Slashdot Mirror


A Liquid That Turns Solid When Heated

Roland Piquepaille writes "There are some sure things in life, such as death and taxes. When you are heating a solid, you expect it will melt and when you're boiling water, you're pretty certain that it will turn into vapor. But what about a liquid that becomes solid when it's heated? Of course, it has already been done, for example in the chemical process of polymerization. But now, PhysicsWeb writes that a team of French physicists has discovered a law-breaking liquid that defies the rules. When you heat it between 45 and 75C, it becomes solid. But the process is fully reversible, and this is a world's premiere. When you decrease the temperature, this solid melts and turns again into a liquid. I'm not sure of the implications of such a phenomenon, but it's fascinating. Read more for essential details."

450 comments

  1. Weird, but cool! by lesterchakyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is one of the things that makes you think if everything is as you know...

    The Matrix anyone?

    1. Re:Weird, but cool! by cynic10508 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is one of the things that makes you think if everything is as you know... The Matrix anyone?

      Ehhh. This is more what we know empirically. We're merely discovering a priori things that we weren't aware of previously. The Matrix was more about what we know epistemically.

    2. Re:Weird, but cool! by boaworm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whats wierd about it ?. Ever heard of a thing called an "egg" ?

      Proteins tend to change form when you heat them, and even when cooled down, they remain the same (the proteins have re-folded).

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    3. Re:Weird, but cool! by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Funny
      Can darwinism work on software bugs ?

      Yes - it's survival of the fittest. Those bugs that could hide the best (until they show up to bite you in the ass) will do so.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Weird, but cool! by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was a joke. Perhaps you should stop working of your vocabulary and start working on your sense of humor. ;->

    5. Re:Weird, but cool! by boaworm · · Score: 3, Informative
      Eggs dont turn back to liquid when you cool them...

      Absolutely true. I was just trying to make fun of the very bad headline. The headline was "Science: A Liquid That Turns Solid When Heated", which is not at all interesting.


      Also eggs cooking is the water coming out.

      Now that is plain b-s. As I said, what happens is that when you add energy (heat) to the proteins, they re-fold and turns into a more stable substance, transforming from a liquid to a firm state.

      Just to clearify this so that people dont believe your disinformation. If you boil and egg, in water, with the eggshell intact, you still think you will boil the water away from the "egg", making it firm ? You are utterly wrong, and not informative at all. Even a simple google reveals this, look here or here.

      Go back to your cave, troll.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    6. Re:Weird, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably just studied some philosophy. Get a clue. Or a PHIL minor. Or something.

    7. Re:Weird, but cool! by krunk7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hehe, "discovering a priori things we weren't aware of" is somewhat of an oxymoron: Websters: a priori

    8. Re:Weird, but cool! by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      Hehe, "discovering a priori things we weren't aware of" is somewhat of an oxymoron: Websters: a priori

      Hmm. Not the definition of "a priori" I was working from. Basically, it has always and will always be true that such a substance can exist. We're only now aware of this truth. Just as at one point early humans had no awareness of the truth that 2 + 2 = 4.

    9. Re:Weird, but cool! by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's probably just studied some philosophy. Get a clue. Or a PHIL minor. Or something.

      All of the above.

    10. Re:Weird, but cool! by phs_00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A priori are things that are self evident though reason and need no experience to deduce. In the example of 2+2=4, it is not that it was true before humans knew it that makes it a priori, but rather that you can deduce, through reason, that it is true without the need for human experience. A posteriori however concerns things which require experience in order to deduce, such as the stove is hot when turned on. Thus if anything these new findings, although they were true before discovered, fall under the a posteriori category, as it relies on human experience and not reason alone as part of the deductive process.

    11. Re:Weird, but cool! by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1
      Also eggs cooking is the water coming out.
      Take a cooked egg (any style) and soak it in water overnight. Does it become raw?

      I don't know who is stupider - the idiot who wrote such utterly obvious crap or the cretins who modded it informative.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    12. Re:Weird, but cool! by simcop2387 · · Score: 3, Funny

      2+2 isn't 4!! 4 doesn't exist, 2+2 = 11

    13. Re:Weird, but cool! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      This was making me think of the 4 states of knowledge:

      1) Things we know we know.
      2) Things we know we don't know.
      3) Things we don't know we know.
      4) Things we don't know we don't know.

      This would fall under 4, my favourite category of all. And this is basically how I've always understood a priori.

      --
      No Comment.
    14. Re:Weird, but cool! by felis_panthera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the article:
      However, a reversible transition in which a liquid becomes a solid when heated has never been observed until now (emphasis added by poster)

      boaworm wrote:
      Ever heard of a thing called an "egg"

      I have in fact... but I have yet to hear of anyone un-cooking one...

      --

      The chains are broken
      Loki is free
      Ragnarok is at hand...
    15. Re:Weird, but cool! by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      2+2 isn't 4!! 4 doesn't exist, 2+2 = 11

      If 2+2 = 11 then an American Football team of 11 men is made up of two men and two other men. I imagine the pass coverage would be terrible.

    16. Re:Weird, but cool! by flonker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's worse, is how many times have you copied & pasted a section of code? Afterwards, you probably modified that bit of code slightly (otherwise, you could have just made it a function).

      Reproduction. Mutation.

    17. Re:Weird, but cool! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Which is why reputable sources are better than wikipedia.

    18. Re:Weird, but cool! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Hehe, "discovering a priori things we weren't aware of" is somewhat of an oxymoron: Websters: a priori

      Clearly you've never studied AI. Logical reduction take exponential computation time.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    19. Re:Weird, but cool! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Whats wierd about it ?. Ever heard of a thing called an "egg" ?

      Yeah, I hate it whem my eggs re-liquify after cooling down for a few minutes. Makes 'em hard to eat.

      /actualy read the article.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    20. Re:Weird, but cool! by Onan · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Donald.

      Say, don't you have a couple of occupations to be managing?

    21. Re:Weird, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is one of the things that makes you think if everything is as you know...
      The Matrix anyone?"

      Didn't anyone ever teach you to write in complete sentences ?

    22. Re:Weird, but cool! by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      wouldn't state 3 be empty? I mean I can see what kind of information could be in states 1, 2, and 4, but I can't visualise anyone with information in state 3...

    23. Re:Weird, but cool! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      "3) Things we don't know we know."

      "Right, I knew that all along."
      "Oh yeah, I already knew that."

      Now visualize this statement and you will see that state 3 is not empty.

      More like playing with "I think, therefore I think I am."

      Missing from the list are the things we know that aren't so.

    24. Re:Weird, but cool! by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      try base 3 math

    25. Re:Weird, but cool! by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Than I guess we'll see bugs that have evolved to provide features. Microsoft is a good example.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    26. Re:Weird, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 would pretty much encompass 99.9999% of things.

    27. Re:Weird, but cool! by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course - I knew that! :-)

      as to your last point, things we know aren't so can always be restated in the converse as things we know that are "not so". Then they fit into state 1.

    28. Re:Weird, but cool! by pAnkRat · · Score: 0

      Not Matrix, bnut the simpsons:

      "Lisa! In our house we respect the laws of thermodynamics!" -Homer

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
    29. Re:Weird, but cool! by greenrd · · Score: 1
      That's why it's better to create functions or classes than to copy and paste code, where possible (except when you're writing code that you're definitely, without a doubt going to throw away after a short space of time, I suppose).

    30. Re:Weird, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it up. You are a pedantic moron and that's the main story here.

    31. Re:Weird, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. you make it sound like evolution was a bad thing.

    32. Re:Weird, but cool! by jmb_no · · Score: 1

      boaworm wrote:
      Ever heard of a thing called an "egg"

      I have in fact... but I have yet to hear of anyone un-cooking one...


      Sometimes I wish I could. Especially when the kids change their minds about how they want their eggs done.

    33. Re:Weird, but cool! by flonker · · Score: 1

      Yes, I mentioned that already. "(otherwise, you could have just made it a function)"

      Also, code frequently gets copied from project to project. That leads to some interesting ideas regarding open source being a pool for software bugs to evolve in. What would they evolve into though?

    34. Re:Weird, but cool! by ross+axe · · Score: 1
      Missing from the list are the things we know that aren't so.

      Not so. Consider the statement 'All odd numbers are prime'. 9 is odd and not prime, therefore the statement is untrue. 'Some odd numbers are not prime' is the same statement, which falls into the 'things we know we know' category.

    35. Re:Weird, but cool! by SAPHRguru · · Score: 1

      Therfore perfectly at home on /.

    36. Re:Weird, but cool! by edittard · · Score: 0
      It's not bs, it's just irrelevant.

      No, it really is bullshit. They are two separate things. You can take the water out without cooking them (freeze drying). You can cook them without taking the water out (boiling). Occasional correlation is not the same thing as equivalence.

      P.S. Does the fact that when the OP said 'cook', you seemed to interpret it as 'fry' say something about your career? It would certainly be appropriate.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    37. Re:Weird, but cool! by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      I've got an easier weird thing:
      Water expands when frozen

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  2. what it says by pbranes · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What it says:

    Plazanet and colleagues prepared a liquid solution containing a-cyclodextrine (alpha-CD), water and 4-methylpyridine (4MP). Cyclodextrines are cyclic structures containing hydroxyl end groups that can form hydrogen bonds with either the 4MP or water molecules.

    What I see:

    And if you expect me to tell you how this discovery will modify our lives, you're going to be disappointed. I've not a slightest idea about it, even if I find fascinating that scientists always find new ways to break rules and shake our certitudes.

    1. Re:what it says by afidel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Failed freshmen chem did we?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:what it says by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Learn some chemistry. Hydrogen bonds have a lot to do with the interesting properties of water (which is quite an odd chemical, by the way).

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    3. Re:what it says by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1

      I've noticed something very similar to this effect. Part of my job involves flame testing materials. This one plastic I often encounter burns and leaves a dripping on the aluminum plate I'm working on. The dripping is solid, but when I hit it with the torch, it melts (spreads out thin) but then re-solidifies (all curled up like crinkled paper) while the flame is still on it. When I remove the heat, it just stays at the second shape. I can reapply heat and it will go through the same process.....

      Heh, have I made a major discovery??

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    4. Re:what it says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose somebody finds a material that causes light passing through it to twist, so that it comes out the other side polarized a different way. When you apply an electric current, it no longer does this and the light comes out with the same polarization.

      Very odd, but completely useless in our lives. Obviously all the work that went into this discovery was wasted.

    5. Re:what it says by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
      What I see:

      And if you expect me to tell you how this discovery will modify our lives, you're going to be disappointed. I've not a slightest idea about it, even if I find fascinating that scientists always find new ways to break rules and shake our certitudes.

      What I see:

      I am a chemist that has discovered a class of mixtures with a very interesting and heretofor unobserved property. I have published information on how to prepare these mixtures--in a way, it is a solution looking for a problem. I expect that given a small group of engineers, a dozen or so different applications could be hashed out over their morning coffee. I am disappointed--but not surprised--that a Slashdot reader couldn't be bothered to use his imagination to come up with an application, preferring to instead complain that no ideas were spoon-fed in the brief PhysicsWeb note.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:what it says by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      different applications could be hashed out over their morning coffee

      THATS IT! SOLIDIFIED, EDIBLE COFFEE! I'm a GENUIS!*

      *Spelled wrong on purpose

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  3. speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    so what could the application of such a material be? a new breed of thermometers are on their way, i guarantee it.

    thermometers for the 21st century and beyond.

    1. Re:speculation on applications? by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've already got good thermometers. How would this magically be better?

    2. Re:speculation on applications? by theAedileDecimus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can just imagine it now...

      You go to Target to buy a 12-pack of "One-Time Use Thermometers."
      Instructions: "When the temperature is between 45 and 75 degrees celcius, the liquid inside turns to a solid, shattering the glass! That's all there is to it!"

    3. Re:speculation on applications? by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that my girlfriend is comprised of this stuff. She seems to suddenly turn frigid as soon as things heat up...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If research in this field expands to discover a class of compounds or solutions that exhibit this property over a range of temperatures, then we'll start seeing them in a ton of different places. If this is the only compound we find, then expect it limited to chem lecture demonstration.

      A limited slip differential is a good place to start...if wheel pairs are turning at very different rates, the differential fluid heats up and freezes. If it gets too hot and is in danger of being damaged, it melts again.

      For this to be a useful application, we need tight control over what temperature the compound exhibits the phase changes. Otherwise, it is literally, just a solution in search of a problem.

    5. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the fact he has a girlfriend? :-P

    6. Re:speculation on applications? by klui · · Score: 1

      Turns solid at 45 and 75 (I'm assuming C). 45C is 113F, outside the range of human temperature. The 45-75 sounds a bit too narrow to be of general practical use.

    7. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One application could be storing hydrogen in solid form for hydrogen powered vehicles.

    8. Re:speculation on applications? by Pius+II. · · Score: 1

      This article (german, sorry) is about a research effort to construct "warm ice" as a dessert.
      The "ice" is a solid at 60 degrees, and melts at 37. The tactile experience is supposed to be similar to regular ice, but (of course) in warm.
      According to some stuff on German TV about this project, they are currently at the stage of getting the taste in there.

    9. Re:speculation on applications? by PoorCoder · · Score: 1

      Motor Oil! If I can get it, I'd just pour it into some of idiots' car engines then mocking them after their cars break-down somewhere on the road... Wonderful stuff!

    10. Re:speculation on applications? by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 1

      new thermistats.

    11. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think that my girlfriend is comprised of this stuff. She seems to suddenly turn frigid as soon as things heat up...

      Find another girlfriend. Oh wait ... you're a /.er and it took you 5 years to find this one. Ditch her anyway, she sounds worse than no girlfriend at all to me.

    12. Re:speculation on applications? by Diamon · · Score: 1

      If your temperature is betten 45 and 75 degrees celsius (113 and 167 degrees fahrenheit), you wont need a one time thermometer to confirm you have a fever.

    13. Re:speculation on applications? by contagious_d · · Score: 2, Funny

      sex toys.

      --
      - /home is where the food is.
    14. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what you're saying is, it will do wonders in the pr0n industry....

    15. Re:speculation on applications? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      How would it shatter the glass just because its a solid?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    16. Re:speculation on applications? by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I think that my girlfriend is comprised of this stuff. She seems to suddenly turn frigid as soon as things heat up..."
      Maybe the problem you're not made of this stuff, and remain soft when things heat up.

    17. Re:speculation on applications? by exspecto · · Score: 0

      I feel your pain man. I know it shouldn't be modded funny.

    18. Re:speculation on applications? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I think someone forgot that water is the only known substance that increases in volume when it freezes. Everything else decreases in volume.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    19. Re:speculation on applications? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I think that my girlfriend is comprised of this stuff. She seems to suddenly turn frigid as soon as things heat up...

      Gee, I hope she's illiterate, too...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    20. Re:speculation on applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her name wouldn't happen to be Maria right? ..... and fears commitment or anything that might lead to a possible breakup?

  4. chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to make some type of gelatin-glue out of liquid by heating it in high school.

    1. Re:chemistry by edalytical · · Score: 2, Funny

      For your mohawk?

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  5. Cookie dough batter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news:
    Cookie dough batter turns to solid in oven when heated. (Yeah, yeah, it's not reversible...)

    1. Re:Cookie dough batter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > In other news:
      Cookie dough batter turns to solid in oven when heated. (Yeah, yeah, it's not reversible...)

      I was thinking about that as well. But I think that cookie dough just turns solid because the water in it slowly evaporates and not because the molecules stop moving (or move slower).

    2. Re:Cookie dough batter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, it becomes solid when it begins to cool. Not before. Though, if you left it in the oven long enough it'll go to solid black pretty quick!

