Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read?

50000BTU_barbecue writes "Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone. But what story have you read that resonates years later because of some insight about human nature or society that's basically cynical or pessimistic? For me it's Fred Pohl's Jem, with its sharply divided resource-constrained future world driven by politics, and its conclusion that humans are just too destructive to handle contacting alien life, especially if humans have the technological upper hand. I'm wondering what other stories have stuck in people's minds. It can be a short story, a novel or an entire series of books."

1,365 comments

  1. Mission Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    10 books of my life I'll never get back (yes, I'm a glutton for punishment)

    1. Re:Mission Earth by AaronW · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll second this. Anything by L. Ron Hubbard. Mine ended up in the recycling bin since I couldn't bring myself to give them to a used book store to put anyone else through that agony.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:Mission Earth by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      These were depressing or terrible?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Mission Earth by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

      But what story have you read that resonates years later because of some insight about human nature or society that's basically cynical or pessimistic?

      All news articles about man made global warming
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      {ducks}

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    4. Re:Mission Earth by garyoa1 · · Score: 0

      Hubbard? Yes he wrote the worst movie ever filmed. Battlefield earth. And yet the book was incredibly brilliant. (And looong) Thing is, if you've read the book you realize that it could never be put on film. Just not possible. If you skipped the book because of the movie, you've missed a great read.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    5. Re:Mission Earth by Kazin · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I read the series when I was 14 or 15, and I remember liking it. I'm pretty sure I shouldn't go back and try again, however.

    6. Re:Mission Earth by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1

      Now, now - I found it quite useful for balancing my washing machine.

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    7. Re:Mission Earth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Bad stories are always depressing. Of course, that doesn't mean that all depressing stories are bad.

    8. Re:Mission Earth by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yes he wrote the worst movie ever filmed. Battlefield earth.

      I take it you've never seen "Battle Beyond the Stars" then. That movie is so bad if you smoke some good pot you'll laugh your ass off watching it.

      Yeah, I have a copy...

    9. Re:Mission Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) LOL - - and how about the "Left Behind" series. We have told friends of other faiths in various other countries about this Born-Again belief, and they were incredulous.

  2. Easy by virb67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Childhood's End

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can never decide if that is a good ending or a bad ending. I'll have to go read it again, I guess...

    2. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you mean Arthur C. Clakes Childhood's End, that wasn't depressing, certainly not up there with the most obvious example 1984. Unless you are trying to make some statement?

    3. Re:Easy by rcjhawk · · Score: 1

      If we're going for disturbing transformations, the The Triumph of Time in Blish's Cities in Flight is right up there.

    4. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, I agree: Arthur C. Clarke's "Childhood's End" is utterly depressing. I was thinking about it when I read the summary and then was surprised that someone else thought about it as well.

      The story depicts mankind's end. No, it's not a new beginning. Our individuality makes us what we are. Humanity ends right there, in some sort of stupid dance. No other Clarke story I know is as dark and depressing. Mankind comes to this pathetic end, not even with some sort of bang, it just gets absorbed, overcome, assimilated.

      Stories ending in all out nuclear war or complete annihilation of Earth or mankind are not as depressing as this.

    5. Re:Easy by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I agree; it was one of the first scifi books that shocked me. Took a lot of thinking to resolve all of the metaphor. Around the same time, I was listening to Neil Young and his "Needle and the Damage Done".

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    6. Re:Easy by turbidostato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Arthur C. Clakes Childhood's End, that wasn't depressing, certainly not up there with the most obvious example 1984"

      1984 is depressing just till you read Huxley' s Brave New World. And the fact that nobody has even mentioned it after well over 100 comments shows exactly why it's so depressing.

    7. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the most depressing part was the way the children left the parents and took mankind with them...

    8. Re:Easy by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Double plus agree.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:Easy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      1984 wasn't depressing, it was just irritating.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Easy by jitterman · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. I'm at least *ahem* years out of university, and I just finished "Brave New World" a few days ago. The last paragraph - "bummer" doesn't begin to approach it.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    11. Re:Easy by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Exactly my thoughts.

      The message I got is that even if humanity is fated to become part of some grand cosmic scheme, it will be in a form completely incomprehensible to us. That the eventual future of humanity will be as alien to us as we would be to Neanderthals. That despite all the advances we have made in the last half century, and will make in the next few decades, no generation of humanity lasts forever.

    12. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      End thread.

    13. Re:Easy by gullevek · · Score: 1

      I think Huxley's Island is even 10 times more depressing than Brave New World. Especially because you can take this and apply to many situations nowadays.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    14. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Republican party platform

    15. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Childhood's End. I read that as a teen and immediately followed it up with the Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy (all 4 books) to get me out of that funk.

    16. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Childhood's End

      This and 'A Canticle For Leibowitz'

    17. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.

    18. Re:Easy by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      "1984": Everything is so depressingly true.

      For the flip side, "Brave New World". If only these two had been combined, Brave New 1984 or some such.

      Just look around, if it isn't from the pages of 1984, then it's so much from Brave New World.

      Ok, may not be science fiction, but at the time, the technology they envisaged didn't yet exist. So, yeah, sciency enough.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    19. Re:Easy by dskzero · · Score: 2

      1984 is far more depressing than Brave New World. At least there are people out there in BNW. There isn't even a "out there" in 1984.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    20. Re:Easy by VAXcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno why everyone thinks Brave New World was depressing. It sounds like a utopia to me. I figure I'd at least be a Beta, which means I'd get some easy office job. Plenty of casual sex and drugs, none of conventional society's problems - what's not to like? A gram IS better than a damn. Everyone belongs to everybody else - paradise!

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    21. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Democrats are so much better. After all, the only true freedom is service to the state.

    22. Re:Easy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ""1984": Everything is so depressingly true."
      no it isn't. It's the farthest thing from true.
      Did you actually read the book? You need a completely closed society, and technology can only be used by the government for that to even begin to be true. 1984 is laughable today. IN 48, with the wars and Fascism? yeah, scary. he last 30 years? no, not so much.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Easy by mmell · · Score: 1

      I normally don't do anything to bolster A/C's, but A Canticle for Leibowitz was the first title that sprang to my mind, followed by The Lathe of Heaven.

    24. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dhalgren. I've never felt more intellectually inadequate than when trying to decypher meaning from the first few pages of this book...

    25. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to post this, but I guess someone beat me to it! I don't understand how showing that all human accomplishments are meaningless is supposed to be "good"

    26. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that you thought that was bleak. I thought it held hope for us as a species. I guess it was bleak for some of the characters, but overall I would have rated it a positive book.

    27. Re:Easy by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I can't read Michael Crichton's books any more. Sphere almost drove me insane. That man is way too good a writer, his shit sucks me in and I can't put the damned book down... and then I'm freaked out for a week after I finish it. Just say no to Crackton! It's been years since I've read him *shudder*

    28. Re:Easy by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      I remember finding a young adult fiction book by Louise Lawrence (Andra) utterely bleak. I have never reread it as an adult, but it had the most down-beat ending. I must dig it out.

    29. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno why everyone thinks Brave New World was depressing. It sounds like a utopia to me. I figure I'd at least be a Beta, which means I'd get some easy office job. Plenty of casual sex and drugs, none of conventional society's problems - what's not to like? A gram IS better than a damn. Everyone belongs to everybody else - paradise!

      And this kids, is why it resonates so damn much. A world full of people solely driven solely by baser instincts, devolving into nothing more than dumb animals, wait worse than animals, at least they have some notion of "family". No meaningful connections to anyone. No joys of raising a child. Utterly self-absorbed. Never alone, forced to be with these people. A prison of vapidity. Twitter as life. Humanity as an assembly line.

      You were meant for more. Humanity was meant for more.

    30. Re:Easy by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Gonna have to read it again. It didn't depress me when I read it. I think I identified with the horned aliens more than the humans, maybe that's why. I'm wondering when they're going to make a movie of Childhood's End. It's about time.

      --
      ...
    31. Re:Easy by spauldo · · Score: 1

      The only depressing thing about Brave New World is the fact that anyone took it seriously.

      I mean, yeah, nuclear weapons get invented and you have a potential for a lot of bad stuff. Electronic surveillance can lead to abuse by governments, corporations, and criminals. But birth control and artificial insemination?

      The problem with Brave New World is that it ignores basic human nature. The kind of scenario depicted would only be possible if humans were altered to remove their drives for family and reproduction.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    32. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kind of scenario depicted would only be possible if humans were altered to remove their drives for family and reproduction.

      I thought that was the scenario.

    33. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stand on Zanzibar
      by John Brunner (Circa 1971)
      It is also a very insightful prediction of the world to come, that gets more on target as each day goes by...

    34. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figure I'd at least be a Beta.

      Bzzzt. I'd like to say WRONG! but maybe you'd get lucky. Hey it happens. How much do you spend on lotto tickets?

      Of course you wouldn't have had a choice to play in this game as it would have been determined at birth what caste you were to be. Also, caste societies never have an even distribution. How many beta's did we see for every alpha. Now extrapolate to gamma, delta, ... epsilon. What percent of society do you figure had to be epsilon in order to support those few alpha's we did see. Near as I can tell, (and most economic reports back this up), we were closer to an equitable society in the 50's-60's than at any point I can find in history. We've departed from that, severely. Back to the numbers in your head above, if you're thinking that the epsilons are less than half the population then you're on crack. Most standard hierarchies have ~8 workers per surpervisor, but lets be generous and assume that you only have 5 staff per supervisor (never mind additional administrative roles). This means that you would have 156 people in the Alpha to Delta range (and yes 125 of them are Deltas) and you have 625 Epsilons. Even if you drop down to binary supervision you end up with 16 Epsilons supporting 15 A-D's. It doesn't favour you AT ALL.

      The worst aspect of slavery and classism is the assumption that the highers have that their inferiors are just that. It forces a behavioural straight jacket on those in subordinate positions because either they are ignored by their 'betters' or worse, they're told they're being out of line. Going back to BNW, how many Epsilons did we see acting out? As far as I've got, I haven't seen any but the elevator operator, and he was a troll barely capable of thought, and yet he sure as heck didn't seem intrinsically happy. He still had issues tugging at him, even if he couldn't pursue them long enough to figure them out.

    35. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur."Childhood's End" has left in a depressive slump since I read it at age 10!

    36. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha-- good comment. "Soylent Green" was more depressing than BNW. Lots of people strive to attain a BNW existence. The American dream

    37. Re:Easy by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the diseases (like lupus) associated with their engineered bodies.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  3. What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1984

  4. Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Though the most depressing part is the people who think she had good ideas.

    1. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who misguidedly think that they're entirely self-sufficient, and those who understand that human individuality can only exist and prosper in a healthy society.

    2. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand... Those who understand her ideas and see them as value to society... and those who are too stupid to understand.

      There are two novels that can transform a bookish 14-year-kld’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish daydream that can lead to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood in which large chunks of the day are spent inventing ways to make real life more like a fantasy novel. The other is a book about orcs.

    3. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      There are arguments against your seeming wisdom: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/07/07/sociopathic/ and I, who understand her ideas, don't believe them to be a value to society.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Absolutely fucking brilliant.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See now, I have a major frowny face.

      Thanks dude. Thanks a lot. :-(

    6. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who understand that individual liberty are not dirty words, and those who like to put dirty words in other people's mouths.

    7. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I love this quote! But you really ought to attribute it to the correct source, which is John Rogers.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    8. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by ramsun · · Score: 1

      Do you, by any chance, watch Craig Ferguson?

    9. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Oh... and while I'm at it, here's the actual quote:

      There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

      -- John Rogers.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    10. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Vaphell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I value people who care only about their family and friends more than the compassionate types loving everybody. The former are honest, the latter usually are easy to pin down as stinking hypocrites.
      People are not wired to care about the whole world. Your brain can track up to 150 people at once. If you claim you can't sleep because children in Africa are dying, you are lying. If you say are worried about the living conditions of the guy who assembled your iphone, you are lying.
      The only way to make sure nobody is left behind is to follow the rule 'Everyone looks after oneself = everyone is looked after'

      we have a decent proxy to determine self-sufficiency score - money. If you are paid a good coin that means you are a valuable member of society. If your score is above 0, you are a net gain for society. Yeah yeah, the rich are mostly worthless but have a high score - nobody said the proxy was perfect (besides the rich were bad guys in the book)
      The whole point is that the healthy society you speak of doesn't necessarily mean inducing guilt trips in individuals to look after everybody and their dog. On the contrary, they should be free to excel without being bogged down by mediocrity all around them.
      I bet this is one of the reasons why the upward mobility is at all time low - people who are bright enough to bring value to the table are paying through the nose instead of expanding, because everybody is entitled to something and it ain't free. They also can't temporarily cut corners in their own wellbeing to bet everything they have on their ideas, because most likely the govt will say it's illegal in 10 different ways and will find 100 ways to punish them.

    11. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who understood it and those (such as yourself) who have not. Capitalism is the greatest example of voluntary human cooperation in history (remember the Freedman's story of the pencil - look it up on youtube). The difference is not between cooperation and no cooperation, but between voluntary and forced cooperation.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    12. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Genda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is where to draw the line between my individual liberty and yours. My fist should experience all the freedom it wants, right up to the edge of your noses freedom to not be bloody. Sadly when people begin assuming that their freedom is a Gawd given right, and continue to take a little more, grab a little more, nudge a little more, we end up with a lot of people who honestly believe that they are entitled. suddenly your continued breathing is interfering with their freedom to use that space you're taking up. This is how wars large and small begin. If you think I'm exaggerating, I would only have to point at the near cratering of the global economy in 2008, and the next one which will be even larger if we don't start limiting the freedom of those who now control our economies. So with individual liberty, must also come personal responsibility, and social accountability. You/They are not the only sentient being(s) on the planet, taking freedom isn't an excuse for not playing well with others.

    13. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I value people who care only about their family and friends more than the compassionate types loving everybody. The former are honest, the latter usually are easy to pin down as stinking hypocrites.

      There's nothing wrong with valuing your family and friends more than other people. It doesn't mean that you shouldn't put zero value to other people, however.

      People are not wired to care about the whole world.

      Actually, yes, they are. Well, not about the whole world, but their community (which is certainly bigger than family). Humans are social primates, with all that entails. If you read up on human ethology, you'll find out that a lot of "basic decency" things, and altruism in general, are actually evolved intrinsic behavior, rather than conditioning.

      Again, this doesn't contradict caring about yourself/family/friends. In fact, it rather complements it - if the society as a whole takes care about you as a member, it makes sense to ensure its continual existence. That's precisely why these things evolved in the first place - they benefit not only the group as a whole, but (on average) individual members of that group as well.

    14. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by ktappe · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who understand that individual liberty are not dirty words, and those who like to put dirty words in other people's mouths.

      Your post was confusing until I saw your screen name.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    15. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who misguidedly think that they're entirely self-sufficient, and those who understand that human individuality can only exist and prosper in a healthy society.

      “Liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order” —Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

      But to bring this comment back on topic, I would say Level 7 by Mordecai Roshwald.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    16. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Outstanding. Thanks for my first really good laugh all day.

    17. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand... Those who understand her ideas and see them as value to society... and those who are too stupid to understand.

      Because obviously, if someone doesn't agree with your way of thinking, the only possible explanation is that they're stupid.

    18. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there are no orcs in...

      oooh!

    19. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      People can care for somewhere under 200 others. Which in a population of over 7 billion means jack all. As governments encompass orders of magnitude more people, expecting the monkeysphere to pressure human decency to rise above the baser notions is ludicrous.

    20. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the flamebait mod exist any more? Fine. I'll bite.

      Here's some of the sources of your depression (1):

      "Government "help" to business is just as disastrous as government persecution... the only way a government can be of service to national prosperity is by keeping its hands off."
      Reason for depression: AC thinks government should bail out big business

      "Ask yourself whether the dream of heaven and greatness should be waiting for us in our graves - or whether it should be ours here and now and on this earth."
      Reason for depression: AC is "saved" by Jesus, and wants you to be, too..

      "Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities"
      Reason for depression: AC wants to put the darkies back in their place.

      (1) Quotes sourced from brainyquote.com

    21. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You don't need to care for all the other people individually - that much is, of course, impossible. You can, however, care for the aggregate, especially when you yourself are also a part of it, and its well-being directly reflects on yours.

    22. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who understand that individual liberty are not dirty words, and those who like to put dirty words in other people's mouths.

      Your post was confusing until I saw your screen name.

      Actually, his post was never confusing, it was just stupid. Then I saw his screen name, and realized it was weapons-grade stupidity that was launched by a missile fueled by hate, selfishness, and greed, sent by the chosen few who get off watching the suffering of the 99%.

    23. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by garett_spencley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's funny because people who come across as entitled to me are the ones who hold the exact ideas that Rand was so strongly against: altruists.

      The ideas of social responsibility, duty, innate obligations to "society", "greater good" are the ideas that hold that is reasonable expect individuals to think and act pro-actively in certain ways for the benefit of others. The demand that an individual love everyone equally is making a claim to an individual's most deepest and intimate emotions. That's a sense of entitlement if I've ever heard one.

      This is not Rand's definition of the word "liberty" but it is one that I think she would have liked: "Liberty, in a political context, is an environment in which all relationships are consensual."

      Here's quote of Rand's on the subject of conflicting interests:

      "When one speaks of man’s right to exist for his own sake, for his own rational self-interest, most people assume automatically that this means his right to sacrifice others. Such an assumption is a confession of their own belief that to injure, enslave, rob or murder others is in man’s self-interest—which he must selflessly renounce. The idea that man’s self-interest can be served only by a non-sacrificial relationship with others has never occurred to those humanitarian apostles of unselfishness, who proclaim their desire to achieve the brotherhood of men. And it will not occur to them, or to anyone, so long as the concept 'rational' is omitted from the context of 'values,' 'desires,' 'self-interest' and ethics." - Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness

    24. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Is that really the meme that's developed? This sounds like a variant on Obama's "public bridges" drive the west's economic might, not economic freedom.

      Free individuals created this society, dragging your ass along with it. You are the beneficiary of it, not the lord and master, regardless of how much your memes tell you.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    25. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by garett_spencley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't need to care for all the other people individually - that much is, of course, impossible. You can, however, care for the aggregate, especially when you yourself are also a part of it, and its well-being directly reflects on yours.

      That's a selfish idea if I've ever heard one ;)

      I am absolutely convinced that the majority of Rand's opponents have never read a single of her books. Rand was once asked to clarify the whole "selfish" controversy on a talk show in the 70's and she said, paraphrasing: "How about I use a different word: self-esteem, would you be more comfortable with that?"

      What most people miss is that Rand was just as much against pop-philosophies that she called "altruist" as she was promoting an alternative, particularly the ideas contained within "altruist philosophies" of using selfishness as a scapegoat for all of humanity's ills. Because she saw that most of the prevailing philosophies were not just advocating for benevolence and kindness but were teaching people that they were essentially worthless and needed to submit themselves entirely to something greater than themselves. As evidence I submit any story where the main protagonist achieves hero status by killing himself at the end to save others.

      You kind of hit the nail on the head without even realizing it. To care about your family, your society, your country, your environment is a selfish act because you are acting for your own individual preservation. It is selfish to love someone because their existence, their virtues, their company gives you personal, selfish joy. It is rational to want your family, your friends and your peers to flourish and prosper because it means a higher standard of living, not just for them but for everyone, yourself included. And Rand promoted rational self-interest (and clarified that all the time: source).

      It's altruist philosophies that have equivocated the idea of having your own selfish interests at heart with being incompatible with the interests of others. Rand was very careful to clarify this and the fact that so many people openly attack her using a complete lack of understanding of what she meant when she promoted the idea of selfishness as a virtue is as close to proof as you can get that these people have never actually studied anything she wrote.

    26. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Free individuals created this society

      I did not deny it. It's important to understand that the converse is also true, however - this society created free individuals, and allowed them to maintain their freedom individuality.

      A free individual without society is a solitary animal, not a creator.

    27. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then there are those who think they are completely self-made and independent and those who have the honesty and wisdom to recognize that they owe a debt to those around them.

    28. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First of all, yes, I have actually read "Atlas Shrugged".

      Yes, I do realize that Rand itself saw some manifestations of what is normally referred to as altruism as rational self-interest at work (the book has that, in fact, even in some quite explicit forms, like the rescue of Galt).

      The real problem with Rand is that her understanding of what "rational" is, is very much dogmatic, and often more emotional than rational in practice. In other words, what she proposes as rational self-interest masquerading as altruism, does not in fact match the real world. The model of behavior that she proposes and glorifies in the book is not in fact rational - it's way over to the other side from the balance of self-obsession vs altruism which results in the best (statistically speaking) outcome.

      In particular, she severely overestimated the importance and self-sufficiency of individual against the society. Her whole model is based on the premise of vast superiority of occasional "heroes" - personal, individual superiority - against the mass of the species as a whole. "Heroes" who single-handedly guided and caused progress by act of their sheer will and ingenuity, pretty much regardless of the environment, and in fact often directly against it. That is essentially what the book is all about. The problem, again, is that there's no evidence really backing that premise. Rand followed it because it matched her beliefs, but a rational philosophy cannot be based on a belief. An internally self-consistent one can, and Objectivism is certainly self-consistent in that sense, but consistency does not imply usefulness if the initial set of axioms contradicts reality.

      The other oft repeated mistake is that such "selfish altruism" is solely a product of rational thought in the first place. In practice it actually arises much earlier than the ability to rationalize, and is seen among many animals. Among some of them it defines some of the crucial traits that distinguish them as species, and humans are in fact one of those species (we are far more "altruistic" than other great apes, and historically our lineage seems to have been more cooperative, judging by anthropological evidence to date). We shroud that in elaborate social rites (itself a result of evolutionary selection of our societies!) that re-enforce and multiply the effect, but that feel of guilt for doing the "wrong thing" at the back of your head is just as much genetics as it is conditioning.

    29. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Actually, Anthem is a better book for someone that age. Get's down to the point more quickly, and is easier to understand.

      The Fountainhead is arguably a lot fuller of a book, still pretty good, but the not-rape parts are kind of hard for some people (similar in content, I guess, to 50 Shades of Grey).

      Now Atlas Shrugged, of course, is considered the ultimate accomplishment, and in a way it is; although I do have to agree that the radio address by Galt is somewhat laborious-> if you have been reading the book up until that point, you already know the content of the address. For some odd reason, there is a lot of hate surrounding this book, even by people who have never read it; I find it rather odd that I can read any number of volumes by various ideologies that I vehemently disagree with, and nary say a word, while others can read this one book, and spit tacks at anything that homo-phonically resembles the title.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    30. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Havenwar · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Raynd. Those who did it at a desk, and those who did it in bed.

      I'm sorry, did I miss you in my narrowminded view of reality? Impossible, there's no way that people are say... individuals... and do things with more diverse reasons or findings than you can simplify. Is there?

      There are two kinds of people who post on slashdot. Those who post insightful, interesting and well researched comments... and those that gets modded up.

    31. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that many of those people who read the books don't get it either. Shutdowns point still stands.

    32. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Havenwar · · Score: 2

      This is true, and it's why I posit that the concept of government is flawed. Not any particular system, but ALL of them. Because none of them have the ruling class remaining a part of the group which they regulate...

      Sure they might be in words, but we all know that they get treated differently, and we all know that when you are late for a meeting and can take a taxi clear cross country on the tax-payers money, then you're not really living in the same world as most people, who often would be hard pressed to afford a taxi across town even without a life and death situation arising. (Granted taxis are more expensive here where petrol prices are twice what they are in the US, but you get my point, I hope.)

      So like you said.. You can care for the aggregate, when you are a part of it, and its well-being directly reflects on yours. Since leadership is so far removed from normal people this is not true for them, thus they can not care for the aggregate, can not care for the individual stranger that to them is just lost in a faceless mass of "other" people.

      So if your latest law happens to cause severe problems for a few hundred or thousand of them, it's not your problem. It'll solve problems for some others, and hey, none of the people affected actually live in YOUR world... Your friends and family and social circle will be fine.

    33. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please amend: all relationships are consensual and no-one is oppressed

    34. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      Atlas Shrugged had Orcs?

    35. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      There are arguments against your seeming wisdom: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/07/07/sociopathic/ and I, who understand her ideas, don't believe them to be a value to society.

      Ah, but Rand's ideas do have value to society. In and of themselves, their social value is strictly negative. As a metaphor, they could serve as a warning of how things can be done utterly wrongly and/or wrong-headedly. In this sense, the book Atlas Shrugged is analogous to books such as 1984 or Brave New World or Fahrenheit 451 or to movies such as Dr. Strangelove or Brazil. Unfortunately, such expositions are instead often an inspiration for the sociopathic leaders of nations and corporations. It goes over their heads, in a way which would draw a Whooosh comment on Slashdot.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    36. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      If everyone would care for 100 others, in an ideal spread, you would end up having 99 others who would care for you.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    37. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Sique · · Score: 1

      The concept of government is flawed, but it is the least of all flawed concepts we tried so far. We know that the countries with weak or no governments are the one with the least growth, with the least stability, with the least individual freedom, with the least accountability.
      Whatever complaint you bring against governments in general, we know that in general the alternatives are worse. That's why goverments arise again and again, and if the official goverment breaks, local inofficial governments like gangs of thugs or cliques pop up like mushrooms after a rain.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    38. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I suggest you look at the comment to which I replied first, then maybe you can direct your venom where it's actually warranted.

    39. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is an argument for a more localized government (which directly translates to leadership being less removed from normal people), not necessary against a strong government.

      That said, a government is effectively inevitable. By definition, a government is an organization that holds the monopoly on legitimate violence over a given territory. If you remove that, what follows is a struggle for power between various interest groups; the ones that win, become the new government. So, flawed or not, the best thing you can do is shape the government to have the most beneficial effect overall.

    40. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because no embodiment of fascism has been so cowardly about admitting what it is.

      Also, she writes awfully. Worse than Hitler.

    41. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with defining liberty as an environment in which all relationships are consensual is that we are non-consensually bound to every other living being on this planet. Every time I flush the toilet, I am sending my effluent somewhere else. This will end up in the ocean, where it effects the lives of countless algae, plankton, fish, and marine mammals, not to mention every person who will end up eating algae, plankton, fish, marine mammals, or any terrestrial animals that eat algae, plankton, fish, or marine mammals. When your morality chooses to ignore this basic facet of life, it is severely deficient, and I think that the results of having Randian acolytes make decisions has borne this out.

      As an exercise - which relationship is less consensual: 1) the economic activities of Jim's Petrochemicals 200 miles upstream from my water source poisoning me, or 2) government telling Jim that he can't put poison in the water? It could also be that China is burning coal that is sending suphur into the atmosphere, which is killing the plants in my garden, but it still holds.

    42. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Funny?

      Yeah, I suppose there are a lot of nitwits who buffoonishly yuck it up as they snicker and jeer at Rand.

      Rand is an interesting cultural phenomenon. She was opposed to theism and collectivism, but pooh poohing Rand is largely only a collectivist shibboleth - the theists are usually indifferent to positive. The amusing thing is she had already perfectly portrayed today's detractors of her books in the books themselves more than half a century ago.

    43. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I admire Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged on the level that she kind of described the current state of affairs, but sort of in reverse!

      The egoistic self-interest radiating beacons of capitalism are the destroyers in the real world.

      Also, Rand made me think that there is no way to be 100% self-sufficient, even with the latest technological gear. Something will break, will need maintenance, and so on. What are you going to do - live self-sufficiently but spend 45 h per day picking up your food and maintaining the machines? Better to outsource that to others. And guess what, then you'll be living in a community of like-minded people.

      Even though Rand described how the "only for my benefit" posse ran from the destroyers (in the book) they did not escape to loneliness. Instead, they escaped to form a community of like-minded people, and if you ask me, where they lived a very Marxian life (where "from all according to their ability, to all according to their needs" was maintained by market-economic forces which defined and balanced the value of ability with the amount of need).

      Still, Atlas Shrugged is a good book to read.

    44. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Havenwar · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Of course both a more localized government as would be my choice and the option of no government are sociologically impossible to reach from our current status quo - so it's a moot point.

      I'd like to point out however that not all governments have ruled by violence, legitimate or not... but that's a debate for another time, since the first argument against this is that these governments were eventually overtaken - usually by violent means - by outsiders.

      When you come right down to it being an asshole is the human thing to do, so we have exactly the society we deserve, want, and are supposed to have. If we tried replacing it with anything else someone would just revert it because they stayed truer to the human nature of violence, conquest, egotism... There is no winning when you fight human nature.

    45. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Let me go all AliasParker on you and say that your repulsive argument is like getting poked with a big stick. Stop it.

      A negative social value, within the context described, goes below NO social value. Use your Boolean logic, basic math and set skills and understand that there is value, no value, negative value and then other theories outside the domain of the discussion.

      The phrase was: don't believe them to be a value.... which qualifies in the middle, e.g. no value. "Strictly negative" in this case, would be silly, so let's put an absolute value where |value| or zero is the new domain and agree on zero.

      If you allow people to be reviled, they will be.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    46. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are paid a good coin that means you are a valuable member of society.

      I can't believe people fall for this crap. If you are paid a good coin then that means you're paid a good coin. It has nothing to do with your "value" to society.

    47. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by rich_hudds · · Score: 0

      You're perfectly free to be as selfish as you like mate. Don't pay your taxes, fuck others, hey even shoot them if you want.

      I'm perfectly free to join up with the rest of society and stick you in jail though.

      I'm a social animal and I try to get by in society. You're free to do otherwise. If you're so self sufficient you'll be fine, if not I guess we'll lock you up.

      You know Ann Rand accepted money from the Medicare system?

    48. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 2

      There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    49. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, can I play?

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand. Those who think there are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand and those who have better things to do then post vacuous platitudes on message boards. (And yes, I know which one I am.)

    50. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It commands an incomparably more precise, logically structured, generally comprehensible and, in essence, extremely flexible ideology that, in its elaborateness and completeness, is almost a secularized religion. It offers a ready answer to any question whatsoever; it can scarcely be accepted only in part, and accepting it has profound implications for human life. In an era when metaphysical and existential certainties are in a state of crisis, when people are being uprooted and alienated and are losing their sense of what this world means, this ideology inevitably has a certain hypnotic charm. To wandering humankind it offers an immediately available home: all one has to do is accept it, and suddenly everything becomes clear once more, life takes on new meaning, and all mysteries, unanswered questions, anxiety, and loneliness vanish. Of course, one pays dearly for this low-rent home: the price is abdication of one's own reason, conscience, and responsibility, for an essential aspect of this ideology is the consignment of reason and conscience to a higher authority. The principle involved here is that the center of power is identical with the center of truth.

      -- Vaclav Havel, "The Power of the Powerless"

      Three guesses what ideology he was talking about.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    51. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me ... and I have NOT read her books, except for Anthem, but I understand her work as being important as a rational response to Communism. I don't see her work as having the same relevance today. I think that many have taken her work as a foundation for justifying their own libertarian actions, which has the unfortunate effect of causing a number of these folks to willfully not understand the debt they owe to their own society, and the need for laws, regulations, and ethics that keep that society running smoothly.

      Why is her ideas dangerous? Because the underpinning of our great nation are not laws and rules from the government, but the moral code that has been the heart of the society for 300 years. Her ideas undermine the moral and ethical foundation that keeps us together as a culture. Not to overstate the case, but we do have an obligation to each other, the corporate world must stay bound to ethics, and the society must remain egalitarian to a degree, or this country is bound to failure.

      Now I agree, there must always be a balance between duty to self and duty to others, but let's not fool ourselves and believe that we only have a duty to ourselves. Would we have anyone enlist in the all volunteer U.S. Army if we only had a duty to ourselves? Her defense of selfishness would lead to a world much less moral than the one we have now ... and I for one would not want to live there.

    52. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 2

      Capitalism is the greatest example of voluntary human cooperation

      What the hell are you smoking?

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    53. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Count+Fenring · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ideas of social responsibility, duty, innate obligations to "society", "greater good" are the ideas that hold that is reasonable expect individuals to think and act pro-actively in certain ways for the benefit of others. The demand that an individual love everyone equally is making a claim to an individual's most deepest and intimate emotions. That's a sense of entitlement if I've ever heard one.

      Wow, if that in any way actually described social responsibility, you'd really have a zinger there. Unfortunately, social responsibility doesn't remotely mean loving everyone equally - or even loving anyone, particularly. It involves acting responsibly within your wider community, and providing for common infrastructure and safety nets. It's about very practical considerations that deal with external realities. Defining it solely in terms of internal emotional construction is stupid. But, then, as a Rander, you're basically a solipsist anyway - who cares how the external world actually functions, when it can all be about ME ME ME.

      This is not Rand's definition of the word "liberty" but it is one that I think she would have liked: "Liberty, in a political context, is an environment in which all relationships are consensual."

      But somehow all her sex scenes are basically rapes. Hmmm.

    54. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If humanity can't overcome its "wiring," we're all just slaves to evolution. No wonder the religious people don't like listening to the atheists. At least religion provides the option of free will.

    55. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Your comment is really funny, but I wonder which kind of horrible person would make a 14 year old kid read Atlas Shrugged.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    56. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Can I be on your Christmas card list?

      Oh wait, I already am.

    57. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this! This is the sort of rational intelligent discourse that I expect from Slashdot. Very well thought out!

    58. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by h0oam1 · · Score: 1

      And then there are those that don't understand that the sine qua non of a healthy society is individual liberty.

    59. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      I value people who care only about their family and friends more than the compassionate types loving everybody. The former are honest, the latter usually are easy to pin down as stinking hypocrites. People are not wired to care about the whole world.

      Correction. People are not wired to care about the whole world equally. I care more about my family and friends than I care about others, that doesn't mean I don't mind when others suffer.

      If you claim you can't sleep because children in Africa are dying, you are lying.

      Either that or you can't lead a normal life. Although "can't sleep" is a pretty high level of caring, usually limited to problems that affect you directly. That doesn't mean you don't care that there are children dying at all. If you don't, you're a sociopath, because you lack basic empathy.

      If you say are worried about the living conditions of the guy who assembled your iphone, you are lying.

      Once again, levels. I don't care enough to go without a phone (and pretty much all other electronics). I care enough to pay more to buy one from a manufacturer that treats their workers better. If you advertise that your phone is more expensive because you don't treat your workers like slaves, you get my money (assuming your phone is also a good phone).

      we have a decent proxy to determine self-sufficiency score - money. If you are paid a good coin that means you are a valuable member of society.

      Being a valuable member of society is a direct opposite to the concept of self-sufficiency. The entire concept of separation of labor implies a lack of self-sufficiency. You don't grow your own food, build your own shelter, or sow your own clothes. You're depending on others contributing to society, and they depend on you doing your part. The fact you are useful means someone is willing to pay you and you provide value. This is efficient, but it is not self-sufficiency.

      The whole point is that the healthy society you speak of doesn't necessarily mean inducing guilt trips in individuals to look after everybody and their dog. On the contrary, they should be free to excel without being bogged down by mediocrity all around them.

      The problem with people like you is that you lack the understanding that you might be free to excel without being bogged down by the mediocrity all around you, but you're incapable of doing so. You depend on society providing an infrastructure which you can use to be successful. That doesn't mean your individual talents don't matter, and shouldn't be rewarded. They do, and they should. And if you're more talented and are providing more value than the next guy, you should be rewarded more than the next guy. If you don't believe me, shun all of society's benefits and see how far you get. No more police to protect your property, no roads to deliver your products, no courts to enforce your contracts...

      Sometimes, helping the people you consider to be "mediocre" can actually help you. If your city is helping the homeless, and people who fit your definition of "productive" don't have to worry about being annoyed by beggers everywhere they go, they are more likely to want to live and work there, bringing more value to the city. Don't get annoyed when society is costing you money if the return you get is worth it. Get annoyed when society is wasting your money and you're not getting a return. Then provide a less costly alternative that is not just, "abandon all the people who are clearly less brilliant than I am", because, in the long run, that will hurt you far more than you think.

    60. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two kinds of people who have read Ayn Rand... Those who understand her ideas and see them as value to society... and those who are too stupid to understand.

      I'm the third kind - I've read Ayn Rand, understand her ideas, and find them oversimplified and poorly investigated.

      Seriously, for all the gushing my friends did about Atlas Shrugged, I really expected it to contain some deep exploration of economics, politics, and history. Instead I got "these principles xyz are more important than anything else, and nature makes it obvious. If you disagree, you are wrong and evil." Bleah.

    61. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by careysub · · Score: 1

      Wonderful! I hadn't encountered that quote before. Thanks!

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    62. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "You know Ann Rand accepted money from the Medicare system?"
      Stop using thta like it's some sort of argument.
      I can show examples after example of Rand flawed view or corporations.

      But taking money form a system she paid into? I can't fault her. We can discuss whether or not she would have opted out.
      I thin a bigger point is that she got her education form a state sponsored university.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    63. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Did you hear the entire speech, or just the out of context part Fox and Romney spread?

      IT's a correct statement. Everything you DO is dependent on the people before you to able you to do it.
      It's a fact. Hell, it's a maxim. It's only controversial for people looking for any excuse to bring up some hate.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    64. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People aren't wired to do math? should we stop teaching it?
      People aren't wired to move down the road at 60 miles an hour, should we stop?

      Money is a horrible proxy. Tesla didn't have any money, so you are telling me he didn't add anything in society?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    65. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except those 200 aren't living in a closed system. Each one impacts people outside your 200 and so one.

      ".. monkeysphere to pressure human decency to rise above the baser notions is ludicrous"
      since that has been happening, it's pretty self evident that you are wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    66. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Objectivism is the Marxism of the right. They both describe a self-referencing theory of a society that was dreamed up by an academic mind (describing the type of mind, not the profession of the writer), offered as an incontrovertible truth, but without any actual analytical or evidentiary support, apparently developed to satisfy the author's emotional needs and preferences (ironic in the case of Marx since he was a ground-breaking analyst of capitalism; Rand has no such work to her credit).

      In the case of Rand in fact her work is a direct reaction to Communism - her family being dispossessed by the Communist revolution in Russia. As such it is a psychologically revealing work about an angry woman, seeking to create a mirror-image to the thing that hurt her personally. As a work of serious political, economic or sociological thought, it is utterly vacuous.

      Of course one of the two was a turgid dense writer, the other very eloquent. Das Kapital is much easier going than Atlas Shrugged.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    67. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by ajs · · Score: 1

      I think the modified version of the quote is from The Value of Nothing by Raj Patel. Specifically the "childish daydream" vs. "childish fantasy" wording...

    68. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Libertarians - where you have the right to shit on your neighbors doormat, and if he doesn't like it, he has to spend millions of his own money to build a case against you and pay the courts to hear it. Libertarians - where land grants rights, and lack of land ownership leaves you a second-class citizen. All the rights of a citizen, but no place where you may exercise any of them.

    69. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Mr Obama, but your "you didn't build that" philosophy doesn't go over well with anyone but the most hard core intellectually bereft teenager.

      Simple question: In the Obama quote, "you didn't build that" - what specifically does the word "that" refer to?

    70. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't agree with shutdown -p now's way of thinking, and I think he's stupid, so he does have a point.

    71. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to care about a million people individually to behave in ways that do not harm their interests. I need only of my own greater good, then act toward others in a way consistent with that. This equation involves only two people: me and any other.

    72. Re:Does Ayn Rand count? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      "personal, individual superiority - against the mass of the species as a whole."

      This response will probably never be read. I tend to get sucked into debates when I have more important things to do so I usually post and disappear. But as I have nothing better to do this particular moment here it goes.

      You misunderstood the intention of the book. Rand was exploring the philosophical ideas of individualism pitted against collectivism, and Atlas Shrugged was fiction. The ideas were there to motivate her characters. You need to read her non-fiction for an application of objectivism to the real world.

      But individualism vs. collectivism is not the individual vs. society or the species as a whole. You misunderstood her definitions of individualism, altruism and collectivism. Collectivism is the idea that the individual belongs to society, that society is an organism unto itself and that the interests of the human race as a whole supersede the interests of the individual; that the individual has a moral obligation to dedicate his life to the service of society, and if that means giving his life in sacrifice then such demands are occasionally made. Spock actually had the most eloquent way to summarize collectivism: "The interests of the many outweigh the interests of the few."

      Rand posited that such an ideology is morally wrong. That's why she chose the word "selfish", to pit her ideas directly in opposition to mainstream altruism. She never cared to demonstrate how rational self interest could appease altruists. She would have shuddered at the notion that any of her ideas were akin to "rational self-interest masquerading as altruism." To Rand, altruism was as close to pure evil as you could get.

      For the sake of completeness: individualism is the idea that the individual has the right to exist for his own sake and has no moral obligation or duty to sacrifice himself for the sake of others.

      That's really all Rand had to say, in a nutshell. She spent an awful lot of time trying to prove, logically, why individualism is objectively moral (and by extension how a system of morality and ethics could be objectively defined which was something entirely new and, even if you come out disagreeing with her, worth reading for that alone). But all she really had to say is that people are not property, that there's nothing wrong with helping others if you so choose but it's a not a moral duty, and there's a lot wrong with subordinating an individual to the level of a sacrifice in the name of "greater good" or "society." That doesn't mean the individual is necessarily pitted against society or even that society has different interests than the individual (in fact Rand pointed out that all society is is a collection of individuals choosing to coexist, and therefore society can have no interests other than the interests of each and every individual individually).

      Anyway my comment was to point out that your examples of "altruistic acts" were not at all examples of what Rand called "altruism." I never meant to equivocate Rand's ideas of rational self-interest as a form of altruism and I'm rather surprised that I was interpreted that way.

      Altruism, as far as Rand defined it, was about personal sacrifice for the sake of others. And she defined "sacrifice" as a surrender of a value for a lesser value. It's the difference between spending your life savings to treat your wife's cancer (preserving a personal value) vs. spending your life savings on building a homeless shelter for strangers while your sick wife dies.

      Since others responded to the other points raised in your comment I'll leave them.

  5. Short Story by wirehead_rick · · Score: 1

    The Butterfly Effect (not the movie!)

    --
    -- Mean People Suck
    1. Re:Short Story by kat_skan · · Score: 2

      The movie was plenty depressing, just in that "O God Ashton Kutcher is trying to act" kind of way.

    2. Re:Short Story by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I thought the movie was good. Didn't always make sense but it was entertaining and thought-provoking, and I liked the ending when he ends-up as a baby. It was nominated by the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films for an award.

      Where would I go to read the short story of Butterfly Effect?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Short Story by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 1

      I hadn't seen it yet, and you just gave away the ending. You insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Short Story by beachcoder · · Score: 1

      There are alternate endings; I never really liked the original ending (though that could have been the execution rather than the concept). Not sure what the book ends with though (didn't know there was one).

    5. Re:Short Story by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. There are two endings. In one he kills himself as a fetus to save his family, in the other he alienates the love of his life to save her.

      Oh, wait.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    6. Re:Short Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would I go to read the short story of Butterfly Effect?

      It's by Ray Bradbury, no idea which collection you would find it in in your legal jurisdiction.

    7. Re:Short Story by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      "O God Ashton Kutcher is trying to act" kind of way

      We must have seen different versions; I saw no evidence that there was any attempt at acting...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  6. Steampunk in general by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've found the literary branch of steampunk to be generally depressing, with very few bright spots. It's interesting because most expressions of the culture are very Jules Verne / Edgar Rice Burroughs pulp influenced, particularly on the costuming side where steampunk really started. But the literary side is almost entirely Dickens with zeppelins.

    1. Re:Steampunk in general by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      How about "modern SF" in general? I spent some time reading the Hugo nominees and most of the stories were depressing. I couldn't decide if I should vote, or just say "Why bother? It's all pointless anyway" like Marvin the Depressed Robot.

      One older SF writer (sorry forget who) actually wrote an essay encouraging authors to write something CHEERY for a change with a positive outcome. The magazine which published the esaay is runing a contest around that theme.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Steampunk in general by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Not all SF is depressing, far from it.

      David Brin's books are in general not a light read, but not depressing either. Stephen Baxter's books often paint very depressing pictures of the world, but always carry at least some hope. Charles Stross and Neal Stephenson books are in general OK. Whom else is I am forgetting?

    3. Re:Steampunk in general by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure David Brin is the best example. I mean, sure, not EVERYONE dies in his books. "Enough of us have survived that we have a good chance to rebuild" is often about as uplifting as his stuff gets.

      Good reads, yes, but no exactly sunshine and rainbows.

    4. Re:Steampunk in general by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Hm? Brin's books are not particularly genocide-y. The "Uplift" books are downright funny, "Existence" is somewhat grim but it gets better.

      You should try Stephen Baxter's "Manifold" series. In one book they _literally_ destroy the Universe (by forcing the vacuum into a lower energy state) - for a good reason, but still.

    5. Re:Steampunk in general by Telvin_3d · · Score: 2

      The uplift books have some very amusing moments but are explicitly genocidal. It's a six book series that involves the death and destruction of a huge portion of the human race. And the protagonist space ship crew repeatedly solves problems by abandoning large chunks of the (ever shrinking) crew, never to be seen again.

      I mean, great series, but I think you may need to recalibrate your definitions for emotional content.

    6. Re:Steampunk in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      particularly on the costuming side where steampunk really started

      Steampunk "really started" as a literary genre. See: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling.

    7. Re:Steampunk in general by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      I'd disagree. There are definitely some precursors that fed into steampunk culture, but it didn't pick up much momentum as a unified aesthetic until it moved into the costuming/cosplay/maker communities. And it would be hard to say most contemporary steampunk literature directly references "The Difference Engine". While it's a great story I feel it's more of an alternate history that happens to also be built out of many of the same era/characters that steampunk often utilizes rather than being a steampunk alternate history, if you appreciate the distinction.

      Of course my whole line of thought is veering dangerously close to a 'no true Scotsman', so the entire distinction may only exist in my head.

    8. Re:Steampunk in general by MaxiCat_42 · · Score: 1

      Iain M. Banks ??

      Phil

    9. Re:Steampunk in general by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a matter of scale. There are multiple human-inhabited planets in the Uplift universe, so a nice little genocide does not carry as much emotional weight.

    10. Re:Steampunk in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      particularly on the costuming side where steampunk really started

      Steampunk "really started" as a literary genre. See: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling.

      Or even "The Warlord of the Air" by Michael Moorcock.
      (Cue serious nitpicking about what constitutes 'steampunk'..)

    11. Re:Steampunk in general by iamnobody2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Moorcock's bastable series is certainly at least a strong precursor to steampunk. Moorcock doesn't get enough respect, his canon is wide and varied yet virtually all interconnected. He practically invented the multiverse! Most of his stuff is fantasy, though he's written his fair share of scifi, such as the Dancers At The End Of Time series. That series is depressing, at least in setting, as it involves a few all powerful humans entertaining themselves until the end of time, which is forthcoming. The plotline itself is, of course, a direct refutation of said setting. Vonnegut's Player Piano was depressing. Battle Royale while depressing enough, probably misses the list being not quite scifi. Stephen King's The Long Walk is the same, it obviously takes place in the future, but nothing sciencey comes up. Heinlein's To Sail Beyond The Sunset made me depressed, but it was just because it was so horrible a book half full of incest. His Farnham's Freehold is often maligned for being racist and sexist, but it's also depressing too! I actually really liked that book. Haldeman's All My Sins Remembered is a certainly qualifies as depressing scifi, sort of like a Remains Of The Day but instead of a butler, he's an intergalactic secret agent. I found Downbelow Station depressingly bad, but Cherryh has a huge following, so it works for some people. I'm not really all that well read in scifi, that was some stuff that jumped out in my head. I've got a copy of Lucifer's Hammer, and that looks pretty depressing, I gather it's roughly The Stand skewed scifi.

      --
      nobody's perfect
    12. Re:Steampunk in general by Dabido · · Score: 1

      *Imagines Dickens jamming with Jimmy Page*

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  7. inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. Absolutely nothing good happens to anyone ever.

    1. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that one is messed up.

    2. Re:inane subject here by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Also on the subject of Harlan Ellison, I've always been thoroughly depressed by "Repent Harlequin!" Said the Ticktockman.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:inane subject here by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the last Bush Administration ... thank you! thank you! I'll be here all night :)

    4. Re:inane subject here by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much most of what Harlan Ellison has written. But that's one of the reasons why he's so brilliant too.
      He doesn't like his writing being called SciFi, though.

      I would also like to nominate James Tiptree, Jr.; her "Brightness Falls from the Air" is some of the saddest reading I have done, and best descriptions of human nature.

    5. Re:inane subject here by jet_silver · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. Leaving satisfied.

    6. Re:inane subject here by 3nails4aFalseProphet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream is definitely on my list. For those that haven't read it, I would describe it as equal parts a continuation of WarGames (if they didn't avert nuclear war), Paranoia (the RPG), and Saw. Shake well. Others that deserve a mention that I haven't seen yet:

      Living Will, by Alexander Jablokov. A man diagnosed with Alzheimer's creates an A.I. preserving his own personality. You know pretty early in the story what the A.I.'s final duty to it's creator must be, which only makes it more heartbreaking when the time finally comes.

      The Nine Billion Names of God, by Arthur C. Clarke. Techies are hired by a cult to build a computer system to document all the names of God. The cult believes when all the names are recorded, the universe will end. The techs are convinced they need to get as far as possible from the cult before the final name is recorded and their belief system is shattered.

