Slashdot Mirror


Windows 'Longhorn' Kicks Off (On Paper)

gdeciantis writes: "NeoWin.net posted an article which outlines some of the new features that are currently planned for the the next version of Windows (codenamed Longhorn). With new features like seamless content transfer across devices, it looks like Longhorn will not just be Windows XP SE."

432 comments

  1. proposed requirements for the next Windows by 56ker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the link to it Just click here!

    1. Re:proposed requirements for the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:proposed requirements for the next Windows by Sinfamous · · Score: 1

      And they even have a comments submission ready...

      Oh Joy!!

    3. Re:proposed requirements for the next Windows by DocSnyder · · Score: 1

      So it won't take very long until the *n?x people will get a lot of cheap or even free >1 GHz boxes which are too slow for Longhorn, just as a 400 MHz box is considered as underpowered for XP. Recycling at its best ;-)

  2. In case the site get's Slashdotted..... by phoenix_orb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks to xStainDx for the heads up in BPN on our forums.
    He has found some documentation on Windows Codenamed Longhorn, the new Windows planned to follow XP. Microsoft have been keeping mum about this, not letting on if Longhorn will be XPSE (read: Second Edition) or a major upgrade and advancement.

    We can reveal today that there will be some major advancements in compliance and driver support for Longhorn with an addition to securing the OS and making it more central to the home PC. For example: Taken from h3-longhorn_preview_winhec.doc
    ADVANCES: Broadcast and video components meet reliability and stability requirements
    New built-in driver support is being planned for Windows Longhorn. Support planned at this time includes a new class driver for USB video cameras.
    Proposed requirements include the following:

    For any device that provides end-user capabilities for transfer of digital content, expose the device schema so that Windows can support seamless content transfer.

    The device and driver must ensure a minimum level of propagation and persistence of device or content metadata.

    The DirectX Video Acceleration (DirectX VA) API must be used if the hardware supports acceleration of MPEG-2 decode with motion compensation, iDCT, or VLD.

    Video that is interlaced must be de-interlaced using the DirectX VA and Direct3D 9 APIs for video.

    The components must be capable of rendering video with the Microsoft DirectShow Video Mixing Renderer using DirectX 9 Direct3D.
    and also discussed is:
    NEW: "Mira" device, if implemented, meets stability, reliability, and compatibility requirements

    Proposed requirements for "Mira" devices are TBD

    --
    Blah Blah Blah.
    1. Re:In case the site get's Slashdotted..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft have been keeping mum about this, not letting on if Longhorn will be XPSE (read: Second Edition) or a major upgrade and advancement.

      No, the next version of Windows will be named "WiNDOWS OS X" in honor of the fact that MS can't think for themselves... Everything else in Windows is from Apple and NeXT so why not the name....

    2. Re:In case the site get's Slashdotted..... by Erratio · · Score: 1

      What...did they forget to have DirectX render the icons and cursor too?

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    3. Re:In case the site get's Slashdotted..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, in 1987 Microsoft hired Susan Kare to do the icons for Windows 3.0... she was the former icon and font designer for Apple from 1983 to 1986 and did all the fonts and icons for the Macintosh. How original!

  3. Oh joy. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess this means we get to see another video clip of the Microsoft CEO stamping around on stage screaming. This time in a cowboy hat and boots of course. I wonder if they'll hand out temp tattoos that look like cow brands with the MS logo?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Oh joy. by bonzoesc · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as he's trying to round up Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, I LOOOOVE THIS COMPANY! Developers, Developers, Developers...

    2. Re:Oh joy. by rherbert · · Score: 1

      Temporary? They'd probably want to encode it into their DNA.

    3. Re:Oh joy. by Wheaty18 · · Score: 1

      What do you think the default screensaver will be in Longhorn? ;)

    4. Re:Oh joy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmmmmmooooooooocrosoft.

    5. Re:Oh joy. by hyrdra · · Score: 2
      I guess this means we get to see another video clip of the Microsoft CEO stamping around on stage screaming. This time in a cowboy hat and boots of course. I wonder if they'll hand out temp tattoos that look like cow brands with the MS logo?

      Don't you mean stampeding around on stage? ;-)
      --


      "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    6. Re: Oh joy. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Cowboy hat and boots? why not invite.... Cowboyneal ??

      I mean, like,
      "Why did Microsoft abandon Hailstorm?"
      - Cowboyneal!!
      "Why did you jump like a cowboy on the stage?"
      - Cowboyneal told me to!
      "Do you really love your company?"
      - As much as Cowboyneal does!!

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  4. woohoo by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yay! another oportunity to have a whole bunch of threads bashing microsoft...

    1. Re:woohoo by wizbit · · Score: 1

      well?

      get on with it :)

    2. Re:woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Here we go.. I wonder how long it will take for this one to crash? 1 day? and I can see why these peeps are looking forward to the next release. Just another O/S to Pirate and not pay for the software. Just wake up and get a real Operating system and be free of the Antichrist. :)
      I wonder how many ways this O/S will transmit information without the user knowing this time?
      I wonder how many ways the 3rd Party software will be rejected?
      Will the Windows firewall be cheddar cheese instead of swiss cheese?
      Insead of 12% of your drive space will be dedicated to your hard Drive for restore points (35mb per piece) will it be 24%? and 70 MB per piece?
      I wonder If M$ will change there tech support greeting to "Hi Thank you for calling M$ how can we screw you today?" LOL

      I wonder.... Will it work?
      They said in NT that it was New Technology. Well that Technology was created 15 years ago from Unix and they could not even get that right.

      So the trend still continues.

      Well I have Ranted :D

      Be Free My Children BE FREE!!!!!!!!!
      this willbe like the new release of the ET Movie...

      XP PHONE HOME XP PHONE HOME

    3. Re:woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windoze sucks major hairy cock

  5. Re:who cares by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

    *cough* NTFS is journalled already...

  6. The much anticipated... by swagr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Notepad upgrade.
    Will we ever see a better text editor come with the os?

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    1. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. just cuz bi3ll usez emacs doesnt mean the masses would understand such things. if you want something better, buy MSOffice.

      duh.

    2. Re:The much anticipated... by clearcache · · Score: 1

      why spend ANY time doing that when so many other people/companies do it better...check out jedit if you want a really good, free one. (Java required.)

      Besides, Windows development (for better or for worse) is all about the IDE. I doubt MS sees the need to throw any effort into developing notepad. And look at what they're doing w/"Computer Management" using their management console...GREAT idea, IMHO, to provide a standardized interface for configuration. We don't need notepad to edit win.ini anymore like we did back in the 3.1 days.

    3. Re:The much anticipated... by Quill_28 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they come out with a better notepad wouldn't they be using their monopoly power to crush the competition?

    4. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      use sysedit

    5. Re:The much anticipated... by x0n · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, you know about the secret .LOG function too? Open notepad, make the first line .LOG -- save it, and voila, everytime you open it, it inserts a timestamp! beat that EMACS in under 85 lines of lisp!

      - Ois

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    6. Re:The much anticipated... by sulli · · Score: 1

      too bad you can't get BBEdit for windows. I would love that.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    7. Re:The much anticipated... by tshak · · Score: 1, Troll

      If they come out with a better notepad wouldn't they be using their monopoly power to crush the competition?

      VERY insightful... please mod parent up.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    8. Re:The much anticipated... by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      I'd love to see Textpad come with win*. It's free as in annoyware (popup every 5th save?) though it's only $30 to register (to support more plugins).

      You can get plugins to do syntax highlighting for pretty much anything immaginable. Reads/saves pc or unix, built in spellchecker, nice and light. What wordpad would be if you actually had to use it.

    9. Re:The much anticipated... by wiredog · · Score: 2

      I like notepad. It does basic text editing very well and very fast. If you need something with better capabilities use Wordpad, or get a real word processor.

    10. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      (add-hook write-file-hooks time-stamp)

      Then put

      Time-stamp:

      anywhere in the first 8 lines of your file.

      Of course, unlike the Notepad version, this is fully customisable and documented.

    11. Re:The much anticipated... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes I see this as a downfall of Linux. The software for Linux seems to always try to be everything to everyone. There is no supper basic notepad for Linux, ok gedit and i am sure that kde has one too, but windows always seems to have kind of a 3 teir application base. sort of a notepad->wordpad->msword or paint->image editor->photopaint depending on how many features you may want.

      Linux seems to do well on the full featured version stuff but not so well on the very basic straight forward applications. (except for the command line. There they do it right.)

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    12. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh secret huh..as in "in the Notepad help file"

    13. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pico, nano, nedit, vi

      Any questions?

    14. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid to admit I still use MS-DOS Editor (posting anonymously because I work at M$).

    15. Re:The much anticipated... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      HAHA! even microsoft employees agree m$ sucks... (well, i guess that really doesn't mean anything...) hehe.

      --
      I write code.
    16. Re:The much anticipated... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      well, actually vi isn't really basic. it's very very complex to be honest. though, pico is DEFINATLY an easy to use editor. someone should make a version of pico for X or something. maybe call it, "notepad" that way, all of these notepad fans will switch to a *nix and we'll rid the world of a few more m$ followers. hehe. (maybe that makes some sense..)

      --
      I write code.
    17. Re:The much anticipated... by Arandir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know what Notepad is? It's essentially the multiline edit control of MFC with a frame around it. Do you know what KEdit is? It's essentially the multiline edit widget of Qt with a frame around it. The example Visual Studio editor and the sample Qt editor are virtually indistinguishable from Notepad and KEdit but for a bit of polish.

      Why doesn't KEdit qualify as a super basic text editor? You can't get much simpler than that.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    18. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't need notepad to edit win.ini anymore

      Yeah, like that new hire we had for a few days, who used MSWord to write source code. Damn it sure looked pretty...

    19. Re:The much anticipated... by lux55 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I want BBEdit for Linux or Unix in general, not just OSX. Windows would be smarter, since it would drastically increase their potential market, but who cares. There are already a million editors for Windows anyway, and Windows users have never been famous for appreciating quality.

      I know there are plenty of good editors for Unix already, but they either have too much of a learning curve for the average user (Vi, Emacs), or they just lack that extra polish that Bare Bones puts into BBEdit. My current choice for Linux is NEdit, but it's based on a rather unintuitive toolkit, which makes save/open dialogs awkward.

      Now that OSX is part of the Unix gang, their Mac-only stance is kind of passe.

    20. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notepad isn't written with MFC, it's straight Win32 API. You're thinking of Wordpad which uses MFC. The source code is available from the MSDN website.

    21. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, no, it's not insightful
      deleting notepad.exe is quite simple to do, deleting internet explorer is not

    22. Re:The much anticipated... by Mignon · · Score: 2
      There is no supper basic notepad for Linux

      Notepad works in Wine. How's that for ya?

    23. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea, hurd all the morons over to Linux. Have the Linux hackers deal with 'em.

    24. Re:The much anticipated... by damiam · · Score: 1
      notepad->wordpad->msword

      gEdit->AbiWord->OpenOffice

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    25. Re:The much anticipated... by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative
      notepad->wordpad->msword

      For KDE:

      KWrite -> Kate -> KWord

      KWrite is just like notepad. No frills, just text, and you click and type. Kate is a serious powerhouse text editor, similar to TextPad for Windows. It allows plugins, and can be used as a simple IDE, or XML document manager. KWord is like MS Word lite. It has a good chunk of the features needed to handle most office needs. It's biggest problem (bugs in WYSIWYG code) is fixed in CVS and there will be a new release soon (KOffice releases follow KDE releases).

      paint->image editor->photopaint

      For KDE:

      KPaint -> Krita

      KPaint is just like paint - suitable for kids to scribble with or JeffK to make dumb art. Krita (formerly Krayon) is the KOffice photo program, a la Photoshop. It's new, and will be in the upcoming release (probably, if now, the one after that). If you want a vector drawing app, there's the very stable and powerful Kontour.

      Basically, you get the "simple" version in the basic install of KDE, and add the "advanced" verion when you install KOffice. There ya go... problem solved.

      --
      Evan --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    26. Re:The much anticipated... by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Will we ever see a better text editor come with the os?

      Me, I use Notepad+, it's never steered me wrong. And when I'm feeling frisky, there's GVim.

    27. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d you ro0l! I bet you can talk some shit about some shit, huh?

    28. Re:The much anticipated... by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

      Notepad needs to support using the key to switch modes. It is frustraing to keep hitting and not be put into command mode....

    29. Re:The much anticipated... by mrsalty · · Score: 1

      I must say that notepad and Wordpad are the most usable products microsoft ever released. just my 2bits

      --
      -- Hail Eris
    30. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like notepad. It does basic text editing very well and very fast.

      I have to disagree.

      1. It can not handle Unix end of line characters properly. This means it does not do basic text editing as well as other basic text editors.

      2. It is not "fast" to use. e.g. to search for the text "findme":
      Vim: /findme
      Notepad: [Alt-e],f,findme,[enter]
      To find a matching parenthesis:
      Vim:%
      Notepad: do it yourself
      etc...

      Have you ever tried Vim, or SciTE?

    31. Re:The much anticipated... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Perhaps an updated Kontour will qualify to be called "powerful". That doesn't describe the current version. The current version of Kontour (well, the one that came with Red Hat 7.2) is sub-adequate. Not terrible, but nothing to hang your hat on. It's had far less development than, say, the gimp, and shows it. The gimp may be a good tool. I'ld need to put more work in on it to find out, but I've seen good work that was reported to come from it. Kontour ... not yet.
      KWrite as of the latest version that I've seen is still missing a good index and table of contents creation facility. (I recommend that they swipe the version used in Word 5.1 for the Mac. MS Word has gone downhill from that with every version, but expecially in their indexing and table of contents facilities. In that version there was text markup that could be visible or not, depending on a switch. And could be easily hand edited. Far superior to the "fields" that the current version uses, at least for tables and indexes. Also, I would recommend that they take a page from Word Perfect and enable Multiple tables of XXXXXXXXX, with different names. This allows one to construct tables of illustration, tables of Code, etc.

      To me bibliographic notation is less important, but I know that it is important to many. This isn't at all the same as footnotes, which I use more often.

      Another nice feature is the ability to create an isolated block of text, perhaps anchored to some particular word in the external text, that it attempts to follow along with. The block needs to be able to be outlined, so as to be a clearly distinct piece of text. (Think of a fragment of code that floats along with a text description of what it does. [Hello, World!])

      I can do most of this with Word. Enough. But not all. KWord, OTOH, doesn't have many of these features yet. Which means that I *can't* use it. Perhaps this is changed in the new release. I'll certainly look at it. For now, I'm wondering just how much of what I need StarOffice will offer. (OpenOffice is still crashing whenever I try to use it. Last time it grabbed the focus on the mouse and wouldn't let go. I ended up killing X Window. I actually thought I was going to need to power cycle the computer, when X finally died (BOY was I glad for ext3's journaling about then!).