    3. Re:Cookie dough batter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leave that shit out for a couple weeks it'll be really fucking solid

    4. Re:Cookie dough batter by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cookie dough batter turns to solid in oven when heated

      Maybe it is because of the loss of water in it...

    5. Re:Cookie dough batter by exick · · Score: 5, Funny

      On my planet, cookie dough batter is already a solid.

    6. Re:Cookie dough batter by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what kind of cookies you make, but I sure as hell don't put water in my batter....

      --

      If I throw a stick, will you go away?
    7. Re:Cookie dough batter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course it is reversible, all you need is a glass or milk.

    8. Re:Cookie dough batter by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Milk is about 90% water, in case you hadn't guessed.

    9. Re:Cookie dough batter by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to back that up with factual data?

      --

      If I throw a stick, will you go away?
    10. Re:Cookie dough batter by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Really? How terrible! *Chugs a bottle of cookie dough*

    11. Re:Cookie dough batter by Agent+Orange · · Score: 1

      cow milk is 87% water. Top link on google for "milk composition".

      I thought even the trolls were able to use google these days...

    12. Re:Cookie dough batter by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      why should I when I have a bounty of nerds to research everything for me? :D

      --

      If I throw a stick, will you go away?
  6. What?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

    No references to Ice nine?! I must be getting old.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No references to Ice nine?! I must be getting old.
      You're not too old, you're just too good for slashdot. Which reminds me, it's a beautiful day outside...
    2. Re:What?! by spellraiser · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good call. Here is a short explanation for those who are scratching their heads over what 'that program from The Recruit' might possibly have to do with solid liquids. Short answer: It doesn't; start reading more books!

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    3. Re:What?! by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      So what does it mean if I caught the Vonnegut reference immediately but have no idea what The Recruit is?

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    4. Re:What?! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Likewise.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unlike Ice9, this is literally a solution in search of a problem.

    6. Re:What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So what does it mean if I caught the Vonnegut reference immediately but have no idea what The Recruit is?

      It means you are someone who once kept up with pop culture, but stopped doing so for some reason.

    7. Re:What?! by solarrhino · · Score: 1
      From here:
      This film is a must-see for Kurt Vonnegut fans. Vonnegut references are abound, including allusions to "Slaughterhouse Five" and "Breakfast of Champions" as well as a plot point concept (Ice-9) borrowed from "Cat's Cradle." In "The Recruit," Ice-9 isn't a crystal of ice that will freeze the world overnight. Instead, Ice-9 is a virus that will infect and disable any electrical equipment that is interconnected - which is everything.
      Google is my friend - wouldn't you like google to be your friend too?
      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    8. Re:What?! by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      Google to the rescue. In a review of the 2003 film, The Recruit:

      This film is a must-see for Kurt Vonnegut fans. Vonnegut references are abound, including allusions to "Slaughterhouse Five" and "Breakfast of Champions" as well as a plot point concept (Ice-9) borrowed from "Cat's Cradle." In "The Recruit," Ice-9 isn't a crystal of ice that will freeze the world overnight. Instead, Ice-9 is a virus that will infect and disable any electrical equipment that is interconnected - which is everything.
    9. Re:What?! by floop · · Score: 1

      Ice 9 did the exact opposite; making water solid at room temprature but when heated beyond 45C or so, it reverted to normal liquid water form.

    10. Re:What?! by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ice-9 would 'freeze' water at room temperature, and any water that water was in contact with. (Freeze in quotes because the water didn't get colder, it just solidified.)

      I don't see how it's the opposite of this at all. Ice-9 just did the same thing that salt does...alter the freezing point of water, although in the opposite direction. Ice-9 was just weird in that the alteration wasn't due to any specific chemical additive, it was due to the molecular layout of Ice-9 itself, and thus it was 'contagious' to any water it touched. It would make that water Ice-9, and so one and so on.

      BTW, Ice-9 seems to me a fairly obvious violation of thermodynamics, but I've never heard anyone point that out. Am I just crazy there?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:What?! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Google, with its cookie that expires after 2030, isn't a friend. It's a good looking stalker that tries to track everything you do, that is why gmail.com redirs you to gmail.google.com.

    12. Re:What?! by ifwm · · Score: 1

      It's the opposite because Ice 9 still started at liquid at higher temps and got solid at lower temps. This stuff starts as a liquid at lower temps and gets solid at higher temps. Opposites.

    13. Re:What?! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      If the people at google had a sense of humor, they would've made their cookie expire at GMT 03:14:07, on Tuesday, January 19, 2038.

    14. Re:What?! by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Everything starts as a liquid at higher temps and gets solid at lower ones.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    15. Re:What?! by slycer · · Score: 1

      You didn't RTFA did you?

    16. Re:What?! by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Everything starts as a liquid at higher temps and gets solid at lower ones"

      Not this stuff. Please read this carefully

      This new substance STARTS AS A LIQUID WHEN COLDER (unlike most everything else which starts as a solid) AND BECOMES SOLID WHEN WARMED. THAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF MOST OTHER SUBSTANCES. To reiterate colder=liquid while warmer=solid.

      I'm sorry, but I don't have time for a flow chart.

      So, did you finally get it?

    17. Re:What?! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Of course I did.

      I was just taking issue with calling Ice-9 the opposite of this, because Ice-9 turns into a liquid when it gets hotter. Everything we know of, with this singular exception, does that. (And, heck, even this does that...it just turns into a solid if you go even hotter.)

      It's akin to calling anti-gravity 'the opposite of the planet Vulcan', because Vulcan has gravity. It's just crazy.

      And it's not accurate to call it the opposite of anything in the first place. Almost all other normal matter, including Ice-9, starts as a solid, heats to a liquid, and then heats into a gas. This stuff starts as a solid, heats to a liquid, heats into a solid, and then...we don't know, but I suspect it heats back into a liquid and then into a gas.

      Normal: solid - liquid - gas
      This stuff: solid - liquid - solid -liquid -gas

      Those aren't the opposite of each other. And mentioning Ice-9 as one of the 'normal' things is just dumb, as Ice-9 is doesn't exist and is impossible.

      The Ice-9 reference was good for a laugh, even if not really relevant. But claiming this stuff is the opposite is just silly...Ice-9 followed exactly the normal patterns for phase transition, whereas this stuff manages to apparently go backwards a bit, because of weird energy issues with hydrogen bonds.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:What?! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Jesus Christ, people, did you actually read what I replied to?

      We had sci-fi twits in here salivating over themselves because this newly discovered material could turn solid at higher temperatures, which was, astonishingly, the exact opposite of the fictional material Ice-9, which, amazingly, turned liquid at higher temperatures, which is possibly the stupidest observation to ever make, as that's what normally happens.

      It's like someone invents a machine to body swap people, and everyone said...my god, that's the exact opposite of the book A Seperate Peace, which didn't have body swapping! Um, whatever. While it is technically correct that A Seperate Peace did not have body swapping machines, that is not a particularly unique trait of that book.

      And, just in case you're not ashamed of yourself...I was right. Everything, including this material, turns liquid at higher temperatures. This stuff starts as a solid, and turns into a liquid, like everything else. This stuff just turns back into a solid when you go even higher, and I suspect it was you who did not read the article.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    19. Re:What?! by mvpll · · Score: 1

      Everything, yeah, like liquid CO2... or perhaps not.

    20. Re:What?! by ifwm · · Score: 1

      No I rad it and you were wrong and you're equivocating. You're the fucking moron who asked how it was different from Ice 9, to which I responded, to which you responded that EVERYTHING turns liquid at higher temps, whihc had nothing to do with anything in the firtst place. Don't get pissed at me if you can't state your point clearly. Even better, don't lie about trying to state a point you never made in the first place. You asked how it was different. I told you. You then claimed that everything did what I said this stuff did, which is wrong because it doesn't.

      As far as reading ANYTHING you reply to, i'll be avoiding thatin the future, as you are clearly too stupid to converse with.

    21. Re:What?! by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      But... they explained the origins of the term in The Recruit.

  7. Re:I can think of another one... by stvartak · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ice only turns into a solid when heated in Soviet Russia

  8. Cool by jhtrih · · Score: 0

    That is pretty cool. Can someone explain the phrase 'sol-gel'? Does that mean that it become more like a gelatinous subject when heated instead of a more 'solid' solid?

    It's been a long time since I've taken chem.

    1. Re:Cool by k98sven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone explain the phrase 'sol-gel'? Does that mean that it become more like a gelatinous subject when heated instead of a more 'solid' solid?

      Sols aren't solids. A "sol" is a colloid solution, so is a gel. Without getting too deep into the chemistry, he's basically saying it's a gel.

      (Look up 'sol', 'gel', 'dispersion' and 'colloid' for more details)

    2. Re:Cool by Medevo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Check out http://www.solgel.com/educational/glossary.htm/ and http://www.chemat.com/html/solgel.html/

      Its basically a more refined process of distilling out a liquid from a solution, and getting a solid out. However this new solid has chemical properties of both parts of whatever was in the solution. It allows for things like low-temperature glassmaking.

      Literally a "sol-gel" is just a solid that still has some of the properties of a liquid/fluid such as flowing and free atomic relocation, but is much closer to a solid then a traditional fluid. This however does not make it a "jelly" or a "gel" its chemically, as well as physically distinct.

      Medevo

  9. Re:I can think of another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you need to think about what the words "increase" and "decrease" mean.

  10. Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just happened to boil the boneless skinless chicken tenders 10 minutes ago and they were soft and mushy before I boiled them but became much firmer/harder after boiling them.......

    1. Re:Nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. and if you could UN-denature those proteins by cooling the chicken again, you too could be discussed on slashdot (and probably up for a nobel prize in biochem.)

  11. I read about this a while back.. by dat00ket · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fascinating stuff. This physics marvel of a liquid is a mixture of many separate elements... including milk, flour, eggs, sugar, and a pinch of salt.

    1. Re:I read about this a while back.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i don't know, the stuff i cook doesn't "When you decrease the temperature, this solid melts and turns again into a liquid".

      however, if you leave it at room temperature for LONG ENOUGH it turns into some nasty goo sometimes.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:I read about this a while back.. by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Baking a cake is a chemical reaction, whereas this is a change of the matter's state, which is a physical reaction.

    3. Re:I read about this a while back.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, this is a chemical reaction as well. Which is why it's no big deal.

  12. T-1000 by philbert26 · · Score: 1

    With a futuristic power source, a 30 degree change can't be that much to ask.

  13. article text - its already slowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    A Liquid that Goes Solid when Heated

    There are some sure things in life, such as death and taxes. When you are heating a solid, you expect it will melt and when you're boiling water, you're pretty certain that it will turn into vapor. But what about a liquid that becomes solid when it's heated? Of course, it has already been done, for example in the chemical process of polymerization. But now, PhysicsWeb writes that a team of French physicists has discovered a law-breaking liquid that defies the rules. When you heat it between 45 and 75, it becomes solid. But the process is fully reversible, and this is a world's premiere. When you decrease the temperature, this solid melts and turns again into a liquid. I'm not sure of the implications of such a phenomenon, but it's fascinating. Read more...

    Here is the summary from PhysicsWeb.

    Physicists in France have discovered a liquid that "freezes" when it is heated. Marie Plazanet and colleagues at the Université Joseph Fourier and the Institut Laue-Langevin, both in Grenoble, found that a simple solution composed of two organic compounds becomes a solid when it is heated to temperatures between 45 and 75, and becomes a liquid when cooled again. The team says that hydrogen bonds are responsible for this novel behaviour.

    Ready for the scientific details?

    Plazanet and colleagues prepared a liquid solution containing a-cyclodextrine (alpha-CD), water and 4-methylpyridine (4MP). Cyclodextrines are cyclic structures containing hydroxyl end groups that can form hydrogen bonds with either the 4MP or water molecules.

    At room temperature, up to 300 grams of alpha-CD can be dissolved in a litre of 4MP. The resulting solution is homogenous and transparent, but it becomes a milky-white solid when heated. The temperature at which it becomes a solid falls as the concentration of alpha-CD increases.

    Neutron-scattering studies revealed that the solid phase is a "sol-gel" system in which the formation of hydrogen bonds between the alpha-CD and the 4MP leads to an ordered, rigid structure. At lower temperatures, however, the hydrogen bonds tend to break and reform within the alpha-CD, which results in the solution becoming a liquid again.

    The research work has been published by The Journal of Chemical Physics in its September 15, 2004 issue under the name "Freezing on heating of liquid solutions." Here is a link to the abstract.

    We report a reversible liquid-solid transition upon heating of a simple solution composed of a-cyclodextrine (alpha-CD), water, and 4-methylpyridine. These solutions are homogeneous and transparent at ambient temperature and solidify when heated to temperatures between 45 and 75. Quasielastic and elastic neutron scattering show that molecular motions are slowed down in the solid and that crystalline order is established. The solution "freezes on heating." This process is fully reversible, on cooling the solid melts. A rearrangement of hydrogen bonds is postulated to be responsible for the observed phenomenon.

    If you are interested by the subject, visit a university library, or buy the article for $22.

    And if you expect me to tell you how this discovery will modify our lives, you're going to be disappointed. I've not a slightest idea about it, even if I find fascinating that scientists always find new ways to break rules and shake our certitudes.

    [Additional note for physicists: I've been forced to use the "alpha-CD" notation here, because neither my publishing software nor my browsers seem to be able to understand the correct notation, which is "CD."]

    Sources: Belle Dumé, PhysicsWeb, September 24, 2004; The Journal of Chemical Physics, September 15, 2004, Volume 121, Issue 11, pp. 5031-5034 Netcraft confirms *BSD is dying. 6:25:24 PM Permalink Comments [0] Trackback [0] Technorati about this page and this post

  14. What a shocker... by RobotPanda · · Score: 2, Funny

    The French have been freezing up when things get heated for years.

    1. Re:What a shocker... by bflong · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh... bigots? Where have you been the past 50 years?
      The Americans call the French pussys and cowards...
      The French call the Americans arrogant and, uh, bigots...
      You must be french. :D

      BTW: The whole thing is a joke anyway. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Pussy. :P

      --
      Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    2. Re:What a shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does Slashdot really pander this much to bigots now?

      Americans = bigots
      OR
      Americans = saviors

      It all depends on whether the German army is currently in Paris or not.

    3. Re:What a shocker... by Goeland86 · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, it all depends on who's in the white house. And right now I'm disgusted of being american. I wouldn't be surprised if they called us assholes, because that's who's in charge right now.

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    4. Re:What a shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And right now I'm disgusted of being american.
      Well you're not alone.

      Many Americans are disgusted that you're American, too.
  15. Now we can buy by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 5, Funny

    a bag of "Hot Cubes" to keep the coffee warm.

    1. Re:Now we can buy by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      You don't want this stuff in your coffee...organic chemicals + you = death.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:Now we can buy by whorfin · · Score: 1

      Are you on the Atkins diet? Isn't Sugar an organic chemical (hydrogen-carbon bond)?

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    3. Re:Now we can buy by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

      organic chemicals + you = death.

      So you live on a diet consisting exclusively of salt, sand, battery acid, and water? What, are you some kind of robot? If so, what are your powers? Do you use them for good, or for awesome?

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    4. Re:Now we can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      organic chemicals + you = death
      Therefore,
      you = death - organic chemicals
      That doesn't seem right. Surely you meant
      you - organic chemicals = death
      Anyway,
      me - coffee = death
    5. Re:Now we can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Great reference. Strong Bad 1 is a classic.

      (They were a lot shorter in those days, weren't they?)

    6. Re:Now we can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a reference if he doesn't refer to the source, is it?

    7. Re:Now we can buy by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      So're fats. I meant hydrocarbons, but that term doesn't apply here either. Oh well...

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    8. Re:Now we can buy by jtrask · · Score: 1

      lllllollercoaster whats a robit?

    9. Re:Now we can buy by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      me-coffee = others.death();

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:Now we can buy by beanluc · · Score: 1

      He did. He quoted it.

