Slashdot Mirror


Nokia 7600 All-in-One Phone

prostoalex writes "The new Nokia 7600, reviewed by people at MobileMag is a 3G/GSM phone with radically new design and built-in functionality of an MP3 player, multimedia browser and digital camera. The phone supports WCDMA as well as GSM 900/1800. Some pictures of the product are available at Nokia's site. This is perhaps Nokia's first attempt to marry mobile phone and PDA in a lightweight and thin formfactor."

275 comments

  1. Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You're breaking up! Can you hear me now? Hello? Can you heare me? Hello?

    Aw screw it, I'll just sit here and snap pictures or play a lame game!

    1. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our new Nokia All-in-One overlords.

    2. Re:Can you hear me now? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      and you know what the phone is missing,
      QWERTY!!!

      damm them for there current QWERTY not
      having MP3!!

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    3. Re:Can you hear me now? by Desco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone actually needs to develop a small alpha numeric keypad that's optimized for two-thumb typing, like they did for stylus typing w/ FITALY... Neither QWERTY or ABCDEF are--- and neither is T9.

      And for the record, this thing looks as ugly as Anna Nicole.

  2. Wheres.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does it have a Kitchen sink? How about Xwindows? What about a full video-confrencing suite? Is it bluetooth enabled?

    The top question: Emacs or VI?

    --
    1. Re:Wheres.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's all here!

    2. Re:Wheres.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU FAIL IT!

    3. Re:Wheres.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail what, monkeyboy?

    4. Re:Wheres.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAILING, FAGCOCKER.

    5. Re:Wheres.... by zelurxunil · · Score: 1

      Heh, bluetooth enabled what a great idea in concept...but if you had a phone and pda in one, isn't it supposed to replace each one individually? Hence eliminating the need for this device to be able to sync up wireless with theese devices.

      --

      What's another word for Thesaurus?
      -Steve Wright
    6. Re:Wheres.... by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 1

      What if you want to sync Outlook? Send the photos and movies you take to your desktop? Use Bluetooth headset hardware? What if you don't dig the built in PDA and want to use your own?

      I have a Nokia 3650 and the PDA functions suck my left one. I'm in the market for a bluetooth enabled PDA so I can get my info off the phone and let it do what it does well: be a phone. Managing your calendar, populating a to-do list, sending email, taking notes, tracking contacts. All of these things are things better done on a PDA with some handwriting function.

      I'm all for gadget convergence between phone, PDA, camera, and media player, but if I had it to do over again, I'd get the Sony Ericsson P800. As it stands, the devices aren't to the point where they can converge and still be -good-, so I'm looking for a good flip cameraphone to replace the 3650 and I'll deal with carrying two pieces of hardware.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    7. Re:Wheres.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the fact that a lot of mid range and luxury cars on the market (or coming soon) are bluetooth enabled to support integration with cell phones (and most likely PDA's in the near future).

  3. First attempt? by miodekk · · Score: 5, Informative
    > This is perhaps Nokia's first attempt to marry mobile phone and PDA in a lightweight and thin formfactor.

    AFAIR Nokia was the first cellular phone maker, who introduced combined phone and PDA (Nokia Communicator). It wasn't maybe "lightweight and thin", but the times were different.

    Regards

    1. Re:First attempt? by DanoTime · · Score: 1

      Strange shape it is... more like some star trek console design. I think they're trying to pre-empt the N-Gage feel and get people used to a different look and feel.

    2. Re:First attempt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sort of reminds me of the Demolition Man and the three sea shells joke...

    3. Re:First attempt? by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They still sell them now, touch screens will have a hard time replacing keyboards such as the one in the Nokia 9210i. Not to mention you won't get much of a word processor or spreadsheet on a small square screen.

      Different form factor for different uses, this is the gadget that might make 3G seem a little cooler.

    4. Re:First attempt? by McPierce · · Score: 1

      AFAIR Nokia was the first cellular phone maker, who introduced combined phone and PDA (Nokia Communicator). It wasn't maybe "lightweight and thin", but the times were different.



      Don't forget the 3650, which has MP3 hardware, digital camera for capturing images *and* video, Bluetooth, PDA features along with Outlook integration. The 7600 is just a different form factor. Hell, I'll bet it's even the same (though newer version) of the OS...

      --
      Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
    5. Re:First attempt? by ecki · · Score: 1

      The 3650 and 7600 are quite different. The 3650 is a Series 60 (Symbian OS) device, the 7600 is a Series 40 (Nokia proprietary OS) device.

    6. Re:First attempt? by McPierce · · Score: 1

      The 3650 and 7600 are quite different.

      Yeah, I noticed that after I posted. I'm interested, though, in the details of the OS image on the device. How is it different from the current Series 40 devices?

      --
      Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
    7. Re:First attempt? by ecki · · Score: 1

      Good question... I guess the current target for Nokia is to get out high number of WCDMA devices since that's what the operators want at the moment. For that reason, the specs probably won't be too different from other Series 40 devices. The first Series 60 WCDMA phones would be more interesting for me...

  4. Hmm...but why? by ideatrack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have seen these before, and yet never understood why it's necessary to combine the two? Both are small enough to be insignificant, and to be honest, if I was on the 'phone to a client, then I'd want to be able to use my PDA without having to stop talking. Isn't this a bit of a niche market?

    1. Re:Hmm...but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can talk while using the PDA part... For example, with Nokia 3650 just press the loudspeaker button to make the sound come out from the phone speaker and use the PDA to check stuff and just talk. That's it.

    2. Re:Hmm...but why? by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      It's like the all-in-one printer/scanner/copier machines... you get a crappy printer, crappy scanner, and a crappy copier all in one big clunky package that doesn't allow you to upgrade the discrete components. neat!

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    3. Re:Hmm...but why? by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm reminded of a quote I heard on Dr. Katz once (I believe the guest was Jon Stewart), "Wow, a futon, great! During the day it's an uncomfortable couch and at night, it's an even more uncomfortable bed!" Why make things crappier, just to put them together?

    4. Re:Hmm...but why? by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a matter of opinion I guess. I stopped carrying my Palm after about six months. I didn't like having both a PDA and a phone hanging from my belt. For me, the more things they can cram into a cell-phone-sized package the better.

      Also, just making the phone smaller is useless at this point. To have any real effect you'd have to shrink the screen and keyboard to an annoyingly small size. Better to keep a reasonable form factor and just put more things in the case.

      As for using the PDA while you're talking, the hands-free earpiece is what you need. Also good for freaking people out in the supermarket as you appear to talk to an invisible person.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    5. Re:Hmm...but why? by RoLi · · Score: 2, Funny
      As an owner of a Treo, I can only say that I will never buy PDAs and phones seperately.

      The main reason is that no, they are not small enough to be insignificant. I need my front right pocket for my keys and my front left pocket for my Treo and the back pockets break things when I sit down, where could I possibly put another device?

    6. Re:Hmm...but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just for the sake of argument, most people use these with headphones attached, not up to their ear. This leaves the device free to use as a PDA while talking.

      For the record, I don't like it anymore than you do. I like phone buttons to be arranged like a numeric keypad,

      1 2 3
      4 5 6
      7 8 9
      0

    7. Re:Hmm...but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Do you really want to ask that question here?

    8. Re:Hmm...but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but if you combine it with a bluetooth headset, you can use your PDA while talking to a client!

    9. Re:Hmm...but why? by alib001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey! Some of us have been waiting ages for an ashtray-mini TV hybrid!

      Seriously tho'... hold one of these to your head to talk and you're half way to owning a set of Spock ears.

    10. Re:Hmm...but why? by Contact · · Score: 4, Funny
      As for using the PDA while you're talking, the hands-free earpiece is what you need. Also good for freaking people out in the supermarket as you appear to talk to an invisible person.

      Actually, here in the UK where hands free kits are becoming increasingly common, there's a corollary to this - when you actually do get some disturbed character walking down the street ranting to himself, nobody pays any attention as they assume he's just on the phone to someone...

    11. Re:Hmm...but why? by mobets · · Score: 1

      sombody hasn't been to a computer store in a while... The latest From HP and others are based on their latest printers. And since when is 1200 dpi a crappy scanner? As far as copying, well, it's not laser, but you do get color if you need it.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    12. Re:Hmm...but why? by yuri · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing the phone only needs to be a spot microphone and tiny earpiece. Everything else in the phone, basically is pda.

      So why not just a pda that has bluetooth and gsm/3G built in.

      Who wants two devices to lose.

    13. Re:Hmm...but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about only carring one device. But I really like the software available on the Palm - from AvantGo and Mapopolis, to Snappermail and games. So I'm a Treo user. The Treo isn't perfect, but it is pretty good. I'm going to upgrade to the 600 mainly for the faster CPU and MP3 abilities.

    14. Re:Hmm...but why? by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      sombody hasn't been to a computer store in a while...The latest From HP and others are based on their latest printers. And since when is 1200 dpi a crappy scanner? As far as copying, well, it's not laser, but you do get color if you need it.
      Of course not, I shop online.
      You're talking about inkjets?! I'm sorry, that just proves my point... who the heck wants an inkjet printer tied to their flatbed scanner?
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    15. Re:Hmm...but why? by Hitch · · Score: 1

      augggh....beat me to it. 'course you forgot the obligatory reference to the goatse.cx man.

      --
      You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
      http://propheteer.org
    16. Re:Hmm...but why? by saunabad · · Score: 1

      Actually, where I live I got so used to see people talking to themselves at the supermarket that I don't notice it anymore. Rents are low here and most of the people are professional drunks or tech students. Or both...

    17. Re:Hmm...but why? by BlewScreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      get yourself a pair of carpenter jeans - you'll get that extra pocket on your right leg - just big enough for a cell phone or narrow palm / pocket pc / whatever

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    18. Re:Hmm...but why? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " when you actually do get some disturbed character walking down the street ranting to himself, nobody pays any attention as they assume he's just on the phone to someone..."

      I just assume the guy he's talking to is named Al.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:Hmm...but why? by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I always found my palm very useful, but I never had it with me - too much trouble to carry everywhere!

