Because when you mix 2 things at temperature T, it doesn't make a thing at temperature 2T. Don't mistake temperature for energy.
Wait, wait, wait.. Are you guys thinking about is a physical connected heat transfer? Then yes, adding two sources at 1000C will not get the temperature above 1000C (you need an active heat source and insolution for that). But this isn't a physical heat transfer. It is an energy transfer over light, and this case the new matterial unconnected to the old can have different material and different insulation. Using physical connected heat logic makes no sense here.
Because when you mix 2 things at temperature T, it doesn't make a thing at temperature 2T. Don't mistake temperature for energy.
?? What are you smoking?
Of course it isn't. But if you add two accelerations to eachother you get twice the acceleration. The stable temperature is based on where the acceleration and deacceleration of temperature meet (how much is added and how much is lost). When you add more, that balance changes upwards.
I had the same question. It seems to me that the only limiting factors would be total power (shouldn't it scale linearly with the number of bulbs?) vs. the rate at which heat is removed from the target location via thermal radiation or convection.
I suppose you'd also have to consider what happens when your target vaporizes, since you'd no longer have a solid object at the focal point to absorb the radiation.
That is also the only way a relation to the filament material would make sense. If the target is made of the exact same material, it would vaporize at the maximum temperature of the filament. But why would it be the same material?
But it's not. Sunlight is for all intents and purposes collimated due to the extreme distance of its source. While these lamps can be "swivelled (sp?) to concentrate light on a single spot", that will tell you little about the setup applicable for use with sunlight.
Have you heard about mirrors? And mirrors on swivels?
That's a lot really. What kind of lights are these?
The summary obfuscates this but whatever the amount of incandescent bulbs you are focusing on the same spot, you cannot get a temperature that is higher than the filament in the bulb (the black box temperature of the bulb). And 3500 is a lot for an incandescent bulb. Maybe it's another kind of lighting then. Like a combination of different LEDs.
Okay. I will bite: Why not? You add energy from multiple lamps. Light superpositions and photons excites what they hit if they are absorbed, because they can't really do anything else. The maximum possible temperature at the focal point, shouldn't have anything to do with the original material.
Perhaps ebay have become aware of a security flaw in the keyfob, and are thus trying to migrate users away from them?
Their flaw is that they are literally unbreakable, so they are moving to something entirely trivial for most big interested parties to intercept and decrypt. I wonder why?
Not sure if it is the case in the US, but where I live, I can not sign away my rights to file a lawsuit if I wanted to and my life depended on it. "Be he SAID he wouldn't sue." would be laughed at so hard in court and would make you guilty almost by default.
Most countries including the US has laws against fake legalise that is intended to scare other people away from suing. This is actually illegal almost everywhere, it is just not enforced, and the lack of enforcement is building precedence.
Is John Deere legally liable if an UNMODIFIED tractor malfunctions and hurts someone? Nope, that's right there in the summary of the license agreement. Why do you think THAT will change because of modified firmware?
There are a lot of things you can not sign your way out of. Most of their contract is not just invalid, but probably illegal.
But I can use FMA3 instructions on multiple Intel microarchitectures without it ever causing my system to freeze up. That's the kind of "quality" only AMD can provide.
Try TSX instruction in a Haswell or Broadwell.. Well if your bios haven't been updated by Intel to disabled the instructions completely.
Errata is unfortunately pretty common in CPUs these days. I hope this one is fixed without having to disable the entire extensions like Intel does.
>"upheld a lower court ruling of contempt against a chap who claimed he couldn't remember the password to decrypt his computer's hard drives"
I am not saying that is the case here, but what if a defendant really doesn't remember the password? Throw him in jail forever? Some devices don't need a key/password UNLESS they are disconnected or reset, and it is very plausible someone might have been using something for a long time without knowing.
Yeah. I don't know the pincode for my SIM-card, I only ever need it when the phone updates the operating system, and it is separate from the code used to lock the phone. So if my phone is powered down, I have no way of unlocking it without traveling back to my home country out of US reach to get the printed copy of the pincode.
No, he has to say "evidence of potential violations" because it's up to a court to determine that there were violations.
No. Carelessness is not a crime or anywhere near being a crime unless you can prove malice, and she was never accused of maliciously being careless with the purpose of being hacked and leaked.
Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.
No, he said she violated the law surrounding the handling of classified materials
No she violated the rules. Which is a firing offense from a job she no longer held. Breaking the security practices at work is not a crime unless you do it with malice.
Incorrect. He said she did break the law, but he didn't recommend prosecuting her for it.
Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.
This is the same guy that a week before the election said they found new evidence, but wait, not they hadn't. And never told anyone they were investigating Trump.
For example, if you aren't looking at something in a video game it doesn't get rendered, ergo schrodingers cat like phenomena. The moon in fact is not there if you don't look at it.
This is NOT AT ALL how quantum mechanics works. Schrodinger's Cat was a gedanken experiment developed by Schrodinger to show how absurd the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics was when applied to everyday objects. Absolutely no physicist believes that this is how QM actually works: the cat is simply either alive or it is dead and is not in a superposition of two states. The point was to show that the prevailing interpretation at the time was wrong. The same goes for the world: QM does not say that things stop existing if they are not observed and nobody believes this. QM is strange and counter-intuitive, it is not crazy!
While it was meant to demonstrate the absurdity of the Copenhagen interpretation, the Copenhagen interpretation still won.
Slashdot Mirror
Because when you mix 2 things at temperature T, it doesn't make a thing at temperature 2T. Don't mistake temperature for energy.
Wait, wait, wait.. Are you guys thinking about is a physical connected heat transfer? Then yes, adding two sources at 1000C will not get the temperature above 1000C (you need an active heat source and insolution for that). But this isn't a physical heat transfer. It is an energy transfer over light, and this case the new matterial unconnected to the old can have different material and different insulation. Using physical connected heat logic makes no sense here.
Because when you mix 2 things at temperature T, it doesn't make a thing at temperature 2T. Don't mistake temperature for energy.
?? What are you smoking?
Of course it isn't. But if you add two accelerations to eachother you get twice the acceleration. The stable temperature is based on where the acceleration and deacceleration of temperature meet (how much is added and how much is lost). When you add more, that balance changes upwards.
So UEFI is now a Mac only thing, huh?
It was 10 years ago ;)
Though as far as I know Apple uses EFI
I had the same question. It seems to me that the only limiting factors would be total power (shouldn't it scale linearly with the number of bulbs?) vs. the rate at which heat is removed from the target location via thermal radiation or convection.
I suppose you'd also have to consider what happens when your target vaporizes, since you'd no longer have a solid object at the focal point to absorb the radiation.
That is also the only way a relation to the filament material would make sense. If the target is made of the exact same material, it would vaporize at the maximum temperature of the filament. But why would it be the same material?
optimal setup for concentrating natural sunlight
But it's not. Sunlight is for all intents and purposes collimated due to the extreme distance of its source. While these lamps can be "swivelled (sp?) to concentrate light on a single spot", that will tell you little about the setup applicable for use with sunlight.
Have you heard about mirrors? And mirrors on swivels?
See also Solar power towers
That's a lot really. What kind of lights are these?
The summary obfuscates this but whatever the amount of incandescent bulbs you are focusing on the same spot, you cannot get a temperature that is higher than the filament in the bulb (the black box temperature of the bulb). And 3500 is a lot for an incandescent bulb.
Maybe it's another kind of lighting then. Like a combination of different LEDs.
Okay. I will bite: Why not? You add energy from multiple lamps. Light superpositions and photons excites what they hit if they are absorbed, because they can't really do anything else. The maximum possible temperature at the focal point, shouldn't have anything to do with the original material.
You slew not just one straw man but a whole field of them. Bravo!
To be fair, you can hardly string a coherent sentence together without knocking two or three of you scarecrows off your feet.
Perhaps ebay have become aware of a security flaw in the keyfob, and are thus trying to migrate users away from them?
Their flaw is that they are literally unbreakable, so they are moving to something entirely trivial for most big interested parties to intercept and decrypt. I wonder why?
What "player" is this?
Probably the Widevine CDM which is what Chrome and Chromium uses. It doesn't as much play as decode.
but it is ammunition to draw out a case until you run out of money, or discourage you from starting a case in the first place
Yeap
Libertarians believe very strongly in property rights and that one of government's most important functions is to preserve property rights:
Pro the imaginary property rights of imaginary property, and to use it to screw everybody else.