      What Eats You, by Norman Spinrad. Absolutely trippy first-person debriefing of a cop after a horrific "incident" in a brutal future L.A. where personalities are injected like drugs. Did I mention the cop telling the story is Joe Friday? Then again, ALL on-duty cops are injected to be Joe Friday. Like I said: Trippy.

      The Forever War, by Joe Haldeman. The ending may be "happy" for a couple protagonists, but damn... what a depressing way to get there.

      --
      /*Insert boring sig here*/
    7. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too was going to post that. AM's sheer hatred makes the Devil look like June Cleaver.

    8. Re:inane subject here by cranq · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I read it when I was in my early teens, and it left a mark.

      --
      Regards, your friendly neighbourhood cranq
    9. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That one is top of my list, read it as a pre-teen, and still think its the most depressing story ever.

    10. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computer seems pretty satisfied.

    11. Re:inane subject here by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Clarke's The Star was pretty depressing, as was The City and the Stars.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    12. Re:inane subject here by neglogic · · Score: 2

      I second "I have No Mouth and I must scream". I always thought it would make a great movie.

    13. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harlan Ellison! God, he could give Dick a run for the most bleak author award. Also, sneakily depressing: Repent Harlequin! Said the Ticktockman.
      Damn, that's some bleak futility right there....

    14. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I so totally agree, and yet I keep going back and rereading that story because it is so damn amazing.

    15. Re:inane subject here by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

      Complete agreement. First story that popped into my mind when I saw the title. I was surprised it took this far in the thread for someone to mention it. Brutal... brutal story.

      It should also get an award for being an evil and depressing video game.

      --
      "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
    16. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bump! Utterly horrifying beyond all measure. Hope is dead, burned, scattered, and gone. Makes "The Road" look uplifting. My pick as well.

    17. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. Absolutely nothing good happens to anyone ever.

      John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up. You keep waiting for one of the characters in the book have something go right and it never does.

    18. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this one..

    19. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was going to be my suggestion. Putting myself into the shoes of the protagonist at the end gives me shivers.

    20. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Harlon Ellison wrote one of the most terrifying "No-Exit" metaphorical analogs for clinical depression ever written, sung or artistically rendered in any form..."I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" It will go down to posterity with the best of Edgar Allen Poe, et al.

    21. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. Absolutely nothing good happens to anyone ever.

      Halan Ellison , seriously depressing shit.

    22. Re:inane subject here by sssputnik · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Some of my picks: I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream On The Beach 1984 Forge of God Use of Weapons (More horrifying than depressing). Flowers for Algernon

    23. Re:inane subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. Absolutely nothing good happens to anyone ever.

      They die.

    24. Re:inane subject here by runupahill · · Score: 1

      Yes. Harlon Ellison has writtten one of the most unrelieved narrative depictions of clinical depression in literature. And I don;t say "literature" lightly. I think this will go down to posterity along with Edgar Allen Poe, Baudelaire, Celine, et.al. Then again.....maybe not.

  8. Flowers for Algernon by danimalx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I win.

    1. Re:Flowers for Algernon by ChrisKnight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you make a distinction between depressing and sad? Make Room! Make Room! made me depressed about the future, but Flowers for Algernon made me cry; and yet I think they were two different things.

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    2. Re:Flowers for Algernon by danimalx · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Depression carries with it a negative outlook about the future, while sad is just a state. Flowers for Algernon definitely made me sad, but not all that depressed.

    3. Re:Flowers for Algernon by aliscool · · Score: 1

      another good one. Er, I mean excellent choice for novel that made me sad. Well written but sad.

    4. Re:Flowers for Algernon by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      And what exactly qualifies it as the best SF story that has "insight about human nature or society that's basically cynical or pessimistic?" The plot is quite sad, but it does seem to have at least some positive things to say about the human condition.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second Make Room! Make Room!.....

    6. Re:Flowers for Algernon by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Make Room! Make Room!

      ooph, that was a bad one.

      I don't know why, but The City and the City brought me down. Nothing so much about the plot and it's a very good novel, but I was kind of down in the dumps after I finished that one. Something about how people will adapt to almost anything. I can never tell if that's a good thing or a bad thing.

      Queen City Jazz was also kind of a downer. Again, not because it's sad or the story is depressing, it's not. Maybe I had nightmares about nanotech after that one and got depressed because of lost sleep. I also had nightmares after The Diamond Age, although I loved that book.

      I also find William Gibson depressing. Something about his voice bothers me. I though Anathem and Reamde by Stephenson were the opposite of depressing. I was jacked after reading those books. I remember I was in a cabin in the Rockies with my wife and had brought a copy of Anathem with me. About 120 pages in, I started reading it to her (she's a mathematician, and a lot of the concepts in the book reminded me of her work). She got kind of pissed because I missed a day and a half of enjoying our vacation because I was couldn't put it down. Well, I did enjoy it, but I guess someone who is engrossed in a book is not the best company.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you don't.

      "The End of the Dream" by Philip Wylie.

    8. Re:Flowers for Algernon by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Parasites Lost?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:Flowers for Algernon by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      Darn... and I thought the only winning move was not to play.

    10. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Flowers for Algernon was a gut ripper if you get invested in the character.

    11. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made me cry

      A signature of a good fiction, independent of the form it was presented.

    12. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Lotana · · Score: 1

      That episode of Futurama got nothing on the stories mentioned here. The episode can be summed up: Love makes you an idiot!

    13. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anzya · · Score: 1

      Oh Make room was a depressing one. Where even the hope that this is the end is chrushed. Misery without end.

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
    14. Re:Flowers for Algernon by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Flowers for Algernon is sad and makes you cry but not depressing.

      The Gods Themselves is depressing even though it finishes on an upbeat note. I think it is more depressing for having the happy ending than it would have been with the obvious catastrophic ending. We will run lemming like to destruction and only a better shiny toy will change our direction. The inability to see the cliff edge is something that evolution has had no solution for in the past and even intelligence seems to have not solved the problem, substituting blind unwillingness to see for inability to see.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    15. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that compare to Stand on Zanzibar which was so depressing that I couldn't finish it?

    16. Re:Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, Flowers for Algernon is very moving, but not depressing, Brilliant book though, one of my favourite SF novels.

    17. Re:Flowers for Algernon by darniil · · Score: 1

      Eh, Make Room! Make Room! didn't really do anything for me. I wanted to read it so I could read the book that Soylent Green was based off of, but I completely lost all suspension of disbelief at the beginning of the book when Harrison gave us a completely impossible premise, one even more impossible than most SF tech. (That is, that the Catholic Church managed to get enough clout worldwide that it was able to impose an international and permanent ban on all forms of contraception.)

      On top of that, the ending fell flat on its face, too. All through the book, we're told that there are so many humans that most habitable places have people standing (or lethargically slouching) cheek to jowl, that's it's because of this massive overpopulation that food variety is almost nil, that overpopulation has used up almost all resources, and then the final line in the book tells us that the US population on 1 January 2000 is 344 million. (I seem to recall that he mentioned a global population, too, that also wasn't far off from what we have today. I don't have my copy of the book near me, or I'd verify this.)

      Now don't get me wrong - I don't have a problem with the idea of resource management and all that. What I have a problem with is that he obviously didn't get anyone to help him with his math. He described how densely-populated the cities were, and he did so rather well. But the numbers that he gave us at the end of the book don't live up to that description, and that ruined it for me.

  9. Not Sci-Fi - fiction but never the less ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alan Watts: The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are describes the internet (in broad terms) and how it will affect us. I'm reading it now, and his assumptions (at the time 1966) are turning out to be true.

    And here I am, on the internet - still.

    We're losing personal connections. Facebook is NOT personal connection and neither is Slashdot.

    1. Re:Not Sci-Fi - fiction but never the less ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for you, but for me it was the opposite: Due to the dwindling personal connections in real life (often due to people's attempts to join other cliques where friendships with people such as me were frowned upon) I moved more and more of my social life online. On the flipside my RL friends now outnumber my OL friends as the latter have gone the way of the former regarding cliques.

  10. Bradbury by frisket · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All Summer In A Day (Ray Bradbury).

    1. Re:Bradbury by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      Oh, excellent choice. I remember reading that decades ago.

    2. Re:Bradbury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bradbury does (alas, did) melancholy like nobody's business.

    3. Re:Bradbury by readin · · Score: 2

      All Summer In A Day (Ray Bradbury).

      Wow thanks. I had successfully repressed memories of that story and you just brought them up again.

      You're right of course. It's an very painful story.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    4. Re:Bradbury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woo, good call. This.

    5. Re:Bradbury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually thought this would be higher on the list. It was the first thing that I thought of when I read the summary. Excellent short story and it made a big impact on me.

    6. Re:Bradbury by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now I have to go watch "Jurassic Bark" to cheer up.

    7. Re:Bradbury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, yes!

      Another really depressing one from him:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_Will_Come_Soft_Rains_(short_story)

      I must also add many of the short stories in Stanislaw Lems "Tales of Pirx the Pilot", especially the "Albatross"

    8. Re:Bradbury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Summer In A Day (Ray Bradbury).

      I was just thinking about this story the other day and wondering how I could best figure out the name given that all I remembered was the plot, and now here it is...

      I don't know, it was depressing that they had to live in those conditions, but otherwise it didn't seem all that bad... then again my memory is only of the 1982 PBS show (which I credit, along with dozens of other similar sources, for shaping my mind and character--I was only 3 when that first came out, I was probably about those children's ages when I first saw it)

  11. Jem? by Millennium · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know if I'd call it depressing. I found it outrageous, myself. Truly outrageous.

    1. Re:Jem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      truly truly truly outrageous!

    2. Re:Jem? by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Oh how I hated that show when I was a kid. Granted, I wasn't really in the target demographic...

  12. Heinlein! by Niris · · Score: 2

    The Moon is a Harsh Mistress and Stranger in a Strange Land are pretty neck and neck for sad endings. Also the Martian Chronicles by Bradbury.

    1. Re:Heinlein! by Elgonn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure I'd consider The Moon is a Harsh Mistress as depressing. I'm still sad for Mike but I'm not sure how you'd find the story depressing.

    2. Re:Heinlein! by belthize · · Score: 1

      I knew somebody had to list The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. I forget how old I was when I first read it, probably 9 or 10 but it was the first (and nearly only) story I ever read that made me misty eyed. Mike's demise struck me as incredibly unfair. It never occurred to me there was anything odd about attributing human emotions to a computer even though the idea of a personal computer was still a few years off (mid 70s).

      I haven't read it in 30 years I wonder if I'd still feel the same.

    3. Re:Heinlein! by cpm99352 · · Score: 2

      Interesting discussion. I read the series numerous times when I was approx 10-14. I'd have to say it was a bittersweet ending, not depressing per se...

      Now what is really depressing is the complete lack of progress in getting off the planet we've made since the story was written (ok, that's hyperbole) - since Challenger.

    4. Re:Heinlein! by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought moon was depressing, but only because the story stops every ten seconds for Heinlein to try and cram some some more political nonsense down the reader's gullet...

    5. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starship Troopers is the most depressing for me. Not because of the content of the book per se, but because it is so darn popular with the military. One of my friends in the military actually thinks that the Federation is a blueprint as to what the government should look like. I'm sure many others do as well.

    6. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did just land a rover on Mars....

    7. Re:Heinlein! by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      The Year of the Jackpot. Short story by Heinlein

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    8. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? The story seems to be basically "yes, we can build a libertarian paradise"*, then at the end it turns out "but people will promptly fuck it the fuck up." The notion that no matter how much better things may ever seem to be getting, they'll always end up how they are today -- that humanity won't even have the decency to self-immolate, but will continue this unending orbit of misery, with fleeting perihelions of progress that just suffice to engender false hope -- is one of the most depressing notions conceivable.

      *IMO the importance of Rand to the libertarian bias that once permeated /., and still remains a prominent segment, is greatly overestimated. Without proof, I strongly suspect RAH had a lot more to do with it. Anyway, regardless of your personal buy-in or not to libertarianism, in the context of the novel, it's legit. There's plenty of SF exploring how spacemen would be different in culture and society than earthmen, and I don't think it's reasonable to approach something like TMIAHM without accepting for arguments' sake that, in this fictional future, with these societies evolved on the moon, libertarianism is more or less paradise.

    9. Re:Heinlein! by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Those are sad, but not particularly depressing.

    10. Re:Heinlein! by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

      I'd say Mike's demise was depressing but necessary for the _independent_ Moon to emerge. Mike's cooperation was necessary for the revolution to win, but with all the stuff he did to subvert due process (up to and including falsifying election results), Luna would most likely have ended up as a totalitarian dictatorship if Mike was around. If anything, the Professor dying strikes me as sad, though then again he achieved his life's goal.

      If there's one thing I had to pick as being depressing about that story, it's humanity's tendency to revert to rules, taxes and red tape...

    11. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it has a pretty optimistic ending on the whole. A few Lunies died, as well as the AI, but hey, TANSTAAFL.

    12. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heinlein is depressing period. I tried to read a few of his books, and IMO they're all the same. There is a lot of blabla about religion and sex, there is always a sort of 'wise' person in them who kicks in open doors like there is no tomorrow, and the books all end at 75% of the text. I couldn't stand Heinlein.

      I'm tsa, BTW, posting as Anonymous because this computer I am on is ridiculously slow.

    13. Re:Heinlein! by ffgandalf · · Score: 1

      The Man who Sold the Moon, and Requim both short stories by Heinlein make me cry.

    14. Re:Heinlein! by ffgandalf · · Score: 1

      Would a society where to wield political power one must have done actual service for ones country so bad?

    15. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree on Heinlein, but I think The Cat Who Walks Through Walls is much more depressing; I'm pretty sure he wrote it to be.

    16. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually talking about some of the other parts and the fact they don't really care for their own people. But to answer your specific question, yes. Whenever the people of government come from one particular part of society, it just leads to cronyism. Plus, you have a part of society that has nothing to say in their own governance and it is not because of any real disability on their part. Finally, what is considered service? Despite Heinlein's protestations to the contrary, I think the book is quite clear that the "Federal Service" is military service; which parallels the US's selective service system and the fact that registering as an objector (therefore not able to fight) are automatically considered second class by the rest of the service and are oftentimes not paid (beyond being provided R&B). But what about in real life, what should be considered service? You'd better believe that whomever has power gets to determine that to fit their agenda; rather than what is good for everyone.

      Pop quiz, how many uniformed services are their in the U.S.? I bet you 95% of people cannot name them without looking them up. So, do the ones that don't immediately come to mind count as "actual service"? How would you define it?

    17. Re:Heinlein! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most depressing part of that was getting to the end and realizing that the whole cat walking through walls thing had nothing to do with the story.

  13. Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Roarkk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do you get when youo combine manic depression, schizophrenia, bigotry, and leprosy, then add in a little literal and figurative rape?

    In the end, a pretty good series, but more than anything else I"ve read the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant has the darkest, most depressing prose I've ever read.

    1. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Ubertech · · Score: 1

      His sci-fi Gap series is pretty dark also.

      --
      Be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to anger.
    2. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thomas Covenant is probably the most depressing high fantasy I've ever read, not really sci-fi though.

      I thought Accelerando was kinda depressing, not for what happens thttp://ask.slashdot.org/story/12/08/07/235239/ask-slashdot-whats-the-most-depressing-sci-fi-youve-ever-read#o the individual characters, more for what happens to mankind overall.

    3. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Nothing2Chere · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Stephen Donaldson as well, but I was thinking "The Gap Cycle". It's more of a science fiction series than T.C. n2ch

    4. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Donaldson missed his calling as a thesaurus; somnolence, incarnadine, inanition - thank the flying spaghetti monster that I have a good dictionary!

    5. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And pretty disturbing. I'm not sure I'd want to meet Donaldson in a dark alley.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by John+Bokma · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't call Thomas manic depressed, nor schizophrenic, nor a bigot. Depressed, sure. Probably clinical depressed. Not a big surprise if one is diagnosed with Hansen's_disease, wife leave, taking only son. To me, this is the only fantasy I've read that's [b]realistic[/b] regarding the transfer to a fantasy world. Would you believe it if you "woke up" in a magic land where loam cures your leprosy and impotence? Or would you consider it just a dream?

    7. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science Fiction is NOT Fantasy. Thomas Covenant is a fantasy series. Stephen Donaldson did do a very dark Science Fiction series called the 'Gap Series' which I'd highly recommend to anyone.

      Of course it's the standard response, but George Orwell's 1984 comes to mind, and so does the late Ray Bradbury's Farenheight 451. Having read them in my early teens they made a particular impact. 451 is an especially good book as when you look around today you'll see many similarities in attitude; the poetry-reading scene is total brilliance. Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is also a dark take on the future and in some ways even more so than 1984 as the mechanism of control is self-administered by citizens as opposed to being enforced by big brother.

    8. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... oh and I nearly forgot to mention the saddest short story I know! Written by Daniel Keyes, 'Flowers for Algernon' is really very sad by any standard. It's a great read, 10/10.

    9. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 3, Informative

      Donaldson's "Gap" series was pretty depressing too - lots of anti-heros, a leading lady who spends half of the series being raped, etc. Yes, the series did get to a point in the end, but it's like wading through ten miles of sewers just to find an exit.

    10. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      From your description I thought you're talking about an Ayn Rand novel.

    11. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by tftp · · Score: 1

      It is dark, but at least protagonists are shown as people (or cyborgs,) each with their own character and desires and hopes. There is purpose in that madness. Pieces fit together, villains are villaining and do-gooders are do-gooding to the best (or worst) of their abilities.

      Compare to Baxter's Titan. How about taking a bunch of angry social misfits who are patently crazy from day zero and launching them on a one-way trip to a faraway moon of a faraway planet, with no means of return and with no purpose in any of that?

    12. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite series, ever.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by giostickninja · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Covenant books are pretty depressing, but they aren't Sci-Fi. Have you read Donaldson's Gap series? It's a space opera arguably as depressing as the Covenant series, maybe even more so.

    14. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Lotana · · Score: 2

      Compare to Baxter's Titan. How about taking a bunch of angry social misfits who are patently crazy from day zero and launching them on a one-way trip to a faraway moon of a faraway planet, with no means of return and with no purpose in any of that?

      And on top of that the descriptions of the living conditions, deaths of all the main characters and the humanity purposefully redirecting an asteroid to hit the Earth (Misscalculation. Supposed to have fractured and only a piece to strike the USA as part of a war) that ends up wiping out civilization.

      Titan was a very depressing novel. Publisher forced Baxter to add another part on the end of the book which magically resurects two of the main characters and describes how Earth and Titan life spreads to other solar systems.

      Given how jarring and tacky the fairy tail addition was, it is much better to skip it: Book ends when Benecraff freezes herself in the water crater on Titan. I guess the publisher wouldn't agree to publish such a downer of a novel.

    15. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Titan got my vote as well.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    16. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by taustin · · Score: 1

      Which is to say, very much like what it was based on.

    17. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      Fantasy, but otherwise pretty depressing stuff. The first series I read where I kept hoping the "hero" would die.

    18. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC to preserve moderation. I saw someone else in the thread mention the Berserker books as the most depressing stuff they've read, has anyone else read Donaldson's berserker story? "What Makes us Human" from Berserker Base (also published in his book of short stories, Reave the Just) was a surprisingly hopeful and upbeat about human nature.

    19. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      I would say, grim, but exalting.

      Donaldson finds a way to say Yes to a world full of tragedy and pain. I find the first two trilogies extremely moving.

      "He was a sick man, a victim of Hansen’s disease. But he was not a leper – not just a leper. He had the law of his illness carved in large indelible letters on the nerves of his body; but he was more than that. In the end, he had not failed the Land. And he had a heart which could still pump blood, bones which could still bear his weight; he had himself.
      Thomas Covenant: Unbeliever.
      A miracle.
      Despite the stiff pain in his lip, he smiled at the empty room. He felt the smile on his face and was sure of it.
      He smiled because he was alive."

      But there is a danger in reading Donaldson. The world is really not so grim. It is not a series of ordeals to wrack your heart. Beauty and happiness are not so rare. If you spend too much time in grim fantasy, the world can start feeling that way.

    20. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anzya · · Score: 1

      I thought his first novel about the mirror masters was more depressing actually.

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
    21. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His Sci-Fi Opera series "The Gap Series" is so much more depressing than the Thomas Covenant series. And well written. But so depressing.

    22. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't consider the Thomas Covenant series to science fiction. It's a fantasy novel, and people who conflate the two are pet peeve of mine.

    23. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, it's just not worth slogging through that depressing series to get a realistic transfer to a fantasy world. You'd be better off writing your own series, if that's what you want. I had to stop reading Thomas Covenant after book three out of sheer disgust with the subject matter, and I'm a pretty hardy reader. I made it through the Silmarilion from cover to cover, for instance.

    24. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Thomas Covenant is probably the most depressing high fantasy I've ever read, not really sci-fi though.

      I thought Accelerando was kinda depressing, not for what happens to the individual characters, more for what happens to mankind overall.

      I was just thinking the same thing, since I'm in the middle of re-reading it.

      Watching what we think of as humanity drowning under a tsunami of progress. Everyone ending up virtualized with the solar system being dismantled for computronium and surrounded by entities too vast and complicated to fathom is very depressing to me.

    25. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of Donaldson's books have that in common. I waded through two of the Covenant series and a few other books, and have yet to see an author who more thinks that mental and physical degradation are crucibles in which a greater person is forged.

    26. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by justiggs · · Score: 1

      second that!

    27. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by esteban_sosa · · Score: 2

      Agrred! The first book is absolutely depressing. But the story eventually gets sooooo good.

    28. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      I liked the illeart/covenant series.

      But I could not get through the Gap series. It was brilliantly horrible.

      In a footnote he comments that he draws from his own psyche. Donaldson might be a very scary man deep down.

    29. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with you. Though I would say more "Dark" than depressing.

    30. Re:Stephen Donaldson - Thomas Covenant by arketh · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if someone would mention the Gap series. Great writing, but yeah, not a lot of happy times for any of the characters involved.

  14. Where to start? by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's the famous Star Trek story "City on the Edge of Forever". The original script by Harlan Ellison is even darker, with people in the engineering section of the ship dealing drugs (which is how the doctor ends-up going nutty -- a bad trip).

    I just read a story last year in one of Gardner Dozois' Best of the Year anthologies. It involved humans boarding a generation ship that would travel to a new galaxy (50,000 years). The first 1000 years were not too bad but over time the humans became dumber-and-dumber, as they had no more challenging task then to scrub the floors/walls/ceiling and keep the ship clean. After 25,000 years they were walking on all fours & no longer bothering to wear clothes (or speak).

    At that point the generation ship was intercepted by a faster-than-light ship that "rescued" the simian-like human beings. I imagine they ended-up in a zoo. (If you have a chance I would recommend buying all of Dozois' annual anthologies. If you like Outer Limits' method of telling a different story each week, you'll like these books.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Where to start? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      The Walking Dead.

      Not the TV show which is cheery in comparison to the comic book where everyone is constantly dying, and their situation seems hopeless. Technically his is fantasy fiction not science fiction, but I don't really care.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Where to start? by RichardtheSmith · · Score: 1

      I think the way it was re-written was much better. It's the only episode where McCoy got to kick ass, even if it was because of the Cordrazine. The original script was just a Redshirt dealing drugs, and Ellison even wrote in a cheesy 60's "trip scene" showing a drug hallucination from the crewman's perspective. Completely inappropriate for 60's prime time TV, when the Doors couldn't even sing the word "higher" on Ed Sullivan.

    3. Re:Where to start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: devolution

      Mayflower II by Stephen Baxter?

    4. Re:Where to start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say the dumber people are the ones who chose the destination for that generation ship. Why go to an entirely new galaxy that is so much further away than the "billions and billions" of stars in our Milky Way?

  15. depressing becuase it's so accurate by Covalent · · Score: 2

    1984 Second? Fahrenheit 451. Same reasoning.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Elgonn · · Score: 2

      Can we even nominate those two? At this point they're practically Sci-Non-Fi.

    2. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 2

      Covalent's entries win by my reasoning. 1984 should win on multiple fronts. Orwell is strangely neglected by the social tribe that goes under the banner "science fiction fan". So is Vonnegut. Why are Orwell and Vonnegut not considered science fiction? Because they're good? Many of the entries being posted are so entertainment-oriented, I'm baffled how anyone can consider them depressing. "City on the Edge of Forever"? What was the happy ending supposed to be? Edith Keeler in space?

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    3. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Spritzer · · Score: 2

      That's exactly the response I had planned. I remember the first time I read 1984, pulling for Winston and hoping for a story where the people succeed in overthrowing or subverting the regime. Oh, the let down, followed by the realization that this is a story about our world, our society.

      I'm going to go curl up in a ball now.

    4. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edith... Keeler... in... SPAAAAAACE!

    5. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why are Orwell and Vonnegut not considered science fiction?"

      A very interesting question, and one I happen to know the answer to after 50 years in the book business.

      Orwell, Vonnegut, Wells, (and very soon Bradbury) are considered fiction (as are Poe, Shelley and Stoker, rather than categorizing them as horror) because they've become too much a part of our wider culture to be categorized as 'genre fiction'. So it is partly a matter of convenience for bookstores to put them in with general literary fiction - because that's where an unaided customer will look for them.

      Also, believe it or not, there is still some cultural stigma attached to reading pulps with cover illustrations of half-clothed women menaced by aliens.

      As a practical and final matter, it is booksellers who determine how writing is categorized - and they try to avoid embarrassing their customers.

    6. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      "You are the dead."

      I never recovered from that moment.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    7. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Can we even nominate those two? At this point they're practically Sci-Non-Fi.

      <shawshank redemption>I guess someone filed that under 'educational' too</shawshank redemption>

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Mr.+Tom+Guycot · · Score: 0

      Every time i watch the news, I feel The Handmaid's Tale should be added to that list...

    9. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree on fahrenheit 451 ... obviously.

      But, I'd blocked out the fact that I agonized through the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant which was mentioned above. One changed my life and guided the formation of who I am as an adult ... but Conenant was a truly depressing read.

    10. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by ccp · · Score: 1

      Actually, 1984 never was. It was a very thinly disguised indictment of Stalinist URSS. And written in 1948. You can't be more transparent than that.

    11. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      If you really want depressing - try blind Faith by Ben Elton. Quite a few of his novels fall into the realms of SciFi, such as his early works Stark and This Other Eden. Cast as satire, he addresses some very serious topics in his 'comedy' novels.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    12. Re:depressing becuase it's so accurate by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Vonnegut is a brilliant schizophrenic who has enough self control to act out on paper. He has never tried to write sci fi. He may have written commentary on present-day social issues in a different enough setting to enable readers to absorb the message without emotionally reacting from the overtness of setting such commentary in present settings. But the tech was never integral to the story, nor were any futuristic settings predective (where the real sci fi came from - Jules Verne and the ilk, with SCUBA and nuclear submarines long before they existed, satellite tech predicted by authors, and all that).

  16. Re:Well..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Bible is as scientific as the awkward potshot you took at it is clever.

  17. Make Room! Make Room! by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Harry Harrison's Make Room! Make Room!. Of course, when I was a kid people were predicting that the Baby Boom was going to result in some mad exponential growth thing and there'd be billions of people in North America by 2000ish, so I thought I was looking at my future.

    1. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by aliscool · · Score: 1

      second this one. Depressing through and through, but very readible.
      I do wonder what Solyent steak tastes like:)

    2. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pork chops.

    3. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by farrellj · · Score: 1

      (Hint: Soylet Green is People!)

      At least it made a classic B Movie!

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    4. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by Lotana · · Score: 2

      Now you are making me hungry. Will never eat human though: Have you seen what kind of horrible, horrible crap they are fed with?!

    5. Re:Make Room! Make Room! by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      I do wonder what Solyent steak tastes like:)

      It varies from person to person.

  18. Here's a couple. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Destination: Void by Frank Herbert. (Or as I like to call it: "Destination: Avoid".)

    Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:Here's a couple. by sludgeman1 · · Score: 2

      I find Frank Herbert's view of humanity, as in "God Emperor of Dune" very pessimistic around human nature, requiring a 3000 years tyrannical ruling to save humanity from its own destructive and short term thinking. Havent read Destination: Void but seems like Herbert didnt hold fond of humanity. Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame. The Stolen Journals and my favorite: When I set out to lead humankind along my Golden Path, I promised them a lesson their bones would remember. I know a profound pattern which humans deny with their words even while their actions affirm it. They say they seek security and quiet, the condition they call peace. Even as they speak, they create the seeds of turmoil and violence. If they find their quiet security, they squirm in it. How boring they find it. Look at them now. Look at what they do while I record these words. Hah! I give them enduring eons of enforced tranquility which plods on and on despite their every effort to escape into chaos. Believe me, the memory of Leto's Peace shall abide with them forever. They will seed their quiet security thereafter only with extreme caution and steadfast preparation. -The Stolen Journals

    2. Re:Here's a couple. by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 1

      *4000 years

      --
      -- --
    3. Re:Here's a couple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Destination Void was the basis for the jesus incident trilogy, which while being dark was also brilliant. Some of his best work.

    4. Re:Here's a couple. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Taken together, Dune (the whole series) and The White Plague, you do end up with a clear vision of someone that has a real problem with humanity.

      In reading the "Dune prequel" books that would appear to have been written by Frank's son I get the idea that this philosophy has been inherited and perhaps strengthened. The foundation of the Butlerian Jhiad is one thing, but carrying it on required an unusual dedication to achieving a goal at all costs. In many ways, the Dune universe required just as much dedication to wrong-headed thinking by groups of people.

      I believe I met Frank Herbert once and overall I am pretty glad it was just saying "Hi" and moving on.

    5. Re:Here's a couple. by ifrag · · Score: 1

      I find Frank Herbert's view of humanity, as in "God Emperor of Dune" very pessimistic around human nature

      God Emperor was really the high point of the series for me. Far more intellectually driven than the other books. Although I suppose for those who strongly disagree with Herbert's ideas maybe not so good then.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
  19. Short Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Flower for Algernon was quite depressing.
    I recommend the short story version - the novel-length version had a greater amount of depressing-ness, but was spread out so that the the concentration and impact of it was lessened.

  20. On the Beach by bvdp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nevil Shute: On the Beach ... ordinary people doing ordinary things before they all die.

    1. Re:On the Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that one. Brilliant, well written, and deeply moving book. Not sure it qualifies as sci-fi, strictly speaking, but I was glad to see someone else bring it up.

    2. Re:On the Beach by sir-gold · · Score: 2

      This definitely has my vote.

      You can't get much more depressing than a book about people who are basically waiting to die of radiation poisoning, with no hope whatsoever

    3. Re:On the Beach by dwywit · · Score: 1

      On a similar note - "Down to a sunless sea" - full of tragedy and hope, right until the last chapter.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    4. Re:On the Beach by Presence2 · · Score: 1

      Agree, wasn't sure if it's sci-fi, but I recall how desperately I wanted that happy ending, and how much it surprised (and depressed) me with it's brutal honesty instead.

    5. Re:On the Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good story, not sure if it qualifies as science fiction.

    6. Re:On the Beach by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm shocked that it hasn't completely dominated this conversation; it's about as depressing a scenario as imaginable, and popular enough to have spawned multiple movies and be in the public conscious far beyond a strict sci-fi fanbase.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    7. Re:On the Beach by Grayhand · · Score: 2

      Nevil Shute: On the Beach ... ordinary people doing ordinary things before they all die.

      Also the most depressing film ever made. It should be the acid test for any world leader. If you can read it or watch the movie and you'd still launch nuclear weapons you are by definition insane.

    8. Re:On the Beach by RandCraw · · Score: 1

      The book came out in 1957; the movie in 1959. Today's average Slashdotter would have been -20 years old then. So I'm not surprised most don't know OTB or were too young to be impressed by a black and white movie with little action and starring actors they don't know.

      For the rest of us the story was simply devastating. And totally believable. Through fear, intolerance, and stupidity, everyone everywhere dies.

      Definitely a fable. Perhaps scientific political fiction?

    9. Re:On the Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded, a more bleak book would be hard to imagine. In retrospect, the worst part was that the event was more likely than anyone was thinking at the time.

    10. Re:On the Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded

    11. Re:On the Beach by pthisis · · Score: 1

      The book came out in 1957; the movie in 1959. Today's average Slashdotter would have been -20 years old then. So I'm not surprised most don't know OTB or were too young to be impressed by a black and white movie with little action and starring actors they don't know.

      There's also a 2000 movie and a 2008 radio drama.

      For the rest of us the story was simply devastating. And totally believable. Through fear, intolerance, and stupidity, everyone everywhere dies.

      Yep.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    12. Re:On the Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, isn't life like that for most of us? (goes to cry in a corner).

  21. Blood Music by Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember too much of it (blocked it out) but what I do remember is enough to keep me from re-reading it:

    1) A reprehensible excuse for a human being as a main character
    2) The reduction of all life in the USA into one giant oozing blob
    3) Europe survives unscathed (maybe)

    1. Re:Blood Music by Greg Bear by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Also by Greg Bear: Hardfought

    2. Re:Blood Music by Greg Bear by malkavian · · Score: 2

      "Forge of God".. The latter books kind of dilute the story somewhat.. But that book as a standalone.. Very gritty and probably exactly what would happen.

    3. Re:Blood Music by Greg Bear by fartrader · · Score: 1

      "Forge of God".. The latter books kind of dilute the story somewhat.. But that book as a standalone.. Very gritty and probably exactly what would happen.

      Yes the end is totally a bummer I agree. The sequel Anvil of Stars really is quite gritty and depressing in its own way - even though it has a "Humans kick ass" plot.

  22. Depends by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone."

    Depends on which side your on.

    1. Re:Depends by slartibartfastatp · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're just reading Asimov - that's a cheer-up guy.

      * in fact, I was never confortable with the prospect of human race becoming a huge hive-mind being. It seems to be a laitmotif in classic sci-fi (Foundation, 2001, Dune).

      --
      -- --
    2. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone."

      Depends on which side your on.

      Sorry, what about my on?

    3. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which side my on what?

    4. Re:Depends by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      I'm not so convinced that happened in Foundation. As either Benford or Brin pointed out, if everybody joined Galaxia, who the heck is writing the Encyclopedia Galactica entries?

      I'm sure that some people joined, but I don't think that it became universal, mandatory thing like RDO had hoped.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    5. Re:Depends by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I felt Ender's Game to be a bit depressing. Finding out you are responsible for Xenocide, harsh.

  23. Ender's Game by malraid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The ending is just brutal, I just get the feeling of everyone hating themselves after pushing a boy to commit xenocide, even though they won the war.

    --
    please excuse my apathy
    1. Re:Ender's Game by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the sequels, you'll find out just how on-the-money your assessment is. Indeed, that hatred gets directed towards Ender, and he's considered a kind of uber-Hitler. He's referred to as "The Xenocide," rather than by his name, even, as though he single-handedly performed this horrific act for no particular reason.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    2. Re:Ender's Game by NoEvidenZ · · Score: 1

      And then in the sequels he has to face his own guilt. There's a vague hope that he can somehow redeem himself which eventually draws him away from everyone he knows and loves. That is what I found truly sad about Ender's story. But he has a wicked personal assistant that I'm extremely jealous of.

    3. Re:Ender's Game by qbel · · Score: 1

      You know, I only read the first book over a decade ago when I was a kid, but I connected with his character and the depressing isolation he felt so strongly... that book really hit me hard, and I still look through my room whenever I go home to find it in hopes of re-reading it. Funny how such a strong emotion connection, even a depressing one, can make you long for it.

    4. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's worse is that he focused that hatred on himself inadvertently through the book he wrote about the Xenocide ("Speaker for the Dead").

    5. Re:Ender's Game by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 1

      Jeez man, spoiler alert?

      The movie isn't even out yet!

    6. Re:Ender's Game by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Snape kills Dumbledore.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Ender's Game by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      I read it differently - the end to me was rather uplifting, the aliens realised that they were going to be destroyed, so they implanted enough information in Ender's head for him to ressurect the species if he so chose. And he did, and as he was "the saviour of humanity" they had to accept his choice to also be the saviour of aliens. Rather a nice line on the futility of war I thought.

      My vote goes to just about anything by Alistair Reynolds. Every single character is brutally self-serving, the closest any of them ever come to a redeeming feature is "being really good at being brutally self-serving". Great books, don't get me wrong, but by no means "fluffy space bunnies". If he wrote a Tribbles episode the Tribbles would win, and not in a good way.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    8. Re:Ender's Game by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Read the sequels, they're far, far sadder. But wow, SO good. It blows my mind everybody just reads the first book, they love that wunderkind goes to school, saves the world Harry Potter style story, but the later books where he grows up get REALLY deep and philosophical... You need to read them.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  24. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it read almost like a documentary for someone who grew up behind the iron curtain.

  25. The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Road

    1. Re:The Road by murder_face · · Score: 0

      Read this book while on "vacation". Have to say that this is one of the better books that I have read in a long time. Though I hate to say the most depressing part is that it ended....

    2. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read that book once. Once is enough.

      Watching the movie made me want to slit my wrists just to see color.

    3. Re:The Road by esldude · · Score: 1

      Saw the question, and immediately this book came to mind. Lots of ways for things to be depressing. Endings, subjects whatever. This one is depressing in every way. I never have been able to bring myself to watch the movie. I read the book, and while a superbly done book, it is mightily depressing in the extreme. Yikes!!

    4. Re:The Road by esldude · · Score: 1

      Second this again. Some of these people are suggesting don't seem the least depressing. I don't really get their perspective. But the Road is one I hate to even remember. Well written, and I read it. Never have watched nor have any interest in watching the movie. Once is enough and then some.

    5. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been reading SF since 1959 and "The Road" is by far the most depressing SF I've ever read. I've read most of the others listed here and they can't hold a candle to this one for depressing.

    6. Re:The Road by The+Real+Dr.+Video · · Score: 1

      I was just going to post this as the hands-down winner as well. After reading this post I glanced at the wall of my den that is covered in over 40 years of SciFi reading on my bookshelves and "The Road" is the only book I ever openly wept over when I finished it. If the readers of this post enjoy the "End of The World" sub-genre of SciFi, I seriously suggest reading this book. Even the way it is written has an impact on your emotions. It's bleak yet you can't put it down. It's so strong that it's hard to suggest runners-up. Perhaps "Down to a Sunless Sea" (David Graham), "War Day" (Strieber and Kunetka) or the 3 book set of "The Erthring Cycle" by Wayland Drew. But really, after "The Road", everything else seems sugar-coated. I would note that younger readers without children of their own may feel less impact than myself, having 4 young kids helped me connect with the main character's feelings.

      --
      Officially a geek since 1984
    7. Re:The Road by denilson3 · · Score: 1

      War Day and A Canticle for Leibowitz for me. I have The Road waiting on my shelf. Just moved up the queque thanks to these comments.

    8. Re:The Road by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Which I suggested. :-) Related, a list of dystopian novels (example) would be fun. I didn't find that particular novel depressing enough to list in my prior post, but it is well written.

      Also, an interesting post apocalypse online novel that certainly qualifies as depressing: http://starvationridge.blogspot.com/

    9. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The road is unrelentingly bleak. Its depressing from page one, and drags that over till the end, it really felt like the author was just seeing how long the reader could endure.

    10. Re:The Road by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      I read through this thread hoping to see a reference to this book.

      When I find an author with an intriguing plot and good writing skills (a combination that is somewhat lacking in the sci-fi genre), I generally read the book in a single sitting. This is the first book that I genuinely liked as a work of literature but nevertheless couldn't finish because I felt so fucking awful after each reading episode (I could only get through 20 or so pages at a time before I had to put it down for a break). I'll probably pick it up if only out of respect for the writing that can pull on my emotions as strongly as McCarthy's. But damn it's just brutally bleak.

    11. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a book about a father and his young son trying to survive in a post apocalyptic world where most remaining people have turned to cannibalism. Scary stuff.

      Note: I had a typo and my spell checker turned "cannibalism" to "Canadianism". I was inclined to leave it but that premise for a book is just too scary for publication!

      I'm a Canadian Cannibal you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *SPOILERS! SPOILERS GALORE!!!*

      I hate to admit it but if I'd been in that situation and managed to raise the boy through all of that, and I knew that I was dying we'd have stayed in the bunker. Stayed until it ran dry. I'd tell him there would be more like them so that he wouldn't worry. And then I'd have shot him in his sleep.

    13. Re:The Road by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of The Long Walk, which if not depressing was certainly disturbing.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    14. Re:The Road by denilson3 · · Score: 1

      Just finished The Road. I don't have kids, so War Day still holds the title for me. Having read War Day also makes the Road seem less grounded in reality.

    15. Re:The Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read through this thread hoping to see a reference to this book.

      I would just have used my browser's "Find" function.

  26. Make Room! Make Room! by ChrisKnight · · Score: 1

    Make Room! Make Room! by Harry Harrison (http://tinyurl.com/9mnvuux) is the most depressing novel I have ever read.

    It was the basis for "Soylent Green" (http://tinyurl.com/8bzfewf), but Soylent Green was a pick-me-up compared to this novel.

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
  27. Forge of God by Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth loses. Literally.

    1. Re:Forge of God by Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's depressing is that he wrote a sequel and it was completely terrible.

    2. Re:Forge of God by Greg Bear by khallow · · Score: 1

      Eh, not really. A deux ex machina manages to save lots of people. And it was great setup for the sequel which I think intentionally or not, is one of Greg Bear's greatest works.

    3. Re:Forge of God by Greg Bear by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Wasn't so keen on the sequel, but Forge of God was a real "Oh... Crap.." moment.

  28. When sysadmins ruled the earth by dns_server · · Score: 3

    I like when sysadmins roamed the earth.
    Basically a computer virus infects the internet.
    The sysadmins go to the data centers to fix it.
    There are terrorist attacks and a real virus is released that kills just about everyone except the sysadmins as data centers filter the air.

    You can read the contents on the link below.
    There is a comic book adaptation as well as a radio play as the story is cc licensed.
    http://craphound.com/overclocked/Cory_Doctorow_-_Overclocked_-_When_Sysadmins_Ruled_the_Earth.html

    1. Re:When sysadmins ruled the earth by farrellj · · Score: 1

      That was depressing!!!!

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    2. Re:When sysadmins ruled the earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a wet dream for most sysadmins I've met

      Yaay, no more users!

  29. Humanity grokked in fullness by mycroft822 · · Score: 2

    Stranger in a Strange Land. Our cultures tend to want to kill anyone that is too far from our version of normal.

    1. Re:Humanity grokked in fullness by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      You have to understand that Stranger in a Strange Land was about 1,000 page diatribe against organized religion. Probably the most telling was Revernd Digby arriving in heaven after being killed.

      Sure, at the end Mike died ... well, moved onto a different plane of existence, but in reality there was little else for him to do on Earth. With Mike's passing Jubal was at the head of a group that was positioned to probably make significant changes in society and would clearly have had both the money and power to do it. Jubal's group at that point was nearly equal in influence to the Fosterite Church but better positioned by being a lot more covert.

      No, I don't see the ending of Stranger in a Strange Land as sad. A very complicated set of circumstances was laid out at the end. Sure, we can miss Mike as he was a pretty unique fellow. But the journey was just beginning for the rest of humanity and the outlook was very positive.

  30. Jan Weiss by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Jan Weiss - The House of a Thousand Floors.

    If you want depression, this is up that valley.

  31. George RR Martin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, him. The magnificent awesome Martin. The guy who writes books where everyone you care about dies, nothing good every happens to anyone, no good deed goes unpunished (the few good deeds that happen), its everyone for themselves or their families - most times, and most importantly, its not even winter yet but its coming! Want a downer? Read A Song of Fire and Ice.

    1. Re:George RR Martin by guises · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not sure that it's the most depressing but it certainly does wear on you over time. Positive events are few and far between, and never really feel triumphant.

    2. Re:George RR Martin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      I slogged through three (3!) of those books before I wised up and just read the wikipedia pages after that. Man...teh suxor.

    3. Re:George RR Martin by Boronx · · Score: 1

      A song for lya. With morning comes mistfall.

    4. Re:George RR Martin by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I completely disagree. I've read the series and it doesn't compare to other series for depressiveness (if I may coin a term), but is certainly well worth reading. Other recent series that (IMO) are more depressing: Butcher's Calderon series and of course the Hunger Games series.

      But all these series read as television scripts - very little introspection from the characters, and very short chapters. As someone who is comfortable and actually enjoys reading old books these "made for TV" books are kind of a let-down.

      Here's what I'm currently reading. It was the second best seller after Gone With The Wind, but today is virtually unknown.

    5. Re:George RR Martin by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Marvelous writer ... who uses all his amazing skill to get you to emotionally invest in a character, just so he can make you watch while he rips the character's liver out before your eyes and serves it to you, raw, on a silver platter with fava beans and a nice Chianti. While the dying character screams and screams and screams...

    6. Re:George RR Martin by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Tried. Unreadable.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    7. Re:George RR Martin by LienRag · · Score: 1

      Actually, the end of The Dying of The Light is quite depressing, though the novel is quite great...

    8. Re:George RR Martin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want a downer? Read A Song of Fire and Ice.

      Yes, because you keep hoping the books get anywhere, anywhere at all. But they just keep meandering on endlessly.

  32. My company's marketing copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just saying'

    1. Re:My company's marketing copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't copy that floppy!

  33. Nineteen Eighty-Four by avatar139 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was young, I found it depressing because of the ending. Now that I'm older I find it depressing because I've seen it begin to grow in the world around me...:P

    --
    I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    1. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add me to the list. I was 17 when I read it and there was just nothing positive about the ending. It's just... depressing. It's always struck me, perhaps because it was the first. But look at the others on the list - Childhood's End has hope of the species, Ender's Game has human's winning, Flower's shows an achievement of greatness that, while failed, could lead to future success, and Farhenheit which, while I agree is depressing, has the hope of other groups existing and fighting. 1984 just ends. Game over. All hopes crushed.

    2. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's still the ending of 1984 that depresses me.

      It's one thing for governments to be horrible to the people they're supposed to care for. I've come to terms with that.

      It's when people are horrible to the people they care for that continues to surprise me.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    3. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by avatar139 · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's still the ending of 1984 that depresses me.

      It's one thing for governments to be horrible to the people they're supposed to care for. I've come to terms with that.

      It's when people are horrible to the people they care for that continues to surprise me.

      The Government is made of people! IT'S MADE OF PEOPLE!

      --
      I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    4. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

      Missing my mod points right now. Well played, sir. Well played.

    5. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by avatar139 · · Score: 1

      Missing my mod points right now. Well played, sir. Well played.

      Thank you, thank you, I'll be here...As long you're here, I'll always be here...;)

      --
      I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
    6. Re:Nineteen Eighty-Four by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Flower's shows an achievement of greatness that, while failed, could lead to future success

      I assume you're talking about Flowers for Algernon. If so, way to miss the point of the story.

      The point was that Gordon led a happier life with a lower IQ than he did with a higher one. And that is depressing indeed.

  34. Battlefield Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it wasn't as depressing as the six bucks I paid to see the movie.

  35. Thomas Covenant by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

    I never got very far into the book, because the main character (I hesitate to say protagonist) had such a dark soul. So maybe it has a happier ending, but I couldn't get to it.

    1. Re:Thomas Covenant by ChrisKnight · · Score: 1

      None of the Covenant books have had anything close to a happy ending.

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    2. Re:Thomas Covenant by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Thank you for removing my last vestige of guilt for not having soldiered through the book.

    3. Re:Thomas Covenant by kulervo · · Score: 1

      Let's see, in the first book an abandoned leper/former author rapes a young woman because she exposes him to something that heals him, all while he denies that she is more than a figment of his diseased imagination. And that's not a spoiler because it happens at the beginning and things go down from there. (I wrote a paper on Thomas Covenant as the perfect anti-hero in high school.)

      I wouldn't say that it's not worth reading (I read both trilogies and will get around to reading the third eventually). Many of the characters are lovely people, and the endings are not quite as bleak as it sounds. In fact the endings are pretty happy compared to the rest of the story line.

    4. Re:Thomas Covenant by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Schindler's List is happier than the opening story line.

    5. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did like the giant that walked through lava and became the perfect being...that was cool..

    6. Re:Thomas Covenant by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      "he denies that she is more than a figment of his diseased imagination." Wouldn't you do the same? Waking up in a land that can't be anything but not real from his point of view and soon being cured. Would you consider it anything else but imagination? As for rape... I have little doubt a lot of people have had way worse dreams than that; to Thomas, at that point, it's just a dream (or maybe nightmare is better). Anyway, The Gap series is way more bleak but I think they are an excellent read. If you think Sci-Fi is depressing/bleak, try to read stuff written by Jonathan Kellerman, Michael Connelly, John Sandford, Kathy Reichs, Dennis Lehane, etc.

    7. Re:Thomas Covenant by kulervo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I had a semester where I read Thomas Convenant for fun/independent report, then I read The Bluest Eye and The Things They Carried for class. The name of the class: Evil in American Literature.

      I still say Thomas Covenant is worth reading though, lots of great moments for the other characters, lots of great other characters. Foamfollower particularly.

    8. Re:Thomas Covenant by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "I read both trilogies and will get around to reading the third eventually."

      I've read the first two trilogies many times. I read the first book of the later series and the writing and plot was so shockingly awful it was like biting into a rotten egg.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    9. Re:Thomas Covenant by kulervo · · Score: 1

      Pity. Thanks for the review.

