Did you miss the Slashdot article where Denmark was number one IT country in the world? You are talking about the single most productive IT country in the world per capita..
More Europeans probably use Opera than Americans, but for Safari I am sure it's the other way. Apple is mostly an American phenomena, Macs are very rare in most of Europe.
Jack Thompson will blame video games, Jerry Falwell will blame gay marriage, Rosie O'Donnel will say it is the proliferation of guns, Rush Limbaugh will tell us that this is the inevitable result of a a Democrat majority. This is how these people get their faces on TV.
It might also be a fancy keyword for shared cache, where one core can use all the cache if the other one is sleeping or not very active. Intel has previously jumped a few fences and not implemented fully shared cache unlike AMD.
US didn't respect European patents. This was a major dispute in the 19th century. England had patented many new industrial machines, and the US was the one place where these machines could be used without paying royalties.
Giving concrete examples would be silly, since it is more or less everything: Machines, factory designs, steam engines, locomotives, etc.
Anti-American riots flared in the 1960s and 1970s in much of Western Europe, especially in the era of the Vietnam War. Throughout the 1990s many popular books appeared in France deploring American culture. No, there was not any absence of anti-Americanism until spring of 2003.
You also see anti-globalization riots, and riots against animal cruilty, that does not mean most people support these movements. There is a difference between having a small anti-american minority in 1970-2000 and the dominating anti-american or anti-bush attitude common today.
Trust me Europe was very pro-US in the 1980s
It was one of the reasons companies like McDonalds grew so fast in the 80s. They marketed themselves as American with capital A, and profited from people wanting to more American(tm). It's also why they are so unpopular today.
Empathy applies to other humans. When you apply the same to animals you are anthropomorphic. This is actually a very odd treat that appears in many humans, especially after Disney started making cartoons. So just because other people don't share this trait with you, doesn't mean they are selfish, they just better able to distinguish between animals and humans, than you are.
The current laws are sufficient, and if you Apple eye-glasses wasn't so narrow you have noticed that the new antitrust case is not against Apple, but against Apple and 3 music cartels.
Apple has the spin angle of claiming to work with the EU to force the music cartels to open up.
Of course recent research shows that the workers probably wasn't slaves. They were treated much better, had good homes, received health treatment, etc. They were probably professional craftsmen.
At Copenhagen University they evaluated Blackboard and found it inadequate. Instead they replaced it with the result of a 3 week student assignment at the Computer Science department DIKU. The result is much more stable and useable (Allthough the basic purpose and idea of this type of software still makes it useless.)
Huh? From the fine summary: "the McCain page was pulling an image from Davidson's site" - how can it be illegal to change the contents of your own website? How could this even be called 'hacking'? If you pull graphics from other websites, prepare to get what you deserve! It says "Pranked" instead of "Hacked" in the summary title for a reason.
Since when have common sense had anything to do with american law?
Why will a cat or dog or pig or any number of other animals accept another species to nurse at its teats, even when, as in many of these cases, said species is considered natural prey or predator? Dogs and pigs will because they have anthropomophic behaviour. Cats wont, so keep them out of the comparison.
Why will cats in particular, highly independent creatures who are extremely good at providing for themselves, go into a burning building to attempt to wake and save their owners, sometimes at the cost of their own lives? I understand the argument for saving one's kittens is that of propagating the gene (though cats could always make more kittens, and that is certainly a more effective strategy both at the personal and genetic levels) but why save some human? Cats don't generally need humans for survival. It is just one of several strategies available to them - and they do it. Many convert from one to the other, sometimes more than once. Cognition? Or wiring?
Urban legend or accident. A dog would do that for that exact purpose, a cat wouldn't. Cats have no concept of humans and don't care for them. Affection from a cat to a human is purely a human mis-perception.
Slashdot Mirror
Well.. Except they of course provide cheap US oil. If Alaska was independent they would be richer, as they could pocket all the oil money themselves.
Did you miss the Slashdot article where Denmark was number one IT country in the world? You are talking about the single most productive IT country in the world per capita..
No. Why do you think the American military emphasizes discipline and following orders without questions?
Nope. I don't see that.
Denmark and Netherlands are two of the most high IT countries in Europe, and they are both in the bottom. It seems more random really.
More Europeans probably use Opera than Americans, but for Safari I am sure it's the other way. Apple is mostly an American phenomena, Macs are very rare in most of Europe.
