Vista Failing "Blackboard" College Courses
writertype writes "Although Blackboard is used to communicate between students and professors at virtually all of PC Magazine/Princeton Review's top 20 wired colleges, when run under a Vista environment users can see glitches. Moreover, IT departments told PC Mag that if Blackboard is used with Vista plus IE7, students can't communicate via the software. When asked why, Microsoft ... waffled. Blackboard says they'll have a fix in place by summer. Meanwhile, are there any other common college apps that Vista fails to work with?"
Ice Cream has no bones.
When asked why, Microsoft ... waffled.
They shouldn't have waffled. They should have given the answer this deserves...how the hell is this Microsoft's problem to correct?
Vista was in beta forever and a day. Beta 3 was out and the API was locked down for at least several months before RTM. In cases where any third party software does not now work under Vista, it is *entirely* the fault of that software company. Holding Microsoft responsible to any degree here is just plain stupid.
I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
It sounds like Blackboard needs to fix their application, yes?
Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
HTML is not rocket science. You can do whatever you want behind the scenes, but at the end of the day HTML is what you send and it's not that hard. Blackboard dropped the ball...
Blackboard is awful, terrible software. Microsoft have simply filtered it out as part of their quality assurance program.
MySpace is next.
Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.
I've been in the business since before the first Windows versions. Usually I make sure to do software so it works with any Windows version. That should be pretty easy as long as you use standard API.
Over the years I've noticed a trend: If you use Microsoft development tools, you end up having problems with backwards compatibility. Either their compilers so a lot of weird things or MS makes sure to break them so even the programmers have to upgrade.
Hopefully this encourages universities to move away from Blackboard if anything.. it's a steaming pile of crap, really.
Doesn't affect me anyway, as any school of comp sci should be, all our labs are thin x-servers.
The rest of the uni can suffer in Novell hell for all I care, stupid ITS.
Yes, I suspect there are quite a number of common collage apps, mostly things that involve DRM, that collage students will find Vista was intended to fail to work with.
It's good to befriend a penguin.
And Blackboard are fucking useless. Awful, awful, awful application, and I've heard all-sorts from people having all sorts of problems with it.
This one isn't Microsoft's fault.
...is that a few months ago in anticipation for the new version of Windows, Blackboard named a new piece of software in its honor: "WebCT Vista." Fast forward a few months, and I get the funniest e-mail from the dept. that handles Blackboard:
"WebCT Vista is not supported on the Windows Vista platform."
*facepalm*
Meanwhile, are there any other common college apps that Vista fails to work with?
;)
Yes, there are some problems with uTorrent
The problem is, both the summary and TFA mention separate issues with both "Vista" and "Vista & IE7". It isn't clear exactly what that means. Does IE7 work on XP with these apps? TFA seems to indicate these are webapps, so shouldn't the browser be the most important component? Flipping things, do other browsers (IE6, Firefox) work on Vista? How about Firefox on any platform?
Without really knowing the answers to all of these, I don't have an opinion on whether this is Microsoft's fault or the app-builder's fault. Yet, if this is a true webapp, ensuring that it works on Firefox should be enough for virtually all cross-platform compatibility issues, shouldn't it? If it doesn't run on Vista/IE7, just tell them to use Firefox for that app. It doesn't cost money; this isn't lock-in.
Here at the University of Arizona, Vista doesn't work with our encrypted Wireless APs because Vista's PEAP authentication... doesn't.
2 5&page=2 - one of a few threads in the Office of Student Computing Resources forums following broken wifi and vista
http://forum.oscr.arizona.edu/showthread.php?t=29
As of right now, Vista users wanting to surf encrypted have to google and find a copy of the Vista-compatible Cisco VPN Client 5.0 beta (the UA's sitelicense website still only has VPN Client 4.9, which is not Vista compatible) and connect to the UA's VPN over our unencrypted public wireless network.
Blackboard to patent software that is none functional when run on a new OS.
It's great to have a patent system that rewards innovation.
blackboard is one big monstrocity of a web app, you wonder how it works at all btw i have no problems using it with IE7?!
