Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Limits Cortana Search Box In Windows 10 To Bing and Edge Only (venturebeat.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from VentureBeat: Microsoft has announced a big change for how the Cortana search box in Windows 10 will work going forward: all searches will be powered by Bing and all links will open with the Edge browser. This is a server-side change going into effect today. Once it takes effect on your Windows 10 computer, Cortana will no longer be able to serve up results from third-party search providers, like Google or Yahoo, nor take you to a third-party browser, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Ryan Gavin, Microsoft's general manager of search and Cortana, said in a Windows blog post announcing the change, "Unfortunately, as Windows 10 has grown in adoption and usage, we have seen some software programs circumvent the design of Windows 10 and redirect you to search providers that were not designed to work with Cortana. The result is a compromised experience that is less reliable and predictable. The continuity of these types of task completion scenarios is disrupted if Cortana can't depend on Bing as the search provider and Microsoft Edge as the browser. The only way we can confidently deliver this personalized, end-to-end search experience is through the integration of Cortana, Microsoft Edge and Bing -- all designed to do more for you."

361 comments

  1. Translation by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Translation: You belong to us, bitches! Now bend over so we can serve you some search results!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Cortana, Microsoft Edge and Bing -- all designed to do more for you

      LOL LOL LOL LOL

      I disabled Cortana in the registry. And Edge is so dumbed-down it's useless.

    2. Re:Translation by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      How? Cortana refuses to speak to me without a Microsoft account.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Translation by justthinkit · · Score: 0
      --
      I come here for the love
    4. Re:Translation by shubus · · Score: 1

      "All your bases are belong to us!"

    5. Re:Translation by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cortana, Microsoft Edge and Bing -- all designed to do more for you

      LOL LOL LOL LOL

      I disabled Cortana in the registry. And Edge is so dumbed-down it's useless

      We are the customers. We paid for the things that we use. We shouldn't have to be forced to go through all the 'disable the registry' hops in order to get our computer to work

      We, the consumers, have given too much 'face' to the tech companies, so much so that right now they, the service providers, get to tell us, their paymasters, what we must do, and not the other way around

      This is wrong, very wrong !

      It is the customers who should have the final say

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    6. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We shouldn't have to be forced to go through all the 'disable the registry' hops in order to get our computer to work

      Then don't use Cortana, use the integrated search designed and provided by Goog... oh right.

    7. Re:Translation by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Complain to whoever in the EU. They just successfully went after Google for similar with android. Well, you may want to double check that, EU regulators have been going after Google for several things and I may have that wrong.

      I don't care enough to check because I don't use it and likely won't for a long time.

    8. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, people use Google because, wait for it, they frigging like it. People use Bing only when they are swindled into it, for example, this story. Yet the EU pesters Alphabet and lets MS go free. Welcome to bizarro world.

    9. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or rather: Not using Cortana and Bing may result in unpredictable and less stable Microsoft profits.

    10. Re:Translation by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      Yes, at first sight, this story does look like an anti-competition lawsuit just waiting to happen.

      Or yet more desperation from Microsoft to lock customers into their ecosystem so they can figure out how to make more money from them later. Take your pick.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    11. Re:Translation by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Translation: You belong to us, bitches! Now bend over so we can serve you some search results!

      I wish I could say I'm surprised, but I'm not. We should have seen this coming.

      I wouldn't be surprised if stuff like Open Office and Libre Office will mysteriously refuse to run under Win 10.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    12. Re:Translation by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dear Microsoft,

      Hi, are you stupid? Are you deliberately trying to make decisions that make you look as terrible as possible?

      I sort of understand the technical reasons for wanting to do this. It's a lot easier to provide consistent results if you control all the pieces to all the tech. But a "consistent experience" is not why people use Windows. If that's what people wanted, they'd already be using a Mac.

      Here's an alternative: Propose an open framework that permits intelligent agents to integrate with and work across search engines and other services, and create a useful, open source implementation that shows how Cortana integrates with Bing and Edge. Start creating some innovative software solutions instead of playing in your own little pond with your own toys, and you might actually find yourself relevant to a broader audience again.

      It looks like I was right to simply turn off Cortana and internet-enabled searching from that bar as the first thing I did after installing Windows 10. What makes you think this is going to entice me to ever turn it back on? Maybe arrange a little "accident" for my registry settings on the next update, I suppose?

      Sincerely,
      -A Windows User / Developer

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    13. Re:Translation by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I cannot fathom a reason I'd use Bing. It's a second rate search engine.

      I will, however, shut down Cortana and save a few cycles.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot easier to provide consistent results if you control all the pieces to all the tech.

      The only problem is if you're substituting a pretender like Bing for results you would have gotten from Google then you are providing consistently "bad" results. If people wanted to use Bing, they would. People choose Google because it is better and meets their needs. Only through underhanded evil acts such as this can MS trick people into using their search engine. I will be sure to point this out to every person I have influence with regarding computer stuff and that's quite a few people.

    15. Re:Translation by Pikoro · · Score: 3

      Too bad you can't kill the process. Even if you turn off cortana, the process will still be running. The only way to do it is to boot from a live linux cd and move the executable files for cortana. Problem with doing that is, it also breaks a bunch of other things like local search.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    16. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: You belong to us, bitches! Now bend over so we can serve you some censored search results!

      There, fixed it for you. When I looked at Bling when it first came out it appeared to just take Yahoo results and filter out anything anti-Microsoft. Can you say anti-competitive monopoly? Yep, business as usual at Microsoft.

    17. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We are the customers. We paid for the things that we use.

      How many times does this need to be mentioned. You are NOT Microsoft's customer, you are their product. They are in the business of selling your browsing habits (and any other personal information they can steal) to whomever will pay them for it.

    18. Re:Translation by v1 · · Score: 0

      you might have forgotten, Bing has been busted for serving up results found from a Google search. (odds are good that if Bing wasn't able to find a high confidence hit on its own it was querying Google to see if it had any better ideas)

      http://searchengineland.com/go...

      Google has run a sting operation that it says proves Bing has been watching what people search for on Google, the sites they select from Googleâ(TM)s results, then uses that information to improve Bingâ(TM)s own search listings. Bing doesnâ(TM)t deny this.

      So it might not matter who they search first, they just want to ad revenue and will get it either way.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    19. Re:Translation by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only problem is if you're substituting a pretender like Bing for results you would have gotten from Google then you are providing consistently "bad" results. If people wanted to use Bing, they would. People choose Google because it is better and meets their needs. Only through underhanded evil acts such as this can MS trick people into using their search engine. I will be sure to point this out to every person I have influence with regarding computer stuff and that's quite a few people.

      I agree. Note that I never said "good" results. I said "consistent", which was absolutely intentional.

      For instance, take their "Pizza Hut" example. Say that Pizza Hut pays for a sponsorship with MS. Now, when you say "I want to order a pizza", you might see Pizza Hut as the first result (okay, dammit, now I'm thinking about pizza for dinner). Had that gone through another search engine, they couldn't guarantee those results, and more importantly (to them), they'd lose out on that sponsorship revenue.

      Honestly, I don't have a real problem if companies try to earn ad revenue this way. I mean, if I want a pizza, then by all means, suggest a pizza place for me. But don't try to pretend you're doing me some favor by locking out anyone else from doing the same thing simply because they have a better search engine.

      If Microsoft was serious about trying to improve the customer experience, I'd be able to simply dictate to Cortana:

      Me: Cortana, I'd like to order a pizza.
      Cortana: Would you prefer Papa John's or Pizza Hut? (note: the two places I actually order from)
      Me: Papa John's. The usual.
      Cortana: That would be a Papa John's large pizza with ... (blah blah)... Shall I order this for you now?
      Me: Yes.
      Cortana: Your pizza has been ordered, and should arrive approximately 40 minute from now.

      When a digital assistant gets that useful, I'll think about turning it on again. But WTF Microsoft... is it that hard to open a web browser and type "pizza hut"? Does anyone need help figuring out how to shop for a black dress on Amazon? It feels like they're shooting so low right now it's utterly pathetic.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    20. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cortana refuses to speak to me without a Microsoft account.

      Huh? I can't decide if you're griping or not -- isn't that a good thing?

    21. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot fathom a reason I'd use Bing. It's a second rate search engine.

      Porn

    22. Re:Translation by guevera · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why does it work better for porn? That would be a brilliant market niche that would provide a great point of differentiation with a motivated audience. I can see the problem with getting the word out, though. I can imagine the ads now, and I don't think they'd work well with MSFT's overall brand strategy.

    23. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how many people here claim to hate Windows and Microsoft yet continue funding them and using their products ... and have done for the past couple of decades. This why Microsoft can do whatever they want, people like you always complain but in the end you just bend over and take it.

    24. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares, that's why pretty much everybody uses Microsoft and Google products in some capacity and share their information on social networking sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, etc. If you're really worried about the privacy of something you use privacy tools (TOR, encryption, sneakernet, etc) but for everything else nobody cares.

    25. Re:Translation by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Only through underhanded evil acts such as this can MS trick people into using their search engine.

      No, people don't care what search engine it uses. If it gives them good results they will keep using it, if it doesn't then they won't use it and Microsoft ends up killing its own product.

    26. Re:Translation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Only for people dumb enough to use Cortana.

    27. Re:Translation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Breaking local search is not a problem.

    28. Re:Translation by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Between the failure of Windows Mobile and now XBox winding down combined with falling PC sales, Microsoft has got to be feeling the heat from investors when asked, "where's the growth in 10 years." Right now their revenues are fine but, with no future money making divisions, they risk stagnation which investors see as death.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    29. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cute. English Nazi's that don't actually understand English. Whoever, whosoever, whomsoever, and whomever can pretty much all be used interchangeably.

    30. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just use Bing to search for Google, and then use that. Google "is" web search for many people, just like Internet Explorer "is" the Internet for many people.

    31. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bing isn't so bad if you just accept that the entire first page of results for any search will be dominated by paid advertisers masquerading as legit 'best possible results for your query'. This is just another case of MS hammering on the greed button before bothering to make a product people actually care about.

    32. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      love how many people here claim to hate Windows and Microsoft yet continue funding them and using their products

      Don't confuse 'using their products' with 'funding them'.
      Some people here have never paid a thing for the Microsoft stuff they use...sure, Microsoft might make something off selling whatever data they can scrape from things like the browsing habits of such users, I wouldn't class that as a case of 'funding them' though, as that phrase sort of implies that you've chosen to give them money.

    33. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    34. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to have my decision to dump Windows entirely after W8 came out over and over again. Nothing like good confirmation.

      It's not like Windows have anything to offer I can't do in Linux or in a VM with ol' W7 running. No updates means stability, and don't use it for anything I don't trust.

    35. Re:Translation by Gussington · · Score: 1

      This is wrong, very wrong !

      It is the customers who should have the final say

      You do. Just stop buying their products.
      Or do really mean you should have editorial decision over the movies you pay $15 to watch because you are 'the customer'?

    36. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It works (or at least worked, haven't checked lately) better for porn because you were able to watch the videos without opening the rest of the sketchy porn site. Allowing the stream without the advertisers and other random scripts from targeting your computer. Last time I checked, there seemed to be fewer sites that bing would stream in this fashion.

      Oh, and of all the reasons we bother with search engines in porn anyway, the Catpcha: amateurs.

    37. Re:Translation by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do have a list of IP ranges that, if blocked, kill Cortana and all the other spyware. But you can't do them using the Windows firewall - system services are exempt, and there's also a whitelist of hosts that will always be resolved via DNS rather than the hosts file. You have to do it from the router. It'll also block Bing, Onedrive, product activation and pretty much everything else Microsoft.

    38. Re:Translation by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the #1 query on Bing is 'google.'

      And #2 is 'facebook.'

    39. Re:Translation by Alumoi · · Score: 2

      We are the customers. We paid for the things that we use. We shouldn't have to be forced to go through all the 'disable the registry' hops in order to get our computer to work

      Please, do tell me again how much did you pay for Windows 10? Is it open source? No? Then you're the fucking product, not a cusotmer.