      And I don't consider myself a heavy word processing user. Or a graphic artist. For professional use... (well, perhaps professionals would be using Lyx? ... No, they would want something that was quick to use and gave immediate feedback as well as being powerful.)

      I keep saying "next time this will be good enough that I'll be able to recommend it to non-techies", but as long as I can't get what I want from it, I sure can't recommend it to others. Right now I end up doning most of my Linux word processing in HTML. That's how bad I find the current crop of editors. (And you KNOW this means that there isn't any decent index, or even page numbers...).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    32. Re:The much anticipated... by DaCool42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      notepad->wordpad->msword

      cat->vi->vim

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    33. Re:The much anticipated... by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      It can not handle Unix end of line characters properly.

      I couldn't agree more. My experience shows that win95/98 puts that stupid block character instead of a unix end of line (== basically one line for ALL the text; it's a real pain when looking at code); whereas 2000 displays it fine however I've found that printing it causes each intended return to turn in to two (causing minor irritation to me and my professors).

    34. Re:The much anticipated... by igrek · · Score: 2, Troll

      1. It can not handle Unix end of line characters properly.

      So what? Unix editors can not handle DOS line endings (^M) neither. You have to run dos2unix or do :%s/...
      It's not basic editor functionality to support foreign OS conventions.

      2. It is not "fast" to use. e.g. to search for the text "findme"

      Wrong. [F3]findme[ENTER] - the same number of keystrokes

      Finding the mathcing parenthesis has nothing to do with basic text editing.

      You confuse Notepad.exe with programmer's editors. It's NOT a programmer's editor. It's basic text editor.

      If you need programmer's editor on Windows, use Vim or MS Visual Studio or whatever, but not Notepad.exe.

    35. Re:The much anticipated... by Grokko · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would add, the most USED applications are Solitaire and Minesweeper, respectively.

      Though I have to admit, i was SHOCKED to see the Windows XP Notepad open an 18 meg logfile without asking to load Wordpad.

    36. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      super basic notepad for Linux:

      cat << eof

    37. Re:The much anticipated... by xTown · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      notepad-wordpad-msword


      emacs-emacs-emacs


      Grows with you as you learn.

    38. Re:The much anticipated... by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      Yes, but... but.. When was the last time you ever had to tell someone to RTFM for notepad???

      *Universe Explodes*

    39. Re:The much anticipated... by wedg · · Score: 2

      The software for Linux seems to always try to be everything to everyone. There is no supper basic notepad for Linux

      I'm pretty sure that the "notepad" for Linux could be considered to be "ed". Try "ed filename.txt". That's as basic as you can get. A step above that would probably be pico (or nano). And then at the top you have VI, Emacs, etc. There's always cat >> filename.txt EOF if you want to get even more basic.

      nEdit is a good graphical notepad too.

      For me, though, the notepad has always just been the console. If I just need to edit something in a jiffy I just "vi /etc/X11/XF86Config" or whatever. If I'm writing a paper or coding I'll bust out nEdit or jEdit or something else.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    40. Re:The much anticipated... by codexus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The problem is that everytime microsoft bundles some basic software with the OS, like an internet browser for example, everyone starts yelling "Monopoly! Monopoly!".

      --
      True warriors use the Klingon Google
    41. Re:The much anticipated... by toopc · · Score: 1
      Will we ever see a better text editor come with the os?

      If this were to happen, I can see the story Slashdot would link to. I would probably sound somethinglike this:

      &nbsp

      Microsoft Bundles Advanced Text Editor

      In a blatant attempt to cut off the air supply of the advanced text editing market, Microsoft has begun bundling Notepad 2.0 with the new version of Windows, codenamed Longhorn. The new editor copies many of the advanced features already found in products like BBEdit from Bare Bones software, as well as adding a few unique features. When asked to comment on this latest development, a ProComp spokesman stated, "Micorosft is clearly leveraging their desktop monopoly in an attempt to corner the market in text editing. The American people do not want this to happen, and we urge the DOJ and State Attorneys General to look into this further." On Slashdot, a popular pro Linux discussion site, many posters were seen to write comments ranging from "First Post" to "Micro$oft suxors for doing this".

    42. Re:The much anticipated... by Arandir · · Score: 1

      You're right. My bad.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    43. Re:The much anticipated... by Kismet · · Score: 2


      So what? Unix editors can not handle DOS line endings (^M) neither. You have to run dos2unix or do :%s/...


      You don't have to search and replace DOS CRs in VIM. Just do :set fileformat=dos and VIM will support DOS mode files just fine, both reading and writing.

    44. Re:The much anticipated... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Kontour, yes, I was referring to the upcoming version, which is simply astounding. If you like and work with vector graphics, this gives you incredible control and excellent features. I just checked the koffice website, and there's no info on the upcoming version. I'm not sure where I saw the info (changelog and screenshots) but it was impressive.

      As for KWord, no, bibliographic notation and some academic features aren't available. That's why I said most office use. For memos and letters, it's there. For writing a thesis, I wouldn't recommend it. Not even the upcoming version. But I can write memos, design newspaper ads, print out VCR covers, and write letters to my niece and nephew... all stuff I've done this week with KWord. Even now I don't *quite* recommnd the current version (that WYSIWYG bug is a killer one, but it is finally stomped and fixed in CVS). But I use it daily with no problem.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    45. Re:The much anticipated... by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      nano. its pretty quick and pretty basic from what I've used of it. I prefer vi for a thousand reasons but nano is nice.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    46. Re:The much anticipated... by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      I'd love to see Textpad [textpad.com] come with win*. It's free as in annoyware (popup every 5th save?) though it's only $30 to register (to support more plugins).

      I paid for my copy. If you use it a lot (I know I do), do the right thing - pay for yours.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    47. Re:The much anticipated... by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      I have =]

    48. Re:The much anticipated... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Good grief, next someone will say just use
      copy con filename
      in DOS for a simple text editor! :-)

    49. Re:The much anticipated... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Good gravy, vi isn't basic. I went from a Windows shop to a place that hated MS more than Slashdot took me weeks before I could write a one page document without screwing up.

      What! :wq saves the document! j moves down, l moves right! :-)

      Of course now it's all I want to use.

    50. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original brilliant M$ code writes in the file
      whenever it is opened - you lisp code writes when
      you write to the file.

    51. Re:The much anticipated... by red_china_menace · · Score: 1

      actually, back in the days of Xenix, bill gates used vi, not Emacs!, which is important because it lends credence to the theory that vi truly is the tool of the devil.

    52. Re:The much anticipated... by red_china_menace · · Score: 1

      this has nothing to do with notepad. Try the same in any text editor. It still works.

    53. Re:The much anticipated... by red_china_menace · · Score: 1

      if you like textpad, try editplus. It has all the features that Textpad has, and tons more, and there are hundreds of user files you can download for just about any language that you might have heard of, and some that you probably haven't. It's also shareware, and less annoying than Textpad (just one screen that comes up when you open it, unlike Textpad which bugs you every so often when you try to save).

    54. Re:The much anticipated... by red_china_menace · · Score: 1

      Follow the links on this page to see all the customization files that users have written: http://www.editplus.com/files.html

    55. Re:The much anticipated... by Ayende+Rahien · · Score: 2

      Hey!
      Watch out, dude, I did it more than once, and then use edline to edit.

      --

      --
      Two witches watched two watches.
      Which witch watched which watch?
    56. Re:The much anticipated... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      You might want to try editpad (www.jgsoft.com). You can open multiple text files with tabs at the top for each one, they have a freeware one available as well, no annoyances at all =)

    57. Re:The much anticipated... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that everytime microsoft bundles some basic software with the OS, like an internet browser for example, everyone starts yelling "Monopoly! Monopoly!".

      No, the problem is people don't understand all the reasons why people yell Monopoly(tm) all of the time. First off, its ok that a browser is bundled with the operating system, its fairly popular to do that. The problem is that the OS in question has become dependent upon that browser. When you hear Microsoft testify that IE can't be removed, they are somewhat correct. Microsoft *could* build an OS that didn't rely upon IE, and its technically possible to take IE out of Windows completely, and use other methods for showing help files and whatever else IE is used for. I can imagine its more possible when you also have the source code available to you =). You can bet that they will still be saying that its impossible to take IE out of windows 4 years from now..

      I really don't see that as *too* bad of a thing anyway. What makes me think that Microsoft is a Monopoly is the contracts between them and OEM's. Lets go back 2 years. Company X is a fairly large OEM (think Dell, Compaq, etc), and they sell 10,000 PC's that year, and 9,000 of them had Windows preinstalled. The others were either other os's or nothing on them. Company X has to pay Microsoft for 10,000 Windows licenses.. Does that sound right? The list goes on and on in that area as well.

      Microsoft has been found a monopoly. If you don't think its correct, then read the laws. If you don't agree, complain about the law, but they did break them plain and simple.

    58. Re:The much anticipated... by m0l0ch · · Score: 0, Informative

      the notepad log function is documented

      that's what help files are for

    59. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"So what? Unix editors can not handle DOS line endings (^M) neither."

      open your dos/win32 file with pico. hit ctrl-o to save your file. Now you can close the file if you want and open it with any other editor. Voila!!!

    60. Re:The much anticipated... by evil+superstar · · Score: 1

      this is exactly what I hate about the desktop on linux these days: let's do it like windows. I thought the open source community was about letting your imagination go and do something interesting but instead it turns more and more into let's compete Microsoft. Anyways... at least with open source I can at least *try* to use my imagination and do something I like with the code the community wrote

    61. Re:The much anticipated... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      this is exactly what I hate about the desktop on linux these days: let's do it like windows.

      Sorry, but this is how user apps on the Apple ][, C64, Mac, OSX, DOS, CP/M, Windows, VMS, Unix, Amiga, BeOS and OS/2 have worked.

      This is not about "Windows", it's about having both a horizontal and vertical application set. It's the same as ed, vi, emacs (if you come from *nix roots), or edlin, qedit, WordPerfect (if you come from DOS roots).

      Sounds like you're complaining just to complain, and haven't really given much thought to what you're complaining about.

      --
      Evan (Who has been using computers since before IBM made PCs, let alone before Windows came out)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    62. Re:The much anticipated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah!
      Notepad then is great editor. Excuse.
      This incredible usefull feature proves it.
      How can I live without an editor that rewrites the files with a timestamp when I open it ?


      BTW, does it digitally sign the file, too ?

    63. Re:The much anticipated... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      *smack*

      <mumbling to a touch louder>java required, i'll show them java required, i'll show them alll!

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    64. Re:The much anticipated... by rjch · · Score: 1

      If somebody mentions "vi", I'm going to scream...

      Everybody knows that pico is the best text editor around... :-P

    65. Re:The much anticipated... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      So you're the one...

    66. Re:The much anticipated... by x0n · · Score: 1

      Eh? explain? .LOG does not work in any other text editor in windows.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
  7. So what is this? Friday filler come one day early? by fruey · · Score: 0, Troll
    Some requirement about data transfer? Who cares?

    Nothing of interest there for me. He who agrees, mod up?

    Seriously - give us something interesting to read about Microsoft, instead of some crappy forum post.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  8. Note the softened code name... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 4, Funny


    ..No more code names like HailStorm for these guys. Expect names like PuppyTail, SnuggleBear and ComfyHat from now on.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Note the softened code name... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      Damnit ... how did you get these names?

      Damn hackers ...

      PuppyTail is MSFT's new marketing division, sorta "wag the dog" style.
      SnuggleBear is MSFT's new education initiative for public elementary schools. Get the kids hooked early. Sort of like "Bob", only friendlier.
      ComfyHat is MSFT's foray into non-computer related profitable industries (prophylactics)

      Look for the news release soon ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    2. Re:Note the softened code name... by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      I know parent was probably intended as an MS jab, but iirc Longhorn is named in the same tradition as Windows XP (Whistler) - Mountains in Washington.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    3. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's ComfyChair.

    4. Re:Note the softened code name... by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
      Softened? Excuse me? What?

      Have you ever seen a Texas Longhorn? Think bigass cow. Now put about eight feet worth of sharp pointy horns on its head. How is that soft and cuddly?

      I grew up on a ranch with a neighbor who raised longhorns. They're generally docile creatures, sure, but when you piss one off and it's charging at you with those massive pointed horns, "soft and cuddly" is the last thing going through your mind, believe me.

    5. Re:Note the softened code name... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd even expect Mr. Bill to throw in a penguin reference in one of the codenames to 'win' over the linux crowd. Of course if that happens, Linus should take him to court a la M$ vs. Lindows.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    6. Re:Note the softened code name... by gatesh8r · · Score: 1
      ComfyHat is MSFT's foray into non-computer related profitable industries (prophylactics)


      [MS Prophylactic has commited a General Protection Fault, will break, and make your girlfriend pregant. If the problem persists, please contact the vendor.]
      [Close] [Details >>]

      --
      Karma whorin' since 1999
    7. Re:Note the softened code name... by nooboob · · Score: 0

      Win 95 codename was "Chicago", that's neither threatening or a mountain. Where'd that come from?

    8. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect names like PuppyTail, SnuggleBear and ComfyHat from now on.

      Microsoft Hatten

    9. Re:Note the softened code name... by Misao · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Longhorn, but Whistler is definitly _not_ in WA; it's in BC, about an hour and a half north of Vancouver (or more, depending on how many campers you wind up following once you leave the freeway.)

      On the other hand, it is fairly close. :)

      -mis

    10. Re:Note the softened code name... by xjimhb · · Score: 1

      So what was thie term they're throwing around?

      Windows Condemned Longhorn

      No wonder it smells like 500 pounds of rotten meat!

    11. Re:Note the softened code name... by morbid · · Score: 0

      Naw,
      Maybe we'll get a "MajorWoodrow" and "BigPiney" Windows soon.

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    12. Re:Note the softened code name... by GTRacer · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, actually, I bet in some cases, the last thing going through your mind is about eight feet worth of sharp pointy horns...

      GTRacer
      - ...or maybe elsewhere...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    13. Re:Note the softened code name... by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

      You have a very good point (ha ha). Luckily, the thought of getting impaled by an angry longhorn somehow enabled me to actually leap over a barbed-wire fence. To this day I have no clue how I managed to jump that high without getting snagged, but I did. And boy am I glad.

    14. Re:Note the softened code name... by donutello · · Score: 2

      This has probably been stated before...

      Originally, the next release after Whistler was supposed to be called Blackcomb. (Whistler and Blackcomb are two ski slopes in Whistler, BC). When they decided to add a release between Whistler and Blackcomb they decided to name it Longhorn after the Longhorn bar which is between Whistler and Blackcomb.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    15. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, same tradition?
      Windows versions used to be named after cities, eg.
      Windows 95 - Chicago
      Windows 97 - Memphis (renamed to windows 98)

      /Erik

    16. Re:Note the softened code name... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      I think the name comes from a mountain/ski range in Washington...not the animal.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    17. Re:Note the softened code name... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, with the new emphasis on Trusted Computing. The next version will be called Windows XP Security Blankie.