      So, I replaced my nokia 8210 and palmpilot with a nokia 7650 (specs here, you can't get them in north america.)

      I'm a convert. The 7650 doesn't suffer too much from lack of a full keyboard or touch screen, and it not too big to carry everywhere. The OS is a dream, everything just works and is very intuitave. Its fun taking snaps or short videos with its built-in camera, and the quality is poor, but ok for fun shots. kinda webcam quality. 640x480.

      The contacts/calendar function is just as good as the palm, and it seems to sync with outlook with less trouble. The games are very good, and there are lots of them on the web. Most java games are about 100kb and good fun. GPRS means I can use email, web and even FTP from anywhere. FTP is very handy as the phones internal memory is limited. Take a few pics and low on memory - no prob, just FTP them up to my machine at home!

      The phone is actually nearly identical to the 3650, but without the fisher-price styling.

    20. Re:Hmm...but why? by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      ...unless you live in London, in which case you turn around, cross the street and run.

  5. That is a nice design by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    However, doesn't really look much like a phone.

    I'd feel pretty stupid holding it up against my face to talk. Although, a bluetooth headset might make a nice addition... Handset's a bit counter intuitive too.

    Not that I really need a 3G phone anyhow.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:That is a nice design by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Sorry, handset = phone buttons.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:That is a nice design by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think it's an ugly design. And I also don't think many people will enjoy using it after using a numeric keypad since they were old enough to pick up a phone.

      Exec: "How do we sell more cellphones?"
      Designer: "Why don't we focus on improving the interface, making it easier to..."
      Marketer: "I KNOW!. We'll arrange the numeric keypad in a really kewl way!"
      Exec: "Brilliant! Let's go with it!"
      Designer: "But...*sigh*"

  6. Upsidedown? by ultraw · · Score: 1

    after a first glance at the pictures, can someone tell me how to hold it so you are not listening to the microphone and talking to the speaker?

    1. Re:Upsidedown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you haven't noticed, speaker is in the upper-left corner.

  7. Re:Butt Ugly.. by ferret70 · · Score: 1

    It's looks like a woman's compact for makeup. Maybe that's who're they're targeting(?)...

  8. Dear God thats a big phone. by iainl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I already fail to use my PDA as much as I might do because its slightly too big to fit in my pockets. This thing is over 3 inches wide, which is half as much again, and surely isn't going to be comfortable to hold in one hand.

    As much as part of me finds it an amusing gadget, this really does seem to be part of Nokia's drive to add so many other applications to phones that they stop being any good at phone calls. I wish my 3510i was as good at the phone basics as the old 3210.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:Dear God thats a big phone. by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      I agree, it's big. And it also sounds like I couldn't have it here in the States even if I wanted one, "the Nokia 7600 is expected to be available in volume in Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific in fourth quarter of 2003."

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:Dear God thats a big phone. by Argon · · Score: 1

      What PDA do you have? After I blew up my old Visor (which I could never carry conveniently in my pocket), I read dozens of reviews and finally settled on a Treo 90. I can heartily recommend it. It fits snugly in the pocket, a color display and a qwerty mini keyboard - a neat device. Best of all, you can find one for less than $150 now.

    3. Re:Dear God thats a big phone. by iainl · · Score: 1

      Ah. Thanks for the recommendation - my current, just a bit too large, PDA is still a Visor Neo, with exactly the same formfactor to the the original Visors.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  9. since it's nokia, brief in finnish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hyi vittu kun on ruma

    english summary:

    buy siemens instead

    1. Re:since it's nokia, brief in finnish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      isanmaanpetturi

      jos et osta nokiaa, tulee turpaan - perkele!

  10. Can they design a phone... by Crow_T_Servo · · Score: 1

    ...where the buttons are laid out like an actual phone? Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I like the old style where the buttons are laid out in a grid. I know that because it's also a PDA that it's design might preclude it from having such a layout, but it sure doesn't look like a phone.

    1. Re:Can they design a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs buttons for typing phone numbers anymore? Yeah, nobody. So why not let the layout to develop something optimal for text messaging and games for what buttons are mostly nowadays used.

    2. Re:Can they design a phone... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      And I thought Old Fashioned meant buttons laid out on a Dial

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:Can they design a phone... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You, like me, don't actually remember phone numbers. You remember mnomonic patterns on a 3x4 keypad and use muscle memory to actually dial the numbers, much the way your fingers just automatically hit keys on your computer keyboard without thinking about where they are ... it probably wouldn't matter if your phone had the buttons labeled because you don't look at them anymore - you just push them in the geometric order you have conditioned yourself to use to access a particular phone number.

      It is way more than 'I like the old style' - you and I actually 'need' the old style.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:Can they design a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, all modern and not-so-modern cell phones have this so-called phonebook functionality so that most people haven't been dialing by typing numbers for a long time. This is why Nokia feels they can rearrange the keys for a more creative outlook.

    5. Re:Can they design a phone... by Datafage · · Score: 1

      Some of us actually DO know all the numbers we call, by heart, cold. However, I STILL don't like unconventional numeric pad layouts.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    6. Re:Can they design a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am frodo baggins , Who the hell are you ?

      I'm with you 99%.

  11. I thought they had learned after the 3650, but.. by halo1982 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else thinks this looks like a $600 football?

  12. Re:GIVE THE TODDLERS A CALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone explain to me what a "toddler" is? I'm from France.

  13. New Ugly Duckling by Lizard_King · · Score: 4, Funny

    Makes me feel a little better for buying the 3650. Now I own the second ugliest phone in the universe.

    --
    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    1. Re:New Ugly Duckling by eyegor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, maybe. I have the 3650 as well. The phone rocks, but the dialpad is a bit weird.

      So far I'm not too impressed with the Bluetooth headsets out there either. I bought one from Belkin and one from Jabra. Neither one would work with the 3650's Bluetooth profile. I suspect that the 7600 will have similar issues

      The 7600 looks too bizzare and the keypad looks like it will be nearly useless.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    2. Re:New Ugly Duckling by Zebbers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You need to buy the Nokia headset, nokia did not conform to the bluetooth headset specs.

      The 3650 isnt really ugly...its shaped like a normal celly and really the only unorthodox thing is the keypad, which doesn't take much to get used to and is actually good for typing with t9.

      Its larger than average cell phones but not larger than ones of the past. I went from a Mitsubishi t250 to the 3650 and the nokia was lighter.

      And...the beauty of gsm is the sim card. just buy a smaller more compact 'normal' phone for the times you just need that.

    3. Re:New Ugly Duckling by akudoi · · Score: 1

      im sorry if i wanted to carry a giant leaf in my pocket i'd have gone to the tree in the backyard.

      what were they thinking?!?

    4. Re:New Ugly Duckling by jfanning · · Score: 1

      You don't need a Nokia bluetooth headset, you just need one that supports the Handsfree profile. Many of them do now.

      There is no problem with conforming to the headset spec, they just don't support it at all and use the handfree profile instead. Most good Bluetooth headsets now support both specs.

    5. Re:New Ugly Duckling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the Jabra. It works with the 3650 now.

  14. all in one? really? by Adler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    wheres the GPS mode? the full functional PDA features? maybe even a radio tuner? with 29MB of memory how useful is this as a mp3 player? more than all that what i'd kill for in a phone/phone service is better quality call sound. if 3G services have such a high data rate for better video capabilities, then why dont they use that to make calls sound less like a phone call and more like your sitting next to the person your talking to.

    --

    Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!

    1. Re:all in one? really? by shakey_deal · · Score: 2, Informative
      Say hello to the Motorola A920.

      3G UMTS
      Triband GSM 900/1800MHz/1900MHz
      Dimensions: 60 x 148 x 24mm
      Weight: 212g
      Screen Size: 39.9 x 61mm
      Screen Resolution: 208 x 320, 16 bit / 64K colors
      Built-In 8MB memory with expandable SD/MMC slot
      Integrated camera (640 x 480 resolution)
      Symbian OS
      GPS
      Audio playback - 128kbps (AAC, MP3) or 64kbps (WMA)
      Audio streaming - 128kbps (AAC)
      Video playback - 256kbps
      Video streaming - 64kbps to 384kbps
      Speakerphone
      Java applications support
      Opera browser
      GPRS

      Motorola a920

      The Nokia is more of 2.5G phone since there is no support for video calls.

    2. Re:all in one? really? by pctainto · · Score: 1

      why dont they use that to make calls sound less like a phone call and more like your sitting next to the person your talking to.

      If you went through landlines, they constrict voice to the 0-5kHz range, saving space and getting rid of the harmonics above that range that make people's voice sound 'normal'. Do you really think that the phone system can withstand a quadrupling of bandwidth that each phone call takes up (~20kHz is threshold of human hearing). You're not the only one using a phone, ya know.

      --
      I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
    3. Re:all in one? really? by kinnell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you really think that the phone system can withstand a quadrupling of bandwidth that each phone call takes up

      The 4kHz bandwidth of the phone system was designed in from year dot because it is the lowest figure which can practically be used. The perceived quality could be vastly improved by simply doubling this figure - it's not necessary to reproduce hi-fi quality. This would not cripple the phone system, because the take up of phones which supported this would be gradual. The phone companies could charge double the price to those who wished to use it as an added value service. As the profits of the phone companies are mostly derived from selling bandwidth, this would be a sound business move.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    4. Re:all in one? really? by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it! I mean, for six hundred bucks I expect a blowjob, or at least a little rub-n-tug!

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:all in one? really? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      CDMA phones are widely considered to have superior call quality than GSM phones.

      So, if you're used to GSM phones, then you could use this thing on its WCDMA band and perhaps get better quality call sound.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:all in one? really? by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1
      You don't want a phone, you want a tricorder! (Sorry, I'm in Australia where there's a Star Trek (original) marathon on one of the cable channels at the moment). I think there's a quote where someone on the programme was asked what was in a trcorder and answered 'whatever Gene Roddenberry wants'.

      So why did they have a seperate communicator...?