    10. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Covenant. I had an intervention from my family who were afraid that the book was driving me into depression.
      What a wishy-washy waste of space was the main character.

    11. Re:Thomas Covenant by Roarkk · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you (and contradict my last post), but while it's one of the most depressing series I"ve ever read, it's also one of the most exhilarating... you soldier on through the worst apocolyptic nightmares produced by pen, then...

      BAM

      One of the protagonists comes out of nowhere and just absolutely stomps the shit out of everything in his / her path, scoring 1M internets for the home team.

      Admit it, ChrisKnight, you never finished the series :)

    12. Re:Thomas Covenant by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      After Robert Jordan's failure to properly finish a series (repeatedly), that's a pretty raw nerve for me....

    13. Re:Thomas Covenant by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 1

      I thought they were happy endings...ish?

      Not as happy as the lord of the rings, but way happier than brazil.

    14. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the third book in the first series had a reasonably happy ending, Lord Foul is defeated, Revelstone is preserved, Covenant's disease is arrested and he's mentally strengthened by his ordeal.

      Definately worth reading the first two Covenant trilogies.

    15. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most of Donaldson's books you hate the main character, they are not people you would ever aspire to. They are depressing because Donaldson could conceive and write for hundreds of pages about someone so selfish. I've never read his books twice, I've thrown them away.

      Most of the other books listed in this post that I've read, like 1984, Brave New World etc I've gone back and read again and again.

    16. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad someone mentioned Donaldson. The three Covenant sagas are brilliant if you can cope with the almost overwhelming desire to smack most of the main characters about the head.

      However, in the context of this discussion, his Gap series is far more relevant than the Covenant sagas. It's one of the most brutally honest - taken to the extreme of scifi imagination - cowboys and spaceships stories I've ever read.

    17. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never got very far into the book, because the main character (I hesitate to say protagonist) had such a dark soul. So maybe it has a happier ending, but I couldn't get to it.

      though read, but way happier ending. tough and pionient, but happy

      Try "a man rides through" by same author

    18. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't

    19. Re:Thomas Covenant by BranMan · · Score: 1

      The book starting that series is "The mirror of her dreams" - "A man rides through" is the 2nd book IIRC

    20. Re:Thomas Covenant by ChrisKnight · · Score: 1

      I have finished the first two series, and all of the available books in the third series.

      Yes, Linden Avery kicks Lord Foul's ass in White Gold Wielder. And then she returns to the default world to find that the man she loves is dead. How the hell is that a happy ending?

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    21. Re:Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, happy ending in a Thomas Covenant book. I encourage you to pick that series back up.

  36. Atlas Shrugged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The message and the technical execution both made me want to top myself.

  37. Childhood's End By Arthur C. Clarke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...the human race just ends with a whimper.

    1. Re:Childhood's End By Arthur C. Clarke by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Actually, the human race goes on to something better. We just can't get there from here.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:Childhood's End By Arthur C. Clarke by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it better.

    3. Re:Childhood's End By Arthur C. Clarke by locofungus · · Score: 1

      I didn't find childhoods end depressing.

      It's a step change in evolution, that we don't normally see other than via extinction events of the current successful species.

      Assuming we actually do get into space and end up with permanent installations away from Earth then I would expect homo sapiens to evolve into something pretty much unrecognizable to us today.

      I don't find that depressing, I find that exhilarating. I just hope that the distances involved will mean that as evolution diverges and we become separate species, we will maintain cooperation rather than end up in conflict. The resources we require are likely to remain strikingly similar long after the time where we've speciated. It would be so tempting to take over an existing terraformed world or space station that is almost what is needed.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  38. A Canticle for Leibowitz by Yunzil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Synopsis: Humans are self-destructive, never learn from their mistakes, and are doomed to destroy themselves over and over again.

    1. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by catalina · · Score: 1

      Yes!!!! Still my favorite SF novel....

    2. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Pal, this thread is about science fiction, not fact.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by spitzig · · Score: 1

      I found it uplifting, at the same time. Even though people continually destroy themselves, they fight to survive-they adapt. They also idealize knowledge(which I kind of also do). Of course they do it so much they forget the point-like just copying things with no idea of the meaning. A favorite example was the blueprints-for years, they'd colored white paper(black? blue?) because the originals were that color.

      It also gave me less of a negative opinion of religion-Christianity was pretty much the bastion of knowledge in the Middle Ages in Europe.

    4. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      That is not close to a correct synopsis. I am as atheist as they come, but you cannot understand this book without the religious references. It all hinges on the final scene, when during the nuclear attack, the second head of the tomato saleswoman awakens. And refuses communion.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I get it. I can't imagine how you don't find it depressing.

    6. Re:A Canticle for Leibowitz by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that I personally didn't find it depressing. The intended message contains a discernible sliver of hope, but I, in fact, do find it depressing, if just for the fact that the only hope presented is rooted in catholic theology.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  39. Canticle for Leibowitz by Niris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Very interesting story, but an ending that I still think about.

    1. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by drkim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So right about the Philip K Dick...

      Ubik, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Man in the High Castle, Three Stigmata were just horrifying - but wonderful.

      I think while it's fun to read his stuff, no one would actually want to live in his worlds...

    2. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Now that we do...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by davecombs · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one that didn't go for Canticle for Leibowitz. I kept reading that it was a classic, but just could never get into it. I finally gave it up about 2/3 of the way through as just too depressing.

    4. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by catalina · · Score: 1

      Still bothered by the some of the religious references - particularly exporting on the starship.

    5. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      I think while it's fun to read his stuff, no one would actually want to live in his worlds...

      Are you sure you don't? Quick, check your pocket change!

    6. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2

      I have to agree about Canticle, although I really don't remember whether I finished it or not.

      If I'm going to read something depressing, at least it should be short. Each an Explorer, by Isaac Asimov, was pretty depressing, but at least it was short.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    7. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by drkim · · Score: 1

      Checking...

      Naw, everything's normal, just 3 Runciters and 10 Joe Chips.

      Man, it was so hot today, I was sprayin' on the underarm Ubik like crazy!

    8. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Then, there is the endless low-level of depression that permeates most Philip K Dick - like a miasma. But he makes you want more, somehow.

      Yeah, I finished reading Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep while backpacking in the middle of King's Canyon over a decade ago.

      I just sat there bummed out of my fucking mind, staring in the full moonlight at some of the most beautiful scenery on the planet.

      Dick's a drag, man.

    9. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I didn't find Liebowitz all that depressing. At least we're told that there are colonies in space where man still survives.

      How about On The Beach by Nevil Shute. Written at the height of the cold war, it starts at a point in time where everything in the world is dead or soon to be because of a nuclear war, except Australia, South Africa, and Southern South America. But that is only because the wind patterns haven't brought the fallout there yet. The story takes place in Australia and everyone is just waiting for the seasons to change when the weather patterns will bring the radiation south and kill everyone there too. It follows several people and through them looks at how people live knowing it is just a matter of time till everyone is dead. The author maintains that where they can, people just try to live normal lives because that is all their they can do without going into overload. Some do lose it becoming alcoholics and extreme risk takers, etc. Some are in complete denial. Some like an American sub commander, internally can't accept his family is dead and buys things for them for when he goes home. Rationally he knows they have to be dead, but can't help but deny it inside.

      The commander is in charge of a nuclear submarine that was docked in Australia at the time all the hostilities literally went ballistic. They go to Puget Sound because they hear intermitant transmissions from a short wave transmitter using morse code. While up there they determine radiatin levels aren't dropping. After someone goes ashore in air tanks they find the transmission was a broken window and a curtain brushing the sending unit. Power is on because the automatic systems haven't crashed yet.

      They go back to Melbourne and the government there starts handing out suicide pills so people don't have to endure radiation poisoning before finally dying. The book ends with all the characters including a young family with a baby born just before the war, killing themselves as the radiation in the area reaches leathal levels.

      I read the book once. It was incredibly well written. One of the best I ever read. I can't read it again. It is way too depressing. WAY too depressing. I tried once and before I even read a page I had a sort of reaction to it. I had to put it down. There was no way I could read it again. I've read Liebowitz a few times and will probably read it again some time. Not anywhere near the coefficient of depresivity that On The Beach puts out. FWIW I read it in the 70s as a teen, when you could still see B-52s routinely flying north from SAC bases in the U.S. on training runs and patrols. Back when 747s were still fairly rare you could still tell the B-52s apart by how damned high they were flying and the contrails. You could tell they had a massive number of engines by the contrails. Different time.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    10. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Stanislav Lem's Fiasco

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    11. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      I hated Canticle, but I'd hardly rate it as all that high on a "depressing scifi" list.

    12. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      My english teacher back when I was...oh, 13 or so made us read On The Beach.

      The scars...they never quite go away.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    13. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Phrogman · · Score: 2

      I gave up about halfway through because it was so *boring*. It was always listed as a classic masterpiece, but I just don't see it. Its nowhere near the worst I have read (Frank Herbert's The Green Brain comes to mind there) but it sure was not engaging at all. Either time I tried to read it.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    14. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about Ballard. 'The Drowned World' did it for me.

    15. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Excuse the off-topic, but I am looking for the author/title of a story about the world where the living space was finite and used as currency. Please help.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    16. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked for this one when I saw the article. My mom had read "On The Beach" while pregnant with her first child. They had already decided to call the baby "Jennifer" when she read this book. Dad said she was upset for days.

    17. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH YES...! I remember it well, now. I was 13 when I read it.

      I think it took 10 years to fully recover.

    18. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Dick always leaves you craving more... Dick.

    19. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      'Canticle' was my pick too. I remember talking out load while reading it "No no no! Dont blow it up AGAIN! Didnt you learn ANYTHING?". Blish's "Cities in Flight" was a good read, sure the universe ended, but I just took that as the ultimate closure. Even if you're immortal you cant beat the system, so it levels the playing field for us non-immortals.

    20. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yes! Billenium - by JG Ballard.

      Fascinating -- and bleak. :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    21. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one with the people dreaming confined in a ship always simulating killing each other was exceptionally depressing.

      Don't know the actual title, I've read it translated

    22. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 1

      On the Beach was a great novel. Very depressing. Even the movie was really depressing for 1959. Like you I was only able to read it once then watched the movie. Not sure I would ever read it again but only because of the feeling of emptiness I had when I was done.

    23. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      For a different kind of depressing, read Blish's "Star Trek" paperbacks. Just a poor translation of the original series to print.

      "Spock Must Die", indeed!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    24. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by pmikell · · Score: 1

      I think that was "A Maze of Death".

    25. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      A second on On the Beach. but if fantasy is also included the trilogy by Mervyn Peake the Gormenghast was so depressing I could never finish the second book.

    26. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the film version of 'On The Beach' isn't so uplifting, either...

    27. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      the feeling of emptiness

      You hit the nail square on the head.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    28. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On the Beach" is depressing for its setting, but it when you compare it to most post-apocalyptic stories, it's rather hopeful regarding the humanity of individuals' toward each other. People are by and large kind toward each other, not roving bands of cannibals. In that sense I found it optimistic.

    29. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The song Morning Dew (often played by the Grateful Dead) is based on On The Beach. Learning that really changed the way I listen to that song.

    30. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      lol... that is one way to look at it. People are kind. Now they're dead. [grin]

      I read your post and couldn't help but google "depressing philosopher." I have a dark sense of humour. Anyway, I don't know why I found it so funny, but I did, that the first result would be exactly what I was thinking about first: Discussion List on "Who is the most depressing philosopher. Given the subject of this post I shouldn't have been surprised that a group somewhere would be discussing philosophies that are truly depressing.

      However, I found a most heartening result on, of all places, Facebook. And it made me laugh my ass off. It is so droll it is beyond belief. I love this humour. It is a Facebook page for Depressing Philosophers Who Say That Nothing Matters So Why Bother Anyway. If you click the link you will see the humour. Honest.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    31. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by jgrahn · · Score: 2

      How about /On The Beach/ by Nevil Shute. Written at the height of the cold war, it starts at a point in time where everything in the world is dead or soon to be because of a nuclear war, except Australia, South Africa, and Southern South America. [snip]

      In the post-nuclear holocaust genre, Edgar Pangborn's /Davy/ cycle needs to be mentioned. New England pushed back to the Middle Ages, with witch-hunts, slavery, religious fanaticism and everything ... and no way out because the natural resources were used up in the 20th century, and anything which has to do with science or technology (like medicine, or glasses) is banned. The protagonists in his story tend to be poets and artists, and they are always crushed in the end, with whatever they had to say forgotten.

      Swedish writer P C Jersild wrote a similar story, "Efter floden". Also detailed, and depressing as hell.

    32. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      For me it's Flow My Tears the Policeman Said.....that's about as depressing as a story gets on every level possible.

      Of course A Scanner Darkly is no book of smiles and happy prancing unicorns either

    33. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by mark_elf · · Score: 1

      Canticle: Doesn't the protagonist just die a pointless death about 1/3 of the way in? He's on his way somewhere and gets shot by a stray arrow, just because. Or maybe the point is that life sucks. I wouldn't know if it has a happy ending. I liked "The Lineman". Miller really likes his characters to suffer.

      But "The Stars My Destination" by Alfred Bester is worse. Talk about punishing some poor sod beyond the limits of sanity. Once again it may be unicorns and lollipops in the end, but there's no motivation to read that far. Apparently "repeatedly voted in polls the "Best Science Fiction Novel of All Time'" by people who like pain.

      Philip K. Dick manages to stay classy while being all post-apocalyptic.

    34. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      That is a trip. I can't even imagine how she felt. I think the word 'upset' probably didn't even approach it. Especially if it was back in the days when that kind of worry was a very real thing.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    35. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize it's an unconventional take. But it's a big picture view, I think. The only difference between the characters and all of us is that they know exactly how short their time is.

      It's also kind of a reverse of the popular platitude, "Live like there's no tomorrow" -- for them, there isn't a tomorrow, yet they live like there is.

      I much prefer that end-of-the-world to, say, The Road.

    36. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had nightmares for a few days after On the Beach

    37. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Leibowitz work is preserved by a monk who worships it, as a relic in some cargo-cultish way. The monks travails and labours are presented for the first third or so. He's ambushed and killed by brigand/mutants as he is on his way to fulfill his presentation of the illuminated manuscript...

      Then the story jumps ahead several hundred years.

      It became difficult for me to view the rest of the book as an exercise. Of course that was more than thirty years ago, in my teens.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    38. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the beach is pretty depressing, I agree, but an excellent novel..

    39. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cried at the end of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. I was like seeing the light at the end of the tunnel after you died and are entering heaven to find out that it's just Satan shining a flashlight in your face.

    40. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this and One Second After.

    41. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. I love Dick. Oh wait that doesn't sound right. But seriously even IRL Philip liked misery. There's a great documentary about how he used to eat horse meat etc. It's sad how he died pretty much penniless, and then tons of movies were made, based on his short stories / novels. He *DID* get to see an early edit of Bladerunner (Based on his "Do androids dream of electric sheep?" story) though, which is probably my favourite movie ever. (But I hate the Theatrical release with voice-overs, I like the other versions like :Director's cut" and "Final cut"

    42. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the beach is bleak as hell yes. There's another after-the-apolocalypse which you reminded me of, theshowmecanck - "Salt" by Gabriel Lord. Cos the story is based in Australia.

      http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=gabrielle+lord+salt&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Agabrielle+lord+salt&ajr=0

    43. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with you. I was 13 when I read it and the dismal outcome of this tale is still with me. That was many years ago, and like you I will not read it again. It's far too depressing.

    44. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without a doubt - nothing else comes close !!!

    45. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what about 1984? It used to be merely depressing SF. Now it's all the more depressing because we actually live in that world.

    46. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by khallow · · Score: 1

      The problem with On The Beach, is that it's hard to take seriously. It's basically the "We're all in it together" myth. But that does contribute to the depressing nature of the book. You can just tell that the author hopes nuclear war is bad enough that no one will do it and end his world.

    47. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It (On the Beach) was one of my dad's favorite books, back in the 60s when it was written: and he was a war-gamer in the army.

    48. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I think the only reason we're all still here is that almost everybody else thinks the same way as the author. If you're of the belief that nuclear war is (or at that time was) a survivable event, you are very much in the minority. Especially with the number of bombs on a hair trigger they had. You essentially had to let loose with everything if they fired at you because you probably wouldn't get a second chance.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    49. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by khallow · · Score: 1

      If you're of the belief that nuclear war is (or at that time was) a survivable event, you are very much in the minority.

      I did and do. The effects of nuclear bombs are well known. While there is some uncertainty about nuclear winter, it's still just a temporary problem. The thing is if you live in the boondocks, have plenty of food stored, and aren't immediately downwind from major targets (or just dug out a good enough bomb shelter), you're going to survive.

      The people who are going to have more trouble surviving will be the ones who thought it was unsurvivable and didn't prepare. But as you noted, that's only a problem if a nuclear war actually happens. Otherwise, they do fairly well by the strategy without giving up a lot of resources for a somewhat uncertain survival plan.

    50. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Beach. Yeah...... very dark. Like you, I've never been able to read it again.

    51. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      You want depressing fantasy? I nominate the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant. The main character is a leper. Start with that, and it goes downhill from there. I know more about leprosy after forcing myself to finish the series than I ever wanted to know.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    52. Re:Canticle for Leibowitz by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Ubik was wonderfully existential (esp. listening to the audio book), but Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch was way too acid-trip for me. I do agree that dystopian doesn't necessarily mean depressing (except for 1984 - that had me sad for weeks).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  40. The Forge of God - Gregory Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unknowable, incomprehensible aliens come to Earth and destroy it. It takes a while, so everybody just waits to get blown up for no reason.

    Summary:
    1. Aliens arrive
    2. Little contact with humans. We don't know anything about them and can't really communicate with them.
    3. Humans are helpless, but we do figure out Earth is doomed.
    4. Boom. Everyone dies. The End.

    1. Re:The Forge of God - Gregory Bear by jason1178 · · Score: 1

      The Anvil of Stars is no picnic either... 5. Some humans survive on Mars 6. Little kids are sent on a mission to avenge the Earth.

    2. Re:The Forge of God - Gregory Bear by ViperOrel · · Score: 1

      How about The Killing Star http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_Star Future is awesome... we've achieved so much... aaaand we're dead.

  41. Hugh Howey's Wool by wintersynth · · Score: 2

    I was having a pretty low day when I started it, and it made it a lot worse. Howey is a master at creating personable characters that you fall in love with in only a few short pages. Then he teaches you brutally why you shouldn't become emotionally involved with his characters. I highly recommend reading it, and overall it's not too depressing, but those first few chapters are some of the roughest in sci-fi I've read.

    1. Re:Hugh Howey's Wool by Sasayaki · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. Glad to see someone beat me to it.

      --
      Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    2. Re:Hugh Howey's Wool by dakohli · · Score: 1

      I am part way through Wool, and am having a hard time to see how things will get better.

      So far, he has set up the pins and knocked them down a couple of times, I can see what is about to happen, and there is nothing any of the characters can do to stop it. This isn't even taking into account the situation that they are all in, a situation that does not seem to have a chance of improving.

      The more I think about it, the more sad it becomes.

      And that being said, I cannot look away.

  42. Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Harrison Bergeron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A short, only a couple of pages long. One of the funniest AND one of the saddest SF stories ever IMO, which is quite an accomplishment for such a short length. Google it, you can find it online (not posting a link since I'm not aware of the copyright limits etc.)
    .

  43. Voyage, By Stephen Baxter by GreggBz · · Score: 1

    Simply because it seems so plausible. I imagine what could have been. As I get older, the reality of our miss-guided human priorities weighs me down. I think about that book, and it just makes me sad.

    1. Re:Voyage, By Stephen Baxter by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Titan (also Baxter) is even more depressing. It starts with Columbia crashing (written pre-actual-crash), then follows the US through the mothballing of 95% of NASA and a big swing to the anti-science-pro-religion factions. This does not bode well for the crewed mission to Titan in what remains of the shuttle fleet.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    2. Re:Voyage, By Stephen Baxter by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      You could just as well expand that to "everything Stephen Baxter ever wrote".

      After Manifold Space/Time/Destiny, I'm convinced he keeps writing because he enjoys seeing his characters suffer...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  44. A Canticle for Liebowitz by overshoot · · Score: 2

    It's right up there in the "damn this world sucks" department, although not quite as depressing as the first time I read the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy straight through. That may have been sleep deprivation, though, but the effect was that in the beginning everything was a stroll through the Shire even when the Ringwraiths were after the hobbits and by the end it was gloom and doom and depression even when Aragorn was being crowned. Impressive effect.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:A Canticle for Liebowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta agree. Finished another read through about 3 weeks ago from start to end, had never noticed how incredibly melancholy those books are. The world as they know it is literally ending, the great kingdoms are in ruin, the elves are jumping ship. The only one on the up is Sauron. Great stuff, but a big downer

  45. Usually happy endings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that a vast segment of science fiction (especially the stuff that was coming out around the cold war) was pretty depressing - a big chunk of it ends with humanity dying, either because we're dumb or because we're malicious. Sometimes both.

    I might start with the anthology "Bangs and Whimpers: stories about the end of the world"
    Another good one is (which doesn't end with everyone dying) is "Repent Harlequin, said the tic toc man" (short story)

  46. Not particularly sure by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

    I'm not particularly sure, because if I'm reading something and its depressing I stop reading it. So which one that I stopped reading was the most depressing isn't easy to determine.

    1. Re:Not particularly sure by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      You'll miss out on some of the worlds greatest artistic works if you stop because it's depressing or otherwise not 'enjoyable'. Pan's Labyrinth is an amazing movie, but it's dark, depressing, and terrifying (and not in a good way, I mean in a way that will give grown men nightmares). Jurassic Bark is has one of the best endings to any single episode of any cartoon ever, but it will make you cry like a baby. Eon starts with the world powers nuking each other into oblivion, despite the fact that both sides knew exactly what would happen if they did so.

    2. Re:Not particularly sure by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      I should also point out that I find very few things depressing.

  47. A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter Miller Jr. by arcctgx · · Score: 1

    Mankind is too stupid to learn from its own mistakes.

  48. Most Depressing Sci-Fi? by Mystiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mass Effect 3. I was depressed for about a week after playing the original ending. (Hey, you never said it had to be good, just depressing.)

    1. Re:Most Depressing Sci-Fi? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you know what's even more depressing? the extended cut ending videos.

      basically they just say "yeas we _really_ meant the shittily written endings."

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Most Depressing Sci-Fi? by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 1

      What depresses me is the continuing decline of CRPG gameplay.

      --
      My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    3. Re:Most Depressing Sci-Fi? by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      I _liked_ the original ending; it had a massively plausible indoctrination interpretation that made you really question what was going on. The revised ending disappointed me by putting the kibosh to that...

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
  49. Harrison by crow_t_robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bergeron

  50. Cormac McCarthy's "The Road" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the world could become....

  51. Hitchhikers Guide - 4th book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Mostly Harmless" was a good read, but it was depressing throughout and ended on a horrible note.

    Spoiler

    Everybody dies, and the entire Earth is nothing more than sausage meat for a bureaucratic corporation to exploit for profit. Kind of like real life...

    1. Re:Hitchhikers Guide - 4th book by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      And, see, I found it hilarious and a good way to end a series.

      You should read how he ended "Long Dark Tea-time of the Soul". Might as well have said "frankly, I don't wish to write another book in this series!"

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    2. Re:Hitchhikers Guide - 4th book by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

      Mostly Harmless is book 5 of 3 as I recall. Elgin Schafer made a 6th book in the trilogy after Douglas Adams died, that attempts to work around the whole Vogon multidimensional explosion thing, but if you stop at book 5 it's a pretty depressing end to such a light hearted series.

    3. Re:Hitchhikers Guide - 4th book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, you are correct. Thanks for pointing that out.

      I had no interest in reading the "6th" book as written by somebody else. And as to the commenter above you, Tea-Time is next on my reading list. I just finished reading Dirk Gently's Hollistic Detective Agency (this time as an adult), and look forward to what's next.

    4. Re:Hitchhikers Guide - 4th book by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I have tried to read "And Another Thing" by Eoin Colfer on multiple occasions, I've tried listening to the audio book, I just can't get into it. I don't know if it lacks Douglas' turn of phrase or the fact that he seems to treat the existing universe as a lucky dip (put your hand into a bag and draw out a random element, try to make it work).

      I know that Douglas reused elements from his earlier works, but they didn't feel arbitrary, and each book started with something new and drew the older elements in as they progressed, they didn't start with recycled material.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  52. Easy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The american constitution...

  53. Harrison Bergeron by amanaplanacanalpanam · · Score: 2

    By Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Not quite as cheerful as 1984.

  54. The Godwhale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T.J. Bass. It's not just dystopian, it's squalidly dystopian.

    Make Room! Make Room! is depressing in a similar vein, too.

  55. John Brunner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot (not all) of John Brunner's work have a very heavy dystopian themes - often leaving the reader depressed at that's the way the world could go. Plus as each decade of time passes, re-reading make the reader more depressed, given that what he wrote about seems even more likely to make the transition from fiction to fact...

    1. Re:John Brunner by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Indeed, he's often considered the godfather of cyberpunk for just this reason, even though most of his work was written decades before the cyberpunks appeared. For a serious, grinding, downtrodden dystopia, though, it doesn't get much better than his The Sheep Look Up. The name says it all.

    2. Re:John Brunner by Ebirah · · Score: 1

      The Sheep Look Up is indeed grim, not least because of the way that reality increasingly resembles the world it depicts. Most depressingly, the eminently practical solution it arrives at to allows human life's continuation (in a still-ghastly dystopian world) is unlikely to be adopted in the real world. Stand on Zanzibar isn't particularly upbeat either. Or The Jagged Orbit.

      --
      It's never so bad that it can't get worse.
    3. Re:John Brunner by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      ditto ditto ditto

      muckers... Corp liability settlements as a profit center ... World wide webs... Aggressive advertising

      thank God none of his predictions came true

    4. Re:John Brunner by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Mmm, Stand on Zanzibar is my favorite of Brunner's books, and easily makes my top twenty list of books overall. But it retained a solid thread of optimism throughout all the darkness. The way I used to describe it is "a book that predicts things will get better and worse at ever increasing rates." Which was an easy prediction, even back in the sixties, but one that few writers bothered with.

      Brunner's Shockwave Rider is often cited as the strongest evidence for claims that he's the godfather of cyberpunk, but I found it a little too happy and optimistic overall. On the other hand, The Sheep Look Up (and The Jagged Orbit) are almost too grim even for me. No one can say the man didn't have range. :)

  56. Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Bobtree · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Blindsight, besides being the best thing I've ever read, has a rather stark outlook on the nature of consciousness and what that means for us as human beings. I don't consider it depressing, though some might, and Watts calls his portrayal of human nature "almost childishly optimistic."

    From Watts' homepage: "Whenever I find my will to live becoming too strong, I read Peter Watts." —James Nicoll

    1. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by pepty · · Score: 1

      I came here to put in Blindsight, that Nicoll quote, and the Rifters trilogy. If that's not enough, there's Watts' personal life: adventures with flesh eating bacteria and US border guards. I think he found the flesh eating bacteria more reasonable to deal with.

    2. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by jguevin · · Score: 1

      +1 for Blindsight. What delicious hopelessness.

    3. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Blindsight, besides being the best thing I've ever read, has a rather stark outlook on the nature of consciousness and what that means for us as human beings.

      I have to second this -- the ending of Blindsight might have been depressing, except that the book's sheer awesomeness outweighs any unhappiness the ending might otherwise generate.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just finished re-reading Blindsight and it's devastating. Among other things, among all the casual cruelty and dysphoria and dissociation his characters bring to the table (SPOILER: we torture and kill things. Not really a spoiler, is it), Watts throws it out there that consciousness itself is a glitch, and probably is anti-survival in the long run. Go check it out, it's a free ePub from his site, under Creative Commons. Get to the end and tell me you've *ever* read darker.

    5. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by runeghost · · Score: 1

      I love his work, but I have to say I found the Rifters trilogy to be even more depressing that Blindsight. All amazingly brilliant though. James Nicoll's quote is so marvelously apt.

    6. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Yep, absolutely. It is difficult to accept that my consciousness - basically the only part of me I am proud of - is just a parasitic entity. Might just as well kill myself.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that!

      Blindsight is a great story and in no way uplifting.

    8. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the Rifters trilogy, by Watts. Brings about the end of the world in the first book and spends the next two dancing in the ruins.

    9. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Blindsight isn't *that* hopeless -- the human race at least survives, albeit as chattel.

      But Peter Watts' Rifter trilogy is the bleakest thing I've ever read. The slow but inexorable annihilation of Earth's entire ecosystem by humans screwing each other over in every way possible is written brilliantly.

      I'm reminded of this April Fool's article in Locus Magazine:

      Acclaimed science fiction writers Paolo Bacigalupi and Peter Watts today announced that they are working on a new shared universe anthology.

      “Peter and I got talking about how much we loved shared-world anthologies, like Thieves World or Wild Cards,” said Bacigalupi, “but were put off by the unreasonable optimism of their settings. We think science fiction is ready for a pessimistic future of bleak, uncompromising wretchedness."
      (...)
      “We expect suicides,” said Watts. “And maybe a Nebula.”

      Bacigalupi added that they had rejected a Barry Malzberg story written for the anthology for being “too optimistic.”

      So apparently the authors with the most 'depressing' street cred in the business are Watts, Bacigalupi, and Malzberg.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    10. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starfish and Maelstrom by Peter Watts are also hugely depressing. The characters are unsympathetic, hardened, dysfunctional; the stories bleak. I ate them up.

    11. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      His Rifters trilogy is pretty depressing, too. But...great at the same time. :)

    12. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my all time best too!

      Homo sapiens vampiris :)

    13. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with Blindsight. Anyone who hasn't read it should .. Along with Peter's earlier works like Starfish, Behemoth etc. A world not too distant from now where corporations make the decisions for the Greater Good. These works are a real standout and look at how people are always ready to step over the bodies of their fellow man to stay on top.

    14. Re:Blindsight, by Peter Watts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Blindsight is depressing, give his Starfish series a whirl.

  57. Greg Bear: Forge of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, depressing SF.

  58. Anything by Ayn Rand. by EWAdams · · Score: 0

    It's depressing because it's so idiotic and yet so many people are taken in by it.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:Anything by Ayn Rand. by khallow · · Score: 1

      I think that stuff is depressing because so many take them as "how to" manuals. It's like being a satanist without the hedonism.

  59. Ian M. Banks by sonofepson · · Score: 2

    Consider Phlebas, Use of Weapons and Matter. Good though.

    --
    If Godzilla did not exist, man would have had to create him.
    1. Re:Ian M. Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Use of Weapons" has one of the most powerful reveals I've read. The purple cover with the outline of the battleship and the white chair gave me chills after reading that book. I highly reccomend it.

    2. Re:Ian M. Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add "Against a Dark Background."

    3. Re:Ian M. Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of those three, the only one I found depressing was Use of Weapons (which I found slightly disturbing, actually).

      Consider Phlebas & Matter didn't have that effect on me, for some reason.

      Against a Dark Background had a pretty dark ending, too, IIRC (pun not intended).

    4. Re:Ian M. Banks by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      Surface Detail too. The Hells were pretty depressing, and finding out who the soldier was at the end, and knowing that he's still fighting wars after 600 years.

    5. Re:Ian M. Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iain M. Banks - not being pedantic, just makes it less confusing for others to search for him.

      The same author also writes fiction under the name Iain Banks - I've never really considered his work depressing however; quite often funny - but that might say more about my tastes than anything else.

    6. Re:Ian M. Banks by fartrader · · Score: 1

      "Use of Weapons" also has one of the funniest moments when the protagonist who has been beheaded, rescued in the nick of time and kept alive and still headless by Culture medical technology is presented with a gift by the snarky drone in said book.

      It's a hat.

    7. Re:Ian M. Banks by misterscience · · Score: 1

      Use of Weapons is particularly twisted and bleak in its view of human nature. As you say, though: really good read.

    8. Re:Ian M. Banks by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Depressing? I wouldn't agree. I think Banks is such a good writer that even bleak subject matter and outcomes in his books are still a pleasure to read. Glad you mentioned him though.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:Ian M. Banks by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

      The books he writes as Iain Banks (as opposed to Iain M. Banks are very different. The one I read (A Song of Staone) does not feel like SciFi to me, and is almost tediously depressing. The kind of so depressing that you just wish the book could be over with except you want to know if it might turn ot OK afteer all. It doesn't.

      The ones that he writes with his middle initial are excellent..

    10. Re:Ian M. Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The books he writes as Iain Banks (as opposed to Iain M. Banks are very different. The one I read (A Song of Staone) does not feel like SciFi to me, and is almost tediously depressing.

      They're not supposed to be Sci-fi, but the "M." ones are. But he's a very experimental author even in his non-"M." persona. Try his first novel, Wasp Factory, which is excellent. Some of his novels are quite amusing, like Espedair Street, or Whit, while others are weird, especially Feersum Ennjin.

      However, as most of his stories are set in the UK, perhaps you have to be British, or even Scottish, to "get" them.

  60. Is "The Road" sci-fi? by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    Then that wins. McCarthy rules.

    Also "I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream" is depressing.

    "The Forge of God" by Greg Bear.

    "O Happy Day" Geoff Ryman

    "Stars In My Pocket Like Grains of Sand" Chip Delany

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Is "The Road" sci-fi? by echusarcana · · Score: 2

      The Road is sci-fi, certainly. And it definitely is an order of magnitude more depressing than most things mentioned here.

    2. Re:Is "The Road" sci-fi? by lymang · · Score: 1

      Agree. The Road is depressing as all get out. I am not sure I find the tiny bit of uplifting hope/redemptive emotion at the end enough to balance out the bleary grayness that encompasses that entire novel.

      --
      Meh.
    3. Re:Is "The Road" sci-fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Forge of God - is a classic, although I did not care for the sequel.

    4. Re:Is "The Road" sci-fi? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      You've read "O Happy Day?" That is absolutely horrible. Basically follows the life of an extermination camp inmate who has been forced to dispose of the bodies.

      Oh yeah, they were only killing men. This was after a civil nuclear war, which they ended by drugging the water... which killed 99% of the surviving women.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  61. Man Plus by Frederik Pohl by carpwall · · Score: 1

    I never actually got through it. When they inform his wife he no longer has any "equipment" for her to service I was outta there. Honestly, where could the book possibly go from there?

    1. Re:Man Plus by Frederik Pohl by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Mars, actually.

      Still, you didn't miss much other than urine dribbling out his artificial labia of his dickless crotch causes a short at an inopportune moment on Mars.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Man Plus by Frederik Pohl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they inform his wife he no longer has any "equipment" for her to service I was outta there.

      False advertising. Should have been called "Man Minus" :)

  62. What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fucking newspaper!

  63. The Divine Invasion by Philip K Dick by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily the whole thing, just the picture painted of Herb Asher living in an isolated dome on a remote planet, detached from the world and reality, obsessing over a female singer and resenting the terminally ill woman who lives in the dome next to his when she reaches out to him for help. Everything that follows is unsettling/detestable, but that image stayed with me.

  64. Most Depressing? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Running MS DOS 3.3" by Van Wolverton.

    I had to re-read Peter Norton's massive, "Programmer's guide to the IBM PC & PS/2" two times after that, just to feel better.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Most depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... and let's not forget Lord of the Flies. Yeeeughhh!!

  65. The Forge of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Forge of God

  66. Firefly by exabrial · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After I heard they cancelled the series.

    1. Re:Firefly by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      tbh if I had to pick between canceling a series early, or letting it run past its welcome, I'd pick canceling it early. I would rather be left with happy memories of it rather than standing there shaking my fist at the franchise (looking at you, stargate universe)

      The ending of the firefly movie was quite depressing though.

    2. Re:Firefly by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      After I heard they cancelled the series.

      I saw "The Train Job" first and never could get into the series. Then I saw the actually pilot and loved it. Universal killed it by trying to fix what wasn't broken. Watch the pilot then Serenity back to back and see what it might have been. Now I love the whole thing but it was always meant to be edgier, it was Universal that wanted more humor.

  67. John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up by rwcnc · · Score: 1

    My clear winner for most depressing SF: John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up. Mercifully, I've suppressed most of my memory of it, but it starts depressing and just keeps on going.

  68. When Gravity Fails by George Alec Effinger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoilers... you knew they'd be here from the question.
    The protagonist Audran lives in a Arabic/Muslim slum, spending most of his days scarfing down baggies of drugs and banging his transsexual girlfriend. He gets hired to find a missing prince, and the whole thing kicks off in a bloody mess.
    Long story short, they kill his girlfriend, who turns out to have been the missing prince. In retaliation, he jacks in "the black chip," and has no memory of the carnage unleased that followed. It ends in the hollow victory that he massacred the killer, but is now ostracized by the world he knew for having unleashed such unspeakable barbarism on the bodies of the killer and the captive police officer.
    At least, that's what I generally recall from 25 years ago when I read it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Gravity_Fails

  69. Echea by Asimov by zugmeister · · Score: 1

    Hands down. Lent it to a friend of mine and his only comment when giving it back was "Why would you ever want to read something so depressing?"

    1. Re:Echea by Asimov by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      By Asimov?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  70. A shoe-in for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream

  71. The Cold Equations. by circusboy · · Score: 1

    reality combined with low margin engineering... very depressing.

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:The Cold Equations. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that one really bothered me.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:The Cold Equations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say that.

    3. Re:The Cold Equations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy shit i adjusted the comment threshold just to search for anyone else who read this.

      THEY MADE US READ THIS IN 8TH GRADE WHAT THE FUCK THIS FUCKED MY SHIT UP FOR A WHILE

    4. Re:The Cold Equations. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I think it was supposed to. The story was carefully crafted to present an impossible problem with no solution, and then to portray people's reaction to it. It was intended to mess you up.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:The Cold Equations. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Which is not a good-written book. It was written as a morality play and fails on almost all accounts. WTF the pilot is issued with a freaking blaster when a simple inspection of the "minimal-weight" ship (with an airlock and enough space for a writing table!) should be more than sufficient?

      Besides, nobody designs systems with such insane safety margins. They are simply unworkable.

    6. Re:The Cold Equations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can blame John W. Campbell for the depressing bits. Apparently he got Tom Godwin to rewrite "Cold Equations" three times because "Godwin kept coming up with ingenious ways to save the girl!"

    7. Re:The Cold Equations. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the wikipedia summary, which left the details of the story to the imagination was far more compelling than the actual story which was just really goddamned clunky.

      It kept on repeating itself about how cold the equations are. Yes the point needs to be made, but only to the extent necessary to proceed with the story. Within the low margins of a short-story, the extra weight of this redundant writing brought the result crashing into mediocrity.

      I wanted to care about the girl before she died, but the attempts to paint a human face on the tragedy fell flat for me, she just robotically waxed philosophical, rued her predicament slightly, and resigned to her death. No emotion in what should be an extremely emotional scene, for the purposes of contrasting against the coldness of those equations.

    8. Re:The Cold Equations. by circusboy · · Score: 1

      I read it when I was somewhat younger, but I think that the part that really got me in the end (on top of everything else,) was that the pilot was going to have to explain what happened to her brother. my imagining of the brother's reaction really knocked me...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  72. The Phantom Menace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can assure you i was VERY depressed by the time i finished that book.

  73. Stand on Zanzibar by arpad1 · · Score: 2

    "Stand on Zanzibar" by John Brunner was pretty relentlessly depressing and not just in a worldwide sort of way.

    No one in the story was happy or had any reason to be happy or had any hope of being happy. Ever. Till the end of time. Even an end to war turned out to be depressing.

    Made "The Road" seem like a carefree romp across the countryside.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    1. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Drishmung · · Score: 1
      I didn't find Stand on Zanzibar that depressing. It actually has a slightly upbeat ending (the end to war bit you mentioned). "The Sheep Look Up" though (sort of a sequel) is much more depressing.

      When I saw the headline for this article, I immediately thought of Jem, only to have it confirmed when I read on. But that's the genius of Pohl. Some of his stores are upbeat, some are downbeat, and you often can't tell until the end which type you're going to get.

      You could probably add his short story "The Tunnel Under The World" (everything you know is a lie; you are a lie; now that you know that, here's some more information to show that you situation is even worse than you thought) or his novel "A Plague of Pythons"

      There is also "On Wings of Song" by Thomas M. Disch which is more than somewhat bleak.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    2. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is the book I thought of as soon as I saw the question.

      Without a doubt one of the gloomiest books I have read, with absolutely no relief to the end.

      "The road" I would vote for because it was over-hyped and basically a shit read. I have read a lot of sci-fi books which treat the same subject much more skilfully.

    3. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by darioushfaunk · · Score: 1

      Definitely second 'The Sheep Look Up.' That story is so incredibly and consistently bleak. I don't think any of the lead characters ever really catch any sort of break.

    4. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

      I found "The Sheep Look Up," also by John Brunner, to be much more intensely depressing. It was like Stand on Zanzibar, only without Zanzibar or Alice in Wonderland jokes.

      And the ending... yeah.

      Made "Stand on Zanzibar" look like a carefree romp across the countryside. (After finishing it, I read "Stand on Zanzibar" to cheer up.)

    5. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good, Brunner was my choice too. Good to see Slashdot knows its stuff still and I don't need to get an account.

    6. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stand on Zanzibar had a happy, life-affirming ending compared to Brunner's follow-up, The Sheep Look Up. _That's_ a depressing book.

    7. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Curseyoukhan · · Score: 1

      I love Zanzibar and I think The Sheep Look Up is much more depressing.

    8. Re:Stand on Zanzibar by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Myself, I never found Stand on Zanzibar OR The Sheep Look Up all that depressing. The Brunner book that I found most depressing was Children of the Thunder. The Wikipedia write-up (and cover blurb) don't really reflect my memory of the book, which I recall liking up to the end, so I guess I ought to reread it. But that has always stuck in my mind as a book I didn't WANT to reread because it was so depressing.

      --
      -DwS
  74. Silent Running by ballpoint · · Score: 1

    Though Silent Running is a movie that's not even based on a book, it could very well have been.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:Silent Running by echusarcana · · Score: 1

      Yes! And it earns bonus points for having Bruce Dern spouting environmentalist drivel.

    2. Re:Silent Running by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      +1

  75. Cannot be Real Must Be Dystopian Sci Fi by Brainman+Khan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Any written work that refers to a Kardashian or a Snooki as admired or celebrity.

    1. Re:Cannot be Real Must Be Dystopian Sci Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any written work that refers to a Kardashian or a Snooki as admired or celebrity.

      I see this has been marked (at the time of this comment) Offtopic.
      In an attempt to try rescue it (as it does contain a nugget or relevance), I invite the Greybeard who modded it such to participate in a wee Gedankenexperiment.

      Take the most depressing Science Fiction you know, think about it, got that feeling well and truly in your head?

      Good.

      Now compare *that* feeling with the feeling you get when you realise that you live in a world where meatbags like the Kardashians and this 'Snooki' thing are regarded as 'celebrities' and *are* admired by a sizeable number of your fellow 'human' beings..

      makes you think harder about the premise of 'The Marching Morons' and similar stories.

  76. Iain M. Bank- Consider Phlebas by edremy · · Score: 1
    Against a Dark Background and Use of Weapons are close seconds. Just unrelentingly bleak- truly awful things happen to anyone likable, the good guys frequently turn out to be evil as hell and virtually nobody survives. I find it rather ironic that CP and UoW occur in the Culture, which is his ultimate techo-utopia. AaDB occurs in a star system that's been ejected from it's galaxy- there are no other stars within thousands of light years. The local civilization has occupied every space within the system over and over again, only to destroy itself in pointless wars. All three are truly awesome books though- he throws out more interesting ideas in a page than lesser authors do in entire series.

    His last few SF books have been a lot more upbeat (at least for him) for some reason- Excession is laugh out loud funny in quite a few places, as is Surface Detail. Matter and Look To Windward at least end on happy notes.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Iain M. Bank- Consider Phlebas by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I think he's trying not to be a "only read this guy's stuff if you want to hate life" author. Better to have some variety.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Iain M. Bank- Consider Phlebas by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I felt that Surface detail was quite depressing in times, the Hells (and being forced to kill other people there) and the soldier, ultimately trapped in a 600 year cycle of wars, still atoning for what happened in use of weapons. Sure the baddies get their due, but overall not a happy book.

    3. Re:Iain M. Bank- Consider Phlebas by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      How about Player of Games?

      Despite it more or less having a happy ending, the underlying theme which pops up in most of the Culture books, that a couple of Minds are pretty much running anything and everything and the humans are just there to look pretty and provide scenery, is very strong in that one.

      Poor Gurgeh...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  77. Jean Raspail's The Camp of the Saints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not so heavy on the 'science' part of sci-fi, but the most depressingly dystopian-and-coming-true-now book I've read to date.

  78. or Brazil by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I read 1984 when I was in junior high (which was in the early 90s), and it was a dark and frightening read. But it didn't really hit me that hard. Then as an adult a few years ago, I watched Terry Gilliam's Brazil for the first time, and it depressed the hell out of me.

    1984 is a story about an ultra-competent government that manages to run everything just the way it wants to and convince people to act and think how it wants. Brazil was a story about an amazingly incompetent government that so much fails at it's job as to take society down with it. Guess which one I find more relevant to the current state of affairs?

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    1. Re:or Brazil by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Brazil was a story about an amazingly incompetent government that so much fails at it's job as to take society down with it.

      Doesn't matter what is more depressing. The question was about fiction, your book is out of scope. The judge is still out about 1984, but Brazil clearly can't participate on this contest.

    2. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You completely missed the point on what 1984 was about.

    3. Re:or Brazil by cpricejones · · Score: 2

      I always thought A Brave New World was the much better dystopic novel, which is a pretty depressing genre as a whole. The world portrayed in BNW was more real to me, and the writing was a lot better, in my opinion, approaching literary science fiction. For example, I really liked the use of The Tempest throughout. You could definitely make the argument that 1984 was more depressing because the writing was worse and the book was less interesting though (i.e., it was depressing to read, not just the content).

      I don't know if The Magus by Fowles would exactly qualify as science fiction, but that was another book that was a great read in the same way (depressing yet very well written so that it was still enjoyable).

      Then there are the more common great scifi books that are depressing because they are so good that you dont want them to end. I remember feeling this way at the end of Snow Crash.

    4. Re:or Brazil by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      I just started reading Brave New World. I knew it was going to be a dark read, but when I reached the part where they electrocuted babies in order to condition them, I realized I was way over my head. It looks to be a tough one (a good tough, but tough all the same).

    5. Re:or Brazil by Nyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe it is me, but I don't really consider 1984 nor Brazil to be Science Fiction.

      Not really much science in those fictional stories.

      When I think of SciFi, I think of stories where science plays the dominate role, like space travel, advance techonology, and of course, shit with science in it.

      Brazil is about Governments. Not science, but about political issues.

      1984 is about Governments. Not science, but about political/social issues.

      they are Fiction, yes. Science Fiction? I don't think so.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:or Brazil by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      1984 is a story about an ultra-competent government

      Competent? The food ration was continually being reduced. They were constantly in a pointless war. They had an iron grip on society, but the government was as incompetent at managing everything else as North Korea is. Or late Maoist China. It's only going to get worse and eventually has to crack. Winston is screwed, but it can't last more than a few decades.

      Right up until 1989 I never believed the Soviet empire would break up, then it did, almost overnight. The same kind of thing is happening now with the Arab dictators.

      Of course Orwell didn't know about the collapse of these dictatorships, but he did know about how badly they manage their countries.

    7. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Hahaha, this is hilarious. Being Brazilian, I always though Brazil (the movie) whas a great and believable caracterization of a fictional sci-fi future for Brazil (the country). But I never expected someone to actually believe that Brazil (the movie) wasn't fiction!

    8. Re:or Brazil by plover · · Score: 1

      I have to admit being depressed by each and every one of Neal Stephenson's books that wasn't Snow Crash. I've bought and read everything else he's ever written, just hoping to get a second taste of that wondrous, mad, absurd story. Hasn't happened yet.

      Or maybe that's just disappointment on a new level.

      Assuming that's the case, I agree with you about Brave New World, but because I read 1984 at a younger, more impressionable age, it resonated harder with me, and both scared and depressed me more.

      --
      John
    9. Re:or Brazil by Havenwar · · Score: 1

      I wish there was a way to mod moderations. I want to mod the "insightful" on this funny... because clearly it's a joke. Well, either that or sarah palin now has a slashdot account and modpoints.

    10. Re:or Brazil by Thagg · · Score: 1

      Read "Zodiac", it was originally released under a pseudonym, but is easily found now as a Stephenson book. It's fabulous.

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    11. Re:or Brazil by deimtee · · Score: 1

      You missed the whole point of the book.
      It's explicit near the end when O'Brien is interogating Winston, and asks him "How do you know you have power over other people?", and Winston answers correctly "by making them suffer"

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    12. Re:or Brazil by dadioflex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really much science in those fictional stories.

      When I think of SciFi, I think of stories where science plays the dominate role, like space travel, advance techonology, and of course, shit with science in it.

      By your definition most SF wouldn't be SF then. In fact very little SF would be SF because most of the "science" in Science Fiction is inaccurate and thus not actually science. 1984 and Brave New World do in fact both include plenty of science, in the background. Pervasive surveillance, socio-political engineering, pharmaceutical engineering, artificial birth - it's all there. I would assume you never actually read either book.