      --
      Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
    11. Re:Now we can buy by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      As soon as the coffee cools you can drink the chemical which can do god knows what to your body.

      Remember it does have a melting point you know.

    12. Re:Now we can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest fixing your method naming convention.

    13. Re:Now we can buy by mdf356 · · Score: 1
      Of course, this implies

      you = death + organic chemicals

      But I'm not sure I know what to do with that information. I mean, I'm not already dead, right?

      Cheers,
      Matt
      --
      Terrorist, bomb, al Qaeda, nuclear, yellowcake, kill, assassinate. Carnivore is dead... long live Echelon.
  16. Damn Frenchies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    They have to be contrarians everywhere...

  17. Re:I can think of another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're confusing expansion with turning solid. Water is one of the few (only?) substances that expands when it freezes.

  18. Assassins take note! by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The temperature at which it becomes a solid falls as the concentration of áCD increases.

    So...if you were to put this in someone's bloodstream with the right concentration, you could cause it to solidify once it reached standard body temperature...
    --
    You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
    1. Re:Assassins take note! by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Putting it in someone's bloodstream would probably kill them ANYWAY - wouldn't cheaper poison be easier?

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:Assassins take note! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with this particular liquid. Normal body temperature is around 37 degrees celsius.

    3. Re:Assassins take note! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Some snake venom basically does that, although I'm pretty sure the reaction is entirely chemical independent of temperature.

    4. Re:Assassins take note! by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 1

      Easier? Easier? *sniff* Where's your sense of style? If you wanted easy, you could always just push someone out of a tall building...although combine it with this...it'd be veddi interesting to see someone shatter instead of splat ^_~

      --
      You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
    5. Re:Assassins take note! by mm0mm · · Score: 1

      make a glass of cocktail with this liquid and have someone drink at party. share some intimate moment with the prey in a hot bath. s/he might experience the worst constipation of the century.

    6. Re:Assassins take note! by ShipiboConibo · · Score: 1

      I believe it says between 45 and 75 Celsius, NOT Fahrenheit. So even the floor of 45C is a good ways higher than the average body temp. Nice idea though, I'm sure if it's possible humans will engineer a version that CAN be used to kill people! So keep your fingers crossed!

      --
      "It seems that when people become desperate they consult the gods, and when the gods become desperate they tell lies." -
    7. Re:Assassins take note! by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the quote, you can lower the freezing temperature by altering the concentration...

      --
      You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
    8. Re:Assassins take note! by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Then use liquid nitrogen, you doof! =)

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    9. Re:Assassins take note! by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a flaw in that logic: The human body would not be able to tolerate the 47 degree temperature that would signal the *beginning* of the hardening process.

      The human body is a toasty 37 degree celsius (98.6 degrees fahrenheit). To take it to 47 degrees (116 degrees) would likely kill the person long before the hardening of the substance would.

      Never mind the 75 (167) degrees...

      Methinks that this might have some value as reinforcement for ceramic moulds.

      Or... perhaps a form of cooking spray that would be guaranteed non-stick. Spray the liquid into the pan, bring the heat up until it's solid, cook until food is done, remove food, and let pan cool. Wash substance off and repeat process.

    10. Re:Assassins take note! by mink · · Score: 1

      Since thats the operating temp range of most processors theese days. It might make a decent thermal interface for heatsinks assuming it can transfer heat well.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  19. Gotta say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell has officially frozen over now.

    1. Re:Gotta say it... by DourSalmon · · Score: 1

      or, potentially, heated over.

      --

      I have little to say, but even less to lose by saying it.

    2. Re:Gotta say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hell has officially frozen over now.

      They have officials for that sort of thing?

    3. Re:Gotta say it... by jasonwea · · Score: 1
      Hell has officially frozen over now.

      They have officials for that sort of thing?
      Netcraft confirms?
  20. Heat shield? by BigZaphod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know much about physics, but could something like this be used as a heat shield of some kind? Like, where the shield is basically considered turned off when it is in the liquid state. Then when it hits a certain overload temperature, it turns to a solid and thus blocks (some of) the heat exchange?

    1. Re:Heat shield? by novakyu · · Score: 5, Informative
      I don't know much about physics, but could something like this be used as a heat shield of some kind? Like, where the shield is basically considered turned off when it is in the liquid state. Then when it hits a certain overload temperature, it turns to a solid and thus blocks (some of) the heat exchange?

      That would probably depend on the property of the solid that forms when the solution is heated (is it a good insulator? what are its structural properties?), but I can think of one related application: temperature-controlled switch.

      The solution is transparent to visible light, whereas the solid that forms is not. Since this process depends on the temperature and is reversible, it's very simple to design a circuit (using a LED and phototransistor or some sort of photo-detector) that works as temperature-dependent switch. From what the article says,

      The temperature at which it becomes a solid falls as the concentration of CD increases.

      it should be possible to tweak the turn-on temperature to a degree.

      But then, this is not anything new--as far as dependence on temperature goes, there are many other materials that are probably more reliable (the only thing novel about this would be that its dependence is backward.)

      Back to the topic, yeah, it can probably be used as heat shield in a limited capacity: i.e. if it turns out that the liquid is transparent to infrared radiation while the solid isn't, this can be used as natural temperature-controlled infrared radiation shield (but of course, it will still be subject to heating due to other methods, like...conduction via the solid itself, unless the resulting solid turns out to be similar to styroform).

    2. Re:Heat shield? by absurdhero · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that the material's conductive properties change when it becomes solid? Do you know something about aCD and/or 4MP that the rest of us don't?

    3. Re:Heat shield? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The interesting thing about that application is that the shield could reform when things cool down. If it were an ablative shield (takes damage), then you could potentially have it fix itself between uses.

    4. Re:Heat shield? by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      Since this process depends on the temperature and is reversible, it's very simple to design a circuit (using a LED and phototransistor or some sort of photo-detector) that works as temperature-dependent switch

      It would be far simpler to exploit the temperature dependence of the LED or the transistor, or maybe an even more simple device that is made for temperature sensing.

    5. Re:Heat shield? by La+Gris · · Score: 1

      Or may be it can be used to protect from projectiles (bullet proof).

      As the projectile hit the liquid surface with significant speed and energy, it tur rapidly into heat. Then the projectile enconter increasing resistance as it enter the material. As the material solidify and the heat propagate, it may dissipate the pressure from a single point to a very large surface.

      --
      Léa Gris
    6. Re:Heat shield? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that the material's conductive properties change when it becomes solid? Do you know something about aCD and/or 4MP that the rest of us don't?

      Ummm, they also use water (to quote the article: We report a reversible liquid-solid transition upon heating of a simple solution composed of a-cyclodextrine (alpha-CD), water, and 4-methylpyridine.). It's just a sort of educated guess, but probably you could further modify this mixture using some electrolyte dissolved in water. Then the material could indeed have tremendous difference in conductivity when turning from liquid to solid.

    7. Re:Heat shield? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I can think of one related application: temperature-controlled switch.

      Possibly, but in what way would that be better than the bimetallic strips that have been being used in electric kettles (amongst other things) for decades?

    8. Re:Heat shield? by rlwhite · · Score: 1

      But that would depend on a balance between the speed with which the heat transfer and "freezing" occur and the depth of the barrier. Most likely the material isn't efficient enough to do this within a practical size. Only a few materials like Kevlar can dissipate that energy quick enough to make a practical bullet-proof material.

    9. Re:Heat shield? by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know much about physics, but could something like this be used as a heat shield of some kind?
      Good point, it takes a lot more energy to change phase (eg. ice to water, water to steam) than it does to simply heat a single phase material a few degrees. The phase change will consume energy before heating will occur again. That is the reason why ice water is at 0 celcius until you melt all of the ice, even if the pot it is in is at 100 celcius - you have to put enough energy in to complete the phase change before heating occurs again.

      Solid state to another solid state phase changes also consume energy, which must be the phase change the overclockers use, since the obvious low melting point alloys that liquify around 50 - 60 Celcius tend to conduct - and liquid metal has a way to get into the smallest scratch and turn it into a real crack in a lot of metals (loose liquid metal plus warm motherboard or CPU would be bad). Liquid metals are paticularly nasty to aluminium alloys, so trying to keep it contained in an aluminium jacket inside a heatsink would be a bad idea.

      Something like this organic chemical mix near electronics would be a better idea than a liquid metal - but as a solid it would act as an insulator.

    10. Re:Heat shield? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      When it is solid, heat is transfered mainly by conduction. When liquid, heat is transfered by both conduction and convection. Granted, conduction in a solid is usually a bit greater than in a liquid, but convective transfer is typically greater than conductive.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    11. Re:Heat shield? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the "ablation gel" used in recent Gundam series...they'd pump a gel out through nozzles to cover the bottom surface of the ship.

    12. Re:Heat shield? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Which of the following sentences sounds cooler?
      "This state-of-the-art temperature-controlled switch utilizes a chemical compound which turns solid when heated, seemingly in violation of the very laws that define our universe."
      ...or...
      "This state-of-the-art temperature controlled switch utilizes a strip of metal."

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    13. Re:Heat shield? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Because the structure of the material changes?

      Convection is probably out in the solid, though conduction may be higher.

      Granted this may not make for much of a heat shield....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    14. Re:Heat shield? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Because it would leak out in the hole the bullet entered the liquid from?

      Might only work for one shot, and maybe only with a reasonably large quantity....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    15. Re:Heat shield? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Once again, science fiction leads science fact! I've not read any Gundam myself, I was unaware of the reference.

    16. Re:Heat shield? by carou · · Score: 1

      Good point, it takes a lot more energy to change phase (eg. ice to water, water to steam) than it does to simply heat a single phase material a few degrees. The phase change will consume energy before heating will occur again.

      That's certainly true going from solid to liquid, the process is endothermic because you need to input energy into the system to break intra-molecular bonds. However, without further data on this new phase change I can't say whether it would have the same properties. Indeed, I rather suspect that, since it seems bonds are being made, the process would be exothermic.

      Also, in the usual case, solids are rather better at conducting heat than liquids are (except where convection can be carefully arranged). So a heat shield made from this stuff would probably have quite the wrong effect.

    17. Re:Heat shield? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      i'm not much of a physicist either, but what this makes me think of is a bullet proof shirt. probably not this chemical specifically, but something similar might work. if you could have a mesh of tiny tubes filled with this stuff, the insides could be liquid (and thus flexible) until enough energy is imparted to it (by the bullet) to make it solidify. the phase change would probably absorb a lot of energy.

  21. Re:what it REALLY SAYS is... $$ by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

    " Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends" "How new technologies are modifying our way of life" "If you are interested by the subject, visit a university library, or buy the article for $22."

    --
    *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  22. Mmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, let's say, mud?

    1. Re:Mmmmm.... by vandoravp · · Score: 1

      The mud already was a solid, just mixed with the water. The water evaporates leaving the dirt behind. Not the same thing.

  23. The Law by TheClassic · · Score: 1

    If it breaks the law, the law was wrong all along, right?

    1. Re:The Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. That law in the strictest sense only applies to pure substances.

    2. Re:The Law by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Funny

      See, that's what I tried to tell the judge...

  24. Gets hard when you heat it? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do I see a new line of sex toys being based on this?

    Or at least a splint that packs down small but that remains rigid when in contact with a warm body.

    Um.. Maybe that would apply to a sex toy ;)

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by srcosmo · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm not sure, but one would probably have to be pretty damn horny to heat the thing up to 45C...
      :-/

      --
      free speach
      Did you mean: free speech
    2. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by afidel · · Score: 1

      At 45C it's going to be more than a bit uncomfortable to be on your skin so I doubt either of those will be likely applications. If it turns opaque when it goes solid (assuming it's mostly transparant when liquid) then it might have possible use as a thermally sensitive solar regulator.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by bhima · · Score: 1

      Warm Body??!! at 45~75 Degrees Centigrade?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 1
      The temperature at which it becomes a solid falls as the concentration of áCD increases.

      I hate to repeat myself, but I think this little property here is what makes the compound good for several *ahem* bodily applications.
      --
      You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
    5. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Why do I see a new line of sex toys being based on this?

      Oh great, just as things get hot you get frozen in place. "Help! I'm stuck!"

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Gets hard when you heat it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...have to be pretty damn horny to heat the thing up to 45C..."

      Friction is your friend?

  25. You can whine about application... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it's cheaper to heat than to cool.

  26. security system by IceFox · · Score: 1

    You could make a neat security system will only work when "heated" and solid otherwise it wont let you in.

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:security system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what

  27. actually . . . by ir0b0t · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I've been drinking this stuff out of the coffee pot in my office for several years now.

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
  28. Missing some info here by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a solid at those temperatures, what is it at higher temps? Liquid again? Does it have two melting points? At what temp does it vaporize? Does it freeze at some point below the normal low-end melting point? At 0 degrees Kelvin, it's definitely a solid, somewhere above that, a liquid, then a solid again, then a liquid again, then a vapor? Maybe.

    1. Re:Missing some info here by dat00ket · · Score: 4, Informative
      "At 0 degrees Kelvin, it's definitely a solid"

      I wouldn't be too sure about that.

      Bose-Einstein Condensate
      Superfluids

      First rule of physics: When you're dealing with extremes, things get funky.

    2. Re:Missing some info here by iabervon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is not a uniform substance, but rather two chemicals dissolved in water. The article doesn't say specifically, but I'd guess at higher and lower temperatures, the chemicals come out of solution and/or undergo irreversible chemical changes. It's a bit like jello except with the gel and the solution behaviors backwards; freezing it or boiling it causes it to separate and behave normally.

    3. Re:Missing some info here by UnxMully · · Score: 1

      Having read the two links, that's a definition of Funky I've not come across before.

    4. Re:Missing some info here by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's actually quite cool(no pun intended). I knew I was making a mistake when I said "definitely" but at least I learned something as a result. However, I still posit that at 0K it would be solid, since there should be zero molecular activity in that state. Ya know, no energy, no motion.

    5. Re:Missing some info here by catenos · · Score: 1

      It's a solid at those temperatures, what is it at higher temps?

      AFAIU the solution is not only solid between 45C and 75C. The article explains that the temperature where the solution becomes solid depends on the mixture ratio of the two components.

      So it seems that the solution is liquid below some temperature X and solid above, with X depending on the mixture ratio and being in the range of 45C to 75C.

      Does it have two melting points? At what temp does it vaporize? Does it freeze at some point below the normal low-end melting point?

      Unfortunately, the other info is not mentioned in the article. I agree with you, and doubt it stays a solid at *very* high temperatures, or that it stays liquid at very low ones.

      --
      Keep an eye on which arguments are silently dropped in replies. Not always, but often times it's very telling.
    6. Re:Missing some info here by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      At precisely absolute zero, everything is solid. Movement even on the atomic level requires kinetic energy; the presence of kinetic energy means the temperature is a tiny fraction above absolute zero.

    7. Re:Missing some info here by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Interesting
      At 0 degrees Kelvin, it's not anything. It's just, in theory, a bunch of suspended frozen stuff that's exactly where it was before you hit 0. It has no chemical properties, because there is no way to do any sort of chemical interaction with it.

      That's in theory, of couse, since you can't hit 0 degrees Kelvin.

      But assuming you mean 'near 0 Kelvin', like d00ket pointed out, things get really weird down there. Some substances don't appear to have freezing points, there is no state below 'liquid'...they just move slower and slower. And some freeze quite normally, then do another transition way down there where they move back to a liquid like substance.

      The substance in the article is interesting, but not completely amazing. Various 'states of matter' are just rules of thumb.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:Missing some info here by tumbaumba · · Score: 1

      However, I still posit that at 0K it would be solid, since there should be zero molecular activity in that state.

