So if Wal-mart gets automatic ownerships of Walmart.x in every TLD x, why do we have more than one TLD?
Unless Domain.com is going to resolve to something different than Domain.org or Domain.biz, they provide no value to anyone except the people selling domain names.
Do European ISP each dig up the roads and put their own cables through everywhere? Or is there some form of regulation that makes the cable owners lease them out on reasonable terms?
"its investment in Palm, viewed by many analysts and investors as an expensive foray into the smartphone market that has not paid off"
Well sure, buying a company for its smartphone and then never actually releasing a phone with those assets is an expensive foray with little payout. Maybe if they'd actually put out a product before the Pre enthusiasts drifted off to other platforms, they'd have done better. I was very disappointed when I had to give up my Pre because I realized the Pre 3 was nowhere on the horizon.
I grew up with good old fashioned Log Cabin "Maple"(flavored) syrup, and while I'll admit the real stuff is good, I do prefer the thicker consistency you tend to get from corn syrup.
I also prefer margarine over butter, so obviously I have no taste
35 for alleged download of songs by R&B star Rihanna
That's terrible. Certainly Rihanna makes enough money that she doesn't have to illegally download songs. And does she really have to go to New Zealand to do it? Seems she's spend more in airfare. She's just pirating music to hurt her fellow musicians.
Unfortunately, it's no doubt been deleted. (It was probably deleted immediately after the debate when Haught realized he lost.) Rabel was right when he said it would be too much trouble to edit it. They've have to recover the video first.
That's true when "you" is a common citizen. Why "you" is an arm of the Federal Government, or the Executive Branch in particular, there's not a whole lot the courts will do if they are ignored.
They were allowed to continue using the scanners during the comment period. But they refuse to actually start the comment period, so it sounds like they have to comply with the court and stop using the scanners. Not that the Executive Branch cares much what the Judicial Branch has to say on anything.
We've got Killerfish resisting all our efforts to kill them, defying scientific explanation. This is the start of the fish takeover! Take to the high ground!
Sure, I should read the article, but the summary makes no sense. Why does the successful launch of one spacecraft prove that it's safe to launch manned spacecraft again? One successful launch doesn't prove anything.
While I'd approve legalizing pot and removing references to God from the pledge and our money (and other parts of government), they're not a priority for me, and I'm glad Obama isn't going to push them and endanger his support. I'd rather he push harder on health care, getting us at least an option for socialized health insurance, and fixing the economy without relying on the Republicans' "Cutting taxes will fix everything" plan.
It would be nice if less people were in the "don't pay income taxes" group. I'm sure those people would like to get out of that group too. But they're in that group because they can't afford to pay income taxes. If you want to shrink the group, we need to either help them earn more money, or decrease costs of living so we can lower the threshold for paying income taxes.
Yes, there's some really bad porn out there. But it's not the government's job to decide which porn is good and which is bad and block the bad stuff. Judge for yourself what porn you want to watch and ignore the rest.
Or that Marriage is in danger of collapsing and dieing if we let more people get married. (Defense of Marriage Act would be an ok name if it was actually aimed at helping marriage, preventing divorces, etc)
The key point there, though. It was the father who abused her. It is far more likely that a family member will be the abuser than some stranger in the house down the block.
Teach your kids Common Sense when they go Trick or Treating. Don't go into the houses of anyone you don't know. Don't trick or treat alone. I seriously doubt any sex offender is going to snatch children out of a pack of Trick or Treaters and drag them into their house to molest them.
Slashdot Mirror
So if Wal-mart gets automatic ownerships of Walmart.x in every TLD x, why do we have more than one TLD?
Unless Domain.com is going to resolve to something different than Domain.org or Domain.biz, they provide no value to anyone except the people selling domain names.
Do European ISP each dig up the roads and put their own cables through everywhere? Or is there some form of regulation that makes the cable owners lease them out on reasonable terms?
Meanwhile, WebOS will continue to languish unwanted, losing even more of its value.
Well sure, buying a company for its smartphone and then never actually releasing a phone with those assets is an expensive foray with little payout. Maybe if they'd actually put out a product before the Pre enthusiasts drifted off to other platforms, they'd have done better. I was very disappointed when I had to give up my Pre because I realized the Pre 3 was nowhere on the horizon.
No. Whom is correct.
Whom do you want to ask about 2012 elections?
The subject is you.
The verb is want to ask
The object is whom
about 2012 elections is a supporting prepositional phrase
Who is always a subject, Whom is always an object (except here, when you're talking about the word itself)
There were pleas to "like" them in various games in order to get minor virtual rewards. I guess that counts as interaction.
I was thinking of this about 2 minutes in Of course that's a Dune reference too.
I grew up with good old fashioned Log Cabin "Maple"(flavored) syrup, and while I'll admit the real stuff is good, I do prefer the thicker consistency you tend to get from corn syrup.
I also prefer margarine over butter, so obviously I have no taste
Yeah, remember when you could have online discussions with decent thread management?
The rule is retroactive. When it goes into effect, it will allow them to lie now about not including the rule.
That's terrible. Certainly Rihanna makes enough money that she doesn't have to illegally download songs. And does she really have to go to New Zealand to do it? Seems she's spend more in airfare. She's just pirating music to hurt her fellow musicians.
Unfortunately, it's no doubt been deleted. (It was probably deleted immediately after the debate when Haught realized he lost.) Rabel was right when he said it would be too much trouble to edit it. They've have to recover the video first.
That's true when "you" is a common citizen. Why "you" is an arm of the Federal Government, or the Executive Branch in particular, there's not a whole lot the courts will do if they are ignored.
They were allowed to continue using the scanners during the comment period. But they refuse to actually start the comment period, so it sounds like they have to comply with the court and stop using the scanners. Not that the Executive Branch cares much what the Judicial Branch has to say on anything.
We've got Killerfish resisting all our efforts to kill them, defying scientific explanation. This is the start of the fish takeover! Take to the high ground!
Ok, read the article, and yup that's basically what it says. We think we found the problem, and this launch didn't blow up. Now we're safe again!
Sure, I should read the article, but the summary makes no sense. Why does the successful launch of one spacecraft prove that it's safe to launch manned spacecraft again? One successful launch doesn't prove anything.
While I'd approve legalizing pot and removing references to God from the pledge and our money (and other parts of government), they're not a priority for me, and I'm glad Obama isn't going to push them and endanger his support. I'd rather he push harder on health care, getting us at least an option for socialized health insurance, and fixing the economy without relying on the Republicans' "Cutting taxes will fix everything" plan.
It would be nice if less people were in the "don't pay income taxes" group. I'm sure those people would like to get out of that group too. But they're in that group because they can't afford to pay income taxes. If you want to shrink the group, we need to either help them earn more money, or decrease costs of living so we can lower the threshold for paying income taxes.
Yes, there's some really bad porn out there. But it's not the government's job to decide which porn is good and which is bad and block the bad stuff. Judge for yourself what porn you want to watch and ignore the rest.
Or that Marriage is in danger of collapsing and dieing if we let more people get married. (Defense of Marriage Act would be an ok name if it was actually aimed at helping marriage, preventing divorces, etc)
The key point there, though. It was the father who abused her. It is far more likely that a family member will be the abuser than some stranger in the house down the block.
One rumor was that China would detain Internet users for spreading rumors.
I said don't go INTO the houses of people you don't know. Knock on the door, take the candy and leave.
Teach your kids Common Sense when they go Trick or Treating. Don't go into the houses of anyone you don't know. Don't trick or treat alone. I seriously doubt any sex offender is going to snatch children out of a pack of Trick or Treaters and drag them into their house to molest them.