Slashdot Mirror


Following FEMA's Zombie Preparedness Plan Could Land You On Terrorist List

colinneagle writes "As if warning a zombie apocalypse is imminent, FEMA hosted a webinar for its Citizen Corps encouraging emergency planners 'to use the threat of zombies — the flesh-hungry, walking dead — to encourage citizens to prepare for disasters.' The problem is many of those recommendations would have you do things that would flag you as a possible terrorist according to The DOJ's controversial 'Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities' guidelines. From the article: 'Don't be silly by thinking you must actually break the law before cops deem you a potential threat and report you. Paying with cash comes under numerous "you might be a terrorist if" lists. Whatever you do, stocking up on non-perishable food as the feds advise should not include buying "meals ready to eat" since that, too, is potentially suspicious and means you might be a terrorist. "Suspicious activity" at military surplus stores includes making "bulk purchases" of "weatherproofed ammunition or match containers and meals ready to eat, as does suspicious purchasing of "night vision devices include night flashlights and gas masks."'"

527 comments

  1. Are you a human being? by magsol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So are terrorists. How convenient.

    --
    "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
    1. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Interesting

      FEMA produced the zombie plan campaign because people weren't taking the real risks (disease, natural disaster etc) seriously.

      Terrorism works by making people overestimate the risks to get the desired behaviour.

      Much as I admire their sense of humour and proactive stance, FEMA appear to be the terrorists here, according to current government definitions of "terrorist" at least.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    2. Re:Are you a human being? by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is a kind of a reductio ad Hitlerum. The problem is that some people are just to serious about themselves.
      Imagine that you truly believe that Muhammed was the greatest, biggest et ceterea, in the world. You and your friends believe in the *proper* imaginary bearded friend in the clouds. You and your little bearded friends are the only ones who really, fully and totally understand the truth, and everyone should obey you. Now keep that thought...
      You also see that you and your country didn't contribute to anything at all for the last say 300 years, on any terrain except some pious womenbeatings.
      Third you see the big Satan and his little helper (the west + Israel) getting people into space, inventing combustion engines, tv's, electric tin openers, microwaves, electricity, [expand the list as you like] and some of those inventions are used to kick your butt.

      This is why there are Mohammedan-terrorists: they feel that the time is NOW or NEVER, and by all means should it be worthwhile to convert (or kill) the infidels.
      Just wait it out, after a bit they will have their own renaissance and we'll all live peacefully here. Same goes for all of the mentalist by the way (ecomentalists, pro-life/choise-mentalists left/rightwing-mentalists, gun-nutters, and so on) and clearly even comic-book-mentalists believing that a zombie-apocalypse is on our hands... So it is not about being human, it is about being human & mental...

      But I wont kill anyone for this believe, it is a mere opinion... :-)

      --
      rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
    3. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing I only by daytime flashlights.

    4. Re:Are you a human being? by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's quite that extreme. However, I pay cash as much as possible because many companies that handle credit card transactions are a bunch of assholes (admittedly, they've gotten better in the past few years). I just don't want to give them money. Oh, I see, not paying the corporate overlord tax. I see how that makes me a terrorist. Nevermind. I'll make sure to wear a ski mask next time I pay in cash, so nobody is confused.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    5. Re:Are you a human being? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An eye opening moment on this subject was when CNN was doing some story and was talking to a single mother of two or three who wasn't well educated and living around Atlanta. This was two or three years after 911 and her life's biggest fear was terrorism. She lived in the outskirts of Atlanta and didn't work near any real target but thought the suicide bomber was coming at any minute.

    6. Re:Are you a human being? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Fancy that, the one who believes "The West" means "America" is calling people names.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An eye opening moment on this subject was when CNN was ... talking to a [person] who wasn't well educated...

      I think I spotted the problem. These people are already zombies in my book.

    8. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Indeed. Things that (statistically) are more likely to kill an American than a terrorist attack:
      • Obesity
      • Cancer
      • Car accident
      • Non-terrorism based plane crash
      • Dogs
      • Cats
      • Somebody elses gun
      • Their own gun
      • Lack of healthcare
      • Peanuts
      • Alcohol
      • Stress

      What's more likely to kill you than a terrorist? Worrying about a terrorist.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    9. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing I only by daytime flashlights.

      You beat me to it.

    10. Re:Are you a human being? by aintnostranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, that might be the case in the US, but in other parts of the world we Christians do expect the return of the Son of God, but:

      1- We don't have any idea when and how it's going to be, things might happen in any order (people that think they got a clear idea of how things are going to be from reading Revelations really startle me) and it can be tomorrow as well as it could be in ten thousand years.

      2- We don't try to make the apocalypse happen - people that think they have a roadmap on how to make it happen are walking a path of big arrogance. Nowhere in the bible does God ask for any help making such things happen. He only told us to love Him and to love others, and tell them about His love. There's nothing there about manipulating geopolitics to trigger anything or any crap like that. But I guess some people find all that love stuff boring and want to collaborate by invading some country or forcing someone to say they believe in Jesus.

    11. Re:Are you a human being? by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      An eye opening moment on this subject was when CNN was doing some story and was talking to a single mother of two or three who wasn't well educated and living around Atlanta. This was two or three years after 911 and her life's biggest fear was terrorism. She lived in the outskirts of Atlanta and didn't work near any real target but thought the suicide bomber was coming at any minute.

      So the terrorists have won. Or is it "the people who would use your ignorance and fear to manipulate you into doing things that you wouldn't normally do" who have won? Either way, we're fucked, so stop being ignorant and stupid, already. Tall order, I know. It's so easy to let Fox News tell us what to fear and how to think.

    12. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I have little doubt you are generally correct, your argument would carry far more weight if you could have provided at least a basic source or link where to get some stats behind that list.

    13. Re:Are you a human being? by Genda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's remember that in the entire history of this country, we've been invaded once (by our Mother Country), attacked once (at Pearl Harbor), and been terrorized once (on 9/11). Moreover, we had really good intelligence in each case that these events were coming and simply screwed up managing that information (if you believe the official versions or allowed them to happen for one reason or another if you believe in conspiracies.)

      The whole point of terrorism is similar to an allergic reaction. The response outweighs the event so dramatically that it does infinitely more harm than the event itself. That isn't to say that blowing up the twin towers wasn't an affront to human dignity. It is to say that the number of innocent people that died as a result of that affront so outnumber the affront itself as to dwarf it to near invisibility, and worse, most of the people that died were innocent Iraqi bystanders who had no dog in the fight to begin with. In an allergic reaction your immune system can charge all the way up to anaphylaxis and death all over a few peanut molecules. We have to be very careful to teach people to weigh threats according to reality and when we catch politicians using the boogie man to scare the public into voting for abominations and the gutting of the Constitution, we need to drag these people out in public places and show the nation who the real terrorists are.

    14. Re:Are you a human being? by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the scary thing is journalists like this one are on the watchlist. Her crime? talking about the constitution and what we need to do to protect it.

      When talking about the founding document of our country is enough to get you labeled as a possible "wrecker" then i think we can all agree the country has gone to shit. Kinda sad how we survived the USSR only to have those in power try to turn us into the USSA. I urge everyone to watch that video, she lays everything out with facts to back them up about how many of the "war on terrorism" plays were used before, even the language identical, by those that wanted to close free societies.

      The fact that doing what you are told will put you on a list frankly doesn't surprise me, the more people hassled and afraid the better the chilling effect.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:Are you a human being? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      You forgot to add Meteors, Lightning, Sharks, etc... to that list. The chances of dying to a terrorist attack in the US are vanishingly small, slightly more if your office space is in a national landmark or government facility, but substantially less for everybody else.

      If that lady were living in Israel or Helmand Province then I could understand her worry, but she was clearly crazy as you noted.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    16. Re:Are you a human being? by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      I have some in laws that still feel the same way. I tried to convince them that living out in the middle of nowhere was a pretty good defense, since there is no big media event to be gained by an attack where no-one would notice for a week or two, but they wouldn't listen.

    17. Re:Are you a human being? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      In some alternate universe, the government is ACTUALLY trying to prevent terrorism.

      The department of "Posting cute pictures of kittens everywhere" is easily the most effective government organization ever. "Keep calm and don't worry about spiders" becomes a national phrase. The president's weekly radio address consists of Obama singing lullabies. George Washington is replaced on the dollar bill with that smiley face from the 80's. E plubris unum is replaced with "Don't Worry Be Happy!" Police are tasked with making sure every doctor's office is stocked with lollipops. The NRA effectively lobbied against a rule requiring all guns to have electronic devices that replace the "Bang" sound with the sound of children laughing.

    18. Re:Are you a human being? by Genda · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right in fact the whole rabid religions from the dessert have been responsible for most of the general unhappiness in Eurasia for the better part of a thousand years, and the world at large for the last 500. Why does it seem that that whenever someone hears the voice of God, s/he feels compelled to shove it someone else's ear? We are funny hairless monkeys, eh?

    19. Re:Are you a human being? by a-zarkon! · · Score: 5, Informative

      How soon we forget:
      -War of 1812
      -Mexican American War
      -First World Trade Center
      -Oklahoma City
      -More bombings, assassinations, and other acts of terrorism too numerous to list.

    20. Re:Are you a human being? by OverkillTASF · · Score: 3, Funny

      Revelations 7:9
      After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. 10 And they cried out in a loud voice:

      For many of those who are trying to "make the apocalypse happen", the above outlines that it can't happen until every nation, tribe, people, and language has been reached by the word of God. Hence groups like the Joshua Project. They want to get the word of God to everyone. Once everyone has been exposed to the word of God, the apocalypse is possible. And the apocalypse is a good thing for believers, so hell yes, let's get on with it. I think the idea to them is... Apocalypse means I get to get off this rock and on to eternal happy-times, apocalypse can't happen until everyone has had a chance to accept God, I need to get God's word out there so that we can get on with the apocalypse.
      It's all very Halo/Convenant to me. Activate the rings... divine winds will whisp us off to heaven... everyone else is fucked.

    21. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The correct response to terrorism is to carry on as normal. The London Blitz during WWII was aimed at terrorising civilians, they didn't bother targeting military installations (which is generally considered to be a turning point for the British campaign as it took the heat off the RAF.

      The official UK government response? "Keep Calm & Carry On."

      (Offtopic: yes, I realise us Brits were just as guilty of terror-based bombing campaigns during WWII.)

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    22. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh yea the war of 1812. When those 'peaceful' cannucks were able to get as far as washington dc and burn the white house(wasn't called that before the war.)

    23. Re:Are you a human being? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Wait, dogs are statistically more likely to kill you than lack of healthcare? Dogs are even above cats?

      What?

    24. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War of 1812 , Mexican American War, You started
        First World Trade Center. Case can be made your actions started it.

    25. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apes/ hairless apes. if you're going to be an ass at least be an educated one.

    26. Re:Are you a human being? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, same could be said about the invasion by Britain (obviously, we started that war) and potentially 9/11. The only one I'm not sure about is Pearl Harbor.

      Point being, 'you started it' doesn't seem to be a criteria for not landing on the GP's list...

    27. Re:Are you a human being? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Let's remember that in the entire history of this country, we've been invaded once (by our Mother Country), attacked once (at Pearl Harbor), and been terrorized once (on 9/11).

      Pancho Villa in the early 1900s. The Japanese actually landed infantry in the Aleutians during World War II (if you want to be pedantic, Alaska wasn't a US state at the time, but whatever). There are wrecked ships, both civilian cargo vessels and military craft, all up and down the eastern seaboard from when German naval vessels attacked US shipping right off the coastline. US territorial sovereignty has been threatened or violated a lot more often than you think.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    28. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not in any particular order. But yes, dogs are better than cats at everything.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    29. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU didn't have any idea when it would happen, but Jesus did. Unfortunately he was off by...er...let's call it 1850 years and counting.

      "I tell you the truth, there be some standing here, who shall not taste death, before they see the Son of Man come in power"
      "When they persecute you, flee to another town; for you shall not have gone through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man cometh"

      Etc etc etc. You believers crack me up. If you knew your own religion, its history, its language, its cultural context, you wouldn't believe. I know this through long, bitter personal experience.

    30. Re:Are you a human being? by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Informative

      When talking about the founding document of our country is enough to get you labeled as a possible "wrecker" then i think we can all agree the country has gone to shit.

      Hate to tell you this, but that's not anything new. Unfortunately I can't recall the exact title of the book this story is from (something about the history of the First Amendment) -- it is from a published book with sources, but you'll just have to take my word on that. Or not, whatever.

      Anyway, back during the height of the 'Red Scare', there was an IWW member (Industrial Workers of the World for anyone unfamiliar -- aka "wobblies") standing on a street corner doing nothing but publicly reading our own Declaration of Independence. After a few minutes, a police officer comes by and arrests him -- for doing nothing but publicly reading the US Declaration of Independence. Now, it just happened that he was doing this outside of an office building where the US Forest Service (IIRC) had some offices, and one of those workers happened to have his window open since it was a nice day out. This guy doesn't really sympathize with the IWW, but he sees this happening and is so outraged that he goes outside and picks up the reading where the other guy left off. And he got hauled off to jail as well.

      So yea, reading the founding documents of our nation has been enough to get even government officials hauled off to jail for quite some time now, unfortunately....

    31. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      We're actually a completely different species. Apes, monkey and H. sap are all primates of the family Hominidae. Yes, we're closer to apes than monkeys, but we're not apes by the scientific definition.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    32. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      The "substantial culture" I referred to was meant to indicate that I meant a subset of all Christians, apologies if that wasn't clear.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    33. Re:Are you a human being? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, the government's official manual for dealing with terrorist events should says in large friendly letters: "Don't Panic".

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    34. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even in Israel the chances of dying to a terrorist attack are 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than the chances of dying by, say, car crash.
      http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Terrorism/victims.html
      125 dead since December 2005.
      this is around 19 deaths/year average for this period.
      car crashes kill around ~400/year average for this period.
      Israel's population is ~7M.

      and just like in the US, people are more afraid of terrorism than car crashes.

      Disclaimer: I live in Israel.

    35. Re:Are you a human being? by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Hawaii wasn't a state till the 50s. The Philippines were a commonwealth of the US and they were overrun by the Japanese.

    36. Re:Are you a human being? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      It's all very Halo/Convenant to me. Activate the rings... divine winds will whisp us off to heaven... everyone else is fucked.

      Interestingly, the Bible also says almost nothing (definitely nothing direct about who goes, or where they go) about being whisked off to heaven leaving everyone else on earth to suffer... this doesn't really mesh with "the old heaven and earth will pass away" or the vision of the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven to rest on the new earth. Also, it doesn't really mesh with the tale of Saul talking to the dead, of the few people who were "taken up", or the tale of the transfiguration.

      Part of the problem is likely due to people reading English translations of the Bible and confusing the different Greek and Hebrew words translated as "heaven" and "heavens", among other things (like ancient culture having a different concept of what heaven, earth, the sun, sheol, hades, hell, etc. were than we do in a post-humanistic society).

      Of course, there's lots of church myths and tales spun outside of what the Bible actually says that a lot of Christians think comes from the cannon -- but they'd do better to believe in Bel and the Dragon than to believe in Dante's Inferno, Milton's Paradise Lost/Paradise Regained or LaHaye and Jenkins' Left Behind series as literal truth.

    37. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      la, la, la, I'm not listening. na, na, na.

    38. Re:Are you a human being? by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Informative

      By my count from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States#2000s there were about 23 terrorism related deaths from 2000-2009, excluding 9/11 (which can be safely considered an outlier). That's 2.3 deaths/yr. If we do include 9/11, it's 302deaths/yr.

      From http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_03.pdf (I know it's only one year, I don't have time to compile a decade of statistics - but removal of any single outlier statistic shouldn't impact the overall message) page 89+.

      Things that have killed ~2-3 people a year include:
      -Measles (2)
      -Malaria (3)
      -Shigellosis (shingles) and amebiasis (4)
      -Scarlet fever and erysipelas (5)

      Things that have killed ~300 people/yr or more:
      -Bronchitis and Bronchiolitis or other acute unspecified lower respirator infection (272)
      -Diseases of appendix (426)
      -Hyperplasia of prostate (446)
      -Tuberculosis (529)
      -Infections of kidney (604)
      -Bronchitis, chronic and unspecified (639)
      -Meningitis (649)
      -Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (6-weeks postnatal) (960)
      -Malnutrition (2,680)

      Even if you play mad-scientist with the statistics and assume that there will be a 9/11 every single year (~3000 deaths), these still kill about as many or more people a year
      -Influenza (2,918)
      -Cholelithiasis and other disorders of gallbladder (3,300)
      -Asthma (3,388)
      -Accidental drowning and submersion (3,517)
      -Other and unspecified events of undetermined intent and their sequelae (4,773)
      -Atherosclerosis (7,377)
      -Viral hepatitis (7,694)
      -HIV disease (9,406)

      Things that GP mentioned:
              Obesity (no single statistic, but assume a fraction of the 600,000 death by cardiac diseases are from obesity)
              Cancer (Malignant neoplasms - 567,628)
              Car accident (Motor vehicle accident - 36,216)
              Non-terrorism based plane crash (Water/air/space/unspecified accident - 1,782)
              Somebody elses gun (Homicide by firearm - 11,493)
              Their own gun (Accidental discharge of firearms - 554)
              Alcohol (24,518)
              Stress (again, no single stat - assume a portion of Hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure) with 33,157 death/yr)

      I couldn't find stats for Dogs/Cats, Lack of healthcare (too vague) or Peanuts (although I did read several times an approximate rate of 150-200 deaths/yr from food allergens, a significant portion of which are from peanuts).

      I know you weren't disagreeing with GP, but there you go.

    39. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read or watch the news ever that's enough source to prove that more deaths occur from other things.

    40. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whole rabid religions from the dessert

      So the cake is a lie?

    41. Re:Are you a human being? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right in fact the whole rabid religions from the dessert have been responsible for most of the general unhappiness in Eurasia for the better part of a thousand years, and the world at large for the last 500. Why does it seem that that whenever someone hears the voice of God, s/he feels compelled to shove it someone else's ear? We are funny hairless monkeys, eh?

      That's from the same playbook as "Music from past decades is so much better than the junk they make today" -- you'll find that religions have been a major part of politics for as long as men have had politics (whether you believe in separation of church and state or not), and if you look at humanity, you'll see that there's always been a small percentage of people who have been responsible for most of the general unhappiness -- often using the same religions/political weapons that are used for good by others. The difference is that we tend to remember disasters better than successes; it helps us route around them as a society (and yet, history still repeats itself).

      So no, whenever someone hears the voice of God, s/he doesn't feel compelled to shove it in someone else's ear -- those are just the ones you hear about, because they felt compelled to shove it in someone else's ear. For all you know, there are people all around you hearing the voice of God all the time -- but since they aren't telling you about it, you don't know. Most people who hear what some call the voice of God probably call it something else; some probably figure it's a psychological defect (which it may be), some call it "common sense, or the voice of reason". It's just that the ones being rabid about it (not just on the voice of God front) are the ones who will defend their point of view loudly, abrasively, and oftentimes to the death. Everyone else just feels a bit embarassed and figures it's not worth mentioning as others will look at them funny if they say something.

    42. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until there's a big-name movie about it, no one knows it happened.

      Revolutionary War: The Patriot
      WW2: Pearl Harbor (and some vague meme about Grammar Nazis)
      9/11/2001: Half the populace still remembers the news that morning.

      If there isn't a 9/11 movie that sells big sometime in the next 30 years, it will be forgotten by 2045. Even if there is, it will still be forgotten every decade until the remake comes along.

    43. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      War of 1812: Americans attacked.
      Mexican American War: Americans attacked.
      World Trade Centre bombing was mostly international in origin. However, almost all the other bombings and acts of terrorism were American on American.

      You Americans do attack a lot of other people, including yourselves.

    44. Re:Are you a human being? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Why would you put a vague "lack of healthcare" in there, but specifically mention "somebody else's gun" and "your own gun"? What about homicides by other weapons, or poison? Why don't you split this list down into all the major diseases? Sounds like you're just repeating some political party's platform.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    45. Re:Are you a human being? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Things that (statistically) are more likely to kill an American than a terrorist attack: ...
      %< -- snip -- %<

      Programming in Ruby on Rails (or PHP).
      [ oops, sorry, just read that week-long interview thread :-) ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    46. Re:Are you a human being? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      And now that family is probably now on the show "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo" ... which should make us all want to kill ourselves. The terrorists have, indeed, won.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    47. Re:Are you a human being? by nip1024 · · Score: 1

      On 9/11 I lived in suburb of Denver,CO. I had no ties to New York or Washington DC. However, I did have a good friend and co-worker from my department visiting New York. She went to a training seminar and was on the 106th floor of Tower 1 when the plane hit. My boss, who used to live in New York said she lost 7 close friends that she knew of; her husband lost a lot more. My aunt lived through the LA riots with nothing more than a broken windshield and shaken nerves. I had several friends from high school living in New Orleans when Katrina hit, though luckily none of them were hurt. I've lived in the Denver area for 15 years and I had dozens of coworkers with children in Columbine High School the day that place became famous and I currently live 5 miles from the theater in Aurora, CO where a recent mass murder took place. Believing you cannot be affected simply because you are not currently an obvious target always seemed childishly naive to me. The Boy Scout motto is "Be Prepared". I cannot think of any way one's life could be bettered by doing otherwise. nip

    48. Re:Are you a human being? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      I have relatives in Alabama who have voiced the same fear about their small town. Perhaps this hysteria is quite widespread, as even The Onion spoofed it (their article is set in Murfreesboro, TN, not too far away in fact).