      We, the consumers, have given too much 'face' to the tech companies, so much so that right now they, the service providers, get to tell us, their paymasters, what we must do, and not the other way around

      Since the begining of the time, a service is usually provided on a 'take it or leave it' base. It's a forced contract meaning you have to agree to the service provider's terms. Of course, you're free to leave if they are changing the terms or you don't want it anymore.

      It is the customers who should have the final say

      And we do have the final say. We can stop using the service if we don't want. BTW, did you ditch Windows in favor of an alternate OS?

    40. Re:Translation by Xenx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows 10 is a paid for product. Yes, most people got free upgrades to it. However, it's disingenuous to act like it's a free product. Anyone building/buying a new computer with Windows 10 is likely paying for Windows 10.

    41. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a lot of people, Google is The Internet. I see people open their browser, Google is their home page, they type "Netflix" (or whatever) in the Google search field, then choose the link to Netflix. This, rather than using a shortcut or typing "Netflix" in the address bar.

    42. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local search in Windows is proudly broken by design - since Windows 7!

      Try some basic search queries and see what happens. Even for file names that are visible it may not show the correct results. Searching in file contents? Forget it.

    43. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just change your locale to one of the many English speaking nations where Microsoft has arbitrarily decided to disable cortana, like Ireland. Unless I'm mixing up cortana voice search with the text input search.

    44. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And only speaks to you if you live in a narrow band of countries. Very poor level of restricted regions available

    45. Re:Translation by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and this move is going to result in another anti-competitive lawsuit, did they not learn from bundling IE all those years ago?

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    46. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now their revenues are fine but, with no future money making divisions, they risk stagnation which investors see as death.

      "No future money making divisions? Dear investor, have you looked at the Windows 10 deployment numbers and have you read its EULA? Written by our primordial money making division, by the way? We have literally billions of customers by their balls. All we need to do is squeeze and money will come out."

    47. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google settled for 91 million last summer for similar abuse of Skyhook Wireless.

                            https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/03/09/skyhook-and-google-settle-long-running-lawsuit/jrWcEQ7Vn9AR4SBTnni1eI/story.html

    48. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      other translation: fuck the users. we've beefed up our legal department and are ready to fend-off challenges from the eff, justice department, and those damn pesky europeans.

    49. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Slashdot really likes modding up bullshit if it plays into the Microsoft hate narrative doesn't it?

      Xbox isn't winding down, it's pulling in record console sales and profits - it's not outsold the PS4 but Playstation wasn't "winding down" just because it was outsold by the Wii and the 360. In fact, Microsoft are just about to announce the next Xbox One hardware design. How do you come up with this shit? PC sales are no longer falling - the PC sales slowdown is almost entirely down to a lack of software pushing the limits like video games used to such that systems just last longer now - as many people are still buying them, and people who didn't have them (i.e. in poorer nations) are beginning to afford them, so the installed base is still growing, we're just not seeing new sales as frequently.

      This is in large part why Microsoft changed the model with Windows 10 - by giving it away free with windows updates they managed to reduce their dependence on PC sales to increase their install base.

      Microsoft still have plenty of new divisions making money too, not least it's cloud division with Azure which includes customers like Apple and with it's greater open source push it's only going to further be able to install itself as a provider in the application server world. These areas are growth areas for Microsoft, it's only real failures in recent years have been Windows 8 which it quickly moved on from and the mobile market. It's still the desktop leader by a wide margin and is growing it's marketshare of the server market and internet services.

      Long story short, stop lying, and the people who modded you up because they love a Microsoft bash no matter how unfounded are retards. Just like you.

    50. Re:Translation by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      For instance, take their "Pizza Hut" example. Say that Pizza Hut pays for a sponsorship with MS. Now, when you say "I want to order a pizza", you might see Pizza Hut as the first result (okay, dammit, now I'm thinking about pizza for dinner).

      But how did talking about Pizza Hut cause that? They don't even offer pizza, just some weird cardboard cutout.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:Translation by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      How many times does this need to be mentioned. You are NOT Microsoft's customer, you are their product. They are in the business of selling your browsing habits (and any other personal information they can steal) to whomever will pay them for it.

      Remember to Facebook this too.

    52. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local search in Windows has been utterly useless post XP anyway.

    53. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do share !

    54. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows/IE was anti-competitive because Windows has a near-monopoly. Microsoft wasn't allowed to use that to "sell" IE. Bundling Bing with Cortana is irrelevant as Cortana has nowhere near a monopoly. What market would be monopolized, even?

    55. Re:Translation by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      It looks like I was right to simply turn off Cortana and internet-enabled searching from that bar as the first thing I did after installing Windows 10. What makes you think this is going to entice me to ever turn it back on? Maybe arrange a little "accident" for my registry settings on the next update, I suppose?

      Sincerely, -A Windows User / Developer

      That's not enough. No really, it isn't.

      Simply flipping the switch doesn't actually turn off Cortana, just check your task manager. Win10 will still connect to the MS servers for all sorts of stuff. I use OpenDNS and set it up to block all of the MS telemetry servers. Ever since I did that, Win10 tries, and fails, to pull up assorted ads, news/weather (which you can only hide it seems), and "protection" from third-party applications (it can't hash and compare with MS's known software list). It is still able to update, but the amount of in-your-face nonsense is greatly reduced.

      To further test, I disabled the Cortana application directly by adding explicit deny permissions to the app. What happened? The start menu stopped working. Entirely. No windows key to bring it up. No desktop search for applications. I had to use explorer to open stuff directly.

      Like many others, if it weren't for the games, MS would be a distant memory

    56. Re:Translation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You have to keep mentioning it because you're wrong. The only thing MS is seeking is more MS products and services to you. The advertising revenue they get is a small trickle of the revenue of things they seek you directly.

      Your inability to understand that revenue streams can come from multiple directions does not make people a MS product.

    57. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the demand we of the season at menu, love cal search is the only way I am do things. Let's see, instead of pulling us a menu to choose my action, but need to click in the same place, which brings up a full page of stuff i never use, start typing and go through several iterations of guessing what a command might be caked, receiving by many stay web search results I didn't ask for. That's the only country erience you want me stuck with,?

    58. Re:Translation by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      I use Bing when i want to see if something is "mainstream" enough that even Bing finds it. Google knows too much about me and my search habits already.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    59. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you need to dig in the registry when there is a simple provided way to do it in the GUI:

      http://www.pcworld.com/article/2949759/windows/killing-cortana-how-to-disable-windows-10s-info-hungry-digital-assistant.html

    60. Re:Translation by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Between the failure of Windows Mobile and now XBox winding down combined with falling PC sales, Microsoft has got to be feeling the heat from investors when asked, "where's the growth in 10 years." Right now their revenues are fine but, with no future money making divisions, they risk stagnation which investors see as death.

      Microsoft's bread and butter has always been and still is the enterprise. As yet, all of their consumer rivals including Apple and Google have failed to penetrate one iota.

      OS, Server and Office licenses make up the bulk of the MS revenue and profit, here it doesn't matter how many PC's are sold because MS charge per license, not OEM for enterprise. Out of this they're bankrolling almost everything else and it's not really making a dent.

      Also, most PC makers have been seeing growth in the last two years with a few exceptions (namely Acer and Apple). Tablet sales have been faltering since early 2015.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    61. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a load of crap. I use bing because after every 1000 searches I get a $5 amazon gift card.

    62. Re:Translation by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I cannot fathom a reason I'd use Bing. It's a second rate search engine.

      It has pretty background pictures, so that's something, I guess.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    63. Re:Translation by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      you might have forgotten, Bing has been busted for serving up results found from a Google search.

      Not sure how it's setup but on my work pc if you highlight a word in an edge page and rightclick>search with bing it brings up a google custom search page for the results.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    64. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, wait!? Bing works better for porn? Are you kidding or serious?

      Uh, asking for a friend.

    65. Re:Translation by mooterSkooter · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is absolutely 100% true. It brings up whatever filth your sordid mind desires - and shows related filthy searches, so you can travel on a filthy trail to whatever end. It's quite disgusting and fantastic at the same time. Works great for images and videos alike. It's the greatest thing microsoft has created.

    66. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft had saturated its market. By driving people away now, they'll be able to show increased growth later when they win people back with a awesome release in 4-7 years.

    67. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't using google as a search engine to produce their own results, IE was farming data from user behaviour when the user did searches on google. It might be a trite point, but the use of Google was perfectly legitimate by the user. IE just skimmed some info from the user's browser to improve Bing searches. I never did see a good argument why it was bad, it was just further evidence that Bing really was an awful tool.

    68. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Win10, then wiped my disk and went back to nice, reliable Win7 because Win10 was simply not ready for prime time use. The forced updates on Win10 would repeatedly break some permission somewhere which would cause much of the Metro suite of apps to become inoperable. I tried to live with it because in general I didn't use the Metro apps because they, well, are less than great in my opinion. I would also immediately disable Cortana and all the related spy settings that are turned on by default in Win10.

      Apparently part of the new MS is a philosophy being pushed by the new CEO that any code changes have to be justified by statistics. This has resulted in MS apps now having embedded monitoring logic that feeds information back to MS in order to provide those statistics. The problem with this strategy is that it means the O/S on my *personal* computer now has built in spyware. This is the last thing that I want on my personal system. I need my personal system to be secure as possible to safeguard the information I have on it. When MS builds in a back door for this sort of reporting it compromises the security of the system and makes it unsuitable for use.

      So, Win7 it is. It's nice and stable and mature. I know that MS is trying to push the spyware into other platforms as well, but I can always cut that off by suitable firewall settings on my router.

    69. Re:Translation by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Shhh, don't show the fanboys how stupid they are.

    70. Re:Translation by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I thought investors only cared about growth in the next quarter?

    71. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It is the customers who should have the final say

      But it's Cortana, not the OS itself. It doesn't need a registry hack to disable it. It's just a switch in a GUI. You aren't being stopped from using Google for your web searches, so there's nothing wrong happening here. It's just their app works with their search engine and they don't want Google injecting a bunch of "Google runs faster on Google Chrome" bullshit into their sandbox of services.

      I understand the Microsoft hate, but fuck all man, if you guys are going to shit your pants over Cortana, then there's no hope addressing the real issues.

    72. Re:Translation by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      MS will sell direct access to the computer desktop level to advertisers. Not being successful as a business doesn't mean they aren't peddling your information. They have also been caught selling information on customers directly to political groups and they were fined for it. MS is not seeking to bring you services, they are seeking to monetize whatever they can to offset the fact that Windows and Office sales are being eaten as fewer people rely on office files to do everything.

    73. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you where its growth is... it is in the 27" iMac I purchased last night when I finally grew tired of Microsoft's bullshit. Cortana would cause my system to fail to boot two out of every five startups. Reinstalling their OS was dragging like only Microsoft software can. So, I replaced the broken component.

      Sorry Microsoft, I had to shutdown YOUR PC to make room for MY new computer.

    74. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody complained about the equivalent on the APL side with their equivalent. Not sure why it's such a big issue now.

    75. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the final say over my own computing systems, and I don't have to stop using their software just to stop using their services.

      Because I own my LAN gateway in its entirety. (The cable modem is pwned by the cable company, but it's outside of my LAN.) Nothing gets past the gatekeeper without permission.

      There's Easylist, the giant list of MS telemetry, and a few other lists that all get DNS-blackholed at that gateway.

      I am not the "fucking product", as you less-than-eloquently put it. Unless, of course, you're talking about my parents, in which case, yes, I'm the product of their fucking.

    76. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I regularly and successfully search for PDF and DOC/DOCX file contents using built-in search in Windows 7. I choose the folders to be indexed and searched using Indexing Settings. The results interface has degraded since Vista, but not in a deal-breaking way.

    77. Re:Translation by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      This is wrong, very wrong !

      It is the customers who should have the final say

      You do. Just stop buying their products.

      Or do really mean you should have editorial decision over the movies you pay $15 to watch because you are 'the customer'?

      This is one of the best responses I have ever read. I switched to Linux when I heard Vista was coming out. Sure, windows was easier but it seemed a better answer and it's easy enough to pick a desktop that has no changes. And honestly, the sysemd stuff doesn't matter to me - I don't get that low level in my daily desktop use.

    78. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because MS hasn't put Edge on Apple.

