By the same token, if you wanted to build one based on Mohmmad's flight to Medina, you shouldn't have a problem. Not if they are being honest about it being based on a theme park.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I realize I'm only picking that last point of your discussion and ignoring the rest, but I teach my kids not to hit each other because it's WRONG. It has nothing to do with reciprocity.
A masochist may like it if I walk up and punch him/her in the face. Doesn't mean I should do it. I'd still think it was wrong.
And if the legislation just says that funding goes to a Theme Park, then there's not a problem. Wanna build a FSM theme park and get tax payer money? Go for it. My bigger complaint would be the government giving tax money to a theme park period, but that's just me.
Also, I've always been confused how an amendment that limits the US Congress stops the State legislature from doing things.
From your reference article:
"The cord is not directly connected to the mother's circulatory system, but instead joins the placenta, which transfers materials to and from the mother's blood without allowing direct mixing."
Interesting that Pro-Constitution is regarded as anit-government. I mean, I guess it's true in a sense. I've just never really seen it phrased that way.
Actually, the ship burned thanks to the paint being pretty much solid rocket booster fuel. http://www.clean-air.org/hindenberg.htm The silver appearance of the Hindenburg was due to a surface varnish of powdered aluminum in a paint formula that resembles the chemistry of modern solid booster rocket fuel.
Or, we could quit trying to blame everything on "global warming" and realize that hurricane severity is cyclical. Florida's been due for a couple of years now.
OK, so what you're saying is that even though the commonly accepted story of Columbus' voyage is factually wrong by your subjective account, it still gets taught in public and private schools the world over.
Thank you for proving my point. Fact is subjective.
Wrong. This just proves that "truth" is subjective. The "fact" remains. There has to be something that is right, that's what I call "fact". There is then something that you belive to be right, and you can call that "truth". Doesn't make it right, and I may be able to prove you wrong with the facts, but it doesn't mean you'll change your mind. It also doesn't mean that you are right.
Either something is a fact or it isn't. The fact is that we don't know all the answers, so we make up subjective truths.
Gee, it's almost like what one considers to be fact is, like, subjective, or something.
Back to my point that what one considers to be fact is truth. Fact is. Truth might be.
Its known fact that the more money one has to spend, the more waste they generate and thus more pollution.
So, I shouldn't try to save energy because then I'll have more money, and I'll pollute more? Your logic has confused me.
Seriously though, "known facts" generally aren't facts. People with "more" money are the ones that can afford to buy the typically more expensive energy saving appliances/cars/lights. Most people don't drive an old beater because they want to, it's just what they can afford.
Re:Submitter needs to RTFA - twice
on
VoIP Questioned
·
· Score: 1
During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand, because delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis. An emerging alternative broadband-delivery technique, broadband over power line, will solve this problem, but wide deployment is years away.
Where did you get this quote? The article doesn't mention "broadband over power line". At least not now. And the web page says it hasn't been updated since 4 AM PDT.
It seems that the author is trying to present a way to power your VoIP router/phone even during a power outage by supplying power over the broadband. Of course, you still have to have your DSL/Cable modem on UPS.
Re:Broadband over power lines?
on
VoIP Questioned
·
· Score: 1
Actually, the article talks about sending power over broadband, not broadband over powerlines. So, I guess he's wanting to power your router from your ISP?
How much power would that require for the router and phone?
Ever hear of only one parent working? Put yourself in someone else's shoes before you try to make them look stupid. It just ends up coming back at you.
Now, if you are a one parent family, this obviously doesn't hold, and this car isn't for you. For me, it'd be great.
I would need more life insurance first though. Too many stupid drivers out there.
And you can't get your babysitter to call the restaurant?
How did your parents ever survive without a cell phone?
The fact is that you don't NEED the phone to work everywhere, you just WANT it to. There's a big difference.
Slashdot Mirror
With that logic, Oxygen is a pollutant as well.
By the same token, if you wanted to build one based on Mohmmad's flight to Medina, you shouldn't have a problem. Not if they are being honest about it being based on a theme park.
Because the tax money is for a theme park. The theme being religiously oriented doesn't enter into the equation.
Where does it prevent them?
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I realize I'm only picking that last point of your discussion and ignoring the rest, but I teach my kids not to hit each other because it's WRONG. It has nothing to do with reciprocity.
A masochist may like it if I walk up and punch him/her in the face. Doesn't mean I should do it. I'd still think it was wrong.
And if the legislation just says that funding goes to a Theme Park, then there's not a problem. Wanna build a FSM theme park and get tax payer money? Go for it. My bigger complaint would be the government giving tax money to a theme park period, but that's just me.
Also, I've always been confused how an amendment that limits the US Congress stops the State legislature from doing things.