    49. Re:Are you a human being? by manaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's remember that in the entire history of this country, we've been invaded ...

      Your "entire history" starts a little late. The Native Americans know the facts are different. Their land is still occupied by terrorist religious zealots.

    50. Re:Are you a human being? by munch117 · · Score: 1

      By my count from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States#2000s there were about 23 terrorism related deaths from 2000-2009, excluding 9/11 (which can be safely considered an outlier).

      Don't dismiss a black swan as an outlier ... on that path lies damnation and subprime morgages. Instead, amortise it over a reasonable long period, e.g. 20 years.

      Even so, your point still stands, of course.

    51. Re:Are you a human being? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Not at all, my political opinion is that classifying yourself as left, liberal or rightwing is dangerous and pointlessly divisive, I support and abhor policies from all political parties. Personally I'd love to see party politics and internal parliamentary deals outlawed.

      I simply listed some obvious causes of death for people living in the US. If it tells you anything, it's about my beliefs of common or well publicised causes of death in the US. The lack of healthcare is in there because people regularly die for want of available medical care. The guns are in there because they kill lots and lots of people (which is one of the things they're designed for), I make no moral judgement on whether this is a good or bad thing, it's just about numbers.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    52. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "apes/ hairless apes. if you're going to be an ass at least be an educated one."

      Oooook!

    53. Re:Are you a human being? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Let's remember that in the entire history of this country, we've been invaded once (by our Mother Country), attacked once (at Pearl Harbor)

      We've been Invaded twice - the Japanese invaded and held Attu and Kiska.

      We also had the 1995 WTC bombing, that just didn't work. That, and we've also had many more terrorist attacks against US soil (I'm purposely not counting the Cole and Beirut bombings). We just know of the ones that made news.

      Otherwise, I agree with the rest of your post. It will be a constant vigil though - people get scared and overreact, and other people will manipulate that fear for their own purposes and personal gain. A constant vigil against human nature. We won't win, just can make things a little less bad for the rest of us.

    54. Re:Are you a human being? by PDF · · Score: 3, Interesting

      there was an IWW member (Industrial Workers of the World for anyone unfamiliar -- aka "wobblies") standing on a street corner doing nothing but publicly reading our own Declaration of Independence. After a few minutes, a police officer comes by and arrests him

      That was Frank Little.

    55. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The War of 1812 is covered by the GP's "(by our Mother Country)" part - we had a war of independence, but it would be hard to describe such a war as one in which we were invaded.

    56. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I am a meat Popsicle.

    57. Re:Are you a human being? by CycleMan · · Score: 1

      You forgot at least two things:

      • Profit!
      • CowboyNeal

      I think this should be a /. survey: "What will you die from?"

    58. Re:Are you a human being? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      No, wrong.

      The "Keep calm and carry on" poster was never publicized. It was intended to be posted AFTER a successful German invasion of the British Isles. But, you know, don't let those inconvenient facts get in the way of your false narrative.

      By the way, the Germans did indeed target military installations. Otherwise, how could it be a "turning point". Turning point from what? It took the heat off the RAF from...what, exactly? Bombing their airfields? But according to what you just said, they didn't bother targeting military installations. +4 Insightful my ass.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    59. Re:Are you a human being? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      What the hell'd you expect? The media had been whipping the 'KILL THE ISLAMOCOMMIES' frenzy for two years, and still considered the 'dirty bomb' a viable WMD. They'd been scaring everybody shitless with the then-new daily 'threat levels' (which will never go to green, of course), and painting binLaden as the 'most evil man since $FILL_IN_THE_BLANK'.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    60. Re:Are you a human being? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Same point can be made for Pearl Harbor, US and UK put an embargo and blockade on oil destined for Imperial Japan and Japan couldn't produce enough from local sources so the Japanese got desperate and the surprise assault on Pearl Harbor was the result of that.

    61. Re:Are you a human being? by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If there isn't a 9/11 movie that sells big sometime in the next 30 years, it will be forgotten by 2045. Even if there is, it will still be forgotten every decade until the remake comes along.

      And we'll still have TSA giving free prostate exams long after we've forgotten why...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    62. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That story isn't part of his wikipedia page. You should source it and add it. It's pretty interesting.

    63. Re:Are you a human being? by LF11 · · Score: 2

      The Flying Tigers were active duty airmen, not volunteers. This made their flights against the Japanese an act of war by the US government against Japan, well before the actual declared hostilities.

      There are other factors, like how the US cut off Japan's oil supplies, and ferried B17's into the Philippines where the only imaginable target was Japan, but none of these were actually acts of war.

      cej102937

    64. Re:Are you a human being? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2

      In so far as it was America's embargos on Japan (including oil) that were choking the life out of their industry, you can make a good case that we did bring Pearl Harbor down on ourselves.

      Though in hindsight, it's actually a very good thing that the Pacific Fleet were caught with their pants down in the harbor: All the ships that sunk went down in about 40 feet of water, literally right next to the repair facilities and drydocks. As opposed to receiving advance warning, sailing out to meet the Japanese, and their bombers send half the fleet 4 miles down to the Pacific Abyssal Plane instead.

    65. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be sure car crashes are one of my biggest fears. When the hell are those self driving cars going comercial?

    66. Re:Are you a human being? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Where'd you copy this from? It's called the Book of Revelation. There is no "s".

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    67. Re:Are you a human being? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Bloody heathen. EVERYBODY knows the only TRUE Second Coming is of Elvis.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    68. Re:Are you a human being? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Apocalypse means I get to get off this rock and on to eternal happy-times

      Funny, I kinda feel the same way about space colonisation. I think I got a better chance of it, though...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    69. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did it was 3 days later. He didnt want to miss his chocolate eggs.

    70. Re:Are you a human being? by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Nice thumbnail stats summary. Thank you.

    71. Re:Are you a human being? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Correction: all members of 1st American Volunteer Group resigned from their respective service before joining. They were all volunteers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_tigers but I've read the same long ago in other sources.

      U.S. did not cut off Japan's oil supplies; we stopped selling them ours some years after their invasion of China; an allied embargo on oil and other strategic supplies finally started in Fall '41. These measures were part of the effort to bring Japan to heel in China and prompt them to withdraw. Even Germany supported China, until '38.

    72. Re:Are you a human being? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. This is what happens when an undergrad is stuck in the library for 2 hours with no meaningful homework because it's only the second week of classes. :(

    73. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live in the olduvai gorge you don't really have a lot of room to complain about people migrating.

      But since you are complaining, I'll ask you, when are you moving back to the great rift valley?

    74. Re:Are you a human being? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      According to the official UN definition of terrorist, only a non-state actor can be a terrorist. So FEMA is off the hook.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    75. Re:Are you a human being? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      War of 1812 was mentioned above (the invasion by Mother Country). Mexican American War didn't have the US invaded, though some areas that later became part of the US were invaded.

    76. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are justifiably more afraid of terrorism than car crashes. I can name at least 3 locations that I frequented that got bombed within a 5 year span that I could had been standing at during the moment of the attack. That doesn't mean that we react to terrorism in the same as as Americans do. It's very much apples-to-oranges... and I sure as hell don't recall *anybody* getting prostate exams at natba"g.

      Disclaimer: I too am Israeli and have lived in Israel.

    77. Re:Are you a human being? by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      The Flying Tigers were active duty airmen, not volunteers. This made their flights against the Japanese an act of war by the US government against Japan, well before the actual declared hostilities.

      The Flying Tigers were volunteers; they resigned their commissions in the US armed forces before taking the assignment.

      Now, I'll grant you, the US government provided tacit support funneled through corporate intermediaries, including allowing the volunteers to leave the service, but as a matter of formality, they were not agents of the US government.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    78. Re:Are you a human being? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Sedition Act, signed into law by the second president of the United States, John Adams. Denounced by the opposition but also used by the opposition when they got into power.

      For everyone who thinks the founding fathers were saints and that we should respect their every utterance and intention when interpreting laws really doesn't understand history. They made the same mistakes modern politicians are making.

    79. Re:Are you a human being? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Official US response, "Panic and vote for us".

    80. Re:Are you a human being? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the apocalypse is a BAD thing for humanity. It's a very un-Christian and selfish viewpoint to wish suffering on the unbelievers just so that paradise comes faster. The most important commandment straight from the mouth of Jesus was "love thy neighbor as thyself", and very clearly from context and parables the "neighbor" includes unbelievers and undesirables.

    81. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cake is a lie.

    82. Re:Are you a human being? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      THIS IS NOT A FUCKING PARTISAN ARGUMENT!!

      Your preferred party IS NOT the shining angel ready to save the country from the UNENDING EVIL of the other party.

      Both parties suck. They're both full of unscrupulous douchebags who'll screw you for another constitutional exception.
      They'll both enact policies bought and paid for by corporate donors, regardless of how bad they are for the country as a whole.

      The sooner you partisan cheerleader IDIOTS start figuring this out, the sooner you can actually start to get the US climbing back out of the cesspool of shit you've been digging yourself into for the last few decades.

      The two parties are turning the citizenry against each other by partisan bullshit propaganda, and most of you are too stupid or oblivious - maybe both - to realize you're being played by the very candidate you're cheerleading for.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    83. Re:Are you a human being? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Your "entire history" starts a little late. The Native Americans know the facts are different. Their land is still occupied by terrorist religious zealots.

      So what you're saying is Native Americans never fought each other and took each others land?

    84. Re:Are you a human being? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Don't forget hantavirus. With the number of exposed people approaching 20000 and a 30% mortality rate, we're already looking at more people than died in the world trade center on 9/11.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    85. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Paraphrase Andy Dufrense " I find it decidedly inconvenient "

    86. Re:Are you a human being? by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Stuck in the library researching whatever interests you, eh? Next you'll tell me that after your shift you're going to hang out in the quad with twenty year old coeds and I'll really pity you your suffering. ;)

    87. Re:Are you a human being? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      as pointed out earlier, the point is that people died, not who started it.

    88. Re:Are you a human being? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      a dog can maul a baby, but a cat is most likely just going to give it toxoplasmosis.

    89. Re:Are you a human being? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      +1

      politics != football.

      you don't choose a team and back it for life. too many people do.

    90. Re:Are you a human being? by greenbird · · Score: 1

      In so far as it was America's embargos on Japan (including oil) that were choking the life out of their industry, you can make a good case that we did bring Pearl Harbor down on ourselves.

      Yeah, because not selling them our stuff because we didn't like what they were doing is a heinous act of war. Huh? Even though it was in protest of their unprovoked, brutal and inhumane invasion of China.

      You go right ahead a try to make that case.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    91. Re:Are you a human being? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      for the love of FSM, mods? how is this off topic?

    92. Re:Are you a human being? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > War of 1812 , Mexican American War, You started

      Arguably provoked by the British. They had a lot of press-ganged sailors deserting in the early 1800's. So they started boarding US ships and kidnapping alleged deserters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressment#Conflict_with_the_United_States The US reaction was to eventually declare war.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    93. Re:Are you a human being? by greenbird · · Score: 1

      Keep Calm & Carry On.

      One thing you have to give you Brits is stoicism. I don't think there has ever been a group of people ever that could come close to your ability to just "Keep Calm & Carry On." This is especially the case of their Army. Never in history has a greater group of line solders been led by a more mindless group of morons than in the Boer War. Yet what ever idiotic situations their leaders managed to get them in the line dogs just kept calm and carried on. No one ran. They mostly just died in place very calmly and carrying on. The Monty Python skit was closer to reality than anyone would admit.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    94. Re:Are you a human being? by neanderslob · · Score: 1

      Usually I would be on the side of "Damn police state, wtf" but I have a hard time getting worked up about this. Because, you know, whenever I buy 5000 rounds of waterproof ammunition, night vision goggles and a gas mask, it's always for something positive.

    95. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I weren't an AC, and had mod points, I'd mod this insightful.

    96. Re:Are you a human being? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Why did the US embargo Japan? Perhaps little things like the Rape of Nanking. The embargo was pressure on Japan to stop their slaughter of Chinese civilians. Don't they teach the whys along with the whats any more?

    97. Re:Are you a human being? by Hydian · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that most (not all) of those other stats represent single death incidents. 9/11 was a single incident with an unusually large death toll. You can't really compare 9/11 to say Bronchitis and say that terrorism would be equally likely to kill you over a 20 year period.

    98. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terrorists already won. Just look at the state of fear that America lives in ever since 9/11.

    99. Re:Are you a human being? by Genda · · Score: 1

      Actually I was speaking about the war of 1812, because we weren't yet a nation during the revolutionary war. As for the Mexican American War, The Alamo, and all of the silly crap on the southern border, that was pretty much us land grabbing so I don't include them. I was speaking of invasion, and standing army occupying American land. An attack, a military force invading and devastating an American population. and Terrorism (and I distinguished the home grown variety from attacks outside.) In fact there were two attacks on the Twin Towers, however the first though terrible, was dwarfed by the second.

      The point I was trying to make is that these are rare events, that the number of American Citizens killed in them were relatively few, and that the huge energy these things garner far outweighs the actual original damage done.

    100. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were all volunteers.

      From your own link: “recruited under presidential authority”. I.E. the US government organized these “volunteers”.

      Also from your own link: “Financing was [...] with money loaned by the U.S. government.” I.E. the US government funded this war effort against Japan.

      If Iran organized and “lent” the funds for a group of Iranians to fight against the US with weapons “purchased” from Iran using the funds that Iran had “lent”, do you think maybe the US would consider that an act of war?

    101. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not saying that the US was wrong to embargo Japan, but an embargo is and has for a very long time been recognized as an act of war. The US embargo predates Pearl Harbour; it was one of the motivations for Japan’s attack.

      I can’t think of a single war where hostilities didn’t start well before the official start of the war.

    102. Re:Are you a human being? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure by "invaded by our mother country" GP meant 1812 (well, 1812 was a small piece of it).

    103. Re:Are you a human being? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      They can also smother them in their sleep.

    104. Re:Are you a human being? by EddyGL · · Score: 1

      I am so sorry for your losses and those of your friends/family.
          But think objectively about it for a minute if you will, and you'll have to agree that your experiences are a bit of a statistical anomaly.

    105. Re:Are you a human being? by EddyGL · · Score: 1

      Just to clear up the slight misunderstanding.
      At first the German airforce was bombing strictly military targets in England, in order to soften it for invasion. However, one night. a single German pilot became lost and accidentally dropped his bombs over central London, prompting a retaliation by the British airforce, during which they bombed Berlin for the first time during the war. This so outraged Hitler that he ordered all strikes on military targets, such as the RAF, to be stopped and ordered a merciless concentrated bombing attack on London itself, now known as "The Blitz". Before this started leaders of the RAF had estimated that they could only hold out maybe a couple more weeks, before loosing so many aircraft, so much equipment and personal that they'd become completely ineffective as a fighting force. This break allowed the RAF to rebuild and resupply their airfields, repair their equipment and planes, and allowed the pilots and ground crews a respite from constant bombing. So yes, it was a rather dramatic turning point in the Battle of Britain.

    106. Re:Are you a human being? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      If there isn't a 9/11 movie that sells big sometime in the next 30 years, it will be forgotten by 2045. Even if there is, it will still be forgotten every decade until the remake comes along.

      And we'll still have TSA giving free prostate exams long after we've forgotten why...

      oddly enough, it's cheaper to fly then a doctors appointment....

      --
      Be seeing you...
    107. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The response outweighs the event so dramatically that it does infinitely more harm than the event itself. .... We have to be very careful to teach people to weigh threats according to reality and when we catch politicians using the boogie man to scare the public into voting for abominations ....

      Nicely put. Same applies to other moral panic phenomena, such as society's excessive reactive to anything related to childhood sexual activity. Even some "experts" note that the impact on a child of being processed as, invariably, a victim of sex abuse - outraged tearful family, guilt, blame, video interviews, labeling and imposed counseling and therapy for eg - can do far more damage than the sexual activity did in the first place. Of course, you're not supposed to point this out since we are not allowed to question society's extreme puritanical and frequently hypocritical position on the age of consent and child sexuality generally.

    108. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm constantly amazed at the amount of people who expect government agencies to actually be consistent. It's not like these people talk to each other.

    109. Re:Are you a human being? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right in fact the whole rabid religions from the dessert have been responsible for most of the general unhappiness in Eurasia

      I dunno, I think the gods of cheesecake and creme brulee have brought a great deal of pleasure to anyone who's non-diabetic...

    110. Re:Are you a human being? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Smoke you!

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    111. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying that we started the War of 1812 reveals an almost utter lack of historical knowledge. It's more accurate to say the there was a temporary cessation of hostilities between the US and Britain following the end of the US Revolution, which picked back up again and eventually got declared as a War in 1812.

      Saying that we started the Mexican American War reveals you don't know jack shit. People who lived in the region we now call Texas revolted against the Mexican government in 1835 and declared themselves a Republic in 1836. The US didn't get involved in that conflict until after Texas joined the Union a decade later, so you can't say we started that one at all.

      First World Trade Center. Case can be made your actions started it.

      No, actually it can't. But if you want to try, then you'll have to blame the British for all the actions of the US, because they were the ones who pissed on their own people enough to make them Revolt and establish the USA. And then why stop there? I'm sure if you spent enough time you could construct a logical trail showing that all of humanity's problems are the result of two tribesmen on the plains of Africa arguing over a goat. Fucking niggers, every time. (sarcasm mods, sarcasm)

    112. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The British gov. never widely published the "Keep Calm and Carry On" campaign, it has only been commercialized recently.

      The Gov. at the time thought by telling people that they had to be calm might actually make them nervous!

    113. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First World Trade Center. Case can be made your actions started it.

      The FBI supplied the explosives, as I recall.

    114. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add lightning strikes or a bee sting to your list, by a factor of 50 at least. (I looked it up on several sites and one of them was more likely by a factor of 50, one was more likely by a factor of 500, can't remember which is which though). So the question is why aren't our dear leaders recommending we all wear bee suits. That would be more prudent protection than having the TSA.

    115. Re:Are you a human being? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      *Phew!* That was close... I buy almost everything with cash, post sci-fi stories on slashdot featuring "stratodoobers", and vote Green or Libbie.

      However, I'm not completely human (part of my left eye is an artificial machine), so as a cyborg I guess I'm safe!

    116. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mistaken. Apes are members of the superfamily Hominoidea, of which Hominidae is one of the two families. Hominidae consists of orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and humans, the so-called "great apes". Monkeys are from a different superfamily entirely.

    117. Re:Are you a human being? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      "we had really good intel" ... popular myth.

      The Maine was sunk in harbor in Cuba.
      The Lusitania by the Germans; carrying military cargo or not, it had civies on board.
      Me grandfather's ship was sunk less than a day (set sail 0700, sunk just after nightfall) out of New Orleans by German U-boat operating in the Gulf. imagine the havoc he could have wreaked if had wanted to. many stories of uboats sailing into New York harbor just to do it.
      spies and sabotuers did exist and land in our country.

      1812 was mentioned (and was more about our sailors being kidnapped by the Royal Navy claiming them to be deserters (look up Impressment)). Mexican-american war was mentioned. There's also the spanish american war. the barbary pirates years. the british trying to influence the outcome of the Civil War. pancho villa.

      as for pearl harbor, we didnt "bring it on ourselves". it wasnt a "retaliation" of any kind for embargos. it was a pre-emptive strike against the main/largest concentration of our military presence in the Pacific Ocean. the japanese war planners, among them Adm Yamamoto, knew that if they attacked and siezed the vital resources in southeast asia that they needed, we would get involved. pearl harbor was a preemptive strike to delay our ability to do so until after they had (hopefully) already siezed control, and it largely succeeded.

      TLDR: whole lotta history you're leaving out

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    118. Re:Are you a human being? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      War of 1812: Americans attacked.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressment

      Mexican American War: Americans attacked.

      The Mexicans fired first.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton_Affair
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican%E2%80%93American_War#Opening_hostilities

      Facts. You lack them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    119. Re:Are you a human being? by dywolf · · Score: 0

      and of course this piece of trollbait is labeled insightful by the /. mods

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    120. Re:Are you a human being? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      mod up. LF11 needs a history lesson

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    121. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not forget, in 2011 there were 47 people killed by NY city subway trains. This stat is posted in most subway cars.

    122. Re:Are you a human being? by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      You're more likely to die from a homegrown terrorist born right here in the good ole USA (with a real birth certificate and everything ;-) than to get killed by foreign terrorists. Oklahoma City, Columbine, Colo, Aurora Colo. And if you pay attention to the 'regular' shootings, you're more likely to get killed by an ex-boyfriend of some girl who works in the reception area than by any sort of terrorist.

      Anyone else find it hypocritical that the Republicans want to defend your right to carry an assault rifle into a movie theater but they will not let you carry an unopened envelope into the Republican Natl Convention, much less a rifle or handgun concealed or not?

    123. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's wrong. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in an attempt to make the US stay out of the war, until they and German were ready to invade it. But, by their own words, they "woke the sleeping giant."