    18. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to a good Canadian bar...

      Nothing soft and cuddly there there, except perhaps the dead grizzly tacked to the wall.

    19. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong country, whistler and blackcomb are in BC, Canada.

    20. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all seriousness, all the latest codenames are all names of mountains in canada...

      lets get a clue... yes?

    21. Re:Note the softened code name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention an obstreperous beastie that was a hard to handle, skinny, tough, maverick.

      Just what I need as a computer OS ...

  9. As a University of Texas Graduate by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really, really hate that they are using that name.

    --
    I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    1. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

      I second this. Knowing the track record of Microcrap networking security, it would seem that making it even easier for data transfer will more than likely make it easier to hack.

      Should have used a truely sucky name and called it "Sooner".. Of course that would probably be associated more with the release date with references made to "Later" as opposed to "Boomer" but..

    2. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Get your university to sue them.
      Carl Sagon sued apple.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by keymygrip · · Score: 1

      I would not be surprised if UT did sue considering what it does to its own students. Our organizations are not allowed to use the words "University of Texas," "Texas" in a certain font, the color burnt orange, semblences to the Bevo head, and that was the list when I got tired of trying things for a T-shirt I was making for my organization. One that is directly affiliated with the University.

      It seems that the licenses for this stuff for affiliated organizations to use them run around $10,000. So I say sue away. Who knew something good might come of the University being pricks about trademark.

      But then again, considering UT has a sweet deal with MS that gives all students licences to any MS home use product for $5 a cd, they might already be in bed together.

    4. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by dar · · Score: 1
      Carl Sagon sued apple.


      Yes, but then they renamed the project to Butthead Astronomer.

      --
      My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
    5. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Carl Sagon sued apple.

      Yes, but then they renamed the project to Butthead Astronomer.

      Yeah, but he got the last laugh. He renamed *himself* to Carl Sagan.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Wonder how much I owe them for the longhorn silhouette on the base of my neck?

      Buncha assholes.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    7. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by Cadre · · Score: 2
      Yes, but then they renamed the project to Butthead Astronomer.

      The project was renamed even after that to LAW - Lawyers Are Wimps.

      Personally, I think they should have stuck with BHA...

      --
      All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    8. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by HiredMan · · Score: 2
      The funny thing, aside from the fact that he sued them for an internal code name, is he was just upset that they were using his name.

      He didn't seem to get the association with the other code names: Cold Fusion and Piltdown Man.

      ;) Hint... those were both scientific frauds.

      The replacement BHA wasn't as poetic but it had it's own special charm...
      =tkk

    9. Re:As a University of Texas Graduate by jacobito · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who doesn't know what you are talking about, what are you talking about?

  10. FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by nherc · · Score: 5, Informative

    From: http://www.microsoft.com/winlogo/hardware/HWrequir ements.asp

    Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals
    This section summarizes Microsoft's key goals for the combination of operating system and hardware platform advances with Windows Longhorn.
    Client Hardware Initiatives for Windows Longhorn
    In early planning for the Windows "Longhorn" client, Microsoft has identified following core areas for advancing the platform for the client PC:
    PC as a trusted, secure platform.
    These goals include core hardware changes to ensure security, plus support for smart cards and biometric input devices.
    PC fundamentals.
    These goals continue to improve the Plug and Play, startup, and manageability characteristics of the system.
    PC has appliance-like simplicity
    These goals includes advancing OnNow performance with "instant on" improvements, predictable power button behavior, and unified interaction between software and hardware controls. This also includes advancing "quiet PC' goals for targeted markets.
    For PC/device interaction, the goals include advancing standards for physical device connections and for discovery and authentication through Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) and Microsoft .NET Passport.
    PC as a primary form of integrated communications
    These goals include advances in voice quality for real-time communications, and advances to operating system support and hardware integration of digital video and voice input capabilities.
    PC as the center of home entertainment
    This set of initiatives focused on audio/video (A/v) streaming and encoding, by advancing a completely digital audio path and reducing system latencies. These goals also include dramatic advances for usability through easy access connectors, new media support, and graphics support for both two-foot and ten-foot user interfaces.
    PC is the preferred mobile device.
    These goals include advancing support for "ink as input" by commoditizing support for Tablet PC input capabilities for laptops and new form factors. These goals also work to expanding the reach of wireless computing, through advances related to IEEE 802.11, mobile IPv6, Remote NDIS, UPnP discovery, and Microsoft .NET authentication. In addition, these initiatives seek to advance scenarios and capabilities for hot docking and longer battery life.

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This also includes advancing "quiet PC' goals for targeted markets. what has 'longhorn' got todo with how quiet we, or computer manufacturers, decide to build our PC's?

    2. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Sounds like either a standby-type button (like a home stereo), or changing processor actions so you can have variable fan speeds or something.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by mickwd · · Score: 5, Funny
      "...predictable power button behaviour..."

      ????

      You mean like a power button that turns the power on, and then off again ?

      Us open-source folks had better give up now - there's no way we can catch up with advances like this...

    4. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 3, Funny

      You missed one :D

      - To make more money.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    5. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Linux is about 3 years late with the ACPI stuff. It's quite possible to build a PC where Linux can't handle the softpower.

    6. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by nachoman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      PC has appliance-like simplicity

      And what does this mean for those who still can't program their VCR? Good one MS!

    7. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'PC as the center of home entertainment' is an idea DIRECTLY taken from Apple.

      Apple had this idea LONG before Micro$oft, and Apple has a much better system to handle it. Titanium iBooks, iPod, the new iMac, iMovie, iTunes, Mac OS X, etc, etc.
      Whereas Micro$soft has XP, which inhibits media transfer of any kind, you will be reported to Micro$soft's servers if you have any MP3, etc, etc.

      Microsoft cannot offer a media hub through vowing to imprison media behind DRM bars.

    8. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, this means that Windows Longhorn will predict when the user really wanted to hit the power button and will turn off instantly.

      The heuristics for determining shutdown times have been improving since Windows 3.1. Remember the advent of the Blue Screen of Death in NT 4.0? That was really just a message telling the user "we think it's time for you to shut off the computer".

      ::Colz Grigor

    9. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Us open-source folks had better give up now - there's no way we can catch up with advances like this...

      That's very funny. But that doesn't alter the fact that since the first soft-powered boxes came out a decade ago, I have never seen any OS, open source or closed, that consistently does the right thing on all machines by default when I push the button. Nor have I seen one that has power control settings that are both understandable and functional on all machines.

      I don't think that the problem is as simple as you imply; otherwise somebody would have fixed this mess by now.

    10. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by morbid · · Score: 0

      That strange. I remember Macs back in the '80s that did the soft power thing. Never had one though :-(

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    11. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by sahala · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You mean like a power button that turns the power on, and then off again ?

      I know it sounds silly, but this really is an issue. The general public wants to be able to use a computer like they do any other appliance. The power button is a simple thing, but across different computers the physical power button maps to different behavior. For instance, on notebooks, will it shutdown, hibernate, or go on standby?

      In XP on my desktop, when I hit "Turn off Computer" (under Start, I might add) it asks me if I want to standby, turn off, or restart. But I just told the computer I wanted it to turn off. It was a lot simpler on older machines where if I hit the switch it would cut the power and I'd be done (with a defragmented hard drive).

      Pretty much general users want to be able to use the computer like a TV: sit down, press a button, and have things immediately available. When the user's done, hit the button again and walk away. Not everyone leaves their computer on 24/7.

    12. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1

      May I recommend a Macintosh running OS X, then? Instant on? Wake up a Mac with OS X, and the thing is ready to use IMMEDIATELY. None of this bull...I mean LONGHORN-sh*t where you wait a minute while the OS decides if it is going to respond or not.

    13. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by belloc · · Score: 1

      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, daß er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird.

      The gist: When you fight a monster, you'd better be careful that you don't become a monster in doing so.

      That's a very appropriate sig for an article on Microsoft.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    14. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by The_Shadows · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft was thinkning more along the lines of "Toaster" or the new Lump-stick-rectangle from Apple.

      Those are much easier to use than VCRs.

    15. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by caspper69 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much general users want to be able to use the computer like a TV: sit down, press a button, and have things immediately available. When the user's done, hit the button again and walk away. Not everyone leaves their computer on 24/7.

      I agree with this, just like the earlier part about having an inconsistent behavior. But, your analogy to the TV is a bit of a misnomer. A TV turns on so quickly because it's ALWAYS on. The insides are always kept "warm," which is why you don't have to wait for your TV to turn on like in the old days.

      But with computers, there could be problems with leaving it "on" and not really "on". Think of all the cheap-ass PC's people buy today. A lot of their problems are caused not by Windows, but by sub-standard hardware and drivers. Leaving this hardware active (think of the IBM DeskStar drives, rated to run only 11 hours per day) could wreak havoc on the durability and lifespan of computer systems.

      I know these devices can be shut down, but that requires "proper" drivers and such. I'm still working with some hardware vendors (not by choice) that can't even get their PERIPHERAL working properly, let alone suspend/resume/power down of that device. Instant-on is still a ways away, and them trying to implement it more quickly is only making the lives of those of us that support computers that much more difficult.

      Maybe I'm just paranoid.

      Probably not though.

    16. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Eccles · · Score: 1

      You mean like a power button that turns the power on, and then off again ?

      I own or make use of three different machines (HP Pavillion, Dell Optiplex, and an original iMac); *none* of them have a power switch that works that way. I've had to unplug all of them in cases of OS failure.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    17. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The specs say that if hold the soft power button down for 3 seconds or so, it should trip the powersupply off. Generally the Dells and the HPs get it right.

      Don't Macs still have a 'programmer's key'?

    18. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      'Remember the advent of the Blue Screen of Death in NT 4.0? That was really just a message telling the user "we think it's time for you to shut off the computer".'

      Yeah, but that message was always spot-on. Amazing.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    19. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by sahala · · Score: 1
      I know these devices can be shut down, but that requires "proper" drivers and such. I'm still working with some hardware vendors (not by choice) that can't even get their PERIPHERAL working properly

      This is the exact reason that I feel a bit jealous when I see my friends using Macs. They've really integrated the hardware and software nicely so that things just work. Meanwhile my windows machine starts fucking up, so I try to shutdown...it hangs, so I hit the power button, nothing happens, and I resort to unplugging the power and shudder to think of what side effects I've caused.

      But, your analogy to the TV is a bit of a misnomer. A TV turns on so quickly because it's ALWAYS on. The insides are always kept "warm," which is why you don't have to wait for your TV to turn on like in the old days.

      Yeah I realized this right as I posted...TVs nowadays usually have that standby feature. But then again old TVs didn't take that long to power up, although the colors usually wouldn't look right for a minute or so.

      Getting computers to the point where they have a reliable standby does require some good hardware integration.

      All my computers are on constantly, and the monitors switch off after 10 minutes idle or whatever. People (very non-technical) that come in and use my computers equate the monitor being off to the computer being off, so they just hit the flashing monitor power button since there's nothing else to press (I have flatscreens and my machines are safely hidden away under my desk) and it suddenly turns "on". This seems to be a decent interaction in my opinion.

    20. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by scot4875 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And what does this mean for those who still can't program their VCR? Good one MS!

      They'll still be able to 'play their tapes' and 'record their shows.' People who want to set up to automatically 'record on a sechedule' will have to RTFM.

      As opposed to (long) past OSes where they couldn't figure out how to 'insert the tape.'

      Remove obvious VCR analogies and replace with something PC related.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    21. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by mickwd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, I've had a few serious responses to this (and some funny ones :), so here goes.

      The points you're making are exactly what I was making fun of. A computer power button should work like every other power button on virtually every other piece of electrical equipment (and on most people's walls, too). It does a simple function that *everybody* understands. Why on earth did computer makers feel the need to start pissing about with it ?

      TVs often have a standby button (usually on the remote control) and a separate power button. If computer makers want a "power" button to do something other than turn the power on and off, they should put another button there, and use it instead for the extra functions.

    22. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by calumr · · Score: 1
      But that doesn't alter the fact that since the first soft-powered boxes came out a decade ago, I have never seen any OS, open source or closed, that consistently does the right thing on all machines by default when I push the button.

      What the hell computers do you buy? Press button - computer turns on. Press it again - computer turns off.

    23. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by wickedhobo · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most important goal.

      RULE THE WORLD.

      Bill Gates says to Ballmer...

      Pinky, you you moron...

      --

      --Stupidity is Self Curing!
    24. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by sg3000 · · Score: 2

      I have never seen any OS, open source or closed, that consistently does the right thing on all machines by default when I push the button.

      Go here.

      I'm sure Mapquest or whatever could point you in the right direction.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    25. Re:FYI: Windows "Longhorn" Platform Goals by gmulert · · Score: 1
      "...support for both two-foot and ten-foot user interfaces."

      Dang, and I thought that new Microsoft Office Keyboard was big...

      Looks like I'm going to have to get a wider desk.

  11. Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Funny

    - Everything configurable via the command line for power users
    - Non-integrated browser
    - Non-integrated media player
    - Drivers for USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and Firewire
    - 100% documented APIs
    - No WPA

    I would also like the ability to fly, bend metal objects with my mind, and understand women.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by fruey · · Score: 1
      - Everything configurable via the command line for power users
      LINUX - Non-integrated browser
      LINUX - Non-integrated media player
      LINUX - Drivers for USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and Firewire
      LINUX (for some hardware, but yes Windows does win on AV stuff) - 100% documented APIs
      LINUX - No WPA
      LINUX

      Easier than flying or bending metal objects anyway

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      It was a joke.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by motardo · · Score: 1

      Actually, making everything configurable from the command line would be immensely useful for administrators.

      -motardo

    4. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by fruey · · Score: 1
      Sorry, sense of humour isn't working today.

      Short replies take me too much time. Arrgh. Third time that I try to submit and always getting complaints about 20 seconds, one minute, etc. And even when I fuck up I have to wait another minute to try again.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > - No WPA

      But why would anyone want to get rid of the Works Progress Administration? It was the best part of the New Deal...

    6. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Aiku1337 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, I thought XP already gives users the ability to fly. Thats one down, at least.

    7. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by jamesbulman · · Score: 1

      Windows XP already ships with drivers for Firewire and there is a download for USB 2.0. Don't know what the situation with bluetooth is though.

    8. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to see the whole computer industyry
      wake up and realise that many computer users don't
      do point n' click.

    9. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by i_luv_linux · · Score: 0

      I want MacOS X without Quikctime built into the operating system.

    10. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by curunir · · Score: 2

      I would also like the ability to fly, bend metal objects with my mind, and understand women.

      Previous attempts at adding flight functionality haven't had less than stellar results...so it'll probably be a while before we see it again.