      You are making mistake assuming that there is such thing as 0K. The ground energy level of any substance will never let you reach 0K. For some substances like hydrogen that ground energy level is sufficient to maintain it in the liquid state at standard atmospheric pressure. I don't remember if hydrogen would actually turn into solid under increased pressure. Would someone tell us here if it does turn into solid.

    9. Re:Missing some info here by NichG · · Score: 1

      Not only does it solidify, but at sufficient pressures I believe it is supposed to become a metal (this has to do with there being an odd net number of electrons in a unit cell of the crystal lattice that forms). I don't know whether that particular configuration has been observed experimentally though.

    10. Re:Missing some info here by div_B · · Score: 1

      At precisely absolute zero, everything is solid. Movement even on the atomic level requires kinetic energy; the presence of kinetic energy means the temperature is a tiny fraction above absolute zero.

      Absolute zero would correspond to a complete absence of movement, which is impossible. This can be seen as a consequence of a few features of quantum mechanics. One of the most intuitive ways to show it (IMHO) is as follows:

      The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that the product of the uncertainty in position and the uncertainty in momentum of a particle is greater than a small constant.

      A motionless particle would have a completely certain velocity (zero), and a constant position. Hence both uncertainties would be zero, and their product would therefore be zero, and not greater than h-bar/2. Therefore motionless particles are prohibited, and absolute zero is unattainable.

    11. Re:Missing some info here by div_B · · Score: 1

      But assuming you mean 'near 0 Kelvin', like d00ket pointed out, things get really weird down there. Some substances don't appear to have freezing points, there is no state below 'liquid'...they just move slower and slower. And some freeze quite normally, then do another transition way down there where they move back to a liquid like substance.

      It should be noted, in the case of Bose Einstein Condensates, that it isn't simply a matter of temperature. BECs are formed by cooling a gas sample (with lasers, believe it or not) at extremely low pressure. This is because the transition must occur directly from the gaseous phase to the condensate phase. A low pressure ensures that collisions between the atoms are rare, and that most all collisions occur between 2 atoms. Interactions between 3 or more atoms lead to the liquid and solid phases of the element at those temperatures, and preclude the formation of the condensate.

    12. Re:Missing some info here by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether that particular configuration has been observed experimentally though.

      It has

    13. Re:Missing some info here by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Yeah, BECs are another state of matter that isn't properly a gas or a solid or a liquid, but a single quantum entity.

      But I thought it was simply a matter of temperature...it was just we don't have any way to get them down that low if they keep bouncing off each other.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:Missing some info here by div_B · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But I thought it was simply a matter of temperature...it was just we don't have any way to get them down that low if they keep bouncing off each other.

      I could be wrong, but I think that many-body interactions can change the internal states of the atoms, which of course must be the same across the board for the condensate to form.

      In a nutshell, BECs are formed by applying a magnetic field, which is essentially a 3D SHO potential (mass on a spring). The atoms are cooled by lasers, craftily 'detuned' from the resonant frequency of the atoms, so that, due to the Doppler effect, atoms approaching the laser experience a retarding force, while atoms receding from the laser experience very little force. In this manner the gas sample can be cooled to ~1 microKelvin (?), which is still far too warm for condensation to occur.

      The magnetic field is then manipulated to form a 'cup' which holds the atoms. The walls of the 'cup' are gently rolled back, so that the most energetic of the atoms 'boil off' the top, taking excess energy & entropy with them (evaporative cooling), and the remaining atoms rethermalize at a lower temperature.

      Once a significant number of atoms fall into the ground state of the SHO, the rest quickly follow, as the probability of scattering into a given state greatly increases with the number of atoms in that state. (this is entirely analogous to photons in a laser all precipitating into the same state, for the same reasons, forming a coherent beam. And it only occurs for atoms which are bosonic, ie those for which #p + #n + #e = even)

    15. Re:Missing some info here by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ha, no, they recently got fermionic atoms to form a BEC. ;)

      I know, it's a trick. The fermionic atoms pair up. Weird trick, I don't really get it. (How are they overlapping enough do that in the first place? Damn quantum mechanics.)

      So, more technically, it only occurs for entities which are bosonic.

      But that way leads to madness and people walking though walls after removing a few atoms from their body and the wall.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    16. Re:Missing some info here by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Of course, to the casual observer all really cold substances are solid if they follow these three rules: they're hard; if you have enough of it, you can walk on it; and if you have a ball of it, it really hurts if you throw it at people. :)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    17. Re:Missing some info here by div_B · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha, no, they recently got fermionic atoms to form a BEC. ;) I know, it's a trick. The fermionic atoms pair up. Weird trick, I don't really get it. (How are they overlapping enough do that in the first place? Damn quantum mechanics.)

      Thanks for the cool link! They overlap because the de Broglie wavelength of the particle is inversely proportional to its momentum, and the particle can't be located to any more accuracy than its wavelength, hence at low temperatures the atoms are spread all over the place. This is also how the BCS theory explains superconductivity (pairing of electrons in that case), but I guess you probably know that ;)

      Also of relevant (to this thread, not the story) interest is that during the formation of a neutron star, there is a period during which the iron atoms of the stellar core pair up and hence exhibit superfluid behaviour, before their electrons are crushed into their nuclei.(not that I've ever met a forming neutron star, of course ;) )

  29. Applications? by Nordberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get ready for the soon to be classic -cyclodextrine in the oilpan trick.

    --
    *Splort*
  30. The Sci Fi angle... by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't this how "The Andromeda Strain" did it's dastardly work? Turning the blood into a solid crystaline polymer?

    1. Re:The Sci Fi angle... by Twisted+Grind · · Score: 1

      I *knew* I'd heard of that somewhere before! Thanks for clearing that up =^_^=

      --
      You know you've lost it when you begin signing physical documents with =^_^=
  31. I'm not sure this is that new by bombastinator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember either Porsche or Volkswagen having a limited slip clutch that consisted of two perforated disks set next to each other in a container of special goo. If the wheels slipped it caused the disks to rotate at different speeds and the friction caused enough heat to turn the goo solid. I can't remember why they quit using it but it was more than a few years ago. I think it was going into their 4 wheel drive race cars. Just a memory though I got no hard data. Anyone know more about this?

    1. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Sounds like liquid crystals, only without the electricity...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by HenryKoren · · Score: 4, Informative
      You are refering to the All Wheel Drive system produced for the VW Audi Group by Haldex

      From Haldex:

      The unit can be viewed as a hydraulic pump in which the housing and an annular piston are connected to one shaft and a piston actuator is connected to the other.

      The two shafts are connected via the wet multi-plate clutch pack, normally unloaded and thus transferring no torque between the shafts.

      When both shafts are rotating at the same speed, there is no pumping action. When a speed difference occurs, the pumping starts immediately to generate oil flow. It is a piston pump, so there is a virtually instant reaction with no low-speed pumping loss.

      The oil flows to a clutch piston, compressing the clutch pack and braking the speed difference between the axles. The oil returns to the reservoir via a controllable valve, which adjusts the oil pressure and the force on the clutch package.

      Something tells me having hydralic fluid that turns solid when it gets hot wouldn't help a system like this :-)
    3. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're talking about a standard 'wet' limited slip differential, or LSD. Wet LSD's have a viscous solution inside that, as the spider gears generate friction by spinning opposite directions, solidifies to unify power delivery from the driveshaft. An open differential allows wheels to spin at differing speeds, usually giving more power to the wheel that's spinning more freely. This is bad in racing. It's also bad for 4wd cars like the Subaru WRX or the Mitsubishi Evolution VIII. Both cars have LSD standard.

      The other type of LSD is a clutch-plate type. These can be adjusted for resistance to slippage by arranging the type and order of clutch plates in the LSD. A viscous LSD on the other hand is governed by the properties of the fluid, and is subject to failure under high loads (i.e. the liquid can only take so much friction before it breaks down and loses it's valuable properties). In general practice, for performance and cost, viscous LSD's are used, but for high performance, resilience, adjustability and durability, the clutch type LSD is preferable, but has a significantly higher cost.

      That's about all I know about LSD's.

    4. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by brer_rabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

      so next time I'm at the car dealership, I should inquire if the car comes with LSD, and if so, what sort of LSD it uses? I've been told to avoid the brown LSD.

    5. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by SWestrup · · Score: 1

      What you are thinking of is a Dilatant Material: a chemical that changes viscosity under variations of applied force (not temperature). Oobleck (Corn Starch+Water) is the primary exemplar.

    6. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think VW's might come with LSD.

    7. Re:I'm not sure this is that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are refering to the All Wheel Drive system produced for the VW Audi Group by Haldex"

      NO, you are WRONG.

      He was referring to a viscous coupling which was first used on
      a Jensen FF, and was later used on the VW Rallye Golf, Golf Syncro, Vanagon Syncro, and numerous other cars.

      The Haldex is a completely different device.

      Check your facts next time, HenryKoren, because this time you were disseminating incorrect information.

      By the way, I am an engineer for a well-known WRC effort.

      And you are not.

  32. Breaks the laws of physics? by mike_lynn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which law would this be? The one that says solids melt into liquids at higher temperatures? Oh wait, there is no such law - thanks to something called Sublimiation where solids go straight to a gas (like dry ice).

    This is not an example of a new found element with impossible thermal properties. This is an example of materials and molecular chemistry in action. This works because it follows the laws of physics.

    1. Re:Breaks the laws of physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This works because it follows the laws of physics.

      Duh.

    2. Re:Breaks the laws of physics? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Technically, if we coudl find something that works entirely contradictory to a known law of physics (conservation of energy say...) then it would still work because if follows the laws of physics. It would just happen that we were wrong about what the laws of physics actually are.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    3. Re:Breaks the laws of physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Dr Obvious.

    4. Re:Breaks the laws of physics? by carou · · Score: 1

      Which law would this be? The one that says solids melt into liquids at higher temperatures? Oh wait, there is no such law - thanks to something called Sublimiation where solids go straight to a gas (like dry ice).

      And if you increase the pressure to 6 times atmospheric pressure, what happens when you heat your frozen Carbon Dioxide? It doesn't sublimate - it melts.

      And in the case of water, if the pressure is reduced below about .6% atmospheric, ice will sublime to steam.

      You see, Carbon Dioxide is not breaking any laws, it is not behaving in a way that is qualitatively different from other materials - there are more general rules which govern the phase change behaviour of materials, it's just that because most people only see the world at about 10^5 Pa, they make generalisations which in a few cases are proved wrong. But it is in restricting the law to one pressure where the generalisation is wrong, not the law itself.

      All simple compounds behave broadly like this: consider a system in which Pressure and Temperature can be changed. There is a point, called the triple point, at which solid, liquid, and vapour phases are at equilibrium (i.e. the boiling temperature is the same as the sublimation temperature). Above that pressure, a solid will melt and then evaporate as temperature rises; below that pressure a solid will sublimate as temperature rises. It just happens that Carbon Dioxide has triple point which is above atmospheric pressure, and most other familiar substances have a triple point which is below atmospheric pressure.

      The reason the liquid under discussion behaves so differently it because it is a mixture of several compounds - and mixtures are always a bit wacky on phase diagrams, because they are so much more complicated and can arrange themselves in so many forms.

      (That's not to say "a solid is a solid is a solid" even for very simple materials, even the atoms of a pure metal will usually find at least two ways to arrange themselves, in most cases leading to grain boundaries between crystals which are big enough to see with a microscope). In this particular case I expect that if you decreased the temperature enough you find it has another solid phase, but probably has an entirely different microstructure to the high temperature solid.

    5. Re:Breaks the laws of physics? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Indeedy.

      Everything follows the laws of the universe. When we see stuff that appears not to, then we've mis-understood the laws of the universe.

      We kid ourselves to think we know more than we do.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  33. Good work but not revolutionary. by Compuser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reverse melting has been known for a long time.
    People have been studying vortex systems that
    do that. This is only new because it's a chemical
    compound (rather than say electrons) that does this.
    No physics breakthrough here. Maybe chemical
    engineering breakthrough but that's it.

    1. Re:Good work but not revolutionary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say I resent the "chemical
      engineering breakthrough but that's it" statement. You're right, though, about not revolutionary, just really cool. And we should also note that they're talking about a mixture of liquids, here, not a single compound. That would be MUCH more interesting.

  34. Space shuttle? by Bin_jammin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if it would be possible to change the temperature at which it re-liquifies, and if it becomes harder or more dense at higher temperatures. Seems like if that were the case, it would make for a good tiling material for the skin of a space shuttle

    1. Re:Space shuttle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it get fairly cold on the side of the shuttle facing away from the sun?

      "Well Jimmy, there goes the leeward side of the shuttle, no lets turn 'er around and get back."

    2. Re:Space shuttle? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, so at 800C degrees (or something) it is diamond hard and getting harder. Now THAT is interesting and and can lead to all kinds of rumination. If you can mix heat-shielding material into it, you can expose it to intense heat on the outside where it gets hard, while the cooler inside remains more flexible and provides structural support as the whole thing flexes, like in the space shuttle.
      This is the stuff that sci-fi stories are built around. Need a few hours, a few beers, and a few friends to flush out a few angles.
      Of course this whole property is interesting; as said before, it's a shame that the property wears off so soon, at so cold a temperature.

  35. Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by reporter · · Score: 0, Troll
    This liquid has immediate application in the construction of skyscrapers. Consider building a 100-floor building. We pair each solid steel beam with a hollow steel beam. We fill each hollow beam with this unique liquid.

    Now consider the following scenario. A raging fire occurs on the 70th floor. Normally, such a fire would threaten the top 30 floors if the fire were sufficiently hot. The top 30 floors could collapse into the 70th floor since the heat of the fire has weakened the supporting beams of the 70th floor.

    With liquid-reinforced steel beams, they should retain their supporting strength. The top 30 floors would be safe.

    If we had constructed the World Towers in New York City in this fashion, then they would not have collapsed on 2001 September 11.

    1. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not that I can read the article yet (due to slowness), but the summary doesn't say what happens after 75C. It might melt again and that would be bad. If true, this chemical will possibly force the scientific community to reevaluate chemical laws and make new, more general (and therefore better) ones.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    2. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by dnixon112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You talk as if fire is a real threat to reinforced steel skyscrapers. Prior to 9/11 there had never been a case of fire causing a skyscraper collapse. In fact, there was not even a real investigation proving that fire caused the 9/11 collapse; the steel was immediately shipped to Asia for scrap metal. So, since fire is not a big threat to skyscrapers why waste money trying to incorporate a new, unproven and likely expensive technology into steel skyscraper construction?

    3. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by mtnharo · · Score: 4, Informative
      An interesting concept, but I think we would need to research it a bit more. From what I gather in the article, the solution turns solid when heated between 45-75C. Beyond that it probably either burns or melts again. Those temps are much too low to have any impact in a fire.

      Secondly, based on the types of compounds in the solution, and the description in the article, the "solid" is probably more of a waxy/jelly sort of substance.

      That said, your idea could be made to work in other cases. I wonder if maybe the substance could be altered for use as a variable damping material for suspension or acoustic purposes.

    4. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Jake+Diamond · · Score: 1

      Uhh...yes, until the fire goes out. It would buy you some time to evacuate people (assuming the mechanical properties of this solid are sufficient), but as soon as it cools, that building is still coming down. It would not have prevented the collapse entirely.

    5. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Exitthree · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First, the World Trade Center collapsed because jet fuel burns extremely hot. The WTC design was actually far stronger than most other skyscrapers standing today. Notice that the building survived the initial impact of a plane, and that it wasn't until later, when the intense heat of the burning fuel had time to weaken the steel support structure that it collapsed. A normal building fire would not have threatened the structural integrity of the WTC because there was nothing in the WTC that was hot enough to melt the beams, until the plane, full of fuel, arrived.

