I thought I'd point them out for the sake of fairness: endurance and longevity. Women tend to live longer than men, and they can physically exert themselves for longer periods. All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    2. Re:Why? by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      This isn't real life, where men have more muscle than women do

      This is soon not going to matter, being as men are soon to be allowed to enter women's events. Something to do with gender rights or some crap. I don't buy it.

      As far as this goes... I'm all for it. There's no reason women shouldn't have the brainpower and reactions to best men at Quake 3 or UT or whatever.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win.

      Except that all else isn't equal, as the parent pointed out. So err... yeah.

    4. Re:Why? by tigress · · Score: 1

      Except that girls are better at multitasking than guys. =D

    5. Re:Why? by radish · · Score: 2, Funny

      You also fail to take into consideration the concept of potential. I realise that as a man, I am potentially stronger, faster and fitter than a woman. I also realise that in reality, due to excessive pizza consumption, there are plenty of women who would kick my ass.

      I watched a TV show last night with some female body builder - I would bet money that she could kick the ass of pretty much any slashdotter, male, female or otherwise :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Why? by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      What you're saying is that when online it's your brain power, reactions and hand-eye coordination that are important. IANAB (biologist), but I'm fairly sure that there are bit differences between men and women's brains (e.g. women can multitask/men can't (gross generalization)). However, I don't know whether this affects online game ability.

    7. Re:Why? by ebuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree wholeheartedly.

      If you want prior art, look at the history of the male / female chess leagues. The creation of sparate leagues actually increased the sexisim debates. Soon the women's league was know for it's weaker players who were often derived the opportunity to play against their stronger male counterparts. It got so bad that (arguably) the best women players made it a point to play in the conventionally men's tournaments. Some were even as bold as to say it was impossible to improve unless they played against stronger opponents.

      Video games, like chess, fail to use a sex's sexual characteristics to give one sex a distinct advantage over the other. Separate leagues aren't necessary, and if there's an all female team, that should be a choice of comaraderie and not adminstration.

      Wow, how many web nanny programs will filter this post?

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except that there is no scientific evidence to back that up at all. You are mistaking correlation with causation. You can't look at historical trends and make a generalization like that. The role of women in society has changed dramatically in just the last 20 years. It will take another couple of generations before we know what impact this will have on their longevity.

    9. Re:Why? by ebuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      Longevity is very important in video games considering most shooters leave me with a half-life of 2.5 minutes.

    10. Re:Why? by plams · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, the male brain is bigger than the female.

      He-he.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      out for the sake of fairness: endurance and longevity.
      Hey don't forget mutiple orgasms

    12. Re:Why? by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      But this is in regard to playing video games, exclusively. Until they have treadmill run games, we are safe...

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    13. Re:Why? by Prehensile+Interacti · · Score: 1
      I am all for the idea of women's competitions. It will end up bringing more women into 'the sport', which from the article (and like experience) is sorely needed. Giving women a playground, where they can hone their skills, and actually get good against each other is a fantastic way of keeping their interest.

      Now the main competitions are not male only - they are open. This means that anyone can enter, including women. Once a girly team is winning their own competitions consistently, then it would be the logical next step to come play with 'the big boys'. This is when gaming will become truely a great pasttime; but we do have a long way to go to get there.

      Hopefully at some point in the future, they will be whopping our male asses so hard that we will be clamouring for a male only competition. But until that point happens, bring them on!

    14. Re:Why? by brilinux · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a male, I for one, welcome our new female overlords!

    15. Re:Why? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win.

      Why do the best Marathon times come from men then? Why aren't women winning the Tour de France? The reference I found is that they are eligible for it, but none have yet been good enough to be picked for a team. Top women can compete with top men in many areas, but in general the testosterone wins in sports.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:Why? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Women [...] can physically exert themselves for longer periods. All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win"

      I don't know where you possibly heard this, but it simply is not true, in fact men have greater endurance on average. Of course "All else being equal" makes no sense in this context - because it simply isn't equal.

    17. Re:Why? by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

      If women were better at endurance there would be more female than male winners of Survivor. And, with four of seven winners female, that is in fact that case.

      I'm sure there are more examples, but that's the first easily googled idea I had.

    18. Re:Why? by Rostin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Triathlons are a great test of endurance. Record times for male competitors are consistently lower than for female. I'm sure there's some detail I'm missing here, but how do you reconcile this fact with your statement that women can exert themselves for longer?

    19. Re:Why? by zootread · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except that girls are better at multitasking than guys. =D

      Actually, that is not entirely true. A guy can be receiving a blowjob, using the computer, eating a slice of pizza, and drinking a beer, all at the same time. A woman would have to sit there and concentrate while getting head, and would not be able to do anything simultaneously.

      --
      Zoot!
    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, my 12 year-old sister could kick the ass of any slashdotter - especially the males. The most exercise you dorks get is lifting the can of Red Bull.

    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Men don't have more muscle then women do. The average man has more muscle then the average woman. Those are two very different ideas. For the first to be true, the strongest woman in the world would still have less muscle than the weakest man in the world.

      Restrictions based on averages are an easy way to discriminate while pretending to have scientific backup. Fire departments didn't allow women because (average) women didn't have enough upper body strength. --Well you know what? If upper body strength is such a requirement, why not just have an upper body strength test? You'll find that some men will fail it and some women will pass it.

      Global statements about "averages", even if true, are simply a cheap way to avoid considering the qualifications of the actual candidate. Imagine if whites were excluded from Miss America because "the average white person is too ugly". Even if factually true, it's an affront to reason to apply judgements on individuals based on averages, especially in cases where it is so easy to avoid.

    22. Re:Why? by DamnRogue · · Score: 1

      To back up the above poster, world's fastest marathon times are 2:04:55 for men and 2:15:25 for women. That's a 8.4% difference. That's closer than I would have expected, honestly, so I'd believe that women are better-suited towards endurance than other activities (say, power lifting).

    23. Re:Why? by FallLine · · Score: 4, Interesting
      All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win.
      Can you back up this claim? What do you define as "long distance"? Men consistently win by large margins in both "average" and professional running "classes". Yes, I'm aware that some scientists predict that women will eventually beat the best men in ultra-marathons (e.g., ~60+ miles), but it has yet to happen and it is much contested. To argue that because women have "more endurance" (itself not entirely proven) that they will win in actual events simply does not follow. Men have less body fat to carry, more muscle per pound, larger lung capacity, larger hearts, and so on. These factors can easily make up for relative lack of endurance in the real world. In any event, I've yet to see a shred of evidence to back this claim up, particularly at more amature levels. What's more, women who compete at these sorts of levels do tremendous permanent damage to their ability to safely reproduce.
    24. Re:Why? by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, that is not entirely true. A guy can be receiving a blowjob, using the computer, eating a slice of pizza, and drinking a beer, all at the same time. A woman would have to sit there and concentrate while getting head, and would not be able to do anything simultaneously.
      Someday, when you finally have sex for the first time, you'll realize just how wrong you are.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what a bad idea it was. Survivor is television. Winning has nothing to do with endurance. Charisma has much more to do with it than endurance.

    26. Re:Why? by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 1, Funny

      You do realize that these females are not going to sleep with you either, right?

    27. Re:Why? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      This isn't real life, where men have more muscle than women do (I'm not being sexist, just take an intro biology course), and are therefore superior to women in terms of pure strength, speed, etc.

      Men on average, are without question stronger than women, but I'm not so sure about faster. When I was in High School I was on the track team (I was the slowest one, but I threw javelin, so I didn't have to be fast) and the fastest female runners were on par with most of the male runners.

      At a higher level, like olympic or college that might be different, but in my experience the extra weight of a male's muscle can also slow him down.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    28. Re:Why? by MoneyT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Survivor is a highly rigged outcome, maybe not controlled but rigged in different manners. You can bet that any women that one of the guys could put up with, were not being voted against by that guy. The guys were out to get rid of the other guys first because they were viewed as the biggest threat. The problem is, the women were doing the same thing. So we have men being targeted by men and women. And then when there's only one or two men left and they realize their mistake, it's already too late, the women have control and the men are going. Women have the greater chance of winning because the men underestimate them politicaly. Survivor is an absolutely horrible thing to use to compare the sexes.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    29. Re:Why? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      But we're discussing competitions. We're discussing the performance of the *top* people.

      You're correct that the strongest woman is (MUSCH) stronger than the weakest guy. That is however totally irrelevant if you're considering whether or not to have separate classes for males and females in weight-lifting.

      Similarily, the best female Counterstrikers can undoubtedly beat the average male. They can however in general NOT hold their own against the *best* male players, and that's what they have to do to avoid getting crushed in competitions.

      When we're talking competitions, average performances are quite irrelevant, the interesting question is if a well-trained female can hold her own on equal terms with a well-trained male. In some sports there's no reason why that shouldn't be so (example: shooting, snooker, FPS, chess), while in others they very obviously can not. (i.e. anything where muscle-mass plays a big role.))

      I agree with your point about fire-persons. If a job requires the ability to life 100 pounds, then obviously anyone who's qualified, male or female, should be able to apply for the job

    30. Re:Why? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Here, have a mirror.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    31. Re:Why? by El · · Score: 1

      In ultramarathons, e.g. 100-mile races, women do better than men. Granted, these are women with less that 1% body fat, but since women burn energy more efficiently and have slower metabolisms, they do better in ultra-endurance sports. In the context of a marathon, having longer legs probably outweighs the benefits of more efficient metabolism -- but then, I'm no expert.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    32. Re:Why? by Datafage · · Score: 1

      That is strange... When I was in XC and track I was a mediocre distance runner at best, weighed 185, but could hang with most of the best girls on the team on practice runs, who got smoked by the good guys on our team. Our girls were also consistently all-state.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    33. Re:Why? by djan · · Score: 1

      All males do this everytime one says "I do"...

    34. Re:Why? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      New female overlords? Females have been our overlords for centuries if not millenia! Now they're just trying to "relate" to the lower classes by stealing our hobbies... I say we don't let em! Rebel against our ancient female overlords!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    35. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is not entirely true. A guy can be receiving a blowjob, using the computer, eating a slice of pizza, and drinking a beer, all at the same time. A woman would have to sit there and concentrate while getting head, and would not be able to do anything simultaneously.

      One other difference, though: the woman is getting hers from a real live partner. The guy who's eating pizza, drinking beer, and using the computer while getting a blowjob is using one of those silicone molds of some porn star's mouth.

      When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention. Whether or not my partner considers it "necessary."

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    36. Re:Why? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      The reason they divided women from men in chess tournies is beacuse the women had an unfair advantage over the men, being the male chess swamis had probably never had a woman be so close to them ... stare at them with such intensity ... hinge on their every move. These strange new feelings would interupt their game.

      God knows, they might wonder why they were playing chess in the first place. And then the whole league could possibly collapse.

      Come you tards, lighten up. It's monday morning.

      AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! *boom*

    37. Re:Why? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Why do the best Marathon times come from men then? Why aren't women winning the Tour de France?

      One possibility is that the difference only shows under extreme (i.e., near death) conditions. That is, if you run people continuously for hundreds of miles, the last few to die may be mostly women. Obviously, even if this was true it wouldn't make a sport. (Note the word "possibility". I'm offering a possible explanation, not asserting a scientific finding.)

      Another interesting tidbit is that the US Air Force had found that many women perform better than men in centrifuges, possibly because of their generally shorter distances between brain and heart. Again, this is basically spinning you until you pass out, which doesn't really make a sport either.

    38. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reminds me of when I used to play Magic with a group of guys I knew.

      We'd play these big 5 or 6-person games, and I'd often win or come in second. Why? Because they spent the first half of the game beating each other up, while I just would stock up land and get my creatures out. Then, when they noticed I was still there and at 20 health, they were all down quite a bit.

      It's not that women are crafty. We don't have to be when it comes to male egos. ;-)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    39. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      What's more, women who compete at these sorts of levels do tremendous permanent damage to their ability to safely reproduce.

      And... so? As long as they know they're making that choice, how does that figure?

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    40. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Similarily, the best female Counterstrikers can undoubtedly beat the average male. They can however in general NOT hold their own against the *best* male players, and that's what they have to do to avoid getting crushed in competitions.

      There's something you're forgetting about the dynamics of women entering male-dominated competition.

      Generally, they're not well-received. So while a guy who's "good" might get into a professional clan just fine (even if it's not one of the best), a woman is not even going to pursue membership in a professional clan unless she's VERY good. Therefore, the "average" woman competing at this level is probably quite a bit better than the "average" man competing at the same level.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    41. Re:Why? by Xaleth+Nuada · · Score: 1

      For those wishing to reduce their code length the enhanced version of
      I for one, welcome our new female overlords
      is
      "I do"

      --

      I read Slashdot for the .sigs
    42. Re:Why? by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      how do you reconcile this fact with your statement that women can exert themselves for longer

      Being a husband (and a father) I'd love to see any guy out there endure childbirth for 12-16 hours. It's been proven that women have a much higher tolerance for pain and greater endurance over the long term than men.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    43. Re:Why? by ophix · · Score: 2, Funny

      when i get a good blowjob, it has my full undivided attention. my ex and i did try an experiment one day, she wanted to see if she could pull my attention away from irc.... and well she won but i wasnt disappointed.

    44. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ultramarathons, e.g. 100-mile races, women do better than men.

      Link? Proof? Story? Is there an actual example of this happening?

      Granted, these are women with less that 1% body fat

      Hold on there captain bullshit, anyone with less than 1% body fat would be DEAD. Surely not in any condition to run a race.

      but since women burn energy more efficiently and have slower metabolisms, they do better in ultra-endurance sports. In the context of a marathon, having longer legs probably outweighs the benefits of more efficient metabolism

      So the same would hold true for your "ultra marathon". Not to mention having better leg muscle mass helps also.

      -- but then, I'm no expert. Then shut the fuck up, you aren't adding anything but clutter and your bullshit opinions that have no basis in fact.

    45. Re:Why? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Again, this is basically spinning you until you pass out, which doesn't really make a sport either.


      No, but I think it is the plot of the next Reality TV show.

      --
      AccountKiller
    46. Re:Why? by El · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simple google search on "women" and "ultramaraton" returns this as the FIRST hit. Next time google before you flame.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    47. Re:Why? by monique · · Score: 1

      Not everyone wants to reproduce.

      If you ask me, which would you rather be, the top-ranked athlete in X sport or a mother, I'd choose option A.

      Almost any woman can be a mother. Only a tiny fraction can be successful professional athletes.

      (And I'm not sure about the permanent damage part, anyway. Yes, women who go below a certain percentage of body fat stop menstruating, but when they gain the fat back, they start again. I'm genuinely curious -- could you point me to some references?)

      --
      -monique
    48. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. My coffee cup is a lot heavier than a can of Red Bull.

    49. Re:Why? by schon · · Score: 1

      they can physically exert themselves for longer periods. All else being equal, in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will win.

      It's interesting that you think these statements support each other, when in fact, they contradict each other.

      The winner of a race - by definition - is the person who exerts his/herself for the shortest amount of time. (Because if you're forced to exert yourself for a longer amount of time, it means that someone is in front of you - think about it for a moment.)

      "All things being equal", in a long-distance race between a man and a woman, the woman will lose.

      Perhaps women can physically exert themselves for longer periods because they need to, in order to finish the race? :o)

    50. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a treeplanter in Canada and one thing I found out was that the treeplanting companies would hire women without an interview because they were so much less likely to quit than men - men often planted more trees per day but women got more in the ground per season because they were more consistent.

    51. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proven that women have a much higher tolerance for pain and greater endurance over the long term than men.

      how exactly is that proven? And by the way, passing a kidney stone is more painful than childbirth. Just because you are a pussy doesn't mean every man is.

    52. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention.

      you may think you have his attention, but I bet you he is thinking of someone else fatty.

    53. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something you're forgetting about the dynamics of women entering male-dominated competition.

      honey, you need to give up on your male-hating views. Men don't care that you are female when you play online games.

      Generally, they're not well-received. So while a guy who's "good" might get into a professional clan just fine (even if it's not one of the best), a woman is not even going to pursue membership in a professional clan unless she's VERY good. Therefore, the "average" woman competing at this level is probably quite a bit better than the "average" man competing at the same level.

      Total bullshit, as a matter of fact, a crappy female player has a better chance of making it into a clan just because she is female than a male does. A male has only his skill to rely on. A female has her skill, plus the fact that the clannies want to get laid. Face it, women aren't at a disadvantage, they are at an advantage and still don't/can't play at a high level.

    54. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention. Whether or not my partner considers it "necessary."

      Yeah, because you treat it like currency.

      You whore.

      Mom, I told you not to post on SlashDot.

    55. Re:Why? by qirien · · Score: 1

      But not every woman can be a good mother. For me, influencing and developing lasting, nurturing relationships with real people (especially one's own children) far surpasses the few years of fame and adrenaline being a top-ranked athlete gives you.

      That being said, I'm not sure about the permanent damage part, either. Googling didn't come up with anything, anyway . . .

      --
      -- Qirien, Academy of Defenestration
      "Who do you want to defenestrate today?"
    56. Re:Why? by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      One thing that you might not have accounted for is sponsorship. If your clan is sponsored, you're playing on better hardware and you don't have to spend time working to support yourself as much, you can spend more time practicing. Currently the most sponsored clans are the best all-male clans.

      It think that it would be a good idea to try to get some all-female clans sponsorship first. And the winner of a tournament (such as an all-female one) will get more attention. Preferably, I'd prefer to see mixed male/female clans instead. If the clans makeup represented the overall gamer population though, it would end up having only one or two females per clan simply because there are much fewer female players.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    57. Re:Why? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, he'll realize that it's hard to drink beer why the pizza slice is in the way.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    58. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can see why you posted anonymously... I wouldn't take ownership of such bad reading comprehension, either.

      honey, you need to give up on your male-hating views.

      My husband, and the majority of my friends, would find it shocking that I "hate" them based on their 43rd chromosome. It's not hatred that motivates me to say shocking phrases like "male-dominated competition"... it's demographics.

      Men don't care that you are female when you play online games.

      Yes, they do, actually. They usually find it amusing, sometimes suprising, and often intriguing. Of course, when they don't *know* I'm female, they don't care. But when you walk into a tournament, it's kind of hard to disguise your gender unless you really try.

      as a matter of fact, a crappy female player has a better chance of making it into a clan just because she is female than a male does.

      "a clan" sure. "A professional gaming clan" as was discussed in the article and as I mentioned in my post, however, is a bit different.

      Face it, women aren't at a disadvantage, they are at an advantage and still don't/can't play at a high level.

      If you happen to belong to an ethnic minority, have a disfiguring disability, or are otherwise marginalized, forgive the assumptions of the following paragraph:

      You know nothing about disadvantage. You don't know what the disadvantage is to being automatically seen as something less than you are, or have the choice of being mistaken for a different gender. The "advantage" of being seen as nothing more than a dickcozy is one I'd give up any day to not have to prove I have a brain.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    59. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you may think you have his attention, but I bet you he is thinking of someone else fatty.

      You know, just because you've never had the fortune to get a blowjob from someone worth fantasizing about doesn't mean that everyone's in the same boat...

    60. Re:Why? by Rostin · · Score: 1

      That's not really answering the question. In activities that both women and men can do (i.e. as close as we can get to "all other things being equal") like marathons, men are stronger performers physically in terms of both strength and endurance. This is true even in events that last several days (like quadruple triathlons). I've always heard before that women have a higher tolerance for pain (and wonder how something like that can be proven) but even supposing it is true for the sake of argument, it doesn't really mean anything one way or another.

    61. Re:Why? by Rostin · · Score: 1

      P.S. I did some googling, and the first two stories I could found that looked somewhat serious are here and here.. Quote from second article: "Men and women differ in their pain tolerance," says psychologist Roger Fillingim of the University of Florida, who has spent years trying to learn why. "There's no debate on that."

    62. Re:Why? by monique · · Score: 1

      But not every woman can be a good mother.

      Agreed. In fact, in my above post, I was considering adding something to the effect of, "And if I try to be a super-athlete and fail, no harm done. If I screw up parenthood, I've screwed up a lot more than my own personal goals."

      That being said, you don't need working ovaries to be a good parent. Real parenthood is a matter entirely divorced from biology.

      --
      -monique
    63. Re:Why? by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Just because you are a pussy doesn't mean every man is.

      Wow, and AC called me a pussy. Pardon me while I shit myself.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    64. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 in 7?

      what the hell does that prove? that's practically 50%, the only way it could be closer to 50% would be 3 and a transvestite.

    65. Re:Why? by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am curious to hear your views concerning the dynamics of men entering female dominated competition. Unfortunately, that doesn't even merit consideration in the popular consciousness. Speaking as male in a female dominated profession, I can assure you no special allowances are given to me, and I had to endure the slings and arrows before I was respected for my abilities.

      If anything, I resent any insinuations of what my capabilities should be. I shouldn't be expected to do all the heavy lifting (as my female compatriots were prone to do), nor should I be seen as incapable of delicacy. But that is a common experience. That changes with demonstration. We are paid the same, do your job to the best of your abilities.

      I am of an ethnic minority, and I resent any implication that I can't compete. I also resent you tarnishing any of the achievements women have made. Diane Nyad, Curie, Lynn St. James, Michelle Wie, etc.; they did better than compete, they set new standards. No "demographic" can take that away from them.

      When my black friends call me an honorary nigga for all the struggles overcome, I'm guessing I might know something about disadvantage. It's meaningless; you will either respect me or not. That changes nothing that I do.

      My mother has accomplished much with limited prospects, especially in a time when it was unfashionable for women to do so. When I make mention that she might be an unsung revolutionary, she laughs. The first person to underestimate her is making a fatal mistake. She resents any implication that she needs accomodation. As she is fond of saying: "You were born here, you speak the language, you know the culture. What is your problem?"

      "The "advantage" of being seen as nothing more than a dickcozy..." Thank you for reducing my sexuality to exploitation. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy to know my romantic pursuits are simply degrading to the other party.

      Maybe it would be better to know less about disadvantage and more about valor.

      In you are going to compete, compete. Arbitrary rules only foster the idea of inability. Girls still seem to accomplish beyond what you might say.

    66. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is article on a woman who has two years in a row beat the men to win one of the more grueling ultramarathons out there-the Badwater ultramarathon, a 135 mile run starting in Death Valley and ending on Mt Whitney. The article states "Women placed 1st, 3rd, and 5th overall in the final top standings. Never again will this race list its results with men and women in separate columns."

    67. Re:Why? by ckedge · · Score: 1

      > Thank you for reducing my sexuality to exploitation. Makes me feel warm and
      > fuzzy to know my romantic pursuits are simply degrading to the other party.


      Whether you like it or not, Western women can barely (if at all) tell the 5-15 percent of us who are wonderful nice human beings apart from the 85-95 percent of us who are assholes hunting tail 24/7.

      Yes, it *should* piss you off. But it's not 100 percent western-womankind's fault, as far as it often is in fact impossible to tell many of the 85+ percent assholes apart from the 15 percent honourable until it's too late. It's not like some slick guy hunting tail is going to up and tell a girl to her face that he's hunting tail and he's going to screw her over someday somehow. (Hence why women get burned so often.)

      It's largely the fault of the 85+ percent assholes. And you can't make the problem go away by ignoring it.

      You're either part of the solution, or part of the problem. And I'm talking to everyone, especially womankind!!

    68. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nyah, that's just good strategy, nothing to do with gender. That's also the best way to win at Risk, for example, and any good player tries to pull it off --- male or female. What is it with geek girls that they're always phrasing everything in terms of male/female distinctions? Just try to blend in and get over it.

    69. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you're the same anonymous person that I replied to earlier. If you are not, it seems you took much that was said in response to that person's particular attitudes much too personally.

      I am curious to hear your views concerning the dynamics of men entering female dominated competition. Unfortunately, that doesn't even merit consideration in the popular consciousness. Speaking as male in a female dominated profession, I can assure you no special allowances are given to me, and I had to endure the slings and arrows before I was respected for my abilities.

      There is little in the way of "female dominated competition," especially in the popular consciousness. I suppose a Betty Crocker Bakeoff would qualify. But as has been noted elsewhere in this thread, women are less competitive than men, which leads to few opportunities for females to dominate organized competition.

      Female-dominated professions are another story. For example, teaching (below the college level, and elementary school in particular) is female-dominated. This results in some really bad dynamics for men who go into the profession; they are sometimes more subject to suspicion of improper behavior toward children, for example. In general, any female-dominated profession such as childcare, teaching, nursing, or garment-making is paid less than "comparable" male-dominated work, which is a burden on anyone who is in the profession, regardless of gender. This burden can be particularly difficult for men, since they typically have the societal expectation of "breadwinner" and may suffer self-esteem issues if they make less than their spouse or have trouble making ends meet. (Don't have a cite on this, but ran across similar research about men and reactions to unemployment several years ago as an undergrad.)

      If anything, I resent any insinuations of what my capabilities should be. I shouldn't be expected to do all the heavy lifting (as my female compatriots were prone to do), nor should I be seen as incapable of delicacy. But that is a common experience.

      It is an uncommon one for most men, and an only slightly more common one for women. I recall distinctly the first time I showed up for an RPG session in high school. "Aww... darn, now we can't scratch ourselves!" and other comments about my "invasion." But after a relatively short time, they realized I was perfectly capable of being a person, rather than just a female. It sounds like you have in some ways experienced the same sort of phenomenon.

      WRT doing the heavy lifting, however, this is a matter of physical makeup, I believe. If you are of slighter build than other co-workers (i.e., you're not the best equipped to do the job), then it is out of line for them to expect it of you. If you are the best equipped, however, it is safer and more efficient for you to do most of it. But you didn't comment on this aspect of the decision, so I don't know if they are being chauvinistic or simply practical.

      "The "advantage" of being seen as nothing more than a dickcozy..." Thank you for reducing my sexuality to exploitation. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy to know my romantic pursuits are simply degrading to the other party.

      Note that this was addressed to someone specifically discussing the fact that women have an "advantage" because men want to get into their pants. It was also addressed to someone who started off by calling me "honey." If you do not see being a sexual object as an advantage, the comment was not directed at your romantic pursuits. In fact, if your pursuits are even the slightest bit romantic, you probably view women as more than a dickcozy, and should not have considered that statement targeted at you in any way.

      In you are going to compete, compete. Arbitrary rules only foster the idea of inability. Girls still seem to accomplish beyond what you might say.

      What I might say? What I said was that they could accomplish quite a bit, in spite of having more to prove fr

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    70. Re:Why? by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      "There is little in the way of 'female dominated competition'..."

      So then you are familiar with the men who tried out for the LPGA and WNBA?

      "It is an uncommon one for most men..."

      I've found adversity is common to almost everyone. I've also found it common to demonstrate competency and that standard is set higher if you are the odd man out [ha, something we agree on ;) ]. That is regardless of gender. Welcome to the trials and tribulations of being a trailblazer (and for women, the trailblazing is more apparent).

      "If you are the best equipped, however, it is safer and more efficient for you to do most of it."