    13. Re:or Brazil by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      Competent? The food ration was continually being reduced.

      Uh, goodbye national obesity crisis!

    14. Re:or Brazil by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      You missed the whole point of the book. It's explicit near the end when O'Brien is interogating Winston, and asks him "How do you know you have power over other people?", and Winston answers correctly "by making them suffer"

      You assert this means that they're reducing rations simply to make people suffer? They certainly inflict suffering in many ways, but to deduce that everything bad that is happening is a deliberate part of this plan is a stretch.

      If everyone is suffering, you have no power. The choice to withhold or inflict suffering is power.

      And strategically, if the people get weaker and Oceania poorer, eventually it will be defeated by one of the other blocs, and the Party would lose power. They must recognise that. That's why ultimately China changed course in the 70s after the Cultural Revolution brought widespread death, poverty and starvation. Even if you have a nutty leader who doesn't care, like Mao or Gaddafi or Stalin, eventually they will be replaced. I think in 1984 it's implied that Big Brother is a figurehead, if he ever was a real person. Probably Oceania is actually controlled by a committee, and while bureacrats can be just as evil as a single dictator, they aren't suicidal. They may not know how to run an economy, but they're not fucking it up a a policy.

    15. Re:or Brazil by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Yes, in 1984, the ever-reducing rations and pointless war is a product of competence - it's not that way because they've failed to make it better, but because ultimately the inner party wants it that way. That is kind of unbelivable, when you think about it. Not that they should want it, which Orwell makes a sort of case for, but that they should succeed at it, always keeping the balance between the three superpowers, and never letting scarcity drop to levels which would actually interfere with their ability to control.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    16. Re:or Brazil by deimtee · · Score: 2

      But to prove you have the power, you must inflict the suffering. The inner party (1 or 2% of the population) exercised this power over the outer party (about 15%).
      The proles were generally ignored, unless they became noticable, in which case they were inducted into the party, or disappeared.
      The Party won't be overthrown or defeated. They are basically in collusion with the other power blocs to keep things balaced, as evidenced by the shifting alliances.
      "Picture a boot, stomping on a human face, forever".

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    17. Re:or Brazil by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      The Party won't be overthrown or defeated. They are basically in collusion with the other power blocs to keep things balaced, as evidenced by the shifting alliances.

      That doesn't demonstrate collusion, more willingness to take advantage of a perceived opportunity. If one of the blocs weakened, it would be pushed back by the others. Each ruling Party's ultimate aim is to take over the world, they would not just sit back and give the others a chance to recover

    18. Re:or Brazil by beachcoder · · Score: 1

      PoFi?

    19. Re:or Brazil by icebraining · · Score: 1

      How do you figure they want to take over the world? I think they're much better served by a perpetual war that gives a purpose to the people - a common enemy to fight. See also the "War on Terror" - it shall never end.

    20. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your definition some of the books that are generally acknowledged to have created the scifi genre aren't scifi. Science rarely plays a part in scifi. A pretence of science is the best you'll get. See Star Trek. SciFi is about translating the human condition into other environments. Fantasy often does the same thing, eg early Pratchett DiskWorld rather than Tolkien.

    21. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think of SciFi, I think of stories where science plays the dominate role, like space travel, advance techonology, and of course, shit with science in it.

      Brazil is about Governments. Not science, but about political issues.

      1984 is about Governments. Not science, but about political/social issues.

      they are Fiction, yes. Science Fiction? I don't think so.

      Sci-Fi is a bit of a misnomer, since the entire genre is actually speculative. Most of it deals with science and technology, but the key component is speculation.

    22. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My all-time favourite movie. As for this contest, Brave New World gets my vote.

    23. Re:or Brazil by Wulfrunner · · Score: 1

      I hear most Universities offer courses in Political Science.

    24. Re:or Brazil by tmarsh86 · · Score: 1

      Dystopia futures are definitely science fiction. Sci-fi is about ideas and what ifs. Space travel in and of itself doesn't have to involve science.

    25. Re:or Brazil by plover · · Score: 2

      Thanks. I did like Zodiac, but it kind of reminded me of the same ending as Cryptonomicon. Both of those novels seemed contrived, and to me they read as if he had followed the trademarked Neal Stephenson Story Writing pattern:
      1. Think of some tricky, cool mechanical ideas, like using salad bowls to plug holes in a pipe, Van Eck phreaking, or diesel fuel to melt inaccessible gold.
      2. Think of a somewhat plausible setting to place the idea in - polluters, prison, jungle island.
      3. Write a plot line where the main character ends up arriving at these ideas in the final chapters.
      4. Add additional story arcs, characters, and other flourishes around the base plot.
      5. Profit!

      They all seem driven to get to the end and to the big reveal of the clever idea. Driving to the end of a story works for a mystery - solve the caper, dispense dose of appropriate justice, meddling kids. But when he gets to the mystery's end, it's more about the clever trick, and less about the people.

      Snow Crash was different. It was an amalgam of crazy from start to finish - crazy setting, crazy government, crazy people, crazy religion, and crazy ideas. And he glued them together in a vat of somewhat plausible foreshadowing technologies like the web, gargoyles, scanner evading glass knives, all those kinds of things that were somewhere on the horizon back when he wrote it. It didn't follow his trademarked formula, because the fun ideas just kept coming from start to finish: an Inuit biker who is his own nuclear power, a pizza deliverator for the mob, the metaverse, Snow Crash, falabalas, etc. The people made it interesting, the tech made it cool. It came together in something ineffable that he's just never repeated.

      And for some reason I liked Anathem. Perhaps because it didn't closely follow the formula, or that one of the cool ideas (the time-based monastery) was a setting element he introduced from the start, and didn't need the big reveal.

      --
      John
    26. Re:or Brazil by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      By your definition some of the books that are generally acknowledged to have created the scifi genre aren't scifi

      Indeed. The best selling sci-fi book of all time, Dune, isn't science fiction by these standards.

    27. Re:or Brazil by Nevynxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pervasive surveillance, socio-political engineering, pharmaceutical engineering, artificial birth - it's all there. I would assume you never actually read either book.

      I wouldn't assume that. I'd assume the reader is young enough that they don't realise that those things didn't exist when the book was written.

      Sci-Fi that's good enough that when the science catches it up, it looks just like fiction. Now that's a skillful writer!

    28. Re:or Brazil by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I always thought A Brave New World was the much better dystopic novel, which is a pretty depressing genre as a whole.

      What part did you find depressing really? Where society is stable and happy? Where people are allowed to do whatever they want so long as they don't try and force it on the rest of society? That society takes rebels and deviants and helps them to follow their whims so long as they don't bother other people? Where science was allowed to progress but kept from running rampant and causing something like nuclear war or global warming? Really, if ones goals for society is something other than progress and being happy, I suppose you could see it as dystopic, but I'd also hazard that person is sort of an egocentric tyrant.

    29. Re:or Brazil by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      It's more about what was given up ... symbolized by the works of Shakespeare. It's something along the lines of giving up humanity for the sake of progress.

    30. Re:or Brazil by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      In my reading of 1984 I felt that the war could easily have been a fiction simply as an excuse for anything the leader/leaders felt they needed an excuse for.
      I also felt that big brother was not a real person. Or at least not alive anymore.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    31. Re:or Brazil by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      "In fact very little SF would be SF because most of the "science" in Science Fiction is inaccurate and thus not actually science"

      ummm, not quite true. nobody ever said the science in SF ever had to be accurate to be science. in many cases in order to make the story seem possible/plausible you have to come up with a whole new technology that doesn't even exist (dilithium crystlas, anyone?) but that has a coherent structure to make it seem possible.

      so are you saying that unless it has "real science" it's not worth reading or watching? so you don't think Star Trek or number of other SF movies are SF because you can't accept the premise of an unknown science that has yet to be discovered or a way found to exploit it?

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    32. Re:or Brazil by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Precisely. There's a reason SF gets shelved with Fantasy. That used to annoy me, but I think I understand and agree with it now. Both are part of the Speculative Fiction category. Take reality, modify it in some hypothetical way, and see what happens. If you change science or technology (FTL, time travel, aliens, etc), it usually falls under Science Fiction. If you add magic or elves, it usually falls under fantasy. Making an alternate version of history is also speculative fiction for the same reasons.

      Just setting something in the future doesn't necessarily make it science fiction, but since the future probably has more advanced technology than the present and an author can only hypothesize what those advances will be, most anything set in a future time period ends up in the science fiction category by default.

    33. Re:or Brazil by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It's more about what was given up ... symbolized by the works of Shakespeare. It's something along the lines of giving up humanity for the sake of progress.

      Well, that could be and probably even was what the author intended. However, what was described was Shakespeare's main proponent was an improperly socialized and emotionally damaged man. He learned Shakespeare from the people who still remember it, the savages who cannot keep up with modern society. Has society really given up humanity for the sake of progress or is what is considered humanity by a biased few and what is impeding progress? What is humanity? What is progress?

    34. Re:or Brazil by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an excellent question for a high school literature class to write on for a 10-page essay ... definitely a question that is more about the process of answering it than actually arriving at an answer ...

    35. Re:or Brazil by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I agree, but we are on /., so it's not like we have anything more important than a high school lit class to do.

    36. Re:or Brazil by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      haha true that

    37. Re:or Brazil by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Did you read the same book I did? Why were they at war? They wern't. Why were the rations being reduced? To line the pockets of the government with more.

      What you didn't read was the book Orwell wrote. He didn't write it about 1984. He wrote it about 1948 (84 was picked as a transposition of 48, not because he thought we were 36 years from that reality, it was arbitrary, not predictive). If a country was "properly managed" what would it look like. Remember, he was writing in a time when the Ministry of Information existed to lie to the people (or tell the selective truth with great colour). What would happen if the government got what they asked for? 1984. Not particularly "competent" but getting all they could want. Complete control of information, and no rights for any citizens. What would that look like? 1984. It was not a commentary on any existing government, but a warning about what he didn't want GB to become.

      Just like Animal Farm wasn't anti-socialist, but actually pro-socialist, just be careful what you wish for (and some of the side-stories were the most important for that theme, and usually the most overlooked).

    38. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Thought I might have to re-arrange some genes there.

    39. Re:or Brazil by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I'd give up a whole hell of alot for "bliss on tap".

    40. Re:or Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty certain that Brazil (seen as I entered college many moons ago) gave me a long depressive episode. Hugely and profoundly disturbing movie. I still classify it as one of the all-time bests.

      What it did, I suppose, is wake me up to the injustices of the world -- the end of my childhood, as it were. Interesting given Childhood's End being mentionied by several others here.

      What was most revealing to me was seeing the movie a second time a year later and realizing just how much and how deeply it had effected me as emotions and feelings got replayed, and called to mind real world events they shadowed or resembled.

  79. I have no mouth and I must scream by wonderboss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nightmarish.

    --
    more cowbell
    1. Re:I have no mouth and I must scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That takes me back, they made it into a computer game too.

    2. Re:I have no mouth and I must scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most definitely. And what about that video game? Just thinking about that story makes me want to kill myself.

  80. The Sparrow by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sparrow_(novel)

    Truly depressing because with the unknown you just never know what you are going to get.

    1. Re:The Sparrow by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Good one. However, I know it's not supposed to be hard SF, but I just couldn't get around a near-future in which we can accelerate planetoids at 1g for as long as we need. Must be some big honkin engines.

    2. Re:The Sparrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. This is the one that instantly came to mind for me.

      Very few books have left me in as much of a funk afterwards as The Sparrow.

  81. "The Sparrow" by Mary Doria Russell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The Sparrow" by Mary Doria Russell by far. Can't tell you why without spoiling the book, but trust me, it hits hard.

    One that's bleak for much of the book is Ursula K. Le Guin's "Left Hand of Darkness."

    Interesting, two sci-fi works both written by women are on my "Best Depressing Sci-Fi" list. That's kind of depressing itself, now that I think about it.

  82. Yep, by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and her ideas worked so well that she died penniless and living off the socialism she so despised (look it up, she did).

    Come off it. Ayn was just a scared little woman frightened by dictators. I could spend hours recounting the holes in her philosophy, but others have done it much better than I ever could.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yep, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer her workout book
      "Sweating away the Empathy"
      - Colbert

    2. Re:Yep, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rand was the female L. Ron Hubbard. She said socialism and government aid were teh devil, but then she took as much as she could from social security and medicare from the same society she called a bunch of fuckshits her entire miserable existence. Hubbard said psychology and psych drugs were teh devil but he sure was full of anti-psychotics when he died.

      If anyone hasn't read Rand and Hubbard here's the tl;dr version: do as I say not as I do. You can't have social programs but I can. You can't have psych drugs that allow you to live a normal life but I can. Fuck you, yeah me. Tell the rats to eschew everything you desire that way there's more for you to horde.

    3. Re:Yep, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and her ideas worked so well that she died penniless and living off the socialism she so despised

      [citation needed]

    4. Re:Yep, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come off it. Ayn was just a scared little woman frightened by dictators.

      Being frightened by dictators is a rather sensible thing for ordinary people. Not everyone has the benefit of living in a country that can rip dictators a new asshole at whim.

    5. Re:Yep, by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      and her ideas worked so well that she died penniless and living off the socialism she so despised (look it up, she did).

      Come off it. Ayn was just a scared little woman frightened by dictators. I could spend hours recounting the holes in her philosophy, but others have done it much better than I ever could.

      Never mind the holes in her philosophy, how much credence can you put in a "30-minute speech" that probably takes 2 hours even when read?

      I don't normally skip over parts of a book, but Galts's speech was not only absurdly long, you'd have to be terminally dim not to have gotten the point by the time he made it, so it's redundant.

    6. Re:Yep, by careysub · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Ayn Rand was a very, very. very, very, very, very, very, very. very, very, very, very poor writer.

      (Think I belabored the point uselessly and annoyingly with all the redundant "verys"? Then you should get my point.)

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    7. Re:Yep, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after a distinguished career, Tolkien lived into his eighties in good health, smiled a lot, and left good memories with most people who dealt with him. Plus he actually stood up to dictators - fought the Kaiser in WWI and survived. Coincidence?

    8. Re:Yep, by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big fan of Ayn Rand, but your argument is flawed. I suck at Calculus, but I can still promote it as a good way of solving certain problems. I'll die poor myself if I have to rely on Calculus to make my living. You really shouldn't judge a system or philosophy based on one person's experience, even that of the founder. Ayn Rand could have been an autocratic, paranoid fraudster and that doesn't mean her ideas are automatically bad ones.

      It may well seem hypocritical for someone to accept Social Security checks if they believe in self-reliance, but when existing society makes it difficult to be self-reliant, you take what you can get. I don't like Social Security either, but if they're going to make me pay into it, they damn well better pay out at the end of it because I want my money back. And it IS my money. The government isn't giving me something I didn't already earn for myself and pay for in taxes. Indeed, SSI is supposed to be forced savings, not an income redistribution program.

  83. Titan - by Stephen Baxter by Rabidcat · · Score: 1

    It's a pretty far reaching story and makes you think how trivial actions can have far flung consequences. Between the rise of the religious right in leading the US, the intrigue with the USAF vs NASA, and the degradation of the ability of the crewmembers to work with each other, the story takes some depressing turns. It's quite telling though, and I would highly recommend it. Some consider the last bit of the book controversial, and not fitting with the rest of the story. I found it to be different but it worked. You be the judge.

    --
    "When I want to do something mindless to relax, I reinstall Windows 95." - JLG
    1. Re:Titan - by Stephen Baxter by tftp · · Score: 1

      Some consider the last bit of the book controversial, and not fitting with the rest of the story. I found it to be different but it worked. You be the judge.

      Deus ex machina, nothing else. You could stick it to Romeo and Juliet too, unchanged. Looks like a last minute addition for commercial reasons. People sometimes look at the last pages of the book to see how it ends. If it ends with "... and thus the last human in this universe ended his sorry existence" then you can bet that very few people will pick this book as an easy reading on an airplane.

  84. Re:Harlan Ellison "Deathbird Stories" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Talk about depressing. Holy crap!

  85. Vernor Vinge: Children of the sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt like christmas getting it in the mail, but then started to read it and understood it was not even close to the other stuff from Vinge. The most depressing part was having to read it cover to cover just in case at some point it got better; unfortunately it's just some kind of bad interlude book where the main storyline (from "Fire upon the deep") doesn't progress at all and nothing of consequence is presented.

  86. I second that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Any author considered too dark for the Russians gets my vote. Do yourself a favor and skip his books. Think of the money you'll save on therapy.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I second that by kulervo · · Score: 1

      Strongly agree.

      BTW - What the hell? That's optimistic?

      Spoiler Warning!
      Humans are so unusual aliens will consider us an abomination, and humans are so decadent we will inevitably be hunted to extinction by vampires we recreate out of boredom.
      End Spoiler.

      That's optimism?!

  87. bad assumption by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone.

    What?? Seriously? Maybe today, (although I think I could find lots of counter examples) but there was a time when it wasn't science fiction if it didn't make you feel bad. Try Harlan Ellison's "Dangerous Visions" or any issue of Fantasy and Science Fiction magazine from 1967 to the late seventies (after that I can't say). Or anything by Ellison, Phillip K. Dick, William Gibson, a dozen others.

    The most depressing scifi would be a multi-way tie, I'm thinking. I'd have to divide it up as "most relentlessly depressing", "most unintentionally depressing", "most depressingly unnecessary twist ending", "most depressing attempt at humor", "most depressingly, distressingly inept" and probably others.

    Now, the most *frightening* scifi book I've ever read was Cory Doctorow's "Down and out in the Magic Kingdom". Although I get the impression he did not mean it so.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  88. 2B or 0 2B, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2B or 0 2B, short story scifi that leaves the reader far more depressed than when it was begun.

  89. Hmm, they are all end of civilization books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut

    Childhood's End by Arthur C Clarke

    On The Beach by Nevil Shute

    The last is a movie, not a novel, and it is not really sci-fi. But I stumbled across it on YouTube the other day so I thought I would mention it: Threads

  90. Some of Fred Saberhagen's books by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

    Some of the later Berserker books were pretty dark and hopeless. I maintain that Star Trek came up with the idea for Borg from Saberhagen's Berserkers.

  91. Robert Holdstock by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Some people have already mentioned Childhood's End, which I found almost unbearable to read near the end. I hit a similar level of depression whenever I read Mythago Wood, Lavondyss, the works. Brilliantly conceived, but for some reason these books make me imagine putting my head into a noose and kicking the chair as a more positive and appealing alternative to reading the books and imagining the storyline.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Robert Holdstock by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Oh god, I've just found out that Holdstock died three years ago. I met him in person in 2002. I have a photo with him. He was a charming and dignified man and he was incredibly patient with all the inquisitive and importunate fans. And now a stupid bacterial infection at the untimely age of 61... OK, *now* I'm really depressed.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  92. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it? Hell, we're living it.

  93. So many.... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Just for sneer fucked up characters, Stephen Donaldson's gap series. Morn Hyland, Angus atnermopyle, Nick Siccorso, Warden Dios, et al are all depressingly flawed.
    1984, Enders Game, lots of Gibson, some leGuin

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  94. Number one. On the Beach. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. On the Beach all life killed by a nuclear war with the last people on earth just waiting for the radiation cloud to come and kill them or commiting suicide. No escape just a dead earth.
    2. 1984. No hope you can not win, nobody can win, there is no hope. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four#Cultural_impact
    3. The The Forge of God. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forge_of_God Only a few humans are saved, the earth is turned to rubble.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Hartree · · Score: 1

      Very similar to my answers. I might exchange 1 and 2.

      I'd also add the short story The Cold Equations by Tom Godwin.

    2. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      I forgot Forge of God.. and Anvil of he Stars.. good stuff

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    3. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      The Forge of God was great. There's a huge sense of momentum and that all humanity's efforts to figure out what's going on are futile. The end of the world stuff is so descriptive, too.
      Disclaimer: I'm a Greg Bear fanboi...

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    4. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what, I find the most solace in 1984. I'm greatly delighted to know that you happy people and your children will suffer most incredibly before you pass from this world. Oh I will go into the same grinder as you will, but I will not be screaming in fear nor will I be screaming in pain I will be screaming WITH DELIGHT when they come and take from you, and take from you, and take from ad nauseam until all that is left of you is your weak breath. You had so much more than I in this life, now the scales will be adjusted and I will trample you with my bare feet and piss on your bleeding lips. What really gives me almost an erection in anticipation is most of you little squeeling porkchop munchkins are so clueless and utterly unprepared for what is coming down the pike for you.

      I will be the trustee in the prison camp, I will be the man who attaches the electrodes, I will flip the switch and throw the lever, I will give the injections and will infect your children. I hate you, I have always HATED YOU and your life filled with good things (you take for granted) that comes at the expense of my empty experience. Suffer little piggy, suffer, for here's comes a
      demon that wants to FEED AND I'M HUNGRY FOR SOMETHING GOOD!!

      Hate you.

    5. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      This was the first answer I thought of. I found it depressing because I realized the scenario is the most plausible solution to the Fermi Paradox, and the whole "a few humans surviving" thing was an empty and implausible veneer of optimism.

    6. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      1984 is bad but where there is life their is hope. Maybe in some small place in the world people are not so oppressed. And their is hope that change will come over time.
      On the beach is so bad because they all just give up. Why not build some massive shelters or take all that Uranium they had in Australia and move under water where at some chance of an eco system will survive? This just lets all die accept our fate is counter human nature and my human nature in particular. Life will find a way.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I hope that this is just from some book you have read or that someone really is monitoring every post on the internet and has tracked you down before you hurt someone.

    8. Re:Number one. On the Beach. by Hartree · · Score: 1

      When they give up in On the Beach, that's still a choice. They are still human in that they can make that choice.

      I'd argue that in 1984, there never was a choice. Oh, they allowed Winston an illusion that he was rebelling, but in truth, he was watched the whole time. Not only is there no real choice, there never was any choice. Hope was only an illusion allowed for a short and limited time by the state which used it as part of the degradation and mockery he ultimately endured.

      There is no hope for Winston, because he truly loves Big Brother at the end.

      There is no hope for anyone as the Ministry of Truth will ultimately exterminate even the ability to conceive of a nondoctrine thought via changing the language to Newspeak.

  95. A short story... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream"

    Can you imagine being in the control of something with the powers of a God over you, that utterly hates you and has no outlet for its rage but to torture you?

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  96. You guys are easily depressed. by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of the titles mentioned here (that I've read), none depressed me that much. For example, Jem. Yeah, the people in it are stupid and destructive, but so what? That's what real life is like. You muddle through, you seize what happiness you can, you do what you can to make things, better.If that's not enough for you, you're in the wrong universe.

    The SF books that depress me are from authors like Harlan Ellison who wallow in their own darkness and babble profound nonsense. And there I think it's the author that depresses me, not the story.

    Somebody claimed that 1984 depressed them because they saw it happening all around them. Really? Nobody's summoned me to viewscreen for mandatory calisthenics lately, and I haven't heard from the Junior Antisex League all week. Yeah, a lot of our political wingnuts (on both the right and and left) sound like they belong to INGSOC, but that's always been true. And contrary to what Orwell feared, they're further from running the show than they've ever been.

    I think a lot of this stuff depressed the hell out of me when I was a teenager because TV had trained me to believe that all stories had endings that if not happy, were at least morally satisfying. But as grownups, we need to get over ourselves. Especially Stephen Baxter, you really needs to go cold turkey on the end-of-the-world novels.

    1. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially Stephen Baxter, you really needs to go cold turkey on the end-of-the-world novels.

      "Flood" immediately comes to mind. I just didn't get what the point of the book was - it reminded me of "The Day After Tomorrow", except even more outlandish.

    2. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by anon208 · · Score: 0

      I think the poster was saying that they were seeing the death of privacy from both giving it away to Facebook and from Government encroaching with wire taps. In 1984 nothing is private. A quote from the book says "Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull." Those are my examples of the general idea I got from the poster.

    3. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Baxter? What end of the world novels has he written? I admit I have only read his Xeelee stuff, but that is most of his output AFAIK. ....
      Hmm, unless you are counting them as end of the world novels?

      Spoilers!
      .
      .
      .
      I wouldn't, even that one with the folded space with the last humans was just to show that we don't count. I tend to largely discount the humans in those novels, the tech, science, Xeelee and Photino birds are where all the action is. I suppose it is kind of the end of the world for the Xeelee, but they do escape to other universes, and they have been (or part of them has been) through several phase transitions of the universe, which is about as disruptive as going to a new universe, so they are used to it.

    4. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree... Baxter is very depressing. Flood and the follow-up are tough reads but quite good. The Terror is amazing but not Sci-Fi.

    5. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by jason1178 · · Score: 1

      Especially Stephen Baxter, you really needs to go cold turkey on the end-of-the-world novels.

      So much this. Baxter gets my vote for most depressing modern writer. Every. Single. Book is the end of humans. When I'm reading about genetically modified squid outracing the heat death of the universe I start hunting for sharp objects...

    6. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a lot of our political wingnuts (on both the right and and left) sound like they belong to INGSOC, but that's always been true. And contrary to what Orwell feared, they're further from running the show than they've ever been.

      Google and read "The Authoritarians".

    7. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Nobody's summoned me to viewscreen for mandatory calisthenics lately

      I wouldn't be surprised if they started doing that in Japan. I used to see the Japanese contractors out on the flightline doing calisthenics every morning. If my boss tried that on me, I'd park a trailer on him. Hrm, might do that anyway...

      I haven't heard from the Junior Antisex League all week.

      Move down here to the bible belt and you'll hear from them all the time.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    8. Re:You guys are easily depressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said

      +1

  97. Fox news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's more fantasy than scifi though.

  98. Earth Abides by dcollins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Low-key, and yet just deeply terrified me. Seemed pretty concrete and realistic. It's all downhill. Every hope is dashed.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Earth Abides by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 1

      I agree with Earth Abides. A very bleak book.

      --
      BM3
    2. Re:Earth Abides by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

      Every hope is dashed.

      In the end, Ish has done well to get his children a good start on a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. All remains of the old culture are lost.

    3. Re:Earth Abides by KendyForTheState · · Score: 1

      This was my choice too... I did a search to see if anyone got there first and sure enough... I usually love post-apocalyptic stories, but this one had a very depressing ending.

      --
      ...I just came for the free beer.
    4. Re:Earth Abides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's all downhill. Every hope is dashed.

      What are you talking about? Ish's descendents are shown to be the way of the future, and the likely source of a new civilization. Seems like hope to me.

    5. Re:Earth Abides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men go and come, but Earth abides - What's wrong with that ?

    6. Re:Earth Abides by Thagg · · Score: 1

      I liked Earth Abides. I can't think of a more optimistic post-apocalyptic story. Yeah, sure, civilization collapses, but people go on a do the best they can. That said, I haven't read the book since it came out 40 years ago.

      It reads to me like the author tried hard to think of the best thing that could happen in the three different eras of the book, once he set things in motion with the initial catastrophe.

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    7. Re:Earth Abides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? That's one of the most optimistic stories ever! It doesn't end the way that our civilized society would prefer, but that's the point - it ends better.

    8. Re:Earth Abides by PigBoyOhBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone posted this, because that was my feeling the first time I read it (in the 70s). I have re-read it many times since (most recently last month) and would quickly name it my favorite book of all time, and also the most uplifting and optimistic. Earth Abides celebrates the durability and optimism of humanity, as opposed to the durability of humanity's technology.

      We humans keep thinking it's our stuff that makes us special, but it isn't. We are what's special about us, and this is what Earth Abides celebrates. Earth Abides and the human race continues to thrive. This book really shaped my world view - a very important read.

    9. Re:Earth Abides by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I found it a pedantic book with nothing insightful. The protagonist raids grocery stores post apocalypse, nothing more. Or is the complete lack of action supposed to be the insight? Color me unimpressed.

    10. Re:Earth Abides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. It is so depressing that I think it is the only book I am unable to reread.

    11. Re:Earth Abides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we have a vote: Is Earth Abides end depressing or optimistic?

      I vote the ending is optimistic. The author shows that some of his other efforts was successful. The one I remember is the part where one set of descendants believe in debate -- and keeping the hammer as the symbol of that.

      They also develop to the point, for better or worse, to have wars...

  99. uh, no.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think "usually provides happy endings for everyone" is a very accurate characterization.
    It _was_ true for a long time, possibly encouraged by the long-time editor of Analog magazine,
    who purportedly insisted on optimistic stories.
    Still, the most depressing:
    "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" (Ellison) for abject terror,
      "Persistence of Vision" (Varley) for being nearly plausible,
    "Press Enter" (Varley) for a rather prescient revelation about computer ubiquity.

  100. The Last Days Of Shandakor by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    It is just a short story, but it was pretty much the last Mars story Leigh Brackett wrote and is beautiful, heart aching and so utterly futile. She is a greatly underappreciated writer from the Golden Age.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  101. Canticle for Leibowitz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    God. What a drag.

    Hey! Ballard's stuff is bleak! I think someone mentioned James Blish, too. That guy's day job was working for the Tobacco Institute. No wonder...

    Then, there is the endless low-level of depression that permeates most Philip K Dick - like a miasma. But he makes you want more, somehow.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  102. What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by gwgwgw · · Score: 1

    "On The Beach", by Nevil Shute

    No other comes close for me.

    --
    That was Zen, this is Tao
  103. Brave New World and a short story by cowtamer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley followed by a short story I read which I can't locate right now.

    I believe it was called 2439 -- the premise being that in the year 2439 (I might be wrong about the year), the Earth is covered in its entirety with a 700 story building in order to provide for the almost 1 trillion humans that live in it (with only algae left to supply them). The story was about the last man to actually have animals, and the authorities plight to convince him to euthanize them in order to make room for the trillionth human, so that 'perfection' can be achieved. The claim of the authorities was that there was enough color microfiche of all the animals that ever lived so that the actual ones need no longer be around to consume resources.

    My paraphrase may seem very silly, but the actual story had enough of an impact on me when I was 15 to change my outlook on our relationship with the environment for good. It'd be great if anyone could point me to the actual story/author.

    1. Re:Brave New World and a short story by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe it was called 2439 -- the premise being

      This, maybe? I still think of it whenever I hear mention of population growth predictions.

    2. Re:Brave New World and a short story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that was a short story by isaac asimov, although I could be wrong.

    3. Re:Brave New World and a short story by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 2

      It sounds like 2430 A.D. by Asimov - a short story. Both your choices are good, still think Earth Abides was more depressing.

      --
      BM3
    4. Re:Brave New World and a short story by wisebabo · · Score: 1

      I believe it was written by Isaac Asimov and resulted in the resource consuming project (I'm not sure if it was the preservation of the last animals) being approved not because the project was important but because it was important to keep people thinking differently.

      Or something like that.

    5. Re:Brave New World and a short story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe "A Happy Day in 2381" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Inside

    6. Re:Brave New World and a short story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been trying to remember the title of this story for years. God, I was scarred for life after reading about this sad, sad man running his hand through the last patch of grass on Earth before searing the soil, stroking the last turtle's shell before suffocating it with cyanide, and petting the last rabbit's fur before wringing its neck. All to make room for a new family that was planning to have two kids or something like that. I don't blame the guy for committing suicide right after.

    7. Re:Brave New World and a short story by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you! 2430 A.D. by Isaac Asimov.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2430_A.D.

  104. Brave New World by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brave New World, Aldus Huxley. Perfectly horrible. Stranger in a Strange land was also pretty depressing.

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    1. Re:Brave New World by fm6 · · Score: 2

      What, you read a novel about a guy transcending death and you're depressed because the guy dies? I think you're missing the point!

    2. Re:Brave New World by catchblue22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, Brave New World. Especially since Brave New World seems to reflect our current cultural situation in much of the west.

      I have heard Huxley's Brave New World compared and contrasted with Orwell's 1984. In 1984, the powers that be manipulate the public's opinions to believe that, in essence black is white and 2 + 2 = 5. In Huxley's Brave New World, the public simply doesn't care about the reality of the world. Most people are simply interested in what is in front of them, their desires, their fears, without any real concern about society as a whole. That sounds a lot like the current corporate state.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    3. Re:Brave New World by catchblue22 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If I may contribute an addendum, here is the quote to which I was referring, by Neil Postman in his book Amusing Ourselves to Death (pdf). It compares Orwell's 1984 to Huxley's Brave New World:

      What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egotism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that our desire will ruin us.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    4. Re:Brave New World by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      The thing about Brave New World was that there was an alternative place (island?) for the "rejects" to live, so IMO the protagonist should simply have moved there.

      I used to write 1984 v. BNW compare/contrast essays in college for booze, and I maintain BNW was a much more optimistic world than 1984.

    5. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is the essence of why capitalism defeated communism/fascism: while the latter systems tried to rule by direct application of force and thus met indignant resistance, the former realized that it's both much easier and more effective to deflect resistance into harmless outlets via the satisfaction of basic human needs and desires.

    6. Re:Brave New World by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Though I had the opposite feeling while I was reading them, I'm going to have to say that Huxley's vision is lot scarier than Orwell's.

      That Winston Smith is clearly a little $h!t, but I'd vote to elect Bernard Marx.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    7. Re:Brave New World by nahduma · · Score: 1

      So, on the one hand, we have a government trying to emulate 1984. (China). On the other, we have a thriving Brave New World. Tails they win, heads we lose.

    8. Re:Brave New World by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Huxleys vision is a lot scarier true.

      But, and here's a big but, more people are now reading books than ever. Media covers also the shit in the world more than ever.

      one could argue about the quality of the books I suppose, but that's another debate.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Brave New World by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "So, on the one hand, we have a government trying to emulate 1984. (China). On the other, we have a thriving Brave New World."

      But our Brave New World leaders, clever as Mustafa Mond, adapt to new times and added a bit of 1984 salt to the equation: we've been always at war with Eastasia (so we never gave weapons to Al-Qaeda, and Donald Rumsfeld never shaked his hand with Saddam Hussein); it's obvious what a fine Emmanuel Goldstein Osama Bin Laden did (I was quite surprised when they killed him, but they are fast at finding substitutes); with regards of Newspeak and the Ministry of Truth, it's not only that, say, Julian Assange makes for an almost perfect Winston Smith -sex included, but that "political correctness" is pushed to absurd levels; countries like UK are not so far from the cameras everywhere distopia; and CIA doesn't even hide the fact that they play Brotherhood's O'Brian role as needed. Finally, just compare USA's current sociopolitical situation with the central 1984 motto and cry: "WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH".

      But all this formal/tactical similitudes are just superficial because deeply is the Brave New World pilosophy. As such, is not that say, photographs of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Hussein are forbidden and destroyed, or that the massive destruction weapons issue is not known to be fake, it is that it really doesn't matter; it is not that the Big Brother prosecutes critical thinking, it is that people, all by themselves, choose religious crooks for presidents; it is not that the national lotto is faked but that people really believe that working hard and adapting to the "true way", they'll reach to the 0.01% status.

      In the end, I find Brave New World much more depressing than 1984 because for 1984 world to work, the stablishment is forced to always be on top of everything, always watching and the coertion is too visible and the obvious target to figth against. Brave New World, on the other hand, is self-stabilizing: people voluntarily choose it and the government doesn't need to search and destroy the outsiders, society itself does it.

    10. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egotism" Orwell thought along these lines as well. In the "Road to Wigan Pier" in makes references to Butler's "machines" chapter in "Erewhon". He felt that we would eventually trivialise our own society but also that this was inevitable in the long run. Given his period he might have been suffering from a Victorian like "we're so close to understanding everything" attitude. These days, every time we come to understand something new we expect it to reveal countless new unknowns.

    11. Re:Brave New World by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact I don't find BNW scary at all. It is a utopia. Most people are happy and well-adjusted, there is no crime, very little illness. When people emerge who don't fit and are intelligent, they simply get sent off to a community of other intelligent people so they don't upset the sheep. If you're a Bernard Marx, you'd really like to live in a world like that. The prize for not fitting in is to be sent to the equivalent of an Ivy League university. As Mustafa Mond points out to Helmholtz, Marx thinks he's being punished but in fact he is being rewarded. The rulers of BNW, in fact, are Platonic philosopher-kings, and they recognise that they must allow the gene pool to throw up exceptions because it is from those exceptional people that the rulers of the world will be drawn. They are altruistic, and the system is designed to ensure that they stay that way. It is only depressing if you believe that there are sky fairies who make rules for humankind.

      --
      From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    12. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate? Don't think the government doesn't work on the same level. You people who point out one over the other are the ones who are really being fooled more than anyone else.

    13. Re:Brave New World by TooTechy · · Score: 1

      This seems to be the majority of America. Insufficient of the population seem to care about the current political situation and even less think that they can actually do anything to fix it and even if they do most of them don't really understand enough about politics to see through the disinformation provided by the political parties.

      It seems Huxley has already predicted corporate run America.

      Fox News (and others) diluted news is just part of the issue. Quality is missing. Capitalism ultimately leads to mediocrity.

    14. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone says Brave New World is depressing. What is so depressing about having flying cars, great drugs, and spending all your free time having casual sex with hot chicks?

    15. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance
      That's here now! We call it "the internet"

    16. Re:Brave New World by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Everyone says Brave New World is depressing. What is so depressing about having flying cars, great drugs, and spending all your free time having casual sex with hot chicks?

      Ah. I see you took the blue pill.

      But seriously, I think that we as humans have a desire for meaning in our lives. Some of use may be able to exist in our current corporate brave new world. However many of us find this existence profoundly empty. I believe this phenomenon is the primary reason why so many Americans are turning to extremist religious views that explicitly reject classical reason in favor of a simplistic view in which the world is 6000 years old. This may seem comforting to them, but because we live in something of a democracy, these people have votes. And many of them are basing their voting decisions not on reason but on illusion. History shows that any civilization that bases its decisions not on reality but on illusion is doomed.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    17. Re:Brave New World by Kuroji · · Score: 2

      Fifty Shades of Gray.

      The debate starts and ends RIGHT FUCKING THERE.

    18. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt exactly the same way reading BNW. Trying to convince my highschool class of it (it was assigned reading) was an interesting exercise though (being a highschool student at the time, I don't think I expressed it quite as succinctly as you did.)

    19. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is only depressing if that is the sum total of human existence, mere survival. I want something more. Many others on here feel the same way.

      So what if I am sent off to an Ivy League School? I want to go to the stars, see the birth of the next universe. Not create some plot point on the demographic budget.

    20. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stranger In A Strange Land was the opposite of depressing for me - just by learning Martian, you could become a miracle worker, orgies were OK, and when you died you went to a spiritual dimension and might be able to reincarnate if you felt like it. It was wonderful! OK, maybe it *was* depressing, after I read it in high school and realized I would never really be able to "tip" a troublesome object (inanimate or otherwise!) out of our 4-dimensional plenum using telekinesis ...

    21. Re:Brave New World by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. Huxley seems to have constructed the book so that you'd revile the society for the first few chapters, including plenty of our taboos occuring often, like children being introduced to sexuality, and then be swept away by the ruler's exposition. People really were mostly happy. Not very philosophical or deep, but they mostly don't seem to miss it, so what problem is there? What I found most intriguing about the book wasn't the society being contrasted, it was how that scenario exposed and explored the emotions of too human characters. That's the point of good Sci-Fi, and it pains me when people think Huxley was warning people against getting caught in frivolities. He was exploring societal influence on individuals. Perhaps not quite masterfully (I have a few qualms with the Savage's progression), but it's still a very strong book.

    22. Re:Brave New World by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Excellent observation. The island is the "out"- amazing how few people got that.

    23. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      countries like UK are not so far from the cameras everywhere distopia;

      Not true. Not even slightly true. Can we bury this fucking nonsense once and for all? For a site that debates the ins and outs of copyright law or which programming language provides the best scaling for enterprise, you guys sure love your trotting out the same false statements time and time again.

    24. Re:Brave New World by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      >> countries like UK are not so far from the cameras everywhere distopia;
      > Not true. Not even slightly true.

      There's a guesstimate of about 4.2 million CCTVs in UK for a population of around 62 million, or about one camera each 15 people. Nough' said.

    25. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In both cases, human beings are degradated to basic animal instinct: Fear, Pain or biological pleasure, and are herded like cattles.

    26. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Huxley is going to win.

    27. Re:Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to our real world, it is utopia all right.

      We have a mix of 1984 and NBW, we're simultaneously being lied to, our freedom of information sharing is gradually removed, we are being evicted out of our common "intellectual property" as it is being sold away beneath our very feet, while at the same time the masses are being distracted by entertainment to keep them disinterested to all of that happening. We are heading to a future which will put any dystopic fiction written so far to shame.

  105. The Assassin Trilogy by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

    Fantasy rather than science fiction, but truly excellent books and rather depressing.

    1. Re:The Assassin Trilogy by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

      Fantasy rather than science fiction, but truly excellent books and rather depressing.

      I forgot to name the author: Robin Hobb.

  106. No "love" for The Killing Star? by questionableswami · · Score: 1

    It's easily The Killing Star by Charles R. Pellegrino and George Zebrowski. The earth is destroyed without warning by an alien civilization using relativistic kill vehicles, then they arrive to finish the job. The last two humans are captured as zoo specimens, and we find out the reason for the attack was simply that since we learned to travel at relativistic speeds we had the power to do to them what they did to us first. Nothing personal. Put me off sci-fi for a long time.

    1. Re:No "love" for The Killing Star? by Nixoloco · · Score: 1


      Oh, it has my vote as well. Pretty much our entire planet/civilization and way of life were obliterated in one clean strike. Plus, I loved the little details and the sort of twist at the end where the alien life wasn't even in control, but was controlled by their own technology.

    2. Re:No "love" for The Killing Star? by wolfie_cr · · Score: 1

      I felt even worse when I read the prequel of that one 'flying to valhalla' and now be SURE that the aliens that exterminated us .........were RIGHT. :P

  107. And in the end... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone"

    Huh. Most of the books I read, "In the end everybody dies." Not many happy endings.

  108. Stephen King's Under The Dome by Thomasje · · Score: 1

    It was so depressing, I was down for days afterwards. I decided never to read anything by King again. (His Dark Tower series is also seriously depressing, but I wouldn't call that sci-fi.) As for hard sci-fi, I'd say Frederick Pohl's Man Plus.

  109. 1984 - funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day I was a Poly Sci major, (talk about being surrounded by libs). We watched the movie in class and afterwards I asked the professor to draw the comparison between the Communist Russia and the world of 1984. She seemed surprised by the comparison and thought it was a commentary on capitalism. It was at that moment when truth and obviousness to me ran smack up against delusion and bias of my professor when I realized that people can see what they want to see if they believe hard enough.

    To state that 1984 is coming true now is a blind and idiotic statement. The abundance around us is stunning. The control of information is SLIPPING away from governments. The freedoms enjoyed by people in the world has never been higher...and yet here you are believing our reality has any resemblence to that horrid book and movie (great, but horrid book). Stunningly depressing viewpoint and one I am glad I. Do. Not. Share.

    1. Re:1984 - funny story by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      And yet, we've (United States) been at war for how long now? And how often do you see pictures of the burn victims in the military hospitals? And what is the incarceration rate in the US? How about mainstream media coverage of the Occupy movement?

    2. Re:1984 - funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, we've (United States) been at war for how long now?

      Continuously since two years before Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four was published. America has known peace for only 15 years since the beginning of the American Revolution.

      And how often do you see pictures of the burn victims in the military hospitals?

      Never, because I don't look for that type of news. If I did, I might find more than was shown during the Second World War, but I'm fairly certain the violence rate has been lower than that lately.

      And what is the incarceration rate in the US?

      Partial point. Demonstrate that the trend holds for more countries than yours. Ninteen Eighty-Four's Oceania involved a superstate of the Americas and much of the British Commonwealth. Neither England nor Canada has experienced the US's boom in incarceration rate.

      How about mainstream media coverage of the Occupy movement?

      I have no reliable perspective on this. How many occupy protestors were tortured, brainwashed, and released with no more desire to associate with their former co-conspirators? Winston Smith's far less public rebellions were met with precisely this response.

    3. Re:1984 - funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked the professor to draw the comparison between the Communist Russia and the world of 1984. She seemed surprised by the comparison and thought it was a commentary on capitalism.

      The professor didn't consider the writers nationality and the underlying tendency of totalitarianism in the British society evidently seen in the Cromwell's era, assuming history suffering only a slight royal intoxication. Americans often take a written word and transfer to their own cultural context. Bible is a great example of this.

      To state that 1984 is coming true now is a blind and idiotic statement. The abundance around us is stunning. The control of information is SLIPPING away from governments. The freedoms enjoyed by people in the world has never been higher...and yet here you are believing our reality has any resemblence to that horrid book and movie (great, but horrid book). Stunningly depressing viewpoint and one I am glad I. Do. Not. Share.

      The war against terrorism, the way wars are justified and the way media is describing the events and the ideas of both the wars and the weapons of mass destruction form a bundle of counter evidence. The age of mutual respect and diplomacy seems to be dying, all conflict are unresolvable and a war is always the end result. This is the time of nuke up or shut up.

    4. Re:1984 - funny story by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      We informally declared war in the early 1960s against Vietnam (mainly to continue on the Korean War, since we ended that one) and relations with Vietnam were normalized only after wars were declared on drugs and other things that could never be won and would never have to end. So, with only very short breaks, we've been at war since 12/7/1941

  110. A Scanner Darkly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the book. Half of PKD stories are depressing. Some are depressing all the way through not just at the end. A Scanner Darkly had a double dose of depressing at the end though because the author dedicates the book to those of his friends — he includes himself — who suffered debilitation or death as a result of their drug use.

    1. Re:A Scanner Darkly by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      That book made me feel unpleasantly like a drug addict. But the end isn't all that sad - it's the afterword which is the worst, I think. Good that they included it in the film, but they cut out most of the harsher stuff - probably because it would come off as too anti-drug for cinema audiences.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  111. My list by cpm99352 · · Score: 2

    Great topic, btw!

    My books are packed up from a move, so this is from memory.

    On The Beach
    The Road (does that count as SF?)
    While many will list 1984, I found his other work actually more depressing: Keep the Apidistra Flying and Coming Up For Air
    Make Room, Make Room (kind of uncharacteristic for Harry Harrison)
    Handmaid's Tale
    Parable of the Sower & Parable of the Talents (I wish Octavia Butler had a) survived to write the third book b) was far more better known)

    Ted Sturgeon has written many elegant depressing (some in fact heartbreaking) stories, including Saucer of Loneliness. There's an excellent series of his works (example here: http://www.amazon.com/Slow-Sculpture-Complete-Theodore-Sturgeon/dp/1556438346/) well worth reading.

    I'm not sure depressing is the word, but Harlan Ellison has written amazing stuff. IMO _Being John Malkovitch_ was a ripoff of one of his stories.

    Finally, my google skills suck, but there's a relatively well known SF/mystery story written in the past 10 years where the premise is that Islam is now the dominant force in America. I found that pretty depressing. Anyone know what I'm remembering?

    1. Re:My list by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own post... Reading all the entries thus far, I was all of a sudden struck by Terry Pratchett (not technically SF) - his later books have become depressing for a much different reason.

    2. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Parables by Octavia Butler (particularly Parable of the Sower) are the most depressing SciFi I've come upon in recent reading.

      That may be influenced by the particularly harrowing scenes that take place in the SoCal region - my home.

    3. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooo, another shout for the "Handmaid's Tale" here. A truly believable USAian dystopia. I particularly liked the historical context it was set in. Why do women write so little and yet so much of the best SciFi?

    4. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christianity or Islam whats the difference. They are both batshit crazy and dangerous.

    5. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >there's a relatively well known SF/mystery story written in the past 10 years where the premise is that Islam is now the dominant force in America. I found that pretty depressing. Anyone know what I'm remembering?

      Were you thinking of Robert Ferrigno's trilogy beginning with _Prayers for the Assassin_ (2006).

    6. Re:My list by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      Handmaid's Tale ! Completely forgot about this one ... really good and extremely dark novel

    7. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It begins and ends with Octavia Butler's books. They were so depressing they had me internally debating the merit of creating horribly depressing art. Was more good brought to the world by the consciousness she raised among readers, than bad was caused by the depression those readers felt?

      In the end, I think she had important (and painful) things to say about our society and human societies in general. But man, I couldn't take it.

    8. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, Octavia Butler!!!

    9. Re:My list by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Thank you! That was the book I was thinking of. I remember reading Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars books when they first came out; he writes about an Islamic group on Mars - at the time it was kind of jarring, but post 9/11 (now that I'm far more aware of Islam) it seems perfectly reasonable.

    10. Re:My list by unitron · · Score: 2

      Don't know about past 10 years, but M. J. Engh wrote a book called "Arslan (a.k.a. A Wind from Bukhara)" back in '76 which was pretty much a downer. Think "Red Dawn", but the troops are Islamic and the American civilians aren't as resourceful or well-enough organized.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do women write so little and yet so much of the best SciFi?

      Maybe it's the publishers?

    12. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flashback by Dan Simmons? Not one of his better ones, imho.

  112. Asimov by frovingslosh · · Score: 0

    So many bad ones. But the first to come to mind is Asimov's "Foundation" trilogy.

    The reason: because after such a good build up from hearing of it from so many people, it was a real disappointment to come to realize that he thought his readers were complete idiots! Really, you couldn't read a chapter without being hit over the head with another "clue" about who the mule was. It got damn annoying. Then, as the book ends, he does his big reveal and tells you the major plot point that you had to have figured out long ago. And then just to be sure that you understood how stupid he thought you were, he goes back and explains all of the painful clues that he kept throwing at you. I could never read another Asimov book again.