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    7. Re:all in one? really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By who? GSM and CDMA both use the same bitrate and GSM's Enhanced voice codec, which is pretty much standard, post-dates CDMA's and, to my ears at least, sounds pretty much the same.

      WCDMA doesn't change the codec either, WCDMA changes the way of transmitting data. Saying the voice quality will improve is a little like saying your web pages will look better if you download them over cable instead of DSL.

      There's a lot of nonsense spoken in the CDMA vs GSM discussions. The constant confusion of the underlying data transport mechanism with the features on top never ceases to amaze me.

    8. Re:all in one? really? by Cato · · Score: 1

      I believe that UMTS (3G standard using W-CDMA) does specify a new codec (AAC, I think it's called), with improved quality, and in the longer term UMTS is talking about stereo etc.

  15. I dub thee by BigBir3d · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Suppository"

    1. Re:I dub thee by Adler · · Score: 1

      "The Suppository"

      prof. Farnsworth is a slashdotter?

      --

      Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!

    2. Re:I dub thee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh, doubt you'll get modded up but that's pretty funny.

    3. Re:I dub thee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:I dub thee by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      measuring 87mm x 78 mm x 18.6 mm

      Dude, it's THREE FRICKIN' INCHES WIDE! That's only slightly smaller than MY FIST.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:I dub thee by wampus · · Score: 1

      Well, some people enjoy handball...

  16. Re:Sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quorum also has a detailed report of this on their website. Truly, he will be missed.

  17. Don't click on the parent link! by twoslice · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Goatse.cx - need I say more??

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  18. AOEWLTUAFE by Kedisar · · Score: 1

    Nokia 7600, 3G/GSM, MP3, WCDMA, GSM 900/1800, PDA

    Apparently, Nokia joined the AOEWLTAFE. (Asso. of Engineers Who Like to Use Acronyms for Everything)

    Personally, I think it's very G. (good)

    1. Re:AOEWLTUAFE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is AOEWLTUAFE you IC! (insensitive clod)

    2. Re:AOEWLTUAFE by laa · · Score: 1

      I hate to knitpick (well, actually I obviously don't, but I'm supposed to say that), but if I'm not mistaken an acronym is something that is pronounced as a word -- which makes AOEWLTAFE merely an abbreviation (at least my tongue doesn't bend to pronounce it).

      --
      Why does the kernel go through stable and then unstable forks? Can't it always be a stable build, like with Windows?
    3. Re:AOEWLTUAFE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mistaken.

  19. PDA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is perhaps Nokia's first attempt to marry mobile phone and PDA in a lightweight and thin formfactor.

    What gives you the idea that this is supposed to be a foray into the PDA arena by Nokia? The tiny display doesn't make it seem like a PDA. The lack of a stylus input doesn't make it seem like a PDA.

    It looks like a repackaged 7650, designed to sell to rich German kids with more money than sense.

  20. one important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can this thing fit in my nose?

    1. Re:one important question by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Can this thing fit in my nose?

      "The Nokia 7600 will fit anywhere! *"

      Yep, looks like it will.



      * When inserted with sufficient force.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  21. real, real ugly by ed.han · · Score: 1, Funny

    well, i wouldn't say that it failing to resemble a PDA necessarily makes it ugly, but yes, it certainly is. it looks vaguely like a simon (that's what that game is called) designed by someone who's read one too many ikea catalogs.

    but this leads to an interesting question: what really is the ideal form factor for a PDA/phone? does it necessarily resemble something we've seen before? is the clamshell/ST: OS model the right direction?

    the nokia designers appear to think that the compact CD player is a reasonable format but it's unwieldy, would be hard to hold to your ear for any period of time, and if you answer a phone too fast, you stand a chance of KOing yourself. i can just see it now:

    [ring]

    "doh!" [as owner accidentally smites self]

    you know, i hope this thing is popular: maybe that way, my train ride will be quieter...

    ed

  22. Us Luddites(sp?) by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1
    What sucks for us luddites or cheapskates is that it's getting harder to find just a plain old simple cell phone. I don't want to spend more than $40 for a phone OR have to sign a contract that has has terms that are grossly not in my favor to get one for free. Besides, all these features are added so that YOU, the cell plan consumer, will burn up more and more minutes and subsequently more money. Sending pictures, downloading music, etc... over a cell phone is an expensive thing to do that just increases you plan's cost and lines the pockets of telcom CEO's.

    Sorry about the rant.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  23. Other links: by chrestomanci · · Score: 4, Informative

    Review in The Register here.

    Nokia page about the phone, with a better listing of fetures here.

  24. Still no videocalls. by shakey_deal · · Score: 1

    Making it unusable for most 3G vendors so who is gonna sell it? The main selling point of 3G IS videocalling, despite what Nokia says. And just 28 Mb memory making it a crappy mp3-player (and that memory is for storing pictures as well).

  25. what's the the numeric keypads ... by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    on the new nokias being in funny layouts?! I know I'm not the only one, but sometimes, I only know phone numbers by pattern recognition on a proper numeric pad! :) If I use a phone with a different layout, man, there goes a bunch of my friends! :)

    I know you do it too ... admit it!

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

      Exactly. First Apple changed the iPod's key layout and now Nokia's been pissing about with their numberpads. Is there nothing left to be said for good old muscle memory?

      Even if the user interface is left unchanged, it takes some time for users to get used to the new positions of vital keys...

    2. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      man.. ever heard of this thing.. umm... what was it called, oh yeah, phonebook functionality that has only been on all(that i've seen) for the last 10 years?

      what's more important is that if you can or can not to adjust writing text on the pad(for which it seems it could be ok for two-thumbing).

      however, the phone model seems like a hip'n'trendy model rather than model for real usage(7 series, lacks mmc card, funky design..)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by mccalli · · Score: 4, Funny
      on the new nokias being in funny layouts?!

      Aah, young 'un. Time was, back in my day, that phones were all circular dials like the 3650, and it was these bizarre three-in-a-row pads that were the weird ones.

      Well...that's only just true - I'm not that old really. However, I was certainly around to see the dying days of the circular dials in the mid-to-late 1970s. Back then, men were men, women were women, small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri and phones were real phones. They were made of bakelite, had clicking dialing mechanisms and sported proper bells inside. An important side effect was that they were also heavy enough to be used as a decent murder weapon.

      Not sure about this new thingy, but the recent 3650 just resurrected the good old days.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    4. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you still dial/type in numbers?

    5. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by makapuf · · Score: 1

      And just think of the pleasure to use games where 3x3 is supposed to be the pattern used for keys ?
      Like, 2 for going down, 8 for up, 4 for left ... you get the idea.

    6. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by JesterXXV · · Score: 1

      it's a phone, not a calculator....2 would go up and 8 would go down...

      --
      Yo mama so fake, she failed the Turing Test.
    7. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      man.. ever heard of this thing.. umm... what was it called, oh yeah, phonebook functionality that has only been on all(that i've seen) for the last 10 years?

      I congratulate your smart ass approach, but you missed what he was saying. He was talking about borrowing someone elses phone, like say, if your phone has a dead battery. Then, trying to dial a friend and realizing that you have memorized the muscle movements but not actually the number and you look like a total dork attempting to airdial a number and hope you get it right.

      however, the phone model seems like a hip'n'trendy model rather than model for real usage(7 series, lacks mmc card, funky design..)

      I agree. Shit, if you want a good phone just go to Japan, buy a GSM phone, unlock it.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by ArmorFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention it looks hard to one-hand text messages or dialing. Often when I'm riding my bike I have my left hand on the handlebars and my phone in my right hand as I am touch typing text messages.

    9. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by ponxx · · Score: 1

      Of course the problem is that if you only need to do this once a year (because your phone has dies) where did you get the muscle memory from? 10 years ago I used to know dozens of phone numbers, now i don't know any... in the rare event i use a different phone i look up the number in my mobile :).

      Ponxx

    10. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Of course the problem is that if you only need to do this once a year (because your phone has dies) where did you get the muscle memory from? 10 years ago I used to know dozens of phone numbers, now i don't know any... in the rare event i use a different phone i look up the number in my mobile :).

      My office phone doesn't have an electronic phonebook, and it's pointless for me to use my cell when that phone is sitting right next to me. I have to really stop and think about what my GFs number is but I can dial it instantly, or I can just push and hold 2 on my cell.

      I don't even have a home phone though, just cell phones at home and cable internet. Good way to live.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    11. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      oh please, thats not the only thing you use one-handed text messaging for.

      SMSex!

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    12. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by josh_freeman · · Score: 1

      This is a truly bloody stupid design. Frag-A-Muffin has a good point. People are used to the 3 x 4 arrangement of phone keys, and anything that strays from that is only inviting confusion. One of these days I actually need to read the book Don't Make Me Think, but the title alone needs to be the mantra of all developers. Don't change the interface without a damn good reason. Making a device look cool is most emphatically NOT a good reason.

      Someone, whose name I forgot once said "Only the nipple is an intuitive interface. All other interfaces are learned." This is so very true. Don't make a user learn a new interface just so you can show off your design skills

    13. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by Gulik · · Score: 1

      O great warrior, of noble stock
      might I enquire as to what's up doc?


      I believe you meant "O mighty warrior of great fighting stock/Might I enquire to ask, eh, what's up doc?"

      I know this is so very far off-topic that you can't even see the topic from here, but we all have little irrational things that make our sphincters clench up. Misquoting Bugs Bunny and improper use of ``begs the question'' are mine.

      Well, two of mine.

    14. Re:what's the the numeric keypads ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm im 19 an i remember the phones with dials. i think i was about 6 or 7 when we got a "normal" phone so i thin the 70's is a bit off unless germany was a bit behind...

  26. Vim! You Ninnie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said.

  27. Where's the review? by gambit3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sounds like a press release if I ever read one.

    I have no problem with press releases, but the submitter should *not* have claimed it was a review.

    1. Re:Where's the review? by thanester · · Score: 1

      It was a review of the press release? :)

    2. Re:Where's the review? by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my bad, the word 'reviewed' just slipped in, since I was linking to a magazine site. Should've been 'reproduced a glamorous press release'.

