> But its the HR guys who filter your resumes for qualifications before they even get to anyone important.
True. I graduated University in 2001, and temped for food/rent until earlier this year. One of my jobs was working HR. For any single position advertised, an employment agency would submit (seemingly) the resume of everyone registered with them. Having filtered out all that crap kind of desensitises you to filtering the resume of the unfortunate new graduates.
We need to make things harder to use, and eventually as a result the stupid portion of the world population will be culled out of the gene pool.
Of course, for this to work we'll need to graft lethal devices onto simple household appliances, but i'm sure there are enough bitter sociopathic techies out there to make this a nightmarish reality.
Shutting the stable door after the horse bolted...
on
RIAA to Sue You Now
·
· Score: 1
I don't honestly believe it'll be easy (possible, even?) to *prove in court* that anyone has caused copyright violations using p2p software.
This is just more FUD from the turd manufacturers.
yup, like my friends' band hovershark (described by a colleague as "music to slash your wrists to") and of course the... uhm.. unique... big poo generator...
I'm not being sarcastic. I'm quite fond of mp3.com.
This has always gone on to some degree; perhaps not with free trips and all, but certainly games companies have a certain amount of power over magazines.
Companies have always quite easily exerted pressure on magazines by giving them "exclusive" previews, etc. These days it's taken for granted that they'll just send out umpteen review copies of their game to all the major magazines, but back in the eighties this wasn't always the case.
I think with the market shift in this direction can only be a good thing though - after all, I'd sooner all those poor reviewers (who really don't have a glamorous existence, despite what you'd tend to think) got a whole bunch of free stuff, than game companies sticking it to magazines for giving a bad review to their buggy/rubbish product.
Slashdot Mirror
> I believe that he knows what he he did was wrong.
Yup. Getting caught would feature high on that list.
> But its the HR guys who filter your resumes for qualifications before they even get to anyone important.
True. I graduated University in 2001, and temped for food/rent until earlier this year. One of my jobs was working HR. For any single position advertised, an employment agency would submit (seemingly) the resume of everyone registered with them. Having filtered out all that crap kind of desensitises you to filtering the resume of the unfortunate new graduates.
Incidentally, substitute "shred" for "filter".
(I still don't work in computing)
"hey, I can see my house from here"
the urine of a specimen of some yet undiscovered hideous species found only in the Canadian Shield (thankfully).
"weasel's piss strained through a mouldy balaclava helmet"
There are too many stupid people on earth.
We need to make things harder to use, and eventually as a result the stupid portion of the world population will be culled out of the gene pool.
Of course, for this to work we'll need to graft lethal devices onto simple household appliances, but i'm sure there are enough bitter sociopathic techies out there to make this a nightmarish reality.
I don't honestly believe it'll be easy (possible, even?) to *prove in court* that anyone has caused copyright violations using p2p software. This is just more FUD from the turd manufacturers.
Apologies for the pedantry, but 500+250+200!=1000. Who gets the other $50? You can send it to me if it won't be missed.
What is congress's path to perl?
will it run nethack?
yup, like my friends' band hovershark (described by a colleague as "music to slash your wrists to") and of course the... uhm.. unique... big poo generator... I'm not being sarcastic. I'm quite fond of mp3.com.
This has always gone on to some degree; perhaps not with free trips and all, but certainly games companies have a certain amount of power over magazines. Companies have always quite easily exerted pressure on magazines by giving them "exclusive" previews, etc. These days it's taken for granted that they'll just send out umpteen review copies of their game to all the major magazines, but back in the eighties this wasn't always the case. I think with the market shift in this direction can only be a good thing though - after all, I'd sooner all those poor reviewers (who really don't have a glamorous existence, despite what you'd tend to think) got a whole bunch of free stuff, than game companies sticking it to magazines for giving a bad review to their buggy/rubbish product.
We dub this "Project Greenhorn"