Not sure if it is the case in the US, but where I live, I can not sign away my rights to file a lawsuit if I wanted to and my life depended on it.
"Be he SAID he wouldn't sue." would be laughed at so hard in court and would make you guilty almost by default.
Most countries including the US has laws against fake legalise that is intended to scare other people away from suing. This is actually illegal almost everywhere, it is just not enforced, and the lack of enforcement is building precedence.
Is John Deere legally liable if an UNMODIFIED tractor malfunctions and hurts someone? Nope, that's right there in the summary of the license agreement. Why do you think THAT will change because of modified firmware?
There are a lot of things you can not sign your way out of. Most of their contract is not just invalid, but probably illegal.
But I can use FMA3 instructions on multiple Intel microarchitectures without it ever causing my system to freeze up. That's the kind of "quality" only AMD can provide.
Try TSX instruction in a Haswell or Broadwell.. Well if your bios haven't been updated by Intel to disabled the instructions completely.
Errata is unfortunately pretty common in CPUs these days. I hope this one is fixed without having to disable the entire extensions like Intel does.
Does it have a real headphone jack? Or did they remove that to make it cheaper?
No they made it cheaper by redefining cheaper as meaning costing $50 more.
Why bother? Just do what time and again I've found works best for a trouble-free life: totally avoid any/all AMD CPUs or GPUs.
Heh, if you want to avoid bugs, better stay away from Intel also. They have a 1000 page errata list with every single processor.
Kidding, but I'm old enough to remember when running Windows 95 on the old AMD K6 boxen was a no-go...
That said, does this fix affect performance any (no matter the OS)?
I never had any issue or quirks with Win95 on my K6. Though that might have been second stepping.
What type of phone do you have that doesn't have to be restarted every few days?
It is an Android. By any of the high-end smartphones perform very well for long stretches.
No, you cannot "set your encryption" to do that. Your shit will be imaged.
You could get around that with hardware support. I think the newer iPhones have a key in some unreadable part which is all you passwords unlocks.
>"upheld a lower court ruling of contempt against a chap who claimed he couldn't remember the password to decrypt his computer's hard drives"
I am not saying that is the case here, but what if a defendant really doesn't remember the password? Throw him in jail forever? Some devices don't need a key/password UNLESS they are disconnected or reset, and it is very plausible someone might have been using something for a long time without knowing.
Yeah. I don't know the pincode for my SIM-card, I only ever need it when the phone updates the operating system, and it is separate from the code used to lock the phone. So if my phone is powered down, I have no way of unlocking it without traveling back to my home country out of US reach to get the printed copy of the pincode.
No, he has to say "evidence of potential violations" because it's up to a court to determine that there were violations.
No. Carelessness is not a crime or anywhere near being a crime unless you can prove malice, and she was never accused of maliciously being careless with the purpose of being hacked and leaked.
Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.
No, he said she violated the law surrounding the handling of classified materials
No she violated the rules. Which is a firing offense from a job she no longer held. Breaking the security practices at work is not a crime unless you do it with malice.
claimed Hillary didn't violate any laws
Incorrect. He said she did break the law, but he didn't recommend prosecuting her for it.
Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.
This is the same guy that a week before the election said they found new evidence, but wait, not they hadn't. And never told anyone they were investigating Trump.
Haha, what did Austin do to you? :D
For example, if you aren't looking at something in a video game it doesn't get rendered, ergo schrodingers cat like phenomena. The moon in fact is not there if you don't look at it.
This is NOT AT ALL how quantum mechanics works. Schrodinger's Cat was a gedanken experiment developed by Schrodinger to show how absurd the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics was when applied to everyday objects. Absolutely no physicist believes that this is how QM actually works: the cat is simply either alive or it is dead and is not in a superposition of two states. The point was to show that the prevailing interpretation at the time was wrong. The same goes for the world: QM does not say that things stop existing if they are not observed and nobody believes this. QM is strange and counter-intuitive, it is not crazy!
While it was meant to demonstrate the absurdity of the Copenhagen interpretation, the Copenhagen interpretation still won.