      Second, I didn't notice in the article whether the volume of the material expands or contracts when it turns solid. If the hollow beam is partly filled with liquid (because the liquid expands when frozen) then there isn't necessarily enough contact between the liquid and the burning sections of the building to protect the upper portions of the beam. The beam will conduct some of the heat to the liquid, but depending on where the fire occurs in relation to the beam, the top of the liquid might freeze first, leaving the upper portion of the beam hollow. If the liquid contracts when frozen, you end up with a partly filled beam, which isn't necessarily stronger than a beam with nothing in it.

      This leads to the third point, that nothing is mentioned about the structural properties of the liquid when frozen. Steel behaves extremely well under tension, and concrete under pressure. Thus, they complement each other quite well (which is why we make buildings out of them). Would the liquid make a better replacement for the steel, or the concrete? And would it perform equally well when the building is not on fire? Has having liquid-filled cavities in the building strengthened or weakened the structure, for the large majority of the time?

      Finally, does the cost of using a material like this justify it? It's new, it probably costs more than steel to use in a building. Wouldn't redundant support structures be more reasonable? Or, using a design like the WTC, which I noted only failed from the heat of burning jet fuel?

    6. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no it doesn't. Please tell me the elastic and shear modulii of the material at this temperature and then we'll start talking. What does its stress/strain graph look like? Hmm? Please don't suggest stupid things when you're not a mechanical, structural, or civil engineer specializing in mechanics of materials.

    7. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by tekunokurato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's rather short sighted, don't you think? This one particular substance happens to break our elementary perceptions of The Way Things Work in a very specific way. It's likely a really small step beyond that to move the temperature range up, down, wider, thinner, etc.

    8. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by DarryDoo · · Score: 1

      What the article said was, the "freezing point" is between 45 & 75, "... the temperature at which it becomes a solid falls as the concentration of áCD increases." It remains a solid at higher temperatures.

    9. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by wash23 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It most certainly would melt again after 75C; it's just a hydrogen-bonded organic solid at that point, and hydrogen bonds are weak and only partially-covalent and would easily melt at moderate temperatures.

    10. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by RWerp · · Score: 1

      We don't know if the solid which exists in the given temperature range is as durable as steel. I'd be surprised. Durable materials, under atmospheric pressure, have high melting temperatures (except for diamond, which burns in relatively low temperature). As steel beams in WTC would degrade anyway in the heat, this liquid wouldn't save the Towers anyway.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    11. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire doesn't collapse steel frame buildings. Never has. WTC Building 7, we were told, did, but no evidence was recovered because it was shipped off to China very quickly. Read up on it man, stop spreading FUD.

    12. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by jx100 · · Score: 1

      umm... wouldn't it be simpler to just not put a hole in the center of the beam and keep it stronger all the time?

    13. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Hi Mr. Expert,

      Why did WTC #7 collapse? No jet fuel, it was pretty far away from the towers.

      Could it be that we've been lied to? Could we really have the only case of steel buildings ever collapsed by fire?

    14. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Alorelith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      William Langewiesche in his _American Ground_ set of Atlantic Magazine articles (Aug-Oct 2002) writes that it wasn't so much the jet fuel that caused the collapse of the towers, but all the paper inside them. It's been a while since I've read the articles, so I don't remember all the particulars, but dig them up if you are interested in the scenario.

    15. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by noda132 · · Score: 1

      A normal building fire would not have threatened the structural integrity of the WTC because there was nothing in the WTC that was hot enough to melt the beams, until the plane, full of fuel, arrived.

      Not only that. The beams had some stuff sprayed on them to shield them from heat. The impact of the planes removed the heat shielding, leaving the beams exposed to the heat from the fuel.

    16. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Mr Idiot!

      WTC7 was where the NYC emergency command center was, with comm facilities, backup diesel generators, and 20,000 gallons of fuel, which BURNED THE THING DOWN.

    17. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steel behaves extremely well under tension, and concrete under pressure.

      Right idea, wrong language. Tension creates pressure too. What you mean is "compression" -- steel is very stable under tension, just as concrete is stable under compression.

    18. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so where's the proof that the tower burned because of a super hot fire that NYC firefighters reported as being out and the building secure?

      funny how burning steel melts so perfectly that the building collapses just like it was professionally demolished. why didn't it topple over instead of falling straight down again?

      and how about that insurance policy the owners of the WTC hade?

      point it, great we have a new substance that makes us rethink our 'natural laws', but I can't see how it's going to be usefull in a skyscraper.

      makes me sad that people just believe whatever the heck tv/cnn says happened in regards to the wtc tragedy.

    19. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Alsee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hot enough to melt the beams

      Even with jet fuel it wasn't enough to melt the steel. The problem is that steel loses much of it's strength at high temperatures, making it liable to bend or snap under load.

      Also, and I relize your are replying to someone else's idea here, but I fail to see any logic in using this stuff in construction. What possible benefit is there in having the material be liquid at low temperatures? Instead of adding this stuff "in case of fire" you're better off using some ordinary building material that will be stronger at both low and high temperatures.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might melt again and that would be bad. If true, this chemical will possibly force the scientific community to reevaluate chemical laws and make new, more general (and therefore better) ones.

      And how, exactly, is that a bad thing?

    21. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, it was a "perfect storm" of things that happened: 1. The initial impact took out some supports. 2. The initial impact blew away the thermal coatings. 3. The jet fuel not only contributed its own heat, but also kindled other items. 4. Relatively thin trusses were used to support the floors between the inner and outer tube frames. 5. When all the previous factors combined, the trusses gave way and the buildings collapsed.

    22. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      If true, this chemical will possibly force the scientific community to reevaluate chemical laws and make new, more general (and therefore better) ones.

      Why? This stuff doesn't break any laws. It just doesn't match our expectations of a liqiud becoming solid if - and only if - cooled down.

      If the stuff was an element instead of an organic compound, this would be ground-breaking. As it is, it's unusual, but not enough to invalidate our current views on matter.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    23. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      If the stuff was an element instead of an organic compound
      If it was an element or an organic compound instead of an aqueous solution of two organic compounds, it might indeed be ground breaking.
      As it is, it's unusual, but not enough to invalidate our current views on matter.
      I second that.
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    24. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the landlord, Larry Silverstein, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse."

      "Pulling" a building means to demolish or destroy. Since setting up a controlled demolition takes weeks of planning, WTC 7 must have been fitted with the appropriate explosives prior to 9/11.

    25. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by John+Courtland · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Did I say it was bad?

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    26. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The building was designed to fall in on itself "just like it was professionaly demolished" so that it would never fall over, causing insane amounts of damage to the city and huge loss of life.

      It was good engineering.

      Dimwit.

    27. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1

      doesn't this violate the entropy law of thermodynamics [rtfm if you really want to know] i've always had the deep down [crazy] feeling that the entropy thing wasn't true

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    28. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes me sad that people just believe whatever the heck tv/cnn says happened in regards to the wtc tragedy.

      as opposed to your unimpeachable (and apparently, anonymous) source of information?

    29. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by j14ast · · Score: 1

      Not that I can read the article yet (due to slowness)
      I know exactly how you feel.

      ah well back to beer, wrastlen' and p0rn.

      --
      Damn the man!
    30. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      In fact, there was not even a real investigation proving that fire caused the 9/11 collapse

      Oh really? Then how did Nova manage to make an episode of it?

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    31. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one particular substance happens to break our elementary perceptions of The Way Things Work

      It does nothing of the kind. It's not the first material to do this, and it won't be the last, the cause of this "mystical" transformation is really quite simple too, and doesn't break any laws of physics.

    32. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If true, this chemical will possibly force the scientific community to reevaluate chemical laws and make new, more general (and therefore better) ones.

      Are you retarded. There's now "law" that that stuff melts when hot and freezes when cold. It's just how most thing happen to be. Chemical 'laws' are much more complicated then that. Who modded this up, anyway.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    33. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It was all the PAPER in the WTC whose burning caused its collapse. The jet fuel would have burned off rather quickly - the paper allowed the fire to burn and burn.

    34. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone who's studied this more directly can fill in the gaps, but a solid steel bar is often weaker than a hollow one. Compare a 1" diameter steel rod to a 1" steel tube with 1/4" walls.
      Not shure how applicable this is to the steel beams used in skycraper construction.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    35. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Professionally demolished buildings are IMPLODED so that the debris falls into the footprint of the building.

      The WTC buildings COLLAPSED, which spilled immense quantities of debris around the buildings, killing firefighters, police officers, etc. and crushing equipment.

      Any competent structural engineer can tell you why the building fell down instead of falling over (hint: the metal isn't any stronger, it's just arranged in a very particular structure). Also, at the point of failure, you had 1/3 to 1/2 of the building falling at least 1 floor height before it stuck an undamaged point of the building. Some basic physics calculations will show why a building can't withstand a floor (at least) effectively disappearing.

      BTW: There was a great analysis of the WTC collapse on Nova (one of those pesky science programs on PBS) that presented the views of a number of structural engineers, including the engineer that designed the towers. Strangely, they've bought into the "big lie" as well. The mind control people are coming for you next. Run! Hide!

    36. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to replace your tin foil hat ever three weeks. The alien mind control rays have a degrading effect on the tin, causing it to decay in such a manner that it will no longer resist such rays after three weeks.

    37. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it broke the laws of physics--please don't tag me as an idiot. I understand all of what you say, and my point remains--what it does is something relatively unexplored, and it is NOT the last; the effect will be duplicated and changed. You completely ignored my point and made it again in your own condescending phrasing.

    38. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      I saw that on Mr. Wizard

    39. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Looks like spelling and grammar are a little too 'complicated' for you, so I don't think you're qualified to lecture me about chemistry. Learn to write and then maybe you can ask me if I'm retarded. What do you think "melt" and "freeze" are anyway? Magic fairy tales?

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    40. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by perlchild · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In a word, NO.

      At best it proves how little we understand that law, but there's nothing to say the entropy wasn't balanced by the energy transfer involved(all physical condensations, straight from gas to solid would be a lot worse from a disorder aspect, without factoring the energy involved), and it's quite likely the math will bear this out(but I'm too lazy to do this math).

      It also shows how an instinctive understanding of physic laws can lead to misunderstanding those laws. I'm sure someone tried to invalidate a few physics laws when we discovered water actually increased volume when heated from 4 degrees celsius to 0 degrees celsius too. Turned out the law was perfectly fine, as long as you interpreted the whole thing, with the phase change graphs and triple-points, and not just the instinctive understanding: heat it and it expands, then becomes liquid, then expands again and becomes gas.

      Trying a simplification of the law, finding it doesn't work, doesn't necessarily mean the law isn't good, it might just be a bad simplification, after all.

    41. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Austenite · · Score: 1

      You what? I think you need to re-enrol in Materials Selection 101.

      Maybe if you're talking specific strength (strengh to weight), but otherwise there is no condition (torsional, longitudinal or transverse)where a solid bar would be weaker than a hollow bar*.

      *Excluding strange situations where inertial loading becomes significant!

      --
      "In person, WAP'ed up and making your life a misery!" BOFH, 2003
    42. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have anything against your point, it's good one, the effect probably will have uses in future, and all that.

      The nit I had was with the "breaks our elementary perceptions blahblah" which is just wayyy too strongly put for something that does something relatively, but not completely, unexplored and nothing nearly weird enough as to break our perceptions of the way things work.

    43. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...it's quite likely the math will bear this out(but I'm too lazy to do this math).

      No need; conceptually it's easy enough: each of the aCD moledules gets bent out of shape by the heat, thus exposing more sites for hydrogen bonds to form, allowing the solidification to occurr. Since these molecules are capable of snapping back into the previous shape when cooled, they are therefore storing energy. And so the solid is still in a higher-energy state than the liquid.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    44. Re:Application: Construction of Skyscrapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't this violate the entropy law of thermodynamics [rtfm if you really want to know] i've always had the deep down [crazy] feeling that the entropy thing wasn't true

      BLASPHEMER!! How dare you question THE LAWS! The penalty is, as usual, combustion while firmly affixed to a stake!

  36. mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I really want a Creme Brulee...

  37. Roland Piquepaille by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Funny

    I vote for a new "Roland Piquepaille" section, he should get a good amount of advertisement revenue from his daily submits, always with "read more" links just quoting the original story.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Roland Piquepaille" = web whore
      editors = $$$$ or sex

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't actually care where the original stories come from, or that somebody gets a few extra cents per page view.

      The fact remains that the stories and articles Ronald comes up with are genuinely interesting.

      I don't see any of the whingers actually finding and submitting decent stories.
      {/rant}

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't see any of the whingers actually finding and submitting decent stories.

      That's because the /. editors reject them. Ever seen a weeks-old story on /. and wondered why nobody submitted it when it was current? In most cases, somebody did - in fact, probably many people did.

    4. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think theres a 1 hour window on slashdot where stories are not automatically rejected
      and eds choose from this one hour window

    5. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One time I snuck a LastMeasure link with an individual n= name to track the hit, and the moderator did indeed click it - that means they also looked at my story. I got pink paged that time.

    6. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are some sure things in life, such as death and taxes."

      ...and articles on Slashdot submitted by Roland Piquepaille :)

    7. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct. I routinely submit interesting stories outside of the standard range of "INDUCE ACT", Linux, and Firefox articles. I always write a nice headline and summary without plagarizing the source article and provide working web links. With only ONE EXCEPTION, all of my articles have been turned down. Some of them show up hours or days later submitted by other individuals, some of them are never seen again. But fuckers like Piquepaille can get 1 or 2 articles accepted EVERY DAY! And we have dupe articles coming out the wazoo as well. I think I'm letting my subscription lapse when it runs out of page views. It's just not worth it...

  38. I don't know chemistry by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plazanet and colleagues prepared a liquid solution containing ?-cyclodextrine (?CD), water and 4-methylpyridine (4MP).

    Is it edible?

    1. Re:I don't know chemistry by k98sven · · Score: 4, Informative

      cyclodextrin? Probably. It's starch.

      water? Definitely.

      4-methylpyridine? Probably causes cancer. Known to cause damage to the central nervous system. In simple words: Poision.

    2. Re:I don't know chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In simple words: Poision.

      Phew! What a relief! I feared it could be poison!

    3. Re:I don't know chemistry by ggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, everything is edible atleast once! I don't know why people keep using "edible" as able to eat something several times.

    4. Re:I don't know chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those seem like polymers to me (or at least precursers to one). Yes, I'm a chemist.
      Stupid French!

    5. Re:I don't know chemistry by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      So then its edible poison...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  39. Damnable Hydrogen Bonds by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn you hydrogen bonding, damn you shaking up our worlds with your heat freezing solids.

  40. New meaning to the term lock up by Duct+Tape+Pro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sure hope it's non-conductive so I can put it as a coolant in my computer. Computer gets too hot, it turns solid and the computer "locks up". Ha!

    Seriously though, if this stuff interacts well with other substances (i.e. doesn't explode, melt, send it to another dimension) then it could feasibly have applications where it would solidify around objects once they got too hot, thereby stopping their motion. And since the article says you can adjust the solidifying (freezing?) point based on its concentration, it could be tailor-made for different devices. This probably won't happen though because I'm guessing this stuff is probably expensive to make and does who-knows-what to human tissue

    --
    i hotdog.
  41. It's stuff like this... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...that gives me hope for a room temperature superconductor. Heating liquids into solids? Hey! You never know!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  42. Weapons technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder what the ballistic armor implications of this development are.

    I can imagine liquid armor in some sort of gel packs. Normally it would allow free movement to the wearer - but it would instantly turn solid from the energy of the impact when a high-speed projectile (eg: a bullet) tries to penetrate it.

    Interesting..

    1. Re:Weapons technology. by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      And then it would break.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:Weapons technology. by Koil · · Score: 0

      "And then it would break"

      Yep, it might break, but then through cycling some type of heating\cooling mechanism through the pack, you cool it back to a liquid and re-heat back to a brand new armor section. (Given that the mechanism can survive a direct hit from whatever is firing at it, but I am sure this could be resolved through heating or cooling through the chasis itself maybe...)