      And this line of reasoning can justify any type of sexism, for keeping women out of combat roles in the military to keeping women out of top positions in businesses as they are less competitive. A good deal of sexism seems to parade itself disguised as practicality. I disregard it. You knew the mission was dangerous, quit bitching about it now.

      "Note that this was addressed to..."

      Someone called you honey and stated that women might exploit men's sexuality comes to:

      "You know nothing about disadvantage. You don't know what the disadvantage is to being automatically seen as something less than you are, or have the choice of being mistaken for a different gender. The "advantage" of being seen as nothing more than a dickcozy is one I'd give up any day to not have to prove I have a brain."

      Uh-huh. Ouch. "It seems you took much that was said in response to that person's particular attitudes much too personally."

      And we could converse about the whole "sex objects" idea, but that won't be resolved today. The connotation immediately puts male sexuality as suspect and degrading; you have just objectified males as satyrs.

      "What I might say?" That when it is pointed out (although I will be the first to admit the AC could have used more decorum) that women might exploit the novelty of being a girl in a male group, perhaps there are dynamics for the males as well? Mutual abuse.

      I thought I pointed out how both men and women succeed in similar scenarios, and there are just as many assumptions for both parties. We could just as easily be discussing males playing Dance Dance Revolution, and the issues would be the same. Perhaps you are just as patronizing as the original poster, just in a different context. Perhaps I pointed out the hypocrisy inherent.

      "Perhaps you do have a few assumptions to realign."

      Indeed, and you as well ;0)

    71. Re:Why? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      "There is little in the way of 'female dominated competition'..."

      So then you are familiar with the men who tried out for the LPGA and WNBA?


      I'm astonished to learn that golf and basketball are female-dominated competition. I think pretty much everyone is.

      This entire conversation stems from the fact that separate leagues for women's competition do not necessarily allow one to judge their skill accurately. The fact that there is a WNBA doesn't suddenly make the world of basketball female-dominated. It simply reserves a little corner of the male-dominated basketball world for women. If it's for valid reasons, then there's not much reason for men to try out for it. If it's not for valid reasons, then the issue of women wanting to be in the "real" NBA is probably a lot more pressing than the issue of men wanting to be in the WNBA, since the benefits of participating in the former are a lot greater.

      "It is an uncommon one for most men..." I've found adversity is common to almost everyone.

      Beautiful out-of-context quote. I've found that there are a lot fewer men trying to be accepted in female-dominated circles than the other way around, and that there are still few women trying to be accepted in male-dominated ones. You have found different, apparently, or you decided to change my meaning.

      "You know nothing about disadvantage. You don't know what the disadvantage is to being automatically seen as something less than you are, or have the choice of being mistaken for a different gender. The "advantage" of being seen as nothing more than a dickcozy is one I'd give up any day to not have to prove I have a brain."

      Uh-huh. Ouch. "It seems you took much that was said in response to that person's particular attitudes much too personally."


      Yes. I did lecture someone who told me that the disadvantages of being a woman entering a male-dominated arena are nonexistent because I can just flirt my way to the top. You lectured me on much the same subject. The difference is, I addressed someone who was directly addressing *me*, while you decided that I obviously felt the same way about all men, not just the ones who like belittling women because they think it's such an awesome privilege to be considered a sex object.


      "If you are the best equipped, however, it is safer and more efficient for you to do most of it."

      And this line of reasoning can justify any type of sexism, for keeping women out of combat roles in the military to keeping women out of top positions in businesses as they are less competitive. A good deal of sexism seems to parade itself disguised as practicality. I disregard it. You knew the mission was dangerous, quit bitching about it now.


      Oh, come on. Are you saying that you work in a place where everyone's job routinely requires heavy lifting, and all the women expect you to do all of it for them? Are you telling me you were *hired* just because you could do the heavy lifting? Or were you talking about a situation where occasionally, there is lifting to be done, and you're often picked as the one to do it? Because they're not the same thing.

      Should I complain that at my first job, they often pulled *me* to do heavy lifting/carting stuff around? Not because I was bigger (I was the shortest person on staff) or stronger (I was usually the only female on the floor, and one of the youngest employees), but because they knew I was taking a weight-training class that summer and so wouldn't mind the extra exercise? Is that also inappropriate? It sounds like it's *always* inappropriate to cast someone into a role for you, no matter what the reasons are.

      There's a matter of reasonable and unreasonable actions. I pointed out that there are situations where your co-worker's actions are reasonable, and situations where they're unreasonable. You haven't given anyone enough information to actually determine if they're being reasonable or unreasonable. Truth is, if you're a foot t

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    72. Re:Why? by zootread · · Score: 1

      Someday, when you finally have sex for the first time, you'll realize just how wrong you are.

      Someday, when you finally talk to an actual girl about sex, you might find that I'm right.

      My apologies if you ARE an actual girl.

      --
      Zoot!
    73. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    74. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you back up this claim?


      Thats easy for a WHITE MAN to say!

  6. Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by fluor2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting: "Why do they bother having women only events for internet gaming? Within sport, I can see the reasoning for sexual segregation - women simply are not as big, fast or strong as men. Thus there needs to be a separate contest for men and women in order to keep a level playing field. Last time I checked the x and y chromosomes were not linked to reflexes, hand - eye coordination, and visual acuity. Men are not going to be able to use any of these physical attributes to gain an advantage. As their advantages are thrown out of the window, so too goes the reasoning for segregated gaming. As for women feeling that men make them feel unwelcome in the world of CounterStrike - history is just full of instances where the dominant group in a field has made it perfectly clear what they think of any 'New Kids on the Block'. You just have to try that little bit harder. Sithu Thein, UK" I totally agree with him. I thought on-line gaming should finally make the genders compete at the same level, but I'm really sad to see that women still are set to "female compos". I understand that women actually may want this, since they still might meet some harassment and such (i can only guess what a 15year old guy say when he hear the enemy is a woman), but I still hoped compos with big prizes should have teams from both genders.

    1. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by caliban02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last time I checked the x and y chromosomes were not linked to reflexes, hand - eye coordination, and visual acuity.

      Actually, many game skills are sex-linked. Men are much better at focusing on single events. They would probably be best at first-person shooters. Women are much better at handling a number of events concurrently, and so might be better at say, real-time strategy.

    2. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by venicebeach · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, men tend to perform better than women on tests of visuospatial ability. For example, they are better at mental rotation (Delgado & Prieto, 1996) and various other tests of visualspatial function (Collaer & Nelson, 2002). Men actually show different brain activations during a navigation task, something speficially relevant to these types of games (Wunderlisch, Spitzer, Tomczak, and Riepe, 2000). I'm not saying that there should be separate competitions, but I also would not assume the playing field is equal simply because muscles are not invovled.

      Collaer, M. L., & Nelson, J. D. (2002). Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: Possible role of attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 49, 1-12.

      Delgado, A.R., & Prieto, G. (1996). Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role? Memory & Cognition, 24: 504 - 510.

      Wunderlich, Spitzer, Tomczak, & Reipe (2000). Brain activation during human naviagtion: gender-different neural networks as a function of performance. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Apr;3(4):404-8.

    3. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by fluor2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With respect to your impressive listing, I can only relate to my small google-search on this subject(s), and as far as I've seen, one cannot conclude anything on researches, considering this:

      1. Women which started gaming from when they were young, e.g. 7 years, are never tested

      2. Women have never had such an opportunity as on-line gaming, since there are more easier to find likewise friends, and nobody SEE your gender when practicing

      I must also say that when it comes to reflexes, many young women win ANY compo when it comes to e.g. grabbing things with their hands.

    4. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by jmt9581 · · Score: 2, Funny

      New moderation category: +1 (Lexis-Nexis)

      --

      My blog

    5. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by NegativeK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy _crap._ The world's coming to an end, no doubt about it.

      That's right, I just saw someone use and post a bilbliography on /. My view on life is now changed.

      --
      This statement is false.
    6. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by shatteredpottery · · Score: 1

      The referenced studies also show that the range of variation within each sex is greater than the difference between them.

      I.e. while men, on average, may tend to have a better visuospatial ability, the male average is only a few percent greater than the female; within each sex, individuals vary over a large range. In other words, the sex differences are too small, and the overlap in ranges is too large. The studies really only tell us what kind of distribution we can expect to see in a very large group, along with some interesting data on brain development.

      It's also worth noting that, on average, women have better hand-eye coordination/reaction times than men, but similar arguments to the above apply. There's only a few instances, upper-body strength, linguistic ability, maybe a couple others, where the difference is meaningful enough to be a decent predictor for individuals.

      --

      A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

    7. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by firewrought · · Score: 1
      men tend to perform better than women on tests of visuospatial ability

      It's questionable whether this advantage would be measurable or not. That would be an intresting study. (Perk up, grant writers!)

      The fact that the genders, in general, navigate differently could make for more intresting and diverse gameplay. E.g., at a deep and subtle level, this breaks up preconceptions that veteran game players may have about how to understand a space and how to anticipate movement in that space.

      On a seperate note, I see a lot of people arguing that a separate league is unncessary because men and women can be equal competitors here. Whether equal or not, women may want a separate league just because male players can be fairly rude at times. Trying playing w/a female nickname and observe how other players treat you.... sometimes guys will level fairly crude stuff at females that goes beyond the normal in-game insults. I do not intrepret this to mean that female player are unwanted... to the contrary, the comments I see tend to be overt sexual overtures delivered with a cruditiy that would not be done in real life. This is just my observation... any women care to comment?

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    8. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by Saucepan · · Score: 1
      The referenced studies also show that the range of variation within each sex is greater than the difference between them.
      Without seeing the data it's easy to handwave and spin the difference as huge or insignificant.

      Having said that, the much-used phrase "variation within [exceeds] difference between them" raises red flags for me. In many cases this phrase carries no real information and is used to dissemble or obfuscate.

      It seems like it may be a case of using technical terms correctly, but in a way calculated to cause laymen to misunderstand a certain way based on the plain-English meaning of the words. Viewing a plot of two overlapping normal-distribution curves might help illustrate my concerns.

    9. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by metroid+composite · · Score: 1

      I believe there is also a difference in reaction time.

    10. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by schon · · Score: 1

      many young women win ANY compo when it comes to e.g. grabbing things with their hands.

      Really? Do you have their names and phone numbers? :o)

    11. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      There's no reason you both can't be right.

      The studies the original poster mentioned are quite easily distilled into plain English:

      Men, on average, are better at visualizing 3D environments (such as a CS level) in their minds, and are better at locating themselves in this map that exists inside their minds.

      Women though, are not as good at this task, and in normal situations are not as good as men.

      Of course, what you're saying is that the average person doesn't dictate what people are actually like. There are girls that can figure out where they are and where they need to be better then some guys, and perhaps even a few as good as the best guys. Or, the best women could easily be good enough to play competitively.

      Actually, one interesting fact is that women, instead of visualizing the area in their minds, tend to think about landmarks instead. Games have typically not had the power to create landmarks that are both visible from a distance (to be useful) as well as distinguishable from other simmilar landmarks (due to a lack of space for maps to have lots of differences). What could be interesting is as maps get more complex and contain more unique landmarks, will women catch up or even surpass their male counterparts?

    12. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      I've heard of these studies before, and it's worth pointing out that men (generally) designed the games as well. So if men have somewhat different methods of processing navigation and spatial information, and they design a game, they would probably tend to design it in a way that best suited the man. For this reason, if nothing else, at the absolute highest level the men could have a small advantage. I doubt it would matter much at the "average" online level, because people universally suck (This is why players with the slightest ounce of ability are often accused of cheating on public servers). That said I think women and men should compete in the same tournament, as only by establishing their presence in the community can they achieve long term equality.

    13. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by Frogbert · · Score: 0

      Sweet merciful crap! Not only was your argument coherent it also included a bibliography.

      +1 Groundbreaking

    14. Re:Sithu Thein's comment is the most interesting by shadow-9 · · Score: 1

      I, for one, do not want female-only tournies, and I think the whole subject is disgusting. I admit that I am female for this post because it is relevant. Otherwise, when I'm online, it has nothing to do with posting, gaming, etc.

      Why would sex matter? I'm sick to death of the whole topic, and tired of women trying to put me in a box with them---I want to play with everyone, or guys, but not women only. I like to play shooters or RPGs, and I usually pick a male character or whatever, and I don't pick a female-sounding name. I've been mistaken many times for a guy player, which is just fine by me. My sex doesn't matter in a game; as long as we can team up and kill everything in site together, why would my teammates need or care to know my sex? Ridiculous.

      Can't believe the women came up with this one. I thought that the internet gaming world would be sexless---I have always used it as such. That's how it should stay.

  7. Sigh.... by Naffer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone else see this as an attempt to make an issue out of a non-issue? Games are marketed towards guys because guys make up the vast majority of the gaming market. Why don't they target the elderly with hiphop music? Becuase its more cost effective to target the younger crowd. Girls gaming? Great... But no one should complain about the fact that way more guys game then girls. Thats the girl's own preogatives.

    1. Re:Sigh.... by grub · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone else see this as an attempt to make an issue out of a non-issue?

      That's the nature of the politically correct world we live in. Soon you'll see:

      The Gay Quake 3 Arena Championship

      African American Counter-Strike

      Unreal Tournament (Kosher Rules)

      etc etc etc I'm only half joking here.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm only half joking here.

      Good. We'll only half-mod you to -1 Troll/Flamebait.

    3. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the PC Police will hammer me down.
      'Tis only karma.

    4. Re:Sigh.... by tigress · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just MAYBE girls don't game as much BECAUSE games are marketed towards guys?

    5. Re:Sigh.... by sarahbau · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Guys don't make up as large a percentage of the market as they think. Games are marketed towards guys because guys are marketing them. I'm not sure what the numbers are right now, but in 1999, 43% of PC gamers were women. 53% of those gamers play online. Only 43% of male gamers play online, which should make the ratio of males to females online almost 1:1. Source

    6. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a girl who quit playing Q3 and UT2k3 because it was my perogative to not be called any number of creative and derogatory terms for woman whenever I won with a remotely female name. At some point you have to admitt that the swarm of insecure guys playing these games makes the environment incredibly hostile for anyone else. Most girls aren't masocists and aren't going to subject themselves to that kind of crap, nor should they be expected to, leaving us in a situation where many online games are targeted to young males not because they're the only people with an interest in them, but because they're the only people obnoxious enough to drive away the other demographic groups.

    7. Re:Sigh.... by vonPoonBurGer · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what types of games you include. If you lump in online web games (Hearts, Bridge, what have you), then women actually make up the larger percentage. Check it out!

    8. Re:Sigh.... by Bai+jie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, I'm a guy and I don't play most online games anymore because of the childish smack talk that is almost nonstop in many of these games. These people are just ruining games for everyone, not only women.

    9. Re:Sigh.... by IndigoDarkwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, I think it will become an issue, because I think there's a generational change en route. At present, marketing studies do show that men are the dominant force in the violent games market. On the other paw, I'm seeing a generation of young girls growing up around me that are more interested in games like Counter-Strike, etc. But starting male chouvenistic crap like segregating male and female teams...? Oh, my definetely female teammate is going to have a field day with that one at our next clan practice.

    10. Re:Sigh.... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      The Gay Quake 3 Arena Championship

      Heh... Imagine the new Models and Skins that come out for that one. Uh oh, he's got his rocket launcher loaded and pointed.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    11. Re:Sigh.... by ImpTech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what's the alternative? Try to make a girl-oriented game and hope somebody buys it? Major game development is not a grand social experiment, its a business. The industry will go where the money is, regardless of who's spending it. The simple truth is that they can only make what'll sell. If you can prove that a game concept will sell to females by the millions, then great, roll with it. But don't think EA or Sierra have any better of an idea what that game is than you or I do.

    12. Re:Sigh.... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      yah, yah. 75% of statistics are made up. The article is interesting, but it never provides any context. What are all these women gamers playing? Are we talking about online chess? Yahoo games? Solitaire Chat^H^H^H^H Simms Online?

      The difference is one of identity and level of interest. What percentage of people who consider themselves "gamers" are women, as opposed to just the percentage of people that play computer games?

      --
      AccountKiller
    13. Re:Sigh.... by tigress · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point completely. Games don't have to be girl-oriented. They just have to be games. I'm a girl and I play damn near every game my male friends play. I kick the crap out of them in several of them too.

      There are, however, games that I totally lose interest in, not because of the game's "orientation" but because of the immature male crowd that gets drawn to it because of the marketing.

    14. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't .. seeing as the article never mentioned it at all.

      The question was not "What can we do to get more girl gamers?". The question was "Should there be more female gaming leagues".

      My answer, in short, is no.

      My answer, in long, is that there are currently (at least in the bf1942 community) many clans that have female gamers (the one I lead has 2, most of the others have at least 1), and it would be lame to have them "seperated" because they "can't compete as well", I'd lose a couple of teammates and friends simply because of this.

    15. Re:Sigh.... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When developing a game, in general you are going to be working on the sort of game you would like to play. Since guys make up the vast majority of games developers they are going to make the sort of games that they like to play. In order to get games that interest girls then you are going to need to have female programmers that have the same sort of taste that the rest of women do. After all said and done, what games do women enjoy? Is there any evidence that these sort of games don't exist?

      What I have found is that the girls, that I know, fall into two categories: the girls who play games and those who don't. The girls who don't play games wouldn't play any computer game, simply because the idea of playing a computer game is not their idea of fun. The other girls I know, who play games have a taste as varied as any guy out there. My sister manages to beat me at a number of games when I play against her. I also know a fair number of guys who don't like playing games like Counter-Strike, because there is not enough strategy involved.

      I wonder how much the media is to blame for these stereotypes and how much the minority of guys who are scared at being challenged by a girl at anything are to blame for scaring women off?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    16. Re:Sigh.... by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      That's why I usually ignore the chat and focus on playing the game

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    17. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Masochists. Back to the kitchen with you.

    18. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there is a nice unbiased source to get statistics from. A website called WOMENGAMER.com

    19. Re:Sigh.... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else see this as an attempt to make an issue out of a non-issue? Games are marketed towards guys because guys make up the vast majority of the gaming market. Why don't they target the elderly with hiphop music? Becuase its more cost effective to target the younger crowd.

      Men drive more than women, too. Should we not market cars towards women?

      As it turns out, women are increasing their Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) far faster than men. It's an untapped market, not a non-existent one. As a result, a majority of cars are marketed towards women more than men these days.

      Elderly people like *different* music than young people. There are plenty of music collections targeted at them (fewer, perhaps, but they don't tend to be as consumerist overall). The number of computer games targeted at women, however, is only recently starting to become a positive integer. And since it's an untapped market, there's potential for great success. Unfortunately, since it's also an unknown market, there's still guys fumbling around trying to work out what women want from games, and failing pretty miserably with it.

      Game companies should be sponsoring scholarships for female computer science and interface design majors, seriously. They *need* it.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    20. Re:Sigh.... by Ironica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are all these women gamers playing? Are we talking about online chess? Yahoo games? Solitaire Chat^H^H^H^H Simms Online?

      The difference is one of identity and level of interest. What percentage of people who consider themselves "gamers" are women, as opposed to just the percentage of people that play computer games?


      If you're marketing a new online game, do you *care* who thinks they're a gamer?

      Of course you do. Because if a lot of your potential market *doesn't* think of themselves that way, you'd be a fool to market to that demographic.

      And yet, they do. I remember the ridiculous TV commercials they first came up with for EQ (even before the Everquest Online Adventures for PS2 came out and was marketed on television). Pretty much every female EQ player found them repulsive. And they were actually *trying* to appeal to women.

      The number of people who consider themselves "gamers" is really pretty small. It's time that computer game companies started realizing they're part of the *entertainment* industry, not the technology industry, and started acting accordingly.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    21. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the other posters who follow up, but you should also take where you get stats into consideration. Try to pick more neutral sites with stats instead of going to Microsoft to see if you should buy Windows or Office.

    22. Re:Sigh.... by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually they DO know game concepts sell to females by the millions. Surely you've heard of the rampant success that games like Sims and its myriad of expansions have had. There ARE games out there that are very popular with the ladies. It just so happens that most of them could care less about our fast-paced blood and guts frag fests. If they WANT to play the game, then they'll buy it and play it. Its not like its on a shelf in best buy that is too high for any women, yet miraculously easy to acquire for men. Simply put, the money to be made from the female gaming community is largely in sectors that have gameplay similar to Sims, many MMOs, and any other game focusing more on social interation rather than direct competition and definitive victory.

    23. Re:Sigh.... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      True, but at least among the console market, the other segment of the market are guys as portrayed in the movie Swingers. Guys sitting around after work playing stupid games together. It's a social activity, and women don't seem to engage in that kind of social activity as much. Why? I don't know.

      I guess you could try to say it's the damn evil corporations who don't cater to women. I don't think it's quite that simple though. I just don't see many women sitting around wishing there were games marketed toward them.

      What if we look at a (somewhat) parallel sitution? Why aren't men interested in these "product marketing parties" that a certain segment of the female population seems enamored with? It used to be mainly tupperware, and Mary Kay Cosmetics, but now it's this overpriced Pampered Chef crap. Is it because men aren't targeted by the marketing? No, I'm fairly certain that most guys would _never_ be interested in getting together with his male friends and look at products being sold by one them. I think there's just a difference in how men socialize with other men, and how women socialize with other women.

      --
      AccountKiller
    24. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why not start with naming the current games like that?

      White male Quake 3 Arena Championchip

      White male Counter-Strike

      White Unreal Men Tournament

      it's farts like you that makes this globe the dump it is

    25. Re:Sigh.... by ronfar · · Score: 1
      I'm just curious, which games draw in the immature male crowd?

      I could hazard a guess at some (Duke Nukem 3D, for instance) but I'm interested in your perspective.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    26. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some level of playing(the one described by the bbc article incidentaly) you need to be able to deal with with other players well enough to both find a clan and play with them. This is why I quit: casual gaming was fine, but it's boring to continually maul pubs. The interesting games are clan matches since these are where the teams are both organized and of similar skill. In pub play teams consist of whichever random people happened to join the server over the last 30 minutes, with the often effortless win going to whichever team has fewer newbie players. There are pubs that play pickups, but really playing there comes down to whoever has more teenage male friends.

    27. Re:Sigh.... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I guess you could try to say it's the damn evil corporations who don't cater to women. I don't think it's quite that simple though. I just don't see many women sitting around wishing there were games marketed toward them.

      Of course not. If people sat around wishing things would be marketed toward them, there would be no need for marketing. Marketing is about convincing people they want/need something that they would otherwise not seek out.

      BTW, the percentage of women who consider Tupperware-style parties something more enticing than an obligation to a friend who's got a bug up her butt about a new product is fairly small. I'd guess that less than 50% of women have even *been* to one of these types of parties. Very, very few would seek them out. Shopping is a lot more fun if it's not someone shoving stuff they think you should like in your face.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    28. Re:Sigh.... by wheresdrew · · Score: 1
      Unreal Tournament (Kosher Rules)

      I don't gib on Shabbas!!

    29. Re:Sigh.... by cEnTiBeE · · Score: 1

      Games are marketed towards guys because guys make up the vast majority of the gaming market.
      This gurl fps gamer learned to use guy skins and name when on line. Boys hate getting fragged by girls, but accept a well played game from another guy.
      Believe me, you have no idea how many of us are out there.... but come March 16, you shouldn't be too surprised when you hear who is barking orders into a mic playing UT2k4 onslaught.... But, now can you help me with this?
      Why do sooooo many boys choose to be 'Satin' in ut2k3?

      --
      cEnTiBeE ... Computers come in two varieties: the prototype and the obsolete. -- Anonymous
    30. Re:Sigh.... by SlartibartfastJunior · · Score: 1

      You really need to see Final Fantasy X-2. Beat up things, collect new dresses, and new wardrobes to put the dresses in. Tell me this isn't aimed for girls.

    31. Re:Sigh.... by danila · · Score: 1

      There are many games which can be played by girls. Tomb Raider is a great example. An adventure game with a sympathetic female lead character. My sister and my mom both loved it (incl. the TRAOD). But, as I heard, one of the TR games was marketed in the UK in a very sexist way, trying to appease the guy audience. Of course, the female UK audience was less interested as a result.

      The point is, stop marketing the games to guys, market them to the general audience. Do it with the same games, Civ, Quake, etc. May be change them a bit, make them a bit richer, to appeal to both genders, but essentially the same game can be played by everyone. Just don't pretend it's for macho players only. At least, the FPS developers got it right after Quake II and there are always female player models included...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    32. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You must work in marketing. A game like Doom 3.. how are they giong to market that toward women? Show an ad with a girl playing it, of course. So a girl sees this ad and says "Oh that could be me!!!". Honestly, this is how someone in marketing thinks poeple's minds work.

    33. Re:Sigh.... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Except that the Sims isn't a game. It supposedly has gaming elements, but they basically don't work. The Sims is really just an electronic dollhouse.

    34. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A game is simply something that entertains players while strive for some goal.

      While the goal in the Sims is somewhat arbitrary and nebulous, it is still a goal. You could actually put the emphasis of the game as trying to distance yourself as far as possible from the anti-goal (failure). Or if you are creative enough, you can impose your own arbitrary rules of how you play the game (ie. getting as close to failure as possible without actually failing). Thus Sims IS a game... albeit a different one for each player... but still a game. To solidify it even more, you could say that it is an RPG in the loosest sense of the term.

      And what the hell do you mean by "gaming elements" and how they "don't work". I pity the person that thinks games have to choose gameing elements from some arbitrary and limited pool of possible game elements to implement.

      Also you're missing a large point of the Sims. Don't get me wrong, I can't stand playing the game, but from what I gathered the emphasis of the game was a combination of gaining wealth and property and accumulating strong social connections (or the other way around if you feel like being a contrarian). It is hardly just a dollhouse.

      I digress.

  8. Ridiculous! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The imbalance between men and women was clear to see, with almost 50 male teams taking part, compared with just seven female squads. And as in the world of sport, there were separate competitions for each gender.

    Separate competitions? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

    Boys' and girls' real-world sports are separated early on because of physical attributes. Physically, girls have different abilities from boys. And there are other physical attributes that cause both genders to become... distracted.

    But online? Who knows -- who cares -- about your real-world attributes? For crying out loud, that's what makes gaming great for us geeks -- we don't have to be muscular, or fit, or even easily mobile! I'd probably lose 10-to-1 against Stephen Hawking at BZFlag.

    So in a world where physical ability and differences are irrelevant, what justification could there possibly be for a gender-segregated gaming tournament?

    Perhaps the organizers have a cynical ulterior motive? If I were a top-level girl geek, I'd turn down an invitation to such a demeaning event -- so all they'd get would be the second-rate girl teams. And then they can say "but look, they're clearly not in the same league."

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Ridiculous! by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Hence one of the many reasons why "professional" video gaming will never and should never be taken seriously. What a joke. Its not a sport. Oh good, someone can click faster than someone else, well good for them, try applying it to something real.

    2. Re:Ridiculous! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      How do you suppose most military training is done these days?

      There most certainly is skill involved, and it most certainly can be applied to 'something real'.

      --
      No Comment.
    3. Re:Ridiculous! by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, or how about those "race car drivers?" All they do is sit there and hit pedals and turn a little wheel. Oh good, you can turn a wheel better than someone else.