      However, I can assure you that when you choose to bang your head against after using Microsoft's new operating system against some metal object, it will end up dented.

      As for your third request, it simply isn't possible. I recommend that you request that Microsoft add the "cooking", "laundry", "dishes", "sex" and "stop bugging me and leave me alone" features. That should solve your problem.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    11. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by WeaselGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      - Everything configurable via the command line for power users
      > Everything is already configurable from the registry. For power admins they can just make a .reg file to apply the necessary changes to all PCs. Though in all seriousness do you have any idea how much work it would take to also make everything configurable from the command line. Almost as much work as it would take to make things configurable in a GUI for *nix.

      - Non-integrated browser
      > There are a lot of integrated components I want out of the OS (like fucking windows messenger) but the browser isn't one of them. I would argue that surfing the web is one of the core features of the computer and thus should be part of the OS. Since IE happens to be the best browser on the market you can't really complain. Its not like they are keeping you from using a different browser.

      - Non-integrated media player
      > Again, playing media is now a core feature of the computer. Users expect this functionality out of the box, thus it belongs in a desktop OS (server OS is a different matter). Moreover it should be as feature rich as possible, which will cause some intermingling with the OS. If you want to use a different media player, feel free, there isn't anything stopping you.

      - Drivers for USB 2.0, Bluetooth, and Firewire
      > USB 2.0 and Firewire are expected in a service pack to XP. Bluetooth would be cool though.

      - 100% documented APIs
      > I honestly don't believe that microsoft gains suppremissy by using special APIs. The reason MS products tend to be better then the compitition is that MS puts more people on the team, and hires brighter people. If someone from the office team came and asked someone on the platform dev team to add a special API to make their life easier I think the platform dev would tell the office guy to fuck off.

      - No WPA
      > Agreed. Of course the corperate version doesn't have it...

      Honestly, there is a lot I would like to see change in windows. For example I don't want to pay for Windows Movie Maker or any of the other extranious applications MS has decided to bundle. Some stuff should be with the OS, internet and media integration is a good thing. It provides a richer user experience that most people will use.

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    12. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some counterpoints:

      Sure Linux can configure everything from a command line, but it has almost no gui configurations. Sorry, but for most things a gui configuration makes configuring things much quicker.

      Sure you don't have an integrated web browser, but you also don't have the best web browser. The price you pay.

      There isn't a media player worth using in linux (real player sucks so much ass).

      There are drivers available for all of that for XP, its just that you have to download the USB 2.0 and bluetooth drivers (firewire is built in).

      The msdn is the greatest collection of programming docs ever. Even if it doesn't cover 100% of the stuff it beats the hell out of all the damn research necessary to find good documention in linux.

      Windows corperate edition, no WPA. It costs a bit more (not a whole lot) then normal Windows XP Pro.

      Oh, and Windows also has the best gui (even though KDE tries their best to copy it, lets hear it for the originallity of OSS development), componentized updating (what, you mean I don't need to recompile the kernal to get an update, what a novel idea.), and the best software and driver support around. Linux is a good server OS, but for the desktop it blows ass.

    13. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, I didn't catch the subject line for this and thought it was an actual list of proposed features. (I admit, I didn't read.)

      - Everything configurable via the command line for power users

      My response, "cool. It'll have a lousy syntax I'm sure, but still."

      - Non-integrated browser

      My resopnse, "Wait. Thats good, but are they really going to do it?"

      - Non-integrated media player

      My response, "I don't beleive it. What was the subject of this post again? Oh. Darn."

    14. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by tugger · · Score: 1

      yes the part about understanding women should come first

    15. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by rainwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to refute a few of your points...

      I would argue that surfing the web is one of the core features of the computer and thus should be part of the OS
      I would have to strongly disagree with you. Perhaps this is because I miss the days when I could get all of my Internet fix through my remote shell account from my long-defunct local ISP. Web use (bah, graphics, waste of bandwidth!) may be something you spend a lot of time doing, but a core feature of your computer? Plus, this is certainly NOT the case in the business world.

      IE happens to be the best browser on the market
      Hardly. Go snag the latest release of Mozilla. Quicker, prettier, more customizable, more stable, and it doesn't spam me with pop-up windows. I only drag out IE when some dumbass web designer uses an old version of FrontPage and fills their HTML with non-compliant crap that only IE can decipher.

      Playing media is now a core feature of the computer. Users expect this functionality out of the box, thus it belongs in a desktop OS (server OS is a different matter). Moreover it should be as feature rich as possible, which will cause some intermingling with the OS.
      Playing media falls into the same category as web use as a "core" use of your computer. I use all my computers as MP3 clients (and a central MP3 server), and I STILL don't use it as much as my web browser, and I don't believe that web browsers are a core feature. Again, not the case in the business world. There is also no need for a media player to be integrated into the OS in order for it to be full-featured, I have been using high quality audio programs for years without them being integrated into my OS.

      I honestly don't believe that microsoft gains suppremissy (sic) by using special APIs.
      Go tell this to the Samba team. Go tell this to anyone who has tried to get a mixed-environment Kerberos system working. Go tell this to any one of the various office suite teams that try to decode MS's secret formats. Microsoft's "embrace and extend" policy (in order to make the origional spec incompatible) has been used sucessfully for years.

      Just my opinions. I have no problem with Microsoft supplying free web/media/etc. components that system integrators can include if they wish (and NOT be forced to include, or suffer penalties if they do not), as long as I can easily uninstall them and replace them with components of my choosing.

    16. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't QuickDraw an integral part of old Mac OS? So I would guess that it's required for Carbon.

    17. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Everything configurable via the command line for power users
      > Everything is already configurable from the registry. ... Almost as much work as it would take to make things configurable in a GUI for *nix.


      FYI, MS has promised a "Command-line Only" mode for NET Server. Hopefully that means that they will have console versions of their admin tools (MMC) and not just REGEDIT, but we'll see.

      NT has always had decent remote management functions. But they rely on MS-RPC which isn't at all safe over the Internet. It would be nice if they had a 'secure mangement port' that was seperate from the others so that you could use the remote GUI tools from afar.

    18. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Though in all seriousness do you have any idea how much work it would take to also make everything configurable from the command line. Almost as much work as it would take to make things configurable in a GUI for *nix.
      I'm a coder, and I disagree. It wouldn't be great, but it could be done.
    19. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by DocSnyder · · Score: 1

      - Yes-No dialogs with a CowboyNeal option

    20. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      what planet are you from and how do I get there? Internet not a core part of a business computer? Web apps are all the rage (for good reason. Much easier to maintain than client/server apps). Mozzilla is nice (I tried the 1.0 release recently), but the number of sites I surf daily that didn't render properly was pretty significant.

    21. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by narsiman · · Score: 1

      Everything related to Administration of NT or 2000 can be done using command line. If you have any questions - read the resource toolkit. It is full of useful cli tools with minimal but decent documentation. To augment it user Winternals. Anyway groups.google.com is the best source for M$ documentation.

    22. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look into WMI, pretty much anything you can do using MMC you can also do using WMI. Its scriptable (VBS, JS, PERL etc..) and even has a command line tool to run quick queries if you don't want to roll out a script - wmic.exe.

      Pretty much everything in Windows is managable using the command line these days. And it gets even better with .NET server - more command line tools.

    23. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ...microsoft gains suppremissy by using...

      It's "supremacy". Dude, you weren't even close.

      Here, my treat:
      http://www.dictionary.com/
      http://www.m-w.com/

      Knock yourself out.

    24. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by kzinti · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would also like the ability to fly, bend metal objects with my mind, and understand women.

      To bastardize the words of the late great Douglas Adams:

      There is a theory which states that if men ever succeed in understanding women, they will instantly disappear and be replaced with something even more bizarre inexplicable.

      There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

      --Jim
    25. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by WeaselGod · · Score: 1

      I too am a coder, and the amount of work does not stem from the difficulty in making the command line tools (since that is in fact fairly simple, it was hyperbole when I refered to using a gui config for nix) but from the shear volume of feature that need to be migrated. Hell, on just the desktop OS it would take a damn long time to convert all of the little configurations here and there (just think of all the little places you go configure settings, folder options, management console, display options, everything in the control panel). With advanced server there are millions of settings to worry about. I had heard rumors of a command line only version of server that someone mentioned above but I have yet to see it and I am curious if thats just a rumor or not.

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    26. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gopher will rise again!

    27. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step aside, bub, I believe the man meant "super missy"!

      NOW who's the idiot!

    28. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes less than 5 minutes to write a command line registry editor. Sick some monkey (or a "Microsoft Developer") to write out a hash of whatever associations you want. If applications store config elsewhere, fuck them.

    29. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by WeaselGod · · Score: 1

      Hay, if front page stories have glaring spelling mistakes in them then I don't think I can be reprimanded for spelling something wrong deep within a comment tree. Besides, you knew what I was talking about.

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    30. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by crudeboy · · Score: 1
      Agreed, but even now you can use command line tools to do much of the work, even remote. The sad thing is that a lot of the sys admins (mcse:s et al) doesn't have a clue about this...
      I think that's one of the big differences between unix and windows sys admins.

      Cheers

    31. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      up till last week i would have said IE was the best, but seriously, the latest mozilla builds are really nice! tabbed browsing absolutely rocks, and it renders pages very fast.

      I really dislike the newer versions of MS's media players... 6.4 (start->run "mplayer2") is decent though.

      for consumers, I would argue that a browser and media player ARE in fact a critical part of the computer - how many people can figure out how to install something? and what if they have a problem with what they install?

    32. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by WeaselGod · · Score: 1

      In most user's minds the internet is synonumous with computers. It is the biggest selling point for most users and the internet is more then just a web browser. Its amazingly convinient to open up windows explorer, browse through all my directories and then seemlessly browse the directories on an ftp site. I can do this because Windows Explorer simply loads the IE com object when it needs to. You would be amazed at the number of applications that load up the IE com object to do all kinds of little things, because its so well integrated that you never notice. These things make my life easier. Sure, each component could have its own code to do these things but why should it. This achieves the same purpose, but allows for smaller programs because they all share components. And its not like MS is the only one who can use these components, all of IEs interfaces are very well documented so that anyone can seemlessly integrate internet functionality into their application.

      Oh, and Mozilla has IE beat on a couple things, the popup killer definitely being on of the more usefull. However I wrote an application that keeps IE from spawning new windows when I don't want it to so that doesn't really bother me. As for Mozilla being faster and more stable this is just wishful thinking. In some cases its faster (not the majority though), but .99 crashes on me a couple times a day. With IE I can go two or three days without it crashing (at home, at work it crashes all the time, but thats my fault since its my application within IE causing it to crash). I don't think mozilla is prettier but thats because I prefer a minimilistic User interface. This is personal opinion though.

      IE really shines when it comes to web based applications. I am sorry but ActiveX controls beat the shit out of both plugins and applets (and contrary to popular belief, ActiveX controls are no more dangerous then an applet. With an applet you can make calls to the vm to circumvent the sandbox, with an ActiveX control you can use IObjectXSafety to designate yourself as safe to instantiate and script within a web browser). Moreover the cab distribution method in IE beats the shit out of smart installation in Mozilla.

      Finally, the IE DOM is superior to Mozillas (oh and curse IE for extending the standard, how dare they add functionality.).

      Mozilla is a good browser, better then IE in some respects, but overall IE is still better. At least there is competition now. It will continue to make both browsers better.

      As for media player, well, obviously we are at different opinions about this. My argument above for the integration of the browser pretty much applies here as well. Judge as you like. I find having the media player objects in my system helpful even though I don't normally use media player to listen to music. Media player doesn't benifit from being integrated with the OS, its every other application that uses media player that benifits.

      Now on to my horribly spelling of supremacy and the point I was making. First, I shouldn't have said special APIs. I should have said undocumented APIs. Obviously MS has made changes to Kerberos and several other components. However they have documented all of the APIs for these components (even if they didn't release the source). People were bitching because MS was supposedly using super secret APIs to created better Apps. I bet they aren't. Sure they aren't going to tell the Samba team how to make duplicate APIs, but they will tell someone how to create an app that utilize the APIs for some functionality. As for the undocumented file format this is a freeking stupid issue. Of course MS has their own file format, and guess what, SO DOES DAMN NEAR ANY OTHER SOFTWARE COMPANY. And you know what, none of us are going to tell our competition how to read our files. That would just be the definition of stupid. Here you go competitor, this is our file format, now you can make a migration tool to steal all of our customers and drive us out of business.

      Anyway, these are my opinions. Obviously we don't agree and just as obviously we aren't going to convince the other to change their opinion. I also wish MS would stop bundling a lot of stuff, like windows messanger and Movie Maker. And honestly it would be really hard to swap components since they would need the exact same COM interface that the MS products have. And look at it from this point, MS already recieves a lot of shit about instability (desserved with the 9x line, not with the nt line), if their components were replaced with unstable third party components then that is going to reflect even worse on MS. Sure, third parties should be allowed to place their icons on the desktop and OEMS should be allowed to take shortcuts off the desktop but that is an entirely different discussion (e.g. to what extent should a company be able to fight competitors).

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    33. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by archen · · Score: 1

      I think you can already use flying women to bend metal objects... er, wait..... nevermind

    34. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by i_luv_linux · · Score: 0

      I think you don't live in this planet anymore. Did you hear something called intranets? Corporate PCs uses browser heavily. It is one of the fundemantal aspects of any Operating System now. Can you think any OS without any browser available for it. No way, it is totally useless.

    35. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by aje · · Score: 1

      In my opinion Microsoft could really make a better OS that today's Windows XP by removing all the extra features and applications such as MSN Messenger, Media Player and Internet Explorer.
      Maybe they could also extend the functionality of CMD.EXE, but maybe that's just utopia? :)

      I people want the software, they should be able to order an inexpensive CD-set from Microsoft or download it from their website instead.
      By doing it would be possible for Microsoft to acquire a much larger group of users.

      Anyway, I use FreeBSD... I prefer devils, not windows... :)

      --
      -- Anders
    36. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by LadyLucky · · Score: 2
      Everything configurable via the command line for power users

      Win2k has always been very good for this. Use windows scripting host if there isnt a command line tool for everything.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    37. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by WeaselGod · · Score: 1

      Aquire a much larger group of users? What, is 95% of the desktop market not enough? There isn't a "Much larger group of users" left for MS to aquire on the desktop side of things (since XP is a desktop OS).