  43. Useful material to have when printing out organs by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This article describes a similar material that is liquid below 20 C and solid above 32 C. Medical researchers hope to use it if they are able to perfect 3D printers that generate organs by spraying cells onto a substrate. The gel is used to reserve open spaces for blood vessels. Once the organ has been formed they cool it and the solid turns to liquid and runs out.

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  44. Bah, I do this all the time... by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...with my oven and fridge. I put some basic liquid ingredients into a pan, place the pan into my heated oven where, once properly forgotten, it turns into a solid.

    Placing the solid into my fridge, and again forgetting it for say, 2 or 3 weeks, reduces the solid back into a liquid.

    Though I havn't personally tried it, I'm fairly certain that if I were to return the liquid back to the oven, and again properly forget about it, that I would again get a solid.

  45. Breaks the rules? by Epsillon · · Score: 3, Informative

    The rules of freezing, melting and vaporising (yes, I missed out sublimation) are not broken here. Chemists have known for some time that certain reactions can both only take place at a certain range of temperatures and reverse outside that range. This stuff does not freeze. It simply undergoes a reaction which bonds two types of molecule together to form a cohesive structure. The "normal" rules still apply to both compounds, but the new compound has a higher freezing point. That the reaction to form the new compound is reversible is also nothing new.

    Analogy: Water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius, sodium chloride (salt) much higher at 804 Celsius. Add the two together to form an aqueous solution of sodium chloride and it lowers the freezing temperature, contrary to the properties of both substances. Heat it, and evaporate the water off and you end up with solid NaCl.

    Sorry, but this has been hyped beyond recognition.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    1. Re:Breaks the rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. Flawed analogy. If you then cool the solid NaCl, do you get the solution you started with? Nope, you bled the water off! You're stuck with your solid.

      Hyped, sure. New? Possibly.

    2. Re:Breaks the rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chemicals do not react, that is form new covalent or ionic bonds. However, they form new hydrogen bonds.

    3. Re:Breaks the rules? by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      The analogy was intended to be specific to the change in temperature of state transitions due to the combination of two compounds. OK, so the reaction may be new, but the reaction does not break any established rules pertaining to the behaviour of matter or the established priciple of bi-directional thermally driven reactions (of which an aqueous solution of NaCl is not one, but is the easiest way of showing two compounds do not necessarily have properties you would expect when mixed), which is what I was attempting to illustrate. Maybe I was not clear enough but, hey, I'm not doing my thesis here.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    4. Re:Breaks the rules? by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

      This stuff does not freeze. It simply undergoes a reaction which bonds two types of molecule together to form a cohesive structure.

      In other words it freezes.

      And your boiling salt-water analogy is horrid. This is pure and reversible melting freezing process.

      It isn't a "scientific breakthrough" in that there is no new new physics understanding, however it is an entirely new material with entirely novel behaviour. Novel materials with novel behaviour is an opportunity for entirely novel engineering and entirely novel applications.

      I admit I'm having trouble thinking of a good application for it that could not be done just as well through other means, but I am only one person and I've only been thinking about it for a few minutes. It is definitely interesting stuff.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Breaks the rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate this man for the Novel Prize.

    6. Re:Breaks the rules? by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      "In other words it freezes."

      Freezing is the natural attraction of two molecules overcoming the energy in that molecule. This is chemical manipulation, pure and simple. That temperature is one of the variables no more makes the process freezing than it does break the established physics. We're confusing physical properties of matter with chemical.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    7. Re:Breaks the rules? by Alsee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is chemical manipulation

      If so then water turning into ice is "chemical manipulation" as well. When pure water freezes it forms the exact same sort of hydrogen bonds this new substance forms. In both cases those hydrogen bonds provide the attraction that overcomes the thermal motion of the molecules, freezing them in place.

      It's the exact same process. The only difference is that in this new substance the hydrogen atoms are "hidden" towards the inside of the molecule at low temperatures and they swing outwards becoming available to attract neighboring atoms when the temperature goes up.

      Hmmm, an interesting way to look at it is that at the lower temperature those hydrogen atoms and hydrogen bonds swing inwards and atoms from one part of the molecule "freeze" to atoms from another part of the same molecule, and that this self-self freeze effect overcomes and severs the normal intra-molecule freeze attactions. This freezing of motion within the molecule explains how you get the required lower net entropy at lower temperature, despite the fact the liquid phase motion of the molecule as a whole has a highter entropy.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  46. Astroturf Alert! by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Informative

    Warning, this Roland fellow submits (and they get accepted!) stories all the time, which link to his personal blog site. All his posts have the same format. Stop feeding him page views!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Astroturf Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story is different from the previous ones. The submitter and the slashdot editors actually understood the point of this story. I think that it is OK.

    2. Re:Astroturf Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      first he is not astroturfing. he is not posting it under a different identity.

      he isnt flat out saying my blog has this, but why should he have to?

      and why should we stop feeding him page views? because his site has some good info?

    3. Re:Astroturf Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why I believe all stories and posts should be anonymous. People shouldn't be trying to make a "name" for themselves by hyping their personal agendas on Slashdot. Ego and karma also have terrible influence on the honesty and agenda of both submissions and posts. Face it, it's a broken system.

    4. Re:Astroturf Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because he often misunderstands the subject. The slashdot editor buys his version, and the few people in the slashdot audience who actually understand the subject do not get modded up.

    5. Re:Astroturf Alert! by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP! Oh... Wait. Never mind.

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
  47. Close--check a Mitsu 3000GT VR4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    close.

    several cars use a "viscous coupling" system, which is what you're thinking of. the use a system of disks that can rotate against eachother in a silicon fluid. when the disks shear fast enough, the friction heats the fluid. it then expands and the PRESURE locks the plates together.

    This produces a limited slip differential that is very controllable and low on wear.

    check out the system in a Mitsu 3000GT VR4 for more details.

  48. Re: But what about a liquid that becomes solid whe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about a liquid that becomes solid when it's heated?

    hey!
    that's me!!!

  49. Garnier Fructise by imstanny · · Score: 0

    Hasn't Garnier Fructise been using this stuff for a while - the name certainly sounds french. the advertisements claim that "it strenghtens your hair by 4x." You'll be able to grease your hair with that stuff and hang weights from your hair, like superman does at some museum.

  50. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by dat00ket · · Score: 1

    You already can.

    Sort of.

    Have you ever seen those little novelty square rocks for sale? Cutesy "on the rocks" rocks? You put them in the fridge and then use them in your drinks instead of ice. Actually quite practical since they don't water down your drink.

    I don't see why you couldn't heat them up instead.

  51. Whigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I see it, the Whigs were a political party and the rest of ya are a bunch of horny nerdy cheezy-mah-neasy, slimeballs.

    We've been in the Matrix ya blind bats, and this is just another thing to show all you science-swearing penis whistlers that we don't know jack daniels about the world and all ya'll are a bunch of deer humping weenies with pocket protectors and tape on your glasses thinking you have it down pact.

    A HEATED LIQUID CAN TURN INTO A SOLID....you hear me!? DO YOU hear me? Good, now go plant a seed in your bum and watch a tree sprout out from it and realize you don't know shit from the face you see in the mirror about the universe.

    I don't give a hootin' sweet good feathery damn what sort of degree you have.

    Now go burn in the pits of Gehenna.

  52. Re:I can think of another one... by servognome · · Score: 1

    One of the interesting things is that ice expands because of hydrogen bonding, similar to what is happening in the material in the article. What makes the rigid structure in ice is that the hydrogen bonds have a longer half-life in ice than in water.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  53. OT: what browser does he use?? by ccozan · · Score: 1

    [Additional note for physicists: I've been forced to use the "alpha-CD" notation here, because neither my publishing software nor my browsers seem to be able to understand the correct notation, which is "CD."]
    i've just checked on my Firefox, it works. Or is he using....oh,no!!!

  54. It's a conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With other submitters, Slashdot seems to moderate and even sometimes actually edit the submissions. It's like the Slashdot moderators get kickbacks for blog-hyping.. which wouldn't be so bad except most of his submissions are mediocre.

  55. Re:I can think of another one... by Plural+of+Mongoose · · Score: 1

    Erm, actually it begins to expand about 4 degrees C before it freezes. This allows the cold, almost frozen liquid to *rise* through the warmer water above, leaving it at the surface, where it will freeze.

    If water did not have this peculiar feature, oceans would freeze from the bottom, never melt, and our little planet would be a dirty grey ice-ball, and not the lovely blue green water-world it is.

    --
    The last fucking thing you want is my undivided attention...
  56. liquid bullet proof jackets anyone? by Goeland86 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember reading somewhere about making a bullet proof suit for soldiers where the suit was in fact hollow and filled with a gel containing nanoparticles. This thing might help us make more efficient ones: when the bullet hits the gel, the pressure is going to make it increase in heat, isn't it? So as the bullet tries to penetrate, it's going to get harder and harder... thus absorbing a HUGE amount of energy. Once the bullet is fully stopped, the pressure disappears, the temperature goes back down to normal and you have a liquid armor again. One problem is keeping the liquid from spilling out of the holes the bullets make... But I'm quite confident that can be overcome with some brilliant imagination. Of course, the real problem is how breakable is the solid formed? Because if the bullet goes straight through the hard material, then there's not point. But I think that'd be one use of this...

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    1. Re:liquid bullet proof jackets anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alsolook for more about one way ballistic glass.

      You can shot at it from one side and it stops the bullets. If you are on the other side you can return fire and your bullets pass through the glass which then seals itself back up again.

      see
      http://www.miragetechnologies.net/Mirage%20 Ballist ic%20Glass.htm

      granted it's not a temperature reactive effect but interesting nonetheless.

  57. Lovely. A revolutionary leap in science... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2

    ...and all I can think is "Woohoo! Snowball fights in summertime!"

    Too much Calvin & Hobbes, I suppose.

  58. Practicle jokes by EvanKai · · Score: 1, Funny

    Replace the nails and screws in the furniture in a hot classroom from the solid form of this material. Then just wait for the instructor to enter the room and turn on the AC.

    Room cools, everything falls apart.

  59. More to it than that... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    The heat actually changes quite a lot of the chemical structure of the proteins in the ingredients.


    I read somewhere that science can explain what happens when we boil stuff, *nearly* explain what happens when we fry stuff, and caramelisation is a complete mystery.

    1. Re:More to it than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > caramelisation is a complete mystery

      Um ... bollocks. Maybe you don't know, but even a cook knows the chemistry. A chemist most certainly does. Caramelization is sugars breaking down. Some of them contain more aromatic hydrogenated compounds, which makes them tasty.

    2. Re:More to it than that... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Caramelization is the oxidation of sugar, retard.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    3. Re:More to it than that... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Well, no it's not, quite. There is quite a lot involved. It does oxidise, but it also hydrolysed as well. Fat breaks down and combines in interesting ways with sugar, but it doesn't really behave the way it's supposed to. I should maybe have made it clearer - we don't go "Wow, what is happening there?", we go "Wow, why is it happening *that* way?"

    4. Re:More to it than that... by mink · · Score: 1

      Check out the Kitchen go to the "Tako's Food Science Lab" and read the section titled "The Millard Reaction". I'm guessing this guy discovered the process and probably can be googled for more information.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  60. "dumb-it-down" soundbite phrasing by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't break any law, it follows every law. Physics around phase-changes (liquid-solid, gas-liquid, gas-solid) can be really weird. Iodine sublimes (goes from solid crystal form to gas with no intermediate liquid form) for example, at least at STP.

    It's almost certainly those pesky hydrogen bonds - they're responsible for just about everything interesting in organic chemistry... Strange how things ultimately come down to geometry :-)

    It is new and strange, but I'd be willing to bet just about anything that the physical laws of energy conservation, attraction and conversion are being rigorously adhered to :-))

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:"dumb-it-down" soundbite phrasing by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen bonds are caused by Van der Waals forces, they make things interesting in physics too (gecko adherence, for a start).

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    2. Re:"dumb-it-down" soundbite phrasing by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It's almost certainly those pesky hydrogen bonds - they're responsible
      > for just about everything interesting in organic chemistry

      Indeed, I was just pointing out that the same root cause (hydrogen bonds) are
      also responsible for certain liquids that expand when they freeze, rather than
      continuing to contract as most cooling liquids do. (The best known example of
      this phenomenon is water, which is why ice floats.)

      When you boil down (Hah!) chemistry to its roots, it all comes down to physics.
      In this case, hydrogen bonds are electromagnetic force at work. Of course,
      when you boil down phyics, it's mostly math. Everything is math. Biology
      comes down to chemistry; chemistry comes down to physics; physics comes down
      to math. Many important concepts in art (color spaces, balance, composition,
      and so forth) also involve a fair amount of math (though artists don't always
      think about it that way). History, if you want to really understand it, is
      all about seeing trends and patterns -- a form of math. Everything is math.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:"dumb-it-down" soundbite phrasing by Noren · · Score: 1
      Cannot...resist...nitpick...

      Iodine is strictly solid at STP (which stands for Standard Temperature and Pressure.)
      It does sublime at standard (one atmosphere) pressure and elevated temperature, though.

  61. liquid that turns to solid when heated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eggs?

  62. No Pictures? by supermonkeyball · · Score: 1

    You would think that such an experiment that there would be pictures to prove it. (Unless it was stated in TFA which I didn't really read because it was too technical) :(

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig
  63. liquid that turn solid ? I've done it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah - Mix cake flour mix with water or milk. Put it in the oven at 400F for 30 mins - result is solid matter.

    So what's new about that?

  64. Heh by conebrid · · Score: 1

    Funny thought, but it would have to be a really hot room - 45 to 75 degress celsius.

    Dress loosely.

  65. Useful for cooling stuff. by gnalle · · Score: 4, Informative
    When the liquid melts, the heat of melting is taken from the vibrational energy, and thus the liquid is cooled by melting. I guess that this positive feedback mechanism would enable the liquid to melt fast whenever it is cooled below the melting point, and thus the new liquid should be very effective for cooling stuff very fast.

    To a physicist the phase diagram is interesting, because the solid/gel must have a larger entropy than the corresponding liquid. (Remember that you calculate equilibrium by minimizing the Gibbs energy G = H - TS).

    Anyway it has been known for many years that some triblock polymers form gels when heated, but perhaps the solid phase of this new liquid is "more solid". Perhaps the news is that the liquid has a larger enthalpy of melting. I don't know

  66. Summary for non-chemists by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading the article (the actual publication, that is), here's an attempt at a summary.

    When you heat something, the entropy (disorder) of a system increases in importance. This is a law of thermodynamics.

    A gas has greater entropy than a liquid, both have greater entropy than a solid. Usually.

    Now, this substance turns solid when you heat it. -This means the solid phase has higher entropy than the liquid phase. That is unusual, but it doesn't violate any laws.

    How does it work? Well, it appear the alpha-cyclodextrin molecule has two conformations (shapes). In the low-temperature one, it hydrogen-bonds to itself. At higher temperatures, these bonds are broken. (this is what happens with ice-water-steam too)

    The funny thing about this substance, is that once these internal hydrogen bonds are broken, it allows the molecule to bind to other ones.. so while you break the "internal" hydrogen bonds, you give rise to a bunch of "external" molecular bonds, to other alpha-cyclodextrine molecules.

    This leads to the formation of a solid. (not actually a true solid, but rather a 'sol', a suspension of linked-together alpha-Cyclodextrin molecules in water) And this solid actually does have lower entropy than the liquid phase, due to the breaking of the internal hydrogen-bonds.

    No laws broken. Nothing 'impossible' going on. But, it is however an interesting phenomenon, and something which certainly may turn out to have practical uses in the future.