    124. Re:Are you a human being? by okcdan · · Score: 1

      "Believing you cannot be affected simply because you are not currently an obvious target always seemed childishly naive to me. The Boy Scout motto is "Be Prepared". I cannot think of any way one's life could be bettered by doing otherwise". I was working outside about three blocks west of the Murrah Bldg. in Oklahoma City on the morning of that attack. A family friend was lost then. I'm with you nip - and the Boy Scouts.

      --
      D.
    125. Re:Are you a human being? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      First of all, our actions towards Imperial Japan extended just a slight bit beyond "not selling them our stuff": US support increased in mid-1941, with the clandestine formation of the 1st American Volunteer Group, better known as the "Flying Tigers." Equipped with US aircraft and American pilots the 1st AVG, under Colonel Claire Chennault, effectively defended the skies over China and Southeast Asia from late-1941 to mid-1942, downing 300 Japanese aircraft with a loss of only 12 of their own. In addition to military support, the US, Britain, and the Netherlands East Indies initiated oil and steel embargos against Japan in August 1941.

      Take a close look at the bolded bit: Someone declaring to you "I'm going to make you lose the war" is a declaration of war in all but name. Moral indignation over who was right has nothing to do with whether America's actions provoked the attack: Our government chose (along with those of Britain and the Netherlands East Indies) to directly intercede against Japan. Right or wrong, you can't pretend we were somehow Innocence Abused when they retaliated. The US was, to be honest, probably the most cynical of all involved at this point - Roosevelt knew perfectly well that Japan would retaliate, and that the moral indignation it sparked (by people making the same fallacy as you just did) would shut the isolationists up and bring America's industrial might to bear in time to make a real difference in the course of the war.

    126. Re:Are you a human being? by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      That's it. Obama is not a us citizen.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    127. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Correction: all members of 1st American Volunteer Group resigned from their respective service before joining. They were all volunteers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_tigers but I've read the same long ago in other sources.

      This doesn't really matter - from any meaningful and sensible view it was an act of war, which it all really boils down to.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    128. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Compared to number of wars, let alone acts of war, your country has committed, not counting those you have indirectly caused or pushed forward others to commit, you've had it real easy.

      Not many countries are in place and have resources to war like you without suffering massively themselves. You go to war but the thought of someone attacking you're cities is something most of your people never even consider - so unrealistic such thing would be to them.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    129. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Except when the cat, lying on it's back, rips the eyes off head of attacking dog that just got on top of it and was thinking "woof, got you!".

      But really, dogs are uninteresting and they give you respect just from showing them that you are the alpha dog.
      Cat's are way more interesting and individual - and you have to earn their love and respect. I've seen an abused dog still licking friendly its master coming home, when just morning it ran hiding from kicks. A cat would never.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    130. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Happens to me when I sometimes take an extra dose of Concerta (slow release methylphenidate - like depot ritalin but with fast onset).

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    131. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      Actually the scary thing is journalists like this one are on the watchlist. Her crime? talking about the constitution and what we need to do to protect it.

      This. I'm always feeling mixed hilarity, anger and disbelief when some yanks praise their country for having freedom of speech, arguing that because it's protected by constitution and Finland (my country) or some other country does not have the same so we don't actually have free speech and USA has. They don't care if actual legal system of country does protect free speech, they don't acknowledge that because we don't have it in same place the same way - or what it boils down to, we are not USA - and that makes me mildly angry, but the elephant in the room is that this could not happen in Finland, we would not accept such violation of free speech, but it happens in USA and they totally just ignore it.

      Of course I'm talking only of some yanks - I presume that you are American? If so, this is not about you, you are an example of clear minded American who instead of just trumping how great USA is acknowledges an issue and maybe say "this should not be happening, but it does and something should be done".

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    132. Re:Are you a human being? by robsku · · Score: 1

      This is lost on fundies, who seem to focus mostly on that nice "wrath of god" type of stuff...

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    133. Re:Are you a human being? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      As best I can figure, centuries of _de facto_ and _de jure_ (to the extent that law applies to diplomacy) do not support your definition of _casus belli_.

      China asked for help against the Japanese invasion. The U.S. and others did so, and in such a way as to maintain at least a figurative fig leaf against international condemnation or Japan being able to point to it as an act of war. It certainly helped that Japan did not want war with U.S., the U.S.S.R., or anyone in Europe.

      For recent relevant albeit short discussion of this, may I suggest starting with "Commander in Chief: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, His Lieutenants and Their War" by Eric Larrabee.

      Perhaps for a bit of perspective, remember the thirty-odd years of proxy wars 'tween U.S. - U.S.S.R.? Berlin blockade? Reconnaisance overflights? Cuba and IRBMs? (And yes, I'm aware the Soviets considered it tit-for-tat viz. Jupiters in Turkey, etc.) However close these and other actions danced to the edge of 'acts of war' they weren't considered so by the two parties.

    134. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Things that (statistically) are more likely to kill an American than a terrorist attack:

      • Obesity
      • Cancer
      • Car accident
      • Non-terrorism based plane crash
      • Dogs
      • Cats
      • Somebody elses gun
      • Their own gun
      • Lack of healthcare
      • Peanuts
      • Alcohol
      • Stress

      What's more likely to kill you than a terrorist? Worrying about a terrorist.

      A Hurricane, A Tornado, A Police Attack at a wrong address (Mine), and an Atomic Bomb.

    135. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse guy says "Come and touch me!" to TSA

    136. Re:Are you a human being? by manaway · · Score: 1

      Ummm, when you equate genocide with migrating, facts you dislike with complaining, and recommend that people who disagree with you leave the country, having a useful discussion becomes unlikely.

    137. Re:Are you a human being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not in any particular order. But yes, dogs are better than cats at everything.

      Except burying their own crap and minding their own business.

  2. A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routine. by trout007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just rip off Foxworthy's act and replace redneck with terrorist.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  3. Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buying MREs doesn't mean you're a terrorist; it means you're a moron with no clue about food storage.
    Or maybe a zombie. (BREs?)

    1. Re:Not suspicious by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have some MREs in my car and a few in my basement that get replaced periodically for emergencies.

      I guess I am both a moron and a terrorist then. I can tell you I know nothing about food storage. I am not also stocking up for a siege. I live in an area with snow and I might get caught without food on accident.

    2. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think he meant you're a moron if you're buying them in bulk. Living off of them for a couple days to a couple weeks sure, but there are much better options out there for long term survival than MREs.

    3. Re:Not suspicious by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      The difference between MRE and non-parishables is the idea that an MRE is something you will be eating in an expected warfare condition. (Where you don't have the opportunity to make a camp fire, and live in an area and move out quickly) vs. Canned foods, where you have supplies where you would have a camp fire to cook, and setup a place to either reuse the cans or have a place to leave your garbage.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Not suspicious by RevDisk · · Score: 5, Interesting


      I plan on buying a few cases myself. I live in PA. We get snowstorms. I now live in an area with very large trees, with some hills. It might take a few days with a chainsaw to get my driveway open again if two very large trees fell across. I roll my eyes at the current zombie fad. I want to be warm, comfy and well fed for a couple weeks even if three feet of snow is dumped on me, like the Blizzard of 1996.

      If that lands me on some list, you know what. Good. At this point, those lists should be seen as a challenge and not a behavior inhibitor. If you're not on at least three watchlists, your life is not particularly interesting. Take up a couple hobbies.

    5. Re:Not suspicious by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you are just gullible. MREs are basically tinned food in a bag. The reason the military want them in a bag is because they are lighter and take up marginally less space. For civilians where lightness nor space are a consideration, buy tinned food, you will save a lot of money and not be scammed by inflated profit margins just because you bought your food in bags rather than tins. Note you will also get greater variety.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MRE is convinent for a quick meal that takes up a small space if you have the ability to heat or cook it if required. For longer term survivability, they are not a good choice. I have a kit similar to this. You can still prepare for an emergency with standard off the shelf stuff from your grocery store without looking like a paranoid terrorist. Cans of meat like SPAM and DAK/hormel canned hams, canned and dried soups, tuna in oil, fruits, vegtables, all have shelf lives in the 2-4 year range. All of them are fully cooked and can be eaten by themselves straight out of the cold can or can be mixed in various quanities and heated for a "supper". Dry boxs and bags of things like Mac and Cheese, powered milk, flour, pasta, rice have a 1-3 year shelf life and can last longer if needed. Keep some of this stuff on hand and rotate through the stuff as you use them and you will have a good start without looking suspicious.

    7. Re:Not suspicious by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Space and weight are always relevant, even if you are a civilian. This is why civilian canneries have started using the MRE approach with civilian food products.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canned food only has a 2 year shelf life, if you're lucky. Cheap MREs come with 5 years. The later is also a complete meal, not just the one item on the label.

    9. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like astronaut food, MREs have a longer shelf life than tinned food because they have been irradiated.

      They also stand up much better to travel (don't dent), so they make a better choice for keeping in the car.

    10. Re:Not suspicious by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're also very calorie dense; each MRE is about 2,000 calories. They're made for rangers toting 80# rucks 12 hours a day, not wannabes sitting in the living room.

      MREs are OK for a few days, but after that they will mess with your internal plumbing too they are so loaded with preservatives.

      You're much better off buying the semi-instant rice, noodles, and potatos at the grocery store, and paying attention to the nutrition information.

    11. Re:Not suspicious by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      If that lands me on some list, you know what. Good. At this point, those lists should be seen as a challenge and not a behavior inhibitor. If you're not on at least three watchlists, your life is not particularly interesting. Take up a couple hobbies.

      I like this... And if I get stuck on the never to be fixed no-fly list, so be it. Air travel has gotten so bad I drove from Houston to Orlando for vacation... Pay cash everywhere! Get "Cash Customer" on all the watch lists!

    12. Re:Not suspicious by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget those exothermic MRE heaters.

      Wake me up when a can of beans can cook itself...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see how your can of pears holds up versus MREs in you leave them in your trunk in the range of -10 to 120 degrees.

    14. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that lands me on some list, you know what. Good. At this point, those lists should be seen as a challenge and not a behavior inhibitor. If you're not on at least three watchlists, your life is not particularly interesting. Take up a couple hobbies.

      I like this... And if I get stuck on the never to be fixed no-fly list, so be it. Air travel has gotten so bad I drove from Houston to Orlando for vacation... Pay cash everywhere! Get "Cash Customer" on all the watch lists!

      Dammit, now I want an "achievements" section on the DHS web site so I can see what I can go for next.

    15. Re:Not suspicious by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has that option.
      Half my family is across and ocean. I wonder if no-fly means no-boat either.

    16. Re:Not suspicious by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1
      The reason to have MREs is right there in the name -- meals ready to eat. You don't have to heat them, but if you have the time, you can using the included heater. Canned food often requires you to heat it, using some sort of stove and fuel. It's also, like others said, very calorie dense and much lighter, meaning that if you are stuck walking, it is much easier to carry.

      Of course, they taste terrible, which is a selling point for me. I will actually wait for an emergency before I eat my MREs, rather than gobbling them up simply so I don't have to go to the store.

    17. Re:Not suspicious by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So civilians have unlimited storage and unlimited carrying capacity?

      You might want to let the military know, they would be interested in that kind of tech.

    18. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most canned goods have a 3 year shelf live based and that time is based on a consistent taste and advertised nutritional valve. An MRE loses taste and nutitional value in the same manner and is also degrades with large temperature changes just as a canned good does.

      This is an example from Hormel regarding their "use by date" from their FAQ at http://www.hormelfoods.com/faqs.aspx#can1

      What is the shelf life of a Hormel Foods product in an unopened can?
              The processing techniques utilized by Hormel Foods makes the canned product safe for use indefinitely if the product seal remains intact, unbroken and securely attached to a can that has been well maintained. It is suggested that all canned products be stored in a cool and dry environment to keep the flavor adequately preserved. For maximum flavor it is recommended that the product be used within three years of the manufacturing date. After that period of time, the product is still safe to use however, the flavor gradually declines.

               

    19. Re:Not suspicious by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Survivalist-type MRE buyers are, by definition, suckers, so stop messing the business model, please.

    20. Re:Not suspicious by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Yes, because a pantry, garage, or storm shelter are finite, and neither is a soldier's backpack, the storage issues are the same and the tiny improvement in density that is worth it for a soldier is also obviously a good tradeoff for a civie stocking up said pantry, garage, or storm shelter.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can we get this added to steam?

    22. Re:Not suspicious by kwpulliam · · Score: 1

      Canned food only has a 2 year shelf life....

      Canned food does not have a 'shelf life' of two years. You are thinking of bottled water (thanks to New Jersey). Most canned food has a 'best by' date, but that is related to flavor, marketing and the ability to track food in case of a recall. It doesn't actually apply to the actual nutrition and safety of the packaged food.

    23. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canned food only has a 2 year shelf life, if you're lucky. Cheap MREs come with 5 years. The later is also a complete meal, not just the one item on the label.

      Check out the expiration dates on cans of properly canned wheat, pinto beans and rice. Compare that to your puny MRE expiration dates. Heck, check out cans of cooked salmon.

      What, did you look in your pantry and randomly pull out a can of something with an expiration date on it?

    24. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you get the exothermic type. Endothermic heaters suck.

    25. Re:Not suspicious by gman003 · · Score: 2

      There's a joke among the infantry: "MREs are three lies in one acronym", as they are not really "meals", they aren't really "ready-to-eat", nor are they strictly-speaking "edible".

      If you have some free time and a *very* strong stomach, look around for some stories of the gastrointestinal distress living off MREs can cause.

    26. Re:Not suspicious by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Kinda defeats the purpose of getting on the list if you both post AC... :)

    27. Re:Not suspicious by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has that option. Half my family is across and ocean. I wonder if no-fly means no-boat either.

      Does it mean no drive across the boarder as well? With the larger PITA of international flights, it is something to consider...

    28. Re:Not suspicious by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of the Four Fingers of Death.

    29. Re:Not suspicious by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Some people live in apartments, or just do not have garages.

      Several months to a years worth of food takes up considerable space.

      I do it with less tinned stuff and more staples, but some people like it.

    30. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno. I think endothermic heaters are cool!

    31. Re:Not suspicious by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      You don't have to heat a lot of the canned foods either. I personally can't stand cold pork and beans, but I know some people that eat them when hunting.

    32. Re:Not suspicious by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they make your pee smell funny.

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
    33. Re:Not suspicious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      For snowstorms, it would actually make more sense to buy dehydrated canned food, since you're not in danger of having your water supply interrupted. That stuff can easily be stored for decades without losing its flavor, is very compact and light, and tastes surprisingly decent once rehydrated.

      MREs (or canned foods) is for emergencies where you may have trouble with water. Earthquakes, for example.

    34. Re:Not suspicious by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      During my time in the military, we were told to make sure we drank at least a canteen of water with our MREs, or the acronym would no longer stand for Meals Ready to Eat.

      They would be Meals that Refuse to Exit.

    35. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm failing to get the point.. The person you replied to said they keep them in the trunk of their car in case they get stuck in a snowstorm.

      That is a scenario where one would have difficulty building a campfire and likely not have supplies for cooking.

      There are many other scenarios in which a civilian may find themselves that would be similar.

    36. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly does a paranoid terrorist look like? Have you actually seen one?

    37. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also curious why a paranoid terroist wouldn't buy SPAM, Mac & Cheese, powdered milk, etc. Please inform me.

    38. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Woot! i got the "raided by DHS with assault rifles and body armor achievement" a few years ago...was never charged with anything, (there was a slashdot article about it at the time, but i am not going to post a link to it)

      wonder how many lists i am on?

      i have a flight in a couple months...we will see how that goes...

      posting anonymously to at least make it more challenging for them...hi guys!

    39. Re:Not suspicious by denvergeek · · Score: 1

      After a week in the field, they sure make shitting difficult. Or maybe that's just me.

    40. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh don't worry, we know who they are!

      Sincerely,

      The Govt.

    41. Re:Not suspicious by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what an MRE is -- and clearly you don't -- a simple google search will help you.

    42. Re:Not suspicious by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If you are stuck in a snowstorm... You will most likely get out in a day or so. Thus you don't need MRE but just trail mix and other food to keep your energy up. However unless you car has enough gas to keep the heat going, you may still want to go out and make a camp fire to keep warm. You can freeze to death just sitting in your car.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    43. Re:Not suspicious by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Canned food is good as long as the can is in good condition (no dents or rust) and there's no sign of bulging (due to anaerobic bacterial activity).

      Of course if you're looking to buy once and be done with it, it's hard to beat the canned + freeze-dried food from places like Mountain House. Their big cans come with a 25yr+ rated shelf life.

      As for the "complete meal": There are plenty of one-can meals available (including the aforementioned freeze-dried stuff). If you really need a cookie or whatever to "complete" your meal, just buy extra packs of the ones you like and keep them around the house.

    44. Re:Not suspicious by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am not sure.

      I have driven across the border to fly out of Toronto before. The Canadian security was way more pleasant to deal with.

    45. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say is somewhat true, but his reason for buying MRE's makes sense to me. Maybe he also has a heat blanket and plans on staying in his car with his blanket and pigging out to pass time?

      Also what you need and what you may want are entirely different things, as well as what you need and what he needs.

    46. Re:Not suspicious by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And for some people cost is more important than volume or mass when stocking up on a year's worth of food.

      But yes, those are reasonable considerations for an actual tradeoff assessment which will vary greatly between situations, and is not primary affected by the lack of infinite space or storage capacity.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    47. Re:Not suspicious by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      i go on unsupported bicycle touring so we need to carry all our own gear. further we occasionally purposefully make it more difficult and add rules that you aren't allowed to purchase anything during the trip. usually the trips are about a week long, but we are carrying all our camping gear, clothes and food to survive for the week.

        we have similar carrying space and calorie requirements to soldiers. I don't use MRE's. i do bring a lot of freeze dried stuff and essentially build my own homemade MRE. we do have some small compact camp stoves for heating them. there is enough stuff out there that you can make your own lightweight and compact MRE's that taste better. And if you aren't planning on marching or biking all day, then you also don't have the same calorie requirements.

      good items for an emergency/survival food kit.

      noodle or rice packets are fairly lightweight, compact and last a long time.
      freeze dried fruit makes a good crunchy snack, and lasts a long time.
      pancake mixes usually go over well, and if you get maple sugar you can add water to make syrup to go on the pancakes.

      there is a lot of stuff out there, you don't really need to get MRE's

      however i guess doing stuff like this gets me on a watch list.

    48. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the first can you should have enough gas to heat the next can.

    49. Re:Not suspicious by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 1

      you're assuming that the electricity has not gone out, or there is plenty of accessible fuel for melting that snow into water. you're also assuming that the snow has not had a chance to become contaminated by environmental factors (animals, roof runoff, salt spray, etc.)

    50. Re:Not suspicious by Genda · · Score: 1

      You go to REI, buy up a large supply of pretty decent freeze dried dehydrated food that will last WAY longer. Better yet, there was a wonderful model home for energy efficiency in Denver, they had a 200 sq. ft walk-in refrigerator/freezer (underground) than operated on 10 watts. With a small modification you could do a three stage freezer with a Fridge, Light Freeze and Deep Freeze. Keep your zones well separated and everything well insulated. But you could store meat, and a wide variety of cooked and flash frozen veggies in the deep freeze for years. Running on only 10 - 15 watts, It could have its own solar power and run indefinitely.

      As for long term storage, anything make of living matter (plant or animal) irradiated and sealed in a hermetic pouch can last for a couple years. Sooner or later the proteins and enzymes in the food will break it down, and it will get nasty. NASA tests these things for long space flights, and because food is both a social moment and an opportunity for personal enjoyment (important on long tedious missions) they want to know how long food can be made to stay delicious and visually appealing.

      For a generation raised on Taco Bell and School Cafeteria Food (canned peas.... eeewwwww), MREs are just fine. For folks who are interested in real food... Drying, Canning, and Freezing are still your best solutions. Back when most folks lived on farms, this was a given, and the amount of amazing food available to make from these processes is simply mind numbing. That and dehydration reduces food volume by anywhere from 60% to 99%. This means you can put a whole lot more good things in the little shelter. Just remember whole dried fruit will reconstitute in your GI tract, and anyone who hasn't experienced eating a dozen dried prune, apricots, peaches, pears... pick a fruit, then followed that with about a liter of water... well let's just say that if your were constipated... you aren't any more (stand back, she's gonna blow!!!)

    51. Re:Not suspicious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you get your water from the tap, more or less. Why would that suddenly cease in case of a snowstorm?