    79. Re:Translation by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Cortana on Google & Chrome: Knoledgable and street smart, she may not be the best player in the field, but she can do the job.

      Cortona on Edge & Bing: For $20 she might give you head and a couple STDs but it is unlikely can find you and you will end up giving your money to a russian hacker by accident anyway.

    80. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand the point here: if that can be configurable, may be changed to something like duckduckgo.com with Firefox, for example...

    81. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I suggest you to use duckduckgo.com to avoid this need ^^

    82. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Please, share this list with us ^^

    83. Re:Translation by quonsar · · Score: 1

      Whatsoever...

    84. Re:Translation by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, now that Microsoft has effectively gotten the EU antitrust dogs to open cases against Google for all the areas where they compete with (and beat) Microsoft (i.e., mobile search), now they've signed a non-aggression pact with Google that would probably prevent Google from pursuing relief in the EU on the same basis for desktop search. Typical Microsoft handshake-followed-by-knife-in-back.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    85. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      you canÂt use a linux distro?

    86. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse 'using their products' with 'funding them'.

      take the term "funding" in a bigger perspective: not only by buying shit you can fund it, but by popularizing their software too...

    87. Re:Translation by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/Q...

      There. I just didn't have them to hand at the time of posting.

    88. Re:Translation by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/Q...

      There. I just didn't have them to hand at the time of posting.

    89. Re: Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      for many mom and pop users, facebook IS the internet (my mom included) ^^

    90. Re:Translation by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Like many others, if it weren't for the games, MS would be a distant memory

      Please, reconsider it again ^^

    91. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft has got to be feeling the heat from investors"

      Really? What basis do you have for this claim? What authority do you have to speak on behalf of Microsoft's investors?

      There are only two companies in US which hold AAA credit ratings: Microsoft and Johnson&Johnson. Investors and credit agencies consider these two companies to be the least risky investments in the entire market. Please take your FUD elsewhere.

    92. Re:Translation by epine · · Score: 1

      How many times does this need to be mentioned.

      Because you've gone out of your way to not actually ask the question, I'll answer it for you. Here's the problem. You can repeat this meme forever and it will never stick.

      It's like one of the four blind men describing an elephant (this party game is even more fun after substituting a cross-legged Brahmin). Blind man #2's partial description of the elephant (or the left toes and right knee of the Brahmin) simply doesn't make fully integrated, conceptual sense.

      Money flows in circles. You can't be the product sold to the advertiser, unless the advertiser receives a flow of money in return (whereupon you assume the consumer role, and the actual product becomes the product—how amazing is that?).

      Can you imagine trying to explain the transistor by constantly mentioning holes as the only charge carrier, and then wondering why people never completely get over this old electron thing? If a person is going to assimilate just half of the story, it will be the electron story, not the hole story, no matter if it's repeated infinitely often.

    93. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise the word is "jackass", right?

      "Jack-ass" LOL!

    94. Re: Translation by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      But if you do enough searches in a month you get gold status and that Amazon card is even cheaper

    95. Re:Translation by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's no surprise at all. I'd imagine Cortana.exe is simply the name of the local service responsible for handling user queries and talking to the "real" Cortana, which lives in MS's cloud. When you tell Windows to only search locally, the service probably is simply put into a limited "local only" mode, but it's still required to interact with the user. I don't see this as being anything nefarious.

      Also, of course Windows 10 will connect to MS servers for all sorts of stuff no matter what settings you use - again, I'm not sure I buy the argument that MS is doing anything sneaky there. Windows has a lot of services that make use of internet connections - location and time services, Windows activation, Windows Update, notification updates/status, code-signing certification validation and expiration updates, and yes, probably a few stupid things that shouldn't be mandatory, like start menu queries (news, weather, etc). But people are acting like this is somehow new. Windows has been chatting with MS servers on a pretty regular basis since XP.

      My feeling is that if you believe that Microsoft is going to spy on your and steal your data, then you'd be insane to run Windows. I tend to view the issue pragmatically: I simply feel there's too high a risk and no real profit in it for MS to do something like that. Others disagree, and that's fine with me - Linux and OS X are fine alternatives.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    96. Re:Translation by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      So, in a similar vein to "a friend of a friend is a friend", you are asserting customer's potential customer is a customer?

      Advertiser is Microsoft's customer. The Microsoft product user, as seen by the advertiser, is a potential customer. Microsoft need not respect this user as an actual customer of Microsoft. Especially since this user fails to respect himself and ever stop using Microsoft products.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    97. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem was a failing hard drive. That isn't Microsoft's fault

    98. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how MS has been tightening the noose once they have people. Recently they reduced all OneDrive storage from 15GB to 5GB and got rid of the 15GB camera roll bonus, along with any other bonuses users may have accrued. Now if you want more space, pay up and they'll still spy on you.

      Windows 10 is going this way too. First the lockdown with the search and browser, then it will start restricting features or shoving ads everywhere unless you pay up a subscription.

      I am happier than ever that I didn't downgrade to Windows 10.

    99. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can rename the exe and then kill the process. It's several steps to find and change permissions, but I've done it on a couple computers.

      The problem is the next time you take an update, it will "fix" that and Cortana will be running again.

    100. Re:Translation by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      What does Cortana do anyway? I search for stuff on the internet in my browser address bar. I search for programs by just typing when the start menu is open. I couldn't find anything Cortana could do in addition to that.

    101. Re:Translation by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      I wish Google would buy out the EU, nobody could do a worse job than they're currently doing.

    102. Re: Translation by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that too, it seems to randomly miss things, like it's a drunk human doing the search. How on earth can a computer program randomly miss stuff?

    103. Re:Translation by IsoQuantic · · Score: 1

      Just kill Cortana process from the task manager. Will require killing it about six times or so before it actually remains off...until you restart...then just repeat the process.

      --
      -- I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
    104. Re:Translation by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I cannot fathom a reason I'd use Bing. It's a second rate search engine.

      I will, however, shut down Cortana and save a few cycles.

      I can't fathom why you use Windows? I use wps and soft focus, two choices that are compatible alternatives to MS Office. I can use them on the mac, linux, and if I am feeling dumb, on windows 10.

      why else would you use Windows 10? Is it for paying extra for anti-virus software, for Trojans that want you to pay and pay for use without adverts? I'll stick to Linux.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    105. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't the customers. We are the product =)

    106. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing seems better at search for current celebrity gossip news than Google and I suppose this makes up a significant part of the search world.

      Google has been better for me at technical questions.

      It is often good to try both. Similarly I like to flip new channels to see what the other side is currently ignoring.

    107. Re:Translation by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      Why I've never used Cortana......right......there. Boom. You can NOT trust Microsoft to let you do what you want to do.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    108. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to know more porn sites than Google Video Search. But more importantly, it can do live previews (just hover over the thumbnail) for most of them.

    109. Re: Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call the waaaambulance.

      Look, if you like Cortana, you get Bing and edge. If you don't like edge and Bing, don't use Cortana. Stop your whining. The software developer gets to pick the technologies. Apple picks apple maps. Google is no better.

      Friggin cry baby.

    110. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! Going off to Goggle and not letting us track you is horrible, you bad customer. How dare you. You know Bill wants your browsing habits, you might be a terrorist.
       

    111. Re:Translation by v1 · · Score: 1

      If you read the reports, they suspected bing was using google to find stuff their engine couldn't, so they manually entered a search result on google for a long random string that would return one hit basically saying "busted!". They didn't give a desktop computer running any browser a chance to search it, to siphon the data from a user serach result. Then they went to a windows computer running explorer and Bing and did the search for the long random string. Just then google servers recorded a single search query (from an IP address at a MS datacenter) and then sure enough, bing on the windows box "found" it.

      That's about as busted as busted can get.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    112. Re:Translation by Ulric · · Score: 1

      Well done.

    113. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Well in Opera if I highlight a word and right click I get a "Search with ->" menu option that lets me choose any search that I have added like DuckDuckGo, Wikipedia, IMDB, Amazon, YouTube, etc.

      Once again, Microsoft is behind on their game.

    114. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between the failure of Windows Mobile and now XBox winding down combined with falling PC sales, Microsoft has got to be feeling the heat from investors when asked, "where's the growth in 10 years." Right now their revenues are fine but, with no future money making divisions, they risk stagnation which investors see as death.

      It is totally ridiculous a company like Microsoft should be subject to the whims of investors. If you want to invest in a company, go find a company that needs your money to function. That large, established companies, with little need for additional funds from selling stock to actual investors, are acting like startups on the verge of death is a condemnation of capitalism practiced here.

  2. Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like I'll be sticking to Windows 7 for longer than I thought.

    1. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or just click on google through chrome.

    2. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my damn Canon scanner software would function on a Linux machine I would have ditched Windows 7 already...

    3. Re:Oh well by markus · · Score: 2

      At this point, it might be cheaper to just get a supported scanner instead. It's not as if scanners are really that expensive any more.

      Having said that, we are in a similar situation and our household still has a single Windows 8 machine. The rest is Linux, ChromeOS and a Macbook that for all practical purposes might as well be a Chromebook; it's not as if it ever does anything other than Chrome.

      The Windows machine is needed for Photoshop. If there was a viable Photoshop clone for Linux, we would not have any need for Windows. As such, Windows 10 has absolutely zero appeal to us; if anything, it only has downsides compared to Windows 8. We'll continue using Windows 8 as long as it is supported, and then probably just disconnect it from the internet and keep using it for as long as we still need Photoshop.

    4. Re:Oh well by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Meh, Photoshop is close to running on Linux. I have CS5 (32-bit) running in Crossover Linux...it seems to just crash on Windows created PSD files for some reason (but any other file format it is fine with...or Linux-created PSD files (I haven't tested how complex)).

    5. Re:Oh well by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      For the curious: http://imgur.com/a/mMrHJ

    6. Re:Oh well by chipschap · · Score: 1

      This used to be a problem for me (I do a fair amount of scanning/OCR). But in the last little while, xsane backends have gotten better, and there are decent OCR interfaces to decent engines like Tesseract. I find I'm able to scan/OCR without having to leave Linux, and I'm getting results about as good as I got with Windows and commercial software.

    7. Re:Oh well by xeno · · Score: 1

      The O'Really Windows DLL parody is hilarious. Source?
      (The goog gives me nothing, and bing just stares off into space....**)

      ** So I suppose that's exactly the problem:
      Google gives answers that range from [precisely-right] --- to --- [not-quite-relevant-but-i-see-where-you-were-going]
      Bing gives answers ranging from [didn't-understand-the-question] --- to --- [utterly-random-shit-the-bed-schizophrenic].

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    8. Re:Oh well by xeno · · Score: 5, Informative

      This.

      Often people are surprised at how well scanners work on Linux in general. For example, I was in the office recently and needed to scan a lengthy document, so I borrowed one of those nice Fujitsu scansnap-style scanners. The owner cautioned me that the software and drivers were a 300+mb download for Windows, and was astounded that it was fully supported in xSane and SimpleScan with *no* driver download. I have a similar one at home and knew the drill, but it was fun to see someone really take in how bad the experience is on Windows these days. I plugged in the USB cable, started xSane, threw 50+ pages into the feeder, clicked just a couple adjustments, and saved the project as PDF with no fuss, no driver fuckery, etc etc. Works better, faster, cheaper in Linux than the "fully supported" Windows config.

      Otoh, there's no convincing some people, and I'm not the geek evangelist I used to be. More for me, I guess.

      (Oh, and Hi there, fellow 2K slashdotter... )

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    9. Re: Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just run Photoshop in a virtual machine. you can use the 2nd graphics card as a pass through, the performance penalty isn't much

    10. Re:Oh well by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Often people are surprised at how well scanners work on Linux in general.

      I'm surprised people still use scanners? Do you also still have a fax machine and a cheque book too?

    11. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Often people are surprised at how well scanners work on Linux in general.

      I'm surprised people still use scanners? Do you also still have a fax machine and a cheque book too?

      There are plenty of unscanned dead tree docs & books out there, cameras could be used, but tedious. And if by fax you mean email, then yes.