      --
      - WeaselGod
      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet turbines
    38. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by drachenstern · · Score: 1


      Just out of curiousity, have you ever heard of the PC-99 standard? which states that a PC must be able to play MPEG layered media? So what that microsoft tries to make it easier on the user's behalf of playing and organizing this stuff. If you don't want it, take it out of the system. If you can't, quit whining until you learn how. Can I? yes. Have i taken IE out of windows? yes. does life suck without it becuase MS has extremely gifted design experts and programmers that came from our midst who sold out for the paycheck? yes. would i sell out and help them? yes. does that make me a luser? no, because i could put ninety percent of the required linux boot informatin in the correct place to make the system boot. I have put in the time, now you shut yer yap about why MS making the compuer easier for the user to use is a bad thing.
      </rant>
      and for the uninitiated, PC-99 is just a standard to make sure that a computer distributor is not building crappy systems and selling them as "useful machines"

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    39. Re:Features I'd like to see in the next Windows by GargoyleMT · · Score: 1
      >USB 2.0 and Firewire are expected in a service pack to XP. Bluetooth would be cool though.


      That'd be nice, except Firewire drivers are in XP. They were in 2000 as well - base, not a service pack. HTH. HAND.

  12. After Longhorn... by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...then what? Aggie?

    Of course, some could argue that XP was done by Aggies...

  13. i want: by KaizerWill · · Score: 1

    another decent quality os like win2kpro. If this is going to be another candy-coated XP-type deal, ill pass.

    1. Re:i want: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ever heard of WindowBlinds, you know Microsoft did nothing more but license their technology for XP. Candy-coating has always been a favorite of Microsoft (Remember the Win16 to Win32 transition a while ago? We got 3D controls), but it's a part of every GUI. If for one second you ignored the gooey and opened the hood, you'd be in for a suprise.

    2. Re:i want: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win16 had 3d controls. They just weren't very pretty ones. :)

    3. Re:i want: by onosendai · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand this argument XP is essentially the W2k code base, the same _basic_ functionality is there, just XP has a somewhat skinnable GUI. Hell, I'd even argue that in many ways XP (esp Pro) is much better than win2k

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  14. Using 3D API's for 2D? by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Following the links led me to Microsofts Longhorn website and another document entitled "Windows "Longhorn" Graphics Bandwidth Requirements". The part I found most interesting is:
    Windows Longhorn will expose new APIs for accelerated 2D drawing. These new APIs will not use existing GDI acceleration but will instead use the Microsoft Direct3D® DDI. New applications, therefore, will make use of the 3D pipeline of the graphics adapter for their 2D / productivity graphics requirements.
    So does this mean that in 2005 my new Geforce8MX will speed up my porn-browsing? Bring it on, Microsoft!

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it means there going to use your cards 3d channel for non 3d tasks. This should really suck when you need that channel for other things, like 3d.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and Gates are alike. Everything about you and what you stand for SUCKS!

    3. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Well, only when what's being drawn. This really isn't a bad thing. The 3d channels have been opened up much more than 2d acceleration has.

      The thing is, everything will be drawn as a 3d object. Think of an OpenGL based window manager. With proper hardware acceleration this will really kick ass. Of course, us on the Unix side of the fence have already done this and M$ will claim it's innovation.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by GenCuster · · Score: 2

      The thing is, everything will be drawn as a 3d object. Think of an OpenGL based window manager. --
      We call this e17.

      --
      "The poet presents his thoughts festively, on the carriage of rhythm; usually because they could not walk" Nietzsche
    5. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows Longhorn will expose new APIs for accelerated 2D drawing. These new APIs will not use existing GDI acceleration but will instead use the Microsoft Direct3D® DDI. New applications, therefore, will make use of the 3D pipeline of the graphics adapter for their 2D / productivity graphics requirements.

      Microsoft Chrome, anyone?

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    6. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      Umm, hasn't Enlighenment always had this?

    7. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. so that's where Longhorn is coming from.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "always" you mean "not yet, and probably ten years and six rewrites from now," unless you do a checkout from CVS and think that's the same as going to Best Buy and picking up Windows.

    9. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Seeing WINE's GDI implementation being so complete AND Direct3D support so inadequate, wouldn't it be just a matter of time before Microsoft does this?

    10. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by nachoman · · Score: 2

      That's how OpenGL does 2D graphics as well... 3 Dimensions with Orthogonal perspective. All the Z coordinates are set to 0. Looking down the z azis gives a nice 2D image.

    11. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by tspilman · · Score: 1

      So does this mean that in 2005 my new Geforce8MX will speed up my porn-browsing? Bring it on, Microsoft!

      Look out... that MX may be a Geforce2 in disguise. =)

      --
      Tom the Sigless
    12. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      news.com.com? What the hell is that?

      --
      ± 29 dB
    13. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      Sounds like Apple's Quartz, but years later.

      Or maybe the new version of Enlightenment, but with a release date in the next decade.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    14. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

      It's a little strange, too.. as of DX 8.0 they've KILLED DirectDraw (the last revision to DirectDraw was in DX 7 with the IDirectDraw7 interface). Things that make little sense? The fact that while the API supports scaling and rotation of 2D images, hardware vendors didn't bother supporting it (yet, with Direct3D you could make a surface, display only that surface's side to the viewer, and perform basically the same operation all day long). Senseless.

      Microsoft should have stuck it out with DirectDraw and forced hardware vendors to implement the support in their drivers (as they should have anyways).

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    15. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by revbob · · Score: 2
      So does this mean that in 2005 my new Geforce8MX will speed up my porn- browsing?

      Nope, it just means that Microsoft is clearing the decks for MPEG-4.

      By requiring 2D graphics to use the 3D pipeline, board makers can put more MPEG-4 logic in hardware instead of having to parse out the 2D elements in software and send them down a different pipe as the existing spec would (arguably) have required.

      In other words, nothing to see here, move along.

    16. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll drop a hint for anyone who cares to listen to a pro-MS lurker. I interned at MS and got to play with a desktop fully built on top of direct3d. It was a really early demo of the product but you could alpha blend, scale, and rotate application windows. I won't say it was excellent, but it was a nice concept to look at. I suspect that the 3d desktop is slated for use in blackhorn since Longhorn will be using GDIPlus.

    17. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to do such things?

      Repeat after me: Bloatware.

    18. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by lothix · · Score: 1

      It is called "innovating" OpenGL's approach.

    19. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      There's that certain something with upside-down Excel spreadsheets.

    20. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by jafuser · · Score: 2
      I've always wondered when Windows was going to have nifty 3d interface like some games.... Now I just want to know when Microsoft is going to add support for navigating your file system in a 3d environment, slaying old temp files with a light saber, and using force push and force pull to "move" files...

      Ugh.. been playing to much JK2 lately...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    21. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      cnet

    22. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      Whenever I see a site like that, I just assume it's a false/trojan site. I mean...use the damn "news.com" domain, not "*.com.com"

      --
      ± 29 dB
    23. Re:Using 3D API's for 2D? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      well cnet owns com.com and links to all of their various sites from there..

  15. E DR17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow alot of the features listed look amazing like the new verizon of enlightenment. Even has Rasterlike comments

    1. Re:E DR17 by KentoNET · · Score: 1

      I hate Verizon.

      --
      "You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
    2. Re:E DR17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "verizon" I assume you mean "version" which is of course short for the Concurrent Versioning System. My only question is, sure CVS has been bypassed by a lot of new technologies, but why do you hate it? Without CVS we wouldn't have Linux.

  16. "New" features? by sphealey · · Score: 3, Interesting
    New features, eh? The only thing that saves Microsoft here is how short everyone's memory is in the tech industry. "Seamless file transfer across devices" sounds very similar to the "object oriented files system", which was first promised for the version of Windows that was going to follow NT 3.5 and was announced in 1991 or so. Of course the follow on to NT 3.5 was NT 4, which was released in 1996 and contained few to none of the promised wizz-bangs.

    But now it will be XP 2.0 (dare we call it 3.11?) that will have the good stuff. I am holding my breath, I am.

    sPh

    1. Re:"New" features? by drfrank · · Score: 1, Troll

      Huh? The object "oriented file system" and device synchronization are related only in the sense that you could theoretically build sync on top of an OOFS.

      And this comment is scored up to 4? You guys have been trading your mod points to the trolls for porn again, haven't you.

    2. Re:"New" features? by swordboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But now it will be XP 2.0 (dare we call it 3.11?) that will have the good stuff. I am holding my breath, I am.

      Somewhat unrelated but along the same thought:

      Will Intel create a 4.77Ghz "Pentium XT" to celebrate the 1000 fold increase in operating speed over the 4.77Mhz 8086 XT processor?

      I'm actually serious. I think it would be appropriate considering AMD's use of the XP trademark...

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    3. Re:"New" features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, except my 4.77MHz 8088 (wish I upgraded to an 8086) XT processor was made by Zilog.

    4. Re:"New" features? by sphealey · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude - I don't have all the back issues of Byte or PCMag anymore. Maybe I was thinking of the "Distributed File System", which also never saw the light of day. Or maybe it was the "Object Oriented Desktop". Chicago, Cairo, Memphis, Daytona - where am I????

      sPh

    5. Re:"New" features? by drfrank · · Score: 1

      The DFS shipped with win2k, and there were updates made available which allowed even NT4 and win95 to use DFS shares, IIRC.

  17. It's the devil i tell you! The devil! by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    Haven't you seen how the devil is represented as a guy with horns and flatulence problems?!! This longhorn windows deal must be the devil's work!

    *runs to hide*

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:It's the devil i tell you! The devil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      By breaking this seal, you agree to the following terms and conditions:

      1. Your first born child belongs to us. You agree to pay all shipping and handling charges in sending child to us, as well as paying ongoing maintenance fees for said child.

      2. You agree to make a weekly blood sacrifice of an Open Source developer using your PC as an altar. Failure to comply will result in the loss of one limb.

      3. You agree not to enage in Open Source development or other intellectual property destroying activities, which we will not define here, but we'll recognize it when we see it. Failure to comply will result in the loss of another limb.

      4. Your soul, of course, belongs to us.

      5. WE STILL DON'T PROVIDE ANY DAMN WARRANTY!!!

    2. Re:It's the devil i tell you! The devil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because it will be based on FreeBSD, just like Apple's OSX...

    3. Re:It's the devil i tell you! The devil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, c'mon! Doesn't this even deserve a (Score 0, Funny) rating?

  18. Seamless & Windows by kvn299 · · Score: 1

    Gosh, I sure do hate to see those two words used in the same sentence. Unfortunately, Microsoft seems to have managed to take this concept to very sinister territory.

    Also, regarding Mira... I wanna know what happens when you accidently drop the device into the toilet when you go to wash your hands.

    1. Re:Seamless & Windows by caferace · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd *love* seamless windows. Panes are a pain.

  19. I heard things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear that Longhorn will revolutionize the world as we know it.

    For instance, the operating system may actually have a feature where you don't have to install IE.

    Another major upgrade is that the you can now customize the blue screen of death to any picture you like. So at least now when your os crashes you can look at a picture of brittaney spears.

    1. Re:I heard things by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      "So at least now when your os crashes you can look at a picture of brittaney spears."

      So as not to interrupt your porn slide show :)

  20. Yawn by pkplex · · Score: 1

    Man... can anyone say "buzzwords" and "milking the market" ?

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The way a dominatrix will milk a male submissive -- slow, torturous, and never-ending. But it might feel kinda nice if you're into that sort of thing.

  21. All I have to say by OccSub · · Score: 1

    Windows XP ME

  22. As a Texas A & M University graduate by krails · · Score: 4, Funny

    And as an Aggie, I think it's damn funny that they'd call it "Longhorn". Guess I'll have to name my test machine I install it on "Bevo" and rename my main Linux server "Beatthehellouttatu". =)

    Gig 'em!

  23. Longhorns trademark? by SivaV · · Score: 1

    In light of MS going after Lindows, should we expect the University of Texas to attack MS over the use of "Longhorns?"

    --
    Siva Vaidhyanathan is the author of Copyrights and Copyrwrongs (2001) and The Anarchist in the Library (2004).
    1. Re:Longhorns trademark? by Utopia · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't stand in court.
      It is just a project codename.
      Not the actual product name.

    2. Re:Longhorns trademark? by LawGirl · · Score: 1

      Only if there's any justice in the world. I can think of a bunch of people who'd take that one pro bono...

    3. Re:Longhorns trademark? by Kredal · · Score: 3, Funny

      The first line was correct... let's rewrite that, shall we?

      Wouldn't stand in court
      It's just a project codename
      Not the product name

      There, doesn't that look better?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  24. Call the experiment "Project Aggie" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear, hear! This is copyright infringement
    and defamation of Bevo. Linux and Longhorns
    forever. Boycott Microsoft!

  25. no analog output ? by tandr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Removal of the analog signal path for CD audio.

    wth?

    1. Re:no analog output ? by dimator · · Score: 2

      Hmm... that would make sense. Forcing CD tracks to go through the OS would allow them to enforce DRM somehow.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:no analog output ? by thedbp · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, I guess M$ never thought that people could just loop a cable from the audio out to the audio in with their favorite audio-recording app running to capture it.

    3. Re:no analog output ? by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      Whoa. Why? I didn't notice that till now.

      Well, we know why *cough* *Hillary Rosen* *cough*; but come on, audio piped digitally through a sound card sounds like ass compared to pure audio straight from the CD drive.

      IANAProfesisonal MP3 ripper; but remove access to the analog path, and you're only alternative is the digital; which can be secured (read: DRM) from both a hardware and software perspective.

    4. Re:no analog output ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is to ensure that there will be a thriving 3rd party market for CD rippers. M$ do not want to remain branded as a monopolist see...

    5. Re:no analog output ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (please correct me if my facts aren't straight)

      I really hope that they aren't talking about
      M$'s "prefered specs" for PC's in order for
      manufacurers to display the "made for M$
      Window$" icon on their case. Garbage such as
      no bios hardware status (non-warning) messages on startup and that kind of crap. If so, I will
      look for that symbol to know what *not* to buy.

    6. Re:no analog output ? by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      Come on, they're trying to do that for years now (at least since win98). The analog audio output on cd-rom drives is a bad idea anyway. The audio cable is unshielded and running right through the em-noise that's in your pc, possibly ruining your audio clarity. At least they're trying to do something about this...

    7. Re:no analog output ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ did this so people would stop sharing analog rips. I mean, how many ads do you see on zeropaid and it's ilk advertising freerip, "rip through your soundcard!". Not only is ADC to DAC and vice versa bad practice, it degenerates the sound quality when converting to analog. Clearly, Microsoft cares about the consumer in this case and wants users to enjoy quality, digital entertainment.

    8. Re:no analog output ? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Um. CD's store information digitally. The analog audio output port on a CD player actually sounds like ass. CD-ROMs have cheapass D/A converters in them to create that analog stream.

      If you extract the audio digitally through the IDE interface or play it through the CD-ROM's SPDIF jack, you're getting the high quality info directly on the CD, not the shit coming out of the CD-ROM's piece of crap D/A converter.