    Yea, I understand how Slashdot works. I was asked my thoughts, but someone who thinks that Asimov is a God and has mod points will burn my karma rather than trying to discuss this. At Slashdot we just mod people down if we disagree.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Asimov by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      I read the Foundation series when a teenager and thought it was pretty cool. I reread the first book a couple of years ago and couldn't believe what garbage it is. That was the first time I understood why so many held SF in contempt.

      Now, before you all start bashing me, let me say I remain a SF fan, but a pretty darn picky one. I blame John Gardner:
      http://www.amazon.com/On-Writers-Writing-John-Gardner/dp/1582434948/
      http://www.amazon.com/Moral-Fiction-Harper-Torchbook--5069/dp/0465052266/

    2. Re:Asimov by echusarcana · · Score: 1

      While I don't agree that the Foundation books are depressing, your comments are very insightful. I never noticed the way Asimov writes before.

    3. Re:Asimov by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      I had this same experience with a lot of Asimov; he just wasn't that great a writer, but it took me years to learn that.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    4. Re:Asimov by zrbyte · · Score: 1

      I have also recently re read them and I agree with you. As literature, they're pretty bad, but I can see why my tennage mind found it so good.

    5. Re:Asimov by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Foundation is garbage?

      Sure, they have problems. Firstly, it's an SF themed retelling of the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of Medieval civilization, right down to the power of the church gradually giving way to merchants. A bit unoriginal perhaps? Then, the entire idea of psychohistory might be depressing. We're no better than the molecules of a gas cloud? The universe is just a giant machine, ticking away like utterly predictable and fatally boring clockwork, and we really do not have free will, we're just puppets going through the motions, as everything is preordained? Except that all that is deeply flawed. At the time those stories were written, Chaos Theory was unknown. I didn't care for the mentalics or the "psycho" terminology. But lot of SF works from the 1950s dabbled with the paranormal, treating those age old superstitions as though there might be something to them. Three to Dorsai! (an omnibus edition) by Gordon Dickson is an example of that. Childhood's End did it too. In a new foreword written some 35 years later, Clarke confessed to embarrassment over that, though I thought he was expecting too much of himself.

      SF in particular cannot avoid the problem of getting it very, very wrong because it is all about futuristic speculation which is usually wrong. What I find more grating is getting humanity wrong. Many of the depressing works I find implausible rather than depressing because the premise is based on some seeming flaw in humanity that isn't true. Malthusian stories spring to mind here. Life faced the population pressure problem repeatedly, long before we were around. Exhaustion of resources is a similar theme that usually doesn't hold up. We have the arrogance to think that every problem we face is new. These fearful stories like to wallow in our supposed unwillingness to deal with change. Often there are many solutions, and some are actually easy and pleasant, but in these stories we stupidly choose misery and suffering, preferring to believe the problems we are trying to ignore are impossibly hard to solve when they really aren't. In reality, powerful anti-social control freaks aren't powerful. It's incredible what people imply the President of the US can do when they blame him for basically everything. What will happen when we run out of oil? To hear some people carry on, you'd think the End is Nigh.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  113. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Harrison Bergeron by kulervo · · Score: 1

    I was depressed by Galapagos. (Bad science) I thought Breakfast of champions was annoying, and I thought Night, which is supposed to be very dark, the most enjoyable thing he has written.

  114. Just about anything by Margaret Atwood by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    ... although "The Handmaid's Tale" in particular makes you just want to go and slit your wrists afterwards.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:Just about anything by Margaret Atwood by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Indeed. "Oryx and Crake" is another miserable one.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  115. A Scanner Darkly by Mister+Mudge · · Score: 2

    Philip K. Dick's "A Scanner Darkly" has to be one of the most depressing books I've ever read. I read it when it was new and it has stuck with me for all the years since - the film helped refresh my memory of its details, of course, but the novel needed no help in establishing that little pit of despair in my brain.

    --
    Mudge

    In theory, theory and practice are the same.
    In practice, they're not.

  116. Frank Herbert's Dosadi Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gave me freaking nightmares.

    1. Re:Frank Herbert's Dosadi Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, 'The Dosadi Experiment'

      I bought it when it came out, tried reading it, gave up at page 20.
      A year later, tried again, got to approximately the same page.
      Several years pass, find the book again, get half way through, give up.
      A decade after buying the book (2007) finally read it all the way through...
      Take book outside, prop it up against an earth bank, use it for as a target for my rifle..the only book I've ever did this with (I've used various CDs and vinyl albums as similar targets over the years)

      Not nightmares, just plain awful as far as I was concerned.

  117. On the beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't get more depressing than the ending/entirety of the story.
    I love a good post. apoc. book

  118. Something from PKD by rush,overlord,rush! · · Score: 0

    "We Can Build You", maybe? I don't remember the plot clearly, but I still remember the depression.

    1. Re:Something from PKD by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      A Scanner Darkly depressed and saddened me.

  119. A 1984 for the modern day. by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of the best answers have already been given, so to be different I'll add Cory Doctorow's "Little Brother". Technically it's a more upbeat book than 1984, but it's more relevant to today's society, giving it more impact.

    It seemed to keep hinting towards clever and cute plot twists and resolutions (which you'd expect since it's pitched as a Young Adults book) but things kept resolving more realistically.

    Oh and a some of Bob Shaw's work (particularly short stories) were pretty dark in tone.

    1. Re:A 1984 for the modern day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cory Doctorow couldn't write his way out of a wet paper bag. My mother is a washing machine? What the fuck is that?

    2. Re:A 1984 for the modern day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cory Doctorow's "Little Brother". Technically it's a more upbeat book than 1984, but it's more relevant to today's society, giving it more impact.

      It's a good read all right. http://craphound.com/littlebrother/

    3. Re:A 1984 for the modern day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little Brother is not depressing, and it has a happy ending (but its a great book!).

  120. The Sword of the Spirits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. Prince of Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prince of Nothing by Scott R Bakker.

    Overall very depressing. Why do I even read it?

  122. James Tiptree, Jr. or Philip Jose Farmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find the exact story, but the short stories written by James Tiptree, Jr. and Philip Jose Farmer have both fascinated me and depressed me. One of the two wrote a story about a man stumbling across a new species on Mars, and it being vaguely humanoid, copulated with it. Only it had a different reproductive system than we could even imagine,(ie the embryo had the appearance of a hideous monster by human standards) and our lovely human killed the strange female's child right in front of her. The story ended with the female saying she would forgive him, eventually; but she couldn't understand why he would do such a thing.

    That story left me in a depressive funk for days. It was horrible.

  123. Stephen Baxter's "Manifold" trilogy by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    All three Manifold books are depressing, but top-notch hard Sci-Fi. If you are into hard Sci-Fi you definitely should check out Baxter.

    The three Manifold books are depressing in different ways. I don't want to spoil them, but I'll just say that they are depressing in a "Childhood's end"-kind of way; that is, you can also be exalted in a Zen-like realization.

    All three books super-highly recommended. My favorite is "Manifold: Space".

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Stephen Baxter's "Manifold" trilogy by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Well, I should probably read them. I have only read the Xeelee sequence so far...oh wow, just wiki'ed it, I didn't realize he had so many other books. Hope I have time to catch up...

    2. Re:Stephen Baxter's "Manifold" trilogy by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      I'll second that these are depressing. I didn't particularly like them besides, but they were definitely depressing.

    3. Re:Stephen Baxter's "Manifold" trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget 'Titan'.

  124. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by Stephen Baxter.

    1. Re:Evolution by agm · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed. I've read and thoroughly enjoyed most of his books. But this one? It still has a bookmark in it about a third of the way along. I just could not finish - no offense intended to a great writer, but it was so hard to enjoy.

    2. Re:Evolution by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Yes. Sweet fuck that book got me as close as I've ever been to killing myself.

  125. Veniss Underground by coliverhb · · Score: 1

    Veniss Underground. If you havent read it, check it out.

  126. Sea of Glass by wrf3 · · Score: 2

    by Barry B. Longyear

    1. Re:Sea of Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sea of Glass is a powerful novel, but I didn't find it depressing.

      In a future facing overpopulation, a computer is built to fix the population problem. The protagonist, through whose eyes we see this world, has a pretty full share of misery and some pretty dark things happen. (The worst, I think, is when his parents are slowly electrocuted to death on live TV as their punishment for having an unauthorized child, i.e. the protagonist.) But at the end of the book, the computer has accomplished its task. It hasn't killed all humans or even most humans, but enough humans die that the overpopulation problem has been mitigated.

      The protagonist muses, rather bitterly, that most people won't even notice much of a change, other than that parking spaces are easier to find now. And the protagonist, despite the misery in his life, believes in the need to thin out the population; he believes that the alternative was some sort of world war that might possibly go nuclear or otherwise wipe out really staggering numbers of people. He's not really happy about what happened but he feels it was necessary to avert a greater evil.

    2. Re:Sea of Glass by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I'm late to the discussion, but glad someone mentioned this one. It's been 20 years since I read 'Sea of Glass' but I still remember it vividly, and it came immediately to mind for the most depressing book. You've got a society on the brink of collapse, a government that watches everyone, a child who is taken from his parents and put in an orphanage where he's physically and sexually abused, tries to escape, is roped into becoming an agent for the oppressive government, and at the end is forced to choose between triggering a psychohistory-style device which is designed to prevent a total population collapse by triggering social factors which will increase general mortality (higher suicide and murder rate, etc.) or not triggering it and letting the world implode in all-out war. As a teenager I was left feeling shocked at just how brutally painful the entire book was. As an adult, I'm a little more concerned at how prescient the novel could turn out to be, given a few more decades.

      Also, the author had this thing for older movies and liked to work in references constantly. I've carried a frustration ever since for futuristic books which focus on older pop culture and basically skip or ignore decades of what would be intermediate entertainment. It makes no sense to imagine a futuristic society, and then spend all your time focused on the past. It would be like if all the space aliens from Hitchhiker's Guide talked only about Earth movies from the 70's and earlier - very out of place. Yes, I understand why if I write a book in the year 2012 about the year 2050, my audience won't know anything about movies not yet created in the 20's, 30's and 40's, but the answer most certainly isn't to make movies from the 2000's a primary theme of the book.

  127. There Will Come Soft Rains by kulervo · · Score: 1

    I haven't read it in a long while but Bradbury's There Will Come Soft Rains isn't necessarily pessimistic, but it is very melancholy. I found that most of the Martian Chronicles were similarly melancholy. The basic premise of that period was always that nuclear war was inevitable and Bradbury used the Martians as a good foil to expose the folly of the Humans in his stories. Even then the Martian societies weren't very joyous, they were more mellow and resigned.

    The whole story line has stayed with me for many years, but none as well as Soft Rains.

    1. Re:There Will Come Soft Rains by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I searched for this because I figured someone would choose it, and you did.

      I haven't read this one since High School, it was included in our literature book. It has stuck with me to this day, and I still remember the story, despite only reading it once or twice at most.

      I should re-read it and see how accurate my rememberance is. I wonder if I'll still love it as much today?

  128. It's a tie by steveha · · Score: 2

    "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" is pretty darn bleak: a crazed and omnipotent computer has killed off all of humanity except for six people; by the end of the story there is only one left alive, and he has been turned into an amorphous blob that will live forever in torment (with no mouth and yet needing to scream).

    Speaker for the Dead is also pretty depressing. After reading it, I was done with Orson Scott Card and I still haven't gone back. Some humans get killed on a newly settled planet, and Ender goes to investigate. Since there is no faster than light travel for matter (only for information), by the time he gets there years have gone by and pretty much everyone's life was ruined by the tragedy. Then Ender's investigation rips open the old wounds. Then he figures out what went wrong and it was all a horrible tragic misunderstanding. I was upset about all this, because Ender was fabulously wealthy and had unlimited access to the "ansibles" (FTL communicators) so at the beginning I thought he was going to play Nero Wolfe, hire someone on the planet to be his investigator, and solve the mystery immediately after it happened and before everyone's lives were ruined. Nope.

    Dancers in the Afterglow had such a downer of an ending that it left me thinking "WTF?!?" for days. A plucky female gets captured by bad guys, who torture her, cut off her arms and legs, and put fast-reproducing bacteria in the wounds so they can never be healed properly. At the end of the story she has been rescued, has been given care, seems to be coping and is almost happy again... and then a meteor falls from the sky and kills her instantly. WTF?!? (I don't think Jack L. Chalker hated women... he never wrote anything else like that; and e.g. Mavra Chang found a pretty happy ending in the Well Worlds series.)

    There was a short story, "Quietus", where there was some sort of apocalypse and there is only one young man left alive. Against all the odds, there is also one young woman left alive, and he meets her. Through a tragic misunderstanding, an alien who came to help kills the man, and the woman is left grieving over the dead body. The alien then has to live with the knowledge that he had rendered an intelligent species extinct.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:It's a tie by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Orson Scott Card is quite the character (to phrase it politely). His handling of the Ender's Game series is astonishing, in the level of contempt he holds his readers -- when writing Ender in Exile he admitted he couldn't be bothered to reread Ender's Game to avoid plot inconsistencies.

    2. Re:It's a tie by tftp · · Score: 1

      The alien then has to live with the knowledge that he had rendered an intelligent species extinct.

      Only because neither the alien nor the grieving woman were intelligent enough to promptly use a refrigerator.

    3. Re:It's a tie by Lotana · · Score: 1

      OK. You got a child.

      Now what? Have the mother have sex with her offspring (If you are lucky to get a male)? Hello genetic defects.

      Not sure what is the lower limit on healthy population, but way more than two or three.

    4. Re:It's a tie by tftp · · Score: 1

      Of course you are right, but I was playing with cards that I was given. If you only have two individuals (and two sets of genes) you get this problem regardless of what cells were or weren't frozen.

      As matter of fact, a female does not even need anyone else to produce a child, as long as the society is sufficiently advanced medically to use parthenogenesis. When you have spaceships and aliens I have to assume a sufficient level of science. Modern level of biology already supports experimental parthenogenesis of humans in a lab.

      So, however you put it, that alien is not responsible for the death of species. His action had no impact on the outcome, even though it helps with the dramatic effect of the story.

    5. Re:It's a tie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Chalker's other stuff is equally screwed up. His books are sexual perversion fantasies where he gets off on gender bending mutilation an deformaties. The "Anchor" books while interesting, are so thick with it they plots get lost. His books aren't worth bothering with.

    6. Re:It's a tie by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Read only one of his. Shadow Puppets. Depressingly bad writing. Will likely never read anything else by him. Really don't know why I bothered to finish it.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  129. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by turbidostato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope. We are living Brave New World much more than 1984.

  130. Ender's Game by DL117 · · Score: 1

    eom

  131. Seven Views of Olduvai Gorge by cpufrier37075 · · Score: 1

    By Mike Resnik is my most recent. 1984, Childhood's End, and Cat's Cradle were pretty much downer's when I read them.

  132. HHGttG 5&6 by p0p0 · · Score: 1

    The last books in the Hitchhiker's series: book 5 "Mostly Harmless", and book 6 "...And Another Thing".
    They were both fantastic books, the latter being not quite a good but still a fun read.

    As I understand it, Douglas Adams was in a dark place when he wrote "Mostly Harmless", which led to the rather depressing ending.
    I don't know if he planned to write a 6th book himself, but he died before he could in any case. Eoin Colfer picked up the 6th book, and made an interesting emulation of Adams writing.

    But the bloody endings. Both books touch upon that the universe doesn't always leave a happy ending for the good guy. But the ending of 5 was unfair but clever in that it related back to what had been told to the characters early on. Book 6 didn't teach me squat and seemed rushed at end and left me the feeling he didn't know how to end it, so simply followed the same vein as the 5th book.

    In any case, I think the ending of book 6 could do with a rewrite and I'm sure there are some who would argue that the entire book needs a rewrite.

    The series was fantastic and I'm happy to have read them, but I still feel things should have turned out better for the late Dentarthurdent.

    1. Re:HHGttG 5&6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In any case, I think the ending of book 6 could do with a rewrite and I'm sure there are some who would argue that the entire book needs a rewrite.

      Nah, not a rewrite, just an unwrite will do, thanks.

  133. Susan Matthews' Andrei Koscuisko, ship's torturer by smchris · · Score: 1

    Need I say more? A series, no less: Hour of Judgement, Prisoner of Conscience, etc. Extra points for trauma.

  134. Oryx and Crake -Margaret Atwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biotech-gone-bad corporate-dominated wastelands of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake are the most depressing i have read of, because she writes about precisely the world we are building for ourselves.

  135. Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Leomania · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The future world she envisioned felt so much like an obvious extrapolation from the world of today. It affected me for awhile afterwards; just kept thinking about it...

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest this one as well if no one else had. The world is depressing _and_ the plot is depressing. And the ending is ambiguous, but quite possibly depressing.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a follow up book to this that shows you how several of the other characters manage to survive; humanity isn't entirely wiped out, but there's so few left that they have to coexist with Crake's creatures.

    3. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sequel, "The year of the flood", is good as well, although "good" isn't really the right word to use. I finished O&C feeling ashamed to be a member of the human race.

    4. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I was going to add this one, but I see you already have done that. I second this then. Great read, but very depressing view of the future of humanity. It makes me want to go out and get some chicken nubbins!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    5. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I was going to add this, but I see you already did it. Instead I will second it. It's a great read, very fascinating. But it's a depressing view of the future of humanity. It makes me want to go get some chicken nubbins.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  136. I read Jem by machine321 · · Score: 2

    Truly outrageous.

  137. Eisenhorn Trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also one of the best sci-fi I've ever read. WH40K but the third book has some really depressing moments

  138. a few by buddyglass · · Score: 2

    Some of these may not be considered Sci Fi, but here you go:
    1. Flowers for Algernon
    2. On the Beach
    3. The Mist
    4. Elric Saga (mostly the ending)
    5. The Road (haven't read it, but I hear it's supremely depressing)
    6. Never Let Me Go (Ishiguro) (haven't read it, but even the synopsis is enough to depress you)
    7. All Summer in a Day (Bradbury)

    1. Re:a few by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      Flowers for Algernon is a good example of a depressing work. Very sad. I had forgotten all about that book. Not sure it was appropriate for a 6th grade class.

    2. Re:a few by cvtan · · Score: 1

      I think there was a movie made of this story called "Charley" (?). I had to leave in the middle it was so distressing. Girl I was with married me anyway.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    3. Re:a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      score++ on The Mist... such a depressing ending.

    4. Re:a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Road is bleak

    5. Re:a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of these may not be considered Sci Fi, but here you go: ...
      5. The Road (haven't read it, but I hear it's supremely depressing) ...

      The Road by Cormac McCarthy. Definately fits Sci-Fi even if it's the only one he's written that does so. Everything the man writes is bleak and despairing and depressing, but so damn fascinating! The Road is depressing and yet maybe it isn't, McCarthy doesn't wrap things up with ribbon, for better or worse.

      If you read it and like it, consider branching out from Sci-Fi and read the western-settings books such as Blood Meridian or All the Pretty Horses, also check out No Country for Old Men. I love that they're turning his books into movies, though I think they'll stop before getting to the appalachian set books, and if you even read the description of one you'll see why!

  139. Most depressing SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A Canticle for Leibowitz" : monks in a post-nuclear collapse world illuminating an electronic circuit diagram they don't understand with pictures of angels.

  140. The Marching Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a short story by CM Kronbluth. If you've never read it, the movie "RoboCop" riffs on a couple of memes in the commercials. The movie "Idiocracy" owes a lot of its premise to "The Marching Morons".

    1. Re:The Marching Morons by cvtan · · Score: 1

      Kornbluth story "The Little Black Bag" is great though.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  141. Dhalgren by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Samuel R. Delany. I found it bleak and hard to digest.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    1. Re:Dhalgren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call.
      One of only a few SF books I have just tossed before finishing it. And then because I had bought it at the same time, I tried to read Triton, and tossed it even sooner--*no one* needs that many genders in a book.

  142. Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by ed1park · · Score: 2

    I must have been around 12-14 when I read it, but left a pretty deep impression. And I thought the idea of a gravity lens was neat. One of my most favorite authors.

    http://www.amazon.com/Space-Tyrant-Vol-Refugee-ebook/dp/B004P8K530/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1344388563&sr=8-2&keywords=bio+of+a+space+tyrant

    Hmmm. On a similar note, some movies/anime that come to mind are Akira, Aliens, Bladerunner, Naussica Valley of the Wind, etc. Also, Grave of the Fireflies is just the plan saddest and most moving anime/film period.

  143. "Star Pilot Grainger" series AKA "Hooded Swan" by dwywit · · Score: 1

    by Brian Stableford. Entertaining, interesting stories, but I just wanted to bitch-slap the main character repeatedly.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  144. Weirdly: Stanisaw Lem by drkim · · Score: 1

    I gotta throw Stanisaw Lem in here.

    Although he's snarky and funny at times, he can leave you with a strong Kafkaesque aftertaste. Definitely depressing.

    1. Re:Weirdly: Stanisaw Lem by Cormacus · · Score: 1

      Memoirs found in a Bathtub is pretty explicitly depressing, although I had to go back and re-read the first chapter for it to really hit me.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
  145. The Road by echusarcana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Road by Cormac McCarthy. Should win this contest by a mile.

  146. Philip K. Dick's Second Variety by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    Also just read Scalzi's God Engines... the ending is amgibuous enough to be either the doom of men or its salvation.

  147. Draka novels, and Earth Abides. by lee+n.+field · · Score: 3, Informative

    S. M. Stirling's Draka novels. The evil of the titular Draka (alternate history South Africa with the branch point in the 1770s, turned relentlessly aggressive slave making fascist master race) is the stuff of nightmares. I could not read any of those straight through.

    More low key, George R. Stewart's 1949 post apocalyptic Earth Abides. If you've never read it, do.

    1. Re:Draka novels, and Earth Abides. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S. M. Stirling's Draka novels. The evil of the titular Draka (alternate history South Africa with the branch point in the 1770s, turned relentlessly aggressive slave making fascist master race) is the stuff of nightmares. I could not read any of those straight through.

      More low key, George R. Stewart's 1949 post apocalyptic Earth Abides. If you've never read it, do.

      Finally, someone posts about the (two?) Draka novels. A truly terrifying vision of what may happen someday - genetic slavery, with the slaves altered to serve every whim of their genetically enhanced masters and be happy about it. The worst part being that the Draka win and beat the "heroes" in both novels.

    2. Re:Draka novels, and Earth Abides. by ageoffri · · Score: 1
      Actually a total of five books, 3 in the original trilogy, 1 book of short stories and 1 book with time and dimension travel.

      Though I'd say the worst part isn't that the Draka win, but that the "good" Draka fully understand what they are doing and rationalize it. The Draka fear the serfs and even more fear other societies that don't embrace the same concepts they do. The only solution the more noble Draka see is to conquer the entire world and modify the serfs so that they can never be a threat again.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
  148. Consider Phlebas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every character except one is killed, the survivor commits suicide, and according to the author, everything that transpired in the story ultimately amounted to nothing of any significance.

    1. Re:Consider Phlebas by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Another excellent suggestion! Although I think Bank's Use of Weapons is far more depressing. I meant to write an Amazon review equating Use of Weapons to his non-SF The Steep Approach to Garbadale. Banks is an impressive writer.

  149. Gotcha beat. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Screwfly Solution by Alice Sheldon. Extinction of humanity in the most horrifying - and horrifyingly plausible - means possible.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Gotcha beat. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      This, or almost anything else she wrote.

    2. Re:Gotcha beat. by rve · · Score: 1

      The Screwfly Solution by Alice Sheldon. Extinction of humanity in the most horrifying - and horrifyingly plausible - means possible.

      epidemic of organized murder of women by men. (...) biological cause for this sexually selective insanity (...) a new religious movement (...) who believe that women are evil, (...) God is telling them to get rid of all of the women. (...) After most of the world's women are dead, adult men start murdering boys. (...) an entire society bent on femicide (...) the source and motivation behind the plague: an alien species is intentionally causing the human race to destroy itself so that the aliens can have Earth for themselves.

      I don't know if it's a good book, I haven't read it, but if you feel it is plausible, maybe that Wiki page needs to be substantially rewritten.

    3. Re:Gotcha beat. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Men mass murdering women because of an alien parasite is plausible?

    4. Re:Gotcha beat. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      I haven't read it, but if you feel it is plausible, maybe that Wiki page needs to be substantially rewritten.

      You actually have to read it. The author makes a good case for male mammalian sexuality being a specialized - and normally interrupted - form of predation. The fact that there are so many psychopaths in real life who murder for sexual gratification - practically all of them male - lends just enough credibility to the thesis to make it decidedly unnerving.

      Fortunately, it's available online for free (legally): http://web.archive.org/web/20080702231205/http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/classics/classics_archive/sheldon/sheldon1.html.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    5. Re:Gotcha beat. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    6. Re:Gotcha beat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently started using my laptop on my lap. I wonder if this is wise.. It gets pretty hot..

    7. Re:Gotcha beat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

      That story gave me the chills seriously... Totally...

  150. Wolves of Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by George Alec Effinger. Also maybe 334 by Thomas Disch.

  151. Anything by Ayn Rand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not because the books say anything interesting or deep, but because so many people *think* they do and have gained positions of power believing in their deeply flawed ideas.

  152. Level 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things go from bad to worse to total extermination. Children of the nuclear age will appreciate its pathos. Surprised it has not been mentioned yet.

  153. A Boy and his Dog by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  154. The Seafort Saga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... by David Feintuch. Truly dismal.

    Also, a special mention for Vacuum Flowers by Michael Swanwick. Not that the story was all that depressing in itself, but he managed to make sex seem so mechanical and automatic that it made me want to chop 'em off.

  155. Dancers In The Afterglow by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    Jack L Chalker's short novel on what makes us human, the inside or the outside? He wrote later that he'd written this at a very depressed time of his life, and does NOT recommend reading this book if you're depressed and/or high.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  156. The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by metrometro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forever_War

    The middle section, in which the soldier returns home to find the planet he gave up his soul for is now a wretched cesspit of crime and misery that can't even remember his war, was omitted from the original publishing, because "Shit, man, we can't print that."

    It's depressing because it's a just a retelling of the author's experience fighting the Vietnam War.

    1. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      I thought it was unpublishable because of the homolife stuff?

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    2. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by metrometro · · Score: 1

      The "homolife stuff", I believe, happens in the 3rd act and stayed in.

    3. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm halfway through the pseudo-sequel Forever Peace, and am finding it even more depressing, though for different reasons. Still, can't put it down. Haldeman is incredible.

    4. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah...had forgotten that one. really head bending.

    5. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by jcadam · · Score: 1

      Yes, Forever War is my all-time favorite sci-fi novel. Can't wait for the movie, hopefully it doesn't get the Starship Troopers treatment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forever_War#Film

    6. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      I just re-read the author's note in my 2009 edition - I stand corrected.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  157. Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang by Greg+Hullender · · Score: 1

    Won the Hugo in its day. Left teenage me depressed for days. Still topical, I think.

    The Amazon Review describes it better than I could.

    --Greg

  158. Oryx and Crake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oryx and Crake. The road to hell was never described so well.

  159. The World Inside by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

    The World Inside by Robert Silverberg.

    1. Re:The World Inside by The+Real+Dr.+Video · · Score: 1

      An excellent choice as well!

      --
      Officially a geek since 1984
  160. Alas Babylon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dismal prognosis for a part of the USA more likely than most to survive a nuclear war.

  161. The Iron Dragon's Daughter by Michael Swanwick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for SF/fantasy hybrids. Last Argument of Kings by Joe Abercrombie for pure fantasy.

  162. Probably by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Informative

    The windup girl. Resource constrained Thailand, miserable existence for what's essentially a genetically engineered sex toy.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:Probably by Verio+Fryar · · Score: 1

      I have just read it and I agree. It is the most depressing book that I have read in a long time.

    2. Re:Probably by CityZen · · Score: 1

      While I agree that The Windup Girl is very dark, I'd also highly recommend it. Imagine an earth devastated by genetically modified organisms, wars, and energy resource depletion. This is the story of Bangkok's attempt to survive independent of the biotech corporations that brought about the chaos and have since made other countries dependent upon them for subsistence. Several threads are interwoven, including that of the genetically engineered sex toy. It's interesting to see the combination of past and future technologies constrained by resource limitations. It's also a good story.

  163. The Road by Troyusrex · · Score: 2

    It's a book about a father and his young son trying to survive in a post apocalyptic world where most remaining people have turned to cannibalism. Scary stuff. Note: I had a typo and my spell checker turned "cannibalism" to "Canadianism". I was inclined to leave it but that premise for a book is just too scary for publication!

  164. Manifold Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manifold Time, by Stephen Baxter. Most monumentally depressing book I have ever read.

    1. Re:Manifold Time by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Yup, "Space" was great, "Time" just depressed the hell out of me... basically take the story of "Space" and then rewrite it through an Ian Curtis filter.

  165. Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    I thought 'Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand', what a great title!
    I was right.
    A horrible, horrible read.
    Never purchased a Sam Delany title again.
    I forced myself to finish the book because I could not believe they would publish a hardback book that was this bad.
    I was wrong.
    Great punch line though, a friend of mine noticed the book title and wanted to borrow it.
    I told him he now owned the book and warned him about how bad it was, he did no believe me, untill he read it.
    Same result.
    Sorry Mike!
    Again: Do not read or purchase this book!
    Avoid all contact, or at least avoid eye contact.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  166. Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solaris

    After reading it:
    1. came to conclusion that it is human nature to repeat certain actions, even though they might be self destructive.
    2. it was probably the best illustration of Freud's - "Death drive" and subconscious
    3. There are might be things in space, that we will never be able to communicate with. Sounds childish, but for some reason, it shocks me.

  167. The Giver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff' Said

  168. Brunner by guygo · · Score: 1

    John Brunner's "The Sheep Look Up". Keep that old penicillin cold, folks. You may need it.

    1. Re:Brunner by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      That's been on my to-read list.

    2. Re:Brunner by guygo · · Score: 1

      Do it! But keep something to make you happy nearby. It can get very thick...

  169. Where are the John Varley books and short stories? by flogger · · Score: 1

    Steel Beach: In the first chapter the main character commits suicide. And does it again later in the book... To live in a world that Varley describes would drive anyone to suicide when understanding what is going on...
    Blue Champagne: A collection of short stories. "The Pusher" is a story that is going to make you feel dirty, and disgusted with yourself for reading. Then to read how a life devoid of friendships drives the pusher to do what he does is eye opening...
    "Choices" is a short about just that. Choices in a marriage in which openess and confidentiality can go to far... Where will we be in teh future?

    On another note:
    Armor by John Steakley. A man stuck in a useless war that consumes him and leads to his and other's demise. This shows the brutality of war and the utter exhaustion that pushes us over the edge... I read this book every year.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  170. Stanislaw Lem by gnetwerker · · Score: 2

    Agree with 1984, Brave New World, The Road, and many others above, but no one has mentioned Stanislaw Lem. Memoirs Found in a Bathtub is pretty dark. The Futurological Congress has a veneer of psychedelic humor in it, but the underlying sentiment is quite grim. Then there's Solaris, so grim they had to film it twice.

    1. Re:Stanislaw Lem by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

      Wish I'd seen you before I posted on Lem...would have modded you up. Absolutely agreed, particularly on Solaris, simultaneously brilliant and tragic.

    2. Re:Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [i]The Futurological Congress[/i] is the first story that I thought about as well.
      Maybe it's because it doesn't seem unrealistic and the general idea has already come true for many.

      [i]Solaris[/i] however I find rather heartwearming as it reminds me of what makes a human human.

    3. Re:Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking for the post about Lem's books.

      I too found Congress very disturbing, and still is one of my "favorite" dystopian futures. That said, with Memories at least there is hope that it is something outside the building, and Solaris is just a return to the old "ok, we have found ETs, now what do we do with them" theme (but Fiasco or Invincible are better as being less pretentious).

      As for Lem frightening futures, I would single out also Ijon Tychi's travel to the planet where they built a machine that exterminates the local people.

    4. Re:Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Fiasco?

    5. Re:Stanislaw Lem by ecki · · Score: 1

      ... or Fiasko.

  171. Bester's Adam and No Eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://variety-sf.blogspot.com/2007/11/alfred-bester-adam-and-no-eve-earth-can.html

  172. Brave New World was a utopia by Paradoks · · Score: 2

    I know that Brave New World is a dystopian novel, but it's a world where people know what they're really good at, can take happy drugs that don't have side effects, get to keep their youthful abilities and looks for most of their life, and if they really object to the structure of society, they can move to anywhere on the planet that better suits them.

    Mind you, I don't know if I'd do all that well in such a society, but I don't know that I'd do all that well in Japanese society, either.

    Anyway, since the book focuses on a couple of people who don't like a highly-structured society, and a person who decides that, rather than move to wherever he'd prefer, it's best to whip himself a lot, I can see that it's still a depressing read.

    For me, though, 1984 was so much harder to take, as I kept mentally attempting to find ways out for the character and failing.

  173. Depressing sci fi novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gladiator by Philip Wylie (1930) was a very sad novel of a character having a difficult non conforming life. Hugo tries to find his destiny only to find a tragic end. It is said this book inspired Superman and Spiderman alike. Well worth the effort of finding. Gladiator is not full of spaceships or aliens, but human tragedy through experimentation on the betterment of humanity gone awry.

  174. Stephen Baxter - Titan by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The story follows a manned mission to Titan. Apart from the very long term outcome, it's a thoroughly depressing read - Hacked from Wikipedia:

    En-route, one crew member dies after a solar storm. The use of a CELSS greenhouse for life support provides a continuous food supply, and the astronauts rely on vegetables, grain and fruit from the greenhouse as they travel on. But things take a dark turn as funding and support for resupply and Earth-return retrieval are cut by Maclachlan's administration (proposed and carried out by the very same men that tried to shoot the shuttle down), leaving the team with no hope for survival beyond what they may find on Titan. Once they reach Saturn and prepare to land on Titan's surface, another crew member is lost during the landing procedure with another effectively crippled. Titan is discovered to be a bleak, freezing dwarf-planet containing liquid ethane oceans, a sticky mud surface, and a climate which includes a thick atmosphere of purple organic compounds falling like snow from the clouds; and the only traces of life they find are fossilized remains of microbic bacteria similar to those recovered from Martian meteorites. The remaining astronauts relay their findings back to a largely uninterested Earth.

    Meanwhile, the Chinese, in order to retaliate for biological attacks by the US, cause a huge explosion next to an asteroid (2002OA), with the aim of deflecting it into Earth orbit and threatening the world with targeted precision strikes in the future. Unfortunately, their calculations are wrong as they didn't take into account the size of the asteroid which could cause a Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. The asteroid strikes Earth, critically damaging the planetary ecosystem. The Titan team members are presumably the last humans left alive.

    As the surviving astronauts slowly die of disease and in-fighting, they decide to try to ensure life will continue to survive: they take a flask of bacteria and drop it into a crater filled with liquid water, in the hope that some form of life will develop.

    The novel's final sequence depicts the final two crew members reincarnated on Titan several billion years in the future. The sun has entered its red giant phase, warming the Saturnian system and aiding the evolution of life, in the form of strange, intelligent beetle-like creatures, on Titan. The astronauts watch as the creatures build a fleet of starships to seed and colonize new solar systems before the expanding sun boils off the surface of the moon.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    1. Re:Stephen Baxter - Titan by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a direct rip-off of a 1970s novel by a British sci-fi author who's name escapes me.

      Mission sent to a distant planet while the Earth teeters towards war and is increasingly uninterested in the mission. Resupply eventually ends and no further messages are heard - assumed global war, end of civilization. Mission crew attempts to populate planet, only to find a microorganism clogs the lungs of children. Everyone dies, the end.

    2. Re:Stephen Baxter - Titan by fartrader · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I agree with your assessment of the book - it was depressing. However I felt that it was a story that Baxter wrote to stretch out the amazing level of research he did for the significantly better, and somewhat magnificent "Voyage" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyage_(novel), where he postulates an Apollo-based mission to Mars in the mid-80's.

      Titan in comparison was utterly ridiculous in its use of Apollo technology. Like taking the Saturn V out of the rocket garden in Florida and restoring it for flight (in reality they've moved it to a huge walk under indoor display). The human dynamics of such a ridiculously long flight were depressing and readable but the basic notion was absurd.

    3. Re:Stephen Baxter - Titan by lanthar · · Score: 1

      Fall back to 1941, Alfred Bester: Adam and No Eve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Bester#Notable_short_stories Guy invents a rocket powered by a catalyst that causing fission in elemental iron. During takeoff, as warned, a bit must have leaked and it causes a chain reaction that wipes out all life on earth. Post-crash landing he is dying, but drags himself to the ocean, continually fending off his dog which went with him in the rocket, and is now trying to eat him because there is no food. He dies there so the bacteria within him can be reestablished in the ocean and maybe start life over again.

  175. Not strictly SciFi by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    but... Bruce Sterling wrote a short story "Dori Bangs," it's a quick read with a delightfully depressing impact.

  176. Kornbluth / Lem by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

    Garden-variety angst, nihilism: pretty much anything by Cyril Kornbluth. Plus points (if that's the appropriate expression) for The Marching Morons and The Little Black Bag.

    On a metaphysical level: Stanislaw Lem .... thousands of pages of highly distinctive prose pointing out, no matter our tech or aspirations, how our natures are our own limits.

  177. Harrison Bergeron by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

    Harrison Bergeron. Because it's happening. Also 1984 and Brave New World. All eerily accurate & prescient.

  178. A Deepness in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One human group using a mindrot virus to enslave and control other humans. A horrible concept and I'm sure we'll see it in the next years. A good book but hard to read.

    1. Re:A Deepness in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One human group using a mindrot virus to enslave and control other humans. A horrible concept and I'm sure we'll see it in the next years...

      Umm, for the majority of humans, that mindrot virus would be television..
      for those who developed a resistance to that one, there is the Internet..

  179. A Scanner Darkley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phillip K Dick Stories in general are pretty depressing.

  180. kalki by redneckmother · · Score: 1

    "Kalki", by Gore Vidal.

  181. The Futurological Congress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider Stanislav Lem the best; I wonder how good he is in Polish (which I cannot read) if he is so dark and funny in translation. The descent through layers beyond layers into the bleakest imaginable reality is something I cannot forget after too many years. A must read if you are into doing things to your mind!

  182. The sadest I've rad by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    A Scanner Darkly

  183. The Isaac Asimov short story where... by dohzer · · Score: 1

    ... it explains how you can't go running from star to star when each one dies, because they will eventually all die. I think it was the story where they keep asking computers for the meaning of life, and each time it tells them there is not enough information for the calculation... until the very end of the story. I remember being really depressed about how eventually all energy will be 'used up' and the universe will die.

    1. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      But...but...surely it has a happy, rather funny, and thought-provoking ending?

    2. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure; I stopped reading just before the end due to depression.

    3. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by Lotana · · Score: 3, Informative

      The story is called "The Last Question" and it is in my personal opinion the greatest science fiction short story ever written. I do not believe it is suited to be called "Most Depressing" because it has a really up-lifting ending. I would recomend you read the last part: The whole short story is available free here:

      http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html/

      Though perhaps some may see the re-birth to still be a downer, it is still much more cheerful than other stories mentioned in this Ask Slashdot.

    4. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      I was kidding. I have read the ending. To be honest, I found the last part interesting, but hardly 'uplifting'. What's the point of living through an endless cycle of 'universe lifetimes' if you can't carry over information from the previous one. I've read some of the other stories mentioned here (1983, A Brave New World, etc), but they were no where near as depressing for me because they never seemed real to me. They will never eventuate, or the concepts will never be as bad as what the stories describe. However, The Last Question talks about a concept which is unavoidable, and is something that I had never considered.

    5. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by alfredo · · Score: 1

      The link is broken

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    6. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      I'll take an endless cycle of 'universe lifetimes', thank you. Modern astronomy is hugely depressing -- no, we didn't get a nice cyclical universe, no, we didn't get a slow "heat death" when entropy goes to infinity. Instead, everything just flies to bits, so far away from everything else that it is impossible to even see the other galaxies while the last stars burn out. Even if there is still intelligent life somewhere at that point, they have no way to figure out that anything but the local galaxy ever existed (if we're lucky and dark energy doesn't overpower that too).

      And if they do somehow know what came before, if someone kept records, will that not be even more depressing?

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    7. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      No, it would mean that *potentially* you could save knowledge and pass it on, thus making life less pointless. Otherwise you repeat mistakes, etc. It'd be like being born and never knowing your parents, never having them to give you a leg-up in life. Never reading a history book.

    8. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by Lotana · · Score: 1

      My appologies. Slashdot links keep adding trailing slash. Here is the corrected link:

      The Last Question

    9. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I guess the link was /.'d. Al

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    10. Re:The Isaac Asimov short story where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link is not available.
      Any other source?

  184. People of Sand and Slag by Paolo Bacigalupi by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    People of Sand and Slag. Damn that depressed me. It's like the Ugly Americans x 1,000. The ugly humans. They fuck up everything they touch and don't care or even notice. And the ending... damn... I was hoping the whole story was leading up to them rediscovering their empathy and humanity. Then they * * * I don't want to spoil it...

    Full story is found here

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  185. 1984 was an allegory for the real world any time. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Or, at least, for elements thereof.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  186. All My Sins Remembered. by dasunt · · Score: 1

    All My Sins Remembered, by Joe Haldeman. About an idealistic young Anglo-Buddhist who joins the galactic version of the UN because he believes in the duty of protecting humans and other sentients. They turn him into a deep cover spy by changing his appearance and implanting different personalities and memories in him. He doesn't handle it well during his debriefings.

  187. Freedman doesnâ(TM)t count... by mevets · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Fairy tales are different from science fiction; and Fairy Tale is a generous classification of his typing.

  188. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 2

    I'd add Frankenstein to the list. Everybody dies in the end, because one man couldn't handle what he had done. And the "monster" couldn't handle being alone.

    Very depressing stuff.

  189. Piers Anthony Mode Series by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

    The mode series is also very depressing. The end of the last book, maybe not so much. But the other three are.

  190. Timescape by Gregory Benford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd forgotten how unlikable one of the primary protagonists was but the description of the oceans dying has never been far from my thoughts since I read this over a decade ago.

  191. The Killing Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Charles R. Pellegrino and George Zebrowski

    Not technically a horror but scared the crap out of me with its description of the death of the human race.

  192. October The First Is Too Late by AuntieAlias · · Score: 1

    by Fred Hoyle. The Stupid is Repetitious and Inevitable. Cyclic collapse and rebuilding. The only cure is societal stasis. The story is a little dated, but the main point is spot on.

    --
    Multitasking: Just Say No
  193. The Northern Gateway Pipeline by kawabago · · Score: 1

    Oil in a pristine environment. What could go wrong?

  194. Anything by Thomas Disch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one that best fits, I think, is The Genocides - Aliens come to farm earth and humans are just vermin to be exterminated.

  195. Titan, by Baxter by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Depressing because after you plow through the whole dull thing in the anticipation of some interesting conclusion, you just get shat upon by an author without an ending.

  196. Nearly every Heinlen book in a tie. by uberwookie · · Score: 1

    Maybe it was just because I ended with Farnham's Freehold

  197. Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Nyder · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is about Science Fiction. Most depressing SCIENCE FICTION books/stories you've read.

    Yet, most of you idiots are going on about non science fiction books.

    There is a difference between science fiction and non science fiction, yet most of you do NOT understand that.

    This is depressing because I came here to hopefully learn about some new books that would be good to read, and I get stupid peeps talking about normal fiction books.

    seriously peeps, science fiction. not fucking fiction.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  198. Dark/depressing books by Greg Bear by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 3, Informative
    Forge of God by Greg Bear could be considered depressing as it involves the destruction of Earth by inscrutable aliens. Its sequel Anvil of Stars is also rather dark in mood, involving an army of children on a long-term mission to find and take revenge on the Earth's unknown destructors.

    Also very dark in tone is the thought-provoking short story Hardfought, also by Greg Bear, well worth a read.

    1. Re:Dark/depressing books by Greg Bear by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I started out really liking Bear, and after five or six novels I finally realized that every one of them had left me feeling depressed. I think the worst was Psychlone, though -- not to spoil it, but way to ruin even the afterlife.

    2. Re:Dark/depressing books by Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blood Music - by far his most depressing book. A kind of Childhood's End but with Grey Goo, and no escape for anything or anyone.

    3. Re:Dark/depressing books by Greg Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forge of God, depressing windup but at least the humans get after the aliens in the end on justice missions.

  199. War Against the Chtorr series by David Gerrold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    War Against the Chtorr series by David Gerrold. I haven't even gotten to book 4 of the as yet incomplete series, because I find it so depressing. And yet so compelling at the same time. :S

  200. The Black Corridor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Black Corridor by Michael Moorcock.

  201. Most depressing....Noir by J W Jeter by farrellj · · Score: 1

    Noir by J W Jeter. Imagine if the *AA organizations got their way, and made copyright infringment a capital offence...and the people who police IP law are like Bladerunners...it's a very good book, both a satire of Cyberpunk/Bladerunner, and RIAA/MPAA rhetoric....but it is TANJ DEPRESSING!!!!

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  202. There are three that I haven't seen mentioned yet: by Snarfangel · · Score: 2

    Level 7, by Mordecai Roshwald: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_7

    Z For Zachariah (young adult), by Robert C. O'Brien: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z_for_Zachariah

    A Canticle for Leibowitz, by Walter M. Miller, Jr.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Canticle_for_Leibowitz

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  203. Re:Where are the John Varley books and short stori by farrellj · · Score: 1

    But Steel Beach has the worlds weirdest/most disturbing opening sentence....'In five years the penis will become obsolete'

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  204. Harlan Ellison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've read many of his stories years ago. I don't recall any his ending with an upbeat unicorm farting rainbows (although a harlequin spraying jellybeans might be close). One that comes to mind is "I Have No Mount and I Must Scream". The Deathbird Stores has some depressing stories as well. I think it is "Pain God" that has an alien take control of a man and forces him to do all sorts of cruel acts for a day on fellow citizens. Then the alien releases the man's mind and sends him out to visit his victims so the alien can experience the emotion of pain and remorse.
    But the one that always get me is "The Deathbird". Not the story itself, but the short aside that Ellison includes about his dog. If you've ever felt worried that you'll be old and alone, this bit will cut to your heart. Even worse than the Futurama episode with the dog.

  205. I'd like to recommend... by amaupin · · Score: 1

    ... the excellent A Grey Moon Over China by Thomas A. Day. A tale of the life of a futuristic soldier who escapes Earth in a colony ark to a far away system. There his group attempts to colonize while dealing with their own internal politics and a non-human threat. The mistakes and triumphs of a lifetime really add up, and the ending left me with a sense of sadness that I strongly remember now, a few years later.

    Wonderful book.

  206. Re:There are three that I haven't seen mentioned y by Snarfangel · · Score: 1

    Okay, dropping my view down to zero, I found Level 7 and Canticle mentioned. That's just depressing.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  207. The Last Gasp... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

    ...by Trevor Hoyle made a big impression on me back in 1984 or so. Pollution poisons the seas and then the air we breathe. Supposedly based on a fair bit of research, although reading the reviews on Amazon makes me think that might not be the case after all!

    Also another vote for Forge of God, after reading it I gave up on Greg Bear thinking "What was the point of that?". Call me fluffy, but I kept waiting for the twist in the plot that meant we (the human race) saved the day after all... but no.

    Childhood's End just made me wistful rather than depressed. 1984 and Brave New World I just found fascinating, although how elements of both are coming true is depressing. I also suspect that if I'd first read them as an adult rather than a precocious kid, I might have found them bleaker than I did.

    1. Re:The Last Gasp... by thejuliano · · Score: 1

      Last Gasp *was depressing* I read it in the late 80s and was down for weeks. It was so realistic I found myself checking the newspaper and TV news for updates... Good choice!

  208. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Clived · · Score: 1

    1984 and/ or Soylent Green. The movie was so depressing. Would never bother to read the book. Was there an actual novel ?

    --
    Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
  209. Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Quila · · Score: 1

    The problem with our current system is that the government creates an environment for the corporate raiders to prosper (deregulation, protectionism, laws favoring large corporations against smaller ones), gives them incentive to do underhanded tricks (forcing them to loan to subprime borrowers), and then bails them out when they fail. They don't suffer the consequences of their actions because of an overly-powerful government.

    On a smaller scale, you don't have to worry about taking a mortgage you knew you couldn't afford, betting everything on the value of the house rising, because the government is going to come in and crack down on the banks, providing mortgage relief. You can easily go bankrupt, leaving the lenders to suck it up for your poor life choices.

    IOW, the recent cratering was decidedly non-Randian in nature.

    1. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by EvolutionInAction · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but if I understand 'Randism' at all correctly, the banks shouldn't be regulated because that would interfere with the liberty of the lenders. Somehow the threat of collapse would keep them from making poor choices. Of course, it makes more sense to think that the owners would run it into the ground, make out like bandits, and leave the ashes of a company while they moved on. Because that's what happens now, even with regulation.

    2. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by garett_spencley · · Score: 2

      Sure, but if I understand 'Randism' at all correctly, the banks shouldn't be regulated because that would interfere with the liberty of the lenders.