    52. Re:Not suspicious by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you really want to save your self some money buy a bunch of canning supplies and learn how to can food your self. I can lots of stuff and this weekend I canned ~2 gallons of homemade pasta sauce, the previous weekend I canned up ~5 gallons of chile, and next weekend I am planning on making and canning a bunch of beef and Guinness stew. I will also can soups, other sauces, veggies, pickles, pickled peppers, jelly, etc. Typically they will keep for a over a year when stored in a cool dark place (basement closet) and it keeps my freezer space open. I end up splitting 1/4 of cow and 1/4 of a bison each year with my father as well as usually getting a deer so freezer space is a premium and before the next year's meat arrives I use the lower quality cuts (round steak and chuck roast) in stew and chile so that it won't get buried in the freezer. Also it is a great use of the fresh produce I grow in the garden so that it also doesn't go to waste. As an added benefit I have good food ready made (just reheat) that I can use when I don't feel like cooking fresh food. Over the course of the year my family will consume the food I canned so it's not like I have some retarded stockpile of food but if we lost power or had some disaster that lasted a few weeks we wouldn't have any problems. I also have a fair amount of tinned food that I bought at the store like some soups and baked beans (seriously why not stock up when it goes on sale if you actually eat it) as well as dried pasta that keeps just fine on the the pantry shelf. There are some foods that I buy in the grocery store that come in MRE packing but that is a brand of Indian food that is like $1.25 per package and one pack is a meal. They have various curries as well as rice dishes so if you have 2 people (or are really hungry) you make up a bag of rice and a bag of curry. One of the benefits I discovered about the Indian food in a bag is you can cook it while still in the bag so you don't even need potable water. This has come in handy when I last went up to the BWCA and brought some along instead of only relying on the traditional dehydrated, or packaged food the guide companies provide you with (even MREs would be a vast improvement over dehydrated powdered scrambled eggs).

      --
      Time to offend someone
    53. Re:Not suspicious by Genda · · Score: 1

      This is exactly right. There are so many things you can do off the grid with a little thinking. You can build a solar grill or oven with cardboard and aluminum foil. Get bother the standard and the HEAVY DUTY which is about 2-4 times as thick, it makes a great small construction material, insulator and can be formed.Case in point, you make a parabolic dish out of cardboard, line it with aluminum foil shiny side out and you can boil water, fry, even start fires with it. A clever person with a properly filled 30 pound (14 Kg) day pack, could easily carry enough food and tools to find/catching more to last as long as they need.

    54. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPAM always inspires a sense of terror in me. I reckon you could terrify the hell out of people with the resulting farts from your recipe.

    55. Re:Not suspicious by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yes, but tossing out weight and density for civilian needs is extremely silly.

    56. Re:Not suspicious by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1

      There's also a convenience side to it. You absolutely can put together your own freeze dried and wet pack long-storage food that is tastier and as calorie dense (or more, in fact.) But think about the people that end up with MREs -- most of them are not hard-corps outdoorsmen or emergency preparedness geeks. They are folks who heard, "you should have some food on hand that you don't have to cook on the stove in case there is an emergency", and they have a couple of choices. The can do a lot of research, go to a bunch of different places, gather it all up, prepare some parts of it in advance, and reseal it... or they can google "MRE", order a case from a camping supply, and be done with it.

      A lot of people are just going to order the MREs... and these are the same people who frankly would burn out halfway through the other part and wouldn't have any food on hand when an emergency hit. I would rather they do something to help themselves than just say, "eh, that's too much work" and go back to American Idol.

    57. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MRE pros:
      -self-heating
      -calorie dense
      -variety of "food" in single pack

      MRE cons:
      -can you say "blockage"?
      -shorter (than canned) shelf life

      Canned pros:
      -long shelf life
      -great variety of types available (fruits, fiber, carbs, meats, all available)

      Canned cons:
      -will have to eat cold if disaster wipes out heating options
      -one-can-one-food - ie more space required to keep variety of food types on hand
      -high sodium content (typically), increase amount of water needed

      This is why I keep both stocked. But even more important, and what many people do not have, is a stock of water. Trouble is, short of your own cistern or water tower, it's very hard to keep enough potable water on hand to weather a multi-week disaster. Tablets, filtration units, o a way to reliably boil water are must-haves but so very few actually put into their kits...

    58. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pipes can freeze and break under extreme cold. But the nice thing about a snowstorm is that it provides its own source of water, provided you have purification supplies. I stick to basic supplies here - carbon, iodine and vitamin C.

    59. Re:Not suspicious by dmatos · · Score: 1

      A couple of the back-country camping parks that I frequent have a rule: No canned goods allowed. This is because there are jerks that don't pack out their cans when they're done eating out of them, presumably because they're big and bulky.

      I can certainly imagine an MRE being a handy meal to pack for a long back-country trip with no refrigeration. We tend to stick to dehydrated items and boil-in-a-bag things, but oftentimes, I'm hungry enough at the end of the day that I wouldn't turn my nose up at anything edible.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    60. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The licorice flavored gum isn't just gum.

    61. Re:Not suspicious by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Ever eaten MRE's. I swear, they must be pre-aged!!

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    62. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPAM's not halal, duh.

    63. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The difference between MRE and non-parishables ..."

      Non-parishables must be kosher then.

    64. Re:Not suspicious by RogL · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you get your water from the tap, more or less. Why would that suddenly cease in case of a snowstorm?

      If your water supply is from a house well, then if your electricity goes out (ice on lines or sliding vehicle takes out pole), you will have no running water. There's still folks with wells rather than city water - especially the folks who may need a few days with chainsaws to clear their driveway after a storm.

    65. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between MRE and non-parishables is the idea that an MRE is something you will be eating in an expected warfare condition. (Where you don't have the opportunity to make a camp fire, and live in an area and move out quickly) vs. Canned foods, where you have supplies where you would have a camp fire to cook, and setup a place to either reuse the cans or have a place to leave your garbage.

      The cans don't get bigger when you empty them; if all else fails, you stack the empties back next to the full ones.

    66. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 dollar portable gas stove?

    67. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who manufactures those MREs, but I've lived on Dutch army rations (made by drytek in Norway), and they did not mess with my plumbing. Then again, it was only nine days.

    68. Re:Not suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a density improvement of, say, 10-20% more food per cubic foot, but the cost may be 200% higher. This is only worth it if you're carrying it around in a backpack. If you're putting it in a garage or basement, you're just wasting your money. I have a small house, the basement is about 800 sqft in size. If I used half the space for preserved food, that's enough to store about 140,000lbs, or a 14 year supply for a family of four. A one-year supply would only take up one small corner of the space. Increasing the storage density by using MREs would make a tiny difference in the amount of space used, but raise the cost from a few grand to over $10K and reduce the number of meal choices. Anyway, very few people need a year's supply of food. A month's worth of cans (plus pasta, lentils, rice etc) will fit in a cupboard and will be plenty to get through the next big earthquake/hurricane/disaster of choice.

    69. Re:Not suspicious by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      MRE's are neither better nor worse than stored canned food. They serve totally different purposes, comparing them is like comparing a drill to a power screwdriver.

      MRE's are a "tactical" food. Keeping a few in the trunk ( mind rapid rotation in hot weather) or a case in the closet for a power outage/blizzard is not a bad idea at all, they provide their own everything except water, so a case of 12 MRE's and 24 case of water make a decent short term supply, but don't eat them for days in a row unless you enjoy constipation. For long term emergency storage of food you want regular, cheap, lasts forever canned goods, forget the overpriced canisters of "just add water" emergency rations they advertise on the radio, they are bad for the following reasons

      1) horribly over priced

      2) totally undesirable outside of crisis, which means no rotation of supplies and 20 years after you buy them when the next "Katrina" hits you will have a years worth of moldy expired crap you cannot eat

      3)food is dehydrated, thus if your emergency keeps you from potable water you
      3a) cannot prepare your food
      3b)will run through your stored water supplies much faster


      Conclusion: if you want to be ready for anything, have a case or two of MRE's, but only if you can stomach them occasionally so you eat/rotate your supply, MRE's are not eternal,
      medium term food storage in the form of canned goods

      long term in the form of seeds and cultivation skills you must develop. Know how to grow apples, cabbage, carrots, potatoes

      know how to construct a crude solar still or ferret away a suitable water purification still in the basement

      for short term water get a few cases of bottles, also keep water purification tabs on hand so if you have to GTFO in a big hurry (zombies, russians, etc.) You will be able to avoid disease in water, but they will not protect from chemical contamination, such as after a flood (flood water is very bad stuff, some can give you chemical burns on your skin)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    70. Re:Not suspicious by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Ever eaten MRE's. I swear, they must be pre-aged!!

      If you're in the military or got them from there, quite possibly. The military keeps a rather big stockpile in case of an actual emergency up to and including an extended all-out war. At least here in Norway rather than throw it away soldiers - particularly fresh recruits - get the oldest rations to eat on their exercises, so they can refill the stockpile with new ones without throwing anything away. I don't know about the newer Drytech food, but the old RSPs (our MREs) had a shelf live of at least 20 years so it was not uncommon for recruits to eat food older than they were as military duty usually kicks in at 19. Actually they only stopped buying them 17 years ago, so they might be chowing down the last ones still. From what I hear they actually change very little in taste over those 20 years, but it didn't exactly taste great to begin with...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    71. Re:Not suspicious by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You, like all those other MRE flunkies obviously missed that part about having a far wider range to choose from. Want to achieve particular objectives then select your tinned foods accordingly. Want to be creative with a petrol stove when cooking for a family the select tinned ingredients and cook away. That petrol stove will also be handy if you have a bucket flour, rice or beans, talk about high density storage.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    72. Re:Not suspicious by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1

      A wider range would likely include all of the above -- including MREs.

    73. Re:Not suspicious by trawg · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. Are there concerns with the safety of self-canned food? I remember reading in maybe early high school science about problems with early canned food attempts, with various toxins getting into the food (maybe it was just the type of cans they were using or something..?)

      The site you linked has some general info but just wondering if you had any experience or concerns with that aspect of it.

    74. Re:Not suspicious by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The biggest concern is with contamination of bacteria or botulism. These are easily avoidable if your follow some basic cleanliness procedures. Some basic things are to not touch the inside of the jar or lid, don't reuse lids (you can reuse rings if they are in good shape) clean your stuff and process it correctly. When I can up stuff the jars have been previously sent through the dish washer with the final rinse being a sanitizing rinse. I put the rings and lids in a pan of boiling water and the jars upside down in another pan of boiling water. This will keep everything nice a sterile until you need it in a few minutes. The food that I put into the jars is very and hot and at a nice simmer and I fill the jar with a clean ladle being careful to not spill onto the rim of the jar. Then put a clean lid on (I use tongs that are sitting in the boiling water with the lids and rings) and then put the ring on. I then put the jar into the pressure canner which is open but has boiling water in it. I repeat this until I have filled the canner or am out of food and then close up the canner. Typically what I can isn't affected (flavor or texture wise) by heat so I prefer to process it at 15lbs of pressure even though I could get away with only 10lbs because I would rather be safe than sorry this is also why I will leave the jars in longer than the minimum recommended time (maybe 5 minutes longer).

      The site I provided previously was not the one I was originally thinking of as a good site is Colorado State which has a bunch of stuff on canning and preserving food with more detail but at the time I only remembered it was a .edu site. I learned the basics of canning and preserving from my grandmother and since she gave up pressure canning (she still does jellies and jams) I have most of her canning equipment but she still has her hot water bath canner. Also if you want to get a pressure canner don't think that a pressure cooker will work as the walls on those are too thin and they cool down too fast which can lead to things not being held at the correct temp for long enough.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    75. Re:Not suspicious by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget those exothermic MRE heaters.

      Wake me up when a can of beans can cook itself...

      Canned beans, unlike dry ones, are already cooked. Warming them is just for palatability.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    76. Re:Not suspicious by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Good point, but my point should still be legible.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Easy by Sparticus789 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I buy all of my MREs at the Commissary on military bases. Nobody gives you a second look, just like nobody looks twice if you are wearing camouflage, carrying a gun and large rucksack, or running at 6 am on a Saturday.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Easy by Entropius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thing is these are all things that civilians ought to be able to do without arousing suspicion, too.

    2. Re:Easy by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, for one, don't want to live in a society where being awake at 6am on a Saturday is not regarded as suspicious...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Easy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to TFA, the Military are terrorists -

      - Purchasing large quantities of ammunition, hydrogen peroxide (check the infirmaries), model aircraft fuel, compressed fuels.
      - Unusually large quantities of fertilizer (well, not so sure about that one, but maybe they are teaming up with the Department of Agriculture).
      - Large quantities of watches, electronic items - have you seen all the electronic gizmos that the DOD orders?
      - A combination of unusual items - describes every military base I've ever seen
      - Firearms and ammunition out of season - ditto.
      - Night vision and camouflage equipment - double ditto; they have the very best night vision stuff, totally jealous.
      - Pipe - I'll bet that the average military base orders thousands of feet of pipe (and pipe nipples) every year; do they tell you what they are going to use it for?

      We'd better alert the Department of Homeland Security!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Easy by tom17 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was called 'being a parent'.

      Ugh...

    5. Re:Easy by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We have the right to bare arms, not the right to bare food.

      We can get guns without arousing suspicion, but food, that you are opening up a new can of worms

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I wouldn't eat those worms if I were you....

    7. Re:Easy by maroberts · · Score: 3, Funny

      We have the right to bare arms, not the right to bare food.

      We can get guns without arousing suspicion, but food, that you are opening up a new can of worms

      As long as the rest of you isn't bare, I won't complain if you wear short sleeved shirts,
      Bare food is dangerous and should be cooked thoroughly
      I just hope that the tin I open isn't full of worms.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    8. Re:Easy by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being a parent requires you to have sex at least once. This is Slashdot.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    9. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT?! You're a parent?
      Did you know there is a chance you have already raped your child and not even realized it?! You could be doing it right now!

      I find that mighty suspicious of you.
      Being up at 6am and now I find out you are a parent?
      Gonna have to ask you some questions tom17. It is a case of national security. Please come with me.
      Where were you on 9/11?

    10. Re:Easy by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      So t-shirts are OK? I'm so relieved.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    11. Re:Easy by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Germany.

    12. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your kids get up at 6 AM? You must not be keeping them up late enough.

    13. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about adding "using violence and threats of violence against civilians to achieve political objectives" ? Oops, silly me, that's the old definition of terrorism; obviously, the US military can't be terrorists. By definition.

    14. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't had it you can't compare it to something, so maybe what you have had is, and so perhaps that big belly is a consequence thereof.

      Parse. This is Slashdot.

    15. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This being Slashdot we've probably all been awake before 6am on Saturday because there was a server to patch or something like that.

    16. Re:Easy by firewrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thing is these are all things that civilians ought to be able to do without arousing suspicion, too.

      On the other hand, as soon as anyone goes full crazy, the media and internet forums are full of people breathlessly pouring over their purchase history, indignantly putting hands on hips and saying that somebody should have none such-and-such individual was up to no good because he purchased X thousands rounds of ammunition or what not. We saw it with the Aurora shooter, and the Virginia Tech guy, and doubtless several others.

      If you're a bureaucrat making a public safety decision, it's nearly always better to err on the side of heavy-handness (and let your city/school/department/whatever get sued by the ACLU several years down the road) then to err on the side of civil liberties (and loose your job because some whack decides he needs to murder people for an idea/political philosophy/religion/voice in his head).

      So how do we reconcile these things and remain a free and just society? I don't have the answer... and I doubt there's any one answer that is suitable for all times and places. Personally, I think it's legitimate/necessary for law enforcement to watch for suspicious activity and to have watch lists. But this can turn cancerous when such lists become a catch-all, when they are used to deprive people of rights without due process, or when they are used for systematic harassment (as revenge or "false positive" on an individual, or as a proxy for racism, for instance).

      The good thing about this particular situation is that the DOJ is distributing specific, objective criteria to law enforcement; this helps temper the over-paranoid and clue-in the relaxed. The bad thing is that it conflicts with the sensible emergency-preparedness activities that FEMA has been encouraging. (As an aside: too bad we don't take EP more seriously. It would save a lot of lives if it did, and it'd be a good, concrete exercise in the quintessential spirit of American self-reliance.)

      The list also seems a little on the paranoid side; I suspect this is because DHS is scared shitless of the lone wolf terrorist. They can track cells/groups, but (according to this one guy in the 'biz) they've only been catching lone wolfs "by accident"... e.g., members of the public noticing something a little funny and reporting it. I don't approve of making "candles and boltcutters" a cause for suspicion, and yet I don't know how you re-design the system to be more... measured... in its approaches when people's careers depend on them finding needles in the haystack.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    17. Re:Easy by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      They're probably in highschool and have to get on the bus by 6:30am....or elementary school, have to get on the bus at 7:30am and just want to have plenty of time to eat and shower....I think I was waking up between 5am and 5:30am when I was in highschool. Though rather reluctantly (three alarm clocks...one by my pillow, one at the foot of the bed, and one across the room -- and there were still times I slept through all three!)

    18. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >adoption

    19. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elton John will be crushed.

    20. Re:Easy by Genda · · Score: 1

      They aren't bare, they poured the can of worms on their naughty bits for decency sake!!! Ooooo squiggly!!!

    21. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've never heard of in-vitro?

    22. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science has solved that problem!

    23. Re:Easy by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      They're probably in highschool and have to get on the bus by 6:30am....or elementary school, have to get on the bus at 7:30am and just want to have plenty of time to eat and shower....

      If you take a shower at 6AM on SATURDAY you'll have plenty of time to make the bus that comes around at 6:30AM on MONDAY. You might even have time to get dirty and have to take another shower.

    24. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you let a zombie bite you, then finding MREs is even easier.

      MREs are all of those living things that AREN'T slowly shambling around. And they have such delicious BRAINS!!!!!

      Now catching them, unless you are part of a large Zombie mob, that's a different matter...

    25. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least once before becoming a parent, because afterwards there's about as much chance as the average Slashdotter.

    26. Re:Easy by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I suspect this is because DHS is scared shitless of the lone wolf [wikipedia.org] terrorist

      Ha! As if! Seriously, how many "Operations Fast n' Furious" do they need to get caught conducting before people will clue in to the obvious fact that "wet dream" would be far more accurate than "scared shitless!"

    27. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a parent requires you to have sex at least once. This is Slashdot.

      So all those trannies like Girlintraining can never be biological parents?

      I think you underestimate the state-of-the-art conception technologies; mixing sperm and ovum in a test-tube then inseminating an unaltered human female with the subsequent embryo is something even it could do (assuming it is a pre-op tranny, of course).

    28. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it actually just requires that you have a child that is your responsibility

    29. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, get the list extended :)
      1) Buying a new car, when you really can't afford it
      2) Excessive levels of debt/ lack of income or unemployed
      3) Harping on that the economy is 'bad' or the price of gas
      4) Living frugally, not spending big on 'consumables'.

      That should pump it up to 200 million plus suspicious citizens that should be in jail.

    30. Re:Easy by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Ah, the country where the suicide pilots got their flying licence. Would you like to confess now or after several years in Gitmo?

    31. Re:Easy by tom17 · · Score: 1

      And what country, may I ask, were YOU in at the time, 'Eric the 2nd'.

    32. Re:Easy by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      I asked first ;-)

  5. Please add me to the list. by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I suggest everyone ask to be added to the list.

    1. Re:Please add me to the list. by cpghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even though it was a myth, the idea is great. Once everyone ends on this list, it becomes meaningless.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Please add me to the list. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      What makes you think we aren't, citizen?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Please add me to the list. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once everyone ends on this list, it becomes meaningless.

      That sounds like a good idea, but there's always selective enforcement.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Please add me to the list. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Only because you don't understand the meaning of the list.

      It isn't to stop terrorist. It's to enable the ones in Washington to eliminate anyone they don't like. Once they get everyone on the list, they can pick and choose who to take out. All they have to say is, "See he was acting like a terrorist. He bought food."

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  6. Um, yeah by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    *Actually* preparing for a zombie apocalypse should get you placed an some other lists as well.

    1. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, screw that, prepare for another LA riots incident. Zombies are far less scary than actual people.

    2. Re:Um, yeah by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      *Actually* preparing for a zombie apocalypse should get you placed an some other lists as well.

      Out of the Zombie Preparedness groups, you *might* have a handful of people who are actually preparing for that. Zombies is to keep it humorous.

      From What is Zombie Squad?

      Our goal is to educate the public about the importance of personal preparedness and self reliance, to increase its readiness to respond to disasters such as Earthquakes, Floods, Terrorism or Zombie Outbreaks. We want to make sure you are prepared for any crisis situation that might come along in your daily life which may include having your face eaten by the formerly deceased.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Insurance for your car, check.
      Insurance for your house, check.
      Health insurance, check.
      Short term disability, check.
      Food, nah, I'm good..

    4. Re:Um, yeah by Reasonable+Facsimile · · Score: 3, Funny

      *Actually* preparing for a zombie apocalypse should get you placed an some other lists as well.

      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.

    5. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Actually* preparing for a zombie apocalypse should get you placed an some other lists as well.

      Preparing for the zombie apocalypse, while fake, also prepares you for most any other disaster (natural or man-made) that you could have. It just adds a someone humorous element to the idea.

    6. Re:Um, yeah by mark-t · · Score: 1

      By its very nature, however, this humorous element is something that is not practical to take remotely seriously by somebody who has any grounding in reality.

      While yes, it's entirely technically true that adequately preparing for a hypothetical zombie apocalypse would, in fact, prepare you for just about any sort of disaster or emergency where you might need to survive without outside aid for some time, if such an apocalypse is actually your motivation behind such preparations, then either you may not be taking the issue of being prepared for a genuinely possible disaster as seriously as you might need to, or else you have a psychosis that prevents you from distinguishing between reality and fiction.

      Preparing for disaster is fine. Joking about it afterward and saying you're prepared for the zombie apocalypse is fine. Actually using such an apocalypse as motivation to do such preparing is not, and by extension, neither is recommending such a motivation to others.