    12. Re:Oh well by jandersen · · Score: 1

      ... fully supported in xSane and SimpleScan with *no* driver download

      And not only that - the SANE daemon makes it easy to build a networked scanner (see http://www.linux-mag.com/id/16...); one that you can access from any system on your network. I use that at home - bought an HP scanner/printer in a car boot sale for £5, set it up on a RaspberryPi, and now we have a neetworked scanner and colour printer. And it is very good scanner too. I only use it from Linux; there is a way to do it from Windows, which I tried, but I don't use Windows for anything, so I don't know how well that works.

    13. Re:Oh well by alexhs · · Score: 1

      You should have look at his screenshot more closely, the hint was in the title: d8PTVnL

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    14. Re:Oh well by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      9/10 scanners I've owned became available cheaply because Windows no longer supported them AT ALL in spite of the scanner typically using the same protocol as the newer scanners. HP is especially shit about this. They bring out a new version of the driver, and just tell it not to support their old scanners deliberately. Another reason not to buy anything from HP. All the manufacturers do this, though, e.g. Canon. My last Canon was picked up for the same reason.

      We need a standard language for scanners (like we have for printers) to stop these shenanigans.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Oh well by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      CS5? Oh good to know I can almost run several year old software on my cutting edge OS. Yes being facetious. But what you mention is not a good thing especially as Photoshop and other software now moves to a subscription based rolling release. The feature of being able to run old software isn't.

    16. Re:Oh well by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Not just scanners, but just about anything. Plug a keyboard/mouse/drive into Linux? Works in a couple seconds. The same on Windows? Have to wait a couple minutes for it to use the same exact generic HID driver it was using for the previous keyboard, wait for it to install it, and then finally it works.

    17. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still Photoshop CS6 because I refuse to lease my software. It does everything that any graphics pro wants. Paintshop Pro is pretty nice too and will not be going subscription based.

    18. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good luck with my old Canon lide scanner in Ubuntu... now if only *PRINTING* were reliable.
      Wired networked laser printer, I can ping it and even ftp files to it, worked great when I installed Ubuntu.
      Few months later, stopped working, makes a noise but then nothing prints.
      This has pretty much been the pattern for the last 5-10 years and 2-3 linux installs; printing breaks 6 months in. No idea why.

    19. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised people still use scanners? Do you also still have a fax machine and a cheque book too?

      A scanner/printer plus an internet fax service replaces the fax machine plus the need for a landline, so yes. In the US, signatures on faxed documents are legally recognized as valid (e.g., on business contracts).

      A check book is still sometimes necessary. We still use checks for the rent - there is no online or direct withdrawal available, and the management office is not conveniently located (plus, they wouldn't take cash in person anyway due to security concerns). So, a check sent via postal mail is the best option. Local property taxes, too, though we could pay by cash in person without much inconvenience as it's only due annually. We could pay online, but they pass on the card charge to the payer (gov entities are allowed to do that), and until recently only took Discover Card, which has become nearly as rare as unicorn tentacles. Some middle-aged folk (though not the wife and I) still use checks at the grocery and other store checkout line, and the likelihood of check usage increases with age. It's very rare to see anyone in their 30s or younger writing checks for retail purchases.

      - T

  3. Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Tatarize · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, stop trying. Accidentally Binging something is terrible, but even with the results right there in front of me... I still closed it down, went to google and typed the same search over again.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    1. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That makes two of us then! You know why? Because, let's face it, Bing sucks. Because the one job it has it can't do. Give me quality results on the SERP page. Bing results suck. Period. Until they fix that fatal flaw, people will run, not walk away from it. Of course, why fix your product when you can just shove it down your customers' throats? Monopolistic megacorp motherfuckers.

    2. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Everyone remember where exactly Google came from, cooked search results where the first bunch of 'PAGES' of results were all paid for and often had absolutely nothing with what you were looking for. So type in a search, results come up and immediately click on page 3 of the results and somewhere between page 3 and page 7 of the results would be what you were actually looking for and MSN search was just as bad as asta la vista (altavista). Welcome to the same old bullshit and the bullshit to try to cover up the bullshit with even more bullshit.

      Windows anal probe 10, we will watch everything you do (seriously disable the camera and mic, no seriously do it now), we will control everything you do, you will only be allowed to do what we approve and we will only approve what we have been paid sufficiently to approve and make no mistake cortana does not serve you, you serve cortana.

      Wow, Windows anal probe 10 is already this bad, the mind boggles at how much worse it will get. Pretty obvious nothing short of goverment regulation will bring M$ to heel and M$ blatantly tells complaining customers to shut up, bend over and take it (expect complaints against M$ to disappear from search results).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, that's got to be the most irrational position on a search engine I've ever heard. Blind devotion to one particular engine is foolish enough, but intentionally wasting your *own* time instead of using the results in front of you? That's just stupid.

      I use Bing. I use Google. I use DuckDuckGo. I use at least two of them on almost any given day. Many days I use all three. Absent situations where I know the results will be off because I used (or failed to use) site-specific syntax in my search, I don't care much which one I'm using. DDG for sensitive-ish stuff (default on my work machine) but it's annoying otherwise because opening its links is slow. I use Bing and Google pretty much interchangeably beyond that. Some searches produce better results in the one, some in the other. It doesn't make a difference.

      Hell, I'd probably even use Yahoo if I had any reason to. I replaced Firefox with Pale Moon, though, and seem to therefore not have any browsers configured for Yahoo (and I'm not going to bother changing that).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    4. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasting your *own* time instead of using the results in front of you? That's just stupid.

      The only stupid one is you for shooting your mouth off without knowing what you're talking about. I won't use Bing results for one very simple reason. They fucking suck. It makes a hell of a lot more sense to add a few seconds to a search by opening Google and searching again to get good results than it does to just accept shit results.

      In case you are daft, the purpose of a search engine is to return relevant useful results. Google does this, Bing does not.

    5. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Bing. I use Google. I use DuckDuckGo. I use at least two of them on almost any given day. Many days I use all three.

      I use Google exclusively for one very simple reason. Google almost always has fresher more up to date results than their competitors. They crawl new sites faster, update their results faster and go deeper into the web. How you could equate Google SERP with Bing is beyond me and I just have to assume that you lack basic awareness of what you are doing when it comes to using search engines. Which is fine for you of course but it makes you look like an idiot when you call other people out for going through the trouble to get decent results.

    6. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by rwven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did MS learn nothing from their antitrust rulings in the early 00s?

      And yes, bing is a terrible abhorrent creation. MS should be ashamed.

    7. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They learned that they can get the government to roll over when they contribute enough cash.

    8. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You call it "bing". We call it "bung". We knew all about the goodness of corn before America was america. Mazola tastes fresh and good.

      --
      C|N>K
    9. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ellison is not going to let you suck his dick no matter how much you kiss up.

    10. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but even with the results right there in front of me... I still closed it down, went to google and typed the same search over again

      Seems like a silly thing to do. Bing's search results don't look much different to Google's search results to me. Some me something you can't find with Bing but can find with Google.

    11. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Bing - that's a carburetor for mopeds and motorcycles. Or a deragotary name for people that are morons.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    12. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Tatarize · · Score: 2

      An extra 6 seconds or so is time well spent given that it would take me longer than that to fish through the feces that are Bing's search results. I'm gaining time. It's efficiency rather than irrationalism. Getting a false lead can suck down a solid minute. I am at a loss as to how anybody could think those 6 seconds are poorly spent.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    13. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate Bing with a passion. I accidentally Bing searched for some FOSS and the top results were malware masquerading as what I was looking for (libreoffice for windows). When bing first launched I accidentally bing searched "nintendo ROMs" and the first page of results prominently featured a page captioned "incest child porn". Nope! So much nope! Bing is such a disaster! Stick to what you're good at, Microsoft. Search is not your "thing"

    14. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      altavista and astalavista.box.sk were two different things.

    15. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, stop trying. Accidentally Binging something is terrible, but even with the results right there in front of me... I still closed it down, went to google and typed the same search over again.

      It must be mentioned. Bing is actually pretty decent for pr0n.

    16. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! It's the sound of Ed Grimley's triangle. (Or is that "ting") The OS is one giant browser helper object. My grandma is even pissed about this shit.

    17. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Speaking as somebody who (unlike you, obviously) actually uses both: no, it's just irrational. I can think of one time in the last month a Bing search didn't have the result I wanted on the first page, and one time for Google.

      My interests are software dev (mostly native code, .NET, and Java, but work sometimes requires everything from Node.js to Perl), InfoSec, webcomics, spaceflight, both domestic and international travel, US politics, cognitive science, phone jailbreaking, strategy gaming, and a bunch of other stuff (much of which is relatively obscure). I don't let Bing or Google track/customize my search results. If either one (or DDG) were dramatically better at finding what I'm looking for, I'd know it. They aren't.

      I will admit I find it annoying to keep up with the changes in search syntax between the various engines, and that would be simplified somewhat if I just stopped using any but one. That wouldn't make the one I chose to use better, though, just more familiar to me (and I'll be really surprised if you can present to me a good argument that Google's search syntax today is objectively better the either of the others I use).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    18. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found that Bing and Google are both of pretty equal quality, and it's pretty much shit. I mean, Google can't actually fucking search for the search terms I enter, always returning results that it thinks I actually want, instead of what I searched for. Bing is much the same way, except that since it's Bing no one really expects any different.

      I use Duckduckgo almost exclusively. Sure, it's got some of the same problems and I don't think it's as good as it used to be either, but I've found it to still be better than Google and Bing.

    19. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      They still own the vast majority of desktops. Windows 10 uptake must have crossed some target number. I also noticed that many stores are now pushing Surface Pro tablet / netbooks...and these had almost faded from view 18 months ago. These days I mainly use Android, Chromebook and a Macbook Air........but..... MS will creep back into control and screw us over for more decades if we let them.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    20. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use DuckDuckGo because they don't spy on me or track me.

    21. Re:Even if you force me, I won't Bing anything. by rwven · · Score: 1

      MS got itself in hot water last time over its browser integration and forcing users to have IE installed while discouraging use of competing browsers. This doesn't seem like a very big departure from that behavior. They just got out from under the antitrust watchdogs w/in the last couple years and this move looks like they're trying to earn them back.

  4. What's that I smell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm...the aroma of a fresh investigation brewing. Meet the New Microsoft(TM) same as the Old Microsoft(TM)

    1. Re:What's that I smell? by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      I just wonder if they have enough politicians in their pocket now that they can get all antitrust claims waived.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  5. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defective by design. however i do wonder if a simple user agent switch would work around that.

  6. Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sure seems like this is anticompetitive and probably should land Microsoft in some hot water with the DOJ.

    1. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sure seems like this is anticompetitive and probably should land Microsoft in some hot water with the DOJ.

      Personally, i see nothing "anti-competitive". Nothing is preventing you from using any browser and search engine you want. Typing something into Cortana doesn't get you anything you can't get by typing the same thing into any search engine.

    2. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Try again shill. Voice search is "part of the OS" just like internet explorer was and we remember how that turned out. What's the marketshare of IE, um I mean Edge? This is an anti-competitive move by a monopolist and they will be slapped hard for it. Count on it.

    3. Re:Antitrust violation? by sheetsda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing is preventing you from using any browser and search engine you want. Typing something into Cortana doesn't get you anything you can't get by typing the same thing into any search engine.

      Bundling Internet Explorer with Windows is what got them into trouble in 2001. Nothing stopped users from downloading some other browser but that argument didn't prevent Microsoft being found in violation of antitrust law.

      I'm amazed at how blatantly they're ignoring history.

    4. Re:Antitrust violation? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Its the same argument as the last time, Microsoft attempting to use their dominance as an OS in order to gain a foothold in a different market.

    5. Re:Antitrust violation? by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      No different that Siri or Google Now... You can still open a browser and search for anything using any search engine.

      I suggest https://www.webcrawler.com/ or Altavista or even gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1...

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    6. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No different that Siri or Google Now

      Nope. Try again. The difference is simple. People use Siri and Google Now to search Google because they actually want to use Google and get Google results. It's called people making a choice to use what works for them. People use Bing typically only when they are tricked into it by underhanded MS shit like this. Why? Because Bing is shit. The search engine is shit, the results are stale and shit. MS needs to be investigated and to get the shit fined out of them.