    1. Re:Summary for non-chemists by Big+Jason · · Score: 1
      This means the solid phase has higher entropy than the liquid phase.
      And this solid actually does have lower entropy than the liquid phase.

      You can contradict yourself with these statements; so which phase has the higher entropy?

    2. Re:Summary for non-chemists by k98sven · · Score: 1

      You can contradict yourself with these statements; so which phase has the higher entropy?

      You are right.
      The latter statement is wrong. It should read "this solid actually does have a higher entropy than the liquid phase".

      Power of habit I guess. As I wrote, it's not usually the case.

    3. Re:Summary for non-chemists by NichG · · Score: 1

      I vaguely remember hearing that one of the helium superfluid/normal fluid mixtures (I don't remember if it was He-3 or He-4) at very low temperature has a lower entropy than the corresponding solid phase, since the superfluid component carries no entropy (its all in the ground state...), but the solid phase can have small excitations and has a nonzero entropy at that same temperature. So conceivably you'd see the same sort of behavior in that form of helium for a range of temperatures (i.e. it'd solidify when heated, and then liquefy again once you're past the lambda transition).
      Unfortunately I haven't been able to find a reference to this, so I may just be misremembering.

  67. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check the last paragraph

  68. Ok, here's what I can come up with by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shock absorbers. This stuff would make fantastic shock absorbers.

    Reinforcement for solid structures. Somebody already mentioned skyscrapers, but I'm also envisoning other more improbable structures, like hurricaine proof buildings. Wind blows, soften up the beams and let her bend a bit. Wind stops, stiffen the supports back up.

    Mecha. This has to be used in mecha. Beams that can bend a bit, be solid or fluid, would be excellent in 50 foot killer robots. You know it.

    Tank armour. Make it solid and when stuff hits, it breaks. Change temperature, and it melts. Change temp again and it becomes solid again, with no signs of previous damage. Regenerating armour.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Ok, here's what I can come up with by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Tank armour. Make it solid and when stuff hits, it breaks. Change temperature, and it melts. Change temp again and it becomes solid again, with no signs of previous damage. Regenerating armour."

      Except that when it goes 'solid', its more like a gel.

      Good luck with your soggy armor!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Ok, here's what I can come up with by Country_hacker · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. My little brother just bought an airsoft gun (Fires 6mm plastic BB's) that came with a target that has a thin layer of sticky 'gel' over it. It manages to stop the BBs that would otherwise ricochet around the room. I would think a gel would actually absorb the energy from the projectile better than a solid.

      --
      Never give any object more potential energy than you want it to have.
  69. it doesn't work that way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That one uses a pump. It's a viscous coupling, very common.

    There are other systems that use ferrofluids. These turn solid when you put electricity through them.

  70. protein folding research ? by wotevah · · Score: 1

    Looks like they discovered a relatively simple chemical that exhibits the properties of protein chains, that is, it bonds in a water solution at a certain temperature using light hydrogen bonds. Depending on how long the chain is, I suppose this is either similar to folding or to the mechanism in protein binding sites.

    This has to have some benefits in molecular biology, probably in protein folding research or new targeted medicines.

  71. Re:Useful material to have when printing out organ by beaverbrother · · Score: 1

    Hmm.... that site mentions that it's biodegradable. Does that mean that the bacteria will be able to degrade these "psuedo-organs" while they are in your body?

  72. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully with a piquepaille section, the kids around here can set their preferences and the rest of us won't be subjected to their endless childish comments every time one of Roland's stories are posted.

    1. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except they aren't Roland's stories, they're plain rip-offs from serious sites. You know, to lure stupid fucking morons like you to his site for cheap page-views and advertising income. Every time you visit his site, YOU cause the internet to die a little bit as useful information is plagiarized, assraped and bent over backwards in the name of profit by some fuckwad SPAMMER. There is no other way to call Roland's endless stream of stolen articles.

      Are you either really dense or really ignorant?

    2. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you post on Slashdot, you cause the internet to die a little bit more. Are you new here?! Roland's blog is probably a notch above Slashdot, which isn't saying much for either of them.

    3. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or roland the faggot himself

      I want to disable this piquieshitty

      he is just stealing content, addint a line and submits it to /.

    4. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first link in the stories Roland submits are always direct to the story. The "Read more" link is always to Roland's blog. I'm smart enough to have figured that out long ago and I simply never click on the "Read more" link. You on the other hand, are such a stupid cock-sucking moron you haven't caught-on yet.

    5. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is - Roland is an asshole for trying to use Slashdot for ad revenue. He probably has no job - all he does is sit around surfing the web all day, find interesting articles, plaigerising them on his dumbass blog, then submitting articles to Slashdot for ad revenue.

      Asshole.

  73. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why you couldn't heat them up instead.

    Because they explode.

  74. Is this really news? by cyclop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well,it's amazing, but it's not the first time i see it.

    I work in molecular biology. Recently we started doing experiments with so-called Matrigel. This is purified extracellular matrix from mice tumours. It's a natural environment to grow endothelial cells and study the development of blood vessels. This is by no means a mysterious substance - thousand of labs buy it and use it every day.

    Well, Matrigel works exactly the same way the substance in the article does. It is fluid around 0, but rapidly freezes at -20 and rapidly becomes solid at room temperature. And it is fully reversible. This also makes the substance a bitch to manipulate -you pick up with the pipette,and it becomes solid inside the pipette before you can transfer it!

    Still, it is amazing to mimic such a behaviour in a simple solution instead than in the tremendous proteins-and-sugars mess that's Matrigel.

    --
    -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
  75. Torsen differential by wotevah · · Score: 3, Informative

    The best option over the above (and a common upgrade) is the fully-mechanical "Torsen" ( torque-sensing ) differential.

    Quaife makes one of these. An all-wheel drive car would need three, and at around $1k a pop they aren't exactly cheap, but they have a lifetime warranty.

  76. Fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You utter fools! This was the first step to the new Terminators. First Skynet, now the new T series. You fools!

  77. Been There, Done That by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the french just discovered jello.

  78. Heat-sensitive Antilubricant? by wash23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was hoping something more interesting and subtle was going on. Of course, it will still liquify above 75 degrees or whatever the melting temperature is for the hydrogen-bonded network of the two compounds... Maybe you could make some kind of antilubricant out of a similar compound though: increase friction / viscocity as the temperature increases. Not sure what that might be useful for though - slowing down a flywheel when a machine starts to overheat?

  79. That's one m^&%^f... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's one m^&$%rfuc&*&^%r son of a bitch bad ass water, man... WHat is it, water gone bad girl? CIA brainwashed water? Bad rebell ice? Oh man, what has the world become...

  80. New deodorant? by bscott · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Body heat activated - when the temperature rises, it fuses your arms to your sides so that you can't release any bad armpit smells"

    OK, I'm just spitballing here.

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  81. And the surprising liquid is . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    . . . called eggs, over easy.

  82. well it would make a heck of a projectile by BushFreakz · · Score: 1

    most things are invented and used in weapons first so....
    heck of a projectile..
    hardens upon firing... hits explodes then melts all over everything..

    if it got in you skin (injected?) your body couldnt get rid of it..
    maybe well see a wolverine soon!!! lol
    mix it with titanium or other metal

    hmmm

  83. Criminal Potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --molding the ultimate slug for coin-op vending machines.

    If you can get the cost of the liquid below the value of a coin.

  84. Vechiles! by teknokracy · · Score: 1

    Why not make it have a use in vehicles, or pretty much any application. If a certain engine area or passenger compartment catches on fire or overheats, the liquid in a chamber or what have you, solidifies and blocks the spread of fire, or whatnot.

    OK so i dont have the best idea but I Can see it getting used for safety features.

  85. Face it, it's a broken system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FACT: KARMA IS DYING

  86. Helium-3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liquid helium-3 (3He) displays similar properties. There is a minimum in its Pressure vs Temperature "melting" curve at 0.32 Kelvin and 29 atmospheres. If one cools a sample of the liquid to, say, 0.20 Kelvin and apply a pressure of 30 atmospheres, the sample would remain liquid. Heat it isobarically to 0.3 kelvin and the liquid will begin to solidify. This new substance is the SECOND liquid to display this property. You can look at the melting curve here:
    http://boojum.hut.fi/research/theory/helium.html

  87. Shape shifters by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 1

    oh oh Odo where'd you go? Think nano structures. think ds-9.

    --
    I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
  88. Here's my Q. by danalien · · Score: 1
    ok, so "between 45 and 75C" it's solid... and if one lowers the temperature it becomes liquid *again* ....

    BUT what if one heats it up to more then 75C? ... what happens then?!

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  89. the actual text of article by bikerguy99 · · Score: 1

    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME 121, NUMBER 11 15 SEPTEMBER 2004

    COMMUNICATIONS Freezing on heating of liquid solutions

    We report a reversible liquid-solid transition upon heating of a simple solution composed of a-cyclodextrine CD , water, and 4-methylpyridine. These solutions are homogeneous and transparent at ambient temperature and solidify when heated to temperatures between 45 and 75. Quasielastic and elastic neutron scattering show that molecular motions are slowed down in the solid and that crystalline order is established. The solution ''freezes on heating.'' This process is fully reversible, on cooling the solid melts. A rearrangement of hydrogen bonds is postulated to be responsible for the observed phenomenon. © 2004 American Institute of Physics. DOI: 10.1063/1.1794652

    The laws of thermodynamics impose that energy and entropy of any system increase with increasing temperature. As a consequence, solids generally melt, and the liquid ?nally vaporizes. Well-known exceptions are systems where heating leads to irreversible chemical changes, such as polymerization, for example. The reversible gelation of polymer solutions upon heating is also well known,1 but the observation, reported here, of a reversible liquid-solid transition upon heating of a liquid composed of relatively small and rigid molecules is highly unusual and unexpected at ?rst sight. This behavior is exhibited by liquid solutions composed of a-cyclodextrine CD , water, and 4-methypyridine 4MP with molar ratios in the range of 1:6: 30-100 , respectively. Cyclodextrines are the cyclic association 6, 7, or 8 glucose units -, -, and -cyclodextrines, see Fig. 1 , and form readily inclusion compounds with a wide variety of molecules. In preparing the inclusion complex of 4MP in CD, hydrated CD was dissolved in 4MP. At ambient temperature, up to 300 g/l of CD can be dissolved in 4MP, and the resulting solution is homogeneous and transparent. When this solution was heated it turned into a milky-white solid. Upon cooling back to ambient temperature, the original homogeneous solution was recovered after some time and the process could be repeated inde?nitely. The temperature at which the solution solidi?es decreases with increasing concentration of CD in 4MP see Fig. 2 . Commercial CD is always hydrated, and when a solution was prepared with CD dried in a desiccator under vacuum and 4MP dried over a molecular sieve, the resulting solution solidi?ed only partially and formed a slurry, while solutions, in which 1 g/l of water was added, completely solidi?ed. Photomicrographs of the solid phase see Fig. 2 inset show inhomogeneous structure, which explains the strong light scattering and milky aspect of the solid phase. Analogous observations of ''freezing on heating'' were made for other methyl-pyridines and pyridine as well as for other cyclodextrines, but a detailed characterization was made here only for the system of CD in 4MP as described below. In order to characterize the structure and molecular motions across the phase transition, neutron scattering experiments were performed at the Institute-Laue-Langevin ILL .2 Since the scattering cross section of protons and deuterons differ considerably, neutron scattering has the advantage that isotopic hydrogen-deuterium replacement can be used as a contrast variation method to reveal the structure as well as the dynamics of different molecular components separately. Unless otherwise speci?ed, the concentration of the samples used in all these measurements was 200 g CD in 11 of 4MP, corresponding to a molecular ratio of 1/50 and a transition temperature of 64C. Quasielastic neutron scattering with instruments of different energy resolution IN5, IN10, IN16 probes the dynamics at different time scales. Indeed, the broadening of the energy distribution of scattered neutrons so-called quasielastic broadening is proportional to the rate of decay of the position-position correlation function of the scattering nuclei, while information about the geometry of the motions i

  90. Chocolate does that too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat it beyond boiling and watch it irrevocably change to an inedible solid form.

  91. Re:Useful material to have when printing out organ by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Unless you know something the rest of us dont, the entire human body is "bio-degradable", and susceptable to all kinds of attack.

    The fluid/solid they would use would just be to create spacers between actual cells. Think of it like polystyrene packing in a box. As your parent said, once the entire structure is built, they can reduce the temp and have it drain out.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  92. Spray on Armor by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Keep this stuff in a chilled container, spray it on something and let it harden and BAM! you got yourself instant spray on armor.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Spray on Armor by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Uh, sure, if you want to walk around in 45 degree Celsius temperatures (at the low end). That's 113 degrees Fahrenheit. Considering heat exhaustion starts kicking in at about 102 degrees, I wouldn't expect the effectiveness of the wearer to rise.

      Now, if you can get spray-on armor at 10-15 degrees Celsius, then you're in business.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  93. It's NOT a "law-breaking liquid" by hopethishelps · · Score: 1
    a law-breaking liquid

    Crap. No law of physics is broken by this behavior. It's interesting, unusual, possibly unprecedented, but it's not "law-breaking".

  94. This could be usefull to astronaughts by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    Peaple think of outer space as incredibly cold, but it can be hot too. This stuff could prove to be a lifesaver if kept in space shuttle hulls, imagine if you kept it in liquid form in a space shuttle during re-entry, and should you wind up with cracks and holes or whatnot it simply oozes out and gets heated up and solidifies. thereby saving the shuttle from near certain destruction. the same with deep space missions, any impact will likely produce enough heat to solidify the material, at least long enough for the crew to deal with the situation. it may be only for a few seconds, but that would probably be enough for them to snap on their helmets.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:This could be usefull to astronaughts by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      But in re-entry there would be temperatures of more than 75 degrees, and it would go liquid again.

  95. Hmmm... Does it act like ice? by mebob · · Score: 1

    Doesn't sound very usefull at first but if you think about it the applications are endless.

    I wonder if it acts as water turning to ice. Does it expand, get denser, or conducts heat/electicity/light better( insulates)

    --
    =1000101
  96. lower critical solution temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several polymer solutions that exhibit lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behaviour. The classic example is PNIPAM - poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) - in water. It will form a phase separated gel at around 30C which makes it interesting for biological applications. A typical idea is to make a solution of polymer and cells and inject it in a site of injury. The temperature increases and the polymer forms a scaffold in situ. Good stuff but unfortunately PNIPAM does not degrade so its biological application is limited. Of course, the solvent for a LCST system need not be water but for the most part, that's what people have used (particularly for biological systems).

    After that little introduction, the reason some solutions undergo a transition as the temperature is raised is because the hydrogen bonding between the solution and the polymer breaks down at raised temperatures and the polymer chains coil up and fall out of solution. Rather than form little particles, all the chains are still entanged and thus form a phase separated but cocontinuous gel with the solvent.

    So anyway, the system mentioned in the article is unusual in that the cyclodextrin is a small molecule, not a polymer. No matter what others have said in their comments, that is something new.

    By the way, I just looked up LCST on Wikipedia and found a link for N-isopropylacrylamide. Not a good article.

  97. Gradeschool science by cheezit · · Score: 1

    Recipe:
    some water
    some cornstarch
    Instructions:
    add water to cornstarch, stirring. At the right ratio, any quick motion with the spoon will freeze the solution into a solid. Once you stop pushing on the spoon it melts into a liquid.

    Where's *my* Nobel prize?

    (for the humor impaired, I understand that this article is about something different...just want to point out that a similar property has been demonstrated before)

    --
    Premature optimization is the root of all evil
  98. No use to skyscrapers by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a little bit O/T, but there is no point pursuing the liquid-filled beam/column idea - there are much, much better ways (read : both cheaper *and* more effective) of fire-protecting steel.