Jack Thompson will blame video games, Jerry Falwell will blame gay marriage, Rosie O'Donnel will say it is the proliferation of guns, Rush Limbaugh will tell us that this is the inevitable result of a a Democrat majority. This is how these people get their faces on TV.
7 56159
And the gun nuts will blame the lack of more guns: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=231053&cid=18
It might also be a fancy keyword for shared cache, where one core can use all the cache if the other one is sleeping or not very active. Intel has previously jumped a few fences and not implemented fully shared cache unlike AMD.
Btw. robson? Rubs on, Rubs off..
Hey, That's less than what you spend on invading Iraq..
Yes. Voting yourself out of the world, can't keep the world from getting to you.
Norway was no choice but to follow EU rules because they in Europa, and most of their import is from Europe and most of their export goes to Europe.
Americans didn't exists in the 19th century. You were some british guy or some german guy..
US didn't respect European patents. This was a major dispute in the 19th century. England had patented many new industrial machines, and the US was the one place where these machines could be used without paying royalties.
Giving concrete examples would be silly, since it is more or less everything: Machines, factory designs, steam engines, locomotives, etc.
Well, except gravity.
Anti-American riots flared in the 1960s and 1970s in much of Western Europe, especially in the era of the Vietnam War. Throughout the 1990s many popular books appeared in France deploring American culture. No, there was not any absence of anti-Americanism until spring of 2003.
You also see anti-globalization riots, and riots against animal cruilty, that does not mean most people support these movements. There is a difference between having a small anti-american minority in 1970-2000 and the dominating anti-american or anti-bush attitude common today.
Trust me Europe was very pro-US in the 1980s
It was one of the reasons companies like McDonalds grew so fast in the 80s. They marketed themselves as American with capital A, and profited from people wanting to more American(tm). It's also why they are so unpopular today.
It doesn't matter if ;)
is empty or not. It will render exactly the same
And no, that is not accidental.
Except styling replaced elements with CSS is not covered by the CSS standard, and is optional at best.
So no it is not a standard, but a pretty good idea that works is most if not all modern browsers.
Because there is a world outside the US?
Empathy applies to other humans. When you apply the same to animals you are anthropomorphic. This is actually a very odd treat that appears in many humans, especially after Disney started making cartoons.
So just because other people don't share this trait with you, doesn't mean they are selfish, they just better able to distinguish between animals and humans, than you are.
The current laws are sufficient, and if you Apple eye-glasses wasn't so narrow you have noticed that the new antitrust case is not against Apple, but against Apple and 3 music cartels.
Apple has the spin angle of claiming to work with the EU to force the music cartels to open up.
Of course recent research shows that the workers probably wasn't slaves. They were treated much better, had good homes, received health treatment, etc. They were probably professional craftsmen.
At Copenhagen University they evaluated Blackboard and found it inadequate. Instead they replaced it with the result of a 3 week student assignment at the Computer Science department DIKU. The result is much more stable and useable (Allthough the basic purpose and idea of this type of software still makes it useless.)
In fact making intentionally deceiving people illegal could have catastrophic consequences on Christmas and Easter as we know it.
Since when have common sense had anything to do with american law?
Except "coups" as you call them are done by the military not by armed citizens.
If the citizens try to overthrow the government it is not a coup. It is either:
a) Terrorism
b) Insurgency
c) A rebellion
Depending on how well it turns out and who writes the press-releases.
It's in the international human rights convention (I think, or an extension dealing with childrens rights).
Of course USA is the only western country that hasn't signed the human rights convention.
Why will a cat or dog or pig or any number of other animals accept another species to nurse at its teats, even when, as in many of these cases, said species is considered natural prey or predator?
Dogs and pigs will because they have anthropomophic behaviour. Cats wont, so keep them out of the comparison.
Why will cats in particular, highly independent creatures who are extremely good at providing for themselves, go into a burning building to attempt to wake and save their owners, sometimes at the cost of their own lives? I understand the argument for saving one's kittens is that of propagating the gene (though cats could always make more kittens, and that is certainly a more effective strategy both at the personal and genetic levels) but why save some human? Cats don't generally need humans for survival. It is just one of several strategies available to them - and they do it. Many convert from one to the other, sometimes more than once. Cognition? Or wiring?
Urban legend or accident. A dog would do that for that exact purpose, a cat wouldn't. Cats have no concept of humans and don't care for them. Affection from a cat to a human is purely a human mis-perception.