    9. Re:no analog output ? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, that is all good for those people that build PCs, but what about OEMs? I am sure they will require USB audio.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:no analog output ? by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Not to be overly pessimistic about Microsoft's intentions, but somehow I have a real hard time believing they listed that requirement because they want to improve the quality of CD audio that the PC plays. I would venture to bet that at least 95% of the people that use Windows wouldn't notice the difference, anyway. So what is their real motivation? Can we all say "D-R-M"?

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    11. Re:no analog output ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is until you buy a CD-ROM that's missing the line out pins.

    12. Re:no analog output ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to burst your bubble, but it will still sound like crap. Get yourself a Real Hi-Fi System(tm) -- www.goodsound.com will help.

    13. Re:no analog output ? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Send the digital signal to a real system. It'll sound great. (I have a Sony ES amp and NHT speakers.. cd's sound awesome ;))

      -Jon

  26. Re:A Windows fan site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    They have a list of all of the known security vulnerabilities in Windows. Funny how I never see any articles like that here.

    Here's one for OpenBSD

  27. Transfer across devices by dissonant7 · · Score: 1

    With new features like seamless content transfer across devices, it looks like Longhorn will not just be Windows XP SE."

    So does this mean that all the forthcoming MS worms will now be "seemlessly transferred" to my handheld devices? -;

  28. Longhorn sneek preview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rumor has it that this next OS will be PNP beyond anything seen up to now: - Out of the box, it will automatically identify and give you remote configuration/control capability over all the appliances in your house. - With appropriate wireless hardware it will interface with your motor vehicles and provide you extended control over their operation, real time location and mechanical status. The counterpart is that whenever you make a significant hardware modification to any of the above units (including your computer of course) the OS will deactivate all of them at once and lock them in that status until you obtain a new activation key from MS...

  29. More DirectX Garbage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DirectX Video Acceleration (DirectX VA) API must be used if the hardware supports acceleration of MPEG-2 decode with motion compensation, iDCT, or VLD.

    Video that is interlaced must be de-interlaced using the DirectX VA and Direct3D 9 APIs for video.

    The components must be


    What does this mean for OpenGL, which is already having problems?

  30. Longhorn sneek preview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rumor has it that this next OS will be PNP beyond anything seen up to now. Out of the box, it will automatically identify and give you remote configuration/control capability over all the appliances in your house. With appropriate wireless hardware it will interface with your motor vehicles and provide you extended control over their operation, real time location and mechanical status. The counterpart is that whenever you make a significant hardware modification to any of the above units (including your computer of course) the OS will deactivate all of them at once and lock them in that status until you obtain a new activation key from MS...

  31. Minimum hw requirements by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    will probably be a 3.2Ghz uP, 1Gb memory and 120Gb disk - and that's just to boot up. More RAM recommended for actually running applications, altho there probably won't be anything left that's NOT already integrated into the "operating system" that comes pre-installed with your new PC.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Minimum hw requirements by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      But linux can't be that big, even with M$ messing with it!

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Minimum hw requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What complete FUD on your part. This is WINDOWS, like any graphics-intensive operating system, as graphical technologies continue, so will base system requirements.

      But seriously... did you know that the minimum specs for XP are a mere 233Mhz processor with 64MB RAM? I don't know about you; but I was running that type of a system 6 years ago. Being able to run on barely-functioning hardware is NOT a requirement for a modern OS. Just because Unix thrives on 'legacy' doesn't mean you have people running out to computer shows to gobble up old 486 DX2 66's.

      And even if you were to build such a system from old parts, how much mileage would you expect out of it as a modern desktop personal computer?

      Operative words: modern, as well as desktop; so shut up now before you try to play the "BUT I BUILT A FREE LUNIX FIREWALL OUT OF PAPERCLIPS AND A TOASTER OVEN!" card.

    3. Re:Minimum hw requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I couldn't resist: 2.4.19-pre4-ac2 #3 Fri Mar 29 01:45:02 CST 2002 i686 unknown

      MEM

      total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:

      Mem: 925134848 371134464 554000384 0 8392704 233963520

      Swap: 1052794880 0 1052794880

      MemTotal: 903452 kB

      MemFree: 541016 kB

      MemShared: 0 kB

      Buffers: 8196 kB

      Cached: 228480 kB

      SwapCached: 0 kB

      Active: 280188 kB

      Inact_dirty: 3688 kB

      Inact_clean: 53788 kB

      Inact_target: 67532 kB

      HighTotal: 0 kB

      HighFree: 0 kB

      LowTotal: 903452 kB

      LowFree: 541016 kB

      SwapTotal: 1028120 kB

      SwapFree: 1028120 kB

      Committed_AS: 185696 kB DISK SPACE

      Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on

      /dev/hda2 909168 780916 82068 91% /

      none 451724 0 451724 0% /dev/shm

      /dev/hdb1 19228276 8245420 10006108 46% /disc1

      /dev/hdb2 19228308 10805548 7446008 60% /disc2

      /dev/hda8 9337356 1250268 7612772 15% /home

      /dev/hda5 4096543 3342767 753776 82% /mnt/disk

      /dev/hda1 409408 151264 258144 37% /mnt/win_c

      /dev/hda6 8177128 7234076 943052 89% /mnt/win_e

      /dev/hdb5 19533472 10650256 8883216 55% /mnt/win_f

      /dev/hda4 15812524 7746700 7262576 52% /usr OK I need a faster PROC only Pentium III 997.462 at 1992.29 bogomips

    4. Re:Minimum hw requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a typical Microsoft User.

  32. Not the next OS by thing_from_space · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that this is the next OS to come from Microsoft. Remember how 2000 was supposed to replace 98 and how it wasn't ready for primetime when Microsoft needed to fluff their coffers? Remember what we got out of that? Microsoft Me!!! It's goning to be near impossible for MS to mess up the NT line, but I wouldn't put it past them to slather on some new features on top of XP Home making it a useless POC and call it their new OS.

    1. Re:Not the next OS by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that 2000(when still called NT5) was supposed to be out in 97.

  33. A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me, taking a big FOGHORN on your desktop.

  34. Longhorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I get the feeling "Foghorn" would be more appropriate?

  35. Seamless content transfer? by Arcturax · · Score: 1

    What does this mean? Is this just a big bunch of buzzwords for "file copying?" It sure sounds to me like it simply means you can copy from multiple devices (mp3 player ect).

    Shouldn't it be able to do this already? Can't it do this already? If its a more strict definition (meaning it copies to about anything) then doesn't Mac OS X already meet this requirement, after all you can copy files (or content if you want to use the buzzwords) to or from about any device. Digital cameras, mp3 players, removable disks, you name it. Is this what M$ means?

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    1. Re:Seamless content transfer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "seamless content transfer" means DRM integrates seemlessly with your content transfer. They left that part out.

    2. Re:Seamless content transfer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea sure OS X can do that stuff, but when Microsoft does it, they are INNOVATING.

      That's the difference.

  36. Re:So what is this? Friday filler come one day ear by fruey · · Score: 1
    No, I am not a moron.

    Getting sick of Slashdot bullshit though. Funny how I get modded both as a troll and as insightful. Some people just mod as troll anyway but why? Why not reply and tell me why the article was so informative.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  37. Shot in the Dark Guess by twilight30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... but it may have something to do with integrating the Digital Rights Management scheme further, so that ordinary users cannot rip CDs.

    I hope to be proved wrong on this. Wouldn't put it past MS, though.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Shot in the Dark Guess by bnenning · · Score: 5, Funny
      but it may have something to do with integrating the Digital Rights Management scheme further, so that ordinary users cannot rip CDs


      As an Apple shareholder, I strongly encourage Microsoft to do this.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Shot in the Dark Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod is without DRM? I don't think so! Apple is doing exactly the same thing.

    3. Re:Shot in the Dark Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a matter of time before that other features/nuisances get hacked around by Joe Programmer.

  38. Digital Rights Managements required for Logo? by rabbitpoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone else follow the link to the microsoft page from one of the first posts?

    http://www.microsoft.com/winlogo/hardware/HWrequir ements.asp

    The document entitled "Requirements for Client PCs" states that several new devices must be present for the Windows Logo program, they include:

    Audio device that supports DRM

    From the TV and Video section:
    Video device that supports DRM

    And a more vague listing in the "Home Entertainment " section that calls for a "Digital Media device that supports DRM".

    On a side note, they are calling for BIOS makers to setup for being flashed from within the Win32 env, does anyone else see this as a way to open a hole for virus writers?

    1. Re:Digital Rights Managements required for Logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a side note, they are calling for BIOS makers to setup for being flashed from within the Win32 env, does anyone else see this as a way to open a hole for virus writers?

      Doesn't Linux have a /dev/bios? Can't smart hax0rs already mess with your BIOS without OS support?

      In Windows 2000 you can already set policies to require signed code before messing with hardware, in addition to normal permisssions. The devil (as always) will be in the details.

    2. Re:Digital Rights Managements required for Logo? by BRTB · · Score: 1
      BIOS flashing from Windows? Can we say BAD IDEA? Not only a neat new toy for the virus authors, but almost guaranteed to mess up normal bios flashing in general.

      I can't tell you how many times I've seen one of those Windows-based flashers die right in the middle of programming the bootblock or something and rendering the whole machine worthless... until somebody yanks out the chip and reprograms/hotflashes it, that is. Nice clean DOS (DR-DOS works fine, yeah *shock* even PC-/MS- DOS is pretty stable, dunno about FreeDOS) is still the best for messing with your BIOS code. Especially with Uniflash. =]

    3. Re:Digital Rights Managements required for Logo? by boskone · · Score: 1

      My Gigabyte board already has the ability to flash bios from win32. so far OK, but when this is widespread, it could be a hole. depends if the MB makers use a common method or not.

  39. Can't see the site... by Junta · · Score: 2

    But judging from the information duplicated on slashdot, this is a big hoax. Dta transfer across devices? Umm... gee, that sounds new. All this garbage about using 3D acceleraters for 2D operations? Blatantly stupid, video cards can do 2D acceleration faster than 3D. The extraordinarily absurd description of how video content would reach the screen? And the little one slipped in about analog path for CD being eliminated, that just sounds like prodding people to believe they are doign this for DRM.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Can't see the site... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that they are serious about this. At least according to their own documentation.

      goto http://www.microsoft.com/winlogo/hardware/HWrequir ements.asp
      and read the Graphics Bandwidth Requirements document. They state that they have a new rendering model that is superior to the one they use now. But then fail to explain any advantage it has. Or provide a link to any research that may help justify their decision.

      Fluff

  40. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Microsoft has finished securing all their code? Or was I dreaming when I heard that they would put a feature-freeze into place while trolling their zillion lines of code for errors?

  41. ONTOPIC you sniveling driveling blithering MORON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  42. Re:as the husband of a UT Grad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a side note, how come Aggies can't build a bonfire without killing themselves in the process.

    That's not called for. That is a very serious and real issue on A&M's campus.

    You might, however, find it interesting to note that bonfire was around for 88 years before it fell in '99. I'd say thats a pretty good track record.

  43. A salute to GW Bush! by fajoli · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    DOJ essentially gives up the anti-trust case and Microsoft code names the next version of Windows after a Texan word like Longhorn? Coincidence?

    I think not!

    1. Re:A salute to GW Bush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The longhorn of George's of which they speak, doesn't go moo.

    2. Re:A salute to GW Bush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whistler (codename for WindowsXP) is a mountain at the ski resort in BC Canada called "Whistler-Blackcomb"
      Blackcomb (codename for a future version of Windows) is the other mountain at that ski resort.
      Longhorn is the bar/restaurant that's inbetween the mountains.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. A scarry thought! by SWTP · · Score: 1

    Ok its code name Longhorn... There is Gateway that uses a cow for a logo. Combind the two and you have a scarry though!

    The best new feature are those that work!

  46. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...snicker...only...meta...data...you...microsoft. . . oad...boy...who...probably...has...never...used... a...real...computer...in...his...life...

  47. And as a fan of... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    ...Flo's Filet, I must agree with you.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  48. Interesting name choice by aafiske · · Score: 1

    Not Windows SEX-P ? :) Kind of like apple's old problem. They used 'X' to denote a certain processor in a computer. So: The Mac II, the Mac IIx, the Mac IIci, Mac IIcx, etc. Didn't work so well with the Mac SE. Mac SE, Mac SEx ... hmm. So they called it the SE/030. (seriously, I used to own an SE/030)

    1. Re:Interesting name choice by tps12 · · Score: 2
      SE/030 is octal, so that's actually the SE/24, kind of a scaled down education market version of the SE/30.

      Seriously, though. SE/30's are sweet. Still useful after all these years, and so small.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  49. "TBD" by sulli · · Score: 2
    Interesting, though, that the details are listed as "TBD" in all three of these categories. Hardware vendors who attend WinHEC may wish to object to this sort of thing.

    But what do I care? i use a Mac.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  50. As a cow by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    I am even more offended than you.

    C-X C-S

  51. TV cards must support DRM! by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Informative
    Seems any WinTV cards that will want Windows logos will have to support MS's (patented) DRM technology. From the document:

    TV and Video Requirements
    NEW: Video device that supports digital rights management meets compatibility requirements

    --

    -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    1. Re:TV cards must support DRM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we will know what *not to buy :)

  52. Too bad Aggies are so damn irritating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if they had a decent recruiting class they could compete with OU and Texas.

    Boomer Sooner.

    Texas A&M is a cult. Got your ring? Got your stupid ass looking boots? Gig'em my ass. Weak sisters of charity.

  53. Lindows...thank god by johnsbra · · Score: 1

    I think that the best thing all of us can do is to support Lindows. It really is the best way that open source supporters are going to make there products enter the main stream. We need to show the business world that it works. Does anyone know if there is a Novell client for it???

    1. Re:Lindows...thank god by Cossie · · Score: 1

      I don't really see how we can reasonably support Lindows if they refuse to honor the GPL (and sound startled that we would expect them to do so!).

  54. Don't be jealous because OU is better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day you'll step out of the hype into the real world of winning. Just remember the only reason UT has any national championships is because a Sooner coached them. Your legend is our former player. Wait wasn't your current coach at OU first? Hmmm.... I can see a trend here.

    1. Re:Don't be jealous because OU is better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 10:35pm and OU still sucks

  55. Let's rephrase this, shall we? by Cutriss · · Score: 2

    With new features like digital rights management, it looks like Longhorn will not just be Windows XP LE (Limited Edition)."

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  56. Name fits with M$ Lock-in strategy... by bubbha · · Score: 1

    Hook-em Horns !!!!!

    --
    I want to be alone with the sandwich
  57. Bad moderation here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Looks like the Microsoft Munchkins have mod points today.

    FREE CLUE: the parent post was not "Offtopic"

    I hope I get you in meta-mod.

    1. Re:Bad moderation here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not talk about the draft at all, you idiot.

  58. Want to see a graphical slashdotting in progress? by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

    http://slashdotted.neowin.net (this is a valid URL, any name before neowin.net shows their statistics :D)

    Here is the graph :D

    http://mrtg.datacolo.com/switch1/?log=neowin.htw eb server.com&png=daily

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  59. So? by bomek · · Score: 1

    Actually, who care?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're totally right! who care!?!1@%?

