What YouTube staff did here was stop this instance of their social media platform being used to foment white nationalism (Why are we using that term anyway? I thought those types hated political correctness?). That it still happened in the first place is a case in the point that the spread of such antisocial ideology is endemic to social media. No irony, just evidence of the issue that the hearing is about.
"Crime" being a larger and larger number of acts that really shouldn't be labeled as such. Like drug addiction, or paying various fines for things that ultimately amount to being poor.
Private for-profit prisons are fascistic, plain and simple. Collusion of government and private interests to institutionally exploit the people. In the pursuit of profit, the for-profit prison industry lobbies the government to increase the number of incarcerable offenses so they make more money incarcerating, under the guise of being "Tough On Crime". The officials that enact what the private prison lobby pushes for are predominantly of one political party in particular.
What if the right to be wrong affects others detrimentally? "Don't tread on me!" says the Gadsden Flag. The trodden upon in this case are those who can't be vaccinated, and to a lesser extent those who have vaxxed since vaccinations are not a perfect shield in a similar manner to seatbelts against crash injury. They are emphatically not the Pro-Pestilencers, as they cry to be.
The freedom to recklessly swing one's fists about ends at another's nose.
You mean paying to improve things that you could personally benefit from rather than what society at large needs for everyone to benefit, including Amazon? That's what I see going on here. Refusal for such huge megacorps to pay taxes like Amazon does is refusal to pay for the upkeep and improvement of the social structures that make success for everyone possible. That's the true theft, not taxation.
And now Amazon has their claws in those schools who now have to do what Amazon wants them to do or else the funding gets pulled. We saw it happen in NYC with the whole HQ2 deal.
Three places where profit motive has absolutely no place in a healthy society: Healthcare, Corrections... and Education. Profit motive in these areas only subverts the public good.
My sister works as a mortgage underwriter and on a lark managed to find an identical-layout house to our childhood home in Missouri. Ours goes for $150k. Out in Cali? >$1 million.
Those "small players that beat them out of the market" that Tim speaks of? They don't. They disrupt the big boys' gravy train and then get bought, and then their novel new concept becomes part of the big boys' gravy train.
So, ultimately, breakup needs to occur.
Think about it... Saudi fund investing in Tesla. Oil wealth investing in disruptive technology that can potentially obviate the need for petroleum fuels.
If this happens, they'll deep-six that company because it's a threat to their cash cow.
"and yes some Democrats are dirtbags on the issue too, despite what comes out of their mouths."
So can you show me the numbers where the votes against Leahy's proposal were about equally D and R? Otherwise, it looks like a classic "Both Sides Are Bad (So Vote Republican)" retort.
"Was only speaking Satirically" = "It's just a joke, lighten up". The classic capper to a round of bullying, trying to delegitimize the grievances of the bullied.
At the very least, it gives challengers to Republican incumbents who are against Net Neutrality another vector to assail the general Republican complicity in the Trumpster Fire.
I am against "Drone Delivery" for one fundamental reason: Gravity. If a delivery truck has a mechanical failure, it's just dead on the road No harm done to the cargo. Gravity does not ensue upon my package. If a delivery drone has a mechanical failure, down it goes, and so does my package.
If a delivery truck takes a hit, it'd have to be a pretty seriously heavy hit to damage my package. If a delivery drone takes a hit... All aircraft are designed first and foremost to optimize weight, because it has to work against gravity to even move. It just doesn't have the bulk to sustain damage like a ground vehicle does.
Slashdot Mirror
What YouTube staff did here was stop this instance of their social media platform being used to foment white nationalism (Why are we using that term anyway? I thought those types hated political correctness?). That it still happened in the first place is a case in the point that the spread of such antisocial ideology is endemic to social media. No irony, just evidence of the issue that the hearing is about.
"Crime" being a larger and larger number of acts that really shouldn't be labeled as such. Like drug addiction, or paying various fines for things that ultimately amount to being poor.
Private for-profit prisons are fascistic, plain and simple. Collusion of government and private interests to institutionally exploit the people. In the pursuit of profit, the for-profit prison industry lobbies the government to increase the number of incarcerable offenses so they make more money incarcerating, under the guise of being "Tough On Crime". The officials that enact what the private prison lobby pushes for are predominantly of one political party in particular.