Meanwhile, are there any other common college apps that Linux/OSX fails to work with?
Meanwhile, are there any other common college apps that Vista fails to work with?
BlueJ has some problems with elements of the UI when run on Vista under Java 5. Java 6 seems to fix this problem. (Works for me..)
More info here: http://bluej.org/help/faq.html#winvista
It looks like many quantitative applications are currently not going to work on Vista, at least for now. Major statistical analysis, data mining and Geographic Information Systems tools that don't run on Vista include:
SPSS, SAS, MATLAB and SAP and ESRI ArcGIS
Eh, this is no big deal, right? I mean, who really wants to know about facts and numbers? Especially when you are using a *computer*.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool. -Richard Feynman
How is this different from Blackboard on any other OS?
== Jez ==
Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
Writing a Win32/64 app that only works in one OS/browser/java version/etc seems to me to be sloppy coding. Blackboard is a *WEB* app, is it not? Why does the client matter? Usually the answer is because the Devs were lazy and took shortcuts by using the client to do something that the server could just as easily do. (Not necessarily the case here)
People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.
shouldn't it be "Are there any other common college apps that fail to work with Vista?"
To use the campus wireless at Dalhousie university in Halifax you have to run their special cisco VPN client for which there's no version for Vista. So Vista = no wireless at Dal. Does the internet count as a common college app?
I predicted it before and it seems to be coming true. We get stories about how people, organizations and governments don't want to switch. We get stories about exceptionally poor performance. We get stories about compatibility problems. We get the occasional "DRM" interferes with normal/legal use stories too.
The big question is when Vista will be declared a flop?
How come when applictions don't work with the latest release of windows, or windows service pack it's always: LOOK MS SUCKS!!!!
And when applications don't work with the latest linux distro, it's like: hey give the application dev some time.
If anything since the number of applications for windows probably exceeds the number of linux apps it should be the other way around. That, plus the fact that linux and any OSS has a theoretical pool of dev's to tap where MS only has their handfull of hired guns.
I have no idea what other sorts of issues there might be. I switched over to an iMac and gave up building PC's partly to avoid dealing with Vista. OS X has it's own personality quirks, but none of the problems I have had with windows. I got an intel mac as soon as boot camp was released and I could run windows if there was an app I really, really needed that wasn't available for OS X. I boot into windows to update it once a month, and hardly use it any more. I used to for the occasional game, but now I play mostly console games when I have time (graduate studies leave little time for games, even when they are a part of my "research" for technology and culture, which is the subject of my interdisciplinary masters). I haven't worked in windows since I got this thing last May.
I thought people smart enough to be in college used macs? = )
At USD we use WebCT 4 and i can confirm that it runs like utter garbage on vista/ie7.
What is Blackboard?
I had to look this up too, since my own recollection (from the early fourteenth century) of blackboards is of large, black-painted surfaces at the end of what was known as a classroom. Peripherals consisted of wooden-backed dusters and slender sticks of calcium carbonate. Both doubled as ammunition for pedagogues to apply, with varying degrees of accuracy, to unruly or inattentive pupils.
Wouldn't that better be "Meanwile, are there any other common college apps so poorly written that they only work in environments they were tested on?"
World of Warcraft
Even though the parent is ranked funny, there is lots of truth to it.
I've worked with and had to support Blackboard before. There are few applications that I think are worse. (I recall a bug that we experienced, where if two people submitted an assessment at the same time, or very close to the same time, the software would lose one of them.)
Also, as crappy as Vista is, it was in beta and development for a long time. At the very least, Blackboard should have issued an advisory stating that under certain conditions their software breaks. (And no sensible IT department at any major educational facility should have upgraded already anyways.)
I guess I would say the root of the problem is the lack of responsibility in the software world. Unlike some professions (for example: Civil Engineering), there is no real regulation or prevailent society to make sure that people develop by a set of standards. Having something like that, would go a long ways toward fixing problems like this.
There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
If Blackboard is half as horrible as Webct is ...agh. I could deal with webct until it was upgraded to webct Vista. When the program learned about the concepts of popups and browser sniffing, it crossed the line of being more annoying than useful. Do educational institutions even try out the computer software they are buying?