    7. Re:Antitrust violation? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      In Siri's case, I can say, "Hey Siri, Google kumquats." It will launch Safari and give me back info on kumquats. If I say, "Hey Siri, Bing kumquats," it will return the results inside Siri. If I say, "Hey Siri, DuckDuckGo kumquats," it will return the results of a Bing search for "DuckDuckGo kumquats."

      So, yeah, Siri is kind of tied to Bing.

    8. Re:Antitrust violation? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Ha! That's a pretty funny set of results. Would installing a DDG app help with that last case, perhaps?

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    9. Re:Antitrust violation? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Except, so far as search goes, they no longer have that dominance. When it comes to surfing these days, the world is overwhelmingly Android.

      This might have meant something even five years ago. Now it's just a has-been monopolist who still can't figure out that they're dying on the consumer side.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re:Antitrust violation? by citizenr · · Score: 1

      limp dick DOJ wont do anything, EU EC on the other hand fined Microsoft cool >$2B since 2004, and is eager to do it again because of windows 10.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    11. Re:Antitrust violation? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed at how blatantly they're ignoring history.

      They didn't have lobbyists back then. Now MS have learned from other big companies and have bought and paid for politicians, and these investments pretty much guarantee there shouldn't be a repeat of what happened in 2001.

    12. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is preventing you from using any browser and search engine you want. Typing something into Cortana doesn't get you anything you can't get by typing the same thing into any search engine.

      Bundling Internet Explorer with Windows is what got them into trouble in 2001. Nothing stopped users from downloading some other browser but that argument didn't prevent Microsoft being found in violation of antitrust law.

      I'm amazed at how blatantly they're ignoring history.

      You're really amazed at this? Really?? So let's recap: the same corporation run by most of the same sociopaths is implementing the same practices. Gates has moved on but most of the top brass is still running the show. They still have a desktop monopoly. There is still a dominant Windows monoculture.

      No, I'm not really seeing anything amazing there. You are? How? In what way? What you call surprising, I call easily predictable. Eh, I guess some people understand recent history and some don't.

      So glad I moved to Linux in the mid 1990s. Never looked back. Never missed this sort of bullshit. I did some RTFM and I learned some new things (OMG, effort! Nooo, not that! Yes, that. It works most times it's tried. If you make an effort to understand that machine you use day after day for years, you will find there are many ways to do the same thing and not all of them have monopolists at the helm.). That investment has paid off many times now. With the skills I learned, I'd also be comfortable on OpenBSD or FreeBSD or most any *nix. With a little forethought one never needs to get locked into the Windows ecosystem. From a security/malware standpoint alone, this is a great thing.

    13. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again shill. Voice search is "part of the OS" just like internet explorer was and we remember how that turned out.

      Yes, it became the norm that a web browser came with the OS and often integrated into it. Microsoft was just ahead of the curve on it. Nowadays all modern personal computing platforms ship with a pre-installed browser and most use that browser's engine to drive elements of the OS. Heck one of the most popular personal computing operating systems, iOS, doesn't even let you install a different browser, you must use WebKit!

    14. Re:Antitrust violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguably, not being a major political campaign contributor is what got them into trouble in 2001. As soon as that changed the trouble miraculously disappeared.

    15. Re:Antitrust violation? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Nothing is preventing you from using any browser and search engine you want. Typing something into Cortana doesn't get you anything you can't get by typing the same thing into any search engine.

      Bundling Internet Explorer with Windows is what got them into trouble in 2001. Nothing stopped users from downloading some other browser but that argument didn't prevent Microsoft being found in violation of antitrust law.

      I'm amazed at how blatantly they're ignoring history.

      The defence MS has is that they are no longer the dominant browser platform. In fact, IE and Edge have been pushed into the minor browser category below Firefox and Chrome on Windows. Sadly this is a defence that will work (especially combined with the fact Cortana is optional).

      However they've shot themselves in the foot here. I suspect it will become so annoying that people will stop using Cortana and start using 3rd party products again.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:Antitrust violation? by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

      Of course they've learned from history.
      The profit they make will far exceed any fine imposed.

    17. Re:Antitrust violation? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      My bet would be "No." Apple is the one that decides these things. Unlike Cortana, there's no way for an app to say, "Hey, Siri, if someone says this, I know how to handle it."

    18. Re:Antitrust violation? by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      Today's US government is MUCH more corporate-friendly.

  7. Oh cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had already disabled everything Cortana related so this doesn't affect me in the least.

  8. Telemetry and now this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, the fucks in Redmond never change their spots do they? So how about it apologists? Can't wait to see how Westlake, DogDude, et al try to serve their masters^H^H^H^H squirm out of this one.

    1. Re:Telemetry and now this by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      They seem to have forgotten the requirement to have the browser selection screen to handle the anti-competitive behavior.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  9. A proper API maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that every time Microsoft designs, publishes, and supports a service integration API, third parties misuse and abuse it.

    1. Re: A proper API maybe? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      What is it they say about turnabout?

  10. Fine with me, for now by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First thing I do when installing windows 10 is to disable cortana, and limit search to the local computer only.

    I don't need or want desktop search to go out on the internet; that's what the search in my browser is for.

    The is emblematic of the entire issue with cortana on the desktop. There needs to be desktop search. When I want to search my computer for a file that starts with 'kid' i just want results from my computer. I don't care about Nicole Kidman's latest movie, i don't care about 'kid friendly meals'.

    I get that microsoft wants to be able to get you to search from the desktop with Cortana... and that's fine I guess for people who want that. But I still need desktop search, and right now, cortana and web results gets in the way of that. If it was a separate UI, I migth leave it on and use.. but its not. So I disable cortana and I disable including web results.

    1. Re:Fine with me, for now by zenlessyank · · Score: 0

      Why have search for local computer? I know MS has had that since Win 95, but who uses it? I've never used search on a local desktop. I already know where everything is. It has been pretty much the same layout for 20+ years. Now I use search every now and then on desktop Linux cuz my brain rejects Linux even though I personally like it. I do find the search in regedit is sometimes useful but I don't consider that the same. Having my OS searching out on the net is a no-no. That is why we have Firefox locked down with NoScript, BlockSite, Ghostery, FoxyProxy & HTTPS Everywhere. Sometimes I think we give the OS too much automation and abilities that are too easy to bypass or circumvent or used against the user/admin.

    2. Re:Fine with me, for now by Luthair · · Score: 1

      How long before they stop allowing us to turn off cortana and web search results? And lets be honest, Cortana never actually goes away even when disabled its still running.

    3. Re:Fine with me, for now by wbr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't like 300 apps on my desktop. Nor do I like clicking sub menus in the start menu. Start menu search is fast and easy.

      Just because you do not use a feature doe not make it useless. Personally I have never had an airbag deploy. Do I call for their removal from cars to save cost?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My films and tv shows are organised into folders alphabetically by title (then by season for tv shows), which is great for DLNA browsing via my TV. But if I'm on my PC and I know what I want to watch, why would I click through subfolders then scroll through hundreds of titles when I can just type 3 letters and get there fairly instantly?

    5. Re:Fine with me, for now by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Why have search for local computer?

      I mostly use it for launching 2nd tier applications. (ie stuff I use frequently but not daily) Everything from internet explorer to notepad++ to regedit to powershell to my vpn client, ... where I'll just hit the windows key or click in the search box and type a few characters of the name.

      I also use it to quickly launch control panels.

      I use it for documents occasionally. Again, I know where they are, but its faster to search by name than to navigate to them.

    6. Re:Fine with me, for now by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Yep. Launching programs (including control panel / MMC snap-ins) is much faster via Start search than via any other means short of Quick Launch (which is all that "pin to taskbar" in Win7+ really is). So yes, the most commonly-used stuff gets pinned, but I try to keep the count of pinned items below 10 or so, and I use a *lot* more than 10 programs.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:Fine with me, for now by dcollins · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you not have any data files? I have records of several thousand students over the past decade for whom people occasionally ask me about their grades or for a reference. My partner has over 300 clients who maybe ask about a certain part of their website once a year. I had to do a local search today to find the particular class in which I referenced Noam Chomsky two years ago. People actually using their computers to do stuff over several years do this all the time.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    8. Re:Fine with me, for now by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Its hard to imagine windows 10 getting any traction in the business world if you couldn't turn this consumer nonsense off.

      If I'm running a call center, or retail outlet, the PCs are all but kiosks.

      If I'm running a law firm or medical practice, there's no way the same user interface i might use to locate client/patient files is going to be sending them out as bing queries at the same time. Or even there as an option.

      Cortana never actually goes away even when disabled its still running.

      The explanation for this is pretty simple and somewhat reasonable. Cortana is essentially also a backend 'service' for a lot of apps. So it needs to be running to answer app requests for, for example, your location, even if that answer is 'location not available' etc. Its cleaner than having the system throw an error or exception, and possibly crash the app.

    9. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have search for local computer? I know MS has had that since Win 95, but who uses it?

      Actually, it goes back a lot further than Win 95.
      C:\> dir filename.ext /s

    10. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, everyone uses Windows search.

    11. Re:Fine with me, for now by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      Guess what Windows Insiders just discovered you can't do in Windows 10 rs1_release 14332?

    12. Re:Fine with me, for now by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I don't need or want desktop search to go out on the internet; that's what the search in my browser is for.

      Wait a sec. Doesn't Apple have a patent on searching the local computer + the Internet at the same time? (Not saying such a thing should be worthy of a patent. I just distinctly recall the feature being pulled from Android when Apple started waving the patent bat around.)

    13. Re:Fine with me, for now by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Microsoft's strategy now is to copy everyone else in vains hopes to make something work. Cortana is a crude mixture of Siri and the much hated Google search bar what would install itself on your browser when you weren't looking. Why? Monetization. The only thing they care about their users anymore is monetization.

      The Metro style apps, a vain attempt to strike it rich in the apps store market (like very other wannabe developer on the planet who thinks apps will help with early retirement). A microsoft ID, a vain attempt to spy on what their customers are doing and buying. Customers start to move towards phones and tablets and Microsoft stupidly decides to switch everything to a touch screen oriented device and fails badly; fires the VP in charge of that and replaces him with the moron that gave us Windows 10. In desparation they decide to surreptitiously install Windows 10 on computers when no one is looking.

    14. Re:Fine with me, for now by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Me, too, and if I want to search my Windows box, I use find or other command-line tools under Cygwin. Have for over ten years.

    15. Re:Fine with me, for now by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Like who? I have never used it because the search don't yield the results I want and the indexer is turned off because it slows the computer down.

      The few times I do need to make a search I open a command window and run either "dir /s" or use the cygwin package with "find" and "grep".

      Microsoft has failed.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    16. Re:Fine with me, for now by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Please elaborate!

      Not sure what you refer to, is it the software package "RS/1" or???

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re:Fine with me, for now by Gussington · · Score: 2

      First thing I do when installing windows 10 is to disable cortana,

      Same here. this should be a non-story for most people, and for the rest it will be the end of Cortana and Edge.
      Google and Firefox will be loving this move.

    18. Re:Fine with me, for now by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Do you not have any data files? I have records of several thousand students over the past decade for whom people occasionally ask me about their grades or for a reference.

      This sounds wrong. Shouldn't the school be keeping grades in a proper records management system? Or is hacking your PC the only thing stopping me from a glowing reference?

      My partner has over 300 clients who maybe ask about a certain part of their website once a year.

      No CMS?

      I had to do a local search today to find the particular class in which I referenced Noam Chomsky two years ago. People actually using their computers to do stuff over several years do this all the time.

      Most people use Apps to do stuff on computers, and those apps have features like search built-in. Anyone relying ton OS level tools the manage their business needs help.

    19. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew you were a fucking pedophile. Searching for kids. Of all the examples you could have thought up........you disgust me, nerd!

    20. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The list of things that should be disabled after installing Windows is getting way to long. At some point it's just too much of a hassle, and you switch to something that doesn't twist your arm. As we have seen with windows 10 (automatic downgrades from W8 retail to W10 locked-to-device), disabeling something doesn't mean it will stay disabled.

    21. Re:Fine with me, for now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cortana never actually goes away even when disabled its still running.