    7. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leonard is praying Sheldon never finds out about this group...

    8. Re:Um, yeah by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      You must be a lot of fun at parties.

      Lighten up, francis.

    9. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preparing for disaster is fine. Joking about it afterward and saying you're prepared for the zombie apocalypse is fine. Actually using such an apocalypse as motivation to do such preparing is not, and by extension, neither is recommending such a motivation to others.

      I see someone is stockpiling their sense of humor for the zombie attack. Are you keeping it next to the MRE's?

    10. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the issue with using it as a motivation. Yeah, it would be nice if we took such things serious from the start for the real reasons, but in the real world, most people are lazy and unmotivated about certain things. People are especially bad at evaluating low probability, high risk situations, either extremely underestimating or overestimating the risk. Having a reasonable perspective on large scale emergencies can be difficult, as many people have not been through a bad emergency (and many may live their whole lives without needing such supplies). Or worse, many people have been through an emergency that turned out to be much milder than it could have been. Is it really surprising that so many people would be unmotivated to take such things seriously, and need a little entertainment to encourage them?

      It wasn't until I had been through a strong hurricane that I had much perspective on what is needed in a disaster situation. I still bump into many people who think hurricanes are not that big of a deal due to having been through several weaker ones (location makes a big difference too). I have to remember I was that way until experiencing a messier example firsthand.

    11. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that such an apocalypse is never "actually" the motivation. Literally never. You've never ran across someone who was stockpiling food and medicine because they really believed in zombies, and you're never going to.

      As for "not taking the real possible disasters seriously", I'm going to have to ask for something concrete to back up that speculation. I won't get it from you, though. Zombies are being used here as a thought experiment to lighten the mood and add some fun to what is otherwise a dull task with an unlikely payoff. In no way is that mutually exclusive with giving said task the care and attention it deserves.

    12. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a lot of fun at parties.

    13. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic thought process of zombie preparedness is that if you're prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse, you're prepared for pretty much *anything*.

    14. Re:Um, yeah by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with motivation through entertainment? It makes the act of preparing _fun_ rather than a chore. And yes, you may end up with slightly misguided priorities (putting shotgun and gasoline above food and water perhaps) but it's better than nothing at all. And if you carry the plan through entirely, you're going to have the right stuff no matter what priority you place on it -- because let's face it, even in movies 'food' is pretty high on the list of zombie survival necessities.

      So...is it a bit silly? Sure. But if that's what it takes to motivate people, where's the problem? Why can't people have some fun while preparing for disaster?

    15. Re:Um, yeah by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I suggested that the very notion of creating a humorous and utterly fictitious notion as the reason for stockpiling inherently creates a situation where one must either genuinely believe that to be the case, or else they must simply *PRETEND* that is the reason they are doing it... and pretending to do something isn't taking things very seriously.

    16. Re:Um, yeah by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with people having a sense of humor about things. Humor, however, inherently introduces a lighthearted attitude towards something... and may be cause for a person to not undertake a task as seriously as they might if there was a genuine risk they needed to prepare for.

      Because if an improbable, but entirely realistic risk isn't going to motivate a person to make a serious effort to be prepared for an emergency, why on earth would a completely fictitious scenario that has no recognizable possibility of ever happening be?

    17. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their zombie apocalypse page got so many hits, it shut down the cdc web page iirc. That means people actually read the page, why? It wasn't boring. If you can get that many people to read a earthquake survival pacakge guide, then lets see you do it. From what I can see more people are influenced by the information when you dress it up like a zombie apocalypse, then would have been influenced by any regular emergency prepare list.

      Get off your high horse already, you are wrong.

    18. Re:Um, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO Stop it! ROFLMAO

    19. Re:Um, yeah by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not on a high horse. I'm presenting my opinion. Your apparent perception I might be implying that I think I am any better than anybody else because of that opinion is entirely erroneous.

  7. Home of the scared by Alioth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A while back something mildly Kafkaesque happened to a friend of mine, who owned a light aircraft (a rather old tatty one).

    He bought a few items from Aircraft Spruce and Specialty - some paints for fabric-covered light planes, and a few items of hardware, to perform some general maintenance and tidy-up. They duly arrive by courier, and he picked them up from his apartment complex's management office. A couple of days later the FBI turn up at his apartment to check whether he's a terrorist! Apparently, the apartment manager saw a box from Aircraft Spruce & Specialty, saw my friend pick it up (who's skin colour is not perfectly white, somewhere between white and hispanic) and called the FBI who came out and investigated him.

    1. Re:Home of the scared by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The DOJ came knocking to my door one morning because 3 weeks earlier (11-sept-2003) my dad rented a car and was in northern California taking pics of a landscape at a major tourist location. In the landscape, there was a dam. My father is perfectly white-skinned but doesn't speak much English.

      My wife answered the door (I was at work) and they kept her busy for a good 1h15m playing bad cop good cop and not telling her what it was all about. Only in the end did they reveal the purpose of their visit and we were able to piece it all together.

    2. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

      Best advice I can give: Never talk to cops. Sounds like your wife got first hand experience on why.

      For future reference, if you ever have anyone claiming to be with law enforcement come to your door claiming they want to talk/look around, you tell them you want to see a warrant first. If they fail to produce a warrant, you can be assured that either A) they have no case and are on a phishing expedition, of which you are not required to hold the net, or B) they aren't really LEO's, but rather con artists trying to work you over.

      Either way, if they fail to produce a warrant ("we just want to talk" is a popular diversionary tactic to trick you into volunteering information you have no legal obligation to give), politely inform them they are trespassing and request they remove themselves from the property before you call the real cops.

      Oh, and this should all be done through a mail slot or chain-locked door - many LEO's are under the impression that if their entry into your home isn't physically barricaded, they can just waltz right in without explicit permission (they can't, unless you've got some blatantly illegal shit sitting out where they can see it).

      Better safe than sodomized.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Home of the scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess on some level it's good to know civvies are keeping their eyes open...

    4. Re:Home of the scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, was that Shasta Dam? There's only what, like 3 major dams up there?

      I mean shit if they're doing that, imagine all the people they're getting for photographing Folsom Dam. Hey, did you know you used to be able to *DRIVE* over folsom dam? It used to be the main thoroughfare between whatever is east of Fair Oaks and southeast of Granite Bay to get across the American River to Folsom. They finally built a bypass bridge like 5+ years ago, but until then, post-911 you could only drive across there one day a week (Sat or Sun I think, although I never actually saw it open.), and the bypass required either a 5+ mile detour back from Auburn-Folsom Road to Hazel to Highway 50 then back up Folsom Blvd or Prarie City Road to get into town, or driving across a 2 lane (Rainbow) bridge to get into Old Folsom, which is windy roads all the way up into town (and was often congested.) Even had a 'terrorist scare' there at some point that shut the bridge down for a while. Nevermind when one of the Dam doors blew off it's hinge and dumped all the reserve water for the year out while everybody was wondering if it was a terrorist act to flood the town. (Which as I remember is what closed the dam road completely. A maintenence failure causing a 'what-if' terrorist scenario.)

      And that my friends is why I can't take my (hypothetical) kids for the exciting ride across the Dam Road, like my dad did with me.

      You know the real reason so many people are on anti-depressants nowadays? Because unless you like 'reality tv', 'reality' is a lot less sanitized, and a lot less happy when you end up in the same 'bad idea' situations you watch on TV. Well, unless you watch Cops, or something, then it's probably pretty accurate.

    5. Re:Home of the scared by swb · · Score: 2

      I agree with this, but I also wonder about this in an age where there's several lists kept by the Powers That Be. There's the "We Haven't Questioned You Yet" list, the "We Questioned You And Decided Your're a Moron and Not a Threat" list and then several levels of "You Are Suspicious" lists.

      Everybody seems to be on the "We Haven't Quesitoned You Yet" list -- I'd worry that being relatively aggressive with my assertion of rights might somehow get me moved to one of the "Keep an Eye on This One" lists. In this day and age I don't doubt that asserting your rights is in the top five reasons to keep people under suspicion.

      In general, though, I agree. I try to avoid all contact with the police just to avoid falling for "the interview" and getting myself searched or something.

    6. Re:Home of the scared by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing advice like this, but how soon is it that asking for a warrant and citing constitutional rights will be deemed suspicious behavior, and qualify as probable cause? "Judge, when I asked the suspect to consent to search, he demanded to see a warrant. Well, right there, you know he's got something to hide, so that was suspicious enough that I felt that there was probable cause.." I mean, they don't even need to put you on trial anymore, right? If they decide you're guilty, you just get abducted and sent off to Guantanamo.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:Home of the scared by arose · · Score: 1

      Opinion != fact.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    8. Re:Home of the scared by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Most people reading this will think:

      "Well, I'm innocent and I've got nothing to hide, so why not just cooperate so they don't give me a hard time about it? I might even be able to help them catch the bad guys."

      The advice I've heard in response to the above was this:

      If you say, I went grocery shopping at 5pm, are you SURE it was 4pm? It wasn't 3:30pm or 4:30pm? Maybe they had asked your wife where you were that afternoon, and she said that you were picking up the kids from school at 5pm (probably because you went to pick up groceries AND pick up the kids).

      Now, the investigator can say that they've got conflicting statements, and that it appears you may be lying about where you've been. They might have had a nothing to go on in this case before, and no excuse to give the judge to get a warrant...on anybody. But now they've interviewed someone and caught them in a lie. Time to get a warrrant and put your ass through the wringer.

    9. Re:Home of the scared by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      If ever a post needed an "IANAL" tag on it...

    10. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you say, I went grocery shopping at 5pm, are you SURE it was 4pm? It wasn't 3:30pm or 4:30pm? Maybe they had asked your wife where you were that afternoon, and she said that you were picking up the kids from school at 5pm (probably because you went to pick up groceries AND pick up the kids).

      Now, the investigator can say that they've got conflicting statements, and that it appears you may be lying about where you've been. They might have had a nothing to go on in this case before, and no excuse to give the judge to get a warrant...on anybody. But now they've interviewed someone and caught them in a lie. Time to get a warrrant and put your ass through the wringer.

      Yup, they cover that and many other of the shady tactics used by LEO's in the video I linked to, which (for those to lazy to click it) is a talk given by a former DA and former sheriff detailing precisely why you shouldn't talk to people like themselves, and how people like themselves can and will twist your words to make you appear guilty.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Opinion != fact.

      Unless, of course, we're in a court of law, and the person giving the opinion is a LEO.

      Sorry, did you have a point?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Home of the scared by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      Best advice I can give: Never talk to cops. Sounds like your wife got first hand experience on why.

      I'm sure that you think you're right, but if I ask for a warrant, then two things can happen:
      A/ They don't get one. They may however remember my name and address, but otherwise I'm safe.
      B/ They get a warrant. Then I'm sure I'm toast as hell. They'll put my house in such a mess it'll take a week to clean the place up.

      All in all, my wife lost 1:15 of her morning and now we've got a story to tell. Plus we were on an H1b VISA and believe or not, the same laws don't apply to immigrants. Immigrants just get deported to Guantanamo (or at least were at the time) without a warrant, a phone call or the chance to kiss their kids goodbye.

    13. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      Best advice I can give: Never talk to cops. Sounds like your wife got first hand experience on why.

      I'm sure that you think you're right, but if I ask for a warrant, then two things can happen: A/ They don't get one. They may however remember my name and address, but otherwise I'm safe. B/ They get a warrant. Then I'm sure I'm toast as hell. They'll put my house in such a mess it'll take a week to clean the place up.

      All in all, my wife lost 1:15 of her morning and now we've got a story to tell.

      Well, cowing to fascists may work for you, but I would rather risk the further illegal harrassment (which I WILL be documenting and reporting) than drop to my knees every time Big Brother jiggles his zipper.

      Plus we were on an H1b VISA and believe or not, the same laws don't apply to immigrants.

      Considering the widely accepted (at least on /.) belief that H1B visas exist solely so that American corporations can get away with hiring low-wage foreign workers instead of skilled Americans, I doubt you'll garner much support by admitting to holding one.

      At least tell me you used your visa to become a full-fledged taxpayer, er, citizen.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:Home of the scared by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      Well, cowing to fascists may work for you, but I would rather risk the further illegal harrassment (which I WILL be documenting and reporting) than drop to my knees every time Big Brother jiggles his zipper.

      If for you spending 1 hour talking to cops is the equivalent of sucking big brother dick, I think the problem is on you. Moreover, you'll be glad you taped the whole thing when they smash your Galaxy SIII on the floor before getting on your way to Guantanamo. BTW, if you despise your police force that much, maybe it's time to move to another country... From your comment, you seem to have balls. If you have brains as well, you'll be on your way soon enough, because by the looks of it, the situation is not getting any better.

      Plus we were on an H1b VISA and believe or not, the same laws don't apply to immigrants.

      Considering the widely accepted (at least on /.) belief that H1B visas exist solely so that American corporations can get away with hiring low-wage foreign workers instead of skilled Americans, I doubt you'll garner much support by admitting to holding one.

      My pay was equivalent to the other workers at my workplace. Moreover, I'm not trying to garner support but just explaining a situation. Do you understand the concept of context? Given the tone of your post, I'm not really sure. For you, not answering the cop would have meant at worst that they came back the next day with a warrant. With the bit of context I added, you were supposed to understand that it was not my case and that the consequence could have been far worse. But you conveniently blinded that information from your clueless first answer while nitpicking only part of the information for your second answer. How dumb can you be running around a tree and claiming around "There is no tree". You're pathetic.

      At least tell me you used your visa to become a full-fledged taxpayer, er, citizen.

      I didn't. Is that bad? I sucked your country dry and then I left. Does it hurt?

      Ah, one more thing: While I was there, sucking your country dry, I paid the same taxes as an American citizen for nearly no benefits (apart from infrastructure etc). So you see? You actually sucked me dry. Feel better now?

    15. Re:Home of the scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a lawyer. This is not legal advice, but you should take it anyway. Wait for your attorney to arrive before telling the cops anything other than "I will require my attorney to be present before answering any questions."

    16. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      Well, cowing to fascists may work for you, but I would rather risk the further illegal harrassment (which I WILL be documenting and reporting) than drop to my knees every time Big Brother jiggles his zipper.

      If for you spending 1 hour talking to cops is the equivalent of sucking big brother dick, I think the problem is on you.

      Funny, later in this same post you lambaste me for what you perceive as a failure to recognize context, moments after you commit the same sin. The statement of mine to which you are replying was directed at your statement

      I'm sure that you think you're right, but if I ask for a warrant, then two things can happen:
      A/ They don't get one. They may however remember my name and address, but otherwise I'm safe.
      B/ They get a warrant. Then I'm sure I'm toast as hell. They'll put my house in such a mess it'll take a week to clean the place up.

      Which implies, to me, that you're more than happy to drop to your knees and lick boot each and every time the powers-that-be so much as imply you should. If that's not the message you intended to posit, you should have been more clear in stating your position.

      Moreover, you'll be glad you taped the whole thing when they smash your Galaxy SIII on the floor before getting on your way to Guantanamo.

      So? I have a plethora of apps which upload video to remote servers in real-time, so smashing the phone (i.e. destroying evidence, a felony I might add) would not bode well for the po-po.

      BTW, if you despise your police force that much, maybe it's time to move to another country...

      Were I a rich man, I might just do that, since expatriation is far easier (again, assuming one can afford it) than fighting against oppressive regimes. Then again, while not rich, I'm also not a pussy, and quite fond of the region from which I hail. That said, while you, a temporary foreign transplant, may lack allegiance to any but yourself, and be satisfied with being a nomad who flees a nation at the slightest hint of trouble, I have a willingness to stand up for the liberty and freedom of all that is, sadly, apparently waning.

      From your comment, you seem to have balls. If you have brains as well, you'll be on your way soon enough, because by the looks of it, the situation is not getting any better.

      You really think running away from authoritarians like a mangy cur, with your tail betwix your legs, is smarter than fighting against said authoritarianism? Maybe if you're incapable of seeing farther than the end of your own nose; those of us with more foresight are aware that people that try to hide from oppression will, inevitably, run out of places to hide - a fact that is already glaringly apparent to those of us who do actually have brains, as you put it.

      Do you understand the concept of context? Given the tone of your post, I'm not really sure.

      As I mentioned previously, I have to express similar doubts regarding your ability to recognize context.

      For you, not answering the cop would have meant at worst that they came back the next day with a warrant.

      No, for me the worst would mean they arrest me for "resisting arrest" and beat my ass to a bloody pulp for daring to question their authority. And you know what? That knowledge still doesn't prevent me from standing up for our rights. There are some things worth fighting for.

      With the bit of context I added, you were supposed to understand that it was not my case and that the consequence could have been far worse.

      Make all the excuses you want, I still say you fail as a human for A) taking the pussy way out, and B) criticizing me for actually having a pair, an anatomical feature which you quite obviously lack. Context or not.

      Guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    17. Re:Home of the scared by arose · · Score: 1

      Sorry, did you have anything but anecdotes to back up your opinion? Say, somewhat neutral stats of the hassle/convictions you go trough if you cooperate vs if you don't?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:Home of the scared by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
      Did you follow the link I provided? It's to a talk given by a former state prosecuter and former sheriff, both of whom I, for on, would consider a far greater authority on the weight given to police testimony than any number of anonymous ./ commenters.

      There's also an episode of PBS Frontline, and accompanying ProPublica article, which detail serious problems with the current state of "expert" testimony in court cases, albeit not necessarily focused on the weight of police testimony.

      Say, somewhat neutral stats of the hassle/convictions you go trough if you cooperate vs if you don't?

      Hey, buddy, you're more than welcome to try and find some yourself. I've tried before myself, so be forewarned - that Blue Wall of Silence is damn hard to penetrate.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    19. Re:Home of the scared by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I am a lawyer. This is not legal advice, but you should take it anyway. Wait for your attorney to arrive before telling the cops anything other than "I will require my attorney to be present before answering any questions."

      I'm not your wallet. This is not economic advice, but you should take it anyway. Until and unless the police actually arrest you or do something else that gives you reason to call your lawyer, you should just clam up. Or pay the price.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    20. Re:Home of the scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always invite the nice law enforcement agents into your dwelling and walkout the door immediately afterwards moments before you activate the security system that locks down the dwelling so the agents cannot escape. Bonus points if the SWAT/ERT is dispatched to your dwelling as you drive away in the law enforcement agents vehicle. Be sure to wear gloves and cover the seat with a plastic sheet.

    21. Re:Home of the scared by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      In the context of my post, having balls is not being afraid to fight and/or resist. Having brains is being capable of recognizing when to stop fighting/resisting because it will cost you and nobody will ever gain anything for it. In other words, it helps you recognize when it becomes pointless.

      Plus, getting out of your country could give you a unique perspective on it. Seeing other cultures could help you figure out what is wrong in yours. It isn't necessarily "running away from authoritarians" as you put it. It can also be seen as "taking a breadth of fresh air". Feeding your brain.

      One more thing, about my ability to make excuses, you are pretty good too. "Were I a rich man, I might just do that." All it takes is a plane ticket or even just your feet. I'm sure you're that rich.

    22. Re:Home of the scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, how many facists how you blown away tough boy? How much shit have you endured to preserve everyones right? None? Nothing? Easy to be tough when your ass isn't on the line. BTW, answering questions isn't bowing to shit, it also happens to be excersizing your rights you facist asshole who thinks that people have to excersize their freedoms in a particular manner.

  8. zee vhat ztupid crap happens when you let hollywoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  9. You're suspicious by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

    By reading this article you're suspicious.
    By reading this comment you're even more suspicious.
    Want to admit something, terrorist?

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:You're suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to admit something, terrorist?

      Guy: I'm just preparing for a zombie outbreak. *clears throat* ahalkeleman-jihad ...
      Feds: Dang, not another zombie nut. Have a nice day, sir.

    2. Re:You're suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALRIGHT! FINE! I'll get rid of my plutonium stash! You happy now? Geez.

    3. Re:You're suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the reason they canceled Firefly!

    4. Re:You're suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By reading this article you're suspicious.

      By reading this comment you're even more suspicious.

      Want to admit something, terrorist?

      OK OK OK OK I admit it. I stepped on a twinkie and it exploded!!!

    5. Re:You're suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder whether ordering these [amazon.com] would land me on some list.

  10. To be fair, the night flashlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is obviously a piece of highly specialized hardware. Civilians should only have access to standard flashlights.

  11. Eh, seen it before by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the nineties there was a group that called themselves "Viper Team". They were firearms enthusiasts, and among the things they did were to make a video on how to blow up buildings. They had no explosives, they and no intent, but they used public and government buildings in their video as to what parts of the buildings were structural and how those areas support the building.

    There was, of course, an infiltration investigation. The infiltrator apparently tried to incite the members into criminal acts, specifically, robbing a bank. By the end of the investigation, only one person spent time in prison, and that was because he had modified an AR-15 to full-auto. But, people who were friends with this man and others in the group probably had their phones tapped and all of the various groups around these people were nervous.

    Oh, by the way, did I mention that the convicted man and the others were also heavily involved in Fandom, so basically all Fandom around here was somewhat investigated? That's basically why I know about it, because there are still a lot of bitter people in local Fandom because of this.