My webct sessions usually go something like this: Dammit! I just want to press the back button. Why can't I press the back button!?
Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
Cisco's Clean Access system does not work properly with Windows Vista. Clean Access is used in a lot of college environments in order to help keep student, staff, and faculty machines from being compromised. Clean Access acts as a point of authentication to allow a user access to the network, but that is not its main focus. In conjunction with the Clean Access Agent for Windows, it can also check if Windows Updates, Antispyware and Antivirus packages are installed and up to date. These packages can be set to either be optional or mandatory by the Clean Access administrator.
Clean Access (at this time) detects Vista as an unsupported operating system. However, there are workarounds that allow the agent to be installed and launch on Vista. The workaround does not perform any of the checks to make sure Vista has all of its patches installed or if it has antivirus loaded. So, in a nutshell, it is just acting as a point of authentication to the network at this time.
It seems to amaze me that Microsoft and a huge company like Cisco couldn't get this software Vista ready for when Vista was available. Cisco has been promising an upgrade to Vista compatibility for sometime in April. A little late especially when Vista boxes already are targets of attack from exploits such as animated cursor crap...
This situation affects our college as well. We extensively use web based services such as Blackboard, Centra ("online classes" software), online software deployment, etc. Conversely, some other tools such as Sharepoint, which is ironically Microsoft, and some VPN access tools do not work with any other browser other than IE! However, we really have a very active computer services department which warned everyone ahead to not upgrade to IE7. It's always better to upgrade a software only when it is needed and at least 6 months after it realeases, to give time for developers to correct bugs/issues.
At our university a lot of students bought or got brand new Vista laptops over the Christmas holidays and lo and behold they could no longer use the Cisco VPN client (4.8.01.0300) supposedly their is a beta that sorta works. We also found out a vendor called Examsoft which allows students to take tests on their laptop also wasn't compatible with Vista and there was no ETA when it would be.
"You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
We were recently told that our law exams cannot be taken on Exam4 under Windows Vista. A new version with Vista compatibility will be out by the summer according to the same email. Few students are running Vista, but I'm sure they're disappointed, since most students prefer taking the long written exams of law school on a computer.
I work for an Engineering college. Our current Windows build has us install 81 different software package. Many of these are not common elsewhere, but some are standard engineering apps. I recently did a test install on Vista and found that 26 of these simply didn't work with Vista.
Due to the economies of the situation -- some of these apps were one-time purchases of $15k or more that are updated anywhere from every 5 years to never -- I don't see us moving to Vista within the next couple of years at least.
We've received reports of people having problems using FirstClass on Vista. MIT doesn't use FirstClass but we get many students who encounter a variety of serious problems with Vista on their notebooks. As a result, and in the context of the transition to Linux, IS&T is currently discussing to recommend only Linux and Mac OS based notebooks to incoming students.
vpn doesn't work with Vista here so ITS isn't supporting it (and ITS is leaning towards going to all Macs with Parallels for the few programs that only run on XP- which is a big switch)
This is what happens when people stray away from simple Web apps and start venturing into Ajax/XHTML/Xpath/CSS3 territory. Those technologies and their implementations are unstable and just *happen* to work on the current browsers if you do X, Y, and Z to get them running. Then developers get comfortable with those hacks and think that's the way things are supposed to be. When a new browser comes out that doesn't allow certain Javascript functions or has enhanced security, the developer's original *hacks* don't work.
I've always felt that logicampus is out of touch with cutting-edge Web 2.0 functionality, but then I remember that there are schools that still use win98, IE4, and other very old technologies. I like not having any fancy ajax stuff in there, it forces the UI design to be solid in the first place.
MATLAB is the main program I use in Windows at my office everyday and since Feb. when I've upgraded my system to Vista I never had a problem with MATLAB.
