One hundred fifty years of research proves that shorter work hours actually raise productivity and profits - and overtime destroys them.
So why do we still do this?
i.e. at least spared other continents from the worst (e.g. when certain courts and Commission were attempting similar "power grabs"), as shown in several articles at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/reports/most-read (cf. also various developing nations restricting patenting of "traditionally known" biotech).
The real tl:dr, in line with the anniversary mo(o)d...;-)
Great idea BTW. Now just think of the kind of footage (including audio) we'll get when everyone is wearing/wielding their Google Glasses (or Sights for that matter;-)) in just a few years (actually, everyone minus the millions who'll get jailed for accidently looking at or listening to anything copyrighted for more than 30 milliseconds while on).
now for the first time in almost four billion years, it's been possible - very difficult, but possible - for life to extend to another planet. [...] who knows how long that window will be open?
...so far (the latter even "to die on Mars, just not on impact"), and how two guys are going to start a population together shall remain the greatest mystery of Mars.;-)
if the intensity of the space warps can be oscillated over time, the energy required is reduced even more
Knew it, Star Trek was real;-) and Geordi did visit the 21st century to leave that piece of advice for cases when inverting the polarity of shield emitters wasn't enough.
Sectoral data protection laws that take ages to be adopted always after the sad fact while Hydra grows another 7 heads... are part of the problem, not the solution.
Make "thou shalt not snoop" the law of the land, with narrow exceptions that require prior consent (for cases other than self-defense), imposing jailtime and fines on all who infringe upon anyone's privacy.
‘[t]he Federal Circuit erred’ in citing [in State Street] a 1952 Senate Report [82-1979(5)] to construe 35 U.S.C. 101 as encompassing ‘anything under the sun that is made by man’, whereas in fact these words are taken out of context from a phrase that proves quite the opposite legislative intention: one of ‘clarifying a limit’, which the U.S. Supreme Court, unlike the CAFC, still seems to have been aware of when making the initial quotation. [...]
Congress actually expressed a restrictive aim by stating that ‘a machine or manufacture, which may include anything under the sun that is made by man, (...) is not necessarily patentable'.
A movie with the submarine's name for title (instead of the book's) in many countries has been made in 2000 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0219224 - reminiscent of The Day After http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085404 (no, this one ain't no Emmerich, and definitely without any Tomorrow).
Both as bleak as it gets on TV too.
the Oliver North/Guns for Hostages scandal, seen from the viewpoint of a CIA bureaucrat, in a universe in which the entire Cthulhu Mythos is real. (Teresa Nielsen Hayden)
what the space drone has been doing up there all this time
Been waiting for the aliens to hatch inside the poor astronauts (sent to this first Close Encounter on a purportedly unmanned mission under the pretense of having to repair some secret satellite), so they'll be ripe&ready for world domination at landing? =;-o
Or wait a minute, T.H.E.Y. said we mustn't ever tell anyone about that, or else... oops, posted already, on/. of all places +++NO CARRIER
What year was this written? 2012? 2004? 2000? Try 1983.
Thought that had been written by Doc Emmett Brown in 1885 after seeing the Tannens rule 2015.;-)
Yet during this period of national "mediocrity," we created Silicon Valley, built multinational biotechnology firms, and continued to lead the world in scientific journal publications and total number of Nobel Prize winners. We also invented and sold more than a few iPads.
And then there was a thing about men and a moon, too (arguably a bit more of an accomplishment than selling gadgets)... or do "alternative viewpoint" (conspiracy) theories claim "equal validity in the classroom" on this one as well these days?
Slashdot Mirror
(Friedrich Nietzsche)
HTML entities, and hence cuts headlines short.
...in The Matrix: It happens when T.H.E.Y. change something.' ;-)
Jim Goodnight, SAS Institute CEO, in: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-550102.html
Sara Robinson, http://www.alternet.org/visions/154518/why_we_have_to_go_back_to_a_40-hour_work_week_to_keep_our_sanity/?page=entire
;-) who figured it out, but Henry Ford.
"Management Summary": It's not Karl Marx
i.e. at least spared other continents from the worst (e.g. when certain courts and Commission were attempting similar "power grabs"), as shown in several articles at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/reports/most-read (cf. also various developing nations restricting patenting of "traditionally known" biotech).
The real tl:dr, in line with the anniversary mo(o)d... ;-)
;-)) in just a few years (actually, everyone minus the millions who'll get jailed for accidently looking at or listening to anything copyrighted for more than 30 milliseconds while on).
Great idea BTW. Now just think of the kind of footage (including audio) we'll get when everyone is wearing/wielding their Google Glasses (or Sights for that matter
by the very nature of the final word, this time around none of the account holders will get a chance to complain... posthumously.
So is the next move after "Would you please rat out your friend for using a nickname?" possibly going to be a particularly considerate pop-up like "Has this friend of yours gone belly-up?"
...so far (the latter even "to die on Mars, just not on impact"), and how two guys are going to start a population together shall remain the greatest mystery of Mars. ;-)
Knew it, Star Trek was real ;-) and Geordi did visit the 21st century to leave that piece of advice for cases when inverting the polarity of shield emitters wasn't enough.
Make "thou shalt not snoop" the law of the land, with narrow exceptions that require prior consent (for cases other than self-defense), imposing jailtime and fines on all who infringe upon anyone's privacy.
Which seems much closer to what Congress actually had in mind, as http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/3/257.full?ijkey=rF2MI0t8NYrGuJJ&keytype=ref#p-88 has pointed out previously:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chipmunks+bad+day
Weinberg's Second Law
A movie with the submarine's name for title (instead of the book's) in many countries has been made in 2000 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0219224 - reminiscent of The Day After http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085404 (no, this one ain't no Emmerich, and definitely without any Tomorrow). Both as bleak as it gets on TV too.
Sure, eliminating eavesdropping opportunities is just the kind of business that SigInt spooks kindly engage in all the time...
an entire dreadful decade by now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Copyright_Directive
No need to make it any worse.
Less so with a methane atmosphere.
No problem... we have headless servers, and that works fine, so why not a headless government?
Because if you ssh even into the best and brightest, the logon message's just this. ;-)
Been waiting for the aliens to hatch inside the poor astronauts (sent to this first Close Encounter on a purportedly unmanned mission under the pretense of having to repair some secret satellite), so they'll be ripe&ready for world domination at landing? =;-o
Or wait a minute, T.H.E.Y. said we mustn't ever tell anyone about that, or else... oops, posted already, on /. of all places +++NO CARRIER
Thought that had been written by Doc Emmett Brown in 1885 after seeing the Tannens rule 2015. ;-)
And then there was a thing about men and a moon, too (arguably a bit more of an accomplishment than selling gadgets)... or do "alternative viewpoint" (conspiracy) theories claim "equal validity in the classroom" on this one as well these days?
Enterprise Intro (Rod Stewart Version) on the occasion...
Hopefully not to meet a similar premature fate (in spite of the track record)...