    The media referred to the group as, "The Viper Militia". Having been acquainted with some of these people that's a bit of a stretch. Even using "Team" in their name was a stretch, they were about as organized as a clowder of cats, as most Fandom is.

    So, in my opinion, it's all a big friggin' joke.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Eh, seen it before by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      "The Fandom" - you speak of this as if there is only the one. Care to be more specific?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Eh, seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which fandom goes by the name Fandom, with a capital F and no adjectives? There are quite a few humorous interpretations that can be used with the ambiguity that gives.

    3. Re:Eh, seen it before by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      there are still a lot of bitter people in local Fandom because of this.

      Fandom gets bitter and holds decades long grudges if their pizza is five minutes late. And if it's five minutes late *and* the pizza place forgot the extra pepperoni, the angst and bitterness is epic indeed. Seriously, Fandom getting their panties in a twist over something trivial is about as notable as the sun rising in the East. They make geeks look like Zen monks.
       
      OTOH, there's a persistent rumor that the FBI and other TLA's have a thick file on the SCA because "it has a private army". I have no doubt they have a thick file... but not because of the "private army" (which a handful of tear gas grenades or a couple of rifleman could destroy in minutes), but because there are more than a few SCA players with security clearances. (Here in my Barony, back when we were a Shire, there were at least three nuclear weapons techs from the sub base that were members. Plus the guys who worked at the USAF base. Plus the guys who were in the army. Plus the guys who were R&D engineers of various sorts over at the weapons station...)

    4. Re:Eh, seen it before by russotto · · Score: 1

      Back in the nineties there was a group that called themselves "Viper Team".

      Handy tip: Don't choose a cool name. Sure, it helps in recruiting, but it gets the FBI on you like white on rice. Instead of "Viper", try "Bunny" (but watch for vice cops) or even "Gerbil". "Team" is OK, but avoid anything military like "platoon" or "squad"; also avoid gang terms like "crew".

      They had no explosives, they and no intent, but they used public and government buildings in their video as to what parts of the buildings were structural and how those areas support the building.

      There's a bunch of things going from floor to ceiling in my building. Drywall partitions. Glass partitions. Pipes in size up to 6". 1" conduit. And two foot wide concrete columns connected to a network of similarly-thick beams just under the ceiling. Fortunately, most terrorists real are dumb enough not to be able to figure out which one is structural.

    5. Re:Eh, seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly extreme yiffing, some poetry.

    6. Re:Eh, seen it before by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      He's referring to fans of Twilight erotic fan-fic.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Eh, seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clopper freaks...

    8. Re:Eh, seen it before by TWX · · Score: 1

      Fandom in those that attended literary and media conventions, which often included sub-genres and outside influences.

      Think of all of the wacky types of people that you see at Comic Con. Odds are good that with varied interests by each individual in the group, just about all major sub-genres were represented. Except Furries. I hope. I dearly hope...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    9. Re:Eh, seen it before by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's my experience that people with interest in modern weapons for careers also have interest in antiquated weapons.

      Spend any time with these groups and one will see how truly idiotic the notion of taking control of them would be. Even those they choose as leaders can't get 'em to stop playing grabass with the wenches.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re:Eh, seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems like a rather broad category to say a lot of them have been investigated. I could see there being a slight scare of a huge overlap between an investigated group and one or two other particular meetings. Otherwise, I wouldn't expect anyone to even be able to name nearly all of the fandoms with some community activity in any reasonably populated area.

    11. Re:Eh, seen it before by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Or even better: http://www.democracynow.org/2012/9/10/infiltrating_occupy_austin_activists_face_charges

      Demonstrators arrested and charged with felonies (instead of misdemeanors) for using lock boxes (pvc tubes that two people put their hands in so that police cannot pull them apart) given to them to use by a cop that infiltrated their group.

  12. Night Flashlight?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So that has been my problem all along. I always have used my day flashlights at night, now I know what I was doing wrong.

    1. Re:Night Flashlight?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't a day flashlight actually have to be more powerful to compete with the sun?

    2. Re:Night Flashlight?? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Well the purpose of a flashlight is to illuminate, so a day flashlight could just be an empty tube and it'd still accomplish the goal.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Night Flashlight?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      came for this joke, leaving happy

  13. Buying bulk purchases of food by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    There have been numerous reports of the Homeland inSecurity demanding customer lists from bulk supply stores/online merchants. Some stores say "no" but some other stores happily hand it over. Then the customers on the list get visits from the DHS officers requesting permission to search those homes.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I heard somebody say that they knew somebody that said Homeland inSecurity demanding customer lists from bulk supply stores/online merchants. Some stores say "no" but some other stores happily hand it over. Then the customers on the list get visits from the DHS officers requesting permission to search those homes.

      FTFY

      citation needed

    2. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That's common knowledge. However, the suggestion that everyone who shops from a bulk supply store is visited by anyone and searched is ridiculous.

    3. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      With the whole "thou shalt prepare for the end" aspect of Mormonism, this could be an interesting wrinkle for the election this year considering our GOP contender likely has a nice food stockpile in his garage if he's being a good Mormon.

      "Every year is the year 1990."

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>>>I heard somebody say that they knew somebody that said
      >>
      >>citation needed

      Way to misquote me. You did it with the skill of a FOX News or MSNBC talking head. http://www.bing.com/search?q=FEDERAL+AGENTS+DEMAND+CUSTOMER+LISTS

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to misquote me.

      A "FTFY" is not a "misquote", it is a deliberate alteration to draw attention to something that the one poster feels is incorrect about another post. It also tends to use bold or italic tags to draw attention to the part that was "fixed". In this instance, the AC used bold tags.

      Meanwhile, you are guilty of both misquoting and quote-mining. You deliberately left off AC's bold tags, and left off their "FTFY" in your quote of them. Now there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with AC's claim to have fixed your post. But by pretending that the AC did something they did not, you only make yourself look like an immature child. And given how you resorted to such a childish act, how can we trust you to link to something relevant? While I would love to learn more if your claim is actually true, your untrustworthiness plus my limited bandwidth means I will not be bothering to click the link.

      Think about that the next time you want to accuse someone of something they did not do.

    6. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by Aserrann · · Score: 1

      Would you rather he had modified your quote in an non-obvious way?

    7. Re:Buying bulk purchases of food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he would rather not had his quote modified at all.

  14. You might be a terrorist if... by cultiv8 · · Score: 2

    Whatever you do, stocking up on non-perishable food as the feds advise should not include buying "meals ready to eat" since that, too, is potentially suspicious and means you might be a terrorist.

    You shop at Costco!

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    1. Re:You might be a terrorist if... by drexlor · · Score: 1

      I know you're making a joke, but I literally just got this email newsletter from costco: http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11771916&cm_mmc=BCEmail_Sept2012MailerLP-_-Header-_-1-_-MarketingItemName (9687 Total Servings 1 Person 1 Year Food Supply)

    2. Re:You might be a terrorist if... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You might be a terrorist if you make your own beer at home. Unless of course your home is the White House.

  15. The whole fucking world is a terrorist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just in case there is one.

  16. Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals???? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Seriously? I can't think of a reason.

    Terrorism is usually something done in a very short time window. I don't think the hijackers on 9/11 took a coffee break to cook up some ramen in the middle of the flight.

  17. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just rip off Foxworthy's act and replace redneck with terrorist.

    And if the Muslim comedian asked for permission from Jeff Foxworthy to use the "You Know You're a Redneck if..." he would probably get a chuckle and agree.

    You know you're a terrorist if you stock up on MREs at the local military surplus store. Who else would eat that stuff?
    You know you're a terrorist if you buy night-vision goggles from your neighbour at the flee market.
    You know you're a terrorist if you USE CASH!

    Thank you, I'll be here until #$#%#%$#%#$

  18. Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No? Then the system of checks and balances still works.

    People who talk about the gestapo never know what this truly means.

    The Gestapo doesn't ask if you are guilty. They decide, then torture you for information or just kill you. And if a second after they decided, they get proof from god that your innocent? No difference. THAT IS DICTATORSHIP.

    Everything else is freedom with a legal system. And if you thought your legal system doesn't mean things can happen like being arrested on a mere suspicion and questioned for hours. Then you have just lived a very sheltered life. Any normal country with a legal system gives the police the duty and the powers to investigate, arrest and question to follow leads. Just hope you are never a subject of a investigation or will you will learn just what it means to live in a system with a working legal system.

    Then again, since the line for emigration to places like Somalia where there is no police who can question you just for receiving a package, is non-existent, I get the feeling that either Somalia government is high efficient at processing immigration requests, or people prefer a country with a working legal system even if it sucks if you ever get caught in its gears.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Way to go off on a rant. Can't you read or didn't you bother? The OP says nothing about gestapo or dictators. He merely gave an example of his friend being subject to an FBI investigation (and probably now on a watch list) for several years because he wasn't white.

      Here's a fact for you: people aren't interested in moving to war zones, durrrr!

    2. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He merely gave an example of his friend being subject to an FBI investigation (and probably now on a watch list) for several years because he wasn't white.

      Actually the example was of his friend being questioned by the FBI because a citizen called the FBI and asked them to investigate him.

      That's an example of the FBI doing their job and following up on possible leads.

    3. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For several years? What was that about bothering to read?

    4. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by quantic_oscillation7 · · Score: 2

      well the NDAA and before that just executive orders enabled Bush and now mr Nobel Peace prize to make you disappear, be tortured and now killed withou any court intervention....

      well i guess there's not much of a difference between that and Gestapo!

    5. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by arose · · Score: 1

      It might or might now be because he wasn't white, but the manager being a paranoid prick was certainly the main factor.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    6. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      The Gestapo doesn't ask if you are guilty. They decide, then torture you for information or just kill you. And if a second after they decided, they get proof from god that your innocent? No difference. THAT IS DICTATORSHIP.

      Sounds a lot like what the US government did to the Guantanamo detainees. Shit, even the government admits a lot of those still being held are completely innocent, but they were still tortured; they were still (and are still being) detained; many of them did disappear for months (and perhaps some disappeared forever; we only know about the ones who were eventually released, often after being tortured, and sometimes after being tortured _while the secretary of state herself ordered their release_)

    7. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      No? Then the system of checks and balances still works.

      Sure, except in this case, the checks and balances shouldn't have been needed to work. Why is it that ordering something from Aircraft Spruce & Specialty is suspicious? Why should the FBI even bother to check investigate?

    8. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      That's an example of the FBI doing their job and following up on possible leads.

      Huh? Following up possible leads on what? Of course I don't know what was reported, perhaps the apartment manager claimed the person was building a bomb or something. But if the apartment manager told the truth, then the FBI should have been "like whatever" and hung up.
      If the apartment manager lied, then that is another issue. Of course he probably lied due to all the media fear mongering.

    9. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Police officers investigate citizen reports of perfectly lawful conduct all the time. Go to youtube and search for "open carry" and you will find police officers insisting that because there was a report of something that is perfectly legal (carrying a firearm openly, lawful in many us states) they have no option but to investigate and file a report about their investigation. Yeah, the FBI should have been "like whatever", completely agree. Unfortunately, that's not how law enforcement bureaucracy works.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    10. Re:Did he disappear? Was he tortured? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      bureaucracy. A citizen reported something so the bureau must generate a report showing how they responded to the citizens concern. Apparently "We ignored it because what the citizen reported was perfectly innocuous" doesn't fly with the powers that be.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
  19. Mormon's are Terrorists by Nemesisghost · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our church leaders have continually told us that we should have both a 72 hr kit and a year's food storage. Its not uncommon for a food storage order make its rounds at church every few months or for there to be classes taught during the week on canning and food storage meal prep. Tack on the fact that besides organizations like Walmart & the Red Cross, we have the largest food production & distribution network, all in house and mostly staffed by volunteers.

    I guess all of that make us one of the largest terrorist networks in the world. And here you thought that our missionaries were just there to annoy you with offers of Mormon Videos & a copy of the Book of Mormon. Never underestimate the clean white shirt, pressed dark pants, tie and the infamous black & white name tag.

    1. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by stevegee58 · · Score: 0

      Well I'd be suspicious of any cult that perpetrated a massacre of unarmed settlers and attemped an armed uprising against the federal government too.

    2. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      A 72 hour kit is a fairly basic safety precaution. A years food storage is fairly reasonably especially for people that are growing a significant portion of there own food.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      I have long believed that anti-gang laws should be applied to Mormon missionaries.

      They wear colors (white shirt and tie, dark pants, name tag), hang around in groups and while they aren't very loud in their threats I've heard of the 'outer darkness', which sounds intimidating to me.

      That said they've left me alone for the last couple of years, even though I live across the street from a meeting hall. Apparently I know too many uncomfortable facts about 'Joseph Smith' (laudanum addict, tarred and feathered and run out of the town on a rail for what he suggested to the 15 year old daughter of the town banker, 10 years AFTER receiving the revelation. Translation errors in the BOM that correspond to Smiths copy of the bible.)

      It must be tough to believe in a religion which is so recent secular records remain. Look on the bright side, at least you aren't a clam.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      attemped an armed uprising against the federal government too

      The Utah War? Biggest embarrassment of the Buchanan administration.
      Armed uprising? Oh, please. The Mormons ran away to be left alone. They armed themselves when they heard the army was coming to attack them.

    5. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Oddly, you left out the magic underwear.

    6. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and attemped an armed uprising against the federal government

      Yesh, you try to overthrow the federal government once and they never let you forget it.

      ***grumble, grumble, grumble***

    7. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear! Hear!
       
      Never mind that the Utah war happened before the Civil War in the United States. By your metric we should also be holding every white southerner under suspicion of holding slaves.
       
      Get a life, neckbeard.

    8. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

      Neckbeard indeed. Lots of anonymous cowards in this thread.
      Last I checked, white southerners (including me) and slavehodlers aren't collectively members of a cult.

    9. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I do consider most if not all religious organizations akin to terrorists, but maybe that is just me!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    10. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by jandrese · · Score: 1

      A 72 hour kit is just common sense, especially for people who live in the snowy midwest (in fact you should really be stocking up for at least a couple of weeks). The full year food storage however seems a bit extreme to me. If you've had some sort of disaster that has lasted for an entire year, it's hard to imagine the circumstances where it would be better by that point. In fact a month of storage would seem to be adequate for an realistic disaster scenario. Either society is back after a few weeks, or it's not coming back.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither are Mormons. And you know it, despite your failed attempts to justify your bigotry.

      And no, I'm not a Mormon myself, and yes, that is what you were going to say.

    12. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Hentes · · Score: 1

      As long as you stock on pork yíou shouldn't be suspicious.

    13. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Part of it is probably redundancy. You know that not all people in the community will stockpile. So those who do will, in effect, end up feeding the rest of them.

    14. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

      Take this and factor in the price hikes.

      And realize that it could get much worse.

      But I think that if we get back, so will society ... eventually!

    15. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a prejudiced asshole

    16. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a similar policy: I try to make sure that I have at least a month's supply of beer on hand at all times.

      Most Mormons that I know are woefully unprepared in this area!

    17. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      Neckbeard indeed. Lots of anonymous cowards in this thread. Last I checked, white southerners (including me) and slavehodlers aren't collectively members of a cult.

      Neither are Mormons.

    18. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, Mormons aren't terrorists. They are religious peoples protected by the constitution to hold the belief that the whole world should be inline with their faith.

      Who also have a whole lot of money, MONEY MONEY!

    19. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      Shhh, you are supposed to talk about that. And its not magic underwear, they are really super advanced body armor. We aren't allowed to tell anyone because the government has been trying to get a set to reverse-engineer for their soldiers. But this is one of our advantages we have over most armies and can't let it fall into enemy hands. /sarcasm

    20. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by babblefrog · · Score: 1

      I believe they are also big on keeping their people off welfare. A one-year supply of food could help a lot if you had a long stint of unemployment. It's not just for the zombie apocalypse.

    21. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that the years supply is more of a self-reliance issue. Suppose you lose your job. Sure, you could depend on the handouts of others, or you have a supply of food for a year while you search for a new job. It also means that you have food to give if someone shows up on your doorstep needing help.

      Either society is back after a few weeks, or it's not coming back.

      I might lose you with this last comment, but unless people remain optimistic about bringing society back, you are right, it won't come back. I'm going to try either way.

    22. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The full year food storage however seems a bit extreme to me. If you've had some sort of disaster that has lasted for an entire year, it's hard to imagine the circumstances where it would be better by that point.

      Have you looked at unemployment rates lately? If you lose your job, food on the table is one less thing to worry about.

      And if, as GP suggests, you do have a small farm/large garden and grow a significant chunk of your own food, a year's supply would guarantee you enough to get through the next planting season (where you;d grow significantly more food if you needed to be fully self-sufficient) to harvest. If you have little food-production capability of your own, I agree it would be unlikely to matter so much for an area catastrophe.

    23. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Mormon, and used my food storage to help with unemployment for a long period of time. Saved our bacon a few times since, when money came up short for the month and we relied on our food storage during those times too.

    24. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      A 72 hour kit is a fairly basic safety precaution. A years food storage is fairly reasonably especially for people that are growing a significant portion of there own food.

      You're talking about people who think things through. They're the enemy of the power structure.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    25. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      The food really depends on your lifestyle, people that grow there own food can often have 6months or more put away. Even with a small garden I've got 6 months of veg put away in canning, hunting can easily have me six months ahead on meat and costco shopping can put me that same ahead for grains and sundries.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    26. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The "I might be unemployed for a year, and I'll need to eat" argument doesn't make much sense to me. MREs aren't cheap (not compared to frugal shopping) especially when you consider you have to re-buy them after 5-10 years, whether you eat them or not. If you're worried about putting food on the table in hard times, it makes more sense to set up a special rainy day savings account that you won't touch except for dire emergencies, like buying food when you're out of a job. If the temptation is too great, you could just withdraw it as a bundle of cash and bury it in the basement.

      This also has the advantage of letting you eat fresh vegetables. The only downside is that you might have to pay for gas to get to the grocery store and back if it is not in walking/biking distance and you have no useable public transport. If that's the case, I suggest making larger but less frequent trips, even though it means fewer fresh vegetables.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    27. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Wow, you guys are FUCKED.

      On the one hand, you can vote for a Mormon Terrorist... on the other hand, you can vote for a Muslim Terrorist.

      I'm sure glad I don't live down there!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    28. Re:Mormon's are Terrorists by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Mormons don't just go out and buy MREs (well, usually). Instead, the advice is to buy more of the nonparishable food that you normally buy. Then, once you have a year's worth, you just rotate through that food.

      The advantage to stocking up on food in this way against unemployment is that you can leverage buying in bulk. I know a Mormon family that has a two year supply. Once a year they buy a year's worth of food at extreme discounts. (So, in reality, they have a 1.5-year supply on average).

      Also, Mormons are big proponents of that rainy day fund. Get out of debit and build a modest reserve. Pretty solid advice, I'd say: if you're out of a job, you'll need more than just food, after all.

  20. Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities=PITA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think there would be some sort of acronym checker to prevent things like this...

  21. Paying cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If paying cash for lots of items lands a person on a watch list, then every person I know must be on the list. Likewise, lots of people stock up on food and ready to eat meals, either in case of emergency or just to avoid cooking from time to time. So I guess we are all dangerous.

    1. Re:Paying cash by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

      How can you end up on a watchlist paying cash? You pay cash and you walk out with your stuff.

    2. Re:Paying cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the "Indicator" lists are what your friends and neighbors are supposed to use to report suspicious activity. So it's like this:

      1) Go to StoreX.
      2) Buy $500 worth of SuspiciousItemY.
      3) Pay Cash.
      4) Store 'manager' calls Feds. (Ain't never had nobody buy $500 of ItemY that didn't use a debit card before! Ain't never had anybody pay cash for $500 of stuff before neither, but this was ItemY!)
      5) Feds show up to store and ask to see parking lot video.
      6) Feds pull your license number from you getting into your car.
      7) You're now a Person of Interest.

    3. Re:Paying cash by Lotana · · Score: 1

      7) You're now a Person of Interest.

      Well at least someone will find me interesting. They might even arange a get together, where someone will actually pay attension when you keep going on and on about yourself.

      I actually heard that you could be sent overseas with all expenses paid! Cuba is a very beautiful tropical country. :-)

  22. At this point... by Scutter · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't it be easier to just add EVERYONE to the terror list? I was about to say "and drop off those who have been cleared", but I couldn't stop laughing long enough to add it.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:At this point... by aintnostranger · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to just add EVERYONE to the terror list?

      Maybe that's exactly the idea

    2. Re:At this point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be a waste of paper. Better to have a "NON-Terrorist" list.

    3. Re:At this point... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to just add EVERYONE to the terror list?

      Maybe that's exactly the idea

      "Did you really think we want those laws observed? said Dr. Ferris. We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." ('Atlas Shrugged' - Ayn Rand 1957)

      It seems like the government is treating 'Atlas Shrugged' like they are treating '1984'.

      As instruction manuals, not warnings.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  23. Night Flashlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "night vision devices include night flashlights and gas masks."'

    Instead of those highly specialized day flashlights...

    1. Re:Night Flashlights by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You won't believe how hard it was to invent the 'flashdark'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Night Flashlights by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      I think they mean infrared flashlights that will show up on IR goggles but not to the unaided eye.