  28. Tch! by Scooter · · Score: 1

    It won't go in my Nokia car kit. I've stuck with a relaible but boring 6310i because it does. I was hoping that when Nokia got around to maiing a modern device (Like the Sony Erricsson one) that it would be plug compatible and fit in the cradle.

    Guess I'll have to get the car re-plumbed.

    1. Re:Tch! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I used to be a big fan of Ericsson's phones, but I have to say that the last time I was shopping for a handset in the low to medium price range, I was very disappointed by the clunkiness of their handsets. I ended up deserting them and going for a Motorola T720 instead.

    2. Re:Tch! by Threni · · Score: 1

      "last time I was shopping for a handset in the low to medium price range, I was very disappointed by the clunkiness of their handset"

      What's wrong with the T610?

    3. Re:Tch! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Exactly what I said:

      It's clunky.

      Their flip-type designs of a year or so ago were much more elegant and functional, and didn't look as if they had come out of a breakfast cereal packet,

    4. Re:Tch! by austad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      T610 is a good phone, much better than the 4 shitty t68i's I went through over the last year. Someone mentioned something about a car kit, just get a bluetooth car kit and it will work with any bluetooth phone. It autolinks when you get near your car, so you can leave it in your pocket. $200 or so.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    5. Re:Tch! by Threni · · Score: 1

      I don't think it does!

      http://www.clubsonyericsson.com/en/products_t610 .h tm

      I'm going to get one in a little over a months time, and I can't see what else is on the market which comes close to being small and light, and which has all of it's functionality. I'll look into the phone you opted for instead. Any others you recommend? What do you think of the P800?

    6. Re:Tch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing your phone with the T610:

      http://www.esato.com/phones/index.php?phone=72&c p= 74

      You have a worse design, shitty screen, crap battery, no bluetooth, infrared, camera, voice activated dialling, data calls, it's not triband etc etc..

      I hope you got that thing for free!

  29. Well, *almost* everything by faust2097 · · Score: 1

    It has a built-in MP3/AAC player* but no removable memory. It says it holds "up to 50 minutes" of music which by most companies' gauges means that it can hold 45 minutes of mono 64kpbs files.

    *obligitory "waaaaah no OGG support!" comment included here at no extra cost.

    1. Re:Well, *almost* everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*obligitory "waaaaah no OGG support!" comment included here at no extra cost. "

      That's because it'd cost money to add to the phone, then it'd cost more money to explain to people what OGG is. Everyone knows what an MP3 is.

    2. Re:Well, *almost* everything by MsGeek · · Score: 1
      Actually something that's better to illustrate the goodness of .OGG Vorbis vs. .MP3 is this page:

      Richie Hass downloads

      I encoded both .MP3s and .OGGs here, using Sound Forge as the ripper/encoder. The .OGGs are smaller and sound better. Sound Forge has a genuine Fraunhoefer codec so don't tell me it's not the cruddy codec. Oh yeah, don't tell me to use F/OSS stuff for the job because I tried everything for the purpose that installs default on Mandrake 9.1 and I couldn't get satisfactory results.

      Such a bummer Sonic Foundry got bought out by Sony. :P

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:Well, *almost* everything by faust2097 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't really care if it has OGG support or not, I just figured I'd get it out of the way.

  30. It may just be me... by turkeyphant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but I've never understood the purpose of 'phones which can play music yet only have enough room for "up to 50 minutes of near CD-quality music". Go-betweens rarely turn out well and what's the point in having to convert your music to 96kb/s just to fit a whole album on there?

    Mobile 'phones often suffer from poor battery life as it is and I can only see this feature reducing it yet more. Why include an additional "feature" that is detrimental to the device's main function? It's a pain having to switch the music on a player at the best of times, but why would you consider it when you've only got fifty minutes and no upgradabilty? I can't help thinking it's only bloated for the sake of it and to appear more trendy. I dread to learn the ways in which Nokia have organised music downloads straight into the 'phone from mobile services...

    Finally, I'm sure I'm not the only one to lament the lack of Vorbis compatibility. As for LAME, I bet you could barely even fit one song on there...

    1. Re:It may just be me... by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      I've got a Kyocera 7135, and my experience is that using the MP3 player doesn't run the battery down very quickly at all, as long as you have the screen off. The phone-related radio stuff and the screen are the big battery killers, not the CPU and the audio output.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:It may just be me... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with you hear.

      "Features" that make the device larger, worse on battery power, and less effective for a single purpose are far more of a hassle than they are worth. I want a cell phone to be a cell phone. Yes its handy if it holds my address. Yes its handy if it has voice recognition. Yes it can be handy if it can check my email/browse the web (pushing it, personally i would rather go for the smaller phone than something like a blackberry, which are actually very useful though).

      But NO, I dont want my phone to hold 50 mins of poor quality music which I will never use.

      If I want music, I want something that can store 20-60 gigs.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:It may just be me... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Mobile 'phones often suffer from poor battery life as it is and I can only see this feature reducing it yet more. Why include an additional "feature" that is detrimental to the device's main function?
      It would make sense in a car, plugged into the cig adapter. After all, in the car, you probably shouldn't be talking to people, so the device needs to find another way to be useful.

      The problem with that idea, though, is as you mentioned: not much storage. If only it would play Vorbis files, then 64kbps would sound fine (especially considering typical car audio hardware quality). But even then, it would still be too little storage, IMHO. (I'm already spoiled by my 20 Gig Neuros.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:It may just be me... by Echnin · · Score: 1
      It also has AAC support. AAC sounds okay even at 64 kbps, good at 96, and great at 128. It can be nice not to have to carry a watch, phone, MP3 player, scheduler and camera. With this phone, you get it all in one bundle. My old 3310 has the watch, phone and scheduler, but I still have to carry my 32 gram MP3 player, and I don't have a camera. Meh.

      AAC kicks OGG's ass, anyway. Who cares if it's not open-source?

      --
      Lalala
  31. Round and round we go.... by raygundan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every time there's a converged device, we get comments like this. Likewise, every time we hear about a new gadget of some sort, we get comments suggesting it would be better if we tried cross-breeding it with a laptop.

    Just stop for a second and realize that not everybody has the same tastes as you. Variety is good! People who want all that and a bag of chips can go buy a PDA/Phone/Camera/MP3/GPS, and people who just want a phone can get one of the simple no-nonsense Nokia models. People who like to have their pants stuffed with electronics can buy it all separately so they can practice juggling it all while simultaneously talking to clients on the phone.

    In the end, we all benefit when there's choices. Quit complaining when a product isn't the same as the products you like-- and just go buy those instead.

    And yes, I should probably heed my own advice.

    1. Re:Round and round we go.... by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pager
      Cell phone
      PDA ...
      If I get one more device for my belt I qualify for a big yellow belt buckle the shape of a BAT.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Round and round we go.... by tntguy · · Score: 1

      Only one pager on your belt? Amateur! (and no, the cell phone doesn't count)

    3. Re:Round and round we go.... by nilenico · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Sovie^H^H^H^H^H Europe, Pager + Cell Phone equals "Mobile Phone".

      --
      .sig? No.
    4. Re:Round and round we go.... by nilenico · · Score: 1

      ...not to mention that having all this stuff in your belt is soo mid-Nineties...

      your dad has his phone on his belt. you don't.

      (personally, I keep mine in my handbag. us girls gotta have some advantages!)

      --
      .sig? No.
    5. Re:Round and round we go.... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Why do guys wear this crap on their belt? It looks so ridiculous, it doesn't make you look professional or important. You end up looking like someones lackey always on call. It seems to be most prevalent in the U.S.

      Put your phone and PDA in your pockets for gods sake. Buy a smartphone and merge them into one device.

      And a PAGER? What he hell are the point of those anymore?

    6. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (personally, I keep mine in my handbag. us girls gotta have some advantages!)

      At the expense of having to carry a bag around everywhere...

    7. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah. And pray tell me in which pocket is a man going to put his cell phone?

      Front trouser pocket? Uncomfortable, "...or are you just happy to see me?"-jokes from your same-sex co-workers and random out-going calls.

      Suit pocket? What suit?

      What else?

    8. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And you are? 7?

      I'm 30 and hence I could be your father and I carry a cell phone on my belt.

    9. Re:Round and round we go.... by nilenico · · Score: 1

      well, I carry the handbag around anyways ;)

      (need somewhere to keep my house keys, my car keys, my wallet, my lipstick(s), loose powder, comb, various other makeup items, various hair doodads, sunglasses, sunglass case...)

      --
      .sig? No.
    10. Re:Round and round we go.... by nilenico · · Score: 1

      same as you.

      and my dad does keep his mobile phone on his belt! :)

      --
      .sig? No.
    11. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about getting a phone that's not the size of a brick? That make those now that it's the 21st century, you know. Fits in the front pocket just fine.

      And yeah, wearing any kind of electronic device on your belt is so gay.

    12. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My jeans are too tight to cram my cell phone in there, and if I do it anyway the antenna pokes me in sensitive spots. But it's fun to get a call with it set on Vibrate Mode ;)

    13. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Europeans call it a mobile phone? They must be so enlightened. I wish to learn more about their culture.

    14. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you 99%.

    15. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, my mobile is always set to Depeche Mode.

      Hm? Why yes, it plays mp3s.

    16. Re:Round and round we go.... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Likewise, every time we hear about a new gadget of some sort, we get comments suggesting it would be better if we tried cross-breeding it with a laptop.

      Ok, but in my case the gadget I want doesn't exist. I want a device like a Sharp CL-760, except with the hard drive like an iPod and the ability to act like an external hard drive, and to receive photos from my digital camera.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    17. Re:Round and round we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pager
      Cell phone
      PDA ...
      If I get one more device for my belt I qualify for a big yellow belt buckle the shape of a BAT.

      Leatherman
      Mag light

      I qualify for the Bat belt buckle, but at this point I don't think my belt is strong enough to hold it up

  32. Global Grid Computing... by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

    is a 3G/GSM phone with radically new design and built-in functionality of an MP3 player, multimedia browser and digital camera. The phone supports WCDMA as well as GSM 900/1800

    Wake me up when it's possible to have a cluster of these. Until then, I'm not impressed.