Here at Virginia Tech The College of Engineering (COE) Is requiring fall freshman for the '07 school year to meet these requirements. Platform: Tablet PC Convertible OS: Windows XP Pro Tablet Edition w/ SP2 (Vista Info)* PC Processor speed: Core 2 Duo (dual core) 1.83 GHz or higher Memory (RAM): 2 GB Hard Disk Drive: 100 GB or bigger ; 5400 RPM spindle speed or better Video RAM: 128 MB CD/DVD drive: DVD+-R writeable DVD Input/Output Ports: USB 2.0 Wireless: 802.11 a/g NIC/Ethernet Card: 10/100/1000 Ethernet Card Warranty: 3 Year onsite with accident coverage (recommend 4 years)** External Backup Drive: USB external hard drive of 160GB or more; one touch/push-button backup capability *** The requirements are so outrageous for XP, for Vis+a however they will be just above minimum. The school also says that if you upgrade to vista your on your own as far as getting help from the university trouble shooting. This is all because Autodesk Inventor and Matlab don't yet fully work with vista and are required. Whats more is our school is attempting to move entirely on line (now about 70% of all things can be done online) and we use blackboard extensively. Whats more, On our blackboard login pages, they say not to use IE7 because of compatibility issues. On another online admin interface, they tell students to upgrade to FF 2 and IE 7 for better protection. This is one reason why there is building momentum to get FF 2 on our start of the year "Get Connected" CDs which install AV, activate windows Firewall, turn on auto updates, and check network settings.
I'm a professional web developer. I've worked in the field for 5+ years and can tell a decent web application by just using it for a while. I have recently gone back to University and have gotten the chance to use Blackboard. My school uses it for everything from general announcements, to posting marks, posting of assignments, etc. While it does the minimum necessary job most of the time, it is a mediocre package IMO. The interface is very inconsistent, very confusing to navigate, glitches are experienced by students and teachers alike every term. I have yet to experience a single term in which profs do not have problems posting assignments, documents, etc. Somehow Blackboard always manages to leave half of the class out. The smarter profs make use of their own University web space to create a simple html page where they post their information. Whenever blackboard is involved, it is generally a messy experience.
That being said, why the hell does a web application break with an Operating System update? Is Microsoft at fault here? Did they mock around with how POST/GET variables get sent to the server or how the browser accepts server responses? Are cookies randomly getting erased from IE? CSS/HTML glitches in the new IE rendering the pages useless? Or is this Blackboard's own code depending on some obscure ActiveX/IE functionality that is no longer there in Vista and thus violating the #1 reason why web applications are so useful? - They are supposed to work everywhere, no matter what OS we use! I'm thinking it's the latter.
[alk]
As a former Blackboard admin for about 4 years, I can say without a doubt that Blackboard is a shoddy product at best.
What I remember personally is constant battles to keep all of the servers operational. It was a poorly written java/tomcat app that did not scale, and required 8 running app servers and a dedicated sql box (all dual xeons) just to handle about 250 concurrent connections. (We were testing a Moodle installation, that handled the same load running on an old dell workstation!)
The only reason we used Bb was a *cough* very expensive state contract which we had no control over.
Also lots of instructors arent very computer savvy, and retraining something even as simple as a web app can be cost prohibitive.
As a matter of fact Im looking for a place to take online classes right now to continue my education, and so far my only requirement is that we NOT use Blackboard.
As for Microsoft waffling, they should have just said "Not our problem", as many others here have noted.
They need to just take Bb out back and shoot it anyway.
In particular, the Visual Text Box Editor--which offers controls for entering and formatting text, equations, and multimedia files--in the Discussion Board and other areas of Blackboard does not work properly for those with Vista and IE7 in some cases. Many academic IT departments are suggesting that students and teachers either use an alternative browser such as FireFox or Opera, or disable the feature altogether.
I work at the Help Desk for the University of Texas, and was actually the first person to field a complaint from a student on this issue. Someone looked into it, and we did isolate it to only those computers running Vista and IE7. IE7 on XP works fine. It seems that the VTBE uses an Active X control to install itself. On XP, IE7 asks if you want to allow the ActiveX control. On Vista, the UAC takes over, but for some reason, doesn't even ask "Allow or Deny?" It just silently kills it, with no notice. (Note: someone much more knowledgeable than me worked on this and explained it to me, so this is second-hand. Don't crucify me for something erroneous.)