      Rand advocated for the complete separation of economy and state for the same reasons as a separation of church and state is necessary. She saw it as two sides of the same coin.

      If it is wrong to dictate to an individual what he/she can think it is equally wrong to dictate to an individual what he/she can eat. There are also a lot of overlaps. Just as individual chooses what to think he/she also chooses who to associate with and trade with and under what circumstances. If individuals require the freedom think and act in order to make decisions regarding their life then that extends into producing the material means of survival: producing material goods for consumption and trade.

      In other words: if politics involves itself in what is proper to worship and believe in then the result is telling us what to think. Conversely if politics involves itself in production and trade the result is telling us who we can trade with, what prices we must accept for goods we produced, what kind of toilet we can put in our own bathrooms and what kinds of food to eat.

      If it helps you, stop thinking about "corporate welfare" and think of your own, because all trade is a two-way street. Keep in mind that the government doesn't just regulate the banking sector at the moment, it's basically nationalized. Yes, private banks still exist but every single loan and transaction occurs with government-issued fiat currency, which means they're setting terms on every single transaction that occurs during their jurisdiction. Not just between banks and consumers but between little Joey and Mrs. Potter when they trade $5 for a lawn mow. People don't seem to get that. That is the most fundamental hardcore regulation of the economy you can possibly have... the central bank gets to decide, by meddling with the supply of currency, what your savings are worth, what interest rates for loans will be, the value of what people who have bad loans will collect and so forth. It's even thought by one popular school of economics to be the cause of the boom/bust cycle.

    3. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Quila · · Score: 2

      And when ripping off the customers, those in charge would be held accountable. Thus they have disincentive for fraud. Freedom stops at fraud, in which case you are infringing on the freedom of others.

      But under our system the frauds get bailouts if their political connections are good enough.

    4. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by number11 · · Score: 2

      If it helps you, stop thinking about "corporate welfare" and think of your own, because all trade is a two-way street.

      I could stop thinking about "corporate welfare", if the very existence of corporations wasn't a government-granted privilege that shielded the owners (who will reap the profits) from personal responsibility. But since it is, it would seem that they should be subject to the control of the greater society. "Corporations" have no natural existence, no natural rights, they're a creature of government, a special privilege granted to a group that should be expected to act in ways that will benefit all of society, not just their shareholders. If they don't like that, let them return to being partnerships, as they were before the invention of the corporation.

    5. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with all this Randism is that it doesn't account for failure. If the bank where I put my savings fail, my savings are gone, even though I didn't made an error in judgement when I put my money there long ago. If I don't have the resources to diversify my savings enough to put them into different banks, and if not only a single bank but a whole system of banks fails, I lose. Regulation is not primarily about infringment on individual freedom and trade, it is about limiting the effect an error, a fraud, or a failure have on innocent bystanders. Regulations are not primarily about control, they are about the containment of catastrophical events. And moreso: Disincentives are also just another type of regulation. Laws forbidding fraud, murder or theft are regulation. And courts upholding contracts and a police enforcing the court decisions are the judictive and the executive branch of those laws and regulations.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Here here. I confess ignorance about what Ayn Rand actually said or offers. (Is that a good word). But, setting her aside, I see a disturbing trend. This trend is the idea that anything that is 'for the common good' is to be distruted, or at the extreme, to be rejected out of hand. This is coming from the conservative side of our body politic. Part of this is due to over reaching and extreme idiocy and sillyness on the part of some in the Liberal side of our body politic. (And both sides are guilty of only hearing the scariest voices on the other side).

      But part of the conservative rejection of things 'in common' is I think a false belief that everything is a zero sum game: if there is more Welfare, then me and others who produce wealth will have less to pay for it. That is partially true. Giving some people welfare also can stimulate the economy, so it is partially a mixed bag.

      But, limiting air and water pollution, the 'ecological real estate,' benefits everyone. Or rather protecting air and water from pollution does. But many conservatives only look at the costs to business or the economy.

    7. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Mod parent correct.

    8. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Count+Fenring · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All libertarian thought basically has this problem - it's all based on simple, reductionist models, which is great for rhetorical purposes, but fails to correctly model reality in any meaningful way.

      The most extreme extension of this is "the gun in the room," an argument that literally boils down to insisting that there is no subject that's not state coercion, and that nothing else can be discussed or spoken of until libertarian ideals are implemented in their entirety. (Courtesy note: As soon as someone does this, if at all possible leave and never speak to them again. There is no meaningful discussion to be had with anyone who uses this)

    9. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I hate Rand, but terrible argument. Nobody can account for unforeseen failure. So what then if the regulations or government itself fails? Hell, the basic argument of Rand's could be stated in terms of failure, that business is less likely to fail that government. That certainly was the main theme of that god-awful book (terribly, terribly written) Atlas Shrugged.

    10. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      If it helps you, stop thinking about "corporate welfare" and think of your own, because all trade is a two-way street.

      I could stop thinking about "corporate welfare", if the very existence of corporations wasn't a government-granted privilege that shielded the owners (who will reap the profits) from personal responsibility. But since it is, it would seem that they should be subject to the control of the greater society. "Corporations" have no natural existence, no natural rights, they're a creature of government, a special privilege granted to a group that should be expected to act in ways that will benefit all of society, not just their shareholders. If they don't like that, let them return to being partnerships, as they were before the invention of the corporation.

      If you own 0.00000001% of a company and they do nefarious things should your house be seized because of this transgression? If you think eliminating limited liability would stop any current practices you are wrong, shares would be sold and the people left holding the bag would be the people who had no input on the bad decision? Corporations are simply a group of people who have decided to invest into their group for a common purpose. Unless you think that the ability to gather is a special privilege granted by the government your argument has a huge flaw.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    11. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      The problem with all this Randism is that it doesn't account for failure. If the bank where I put my savings fail, my savings are gone, even though I didn't made an error in judgement when I put my money there long ago. If I don't have the resources to diversify my savings enough to put them into different banks, and if not only a single bank but a whole system of banks fails, I lose. Regulation is not primarily about infringment on individual freedom and trade, it is about limiting the effect an error, a fraud, or a failure have on innocent bystanders. Regulations are not primarily about control, they are about the containment of catastrophical events. And moreso: Disincentives are also just another type of regulation. Laws forbidding fraud, murder or theft are regulation. And courts upholding contracts and a police enforcing the court decisions are the judictive and the executive branch of those laws and regulations.

      It does, if you put your money in a bank and they fail then you fail, just as if you put your money in d'Anconia copper and if fails do to intentional negligence of the owner you fail as well. Investing money in anything has risks, you accept those risks by investing your money. What you are asking for is a place where you can invest your money and get growth without worrying about risk, that is nonsense.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    12. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Randism does account for failure - if you fail, too bad, so sad, sucks to be you. Randism offers no safety net for failure and makes no apologies about it, in fact it considers the fear of failure to be a sign of personal weakness, basically calling anyone who doesn't want to take on a ruthless objectivist world a pussy who knows they suck.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't regulation because in some ways no matter what regulations are in place there will be winners and losers. The problem is the idea that we can somehow mandate that there be only winners and no losers. This is like the schoolyard game where everyone gets a trophy. Trying to make that a reality in life doesn't work no matter how hard you try.

      What we are looking at are people that would very much like to mandate there be only winners. Equality of both opportunity and outcome. Eliminate poverty by simply making it illegal to be either too rich or too poor. The problem is, as has been shown time and time again throughout history, is that if you do not have losers you do not have real winners. Without the incentive to be a "winner" and the disincentive to be a "loser" humanity sits on the sidelines and waits to see what happens without participation. This was a huge factor in the Soviet economy and it took them about 40 years to figure it out. We are apparently going to try again even with overwhelming evidence that it doesn't work.

      Specifically what you are thinking of is that banks can be regulated to be trustworthy guardians of all things financial. Problem is, there is a very small area where it is profitable to be in the banking business - outside of this area it is either too risky or not enough return on investment. Admittedly, the has been some miscalculation both ways recently but it tends to be self correcting. This self correction is a good thing. Trying to construct a regulatory framework where the rules prevent straying outside of an even smaller defined area is very likely to miss. So far, you will note there is no regulatory framework - likely by intent. A real risk to the economy would be to try to build such a framework, likely one again mandating there be only winners.

    14. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Quila · · Score: 0

      Regulation is not primarily about infringment on individual freedom and trade, it is about limiting the effect an error, a fraud, or a failure have on innocent bystanders.

      Theoretically, I agree. But regulation in our system is not set up that way. For example, the triggering factor to the subprime collapse was government regulation meant to force lenders to give morgtages to people who would normally be rejected due to their financial situation (hence, "subprime"). This regulation was enforced for a social reason, a utopian ideal that everybody whould be a homeowner even if they can't afford it. It was not meant to prevent fraud. In fact, it encouraged fraud as banks found a way to profit on it. We have other regulations that prop up prices for industries such as farming. A lot of states have regulations with origins in religion (e.g., no liquor sales on Sunday). Regulation of cigarettes is a good one, pure nanny state, interfering with the free association between a consumer of a product and its producer.

      Randian thinking requires that you privatize the profits and privatize the risk. Freedom means freedom to fail. The problem these days is that often the profits are privatized, but risk is socialized. What allowed this to happen is a powerful government, a government powerful enough to hand out favors to those who can buy thim. If the government did not have this much power, it could not hand out such favors to the rich and socialize their risk onto the rest of us.

      And courts upholding contracts and a police enforcing the court decisions are the judictive and the executive branch of those laws and regulations.

      According to even hard-core libertarians, this is one legitimate function of government. The libertarian ideal of free entities making contracts with each other, without interference from the government, can't exist without a legal system to enforce those contracts. This is libertarianism, not anarchy.

    15. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which makes it rather ironic when a Randian blames other people for how the world is moving away from a Randian paradise ("oh why you keep voting for the same corrupt people?"). Shouldn't Randians blame themselves for their own failure to create it?

    16. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by geekoid · · Score: 2

      " the recent cratering was decidedly non-Randian in nature."
      Are you high?
      removing regulation is what caused it and it is very Randian in nature. I could site examples through all of history where laissez-faire capitalism type ideas destroy the vast majority of peoples lives.
      However I think the most telling piece against her overall philosophy* is the interview she did with Donahue in the 70's.

      What she is getting at makes sense in the context of what was happening in the Soviet Union during her youth.

      *Most people don't read past the part where all knowledge is based in reason(para phrasing).

      "is that the government creates an environment for the corporate raiders to prosper (deregulation,"
      Do you read what you write? so now removing regulation is government control? I spent 2 years studying Ayn Rand, and I can say, for certainly, that you are an idiot.

      Deregulating is as "Randian" as one can get.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You should receive 0.00000001% of the blame and resulting judgments.

      "Unless you think that the ability to gather is a special privilege granted by the government your argument has a huge flaw."
      BY pooling that many resource, it does give corporation undo influence over the government.

      And this isn't new. There was as serious debate by are founding fathers as to whether or not to specifically disallow corporation. Corporation ran amok in England then. When a system emerges to remove responsibility from the owners, why would they act responsible?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Under the system the frauds HAD to have bailout or it would have been far, far worse.

      I talked to a lot of people about this, because I didn't like the bailout, but basically it came down to this:

      Would you rather a few fat cats to get away, or do you want the entire economy to implode?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, he is asking for a safe place to put his money. Growth wasn't part of it.

      Laissez-faire capitalism doesn't take control and abuse into account, that's the problem.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by geekoid · · Score: 1, Informative

      And if you 'fail because some large corporation lied? Oh too bad the powerful men stepped on you.
      Or they dump all there waste into the water? or take you land so they can have their railroad, or any number of actual real world examples.

      " ruthless objectivist world "
      ah, and there we have a another person who didn't read her entire philosophy.
      Explain to me how you could even have a chance to succeed of large mega corporation controlled everything? hmm? We are talking EITC + Robber barons and turning them up to 11.

      Ayn Rand state that corporation would take care of the people. Do you REALLY believe that? DO you really think BP would have made any effort beyond capping if the government didn't have regulation and forced them to take responsibility for their fuck up?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Quila · · Score: 2

      Would you rather a few fat cats to get away, or do you want the entire economy to implode?

      The economy wouldn't have imploded, but it would have taken a bigger short-term hit. But by softening the hit, we've prevented a truly healthy rebound. The market needed to correct, but we didn't allow it to do so, and we incurred tremendous debt in the process. We got screwed twice just so politicians can get reelected.

    22. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that but I'd love to see what some libertarians think about it. Of course they'll never admit that monopolies could be a problem even if they'd form in an unregulated marketplace, which they totally wouldn't.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1

      The link actually does have some excellent points. Most people genuinely don't want violence, and certainly there IS a lot of doublespeak to soften the reality of topics such as war. Why else do we describe people as "fallen soldiers"? Surely no one actually believes that the cause of death was tripping and falling. Highlighting the skewing of political speech is perfectly reasonable.

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
    24. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      The most extreme extension of this is "the gun in the room," an argument that literally boils down to insisting that there is no subject that's not state coercion, and that nothing else can be discussed or spoken of until libertarian ideals are implemented in their entirety. (Courtesy note: As soon as someone does this, if at all possible leave and never speak to them again. There is no meaningful discussion to be had with anyone who uses this)

      Ironically, when pressed to state what legitimate function government has - the Objectivist response is basically "guns" - a military to protect the borders, and internal police to use (ultimately) deadly force to protect private property.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    25. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Yes, highlighting the skewing of political speech is reasonable - that's not what "the gun in the room" does, remotely. It's taking complex concepts, filtering them explicitly through the speaker's viewpoint, taking them to an unreasonable extreme, and then refusing to budge from the resulting absurd reductionism. It IS a skewing of political speech.

      Also, I'm sorry, but your "fallen soldiers" example is pretty bad - it's an alternate meaning of fallen - no one is actually interpreting it as anything other than "killed." One can argue that it's a positively connoted word; but there aren't really neutral words, and it's not deceptive in any sense; not like, say, telling someone who supports the local teacher's union that they're a jackbooted thug with a knife to your throat.

    26. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And they all get silent and mumbly when you ask how those guns get funded.

      BTW - I

    27. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Ahem. The end of that was "I love your sig"

    28. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      A safety deposit box would do perfectly then.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    29. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      You should receive 0.00000001% of the blame and resulting judgments.

      You think that the people that had pension's through Enron should have had not only their retirement wiped out but also seize more money from them since their pensions would not cover the huge amount of debt Enron racked up?

      "Unless you think that the ability to gather is a special privilege granted by the government your argument has a huge flaw." BY pooling that many resource, it does give corporation undo influence over the government.

      So you think Unions, are a bad thing them? The only reason corporations and unions have undo influence is because our elected officials have no morals, if our politicians were not for sale corporations would not have as much influence.

      . Corporation ran amok in England then. When a system emerges to remove responsibility from the owners, why would they act responsible?

      The corporation will have its assets seized and charge any individuals responsible for wrong doing criminally, not going after a shareholder's personal assets if the company they they invested in doesn't have enough assets.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    30. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      The most extreme extension of this is "the gun in the room," an argument that literally boils down to insisting that there is no subject that's not state coercion, and that nothing else can be discussed or spoken of until libertarian ideals are implemented in their entirety. (Courtesy note: As soon as someone does this, if at all possible leave and never speak to them again. There is no meaningful discussion to be had with anyone who uses this)

      Ironically, when pressed to explain what legitimate function government does have the answer boils down to just "guns" - a military to protect the borders, and police to protect the sanctity of private property.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    31. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, the triggering factor to the subprime collapse was government regulation meant to force lenders to give morgtages to people who would normally be rejected due to their financial situation (hence, "subprime")

      This is the biggest lie of the right regarding the housing meltdown. CRA didn't force lenders to lend to high-risk borrowers, it enabled them to lend in a predatory fashion.The financiers had a fucking field day repackaging and trading on subprime mortgages, profiting hugely in the process and knowing that they would not be left holding the cards.

      "Of course you can afford a house, ma'am, just sign here - we'll take care of everything."

      Surprise! We no longer hold your mortgage. We chopped it up and sold it to a bunch of suckers by bribing the government to slap a 'AAA' rating on that crap. Don't come crying to us - just get your shit packed by Saturday and get out!

    32. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by Quila · · Score: 1

      CRA didn't force lenders to lend to high-risk borrowers, it enabled them to lend in a predatory fashion.

      You're right, forced isn't the right word. Created an environment that encouraged it is more like it. But then there was the pressure from the government to stop the practice of redlining (not lending in high-risk areas).

      n.The financiers had a fucking field day repackaging and trading on subprime mortgages

      That's another one, the government making Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac take on more risky investments.

      The lie of the left here is that government social intervention had no bearing on the housing crash. They don't want to admit that their meddling always has negative unintended consequences, because otherwise people would try to stop the meddling they're doing right now. The real lie of the right is that they do meddling too, just for their own pet causes. Libertarians are outside that mess, just wanting the meddling on both sides to cease.

    33. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      (forcing them to loan to subprime borrowers)

      That program worked better than expected. What, are you all pissed niggers managed to own some land?

    34. Re:Liberty is supposed to come with accountability by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that when you regulate you create an environment which, over time, allows these large corporations to come to being within it. It also creates its own equilibrium. You can't de-regulate quickly and expect the system to simply right itself overnight, as the system didn't come into being overnight.

      That's the problem with thinking deregulation would fix everything, and then soon after blaming deregulation for all the problems and clamoring for the immediate return of regulation. The problem is, if the process isn't carefully managed, those in the market will sweep in and make full use of the vacuum to create dubious deals. Even *that* is not a problem if, as you would expect, it all comes crashing down and the business fails. In a deregulated market, banks will fail, but others will succeed. Those that succeed will be the ones who can maintain a healthy business. Those that fail will be the ones that try and act like short term raiders.

      Perhaps we had no choice, but we reached a point where the rubber met the road with bad banks and did the opposite of what was needed to get the financial sector back to a healthy state without the regulation: we bailed them out. Now, you may as well re-regulate, but bear this in mind: the big, evil financial corporations that are sucking the life out of the economy almost had to either shape up or meet oblivion. Now, they don't need to. Yes, regulation will keep them from going bezerk, but it will resume slowly stagnating the system the way it was doing before we de-regulated. Bad companies will get put back on life support and you can kiss innovation good-bye.

  210. They're Made out of Meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're Made out of Meat - Terry Bisson

    1. Re:They're Made out of Meat by Lotana · · Score: 1

      "Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the Universe would be if one were all alone ..."

      Very nice short story and almost humorous in its execution. It is mandatory to provide a link to the author's page where he has the whole story available:

      http://www.terrybisson.com/page6/page6.html/

  211. Asimov? by thejuliano · · Score: 1

    I'd have to go for "The Ugly Little Boy" by Asimov (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ugly_Little_Boy). It's sad in an unexpected way for a Sci-Fi story that's not easily forgotten. Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 are also good choices, but I wanted to add something unique.

  212. Sky Crawlers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just finished reading Sky Crawlers. It's a beautifully crafted film (really not for kids, despite being anime), but I just feel depressed after watching it.

    1. Re:Sky Crawlers by Lotana · · Score: 1

      If you want to talk anime, the most depressing one I have ever seen is: Grave of the Fireflies

      It isn't science fiction though, so perhaps does not meet the requirements.

    2. Re:Sky Crawlers by bobamu · · Score: 1

      Sky Crawlers is positively cheerful compared to Saikano

  213. The Sheep Look Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very depressing book, could not finish it.

    1. Re:The sheep look up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      answering to myself: yeah, quadrilogy as in four books, "on the shockwave" is "the shockwave rider", my bad !

  214. Spoiler. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Stranger in a Strange land was also pretty depressing.

    Then, you didn't finish it. When you get to the end, you find out it was actually pretty boring. The whole thing is basically mock-religious award bait with a scifi book jacket.

    Let me spoil the ending for you:

    It turns out he's Jesus. It turns out everybody is Jesus.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Spoiler. by neyla · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, it turns out there should be a lot of orgies - it tends to turn out that way in Heinleins books, particularly the books he wrote as a older guy - in those books it turns out the world would be a better place if hot young women would have more orgies with old guys.

    2. Re:Spoiler. by The+Rizz · · Score: 4, Funny

      it turns out the world would be a better place if hot young women would have more orgies with old guys.

      I don't agree that would make the world a better place, but ask me again in a few years and I might have changed my mind...

    3. Re:Spoiler. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      As an increasingly older guy, I'm OK with this.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    4. Re:Spoiler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I've never understood is ubiquitous sex making people passive. On the few occasions I've scored I've been more mentally alert, socially and professionally active, and emotionally independent for weeks. Very hard to push down by government or anything.

      On the other hand the effects of prolonged sexlessness... well, this is Slashdot, we all know them!

    5. Re:Spoiler. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Goes well with your handle, too, CreatureComfort!

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    6. Re:Spoiler. by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      As an old guy I'd be willing to give it a shot, just as a social experiment, mind. We need data points.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    7. Re:Spoiler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an old guy, I couldn't agree more~

      Except Heinlein wanted orgies with his own clones.

    8. Re:Spoiler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it turns out there should be a lot of orgies - it tends to turn out that way in Heinleins books, particularly the books he wrote as a older guy - in those books it turns out the world would be a better place if hot young women would have more orgies with old guys.

      Works for me.

    9. Re:Spoiler. by overmod · · Score: 1

      The only problem with the later Heinlein women is that they always seem to be 'smelling pretty whiff' and needing to take baths all the time... puts a damper on the orgy bit.

    10. Re:Spoiler. by neyla · · Score: 1

      Joke is old, let it rest. The average slashdotter is in his/her thirties and married, myself I've got 3 kids and have been sexually active since I was 15. Nerds aren't as different from non-nerds as you'd think.

      Anyways, having your need for sex and intimacy met does tend to make you calmer, more focused, less frustrated, happier and less aggressive.

      Heinleins views on sex are hopelessly naive and adolescent, he basically never grew up. His idea of "nests" for example in Stranger in a strange land, essentially group-marriages. He assumes everyone would just get along, there'd be no internal power-plays, no jealousy, no preference, no cliques, no abuse of power - basically nothing human. Yes he handwaves a new religion to explain it, but a new religion doesn't instantly undo a million years of evolutionary adaption.

      Basically, it's a teenage-fantasy-sex, and not mature sex. Not nessecarily much wrong with that, but as you yourself mature, you start to see trough it and see it as shallow and ridicolous, perhaps good for a laugh, but not something that tells you anything useful about real adult human beings and their sexlives.

    11. Re:Spoiler. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it turns out the world would be a better place if hot young women would have more orgies with old guys.

      I don't agree that would make the world a better place, but ask me again in a few years and I might have changed my mind...

      I think we should also have hot young guys with older women

    12. Re:Spoiler. by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      Heinleins views on sex are hopelessly naive and adolescent, he basically never grew up. His idea of "nests" for example in Stranger in a strange land, essentially group-marriages. He assumes everyone would just get along, there'd be no internal power-plays, no jealousy, no preference, no cliques, no abuse of power - basically nothing human. Yes he handwaves a new religion to explain it, but a new religion doesn't instantly undo a million years of evolutionary adaption.

      Is not the point of sci-fi to explore what would be possible if we weren't constrained by the bounds of reality? Like what could life be like if human beings could overcome their own greed, selfishness, and pointless jealousy? It's one thing to call him offbase. On the other hand, you could call humanity in general flawed rather than to claim he's an immature loon. Or do you really find jealousy logical?

    13. Re:Spoiler. by neyla · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi is free to relax bonds. Usually it's best when it relaxes *one* or at most a *few* bonds, while keeping the rest as consistent as possible with known reality, relaxing all bonds just results in a world that makes absolutely no sense since anything can happen at any point for any reason at all (or for no reason).

      The humanity in SIASL is clearly the same one we're having, in the entire first 75% of the book, everyone behaves like human beings do. The thing that *is* purposefully relaxed in the book is the existence of a human brought up by aliens with alien culture, and magical abilities thrown in to make it harder to dismiss him as "yet another prophet".

      It's not a problem if sci-fi is inconsistent with the real world we know in a few specific ways. But this is more a case of being inconsistent with *itself*.

  215. Total Eclipse by John Brunner by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Total bummer ending. Most downer sci fi book that I can remember reading.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  216. I think it went: by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

    SCO Group Files For Chapter 7

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  217. Light of Other Days by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

    "Light of Other Days" by Bob Shaw. The concept of slow glass was excellent science fiction, while the story line was heartbreakingly sad. I read this in an excellent collection which included Godwin's "The Cold Equations" mentioned earlier, as well as the great Asimov story "Nightfall."

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
  218. Stanislaw Lem by EricThribb · · Score: 1

    Most of his books - His Masters Voice on the failure of science, Solaris for just being Solaris - The Tarkovsky film version managed to be even more bleak than the book (I choose to deny the existence of the later George Clooney version)

  219. Re:Where are the John Varley books and short stori by flogger · · Score: 1

    Yup, that's about the most depressing thing out there.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  220. The sheep look up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By John Brunner. And in general the associated quadrilogy ("on the shockwave", "stand on Zanzibar", "the shockwave rider", "the jagged orbit" and "the sheep look up").
    Love them, but definitely depressing.

  221. ( Billion by rossdee · · Score: 1

    The 9 Billion Names of God (A C Clarke)

  222. Running Man by Cogline · · Score: 2

    Running Man by Richard Bachman (Steven King). Not like the movie at all--no mass market appeal. But the development of the main character and ending left me dazed for days.

  223. A boy and his dog. by The+Shootist · · Score: 1

    A boy and his dog.

  224. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK obviously not science fiction. But I remember reading "Civilization and its Discontents" for a philosophy class in college (basically, Freud's theory is that all of civilization is a massive defensive adjustment to control man's chaotic sexual impulses) and thinking, this must be the last important book ever written.

  225. In The House of the Worm by George R R Martin by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    In the House of the Worm takes place in a far future where the few people left live in enclosed stone fortresses in a vast desert. They live on worms and bugs caught in the underground catacombs. They never leave the stone fortress, have no knowledge of anything outside or underground. The entire story reeks of decay and a slow death of the human race without any awareness of what they once were or what is happening.

    Very depressing.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  226. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

    1984 and/ or Soylent Green. The movie was so depressing. Would never bother to read the book. Was there an actual novel ?

    "Make Room! Make Room!" by Harry Harrison.

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  227. Most Depressing Sci-Fi by Amphibious_Tank · · Score: 1

    A Canticle for Liebowitz

  228. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by incy_webb · · Score: 2

    Yep. "make room! make room!" by HH and "with folded hands" by Jack Williamson.

  229. rooting for Winston?? hahaha very funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were rooting for Winston? I'm going to put the same question to you then that O'Brien put to Winston:
    Paraphrasing, I don't have the exact words, so I'll ask in my own words

    What makes you think the proles will ever overturn our rule?

    We have been farming you for millenia, but the fruit we are after is not your meat. We want your tears, we want
    your screams and your wails for those are the things that delight us. From the beginning, we have allowed your
    numbers to swell and gave you cities to despair and sicken in, and we have torn these same cities and empires
    down whenever it pleased us and built anew and razed over and over through all time. You are all sacrifices
    and there is nothing new under the sun and no recent atrocity you may have become aware of, that wasn't visited
    on your kind thousands of times before.

    For who controls the past controls the future, and who controls the present controls the past. The future is
    indeed a boot crushing a man's face. You see we have been controlling your present for such a _very_ long
    time.

    There was no hope for Winston from the outset, just as there was no hope for the cow you ate last night.
    For you as well, for you there is certainty, but with certainty no hope.

  230. We All Died At Breakaway Station, Richard Meredith by PatMcGee · · Score: 1

    Title pretty much sums up the plot. One of my favorite books when I'm in a really dark mood.

  231. Never let me go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Kazuo Ishiguro. You might not have heard of him as he's not really a SF writer, but this particular novel is a SF dystopia that is pretty good and oddly disturbing / depressing.

  232. The men in the jungle by jasontheking · · Score: 1

    The men in the jungle , by Norman Spinrad.

    About 20 pages in, the hero of the story eats baby meat. And it just gets worse from there. a bunch of humans stuck on a planet with nothing to eat, devolves into a place that you just try and expunge from records, in the hope that noone goes there.

  233. Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chapterhouse: Dune

  234. SciFi / Fantasy mix by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    There is a genre known as "fantasy" which somehow is mixed-up with some element from "scifi" and then marketed as "scifi"

    I find those being the most dull - If I want to read scifi I do not need to read a story about "Ghengis Khan" or "Middle Age Worlds" with horse riding knights and all, with spaceships

    It's dull, it's uninteresting, it's stupid, and totally un-entertaining
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  235. Star Wars Episodes 1, 2, and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely a tragedy... I heard there was a movie, but I don't believe that anyone would have wasted their time on such terrible fan fiction

  236. Earth Abides by Fizzol · · Score: 1

    The world goes from a functional civilization to tiny tribes of people speaking different languages and worshiping different gods in the space of one generation. No science, culture, art, or knowledge beyond what's needed by a hunter-gatherer society survives.

  237. The Liberation of Earth? by guinsu · · Score: 1

    Probably not the most depressing, but a downer underneath all the snark nonetheless.

  238. Dogfight by Gibson and Swanwick by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The short story "Dogfight" from the Burning Chrome collection has a young street criminal discover that he has a talent that could bring him a legitimate source of income and friends.

    Since it's my answer to the title question, you can guess that it doesn't end well. The whole story's online here and a couple of other places.

  239. L. Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health

    That's got to be the most depressing book ever, in any genre!

  240. Self Revelation... by ZephyrQ · · Score: 1

    Does the fact that I've read and enjoyed the endings of most of the books listed here make me a depressive person?

    Oh, wait, I've been married 21 years...

  241. "We Who Are About To..." - Joanna Russs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We Who Are About To..." - Joanna Russs

    Whip-smart feminist science fiction author from the '70s (deserves a wider audience). A good writer. This book is super-depressing. Can't really describe how w/out giving things away. But I've read every book listed so far, and this one is definitely in the running.

    1. Re:"We Who Are About To..." - Joanna Russs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always doubt it when people say they can't describe a book without giving the ending away. 99 times out 100 they are just really bad at giving a good overview of the book. However in this case I believe my esteemed equal is pretty spot on. I am posting AC because I'm going to give things away, courtesy of wikipedia...

      Yes that's right, spoiler follows.

      "A group of people, with no technical skills and scant supplies, are stranded on a planet and debate how to survive. The other colonists want to found a new colony from scratch. However, the female protagonist kills everyone but herself. Eventually, she kills herself too."

      Women. Can't live without them, can't survive their strange murderous desires in hard survival situations. This is what passed for feminist scifi? Kill everyone? Geez. No wonder feminism got a bad rep.

  242. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by MaxiCat_42 · · Score: 1

    Similar to that was "The Sheep Look Up" by John Brunner. Oh, and most of the stuff by Ursula La Guin.

    Phil.

  243. The Sheep Look Up / Cancer Ward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up - very depressing dystopian Sci-Fi. Most depressing book ever though for me was Solzhenitsyn's Cancer Ward. A men's cancer ward. In the 1950's. Int he Soviet Union. In Soviet Central Asia. Talk about stacking the decks.

  244. depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The forge of god by Greg Bear.

    I kept expecting it to have a happy ending, but no.

  245. The Late, Great Planet Earth by whitefox · · Score: 1

    "The Late, Great Lanet Earth" by Hal Lindsey.

  246. Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short, the collapse of society as engineered by a brilliant, emotionally conflicted genetic engineer. Quite chilling, left me thinking more than any recent book, but it could have been that I was lonely at the time.

  247. Lords of the Starship by Thyrsus · · Score: 1

    Mark Geston,criticizing technology worship. The cover blurb:

    "The ship was to be seven miles long, a third of a mile in diameter and have a wing-spread of three and a half miles. It would take two and a half centuries to construct. Its announced purpose: to carry humanity away from its ruined world, from the world that had become a perpetual purgatory.

    To build this vast ship would require the undivided activity of an entire nation and would mean carrying out a ruthless program of war and conquest, of annihilation and reconstruction, and of education and rediscovery.

    But was this starship really what it was claimed to be? Or was there a greater secret behind its incredible cost -- a secret so strange that no man dared reveal it?"

  248. Culture Series by Iain Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the culture series that I have read (I only read 5 books so far) have pretty interesting and sad/unexpected endings. I found first book Consider Phlebas to be really good, and particularly depressing.

  249. Warhammer 40,000 by ZeroSerenity · · Score: 1

    In the future, there is only war. Take away the awesome Space Marines and even the Imperial Guard and you get the most depressing warmachine ever concieved to fiction. 1,000 Psykers sacrificed every day to keep the Emperor "alive", weapons cannot be made anymore, engineering has been replaced by religious rites and invention is all but gone in religion to the Emperor. That's real depressing.

    --
    For those who seek perfection there can be no rest on this side of the grave.
  250. Scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ridiculously funny, and depressing that people actually believe it.

  251. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1984 and/ or Soylent Green. The movie was so depressing. Would never bother to read the book. Was there an actual novel ?

    "Make Room! Make Room!" by Harry Harrison.

    Which was more depressing than Soylent Green, at least the film had solved the 'how do we feed the increasing population?' issue, the book just painted the picture 'we're fucked..'

  252. Ayn Rand's Manifesto for Psychopaths by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, Rand's destructive philosophy urges people to live the life of a psychopath. Here is a quote from George Monbiot in the Guardian:

    ...Her psychopathic ideas made billionaires feel like victims and turned millions of followers into their doormats...

    It has a fair claim to be the ugliest philosophy the postwar world has produced. Selfishness, it contends, is good, altruism evil, empathy and compassion are irrational and destructive. The poor deserve to die; the rich deserve unmediated power. It has already been tested, and has failed spectacularly and catastrophically. Yet the belief system constructed by Ayn Rand, who died 30 years ago today, has never been more popular or influential.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    1. Re:Ayn Rand's Manifesto for Psychopaths by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Selfishness, it contends, is good, altruism evil, empathy and compassion are irrational and destructive.

      In truth, this isn't actually what Rand's philosophy is about. The book does show numerous examples of empathy and compassion - the catch is that they are only directed at certain people who have specifically earned them by virtue of being of importance to the one directing them.

  253. The Harvest by Robert Charles Wilson by arashi+sohaku · · Score: 1

    When I finished reading this book, I was pretty down for a few days. Even now, 20 years later, it brings on a touch of melancholy. I enjoy Wilson's work (Chronoliths was good), but this one fits the bill for the topic.

    --
    No .sig for me, I'm trying to quit.
  254. To her credit by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    she required a lot of convincing to take aid late in life, and left alone she probably would have died in a gutter. Literally. Her friends intervened and convinced her to accept what help there was. That's sort of the trouble with people like Ayn. Very low self esteem, they feel they deserve what they get, and in their favored economic systems that's less than nothing unless you're 1%...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  255. Good point with Lem - eg. Solaris by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Solaris - no matter how hard we try and how hard the alien with godlike powers tries the differences are so huge that there is no clue how to communicate even after more than a century.

  256. Have two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say the two most depressing I have read are "The Alien Years" by Robert Silverburg and "Xenogenesis" by Octavia E. Butler.

    In "The Alien Years" we are invaded, and have no clue why or what they want. All we know is that they aren't doing what we would consider conquering us.

    In "Xenogenesis" we are saved from ourselves by rescuing what is left of humanity after a nuclear war. But those that have survived aren't going to simply be returned to the world the aliens have spent so much time and energy cleaning up.

    Both are great reads.

  257. I must read darker shelves... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    "Revelation Space" series by Alastair Reynolds.

    Make Room, Make Room! -Harry Harrison (You know this book by the movie title: Soylent Green)

    Ursula K. Le Guin:
    The Lathe of Heaven
    The Dispossessed -

    And of course, HP Lovecraft:

    Herbert West, Re-animator.
    The Whisperer in Darkness
    Shadow out of Time
    The Colour out of Space

    Someone mentioned Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delany...

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  258. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by dbIII · · Score: 1

    not fucking fiction

    Well that cuts out Anne Rice then.

  259. Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect by LordofEntropy · · Score: 1

    Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect. Also, Beggars in Spain.

    --
    Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
  260. (off topic) it's not science fiction by milkmage · · Score: 1

    it's actually science fact (which makes it that much more depressing).. brilliant book, but I felt like utter shit when I read the last chapter. humans fucking up the world..

    (watching the Curiosity landing the other night restored a little faith)

    A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Short_History_of_Nearly_Everything

    buy a copy - the illustrated version is handy - every time you pick it up you'll learn something new.

  261. Ray Bradbury's "All Summer in a Day" by Dialecticus · · Score: 1

    My vote is for All Summer in a Day , a depressing little tale by Ray Bradbury. I first encountered this short story when I was a kid, and it really messed me up.

  262. Count Geiger's Blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.amazon.com/Count-Geigers-Blues-A-Comedy/dp/0312890087

    Way to take every boy's dream of becoming a superhero and throw a cold bucket of reality on it.

  263. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Audacity of Hope

  264. Banks, Egan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use of Weapons was very very sad
    Permutation City endlessly depressing
    Jem I wouldn't ever read based on the premise alone a few amazon reviews I just browsed through

  265. Ray Bradbury's "All Summer In A Day". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it 30 years ago, it still haunts me. Here's the wikipedia synopsis (spoiler):

    The story is about a class of school children on Venus, which in this story is a world of constant rainstorms, where the sun is only visible for two hours every seven years.

    One of the children, Margot, moved to Venus from Earth five years earlier, and she is the only one in her class to remember sunshine, since it shone regularly on earth. She describes the sun as "a penny", or "like a fire in the stove", and the other children, being too young to have ever seen it themselves, refuse to believe her accounting of it. Out of jealousy, she is bullied and ostracized by the other students and finally locked in a closet during the time the sun is due to come out.

    As the sun is about to appear, their teacher arrives to take the class outside to enjoy their only hour of sunshine, and in their astonishment and joy, they all forget about Margot. They run, play, skip, jump, and prance about, savoring every second of their newly found freedom. "It's much better than sun lamps!" one of them cries.

    Suddenly, a girl feels a raindrop on her. Thunder sounds, and they run back inside. Then, one of them remembers Margot, who is still locked in the closet. They stand frozen ashamed for what they have done, unable to "meet each other's glances."

    The precious sun has come and gone, and because of their despicable act, Margot has missed it. They walk slowly and silently towards the closet, and let her out.

  266. Nightfall anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not THE most depressing sci-fi I've read (I'd put 1984 on the top), but it was short, powerful story that deserves to be remembered. And as a curiosity, IIRC, Isaac Asimov was granted a raise in his pay from Astounding Science Fiction magazine because of it. After that he started to get the maximum value John Campbell payed for a story.

    1. Re:Nightfall anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one I was thinking of, but I haven't read the novel yet to see if it cheapens the experience at all. The short by itself was an amazing work with a daring abrupt ending.

  267. My nomination by rworne · · Score: 1

    The book "The Killing Star" by Charles R. Pellegrino and George Zebrowski.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_Star

    One of those "first contact" novels, where "first contact" is by relativistic weapons slamming into Earth wiping out every living thing. All to the tune of Michael Jackson's "We are the World" warbling over every RF frequency.

    The aliens then go on a hunt chasing down any last remaining vestige of human society, with possibly the last breeding air of humans captured and kept as zoo specimens.

    And there's even more to the ending, and it's depressing too.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  268. Tom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bergeron

  269. Louis Sachar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if this counts as a SF novel or not, but The Giver depressed the hell out of me

  270. VALIS Trilogy by Philip K Dick by jt_woody · · Score: 1

    And most of Dick's other stuff is pretty depressing too ( A Scanner Darkly, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? etc) ...

  271. Me too by rve · · Score: 1

    The Road

    I endorse this choice

    I regret watching the movie after reading the book. I had pretty high expectations because the big screen version of 'no country for old men' turned out so good... ah well.

  272. Huddling Place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddling_Place

    People stop communicating with other people in person (preferring via telescreen), develop Agoraphobia, senseless death.
    See also: Social Media

  273. Going for Obscurity by Agripa · · Score: 1

    I always have difficulty reading through the descriptions of culture that I personally experienced knowing that it was all senselessly destroyed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Next_Door

  274. Nutrition Labels... by stoicfaux · · Score: 0

    Nutrition labels on processed and fast food read like science fiction and have pretty depressing effects given what they do to a human body. That people continue to eat such "food" as their primary source of calories is just gravy.

  275. There are two kinds of Ayn Rand by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    The one that inspires brave fiscal visionaries who have given us today's economy, and the other that sends a pal to collect her welfare cheque.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  276. Benford's Galactic Center Saga by wmorrow · · Score: 1

    It just goes on and on with the relentless conflict..

  277. Dénis Lindbohm and P.C. Jersild by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    P.C. Jersild, "After the Flood" and Dénis Lindbohm "The Roots of Doom", "The Bewinger" are two of the most depressing authors I have been reading.

    On a side note - I have actually performed computer support to P.C. Jersild when he lost his book on his computer once.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  278. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grave of the Fireflies is just the plan saddest and most moving anime/film period.

    Damn you, you would have to mention it. Even thinking about that film causes me to well up, and I've only ever watched it once, about three years ago..

    no matter how dystopian SF writers get, they'll have to go some to truly equal how fucked up we've *really* been

  279. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piers Anthony was a huge pedophile. Nearly every story included a nubile young man lusting after nubile young females, and even some of the titles were terrible (The Color of Her Panties). I liked some of his books until I was old enough to realize he was a pedo.

  280. John Updike : Toward the End of Time by lightyear4 · · Score: 1

    Though Updike is rarely considered in this genre, his "Toward the End of Time" is very much sci-fi and without question rather dark. It's a story of mortality and decline, set in a post-apocalyptic environment in the near future, following a nuclear war. The US has fallen into anarchy; men are no longer able to reach orbit. No grey goo, but nanotech run amok.

  281. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the comments here are related to sci-fi stories, sorry to spoil your rant.

    But I do take issue with this statement from the summary:
    "Usually sci-fi provides adventure with happy endings for everyone"

    Bullshit. Sci-Fi does not require adventure, and often does not include it at all, but it does usually have somewhat bleak visions for the future, not "happy endings for everyone". It should be a list of happy sci-fi stories... it'll be a lot shorter.

  282. Most depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Orwell's "B-side" -- Animal Farm.
    The Long Afternoon of Earth

  283. Short story about a future drug-enforcement agent by wormo · · Score: 1

    Read it over 20 years ago in a sci-fi anthology, no idea who the author was or the overall title of the short story collection.

    It began with an agent being sent out to deal with a new street drug that turned people permanently catatonic as its withdrawal symptom. Of course the agent ended up being drugged with a dose of this stuff by the bad guys. At first he thought he'd survived it... until at the end of his life, he woke up from the hallucination. And lived a whole other life. And then woke up... and lived another... and woke up....

    So by the time the drug really wore off, he'd lived so many different lives in his head, he was in a mode where he didn't believe anything anymore and was totally non-responsive and catatonic like all the other victims.

  284. Sci-fi makes everything fun .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you have read enough of it. How can you not be amused by putting a pretty young girl to death in the Cold Equations.

    How can you not enjoy America Nuking itself in the the war against the Chtorr to defeat the alien ecology to find out
    that it just grows faster.

    Or the beautiful drama and pointless achievement of Dogfight in Burning Chrome.

  285. re: Childhood's End by dryo · · Score: 1

    Everyone who said that "Childhood's End" is depressing (including tvtropes.org) is suffering from a profound lack of imagination. The end of civilization as we know it may not be a bad thing if it is replaced with something infinitely better. The author left that part up to our imagination. How one interprets this book speaks volumes about our ability to imagine a better existence. A pessimistic interpretation indicates an inability to conceive of a posthuman future in which consciousness exceeds its current limitations. Isn't the title of the book enough to make the point that humanity is leaving the cradle? Or is growing up a bad thing, and we should all pine for the nostalgic days of infancy?

  286. Directive 51, hands down. by CyberTech · · Score: 1

    Some background.. I read... a lot. 200-300 novels per year.

    When there's a series, I finish it, even if I didn't much like the first. I'll re-read them every year or other year.

    For this book, I won't be reading it again, nor will I buy the 2nd (much less the 3rd) in the series.

    Directive 51 terrified me. The concepts in it are just too close to reality; the political machinations; hell those damn near happen now.

    It's a book about a worldwide biotech attack that renders all petroleum-based products into goo, combined with a nanotech attack that attacks any metal with electricity present. I won't spoil the rest, suffice to say the attack on our modern technological civilization was complete. It was a book that wouldn't leave my head for several weeks.

    --
    -- CyberTech
  287. pk dick's a scanner darkly by 0-9a-zA-Z_.+!*'()123 · · Score: 1

    oddly not the first time I read it, but the re-read really bummed me out.

  288. Almost all work by Stephen Baxter by rooie · · Score: 1

    But especially Titan & Evolution. Books in the Xeelee sequence mostly have negative endings, but at least some humans thrive in it. Read Stephen Baxter sf (not the alternate history novels) when you want a downer. Nice if you're a teenager, but as a grownup (haha) I want some more positive, nicer, books.

    1. Re:Almost all work by Stephen Baxter by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think the Xeelee books tend to be some of his more upbeat works. They tend to have a human doing something clever and saving the day, even if that means they're just one step closer to the Xeelee putting them away in a box.

    2. Re:Almost all work by Stephen Baxter by rooie · · Score: 1

      But in the end humans still loose. I can't see anything more depressing than doing clever things AND saving the day, and that that is pointless in the end.

  289. The Gods Themselves by locofungus · · Score: 1

    I know it has a happy ending but the mad desperate dash to suicide and the unwillingness to accept that cheap, plentiful energy might power the economy now but can destroy the world later mirrors so closely our addiction to oil and our willingness to spend trillions defending our sources of oil but only spend peanuts researching alternatives.

    Tim.

    --
    God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  290. Most Depressing and Most Horrifying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream ~ Harlan Ellison. By far the scariest (and depressing) SciFi ... EVER!

  291. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by houghi · · Score: 1

    Sure that was depressing. However I was really depressed when I read I am legend. How can the writer get the movie so wrong?

    I mean come on. The movie had a completely different ending.

    Doesn't the writer watch its own movies? Luckily there are things to protect the copyright holder and if I was the copyright holder, I would sue Richard Matheson for clear copyright violation and theft or even rape of a great story by Will Smith.

    Because of this, I think we must give movie companies more power. They clearly have not enough to say in the copyright matter.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  292. Evidence abounds by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Heroes" who single-handedly guided and caused progress by act of their sheer will and ingenuity, pretty much regardless of the environment, and in fact often directly against it. That is essentially what the book is all about. The problem, again, is that there's no evidence really backing that premise.

    Are you serious?

    The history we learn is chock full of such people. Joan of Arc, Einstein, Roosevelt, Churchill, Steve Jobs, Darwin, etc. etc. etc.

    The list is endless. There are countless individuals who have affected how the whole world turns, for better or worse... in fact if anything history shows us progress does not really happen until such people come along, because otherwise the world simply sits forever in a plodding state of status quo, or in fact slips backward into chaos.

    The other oft repeated mistake is that such "selfish altruism" is solely a product of rational thought in the first place.

    Of course it's not, but the innate sense of wrong is not powerful enough to really stop people from doing the wrong thing. It's only discipline to reinforce that natural instinct that makes it powerful enough a force to have real impact.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Evidence abounds by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      The history we learn is chock full of such people. Joan of Arc, Einstein, Roosevelt, Churchill, Steve Jobs, Darwin, etc. etc. etc.

      How exactly do you know that those people have really "moved the world" by their sheer will, rather than being flesh and blood manifestations of the coming change, suffered by society as a whole that spawned them - zeitgeist, if you want? Their existence doesn't really prove anything by itself.

      in fact if anything history shows us progress does not really happen until such people come along, because otherwise the world simply sits forever in a plodding state of status quo, or in fact slips backward into chaos.

      Can you give an example of such 'status quo' or 'slipping backwards into chaos', and demonstrate how either happened specifically because such people didn't come along? Or perhaps they didn't come along precisely because the society at the time was not able to foster such people?

      the innate sense of wrong is not powerful enough to really stop people from doing the wrong thing

      It is, actually, otherwise various small-scale experiments in anarchy, or other schemes that seemingly are inherently flawed due to tradegy of the commons (e.g. Mincome) wouldn't be so successful. Most people will in fact do the right thing when left to their devices. The reason why we need laws and governments is because the minority of people will cause harm, and that harm is disproportionately affecting all of us. In a sense, anarchy is tyranny of the (armed and willing to use said arms) minority.

    2. Re:Evidence abounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The history we learn is chock full of such people. Joan of Arc, Einstein, Roosevelt, Churchill, Steve Jobs, Darwin, etc. etc. etc.

      Your "choke full" and "endless" list is actually nothing compared to the millions/billions of the rest of the human population at their respective times. History calls them "heroes" partly because they are exceptional and rare.

      Mind you, some, perhaps many, of the people on that list would be political leaders - part of the freedom-interfering government that Randeans are so against, who cared for a whole state/nation/large terriroty, which is usually much more than ~200 people at a time, contrary to the notion that people can only care for people close to them.

    3. Re:Evidence abounds by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Any exactly none of the people you mention "caused progress by act of their sheer will and ingenuity, pretty much regardless of the environment, and in fact often directly against it", they were all deeply embedded in their times, and brought about their advances either by building on the works of others, or engaging other people, and most definitely not being absolute independent individualists (the mix differs form person to person, the accomplishments of Einstein being quite different from Churchill).