    -B

  33. What, no ogg support? by Spamhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bah!

    --
    Everybody Wang-Chung tonight!
  34. Number order by BaltoAaron · · Score: 1

    I remember a suprising amount of my phone numbers by pattern. (That's just me) I would have a very hard time transposing the shapes in my head to the new vertical alignment of the number keys on this thing. No thanks.

    --
    "We all know that Crap is King" - Don Henley
  35. Re:Ugly.. by debianlinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It appears to me to be a rather intelligent design. Both hands can be used to quickly manipulate buttons (as opposed to palming while pecking) without obstructing the screen. As for answering a call, that's what headphones are for. As to the 1st poster concerning Bluetooth... RTFA!

  36. ICK! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    First off, it's ugly. Second, how in the WORLD am I supposed to dial with one hand???? Third IT'S UGLY!

    What's wrong Nokia? regular looking (and useful) keypad too good for you? No wonder many Nokia users have all of their numbers in the phone instead of thier head! It's faster to hit a speed dial then a 7 digit phone number.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:ICK! by grub · · Score: 1


      how in the WORLD am I supposed to dial with one hand????

      Get the drummer from Def Leppard to show you his technique.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:ICK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Don't.

      Put down the damn phone and pay attention to operating the vehicle.

    3. Re:ICK! by radd0 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention #4:

      4. It's fugly!

      While this won't even get consideration, I'm holding off on the Treo, Kyocera, Blackberra combos for now... Why? The Samsung SPH-i500 Smartphone w/Palm OS 5.x is why.

      Samsung SPH-i500 Features

      Samsung Palm OS 5 Smartphone Announcement

      Unfortunately service is only offered from Sprint right now, but that should change soon.

      -r

  37. More than meets the eye. by flowbee64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, the new 7600 from Nokia has everything. But if we all just wait, we can get the Nokia 7800, with all the features of the 7600 plus the ability to turn into a car or jet plane and fight evil robots and dinosaurs and stuff.

    And while I'm waiting, I'll get the NGage instead, because the last thing I need is a cellphone that's just a cellphone. I need to spend way too much money on something that has tons of awesome features, but as a phone has bad reception and drops calls all the time.



    --
    "I, for one, welcome our new %INSERT ARTICLE SUBJECT HERE% overlords."
  38. more photos here by selderrr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    here

    A damd fine machine, I might add !

  39. Re:GIVE THE TODDLERS A CALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toddler == young child

  40. Rant away, good sir... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    But please be aware that you can get unlimited data plans (for very little more) so that all that picture sending and whatnot is cheaper than actually talking. Data minutes on modern cell networks (GSM/GPRS or 1xRTT) do not require the phone to occupy a voice circuit.

    I might also recommend the Nokia 3565 and 3390 as phones that appear to be relatively simple. T-Mobile has both for $50 with no contract, which is outside your range-- but I don't recall *ever* being able to buy a $40 cell phone without signing something.

    Your point is well taken, though-- there are customers enough for both types of phones. I hope you find one that suits your tastes and your wallet, and i'll continue looking for one that will let me quit carrying 4 devices around with me.

    1. Re:Rant away, good sir... by RevMike · · Score: 1
      I might also recommend the Nokia 3565 and 3390 as phones that appear to be relatively simple.

      I like the 82xx series from Nokia. It does the cell phone thing just right for me. It is small enough to be unobtrusive, but large enough that the buttons are easy to use. It has very good battery life. The UI for the phone book and such is intuitive.

      Just don't ask it to be anything other than a phone.

      For the record, I'm using the 8265 on an AT&T TDMA network.

  41. Cute with a capital Q by unfortunateson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like it: it's small, but they didn't try to shoehorn in a full keyboard for my sausage-like fingers to mash. The goofy key layout looks pretty optimal for texting with thumbs, actually.

    Regarding "How do I use the PDA and talk at the same time?" -- use a $60 bluetooth headset.

    What is it missing to make my perfect convergence unit?
    a) Higher-res screen. According to the specs at Nokia, it's only 128x160, less than an older-generation Palm. Give me at least 320x240, and we're talking useful
    b) Memory slot. I'm not terribly fussy. My camera is CF, my Palm is SD (but I don't own any devices for it, because it doesn't have good enough sound for me to want to download MP3s), my laptop supports SD and MS but not CF (which is solved with a PCMCIA card)
    c) Maybe a stylus. I've gotten very used to touchscreen on my Palm -- it's sorely missed on my GPSr for selecting items and text entry.
    d) Oh yeah, GPS receiver.

    (a), (c) and (d) are mainly price issues. (b) means they want you to keep paying to download over the phone lines.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Cute with a capital Q by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the memory slot is probably a size issue(it's 87mm*78mm), and they probably had hard time figuring out howto stick a mmc slot into that(3650 and 6600 and ngage have mmc slots for cheap memory extensions)

      gotta run...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. I want just a phone by olivrwendl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My dream phone is small, lightweight,and has a long battery life. Combining multiple features tkaes away from all three of these characteristics. Am I weird for wanting a phone that is just a phone?

    1. Re:I want just a phone by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      a freaking men.

      we share the same dream...i want a phone that is very light and has a loong battery life!

    2. Re:I want just a phone by dabadab · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's what's in the low-end of Nokia's line-up, like the Nokia 1100. It has friendly big buttons, weighs 86 g and the battery lasts a week with normal usage.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    3. Re:I want just a phone by dagbrown · · Score: 1

      Then buy just one! There're lots available. (I personally recommend the VTech A700, but I don't think you can get those outside of Canada for some reason. Shame, it's an awesome basic phone, batteries last forever, it gets good reception, and it weighs nearly nothing.)

      Ain't nobody forcing you to get one of the cool toys. If you're looking for unexciting technology, what an earth are you doing reading Slashdot, of all places? Of course Slashdot will report on the greatest whiz-bang gadgetry--that's what it's for. Complaining that you "just want a phone" is neither insightful nor interesting.

    4. Re:I want just a phone by olivrwendl · · Score: 1

      I do want the cool toys and have my share of them - it's just that when you combine products like this and try and make it small you end up with a crappy mp3 player, a crappy camera, and a crappy phone. I would rather have a small long lasting phone, an Ipod and a canon camera. three worthwhile products instead of one worthless one.

  43. Nokia's productpage by akiro · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to Nokia's official product-page for it:

    Nokia 7600

  44. 3650? n-Gage? 7600? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    The new Nokia 7600 Phone, the latest in our line of products that we'll tell you that you love but you'll hate anyway!

    At least this product's announcement didn't include as much BLATANT STUPIDITY as previous ones...

    P.S. I accidentally smashed the faceplate all to hell on my 5165 two days ago... Any sugggestions as to a good/inexpensive brand/model to go with besides Nokia? Preferably a Gate phone?

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:3650? n-Gage? 7600? by howajo · · Score: 1

      just buy another faceplate for your 5165, there's nothing better out there.

    2. Re:3650? n-Gage? 7600? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      There has to be something better considering how often I have to bring the damn thing in to Cingular to get the battery "tightened". The battery randomly comes loose in my pocket, which leads to the phone losing power and/or the battery charging funny or not at all. Have to have it tightened almost every month.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    3. Re:3650? n-Gage? 7600? by Rai · · Score: 1

      I have Cingular service and the only 2 GAIT models they carry (currently) are the Nokia 6340i and the Sony Ericsson T62u. My preference is the Nokia, but just because I'm more comfortable with Nokia's operating system. I don't use a GAIT, though. I still have my good ol' 5165 (and a spare as well :) )

  45. Stupidest Phone EVER... by howajo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps, if Nokia plans on continuing the trend of High Feature/Low Quality phones, they should concentrate on making one with a smooth contoured design so that it will hurt less when I tell them to shove it up their ass. 51XX was the last good phone they made.

  46. Cheap service... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
    I don't want to spend more than $40 for a phone OR have to sign a contract that has has terms that are grossly not in my favor

    I don't know what your situation in the US might be (sorry if I'm making an incorrect assumption) but here in Australia, an option is to buy a pre-paid mobile phone, use the service that comes with it until it expires and then take out a flat-rate pay-per-call plan using the handset which you now own outright.

    It isn't what I did, since I wanted a slightly groovier handset, but it is a potentially very cheap option.

  47. Re:GIVE THE TODDLERS A CALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you Americans want to vomit on them? That does not make sense!

  48. Just Don't Get It by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

    Appearently Nokia doesn't understand that most sane people don't want to talk on giant crappy looking things. First a taco then this new atrocity, a laptop phone? (and no I don't mean a peripheral I mean holding a laptop up to your head and talking) Besides regular phones are getting more and more PDA like all the time, storing to do lists, memos, etc why don't they work on improving that?

    --
    Trust Your Technolust
  49. Re:Sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a goatse link. A much better link for discussion of the sadly deceased musical genius is here.

  50. Someone's calling on the Taco. by Channard · · Score: 1
    My God, that this is terrible looking. I can barely let blackberrys' pass as cell phones, but that thing doesnt even look like a PDA, it looks like neither.

    Bear in mind this is from the company which brought us the N-Gage, a device which has been described as looking like a taco and requires you to remove the battery to change game. Nokia make fine phones but something seems to have gone wonky of late with their work in other areas.

  51. Availability? by mb12036 · · Score: 2

    Did anybody see anything about US availability? Looks like it is being released about every place but here.

    1. Re:Availability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work in North America. It doesn't support the GSM 850 and 1900 bands.

    2. Re:Availability? by 503 · · Score: 1

      No US availability because it won't work there. Since it's only 900/1800 dual-band (in GSM mode) this won't work with North America's 1900MHz GSM networks. Widespread North American WCDMA coverage is also a ways off.

      If the 7600 takes off in the rest of the world, perhaps they'll introduce a tri-band 7610.

  52. Re:Butt Ugly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm. You sound like the sort of guy who'd chop a lady's feet off and jizz on her bleeding stumps. Get away from me you pervert.