      The explanation for this is pretty simple and somewhat reasonable. Cortana is essentially also a backend 'service' for a lot of apps. So it needs to be running to answer app requests for, for example, your location, even if that answer is 'location not available' etc.

      No, that's a shitty explanation. They could have handled rejections in the API for accessing Cortana.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Fine with me, for now by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 3, Informative

      Redstone or rs1 is the codename for the next rolling release of Windows 10.

      Build 14332 was pushed out to the fast ring of the Windows Insider program 3 days ago.

      It removes the ability to disable Cortana (you can still hobble the bastard by removing permissions) and removes the ability to turn off web search. Currently it performs web search with the users default web browser and search engine, but that is obviously going to change.

      They also made the Start menu even worse.

    23. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't install Windows 10 on your machine if you value anything that you do on those machines, this software is the biggest rip off in human computer history.

    24. Re:Fine with me, for now by vux984 · · Score: 1

      No, that's a shitty explanation. They could have handled rejections in the API for accessing Cortana.

      Right, but what if you wanted the weather app to work based on your location; but also have the desktop cortana assistant disabled?

      I mean, i swear some people simply object because the process name is called cortana. If they renamed it windows-app-services-engine people would suddenly be fine with it.

    25. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turning off cortana and search is actually Not allowed.
      You may have disabled cortana, but it is still phoning a crap-ton of info to microsoft.
      The only way to solve the infection is to delete cortana binaries from the windows filesystem and leave windows update disabled.

      All that horrible windows 10 crap still sends data when things are disabled. You must remove the files for the specific feature or it is not 100% disabled.

    26. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run Fast Ring on a desktop and a touch laptop and normal Win10 enterprise on another laptop, and its very interesting watching the evolution of the UI - I have quite a hard time moving back to normal Win10 as I'm getting use to the new features. Based off of this, I'm thinking that the Redstone release will be similar to the jump from 8 to 8.1 in terms of usability. I use Cortana quite extensively (Cortana + PowerBI FTW!) and certainly have no problems with MS making Cortana work only with Bing/Edge. Cortana is MS's product for voice searching Bing - I get it. I actually spend most of my browser time in Chrome if I want voice search on Google, I've got it there. No one's complaining (well, maybe the EU) that Google voice search doesn't use Bing, are they?

    27. Re:Fine with me, for now by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean, i swear some people simply object because the process name is called cortana.

      Well, it is a little creepy.

      If they renamed it windows-app-services-engine people would suddenly be fine with it.

      Nobody trusts it not to sniff up their arseholes and report back to Microsoft, and nobody trusts it not to consume system resources randomly when they want to be using them for something else. I for one run Windows without swap space, because why bother with 16GB of RAM which isn't even expensive or a particularly massive amount any more, and I prefer not to waste actual memory when I could be using it for virtual machines.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Fine with me, for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Seriously, that's just you projecting your issues onto your hate-target-of-the-day.

    29. Re:Fine with me, for now by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I use it for things like "where in the hell does Windows actually stick that .dll file?" Incidentally, the Windows search is nearly useless for that, so I pretty much go to the command prompt and do a dir /s to do any local searches in Windows.

    30. Re:Fine with me, for now by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has completely failed with Windows search.

      This can be proven through the simplest of experiments:

      1) Download and install "Agent Ransack". Run the program. Enter a partial name for the file and hit search.

      This program does not index, is simply crawls the HDD(s) attached to the computer. Notice how it will search everything in a few to tens of seconds? Why do we need indexed searches again? Let me show you:

      2) Download and install "Search Everything". Run the program.

      Now this program is indexing the HDD. It's doing it on start up, and the first time you run this program you may have to wait a **few minutes** for the index to complete. Once the indexing is done you can enter partial file names in the search box. Cool, huh? How awesome is that? Search is **fucking instant** right across your file system. It's pretty cool. The indexing is rebuilt each time you run the program, only takes a moment each time you start it.

      So, having completed those experiments you can see that Windows has failed entirely. Their indexed search takes **hours** to index files and it does not search instantly. It's the worst of all worlds and needs to be fixed or killed.

  11. Here we go by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Unfortunately, as Windows 10 has grown in adoption and usage, we have seen some software programs circumvent the design of Windows 10 and redirect you to search providers that were not designed to work with Cortana. The result is a compromised experience that is less reliable and predictable. The continuity of these types of task completion scenarios is disrupted if Cortana can't depend on Bing as the search provider and Microsoft Edge as the browser. The only way we can confidently deliver this personalized, end-to-end search experience is through the integration of Cortana, Microsoft Edge and Bing -- all designed to do more for you."

    Unfortunately, as we have continued to sneak Windows 10 onto unsuspecting users systems, we have seen some software designed to disrupt the malware like experience of Windows 10 and redirect you to search providers that were not designed to collect all of your information and send it to Microsoft. The result is a compromised user database that is not worth as much as an ad platform as we had hoped. The completeness of our database is crucial to us, and is disrupted if CompTelRunner, Cortana, and other subsystems cannot use the MS backend for data collection. The only way we can plan on how to pillage further and make our database more valuable to other entities (NSA) is through the integration of Cortana, Edge, and Bing. -- All designed to capture more for us."

    FTFY

    Disclosure, sent from a Win 10 box. Hypocritical I know.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Disclosure, sent from a Win 10 box. Hypocritical I know."

      Depends. Did you willingly upgrade, or were you one of the millions that woke up one morning to a brand new OS.

    2. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a world of difference between ignorant hipocracy and intentional hipocracy.

  12. But but but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...open source and Satya Nadella and competition... Yeah, we see how far all of that went. Once evil always evil. I can't wait to see the twaddle about how MS of 2016 isn't the same as the MS of old. Yeah right. Wasn't there an experiment with some monkeys where they swapped them out one at a time to see what would happen? You know the end. Trust MS and get fucked in the ass. What a surprise.

  13. money money money by Sigvatr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $$$$$$$$$$ money money money

  14. Go to hell... by Psycho_Bunny · · Score: 1

    I live in Seattle and when someone tells me they work for MS, I give them the cold shoulder. I'm so over those jerks.

    1. Re:Go to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when I would have called you a jerk for that but, you know what? You're right. The funny thing is, most MS people I know, even they're dotnet and C# fanboys, almost invariably epitomize the trope of the fedora wearing, basement dwelling, pimple faced nerd loser. And they're usually complete assholes about it to boot. Just witness the typical Windows Phone related comment section. I believe it was The Verge or somewhere that called them out on that a while back. It's ridiculous. I wouldn't use non-Windows MS stuff if for no other reason than I don't want to be associated with their userbase.

    2. Re:Go to hell... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use non-Windows MS stuff

      Hey, their Microsoft 2.0a mice were awesome (in the days of ball mice). Also Consolas, a font they bought, is the best programming font I know -- even if you need FreeType instead of whatever Windows uses for rendering to make it look good.

      All the rest of their products, though...

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Go to hell... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, their Microsoft 2.0a mice were awesome (in the days of ball mice).

      No, they are shit. They are too large, so you have to move your wrist to move the mouse, you can't just run it with your fingertips.

      Also Consolas, a font they bought,

      Yes, that's right. Everything good at Microsoft was bought from someone else, and they haven't had it that long, except SQL Server. Presumably all of Microsoft's competent employees work on that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Go to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consolas? Isn't that the Visual Studio default font? The one that looks so crappy that even if you turn cleartype / anti aliasing etc. off, it still gets blurred.

      I've had to replace it with Terminus to get readable non-blurry code.

    5. Re:Go to hell... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not good with Windows font rendering -- but with FreeType it's the bestest font ever. Which, considering which platforms use FreeType, is a bit unfortunate for Microsoft.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:Go to hell... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      [...] except SQL Server. Presumably all of Microsoft's competent employees work on that.

      DBA here: MS-SQLSERVER only turn my job worse, almost all (even mysql/mariadb works way more friendly than it... not need to mention postgres, which is way better than mysql/mariadb)

    7. Re:Go to hell... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      DBA here: MS-SQLSERVER only turn my job worse,

      Oh yeah, it has a certain amount of Microsoftness to it which you can't ignore. But at least it is also fairly high-performance (on smaller data sets).

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: Go to hell... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      There is some tasks not scriptable (like managing 'Maintenance Plans', which turns my job into a living hell when must be changed for 50+ databases... * "Microsoftness" in this case means "make it trough the GUI" (which is a very bad thing sometimes for IT professionals, but very convenient other times...) * please, don't suppose the context of an answer without knowing the details: it drops you in awkward situations, like this one ^^

  15. that was the plan day one but... by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    that was always their plan somewhat. if you recall they toyed with free edition where those were the exact restrictions... but home and pro users were still to be able to choose... . anymore i just use cortana to set alarms and nobody else i know will even enable it because it demands location permission.

  16. Come on Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Steam - the world is relying on you to bring a decent gaming platform to Linux. It is now more important than ever.

  17. Shill alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Shill alert!

    The parent account has been flagged for repeatedly violating Slashdot posting guidelines, specifically, shit-posting pro MS shill reputation management garbage.

    In short, GTFO troll!

    1. Re:Shill alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! That's my account you're talking about, you insensitive clod!

  18. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a former long time Linux user

    Stop right there as I'm pretty sure I've heard that one before. Please say MS isn't still wasting money paying shills to troll Slashdot. In 2016. Please say it isn't so. Wouldn't that money be better spent on a site that still has a userbase?

  19. Replace Cortana with Clippy by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be slightly less annoying.

    1. Re:Replace Cortana with Clippy by fbobraga · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Replace Cortana with Clippy by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1
  20. It's it ironic, don't you think? by TimMD909 · · Score: 2
    1. Re:It's it ironic, don't you think? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Considering that the only thing ironic in that song is that it had nothing to do with irony.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  21. Bend Over Google by dcollins · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember, this is not yet one week since Microsoft & Google announced a "no complaint" to regulators pact:

    https://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/04/22/1421201/microsoft-google-agree-to-stop-complaining-to-regulators-about-each-other

    In classic Microsoft fashion, they forge an agreement with someone and then screw them over in the most mean-spirited, legalistic way possible. Google should have known better on this one.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Bend Over Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Microsoft. Fuck yeah( said like Chris Farley would have said it ).

    2. Re:Bend Over Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google should shade Microsoft and offer OK Google as an alternative to Cortana. Imagine the horror when Microsoft's data shows a bump in disabling Cortana and increase of google app downloads from the Windows Store.

  22. Brace for lawsuit, Scotty! by lylefile · · Score: 1

    Did Microsoft so soon forget the IE anti-monopoly lawsuits? This is certain to draw more litigation. Silly earthlings.

    1. Re:Brace for lawsuit, Scotty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear not, the government and MS have enough common interests and mutual arrangements that MS will not suffer any consequences. Or did you think the rule of law still applied in this country? Sorry, but that's not the game anymore.

  23. Meh... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would annoy me if I had any reason to run Windows. Thankfully, that's not the case.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Meh... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      This would annoy me if I had any reason to run Windows. Thankfully, that's not the case.

      -jcr

      I have Windows and Linux, but have never used Cortana, so it's no big deal.

    2. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhg. What's the point of such a comment then? It's like walking into a bar and saying to everyone "I don't drink" and walking out. Not every article needs to be polluted by commenters who think they are superior to others because they don't run Windows (or worse, think they're superior because they run Linux, as if it's that important it's a part of their identity).

    3. Re:Meh... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Kid, I'm not going to quit signing my posts, no matter how many times you throw a tantrum. Get some serious professional help.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Meh... by jcr · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have the cause and effect reversed. You're not inferior because you use Windows, you use Windows because you're inferior.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very immature of you boy. You apologize right now and grow up.

  24. Edge, AKA the Little Browser that Couldn't by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had to use Edge at work for a couple of months and it would frequently crash while trying to render Slashdot. Maybe as much as 50% of the time it would freeze or pop up a message saying that "Edge has stopped" and then it would try and restart.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  25. Does anyone really use this? by FictionPimp · · Score: 2

    The first thing I do in windows 10 is hide every visible thing about Cortona I can. I'm sure my co-workers would just love hearing me repeat myself to my computer over and over as it attempts to find anything useful on bing.