We haven't issued an advisory yet, and it's actually been surprising how few people have called on the issue. None of my classes use the discussion section, and it seems that the vast majority at the University don't, else we would be seeing a lot more calls.
MATLAB is the main program I use in Windows at my office everyday and since Feb. when I've upgraded my system to Vista I never had a problem with MATLAB..
What I should have said is that the following programs are not supported under Vista, rather than stating that they don't run. The program I spend the most time with is ArcGIS. Mostly, I simply *hate* performing upgrades. I have been using the two terms interchangeably to help justify my decision to wait until ArcGIS is no longer supported under Windows XP before I changing over to Vista. If all goes well, I won't have anything to do for a couple of years.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool. -Richard Feynman
While this IS slashdot and I am rather familiar with the typical MS bashings that go on here, application compatibility is the responsibility of the 3rd party ISV. Microsoft has been pushing application compatibility for the better part of the past 2 years, even flying bigger ISVs out to main campus for FREE to participate in the application compatibility labs. Yes MS is an easy target to flame but lets put blame in its proper place.
To think is to engineer, to engineer is to become God
I use Vista IE7 and blackboard at WSU. It works but, blackboard installed Java 1.5 runtime and it crashed Vista (on a fresh install). I install Java 1.6 and Blackboard works, but gives me warnings on how this version of Java is not supported in Blackboard. I think the prblem is more in the Java and not in the blackboard. PS both suck.
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
blackboard, and its old counterpart webct are absolute shit. takes forever to load, crashes firefox (and sometimes IE7) like nobody's business. uses java like its the next coming of jesus. stupid popup to check your browser. absolute garbage.
I strongly advocate that every geek drop in at a local school or school division and talk to them about IT. The existing clunkers may make fine thin clients and a few new servers do not cost much to use as Linux terminal servers (see http://ltsp.org/ ). There are several distros that automate the conversion of a reasonable PC with two NICs, some extra RAM and storage into a Linux terminal server so that the old machines or new thin clients have only to show the pictures and receive the clicks. Thus a whole lab gets to log in and run on a single good server. Maintenance is down an order of magnitude this way as only one machine needs a file system. Debian, Ubuntu, SkoleLinux and K12LTSP have reasonable repositories for schools. These system do everything a school may need except allow full screen video to every seat. All the normal click/gawk/click stuff works beautifully. Teachers can easily monitor/control each student using VNC or whatever. I like to log a student out when they wander... or I block their favourite time-wasting sites. These are powerfull payoffs for schools who make a small investment in effort to install such a system. It is useful in a single classroom, a lab, or a whole building.
Schools that have a bit of money to spend can invest in a powerful server that can run a whole school over gigabit/s. A motherboards like TYAN S3992 (see http://www.tyan.com/product_board_detail.aspx?pid= 235 ) are just made for this with Lots of RAM, dual gigabit/s NICs, and dual Socket F Opterons. The investment in such a server is spread over every seat in the system and the per-seat cost can be $25 or so for the server, free systems donated by government or business ($0) or new thin clients such as NTAVO 6040 ($139) with LCD screen, USB keyboard and mouse really is very cost effective and easy to maintain. Having a single server is a little less reliable as a single point of failure but having fewer parts also saves money.
A problem is an opportunity http://mrpogson.com
At the district I work at, we use a web based Student Information System called eSchoolPlus. The first iteration was designed exclusively around Internet Explorer. The salesman told us it would work on Macs, but failed to mention that we'd have to dig up a copy of Internet Explorer 5 for all the teachers. Nothing worked outside of Internet Explorer, and the system was completely useless on the Mac.
Fast forward about 8 months and the company started rewriting the system from ground up. The morons are still using ActiveX controls and coding everything around Internet Explorer 6. Despite claims that this time it really is platform independent, again, 1/2 the functions of the website still don't work outside of Internet Explorer 6 for Windows. So we have to have THREE web browsers on the Macs just so teachers can do scoring, attendance, and grades: Safari, Firefox, and IE 5. There is no one browser that will work all three features.