  53. Re:Ugly.. by in7ane · · Score: 1

    For some reason all of this reminds me of SouthPark: 105

    "This is perhaps Nokia's first attempt to marry mobile phone and PDA in a lightweight and thin formfactor."

    "The elephant is much too much big for Kyle to keep in the house, so he tries to bring it to school. Cartman mentions that he got a pot-bellied pig which is small enough to keep in the house" ... "Kyle plans to cross breed his elephant with Cartman's pig" ... "Terrence presents a five-assed monkey and Cartman's pig gives birth. Only the result looks nothing like a elephant-pig combination..."


    Why oh why are 3G phones so ugly...

  54. Very nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it run Linux ???

    I think one of this babies running linux would be
    a better pda.

  55. Nokia phones by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Is this unit going to be compatible with N-Gage games?

    A variety of N-gage compatible phones - and a cheaper game only device with no phone attached.

    That's the only thing that could prevent N-gage being stillborn, imo.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Nokia phones by ecki · · Score: 1
      Is this unit going to be compatible with N-Gage games?

      No.

  56. Is it just me... by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or has Nokia topped itself in making the ugliest phones known to man? Good LORD, I wouldn't want to be caught with that thing as my communication's device. Ugh!

  57. Ugly, not designed for human use... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sorry, but I want a cell phone with PDA capabilities, not a PDA with cell phone capabilities, and certainly not a weird square looking communicator device.


    By far my favorite so far is the Samsung SPH-i500 (see it here), and it's upcoming successor, the SGH-i500, which will be the GSM version, with Palm OS 5 and other goodies.


    This is what I've been waiting for, for some time - a cell phone, with a Palm OS PDA built in, and complete integration between the two. You can manage one address book, click on your Palm address book and dial from there, search Zagat.com with a Palm web browser to find restaurants while walking the streets of New York, and pretty much do all the stuff I've always wanted to do with a PDA, but couldn't because it didn't have an internet connection, and getting one added on was too bulky/expensive, and browsing on your cell phone was waaaay too awkward for anything other than the simplest polling of your email to see any new subject lines, maybe reading a short email from a friend.


    The CNET reviews are definitely mixed, but I spent an hour or two playing with my friend's SPH-i500 and I'm totally hooked. Now I just need to convince myself to spend 600 bucks on it, after my last large PDA expenditure on a Clie that I use once every month or two.

    1. Re:Ugly, not designed for human use... by Traa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have a look at the Handspring Treo 600. This cellphone, with a palm (Palm5) build in, is getting some rave reviews (best of CeBit). I very much agree with you that the right combo is a cellphone with PDA capabilities and not the other way around. My single biggest issue with anything out there is the 'input capabilities'. I have still not come to terms with grafiti or any of it's siblings, and don't get me started on the alphanumeric input through a numeric keypad...thats just evil :-)

      Anyways, the handspring has this fully integrated qwerty keyboard and I have had a chance to try it. Works much better then I expected. I managed to type someones address as they where giving it to me.

    2. Re:Ugly, not designed for human use... by CySurflex · · Score: 1

      or if you don't like the $500 or so price tag thats going to tied to the Treo 600 (it's coming out first week in october), then check out the Treo 300, which now can be had for $100 in places. It's a Palm OS/phone. I've been using it for the last year and I love it. Of course I'm going to upgrade to the 600 as soon as it comes out :)

  58. Good Design! by e.m.rainey · · Score: 1

    First off, let me say that I'm suprised how vehement the reaction to this design. Come on! You don't have to buy it people! Second I'm suprised at the luddite reaction to the numbering arrangement. Doesn't anyone have any interest in trying something new out to see if it's better? Honestly I though /. had more forward thinking people! Where are the dvorak people when you need defense for doing something different? Finally, I don't think it's ugly, it's actually quite svelt. I'd get one if it had a qwerty on it. Then again, I have an odd taste in phones, I have a Danger Hiptop (Tmobile Sidekick) afterall.

    --
    The next remark is false. The previous remark is true.
    1. Re:Good Design! by wampus · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at getting the Sidekick. Is it any good?

    2. Re:Good Design! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the Sidekick is great! I love it. It's a bit clunky as a phone, pretty big in my pocket, and many people complain that it is not pleasant as a phone. The shape against one's ear is not the best for talking.

      But if you use a headset (I've tried this, but usually don't use it) the sound quality is fantastic.

      Best two things are the all-you-can-eat data plan, and the keyboard. Makes the difference between usable and unusable. And as of this week it now has an onboard SSH2 client!

  59. People have no clue when they say ALL IN ONE! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When a phone/watch/whatever can do what Keysuite v2.1 does on the Palm OS, wake me up and maybe I'll take a look. And no, basic calendar and todo list are NOT enough for people in the real world who make money with their time (sales, office execs, etc, especially sales and self employed people). Having contacts in multiple catagories, viewing all past/present/future activities and todos for a contact, associating contacts with referrals and companies, etc, all that makes the difference between making a sale and letting a prospect slip through the cracks. For homework and chillin' wit Yo 133t kewl crew, ok. But for professionals the cal and todo and contact list on cell phones, even the new combo phones, is a joke.

    For anyone who lives and dies by their palm, take a look at KeySuite. It blows everything else away. The sync NEVER fails and it can have as many cals, address books, and todo's as you want, even from public exchange folders! YES! MULTIPLE!

    PS. I am no shill. I just LOVE that program. And every time I hear that "SomethingXYZ(TM) can replace your palm!" I fear my time is being wasted by a reviewer who is younger than than Palm OS itself.

    1. Re:People have no clue when they say ALL IN ONE! by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      And no, basic calendar and todo list are NOT enough for people in the real world who make money with their time (sales, office execs, etc, especially sales and self employed people).

      Since I am self employed I probably qualify to craft a reply here.

      Even though I don't generally disagree with your notion on "all-in-ONE" the basic calendar in newer Nokias is an absolute killer feature and life saver.

      Why? I should urgently call Joe Dork tomorrow at precisely 10:29. Sure, I can add it to the callendar (with 5 minute precision) of my Palm and set an alarm. Or I can enter it into my 6510 (I think) automatically integrating the number from the address book.

      Guess what; tomorrow at 10:29 my trusty phone will emmit an annoying beep and (keyboard locked or not) just punch the green key and voila: I'm connected to Joe Dork (if not his voice mail, some dreadful Muzak, or a friendly voice that suggests to dial 1).

      Add that to the very accurate clock and the alarm clock from hell (which even works when the phone's off and I prefer that in the bedroom) and you have a killer device for old-fart busy executives, like me.

      I don't dispute though that you still need an additional pda (or paper agenda, but they're just too clunky to be effective).

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

  60. eh... by mantera · · Score: 1


    it looks exciting but how can you have a useful PDA in a 128 x 160 screen?!

    I hope they'd find a way to make a screen much bigger.

  61. It's just the next step by dabadab · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I haven't seen much of a review on the site, but you can get the specs here: Nokia 7600 specs

    Aside from the WCDMA support it does noto seem to offer much more than the 7650 or the 7250i (oh, 7250i doesn't have Bluetooth, and there's no radio in the 7600), so I don't get the bit about "Nokia's first attempt", it's just the next phone in Nokia's high-end line - nothing to get too excited about.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  62. Keypads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about other people, but Nokia have moved away from traditional keypads of late and it's really put me off their phones.

    Sure I can see design benefits from moving away from the 1-9 + 0 arrangement, but this design seems to be taking it a little too far. It actually seems to make the phone incredibly bulky and fat. I don't know why the story-poster suggested that it was their first attempt at a 'thin' PDA-cum-phone, because in certainly doesn't look like it!

    I've just got a T610 and am very happy with it. Chocolatee bar form factor, small and very useable. I don't have a PDA as it performs all the functions I need, so as far as I'm concerned, a phone with a PDA in it that looks and functions like neither is a bit of a novelty and not something I could ever see there being a huge market for.

    That said, the N-gage looks interesting, but what is it about adding game consoles/PDAs/kitchen sink to phones all of a sudden?

  63. What review? by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    That wasn't a review. It was a press release.

    Interesting design. Looks like your typical skinned mp3 player :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  64. U-g_l-Y by thung226 · · Score: 1

    EEEEWWWWWWwww.

    If any of my co-workers pulls this out at a buisness meeting, I'm going to punch them in the face.

    I'll do it.

    --
    -n-
  65. Holy... by bigfatlamer · · Score: 1

    ...shit that thing is ugly.

    No amount of cool features and interoperability can make up for that fact that I'd rather be seen masturbating in public than holding this thing up to my face.

    BFL

    --
    There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
    --Doug Copland
  66. Crap phone designed to "be cool" but fails by Chreo · · Score: 1


    Sure, the new 7600 from Nokia has everything.

    It doesn't have everything. It's a 3G phone but lacks Videocalls (due to placement of camera/lack of 2nd camera). The MP3 abilities also seems like crap (28MB come on, I thought 128MB was minimum today). I can't believe people still buys Nokia phones considering this mindnumbingly stupid attemt. I've owned 2 Nokias before (had big troubles with the batteries on both) switched to SE and never ever going back.

    --

    Life is what happened when Good Intentions met Harsh Reality (the brother of the more infamous Chaos).
  67. Nokia's "Designers" by borg1238 · · Score: 1

    What the hell is wrong with Nokia's designs lately? I know they are trying to innovate, but jesus christ, reign those designers in. Just cause someone can create a Winamp skin, doesn't mean they can design a phone.

    1. Re:Nokia's "Designers" by dagbrown · · Score: 1
      What the hell is wrong with Nokia's designs lately? I know they are trying to innovate, but jesus christ, reign those designers in. Just cause someone can create a Winamp skin, doesn't mean they can design a phone.

      You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.

      Let 'em design away for a while--they're obviously having fun, and they're playing with the concept of what a cell phone is supposed to be like. A sense of play is very important; today's stupid-looking gizmo could turn out to be tomorrow's vital innovation.

    2. Re:Nokia's "Designers" by borg1238 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying they shouldn't try to create something new and innovative. However, it's one thing to design something wacky and impractical in the concept stages, but someone high up in Nokia should have nixed the phone well before it got to the manufacturing stage.