      Why don't they get a life? Who would ever watch people go in circles in cars when we can go out and get in our own car and do it ourselves?

      No one would take something as silly as that seriously.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    4. Re:Ridiculous! by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well , this is not a one off. They have seperate chess matches for women though women do participate (and win) is general open to all matches. There are even "Women Grand Masters" , why they just dont just use Grand-mistress is a mystery though.
      Its probably like having amateur and pro events. If there are a lesser number of women participating, probably makes sense to let them win some matches and encourage them to play more, maybe? Or maybe just targeted advertising?

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    5. Re:Ridiculous! by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Stephen Hawking? He's a QuakeMaster. (scroll down)

    6. Re:Ridiculous! by dougthonus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >

      Actually, scientific studies (which seem to be widely accepted as true) show that men are better at spatial relationships, and interpretting 3-d objects. Both of which would both be extremely important in most video gaming. This is typically why men are better (or at least learn faster) at games like pool or darts (and many other games) that don't require greater physical strength or muscle development.

    7. Re:Ridiculous! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hence one of the many reasons why "professional" video gaming will never and should never be taken seriously. What a joke. Its not a sport. Oh good, someone can click faster than someone else, well good for them, try applying it to something real.

      By that same logic: "Oh good, someone can run swing a fat stick better than someone else, try applying it to something real." Obviously, the concept of "professional" baseball gaming will never be taken seriously, either.

      Of course, swinging a stick with great precision is handy when you're a hunter-gatherer. But last time I wanted a pork chop, I went to the store, not out to the woods. And guess what -- that pork chop was labelled with a bar code, and I purchased it using my debit card and pin.

      By clicking buttons.

      What was that about applying my skills to something real?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    8. Re:Ridiculous! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Actually, scientific studies (which seem to be widely accepted as true) show that men are better at spatial relationships, and interpretting 3-d objects.

      I keep hearing that, but my wife can fit an entire house full of assorted-sized junk into a single 10x20x8 three-dimensional area -- she demonstrated this ability when we moved last year and put our stuff in storage. She can pack the trunk to within an inch of its life, where I'm lucky to figure out how to get the suitcase in.

      We may not be statistically relevant... but then, neither are the top athletes in any sport.

      As for pool and darts -- aren't those as much social events more than anything, at least at the beginner level? It would be nice to think that this "new" sport could avoid the glass ceiling at the entry point.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    9. Re:Ridiculous! by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Actually the article, or maybe the comments attached to the article, suggested that the girl teams opted to have a seperate competition, rather than compete with the males. To me, that makes the whole mess kinda dumb. If they don't want to play, so what?

    10. Re:Ridiculous! by Zed2K · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Baseball players have to be in good physical condition, video game players do not. It takes years of training to learn to hit a 100mph fast ball or a curveball that drops quickly in front of you.

      People who play video games do not need any physical conditioning nor do they need any real skills except reflex to hit a button up and down. That is not a skill.

      So basically you are saying there should be competitive grocery shopping? Yeah your stupid.

    11. Re:Ridiculous! by BloodyLoony · · Score: 1

      Separate competitions? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. [...] So in a world where physical ability and differences are irrelevant, what justification could there possibly be for a gender-segregated gaming tournament?
      There are about 100 times more boys playing CS than girls, so naturally boys would have the stronger teams at the top. The girls want to play in their own competitions because if they competed with the boy teams they'd lose, neither boys nor girls whave any interest in playing uneven matches, it's just hat simple!

    12. Re:Ridiculous! by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Race car drivers do a lot more than sit there turning a wheel and hitting pedals. They have to put up with tremendous g-forces and shocks to the body just in a normal race where they don't crash. Plus there is that whole, if I screw up I might die aspect.

      Oh and I don't consider nascar (which is racing in circles unless you look at the road coarses) a sport. Its an event, but not a sport. Video games are not a sport. They are an event and professional gaming for money is a joke.

    13. Re:Ridiculous! by Zed2K · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No video game can teach you how to fire a rifle. It may simulate situations and evaluate how you might work them out but they do not teach or train a soldier how to use the weapons or how to survive. Most military training is out in the field, computer simulators are still too expensive and still a poor substitute for the real thing.

    14. Re:Ridiculous! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      There are even "Women Grand Masters" , why they just dont just use Grand-mistress is a mystery though.

      Uh, what? If I am one of the best of anything in the world, why the f**k would i be called a "Mistress" instead of a "Master"? The real mystery is, why do they insist on calling them "Women Grand Masters" instead of just "Grand Masters", or is this your name for them?

      Mistress has several sexually related and degrading conotations or apparently as my search just yeilded, denotations.

      from google:

      define mistress: mistress - an adulterous woman; a woman who has an ongoing extramarital sexual relationship with a man

      define master: master - an artist of consummate skill; "a master of the violin"; "one of the old masters"

    15. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - justification for being fat and unhealthy. Most of you dorks live that way, but few of you actually put it into words. Amazing.

    16. Re:Ridiculous! by molafson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Baseball players have to be in good physical condition, video game players do not.

      (cough) David Wells (cough)

    17. Re:Ridiculous! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically you are saying there should be competitive grocery shopping? Yeah your stupid.

      Well, competitive grocery shopping might be a bit nuts.

      But competitive grammar? You're on!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    18. Re:Ridiculous! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      No shit.
      But are they going to train you on the latest multi-million dollar aircraft by throwing you behind the cockpit?

      --
      No Comment.
    19. Re:Ridiculous! by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, and the Nigerians have a whole lot fewer athletes at the Olympic Games every year than the US, so naturally they'd have no chance at winning a marathon.

      How the hell should the relative numbers of boys and girls in the tournament have any bearing on the skill levels of the individual teams? Would one team of girls who trained nonstop for a year lose to 100 teams of boys who'd just learned how to play the game the previous day, because of the sheer number of boys?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    20. Re:Ridiculous! by indigeek · · Score: 1

      No he was not making up the term. Here is an article about womens chess.

      BTW, Atleast in India, we still have english anachronisms from british times well preserved. A head-mistress of a school is the woman in charge of the school and not somebody who walks around with a whip. and webster seems to think so too.

    21. Re:Ridiculous! by slycer · · Score: 1

      Some people find certain games entertaining to watch.

      I suspect that as the younger game playing people start to age, there will be more demand for broadcast games.

      This turns it into a "sport".

      It's not about physical prowess, it's about entertainment.

    22. Re:Ridiculous! by servognome · · Score: 1


      Sports does not equal good physical condition, John Kruk, David Wells, John Daly, Tony Saragussa. Depending on what you play there is various levels of physical conditioning required. Professional gamers require training just as athletes. Hand eye reflexes, dexterity with a mouse (top level gaming requires very quick precise wrist movements), not to mention virtual spacial visualization.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    23. Re:Ridiculous! by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      So basically you are saying there should be competitive grocery shopping? Yeah your stupid.

      Umm... "Supermarket Sweep". 'Nuff said.

    24. Re:Ridiculous! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Counter Strike is a "guy game". Sims is a "girl game". I suppose girls would be better than guys in Sims and other girl games. Then again you never know - there are lot more "extreme" guys out there than really "extreme" girls (or the girls keep it well hidden?).

      The top women don't do as well as the top men in scrabble, chess, draughts, go, snooker, pool etc.

      An interesting exception appears to be bowling. Seems to be one of the few sports where women are as good as men.

      Sure there are always exceptions, but more men tend to be more obsessive _and_competitive_ about the games they play, to the point where it could be unhealthy/unbalanced. That's why they tend to be better - if most of your waking and sleeping life revolves around the game and you have a natural talent for it, you'd more likely be better than someone who just has talent and only plays/practices a few hours a day.

      If a woman had the compulsion to wash her hands every 10 minutes or so, she'd quite likely:
      1) hide it from everyone else
      2) consult professional help.

      If a man had the same compulsion, I doubt people would be too surprised if he:
      1) Forms a club for likeminded men and brags about how many times he washes his hands a day, and that he's found the best soap, water AND method to do it.

      If you aren't as competitive, you usually end up not being as competitive.

      The justification for a gender segregated tournament could be the same as the one for chess/golf. The top woman chess/golf player won't even make the top 10 in the world, barring a fluke.

      --
    25. Re:Ridiculous! by BloodyLoony · · Score: 1

      The Nigerians is one terrible argument, there is physical differences between Nigerians and Americans that come in to play when running a marathon and you even know it yourself, which is why I find your whole comment pathetic. What are you trying to say? I even have the facts on my side in thise case. Boys and girls are seperated in some (I don't know how many) tournaments because the boys are better.

      Sure there might be a girl on the boys team once in a while in a regular tournament, but when the girls generally have no chance of winning, of course they form their own tournaments.

    26. Re:Ridiculous! by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      The best definition of a sport I've heard is you have to be able to be injured, and you have to be able to win. Interestingly enough (or sadly depending on your perspective) War qualifies as a sport under this definition.

      --
      AccountKiller
    27. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competion is all about skills. If you've got better skill, and use it correctly, you win.

      How about the 72yr old guy that suck 2500 freethrows consecutively in '93?

      There isn't an NBA player anywhere that could match that. It dosen't mean that he could go 1v1 against shaq, and expect to live, but it's a level of competition.

      If there's a female that snipes in a FPS, and she's hits 99.5% of the time, where most people can't get anywhere close to that, then it's fair to say that she's a good competitor.

      Whether you agree with it or not.

    28. Re:Ridiculous! by dougthonus · · Score: 1

      >

      I think this is more relevent for tracking moving objects and other things.

      I think the perfect example is driving. Men can more quickly adapt to what's going on around them in a car and translate the objects around them better. The result is that the women feel the men are careening out of control and complain. However, partially this is due to the fact that their brains aren't translating the information as quickly, so what looks out of control to them isn't to the men.

      I don't really have a particular view on video gaming or anything, and I'm not entirely certain how much this would relate to that, but I wouldn't be suprised at all if scientific evidenced showed that men were significantly better at certain types of games because of this.

    29. Re:Ridiculous! by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 0

      If there are a lesser number of women participating, probably makes sense to let them win some matches and encourage them to play more, maybe?

      No! No! No! Play them straight and may the best person win. If you lose, suck it up, tell her she played a good game and move on with your life. If you win, tell her she played a good game and move on with your life. You don't have to rub it in her face that you're a "big, strong man", but you don't have to apologize for it either.

    30. Re:Ridiculous! by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      The real mystery is, why do they insist on calling them "Women Grand Masters" instead of just "Grand Masters", or is this your name for them?


      geez.. I think it was just a way to say that there are women grand masters. The vast majority of Grand Master chess players are male, so in a discussion about sex differences among game players you might want to point that out.

      Grand Mistress is a stupid term though. I think the original poster thought the term master was a term used to distinguish gender, not a term to distinguish proficiency level. A Masters degree has nothing to do with gender after all.

      --
      AccountKiller
    31. Re:Ridiculous! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Reflex is not a skill, it is a talent. Most FPS'samount to a sort of hunting. It amounts to have to use intelligence much like a chess match or poker tournament. Can one outwit a foe, not can one move faster or swing harder.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    32. Re:Ridiculous! by e03179 · · Score: 1

      What next? A female valedictorian and a male valedictorian?

      --
      -516
    33. Re:Ridiculous! by chooks · · Score: 1
      What about Chess?

      From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sport/297529.stm


      But Mr Banks said Culture, Media and Sport Secretary Chris Smith had considered the issue and had decided to broaden the scope of the 1937 Act to enable chess and mind games to be funded by the Sports Council.



      I guess if someone throws the rook at you in a fit of chess-inspired roid rage, you could be injured...;)

      So maybe now its ok for chess nerds to date cheerleaders. Cool!

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    34. Re:Ridiculous! by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Well, competitive grocery shopping might be a bit nuts.

      Actually, I remember several years ago seeing a game show on some UHF channel called "Supermarket Sweep." It was competitive grocery shopping. Something about getting all the items on your list into your cart as fast as possible, and the best time wins.

      It was a bit nuts. Personally, I much prefer the British game show where the end game consists of trying to taunt kittens onto the spot that has the prize you want to win...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    35. Re:Ridiculous! by Ironica · · Score: 1

      I think the perfect example is driving. Men can more quickly adapt to what's going on around them in a car and translate the objects around them better. The result is that the women feel the men are careening out of control and complain. However, partially this is due to the fact that their brains aren't translating the information as quickly, so what looks out of control to them isn't to the men.

      Er... on the other hand, it might be because men are more apt to engage in risk-taking behavior. Which is why, even if they might have fewer accidents numerically per mile driven, they are much more likely to cause a serious injury or fatality in a given accident than women are.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    36. Re:Ridiculous! by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      As evidenced by the fact that many NASCAR drivers get ringers to drive at Watkins Glen and Infineon Raceway for them. It's hard to consider Tony Stewart or Ryan Newman as world class race drivers when they would get their asses handed to them in F1, while Schumacher could easily do well in NASCAR, once he grokked all the bullshit rules and bumping.
      Yes, get those offtopic and flamebait points rolling. Just to get somewhat back on topic, there has never been a good female race driver, and that woman who drag raced in the pink car doesn't count.

    37. Re:Ridiculous! by dougthonus · · Score: 1
      on the other hand, it might be because men are more apt to engage in risk-taking behavior. Which is why, even if they might have fewer accidents numerically per mile driven, they are much more likely to cause a serious injury or fatality in a given accident than women are.
      This just proves the same point. They have less accidents per mile driven despite driving in a riskier fashion. If they didn't process spatial objects better than they'd have worse accidents AND far more accidents. The fact that they don't have far more accidents is still evidence to support this opinion. If you do some research on the topic, I think you'd find a very large body of evidence that this is the case. (the driving example may not have been the perfect example, but the differences in how men and women process spatial objects is generally accepted).
    38. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nigerians is one terrible argument, there is physical differences between Nigerians and Americans that come in to play when running a marathon and you even know it yourself

      yeah the physical differences that get sportscasters fired when they try to bring them up. Political Correctness police suck.

    39. Re:Ridiculous! by BloodyLoony · · Score: 1

      Only in a communist country, or could that be in the US?

    40. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second your note. Exactly!

    41. Re:Ridiculous! by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      ...any real skills except reflex to hit a button up and down. That is not a skill.

      Contradiction in terms? English is not my native language, but aren't you asserting that reflex is a 'real skill' here?

      Excelling at an FPS definitely requires talent, coordination, agility, reflex, maybe teamwork (depending on the game), and a lot of training. Like in real sports, you have the same good contestants consistently beating the not so good. Coincidence, or some sort of acquired skill (training)? It also attracts sponsors because people are interested in it, enough that the sponsors finds that it's worth their money.

      To me personally two of the most stupid "sports" I can think of are tractor pulling and wrestling (yeah, I know the facts WRT wrestling, notice the quotation marks), nonetheless people in some parts of the world enjoy it greatly. I leave them to it. Oh, and it's a huge moneymaker.

      You are trying to present your subjective opinion as general fact, calling someone who doesn't agree with you stupid? How grown-up.

      Yeah your stupid.

      For some reason I find this hilarious. Ask your local Grammar Nazi.
      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  9. You never know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My co-worker used to play online using a feminine name. If you'd ever seen my co-worker you'd realize how funny this was. Think Richard Stallman meets John Goodman... Anyway, he swore that he did better with a female name because people were less likely to kill him.

    I heard that Slashdot moderators also go kindly on female posters.

    Sarah_the_geek_grrl

    1. Re:You never know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I heard that Slashdot moderators also go kindly on female posters.

      Yeah, I went kindly on that poster of Jennifer Alba.

    2. Re:You never know... by rholliday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is 1,000% true. Women (or percieved women) always get special treatment in gaming situations, be it on a MUD, FPS, MMORPG, doesn't matter. People used to send my girlfriend RL Purchaseable items for her MUD, especially if they asked to see her picture. It's the same tendency that causes most men to do "chivalrous" things for women: somewhere deep down they think this is getting them one step closer to getting laid.
      To quote the great Chris Rock, "Can I help you with that? Can I help you with some dick?"

      And as to getting schooled, I'm sure most gamers wouldn't mind Stevie Case (AKA KillCreek) walking all over them in a game of Quake III. Hell, if she can take John Romero to the cleaners ...

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    3. Re:You never know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think Eric Krout has been going as $$$$exygal for so long now?

    4. Re:You never know... by NoData · · Score: 1

      Think Richard Stallman meets John Goodman..

      [shudder] No, thanks all the same, I'll think something different...

    5. Re:You never know... by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1
      It's the same tendency that causes most men to do "chivalrous" things for women: somewhere deep down they think this is getting them one step closer to getting laid.

      I agree with your main point totally but I don't think it's always true that men think they are closer to getting laid (consciously or unconsciously). I think that there is an in-built instinct in men to protect women, and this "kindness" springs from that as much as wanting to get laid. My 2 penneth anyway.

    6. Re:You never know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the exact same thing. If I'm not using a famale name, I use a "fluffy" sounding name--something that makes me sound like a 14 yr old girlie, or something just outright stupid--better if it makes little (but some) sense.

      I think it disarms the opponents. Anything that takes their concentration off the game is good. Subconciously, I think they're working on your name, trying to figure it out, and whether you're a girl or just whack. Then they get all upset that they got 0wnet by "pink bunny" or whatever, because (sub)conciuosly they think they've got to be better than someone that goes by the name of "Fashion Police", and insults everyone's poor color coordiantion.

      Bind some taunts, mock them a bit, and you'll throw quite a few people off their game. It's just another weapon.

    7. Re:You never know... by rholliday · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. I'd like to think so, but there's too much evidence to the contrary. To some extent our reproductive instincts dominate us all.

      I doubt that anyone would argue that attractive women get better treatment than unattractive. And neither do I doubt that, barring conflicts in sexual predilictions, that most of these "kind, chivalrous gentlemen" would turn down a piece if it were offered. ;)

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    8. Re:You never know... by Princess+Die · · Score: 1

      I started skin for Unreal Tournament because I thought the smaller frame made me harder to hit. Found out that the hit profile for each skin is exactly the same. But I definetly didn't get as killed as often using a female character. So there is something to this. I also found that I didn't get as killed as often on UK servers for some reason... xoxoxoxo... Head Shot! Princess_Die

    9. Re:You never know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas I used to use male nicks on hotline becuase it was the only way to get 5 minutes peace and quiet from all the testosterone powered 15 year olds who kept trying to hit onto me if I used a female nick.

      Sara
      a macgrrl in an NT world

  10. Anyone... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    else miss Dear Mynx?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  11. Women's matches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches.

    Definitely not. Women have the potential to be as good as men at FPS gaming, and that potential won't be developed if they're consigned to the usual sexist ghetto.

    Our 4-year-old daughter can already frag me occasionally in Quake, and I've been playing since '96....

    1. Re:Women's matches by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      You've got your 4 year old daughter fragging in quake already? Sheesh, don't want to get into that conversation...lets leave it for another day ;)

      --
      No Comment.
    2. Re:Women's matches by rholliday · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...

      And people wonder why they say the ratings on games aren't working.

      I'm all for getting kids into games, but there's a point at which a child can differentiate betweeen when it's okay to "kill" in a game, and to hurt someone in real life, but I don't think that 4 is it.

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    3. Re:Women's matches by irokitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would hate to see what your daughter does to other kids on the playground.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    4. Re:Women's matches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was playing Hack(now Nethack) at 5. I've yet to attempt to kill the Wizard of Endor IRL. Kids watch cartoons. Any reasonably intelligent 5 year old can understand the concept of fiction

    5. Re:Women's matches by nemaispuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      My 13 year old daughter is probably the most vicious player I have ever met! Not only does she frag you, she goes the "extra yard" by blowing up your corpse! And when we are playing death matches in Quake she will mutter things like "My name is Perfect Little Angel, how may I kill you today?"

      Maybe this is what the guys are afraid of when they are playing online is that they could get their asses handed to them by "a girl".
    6. Re:Women's matches by molafson · · Score: 0

      Our 4-year-old daughter can already frag me occasionally in Quake

      Does she also sleep in a Skinner box? Or would that interfere with her hourly Ludovico treatments?

    7. Re:Women's matches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll admit to it being a bit of an experiment, because Society Frowns on This Sort of Action. There's a reason I'm posting AC, after all. :)

      In this case, my rationale is twofold: (a) she's already a well-socialized, well-adjusted kid, so exposure to the horrors of Quake probably won't instantly warp her fragile little mind; and (b) because we're the rare sort of parents who actually pay attention to our child and demand high standards of behavior from her, we should be able to catch any moral/behavioral issues early enough to turn them into positive learning experiences.

      So far (six months or so into her gaming career) it hasn't been a problem. Personally, I have a hard time believing that ten minutes of Quake a day is somehow more developmentally perilous than an hour a day of Wile E. Coyote blowing shit up, but I'm well aware that Authorities Differ on the subject. I believe that apparent liabilities such as violent video games can, with the proper supervision, be used to reinforce exactly the social lessons you're talking about. ("It's only OK to shoot people in Quake. It's never OK to whine when you lose, or to be a poor sport when you win. And when you lose your temper, it's time to shut off the game and go play outside.") I was taught similar lessons with real-life firearms as soon as I was old enough to look through their sights, and I've somehow managed to avoid the temptation to camp any clock towers in real life.

      Right now, she wants the UT2004 demo installed on her system so badly she can taste it, so we're sublimating her bloodlust into a growing acquaintance with Dr. Seuss. She's already able to read the first twenty pages of one particular book, and she understands that when she can make it through forty more, she'll get the keys to some hot nuclear death. Stay tuned to CNN to see how our little experiment turns out!

    8. Re:Women's matches by rholliday · · Score: 1

      Well, no one knows there children better than parents ... in most cases. Like I said, there is a threshold. Hopefully you are correct in your particular instance. The way you phrased your original post did not make it sound as if there was a healthy program going on (though I'm aware that my post made it sound as if I'm a Troll). I also hope that she'll stay on the path your setting once she goes to school and is exposed to other children. I think that the concept of virtual "killing" can be difficult to grasp, and sometimes bothersome, just as some children have problems when they connect the pig in the movies with the bacon on their plate.

      Are you training her in firearms as well? I think it would be a good idea, to help reinforce the messages you're teaching concurrent to Quake, especially if there are firearms in the home.

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    9. Re:Women's matches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She actually spends about six hours per day in day care with eight other kids. She has learned lessons like "no hitting" pretty well, and seems to understand the reasoning behind the rule rather than simply fearing the punishment for breaking it. I'm not too worried about incipient sociopathy at this point.

      We don't keep any weapons around the house (another good reason to post AC :) so the issue of real-life firearms hasn't come up. At 4, she's far too young to be exposed to any weapons-related instruction other than, "If you ever see a real gun, run away from it QUICKLY and tell a grown-up."

    10. Re:Women's matches by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Just reading that scared the crap out of me. It's like my little sister all over again. Ah she's comming.

  12. Great! by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've spent the last year trying to get my fiancee interested in games... this last week, she started showing signs of being hooked on Roller Coaster Tycoon. I guess it goes: Mid-range PC: $800 RollerCoaster Tycoon Deluxe: $20 Watching my SO build a coaster that makes all the riders sick: Priceless!

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    1. Re:Great! by radish · · Score: 1

      I got my girlfriend a metallic pink GBA SP for valentine's day and she's really getting into it...I think next stop is Spongebob Squarepants for my Xbox :) She also love Project Gotham because she can drive the same car she has in real life. In my experience lots of girls love gaming, but fewer are interested in the typical FPS type violence-fests.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Great! by carn1fex · · Score: 1

      Yea ive been trying to do the same.. someone should start a message board on tactics to get your wife/girlfriend into video games or other nerdy persuits.. I played simcity3k for awhile with my g/f where we would both plan the city but i would move the mouse until it was later revealed that she would just slyly say 'sure' to my suggestions and was just bored. D0h!.. but i bought her Uru (Myst 4) and she likes that.. puzzle games.. who woulda thought.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  13. gender segregation? by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches

    Oh come on! I think it is silly to have separate leagues for men and women in real-world sports, where it could be argued (not by me) that the physical differences between the genders would give one or the other an unfair advantage. In a virtual environment, even that would be voided. Why separate them?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.

    :wq!

    1. Re:gender segregation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been mentioned, in a virtual environment any phsycial differences between the genders don't exist, but then it becomes a mental game, as well as reaction times, etc. You are implying that both genders think alike, which is clearly false. Also, there are cultural biases to overcome. So there may be reason there to separate the genders. Ofcourse, there should be a matching male leauge, in all fairnes.

    2. Re:gender segregation? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting similarity: fencing. As a sport, it's almost entirely non-gender biased. Contrary to what most movies show, fencing (the sport) is entirely centered around two things: strategy and fine-motor skills. There's no need to make an enormous, rapid swipe when a 1/4 turn of the wrist puts you blade on the good side of your opponents'. When your blade has more flexibility than a car antenna, the few brief times when you lock foils against eachother come down to manipulating mechanical advantage, not strength.

      I mostly fence foil, and at my university, that puts me fencing against a lot of women in practices (most of the guys favor epee). About the only substantial advantage I have over them is the fact that I'm 6', and thus have a slightly better reach. But, honestly, I'd have the same advantage against a 5'7" guy. The only other physical factor to the sport is enough endurance to stay quick after a few matches, but that's not something that belongs to either gender, really.

      Yet fencing, in competition, is separated by gender. We go to a competition where there might be 100 guys fencing Sabre, and one of our women wins because she has a field of 8 to fence against.

      It sounds a bit too much like some triumphing, girl-power movement, but I honestly think it falls into the same category that this gaming competition does: on some deep-seated level, far too many guys fear losing to a woman.

  14. Don't change anything! by shic · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always thought typical female disdain for pixel-blasting violence to be a most endearing quality. I, for one, am against this slippery slope towards androgyny.

    1. Re:Don't change anything! by rholliday · · Score: 1

      I'm also against the increasing masulinization of women in society, but I think that video games aren't going to change a girl's (woman's, chick's) natural attributes very much. My gf will hack and slash through Diablo II with the best of them, but she still shies away from "gross" things in real life. She may try to anally rape me with a Zergling in StarCraft, but she still sometimes needs (and, I sometimes suspect, wants) me to open jars for her. There's a balance in the world, and it is good. :)

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    2. Re:Don't change anything! by shic · · Score: 1

      Many years ago I was at a science convention (don't ask) and saw a presentation of W-Technologies' virtual-reality full-immersion technology. (UK cutting edge, all the rage mid '80s technology) After the presentation, during questions, a woman asked why all the simulations involved killing people. The CEO fielded that one by saying that he could find no end of young men willing to pay a pound a minute to kill people, but that Knitting simulators were predicted to generate less revenue.

  15. Suck it up! by EnterpriseNCC-1701 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a girl in the gamming world and I think having seperate matches for woman is rather stupid. It is a game, it is ment to be fun, and if some girls suck gamming then they can suck it up, practice, and get better.