We got fed up and called Pentamation (the company that owns eSchool) so we could actually troubleshoot the problems in person on a Mac with Safari and Firefox. We explained to them that they need to stop using Internet Explorer 5 because it hasn't been updated in almost ten years. After asking them to find a Mac with a similar setup, they told us they don't have a Mac to test it on.
The University of Pittsburgh has a site license for Vista but they won't release it to students, faculty or staff until they can work compatibility problems with networks, vpn and common third party apps.
Blackboard is the real problem here; it doesn't really work in ANY browser. It sort of works in IE6, except that the back button is usually broken. It continues to astound me how sites that are essentially a list of links to files can break under any browser, let alone the modern selection.
"Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
seriously I can't figure out why they are the largest provider in this area. I guess colleges like software that sucks.
/rant
Look, I'm not an MS fan but why should they be responsible if software doesn't work with their new release? The betas have been out for months, plenty of time for BB to test and fix these problems. Besides if your web app relies on the OS then you're doing it wrong!
The Anti-Blog
Meanwhile, are there any other common college apps that Vista fails to work with?
I'd guess there are, otherwise my college would've upgraded IE6 and VS6.0 by now at least...
I hate this. The implication is that the problem is with Blackboard. It's just like so many people think that when a web page renders well only in MS IE, it is a problem with the web site, or worse "with all other browsers".
When all the cars on the highway are driving the wrong direction, you really have to wonder who is going the wrong way.
When a web site doesn't look right in Firefox, it is most likely more correct to say the problem is with the designer's thinking only in terms of the one, non-standards-compliant browser, i.e., the Microsoft product.
Similarly, that Blackboard doesn't work on top of Vista is probably more accurately thought of as a problem with Vista...
Since Microsoft started pushing IE7 on XP users as a "critical update", all kinds of people who must log into intranets and VPNs from home for work have lost their ability to do so, unless they roll back to IE6. Sadly, Vista users can't do that. Vista, so far is worse than Windows ME. We didn't need it. We didn't want it, and the computer capable of running it well is still science-fiction.
How ya like dat?
Which is used in teaching statistics in every Cal State University in California. Not sure about elsewhere.
It seems to me that Blackboard released a project that worked correctly(lets pretend ok) on a specified list of operating systems.
Microsoft released a new operating system and never claimed that all your old stuff will still work, just that you most likely can still use your old stuff. That product works(lets pretend ok) as specified. Its also worth noteing Microsoft continues to sell their previous system.
If there are any problems the only people who deserve blame are those working at the IT departments at these schools. Perhaps they should have validated all the software the school depends on when using Vista before deploying it. Just a thought.
I know this is Slashdot (hence the car analogy) but holding M$ responsible for this or Blackboard makes no sense at all. Suppose I order a turbo charger from Eaton, for a 1975 Ford Mustang. Next I get all pissed and acuse Ford and or Eaton of scewing up when the thing will not fit on my 2005 Ford Mustang.
Seriously these is a preschool skill, they give you some pegs and a board with holes. You have some round pegs and some square ones, as well as round holes, and square ones. You are supposed to take away something form the experience of playing with these items. One that they are good for thowing at the kid you don't like, and two that some things don't fit together and others do. Its your task as a human being to study things and figure out how and what they can be used for or combined with.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Overall, I can't think of a way for an organisation to create an application that was worse than Blackboard. I still regard my time having to interact with that piece of shit software as some of my worst times at University. All in all, using Blackboard only made me, and my colleagues, dumber.
If only one University decides that Blackboard isn't worth using, then Vista has now made it into my heart as a successful product.
...Runs on ActiveX/IE. Still!