  68. YES BUT CAN IT RUN OSX...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a bewolf cluster of...

    well whatever

  69. What i really want for christmas.. by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    A cell phone that converts to a wrap around display that fits over my eyes like oversized goggles and lets me watch movies.

  70. Obligatory Simpsons Quote... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 1

    Bip Bip Beep Beep
    <Operator> The fingers you have used to dial are too fat. To order a special dialing wand, please mash the keypad with your palm now.

  71. Why is this still called a 'phone' ?!? by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 1

    Even with the current cell-phones that have lot's of cool games inside, internet connection, and on some even video, talking is one of the last thing you do with it. You might even get annoyed that someone actually calls you and disrupts your snake game...

    It should just be called a portable mini-computer, also having the option for voice communication!

  72. Nokia have lost the plot by Bertie · · Score: 1

    The reason why Nokia got to the dominant market position they enjoy today is because their phones were simple and intuitive to use, and looked sort of cute and non-threatening and accessible, but not to the extent that they came over as toy-like. In a world of disgustingly ugly Ericssons with awful interfaces and Motorolas that were just downright embarrassing, they cleaned up because they appealed to the masses.

    Now, though, they seem to be forgetting everything that made them popular. Their devices are becoming ever more contrived in both appearance and functionality, and they're blatantly chasing the zeitgeist instead of telling us all what it was.

    Meanwhile, the companies that they so thoroughly trounced have really raised their game, and phones like the Sony Ericsson T610 are exactly the sort of thing you might have expected from Nokia before they started producing phones that look like they've melted in an effort to appeal to tha kidz.

    This stupid gadget's yet another example of this silliness. Amazingly, it actually uses elements of a UI layout that Nokia had previously binned because users hated it - well, OK, admittely it's been updated, but several years ago they played with a prototype of a device with the buttons in a row down the side, thinking that it would increase speed of text input for SMS messages, but it turned out it was much worse. There's ample detail about it in this book. Here, instead of one row, they've got two, but apart from that, it's pretty much the same idea they've already rejected. Now tell me they aren't going for form over function.

    Oh, and it's a crap shape for putting in your pocket. By my reckoning it's about the size of a 3.5" floppy, maybe a bit smaller. Now look at the way you'll have to hold it in your hand - the broadest diagonal will go right across the palm of your hand. Try picking up a floppy and hold it that way and tell me it's comfortable. And in all likelihood you've got big ol' Western hands - how's it going to go down in Japan? Remember how small those original designed-for-Japan Playstation joypads without the analogue bits felt in your mitts?

    Ooh, but isn't it pretty?

    1. Re:Nokia have lost the plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      T610 looks, just like all Ericsson phones, like a brick.

      But your point about recent Nokia phones is true. 6110 was the last good looking and usable Nokia phone. And it works. I still have it.

  73. Texting by rf0 · · Score: 1

    You hvae to wonder how long it will get use to being able to text fast on that keyboard layout. I'm not saying the classic layout is ideal but everyone knows where the keys are

    Rus

    1. Re:Texting by wampus · · Score: 1

      One word here: QWERTY.

      Just because it is established doesn't mean it is better. Lots of people like Dvorak much more after they learn the layout, why not the same for the stupid football layout?

  74. Not a converged device by rbrome · · Score: 1
    A couple important notes about this phone:
    • This phone only supports WCDMA 2100, GSM 900, and GSM 1800. It does NOT support either North American frequency - 850 or 1900. So this phone is NOT compatible with any North American cellular networks. It's strictly a European/Asian 3G phone.
    • This is NOT intended to be a converged device as far as replacing any kind of PDA. Nokia does have a smartphone OS for such converged devices - Series 60 - but this phone uses an enhanced version of Nokia's Series 40 platform, which is NOT a smartphone OS. It supports Java, but that's it - nothing too fancy.
  75. != Review by grantsellis · · Score: 1
    I know it's builled a review, but the language is more that of cheerleading or PR, with phrases like
    the latest mobile imaging features in a futuristic exterior.
    Taking Nokia design to a new level
    Enhancing the exclusive design of the Nokia 7600,
    The Nokia 7600 phone opens a new door to the world of multimedia communications.
    Even at the student newspaper I worked at phrases like that would get the reviewer hauled out and shot (metaphorically speaking).

    // begin cynicism

    Of course, this from a company that hired models to pose as tourists and ask people to take their picture when the company introduced a camera phone.
    Who's surprised they have a few tame news outlets? //end cynicism
  76. Two disparate functions by winkydink · · Score: 1
    Phone/PDA combos do one or the other really well, not both.

    If it's a PDA manufacturer that adds a phone, you end up with a great PDA and a sucky phone. And vice versa.

    As much as both phone and PDA manufacturers would like to marry these two products to make one less thing to carry, I'm convinced that from a mform factor & UI perspective that it will always be a trade-off. It's easier to just wear a jacket or vest for the extra pockets and carry both.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  77. Re:Ugly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Simon"

  78. 7600 - Fashion phone by redalien · · Score: 1

    This phone is nothing but a fashion item for the European teens. For those of you familiar with the Nokia phone system, it is a Series 40 phone (Like the 7210), and not a Series 60 (7650, 3650, N-Gage, etc) or a Series 80 (9110, 9210, 9210i) which are the PDA style phones.

  79. Scotty... by radoni · · Score: 1

    ...1 to beam up!

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  80. Weird... by jargoone · · Score: 1

    I was prejudiced against Nokia for the longest time because of their emphasis on being cute. I recently got a "normal" Nokia phone (8265), on which the only non-normal item is the buttons, which are somewhat oddly-shaped and laid out. I like the phone a lot on the whole. Still, it seems that they refuse to make a "normal" phone that isn't the size of a brick. Weird button feel or layout seems to be the biggest problem. But judging by the pictures linked to in the article, it looks as though this thing might be difficult to even talk on.

    I realize that looks sell, and I'm not one of those "give me just a phone, dammit" people. But let function rule over looks for at least some things. Don't put the buttons in a circle, for chrissake.

  81. Interesting but suffering from some tragic flaws by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

    I am all for the revolution that merges all of these devices into one useful device that I just carry around with me.

    I enjoy carrying around my 3650 and being able to snap pictures all the time. They aren't super high 5 megapixel pictures, but I also don't carry my super high 5 megapixel camera with me all the time. It would be nice if the image quality for these babies reached 1 megapixel.

    This phone however suffers from some flaws that make it a bit unfriendly. The dialing interface is worse than that of the 3650. If you're going to go through all that trouble (and have an expensive phone to boot) - you might as well go touchscreen and put the keys on the interface.

    The phone simply doesn't have enough memory to truly be useful in its stock configuration. Hopefully information floating around about lack of memory upgradability are false as its somewhat pointless to have an integrated device going around with such a trivially small amount of memory.

    Its about time that a good Nokia phone gets voice dialing though :)

  82. Real PDA/Phone = Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you buy a regular smartphone or a proprietary-OS PDA/Phone, your cell phone company decides for you what it can do.

    If you buy a Palm/Windows/Symbian based phone, YOU get to decide what the thing does.

    Do I like my phone's fat email client, native-format attachment reader/editor, VNC client and USB modem app? Of course I do: I'm the one who put them there.

  83. Hard to believe that they made it look that way... by SuperDuperMan · · Score: 1

    on purpose. Man they must have been under some tight deadline or under the influnence of some bad drugs to come up with that and think it's the best design for their hot new product.

  84. Reviewed my ass by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's not a review! That is quite literally a cut-and-paste from the Nokia press release!

    Here's the original

    Here's the copy.

    Spot the difference.

    If you look, they even include the asterisk from the Press Release, without copying the footnote it links to!

    1. Re:Reviewed my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's the difference then - no footnotes!

  85. Please submit your ass for review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comments were not buttock-related.

    Pls fix k thx

  86. Gadget Overlap by WebfishUK · · Score: 1
    Here is another example of a gadget which is good at some, poor at others. The phone I have already is a good phone, but it is a poor address book and an ok organiser. On the otherhand my Palm is a good organiser and address book but lacks any phone functionality. Also I have an Ipod, a great MP3 player, but a rather poor address book. I have too much Gadget overlap.

    Fundamentally I want one of two discrete solutions;
    • The ultimate universal gadget that does each of the above well
    • Devices which perform one task and none of the others but with good communication
    --
    -- "Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!"
  87. If I throw it in the air, will it fly back to me? by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

    At least it's a quick sell to the "gotta have the latest gadget" crowd...

  88. great by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

    For those of you bitching about the 3650... don't worry, this 7600 is as available in the US (GSM 1900, remember?) as the 7650, the grown-up older brother of the 3650.

    Which is to say, we're not getting any of the better phones.

    --
    --Matthew
  89. no way by sootman · · Score: 0

    Any phone manufacturer who thinks lots of people want a phone with keys in anything other than the familiar
    1 2 3
    4 5 6
    7 8 9
    * 0 #
    pattern is on crack.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  90. FUGLY! by RobertKozak · · Score: 1


    I am the only one that find this mobile phone to be the ugliest ever developed?

    --
    Bet this .sig looks familiar.
    1. Re:FUGLY! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it looks pretty cool, although it doesn't seem practical as a phone (esp. with the odd keypad layout)

  91. MP3 and *AAC*? by Damek · · Score: 1

    Has nobody said anything yet about the mention of AAC in the review? This is the first I've heard of any other device playing the same format that iPods play... Are there any other MP3 players that also play AAC? Will we see more AAC support cropping up, and faster than Ogg Vorbis support seems to be coming along? I hope so! (Well, I hope for more AAC support in other devices, I don't really care if it comes along faster than Vorbis support...)

  92. Great... by aznxk3vi17 · · Score: 1

    ...yet another phone designed for us to lose them, prompting us to buy the next design which will be ugly, unintuitive, and even easier to lose.

  93. What about the S/E p800? by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

    The P800 has *excellent* handwriting recognition. I can knock out long text messages in seconds. I really don't understand why anyone wouldn't buy a P800. If for no other reason than PalmOS sucks and SymbianOS rules.