  60. Shoehorn? by haeger · · Score: 1

    I think shoehorn would be a more suitable name since they will probably squeese this Windows into everything they can manage.

    Oh well.

    But wait, wasn't there an article about "MS is running outta juice!"?

    How does this affect project Shoehorn?

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  61. I'm not buying it unless... by Zenjive · · Score: 1

    it contains nano-probes. Win XP didn't completely assimilate me, dammit! I want to be part of the hive! *sob*

    --


    A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
  62. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like...reiser...and...most...other...linux...fa nboy...filesystems...and...they...are...all...slow . .. o...boot....

  63. What the... by shades66 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Just read through the requirements and the following caught my eye..

    1) USB always full power. It looks like they must have shares in battery spares!?!?.. Why should they dictate how power management works. Shouldn't they be working around the hardware instead of expecting to dictate how the hardware works...

    2) Memory requirements.. Why are they asking this? They should make a system that can run in 64Mb MAX so that we can use the rest of the memory for the applications. It annoys me that with every new version of windows it takes up all the base level memory (ie when XP was released 256Mb was starting to become the norm. But XP needed that as a base just to load smoothly..)

    3) Win32 Flashable BIOS .. This worries me A LOT!!. With the past realiability of Microsoft products the last thing I want them doing is playing with the BIOS. I can imagine now all the queue's in PCWORLD at the service desk because they tried installing Windows X and now their computer won't even switch on..

    oh well. got to laugh at Microsoft trying once more to try and take over the world (They may get the hint one day that they can't)..

    I do wonder how many people will want this version of windows with all its anti-theft rubbish. Personally when I use my computer I want to use it the way I want not they way Billy Gates want's me to. That is why I use Linux. It is fairly simple to use, The applications I need are as good (if not better) than their windows counterparts. It allows me to experiment and learn without annoying restrictions. I know what is running on my machine, I can use what I want to access my machine, I know what the machine is logging behind the scenes, I can customise what I want without voiding my licence, I don't have to pay for bug-fixes (The patches from 95 to 98 to ME to 2k to XP cost a fortune...).

    Anyway rant over...

    Mark.

    --
    ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
    1. Re:What the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Preface:
      I been a linux user since Redhat 5.0. I hold professional certifications from SAIR, and am a MCP, and CNA.

      Xp will run fine on 128MB and does not need 256MB "as a base to load smoothly". There are also several gui option you can turn off to speed up the gui's "responsiveness". Try running say Mandrake linux with 64MB and then tell me how great linux runs on low on machines. And no, xfce does NOT compete with XP as a desktop environment. Both XP and Mandrake run better with 256MB though.

      Bottom line is today's most advanced GUI OS's take lots of memory. In exchange you get lots of great features that make it easy for newbies to use it. For example in XP attach a digital camera, and not only will XP recognise it, it will offer to print it out in 4x6, 8x10,etc formats, it will also allow you to order prints online. There are a ton of other great features like this in XP. Laugh if you want, but MS knows what consumers want and they are making sure that their OS is easy to use, and integrates with digital devices consumers own.

      Regarding win32bios, why not? 90% of desktop users in the world use windows. This is a great way to avoid having to use a DOS boot disk. Yes it creates the potential that a user can screw up their machine, but it also makes bios flashing really easy. Got 500 identical machines, simply push out an update. Easy. Sorry but your the minorty here and most users would welcome this.

      Regarding the anti-theft stuff I completely agree and am against DRM. As an aside in the larger scheme of things, I also happen to think that MS's needs to be forced to open their API's and file formats.

      Bottom line is while MS as a company may need to be smacked down a little , XP is a great product. Its very stable and offers a shitload of ease of use features. Linux desktop distros could learn a lot from it. In fact they do, since most linux desktops are an attempt to copy MS products feature for feature.

      But then I'm just a troll huh?

    2. Re:What the... by pretoris · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... Why should they dictate how power management works. Shouldn't they be working around the hardware instead of expecting to dictate how the hardware works ...

      Because it makes sense. If Microsoft can program for hardware that works in a set, defined way they can get an OS that is works much more smoothly, actually other OS's could to. Look at MacOS X. Apple knows excatly what to expect from the hardware and can code accordingly. That doesn't mean that the OS will be more stable, just that it could be...

    3. Re:What the... by januschr · · Score: 1
      3) Win32 Flashable BIOS .. This worries me A LOT!!. With the past realiability of Microsoft products the last thing I want them doing is playing with the BIOS. I can imagine now all the queue's in PCWORLD at the service desk because they tried installing Windows X and now their computer won't even switch on..

      There is that, and then there are the hordes of script-kiddies that will drool at the thought of spreading virii and worms that exploit this particular feature, rendering hapless users' XP boxes unusable.

      --
      This is my sig. Read it and weep.
    4. Re:What the... by hacker · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't they be working around the hardware instead of expecting to dictate how the hardware works...
      We are still talking about Microsoft, right? Of course they're trying to define the standards.
      With the past realiability of Microsoft products the last thing I want them doing is playing with the BIOS. I can imagine now all the queue's in PCWORLD at the service desk because they tried installing Windows X and now their computer won't even switch on..
      ...or even worse, deciding that Microsoft products are no longer useful to you, and you decide to run Linux or BSD on your PC.. but nOOooo.. now the BIOS is incompatible, and circumventing that bios with another version (such as linbios) would now be in violation of the DMCA.

      Lovely.

  64. You mean by theolein · · Score: 1

    They wanna start selling Macs?

  65. Longhorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like more Microsoft bull.

  66. hey!!!!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

    features like seamless content transfer across devices

    it looks like MS sees that apple has gotten it right.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:hey!!!!! by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      MS has seen this for years. Every new release of Windows has some UI feature or trait that was copied blatantly from, or at the least, obviously inpsired by, Mac OS. With any luck, the next thing they'll copy will be anti-aliased text throughout the OS.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    2. Re:hey!!!!! by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Windows XP has something called "ClearType," which Antialiases the text all over Windows. You're a little late.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    3. Re:hey!!!!! by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > With any luck, the next thing they'll copy will be anti-aliased text throughout the OS.

      That feature was in the Plus pack for Windows 95, the interface for which had UI elements ripped off pixel-for-pixel not from MacOS, but from NeXT. XP has sub-pixel antialiasing for LCD screens throughout the OS. And it doesn't take half the CPU time to do it ... how's Quartz workin out for ya?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    4. Re:hey!!!!! by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      The "feature" has been there for quite some time, but how well does it work? Not very well at all, if you ask me. When was the last time you heard someone talking about how beautiful and clear the on-screen text in Windows looked? Yet, I hear that kind of comment about OS X every day.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    5. Re:hey!!!!! by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Like I told someone else, ClearType has been available in Windows for a while, but how well does it really work? Not very well at all, which was my entire point. Never once have I heard someone say how beautiful and clear the text on my XP machine is, yet I hear that kind of comment every day about my OS X machine.

      I won't deny that a lot of UI features in 95 came from NeXT, but some were more obviously ripped from Mac OS (Recycle Bin and My Computer come to mind immediately).

      I don't know where you get "half the CPU time" either, but from someone who actually uses OS X day in and day out, I'd have to say you're a bit off. Perhaps in 10.0 that would have been accurate, but certainly not with 10.1.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  67. Re:Want to see a graphical slashdotting in progres by Traksius+Egas · · Score: 1

    Let me get this right, this machine is hosting a PRO-Windows XX OS webpage? And it's running Linux?

    Say it ain't so. hehe

    Nice little stats page. Any idea what generates it?

  68. Windows Longhorn by bigjohnandsparky · · Score: 2

    A beta copy of Windows Longhorn has just been made available. Check it out here:
    http://ftp.die.net/mirror/humor/microsoft/w inrg.sw f

    1. Re:Windows Longhorn by damiam · · Score: 1

      You could at least make it link, if you're trying to con people into going there. It's so much more obvious when it says "humor" and ".swf" right there on the page.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  69. Nice name by DotComVictim · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it's quite funny that the codename "longhorn" refers to the beetle family, cerambycidae, well known pests of forests and ornamental plants. The larvae consist of worms that bore into the host, making it more susceptible to future infestation and disease.

    The analogy between this and the Windows operating system invasion of the corporate desktop is quite amusing.

    1. Re:Nice name by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Where does it say that the codename "Longhorn" refers to a beetle? Usually the word "Longhorn" brings to mind a large, powerful beast upon which hundreds of individualist cowboys were able to make their living, on account of their extreme reliability and...

      Actually, that's even more amusing :)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:Nice name by sehryan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is named after a mountain somewhere in America. Blackcomb is another MS codename, which is another mountain, I think in Colorado. And XP was Whistler, once again sticking with the mountain theme.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    3. Re:Nice name by stubear · · Score: 2

      Actually Longhorn is a bar at the ski resort histler. Their latest names have come from this area; Whistler, Longhorn and Blackcomb.

    4. Re:Nice name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whistler/Blackcomb are both in BC, Canada.

  70. Competition by papasui · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Say what you want about Microsoft but the fact is that each time they release a new operating system. They are encouraging growth in the market. Open source groups have more reasons to make something thats a free equal (or better than) to Windows, while they are also imposing higher system requirements forcing hardware companies to sell more hardware and make faster parts. The fast parts yield more complex applications do to the fact that since Windows has higher minimum requirements the software users will already have faster systems that can run the software quicker. I don't know about you guys but I can do a lot more with my PC now than I could back when it was a 486dx2 with 8 megs of ram.

    1. Re:Competition by ReindeerBeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I honestly can't believe that I'm reading this.

      The fact that you can't do anything with your old 486 (I'm assuming with Microsoft products) is exactly what's wrong with Microsoft products. I was using a 486 SX (older than yours!) until very recently as a firewall for my home network. I upgraded that to a P75, and everything is speedy. Try doing that with Microsoft. But I guess you would rather have to keep spending more money upgrading your computer every time Micorosoft comes out with a new O/S....

      Hardware will continue to improve with or without Microsoft. In fact, Microsoft tends to lag behind hardware advances, requiring you to upgrade to their new version just to be able to use new hardware (USB and Win95). Microsoft is simply becoming lazy, and doesn't seem to realize the effectiveness of optimizing code. I wouldn't worry about hardware companies becoming lazy if Microsoft stops creating bloatware - consumers will always want faster/better stuff.

      -John

    2. Re:Competition by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft makes software for the 90% of users that are mainstream. Never forget that. Chances are you don't fall into that category.

      Funny how nearly every person I have fixed a system for complains repeatedly about the speed and reliability of the Microsoft software they use. Odd configurations do not consist of of a default Win95/98/2000 installation with service packs. I'd venture to say I have serviced more of the percentage than 10%. Not all of them are going to be in the 10% there.... if they are, then well... microsoft had better get a bomb ready, because that means the 10% is located in a very close proximity and can be easily annihilated :)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    3. Re:Competition by ReindeerBeer · · Score: 1

      danheskett, Who said anything about using Linux? I'm actually using OpenBSD for my router. That's the thing about open-source - you can pick and choose which exact O/S your using for the current situation, and they're all fully compatible.

    4. Re:Competition by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      How's the weather up there in Redmond?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    5. Re:Competition by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      I'm a long time fan - so don't take this wrong. I dis-believe. There is no way you can be running Win2K with Visual Studio 6, a current version of IE, and any services (like IIS or a db) running on a p-180 and call it zippy. Might be stable enough - but oh, the pain! I give my brother hardware like that to chop up into whatever he is calling art that week. Hate to break this to you , but if you are trying to use a p-180 to do code - you are a long way from the 90% yourself.

      Heck, I'm typing this on a slow p-600 w/512M RAM. It is headed to the server room to run nothing more than a linux cs server as it is way at the bottom of my hardware food chain. A 1G duron should not cost much over $50 these days....

    6. Re:Competition by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      You can do more with your PC now than you
      could with a 486dx2 w/ 8meg RAM?

      Ok, what do you do now, and what did you do
      then (let's have the goods here, I DON'T
      actually believe you).

      Next, you argue that Windows is imposing
      HIGHER requirements (to run, I assume), thus
      making PCs faster... How about ignoring
      the upgrades, and utilizing the system for your
      own needs? Now... DOS 5.0 (Microsoft) starts
      in under 3 seconds on a Pentium 150 (lets use
      this here ANTIQUE POS laptop as a reference).
      Windows 3.1 starts in 3 seconds. Hows that for
      efficiency? I bet I FINISH my letter BEFORE you
      BEGIN yours. (get this, we are both using
      Microsoft s'ware!).

      Ratboy666

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    7. Re:Competition by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      Ah, well... OK, I'm making EJB's - running a copy of Weblogic, Oracle, and VisualAge - along with a buch of other stuff. As it can take several minutes for the portal server to start up, I'll keep the "typical" end user machine waiting for testing and hang onto the fast box for development. I suspect we differ on our interpretation of snappy...

      I must keep you away from the appropriations committee. If my wife even had a hint that a GF4 may not really be needed for coding, I could loose my funding! (grin)

  71. There's nothing loke a longhorn to ... by balneary · · Score: 1

    generate plenty of bullshit.

    1. Re:There's nothing loke a longhorn to ... by balneary · · Score: 1

      Oops... 'loke'?? The problem with previewing is that
      sometimes you read what you thought you wrote.

  72. Re:Things To Do Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is your stick:
    8=================D

  73. Re:as the husband of a UT Grad by ThePlague · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yes, only a 1/89 = 1.8% catastrophic fail rate. That's not bad at all. They teach engineering there?

  74. Uh Oh by kick_in_the_eye · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't confuse this with the new Lindows Wonghorn release.

  75. RMS would never allow it by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Emacs is his baby, and I doubt very much whether either party wants it included with Windows.

  76. How appropriately named. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bend over so MS can give you the Longhorn..

  77. Win32 Flashable BIOS to lock others out by theolein · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Won't this be an MS attempt to get your PC to lock out any other OS? I can imagine some of the marketing genii at MS going on about "How to finally get all those people who run Linux in a dual boot locked into our OS". I really would not put it past them, especially in light of the fact that new PC's are sold mostly with some MS OS preinstalled

  78. Re:as the husband of a UT Grad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell that to the dead kids. no college tradition is worth dying for.

  79. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How closely would either one of these resemble this?

    Or is it more like BeFS?

  80. Re:Want to see a graphical slashdotting in progres by jtharpla · · Score: 1

    MRTG, http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/

  81. No Analog path for CDs by jparker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the doc:

    Proposed requirements for advancing audio capabilities include:
    Removal of the analog signal path for CD audio.