    The basic issue, as you note, is that steel loses flexural strength at an alarming rate when heated. At 500degrees C, the flexural modulus is reduced over 50%, and that's enough to destabilise structures - after which loads get concentrated, and progressive collapse ensues. No need for actual melting.

    So: how to keep structural temperatures down. There are a few basic approaches. One, occasionally used when the steel is BIG, is just to rely on Hp/A: if the exposed surface area is small compared with the cross-section, the rate of heating will be acceptaby low. The second is insulation: either a spray-on insulating coating (usually vermiculite-based), encapsulation in concrete, or enclosing with insulative board materials. There are also intumescent coatings, but these are expensive, and so limited to areas where the steel is exposed for aesthetic reasons - lobbies and the like. The third, proposed here, is essentially filling the structure with liquid. But a polymer like this, apart from expense, is never going to abstract enough heat to do any good. There is are only two structures I know of which do this, both exposed tubular structural members: the Cannon Stret office building (Ove Arup & Partners, London, 1973) and the Swiss Re building (Foster & Partners, London, 2003). In both cases the fluid is water with anti-corrosives and a bunch of other chemicals, and is continually pumped. Not cheap, but only water has a high enough specific heat capacity to be useful.

    Note further, the point of fire protection is NEVER to save the building. The *only* criterion is to buy time to get people out, and safe. The building can fall, indeed should - after a major fire there will be all sorts of latent damage that could endanger future inhabitants. The two coincided at the WTC: it wasn't just the extraordinary fire load that brought the building down - but the impact which shook loose flaky insulative materials, fatally exposing the (lightweight floor) structure to high rates of heating.

  99. I have an idea. by exspecto · · Score: 0

    McDonalds should make coffee cups with this stuff.

  100. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't advise trying that. The liquid inside will expand and bust the plastic cube.. and I'd bet the liquid inside isn't good to ingest..

  101. Helium can too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >If the stuff was an element instead of an organic compound, this would be ground-breaking.

    Actually, no. Helium-3 performs the same trick, although at a quite narrow pressure range.

  102. HoF by Boronx · · Score: 1
    Whats the heat of fusion for ICE-9? Seems to me that the water would have quickly reached melting temperature, and that ICE-9 would have spread at a more liesurly pace from then on.


    And is the heat of fusion for this new stuff negative?

  103. Application... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um... some kind of coating for brake pads?

  104. Armor by Hobadee · · Score: 0

    What about using it to make armor? You could fill small pouches with the stuff, then, when a bullet hits it, the heat will cause it to turn solid, stopping the bullet, a few seconds later after it cooled off again, the bullet would just sink to the bottom, and the armor would be ready to stop another bullet. (The liquid would have to be put in a self-healing container)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  105. Can they line condoms with this stuff? by sammy_cda · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can this stuff be used to line condems?

    1. Re:Can they line condoms with this stuff? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that any slashdotters are really going to care, or make any use of this idea?

  106. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    you = death - organic chemicals
    In Soviet Russia,
    organic chemicals = death - YOU!!
    I'm sorry.
  107. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    ok, so what to use instead...

    Metal cubes are probably not good because they may react with your drink. And your non-reactive metals like gold and platinum are both very heavy and very expensive...

    it seems like anything you can do in this regard will either have similar problems (i.e. weight/efficiency of energy transfer) or be chemically unsafe as you are fighting the second law of thermodynamics.

    So, if you want to fight the second law of thermodynamics as effectively as possible use a vacuum flask. Or you can decide not to fight it and add a heating element to your cup ;-)

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  108. I reproduced the experiment this morning by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I made an omelette.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:I reproduced the experiment this morning by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

      damn, you beat me to it!

      --
      -Cnik
  109. Slashdot Egoists + science story = hilarity by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every one at slashdot thinks they understand science because they think of themselves as geeks. I say it is not being a geek that makes you a scientist, but being a scientist makes you a geek. This story is a perfect example. Some material does something that we would not expect based upon our own observational experience, but since we "know science" it must violate all of our accepted scientific ideas. Its really funny if you don't take it serious. Seriously it must show that our educational system has doen such a poor job of explaining the basics of the scientific process and/or that we'd rather make fools of ourselves than admit that we don't know everything.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Slashdot Egoists + science story = hilarity by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      A lot of people on /. (and geeks in general) identify themselves by their intelligence. It's their little clique, the bit that sets them apart from everyone else. And when that is challenged (they actually might not know something), they bluff.
      It's not so much an issue of the educational system as an issue of misplaced pride, IMHO.

  110. been there done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My turd comes out liquidy but solidies when heat is applied and vice versa.

  111. There are other examples by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1

    I don't know why this is considered novel; there are other known substances that also solidify with increased temperature. One I'm pretty familiar with is pluronic lecithin organogel (PLO), widely used in compounding pharmacy as a base for transdermal (through the skin) medications. PLO carries the drug it's mixed with right through the skin and nearly disappears from the surface.

  112. The only practical use for this.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    Is to make that Android in Terminator 2.

    God damned, I should have known, Cyberdyne does exist!

    1. Re:The only practical use for this.. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the T1000 is a colony of high energy nanobots, most likely carbon-based. This is why it can use temporal displacement... if it were non-organic (metal) it couldn't go back.

      Duh.

  113. Rheological applications by asadodetira · · Score: 1

    This is interesting for rheologists. If you heat the liquid the viscosity probably increases a lot before it turns into a solid. This certainly has many mechanical applications such as shock absorbers, clutches, etc.

  114. Properties for self-healing hull of space vessels? by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    If the effect of higher temperature is equivalent to that achieved by lower pressure: could a material like this have the properties to be used as a liquid layer between an inner and an outer hull of a vessel in space (practicalities of getting it up there aside for the purposes of this argument of course) - so in case of a breach, the resulting drop in pressure would cause it to solidify around the point of an impact (e.g. of debris or micro-meteorites) exposing it to the vacuum, thus sealing the leak?

  115. actually not that odd by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    It has been known for a LONG time that solutions of "pluronic" , available by the tank car load from BASF, will gel as you raise the temperature of the liquid above RT, and the gel melts again at a still higher temp
    Again, hydrogen bonding, but intrapolymer activity

    I forget the exact details,but you can get brochures from basf with this info. Also, this has been used to prepare temp dep loading gels for capillary sequencing of DNA

  116. Darwin and Friends by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "Those bugs that could hide the best (until they show up to bite you in the ass) will do so."

    Kinda correlates with Murphies Law, huh?

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Darwin and Friends by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Yeah - bugs don't evolve out of software - they evolve to survive :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  117. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

    Copper coated with a thin layer of stainless steel should do the trick (just like in high-end saucepans).

  118. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

    Although, thinking about it, they'd just sink to the bottom of the glass and shatter it.

  119. Not surprised, its a sol-gel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really surprising, there are already a number of examples known for sol-gels where on heating the liquid phase forms a solid phase which melts on cooling.

    It is not a liquid forming a solid, its a liquid phase containing the sol-gel turning to a gel phase on heating and back to a liquid phase on cooling.

  120. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd recommend some sort of radio-isotope clad in stainless steel. Self heating.

    Plus if you hold your coffee cup between your legs in the car it could give your future children an opportunity for advantageous mutations. Of couse they could also turn out to be complete freaks but these days they're likely to turn out to be complete freaks anyhow so it is not like anyone would notice.

  121. I did this when i was five by ciderbob · · Score: 1

    Did nobody try playing with water+cornflower as a child?? Am I taking crazy pills or hasn't this been done before??

  122. Sulphur? by rlk · · Score: 1

    I recall reading way back when that sulphur goes through an interesting variety of state changes as it's heated -- it first becomes a free-flowing liquid, then the viscosity increases in discrete steps as it's further heated, and then it becomes a free flowing liquid again and finally boils. It never really solidifies, but the viscosity markedly increases as it's heated to the point that it becomes taffy-like or harder.

    Or my memory could be AFU.

  123. Re:Wonder if they are more efficient... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
    ... or for US readers, sulfur.

    I remember fron school chemistry many years ago that sulphur melts normally at a relatively modest temperature, and is clearly liquid, then as you keep heating, at a certain temperature the viscosity rises until it becomes first very viscous like treacle, and then almost, but not quite, solid. Eventually it starts to oxidise or burn. I don't know what happens in the absence of oxygen, whether it becomes liquid again as the temperature rises, or goes straight from very viscous to vapour. Maybe someone else has tried the extended experiment, and knows the answer?

    But the point is that it is a fairly similar but not so extreme anomaly, but in a simple chemical element.

    Are there any more, I wonder?

  124. "breaks laws of chemistry?" by Casmira · · Score: 1

    im not mr chemistry but however ... wouldnt 'heating it' simply react it with oxygen in the air, then if it has weak bonds with the oxygen initally (covalent?) it would just decompose by loosing that oxide, (just like H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) does lose its Oxygen to become H2O2 -> H2O + O2) thats my little theory but reading on they really changed hte laws around!

  125. The process they describe IS polymerization by csoto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not novel. This polymer just happens to form weak bonds, as opposed to disulfide, vinyl, ester or other types of strong bonds typically associated with polymers. That's the neat part - they're mostly reversible.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  126. copied design? by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else detect a certain similarity between the blog at the 'read more' link from the original post, and Groklaw?

    Is this a third-party template that they both happen to use, or did somebody just rip Groklaw's design?

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  127. Warm ice-cream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wanted ice cream that doesn't make my teeth hurt. How about making warm ice cream out of this stuff?

  128. Mohawks by SimonShine · · Score: 0
    Currently mohawks benefit from the nature of the matters people already tend to put into them - that is, stuff that becomes liquid at a relatively high temperature and then goes solid at any temperature that you and your hair could be confronted with in a situation in which you'd rather not have melting hair.

    So please elaborate.

    --
    Take off every 'ZIG' !!
  129. Sex toys by SimonShine · · Score: 0
    Or, presumably, some damned big body openings as the matter turns to solid at lower temperatures when there is more of it.

    But I really don't know if 45C is that unrealistic when doing one's thing. :)

    --
    Take off every 'ZIG' !!
  130. Re:Now we can buy hot cubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you drinking that lacks the viscosity to decelerate falling spheres from air? LN2?

  131. Speaking of Hell... by shawnseat · · Score: 1

    Elemental sulfur has the same property as this new stuff. It melts at 96 C and reversibly polymerizes around 150 C to form a semisolid syrup which then turns much more fluid 50 C warmer.

    --
    Religion is the opiate of the masses. The wealthy smoke the real stuff.
  132. What about plastic... by RedVortex · · Score: 1

    Well... Plastic, when you heat it, goes liquid (and you really don't want to touch it when it is liquid, believe me), then back to solid when you remove the heat, you can even do it a couple of times before it has become totally a gas because of the heating process. I did it a lot of times with a lighter and straws (and too much time to spare) when I was young...

    So, considering my past experiences, it looks like people who make great discoveries are either very intelligent or very stupid, hehehe

    RedVortex

  133. Once again, Slashdot betrays its ignorance ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of a viscous coupling with silicone fluid in it,
    the viscosity of which fluid INCREASES with temperature ?

    I didn't think so.

  134. Torsen differential - a few clarifications : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The best option over the above (and a common upgrade) is the fully-mechanical "Torsen" ( torque-sensing ) differential.
    Quaife makes one of these."

    Actually, Quaife doesn't make a Torsen. Torsen is a registered
    trade name used by the Gleason Gear works.

    The Quaife diff operates on similar principles, but uses a different type of gear tooth machining process than the Torsen.

    All Audi Quattros which are not Haldex equipped use Torsen differentials, by the way. The first Quattros used pneumatically
    operated locking center and rear diffs, rather than Torsen diffs.

    Many race cars use Quaife diffs.

    Either of these diffs is NOT a limited slip differential, but rather is a torque-biasing differential.

    The difference is, the torque biasing diff sends more power to the wheel which has the best grip on the driving surface. Whereas the limited slip prevents too much power from going to a wheel which has poor traction. It may seem a semantic difference, but it is not. The torque-biasing diff is more efficient and also is easier on tires.

    The Quaife and Torsen are purely mechanical systems, but the most advanced rally cars ( and some of their street variants ) use
    electro-hydraulic differentials, which work in concert with commands sent by a processor box which uses inputs from driver controls and from yaw sensors. This means that these
    differentials can dynamically change the handling of the car, as desired by the driver, such that the car will oversteer or understeer more, according to the driver's needs.

    Happy driving...

  135. The French... by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the French to ignore the rules of Physics, and strike out on their own.

    When will they cooperate?

    1. Re:The French... by chawly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If "cooperate" means that we have to believe it when you folks say it - then never. We always check.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  136. Interesting by Alceste · · Score: 1

    But it's not as if it goes through amorphous to ordered to amorphous. The hydrogen bonding creates a solid-bonding in quite a loose sense as sol-gel structures are like toothpaste physically.

    Certainly not "nothing to see here," but not T-1000 either.

  137. Spoilers alert! by dwellersire · · Score: 0

    This material is just from the new T-1100 from Terminator 4. :)

    --
    Help cure cancer! Fold for slashdot: http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=t eampage&
  138. Good Bye Viagra! by chanio · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, it might work...

    --
    Rwe obliged 2 save our future by choosing:O3 hole-greenhouse effect instead of accepting everydays gossip-nonsense chat?
  139. Salt water by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    It does that if you heat it long enough and hot enough.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  140. Re:Nothing new here... by blackholepcs · · Score: 0

    How the hell is the above post redundant when it is THE ONLY POST stating that the wife has prior art for her ice blood? Wtf is up with that?

    --
    Halitosis - (n.) Halle Berry's Camel Toe.
  141. Already been done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about viscious differentials? I thought they have a liquid in them that solidifies from friction (heat) and causes them to lock.

  142. Insulation, not jet fuel by Finkbug · · Score: 1

    " 'hot enough to melt the beams'

    Even with jet fuel it wasn't enough to melt the steel. The problem is that steel loses much of it's strength at high temperatures, making it liable to bend or snap under load."

    The impacts blew off the spray-on insulation protecting the steel. Without it a large spreading fire was enough to weaken the steel. Jet fuel was the match: it lit the fire but didn't keep it burning.

    More contentious is whether the buildings should have been able to avoid collapse even with the weakened steel and structural damage. In an attempt to maximize contiguous internal floor space and use less material the towers were designed very differently from earlier 'scrapers. (Anyone know if later buildings used their design?) Some claim this doomed the buildings; others that it's the only reason they stayed up as long as they did.

    --
    Feeling so good natured I could drool
  143. Its not reversable by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...and salt water is not a liquid, its a solution. This is a pure chemical substance this article discusses.

    I'd also like to ask who is the mod who gave this an extra point and said "interesting"? More proof of slashdots failure as a moderating system.

    1. Re:Its not reversable by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Actually I get more signal and less noise than any other forum I use.

      If salt is heated enough will it ever yeild liquid sodium metal?

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:Its not reversable by thelizman · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. I think that the thermal energy required to break the NaCl bond is also the thermal energy required to vaporize sodium, so if you heated saltwater hot enough, you'd get...nothing. I remember table salt (NaCl) being an oddity in that it actually has a high bonding energy, where as most halogens are easily liberated from their salts.

  144. Home physics experiment by Phigrin · · Score: 1

    Take an egg. Heat it. Observe the liquid changing into a solid... (BTW it is not reversible)

    1. Re:Home physics experiment by chawly · · Score: 1

      Very true. But you're missing the point. I live in Grenoble - the laws of physics get bent here every day. Including Sundays.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  145. SHIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pour a lot of beer through a 98-degree college student body and something solid eventually comes out.

  146. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about a liquid that becomes solid when it's heated? Of course, it has already been done,...

    ...and repeated many times in the kitchen by my wife.

    Tuna Casserole Surprise, anyone?

  147. And in Soviet Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ICE melts YOU!