      There are no real world equivalents of Rand's fantasy figures.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  293. Vilcabamba by owlman17 · · Score: 1

    Vilcabamba by Harry Turtledove.

    It's a short, good read. Made me think for days. It's analogous to the Europeans finishing the conquest over South American Indians.

    "The story is set sometime in the 21st century, 50 years after an alien race called the Krolp conquered and occupied much of planet Earth. The story is told from the perspective of President of the United States, Harris Moffatt III, who rules a rump United States and Canada that runs along the Rocky Mountains. Moffat's father and grandfather were also presidents."

    The online text is here.

  294. The Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE MACHINE (Industrial Edition Re-edit)

    Odd, weird, fits the bill and is wonderful.

  295. Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memoirs found in a Bathtub, it just keeps resonating with my life...

  296. Also Rans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Memoirs found in a Bathtub ~ Stanislaw Lem
    The Futurelogical Congress ~ Stanislaw Lem
    Scanners Live in Vain ~ Cordwainer Smith (do read the Instrumentality of Mankind!)
    The High Castle ~ Phillip K. Dick (and just about anything by him)

    1. Re:Also Rans... by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      The High Castle ~ Phillip K. Dick (and just about anything by him)

      That's "The Man in The High Castle". I didn't find that too depressing.

    2. Re:Also Rans... by mark_elf · · Score: 1

      Had to search this thread pretty far to find mention of Cordwainer Smith. The short stories. I like his novel "Norstrilia", but it's an acquired taste. Think I'll break out some C'Mell tonight.

  297. Watch more nature shows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is in fact in our evolved nature, and in our "unmediated" self-interest to "injure, enslave, rob or murder others"

    If you don't see that unbridled capitalism/liberterianism/whateverism leads to the oppression of the weak by the strong, well, you simply arent't paying attention.

  298. The Giving Tree by matunos · · Score: 1

    Everyone else is over-thinking this.

    1. Re:The Giving Tree by matunos · · Score: 1

      Oh, as it's sci-fi cause it has a talking tree.

      (But really I'd say The Handmaid's Tale, but the epilogue offers some redemption.)

  299. The converse is not true by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    this society created free individuals

    Absurd, free individuals exist DESPITE society, not because of it. Society as a whole acts as a force of conformism.

    A free individual without society is a solitary animal, not a creator.

    Also absurd, a single individual alone can be a creator. Would not a sole man trapped on an island building a raft be a creator?

    The creator is anyone who can take whatever is around him/her and shape it into something greater than what it was.

    Society is irrelevant, except to the extant that it tries to stop them.

    The source of you confusion is that one of the things people can shape is society itself, and there you "need" society to the same extent the man building a raft needs wood. Society is simply the raw material of creation, but you should never think that society was the reason for existence of the one who would seek to shape it... it's being worked because it is there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The converse is not true by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Absurd, free individuals exist DESPITE society, not because of it.

      And your proof for that is?

      Also absurd, a single individual alone can be a creator. Would not a sole man trapped on an island building a raft be a creator?

      A lone man trapped on an island building a raft relies on his past experiences and training he obtained from the world at large - that's how he knows how to build one. Furthermore, he builds one to rejoin the society he was separated from. A lone man on an island who was taken there at birth wouldn't want to build one, nor would he know how to. In fact, a lone man raised as such is little more than an animal, as natural experiments along those lines (lost human children raised in wilderness etc) show - he'd only be a man in a sense that he'd have a capacity to become one, but it doesn't happen by itself or in a societal vacuum.

  300. Melancholy Elephants by Spider Robinson by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    The premise is a future in which copyright has expanded even further, and they're on the brink of â€oein perpetuity." Along with automated testing for matches within the entire existing corpus of art and music, the race is rapidly approaching the point where all combinations playing to humans are already known and protected. Forever.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  301. Never let me go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never met anyone that did no regret reading it afterwords. Not to mention the readers notes at the end suggesting parallels with today.

  302. Excellent by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It is exactly because of people like you, that 1984 will never come to be...

    You want it too much.

    PS - Kittens! Ha!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  303. I disagree with the premise - What SF is "happy"? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think, virtually all of the SF and fantasy I have read has generally been pretty grim.

    What on earth leads you to think most stories have happy endings in SF? It seems like you have been watching too many movies, where that practice is commonplace. Books? Not so much.

    I mean even Hitchhikers Guide is funny while reading, but the earth is destroyed...

    So what really happy rainbow ending SF is there? It seems a much harder question to answer than "find me something depressing".

    My only answer would be Laumer's Retief stories. And even THAT doesn't count much since Retief never gets credit... but like Hitchhikers, it's amusing to read.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  304. Eastern perspectives by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

    Most of the sci-fi from behind the iron curtain was pretty bleak (and quite deep).

    Roadside Picnic by the Strugatsky brothers and His Masters Voice by Stanislaw Lem are two great examples of that. Highly recommended.

    1. Re:Eastern perspectives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A thread full of 900 comments, and one mention of Roadside Picnic!

      Never sci-fi has such a potent mix of hard science and superlative writing. The English translation is so good, but I can't imagine how good reading this book in original format would be!!

    2. Re:Eastern perspectives by gerddie · · Score: 1

      I didn't feel that Roadside Picknick was depressing, to me the ending felt quite optimistic. Far Rainbow on the other hand ...

  305. High Frequency Trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/08/07/2242245/this-is-what-wall-streets-terrifying-robot-invasion-looks-like

    'nough said ...

  306. What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    Government fiscal reports and plans.

  307. blindsight by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1

    By peter watts is up there. Dysfunctional crew and highly claustrophobic atmosphere in a first contact story that's original and terrifying. Especially the ending, which is a profoundly depressing view of life in the universe.

    And the gap series by Stephen donaldson is hard to beat for relentless abuse of and by just about every character on every page of the series....

  308. "This Is the Way the World Ends" by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

    "This Is the Way the World Ends" by James Morrow. It's a book about the aftermath of a nuclear war.. yeah I know there are lots of those, but this one is so incredibly bleak that it makes Neville Shute's "On The Beach" look upbeat..

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:"This Is the Way the World Ends" by Peter+Amstutz · · Score: 1

      "This Is the Way the World Ends" by James Morrow. It's a book about the aftermath of a nuclear war.. yeah I know there are lots of those, but this one is so incredibly bleak that it makes Neville Shute's "On The Beach" look upbeat..

      This is the book that came to mind as well. In the story humanity is literally put on trial for the crime of nuclear war, prosecuted by the dead and the unborn generations. It is so surreal and dark that it would best be described as a nightmare or panic attack committed to paper.

  309. Off the top of my head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Scanner Darkly by Phillip K. Dick (The afterword made me cry)

    Gateway by Frederick Pohl (The final implications of the book turn the main character on his head)

  310. only one? by BenBoy · · Score: 1

    Ward Moore: Bring the Jubilee, or Greener than you Think. In the latter, the world is brought to an end by a feckless fool, in the former, one man's world is ended when he fouls up a critical historical event and winds up creating an alternate. Tucker's Year of the Quiet Sun, a very lonely ending. Greg Bear's Forge of God gave me actual nightmares over a period of weeks. The utter inevitability of the ending of the world (the Neutronium/Anti-neutronium timer) gave me the notion of what it'd be like to have untreatable cancer.

  311. Not yet mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiasco, by Stanislaw Lem

  312. The Carpet Makers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Andreas Eschbach. The end is simply grandiose and terribly sad. I really encourage you to read it.

  313. A Maze of Stars by John Brunner by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    A Maze of Stars by John Brunner was a bit depressing, although quite good, when I read it. Which, even more depressingly, was 16 years ago...

  314. Incorrect. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    People can care for somewhere under 200 others

    People can TRACK IN THEIR MIND, without external aid such as paper or computers, ~150 to ~230 other people and their mutual relationships.
    It has nothing to do with caring (as in liking) - you keep a mental record of your bullies just as you keep a record of your buddies.

    People care for other beings they find to be sentient. I.e. Things that are like "us".
    Because, when we recognize (consciously or not) that something or someone is in some way "like us" - our brain tells us that IT IS US.
    Brains are crazy like that.

    So, you may not care for whales, or pandas, or people in far off lands, or mentally deranged beggars in the streets or your next door neighbor - until it kicks in that they are like you.
    And it makes no difference if they are 7, 7 billion or 70 billion of them.
    Once your brain realizes the similarity of "them" to "you" and they stop being the "others" - you can't help it anymore.
    They are you and you are them, and on some deep buried level you know it.

    That does not mean you will instantly like "them".
    You may actually end up hating those people or animals you were ambivalent about.
    You'll actually hate the aspects of yourself which you don't like and all - but you'll be caring.
    Hating is caring too, just not the good kind.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Incorrect. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      They are you and you are them, and on some deep buried level you know it.

      Grokking is.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  315. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    I got some bad news for you about I, robot....

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  316. One of The Xelee Sequence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I forget which one in particular, but there's an appendix with a timeline of events in the universe. After the events of the book, the timeline is extended to a point containing something like "baryonic life in the universe becomes extinct". So not only am I *personally* going to die, and the human race become extinct, and the solar system be destroyed when the sun dies, and what replaces us become extinct (ad nauseum) - but it's all ultimately in vain because everything that we can possibly identify as life will eventually die.

    For fuck's sake, I didn't need *that*.

    1. Re:One of The Xelee Sequence... by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Vacuum Diagrams has that timeline in the end. On the upshot the Xeelee did escape to another dimension where as humans managed to escape in to three or four different dimensions.

      I'm going to post this further down, but the Xeelee Sequence books are actually the most upbeat of all of Baxter's work.

  317. The Sirens of Titan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vonnegut's take about the purpose of humankind http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sirens_of_Titan

  318. The Demolished Man by ledow · · Score: 1

    The Demolished Man

    Sod the novel itself, just the fact that that heap of junk won awards was enough to depress me.

  319. I have no mouth and I must scream by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    by Harlan Ellison.

  320. Here you go: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Here you go: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So one camp says she died rich, and another penniless. Both camps have an agenda. Reading those articles, I'll only assume social security was involved, as Medicare was not proven.

      Something tells me she probably put more into SS than she received (probably even without inflation adjustment), in any case. A practical human being can hate something, while justifying using it. (Remember that SS is something you're forced to contribute to your entire working life. Principled conservatives will realize by not taking some back, the gov't essentially robbed you)

  321. The Cold Equations by Instantlemming · · Score: 1

    The Cold Equations by Tom Godwin. Still depresses me only thinking about it.

  322. The Year of the Sex Olympics by Leo+Sasquatch · · Score: 1

    by Nigel Kneale of Quatermass fame. 30 years before it actually happened he nailed the whole concept of reality television. Only a B/W print survives due to the BBC being a cunch of bunts, but it almost works better that way. I've seen shooting stills, and the 1968 day-glo colours on everything might make it look dated. The shots of the sniggering proles when it all starts to go pear-shaped are still disturbing to this day.

    Most depressing story I ever read, I can't remember the title of - maybe someone can help. Short story, being written from the point of someone who is Atoning. What is she Atoning for? Well, humanity found this abandoned world. All beautifully laid out, slightly odd architecture, but ready for humans to just move in. And food in abundance, with the most delicious vegetables. Who turn out to be the inhabitants, who go dormant every so often, like 17-year locusts. They wake up to find this strange alien race camped out on their planet, chowing down on their unborn children. Worse than that, they're such an advanced species, they forgive us. We weren't being evil, just very stupid. So the human race Atones by returning parts of their body to the biosphere of the world, and the reveal is that this person is largely artificial now, because she'd been on-world for so long, that she was mostly composed of local proteins.

    Cracking story, totally alien aliens, and the idea that we hadn't invaded, or attacked, we'd just buggered up the evolution of an entire species that would take generations to fix, because we got it horribly wrong.

  323. Can't remember the title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A short story I read once was set in a universe experiencing the big crunch. Humanity sent out a lifeboat that was designed to leave the boundary of the universe and therefore survive the end of everything.

    Outside the universe, it turns out there is nothing to do but watch stars and galaxies shrink down until they are shorter than the Plank length and drop out of existence. No-one else has escaped, just the one city-sized ship. Everything had to be completely recycled if the inhabitants were to survive. Political tensions arose between two factions - one objecting to the loss of energy from the ship's windows and running lights, and the other hoping that there might one day be someone out there to see them.

    The two protagonists leave the escalating civil war in a shuttle. They search for another universe they theorize might have sprung up in the blackness...

  324. Problem with Stranger in a Strange land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I liked the beginning of Stranger in a Strange Land. But, as the book progressed it just started mirroring silly male fantasies about fucking.

    To me that was depressing as I liked the beginning and was waiting for something more than some intellectually-masked wank fantasies.

    I've made this observation with other books too. Once the storyline sort of dies, the author regresses to more primal insticts and starts writing about people fucking all the time in some kind of free orgy for everyone.

    An exception is Philip K. Dick. He's hardcore. He really fucks with your mind, and he doesn't regress to those fuck-fantasies. He's on point all the time, and he'll leave you if not depressed, wondering what the hell you just read (in a good way, mind you).

    1. Re:Problem with Stranger in a Strange land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmm...while not Sci Fi really, this is what happened to the Anita Blake series.

    2. Re:Problem with Stranger in a Strange land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the beginning of Stranger in a Strange Land. But, as the book progressed it just started mirroring silly male fantasies about fucking.

      Are there any Heinlein novels that don't fit that description? His model seemed to be:

      Interesting sci-fi premise
      Intermission with Heinlein's stock characters having orgies
      Dull wrap-up killing off all of the new characters
      Stock characters go back to having orgies

      Or did I only read his crappy books?

    3. Re:Problem with Stranger in a Strange land by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      You read his later (1960 onward) books. Read his stuff prior to and including Moon is a Harsh Mistress. Podkayne Of Mars is a good place to start with his juvenalia work. Starship Troopers is another good one.

  325. Blind Faith' Ben Elton. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A more modern one:
    Ben Elton 'Blind Faith'
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Faith_%28novel%29

    One of these 'it could so easily happen' stories. Everything gets put on YouTube. If you dont you are weird and hounded out of society 'What do you mean you dont want to put your first time out there, are you embarrassed of who you are?'
    Also People embrace democracy, but remember people are stupid and impressionable. They end up passing a law that 'everyone is famous' Tell me that is unbelievable?

  326. A short story with a forgotten name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually there was a short story which I read in middle school that got me into distopian fiction.

    It was about a boy (I'll call him Peter, even though it probably isn't his name in the story) in the future where everyone wore grey jumpsuits (color was not allowed) and was told what job they would have and at the beginning of the story a teacher showed a dream like a movie to the classroom they took from a bully of him beating Peter up and then punishing him for having the dream in the first place.

    So Peter finds this girl named Zoe wearing a (red?) dress and I don't really remember the rest of the story, just that it ends with Peter and Zoe getting chased and they end up going back to the 1970's.

    The ending wasn't depressing, but the tone of the story was.

    Now for the life of me, I can't remember the title is. Maybe someone here read it and might know?

  327. Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flowers for Algernon is quite depressing to be honest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowers_for_Algernon

  328. Ick by ledow · · Score: 1

    My father-in-law is a well-published author and he delved into science fiction a few times (along with stories set in WW2).

    Apparently, when he was having a bit of a rough time, he wrote three stories. In the first, the Earth was wiped out. In the second, the Galaxy was wiped out. In the third, the whole Universe was wiped out.

    But he had some interesting ideas and never managed to get them published (he was very close once, but his agent and publisher were in the World Trade Center - he was in the US and due to visit them on 9/11).

    The most horrible one was about a group who, I think, crashed their ship onto a planet/planetoid. The problem was that the planet had a "hot" side and a cool side. You could survive on the cold side, but the hot side was virtually instantaneous death. That's not so bad, until the plot introduced that the planet had quite a fast axis-spin. Without the aid of modern vehicles or shelter, you had to keep walking. And walking. And walking. Or you would die. Throw in a lot of extraneous drama and a pregnant woman and it was quite a good story idea.

    At what point do you give up and STOP walking and leave everyone else to cope without you, when rescue could be just around the corner?

  329. Childhood's End - Arthur C. Clark by brillow · · Score: 1

    The ending was terribly depressing, but very good.

    1. Re:Childhood's End - Arthur C. Clark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember. I read that when I was a wee tyke.

      Did humanity transform into a higher energetic form in keeping with some larger destiny, or did we devolve into grunting mucus monsters?

      Either way, the effect was such that all our silly dreams of Star Trekking and Boldly Going with our primitive meat puppets were cast aside like childhood toys no longer relevant, if indeed they ever were. That was the depressing part, having to leave behind fairy tales, but overall, assuming what I think Asimov intended, evolving into something bigger and better is pretty optimistic.

      I bet fruit flies and fish think they're hot stuff from their limited perspectives.

    2. Re:Childhood's End - Arthur C. Clark by brillow · · Score: 1

      Yeah but only the kids got to evolve. People my age had to stay on earth and die in a post-apocalyptic hellscape. Or blow themselves up with nukes.

    3. Re:Childhood's End - Arthur C. Clark by brillow · · Score: 1

      Also, I'm not sure I want to have my soul eaten by the giant super-consciousness.

      The whole point of the story was that humans don't get to control their destiny. Aliens ultimately decided what would happen to us and it was to have our children's minds be devoured into the grand intellect or whatever.

  330. Re: Childhood's End by brillow · · Score: 1

    It's depressing because it implies that we can't go. A lot of books which end in human elevation or utopia tell the reader that they could make it, they might live to see that. Childhood's End was explicit in that you can't go.

  331. Never Let Me Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never Let Me Go, by Kazuo Ishiguro. There's a whole laundry list of depressing things, despite it being a good read. Namely, a young couple in love, convinced they could avoid their pre-determined fate as unwilling organ donors, get denied.

  332. Rick Shelley's "Second Commonwealth War" Trilogy by flanders_down · · Score: 1

    The three books composing the Second Commonwealth War series are the most depressing stories I have read in over 60 years of reading science fiction.

    I fought in Viet Nam, and then went freelance, fighting for various groups and causes through Africa and Asia. On occasion I've read the same book several times in succession simply because it was the only damned book I had or could get. I know war fairly well from a ground-level perspective.

    Rick Shelley appears to know war quite well, himself. He has certainly captured the essence of war in these books. The whole "we won, but at what a cost" syndrome is laid out for everyone to see.

    You can "win" any war. But at what cost to your own side?

  333. Depressing or just dark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have no mouth, and I must scream" if short stories can be included.

  334. Ben Elton's Blind Faith by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    Blind Faith was one of the more depressing novels I've read recently. Although it wasn't 'science fiction' per se, it did predict a technological near-future that seems to be getting closer by the second.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  335. On religion by Milharis · · Score: 1

    On religion :"The Streets of Ashkelon" by Harry Harrison. On a planet where lives natives with no concept of religion or belief, one person tries to teach them the scientific method while a missionary tries to convert them.

  336. Not a novel but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cried like a baby at the end of Silent Running. But then, I was only about 7 the first time I saw it.

    Iain M Banks' "Against a Dark Background" is pretty bleak as well, not just for the fact that most of the characters get killed, but because it is basically a story about the themes of infertility, mortality and the sheer, utter pointlessness of doing anything at all in a lifetime/ world/ star system/ galaxy/ universe that is ultimately and inevitably destined to end.

  337. Very easy... James Tiptree, Jr. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Almost anything by James Tiptree, Jr. AKA Raccoona Sheldon AKA Alice Bradley Sheldon.

    Later learning that she shot herself (after shooting hear "84-year-old, nearly-blind husband" in his sleep), leaving a "suicide note... written years earlier, and saved until needed" came as no surprise.

    A personal close second is a funny one. Literally. "Bill, the Galactic Hero" by Harry Harrison.
    Not realizing at the time that it was satire it just came out depressing as hell, even a bit scary.
    I was nine or ten when I read it, lying sick in bed, running a high fever.
    A brain which is not fully functional has "issues" with grasping satire.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Very easy... James Tiptree, Jr. by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Almost anything by James Tiptree, Jr. AKA Raccoona Sheldon AKA Alice Bradley Sheldon.

      Seconded. Tiptree used her/his considerable talent to explain exactly why everything turns to shit in the end, and to explain it in dozens of different ways.

      (But I also wonder what kind of SF the OP reads if it's full of "happy endings"? As far as I can tell, SF has been basically pessimistic since Hiroshima.)

    2. Re:Very easy... James Tiptree, Jr. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Well... While happy endings ARE optional, science fiction is the only literary genre built on its built in hope.
      Stories mostly dealing with the future, where humans still live - i.e. we haven't killed ourselves off.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  338. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern society has always been about the Brave New World. Huxley wasn't writing a futuristic dystopia, he was writing a contemporary parallel. From the Roman games to Marx's "religion is the opiate of the masses" to Garfield's "television is the opiate of the masses", as starving or freezing to death become less of a reality, we create a new reality. Mainly by hiding from reality...

  339. Metro 2033 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  340. The Death Of Grass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a John Wyndham novel but with no hope, no possibility of salvation or a return to normalcy. It's fascinating to see 60s British society crumble so thoroughly and inescapably. Read that and then watch Threads and When The Wind Blows.

  341. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh god. I saw Grave of the Fireflies when I was a teenager straight off of Battle Athletes and Card Captor Sakura.

    I think I cried for a week.

    (Thanks for sharing your opinion, and bringing back the memories.)

  342. Harlan Ellison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read "I have no mouth and I must scream." Probably one of the most nihilistic Sci-Fi writers I've ever been scarred by. Bit of a jerk, too.

    Try not to slash your wrists.

  343. stephen r donaldsons gap series by CoderFool · · Score: 1

    I found stephen r donaldsons gap series more depressing than his thomas covenant series

  344. Never Let Me Go, The Guardians, Frankenstein by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro doesn't fit the profile of most science fiction, but it highlights the reality that humans are quick to dismiss the humanity of anyone who is different. This is the core of racism, ageism, sexism which will most certainly be extended to other sentient life. I think it was the Guardians by John Christopher which stuck with me from childhood, the idea that the protagonist discovers that others are the builders and that they themselves are eaters of the world. It fits well into all dual mode societies where some are the poor producers and others are the wealthy consumers. H.G. Wells "The Time Machine" takes this relationship thousands of years into the future where it reaches its logical conclusion of two species of humans. Neither of these books has an adequate Hollywood adaptation but our vision of Frankenstein's monster has been distorted through theater and cinema into something which barely resembles Mary Shelly's novel. The lesson that the evil in Frankenstein's creation is our own hatred and predjudices reflected in what began as a restored an innocent life was completely lost.

  345. Songmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orson Scott Card: "Songmaster"
    Incredibly sad. One of the few books that has made me cry.

  346. Just a couple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubik - Philip K Dick
    High Rise - JG Ballard, if that counts...I still feel disturbed even now when I think about that book and I read it a long time ago

  347. Soft Apocalypse by wompa · · Score: 1

    by Will McIntosh. The slow death of society. Some staggeringly depressing reading at times. Great story though.

  348. Re:Reading... by Phrogman · · Score: 2

    Do you think that more people are reading books that used to in the past? Honestly, while I read heavily and my wife reads twice as much as I do, almost no one else I see on a regular basis reads all that much. Only 1 out of about 20 coworkers reads when he has a break at work.

    I have no evidence, but it seems to me that literacy is plunging dramatically, and the most challenging thing that most people read is the text of instant messages on their phones, most of which is likely misspelled :P

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  349. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these mentioned are in the Clute/Nicholls Encyclopedia of Science Fiction.

    Except the Tolkien (a fantasy about the advent and impact of the Industrial Revolution on the idyllic bucolic English yeoman). And the computer manuals.

    I read the question as being about Tragedy vs Comedy, or the Tragic vs the Romantic. On the Romantic side, Brian Stableford has rightly pointed out that SF is the only literature in which the author can complete the novel with "and the whole world lived happily ever after."

    On the depressing side of things, I recommend The Puppies of Terra by Thomas M. Disch, also 334 by the same author, and Fritz Lieber's "A Bucket of Air" is wrist-slitting stuff.

    Robert Sheckley sometimes makes explicit the existential terror that underpins his humour, as does his acolyte Douglas Adams.

  350. A Wizard of Earthsea by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    In Lord of the Rings, the core of evil is external. In Ursula K. Le Guin's Earthsea trilogy, the evil dwells within, a far more realistic and disturbing worldview.

  351. Has anybody mentioned... by claviBeav · · Score: 1

    I'd second "On the Beach" as being right up there on the list. And while I have not had time to read through all of the comments, and I'm not sure if it quite qualifies as "sci-fi" but has anyone mentioned Cormack McCarthy's "The Road"? Talk about depressing...

  352. "Search and destroy outsiders" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    I think you are confused. As I've already posted above, the "outsiders" in BNW get sent to islands full of other highly intelligent people; it is a reward rather than a punishment.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I think you are confused. As I've already posted above, the "outsiders" in BNW get sent to islands full of other highly intelligent people; it is a reward rather than a punishment."

      Well, I'd say it's you the one confused: those that would want to shake the other people and say "awake, don't you see what's happening?" are deprived *exactly* of that. It *is* a punishment that will only not look like that to those that shouldn't go to the island anyway.

      The fact that a majority of them accept the punishment instead of going into the wild makes the triumph of BNW even more resounding: the island is the BNW version for those that don't integrate in the standard BNW, just as in our current world they have their own islands (i.e. in the Internet), but are nevertheless integrated into the system (only a different part of it).

    2. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd say it's you the one confused: those that would want to shake the other people and say "awake, don't you see what's happening?" are deprived *exactly* of that.

      So what is happening? What is the deep, dark secret that the "wakers" are trying to make others see? What, exactly speaking, is wrong with being content when you have everything you need, and the same is true for everyone else? What justifies trying to disrupt a status quo everyone is happy with?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "What, exactly speaking, is wrong with being content when you have everything you need, and the same is true for everyone else?"

      That we are human beings, not irrational animals. You either get it or don't get it.

    4. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What, exactly speaking, is wrong with being content when you have everything you need, and the same is true for everyone else?

      That we are human beings, not irrational animals.

      That doesn't answer my question. Being content when everything is well is perfectly rational, and appealing to some definition of humanity requires you to specify said definition, justify why it should be accepted, and then show why BNW-type situation conflicts with it, none of which you have done. Unless, of course, you are trying to appeal to emotion rather than logic. You know, like irrational animals do.

      You either get it or don't get it.

      Using an ad hominem in place of a rationale strongly suggests that you don't have one.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "hat doesn't answer my question."

      Yes it does: you don't get it.

      "Using an ad hominem in place of a rationale strongly suggests that you don't have one."

      True, up to a certain point. If you don't get it after more that 25 centuries of phylosophy, I don't get a rationale for you to be offered on a Slashdot post.

    6. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      lol, the man misspelling philosophy as "phylosophy" is trying to take the intellectual high ground here? There's something deeply ironic about that.

    7. Re:"Search and destroy outsiders" by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "lol, the man misspelling philosophy as "phylosophy" is trying to take the intellectual high ground here?"

      What's highly intellectual about making mistakes on a foreign language? I admit is much better to do it properly and it's not a justification but an explanation. And then, last I looked at it, neither Aristotle nor Plato spoke modern English fluently; probably that's a proof they are not on "intellectual high ground" either.

  353. White Plague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Herbert's White Plague was much more depressing than his others.

  354. Consider the context by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    When BNW was written, corporal punishment was rife in most schools across the developed world. At Eton, you could be beaten with a stick by a boy two years older than you were. This was all part of the conditioning to put up with arbitrary punishment and maltreatment in future, and led to a number of upper class men with very kinky personalities. In BNW, much gentler conditioning is used early on so that corporal punishment isn't necessary. It is much kinder than the social norms when Huxley was writing.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  355. Ancient Light by Mary Gentle? by middenview · · Score: 1

    Bickering away to an apocalypse with someone actually prepared to press the button. For 99% of the book it seems possible that sense will prevail, and then the light - as in the title - is seen.

  356. John Brunner by oboeaaron · · Score: 1
    700+ comments and still no mention of John Brunner? Unpossible!

    Specifically, Stand on Zanzibar (overpopulation leads to massive increase in violent crime as aggression levels rise, along with mega-corps basically enslaving entire African countries) and to an even greater extent, The Sheep Look Up (ecological catastrophe in slow-motion, domestic terrorists dose municipal water supply with psychotic drugs).

    Both actually highly enjoyable, especially Zanzibar with its spy story, fast pace, and mod, proto-MTV style jump cuts.

    --
    Journey onward.
  357. (Only available in Norwegian) Lushon-trilogien by agnordby · · Score: 1

    The Norwegian trilogy Lushon-trilogien by Andreas Bull-Hansen really deserves a larger audience!
    http://www.bull-hansen.com/styled-15/index.html

    If you're a publisher, deeply consider this trilogy!
    Grim, disturbing, well-written.

    ...and if you happen to read Scandinavian, and haven't read this series yet: do so!

  358. Level Seven, Mordecai Roshwald by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Level Seven, Mordecai Roshwald

  359. depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thomas Disch is pretty depressing, but he's got nothing on Silverberg when he gets his grump on" *

    *unkown

  360. Frankenstein by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Does Frankenstein count as science fiction? I know it's older than most other works in the genre, and the science is significantly more primitive, and it's not set in space, but in other respects it really feels like it ought to belong in the science fiction genre. Some people classify it as horror, but I think that's only because many of the half-baked movies extremely loosely based on it are horror. The book itself does not have any of the usual elements of horror. (Okay, yes, it has a "monster", but he's not a monster in the usual horror-genre sense of the term. If anything, humanity is the monster, which is much more typical of sci-fi.)

    It is also categorically the most sorrowful book of any kind that I have ever read. It could almost be called a study in sorrow.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  361. Chronicles of Thomas Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great books but Thomas and Linden are so depressing...

  362. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking fiction, however, would be a good list too...

  363. The end of everything.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Level Seven, Earth Abides, On the Beach.

  364. I Have No Mouth, And I Must Scream by yanyan · · Score: 1

    I Have No Mouth, And I Must Scream by Harlan Ellison

  365. Death of Grass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't read it myself, but my uncle once told me that when my dad read The Death of Grass as a young man, he was so freaked out that he spent all his free time for several weeks wandering the fields of the semi-rural area where they lived, planting potatoes wherever he went.

  366. Heh. by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    Heh. Reading. *blank stare*

  367. Threads. by detlefvonberg · · Score: 2

    Not a book but a movie (from a script by the Yorkshire writer Barry Hines).

    I read a review of Threads one time which said "it will darken your world." That's true. It will also probably change the way you think about humanity. Do not watch it at night by yourself.

    One of the greatest films of all time.

  368. Just what I needed by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    a list of books to avoid at all cost.

    On a related note: how does one manage a list like this, e.g. when on the hunt for books at the bookstore or library? I've got some index cards with a list of books/authors I want to read, but adding the negatives would make for a large and unwieldy list.

  369. Testament by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    A movie, not a book, but the ultimate downer. US and Russia have a nuclear exchange. Civilization wiped out. A woman watches her kids die slowly of radiation poisoning. She rounds up her last child and a mentally handicapped neighbor sits them in the car in the closed garage and is ready to turn the engine on but changes her mind.

  370. Another easy by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    A Canticle for Leibowitz

    We blew ourselves up, we'll do it again, forever and ever.

  371. The Last Children of Schewenborn by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Didn't think I'd post here because even though I I know many of the ones mentioned here, they've all kinda have worn out their scare to me.

    Then I just remembered the 80ies German teenager novel "Die letzten Kinder von Schewenborn". There's a UK edition called 'The Last Children'. It's like 'On the Beach' but like 10 times as much. A young teenager and his family experience a nuclear holocaust during a trip to his grandparents. The children born in the months and years after are heavyly mutated and handycapped. He's basically the youngest remaining 'normal'. The story is open ended and grim beyond anything else I've read.

    The book is written as a cautionary tale and is an expression of the german environmentalist movement of the 80ies and later. Today it is part of the regular 8th grade German curriculum reading list in Germany.

    Definitely the most realistic nuclear holocaust scenario I've read to date. I do not want to read again. Seriously.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  372. My tax declaration of last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is only slightly worse than seeing how the money is spent

    ooops sorry was to be supposed a fiction book

    Then the government plans to bypass our financial crisis.

  373. 1984 by emho24 · · Score: 1

    1984 depressed the hell out of me for a couple of weeks. I think it affected me so much because I can see the beginnings of such a world happening all around. Currently, language is a weapon. Your own speech is being used against you to control you. "Politically correct speech" is nothing more than a tool for political ideologies to control what you say, how you act, what you do. If you control the language, you control the debate.

    --
    You must gather your party before venturing forth.
  374. We by Yevgeny Zamyatin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you haven't read it, you should. It's the literary predecessor to 1984 and Brave New World. It's also incredibly bleak.

  375. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the only two that are debatable (in my opinion) are The Road (which reads like sci fi even if it isn't) and 1984 (which is definately sci-fi).

    The fact that there are strong political overtones in 1984, and that there are not ray guns and cat like aliens in The Road, does not disqualify them.

    Incidentally critics also vacilate on whether or not these works are SF.

  376. Use of Weapons by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

    Use of Weapons by Iain Banks. The ending just killed me.

  377. not sure if you'd consider it sci-fi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I'd go with Atomised by M. houlebecque (or however you spell his name - can't be bothered to google it )

    Bleak, real, chilling to the bone, and the latter part of the book set in the future, with dehumanisesd society, feeding on its own excrements is just a real downer

  378. Bio of a Space Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio_of_a_Space_Tyrant by Piers Anthony
    Book 1 "Refugee" is amazingly depressing. The main character is a refugee floating in a space bubble, and most of the adults are raped, killed, or kidnapped by the end of the story.
    Also, Machine Man by Max Barry. Augmentation gone wrong, with a focus on the evils of mega-corporate middle-management.

  379. Nightfall by Isaac Asimov (1941) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a book called Nightfall by Isaac Asimov that was an incredibly cool premise. It's set on another planet in a trinary star system (if not more stars). As a result, the "humans" on the planet never had darkness. There was constantly at least one sun up, and as a result their culture and scientific belief never got past a geocentric model.

    (Spoilers below, I highly recommend anyone interested go and read the book).

    The "radical" scientists in the book realized that the orbits of the suns and their planet could be explained with the existence of another nearby sister planet (though impossible to see as it was always in the glare or blocked by the suns) which contradicted the commonly accepted religious doctrine. They hypothesized that if another planet existed, well there was no reason the universe couldn't be even bigger than that and accommodate dozen's of other celestial bodies, possibly even other entire star systems.

    They also realized in a short amount of time an alignment of the stars in their system would give them a true nightfall and would allow them the darkness to see out into the universe. Prophecies and religious beliefs told them that this would be the end of the world and indeed it turned out to be as when their population was confronted with how insignificant they were compared to the vast universal expanse, their society essentially broke down into anarchy as everyone went completely bat shit insane.

    On one hand it is a depressing and unhappy ending. On the other, some could possibly find humour, if not a little quasi-sadistic pleasure at the fate of those in the story because their society proved inferior (or at least less fortunate).

  380. Stephen Baxter's "Evolution" by KeithH · · Score: 1

    This standalone book walks the reader episodically through the history of man from a proto-mammal surviving the K-Pg mass extinction event 65 million years ago, through the evolution of primates, to the modern day where mankind dooms itself, and then through the future in increasingly depressing steps while our decendents are farmed like cattle to the far far distant end of life on Earth.

    "Evolution" is a great cautionary tale but the finale where our descendents and the planet are literally unrecognizable is depressing and continues to haunt my immortal imagination.

  381. The Books of the Wars by Fenis-Wolf · · Score: 1

    The Books of the Wars-I've never managed to actually finish it. It's basically the ending of every hope I have for humanity. Humans have reached out to the stars, and ventured far and wide. An evil rises on Earth and seduce the colonies to rush back one by one to Earth (to save it from the evil)-only to be ground down and reduced to nothing. http://www.amazon.com/The-Books-Wars-Mark-Geston/dp/1416591524

    --

  382. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just what Big Brother wants you to think.

  383. babies crushed between blue-hot rollers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that image haunts me to this day, I read it (once) late in the last century...

  384. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by tmarsh86 · · Score: 1

    I think it's you who doesn't understand what science fiction is and is not.

  385. Titan, by Stephen Baxter by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 1

    Titan, by Stephen Baxter sticks in my mind as being incredibly, irritatingly depressing. Despite the "uplifting" epilog tacked on at the end, it's the story of an expedition to Titan that goes utterly, horribly wrong in every possible way that will prolong the suffering of the protagonists. It's not a novel, it's a torture fantasy that ends [spoiler alert] with the deaths of all of the characters, but only after author has exhausted all of the possible ways of degrading and abusing them. Ick.

    1. Re:Titan, by Stephen Baxter by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Not just the death of all the characters, the death of the entire human race.

  386. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try "Now and Then, Here and There" for even more depressing anime.

  387. Depressing only if you're gutless by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Most people don't have the intestinal fortitude or inclination to face unpleasant truths. "Canticle for Liebowitz" suggests that we will never learn from our mistakes, just like the evidence of the Romans, Mayans, Sumerians, Easter Islanders, et. al. would suggest. "Breakfast of Champions" rubs our noses in the unpleasant aspects of modern existence. It challenges the reader to recognize these facts and perhaps even do something about them. And *that* in a nutshell is what annoys some people. They don't want to think about anything bad. They don't want to do anything about anything bad. They don't want to think ahead to what bad things that look likely to happen. They want to be entertained. They want books and stories to be somewhere between candy and masturbation. They want unthinking optimism. They want Pollyanna.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  388. S M Stirling's Draka trilogy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    The bad guys take over the whole world and turn it into one big plantation worked by slaves. They genetically engineer everyone else using viruses so that they will never be any rebellions against their rule. They take over alternate timelines and other planets and do the same thing there. The whole thing seems to be written as an ironic reference to Fukuyama's idea that history will end with Liberal Democracy.

    Apart from 1984 it's one of the gloomiest views of the future I've ever read.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  389. Maybe not Science, but certainly Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bible.

  390. Children of the Mind, Ender's Game series by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

    For me, probably Children of the Mind, the last book of the original Ender's Game series.

    I wrote about several moments, but they're all spoilers. So I'll just include this one, as generic as I can make it. This scene was so hard to read, I had to stop and put the book down for awhile.

    A man has to convince the woman he truly loves that he doesn't love her at all, so that she'll be willing to sacrifice herself to save the lives of a planet.

    I'm tearing up just thinking about it. ;-;

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  391. Santiago: A Myth of the Far Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giles Sans Pitié is a spinning wheel,
    With the eye of a hawk and a fist made of steel.
    He'll drink a whole gallon while holding his breath,
    And wherever he goes his companion is Death.

    There never was a history written about the Inner Frontier, so Black Orpheus took it upon himself to set one to music. His name wasn't really Orpheus (though he was black). In fact, rumor had it that he had been an aquaculturist back in the Deluros system before he fell in love. The girl's name was Eurydice, and he followed her out to the stars, and since he had left all his property behind, he had nothing to give her but his music, so he took the name of Black Orpheus and spent most of his days composing love songs and sonnets to her. Then she died, and he decided to stay on the Inner Frontier, and he began writing an epic balled about the traders and hunters and outlaws and misfits that he came across. In fact, you didn't officially stop being a tenderfoot or a tourist until the day he added a stanza or two about you to the song.
    Anyway, Giles Sans Pitié made quite an impression on him, because he appears in nine different verses, which is an awful lot when you're being the Homer for five hundred worlds. Probably it was the steel hand that did it. No one knew how he'd lost his real one, but he showed up on the Frontier one day with a polished steel fist at the end of his left arm, announced that he was the best bounty hunter ever born, foaled, whelped, or hatched, and proceeded to prove that he wasn't too far from wrong. Like most bounty hunters, he only touched down on outpost worlds when he wasn't working and like most bounty hunters, he had a pretty regular route that he followed. Which was how he came to be on Keepsake, in the Tradertown of Moritat, in Gentry's Emporium, pounding on the long wooden bar with his steel fist and demanding service.
    Old Geronimo Gentry, who had spent thirty years prospecting the worlds of the Inner Frontier before he chucked it all and opened a tavern and whorehouse on Moritat, where he carefully sampled every product before offering, it to the public, walked over with a fresh bottle of Altairian rum, then held it back as Giles Sans Pitié reached for it.
    "Tab's gettin' pretty high," he commented meaningfully.
    The bounty hunter slapped a wad of bills down on the bar.
    "Maria Theresa dollars," noted Gentry, examining them approvingly and relinquishing the bottle. "Wherever'd you pick 'em up?"
    "The Corvus system."
    "Took care of a little business there, did you?" said Gentry, amused.
    Giles Sans Pitié smiled humorlessly. "A little."
    He reached inside his shirt and withdrew three Wanted posters of the Suliman brothers, which until that morning had been on the post office wall. Each poster had a large red X scratched across it.
    "All three of 'em?"
    The bounty hunter nodded.
    "You shoot 'em, or did you use that?" asked Gentry, pointing toward Giles Sans Pitié's steel fist.
    "Yes."
    "Yes, what?"
    Giles Sans Pitié help up his metal hand. "Yes, I shot them of I used this."
    Gentry shrugged. "Goin' out again soon?"
    "In the next few days."
    "Where to this time?"
    "That's nobody's business but mine," said the bounty hunter.
    "Just thought I might offer some friendly advice," said Gentry.
    "Such as?"
    "If you're thinking of going of to Praeteep Four, forget it. The Songbird just got back from there."
    "You mean Cain?"
    Gentry nodded. "Had a lot of money, so I'd have to guess that he found what he went looking for."
    The bounty hunter frowned. "I'm going to have to have a little talk with him," he said. "The Praeteep system's got a Keep Out sign posted on it."
    "Oh?" said Gentry. "Since when?"
    "Since I put it up," said Giles Sans Pitié firmly. "And I won't have some rival headhunter doing his poaching there and picking it clean." He paused. "Where can I find him?"
    "Right here."
    Giles Sans Pitié looked around the room. A silver-haired gambler on a winning streak, decked o

    1. Re:Santiago: A Myth of the Far Future by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      My god, I didn't think that anyone else alive had ever finished that book.

    2. Re:Santiago: A Myth of the Far Future by obsolete1349 · · Score: 1

      GP here. I pretty much thought the same.

  392. Re:Reading... by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    I used to read at least a book a month, but now, most of my reading is done on the Internet. In fact, I probably read more now than I ever have before. I also find Kupfernigk's comments on BNW to be insightful, at least in the face of common misperceptions of BNW, which is often taught as a dystopia in school. When you consider the implications of his comments, you will realize public schools teaching BNW as a dystopian example (contrasted and compared with 1984 usually), you can see this is completely without irony. It is the school's interest to teach BNW this way (self esteem, information control etc).

    Back to your comments, I think the question here is the quality of what we are reading, for which only the reader can be responsible.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  393. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by ed1park · · Score: 1

    Then you definitely don't want to read Firefly by him as well. (sexually molested 5 year old)
    http://www.amazon.com/Firefly-Piers-Anthony/dp/0380759500/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344435434&sr=8-1&keywords=firefly+piers

    And avoid Nabokov's Lolita. (Pedophile and 12 year old)
    http://www.amazon.com/Lolita-50th-Anniversary-Vladimir-Nabokov/dp/0679723161/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1344435597&sr=1-1&keywords=lolita

    On a slightly different note, guess how old Mary was when she gave birth to Jesus!

    12-14! Does that make God a pedo? Of course girls were usually married off by 12 or 13 then. Imagine an ethereal force impregnating underage girls... Anyway, I suppose we were all born from pedophiles and all Christians worship a pedophile deity by your logic. Oh, and a jealous mass murderer too! (Noah's ark and all that) Anyway, I digress... :)

    Hey, if God were an alien (any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic/miracles of course), then I suppose you could argue that the Bible is a work of SciFi. And definitely depressing too! *ducks* :)

  394. Anything about Steve Jobs by Wingfat · · Score: 1

    Apples makes me sick (allergic)

  395. Hmmm can't remember the title by iago12345 · · Score: 1

    There was a very depressing book my parents made me read a little bit of as a child, but I can't quite remember the name. It was kind of an odd fantasy/sci-fi hybrid. It had interweaving plots between characters in a bit of a primitive culture. The societies were superstitious and would perform acts of mutilation on newborn babies, sacrifice of their own children, offering of animals, etc...fearing punishment otherwise from an unknown entity. Some characters would perform magical feats of an elemental or physical nature. I do remember one of the primary characters was killed then reanimated as a zombie, but I have to admit, I had to put the book down at that point, even as a 7 year old I could tell GI Joe had a more coherent plot on a weekly basis (plus no one ever got hit by the laser shots from the guns which was more age appropriate). I do have to admit i'm still fascinated it was so popular. I remember them referring to it something like Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth, but I can't remember the true title. If I think of it i'll update my post.

  396. The Oracle Server Installation Instructions by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Sad. Grim. Misleading. Full of lies and deceit. An uncaring attitude that finally drives the reader to unending despair and dark madness.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  397. Red Mars by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

    Red Mars. The reason is because of all the legitimate issues the astronauts had to face and the problems that could/will occur. It turned me off of wanting to go into space until we have something closer to Star Trek.

  398. Ballard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cage of sand or Voices of Time by Ballard. The entropy of the universe in short story form.

  399. The Cold Equations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://baencd.thefifthimperium.com/13-TheBalticWarCD/TheBalticWarCD/The%20World%20Turned%20Upside%20Down/0743498747__19.htm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cold_Equations
    By Tom Godwin

    Probably the story that has had the most emotional impact.

  400. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stephen Baxter's "Evolution."

  401. "Hellstrom's Hive" by Frank Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hellstrom's Hive" by Frank Herbert
    The 'Stumps": Disturbing and both societies are very depressing.

  402. Dust by Charles R. Pellegrino by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    See amazon entry. It's quite a fantastic read although very bleak.

      Funny fact: they play around with things reassembling ipads in the book

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    1. Re:Dust by Charles R. Pellegrino by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      ....maybe I should have given a small synopsis. The story is basically about the collapse of our ecosystem by removing some of the lower parts of the food chain. From the top Amazon review (by Tim F. Martin) :

      "The action begins when Richard Sinclair, a paleontologist, working at a scientific research facility near his Long Island home, narrowly escapes with his nine year old daughter Tam - purely by accident - an attack by an unknown entity on his neighborhood. Taking dozens of people by complete surprise, the entity looks like a living black carpet. Killing in minutes innocent bystanders, police officers, and later a television reporter crew (as well as Sinclair's wife), the media dubs the threat motes. As the area is quarantined, Sinclair and other scientists come to the conclusion after a harrowing trip into the infected town that the "motes" are mites, a massive horde of starving mites that attack and devour literally to the bone anyone that cannot escape them.

      Sinclair and the other researchers of Brookhaven (also called the City of Dreams) discover that the threat of the motes - however bad - is merely the tip of the iceberg and not only the United States but all of humanity faces a grave threat. Looking at data from bee keepers - who were virtually of business - the astronomical rise in orange juice prices, and a host of other bits of data not previously integrated by researchers (bringing to mind for me some of the separate bits of intelligence prior to September 11th), Sinclair and the others come to a startling conclusion; the world's insect have vanished. They have all died out, disappeared completely, and this seemingly good bit of news (at least at first glance, to the uninitiated) rapidly produces vastly dire consequences. With the extinction of fungal gnats (a bit of data an entomologist died procuring), massive fungal blooms are spreading throughout the world's crops (aided by the fact that most of the world's crop plants are of extremely limited genetic diversity). With no insects to control the fungus (and farmers having gotten away from spraying their crops due the gradual decline in insect pests the last few years), the fungus spreads amok, first wiping out crops in India (precipitating an ugly war between it and Pakistan and Sri Lanka as India seeks to annex areas with uninfected croplands, dragging the U.S. into the conflict), later to other countries. Large numbers of animals die throughout the world - insect eating bats, later, fruit eating-bats (which as they die out no longer pollinate plants themselves), many omnivorous animals, freshwater fish that rely upon larval aquatic insects for food - and with no flies or other insect scavengers to remove the bodies, freshwater throughout the world is rendered toxic by the massive amounts of bacteria that now teem in it. Much of this runoff spreads into the sea, creating low or no oxygen areas, wiping out those fish species not already being depleted by frantic nations desperate to replace declining crops as a food source. Even the motes are a result of the end of insects; no longer held in check by insect predators nor having to compete with insects, reach plague proportions in some areas, once harmless mites killing hundreds of people.

      Things of course in this novel get worse, much worse. The economy goes into a freefall in the United States as non-mote infected areas refuse to have anything to do with those under quarantine or even suspected of having a mote problem. Entire industries collapse, such as the trucking industry, while those reliant on trucking, such as grocery stores which need regular shipments of goods, collapse as well. As crops start to fail in the United States and as gasoline starts to become scarce thanks to a broken down transportation system, riots begin to happen. Stepping into these chaotic and turbulent times is Jerry Sigmond, a corrupt former talk-show host with unfortunately real skills in making others into fanatical followers of a new mass movement he begins to lead, one that sees scientists and engi

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  403. The Giver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who hands this book to middle schoolers? Seriously?