    1. Re:What about the S/E p800? by Cato · · Score: 1

      I use the P800 and I find its handwriting recognition a pain - longer strokes are needed than with Graffiti on Palm. It also crashes more than my Palm does, ironically enough - even though Symbian is a better OS for multi-tasking etc, it does seem to be possible for an app to take it down (Opera is particularly bad at this). I also sometimes have to reboot my P800 to get enough memory to launch Opera (I thought Symbian would automatically close processes if this happened).

      However, Opera on P800 is really impressive on almost any site, and includes SSL, JavaScript, HTML 4.0, etc. Shame that I can't work out how to delete a bookmark, though...

      It's a lot more complex than 'PalmOS sucks and Symbian rules' - Palm has far more applications and requires fewer taps to get things done, while Symbian is better for a phone (e.g. shows you battery level and signal at all times, whatever the app).

      When the Treo 600 comes out I'll get one, because it has a keyboard and I really want to be able to do email and Wiki updates without being tied to a PC. The P800's email is not bad, but sending email is tedious due to the handwriting input.

  94. k.i.s.s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about instead of cramming this device with as much as digitally possible, they put the money into towers and bandwidth. I've been through three different carriers (Verizon, Sprint, and now Cingular), with five different cellphones (Samsungs and Nokias) in Washington, DC. I have yet to find anyone who can give me a strong signal within every acre of the beltway, and/or consistently make and hold a phone call.

    That is UNACCEPTABLE, when all this money is thrown into shit a vast majority of the mobile public does not care about.

  95. Better, not smaller by Angram · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smaller phones would be more nuisance than gain - the keys and screen are as small as they can get and still remain useful for most people. What we need is lighter and more ergonomic phones - same general size, but a better and less bulky shape. Consider the fact that many clip their phone to their belt, yet it isn't in any way designed for such a purpose - you always have a box jutting out from your side. Why not make it crescent-shaped? It could hug your belt, remain closer to your body, and be less likely to smash into things (rounded outside, more like a dome-shape than present).

    --

    GL
  96. nice advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, this is so going to kick the Treo 600s butt! Same for the highend Sony Ericcson! ... not. There are phones out there with better integrated cameras and *real* PDAs as well as MP3 players. This is a halfassed try and doesn't offer anything above a number of other phones which already offer these features apart from a whacky design.

  97. "Content" can be downloaded... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

    ...but does that mean it can "Sync"??

    I'm looking into getting my first cell phone, but I want one that I'll be able to sync with my calendar, address book, etc... I don't care if it's not a full PDA - but if it has a calendar or whatnot built in to begin with, I want to be able to sync it.

    It seems that all the new phones only sync with the providers servers and there's no direct connection method... :-(

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  98. Kyocera 7135 by linderdm · · Score: 1

    You might take alook at the Kyocera 7135. It is a phone first, with PDA functionality. MP3 player too. And, unlike the Samsung i500, it has a Secure Digital card slot and speakerphone. Another cool feature is the pager style display on the top of the phone. It runs on Palm OS 4.1 and so far works great for me. Here is a review from PC Magazine.

  99. two steps backward by asscroft · · Score: 1

    Phones are neat because you can dial with one hand - in the dark.
    PDA's were held back because they took two hands.
    Finally, palm/handspring came up with that little joystick thingy that allows one handed use.
    Yeah, PDA/Phones are finally one-handeable, but they're probably still a little hard to use without looking.

    Enter this beast which splits the number pad in two vertical rows on either side of the display.

    You now need to look and use two hands, just to DIAL the phone.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  100. Re:I thought they had learned after the 3650, but. by niko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks more like a $600 contraceptive case.

    If it becomes availble in pink, the young ladies can make a frantic dash to answer that important call only to discover they're answering a rubber diaphragm!

  101. Re:Ugly.. by Cato · · Score: 1

    Agree about the ugliness, like the 3650, but have a look at http://www.mphone.co.uk/Ericsson/z1010.html for a SonyEricsson phone that at least doesn't look too bad.

  102. this is a troll, feel free to not read me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and mod me down. but don't claim that's gw bush's quote. he didn't make it up. his press guys did. he doesn't have the brains for that.

  103. Looking forward to future generations by thanester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have always wanted a cell phone that's an MP3 player. 29 megs of memory obviously won't cut it, but they're only going to get better from here on.

    I'm eagerly waiting for the day when we'll have a small device that's a cell phone, mp3 player, and full web browser, WITH a reasonable input interface. I applaud each step closer to that day.

  104. Looks good but by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1


    Nokia 7600 looks good but I am getting this one:
    Image1
    Image2
    Image3
    Image4
    Image5
    Image6
    A review
    Click on screens to view all screens

  105. Wanted: A wearable Treo 600 by jfaughnan · · Score: 1

    Handspring/Palm has a preview of the new 600 series [1]. Since I'm very "PalmCentric", this is the kind of direction I want to go -- a PalmOS device that's a good phone and lets me drop one device (and its travel charger, cradle, etc etc). It also has a built in camera for pinhole pictures.

    Problem is, I doubt it's really wearable. I need something that clips on my belt. If they dumped the keyboard from this one and used a Tungsten T like slider to extend the device for use I think they could make it wearable.

    In other words, I want a slightly skinnier cross between the Treo 600 and the Tungsten T, with a well designed cradle that will attach firmly to be my belt.

    Is that too much to ask :-)?

    I suspect that I won't get it until late next year, more's the shame.

    john

    [1]http://www.handspring.com/treo600

    --
    John Faughnan
    jfaughnan@spamcop.net
  106. That's all fine and dandy... by bailunrui · · Score: 1

    ... but can I use it as a phone?

  107. Direct Neural Stimulation I/O, Next by eer · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're almost there...with bluetooth interfaces to implanted cochlear implants, and to visual cortex direct neural simulation stimulators, we can do away with the clumsy spinal taps with which Neo and friends have to put up.

    Now, if we can just figure out how to teach the damn things to be suspicious of new acquaintances, we can beat the Borg via free-market alternatives to the one, monopolizing collective!

  108. Looks good, but.. by Sunnan · · Score: 1
    I think this looks pretty nice, actually - but where's the phone/pda that
    1. runs on free-as-in-source software
    2. has a GKOS-keyboard?


    Especially the first point is what I'd be most interested in.
  109. UMTS? Yes! Video chat ? no! by z80 · · Score: 1

    Nokia has made several mistakes with this phone. First of all, the most obvious thing is that it's _so_ ugly.

    Secondly, it's a UMTS phone, which could be a good think except Nokia doesn't think video chat is important.

    Third - Nokias track record when it comes to quality in their products sure as hell won't pursuade me buy this phone.

    No, Motorolas A920 is the way to go. It looks great.

    --
    -- http://z80.org - all opinions, all the time --
  110. Type it in once... then forget it. by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    If I use a phone with a different layout, man, there goes a bunch of my friends! :)

    If they were REALLY your friends, you would store their numbers in the phonebook and never have to dial again.

    1. Re:Type it in once... then forget it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really are your friends, they'd call you... but this being Slashdot, I figure that he's lying about having friends anyways.

  111. Re:Nokia's "Designers" = WinAMP Skins by adzoox · · Score: 1

    mmmm.... no ... Nokia's sales are sliding too. That design is impractical and ugly ... not to mention COMPLETELY boring - like the parent said, it looks like a WinAMP (in my case Audion) Skin - one I wouldn't download.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  112. Fugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That phone is fugly.

  113. It doesn't dry your hair? by The_ForeignEye · · Score: 1

    What!!!!????

    It makes phone calls, takes pictures, plays music, has games... and you can't dry you hair with it?

    Sorry, but until they come up with a device that AT LEAST lets you talk on the phone, take pictures, play music, play games, dry my hair, press my clothes, clean my room, and check for new porn on the net, I'm not interested. Thank you very much.

  114. Re:If I throw it in the air, will it fly back to m by Rick.C · · Score: 1

    As ugly as it is, if it doesn't come back by itself, someone will surely return it to you. No one would want to keep it.

    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  115. I'm with you 99%. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selectable 900/1800/1900 MHz? Makes you wonder why they didn't go with 1900 MHz in the first place. Oh, maybe there are there games which run too fast on 1900 MHz?

  116. Re:I thought they had learned after the 3650, but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should hope young ladies of today would use something more effective than a diaphragm.

  117. Hiptop by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    This device looks really snazzy and I like the jewelry, but I'm pretty happy with my hiptop, which now supports SSH for free after this week's over-the-air firmware update, and it has a full keyboard. I've written a spreadsheet and a peer-to-peer sharing app, hacked on an IRC app, and written some other stuff for it, all with their Java SDK.

  118. No lens cover? by Sindri · · Score: 1

    Why on earth don't mobile phone camera lenses have some sort of lens cover. The screen on my phone is covered in scratches, I asume the lens on my camera phone would be to after a short while.

  119. If you ask me... by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

    ...what's wrong with cell phones these days isn't the insane, impractical designs (although that's mostly Nokia) or the fact that they're trying to make a phone that does everything for you - I don't like the way service providers rip off their customers at every opporunity. You know.

    " High quality streaming video!*
    Digital camera and video recorder!
    XHTML browser!
    Multimedia messaging!
    Built in JAVA!~


    * Cost: $0.10/second
    Phone doesn't have enough memory to make this worthwhile. It can't be upgraded.
    Cost: $0.10/page
    Cost: $0.15/KB
    ~ Not activated until you give us your firstborn."

    Agh.

  120. Okay by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    My ass was once voted 'Third best ass at Criterion Studios Ltd'

    I kid you not.

  121. Truth in advertising. Can you say cut and paste? by jphughes · · Score: 1
    The Nokia site for this phone is nice, interesting, etc. but I downloaded the high resolution picture for this here and took a look at it. It is clear that the pixels for the image are, to my untrained eye, 5x smaller than the pixels for the words and symbols at the top and bottom.

    It could be that the center section has really fine pixels, but nah...