"Legal activities should not be blocked"? I was unaware that GoFundMe was a government institution.
"...since a controversial and ultimately retracted 1998 paper..."
Fraudulent. The word you want is Fraudulent.
"Errors in pay" that are conveniently in the employer's favor is called Wage Theft if proven. Wage Theft is a crime.
What if the right to be wrong affects others detrimentally? "Don't tread on me!" says the Gadsden Flag. The trodden upon in this case are those who can't be vaccinated, and to a lesser extent those who have vaxxed since vaccinations are not a perfect shield in a similar manner to seatbelts against crash injury. They are emphatically not the Pro-Pestilencers, as they cry to be.
The freedom to recklessly swing one's fists about ends at another's nose.
You mean paying to improve things that you could personally benefit from rather than what society at large needs for everyone to benefit, including Amazon? That's what I see going on here. Refusal for such huge megacorps to pay taxes like Amazon does is refusal to pay for the upkeep and improvement of the social structures that make success for everyone possible. That's the true theft, not taxation.
And now Amazon has their claws in those schools who now have to do what Amazon wants them to do or else the funding gets pulled. We saw it happen in NYC with the whole HQ2 deal.
Three places where profit motive has absolutely no place in a healthy society: Healthcare, Corrections... and Education. Profit motive in these areas only subverts the public good.
Nexus Mods has had the correct solution to this problem for years already: Remove the dislike button.
My sister works as a mortgage underwriter and on a lark managed to find an identical-layout house to our childhood home in Missouri. Ours goes for $150k. Out in Cali? >$1 million.
Those "small players that beat them out of the market" that Tim speaks of? They don't. They disrupt the big boys' gravy train and then get bought, and then their novel new concept becomes part of the big boys' gravy train. So, ultimately, breakup needs to occur.
Wingnut president accuses media outlet that doesn't bark at the GOP moon of "Political Bias". News at 11.
I figured it out. "Make America Great Again" means either one of two things:
...Or both.
1: It's a commandment to whoever succeeds him.
2: It's actually Make America (enter another) Great (depression) Again
The monied have a vested interest in the status quo, even if it's unsustainable. Are you really expecting them to have such foresight?
Think about it... Saudi fund investing in Tesla. Oil wealth investing in disruptive technology that can potentially obviate the need for petroleum fuels. If this happens, they'll deep-six that company because it's a threat to their cash cow.
"and yes some Democrats are dirtbags on the issue too, despite what comes out of their mouths."
So can you show me the numbers where the votes against Leahy's proposal were about equally D and R? Otherwise, it looks like a classic "Both Sides Are Bad (So Vote Republican)" retort.
In America here, we just go straight to using the Credit Score itself as a social credit score. We don't have a second layer on top of it.
"Was only speaking Satirically" = "It's just a joke, lighten up". The classic capper to a round of bullying, trying to delegitimize the grievances of the bullied.
More accurate analogy: Flower pot hat fad craze subsides, Flower potting enthusiasts rejoice as flower pot prices improve dramatically
I recall a uninamous SCOUTS ruling that states that naturally occurring genetic sequences cannot be patented. Shouldn't this apply to this case?
At the very least, it gives challengers to Republican incumbents who are against Net Neutrality another vector to assail the general Republican complicity in the Trumpster Fire.
I am against "Drone Delivery" for one fundamental reason: Gravity. If a delivery truck has a mechanical failure, it's just dead on the road No harm done to the cargo. Gravity does not ensue upon my package. If a delivery drone has a mechanical failure, down it goes, and so does my package.
If a delivery truck takes a hit, it'd have to be a pretty seriously heavy hit to damage my package. If a delivery drone takes a hit... All aircraft are designed first and foremost to optimize weight, because it has to work against gravity to even move. It just doesn't have the bulk to sustain damage like a ground vehicle does.
Which of these Attorneys General are up for re-election in 2018, or are in a state where the governor that appointed them is up for re-election?
What case is this?
I am predicting a glut of second-hand used cards first.