I don't know if this has been already mentioned, but it's been my experience that ExamSoft (a critical program for Law Students) produced by SoftTest is incompatable with Vista. This is causing a lot of problems, at least at the Law School I work at, as we require all our students to own a laptop. While we do have recommendations posted, includign a warning to only buy computers with XP Pro, people don't always read them. If they buy a laptop with Vist installed, they end up not being able to use it for school or the bar exam (their finals and the bar exam both require ExamSoft). Those unlucky students are forced to handwrite their exams - not plesant. It's getting tedious for us as the students keep showing up, yelling at us: "I paid how much for the latest laptop and now you're telling me I can use it at school?!?" To be fair, this is as much problem with SoftTest as it is with Microsoft. What makes it dificult, however, is that we used to have an XP Pro site license, so anyone with an unsupported OS could have XP Pro installed free of charge. Microsoft, in their infinate wisdom, however, saw fit to "upgrade" our site license to a Vista one. Now, we legally are no longer able to downgrade people's machines. When we complained to Microsoft about this, their response was that they wanted to "encourage" their large, volume license customers to upgrade so we can experience all the "benefits" associated with Vista! As a side note, our print-quota software doesn't work with Vista, yet, either. Needless to say, we're very unhappy and sinc Vista was released... the number of Macs in the building has skyrocketed. Granted, the new Mac users still need to aquire a copy of XP Pro, but... they're usually expecting to have to buy it elsewhere and have us install it via BootCamp. The Vista users, however, are pissed about spending lots of money on a new laptop and then having to spend more to "cripple" it by downgrading to XP. While the blame does lie primarially with SoftTest and our printer quota software, it is unconcionable that Microsoft is not willign to work with us and let us continue to offer XP so that the students can use the School-critical software on their new laptops!
Solitary, Poor, Nasty, Brutish and Not Quite As Tall As I'd Like To Be.
Its all on this site here
The article summary (no, I'm not reading the article.... after all, I'm on Slashdot) somehow makes it sound as if it is Microsoft's fault or problem, that some third party software doesn't work right. It really isn't. It's the third part software developer's fault.
/is/ paved with good intentions), the third-party developers don't really have a right to complain that /THEIR/ software was broken by Microsoft. It wasn't broken -
It really is up to Microsoft to dicate how their next OS will work. If they want to make some changes, which they consider critical from a security standpoint (never mind end result, effectiveness, whatever... after all, the road to hell
a) it was not designed well in the first place, to be so affected by the changes
b) it has failed to adapt to the changes in Microsoft's OS, given PLENTY of time.
After all, Vista has not popped out all of a sudden, like a mushroom after a night's rain shower. So Blackboard, Inc wants to tell us it couldn't make it's shit work after _5_ years of leaked Vista and Longhorn releases and public and private betas? So who really is the incompetent party here?
Besides, Blackboard sucks. It doesn't scale well with a growing user base and thus needs insane hardware specs to run reasonably. Bah.
Much of this discussion has been predicated on a faulty premise. The problem with Blackboard isn't Vista. Its IE7.
I've been making extensive use of Blackboard this year in teaching two classes. I've been using it as a supplement to readings, in class discussions, and material on my web site. I'm not going to say that Blackboard is the world's greatest software, but it has proved functional enough for the limited purposes I've used it for.
Students have reported a variety of problems using Blackboard, but most students have had no trouble with the system. The biggest source of problems appears to be IE7, which breaks in a variety of different ways. Blackboard doesn't appear to be doing anything fancy in the places where IE7 fails. As best I can tell, this is the direct result of another round of Microsoft not implementing well accepted web standards in web markup. There are actually two levels to the problem. One level is their past incompatibilty with web standards, which caused many web sites to have to identify browsers to know what code to run for Javascript and other purposes. For what its worth, many of the recently reported problems with blackboard and IE7 can be fixed by changing the blackboard code to treat IE7 like Firefox. It doesn't solve all the problems, however.
In the end, the fundamental problem is that Microsoft continues to treat the web as a place where it can do anything it wants. The result are dozens of markup features, from iframes to location attributes in JavaScript, that should be easy to use, but aren't.
I have no great love for Blackboard, but I don't think Blackboard is responsible for this problem. They'll have to fix it, of course, and the sooner they do so the better, but they would be well advised, in the short term, to add a check for IE7 that directs users to other browsers under a banner along the lines of "IE7 engineered not to work with this product (and many others). We suggest you try Firefox or Opera instead."
Davis http://davis.foulger.net