    3. Re:Night Flashlights by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Your TV or cable box's remote control works really well for this, but it is a bit strobe-y

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:Night Flashlights by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The only people pointing this out are themselves clueless.

      They are talking about those red "map light" type of lights, that are designed to let you see but not effect your dark-adaptation.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Night Flashlights by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Also, really really weak. If you have NV Goggles on in a really dark room it might be worth it, but in most circumstances it seems pretty dubious to me.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Night Flashlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All amateur astronomers have these. Hard to read a skymap without any light.

    7. Re:Night Flashlights by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      I had the opportunity to play with whatever the military (USMC) was issuing in the early 90s, and our TV remote was enough to light up the whole back yard.

      I would imagine that the new stuff is much more sensitive

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  24. Paying cash is a problem? by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Paying with cash comes under numerous "you might be a terrorist if" lists.

    Glad that cash is still widely used in Europe and in the rest of the world. It would be a sad day when you can't buy something without giving up your privacy or when you can't buy something with cash and immediately being flagged as a terrorist suspect. Frankly, wtf?

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:Paying cash is a problem? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      30 years now. Europe too. Try and buy a new car with cash. If the dealer is smart they will have you break it into payments (under the trigger limit) just to avoid hassle. If they do, both the dealer and the buyer are guilt of money laundering.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  25. Kinda interested. by Chatsubo · · Score: 5, Funny

    TFA's 2 points about over/under - interest in radio controlled aircraft, I can see it now: "Good morning sir, I'm somewhat interested in radio controlled aircraft and would like to purchase one. Now, don't get me wrong, I do have a interest that sits above just a casual interest, however I'm also not overly interested in them, in fact, I'd say I'm about just the right amount of interested in radio controlled aircraft to buy one, but not so interested that it'd be suspicious.... say, who are you calling?"

    --
    > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    1. Re:Kinda interested. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      ...have you ever worked as a writer for Monty Python? Because that sure sounds like one of their skits!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Kinda interested. by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

      Nope, but I appreciate the compliment. Thanks :)

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
  26. Self fulfilling by CQDX · · Score: 1

    The suspicious activity list is just another sign of the decline of our society. Time to stock up...

    1. Re:Self fulfilling by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Societies fine in that respect, it's the governing body.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Self fulfilling by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Societies fine in that respect, it's the governing body.

      Unless you know something about the US election process that we don't, the governing body is (so far) getting its approval from society - or the voting members thereof.

      Granted, some of our congress critters were voted in more because they claimed that their opponents were "too Liberal"* than on a platform like daily strip-searches at school bus-stops, but just because they didn't actively campaign on expanding the benefits of Guantanamo to all 57 states doesn't mean that we have to accept it when they do.

      People do tend to get the government they deserve.

      ----
      *Insert appropriate ideological position here, based on local vilification standards.

  27. If I'm walking dead by Lucas123 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would I care if they think I'm a terrorist?

    1. Re:If I'm walking dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you enjoy romantic chats with TSA monkeys, being told you're on a no-fly list, and non-refundable plane tickets?

    2. Re:If I'm walking dead by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      I'm dead. I don't care. All I want is to eat that TSA monkey's B-R-A-I-N-S!!!

  28. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by trout007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are messing up the delivery. It has to follow the format.

    If you (insert joke here) , you might be a terrorist.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  29. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the fact that many of the acts of terrorism these days involve suicide bombers. Maybe the assumption is that terrorists all live in secluded bunkers in the middle of nowhere and don't have ready access to McDonald's?

    What I like is "buying firearms outside of season". Okay, hunting rifles, I can sort of see--except for the fact that many gun stores hold sales in the off season in order to keep customers coming in. But what about handguns? Is there a "handgun season" I don't know about? Some high-caliber revolvers are used in boar hunting, but that's all I know. I guess the take-away is, "Legally own a firearm, which the Constitution lets you do? You might be a terrorist."

    One thing that should be mentioned, though, is the key phrase: "large quantities". The list mentions propane gas. Just buying one tank for your family BBQ isn't going to arouse suspicion. Buying 50 canisters, though, might--and, honestly, even I would raise my eyebrows at that. My favorite part, though: "Shoplifting or purchasing [...] several large aircraft, engines, or transmitters". If a guy manages to fit several large aircraft under his coat, he deserves to keep them.

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  30. So, here's a question... by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What should the DOJ do to prevent possible future terror attacks? Should they just be accepted as a cost of freedom? Rejected as a highly improbably occurrence? If not, what sort of indicators should they look for before investigating further?

    1. Re:So, here's a question... by panda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They should just be accepted as a cost of freedom and rejected as a highly improbable occurrence.

      In addition, the U.S. gov't should stop oppressing people both at home and abroad. If they spent as much time looking after the interests of the average citizen and the common good of all Americans, and not just the wealthiest, most influential in the top one tenth of one percent of the population, we would not be the target of terrorist attacks.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    2. Re:So, here's a question... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could stop fucking around in other people's countries?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  31. Pretty general terrorist criteria by realisticradical · · Score: 1

    With a list like that I'm surprised that the noise level isn't so high it makes the data pretty much useless.

    You might be a terrorist if you're buying freeze dried meals, survival equipment, ammo (especially out of season), camouflage gear and night vision equipment, etc (all from the list). Then again you might be preparing for a backpacking trip, a cost conscious hunter, prepping for unlikely events, or any number of things normal people are extremely likely to do.

    1. Re:Pretty general terrorist criteria by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, "normal" people only buy football stuff, hotdogs/hamburgers, and budweiser.
      It's the American thing to do! (how that came to be, I'm completely unaware)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Pretty general terrorist criteria by profplump · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the purpose of the list is to catch terrorists. As you note it's probably worthless for that. But it's a great tool for harassing the citizenry, justifying government spending, etc.

  32. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between the parent and the replies, you guys don't watch SNL? They did this years ago, in an opening where they had GW and someone else doing them back and forth.

  33. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    If you (insert joke here) , you might be a terrorist.

    I don't get it...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  34. PITA? by clemdoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities' guidelines? PITA guidelines? Well done!

  35. Re:Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities=PI by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    Dunno, I think that one fits pretty well... "Hey guys, we've got another PITA to investigate."

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  36. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed this is actually really common. Just about anytime I hear people say "you might be a redneck" jokes they say it in the format "You might be a X if you Y" whereas I've only ever heard Foxworthy deliver them "If you ever Y, then you might be a redneck".

    Funny, I was starting to think I was the only one who noticed other people were screwing up the format.

  37. Way to go L.A.! by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

    "... the LAPD adopted 15 of the DOJ's ridiculous lists regarding 'Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities.' "

    Yeah, because nothing ever goes wrong in L.A. that citizens would need to be prepared for.

    Except for riots. And earthquakes. And the whole place burning down every year. But other than that, it's just like you see on TV.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Way to go L.A.! by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Except for riots. And earthquakes. And the whole place burning down every year.

      That actually sounds exactly like I see it on tv, actually better since you left out gang violence, but then I imagine that is like what I see on TV.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Way to go L.A.! by neminem · · Score: 1

      Nah, I live there. The whole place only actually burns down like once every three years.

    3. Re:Way to go L.A.! by ZFox · · Score: 1

      it's just like you see on TV.

      I'm still waiting for it to separate from the continental US, so that we can use it for a penal colony.

  38. Alex Jones screwed the pooch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comparing a network world blog response to the infowars response network world cleaned house pointing out state sponsored terrorism scare mongering, highlighting a program aimed at conditioning the public to accept more intrusion and overreach to combat the terrorism boogieman.

    All of this while Alex and crew pissed away their opportunity on the phrase "real survivors" (soundex "real men") followed by a list of sponsors and reciprocating friends.

    http://www.infowars.com/cdcs-zombie-apocalypse-propaganda/

    Sad... really quite sad.

  39. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Pope · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you (don't get it), you might be a terrorist!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  40. Hurricane season.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like anyone that follows the guidelines for hurricane season in Florida is a terrorist too!

  41. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by SteveDorries · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's your sign.

  42. Lists, lists, lists by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Government increasing a grip on our habits, whereabouts, manners, thoughts, etc. which results ideally in absence of successful acts of terrorism, that being the measure of some kind of synthetic success of the society. This is in a striking contrast with other crimes: theft, for example, where the rights of thieves are protected.

    Granted, destruction of twin towers which led to deaths of 3000 people are not comparable to typical home invasion/exceeding defense limits scenario, but they might be comparable to the massive billion-dollar scams that deprived thousands and thousands of people of their earnings.

    When some intellectuals defend the "freedoms" of a gangster terrorizing poor ethnic neighborhoods, when they defend "freedoms" of a home invader who met a bullet in the face, the society sees this a healthy sign of a liberal society. Some intellectuals consider existence of some sort of crimes as a healthy sign of freedoms in society: drunk driving, for example, would not be possible in a Shariah country.

    I propose to similarly consider the incidents of successful terror acts as a measure of "healthy liberalism" in society:

    If in some Western country X, terrorists are able to carry their acts - good for X, liberties, privacy of ordinary citizens are preserved.
    If a president of the country Y is killed - good for Y, liberties are preserved.

    How do you like them apples now, slashdot?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  43. So the system worked ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Bunch of people appear to be intent on blowing up buildings. Fed investigates, determines that one guy committed a crime, nobody else did. One guy gets arrested, indicted and imprisoned for the crime, everybody else gets asked questions, not arrested, indicted, convicted, improsoned or disappeared.

    1. Re:So the system worked ... by Quila · · Score: 2

      The part that bothers me is that the FBI tries to entrap them, get them to commit a crime where they normally wouldn't have done it. And in the end, you know those wiretaps are still around. There is no way to order the FBI to close the case, clear the files, and let these people get back to their old lives.

      The Ruby Ridge fiasco shows how badly the government can behave in this regard.

    2. Re:So the system worked ... by robsku · · Score: 1

      The part that bothers me is that the FBI tries to entrap them, get them to commit a crime where they normally wouldn't have done it.

      Doesn't surprise me - it's just another variation of those law enforcement guys who "infiltrate" legal peaceful protests and try to turn people in to rioting so that cops can attack them. I understand that USA is one of countries where this kind of stuff is known to happen. It has always caused a strong disbelief reaction in me - it makes no sense whatsoever, if it's actually legal somehow then insanity is tripled and I'm having hard time figuring out WTF is the motivation behind such.

      Would not fly here - although if law enforcement people were caught doing this I'm pretty sure that anything above those doing infiltrating would be hushed up.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    3. Re:So the system worked ... by Quila · · Score: 1

      It's funny how it backfires. Now whenever a protest gets ugly due to the actions of the protesters themselves, they claim agent provacateur. The occupy protests had at least one known agent provacateur, but a whole lot of illegal activity on their own too.

  44. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    Many, many people can't tell a joke.

    I once had a lady who I saw on a daily basis try three different times, on three successive days, to tell me the same joke. The third time was because she realized she botched the delivery the second time, which was because she realized that she botched the delivery the first time.

    Well, at least she realized it.

    Unfortunately, by the time she got to the third time, when she finally delivered it well enough, I already knew the punchline, and, quite frankly, the joke wasn't that funny anyway.

    On the fourth attempt, I asked her if she would please stop.

    Even sadder, the whole thing began when I asked someon a riddle. This poor lady didn't even grok the difference between a joke and a riddle. She had no chance of telling it well the first try.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  45. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus, it is even more retarded.

    If I was some sort of country-hating terrorist trying to stay off the grid and on the down-low, want to know where I would be getting food from? Farmers markets that is where.
    Buy things in bulk and make any kind of food any way I wanted to, and equally without wasting money on packaging, distribution and the usual company costs to stay afloat and expand.
    Buying ready meals? That'd be a waste of funds, which they likely have very little off which they'd put towards getting chemicals for all sorts of crap or bullets / guns, or whatever other nonsense terrorists buy.
    Why waste money on bland things when they could be making nice, tasty meals for what could possibly be their last few days on Earth?
    It ain't hard to make a decent meal in even 30 minutes. There are obvious exceptions for some preparations that need several hours to be done in the right way, and then even sometimes things that need days or even months.

    Unless of course they are speaking about the lazy terrorists. But you wouldn't even need to look out for those. If they are too lazy to make food on tight budgets, you can tell the kind of person they are already. Those are the ones that get caught every month simply because of how sloppy they are in general.
    You'd think they would have psychologists employed in these agencies.

  46. Ask a Mormon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mormons are mandated to have 6 months of food storage. There are MANY businesses in Utah (that offer mail order service) that will prepare you for the "end days"! You are unlikely to set off the government terrorist alerts if you are simply following the precepts of your cult (ahem), I mean religion!

  47. Let's Poison this Fucking Well by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

    Proposal: Everybody go out and spend as much time as possible taking pictures of dams, power plants, government buildings, and anything else that makes the Spooks paranoid.

    Also, let's agree to stop buying firearms, ammunition, fuels, adhesives, plumbing bits, et. al., with anything but cash.

    Dress in cammies. All. The. Time. This is especially important to do when taking photographs of infrastructure as mentioned above.

    Have a poker night with your buddies, or a member of a DnD club? Make your meetings (and communications regarding meetings) as cloak-and-dagger as possible, to give the impression that you're engaging in some sort of nefarious activity.


    In essence, let's poison the holy living FUCK out of this well - give them so many false positives, they'll be forced to scrap the whole project.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Let's Poison this Fucking Well by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Proposal: Everybody go out and spend as much time as possible taking pictures of dams, power plants, government buildings, and anything else that makes the Spooks paranoid.

      Also, let's agree to stop buying firearms, ammunition, fuels, adhesives, plumbing bits, et. al., with anything but cash.

      Dress in cammies. All. The. Time. This is especially important to do when taking photographs of infrastructure as mentioned above.

      Have a poker night with your buddies, or a member of a DnD club? Make your meetings (and communications regarding meetings) as cloak-and-dagger as possible, to give the impression that you're engaging in some sort of nefarious activity.

      In essence, let's poison the holy living FUCK out of this well - give them so many false positives, they'll be forced to scrap the whole project.

      The well is actually pretty polluted as it is. Name your kid "Guadalupe Ortiz". Or for that matter, "Ted Kennedy". They'll come pre-registered on certain government watch lists. Never mind that the actual "Guadalupe Ortiz" was apparently a Mexican travel agency allegedly laundering drug money - a couple of years back a certain Ortiz made the news in California by trying to buy a car and coming up as a "positive" on the list.

      Ironically, this same list would come back with "Usama" bin Ladin (Fox News spelling), but not "Osama" bin Ladin (more common spelling).

      Garbage In, Gospel Out.

    2. Re:Let's Poison this Fucking Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a member of a DnD club? Make your meetings (and communications regarding meetings) as cloak-and-dagger

      Way ahead of you buddy! All rogues all the time. There's so many knives in so many backs that I'm developing backstabitis.
      (plus we play Shadowrun now and then, which is pretty much a terrorism/criminal sydicate simulator. No no, it's cool, we're fighting "corporations" not the government, so it's totally cool).

      Unfortunately I don't think you really thought your plan through:

      give them so many false positives, they'll be forced to

      ...keep tabs on EVERYONE. ALL. THE. TIME.

  48. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Is that an airplane in your.... oh my god! Someone call an ambulance!

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  49. 1990s vs. Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1990s: Everyone is gay --Curt Cobain.

    2010s: Everyone is a terrorist --the government.

  50. I don't see an overlap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read the linked too article? The amount of overlap from the actual CDC list of items to have and the list of items that could land you on a watch list are.. zero.

  51. I have to call FUD on this one by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

    I have belonged to several zombie fansites and zombie survival oriented forums over the years, where the members regularly do the things mentioned in this article. There are even threads where members post and compare photos of their massive weapons collections, many of which have AR15s, pistol grip combat shotties and other goodies not allowable in my state.
    No one has ever posted, at least to my knowledge, about being questioned, harassed or contacted by any official in the midst of their activities; and while that doesn't mean they aren't silently placed on some watchlist, I think it's unlikely; especially given the number of natural disasters the North American continent has seen in recent years. It just makes sense to stock up on some supplies. Not every government agency is the TSA. It's a losing argument for the feds because the CDC and FEMA promote survival saavy; if a serious terrorist attack occurs again, or a hurricane/flood/wildfire/earthquake/tornado strikes, victims in that area will need some of those survival skills and gear, and they know it.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:I have to call FUD on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the people who share those photos and never mentioned being investigated are just FBI plants who join forums and share those photos to try to get domestic militants to do the same.

      These people are then black-bagged in the middle of the night and their online persona is assumed by another FBI plant.

      Pretty simple, actually.

  52. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by jandrese · · Score: 2

    This isn't about middle eastern "crash planes into buildings" terrorists, they're looking for Timothy McVeigh type terrorists and Michigan Militia types. Basically far right rednecks that are not always completely with it mentally and sometimes go a bit too far.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  53. But nobody seems to have pointed to the webinar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a link if you want to listen for yourself: http://www.citizencorps.gov/resources/webinars/zombieawareness.shtm

  54. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This string walks into a bar

    says "no sir, I'm a frayed know"

  55. Some of the items do seem out-of-place... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    The premise is to prepare for a zombie attack, correct?

    "Suspicious activity" at military surplus stores includes making "bulk purchases" of "weatherproofed ammunition"

    There are two constants when it comes to zombies:

    1. You need to shoot them in the head, or it will be ineffective. The vast majority of people who buy ammunition simply aren't that good of a shot.
    2. Regardless, there are always more zombies than bullets. Always.

    "night vision devices"

    Aside from the specific problem of thermal imaging not working too well on the walking dead (who are likely ambient temperature), passive night-vision technologies are generally intended to be able to see in the dark without being seen yourself. I don't recall many examples of zombies being that reliant on their visual senses (assuming they even still have eyes).

    gas masks.

    A zombie hoard's main weapons are tenacity and numbers, not mustard gas and sarin. Zombie plagues tend to spread by fluid exchange (e. g. biting) rather than airborne agents.

    Homeland Security wants us to prepare for zombies. These items don't seem to prepare one for zombies very well.

    1. Re:Some of the items do seem out-of-place... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You need to shoot them in the head, or it will be ineffective. The vast majority of people who buy ammunition simply aren't that good of a shot.

      I take it you haven't played many zombie games recently, have you?

    2. Re:Some of the items do seem out-of-place... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      The premise is to prepare for a zombie attack, correct?

      "Suspicious activity" at military surplus stores includes making "bulk purchases" of "weatherproofed ammunition"

      There are two constants when it comes to zombies:

      1. You need to shoot them in the head, or it will be ineffective. The vast majority of people who buy ammunition simply aren't that good of a shot.
      2. Regardless, there are always more zombies than bullets. Always.

      You don't need to kill ALL the zombies; just the ones who get too close.

      "night vision devices"

      Aside from the specific problem of thermal imaging not working too well on the walking dead (who are likely ambient temperature), passive night-vision technologies are generally intended to be able to see in the dark without being seen yourself. I don't recall many examples of zombies being that reliant on their visual senses (assuming they even still have eyes).

      So while it may be useless to find zombies, thermal imaging sounds PERFECT for locating other survivors. Also, you'll want to identify any hidden survivors before they see you if you're on the move lest they mistake you for a zombie.

      Secondly, just because they don't need to see doesn't mean you don't. So what if your night vision also happens to be designed so it's harder to see you. What, we're claiming anyone who buys a product with extra features they may not need is a terrorist now?

      gas masks.

      A zombie hoard's main weapons are tenacity and numbers, not mustard gas and sarin. Zombie plagues tend to spread by fluid exchange (e. g. biting) rather than airborne agents.

      Homeland Security wants us to prepare for zombies. These items don't seem to prepare one for zombies very well.

      Isn't the standard story that zombies become zombies through some sort of virus? Could be airborne. Also, we have no way of knowing how effective various toxic gasses would be against the zombies themselves. Maybe the stockpile of teargas kept by the local PD will turn out to be a great zombie killer. Maybe if the infection gets too out of hand they'll start gassing them from airplanes. Or hell, you never know what kind of toxic chemicals might be in that abandoned warehouse you're thinking of taking cover in -- might want to throw a mask on while you check it out.

      Maybe not the top priority items, but they certainly still have some uses....

    3. Re:Some of the items do seem out-of-place... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to kill ALL the zombies; just the ones who get too close.

      Aside from assuming that you have a good feel for how close "too close" is (on top of the required marksmanship), I believe the idea is not to spend a whole lot of time "that close" to begin with.

      So while it may be useless to find zombies, thermal imaging sounds PERFECT for locating other survivors.

      That's a long-term goal, and it particularly requires both having properly ensured your own survival as well as having someplace to evacuate those survivors to. The general idea from DHS is to have people be prepared to evacuate themselves on short notice and/or be prepared to dig in for 1-2 weeks, rather than focusing on being Big Damn Heroes.

      Secondly, just because they don't need to see doesn't mean you don't.

      A flashlight and some D-cells are a hell of a lot cheaper and more useful (e. g. can be used for signalling), leaving you money you can put towards other things, like the aforementioned ammo if you really want to go that route.

      Could be airborne. Also, we have no way of knowing how effective various toxic gasses would be against the zombies themselves.