    --
    "Most interesting how often you humans seem to obtain that which you do not want" -Spock
    1. Re:Suck it up! by deadhead48 · · Score: 1

      I'm also a female that likes to games and I agree. There is no reason why we should be treated differently because of our gender. Stereotypically yes girls are not good at playinng games but who really cares.

    2. Re:Suck it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading the subject a few times, I think "Suck it up" is great advice to female gamers :-P

    3. Re:Suck it up! by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

      I'm a guy who plays a lot online and I must say that for me, it's always more fun when there are a few girls playing - their tactics are different, their comments are different and all that contributes in a very positive way to the game - it makes the whole game so much more refreshing, just like different views make for an interesting discussion.

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    4. Re:Suck it up! by prisoner · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with online games is not girls who do or do not suck. There are plenty of guys that suck too. It's the 15 year old boys who can't seem to keep their mouth shut and spew an endless stream of profanity because mommy isn't around. God forbid they even suspect that a female is playing as their trash talking about what they would do to her will go into overdrive. At first it's funny as it rapidly becomes clear that they wouldn't know how to do half of what they're talking about but after awhile it just gets old. I'm sure that the women online are just sick to death of it.

    5. Re:Suck it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suck up :)
      you just want their email addresses :)

    6. Re:Suck it up! by rinderpestofshank · · Score: 0

      hey,
      sorry but i couldn't resist

      "I am a girl in the gamming world"
      gamming: slang for fellatio, like giving a blowjob, sucking d**k etc...

      ah, sweet joy of pointing out other people's mistakes

    7. Re:Suck it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think it's a mistake? Did you look at the subject line? It's pretty clear to me that she's a professional gammer, not a gamer.

  16. Amazing new technology by DarthTeufel · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wow. I never knew they would get computers in a kitchen.

  17. No need for separate games by indulgenc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife got started on computers games playing the original tribes. It started out with me showing her the basics and helping her get started. I'd have her switch to my team so I could show her tactics, etc. Soon, she started playing a lot on her own.

    Fast-forward to a few weeks later, and I would lose to her in duels 90 percent of the time. She would hit top scores on servers routinely, and I started switching to her team any time we played together so I wouldn't always be on the losing team.

    The funny thing was, no one believed it was really a woman playing when she'd kick their ass.

    -i

    1. Re:No need for separate games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing was, no one believed it was really a woman playing when she'd kick their ass.

      Why would anyone even know enough to dispute that fact? Unless some dimwit was gloating "you got beat by a woman! ha! ha!" Yeah, that'd be progressive.

      I guess what I'm saying is whenever I play online, I never see anyone talking "ha ha, i'm a man" or "ha ha, i'm a woman", and I'd never really expect to see that. So how would I know?

    2. Re:No need for separate games by localman · · Score: 1

      Interesting -- I had the same experience with my wife and Tribes.

      I think Tribes is a very female friendly game. For one it's not as viscerally violent as the others (no blood and gibbage), and the locales aren't so film noir (airy outdoors).

      Plus there's something about the true 3D play (with flying) that my wife just seems to handle better than me or any of our male friends. Her timing and control for ariel acrobatics are pretty amazing.

      Perhaps it's because she's really an angel (awww... choke... gag... ;)

      Cheers.

    3. Re:No need for separate games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The funny thing was, no one believed it was really a woman playing when she'd kick their ass.
      The disbelief has nothing to do with her kicking their asses; it has everything to do with the fact that 90+% of the "women" in online gaming/sexchat/whatever are men pretending to be women. Or maybe women pretending to be men pretending to be women... you can't really tell for sure unless you happen to meet them in person. But in any event, people lying about their physical attributes in one way or another.

      Personally, I don't give a shit one way or the other. But if you make a big deal out of what you are "in real life" you're going to get a shrug and a brush-off, because it's so easy to lie, there's no reason to believe it.

    4. Re:No need for separate games by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      not to add just another "me too" post, but me too!

      My fiance also got started playing video games with TRIBES.

      I always figured that was a very unique game for someones introduction to video games, because TRIBES has such a steep learning curve, but I guess I was wrong.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  18. Why lack of women? by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Lets see... BMX XXX, DOA:Beach Volleyball, 'natural physics' on the latest tomb raider.

    It comes down to developers either making a cool game, or a buncha horny techies that use sex to sell to adolescent teenage boys (or both). Those 'horny techies' are juvenilizing the gaming world so that women don't want to be a part of it.

    Oh, and to tack on my opinion. I think 'gaming for money' as an occupation is rediculous, and I don't see why companies sponser it (no need to argue this point, its my opinion and I've heard most of the arguements).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Why lack of women? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      Blowing away my chance to moderate here... I agree gaming for a living is a bit silly but do what you love, if you happen to make money at it, even better.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    2. Re:Why lack of women? by HumanTorch · · Score: 1

      or a buncha horny techies that use sex to sell to adolescent teenage boys (or both). Those 'horny techies' are juvenilizing the gaming world so that women don't want to be a part of it.

      Yet somehow the physical perfection and large muscles of the male characters is always overlooked.. how many fat slobs with bad skin do you see in games? I think people in general would rather have characters that look good (male and female). I sense a double standard here WRT female characters.

    3. Re:Why lack of women? by gauauu · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between a character looking good, and trying to use the sexuality of the character to sell a game.

      Chun Li from SF2 looked good. But they didn't sell the game by focusing on her breasts. BMX XXX, DOA extreme beach volleyball, and their ilk all do.

      Solid Snake may be a stud, but you don't see them marketing Solid Snake's sexual appeal.

      And you mention a double standard...that's because there IS a difference between men and women. Men are more likely to tune in to sexual images than women are. It's a fact of life, and marketing people know it.

    4. Re:Why lack of women? by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 1

      "Solid Snake may be a stud, but you don't see them marketing Solid Snake's sexual appeal."

      I don't know, looking at the name for the third Metal Gear Solid, I'm not certain that's the case... *grin*

  19. Seperate but Equal by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where have I heard that one before?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Seperate but Equal by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      modded funny? dumb mods. +1 Scarey because it's True, but not funny.

  20. I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's not that they can't hack it, it's that they don't usually care to spend 8+ hours a day playing a video game that's nothing but twitch movements over and over.

    Probably something about wanting to have some degree of a social life, eh? Not that we'd know anything about that here...

    1. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. A "social life" is so great. Havong meaningless, mind-numbing conversations about "relationships", furniture, clothes and spending the whole day boring your fiancee to death in a shoe store is SO DAMN SOPHISTICATED. It's just SO DEEP!

    2. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you'd better get over it unless you plan on spanking it every day for the rest of your lonely life.

    3. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash! You can have sex without having to bore yourself to death in a relationship! You know, there are so called "one nights stands" and "hookers".

    4. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then one day you try to piss and blood comes out. Great idea, fuckwad.

    5. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather risk that than risking a divorce where I lose my house and pretty much everything I earn in the next 1000 years, thank you very much. Enjoy your perfect little world, cocksmoker. But don't come crying when it breaks.

    6. Re:I'd disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah!

  21. This last weekend by wjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I atteneded an event called LanSlide, 60 person lan run by girls. I have to say it was a much better lan then some of the similar sized ones I've been too. And the organizers are more then just your avarage girls so theres no "A/S/L" shit and on top of that, Hell, there fun to play with.

    1. Re:This last weekend by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      quote: "Hell, they're fun to play with."

      Why yes, yes they are fun to play with :P

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    2. Re:This last weekend by wjames · · Score: 1

      :-P Not in that way. But they do seem to pick up on games a good bit faster then the guys.

  22. Re:Why segregate girls? by buhatkj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    actually, it is a well-documented fact that while on average men are superior in the areas of simple strength, and aggressive competitive behavior comes more easily to men than women, women have significantly faster reaction time, better accuracy, and the ability to track more targets at one time. this was discovered specifically relating to women being fighter pilots, but i'd bet it's valid for twitch games too. what holds most women back is that they lack confidence and are not aggressive enough. that and they are scared that people will think they are a "bitch" if they act aggressive. it's sad that society beats that sort of thing into them... i'll tell ya this, my fiance hands me my ass at tekken...

    --
    sometimes, i wonder if i'm the only conservative on teh intarweb. ah well, back to mah hogs and warmongerin'....
  23. Do her? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, the female Danish CS clan is called "do me"! Neat!

  24. Lies!! by HoxBox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously the girls are only guys pretending to be girls. Not that I would know...

  25. Re:Why segregate girls? by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is so terrible about pointing out the apparent, natural and omnipresent differences about males and females?

    (ok, here I go throwing my karma into the fire)

    Men excel at physical pursuits. It is not only because our hormones allow greater muscle mass -- there are other forces at work here and science has not yet pinned them down. But a quick look at fighter pilots today, for example, shows that even in a field where physical strength is not essential, men are far more suited to the task than women.

    Sure, there are lady fighter pilots, women who can exert the concentration and coordination necessary for Uncle Sam to trust them with $100M toys. Just as there are women who can beat men at Quake III. All I'm saying is that statistics confirm that there are not many of them.

    Is that so bad?

  26. Separate matches by nodwick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's some discussion about the welcome or lack thereof women get in the gaming community, and arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches.
    It's a question that's been rehashed a lot, but here are a few thoughts.

    Some sports separate out men and women because physical differences make it hard for them to compete. Obvious examples that come to mind are contact sports like football and basketball, or even non-contacts like tennis (mentioned in one of the article comments) where physicality still plays a strong role. It's the same reasoning that makes sports like boxing have weight classes (a gender-neutral issue): to produce interesting matchups that let the competitors focus on how well they compare with others with a similar physical starting point.

    Having said that, it doesn't strike me that there are significant differences in physiology that would prevent co-ed competitions from being fair, any more than you would expect one gender or another to have an advantage in competitions of bridge or snooker. The fact that they still compete in separate brackets more likely has more to do with advertising dollars (sponsors probably figure that the female market for Counterstrike is pretty small) or inertia (hey, let's do our tournaments like every other sports competition!) than any argument based on merit.

    1. Re:Separate matches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some sports separate out men and women because physical differences make it hard for them to compete."

      I play adult co-ed soccer. There have been times when the best player on our team was a woman, a small woman. Go Liz!

      Then there was the year when our leading goal scorer was a woman so short that I've actually seen members of the other team lose track of where she was. Go Ghazala!

      I've seen intelligence and position-play triump repeatedly over blind speed. Go Suzy!

      And you know something, in my experience, games are more fun when there are both men and women involved.

  27. 3 kinds of girl gamers by fuchikoma · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Serious Gamers
    Guys don't like playing them because they're smarter, better, faster, and sometimes you fall in love...

    2. "WHEEE CUTE!"
    Usually they watch anime and/or create bad erotic fanart about doe-eyed male anime characters. They don't play any game that doesn't involve a cute catgirl or bunnygirl. See Final Fantasy XI or Ragnarok Online.

    3. Your Mom Playing Solitaire
    You know she's playing it right now. Remember that 1.5ghz Athlon system you built for her so she can send digital photos to grandma and make her own mix CD's? Yea, it's a $900 solitaire deck shuffler.

    1. Re:3 kinds of girl gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. "WHEEE CUTE!"
      Usually they watch anime and/or create bad erotic fanart about doe-eyed male anime characters. They don't play any game that doesn't involve a cute catgirl or bunnygirl. See Final Fantasy XI or Ragnarok Online.


      A fair few male gamers are like that too. Hopefully come the revolution there'll be enough space left in the furry concentration camps for them as well

    2. Re:3 kinds of girl gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      3. Your Mom Playing Solitaire
      You know she's playing it right now. Remember that 1.5ghz Athlon system you built for her so she can send digital photos to grandma and make her own mix CD's? Yea, it's a $900 solitaire deck shuffler.


      Wrong - it's Freecell she plays, not Solitaire. You need to up the resolution on your spy satellites.

    3. Re:3 kinds of girl gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They don't play any game that doesn't involve a cute catgirl or bunnygirl"

      umm..i think it's the other way around. catgirls and bunnygirls are more for the guys...it's the cute anime male characters that seem to interest the girls.

      example, i was watching an X-play episode with a friend about FFXI. There was one part where they were showing the character creation and were scrolling through the character models. Then the model for the typical cute guy anime character came up and she suddenly squeled and was like 'omg, he was cute!'

  28. Oh - we've come so far ! by bushboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    That this would even be an issue is testament to how little we've really achieved in gender equality.

    Why do we have to relegate everything to the sexes ?

    I'm a liberal !
    Let women go head to head with men ! (hmmm, there's something about that statement that ... er, whatever)

    So long as I don't have a female boss, I'm happy !

    I'm mean really guys, lets get realistic here :)

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  29. Once again.. by Gandalf+Greymeister · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why is it that when the few girls get into the gaming spotlight they focus on a groups with names like "DoMe"?

    1. Re:Once again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. i missed that.

  30. differences by sangdrax · · Score: 1

    [quote]
    "But it is two steps up and one step down as we are segregating males and females. It's saying that the girls aren't as good as the males."
    [/quote]
    Why? There can be both single gender and mixed competitions right?

    Besides, in many fields which emulate some kind of war-like tactics, we men seem to be genetically at the advantage (on average, ofcourse). This is so in many sports as well as games like chess, etc.

    If this advantage does not extend to CS, the single gender games will die from natural causes anyway.

    A bigger problem is enforcing single gender games over the internet, imho.

    1. Re:differences by drox · · Score: 1

      Besides, in many fields which emulate some kind of war-like tactics, we men seem to be genetically at the advantage (on average, ofcourse).

      I object to the word "genetically" in the above, but otherwise I can agree. I suspect the main reason (human) women lag behind men in war-like pursuits is learned.

      Boys *learn* fighting (and gaming,and roughhousing) in their youth. Girls seldom do, which has interesting consequences.

      I recall my martial arts instructor explaining why he'd rather get in a fight (not a game or a sparring match but a real fight) with a man than with a woman. He said it's because, even though he's more likely to lose to the man (physical strength, learned skills, etc.) the woman's more likely to hurt him. Because when men fight, one wins, one loses, and it's over. They might even be friends after. When a woman fights a man, she's desperate, angry, and backed into a corner. She knows she's at a disadvantage, she's out of options and she'll fight dirty. And even if you win, you don't win, because she'll come after you later, when you aren't expecting it, and finish the fight. To a man, that's not sporting, but to a woman it's to be expected. You asked for it.

      I don't know if any of this applies to games, but I found it interesting.

    2. Re:differences by slycer · · Score: 1

      The problem comes in due to the lack of female gamers..

      Segregate out a smallish portion of the population. The people in this portion can only play against each other, there are some really good players, but in general, the competition is not as fierce or as good - NOT because of lack of skill, but because of lack of participation.

      How are the people that have been segregated into this smaller group going to learn & improve? Where does the skill bar drop?

  31. You mod's are something else ... parent is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was clearly a joke and a funny one at that, although I'd add a "heterosexual with occasional lesbian tendencies" requirement in there as well.

  32. Re:Why segregate girls? by ePINOY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe these girls can't 'hack' it because they don't spend as much time as you do playing the game? I'm sure if a girl was interested enough to play the game for that many hours that she'd be pretty good. I've played against some ladies that were pretty decent. Just because it's popular among the boys doesn't mean a girl can't 'hack' it.

    I think the idea of segregating girls in online game matches is a retarded idea.

    --
    suteki!
  33. I used to work at a now defunct studio* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And the lead tester there was female, heavily into games and extremely competent. With the exception of one dickhead, I don't anyone was surprised by the idea that women would enjoy games as much as a man. IMO the idea that women shouldn't play games is partly a result of typical geek stereotypes-we don't mind seeing fat men with poor dress sense, pocket protectors and bad hygeine, but God forbid a woman should look like that

    * It's not Ion Storm, mm'kay

  34. they're hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a name like

    The DoMe team in Las Vegas

    who wouldn't want more female gamers?

  35. Why won't my wife play games? by humandoing · · Score: 1

    This article is kinda cool. I've tried for ages to get my wife to play video games with me :)

    She got really bored after about 45 seconds of Starcraft, I don't think Warcraft 3 will fly. She totally won't do the first person shooter thing. I get in trouble when playing Unreal Tournament. ;)

    Maybe I'll have to get a console (xbox, gamecube, whatever) to attempt enticing her. Anyone have any ideas for games that I might try to get my wife hooked on gaming? :)

    1. Re:Why won't my wife play games? by theblueprint · · Score: 1

      I'd reccomend Tiger Woods 2004. I got my gf to try it this weekend, and we found that her brother and his wife play also. It's a great game on its own, ideal for newbies in general. There's no time limit, so they can take their time and not feel hurried. This way they can learn the controls, and they only need to concentrate on their turn. My gf is already talking trash about our showdown next weekend.

      --
      "from the bricks to the booth...I predict the future like Cleo the psychic..."
    2. Re:Why won't my wife play games? by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Starcraft, Warcraft, etc. are in the same genre. If she dosen't like the genre she won't like any of them.

      Pick something that she might like, and then stand back and let her enjoy it. Mine really cleans up when we play Scrabble, and she's a regular at the yahoo word related games, "Text Twist", etc.

    3. Re:Why won't my wife play games? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Start off with games that aren't competition-based. SimCity, RollerCoaster Tycoon, etc. are usually good because there's not really a competition going on. If she's into the fantasy genre, try something like Morrowind. Its combat controls are pretty simple, and there's plenty of story. Stay off the twitch-type games until she suggests that she wants to try it. Puzzle games (or online card games/pool at someplace like Yahoo! Games or Pogo.com) might be something you could play together.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  36. Re:Yeah right by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know a grand total of 1 ( ONE ) female gamer. And she looks like she has been hit in the face by a vat of acid at 300km/h, has about the same weight as as the Eurasian tectonic plate, is as charming as Margaret Thatcher on a Sunday morning, about as reliable and trustworthy as an unnamed operating system which does NOT control 5% of the global market...
    <br><br> ...but hell, it was Friday night, and you needed a date.

    --
    Beep beep.
  37. Re:Why segregate girls? by ePINOY · · Score: 1

    It's not so bad, but I don't think it makes much of a difference in online games, do you?

    --
    suteki!
  38. Re:grub IS NOT FUNNY. WHY TF IS HE ALWAYS MODDED U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't be jealous of Mr. Grub. Maybe you're just cranky from not having your afternoon nap.

  39. No fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They show pictures of a hot female gaming team named "DoMe" and they don't even provide phone numbers! Life is sooooo not fair!

  40. sexism in reporting, n/m gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i love the way, when the media reports on males in gaming, they find the geekiest ones they can. but when they report on females, they have close ups of the two best looking ones.

  41. what a tease by enrico_suave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I saw a headline that went Gxxx xx xxx Gxxxxx Wxxd and immediately thought it was an article about Girls Gone Wild...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  42. screw segregation by Dzerzhinski · · Score: 1

    I had also been under the impression that women have better reflexes. My gf can take me on evenly at Soul Calibur despite the fact that I have logged in a lot more hours playing it, and while she dislikes FPS games (preferring strategy, she can be vicious) once she developed the right reflexes I am sure she could kick my ass their too.

    --
    Never trust a physicist further than his DeBroglie wavelength.
    1. Re:screw segregation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just you... ;-)

  43. The One Place Gender Doesn't Matter... by EXTomar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and they want to bring it back in? I play some of these games and not once in my mind has the gender of my teammate or opponents has ever entered my mind. In fact it would be a distraction. Thinking that someone has an advantage in a game because they are male or female is like trying to figure out if someone has an advantage if they are right or left handed. If someone wins or loses they do so because they are an accomplished or failed player. Gender has very little to do with it.

    The one place where competition can be leveled down to fundemental non-physical attributes, a place where women can actually compete on equal footing as guys, they want to bring back gender divisions? I just don't get it.

  44. Re:Yeah right by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Funny

    If she's so bad, get another girlfriend.

  45. Nude Babe Gamers Webcam... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I, of course, always go to the Nude Babe Gamers webcam site... I don't subscribe, I just take the free tour over and over againe.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  46. can't see you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "can't see you! RAAAH! fire away"
    VS.
    "see that pretty girl there? i wish i could
    take her out on a date... what i'm dead again?"

  47. Is this really news? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    ...five girls start playing counter-strike and suddenly the World Of Gaming is shaken to the core? Reminds me of a few years ago here in the US when we had 2 latin artists who were selling lots of records and every piece of news you could get your hands on called it a "Lanin Craze!"

    I think it's all good and well. I like games. I like girls. Let's all play. But it is not exactly groundbreaking, is it? Girls have been playing games, in good numbers, since Nintendo first came out.

  48. Oh please! Get a grip already! by carlmenezes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Part of the joy of online gaming is that your opponents can be guys or girls and you can still have a fun game. If you know the girls you're playing against, so much the better.

    I mean, usually the need to separate two groups engaging in a common activity arises due to some kind of friction between the two for whatever reason.

    Here, I don't see what the reason could be.

    Insecurity among the guys? maybe, but why spoil the fun of the game because of a personality trait?

    Embarassment? for what? getting beat by a female player? Catch up with the times already!

    Sorry for putting it like this, but it has to be said - an online game is meant to be fun. So if the number of female players is increasing, I say that's a really good thing and probably the only place I'd say where it would make sense to make it girls only would be a game that's like an MMORPG version of Barbie's Dreamhouse.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Oh please! Get a grip already! by October_30th · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      that your opponents can be guys or girls

      Well, I'm sorry to say but you've fallen for propaganda.

      Men on the net are men, women on the net are 40-year old hairy men who'd like to be women and both the men and women on the net who say they're under 18 are actually FBI agents.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
  49. My Girlfriend by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think most girls are turned off by FPS, though I'm not quite sure why. The most common reaction I see is trying to move their head rather than looking with the mouse.

    My girlfriend however, really likes Warcraft 3, so much so, that when she came back from South America having studied abroad for a month, it was the second thing she wanted to do.

    She really enjoys the social aspect of the game, and although she's never the best player there, she's also never the worst (she only plays at LAN parties since her laptop has an 8 meg video card).

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:My Girlfriend by localman · · Score: 1

      I think most girls are turned off by FPS, though I'm not quite sure why. The most common reaction I see is trying to move their head rather than looking with the mouse.

      I've seen this behavior, but I don't think it's a female trait. It's just anyone who hasn't played many 3D games. I know that me and my male friends did this in back in 94 when we first played Doom. And we thought it was funny. After a week or so it passed. Most women are just starting out, so they're still at that level.

      I have a couple female friends (including my wife) who kick ass at FPS games. I was there when my wife first tried one, and she did the head moving thing. Now she kicks my ass and everyone else we know. Her head is stationary.

      You're right though, about the turn-off -- but I don't think it's FPS, it's the attitude of the games. My wife doesn't like the serious goriness of UT or Quake. She prefers Tribes and Counterstrike, which have a bit lighter feel. She especially likes fooling around and being goofy in-game, which is easiest in Tribes (dance animations are included).

      I blush to stereotype, but I think an FPS could crack more of the female market if it were made more light -- not so much focus on death and destruction, but more on playful competition.

      Cheers

    2. Re:My Girlfriend by BobaFett · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've seen this behavior, but I don't think it's a female trait. It's just anyone who hasn't played many 3D games. I know that me and my male friends did this in back in 94 when we first played Doom.

      I think it was something about Doom, the way it was done. I never had the slightest inclination to move out of the way when playing Quake, or any other FPS later, but I still lean sideways in my chair sometimes when an imp throws a fireball at me.

    3. Re:My Girlfriend by crazyharry · · Score: 1

      In Descent, I always tried to slide out of the way of oncoming fire by moving my chair.

  50. puzzle games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ze vimen love ze puzzle games

    but ze men don't! ;)

  51. Voluntary Segregation by michael+path · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll probably get modded down, because no one of either gender every listens to me, but.....

    Since many major online games (UT, Quake, etc) offer granularity of servers, I imagine there's probably alredy "girls only" servers and other private interest group servers just the same (password protected, et al).

    It seems natural. We already have television networks (several) specifically for genders. Chat rooms for certain interests.

    Now, with all that said, I can't say I mind competing with/losing to a girl. I don't understand the need for specific major competitions specifically for females. In fact, I'd imagine that 'being a male' as a requirement for a competition would probably result in legal action.

    -m.

  52. Re:Why segregate girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe people consistently fall into logical fallacy because they don't understand the seperation between improbability and impossibility

  53. Why create disparity where there is none by quantax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I often get the feeling that people doing the boys vs girls thing when it comes to competitive events lose sight of why its that way in the first place.

    The reason a lot of physical sports are segregated is not even so much a difference of strength issue, but a more psychological one, in that girls are less likely to join a traditionally all-boys (now unisex) sport such as lets say football because of the fact that their peers are all competitive males, which can make one feel insecure, or the 'weakest link'. So, they create all-girls football teams so girls will be encouraged to join the team since they are playing with their female peers and so are on 'equal' ground. No need to worry about being mocked by a buncha assholic boys, just from bitchy women (its always easier to take critism from the same sex).

    However, by segregating gamers into sexes in a faceless game, they are only actually promoting the idea of female inferiority in competive events. Treating girl gamers as a special commodity cheapens them, and makes me lose respect for them as gamers. If anything else is considered except the skill of the player, you've already lost the point of the game, and need to try again; whether its a he or a she is irrelevant. The sooner female gamers are not treated as special people who need to be segregated, the sooner everyone can get on playing w/o regard for sex like we're supposed to, and really get down to what matters: having fun with fellow gamers.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    1. Re:Why create disparity where there is none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh man, i'd like to see a mixed highschool football game. 6 foot 240 pound guy vs. 5'5" 140 pound girl...hmm...i wonder who's gonna win...

    2. Re:Why create disparity where there is none by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Rigth, while putting the 7 female teams in among the 50 male ones, all probably finishing in the bottom third would do WONDERS to destroy the idea of female inferiority.

      Here's a hint: Noone would have dreamed of stopping a female team from competing in the male class. None of the team wanted to though, because they all knew they'd get their ass kicked.

      I'm sorry, I know this ain't politically correct. But that doesn't make it less true.

    3. Re:Why create disparity where there is none by quantax · · Score: 1

      Yes, physically, a majority of females are not going to be able to compete against a buncha huge guys. Nothing new, in a game where size matters, thats not a revelation; my point is that part of the issue is psychological as well as physical.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
  54. Journalistic licence by JusTyler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Notice what the BBC have done with their photos. They've clearly picked the two most photogenic members for quotes, because if you look at the others way down at the bottom picture, those other girls are what you'd expect the stereotypical girl gamer to look like, rather than two pseudo-hotties.

  55. Hey come on. Female equality is all good until... by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    You get your ass handed to you by a girl while gaming.

    "Uh....well, I'm a girl TOO!...yeah..."

    *sobs*

    Disclaimer: This may or may not have actually happened.