    1. Re:Does anyone really use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Back in the '90s when Apple first added voice recognition to MacOS a co-worker across the hall started using it. I was so annoying that I would occasionally yell "SHUTDOWN" across the hall to turn off his computer. He eventually got the message.

    2. Re:Does anyone really use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always do something prior to that: not installing windows. Why would I spend some good bucks on something like this?

    3. Re:Does anyone really use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of the 100+ customers ive talked to who are running win10...maybe 3 or 4 knew what cortana was & were using it.

      5 or 6 times ive had customers ask what it is & then once i told them, had me disable it.

      Everybody else just seems to ignore it... just another unused feature of windows10 that gets in the way... like the app store.

  26. Sounds familiar... by jeffbaichina · · Score: 2

    "In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire, for a safe and secure society,Â..."

  27. What? by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 1

    Cortana
    search box
    Bing
    Edge

    What in heaven's name are all those? I use Windows 10, but have never encountered one of those.

  28. Right from Bill's Play Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nadella is reading right out from Bill Gates' play book from the 1990s. The UI is different (and in my opinion, crappier. Windows 3.1 has a more usable UI.) and the PR spins are trying to make it seem like "Microsoft is your friend" rather than a corporate behemoth, but under the hood they are doubling down on the evil shit that got them into trouble with the DOJ in the first place. MS is trying to abuse their market position to push their 3rd. rate search engine, their 3rd. rate Siri clone, and their 3rd. rate crap apps down users' throats. This is the same thing they did with IE, and earlier than that, Office.

    1. Re:Right from Bill's Play Book by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Except that in the 1990s Redmond had the clout to stand on competitors throats and choke the life out of them. In and Android-iOS universe, what the fuck does Cortana even matter?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Right from Bill's Play Book by tepples · · Score: 1

      In and Android-iOS universe, what the fuck does Cortana even matter?

      Because Cortana is part of the operating system that ships with just about every new, inexpensive, mass-market computer on which developing Android apps is comfortable.

  29. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

    Look asshole, we know you're a fucking shill. You can quite with the "I'm a former Linux user". You're a lying astroturfing sack of shit.

    And yes, you soulless piece of marketing filth, you are getting paid. Now just fuck off.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  30. OFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Fucking Please.

    Why do they even bother to say anything? Their explanation is worse than the reality.

  31. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Citation needed]

  32. Serious question... by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a new and somewhat reluctant user of Windows 10. I only use it as a platform to launch certain games, via Steam. All of its other features (other than what it provides as APIs to games) I don't need. I especially don't need any of this Cortana crap, auto-updates, or other typical PC-type features. I have a Mac for all that stuff.

    So what I'd like to ask is how do I disable everything I don't need? Can someone point me to a "minimum Windows 10 for dummies" kind of thing? I've been through all the interface that I can see, but I suspect I'm only scratching the Surfaceâ, because it still acts somewhat intrusively, even interrupting a Dirt Rally session mid-stage the other day to tell me it needed to restart to install an update (and DR's design meant the stage was voided). I despise that behaviour - it must be possible to set things up such that I'm in charge of it, and not the other way around? Any tips or help appreciated!

    1. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.howtogeek.com/221869/how-to-disable-or-configure-location-tracking-in-windows-10/

      Google-fu..., Level Complete!

    2. Re:Serious question... by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

      Windows 7? I was trying 10, and while it wasn't bad to start with (once tweaked sufficiently) once it went to full release, it seemed to get worse with every patch. After the patch before this one, I nuked my Windows 10 install and put on a clean copy of 7 and realized how much I'd missed it.

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    3. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It cannot be 100% disabled. M$ already had knew exactly which things we'd hate about it so they made sure to lock them in. Cortana, Feedback, their ad shit, it always runs in some way whether you want it to or not- even using the howtogeek website linked in another post.

    4. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=install+ubuntu

    5. Re:Serious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't disable most things, and even the things you did disable, Microsoft can push "important" updates without any description, that regularly change settings back to the preference of Microsoft or any of there partners. Yes it sucks.

    6. Re:Serious question... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I never left Windows 7. Download and run (in monitor mode) GWX control panel to really lock out the Windows 10 downgrade.

  33. Colour me surprised by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I never thought Microsoft corporation would do this.

    Just like I'm positive they will never ever require Intel hardware to force UEFI Secure Boot to qualify for Windows stickers.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  34. Clearly MONOPOLISTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the judicial system has already anointed Microsoft as a "No Fault" Monopoly.
    Ain't capitalism great!

  35. This is all fine and good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will delay getting Windows 10 and never use cortana. Microsoft must think cortana is the best thing since sliced bread if they are forcing people into a search provider. Only people to naive to disable it will use it.

  36. Easy Decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't use Cortana ever. And I sure am glad I decided to dual boot my laptop with win10 and Ubuntu instead of just win10.

  37. Microsoft Consent Decree expired by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could it be that the settlement against Microsoft established in 2002 which, amongst other things, required them to open their browser to competition, was preventing them from eliminating competing search engines? The only reason Microsoft permitted other browsers, and by extension, search engines in the browser, was because of this case. I suspect that they just forgot that they can now be evil again.

  38. Re:They are scrambolinjg our BRAINS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are being stupidified by the bourgeois technocrates! Revolt! The workers must rule!!!!!! I sometimes hum little songs to myself but they are not any particular genere. Am I a bird?

    No, you're a douche.

  39. Further limiting Cortana into pointlessness. by Chas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cortana.

    Where do you want to go today?

    Well you CAN'T! FUCK YOU!

    Instead of turning the Cortana interface into a useful tool, they've basically hamstrung it.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  40. Say it with me: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And nothing of value was lost.

    does anyone care what Microsoft does with the latest release of explorer

  41. I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how they can even say the reason for this is to "prevent a compromised user experience" with a straight face when everyone knows the real reason behind it... Oh wait, it was written in a blog

    1. Re: I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they announced it you could hear evil laughter emanating all over Redmond

  42. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone use Cortina? I played around with it for about a day, found it less than useless and disabled. I don't care if it uses Alta Vista and Mozilla 1.0.

    1. Re:So what? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      AltaVista before it was hijacked by Yahoo was actually good.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much better than Google is today. You were actually able to have some kind of usefull controll over your searches. I miss being able to use a search engine for work...

  43. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Ok firstly you are WAY too emotionally invested in this for anybody to take your obscenities seriously. But to his point, what is the setup that offers that sort of integrated experience that you get with a Surface Pro or an iPad Pro? It's the same old "me-too" story with FOSS again, late to the game with no disruptive innovation. For what it's worth Microsoft did exactly the same thing with Windows Phone, it (like the Linux desktop) is quite a good system but it (and desktop Linux) was a late entrant to a mature market and provided no disruptive features to win over users. The proprietary vendors are getting out in front and producing great end-user products that end-users like and the FOSS evangelists like yourself are just getting all angry about it instead of innovating. The FOSS innovation and great products are backend ones, not consumer-facing ones so you can either keep getting all upset about it or you can innovate or fund innovation in the consumer product FOSS space.

    Even today most of the people here are still getting riled up about Microsoft because in the end they use Microsoft products, still hung up on the actions in of Microsoft in the mid 90s but still using their products and supporting them decades later.

  44. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Does Edge support plug-ins, like adblock and noscript? If not then it's a broken browser.

    And what problems in Windows 8.1 are fixed? That's what I'm running and it fixed stuff in Win8. I don't care about the stupid start menu anymore, I learned to live wihtout it and I don't want a stupid wannabe start menu that shows Metro apps.

    What about all the problems and misfeatures that Windows 10 added? Cortana, pure idiocy (hey, if we copy Siri badly we can be rich too!). Forced acceptance of all upgrades, idiocy. A giant string of registry hacks and control panel settings to make the thing play nice with telemetry, spying, advertising, peer-to-peer sharing of updates, sharing wifi passwords, etc, it's all idiocy. Not to mention the militant marketing campaign to dupe people into getting Windows 10.

  45. Until Euro antitrust gets it by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    Fucking liar.

    Pardon my C#.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Until Euro antitrust gets it by green1 · · Score: 1

      In completely unrelated news, Microsoft and Google just signed an agreement not to complain to regulators about each other. ... someone at Google is incredibly naive

  46. In other words by cmorgan503 · · Score: 1

    MS is going nuts over us disabling all the spying telemetry that 'makes' bing works? Yes, I know I got a free upgrade going from windows 7 to windows 10, and no, I'm not interested into being a part of Microsoft's data collecting experiment. I cannot use bing on either Edge or chrome due to disabling most of the telemetry, and somehow, I suspect I'm not the one losing out on this. I don't use Cortana, and I'm only using Edge for school related works, because, for some reason, when I login to the school's site using chrome, i'm logged out of gmail, which means I'd have to fire up keepass 2 to get my google password and log back in.

    1. Re:In other words by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      MS is going nuts over us disabling all the spying telemetry that 'makes' bing works? Yes, I know I got a free upgrade going from windows 7 to windows 10,

      No, you got a major downgrade. You lost the interface that works, the OS that uses practically no resources, and the right to turn off telemetry. Meanwhile, Windows 7 runs all the same software, at least, everything meaningful. You got raped, not upgraded.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will be always idiots on this planet so there is just no help trying to help them out.

  47. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you are replying to a coward. Why even bother reading their trash? Personally I consider all coward posts as lies and not worth the name they are signed with.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  48. So.. how do i change the rest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To confirm can you change the search engines in:
    Amazon Alexa?
    Apple Siri?
    Google Now?

    Are there any other of these digital assistants?

  49. all the others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can the default search engine be changed in Alexa? Siri? Google Now?

  50. Can it search all of Office365 as well? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Finally, a use for that authentication stuffup that left most Office365 accounts wide open.

  51. That's all they know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another case of MS hammering on the greed button...

    Just another case of MS being Evil. People there don't know how to make money any other way, IMO.

    1. Re:That's all they know. by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      And Google is different how? Remember with Google unless you are a paying customer you are the product and they make money from you.

    2. Re:That's all they know. by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      The entire first page of Google results is not dominated by paid advertisers masquerading as legit 'best possible results for your query'. This is very different from Google. In fact that is why it is so successful as a search engine. People use it because it returns functional results. If Bing were better or duck duck go, then people would head there to search instead of Google.

    3. Re:That's all they know. by Windowser · · Score: 1

      unless you are a paying customer you are the product and they make money from you.

      Tell that to everyone that installed Win10 !

      --
      Avoid the MS tax, always buy I.B.M. PC's (I Built-it Myself)
    4. Re:That's all they know. by Isca · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think that's the issue. There are paid results on google too but google puts them at the bottom of every page and bing always puts 2-3 at the top of the first page ala amazon.

      The main difference is google has become very adept at removing clickbaity sites from the first page and Bing has not. I don't think Microsoft is making money off any of those results, they are just not good at removing them.

  52. He went on to say... by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

    "Unfortunately, as Windows 10 has grown in adoption and usage, we have seen some software programs circumvent the design of Windows 10 and redirect you to search providers that were not designed to work with Cortana. The result is a compromised experience that is less reliable and predictable"

    The Microsoft stooge went on to say:

    "Of course, we /could/ have created a framework that incorporated the ability to use different search providers, since this is obviously something in which some customers are interested. But instead, we have decided to further limit customer choice, breaking third-party applications, so we can bolster the diminishing market-share of the financial black-hole that is Bing, while pretending it's all in the name of "improving" the customer experience. And then we'll look around all confused as people stop buying our products because we've stopped providing them something that works for /them/ in lieu of offering something that works for /us/."

  53. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry that an objective and balanced post highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of both FOSS and proprietary camps upsets you but you need to learn to deal with failure in some aspects without getting all angry about your own inadequacies. Id say "have a nice day" but undoubtedly this post will just infuriate you even more.

  54. What about Alexa, Siri, Google Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the same changing of default search engine available in Siri, Alexa and Google Now?

  55. like Android maps by short · · Score: 2

    Similar to Android maps. When any application wants to display a map it only displays Google Maps. Despite I have several other better (=offline) maps installed. And no, I have downloaded the areas into Google Maps offline maps and it still does not display anything offline. Plus other maps (like mapy.cz or MapsWithMe) render the maps better anyway.

