It's faster because most of it is part of the basic building blocks of windows. How many components use MSHTML as their rendering engine? You don't even have to start IE.
Firebird has to load it's own rendering engine, plus the browser gui, etc.
I realize this doesn't make much difference to reality, but you can't really blame the firebird developers because they use a rendering enine that isn't integrated into the windows codebase.
I'd feel pretty stupid holding it up against my face to talk. Although, a bluetooth headset might make a nice addition... Handset's a bit counter intuitive too.
Not that I really need a 3G phone anyhow.
Re:Anyone care to point to a privacy-free version?
on
Doctor Who Comeback
·
· Score: 1
Privacy free?
What's that, where the webmaster comes and gets you to sign your name in person, then sits behind you and reads over your shoulder?
Congress might be likely to pass a law making innovative software providers more liable for the copyright infringements of their customers in order to stop the public outcry over the RIAA lawsuits...
How in the hell does that affect any intelligent innovative software provider (who makes software that can infringe on copyright), who after the napster case, realized that basing their company in america is a Bad Idea TM?
Or is it just another death knell for american software developers?
Slashdot Mirror
I already installed it on our servers.
You have to stay on top of the rules though...
They should have a look in the castle ARGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH, then.
Just wanted to congratulate you on your outstanding writing abilities.
At least not from doing what it's supposed to be doing. They died from excessive heat, or shorts, but never from doing their job...
Hard drives can't be that stressed by the sort of work the SETI program adds. Not exactly a daily thrashing.
But you have to purchase them.
I saw the site yesterday. Nice resource.
So I'll have to strip down to answer my ringing undies*?
*Spiderman underoos.
Incentive yes, doesn't make it any less illegal or unscrupulous.
What I mean to say, is loss of information isn't valid, but being entered into a contract which requires your signature, yet without your signature.
I'd persue that angle.
I am in no way a lawyer, but isn't forging (or in this case continuing action with a required signature) considered fraud? Sort of like slamming?
If it isn't illegal, which I can't fathom, it certainly should be.
It's faster because most of it is part of the basic building blocks of windows. How many components use MSHTML as their rendering engine? You don't even have to start IE.
Firebird has to load it's own rendering engine, plus the browser gui, etc.
I realize this doesn't make much difference to reality, but you can't really blame the firebird developers because they use a rendering enine that isn't integrated into the windows codebase.
Excuse my fat fingers and monsterous head cold.
In 5...
4...
3..
2..
Sorry, handset = phone buttons.
However, doesn't really look much like a phone.
I'd feel pretty stupid holding it up against my face to talk. Although, a bluetooth headset might make a nice addition... Handset's a bit counter intuitive too.
Not that I really need a 3G phone anyhow.
Privacy free?
What's that, where the webmaster comes and gets you to sign your name in person, then sits behind you and reads over your shoulder?
That no one has posted a
Netcraft delivered another bombshell to the beleagured US intelligence services, *TIA is dying.
The TV will just show stuff like grass growing :)
Man or Astroman is great, but they hardly played gigantic venues, every show I've been to had at most a thousand people, often much much less.
Magink, is a combination of the words magic and ink.
HOLY SHIT, I would have never made that connection, it's completely counter-intuitive, and definitely not something that jumps right out at you.
70 fps is definitely good enough for large monitors or display screens, for non gaming purposes. Heck, you could even make a nice big tv out of it.
Plus as I re-read the article, he says almost anyone.
I did read the fucking article.
It still struck me as rather strange. If it had been Dave Barry, well, then it would have been rather more understandable.
I mean, he's no H4Xx0R god or anything, but he seems to be fairly knowledgable.
Congress might be likely to pass a law making innovative software providers more liable for the copyright infringements of their customers in order to stop the public outcry over the RIAA lawsuits...
How in the hell does that affect any intelligent innovative software provider (who makes software that can infringe on copyright), who after the napster case, realized that basing their company in america is a Bad Idea TM?
Or is it just another death knell for american software developers?
Well yeah, about the same time longhorn comes out you mean?