  56. Differences between women and men by BassKnight · · Score: 1

    Putting aside all the biological stuff, I think that rather than saying "Girls suck at games", just because they lack some capabilities (or simply they don't have them properly "trained"), one have to understand seriously "why". And besides the biological differences (genitals, hormones, brain, pH, etc), there are also some social facts. The simple example on children: girls tend to play with dolls and boys with toy soldiers; since little, girls are taught that the meaning of playing with dolls is neccessary, that it will be useful when they will be mothers (well, I think that that's the subliminar message that lies behind), a lot of the sense of responsability is put into the things that little girls do when they play. With boys, the only thing that matters is to have fun and to prove to be the best of all. Now, take a couple, boy and girl, take these simple ideas, make them grow (let's see what happen to them in their 15-16s), and see the result. If the boy, by chance get a good way with video games (now it does happen a lot), will have a lot of advantage compared with the girl that, most probably, won't have the least interest in video games, at most she would use the computer to have a little fun chatting with his friends or surfing the net. My conclusion is that most girls simply aren't interesed in video games and, worst, some of them (including my girlfriend) simply think that ones like me that like video games are losing their time and are simple a bunch of ummature, lazy and hopeless bums. Well, of course this was taken from the point of view of the society where I'm living.

    1. Re:Differences between women and men by cens0r · · Score: 1

      quite a few studies suggest that girls pick dolls simply because they are genetically programmed to like that sort of thing. There may be more to the nature and less to the nurture than originally thought.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  57. Uh-huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many of these "girl gamers" are male Slashdotters hoping to pick up a date? Something smells fishy, and not in a good way.

  58. I never understood it until... by Kaashar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My fiancee and I have played just about ever genre out there togther. She hands me my butt in FPSs (I used to be better, but she's more accurate now), I whip her in RTS and we have a blast in MMOGs togther.

    I once asked her why she choses gender neutral names when the game offers only male character models, or choses male models 90% of the time when offered a choice.

    It's all about attitude. Most young male gamers are sexist rude pigs towards women. Most of the remaining are more interested in harassing her than playing once they find out she's a 'chick'. They don't care about her aptitude (she's one of the highest characters in our current MMOG ; in FPSs she's always in the top 5% of the game at the moment, etc) they want to know about 'her boobz' and such.

    Sha said it best once before "If I could strip their anonymonity away when acting like that I'd always play a female. Most guys act like assholes because they're anonymous on the internet so they feel they can get away with it."

    And she's right. I'm ashamed at my fellow man (pun intended) when I see how they react. The first time in history gender is transparent we still act like male dogs in heat around a member of the opposite sex.

    Female players who go out of their way to 'stand out' in my opinion are only one step above the male sexist pigs. I've seen the chatbars when she joined an all-girl clan once. I think both of us were equally disgusted at the attention whoring that went on.

    Personally I'm looking forward to the point where this all blows over. It seems once every few months we hear about these 'rare' female gamers out there. There's more than you think folks, they're just playing under male names so they get treated like everybody else.

    1. Re:I never understood it until... by October_30th · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Most guys act like assholes because they're anonymous on the internet so they feel they can get away with it.

      So, I guess that makes Slashdot an equal-opportunity blog, then. Here you get crap from the untold hordes of rabid ACs regardless of your gender.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
  59. Yeah, but separate leagues? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Informative

    My clan has two female players out of roughly 40 total players. We play combat-oriented games. They play in the leagues alongside the rest of us. Their skill is in step with the amount of time they spend playing, just like every other player in our clan. We don't treat them any differently, and they don't demand to be treated differently. If someone sees a "problem" with the fact that females do not like to play these types of games, why alienate the brave few by segregating them in a separate (and likely very small) league.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  60. Nah by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1

    I'd love to have more female opponents in fighting games. For some reason, a girl who can jump-in-HK standing+HP forward+LP into a quarter-circle-forward, half-circle-to-back+HP MAX SDM ending with a forward-down-downforward+LKx2 (one in air) is damned sexy.

  61. Re:Why segregate girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flamebait? do you people enjoy moderating up things that are blatantly incorrect? here is some flamebait.. grab a spoon, and eat the shit out of my ass

  62. and now the important question in our minds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when and where can i arrange a quickie ... session of gaming Ofcourse with these girls

  63. Seperated matches. Oh yeah nice thought. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Geez, I guess it makes sense in physical sports, although according to some reports women may start to outperform men in some of them, where the differences in body would make competition uneven.

    But in non-physical matches? Always wondered why there are no female F1 drivers. Anyone know if women drivers are even allowed?

    Computer game matches are new and so we should have none of this old sexist crap. Jiggling a joystick a twiddling the mouse are skills were build of body don't matter. In online games you don't even know who you are playing against. Unless you got one of those people who think quake is an irc channel. Then you know it is a 12 yr old boy.

    However I am an old person myself and I can understand why some women might be in favor. Personal I would be a in favor of being able to filter game servers on mental age of players.

    The fact is that there are an awful lot of kids out there who think that on the net they can behave as complete assholes. Since I have a somewhat cute nick I get the old A/S/L routine as well. Since I tend to answer "30+/about to/right behind you" they usually shut up but I hate to think what would happen so anyone stupid enough to admit they are female.

    The best online game sessions I have had I had no idea about the other players. Not their age or their location or their sex.

    If we start with seperated matches then we have admitted that we are still a sexist society. I can understand why women might want to play apart from the boys. Just hope they allow old guys who just want to game.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Seperated matches. Oh yeah nice thought. by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1
      Since I have a somewhat cute nick I get the old A/S/L routine as well. Since I tend to answer "30+/about to/right behind you" they usually shut up but I hate to think what would happen so anyone stupid enough to admit they are female.


      In my (limited) (IRC) experience, you don't even have to admit or deny anything. Just use polysyllabic words and confuse them by being friendly, and the information will never actually enter their brains. Not even a photo will reach them if it's somewhat androgynous. Instant, unasked-for, probably very desperate admirers who nonetheless don't seem to be listening. It's depressing how irrelevant text and the thoughts it transports seem in a completely text-based medium.


      (Uhm, I'm not sure polysyllabic was a word before I used it.)

  64. Ummm, earth to boring guy by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Are "gamers" that insecure about their masculinity/sexuality/gaming prowess/dick size/pick something else that they're afraid of playing against girls?

    Since there is no way to mod this "Duh", I had to respond.

    OF COURSE! Have you ever played an online game? There are always those who are (or pretend to be) loud-mouthed, homophobic, racist, misogynist, immature dick-heads. They usually are the ones who cheat and play like tools. They either really are that ignorant, or they do it just to cause a stir and piss people off. Being female would only garner a different type of insult from these morons. They are what make online gaming so annoying. But it is so much fun and gratifying to own them. :-)

    Now I know that not everyone is like this, but the ones who aren't don't care who they are playing against. Most of the time you don't know anyway, you just know people by their screen names and your past experiences with them. For all I know, some of them are women.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  65. Animal Crossing by AgentGray · · Score: 1

    It was Animal Crossing for the 'cube that got my wife hooked on videogames.

    She puts about 20 minutes a day in on it. How many fish can you catch?

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
  66. arguments by Savatte · · Score: 1

    and arguments over whether it's a good idea to have separate women's matches

    I assume these are arguments over the relative merits of hot oil vs jello.

  67. Re:grub IS NOT FUNNY. WHY TF IS HE ALWAYS MODDED U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    personally i think it's hilarious. maybe i just missed the joke 4 years ago?

  68. seperation of men and women... by lambadomy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to bring this up, but there is some reason that it is advantageous for the "girl gamers" to have their own, seperate competitions.

    I remember attending the "all female tournament" for quake 1, and other than the top two or three players, I wouldn't say any of the other girls had any business being in any tournaments. In theory, there is nothing seperating men from women in skill in these games. In practice, it doesn't work that way. The girls, at least so far, are never the top players. Having seperate events for the women gives them a huge advantage in terms of exposure and, well, being in news articles or potentially winning money.

    The reasons for the disparity in skill seem pretty simple. While there is nothing specific keeping any individual girl from being at the top of the heap (that I can think of), the fact that there are umpteen (we'll say 99) times more men playing than women means statistically likely one per 100 of the top players will be a girl, and one per 100 of the top teams will be all girls. Here, we have 7 out of 57 teams. Even if the ratio is not 99:1, I doubt it is anywhere near 7:1. The women are just pulling talent from a smaller pool.

    1. Re:seperation of men and women... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having seperate events for the women gives them a huge advantage in terms of exposure and, well, being in news articles or potentially winning money.

      But your making gender an issue when skill is the issue. An all girls server is wrong, in my opinion, just as an all boys server would be. A "newbie" sever would be better, or a beginners/amatuer tournament. I start out sucking at all online games I play and usually just end up playing the "local" version against the computer most the time. this is usually because I usually enter the scene later than others and am thrust into a server that has been in service for a year or so. If I could have fought it out with newbies for a while, then moved on to a "normal" server it would have been a better experience. Mind you, these shouldn't be enforced as policy, just viable options to people not as skilled.

      Girls only / boys only servers... what is this, the 1800's?

    2. Re:seperation of men and women... by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything about girls only or boys only servers in the article, and I've never heard of them existing - how could you enforce something like that? This is about live tournaments which seperate men and women. And truthfully, I have never heard of a tournament that excluded women from playing in it. While there is often a smaller "girls only" tournament on the side, there is nothing keeping the girls from playing in the main tournament, other than perhaps scheduling issues which prevents playing in both. The fact that there are prizes that exist for the girls with much lower competition (at least in terms of total teams) makes it a no brainer for the girls to play in the girls only tournaments. More teams means more rounds in the tournament and more chances to lose. Why do that when you can win doing less? Personally, I think the girls only tournaments aren't going to help the girls get more recognition - they will never have the same prize money or level of competition due to the lower overall talent level (explained in my previous post). If the best girls instead played in the main tournament every time, they'd face tougher competiton and actually be able to prove themselves instead of complaining about the seperation that only exists becaus they created it.

    3. Re:seperation of men and women... by msimm · · Score: 1

      The girls, at least so far, are never the top players.

      As I have mentioned elsewhere, I am the former leaders of a largish (70+) T2 clan. We had only one female player that I was aware of, but she was our star capper. She was very respected between the other clans and would definately be considered a top player. As far as I can tell there are fewer women playing then men, but thats about all the differnce there is.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  69. GGW by savagedome · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, GGW now stands for Girls in Gaming World and not Girls Gone Wild anymore?

  70. Re:Why segregate girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so harsh on the moderators. They believe that the blowjob fairy is going to visit them in the night because they spent mod points on a pro women post.

  71. I've been most fortunate in this aspect by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 5, Funny

    My wife is an avid gamer, and has handed my butt to me on the proverbial platter several times in UT and UT2003 and now she's mastered (God help us all) the Raptor in the UT2004 demo. I've always been the proud monkey at LAN parties when she starts screaming "How'd you like that one, MotherF***er?" at all my guy friends. The family that plays together, stays together.

    --
    End of Line.
    1. Re:I've been most fortunate in this aspect by djsable · · Score: 1

      Valentines Day? We went and bought Balders Gate II and played it Co-op mode all day.

      That and she baked a cake in the shape of a heart.

      Cake, video games, and a wife who loves you.

      Doesn't get any better than that.

      badger

  72. There should be seperate female competitions by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Funny

    or else they will be constantly kicking the asses of us guys

  73. Whose f*cking bright idea was it... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to put the females in a seperate competition? What a dumbass, sexist thing to do.

    Even appart from the fact that in video games, chess, bridge or any other sport/game which doesn't rely on physical prowess the difference between male and female doesn't come into play; it's just a dumb thing to do.
    I for one would love to compete (or rather: be in the same room...I don't think I'm at their level of play) with Louise and the other girls.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:Whose f*cking bright idea was it... by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      It was largely the girls idea...that and marketers. I remember when things like this first started (at least, I think I do). The quake 1 "all female tournament" was started by Anna Kang, now John Carmack's wife. It turned out that girls who couldn't necessarily win the tournaments for everyone could win the girls-only tournaments, and get prize money. I'm good friends with one of the best female Quake 1 players, and she was able to parlay it into a decent amount of money, even though she wasn't able to win a tournament with the best male players. If people are willing to put up prizes for it, why wouldn't people play?

    2. Re:Whose f*cking bright idea was it... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      So it's basicly a case of money over equality? Not so smart in the long run, even if the girls weren't up for it in the beginning, if you ask me... ...but then again, you didn't :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    3. Re:Whose f*cking bright idea was it... by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, though I think in many cases the girls get to play in both the main tournament and their own, girls only tournament. So then it is win-win for them.

  74. Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by AngelicBadGirl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What exacally is wrong with girls gaming? I'm a female. I love video games... and I play well. Why should I have to play against all girls because some little 15 y/o boy is afraid I will beat him? Any male who thinks we should be seperated needs to grow up. It won't hurt your ego that bad to loose to a girl.

    --
    -ABG
    1. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone thinks anything's wrong with it (unless they think gaming itself is wrong), and yah, separation on the basis of sex is a little absurd. If competition seems too much for some, wouldn't some kind of beginners league serve the same purpose? To state the blatantly obvious, video games aren't weightlifting. (Even with "physical" sports like running or swimming, being male doesn't necessarily give you an advantage. Why should a naturally overweight boy be judged more harshly in school sports than a naturally "fit" girl? Never quite understood that. Not every girl is weaker than every boy.)

    2. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by Nick_dm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As some people on here have mentioned, the push towards this didn't come from the whole (male dominated) community. Many girls chose to play in teams that are female only. When I started playing 4-5 years ago there were only a handfull of female only teams, and girl gamers scattered around other teams. There were plenty of all male teams, but these weren't "male only", it was because of practical (not many girls about) rather than ideological reasons.

      I'm not sure whether the trend towards segregation was started from females who were sick of men looking down on them (I've never noticed it in the circles I've hung out in, but I'm sure it happens, maybe more in some communities) or whether it game from organisers looking for a gimick. Certainly I think some female 1on1 tournaments were held before the team ones became common, and guys were certainly not pro-segregation (girls having a tournament to themselfs with prize money, when they could enter in the main tournament too, that made some guys pretty annoyed).

    3. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by Kong99 · · Score: 1
      You'd be surprised at how fragile most of these teenage boys egos are! Why do you think there is some much cheating? A lot of these young males play online game to feel worthwhile, for many, not all mind you, but for many losing to a girl is just a disaster. I think this will change over time as more girls play FPS games and demonstrate they can play just as well as the boys. But overall there is still currently a mindset that girls can't play FPS games well. So to lose to a girl would mean as a boy you really suck. Not much different than say a boy losing a foot race to a girl. The girl may be very fast but the losing boy will still get harassed by other boys for losing to a "GIRL"!!

      I am sure many of these boys would be just as upset if they found out that an old man like me was kickin their cheese! I am 35!

    4. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by FoogyFoo · · Score: 1

      It won't hurt your ego that bad to loose to a girl.

      Yeah, but to lose to a loose girl might

    5. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should I have to play against all girls

      Well, 1) because some girls just like to play with other girls, and 2) because guys are getting tired of women demanding equality, but only at their convenience and only when it suits them. i.e. the feminists who demanded that Annika Sorenstam be allowed to play with the men because she was good enough. However, there are plenty of male golfers who can't compete with Tiger Woods but could do well in the LGPA, so why not let them play in women's tournaments? Demanding to be allowed into the men's clubhouse while still having a sign outside yours saying "no boys allowed" is lame hypocrisy.

      all girls because some little 15 y/o boy is afraid I will beat him? Any male who thinks we should be seperated needs to grow up. It won't hurt your ego that bad to loose to a girl.

      If you're demanding respect you might consider showing some, and lay off the "little boy" schtick.

    6. Re:Whats wrong with Girls Gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will hurt their egos that much. I was ranked 3rd overall in Laser Tag in Colorado Springs for several years during High School. You would not believe the shit I put up with.

      I'd have had her, but my laser wasn't working. You guys should like, check the sighting on pack 5.

      Her hair got in the way of the targets (Total bs, it was tucked under the pack, but after which I wore it pulled back and continued doing well).

      Fog was watching her back (are you kidding?? We are related!! Sibling Rivalry people. Fog was ranked fourth so helping me was not on the menu even if I would accept fog's help).

      and on and on and on.

      Bah. Humbug.

  75. Re:Why segregate girls? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    statistics can also confirm that you are a dumbass. But are you really? probably not.

    What are you going to say when your daughter wants to join the air force? "No, sorry dear but you probably won't make it since men have a better chance at having the neccesary physical and psychological attributes. Your time would be better suited to tailoring my pants. Go help your mom now."

    If men have historically been the only ones to be fighter pilots, of course there will be some time before you see the same amount of women as men. Does the U.S. armed forces even allow women as fighter piots yet? i know a girl from childhood in the army who is a helicopter pilot, but for transport. Are women allowed in "combat" position?

    chrissake, the same with CS curriculums. Just because there might only be 1 girl to every 5 guys, does that mean statistics show girls don't have what it takes to understand a computer system? of course not.

  76. *cough* by Tei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you know Teens?

    men-teens try to show thei are the "stronger" and "better". Girls not. And men-teens do the same with videogames, and this why Girls dont want to play most videogames, except..

    tetris (and that similar crap)
    sims (i guess..)
    buble booble

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for god sakes im a teen girl and me joy and fun is killing things on games, always have and always will. Sims is to slow and just doesnt have the fun in interacting with other people and killing things. Yes I know I'm different from other girls but that doesnt matter here. So will everyone just know girl are here to stay.

    2. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you filthy bitch and make me a sammich.

    3. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in the wrong place, Fark is over that way.

    4. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it with "sammich"? That sounds like a retarded monkey with a lisp trying to talk. Typing "sandwich" only takes one more letter. And "sammich" isn't any closer to how it's usually pronounced (maybe like "sanwich") unless you're a retarded monkey.

      also, if you can't think of anything more useful for a bitch to do than that, you must be a fudge packing gay homo faggot ass pirate metrosexual, so shut up.

    5. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the gayest reply ever. My hat is off to you, assbutter.

    6. Re:*cough* by MorphKittie · · Score: 1

      um where you dropped on your head when you where bored and i still stay true to what i wrote girls are gamers and forever we will stay and we will take over the world over men.....can i have a sammich now? -laughs and smacks him-

  77. just a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares if you play against a female.. I for one would invite ALL of those female in that article over for a LAN party. Having a pretty cool chick can brighten a guys life.

  78. Re:Why segregate girls? by GTownBeast · · Score: 1

    This isn't a contest of who's stronger, it's a contest of wits. If you take a girl and a guy who like gaming and have done it before, and have them play the same amount of time, their skills will advance at approximately the same pace. The reason for fewer girl gamers is that most don't enjoy it. The girls who do enjoy it and play regularly are good. It's not that hard to figure out.

    --
    Rumor has it... that Catholic School Girls Rule
  79. Fighter pilots by drox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, there are lady fighter pilots, women who can exert the concentration and coordination necessary for Uncle Sam to trust them with $100M toys...All I'm saying is that statistics confirm that there are not many of them.

    Actually, women (on average; we all know women AND men who are exceptions) tend to excel at just the kind of skills fighter pilots (and kick-ass gamers) need. Good reflexes, eye/hand coordination, etc. But fighter plane cockpits are crammed with equipment and most of it is designed with a MALE pilot in mind, i.e. 5'9" or taller. The best reflexes in the world aren't going to help you if you can't reach the controls.

    1. Re:Fighter pilots by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "most of it is designed with a MALE pilot in mind, i.e. 5'9" or taller."

      Historically it's been exactly the opposite: fighters were designed for men of average height, 5'9 to 5'10", not "5'9 and taller". You wouldn't want to be 6'6" in the cockpit of a F-16. Not saying a 6'1 or 6'2 guy couldn't fit, just saying it's more comfortable for a shorter, slimmer person.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  80. Another cartoon by dapyx · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    1. Re:Another cartoon by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      And hence why girls will always be the best assassins.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  81. women get treated differently online by CresentCityRon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was playing an online game ( I think it was Battlezone by Activision) a few years ago and my handle was gender neutral. Someone asked if I was male / female. I was taken back by that question as why would it matter? I said female to see if it mattered. Boy did it. I had players taking damage by jumping between me and an opponent, players nearly killing off someone and then leaving the prey for me to finish off to up my score, and even offering tips! Normal protocol is to be mean, rude, and blast everything that moves and even some that don't.

    Its one world but not everyone experiences it the same way.

    1. Re:women get treated differently online by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

      Maybe what many people who are critical of segregating or creating seperate leagues along gender-lines are ignorant of the kind of behaviors you describe. Many critics of segregation think the bias either makes the game more exciting by adding the emphasis on gender, or think that seemingly mature guys are no longer influenced by women/psuedonyms. The truth is that it will always make a difference in behavior without regard to the skill level of the individuals.

      Pair-bonding/survival behaviors are hard-wired and compulsive in males and there's an underlying expectation of them from females. It's the reason why a female can abuse a male in a public setting and know that a reprisal will trigger a retailitory response from every nearby anonymous male. These behaviors and the anticipation of them exist at such a low level that individuals exhibiting them are not always concious of them. In a social/survival context, these behaviors influence/introduce potential mates and create/reinforce relationships. This kind of deferential/sacrifical behavior has done our species a great service in meatspace (breeders must survive!!) but in a video game it's unnecessary social noise.

      If gamers are serious about creating a competitive environment for large communities where real-world swag is up for grabs, then the planet has a nearly infinite variety of non-gender handles any player could be proud to use. It's not about androgeny, it's about neutralizing the social noise between genders in a competition. What would really rock would be to generate in-game random handles for the players and only let the audience know who they are until the match is completed and the actual player-handles are revealed on the leader-board.

      As for luck, skill, and technical prowess in a game...I eagerly await the birthright lotteries and the kind of online gamers that will produce.

      --
      Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    2. Re:women get treated differently online by phorm · · Score: 1

      At the end of the game, did you tell them you were actually a guy? It would have been pretty fun to see the reaction, provided you weren't planning on coming back to that particular server (with that handle) anytime too soon.

    3. Re:women get treated differently online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OK, so guys like to show off in front of girls ...

      Why would they do this at the risk of losing real money in a competive environment? Isn't that giving the advantage to female players?

      For on-line gaming in general, everyone socially engineers (some more then others) and they don't do it subconsciously. It isn't noise, it is an enriching part of the online gaming experience. The whole point of playing with human team-mates again human opponents is that they are ... human, warts and all.

    4. Re:women get treated differently online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's terribly clever and original. At least that's what I thought when I pretended to be a girl to get extra attention on a BBS back in 1980. But actually it was stupid and trite even then. It certainly hasn't gotten any fresher with age.

    5. Re:women get treated differently online by danila · · Score: 1

      OK, so guys like to show off in front of girls ...

      Why would they do this at the risk of losing real money in a competive environment? Isn't that giving the advantage to female players?


      Genetically guys aren't programmed to compete with girls, they compete FOR girls with other male players.

      Personally, I don't care about the human person on the other end of the connection at all. I am playing with game characters in a virtual world. It's not like I can get laid in UT2004 Onslaught game - the matches are too short, there is no privacy, you can get killed at any moment and player models don't have private parts anyway. :) So my teammates are just that - teammates, colleagues, friends for a few hours...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  82. I play CoD in a clan... by cs02rm0 · · Score: 1

    ...(well it's not like anyone round here can take the piss for being geeky)...

    ...and we have a 'girl' (mid-20s) and she can hold her own, so I don't see why she shouldn't play (and we're not a crap clan).

  83. Remember by El · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "On the internet, knowbody knows you're a dog." If I can't tell the gender of the people I'm playing against, what difference does it make? Sure, people that self-identify as female get treated different in role playing games, but half the people are misidentifying themselves anyway. In FPS games, gender doesn't seem to make any difference -- you frag your enemies and cover your friends. If they really obeyed the laws of physic, smaller players would be harder to shoot, but I don't know of any games that actually do this. Maybe it's different face to face, but I've played at gaming centers against people in the same room and still didn't know which of them was in the game with me. (By the way, it was the first time I'd ever played against humans and I got my ass handed to me on a platter.)

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  84. Maybe females are better? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There is a lot of talk on this subject about how "everyone is equal" for an online game... maybe not.

    Just google the usenet groups for "female fine motor skills" and you will see lots of discussion on the topic, including relevant places such as rec.guns and rec.games...

    I think coed games are just fine. I like to play fps against real people and I don't care who they are.

    As far as fairness, I'd tend to think skill, connection speed and location relative to the server are more important that physical differences between M/F.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  85. Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let them compete on an equal footing initially. If it really turns out that there is such a clear deliniation in ability, then you have a great case for a separate league. If not, then we've just eliminated a lot of unnecessary organizational overhead.
    .
    Seems fairly straigtforward.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree. I don't play video games, so I don't honestly know how well the women are received in the community. And, I don't really care if they play in the same league or separate. But, what you are suggesting is complete shit.

      If you are going to have them playing in the same league, then have them play in the same league. But, don't switch afterward if you find out that they all finish in the bottom quarter. If the women find that they can't compete, they can always stop playing and form their own league, but it should not be the responsibility of whoever runs the current league. Then again, if they decide to separate the leagues to begin with, I wouldn't have any problems with it.

      What it boils down to is this: If you want me to treat you as an equal, I'll treat you as an equal. But, don't come crying to me when you can't compete and say that you want me to give you special treatment!

    2. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by Eivind · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sure. I'm all for letting girls who want to try their luck in the male classes. There's no reason not to.

      Some though, would feel that allowing that would further underline the differences. Today we can all play make-believe and say there's one class only for girls, one only for boys, so it's equal in a way.

      If we let girls compete whereever they choose (and I see no reason not to) then we also need to be intellectually honest enough that there's one "free for all" class, and one "females only", and we can no longer pretend it's "equal".

      The risk is that this would further undermine the status of the females-only class. It'd be sorta like there's special classes in many sports for "only those under 16".

      You'd have a situation where it'd basically be a male as "World-Champion" (or whatever) in any sport, and the females would be relegated to "World-Champion - female only class"

      It's a tricky bussiness. It's tricky because we have this ideal, and the political correctness, that we're supposed to be equal. And the fact of the matter is that today we are not. In some sports, like those where muscle-mass play a role, we'll never be. In others, where muscles are irrelevant, we *migth* get there some day, but today we're not. (Personally I'd be overjoyed to see a female F1-winner or chess grandmaster)

    3. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let them compete on an equal footing initially. If it really turns out that there is such a clear deliniation in ability, then you have a great case for a separate league. If not, then we've just eliminated a lot of unnecessary organizational overhead.

      and leagues have been playing Counterstrike for roughly 3 years allowing anyone, male or female, to play on any team in any ladder. The question that isn't asked by this article is "who requested the ladders be seperated?". To say the least, it should've been the question asked before the article was even considered.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    4. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many men were allowed in 'DoMe' ? None, because it's a female only clan ! I highly doubt that the 50 not-female-only clans were infact male-only. I also doubt that they couldn't have joined in with the 'male-only' clans if they hadn't of advertised them as being a sexest clan.

      It would be nice to know how many of the 'male-only' clans actually contained females. I have a had time believing a clan would be barred from playing becuase they were mixed genders.

    5. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really simple, imo:

      everything between males and females (including but not restricted to on-line gaming :-) rises and falls with the difference between "be equal" and "have equal rights". male and female are _not_ equal. if they were, i either didn't have a dick, or i'd have breasts :-)

      stating that men and women are equal is not 'politically correct', it is just plain and simple 'wrong'.