  56. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

    Pfffft!

  57. Ok by me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use Cortana
    I don't use Bing
    I don't use Edge

    Mind you, I only use Windows 10 on a small netbook so the impact of this petulant action by Microsoft will be minimal as far as I'm concerned. Looks like they're not just shooting themselves in the foot, they're after the whole LEG!

  58. Re: I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shrill alert. Nobody on slashdot or most corners of the internet can articilate themselves in such a manner.

    Go drown in a river of piss fag.

  59. All Your Searches Belong To Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid Windows 10 users. You belong to Microsoft. Don't you ever forget that.

  60. Microsoft limits Cortana search to Bing by tetraverse · · Score: 1

    How would the EU Commission feel about Microsoft limiting Cortana search to Bing and Edge only?

  61. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Geeky · · Score: 1

    I know I'm replying to an AC, but what the hell, it's Friday

    The surface is both a poor tablet and a poor laptop. If you absolutely have to have a single device that can be both, it's adequate. No more. Windows 10 is nowhere near as good a tablet experience as either Android or iOS - there's still too much desktop getting in the way. For example, if you want to open a file in a universal app you get the good old classic Windows file selection dialog which is fiddly and awkward to use in tablet mode. Most of the settings can be configured through the touch friendly settings page, but advanced ones require control panel applets. If you don't let it hibernate after a few hours (and therefore pretty much require a reboot next time you use it), battery drains too quickly - based on my experience with iOS and Android I expect a tablet to start instantly (and OSX proves you can have a full blown OS sleep properly with minimal battery drain and still wake up instantly)

    On the laptop side, it's too much of a compromise. If I want to use a laptop I want to be able to use it on my lap - the clip on keyboard arrangement only really works on a desk.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  62. Remind us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... all searches will be powered by Bing ...

    Tell us again how Google is using their market leverage to block other search engines, I forget

  63. We monopoly because we're incompetent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would use an OS whose maker claims to be too incompetent to work with internet search engines?

  64. Foil Hat Set to "Oh Really" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you're thinking it through. Microsoft needed Google to say "no complaint" so the real deal was to do something that would cheese off more Microsoft customers and drive them over to Google.

  65. In other words by m76 · · Score: 1

    Adoption is high enough now that we can start pulling shit like this.

  66. Remind me again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me again... How do I uninstall Cortana?

    I mean other than with a Windows 7 install disc.

  67. Windows 10 != Windows 10 Enterprise by tepples · · Score: 2

    Its hard to imagine windows 10 getting any traction in the business world if you couldn't turn this consumer nonsense off.

    Microsoft doesn't want Windows 10 "getting any traction in the business world". It wants the more expensive Windows 10 Enterprise "getting any traction in the business world".

  68. What ?? by rmist · · Score: 1

    Cortana ... what's that ??

  69. can you trick it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cortana, search LMGTFY <rest of search>

  70. Sure, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect another slap in the face by the European Commision. Not that we did not know, but thanks for illustrating that you remain the same stupid, obnoxious criminal organization that you have always been.

    1. Re:Sure, Microsoft by green1 · · Score: 2

      Do you need standing to complain to the EC? Because if so, the only one likely to complain is Google, and conveniently they just signed an agreement with MS not to complain to regulators. I'm sure the timing of this announcement so shortly after that agreement was signed is a mere coincidence...

  71. Cortana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh Nooes! Not Cortana Searchbox. What ever will we do?

  72. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get mad at the shills, it'll only make you go off the hinges and result in a down mod. Do like I do. Mock them!

  73. And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you bother using a Google search with a Cortana request. If you're asking an interactive, natural language agent for information you should get natural language information back. Not some 1990s era web page search result. It's why I rarely use Google's voice search - what good is saying "Okay Google, where is the closest Five Guys" while driving in traffic and having a web page come up that you have to read? There is no way Cortana is going to take generic web search information and parse it without some additional qualifiers.

    Luckily, Cortana does a piss poor job of natural language response in the first place, so it's not like we're actually losing anything by being diverted to Bing. A bunch of useless results on a web page are barely more useful than a bunch of somewhat useful results on a web page when what you really wanted was a natural language answer.

  74. NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the sound Ed Grimley's triangle makes. (Or is that "ting"?) The OS has been turned into a giant browser helper object. My grandma is even pissed at this shit.

  75. Did I get this right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now the only alternative is to get crappy results from a stupid bitch on a lousy browser?

    Wow, what a great World of Tomorrow. Can't wait till MS finishes sticking Win10 in my Win7 box like a rancid suppository.

  76. Antitrust lawsuit time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd sue them except I don't have standing. This is a clear violation of the clayton act, now some lawyers go fuck these monopolists!

  77. Read As : "Microsoft Kills Cortana" by Revarg · · Score: 1

    because there is now no use for her.

  78. Linux on desktop by iamacat · · Score: 2

    If now is not the time, it will never be. Windows 10 is essentially only good for gaming. For every other task, a Chromebook or a MacBook, depending on your budget and preferences, does the job better while being less annoying. Yes, they also have frequent software updates, limitations and analytics. But they are not obnoxious in normal daily use. Every time I want to use my gaming box, it has logged me out and I have to sit through 10 minutes of "working on updates" until I can start Portal.

    Video card and game manufacturers should partner with distributors like Steam and commit to same day Linux releases for titles and drivers. Invest in Vulcan and whatever is the most promising replacement for X11 until performance/stability is as good as DirectX. Then there will be no more reasons for people to get abused by their computers.

    1. Re:Linux on desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know that you can actually configure when Win10 installs updates and make it auto-reboot, too? At, say, 5am...

    2. Re:Linux on desktop by GougeMan · · Score: 1

      Just change the games you play and come on over to Linux. Let's all sleep better at night knowing we are totally disengaged from this too big to fail company known as Microsoft. They are playing 'nice nice' with open source now, but you know what they are planning to do eventually. Just swallow the gaming pride and come on over.... Sleep good... Yes....

    3. Re:Linux on desktop by iamacat · · Score: 1

      This still makes the PC reboot at night and then do lengthy "working on updates" thingy after logging in next time.

  79. Personalized for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? No you can't use that other search engine.

    What? No you can't use that other browser.

    This is Cortana! It's for you.

    We know better.

    Bitch.

  80. Cortana? by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    It was one of the first things I disabled. I disabled it for the same reason I disabled the Amazon search integration in Ubuntu.

    I've never quite understood why I would want my application launcher to search the web.

    Now, if Microsoft did something dumb like make it so you can't disable Cortana, that might just be enough to make me replace Windows with something else. (Haven't wanted to put in the effort, but they are really making it hard to justify not putting the effort in. That might be the proverbial straw.)

  81. Who uses this stuff anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead Microsoft do all you can to get people to use your services. I never cared about Cortana, Edge or Bing. Doing this does nothing to stop me from using the services I want so do what you have to. I always have Chrome open to search, and I think only once did I search from the task bar. I eventually hid it to make room for apps I actually use. Windows 10 is a decent version, once you turn off and disable all of the crap Microsoft throws at it.

  82. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you should read your comment out loud and let us know if you think they sound like something a sane person would say. If not, then perhaps you should talk to someone. I'm not kidding/trolling.

  83. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Edge just plain sucks. We've all but disabled on the Win 10 installs at work because it's so broken.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  84. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by spacepimp · · Score: 1

    Why can't his response be earnest? Linux is a cancer.

    -Bill G... err -anonymous coward

  85. A disturbance at the trough by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

    Put up with being fed garbage, and you will continue to be fed garbage.

  86. Awesome by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Three birds with one stone.

  87. Windows is good for Microsoft but not for the user by EmperorDread · · Score: 1

    So when my lap top did a recent auto-update to the most recent flavor of windows 10 it broke my laptop. Had to buy a new drive, re-load a new copies of windows, then mount the old drive to recover my files. Then the laptop re-updated again despite my taking pains to turn off auto-update. Once again my laptop was made useless. That's my mac conversion story. I have never regretted switching and will never buy another windows machine again if I can help it. Microsoft seems to be all about being Microsoft as an advantage to Microsoft and then excuse their poor product and abysmal user experience by saying marketing double speak things like, "The result is a compromised experience that is less reliable and predictable." Well, I can tell you what else is predictable. If you screw the customer too often, they take their money elsewhere.

  88. That's why I don't use it by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    First, I think you have to bend over by giving them your Microsoft account login and everything else they want. I hate Bing with a passion.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  89. Yay!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is back, bitches! Returning to their strategy of using their desktop dominance against all rivals.

    Suck it, freedom!

  90. Cool story. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

    First thing I do when I install a 10 box is get rid of that crap. Or rather hide it, probably can't get rid of it.

  91. Google knows more about MS products than Bing does by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    About a month ago the wife got a new laptop, and it had Win10. I was asked by my 5 year old to put flowers on "the screen when it goes to sleep". (Lock Screen.) So I set a picture, and wanted to see it. I looked for a "Lock" button. Didn't see one.
    I have Win8.1 (setup more or less to look like XP, as I am used to that, with Classic Shell.) and have a lock button in my start menu..
    .
    Wasn't sure where the heck it was in Win10. So I typed in the search box, and got Bing search results, none of which (well, at least in the first page of results) had the answer I was looking for. I copied my search and pasted it into Google and not only did it come up with good results, it came up with instructions where to find the Lock Button I was looking for right on the search result page. I didn't have to go any further..
    .
    Google knows more about Win10 than Microsoft Bing does! What the hell? And I have a nagging feeling I have encountered stuff like that before..
    .
    I may have some issues with Google, but at least they know how to find stuff.

  92. United States v. Microsoft - Redux by eepok · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his findings of fact on November 5, 1999, which stated that Microsoft's dominance of the x86-based personal computer operating systems market constituted a monopoly, and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to that monopoly, including Apple, Java, Netscape, Lotus Notes, RealNetworks, Linux, and others.[15] Judgment was split in two parts. On April 3, 2000, he issued his conclusions of law, according to which Microsoft had committed monopolization, attempted monopolization, and tying in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Microsoft immediately appealed the decision.[16]

    On June 7, 2000, the court ordered a breakup of Microsoft as its "remedy". According to that judgment, Microsoft would have to be broken into two separate units, one to produce the operating system, and one to produce other software components.[16][17]

  93. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Linux is a cancer.

    you must be new here...

  94. Difference, IMO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a big difference between Google and Microsoft.

    Microsoft is evil even when the evil lowers Microsoft income. Evil, not making money, is Microsoft's core business.

    Google takes advantage of social weakness to make money, like providing no way to update Android. The managers of Microsoft (Monkey Boy, for example) have such limited social ability that they are not able to avoid being self-destructive.

  95. Re:I'm actually happy with Windows 10 and Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read his comment and found it to be precise. If you disagree with it, then you don't live in reality.

  96. But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if I don't want a "personalized, end-to-end search experience". What if I want useful search results instead?

  97. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow if only I had known how much of my search experience was being ruined by routing cortana to Google I would have dropped them months ago. I love having to search 2 pages in for a result that Google would have put up in the top 3, its like Bing and I are working together to find the results instead of it patronizing me by just finding it for me. And with the added benefit of not being bogged down by that same old browser. You know the one is been using for years, and have synced accross all my devices its so liberating. Great job microsoft this is almost as good of an idea as the Kinect. A camera that's always watching you in the living room whether you like it or not, Where do you guys keep getting these a plus ideas?

  98. It is worse in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China the default search engine is Baidu,the state-owned search engine.
    Maybe Monopo$oft is trying to make our 1984-ish situation worse.

  99. Nothing changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as I can boot into root by default without any password, windows10 will make me a happy customer.

    ps don't forget to disable your firewall as well, it's easy too

    -m$

  100. Re: Windows 10 != valuable software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows professional which retails for $150 permits the administrator to select between vista 7,8, and 10.

    To the extent that windows10 creates new sales for windows professional, m$ can actually make money by paying providers to bundle win10.

    And paradoxically, conscientiously destroying the quality of win10 is the best economic outcome for() in time interval (from.now -to- some.futuretime)