You mean you maternal grandmother?
Yeah, I'd say they did offer the non-citizen argument. Are you saying that you have 100% proof that he is a natural born citizen?
There's also the question of him becoming an Indonesian citizen while living there. Did he file as a non-US citizen for college? We just don't know.
I'm failing to see where Beardo claims his kids decided. Of course he decided for them. As you state, neither of them has the ability.
As a parent, he has made the decision for them, it's what parents do.
Hopefully he discussed this with his wife. Possibly he discussed it with his kids, but maybe not.
From your reference article: "The cord is not directly connected to the mother's circulatory system, but instead joins the placenta, which transfers materials to and from the mother's blood without allowing direct mixing."
Interesting that Pro-Constitution is regarded as anit-government. I mean, I guess it's true in a sense. I've just never really seen it phrased that way.
THAN! THAN!!!!!! For the love of all things good and holy, the word is THAN!
Anyone can say a number that dont work for 3n+3? (ending with 3, not 1)
3 -> 12 -> 6 -> 3
5 -> 18 -> 9 -> 30 -> 15 -> 48 -> 24 -> 12
7 -> 24 -> 12
9 -> 30 -> 15 -> 48 -> 24 -> 12
11 -> 36 -> 18 -> 9
13 -> 42 -> 21 -> 66 -> 33 -> 102 -> 51 -> 156 -> 78 -> 39 -> 120 -> 60 -> 30
15 -> 48
17 -> 54 -> 27 -> 84 -> 42
19 -> 60
21
Can you find me one that does work? I haven't done even numbers because they are either a power of 2 or they eventually halve down to an odd number. Powers of two always work.
Actually, the ship burned thanks to the paint being pretty much solid rocket booster fuel.
http://www.clean-air.org/hindenberg.htm
The silver appearance of the Hindenburg was due to a surface varnish of powdered aluminum in a paint formula that resembles the chemistry of modern solid booster rocket fuel.
...but, unlike what I would consider true Christians, you guys just keep telling the same lies over and over again.
So, what, true Christians tell all new lies?
Or, we could quit trying to blame everything on "global warming" and realize that hurricane severity is cyclical. Florida's been due for a couple of years now.
Go back and re-read the article. He said that HIS PVR has enough room. Since he built it, I'm guessing he knows how much storage the machine has.
OK, so what you're saying is that even though the commonly accepted story of Columbus' voyage is factually wrong by your subjective account, it still gets taught in public and private schools the world over.
Thank you for proving my point. Fact is subjective.
Wrong. This just proves that "truth" is subjective. The "fact" remains. There has to be something that is right, that's what I call "fact". There is then something that you belive to be right, and you can call that "truth". Doesn't make it right, and I may be able to prove you wrong with the facts, but it doesn't mean you'll change your mind. It also doesn't mean that you are right.
Either something is a fact or it isn't. The fact is that we don't know all the answers, so we make up subjective truths.
Gee, it's almost like what one considers to be fact is, like, subjective, or something.
Back to my point that what one considers to be fact is truth. Fact is. Truth might be.
Its known fact that the more money one has to spend, the more waste they generate and thus more pollution.
So, I shouldn't try to save energy because then I'll have more money, and I'll pollute more? Your logic has confused me.
Seriously though, "known facts" generally aren't facts. People with "more" money are the ones that can afford to buy the typically more expensive energy saving appliances/cars/lights. Most people don't drive an old beater because they want to, it's just what they can afford.
During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand, because delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis. An emerging alternative broadband-delivery technique, broadband over power line, will solve this problem, but wide deployment is years away.
Where did you get this quote? The article doesn't mention "broadband over power line". At least not now. And the web page says it hasn't been updated since 4 AM PDT.
It seems that the author is trying to present a way to power your VoIP router/phone even during a power outage by supplying power over the broadband. Of course, you still have to have your DSL/Cable modem on UPS.
Actually, the article talks about sending power over broadband, not broadband over powerlines. So, I guess he's wanting to power your router from your ISP?
How much power would that require for the router and phone?
I suppose you were trying to be funny, but you missed. According to Intel, it's Celeron.
On another offtopic note, the word is THAN, not THEN. Why is that one so hard for people to get right?
When was the last administration that actually *cared* about the environment?
Ever hear of only one parent working? Put yourself in someone else's shoes before you try to make them look stupid. It just ends up coming back at you.
Now, if you are a one parent family, this obviously doesn't hold, and this car isn't for you. For me, it'd be great.
I would need more life insurance first though. Too many stupid drivers out there.
And you can't get your babysitter to call the restaurant?
How did your parents ever survive without a cell phone?
The fact is that you don't NEED the phone to work everywhere, you just WANT it to. There's a big difference.