We just spent $10K+... to mitigate the costs of having an outside lab...
What would have been the cost to have an outside lab do the testing?
it's a big burden for small manufacturers.
Agreed - I know how small business can be, but it's a bigger burden on the community at large to do anything else.
Current FCC/CE regs... [are] a bit onerous IMHO.
What makes them onerous it the cost of complying. A better solution than a "this probably passes" statement is better access to testing labs for small businesses. Something like a Business Assistance Grant for small businesses in the electronics sector. Maybe take it up with your local governing authorities. Or see if (as someone else suggested) you can use the fact that you've grown beyond the infancy stage, you can persuade your local industryassociation to set up some sort of program.
Or there's an opportunity for some enterprising engineers to set up a "FCC regs compliance testing" company, priced below what it costs internally, and sweep up all the small-business testing jobs in your state...
While W3C has not made HTML a standard, the ISO and IEC apparently have standardised "a refinement of the World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C's) Recommendation for HTML 4.0... Documents which conform to this International Standard also conform to the strict DTD provided by the W3C Recommendation for HTML 4.01."
given that the powerlines are cut, surely you have a bigger problem than "the internet's down"??? Assuming that you can even tell that it's down...
What happens in the situation where one of the BPL boxes goes kaput due to ill weather (or as someone else suggested, bulletholes)? How is this different from the lines getting cut by a tree or ice?
Honestly though, Canberra is a very small town, so if you are expecting to see "Australia" while you're there, there's not much. Your best bet is to look here or here for things to do there.
Otherwise bear in mind that it's about 200 miles to Sydney, 400 miles to Melbourne or 800 miles to Brisbane, where the real stuff happens...
What kind of things do you like to see when travelling?
It seems that "Linux" cannot get certified... or at least, not easily.
The tests themself are mostly available free - but the certification costs around $4000 + percentage of revenue.
Now I don't know about Linus himself, but there are a fair few companies (Redhat, SuSE, Debian) who would have to each shell out to sizeable chunks to be certified... Seems like a bit much to me...
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) calls the
Moon flight projectChandrayan Pratham, which has been translated as First Journey to the Moon or Moonshot One.
Reliable Software makes a product called "Code Co-op: Server-less Version Control", (free trial, then cheap licence per seat) designed exactly for distributed closed-source development, especially where there is no central server. (I have never used it, but I came across their site more than 5 years ago when looking for good windows programming info, which they still have - also cool scientific programming info.)
As a rule, they'll often look the other way if they aren't losing any money.
I think this is the key to this disagreement.
"Copyright holders look the other way unless money is being exchanged..." is clearly false - c.f. RIAA, MPAA, BSA, etc. However, the common factor in these cases it that all those organizations believe that they ARE losing money, even if money is not being exchanged.
So you are _PROBABLY_ safe if you are not causing the copyright-holder to lose money - Fan websites rarely impede moneymaking activities, but warez sites often do.
Oh, looks like you can if you use "folder view for ftp sites" but not if you use the regular view. Too bad that used to suck because it took twice as long to pull up as regular view. Guess what is the first option changed in my IE advanced settings...
as to your last point, things we know aren't so can always be restated in the converse as things we know that are "not so". Then they fit into state 1.
Slashdot Mirror
We just spent $10K+ ... to mitigate the costs of having an outside lab...
... [are] a bit onerous IMHO.
What would have been the cost to have an outside lab do the testing?
it's a big burden for small manufacturers.
Agreed - I know how small business can be, but it's a bigger burden on the community at large to do anything else.
Current FCC/CE regs
What makes them onerous it the cost of complying. A better solution than a "this probably passes" statement is better access to testing labs for small businesses. Something like a Business Assistance Grant for small businesses in the electronics sector. Maybe take it up with your local governing authorities. Or see if (as someone else suggested) you can use the fact that you've grown beyond the infancy stage, you can persuade your local industry association to set up some sort of program.
Or there's an opportunity for some enterprising engineers to set up a "FCC regs compliance testing" company, priced below what it costs internally, and sweep up all the small-business testing jobs in your state...
Never mind - my goof...
... Documents which conform to this International Standard also conform to the strict DTD provided by the W3C Recommendation for HTML 4.01."