    1. Re:No Analog path for CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Note that most CDROM drives have SPDIF outputs on them. I prefer this over the analog output since in general DACs CDROM drive aren't as high quality as sound card DAC, and because many soundcards will convert it back to digital anyway (if you have a digital out on your soundcard). Getting rid of the analog signal may be a good thing.

      On the other hand, XP is rumored to not use the cd to soundcard path, but insread it reads the audio via the IDE and writes it to the sourndcard, seems like a waste of resources for no apparent reason. Maybe they'll add removal of SPDIF output to the list too, in which case I hope there an uproar.

  82. Not Like What You Think by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    seamless content transfer

    Sure, a great idea, technically sound from the standpoint of making device API's easier to deal with and make the consumer experience easier, too. Kinda like the UNIX concept of "everything is a file", except maybe, everything is "copyrighted digital content".

    So look for inserted technology in the way of DRM or, as I prefer to name it, CUR (Content Use Restriction).

    Yep, I can see it now: seamless nice setup of interdevice PKI after the device keys and your VISA card number (embedded into the Longhorn Authorization process) are verifed over .NET.

    Michael Eisner will be giving plaudits to Microsoft for "achieving what Intel and the hardware manufacturers said was too difficult".

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  83. just as long ... by pascaully · · Score: 1

    ... as it still delivers me my daily dose of pr0n I don't care what it takes to run.

    --
    You dare to hit ME! JOHNNY PASCAULLY!!
  84. Ensure that file associations are appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Windows Desktop Guidelines
    Ensure that file associations are appropriate"

    ALL Audio/Video formats = Windows Media Player
    ALL Web = Internet Explorer
    ALL Database = MS SQL Server

    So, in summary...
    ALL YOUR FILE ASSOCIATIONS ARE BELONG TO US!

    1. Re:Ensure that file associations are appropriate by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      That _is_ interesting. Wonder if the judge in the antitrust case would have an opinion on Microsoft requiring that all OEM data files can only use the Microsoft middleware?

      I believe this also conflicts with something Quicktime does: I don't like it, but it can create a small file on the desktop that's little more than an ad to 'upgrade to Quicktime Pro!'. This file must associate to Quicktime, of course- and hence violates Microsoft's guidelines...

  85. Longhorn? by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Funny

    What a cheesey sounding name.

  86. "seamless transfer across devices" by evilpaul13 · · Score: 2

    That sounds to me, like it'll have lots of drivers for PDAs and Digital Cameras and just auto-mount them as if they were a HDD. Of course the site is /.'ed so I can't read the story, but I hope MS found something else to add other than just that.

  87. Anti-Microsoft opportunity! by Alsee · · Score: 2

    The best way to kill off sales of a current product is to announce how great the next version is going to be.

    If any /. readers happen to be a writer for the New York Times for example, maybe you could write up an article about how great Microsoft's next version is going to be! Watch people in droves hold off on upgrading to XP! Praise can be a better weapon than FUD. Weeeee!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Anti-Microsoft opportunity! by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      Conversely, talk about requiring DRM support in the next release will ensure people will want the current version, so that they won't be stuck with the next one.....

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    2. Re:Anti-Microsoft opportunity! by Alsee · · Score: 2

      talk about requiring DRM support in the next release

      Shhhhhhhh!!!!

      Don't tell them about that until the next version comes out, after they've already held off buying XP!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  88. Re:Wishful Thinking by urmensch · · Score: 1

    try bluefish. it's shaping up to be very polished.

  89. Called "Longhorn" for good reason by dunkerz · · Score: 1

    The horns on Bill Gates are getting longer. Finally, something in a Microsoft product that is to be agreed with :)

    --

    You were expecting a sig?
  90. Re:Lindows and Open Source? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    From the Lindows insiders FAQ:

    "Insiders also need to agree to honor our non-disclosure agreement, keeping the program and any information learned as a Lindows.com Insider confidential."

    Wouldn't it be better just supporting Wine and your favorite distro? Open Source and Non-disclosure agreements somehow don't seem to jive in my book.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  91. Microsoft removed the content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The content appears to be gone of the site. The word document is now empty and the path to the executable containing the 6 documents is gone. Did someone back them up or does anyone have an alternative link?

  92. I can just see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Push the power button and it says... Invalid Boot Sector:The OS you are trying to load is not Longhorn... Please call microsoft.

    Or better yet:
    Scandisk-Please wait while we verify that you own all of your digital media content...Deleting Illegal Files...

    1. Re:I can just see it now.... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      Push the power button and it says... Invalid Boot Sector:The OS you are trying to load is not Longhorn... Please call microsoft.

      They've already started: I went to create a new Hotmail account for a throwaway registration, using Mozilla 0.9.9 on Win2K. I got a message saying my browser was "no longer supported" or "an outdated version" and to upgrade to Microsoft's latest Internet Explorer.

      I could have manually changed the headers, but I went to Yahoo instead.

      That's not the point, though; the point is Microsoft's in the position where they can dictate to the consumer, and the consumer has no choice.

      Luckily we have Open Source. Or, conversely, thank Microsoft we have Open Source/Free Software; without their strong-arm tactics it would be (commercially) as unnecessary as Napster would be, if music CDs cost $2 each.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  93. Why I won't complain about microsoft by MagickChicken · · Score: 1

    Consider the following:
    In the beginning of Microsoft, there was dos, dos was a simple command line OS, and some may compare it to Linux, but they were really not very similar. Next came Windows, and Linux got X and as time progressed we began to see a pattern:
    Let wx be the windows operating system, where x is the current incarnation (IE 98, me or XP), and let ly=linux, where y is the current linux incarnation. If current patterns hold true, we can derive the following:
    LIM [wx] =
    x->infinity
    [ly+(system requirements)-(usefull utilities)+2(games available for linux)^2)
    but for
    Lim[ly]
    y->infinity
    (system requirements)->0
    (games available for linux)->infinity
    so we can see that with each new iteration of windows, it becomes more and more like linux (though microsoft calls these NEW Features), so that eventually they will be entirelly cross compatible, we can all use those windows applications that never get ported and we can all delete those nasy windows paritions, so I say, let them make new OS's

  94. Weird, I don't see anything about IPOD?!? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2

    hrmf.

  95. Re:So what is this? Friday filler come one day ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how you were modded down. Taco et al are fags.

  96. Win32Bios by dman6666 · · Score: 1

    >>This is a great way to avoid having to use a DOS boot disk. Yes it creates the potential that a user can screw up their machine, but it also makes bios flashing really easy. Got 500 identical machines, simply push out an update. Easy. Sorry but your the minorty here and most users would welcome this.

    Add me to the list that does NOT want to see this. Win32Bios + VBScriptTrojan/Virus = AHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

    Not that virii don't already trash bios' but it's not as widespread as MS apparently wants it to be!

    I suppose that "dual" bios option will then become the standard in the next 2-3yrs.

    1. Re:Win32Bios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Alpha Platform there was the

      ARC\AlphaBIOS which was a firmware just for windows(though linux works with it ;-) )

      The other one was the SRM bios which was intended for the tru64 unix installs.

  97. I don't need Windows Bull (aka Longhorn) by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Dear Microsoft,

    regarding your plans to release a new version of windows...

    The last Windows version I used was Windows 98 se. I used that for playing games, but nowadays I don't need that anymore because the games I play all have Linux ports. Other than that there was a copy of Windows NT4 running on my company notebook but I've upgraded that notebook to Linux two weeks after I got it. (mainly due to the usability and stability issues with your OS).

    I also use Star Office. I get around compatibility issues to your office product by using PDF files if necessary. Mozilla has ever since version 0.9.2 been my browser of choice.

    So, you see, there's hardly any reason at all for for me to use any Microsoft product. Not even if you added all the DRM features and marketing data collection capabilities no user could ever possibly want.

    Regards.

  98. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try JFS Troll.

  99. I vote by Prong_Thunder · · Score: 1

    We dub this "Project Greenhorn"

  100. Longhorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did they code name the new windows after a villian from Freakazoid cartoons?

  101. Re:who cares by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

    May I take this moment to inject some rampant BeOS fanboyism into this thread?

    \m/ BeFS \m/

    That is all.

  102. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  103. I'm sorry, but where are the advances? by j09824 · · Score: 1

    Is this some kind of bad joke? When I go to that page, I see some uninteresting low-level features. And the Word document "Preview: Windows 'Longhorn' Proposed Requirements for Client PCs", a 199k Word file doesn't load into AbiWord , but actually just contains the string "The content is to be provided at a future date." (199kb of backwards incompatible WordXP just for that? Some things apparently never change.)

  104. Re:who cares by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    Sure, I'd love try that... but unfortunately it's not readily available :(

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  105. Not Quite by XScB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually I believe Longhorn is named after this bar in Canada at the foot of Whistler. Whistler having been the codename for Windows XP.

    So instead of a cowboy, think of Ballmer dressed as a Mountie or Moose.

    Kinda scarier I think.

  106. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -Detection of Linux/Unix upon Longhorn installation will result license termination, corruption of BIOS, and fine of $100,000! Credit card only please.

  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Uhhh... by Lithium+Element · · Score: 1
    Mozzilla is nice (I tried the 1.0 release recently), but the number of sites I surf daily that didn't render properly was pretty significant.

    What are you smoking? Mozilla 1.0 hasn't been released yet. That might certainly explain why pages didn't render properly...

    1. Re:Uhhh... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      I thought the slashdot story said 1.0 released, and I downloaded it, 'cause I hadn't tried it in a while. You are correct. Upon examination it is 0.99. Whatever. It's still quite a few.

  109. METAPAD by sofar · · Score: 2

    METAPAD is a much more feasable alternative. not only is it a good and stable replacement for notepad, it's also completely free. Not to mention it isn't bloated but just a lovely lightwight text editor just what it's supposed to be.

    Funny how these jewels go so unnoticed so often

    /me quickly returns to vi

  110. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  111. trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    flaming grits, M$, linux, hope this fails,BSD, conspiracy, and f you all because my obscure ___ is better.

  112. What if Longhorn does not come? by ispel · · Score: 1

    Would anyone care if "Longhorn" did not come? What if Microsoft's "dream" was unfufilled? How would it affect the world if Microsoft's new operating system had to be scrapped because of the anti-trust litigation? All that new code for Digital Rights Managment, an Amazing database file system, and the usual plethera of new bug fixes that won't be back-ported, was stopped cold and thrown into the intellectual property vault forever. Who cares?

    It would not matter. The general public won't be disappointed; they don't know what Longhorn is (do you?). Some Microsoft execs and investers will be screwed. Some Microsoft execs will have destroyed dreams (the googly eyed marketing guys like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs). What if Windows XP were to never be? WinME? Win95?

    The x86 computer industry would do just fine without the Microsoft solution. There are plenty of operating systems to choose from that will do Microsoft's job well.

    1. Re:What if Longhorn does not come? by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Yes but whoever it was people would still be complaining. Heck, even if it wasn't a commerical OS people would still be having Linux/FreeBSD/BEOS/Mac or whatever wars.

      Of course FreeBSD is the best ;-)

  113. Already? by Walson · · Score: 1
    1. Already there is news of the next version of windows, but still no news about half life 2.
    --
    ~Common sense is the most evenly distubuted of all things, everyone thinks they have enough, and wants no more
  114. Fool, MB not Mb. nt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  115. Longhorn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is this going to be another 'bum steer' from Microsoft?

  116. Re:who cares by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

    BeBits they should have BeOS 5 personal edition mirrored somewhere (I think)

  117. Re:as the husband of a UT Grad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, its E363B - Building with Beer...

  118. Explanation of MS's new Codenaming Scheme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    okay kids, here's the reasoning behind MS's new codenames:

    - Whistler is a world famous ski resort north of Vancouver in BC, Canada
    - Blackcomb is one of the mountains there, and
    - the Longhorn is a bar in Whistler

    lots of MS execs have expensive cabins at Whistler so it kinda makes sense

  119. Re:Wishful Thinking by lux55 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the recommendation! Bluefish definitely has potential, and I try it out briefly each new major release, but it suffers from the same lack of GUI expertise that most Windows and Unix apps do.

    If you look at the BBEdit interface, it's a blank window. It has a single thin bar at the top, and that's it. When you open any additional toolbars, they open horizontally, so that they can be placed beside the editing window(s), on either side. This translates into more screen space for the editor, because the more toolbars that are thrown at the top take away from the number of visible lines. The width of the lines doesn't need to extend to the edges of a 1200x1000 screen - that would be too difficult to read - so the placement of toolbars on either side is perfect.

    Otherwise, there are only minor issues, which are shared by 99% of the editors out there, but I need the polish of a production tool. As much as I wish I could contribute more to projects like Bluefish, I simply don't have the time.

    Another comparison is the GUI of the GIMP (or any other graphics app for that matter) vs. Photoshop (or any other Adobe app). These projects will get the attention they deserve when they become more intuitive to GUI-based users. Then there's those that use Gnome and gang purely to have multiple shells open. :)

  120. That looks suspiciously familiar.... by gusnz · · Score: 2

    Step 1) Substitute "CBDTPA" for "Windows Longhorn" in the feature list.

    Step 2) Reread it.

    Is it just me, or does this talk of trusted, secure platforms and completely digital audio paths seem strangely familiar...?

  121. Windows "Longhorn" = OPENBSD! by modipodio · · Score: 1

    A bold new direction for micrdoft just read about it here!

    --
    __________________________________________________ "UNIX is a fascist state, Windows is a democracy.
  122. Who cares? by s390 · · Score: 2

    Who cares what unwanted bloat and pandering to Hollywood's RIAA/MPAA goons Microsoft plans for their next revenue-extraction cycle? Irrelevant, that's all. Microsoft built it's empire on "good enough" software, but now most people have hardware and software that's "good enough" for what they want to do with it, so they have no need to pay OEMs or Microsoft again. They who have lived by "good enough" are about to die by it. And good riddance to bad software. I'm buying LEAP Puts on Microsoft stock.

    A study that documents the corporate backlash against Microsoft's overweening greed is here.

  123. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  124. Origin of the name by thecap · · Score: 1
    Have you been to Whistler Blackcomb ski resort? It is a 5 hour drive from Redmond and a lot of Microserfs visit it. Sitting in the valley between the two mountains is a bar named Longhorn.

    Longhorn is the bar which must be crossed to get from Whistler (Windows XP) to Blackcomb (the next big release)

  125. Which ones pinky? Steve or Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're Pinky and the Brain

    Yes, Pinky and the Brain

    One is a genius, the other's insane

    They're laboratory mice

    Their genes have been spliced

    They're dinky

    They're Pinky and the Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain

    Before each night is done

    Their plan will be unfurled

    By the dawning of the sun

    They'll take over the world

    They're Pinky and the Brain

    Yes Pinky and the Brain

    Their twilight campaign

    Is easy to explain

    To prove their mousey worth

    They'll overthrow the Earth

    They're dinky

    They're Pinky and the Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain,
    Brain, Brain, Brain, NARF!