      "have equal rights" -- thats something differenet. it doesn't have anything to do with "be equal". male and female do _not_ need to have the same opportunities. they do not need to have the same chances, and they do not need to have the same difficulties. let's face it: i, as an average man, don't have the problems an average woman would have when, for example, trying to carry heavy suitcases. instead, jane average woman could do other things more easy than me average joe can.

      "have equal rights" means only that i don't make a woman's life harder that it already is, if she doesn't.

      additionally, i could say: i make a woman's life better if she does the same to me (="be fair") or i make it better if i can, even if she doesn't do the same (="be a gentleman").

    6. Re:Okay, so let's put that theory to the test... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      If we let girls compete whereever they choose (and I see no reason not to) then we also need to be intellectually honest enough that there's one "free for all" class, and one "females only", and we can no longer pretend it's "equal".

      I'm sorry, where's the need for a 'females only' class? Who's calling for it, apart from insecure immature males?

      You'd have a situation where it'd basically be a male as "World-Champion" (or whatever) in any sport, and the females would be relegated to "World-Champion - female only class"

      Unless, of course, you had a female world champion in the open class, which is a priori equally likely. Women can't win at the highest level in the toughest sport in the world? Tell that to Ellen MacArthur.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  86. Women *WANT* segregation. by raehl · · Score: 1

    At least, the women who would compete in women's-only competitions want it.

    There's no one keeping women OUT of regular competitions. But since the vast majority of FPS-game players are male, the vast majority of ueber-good FPS game players are also male, and the best male players are *SIGNIFICANTLY* better than the best female players.

    It's the same anytime you have two groups, one of which is significantly larger than the other. The larger group will have 10 top-tier players, and maybe 100 2nd tier players, while the smaller group will have 1 top-tier player and 10 2nd teir players. Get one group (the males) to play against another group (the females) and the smaller group (in this case the females) will get creamed almost every single time.

    While I'm sure it's possible for women to be successful FPS-gamers on an individual basis, if they insist on segregating themselves on all-female teams instead of getting on teams with other gamers who are better (but also male), women and the female teams they are on will need a separate division from male teams as the best male teams will regularly annihilate the best female teams.

    It's a numbers/social thing, not a gender thing.

  87. I'll second that.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    We had a clan (T2) with over 70 players. We had ONE girl among them, but she was our start capper (flag grabber, CTF). She was well respected and not just by the members of our own clan. I've seen a few girls in various games since and they play just as good (or poorly) as their male counterparts.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  88. Men have feelings too! by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hear hear. I could be beaten by blind,pre-pubescent paraplegics with bad hearing all the live-long day and I'd still enjoy the experience. But it's ruined when some whiny brat from Jerkwater, USA calls me a "cheting haker" because I got a head-shot.Once.

    To think that only women are subject to abuse is either naievity or ego.

    1. Re:Men have feelings too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I certainly agree with this, but honestly I found that the abuse dished out to women was more creative and focused. You get the more vulgar forms of "dumb bitch who should go back to doing dishes" on top of the cheting haker. You get more of the cheating hacker because its a proven fact girls can't make a headshot unless they have an aimbot or their boyfriend is ringing for them(the excuse a Q3 clan provided for kicking me out when they found I was female). The community is undeniably hostile for all, but it a has a number of members that go out of their way to make sure girls/homosexuals/ect don't participate.

  89. Not the usual... by Psychotext · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've actually been very suprised recently by finding out how outright hostile women can be towards games / gamers. A friend of mine was staying over with his girlfriend and she stopped him from playing on the console with us. She even threatened to go and stay in a hotel if he started playing. I was gobsmacked. She softened up a bit in the end when I taught her the buttons on one game and she managed to beat my mate on quite a few occasions.

    I suppose I'm quite lucky on that front. My missus plays games more than I do (More spare time) and recently I've noticed that she's managing to kick my ass on certain games. I dont know if it's a gender thing but she seems much more able (Patience might come into it) to learn and pull off the combos in fighting games. I don't even attempt to play Soul Calibur 2 or DOA against her anymore!

    I wonder how many other people have experienced such extreme hostility towards playing games from their significant others? I know that my brother gets grief every time he puts a game on and as such very rarely gets a chance to play games anymore.

    --
    People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    1. Re:Not the usual... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it's just annoying when somebody you want to spend time *with* goes off into his/her own little (and often rather idiotic-seeming) world of frags, preferring it over you. It soon gets boring to watch, and what's worse is how you just know (or at least think) there simply *is* no such thing as a "quick game of (whatever they're addicted to)". It's like your mommy's talking on the phone for hours when you really, really, really *right now* NEED to ask her why there's no snow this year (assuming you're 5 years old). Not that I *have* a S.O. ...sigh. So my vote goes to the maximum tolerance toward gamers faction.

    2. Re:Not the usual... by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      I certainly see your point, but in my eyes it's no different than the lady in your life sitting and going into a trance over Joe Millionaire or Friends (Insert show here). It's certainly not an excuse to have a go at them or act like a 5 year old because they aren't spending time with you.

      Perhaps that's the female thing though, maybe it's just that men like a bit of time to themselves and women would rather spend it together. Still, there are always two player games! Better still perhaps are adventure games or games with strong storylines that you can both get into.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    3. Re:Not the usual... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      And I didn't mean to say this is an inherently "gendered" problem (hence my "his/her"), or limited to video games.

      Adventure games are of course ideal for playing together. (In fact, many of them I couldn't play any other way because I suck at puzzles.)

  90. My Wife... by localman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...was regularly ranked in the top ten Tribes players in the world, according to the realtime stats at some site that tracks such things. She used to play 10+ hours/day 5+ days/week.

    It was interesting to see the varied reactions of the guys. She didn't advertise that she was female, but if it came up the first reaction was usually disbelief and dismissal -- they assumed she was a guy lying about his gender. Then after adequate proof (using voice comm in game, for example) they'd be surprised, but accept the truth. Then they wanted to see pictures.

    There were basically two reactions: anger and attraction. It was usually the younger guys who got angry -- for some reason they were pissed off that a girl could beat them. They'd get all bitchy at her and call her names, claim she was cheating and disappear. Maybe they'd be like that with anyone. Who knows?

    Most of the older guys (heh -- meaning past puberty) ended up getting attracted to her. In fact a whole bunch of guys would flock around her online wherever she went... be it gaming, or IRC.

    She went to TribesCon IV in Reno a couple years ago, and she was one of maybe three girls who came to play... out of 200+ total gamers. There were lots of girlfriends there, but they stayed off to the side.

    Some of the guys became quite taken with her (it doesn't hurt that she's a hottie). Which got a little weird. Eventually she retired and got back into real life.

    Cheers.

    1. Re:My Wife... by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think we can expect women to be more of a force in the physical world of gaming soon... My girlfriend plays more Gunbound than I do and is probably better at it than I am.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    2. Re:My Wife... by benploni · · Score: 1

      Better Pic of his wife. ;-)

    3. Re:My Wife... by djsable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife is so into games, that she just completed a certificate course for becoming a Games Tester, and is currently applying to several local gaming houses.

      And she is constantly annoyed at all the T&A in most video games. It is fairly infantile the amount of skin that most female characters show in video games. Women are not built like that, nor do they normally dress like that. (Although some will if you pay them $100 a half hour, and will other things besides.)

      It seems that the majority of game developers are 12 year old boys with over-active immaginations and a lifetime subscription to playboy magazine because that is how they portray women in games.

      Girl Gamers are out there, and they spend money. Lots of money. She buys just as many games as I do, and to ignore, dismiss, or otherwise belittle that marketing slice is not a really good idea at all.

      badger

    4. Re:My Wife... by localman · · Score: 1

      BTW -- she just got her braces off, but we don't have any pictures since then. Now her hotness is complete ;)

    5. Re:My Wife... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Women are not built like that, nor do they normally dress like that.

      So what? Much like in comics, men aren't any more realistically portrayed in games than women are. Feminists whine about how the women are all thin, attractive and have huge breasts, ignoring the fact that the men are built like brick shithouses and are hung like rhynos. Even guys like Bruce Banner and pre-spider bite Peter Parker, who supposedly were the origional 98 pound weakings, look like they have 1% body fat and work out six days a week.

    6. Re:My Wife... by enol · · Score: 1

      Amen. Yup that's how it's usually been. The reactions really are anger or attraction. I've been a gamer (I'm a female as well) for a long time and when guys find out your sex (I won't advertise, but if they ask I won't lie) they get competitive, determined to kill you at every turn, or start talking to you in that different "tone" (sort of like the virtual version of "How YOU doin'")

      Frankly, most of the guys are gents. But that awkwardness is there and I can't say I like it much, even sometimes among my clan buds. Before voice comm, it didn't matter, it was easier to go incognito. After all, it's really just about the game. After the popular usage of comms though, it's harder to avoid these "social" effects. I'm sure it's much more obvious in LAN parties and gaming competitions.

      Easy solution: guys get used to have girls in their midst. All these issues become totally moot.

    7. Re:My Wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting tired...

      I just misread "ranked" as "naked". Let's hear it for bad email viruses.

  91. That is simple by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    When you saw the first picture, your first question was 'Wonder how well she does', or 'Does she frequent my server', right? There was never a thought about non-stick cooking spray and gravity boots, correct?

    Come on, why pick on the women for having sexual names, I kind of LIKE the attitude, and think it should be encouraged.

    -Charlie

    1. Re:That is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, why pick on the women for having sexual names, I kind of LIKE the attitude, and think it should be encouraged.

      Oh sure, but when I play RTCW:ET with the nickname "Long Dong Silver", everyone gets all up in arms.

  92. Gals that play Wolfenstein {RTCW} by Avada+Kedavra · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that girls on the HP Wolf servers tend to play in the medic class. Not sure why
    though.

  93. Not a gender issue by Vhalkyrie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a female gamer - I have been since I was 5 years old. I've always had a computer in my house since my Atari 2600 and Commodore Vic-20. I am heterosexual, attractive, working on my bachelors in mathematics and computer science, and play video games of all genre's - FPS, strategy, roleplaying, action, etc, etc. When I was growing up, I never saw a difference between 'boy toys' and 'girl toys' - I played with hot wheels cars with the neighbor boys and I had barbies as well, who always had a career of their own in my imaginary world. When playing with legos, I could reverse engineer every model listed on the box, but lacked the artistic flare to create my own images from scratch.

    When I play games, I prefer to play a female avatar. There are a few male jerks who are just trying to cyb0r, but most are very cool. Nearly all of my online friends are guys who treat me exactly as I expect to be treated among my peers. They aren't looking for a girlfriend, they're just looking for a friend to play games with.

    However, when I am in an IRC tech channel, I go by a male alias. While I am all for proving existing stereotypes wrong, I'm tired of arguing the same points over and over again. Unfortunately, I have found having a male alias gives me instant credibility that I don't get with a female alias. The bias is that I am an oddity, and therefore have to not only fight my point, but also the preconceived notion that I'm not supposed to know what I know.

    I've always had a very, very strong interest in the sciences, and they were my favorite classes in school. I don't believe my aptitude and interest in science and gaming has anything at all with me being an oddity among my gender, but more with my upbringing that I never saw the difference between 'boy' interests and 'girl' interests.

  94. Re:Why segregate girls? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does the U.S. armed forces even allow women as fighter pilots yet? i

    For about a decade now.

  95. This is a very significant effect by kahei · · Score: 1


    Here's a little experiment anyone can try: make a new male character and log onto GunBound. It's a fun, easy, free-to-get started game found here:

    http://gunbound.net/

    Play a few games as a male and see what happens if you ask questions and generally make like a noob. Look, many semi-literate teens are swearing at you and saying your weapon is cheap and going 'lol noob' and so on. Now make a female character and play the same way. Now, people even tell you the rules when you ask!

    It just plain makes more sense to play as a girl. Boys are pathetically helpful, girls stick together with you.

    Even the more grown-up players (not many on GunBound, really) seem to just look on you with that much more favor. I think it's partly because girls (and boys playing as girls) are less likely to spout abuse / gloat about leet skilz / generally care too much. As a result, people are friendlier to girls and it's slightly nicer to play with them.

    I think that in a game with older, more mature players, and in games like Day of Defeat where people tend to play quite seriously, the effect is somewhat weaker -- but it's still there.

    I'd also say this effect extends into many, many areas of IT and professional life -- given a male and a female applicant of equal skill, everyone I know in my position would hire the female because it's just better for business.

    Such is life.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  96. Again? by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just crazy, but it's almost as if females are getting over-exposure in the gaming world as goddesses or stand-out individuals. In truth, most of them just want to be treated equally, and not be shown as some person that we should all revere. Respect them like you would any other gamer stranger.

    This is coming from my experience with my girlfriend who is just as much of a gamer as I am.
    Of course, her birthday is on Xmas, but still insists to NOT treat her any more special than we would if her birthday wasn't there, so she may just be forcing the great equalizer issue.

  97. One of the reasons. by tigress · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just want to say that the comments from the male crowd here alone is a very good indication of why there aren't as many girl gamers.

    We simply do not get any respect.

    A common misconception about girls that play games is that they play "boring online games", such as Yahoo games, solitare, chess or whatever. Yes, many girls play those kinds of games. However, so do many guys. The thing is, most of those guys would never post here, and most of those girls are the only ones the average slashdotter would see (Yeah, I'm using a stereotype here, so sue me).

    Another common misconception is that games are marketed towards guys because there aren't as many girls that do play "the cool" games. This is a matter of market forces. While I agree that there are fewer girls that play games than guys, the number of girls that play games isn't really that low. In fact, most of my female friends play games. Females make up 51% of the world population, after all, so there's a HUGE market out there.

    A third misconception is that girls aren't interested in games. Totally wrong, see above. Girls ARE interested in games. Obviously.

    These are misconceptions that are repeated constantly. We girls are simply seen as people who aren't techy. If one of us IS, then we're seen as not as competent as a guy. If we prove to be competent, then we suddenly turn into a threat. All of those are reasons to talk down to girls, not just in gaming, but in other areas as well.

    I can tell you one thing that girls are though. We're not interested in being called names, just because we try to show an interest in the very same field as guys.

    Maybe, just maybe, more girls would confess to being gamers if they weren't insulted whenever they tried it.

    (Okay, maybe this post wasn't so thought through, but I'm currently busy starving myself to keep my figure.... or maybe I'm just delirious from coding all day and forgetting to eat. Bah, whatever.)

    1. Re:One of the reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cry me a river.

      Try playing with a male avatar on any online rpg vs a female avatar on the same and see the difference in how you are treated.

      Then talk about who gets respect.

    2. Re:One of the reasons. by tigress · · Score: 1

      When I play with the male avatar, I don't get hit on by horny teenagers.

      When I play with the male avatar, I get respect for being a good player, just just my attributes.

    3. Re:One of the reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I play with a male avatar, I get randomly attacked without even typing anything just so others can prove that I'm teh ghey and they are teh 1337.

      When I play with a female avatar, everyone is hospitable, friendly and acts their roles suddenly.

      Clearly we are living in two completely different worlds.

    4. Re:One of the reasons. by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1
      We simply do not get any respect.

      In gaming (FPS especially), you do not get respect because of your gender, you earn it based on your talent.

      If you're learning a game and you make newbie mistakes, people are going to fling insults, especially if you hurt your team or other players in the process. Now, you can either be offended by that, or you can take that as a challenge to improve your play.

      We girls are simply seen as people who aren't techy. If one of us IS, then we're seen as not as competent as a guy. If we prove to be competent, then we suddenly turn into a threat.

      Online games are competitions. You either suck or are treated as a threat (regardless of gender). Most of us would like to be considered a threat when we're playing Counter Strike or Enemy Territory, so I don't see what your problem is.
      --

      ÕÕ

    5. Re:One of the reasons. by JavaLord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We simply do not get any respect.

      No, you probably get treated the same way guys do when they play online games, especially FPS games.

      Females make up 51% of the world population, after all, so there's a HUGE market out there.

      Yes, but this doesn't mean they make up 51% of the video game playing population. While gaming may be popular with younger women nowadays, there is still a huge gap in the 25+ aged women who just don't play games at all (outside of slots, solitare, pogo, etc) . To them, there is still a social stigma against it.

      I can tell you one thing that girls are though. We're not interested in being called names, just because we try to show an interest in the very same field as guys.

      Anyone in an online game gets called names. Seriously, I'm sure that anyone who plays a FPS game here has been 'flamed or lamed' at one point or another. Don't expect special treatment because you are a girl, of a certain race, etc.

      To see my point, go into a fps with a neutral nickname and announce you are of a certain ethnic group and see how long it takes for people to bring that up. People aren't picking on you because you are a girl, it's because you are there and they do it to everyone else also.

      We girls are simply seen as people who aren't techy

      Look at the gender breakdown of computer science or mathmatics majors that finish with a degree. It's not that you are seen as not being _techy_ it's that most of you aren't. That doesn't mean you can't be, it's just that most girls aren't interested in that kind of stuff.

      In fact, most of my female friends play games.

      Yes, but that doesn't mean most females play games. Most of my friends work in IT, but that doesn't mean 75% of the world works in IT.

      Maybe, just maybe, more girls would confess to being gamers if they weren't insulted whenever they tried it.

      It seems to me girls are encouraged to play (given free things, invited to join clans, etc) more than men are. Like I mentioned before, if you get called names online it's not beacuse you are a girl, it's just because you are there.

    6. Re:One of the reasons. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      You can spout off about all the "misconceptions" until you pass out, but I don't see any evidence to back up your claims. The women I've seen play console games really _do_ seem to be more interested in Dance Dance Revolution. I know at least one guy that's into it too, but he also plays LOTS of games. I've known one woman who's into games like Thief and Diablo, but for the most part that's it.

      I've played FPSs with women before, and they had fun, but they just weren't into it as much as the guys were. Women may play computer games some, but I think it's the guys who're the real hardcore gamers. I don't think I'm particularly unusual, but I keep hearing these "misconceptions of women gamers", but no real evidence to back it up and it conflicts with my real world experience. Sorry, but it just smacks of politicism.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:One of the reasons. by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Whoa, hold on. I hear this a lot, and you're partially right, there are guys who don't respect girls. No argument here. I bet this has been going on pretty much since we were consciously aware of the difference, and I doubt it's going to change soon :P

      *But*. There are guys who *do* respect girls - and there are also guys who consider girls "just another person that happens to have different anatomy." And you don't hear from us because we don't feel any need to broadcast it. I mean, would you honestly prefer getting bombarded by people saying "Hi, I'm going to talk to you the exact same way, I promise"?

      I know plenty of people who have no trouble dealing with both genders online. I personally don't even know which gender the people are (a few weeks ago we realized that every single "female" player in our FFXI linkshell was actually male, while a few "male" players were actually female. So it goes.) But if we don't broadcast the fact that we don't care, nobody even notices!

      So please, tell me what I'm supposed to be doing here. If I talk down to girls, I'm evil. If I explicitly say "hi, you're a girl, and I don't mind that" I'm evil. If I don't mention anything, I'm still evil-by-association. How exactly am I supposed to get on your good side?

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    8. Re:One of the reasons. by tigress · · Score: 1

      Actually, you just did get on my good side. By getting it.

      I know there are lots of guys that respect girls. Unfortunately, there are too many that don't, that's what discourages a lot of female would-be-gamers.

    9. Re:One of the reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you just did get on my good side. By getting it.

      Just because someone agrees with your misguided opinion, that doesn't make it right. Get off your high horse. You get treated like every other player in a FPS game. Badly. The only thing that earns you respect in a FPS game is skill. Not gender or friendlyness. Maybe that doesn't fit in to your world, but tough shit that is the way it is.

    10. Re:One of the reasons. by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      I've been playing video games since Doom II came out and playing online since quake 1. I've been a member of the Q3 CTF community for over 4 years and won a spot at the qcon CTF tourney held this past august.

      That being said the parent is correct. Women get absolutely not respect in gaming. I know more than a few female gamers, my g/f included, and it is really pathetic the type of bullshit they have to put up with. Many just change their names to something that doesn't show their gender. Some women seem to like the sexually suggestive comments made on an hourly basis but they are in the minority.

      You may be quick to think that this is a bunch of pre-pubecent males who are acting out the only way they know how by insulting and trying to degrade but the fact is most of these guys are my age, (27).

      Anyway I know a lot of female gamers that kick ass and can/are in clans that are very good. Hopefully the gaming communities will get better and we can all just STFU and Play ...but we'll see.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    11. Re:One of the reasons. by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      I'd say there are 3 types of reactions women get in gaming communities:

      1) Hey baby wanna have the sex0r? (asshole)

      2) Oh you're a girl? Want to join my clan? (suckup)

      3) Lets play... (people like u and me)

      I don't know what the majority is but if you ask my g/f she'd probably say #1

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    12. Re:One of the reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We simply do not get any respect.
      more girls would confess to being gamers if they weren't insulted whenever they tried it.
      Mine is 8 inches [8in.net]


      But you're still making crude implied penis jokes in your signature?

      No offense (and I have ample respect for girls playing online, my 16-year old cousin is a much better gamer than me), but it seems a little unfair to be complaining about gender issues if you're not ignoring them yourself.

    13. Re:One of the reasons. by shadow-9 · · Score: 1

      >We simply do not get any respect.

      Not true; never is if you're actually interested in the game and not in just being around the guys. I've never been disrespected for my ability to play any game with guys--(Diplomacy and AD&D and chess--yes, non-computer games I played a long time ago), Ultima, Diablo, Dungeon Siege, Unreal Tourn., RoadKill, etc. I think actually that guys are fair and just to women. Oh sure, you'll see one or two who won't play against you out of some old-fashioned chivalrous idea of theirs, but otherwise guys are very cool and willing to have you join in, as long as you're serious about the game like they are.

      >one of us IS, then we're seen as not as
      >competent as a guy. If we prove to be
      >competent, then we suddenly turn into a threat.

      Yes, you really are going into stereotypes--of your own. It's rude to tell lies about anyone, and especially guys on this topic.

      >Maybe, just maybe, more girls would confess to
      >being gamers if they weren't insulted whenever
      >they tried it.

      Look around you. The serious gamers who are from the female sex are speaking up all over this board, and are playing all over the Net. We're not being discriminated against. You don't have to wear the feminist-colored glasses for EVERY topic you think about. We're not a second-class race here, we're gamers like the rest of them. Don't relegate the women to, "oh, maybe someday I'll speak out when I feel comfortable enough too, when the big, bad guys stop bullying me! boo-hoo." When I read words like yours, I DO start to feel discriminated against--by you!

      Thanks, and try to have a cheery day, won't you??? :-)

      (Oh, yeah, did I mention I'm female? Why do I have to keep doing that? ;-)

    14. Re:One of the reasons. by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause God knows men never have to put up with degrading comments from women in any social setting.

    15. Re:One of the reasons. by danila · · Score: 1

      Funny, your post made me remember my sister again. She doesn't like the story in games, she usually ignores the cut scenes and goes straigt to the shooting, running, jumping, whatever. :) When playing GTA, Tomb Raider, XIII or something else she would inevitably miss some important information about what you were actually supposed to do in some particular level and come to me begging to download her a walkthrough. :) So much for stereotypes...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  98. This has to be said.. by use_compress · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why does anyone think this is a good thing? Video games suck up so much of your time and leave you with virtually nothing--a slightly faster reflex is not as desirable as the physical benefits from playing an athletic sport or the mental benefits from playing a mathematical table game like chess, backgammon, or poker. Gender equality isn't a good thing when it applies to something that's harmful. Comparatively, an increase in male prostitution is not a good thing just as an increase in female gang membership is also not a good thing. Mod as troll or flamebait if you wish, but I'd like to know why Slashdoters (and Slashdotrises) think this is positive.

  99. Re:grub IS NOT FUNNY. WHY TF IS HE ALWAYS MODDED U by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

    I caught the joke about ten years ago. It's still funny, so you don't need to stop laughing. =^-^=

    --
    I have no regrets, this is the only path.
    My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
  100. Not a big deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know what the big deal is all about. I've been online gaming for years, and the issue of women playing only comes up when someone says "Hey, I'm a girl!" and eveyone else says "Cool! Welcome!". I have heard of absolutely NO instances where someone has complained about there being a female playing. In fact, most people I've played with find it quite refreshing.

    BTW, if women are finding resistance being accepted in the gaming world, naming themselves the "DoMe clan" is not going to help. It's kind of like having an all black group calling themselves the "Lynch Squad". I can say that because I am black ;).

    Odin "Mech Warrior 4: Mercs"

  101. Females in motorsport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words:
    Jutta Kleinschmidt

    A chick that not only can drive, but can lead in Paris-Dakar rally REALLY deserves respect.

    --Coder

  102. I wonder if it's worth mentioning... by Desirsar · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt I can still waste them in any online game I choose to play them at, but I wouldn't put it past them to beat on a lot of other people online. I got everyone in my uncle's family to start playing PC games when I fixed their computer last. (Isn't it fun to be the one in your family that EVERYONE calls for that? :) ) Anyway... They have 4 girls in the house, and one who already got married and moved away, so there is no influence from brothers. In fact, I'm the only male among my cousins other than the oldest, who was adopted later anyway. (This is out of 14 kids total. 'Kids' might not be a good word, I'm 25, heh.) I gave them Quake 2 and GTA after restoring their computer and making the printer and scanner work for the first time since they bought it. They had to set up a system of sharing the computer after this, because ALL of the girls became hooked on GTA. The youngest, only 4, played it the most, but she turned down the sound because 'the people said naughty words at me'. You just have to give someone the right game to get started on. Fishing Derby on the 2600 was enough for me, but I guess some girls need GTA. :) I certainly wouldn't want separate leagues, though, I'll shoot a girl just the same as a guy, and would expect them to do the same.

  103. Focus! by buus · · Score: 1

    This discussion has veered away from the fact that really hot Danish women are involved in geek activities. The gaming community should working to keep these women involved so someday a swimsuit gaming calendar will become a reality.

  104. Re:Separate but Equal by sulli · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From President Bush and Governor Schwarzenegger this week?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  105. PFFFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And how much of that 43% are playing The Sims? That is the ONLY game that ANY woman I know plays. Here, we are talking about (mostly) FPS. I don't know a single woman who plays any FPS (though maybe they are closet FPS fans). Come to think of it, I don't know any women PERIOD. *jumps off a cliff*

    1. Re:PFFFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0%! the sim was released in 2000 not 1999

  106. girls could compete easily in FPS games by guru512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I dont play regularily online, but when I play some rounds of Deltaforce, Call of duty, or UT I usually end up in places 1-3.
    There are so many _bad_ males playing it isnt that hard to have some fun and even win tournaments.
    Sure theres also the few insane elite guys who will waste you even barehandedly, but theyre the chosen few - and many of them probaby dont have a real life anyway ;)

  107. The reason is.... by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Umm, having been at the CXG event, and seeing how it was set to be the largest female gaming event ever, I think you are off here. It wasn't that that they were not allowed to play in the 'male' tourney, I have actually never heard of an event that excluded women, but simply that is was less profitable for them.

    What I mean by that is there was a women only tourney that, if memory serves, paid out as well as the other 'general' competitions.