While W3C has not made HTML a standard, the ISO and IEC apparently have standardised "a refinement of the World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C's) Recommendation for HTML 4.0
http://www.funnyhumor.com/jokes/254.html
given that the powerlines are cut, surely you have a bigger problem than "the internet's down"??? Assuming that you can even tell that it's down...
What happens in the situation where one of the BPL boxes goes kaput due to ill weather (or as someone else suggested, bulletholes)? How is this different from the lines getting cut by a tree or ice?
There is _NOTHING_ in Canberra... :-)
Honestly though, Canberra is a very small town, so if you are expecting to see "Australia" while you're there, there's not much. Your best bet is to look here or here for things to do there.
Otherwise bear in mind that it's about 200 miles to Sydney, 400 miles to Melbourne or 800 miles to Brisbane, where the real stuff happens...
What kind of things do you like to see when travelling?
Canberra LUG here, Wollongong LUG seems offline at the moment.
So? lots of things have specifications... In fact as I read it, it says:
then and from chapter 2:
But I agree on the rest...
(Note: many flavours of BASIC have functions in addition to subs these days...)
You recall a BASIC without FOR? MBASIC in DOS 3.3 had FOR loops. Possibly WHILE too, but I can't be sure of it...
And then there's
I guess IHBT...
Especially when Patrick is (almost) synonymous with Slack-x86, David with Slack-Sparc, and Chris with Slack-Alpha...
That's really something more like three one-man distro's with a common codebase and shared brandname...
Wow, hey, you're right...
Configure was originally written by Raymond Chen...
Interesting....
I wondered too... It took a fair bit of poking around on the Open Group's site to find this:
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/Brandfees.htm
It seems that "Linux" cannot get certified... or at least, not easily.
The tests themself are mostly available free - but the certification costs around $4000 + percentage of revenue.
Now I don't know about Linus himself, but there are a fair few companies (Redhat, SuSE, Debian) who would have to each shell out to sizeable chunks to be certified... Seems like a bit much to me...
Aren't enunuchs already fixed???!? :-)
Well, between you, me and Brad Templeton, that's three of us...
I don't know that it's particularly QT-related, or odd - even the gimp windows shown on the top left of the KDE screenshot show the double-border.
Then realize that the "extra" border is actually the border of the "tab" and is there for visually describing the edge of influence of the tab button.
It seems pretty reasonable to me...
I use Mozilla, but this quicker variant seems to work for me... (I was using your algorithm until I tried this...)
Visit page
if (mis-rendered) {
Reload(this->Page);
}
Read(this->Page);
that's so close to true it's scary...
Reliable Software makes a product called "Code Co-op: Server-less Version Control", (free trial, then cheap licence per seat) designed exactly for distributed closed-source development, especially where there is no central server. (I have never used it, but I came across their site more than 5 years ago when looking for good windows programming info, which they still have - also cool scientific programming info.)
That said, there's nothing you mentioned that you cannot do if you rent a *nix box and install alexandria, which powers sourceforge or Savane, which powers Gna.org, LCG Savannah and GNU/Non-GNU Savannah
We do.
"Copyright holders look the other way unless money is being exchanged..." is clearly false - c.f. RIAA, MPAA, BSA, etc. However, the common factor in these cases it that all those organizations believe that they ARE losing money, even if money is not being exchanged.
So you are _PROBABLY_ safe if you are not causing the copyright-holder to lose money - Fan websites rarely impede moneymaking activities, but warez sites often do.
Ditto... I HATE the look of fancy coloured documents on laptops.
Too many pages of poo-brown and spew-green, which started as quite acceptable yellow and orange.
Occassionally I have seen unusably bad colour-schemes - only to discover that they look fine when I switch over to a CRT.
Posting this comment inspired me to check out the new IT colour scheme on the desktop - whoa, now I know why everyone was complaining...
Oh, looks like you can if you use "folder view for ftp sites" but not if you use the regular view. Too bad that used to suck because it took twice as long to pull up as regular view. Guess what is the first option changed in my IE advanced settings...
IE can upload ftp? I didn't know that... I'll have to check next time I'm in windows...
Netscape 4.x and earlier could upload files. 6+ (Mozilla-based) couldn't.
That's why you needed a dedicated client.
Oh, of course - I knew that! :-)
as to your last point, things we know aren't so can always be restated in the converse as things we know that are "not so". Then they fit into state 1.