  404. "The Windup Girl" by Paolo Bacigalupi, and by alfredo · · Score: 1

    "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood offered a rather bleak look at humanity. Both well written.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  405. Jules Verne: Paris in the 20th Century by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    At the end of the book, the protagonist is standing outside the window of the woman he loves, in the snow, utterly broke, and it can be inferred that he freezes to death ala the little match girl. Verne was pretty spot on considering he was predicting 100 years in the future, but the depressing ending was just too sad. This was his last novel, and wasn't published until the 1990s.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Jules Verne: Paris in the 20th Century by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      At the end of the book, the protagonist is standing outside the window of the woman he loves, in the snow, utterly broke, and it can be inferred that he freezes to death ala the little match girl. Verne was pretty spot on considering he was predicting 100 years in the future, but the depressing ending was just too sad. This was his last novel, and wasn't published until the 1990s.

      I have it. Despite the miserable character (hardly possible to sympathise with for me) and the blatant adoration Verne shows towards his heroes (his editor makes several remarks in the side-notes), the end was very cold.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  406. James Tiptree jr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Love is the Plan, the Plan is Death" from "Warm Worlds and Otherwise"

  407. Most things by Stephen Baxter by squidflakes · · Score: 1

    Apart from the Xeelee Sequence books, most everything written by Stephen Baxter is depressing as fuck with a mild silver lining.

    Evolution was going great till it got easier for humans not to be intelligent and we went back to the trees.

    Manifold Space was going great till the paranoid government nuked the kids.

    Manifold Time was going great till the super intelligent squid decided they didn't need us anymore.

    Manifold Origin.. fuck, I don't even know.

    Titan was going great till the Chinese dropped the rock.

    Exultant was reading a lot like Hellstrom's Hive and that just sent chills down my spine.

    Moonseed was going great till OOPS!

    So, while I love his work, I tend to stick to the Xeelee Sequence books unless I'm really in that place where I can take casual discussion of the end of the entire planet.

    1. Re:Most things by Stephen Baxter by kallisti · · Score: 1

      The Xeelee sequence is mostly about humanity wasting centuries of time and resources fighting a totally pointless war against another species whose only real crime is being better than we are. While we're fighting a race who is less worried about our attacks than we are of ants, there's a silent killer destroying the entirely of the universe! That doesn't qualify as depressing? What about the part where humanity is enslaved through a wormhole?

      There are a lot of "oops, everybody dies" books listed here, but I find the "life sucks for a long, long time" to be far more depressing.

      On that note, The Wind-up Girl by Bacigalupi. A future without oil where rival Monsanto-clones purposefully spread food destroying plagues so farmer's need to buy their cures. That's depressing, because it's quite possible.

    2. Re:Most things by Stephen Baxter by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      That was pretty depressing, but if you read one of the Exultant books you'll get the part of the story where we almost got on par with the Xeelee, but were too tangled up in our own past, unable to forgive what we had done.

      Ok, now that I think about it, I see your point.

    3. Re:Most things by Stephen Baxter by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

      And don't forget "Flood". The oceans rise and keep rising, and heroes fight valiantly to ensure that humanity continues to exist - until they fail miserably because of human nature, and everyone dies. Gee, doesn't that just make you whistle while you work ...

      --
      "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  408. Re:Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood +1 by alfredo · · Score: 1

    I second that and recommend the followup "The Year of the Flood" by Margaret Atwood I also enjoyed "The Windup Girl" by Paolo Bacigalupi "Canticle" was very good too, but it seemed more into the politics of the future than the science.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  409. Eyes Do More Than See by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Asimov. Not necessarily depressing per se, but definitely sad.

    1. Re:Eyes Do More Than See by McCat · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize I was not signed in when I posted this. Oh well. Additionally, would The Hunger Games be considered Sci-fi? I wouldn't necessarily rate them (especially the latter two) as timeless or anything like that but the end was certainly bittersweet and also somewhat sad and depressing.

  410. Re:The Forever War, Joe Haldeman (Spoiler) by fartrader · · Score: 1

    Actually while the war itself is depressing and the cultural changes that the main character experiences divorces him from the culture and reason he is fighting - it has an upbeat ending and message. Society has passed through good and bad cycles and reached a stable equilibrium - ironically the kind of society they were fighting in the first place, just didn't understand. The individual characters end up happy because in such a society they hedge their bets and recreate a set of "baseline cultures" just in case they need to go back to first principles. Good stuff.

  411. Bordered in Black by SonnyDog09 · · Score: 1

    Bordered in Black by Larry Niven. An entire planet of humanoids grown to be food for some other species and the implications of that.

    --
    Your "fair share" is NOT in my wallet.
  412. Ray Bradbury by Alien7 · · Score: 1

    "August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains"
    The idea of an automated house that just goes on living after humanity has vaporized itself in a nuclear holocaust is just sad. Dead dog included.

  413. Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memoirs found in a bathtub.

  414. The Sparrow. by daniel.waterfield · · Score: 1

    The Sparrow. Seriously. It's one long bleak chapter after chapter.

    --
    i know not what weapons the next world war will be fought with, but world war IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
  415. I Am Legend & Lathe of Heaven by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Richard Matheson's "I Am Legend" deserves to be up there... and I mean the book ending... not the hopeful movie ending.

    I'd also add "The Lathe of Heaven" by Ursula LeGuin.

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  416. Threads by evilandi · · Score: 2

    Threads, a 1984 BBC TV film docu-drama giving a reasonably accurate account of a nuclear strike on the UK, from the point of view of residents of the country's fourth largest city and their next two generations. It includes the "Protect and Survive" real-life instructional videos, realistic Regional Seat of Government setups and gives an extremely unpleasant account of exactly how useless such preparation would be. It is both clinical and graphic, and ends on a stillbirth. It is extremely science and thankfully fiction... so far.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  417. Almost anything by Harlan Ellison but particularly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream"

  418. Maybe someone can jog my memory... by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a story where a man is depressed and finally decides to kill himself and then he learns that he is actually a member of an alien race, where constant suffering is the norm and they "jack-in" (The original Matrix!) to experience life as a human on Earth, which is a relief from their torment, but they are only allowed one human lifetime... and they don't remember their alien existence until their human life has expired? The man who killed himself as a human then remembers who he really is and what he just lost and is tormented because of it. Talk about regret! I might be getting parts of this wrong, but I remember this one being hugely depressing when I read it once upon. Anyone know the title?

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  419. Brave New World by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Read it as a kid, depressing as it gets.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  420. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by mknewman · · Score: 1

    Pretty much everything by John Brunner will bumb you out. Stand On Zanzabar is my favorite. Sheep Look up is excellent, and Shockwave Rider is also. The rest of his stuff is pretty much pulp, very obscure and hard to find. I spent years collecting his books, he has well over 60 that I found, lots published in magazines that I never got my hands on. Very little online about him. Really classic sci-fi, I highly recommend it.

  421. Most depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has to be "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" from Harlan Ellison. It is really disturbing.

  422. Depressing Sci-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green

  423. The Veldt by misterscience · · Score: 1

    Ray Bradbury's story from The Illustrated Man about kids reprogramming their holodeck-style home entertainment centre. Very grim: Still makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

  424. Tomb Tapper by James Blish by kemosabi · · Score: 1

    It has a nasty ending that's incredibly sad and is based on an alternate future that would be roughly now. And if you think about how war is conducted and has been conducted since it was written, the basic idea isn't too far-fetched, but was outre when Blish wrote the story. It's in a collection called "Galactic Cluster". I've claimed to various people that this story is basically cyberpunk despite predating cyberpunk by roughly 30 years, and not because of the goggle, by the way, but rather because of the tone and sensibility. I'll lay odds that Gibson, Sterling, Stephenson, W. Jon Williams, and others may have read it. I'll assert that if they haven't then they should, dammit. Oh, and another selection by Blish: A Case of Conscience

  425. Windup Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi is taking me longer to finish than expected because of its bleak outlook and lack of tech, but the story is great.

  426. The Foghorn (Bradbury) by Snodgrass · · Score: 1

    Probably not the most depressing story ever, but it took me a few days to recover from.

  427. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes ! Braver and newer ! Some would say we are as new as 2012

  428. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by geohump · · Score: 1

    This is about Science Fiction. Most depressing SCIENCE FICTION books/stories you've read.Yet, most of you idiots are going on about non science fiction books.There is a difference between science fiction and non science fiction, yet most of you do NOT understand that.This is depressing because I came here to hopefully learn about some new books that would be good to read, and I get stupid peeps talking about normal fiction books.seriously peeps, science fiction. not fucking fiction.

    Yes, the difference is that pure fiction takes place in the cosmos the author lives in.
    Fantasy takes place in cosmos that have magic active in them.

    Science fiction is fiction that explores the implications of different possible worlds of humanity based on the way we use technology, or what technology can allow us to do. Sometimes this means space westerns (Serenity! EESmith etc) and sometimes its deeply profound sociological exegesis. (LeGuin).
    It does not have to have rockets or space lasers in it. In fact the best SF I have ever read didn't (and yes, despite that, I loved EE Doc Smith's Lensman series, :)

    Responding to your inside reference; I am not a number. I am a free man. Hah, we wish. Which was the entire point of the conclusion of that series.

    Be seeing you.

    No. You won't.

    J. hand me that flashy thingey.

    Pull out sunglasses.

  429. Lost in the Cosmos, by Walker Percy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Lost in the Cosmos is intended to depress us about being human in a "wherever you go, there you are" sort of way.

  430. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should be
    "Nineteen Eighty-Four"

    My fellow Pedants must all be asleep to miss that one.

  431. Vonnegut: Welcome to the Monkey House by bryanbrunton · · Score: 1

    All that needs to be said about this story:

    Mandatory ethical birth control, which makes people numb from the waist down and takes every pleasure out of sex.

  432. Harrison Bergeron - Depressing Sci Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harrison Bergeron by Vonnegut, 1961. Set about 70 years from now (120 years in the future from when it was written,) the intelligent people are dumbed down to the lesser IQ'ed population by concentration interruptions from implanted ear devices that sound various loud sounds at erratic intervals. It's a good short story read and interesting plot, so I won't spoil the ending. But, oddly enough, a few years ago when I watched my children study with the TV on the background, multitasking on the computer and Instant Messenger sounding different sounds when a friend entered IM, left IM and sent messages, it occurred to me that we have done to ourselves what Vonnegut envisioned a future government to do. "We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo 1970.

    J

    P. S. Humans CANNOT multitask (in the truest sense of the word.). Brain Rules. John Medina.
    http://brainrules.blogspot.com/2008/03/brain-cannot-multitask_16.html

    Harrison Bergeron
    full text easily found in a Google search

  433. Some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ark (Stephen Baxter)
    Brave New World (Aldous Huxley)
    Fahrenheit 451 (Ray Bradbury)
    Nineteen Eighty-Four (George Orwell)

  434. Most cyberpunk by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I just finished re(re-re-...) reading Gibson's Neuromancer, but I can also think of William's Hardwired, or Sterling's stuff, and there aren't a lot of "happy endings". Of course, the OP asked about "scifi adventures", as though they were all adventure movies....

    The really, really unpleasant part is how close we are to Gibson's world of Neuromancer....

                mark

  435. Depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By far it is: The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant Stephen Donaldson, anti-hero, miserable SOB, with leprosy....who could enjoy that?

    1. Re:Depressing? by youlogee · · Score: 1

      Amen to that! Don't forget the "protagonist" is a child rapist. Holy crap I wanted to kill myself just to get out of finishing the book. Unfortunately I can't just put a book down. To heap misfortune on top of that it's a trilogy of trilogies. (You can see where this is going). I managed to stop after reading 3 of them. Luckily the suicide hotline is free....

  436. A Canticle For Leibowitz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just... Damn...

  437. Most Depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bambi!
    Yes he grew to be a fine Buck, but you just know that hunting season is just around the corner!

  438. The People of Sand and Slag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by Paolo Bacigalupi :

    http://windupstories.com/pumpsix/the-people-of-sand-and-slag/

    I don't even like to think about it, it's so so horrifying, in a deep psychological way. It strikes at the heart of what we all hope for the future and for technology.

  439. Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time - Stephen Baxter

    Turns out that the surviving sentient species that makes it to the end of the universe and then starts tinkering with the manifold, are a bunch of squid we uplifted and sent out to do asteroid mining, but human's stayed behind and died out cause we couldn't stop being cunts.

  440. Absolute most depressing by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Obama's plan to turn America into yet another European-style socialist state.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:Absolute most depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama's plan to turn America into yet another European-style socialist state.

      I read the prequel - "The man who starved to death in a ditch because he got sick and couldnt afford healthcare".

    2. Re:Absolute most depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama's plan to turn America into yet another European-style socialist state.

      This is hilarious, because it assumes that:

      1. This is possible
      2. Obama could do it
      3. Obama wants to do it
      4. It would obviously be a bad thing

      None of which are remotely evident... Obama is barely left of GWBush. But don't let me interrupt your right-wing "oh-god-we-lost" disaster scenario.

  441. The Handmaid's Tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Margaret Atwood paints a picture of a future America that is horrifying, depressing, and more plausible with each passing day.

  442. God emperor of Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "God emperor of Dune". depressing. all religions have been eliminated for the sake of the big worm that all of humanity must worship. At least it ends on a high note....

  443. No, No, Not Rogov! and Adam and No Eve by lanthar · · Score: 1

    Adam and No Eve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Bester#Notable_short_stories [wikipedia.org] Guy invents a rocket powered by a catalyst that causing fission in elemental iron. During takeoff, as warned, a bit must have leaked and it causes a chain reaction that wipes out all life on earth. Post-crash landing he is dying, but drags himself to the ocean, continually fending off his dog which went with him in the rocket, and is now trying to eat him because there is no food. He dies there so the bacteria within him can be reestablished in the ocean and maybe start life over again. Also No, No, Not Rogov! is a story I always enjoy re-reading, despite the sad ending. It's not world ending, or anything like that, but it's just a mournful short story.

  444. Maria Doria Russell, MT Anderson by jknapka · · Score: 1

    "The Sparrow", by Maria Doria Russell, is the most heartbreaking first contact story I've read. Summary: we are just about guaranteed to do it wrong, with tragic consequences, because aliens will be, y'know... ALIEN.

    "Feed" by M T Anderson is the third side of the 1984/Brave New World triangle, and the one I see as most likely to describe our future:

    1984: government controls all information.
    BNW: nobody has to control information because no one really cares about it.
    Feed: there's so much information (85% of it BS) that it's impossible to sort the wheat from the chaff.

  445. A World Made By Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A World Made By Hand" by Kunstler is pretty bleak. Pretty much a story that takes place a decade or two after the oil runs out.

  446. Fiasco by Stanislaw Lem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stanislaw Lem has some great and exceptional works. In fact, I think Cyberiad (whose naming predates any 'cyber' hoopla, harumph) is such an interesting piece of fiction that if you haven't already nibbled at it, you should consider adding it to your reading list now.

    Fiasco, though. Wow, what a dark storm of a work. We finally encounters extraterrestrial life and sally forth to the planet containing said life to try to engage in communication with them. Not only do the planet's denizens not really want to talk to us, but also they appear to be in the midst of some kind of ongoing cold war that's divided the planet. Determined to get some type of communication going with the species below, the representatives of Earth decide to blow up the planet's moon: a first contact fireworks celebration that leads to mass depopulation in the planet below.

    Lem wrote his novels in Russia-occupied Poland during the cold war and in no other place does this fact ring like it does in Fiasco. The novel is grim, fatalistic, nihilistic and riveting. It's a haunting work that leaves lasting and vivid impressions.

    Final note: although I've been reading Slashdot for years, this is my first post.

  447. Orthe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orthe by Mary Gentle - most depressing book I have ever read.

  448. A ClockWork Orange by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    Besides A Scanner Darkly, I'd say A ClockWork Orange (the book) was very depressing. Its a good read, if you can get past the hybrid lingo of Russian/English slang.

  449. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1984 is not even fiction anymore - let along Sci-Fi.

  450. The hitchhikers guide to the galaxy by pwolk · · Score: 1

    I won't enjoy it.- Marvin, the Paranoid Android

    1. Re:The hitchhikers guide to the galaxy by Amelia+G · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      chick-in-charge at Blue Blood
  451. I definitely know one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said.

  452. You didn't listen to the speech by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Did you hear the entire speech, or just the out of context part Fox and Romney spread?

    You obviously didn't hear it. If you had you'd not be trying to make people listen to the whole thing, because the context made his remarks FAR WORSE than just that simple quote would imply.

    Everyone - don't listen to this simpleton parroting liberal talking points about about the "context" alleviating what Obama said (note HE didn't link to the whole thing, not wanting you to actually know). Watch the whole thing as he asks you to and then decide for yourself.

    Obama should not be elected based solely on that interview. Green, Libertarian, Republican - vote for ANYONE else, but not someone who firmly believes people are simply wards of the state, incapable of creation without a hand from the federal government.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  453. Oryx and Crake/Year of the Flood by drkoemans · · Score: 1
    Atwood is pretty good at depressing, even if she doesn't consider herself a sci-fi author. If you like Margaret Atwood, I suggest you DO NOT listen to this interview. She apparently isn't familiar with the work of Orson Scott Card.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129324791

  454. Science Non-Fiction by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    I never get more depressed than when I read this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

  455. Pefers Comedy by rangleme · · Score: 1

    I certainly would rather read comedy sci-fi or fantasy than depressing stories. Tales like "The Cold Equations" make me angry... I'm sure that is why Kirk cheated on the "Kobayashi Maru" in Star Trek. Even depressing morality tales like "The Red Balloon", "Flowers for Algernon", "A Summer in a Day" and a story about a polluted world where the last gardener tends the last plants in a greenhouse that a mob destroies (Sorry I can't remember the name). As good as the stories get, even "Slient Running", "Soylent Green" and "2001: a Space Odessey" can be depressing. Thankfully there are writers like Pratchett and Adams that don't depress me.

    --
    Do Good, Annoy Evil!
  456. The Bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    definitely.

    The start is imaginative, but it goes rapidly downhill, and doesn't end well for anyone.

  457. The real world by cpghost · · Score: 1

    The most depressing Sci-Fi I've read is what History writes herself right now. Who would have thought a couple of decades ago that we would spend trillions not to build some huge projects that are beneficial for the human race, but on bailing out banks? BANKS?! Who would have thought just after 9/11 that we would support a radical Islamist takeover of Syria by Al Qaida and hteir ilk, just because we dislike the local dictator there? If that's not depressing fiction becoming true, I don't know what's more depressing than that.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  458. Re:Most Depressing? Slashdot comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously peeps, science fiction. not fucking fiction.

    So no Heinlein then?

  459. Not really plausible by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    The climactic horror in the book is when the male protagonist murders his beloved daughter because the parasite irresistably compells him to.

    This was the "Gimme a *deleted* BREAK (book impacts far wall hard enough to leave a dent)" moment in the story for me. The parasite, as described, would no more have irresistably compelled him to murder his daughter than he would have been irresistably compelled, minus the parasite, to rape her.

    If the parasite could have just overridden all human will and compelled a human to do anything, then, hey, presto, make everyone kill themselves, much quicker solution.

    1. Re:Not really plausible by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      The parasite "as described" didn't just warp sexuality, it also eroded inhibitions. Unfortunately, people are already known to get violent, and sexual, and violent sexual, compulsions naturally, no parasite required. Considering we also already know of examples of parasites that have disinhibiting effects, it doesn't seem like that much of a stretch to me.

      The point was that the parasite only had to do two things: 1) reduce sexual inhibitions, and 2) suppress the normal interruption of the (posited) link between violent predation and sexuality in male mammals. At that point it's elegant, in a horrifying way. Get one half to kill the other half, then take out much of itself when targets thin out, by targeting just a couple weak fracture lines.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  460. Hell by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

    To me it would be Stanislaw Lem's Memoirs Found in a Bathtub, but I would give honorable mention to 1984, The Dark Tower, and the Thomas Covenant Series.

    --
    One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
  461. Read-once literature by Max+Hyre · · Score: 1

    I, too, came here to mention IHNMaIMS. It's one of two works I've read only once because I'm too scared to go back.

    The other is Dracula. I started it one evening and finished early the next morning because I was literally too scared to put it down unfinished. I'm thinking that after ~40 years, maybe it's worth a re-read. I Have No Mouth..., never.

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
  462. The Road by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1
    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  463. Most depressing by mostlyDigital · · Score: 1

    The Road

  464. All Turned by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    How exactly do you know that those people have really "moved the world" by their sheer will, rather than being flesh and blood manifestations of the coming change, suffered by society as a whole that spawned them - zeitgeist, if you want?

    Because all of them went against the zeitgiest in order to change things.

    As I said, there are countless people noted through history that made whole populations change course wildly.

    THAT IS HOW YOU KNOW.

    And that is why they are remembered.

    To claim otherwise is madness, madness a child can see through knowing the example of even only one of these rare people.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  465. Depressing SciFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cold Equations by Tom Godwin. Having to make a choice who should die, a young girl stow away just wanting to spend time with her brother, or the colony they are headed to.

  466. most depressing sci-fo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try "The Windup Girl" or "Execution Channel"- will make your day...

  467. The Hunger Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree absolutely with previous posts mentioning "1984," "The Road" and "On The Beach." Also wanted to add "The Hunger Games" trilogy, which I found incredibly depressing, with the descriptios of a society so oppressive that young people are forced to fight to the death. Also, the heroine, Catniss, has to constantly think about what she's saying and doing at all times so as not to give the ruling regime the excuse to torture and/or execute her or those she loves.

  468. Mechanical Mice by pigiron · · Score: 1

    by Eric Frank Russell written in 1941 pre-sages self-replicating mechanical automata. As Bill Joy has noted, one can see clearly now that this could lead to the entire planet being completely covered by a seething dust of all-consuming mindless nanobots.

  469. Arthur C. Clark by peterantonrev · · Score: 1

    This isn't so much about any particular story line as much as with the author itself. I had great hopes of getting lost in the visionary books of the man who created 2001: A Space Odyssey which I finished reading the car on the way to the theater back in high school. In later years as I was reading 2010, 3001 and whatever other books are in the series, I started to become aware of a disturbing undercurrent to his writing. There was a very distracting dimension of the self promotion of his view of the future as the only logical future outcome. I wanted to slap him upside the head as I read so I could just enjoy the story whatever its relationship with the actual future. Isn't that the purpose of science fiction? To get lost in alternate-certainly-possible-but-not-necessarily future conditions? His arrogance was unbefitting of an open minded yet imagineering weaver of possibilities. Yet, may he rest in peace. Maybe he's in some remedial creativity school on some mystical invisible planet from one of his books that he didn't even realize existed at the time he wrote it.

  470. Samuel Delaney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trouble on Triton

    After all the changes enabled by advanced technology, nothing changes.

  471. Pure nasty by jmichaelslocum · · Score: 1

    A Boy and His Dog Harlan Ellison.

  472. "The Children of Men" and "Never Let Me Go" by lerxstz · · Score: 1

    Both interesting and horribly depressing at the same time. Also made into movies.

    --
    I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
  473. James Tiptree, Jr. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Her Smoke rose up Forever."

    A man is trapped to remember all the worst times of his life, for eternity.

    Also, for another, something I read that talked about the insects and other beings eating the last man on earth.

  474. More than just 1984 and BNW by Fyzzler · · Score: 1

    There are many more choices than 1984 and BNW. There was that Asimov story about the single human who helped the Androids/Robots achieve freedom by committing Genocide on the whole human race. At the end, he is the only human alive and his supposed girl friend reveals she is an Android.

    Then there is John Brunner's "A Jagged Orbit" which was good, but depressing.

    Then we can stray into Fantasy with Stephen R. Donaldson and the Thomas Convenant series. I could not get past the second book. It was too depressing.

    Then finally, one of my all time favorites that was kind of depressing. "The Siege of Wonder" by Mark S. Geston. It details a war between Science and Magic. You can't help but root for Magic. Science discovers that all of Human behavior, even love, can be modeled by Mathematics. People who fully understand the math, tend to all commit suicide. Science wins the war, but nobody seems to be all that happy about the victory. Very good book, but leaves you depressed at the end.

    --
    I have one question. If the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture is not in charge of Gundam, then who is?
  475. A bad day for sales by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    I remember reading this short story when I was a kid and it stuck with me. It's written in cold war era, and reflects the worry of nuclear bombs being dropped. The story is basically about a robot standing at the front of an amusement park, trying to entice people to come in. Unfortunately as the story goes on, you realize that there is something wrong. At the end you realize that the bombs have dropped, and there is nobody around to go into the park. The robot is talking to itself, because everyone is dead.

  476. I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" by Harlan Ellison.

  477. Iain Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Against a Dark Background
    Consider Phlebas
    Use of Weapons
    Matter
    Player of Games

    The first is very depressing, set close to the heat death of the Universe. The other four are part of his Culture series. 'Consider Phlebas' and 'Use of Weapons' are both extremely dark. 'Matter' is one of my favorites and although I came to a different conclusion, my wife and one of my Brothers thought it was horribly depressing.

    I would also recommend 'A Plague of Angels' by Sherri S Tepper. I won't spoil the ending, but it was severely depressing.

  478. Bleak and short for a change? Stross: A Colder War by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    http://www.infinityplus.co.uk/stories/colderwar.htm

    the Oliver North/Guns for Hostages scandal, seen from the viewpoint of a CIA bureaucrat, in a universe in which the entire Cthulhu Mythos is real. (Teresa Nielsen Hayden)

  479. Great Sky River by cjoy · · Score: 1

    I'll put in a vote for "Great Sky River" by Gregory Benford. This was a nebula award nominee I picked up about 10 years ago and gave me nightmares ever since. The background is a small group of humans on a planet which has gone "mech". To try and survive, they have increasingly replaced their bodies with robot parts. It's not enough: the machines are faster, smarter, and their motivations largely incomprehensible as they hunt the survivors down. Eventually, they come to understand part of the reason they are being hunted, cut to pieces, and brain dumped. It's not because humans even matter anymore, they are shown the museum full of deconstructed and "reinterpreted" human components they are to become a part of. This was a very believable "hard sci-fi" novel which laid out a quite convincing and bleak possible future.

  480. Most depressing SyFy book ever by skipdallas · · Score: 1

    Samuel R. Delany's "Dhalgren" was the most depressing Science Fiction Novel I have ever read. Very dark and a bit confusing. But despite this, I really enjoyed it. I first read it in 1974, and I just purchased a new copy. Maybe the second time around I will get even more out of it.

  481. On The Beach, a/k/a USS Charleston by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    A movie with the submarine's name for title (instead of the book's) in many countries has been made in 2000 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0219224 - reminiscent of The Day After http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085404 (no, this one ain't no Emmerich, and definitely without any Tomorrow). Both as bleak as it gets on TV too.

  482. "The Sheep Look Up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't believe no one has cited this one by John Brunner. I'm not going to spoil it but seriously, after reading this prescient and utterly pessimistic evisceration of Westernised industialisation and the corporate sodomising of our planet you might want to read Childhood's End or 1984 just to cheer you up...

  483. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1984

    A close (or multiple) reading of 1984 shows it not to be depressing but hopeful because in the end, it is revealed that The Party fell.

    It fell despite its ability to control information and mass consciousness and language; with the ability, through the telescreen to have an audio-video bug in every house; despite a constantly vigilant secret police that sat above all, turned children into informers against their parents and crushed whomever it liked into powder in (obviously) Stalinist show trials, the Party Finally fell.

    The thing that is brilliant about 1984 is not it's immediate reward of a happy ending but its precise evocation of a world that is an extension of Soviet-Style, Cult-of-personality communism, and in that ability to evoke what you found in that state on such a visceral level that parts of it become permanent experiences for the reader.

  484. Here are my nominees... by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1
    ... that hopefully haven't already been done to death:
    • "The Jigsaw Man" by Larry Niven
    • The Sheep Look Up by John Brunner
    • "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury (from The Martian Chronicles)
    • The White Plague by Frank Herbert
    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  485. Re:Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. We are living Brave New World much more than 1984.

    Split the Hegelian difference and go for fusion. Both books can be said to reflect the age we live in.

    Reading a history of the FBI and other intelligence agencies operating against communist subversion and popular movements by planting intelligence agents, wiretapping and other forms of domestic surveillance reveal aspects of Orwell's "brute force of the state." While what is described about Brave New World is also present and pervasive in our culture, from a twenty-four-hour news-cycle that leaves us in a permanent state of information overload, erasing remembered history, to proles who live in sedentary bliss in front of the warm glow of The Mentalist, eating themselves into clinical obesity.

    Both writers are winners.

  486. When Heaven Fell, by William Barton by Guppy · · Score: 1

    For readers who were impressed by Blindsight, I'd like to recommend William Barton's When Heaven Fell. There are some similar themes, including the enslavement of humanity (and most sentient species in our corner of the galaxy) by a race of Eusocial aliens who are non-sentient (but unlike your typical SF example, there apparently is no Queen to assassinate or negotiate with, nor any hidden hive-mind who just happens to mis-understand humanity). Despite being non-sentient, their co-operative efforts allow them to build advanced weapons and AI servants superior to anything humans have.

    I remember debating this novel with members of my old SF club, and one of the objections a friend had, was the number of gratuitious sex scenes in the book. I thought that the emptiness and gratuity of the sex scenes was actually an important but subtle point, although I couldn't quite explain it to him, until I realized the problem was that my friend was a History major, while I was a student of Biology; not too spoil too much, but if you read the book, think about what are the selection dynamics that lead to the evolution of Eusociality.

  487. Worst and most terrifying science fiction by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Das Kapital by Karl Marx. It's a poorly written (though may be it was the translation I read) diatribe about a utopian world free from capitalist overlords. It wasn't so depressing in and of itself, just it's implications, knowing what it would do over the next century to civilized cultures.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Worst and most terrifying science fiction by marty23571113 · · Score: 1

      Worst and most terrifying science fiction? NOW http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19169023

  488. The Cold Equations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a short story, but The Cold Equations by Tom Godwin. I remember being pretty upset about the outcome when I read this in junior high (surely there HAD to be a better way of handling that).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cold_Equations

  489. Snow Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found "Snow Crash" to be depressing. A broken world of dog eat dog.

  490. Most depressing SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Forge of God by Greg Bear

  491. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Get the genre right, it's Fantasy, not Science Fiction.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  492. I really hate his guy... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    I waited for years as those books dribbled out, and each was worse than the last.

    He needs his balls kicked in...

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  493. Leper guy by Meski · · Score: 1

    Anything in the 'Tales of Thomas Covenant' series.

  494. Nuclear war stories FTW by nullgreen · · Score: 1

    Level 7 by Mordecai Roshwald

  495. Not exactly a book... by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The storyline of the anime Southern Cross -no NOT the dubs, please- always struck me as phenomenally depressing.

    There are literally no happy endings in that series. Two different species reaching the ends of their lines and nearly every character ends up dead. Those that don't die are left to a rather unpromising fate with no hope to speak of. Nobody wins. Both sides collapse. It's a grim outcome.

    The show got canceled in part because it was just such a hopeless story. Yeah it had other issues too.

    Other than that, Niven and Pournelle's Footfall struck me as depressing. Not only does humanity get wiped out, it's freaking elephants who do it. I really hated circuses after that.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  496. It's not as great as it sounds by Xyanthiae · · Score: 1

    1984. Who wants a lobotomy after being caught having sex....wooo.

  497. Blindsight (Peter Watts) by letsgetphysicalchem · · Score: 1

    Peter Watts' Blindsight has resonated with me since I first read it. It is a raw, intensely in-depth, hard core science fiction story that (amazingly) includes everything from genetic vampirism to astro-spectroscopy. Not only is it good SF, it delves into the human psyche and provides a chillingly realistic portrayal of how a first encounter would probably be handled by our race. For those of you that enjoy your SF served with a piping hot bowl of reasonably-good-scientific-explanation soup (but not too reasonable... then it would be work, not play), then I suggest taking a gander at Watts' website where he allows the free download of the ebook in many formats. [http://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm]

  498. Two for me by Asuyuka · · Score: 1

    One is depressing, in a good sense. There Will Come Soft Rains by Bradbury. Its haunting, a small tale after the end of the world. The other is depressing and just boring. Galactic Odyssey by Keith Laumer. Maybe I missed it, but I just wanted him to have his Lady Raire back already. Which is sad, because I love the Retief books, and feel that while they are not appreciated as they should be. Guy's got a great sense of humor.

  499. 1984 traumatized me by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    Not precisely a sci-fi, but the saddest story I've ever read. The ending is worse than I could imagine.

    I was emotionally traumatized for reading that.

  500. What?! Brave New World is an Utopia? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    BNW is an utopia?

    BNW is a dystopia; it has widespread violations of human dignity.

    Everyone who believes in natural law and universal human rights is shocked by your post.

    And the purpose of life is not to be happy through blissful ignorance. This would horrify the ancient Greek philosophers who wrote
    "The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being."

    1. Re:What?! Brave New World is an Utopia? by khallow · · Score: 1

      You mean Brave New World was meant to be a cautionary tale rather than a "how-to" manual? Who knew?

    2. Re:What?! Brave New World is an Utopia? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      You mean Brave New World was meant to be a cautionary tale rather than a "how-to" manual? Who knew?

      Yes, of course BNW was meant to be a cautionary tale. But look at the post I replied to. The guy says BNW is an utopia!

  501. Most depressing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donaldson's Illearth Wars 3 Vols. or was it four.

  502. CLIFFORD SIMAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you haven't read any Clifford Simak, PLEASE DO.
    One of the BEST, without a doubt.

  503. Re:What's the Most Depressing Sci-fi You've Ever R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1984

    Under the spreading chestnut tree, I read you, you bored me.

  504. My Three by bigt_littleodd · · Score: 1
    My three, in no particular order:

    "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy. Not really "science-y", and has what I perceived as illogical leaps, but oh-so-dreary.

    "The Light of Other Days" by Arthur C. Clarke and Gentry Lee. Scientific advancement commoditized and abused to no end results in a society where there is no privacy. At all.

    "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood. Scientific advancement without control destroys civilization. (No, I haven't read the sequel yet.)

    --
    Let's play Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I'll be Pestilence.
    1. Re:My Three by bigt_littleodd · · Score: 1

      "The Light of Other Days" is by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter, not with Gentry Lee. Send your complaints of my mis-attribution to my lawyer.

      --
      Let's play Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I'll be Pestilence.
  505. Gene Wolfe - The Fifth Head of Cerberus by 0-9a-f · · Score: 1

    The Fifth Head of Cerberus is by far the most difficult book I have ever attempted to read, taking 3 months before I finally cracked the writing style and mood. By the end of it, I just wanted it over... I felt dirty, as though a part of me had been removed that could never be returned. My naivety died in reading that book.

    Even now, just thinking about the book brings a darkness back into my spirit, which I cannot bring myself to look at. I feel hopeless and numb.

    Such a profound and lasting impact I've never had from any other author. His words spoke directly into my soul, and I identified with - no, became - his characters in subtle yet powerful ways. I hope never to read his works again, but now they are a part of me.

    If the book does not affect you, either you have not read the book, or your spirit is already broken.

    --
    With each breath in, a flower somewhere opens; with each breath out, a flower withers away. In between lies beauty.
  506. Good list. Add torture by Quila · · Score: 1

    "On the Uses of Torture", a short story by Piers Anthony. A sadist is recruited to establish contact with an alien society where no envoy has ever returned, and experiences some pretty gruesome torture. The ending is just sick and depressing.

  507. E.M. Forsters The Machine Stops (1909) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who uses the Internet should read E.M. Forster's The Machine Stops. It is a chilling, short story masterpiece about the role of technology in our lives. Written in 1909, it's as relevant today as the day it was published. Forster has several prescient notions including instant messages (email!) and cinematophoes (machines that project visual images).

    -Paul Rajlich

    THE MACHINE STOPS
    by E.M. Forster (1909)

    I

    THE AIR-SHIP

    Imagine, if you can, a small room, hexagonal in shape, like the cell of a bee. It is lighted neither by window nor by lamp, yet it is filled with a soft radiance. There are no apertures for ventilation, yet the air is fresh. There are no musical instruments, and yet, at the moment that my meditation opens, this room is throbbing with melodious sounds. An armchair is in the centre, by its side a reading-desk-that is all the furniture. And in the armchair there sits a swaddled lump of flesh-a woman, about five feet high, with a face as white as a fungus. It is to her that the little room belongs.

    An electric bell rang.

    The woman touched a switch and the music was silent.

    "I suppose I must see who it is", she thought, and set her chair in motion. The chair, like the music, was worked by machinery and it rolled her to the other side of the room where the bell still rang importunately.

    "Who is it?" she called. Her voice was irritable, for she had been interrupted often since the music began. She knew several thousand people, in certain directions human intercourse had advanced enormously.

    Full story:

    http://archive.ncsa.illinois.edu/prajlich/forster.html

  508. The Merchant Princes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charles Stross has a talent for apocalyptic endings. In that particular case you can understand why the acting president of the US gave that apocalyptic order.

  509. A short but terribly depressing one - by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

    The announcement of the cancellation of Firefly.

  510. Anthonology: related titles by 3nails4aFalseProphet · · Score: 1

    Pro Tip: don't search for Anthonology (the collection of short stories including On The Uses of Torture) on Google's Play store. It isn't available in digital, and Google assumes if you're searching for Anthony you must be a perverted freak of the highest order. It's hard to explain to your wife why an anthology of yaoi is in your search history. "No, honey it's OK... I was really just trying to find a short story on the uses of torture." Yeah... saying you were looking for a torture story doesn't really make things better.

    --
    /*Insert boring sig here*/
    1. Re:Anthonology: related titles by Quila · · Score: 1

      I guess it's good I got it dead tree from a used book store.

    2. Re:Anthonology: related titles by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Pro Tip: don't search for Anthonology (...) on Google's Play store.

      What is wrong with re-reading the dead-tree version that you've already got?

      Just because it's the most depressing story you're ever read, doesn't mean that it's not something you keep around for the future. If only, so you can think "I haven't read that story recently ; and I feel better for it!"

      SF (or SciFi, or whichever dog you back in that almost-meaningless poo-flinging contest) as a genre between 70 and 100 years old, depending on your particular cup of tea, so on average, random samples from the history of the genre are going to be 35 to 50 years old. well into dead tree format.

      Or are you one of these people who give away / sell / throw away books once you've read them and found them entertaining? I don't think I've ever met one of those - people either don't read, or keep the books they enjoy.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    3. Re:Anthonology: related titles by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      PS : I was searching to find if someone else considered "On the uses..." to be their "most depressing" story. It was a toss-up for me between "On the uses ..." and "In the Barn".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  511. Easy: The Night's Dawn Trilogy by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Why The Night's Dawn Trilogy, you ask?

    Because anyone who's read Peter F. Hamilton knows he's wordy-as-fuck and his books span a thousand+ pages.

    I took a chance on "The Reality Dysfunction" as my first Hamilton experience, and after a couple months of pain I finished...only to discover that the damn thing was a trilogy, and the story completely left me hanging. What pissed me off most was during those months of reading, there was *barely* anything interesting happening in the book, and it *barely* kept me going. I finished that book from sheer determination, and then when I found out it was a three-part torture set, I lost my will to continue.

    I'm not enough of a masochist to finish that trilogy. The Reality Dysfunction was my first and last Hamilton experience.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  512. Re:Where are the John Varley books and short stori by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Ah, Steakley. He's depressing, but he's *good*. The grittiness is at least balanced by a vivid intensity of action and a fantastic sense of humor. It's very sad that he died before he could write a sequel to Armor - or any other books, for that matter. I found him first through 'Vampire$' which I like even more, but I've read both books several times. I admit, though: after the second time through (apparently didn't remember it well enough the first time), I simply skip the 'puppy in the well' section because it's some of the evilest few pages in literature.

    Curious fact for people who may not know him: 'Armor' is basically set in the same background universe as Heinlein's 'Starship Troopers.' I think I remember seeing Steakley quoted as saying, "I wouldn't have had to write this book if Heinlein could write action."

  513. CM Kornbluth and Lester Del Rey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two of my all-time favourite SF writers from pulp-fiction days.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CM_Kornbluth
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lester_Del_Rey

    You never hear their stories any more, nor their like, really. The pulp fiction of their time always gave me a sense of wonder in the same way that the movies of the time did. Newer stories are so often wrapped up in the opera and tend to forget the space part.

    I understand that our current batch of science fiction is beholden to our times. We live in a land of risk-management, and budgetary analysis. These authors came from a time before there was a sticker on the top step of the ladder that told you not to go there. their fiction assumed a race of people as adventurous as they were, and openly mocked those that would have them take shorter strides.

    Have you noticed that science fiction to the common audience is nothing more than comic-book superheroes and fantasy? I like junk food as much as the next guy, but ever-so-often I long for something better.

  514. It's a Good Life by hicksw · · Score: 1

    It is only a short story by Jerome Bixby (1953), but
    It's a Good Life portrays a truly hellish psychological environment.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_a_Good_Life

  515. City at the End of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greg Bear, City at the End of Time http://www.amazon.com/City-End-Time-Greg-Bear/dp/0345448391
    Talk about no hope when space time rips itself apart.

  516. Re:Bio of Space Tyrant: Refugee by Piers Anthony by ed1park · · Score: 1

    I just watched the first episode, and wouldn't even put in the same ballpark as Fireflies. Can't stomach the over the top action sequences. I'm sure it's a very sweet and touching show, but strictly for kids. I'm more inclined to watch Naruto. Thanks for the suggestion though.

    That reminds me, Galaxy Express 999 is another great and old anime series that is like Twilight Zone with a Sci Fi twist for kids.

    And Robotech is another great one. A cartoon ahead of it's time with feminist themes and gritty depictions of global war and alien invasions. First cartoon I watched as a kid where a main character actually died from battle! (Roy Fokker) Meanwhile on the other channel GI Joe characters were shooting lasers and missiles all over and not one fatality. Bleh

  517. "The People of Sand and Slag" by Paolo Bacigalupi by MeganTotem · · Score: 1

    I read this short story in The Year's Best Science Fiction: 22nd Annual Collection, edited by Gardner Dozois. Frankly, it broke me. It's about a moment that defines the point at which our humanity is lost. Not a moment of evil, just a moment of losing what makes us human... and how easily it can slip away. I was upset for months. And I'm not even a dog lover.

  518. Depressing Sci-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asimov's foundation is depressing for several reasons. It glorifies Socialism as a political mandate when it has failed everywhere. It makes no attempt to understand economics. It is so long and so vague that when you read it and turn the last page you realize you've been fucked by wasting precious hours absorbing historical twaddle, not to mention the hard earned shekels shelled out. The worst part is that Asimov has many excellent novels. Like many PhD's and MD's he thinks he is an expert in everything cause he is so fucking smart becuase he got a few letters after his ame.

    Foundation just sucks, the mule the intellectual genius janitor to rule the cosmos? Spare me.

  519. So long and then at the end.... by jgb1128 · · Score: 1

    How about The Dark Tower series. Now EIGHT books thousands of pages, and if you have read them the end is incredibly depressing (but its the right ending!). I met Stephen King and told him I loved the ending even though it is a total downer.

  520. Worst Case BNW + '84 = Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are altruistic, and the system is designed to ensure that they stay that way.

    Growing people up in severe environments of torture, so that they behave a certain way as adults and are happy is NOT altruism. I'm currently reading BNW and the sheep are not given a choice about how they live their lives. They are manipulated from before birth, and tortured after birth to achieve certain responses to given stimulus. Not only is this different from how we experience freedom (different is fine) but it is the exact opposite of freedom because the people being raised in this system aren't given a choice until well after they have been subjected to its influence. And after such an extreme indoctrination, it is the rare individual indeed who slips the training to experience their lives in their own fashion.

    In chapter 2 they zap, surprise and play terrifyingly loud noise at babies. The flocks of people in the book are created to be consumer whores without a choice in their lives.

    Zenith gives an alternative idea of the same principle being applied in a different way (the population is drugged into happiness via the water supply).

    Being forced to be high, being forced to feel a particular way is not a utopia. Just because the littlest elf is smiling on the outside, doesn't mean he isn't dying on the inside.

    All that being said, I am seeing large parallels with today's world compared to BNW more than '84. I think we're already partly towards are terrible blend of both of them. We are being fed a medicated diet of media designed to keep us scared but just happy enough, but the people who have the power absolutely are not doing it for our benefit. They are operating purely for their own benefit and that's what's pushing us closer to conflict. The stupid thing is that if the CEO's would have stopped bottom-lining everything, they probably could have kept going near indefinitely. Personal greed at the highest levels has led to society wide distrust of any power figure and a general sense of helplessness. It's the helplessness that is presently keeping people passive. However that will only last so long before people start getting really mad. In many cases I think random gun violence is a sign of this despair (pure pornographic hypothesis).

  521. Depressing Sci FI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The World Inside by Robert Silverburg

  522. Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury by Amelia+G · · Score: 2

    Martian Chronicles. Ray Bradbury brilliantly presented how the banality of evil could be exhibited wherever mankind ended up. The minor mundane awfulness of humans, even in what should have been fascinating circumstances, was depressing as all get out.

    --
    chick-in-charge at Blue Blood
  523. Hellspark by Janet Kagan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's Hellspark by Janet Kagan. Why? Well, it shows that humans can't recognize other sentient species, so how on earth (ha ha) would we be able to populate other planets once we can travel without decimating those worlds. On the other hand, it is my alltime favorite Science Fiction book.

  524. Almost cried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once read that they were canceling Firefly...

  525. Jacobs ladder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for me it was very depressing having just returned form Vietnam!

  526. Most derpressing Science-Fiction ever. by denise_yenko · · Score: 1

    Roger Zelazny's _Dalhgren_

    --
    I'm armed and I haven't changed my patch, so don't start with me -- you *know* how I get!
  527. The Giver by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

    Children's book my aching proboscis. But, like Brave New World, for some collectivists this is a utopia, not a dystopia. Only in a free world can both exist as micro-climes.

    --
    "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
  528. sci-fi book sections in decline by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Back in the 70s a local bookstore had an entire wall of paperback sci-fi.

    Somewhere in the 90s it seems that sci-fi book offerings went into decline. Sure there were still the republishing of 'classics' (dune and such), but not too many new works for sale.

    My most recent trips to a bookstore seem to indicate that sci-fi is still in decline, if bookshelf space is a fair indicator. (I am not including manga or other derivatives)

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  529. surfing the net by phone instead by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    *raising hand* I now use my phone's web browser to catch up on http://news.google.com/ and facebook... guity as charged.

    But I do remember I used to have a paperback book I'd take to school or work, yeow.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  530. Any utopian sci-fi by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    Since it all is based on pure fantasy.

    I just hat the contamination of sci-fi with fantasy.

  531. "Soyland Green" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the sci-fi novel "Make Room! Make Room!" and it's movie counterpart "Soyland Green"? I think we are on the path now to that horrible near future - global warming, nuclear disasters, the dying oceans, and corruptions all over the world by the powerful.

  532. Never let me go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Never let me go"
    An alternate reality where artificial insemination brings about Human donors; living a life of cattle like acceptance of fate; whose sole purpose is to provide organs/blood/marrow/plasma until they are used up & left to die.

  533. "The Day The Earth Stood Still" by Footsienabackyard · · Score: 1

    The 1951 movie made with the usual Hollywood edits from the short story "Farewell to the Master," by Harry Bates...http://thenostalgialeague.com/olmag/bates-farewell-to-the-master.html

    --
    Don't you think...? Or don't you?
  534. Frankenstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankenstein is really depressing. I couldn't eat or sleep for 1 months after reading it.

  535. most depressing sci fi book by modernbob · · Score: 1

    the road....

  536. One thing about the Boston Tea Party by Quila · · Score: 1

    Most people think it's just about government taxation. No, it was about crony capitalism, since the purpose of the tax was to funnel money into the influential East India Company.

  537. 1984 George Orwell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very depressing...because Orwell's novel was so prescient. "1984" is almost here...in America...in the year 2012!

  538. Unknown Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read a book, back in the 70's, and would like it if someone can come up with the title. It's about astronauts travelling to another planet, which is totally run by machines. Ultimately, the main character is cornered in a cave by a large robot, so he threatens to hit another robot with a large bar or stick. Turns out, the robot he's threatening to hit is "pregnant".

  539. Buffy, Season 6 by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    (Spoilers) Buffy gets yanked out of heaven by her best friend who gets addicted to, um, drugs so to speak who ends up going all end-the-world-crazy (with veins to boot) when her girlfriend is killed by a stray bullet (meant for Buffy) while Spike finds out that it doesn't matter how much you love. I mean, c'MON.

    I know, not sci-fi.

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  540. I LOVE dystopic fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1984 (Orwell) or We (Zamyatin). Those are my nominees.

  541. Cowboy Bebop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a book, but depressing none the less.

  542. China Mieville - Perdido Street Station by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Depicted a horribly powerful state government, ineffective against the nightmarish dream moths in a depressing Ankh-Morpork like city sans humor. Many protagonists die or get brain-wiped - dreary stuff.

    The sequels were even more depressing (Iron Council as well).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  543. "The Star" by Arthur C. Clarke by twms2h · · Score: 1

    The Star, by Arthur C. Clarke (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Star_(short_story) ) At least, if you believe in Christian mythology you will find it rather depressing that god chose to let the star of such a great civilization go nova just to generate the star of Bthlehem.

  544. easier by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Inconstant Moon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconstant_Moon ursula l guinn called it most depressing.

  545. "V", the TV series(es) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The end of both TV series shows the aliens win. Humanity is reduced to the status of cattle. The resistance is well and truly crushed. How do you get more depressing than that?