    Now, would you compete against 50 of the best, or 7 of the best if money was awarded to the top 10 finishers? Only 2 guesses, so think hard about this one.

    The one thing I am not sure about is if participating in one excluded you from the other.

    Lastly, it turned into a massive clusterfsck anyway, the CS tourneys were pretty much shut down, and there was bad blood all around. People were pointing fingers left and right, and I was there till 3am watching it all happen. Happy days for the staff at CXG. There are several good writeups available, look them up if you care.

    -Charlie

    P.S. The funniest part of the event was watching the odd head spin around and track one of the women like they were on fire. Usually followed by 'A g.. A gi.. a.. a...'. It didn't happen often, but it did, and it was beyond funny.

  108. Re:Separate but Equal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, let's see. Did they say that? Nope.

    Looks like that makes you a lying sack of shit.

  109. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a/s/l? post pix plz

    kthnx

  110. Re:Why segregate girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ, I hate faggots like you who pull the tired "HERE GOES MY KARMA BUT ITS WORTH DEFENDING MY NOBLE BELIEFS" line out of your crusted asshole.

    Here's a newsflash: Karma is a measurement of your inability to get laid. Go deepthroat a shotgun you fucking faggot.

  111. Your theory is unfounded by Cleahpatra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that seems off about your post is how you're confusing videogames with sports. The physical differences (such as lower center of gravity, muscle-length / breadth, and etc.) that tend to delineate the female and male classes in sports don't really apply to videogames. PS: Chess grandmaster Anjelina Belakovskaia 1995, in case you were wondering. More recently, Alexandra Kosteniuk was ranked #29 over all in U.S. Chess on December 2003 (http://www.uschess.org/ratings/top/dec03/OverallL ist.php) which is ranked regardless of gender or age. She's only 20. PPS: I regularly manage to kick people's asses in videogames, regardless of their gender. It's probably my lower center of gravity helping me.

    --
    I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    1. Re:Your theory is unfounded by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Anjelina and Alexandra are probably the exceptions that prove the case. If there have been two women that have been ranked within the top 30 for the year in the past 9 years, we can do some math on it.

      We take the top 30 for each of the 9 years, and we will have 270 total players that have been ranked. If there have been only 2 women of that 270, I'd say that it is a rather skewed ratio.

      I'm not sexist, but I can make a rather valid observation that men tend to approach games like Chess in a way that is completely different than women. With regards to whether or not they are more successful, the evidence has to speak for itself.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    2. Re:Your theory is unfounded by Cleahpatra · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, Slime-dogg, I was not listing ALL of the female Chess champs in the last few years. Those were just two off the top of my head. I'm sure if you would care to research a little on this lovely thing called "THE INTERNET" that we have, it would easily come to light that those were FAR from the ONLY females that rank.

      Therefore, there is no "evidence" speaking for itself. The original quote asked if someone could name a female chessmaster, which I have done. It did not ask for someone to name all of the female chessmasters ever.

      Your theory is unfounded also.
      NEXT.

      --
      I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    3. Re:Your theory is unfounded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I regularly manage to kick people's asses in videogames, regardless of their gender. It's probably my lower center of gravity helping me

      Girls usually have faster reaction when it come to familiar situation. So, it is your "lower center of gravity" helps you. I think, that when someone changes tactics it takes for you a lot of time to adapt. Also, I think that games you're playing and "kicking peoples's asses" are 2D, not 3D.

      Most girls do not play games just because they think it is not practical.

      So, here it comes: Dixi.

    4. Re:Your theory is unfounded by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      If I cared enough about the topic to actually do the research, you would definitely get an accurate report. Since it seems that you care deeply about such things, I'll leave it to you to drudge up the names and the totals. I'm pretty certain that you're going to find that I'm correct in where I stand.

      If you don't like the top 30 totals, then you can get all of the top 50 totals for the past ten years, and you'll probably get near the same percentage.

      Of course, this is all speculation, but as I've said, I don't care enough about it to actually invest the work. I think that females are just as gifted as males are, but I also take into account the actual popularity of the "sport" amongst the sexes.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  112. Game = Gender/Race freezone.. by msimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The interesting thing about gaming is the fact that the friends you make can be so diverse. To say one (minority) group should be segregated because they don't play as good as majority group Y is just silly. Why would we want to put up more artificial walls?

    --
    Quack, quack.
  113. A rebuttal... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    THEORY: There is a gender based difference in the innate online gaming abilities.

    TEST: Allow men and women to compete in the same arena and see if a statistical variation manifest itself. Particularly one that is not explained by raw numbers of male or female participants.

    CONCLUSION: Depends on results of above test.

    Still seems pretty straightforward to me. Either there is a difference or there is not. "Complete shit" would be making an assumption without testing it. It would also be "complete shit" to refuse to make adjustments in the face of contrary statistical data.

    My hope is that it turns out that a good gamer is a good gamer, but hey, as long as the issue has been raised, why not put it to the test?

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:A rebuttal... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      CONTROL: For hours played per week, number of years spent playing video games, and equipment.

      For women who really like FPS games (I'm not one of them... I'll stick to MMOGs, thanks) these factors are still going to make a difference. My husband and ex-husband both practically grew up on strafing and turning. Me, I could learn, but it would take me a while, and having years of experience synchronizing the mouse and keyboard is a definite advantage, even if there's no "innate" advantage.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:A rebuttal... by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 0

      If you want to perform an experiment before deciding which way to go with the leagues, go for it. But don't form leagues around the assumption that girls are equal and then change the leagues when they can't compete. Suppose you decide to put them all in one league (based on your experiment) but find that the women just aren't competing well. Are you going to form separate leagues for them then? Are you going to form separate leagues for the guys that suck?

  114. Moving into FPS's by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    The fact that the article takes for granted that women play puzzle, role playing, and adventure games is in and of it's self a large step for women. 2 years ago I don't think any main stream media would say women took part in anything except tetris and hoyles.

    --
    I do security
  115. I see an advantage on sexual segregation by Rolman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, someone who has so far only played with idiotic guys that only keep saying "u fag!" when you frag them, will feel very much relieved when playing against the usually quieter girls. I love playing against other people online, but I hate how the communication is abused with the permanent trash talk. The game is supposedly to be fun and people are there to show their playing skills, not their ignorance and horrible verbal/typing 5k1LL5. Gender mixed teams really help the S/N ratio, even if most of the conversations are "A/S/L?". Hey, both guys and girls go online to increase their chances to get laid, we can't do jack about it.

    But I digress, I've had many girls as opponents in several kinds of games. In fact, I would recommend playing the awesome Pac-Man Vs. against women, it's ungodly funny. Women-friendly games are not always stupid things like Barbie. There are great games you can play with your SO, if not together, then taking turns is fun too. Examples? Animal Crossing, Mario Party, Mario Kart (online, yes!), Mario Tennis, Bomberman, Tetris Attack, Parappa and Umjammer Lammy, and Wario Ware, even some FPS I have played against women and had a great time.

    I think an all-boy team is just as bad as an all-girl team. But, I also see an advantage with sexual-segregation. There are people very insecure about themselves, those are the ones that will never accept a defeat from the other gender. Let these idiots play with themselves in their closed circles, and let the mixed gender teams get rid of them and enjoy the insane fun.

    So please, continue to make your gender-specific teams and keep yourselves out of this horrible, unfair mixed gender world where I play =P

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
  116. pfft yeah right... by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

    where are these imaginary male gamers who live in 'ph3a|2' of females? i play dod and cs and ut ect and i dont mind playing with chicks at all. all the gamer guys i know share that opinon. A hot girl who plays dod is like my dream date! Anyone intersted? ;)

    --

    Matt
    You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
    1. Re:pfft yeah right... by chollowayss · · Score: 1

      I used to date a good looking chick who played DoD. I cry myself to sleep at night trying to remember why I broke up with her. I need to find another geek chick...

      --

      "The next generation of interesting software will be made on a Macintosh, not an IBM PC." -Bill Gates
  117. Why isn't Matell concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...about the dearth of boys interested in playing with Barbie? Or Revlon or L'eggs concerned about how few men use their products?

  118. Interesting story... by raytracer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recently, I completed reading Blondie24 -- Playing at the Edge of AI, an interesting book by David Fogel on his attempt to use evolutionary computation to evolve a high quality checker playing program. He tested his program by playing online against other checker players on The Zone, an online gaming network.

    Early on, he discovered that his rather pedestrian nickname attracted few opponents, so he changed his online nick to be Obi_WanTheJedi, which seemed to attract a great deal more competition. As his program was revised and became stronger, he noticed that opponents would often become rude and angry as they fell behind, and would stall hoping he would drop out, or just disconnect, often after swearing like a sailor. Such drop outs made evaluating the games more difficult, so they tried a different strategy. This seemed worst among intermediate players: the better players were often much better sports.

    They developed a cover story for Blondie24, a 24 year old female mathematics major. She was also single, attractive, and looking for a boyfriend.

    They reported that they were on the receiving end of crude remarks and suggestions in about 1 in 3 games. Interestingly enough, the better players were reported to be uniformly polite, complimenting "her" on her excellent play at so young an age.

    It seems rather obvious to me that women and men should be competing in the same competitions in this arena. The mere fact that fewer women play should not be a deterrent, nor do I think the prospect of easier money for women competitors merely by virtue of their being fewer female competitors is a good precedent to set. But perhaps all players should review their own behavior, and try to maintain a degree of fun and sportsmanship.

  119. Life *as* a female gaming squad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to say I can only imagine what it would be for me to live *as* a female gaming squad.

    I suppose I would have 10 breasts and 10 arms to fondle myself wi....

    OH, WAIT!

    I had forgotten that Slashdot editors are incapable of using correct grammar! They must have meant, "Life for a female gaming squad."

  120. Sad but true... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sad thing is that homophobic (gay, fag, queer), racist (jew, nigger, coon), and/or other inoffensive language (rape, cocksucker) seem to be a standard part of the lexicon for a large percentage gamers.

    Frankly, I find this unacceptable. I'm not homosexual but I do find homophobic language offensive, and the same goes for the other, less acceptable language that crop up on almost every public gaming service.

    I find it both funny and sad that these kids (and most of the people who resort to such language are kids) think nothing of using language that they wouldn't dare use at the dinner table or to a someone they bumped into at the mall to sound "cool" and "macho" online.

    And it's amazing how far they'll take it: I've had people threaten to track me down in real life and kill me and my family, rape our corpses and then rip our heads off and shit down our necks. If it wasn't so laughable at the time then I would have been well within my rights to report the matter to the relevant authorities. I'd love to see some 13 year-old sat down on the couch with his parents and a pair of law enforcement officers explaining that he regularly sent death threats to people just because they outclassed him in a game.

    The fact is that as long as this sort of behaviour is accepted or even tolerated by the majority of online gaming communities then those communities will remain the domain of teenagers who have bigger mouths and egos than brains.

    There's no doubt in my mind that, whilst most men would shrug their shoulders, dismiss the idiots as part of life and just carry on gaming, most women will not tolerate such stuff.

    As my girlfriend put it when she saw some of the stuff that gets spewed out by some of these people, "What idiot would say that kind of stuff and why would you want to spend your free time listening to it?"

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Sad but true... by ManoMarks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am Gay, and it's a frustrating to see the strings of invectives that come poring across my screen, but if you've ever posted on Yahoo! message boards you know it is even worse there. Usually if I call someone on it, they'll stop for awhile. But when I used an ID that had the word "gay" in it, I had people change teams so they could try to kill me. Of course, the real bigot/haters are usually horrible players, probably because they spend so much time typing they forget to play. So much of it is also profoundly misogynist and uses profoundly sexist language. If I were a woman, I'd feel I was getting a rather hostile response from people who didn't even know, most of the time, that I was a woman. I support servers that make an attempt to keep it clean and ban those who are overtly hostile.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    2. Re:Sad but true... by 0x1337 · · Score: 0, Troll

      F00k 0ff, j00 g4y-455 5h17f4c3 b3f0r3 1 r4p3 j00r n00b1n355 w17h 4 5h0w312 0f bu||375 0u7 0f my SIG Commando, j00 cr4k 5m0k1ng F4GG07...

      Shout outz to teh MyGot CLAN!! W007!@#

    3. Re:Sad but true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he should be on a GS server instead!!!

    4. Re:Sad but true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Frankly, I find this unacceptable

      Nobody's holding a gun to your head. Don't like gamers? Don't game!!!

      Ohh, but you want to bitch about it on slashdot and cry like a fucking baby. Boo fucking hoo.

      BTW you're a gay jewish nigger coon queer-ass faggot homosexual and you should be raped, you cocksucking n00b.

    5. Re:Sad but true... by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      I take it you don't live in America?

    6. Re:Sad but true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like listening to him whine, get off slashdot, you drooling retarded lisping monkey. Did the zookeepers forget to give you your rabies shot today? What the hell do you think slashdot is for, go home and suck your own dick or something, if you even have one.

    7. Re:Sad but true... by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      I'm not homosexual but I do find homophobic language offensive

      next time, don't say you're not gay.

      don't say anything.

      just say you find it offensive.

      your orientation shouldn't matter.

      unless you're lesbian, in which case it does matter, so please let me watch you do your thing!

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    8. Re:Sad but true... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I was trying to reinforce the fact that I find attacks on minority groups to be offensive, even if I'm not a member of that minority group.

      I very comfortable with my own sexuality and definitely wasn't trying to say "I'm not one of them". Indeed, to one or two of the people who I've encountered I've expressed the sentiment that I'd rather be gay than ignorant and bigoted.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:Sad but true... by danila · · Score: 1

      I don't find it particularly offensive or disturbing, just stupid and somewhat annoying. I've been playing UT2004 demo for a week and until today I was lucky to land on good servers with decent players. That is, no racist or homophobic comments, no shooting your teammates, etc.

      Today I joined a particular Onslaught server with ~26 players and the first message I saw was something about niggers. Of course, it didn't end there... And people would regularly shoot their teammates when someone gets into the vehicle faster, etc. When we were leaving the base in the very beginning, some would be left behind to go on foot and those would always shoot us in the backs. Harmless, but really annoying. Totally reckless behaviour during the rest of the game...

      I much prefer to have a challenging and difficult game against a strong team, and regardless of the outcome I would be saying "good game" to them in the end.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    10. Re:Sad but true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, everyone you hear talking like that is under 18. Just ignore it.

    11. Re:Sad but true... by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point. Now go home, your mama's calling. I hear there's brownies for dessert!

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    12. Re:Sad but true... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Don't feed the trolls.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  121. So, my guess would be that... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    you see no apparent difference in ability? I really don't know but my guess would be that there is no gender based difference. From my exposure to the martial arts world, I've faced female sparring partners who were tactially as good as any male opponent I've faced. In fact, if any experienced (obviously you go a lot easier on novices) sparring partner thought I was taking it easy on them because they were female, they'd be p*ssed - and rightly so. It's a game, and they came to play - so let them.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:So, my guess would be that... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I rarely play CS myself, but in every game I've ever played (TFC, Q1-3, etc) and in the handful of CS games I've played, I've seen little to no difference between male and female players in terms of ability.

      I've seen definite differences in terms of class/weapon preferences and choices of strategic positioning and such, but those differences occur often enough in the male population that it could quite easily have nothing to do with the gender of the player and everything to do with the mindset required to play the game as much as most of the people I've played the game with for any significant period of time.

      On the other hand, the one thing I have seen as more common among female players than male players is the wish to seperate themselves from the players of the other gender. The reasons for this should be obvious in public game situations, but if the same slurs and abuse occur in tournaments that occur in public games, the players or teams involved should be punished accordingly rather than preventing the female players from competing with the male players. In general, though, if a female player or all-female team does exceptionally well (compared to all players) in a tournament, you usually hear about it.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  122. ...and in proper APA style too by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
    Damn.

    Colour me impressed.

    If there were more posts like this, maybe Slashdot would be worth the 2+ hrs/day I spend on it.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:...and in proper APA style too by LupusUF · · Score: 1

      "...and in proper APA style too"

      Actually, it is not in correct APA style (5th ed)...parts of it are, but there are mistakes. (ie: in once place he used "and" where he should have used "&" The second line of the refs should have been indented, and so on). :)

  123. Stevie Case fragged John Romero by shaark78 · · Score: 1, Informative

    She was a celebrity gamer and beat the crap outta John Romero in Q3. They eventually married, tho now they're divorced.

  124. You're right, I lied. by sulli · · Score: 1

    They both advocated separate and unequal treatment for gays and lesbians. Thanks for the correction.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:You're right, I lied. by FallLine · · Score: 1
      They both advocated separate and unequal treatment for gays and lesbians. Thanks for the correction.
      So do your probable heros, Kerry and Edwards. Your point?
    2. Re:You're right, I lied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. Gays and lesbians can get married just like anyone else, there's absolutely nothing stopping them. The restrictions are the same for both hetero and homo. 1 man + 1 woman.

      So you're still a lying sack of shit. At least you admit it. That's the first step on the road to recovery.

  125. What a Team Name!!! by Lizard_King · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoa! Those gaming girlz are hot!

    "I have played computer games since I was a kid," says Ms Maller, a member of the Danish clan, DoMe.

    Did anyone else get aroused by this? =)

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
  126. Yea, I agree... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    you'll have to shake that part out. However, my guess would be that a good gamer is a good gamer and leagues would be better ranked on categorized abilities as opposed to gender. Your suggestion of hours of experience would be such an example.

    I understand there are theorys on visual-spatial acuity, etc., but I got a feeling that at the elite level, it boils down to tactical thinking. None the less, if somebody wants to actually test it, I'd be curious to see the results.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  127. Re:WTF are you mods on? This is NOT off-topic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up and take your shitty moderation like the nerdman you are.

    It's slashdot, you expect the limpdick mods to actually use their brains for something other than thinking up new unfunny LOTR jokes?

  128. .eq. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> Online, everybody's equal [...], the only thing that matters is reflexes to move the mouse and hit the keyboard.

    Actually, one could make the argument that women are superior shooting gamers because women have much faster reaction times with their hands (tip: if you're a guy taking a karate class, don't pair up with a girl for the blocking drill. It's more likely she'll touch you than you her;). Just like you probably won't win at slap-the-hand with your sister, because her hands are faster -- they're smaller and lighter, plus her reactions are a bit sharper.


    Counterpoint, one could argue that faster hands are offset by the fact that men's brains are (slightly but consistently) better at three dimensional reckoning, i.e. remembering where the car is parked, navigating a maze, getting yourself "unlost" (without asking questions:), driving a car... do your own googling, but IIRC (&pretty sure I do), this has been researched extensively.

    I'm not bashing either sex, although I did moot the point I originally had when I started writing.

    =)

  129. Women are better game players. by master_p · · Score: 1

    Their thought is much more strategic and their reflexes much better than us. I once saw women playing Tetris, and it was scary.

    1. Re:Women are better game players. by Ciel · · Score: 1


      Their thought is much more strategic and their reflexes much better than us. I once saw women playing Tetris, and it was scary.

      Actually, this is probably wrong on both counts. First, I don't believe that there's much of a statistically significant difference in "strategic thinking" one way or the other between male and female gamers, and, as to your second contention regarding reflexes, I'm quite positive that it's totally wrong, indeed 180 degrees from the fact of the matter. In the psychometric tests that I'm aware of, men have always scored better in reflex response and spatial coordination than women.

  130. Re:WTF are you mods on? This is NOT off-topic. by notque · · Score: 1

    Did the person wielding the mod points even bother to read the whole post?

    I don't know, but I surely won't when I meta-moderate it later.

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  131. Why even have a "only female" clan? by PjotrP · · Score: 1
    I've managed some quite succesfull clans for quake, and i really dont see how you could at the one hand limit yourself when putting a clan together by just accepting female members and on the other hand take an fps team game seriously enough to compete at tournaments. If the pool of players you have to draw the talented ones from is like 20 times smaller than the pool of players other clans pick their players from, it would be very unlikely for you to ever beat those other clans.

    We had one female in our team and she was with us because she was very skilled. one of our better players actually. but the chances of getting together enough equally skilled players for a clan seem next to zero.

    why make an all girl team and then complain about not getting to play with the boys? first you say no to the boys and then complain when the boys say no to you (which they probably dont even do based on the fact that you're a girl but because you're probably just not skilled enough to compete.)

    --
    PjotrP
  132. A few thoughts... by Alexis+Brooke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a female gamer, I can say the following:

    I played The Sims when it first came out, and enjoyed it thoroughly at first. It was fun, and kept me entertained for the better part of a week. After the house- and family-building aspect got old, though, I discovered that there are only a certain number of times you can remove someone's pool ladder or stick a guy in a small, doorless room with a lit fireplace and loads of wicker furniture before it ceases being amusing.

    I also enjoy games such as Quake III and Unreal Tournament. I like them because I'm good at them, and can whip just about any of my male friends. They're the perfect games for a LAN party, when you've got ten people in a room, working as teams, shouting orders, laughing, and having a good time. For me, though, first-person shooters sorta lose their appeal without the group dynamic.

    Even more entertaining are games like Warcraft and Starcraft, mainly because they involve thought and planning, and aren't just a wild frag-fest (although those are fun as well). Unlike FPSs, I'm equally entertained playing a RTS with someone in the same room as I am with someone online, or even against the computer. When my internet connection is out and I have the urge to play a game, chances are I'll be loading up Brood Wars for a three-hour game against the Protoss and Zerg.

    These days, though, my main vise is EverQuest. Yes, I'm an Evercrack junkie. But, unlike what seems to be the majority of the players, I'm not terribly concerned about level advancement. I don't have the uberest gear, I'm not in a raiding guild, and I'm not flagged for the Plane of Time. I do, however, have a wide circle of close friends I enjoy hanging out with, and am part of a close-knit guild that's more like a family. Most of the female players I associate with feel the same way as I do, so I suppose it's the social interaction that we find most important.

    Anyways, those are just my thoughts on the subject... *shrug*

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
    1. Re:A few thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do, however, have a wide circle of close friends I enjoy hanging out with, and am part of a close-knit guild that's more like a family. Most of the female players I associate with feel the same way as I do, so I suppose it's the social interaction that we find most important.

      then get back in the kitchen and talk on the phone.

  133. Heh, the female clan is named "Do Me" by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    They name their clan "DoMe" and don't expect to get shit? please. Everyone knows that a real FPS clan name has to have a reference to evil, a lack of light, drugs, mythical creatures, or computer hardware.

  134. They're all wrong. by sulli · · Score: 0, Troll

    And Newsom is right.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:They're all wrong. by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hmm, why did you just mention Arnold and Bush then to begin with?

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
  135. More to the point by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    How the hell would you even know with most leagues? I played a lot of FPS games my freshmen and sophmore years of university, and was in a number of clans that played in a number of leagues. We had no idea the genders of our opponents, it's not like we talked to them. Hell, expect for voice communications we wouldn't have known the genders of our teamates. One clan I joined actually had a female leader. Didn't know that until she started fliriting with one of the other members in IRC (her boyfriend).

    I have no idea why it is an issue. I'm in a SWG guild now and it's a mix of men and women, some husband-wife teams. Mix of ages too, from 16-50. Some father-sons teams and the like. That's one of the nice things about online games, you can have a real wide cross section of people together to play.

  136. Barbie's Dreamhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >>...the only place I'd say where it would make sense to make it girls only would be a game that's like an MMORPG version of Barbie's Dreamhouse.

    Come on, that would never fly. Even though girls would play it, you'd miss out on all the gay merchandising. I mean, come on.. have you ever looked at what Ken wears? Ken isn't Barbie's b/f, he's her gay confidant. When the BarbieWorld(TM) MMORPG gets launched, the first 60% will be signing up to "see how easy it is to fit in".

    Oooh, cb00te2003, that's a *kee-yute* haltertop. And where did you get those shoes? Does Bloomingdales make them in men's sizes?

    ps: gay is ok. well, for other people, anyway. :

  137. social problems by TheUberBob · · Score: 1

    there are a lot of rude online gamers playing FPS games that either flirt/try to follow girl gamers around OR call them names. Sometimes the presence of a girl handle actually encourages better teamwork since letting boys know you'd rather play as a team than just go solo encourages them to do what the girl wants :) Personally, I'd like to see more girl gamers because they tend to be teamplay oriented and understand cooperation....whereas a lot of boys are dealing with their ego/competitive socialization issues online. Yes these are stereotypes, but i've been playing heavily for years and when I use a girl handle on a public server there are usually a couple of boys that actually start to play more as a team...its hit or miss though, sometimes you just get more shit. A final note...sex and rape in game talk seems to have waned a bit, a couple years ago there were a LOT of 'Dude, you got raped' comments...not exactly welcoming discourse to a population that is more frequently the victim of rape.

    --

    All your preview button are belong to Hello Kitty.
  138. What it takes to be the best ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be very good takes skill ... to be the best takes a full time commitment. Are there really as many young women as guys who are willing to put 40+ hours a week into a computer game? For the love of the game?

    Giving up most of your life for a computer game is what it takes ... and I know it is a preconception, but I picture no life loosers as mostly males :)

  139. God damn it... by Ciel · · Score: 1


    Ugh. I have to say that all of this genuinely irks me. One of the reasons that I enjoy having an alternative virtual life is that it can provide some measure of distance from all of the petty "Us versus Them" contentiousness that suffuses so much of day to day existance. The idea of people deliberately reintroducing that dynamic by actively discriminating against female players is just infuriating. With all of the vile baloney that the media is constantly pumping out about gamers, one would think that the community would WELCOME some gender diversity.

    But, after all, I suppose that the people behaving this way are just the same sort that create such tensions in the real world, eh?

    A word to the wise for all of you l33t Counter-Strike wankers: God knows that you poor bastards need every opportunity that you can get to earn the affection of the ladies, and, given that your CS habit probably precludes the development of most other skills/redeeming qualities, I would not be so quick to squander the good will of prospective female gamers were I in your position.

  140. Trash talking... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

    It's a guy thing. Nothing personal (usually) and we all get it. It's fun and a nice stress release. It's rude, crude and usually involves words so foul that you'd never actually utter them in anger. It's not personal.

  141. Yea, actually....that happens all the time... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Cycling has CAT 5 through CAT 1, then elites, Swimming, pretty much the same thing, gymnastice, ditto, and so on and so forth. Why not categorized competition for online gaming? I'd be kinda surprised if they didn't do it already.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  142. I think it'd be great.. by MasJ · · Score: 1

    I think women into gaming would be great, hey most of them are quite slow when it comes to games and stuff (no offence to all the uber fast women out there..) but it'd be a lot of fun to take the battle of the sexes to a brand new arena. :D

  143. My Experiance by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

    Those who have read my posts before might recognize that I happen to know a thing or two about NWN. And as such I've had the needs for good DMs on my servers.

    Now over time I've had a lot of players come and go from my mod and some of them were some of the best players I've seen bar none. However often their temperments and or mannerisms made them unsutable, in my judgement, to make them a DM. And guess what, most of the ones that might have had a shot were guys but it was often those "guy" tendencys that lost them the job at the same time.