      The expense is too great, and would only useful for scenarios that are too specific. You're talking about shelling out hundreds or thousands of dollars for the ability to walk around for a few hours at maximum. It's cheaper and more broadly applicable to, for example, store a tankful of gasoline so you can not be stuck in the miasma to begin with.

  56. Sorry I must be late to the party by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    But when did this stupid zombie apocalypse fad become so widespread? Does it have to do with movies? Resident Evil (2002) and Shaun of the Dead (2004) have been around awhile, but I feel like it's only been in the last couple of years that everyone and their damned grandmother has started talking about it. Maybe video games. Either way, it won't be zombies that kill you. It will be cancer. Sorry to be such a buzzkill =(

  57. No zombie virus? by Hentes · · Score: 1

    The CDC told the Huffington Post, "CDC does not know of a virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms)."

    What about rabies?

  58. Wouldn't it make more sense by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    to just have a well stocked pantry? I can understand having a few in your car, etc. but if you are in your house, you should have access to a lot tastier options.

    1. Re:Wouldn't it make more sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I can understand having a few in your car, etc. but if you are in your house, you should have access to a lot tastier options."

      I live in a hole in the ground.

  59. Seems legit by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Since there *are* no such things as zombies, I have to wonder what all these preparations are for. Judging by the demographics, I'd say that "zombie apocalypse" is really just a fun proxy code word standing in for "racial holy war".

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  60. It depends on where. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    If you (insert joke here) , you might be a terrorist.

    I don't get it...

    It depends on where you insert the joke. It also depends on how forcefully you do so. Using certain values for these variables will increase the likelihood of you being a terrorist.

    :-P

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  61. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long does jelly/jam last?

    What about jarred veggies?

    Why not just buy them off the illegal down on the street corner? He'll have no problem taking cash, and certainly won't complain if somebody buys out his entire stock of fruits or veggies. Properly preserved and you left no record.

    Now who'd want to spend that much time preparing their own food is beyond me, but it's possible and would keep you from getting flagged for that particular thing.

  62. Not on any Government list - by na1led · · Score: 1

    There must be something suspecious about you.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  63. SSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under these guidelines, the Social Security Administration qualifies as terrorists.
    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-social-security-bullets-20120910,0,2812457.story/

  64. Hard to get good MREs any more by Animats · · Score: 1

    Since Wornick discontinued the civilian MIL-SPEC line, the commerclal MREs haven't been as good. The Eversafe ones are much worse, and run heavily to pasta. (Chicken-based MREs are OK cold. Pasta, no.)

    Any recommendations?

  65. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I would imagine those might come in handy if you're planning on a trip to join the jihadis in, say, Afghanistan.

    Though the guys in the mountains of Chechnya make do with Snickers bars...

  66. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Jaytan · · Score: 1

    If you

    Just rip off Foxworthy's act and replace redneck with terrorist.

    you might be a terrorist.

  67. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by 3dr · · Score: 1

    Yeaahhh, you need to work on your delivery.

  68. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Zephyn · · Score: 1

    And in other news, an individual known only as "Tater Salad" has been added to the FBI's list.

  69. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Far right (think KKK), OR far left (think Symbionese Liberation Army).
    It's not just rednecks who go too far.

    Basically anyone who's completely off their rocker.

  70. Halt, Citizen! by FSWKU · · Score: 1

    Why are you stocking up on supplies? Only terrorists need supplies! Citizens are not meant to purchase any of these things, as they are earmarked for the greater good of The State. Should an actual disaster arise, The State will dispense goods to you as needed at the discretion of local officials. Since you have shown you are unable to trust your glorious benefactors, you are hereby remanded to State custody to be re-educated.

    Always remember:
    The State knows best. The State keeps you safe. The State will provide for you. Freedom breeds individuality. Individuality breeds free thought. Free thought breeds unhappiness. Unhappiness breeds dissent. Dissent breeds chaos. Sowers of chaos will be dealt with accordingly.

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    1. Re:Halt, Citizen! by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

      Only the police and military should stockpile beans.

    2. Re:Halt, Citizen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will the state dispense such materials!? Via the profitable post office?

    3. Re:Halt, Citizen! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Beans are a known tool for terrorists.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Halt, Citizen! by ZFox · · Score: 1

      Beans are a known tool for terrorists.

      Especially, when combined with power window locks.

  71. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Genda · · Score: 1

    You might just be a terrorist...
    - If you consider C-4 an undergarment...
    - If your shoes provide energy return, light up when you walk and go BOOM...
    - If your Gawd is bigger than their Gawd and you're willing to fight about it...
    - If your idea of "Spraying Pests" includes an automatic machine gun...
    - If you're setting off a nuke sounds like the Mutha of all Weenie Roasts...
    - If a businessman walking down the street holding out his hand yells "Hi Jack" and you pull a gun...

    You're right this works pretty good... Thank you Mr. Foxworthy!

  72. Neat car! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Not everyone has that option. Half my family is across and ocean. I wonder if no-fly means no-boat either.

    Does it mean no drive across the boarder as well? With the larger PITA of international flights, it is something to consider...

    If you've found a way to *drive* across the ocean, well, my hat is off to you, sir!

    :-P

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Neat car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found a way to drive across the border and catch a flight in a neighboring country. Which was the point.

  73. No one expects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Fandom" - you speak of this as if there is only the one. Care to be more specific?

    The furry fandom. They were/are a bunch of yiffing furries.

  74. It's not the preservatives by Quila · · Score: 1

    MREs have very low dietary fiber content, and that's what messes with your system. As a past consumer of many an MRE going back to the days of the four fingers of death, I can confirm the effects. Otherwise, MREs are nutritionally sufficient, although high in fat and sodium. So if you plan on living on MREs, make sure you pack a few bottles of fiber supplement like Benefiber and mix it with lots of water.

  75. Basically, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinking like an individual = terrorist.

    Also, for everyone out there with stories about being investigated by the FBI, the FBI HAS to investigate every single report they get; they are just as thrilled about following you between work, home, and the grocery store, as you are about being followed.

  76. The DOJ has broken the public trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DOJ has got a problem, they have become lawless, unaccountable, arrogant and secret, this is why they don't want juror's to know their right to nullify bad laws. They don't prosecute big banksters, or the Senate who broke their oath to regulate the monetary system.

    Businesses who flag cash can be boycotted anonymously, and their actions can be spread word of mouth. "Don't shop there, they don't take cash"
    Take it up a notch, DESTROY them, rumor they sell GMO's. If the government can lie, and there's only lawlessness, let's continue the trend.

    MRE's taste like shit, why would anyone stock them? Who's selling them? If the DOJ really obeyed their oath, and they think that people buying this stuff are terrorists, they would have already raided the Home Depot, Lowes, CostCo's, but they haven't done that because they are oath breaking thugs starting shit with people for no fucking reason.

    The problem with Eric Holder breaking his oath, is a matter of trust.
    Prepping for a flood, earthquake, tsunami, bad weather isn't terrorism.
    A Juror knowing about nullification isn't wrong, yet the same people go after that.

    Homeland Security, FEMA, DOJ Of these three, DHS needs de-activation, FEMA needs de-activation, and the DOJ needs a complete cleansing of the highest offices, lifetime ban from EVER being in government again for all three agencies employees.

    With those gone, the US Constitution can be restored. From there the monetary system, and banks become regulated again and trust can come back. Keep down this bullshit secrecy, corruption oath breaking path, and it's going to be very nasty.

  77. But think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of the brains!!!

  78. I saw one guy get nailed by Quila · · Score: 2

    They questioned him as a witness to one crime, with wich he had nothing to do and was perfectly innocent. But during the questioning he ended up laying some crumbs with a few wrong words, which the investigator followed, and ended up in him being arrested for another crime (adultery, he was in the military).

    It may not be adultery for you, but maybe something you didn't even know was a crime. Maybe you admitted to sightseeing along a highway in Nevada, and off-handedly mentioned how much you love camels too. Wait, did you ride a camel on a Nevada highway? Busted! A lawyer will tell you "Don't answer that" before you hit that point.

    1. Re:I saw one guy get nailed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. So even if you are totally innocent and haven't committed a crime, you shouldn't talk to police because you might accidentally admit to a completely unrelated crime you committed but got away with.
      And this is a bad thing why? You DO know that ignorance is not an excuse for breaking the law, right?

    2. Re:I saw one guy get nailed by Quila · · Score: 1

      Do you know all 200,000 pages of the US Code, plus all federal regulations, plus your state code, plus state regulations, plus your county and city codes? Have you gone over all court decisions pertaining to those laws and regulations? Have you done this with an attorney to make sure your understanding is correct? No? There's ignorance of the law for you.

      Ayn Rand was a bit of a kook, but one thing she definitely nailed was this quote:

      There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

      This is why you have an attorney present, or don't talk.

    3. Re:I saw one guy get nailed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very easy to rule an innocent man. Credible threat of wiping out him/his familiy, it's that easy. Ayn Rand is a twit who did shitty musings, mistaken by some for philosophy, about things she didn't understand from the comfort of middle class American life. Warlords and governments that aren't bound by their laws in any way rule effectively, don't insult their subject with that SHIT.

    4. Re:I saw one guy get nailed by Quila · · Score: 1

      You need to take the context into account, a government with the pretense of being a free society, where everybody is supposedly free, but the powers that be slowly encroach on the freedoms until people who think they are free, aren't. She's talking about an enviornment where most people think "Why worry if I've done nothing wrong," but there exists a very real need to worry.

      Ayn Rand came from a country where the threat of wiping out your family was very credible and real, so I'm sure she understood that option.

  79. In other words by slapout · · Score: 1

    Don't go camping.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  80. This parrot is dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No officer, this is a day flashlight."

  81. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by trout007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry I don't watch SNL. I like comedies.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  82. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Hatta · · Score: 1

    FWIW, Jeff Foxworthy has used "You might be a redneck if..." as the title to several of his books.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  83. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

    "Then I bought the horse a prostitute!"

    ...maybe you had to be there...

    --
    Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
  84. always prepared... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Well, there you have it, being prepared means you're a terrorist. Somebody better go round up the Boy Scouts, wouldn't want those terrorists in training getting away...

  85. Think that's bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the harassment of those "unpatriotic commies" during the red scare is pretty well-known. Look back from that and the government wasn't exactly friendly towards the union activists. Look back from that and at issues like woman suffrage or slavery (The latter might have been in line with the founding documents, but if we're talking about human rights in general...).

    Things might suck now, but looking at human rights and what the government can do to humans inside the borders... things are a lot better than in the good old days.

  86. I don't care who you are... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I don't care who you are, that there is funny!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:I don't care who you are... by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      And we've come full circle.

      I suppose you could call that "Ring around the Blue Collar."

  87. my favorite statistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans are more likely to be killed by a piece of their own furniture falling on them than they are by terrorism.

    Honestly, you're more likely to trip and fall face-down in a mud puddle and drown in it, than you are to be blown up by terrorists. Life's too short, just forget about the terrorists and get on with living your life.

  88. Election process utterly corrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your post that people tend to get the government they deserve. US Americans have brought this on themselves through carelessness, neglect, ignorance, and apathy.

    That said, the entire election system is utterly corrupt and fraudulent. It's now the case that whomever pays for the best hackers can cause any election to show whatever result is desired. Exceptions for a few states, like Oregon, with harder-to-defraud systems.

    The current US Government no longer has the consent of the governed.

  89. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    Stupid horse! I said posse! POSSE!

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  90. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or people of any political persuasion who don't go too far, but take their responsibility to defend their homeland if invaded seriously. Just because we now have a standing army* doesn't relieve the militia (i.e. the subset of the population able to bear arms) of their duty. The government is not fond of them, both because from a distance they look similar to the nutjobs, and because their presence indicates a self-reliant distrust of the government to make everything ok.

    *a standing army was considered harmful by the founders. There's legitimate arguments why things have changed and there are now better reasons for one than there were then (though all the reasons against one remain), among them that the advance of warfare technology makes it prudent to have aircraft, tanks etc. stockpiled before war, and to maintain a subset of the population with the significant training required to use them effectively. Frankly I think we could hew much closer to the Founders' aims without compromising security, e.g. by universal service for a couple or so years, so the whole militia has some training, however distant, and can be called up, drilled for a few weeks, and deployed, but I don't reject the legitimacy of the present arrangement.

  91. News at 11: 99% of the US population ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suprised to find themselves on a terrorist watch list

  92. Some things they left out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other indicators of potential terrorism include:

    Growing your own food
    Keeping dogs as pets
    Buying or selling things on Craigslist
    Purchasing gas cans
    Buying bottled water by the case
    Buying camping equipment (I work for a camping store and we submit a monthly report on all camping equipment sales to the government - except some sales get reported immediately, such as camping fuel, and more than two of anything in the camping department).
    Hiking the Appalachian Trail

    and more..

  93. In related news,Umbrella Corp have also denied any by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    knowledge of an installation at Raccoon City. ;-)

    CDC does not know of a virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms).

  94. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that bugs me to no end as well.

    If you've ever cut your grass and found a car... you might just be a redneck!

  95. This and Doomsday Preppers by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    ...is proof that the education system has FAILED in America. Now politicians and bureaucrats raised under a failed education system are starting to make policy and decision while citizens of a failed system are going to vote.

    I am personally preparing for the Stupocalypse which is currently in progress and nearing its peak.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:This and Doomsday Preppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the Stupocalypse will never reach a peak. Stupid is one of those rare commodities that never runs out, never gets thinner the more you spread it, can never be painted over (no matter how many coats of primer you use), never ends (unlike our universe which most scientists now agree has some definite boundary.

      It's going to be with us in large and abundant quantities for a long time with only the briefest flashes of something intelligent to make us aware that there actually is stupid in the universe. if it weren't for the occasional flashes of intelligent brilliance, we'd never actually know how stupid the whole damn place is.

  96. War on terror = war on Americans by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    The only way to oppose terrorism being used as a tactic is to not be afraid. Their goal is to terrorize us, so our response should be, "Go ahead. We kill more of us than you ever will. You don't scare us in the least and if you keep annoying us, we'll simply nuke you."

    The war on terrorism is having one success. The American people are becoming afraid of their own government. Or, maybe that was the goal all along. We're losing our freedoms one after the other and the central government gets stronger and more oppressive with each passing day.

    Whichever way you vote in November won't make a difference. One party may get us to totalitarianism a little quicker than the other party, but make no mistake -- both parties have the same goal. I fear this won't be resolved until there is blood in the streets.

  97. but-but-but the army does exactly those things! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    guess the US meets the definition of a terrorist state. we need to boycott ourselves.

    or maybe fix the defini.... nah, it's a trick, boycott ourselves! keep America free! -- uh, wait....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  98. Admittedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the people stocking up on ammunition and non-perishable foods are doomsday cultists who should on no account be trusted with weapons.

  99. Whitelist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For simplicity purposes I propose we move to a"whitelist" system. If you haven't specifically proven that you are NOT a terrorist, the government will work under the assumption that you are. Indefinite detention for all!

  100. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are messing up the delivery. It has to follow the format.

    If you (insert joke here) , you might be a terrorist.

    Since I did not have Jeff Foxworthy's permission to use his "You Might be a Redneck" format, I had to paraphrase. Anyway, if you make jokes about terrorists, you must be a liberal (Democrat) according to Bill O'Reilly and should be sent to Gitmo. ;)

  101. Your search does not lend credibility by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The sites it comes up with are places like "shtfplan.com" "oathkeepers.org" all linking back to the same story on Oathkeepers (look them up with the SPLC), which they pulled, that is an unconfirmed account that says "A fellow veteran contacted me concerning a new and disturbing development. He had been utilizing a Mormon cannery near his home to purchase bulk food supplies." So it is "I heard somebody say that they knew somebody that said."

    That is not "numerous reports" as you claimed, it is one report repeated numerous times and the report is of very poor quality. Granted shit like this gets passed off as "journalism" but that doesn't make it any more accurate or proper in this case.

  102. Re:A Muslim guy should make this a stand up routin by honestmonkey · · Score: 1

    I'd link to the actual comic, but they are having problems at Blind Ferret right now. It's somewhere in here (or will be when they get back up properly):

    http://www.leasticoulddo.com/

    Running gag, as it were. Also, it might be "tried to buy" instead of bought. Yeah, good times.

    --
    Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
  103. Night Time Flashlights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess I'm missing something here but I thought all flashlights, that work, were for night time.

  104. Coincidence? by Raved+Thrad · · Score: 1

    So has anyone else noticed that "Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities" and "Pain In The Ass" have the same starting letters if you turn them into acronyms?

    --
    Life, ultimately, boils down to the Four Fs: Fighting, Fleeing, Feeding, and Mating.
  105. The real meaning of "Terrorist" by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    The term "Terrorist" is not necessary equals to "Killer"

    The real meaning of "Terrorist" is one who commits "TERROR" - which includes, but not necessarily limited to "KILLING"

    Hence - your list of what most likely kill Americans is not necessarily the right list in pointing to what a "Terrorist" can do to America - and Americans
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:The real meaning of "Terrorist" by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      An interesting point. Measured this way my list should have been "Things that you're scared of" instead of "Things that are likely to kill you", and for some terrorism would come near the top.

      However, that was my original point - the disparity between what people should justifiably worry about and what they should leave on the back burner, so to speak. Fear is a lot easier to resolve than death is.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  106. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole list is fucking stupid. As you mentioned there are gun sales out of season, not to mention some animals (e.g. varmints) don't have a season, and there are a million different seasons for different animals. So do I have to wait till the morning the season starts to buy my rifle? Can I buy any gun if a season is in progress or only one that could be reasonably used for that type of animal? Do I need to own a tag for that type of animal and if not why not? And what about all the legal uses of firearms that have nothing to do with hunting?

    As regards the "large quantities" part, anybody who works for the right company can purchase large quantities of stuff (propane, fertilizer etc) that could be used to make explosives and nobody bats an eye when they do because it would be prohibitive for the feds to keep track of it all. Which makes the whole list about as effective as the TSA screening passengers but not aircraft maintenance personnel. It's an excuse for a bloated budget and a bloated security industry run and incentivized from the top down. Nothing more nothing less. Let's hope that it doesn't turn into something worse.

  107. Doesn't really matter by StefMeister · · Score: 2

    Although I agree with your (and the GP's) assessment that the fear for terrorism is extremely exaggerated, the statistics you give do not matter much for any person's fear of terrorism. The question is not what the likelihood is of some American dying of terrorism. The question is what my likelihood of dying from terrorism is.

    Most people feel they can control lots of those other risks (or make them non-lethal) by caring for their health, eating well, thinking they are a superior driver, etc.
    However, they feel they have no control over "death by terrorist" which increases the fear of it by an important factor.

    It still not worth all the fuss, but it can explain some of the irrational fear about it.

    --
    "Son, in a sporting event, it's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get" - Homer J. Simpson
  108. Zombie Apocalypse would be have a cure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching documentary last night on the fact bacteria are becoming resistant to antibiotics due to the widespread use of antibiotics in animal feed and the readily available over the counter antibiotics in Asia. The scientists researching new ways to combat superbugs have been attempting to come up with new solutions to this by various methods. One of they was to attempt to identify those bacteriophages (viruses these eat certain types of bacteria) to help us. As bacteria evolves quickly, those who survive change and adapt will be stronger until such time that they become more than superbugs. Bacteria also has the ability to communicate with other bacteria with the use of chemicals. They use these chemical signals to determine when there is enough of themselves to start doing nasty things to their hosts. Such as killing them. So scientists are going to find ways of stopping these bacteria from communicating.
    How do we know that zombies are caused from a bacterial or viral strain? Well it's in books and T.V isn't it.

  109. FEMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FEMA IS NUTS AND THIS PROVES IT BIG TIME!!!!!!!!! zombies my azz! what a joke fema should be shut down. i think it is being run by zombies now!

  110. Terrorist Animals! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://historylist.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/human-deaths-in-the-us-caused-by-animals/

    I was looking for the Statistic for number of deaths caused by Deer per year as I remember hearing that it was the most dangerous animal in North America...

    They don't count it in that list, but still a healthy (or not) 130/year.

    Apparently alergic reactions to bees/wasps are also pretty high at 51/year.

    Lassie weighs in at 31.

    Closest to 2.3? Bull at 3/year. So you are slightly more likely to get killed by a Bull than by a terrorist.

  111. Re:Why would a terrorist need ready to eat meals?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're looking for Timothy McVeigh type terrorists and Michigan Militia types.

    Maybe they should stop looking in Sam's Club and start looking in churches.

  112. Is Fox News a political party now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Fox News a political party now?

    As far as I'd heard, they were just the most sensational and biased outlet of the mainstream media in the USA.

  113. WTF by drpt · · Score: 0

    The government cannot protect you from "Terrorist Activities", any more than they can protect you from the common cold. The TSA never catches any terrorists, and they are usually caught on the flights. Homeland security has done what for me? The cameras in the U.K have proctected us from what? WTF,,, get a life and don't be scared you are going to die at some time (I was told that my day is near, without treatment) just live your life.

    --
    Proudly Butchering code for 20 years
  114. not sure if any has made the point by nibbles2004 · · Score: 1

    Hey i love zombie movies, can't get enough of them, but some say sadly, the earth is not going to face a zombie Apocalypse, so while it's fine and fun to come up with survival scenarios, you don't need to actually put them in practice, no individual needs a AR15

  115. Silly American obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very