    Now enter in the girl RPG gamers. Since nearly everyone has made a female RPG PC (Player Chararacter for the uninitiated.) its not as easy as picking out the female avitars to find the girl gamers but after chatting with someone for a bit it typically becomes apparent. And suprise suprise, what the girl gamers sometimes lack in sheer skill they make up for in being nice, fair, and dedicated to the game!

    Anyway, while from my perspective there are still some genres that are pretty much male domniated and I don't see that changing. The girl gamers are coming, and I for one welcome them with open arms.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  144. Re:Why segregate girls? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    The one aspect of American society where women aren't allowed to compete (even nominally) is sniping. There are issues of compasions and violence involved in the decision. The studies involved might give some insight into this decision?

  145. Re:Why segregate girls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the ability to track more targets at one time.

    link to a study or some proof? How does this get modded insightful? Because it's his opinion? Tell your finacee to come to 8 on the break, play some real tekken players and get owned.

  146. Some perspective, and hope by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been playing online games since pretty much "the beginning" (before games were made to use TCP/IP, we played IPX games over TCP/IP in Kali). There are a couple of things that are helping both the treatment of women and toning down open hostilities:

    1) Player moderation (ie. voting people out of the game)
    2) Voice chat

    I was worried about #2 when it started out, but it actually does a lot to reduce the trash in online gaming. A lot of people won't say out loud the kind of words they'll type, at least not the extremes. There's still plenty of salty language out there, but there is a distinct difference between what people will say, and what they'll type.

    Also, for the kiddies, the fact that they have to say the things out loud, inside their house, can make all the difference. I've kept a great post from a gaming message board about this: "I was watchin my cousin play [Return to Castle Wolfenstein: Tides of War] and then this lil kid comes on over the mic and says mother****er then the next u hear is a giant smack n then the kid starts crying roflmao....". Plus, anyone that tries to talk someone down in a squeaky kiddie voice usually gets laughed and humiliated out of the room.

    As for women, I'll often let my girlfriend wear the headset for playing SOCOM II online, and let her do all the talking for me. She often gets attention, but she never gets harassed, and the majority of the undersexed kiddies are too shy to try and hit on her verbally. That, and everyone else audibly laughs at them and makes fun of them when they try.

    Some malcontents are undeterred by voice chat, but it does help weed out a lot of it. For the rest, players being able to vote losers out of the game is a great feature. My main complaint is that too few games explore such a feature fully.

    1. Re:Some perspective, and hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of that helps when the idiot kiddies are the majority. I really wonder where this all got started. I played on Kali too when I was about 14 and didn't see anything like I see in games today. I've stopped playing some games entirely because people that know how to respect each other have become few and far between.

      What happened?

      And while we're on the subject, why do these kids always roll their eyes when I start talking about my Commodore PET? And where's my cane?

    2. Re:Some perspective, and hope by Darkangael · · Score: 1

      "For the rest, players being able to vote losers out of the game is a great feature. My main complaint is that too few games explore such a feature fully."

      The problem with being able to vote people out of the game is one of the losers could get all his/her (usually his) "friends" to come on and vote people out just to annoy the players. Not such a problem if an admin is online and sees it, but when one isn't (which could be most of the time) then it's a real game killer.

  147. Is nothing sacred? by nineoneone · · Score: 2, Funny

    For fucks sake!
    This is the thin end of the wedge!
    They'll be on ./ next.
    Goddammit!

    --
    sig under development
  148. You go, girl! by Latte+Lovin'+Lurker · · Score: 1

    Few things are more fun than taking cocky, obnoxious teenaged boy gamers down a few pegs ... or, for that matter, cocky, obnoxious male gamers of any age.

    1. Re:You go, girl! by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Few things are more fun than taking cocky, obnoxious teenaged boy gamers down a few pegs ... or, for that matter, cocky, obnoxious male gamers of any age. ...yeah, by cocky, obnoxious, man-hating female gamers. Whoop de frikkin do.

  149. Wrong Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows BOY gamers have a joystick. GIRL gamers have a mouse with a ultra sensitive scroll-wheel. Sheesh.

  150. Re:WTF are you mods on? This is NOT off-topic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are being stalked.

  151. I'm ok with categorized competition by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 0

    I even play sports in a couple recreational leagues because they are a lot of fun, but I don't take them nearly as seriously as people in the more competitive leagues. What I'm not ok with is a group of people saying that they can compete in the competitive league, finding out that they can't compete, and then telling the organizational body that they have to form another league for the less competitive people. If those people want to form their own less competitive league, I wish them luck. But, it doesn't fall on the organization's shoulders to do so.

    One more hypothetical, just out of curiosity. If you do end up creating the men's and women's leagues because the women are not competing, do you let the less competitive guys into the women's league?

  152. Strippers and Bad Taste by Malkin · · Score: 1

    Well, you know, when pro gaming tournaments have a history of doing things like rewarding players with strippers (e.g. Babbage's CPL 2000), it's no wonder they want to separate the males from the females. Not even in American football, which has always objectified women, is it appropriate for anyone to hire women to prance around topless at *official* events (Janet Jackson notwithstanding). It just makes everyone involved look like a bunch of pathetic weenies who don't get laid often enough (if at all).

    I would love to see women competing with men directly in pro gaming tournaments, but I think the sport definitely needs to do some growing up, on the way.

  153. Re:Why segregate girls? by Dravik · · Score: 1

    Physical strength is very important to fighter pilots. Under continous high g force manuevers it becomes very taxing to keep looking around the cockpit. To get off topic one of the major problems with the women in all branches of the US military is double standards. The same people who scream about equality scream even louder when it is suggested that women should be held to the same standard as men. This is why most women are not respected in the military. They are babied along with lower standards, given prefential treatment, and then bitch and moan about being discrimnated against. Nothing will lower your respect for someone more than hearing them complain about having 3 other people in their tent while all the men are living 8 to a tent.

    --
    The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  154. Re:Why segregate girls? by GreaterThanZero · · Score: 1
    Thank you. Argh. I probably shouldn't drag myself into this, but I've been a female interested in stereotypically male things all my life and am consistently amazed at the sides of the fence that people are on. Thankfully, most people just don't care anymore -- I'd love it if everyone was like that.

    I feel that I'm part of the first generation who was plagued by the "You can do anything you want to! You're female! Anything!!" people, trying to be helpful. Meanwhile, I sat back and was like, "yes, I know...I get it! Ok! Can I -- please, I just want to...ARGH! Can you just shut up and let me go and actually DO those things you say I can do?!" Every single one of them felt they were the first person to tell me that I was a free girl. Bet they sure felt important.

    While I am grateful that I don't feel restricted, it just pisses me off more when people try to then restrict me. Of course I currently suck at CounterStrike. Of course I currently suck at Diablo. There is a lot of stuff to get used to in terms of UI, and just plain memorizing whatever the hell you're carrying. But all it takes is time.

    My boyfriend is currently helping me learn Soul Calibur 2 because I'm addicted. :) Re-teaching me, in a way, because I've had such little chance to play fighting games that I used to resort to button mashing. At first, when I watched him and his friends play and hear them all laugh at the same time at some move on screen, I couldn't pick it up on what was so funny. But it just takes time. I feel more confident about seeing the attacks/blocks/parries and seeing the chess game (He just attacked and was parried three horizontal hits -- what're the odds the next one will be vertical?) involved. After playing lots, now I start laughing and calling people out. (Heheh...just stay far away a liiiittle longer while your cheap-ass sword builds your health back up, Nightmare...)

    Parent is right. Ok, so it just so happens that activities that have been made with men in mind currently are having trouble finding women working at the same level. Big surprise. People are apparently not ready to deal with a female, and everything is still tailored to males. I'm not saying change it. As I said before, all it takes is time...for me, anyways. I tried a different thing -- fighting games in the above example -- and did the best I could(button-mashed), but I'm with time I'm able to differentiate what's going on a bit better. Give anyone, male or female, something to do that's not in their current paradigm, and they will get it with practice. Or maybe I'm just honestly slow compared to most girls.

    Every time on /. that someone brings up females and techsomething, there's a discouraging amount of commenters who just fling insults. Did I grow up in some sort of encouragement-dream-world? I consistently see the amount of girl geeks around me growing in every compsci class I take. Is my world the exception?

    Commence flaming, because I admit I'm a little irked by some insulting commenters, so this may be a little rant-ish and incoherent...ah well. :)

  155. or Kirby Puckett... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    ...or Tony Gwynn, or John Kruk, or Babe Ruth...

    That doesn't count those who were intoxicated and still performed at a "high" level (e.g, Mickey Mantle, Dock Ellis (who apparently through a no-hitter while on an LSD trip)).

  156. The odd truth of the sexes... by tazanator · · Score: 1

    Well my understanding on Couter-Strike is everyone wants to be a sniper. The eye opening point is that the russians found out in WWII that women made better snipers than the men. A few quotes from http://www.vor.ru/English/Victory/vict_16.html "The defenders of the Motherland in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 included women too. Women joined the army on a voluntary basis and became pilots, members of tank crews, snipers. One of the sniper companies was formed from women graduates of a sniper school near Moscow. The company was known as "the company of crack shooters", and its members demonstrated feats of heroism fighting their way through to Berlin. From February till May 1945 the company was commanded by Guards Lieutenant Nina Lobkovskaya." "By May 1945 the number of killed Nazis in Nina's record book increased to 89." Place this against the american icon, "during the Vietnam War, Marine Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock became the most accomplished sniper of the era, with 93 confirmed kills and 300 probable woundings."

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  157. Too Hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Louise Thomsen is way too hot to be a gamer. I know that's exactly what the article is talking about, but hey..

    Just too hot...

  158. Most girl gamers are attention whores... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that is the only reason they play. Seriously. Most of them feel the need at some point to say "IM A GIRL!" and watch the nerds drool. I have more respect for the (few) female players who don't activly advertise their cunthood.

  159. Actually, discrimination is NOT where you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, you aren't thinking about the issue hard enough...

    NONE of the big gaming events and leagues have ANY restrictions that would stop girls from competing. The Cyberathlete Professional and Amateur Leagues, the World Cyber Games, the E-Sports World Cup, Quakecon, the Clanbase European leagues, the United Gaming Syndicate, etc.

    Yet, female-only tournaments are supported by many girl gamers! Why do they support exclusionary tournaments? Well, there is the camraderie associated with people of a similar sex, of course - although that isn't much of a reason for discrimination.

    But also, very few girls are actually good enough to do well in big tournaments that allow men to play, too...so their best shot at getting money/prizes/recognition is to have a separate tournament!

    For example, consider Succubus, arguably the best female Quaker 3 player in the world. Looking at the (sadly outdated) Pro-Player Index, we see her prizes in major events:

    Tournament History
    CPL Europe - Holland: placed Top 64, won $0
    BabbagesCPL: placed Top 128, won $0
    BabbagesCPL Female Tourney: placed 1st, won $3000
    All Female Tournament 2000: placed 1st, won $2000

    When she competed in the anyone-allowed tournaments, she wasn't able to get a high place nor a prize - but she still gets a lot of respect and a little cash for winning exclusionary 'Female-Only' tournaments. Thanks to this extra opportunity, she was able to win far more money in 2000 than 'star' male Quakers of much higher skill like Pow3r, PELE, Wombat, Python, ProZaC, and so on.

    Yes, there are females who have the skill and experience to compete at a high level in computer games. For example, Sweden has a lot of very good female Counter-Strikers, most famously Queen, who was in the clan A-Laget back when it was a top team. But only a very few are that good - most just aren't at the same level as the top male players. So why would they want to play against boys, when they can play against girls and get better prizes and winner's reputations?

  160. Bout time.. by mcdade · · Score: 1

    It's about time that there are some girl gamers.. we need more of them!

    Cause you are all a bunch of ugly mofo's and smell bad.. i want to be sitting next to some cute girls who smell nice and bring snacks.

    -b

  161. Is there nothing left for guys anymore? by AcidComplex · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is there nothing left for guys anymore, It seems like every sport/game/everything else sacred to guys is being played by women, which is not the problem, but EXPECT different rules, or let us into the girls bathroom, whats the difference?

  162. depends on the girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as they arent fat and ugly, they can play wherever they want.

  163. Female as in mares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Female as in mares?

  164. Girls in gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Few points real life points I wanted to make:

    1) a all girl league may be a good way to actually make progress in getting more girls interested in gaming - taking out the male component may make it an interesting spectacle and get it some press to get it kicked off (this would be a good thing)

    2) the top athlete in any sport - including not seriously physical ones (pool/golf) - are dominated by men in the end - this also rolls into just about any business in the world - i love women and i think my wife is brilliant - but in the end - i do think the best man is better than the best woman at nearly anything (obvious sexual jokes aside)

    3) anytime i go into a Gaming Software store (ebgames, software etc, compusa) - 95% are guys shopping in the software section - why would you market to girls if this is the case?

    4) a "gamer" and a person who once played a game is a different thing - i would be willing to bet the numbers being quoted are skewed by this fact - my wife has played the sims and a couple of other random games - but she is by no means a gamer - her 30 hours of playing per YEAR doesnt make her a gamer.

  165. biology, muscle mass and gender by Mangal · · Score: 1

    Forget taking an intro bio course- open your eyes and look around. Notice that ALL men are not equal in size, nor are ALL women; notice that there is a large overlap in the range of sizes. Muscle mass is dependent on USAGE and nutrition, not just gender.

    --
    I'm not just being paranoid- I've seen the data.
  166. YOU CANNOT HIDE, THE PAPER. I WILL FIND YOU!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0




  167. -- Case in point by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1


    Some days I pWn, other days I am pWn3d.

    (I'd like to think I have more days of the former rather than the latter!)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  168. good 3D game for women to try by nxs212 · · Score: 1

    Alice from EA. Decent storyline, nice graphics and tons of things to kill.
    My gf never played quake, unreal or any of those games. I picked up Alice for her new pc since she liked box art and story seemed promising.
    She finished the game mostly by herself.
    By the time we were done, it became clear that I was not only bad with directions while driving but also sucked at navigating large maps in Alice :)

  169. YES by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1


    pWn4g3

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  170. I agree with Women in Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I even think they should come up with specialized gaming characters.. ones that can cook and clean for the other players that are doing the real gaming.

  171. If it's in FFTA, it must be true!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Square-Enix wouldn't lie.

  172. Marriage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this goes to show that if you're stupid enough to marry a girl who doesn't at least respect your interest in games and technology (or better, join in with it) you've only yourself to blame.

  173. ROTFLMAO by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy shit. Jesus I got coffee everywhere you dumbfuck.
    haaahaha... multitasking is overrated, don't read at less than threshold: 2 and drink at the same time.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  174. Equal rights by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    have them compete in the same games as males. Don't treat them like they are inferior, because they are not inferior.

    Game companies typically market towards males, but virtually ignore females. There are some females who are interested in the same games as males, but they are a minority. Please do not ignore the other half of the market.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  175. Contrary evidence... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I used a female skin for Q3A and I definitely get focused on first in a room full of players. When I switched to the boring default it was markedly easier after spawning.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  176. So any of you ladies hot, single and looking? by Polarism · · Score: 1

    lol ;)

    Seriously though, I have a female friend who could probably win some serious money if she started playing Chess professionally. I don't think gender has much to do with it though, it's all intelligence and skill.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  177. You mean you cant access your fridge from the web? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    What are you, living in the Stone Age!?!?!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  178. Um... by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > My husband, and the majority of my friends, would find it shocking that I "hate" them based on their 43rd chromosome.

    You mean they all have Down's Syndrome? I suspect you mean "differing 42nd chromosome."

    Virg

  179. In English it translates to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won, asshat. ^_^

  180. Googlefight! by FsG · · Score: 1

    Time for a googlefight! Male gamers (106000) vs. Female gamers (144000)! FEMALE GAMERS WIN - just as I always suspected.

    --
    I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  181. The More I Game... by NickFusion · · Score: 1

    The lower my center of gravity seems to shift.

    And it doesn't really seem to help my game.

    Damn these dorritos!!!

    --
    What were you expecting?
  182. Some ideas... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

    We just picked up Animal Crossing (GCN), and my wife seems to like that. She also enjoys puzzle-like games.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
  183. if you want get the chicks by DuckWing · · Score: 1

    All this says, all the good geek chicks are playing Counter Strike!

    --
    -- DuckWing
  184. whoami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole idea of online segregation is absurd. Who's to say I'm a man or a woman? Can you prove it? It all comes down to if you're good enough to play regardless of sex, race, creed, yadda yadda yadda.

  185. Anyone actually verified this? by SkeptAck · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, it's bunk. There are tournaments ($75 entry fee) and there are female-only tournaments ($35 entry fee). I didn't see anything to indicate that females could NOT join the real tournaments. That males can't join the female-only tournament is implied by the fact that they're called "female" tournaments, but that's hardly gender-discrimination aimed at females. That these female-only tournaments are "viewed as a sideline" might just possibly be because they *are* a sideline.

  186. Girls get shot? by Moocowsia · · Score: 0
    "I have been a female computer gamer and a role player for many years now. In fact I started playing RPG's when I was 8 with my dad. I have always found that once people know you are a girl you will be shot!! Boys can't help themselves, they have to shoot you. Only IF they find out though, if you dress like a boy and mask your voice you can get away with it and be treated like one of the lads. If you are a kid you will be shot too, I find my daughters suffer exactly the same fate as me once they are found out. Come on lads why do you do it ??" Sharon Craft, Peterborough UK

    Would someone help this woman pull her head out of her ass? I think the main purpose of games where you can be shot is to shoot other people!

    --
    Moo!
  187. This page was generated... by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

    This page was generated by a Squad of Female Gamers for Bastian227 (107667).

  188. World War II Online Women Leaders by Mittermeyer · · Score: 1

    The women players of WWIIOL are an absolutely essential component of both Allied and Axis teams. They are rarely the most uber players but several very top people do happen to be female.

    More importantly, WWIIOL is a team game where a commander may be corraling 50-100 players at a time in a very chaotic environment. Several of the women generals really shine in this department, and are moving up the command chain as respected commanders. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see a female side Commander-in-Chief running forces in the 1000s.

    It doesn't have to be pretty shiny social interaction or l33t stuff for the women to show what they can do online.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  189. Lemmings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3496963.stm

    It is me or is she playing Lemmings?

  190. What about both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was one of the better FPS players. Then he got gender reassignment surgery. Now she's one of the best female FPS players around.

    Go fig. *shrug*

  191. Why this gal is not a female gamer by emily_the_dragonet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hm.... I've seen a lot of stereotypes and statistics thrown out there. Two that I want to comment on.

    In male-male friendships I often see guys jokingly insulting each other. "Midget", "Idiot" and more. In female friendships, verbal attacks are taken seriously. If I insulted one of my female friends, it would be assumed I meant what I said. Sure we spar verbally, but not aiming for each other. (Politics, other people, random fish (yes, fish), anything can be a argument) So though you have a bunch of guys insulting each other easily and they still have fun, a girl fresh into the world of gaming wouldn't be ready for insults she isn't supposed to be offended by. This isn't my reason though.

    The main reason I have not downloaded the UT demo or any such thing is: I don't want to start out bad. I don't want to lose, to a guy or otherwise. Don't act like it's only the guys who don't care if they lose now.

  192. A great manufactured 'controversial' plant article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this just a manufactured 'controversial' plant news article pretending to be actual news.

    Let's see the tide of hummanity that this article 'discovered'

    a. boys and girls play differently
    b. boys are less than mature than girls at the same age
    c. girls are more polite than boys
    d. a 12 year old is much less mature than a 25 year old

    Damn, can't they just photocopy an old news story from 5 years ago and just republish it without pretending to present it as new news.

    I'll give you a heads up here: There will be a 1 day avalance of IRS / income tax filing / etc., on April 15, 2004.

  193. modded 5?! by my+sig+is+bigger+tha · · Score: 1
    here's a woman who will never play Sims. sounds boring as hel.

    moderating overgeneralizations 'interesting' is ridiculous.

  194. Re:A great manufactured 'controversial' plant arti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    a 12 year old is much less mature than a 25 year old

    Prove it.

  195. Lots of girls play FF11... by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Only women take Mithra characters, so there are plenty! Feel free to hit on any female characters in an MMOG!

    Right?

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  196. Welcome to the new world order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Where everybody is exactly the same and any form of chemistry between the sexes is long forgotten.

    I think the only "winners" will be those who always were, and always will be malcontent, irrespective of present conditions.

  197. It's all about obsession with systems by JazFresh · · Score: 1

    Sorry, it's another "you know, white guys drive like this, but black guys drive like *this*" post.

    Guys get obsessed with systems. Most guys know absolutely *everything* about some topic, whether it be computers, car engines, movies, comic books, etc, etc. Girls, by contrast, tend to think that obsessive knowledge in those areas is a waste of time.

    This means that in general, girls won't bother learning the intricate depths of some games. They won't bother spending hours perfecting double-jumps in Quake2, or configuring their keys for faster weapons changes. This generally puts them at a disadvantage to the guys, but if they really wanted to beat the guys, there's no reason they couldn't.

  198. The Internet is about equality... by tempfile · · Score: 1

    In this context I remember something Anand Lal Shimpi, Mr. AnandTech, wrote in an editorial when AnandTech was first founded.

    Anand was 16 at the time, and it looks like he had gotten some critic along the lines of "how could a 16-year-old competently write articles on hardware". He just stated that the Internet allowed everybody to use the same tools and the same platform, therefore removing any superficial barriers that the real world society might impose - be it age, race, sex or anything else.

    This is just as applicable to games. When I'm on the Internet, I don't care who my game partner really is. The only thing I care about is that I can have a good time with him or her. None of the usual social barriers apply.

  199. well duhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to play games with teen boys who are trying to get off on how tough they are, you're going to be reading some low-powered tough talk. That's just the way it is. If you think you are too high class for that, then find some other pursuit.

  200. League for N00bs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't reitterate what a hundred others have said about seperate leagues in online gaming. It's been said. Except that the idea that segregating all the girls into a league is as laughable as having a league for people who've only been playing for 3 months or less, and want to feel better about being killed in 60 seconds instead of 20.

    If you're not good at the game, don't enter competitions.

    One of the great things about online gaming is that it doesn't matter if you're the best or not. It's all about if you're having fun (of course it's more fun if you're the winner, though).

    I used to play CS and Team fortress years ago, and can recall many a game where I'd get owned, but still had a great time, as I'd keep trying to outwit the other player/team (sometimes not sucessfully, mind you). Mind you, back then there seemed to be more teamwork and comraderea (sp?) between strangers.

  201. Women and gaming and in linux by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    women get treated like crap in both by sexist users and gamers.

    doesnt suprise me that they get left out of the same brackets as males, because sadly, a lot of gaming geeks and geeks out there dont see women worth their time, not all, but a good handful do.

    My kristen is into gaming and computers, she codes, and plays ragnarok online, some other rpg's and dance dance revolution.
    though, given the incentive, she can prolly kick anyone's ass in any FPS you throw at her.

    It must be a male ego thing, girls toting around guns threatens men I guess, never has threatened me (except when they point them at me. yike.)
    virtual or not. not to mention you check several BBS' online and you see women getting treated like shit when they talk about something they accomplished in linux for being first time users, they get all sorts of trolling and sexist remarks. and these people wonder why they cant get laid..
    sheesh..

    anyways, I'd love to see some girls take on some dudes at UT2k4 for a few rounds. see who gets pwned.

    1. Re:Women and gaming and in linux by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I know a few women that play Q3 and can woop my ass hands down. I think its sweet (in a kinky cool way). I've also noticed that unlike most guys (or maybe just young boys) Women don't get the stuck-up "I'm better then you so shut-up" attitude.

      My chick is all into playin PS2 or *cough* Xbox games like mad but I've tried to get her to try Counter-Strike and/or Quake3 but she just won't do it.. kinda bums me out.

    2. Re:Women and gaming and in linux by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      and maybe that's it, maybe a lot of the male gamers are anegerd by the fact women dont act like them, they might go "pwned" or some shit, but they act very nonchalant(sp?) and I think that cool calm attitude pisses off most already enraged men.

      hell, look how pissed off your fellow gamers get when they lose a game.. they're like "GAAAAAH and throw a tantrum. (not necessarily in your own clan)
      while most women (depending on what time of the month it is, or just how they are) will be like "dammit, oh well, back into the fray."

      And I think it's the fear of "being beaten by a girl" mostly.

  202. Re:Why segregate girls? by Highrollr · · Score: 1

    Tell you what. You tell my gf that she "lacks confidence" and I'll see if I can hold her back.

  203. don't make it sound so one-sided by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Men have to put up with as much, if not more, sexism from women as the other way around.

  204. Unreal Tournament 2004 by danila · · Score: 1

    One of the voice taunts included in the beta demo is "You play like a girl". I am not saying it should be removed, PC be damned, but it's quite indicative, isn't it? :)

    On the other hand, my younger sister (20 years old) got hooked on the demo instantly. :) She never liked single player FPS games, but after trying UT2004 online she was even compelled to overcome her P2P addiction and close KaZaA and eDonkey. :)))

    It was quite funny to hear her bragging about her team winning 4:1 in CTF with her brinding all the flags. :) If you see girl-neto on one of UT2004 servers, be kind. :))

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  205. Funny thing is, it's happened to me... by zootread · · Score: 1

    One other difference, though: the woman is getting hers from a real live partner. The guy who's eating pizza, drinking beer, and using the computer while getting a blowjob is using one of those silicone molds of some porn star's mouth.
    When *I* give a blowjob, I expect undivided attention. Whether or not my partner considers it "necessary."


    Well, this girl I know said she wanted to come into where I work and give me a blow job while sitting under my desk. Unfortunately, that would not work as I would get busted easilly with the way my desk is arranged.

    So I was at her place one evening. We were drinking. Her computer was acting funny and she asked me if I'd fix it (she wanted to show me some pics that were on there). I really didn't feel like fixing the computer, it was some annoying WinXP problem that I didn't really have a clue about. But then a light bulb went off in my head. I said "I'll fix it if you get under the desk and suck me off."

    Being the crazy nympho, she was happy to do it, and it fulfilled the fantasy she had before, so it worked out nicely. And at the same time, I was trying to fix the computer, and drinking wine at the same time. Well, ok, I was pretenting to try to fix the computer, but still, I was multitasking for the most part, and had the computer been working properly, I might have been browsing some porn (though it wouldn't be necessary, this girl is seriously hot; too bad she doesn't live in the same city anymore).

    I admit, throwing the slice of pizza into the mix would be a little extreme. But I'm sure its been done by someone, somewhere.

    --
    Zoot!
  206. Oops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just came all over your face. Mmmmm...

  207. Girls are just like boys, only more so. by miketo · · Score: 1

    I'm all in favor of women playing online games, I don't harsh on them or harass them, and I find they're just as interested in the same things as I am while gaming. I've had my head handed to me many times by women gamers, and it was a blast. No need to debate differences between men and women gamers, any more than there's a need to debate nuances of philosophy. Just play games, and let others sort out the stacks of bodies afterward!

    [Subject heading is a quote from Robert Heinlein, I think as a proposed article title from Jubal Harshaw in "Stranger in a Strange Land."]