Slashdot Mirror


VoIP Questioned

87C751 writes "C|Net is carrying a very FUDdy story on the downside of VoIP telephony. Alongside the reasonable point of 911 dialing being unavailable during service and power outages, the writeup mentions broadband over power lines as a possible solution to the power failure problem. (talk about your cognitive dissonance!) It also notes that VoIP customers may not be listed in the local phone book, causing problems with "major fast food companies" (do they mean pizza deliveries?), and that Tivo requires a POTS line for initial setup (which sounds like Tivo's problem, not VoIP's)."

375 comments

  1. Series2 Tivo by StormRider01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    huh, my Series2 Tivo setup just fine over my broadband connection...

    1. Re:Series2 Tivo by ZeroGee · · Score: 5, Informative

      It sets up fine if you use the special broadband code in the "dialing prefix" box -- something like ",#401" if I remember correctly, but initial Guided Setup "appears" to require a phone line for all but the most tech-savvy. After guided setup, it will allow you to use your network card as the preferred connection type.

    2. Re:Series2 Tivo by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      The TIVO does not have a friggin ethernet connection. SO how is that even possible.

    3. Re:Series2 Tivo by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      Key word, Gandalf. "Series2"

    4. Re:Series2 Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess - your PC's cupholder is broken too, right?

      http://www.tivocommunity.com/

    5. Re:Series2 Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Series2 Tivo can do the entire setup without a POTS line. You need a USB network adapter (NOT wireless) and there are only a handful that work properly. BUT it does work, and it's not a big deal if you're a true geek because you probably have the right adapter. (I did!)

    6. Re:Series2 Tivo by musicscene · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wireless like mine. I was unsure at first, but it worked famously.

      --
      "I'm not ashamed I can't function in society like I'm supposed to." - Paul Westerberg
    7. Re:Series2 Tivo by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Informative

      You plug a USB ethernet adapter into the USB port. There is no Step 2.

    8. Re:Series2 Tivo by alkali · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't run Ethernet to the corner of the living room where my TiVo sits, but it updates just fine using my Vonage line as if it were POTS.

    9. Re:Series2 Tivo by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

      Not true. Enter the dialing prefix #,401 and it works fine with wirless. Completed it this past weekend, confirmed, etc.

    10. Re:Series2 Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this one. I use my Vonage line to dial into work when their T goes down. I get a speedy 48k on average and have used the line for faxing as well. Its been two years and I finally cut the local Bell cables from the house.

    11. Re:Series2 Tivo by malfunct · · Score: 1

      The tivo problem is indeed the VOIP's problem. What happens is the VOIP sets up its circuit to filter out "non-voice" data (basically just gets rid of high frequency stuff) so they can compress the signal further. This of course wipes out modem communication. If you pay more you can get a "fax line" through vonage (don't know about other VOIP solutions) that doesn't do the filtering so it gives a connection that tivo can use if you set the modem speed slower in the tivo. I have a feeling that the people using DSL will end up having similar problems as they expand DSL to take up more of the channel and filter more out of the voice side.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    12. Re:Series2 Tivo by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      What about it?

      This is still not a VoIP problem, in that VoIP was built for voice not for analog data.

      It's a TiVo problem in that there is no ethernet port. That being said, there are workaround (USB NIC anyone?) so it's not really a big deal anyway.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    13. Re:Series2 Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As does ADT. My friend's shop is using Vonage instead of a regular land line, and is using it for his voice, fax, and ADT services without a hitch. I guess the ADT guy just had to change the number it dialed or something based on where the VoIP number "originated" from

    14. Re:Series2 Tivo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Actually the 5.x tivo software will allow you to do the entire thing over the ethernet. No need for the #401 either, it gives you two options: Internet or Phoneline.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    15. Re:Series2 Tivo by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Problem is VOIP sells itself as a replacement for phone service and it is not as it doesn't support data transmission.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    16. Re:Series2 Tivo by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe it does or maybe it doesn't, but I fax out via Vonage all the time (9600bps)

      It often can work, especially if you add *99 (although it's not required), but it's not totally reliable.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    17. Re:Series2 Tivo by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Didn't help me with my v4.00 that came off-the-shelf at a retailer only two weeks ago... it didn't even have the drivers to see the damn USB-802.11b device until it had done 4 hours of screwing around with phone lines (gotta love that 25' phone cord draped clear across the main floor of the house, even though I have wireless and wired broadband available where the TiVo sits) and indexing and retarded crap like that.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    18. Re:Series2 Tivo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1
      Didn't help me with my v4.00

      Well, 4.x isn't 5.x :)

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    19. Re:Series2 Tivo by NateTech · · Score: 1

      And 5.x isn't available to the general public. Let's talk about the real world here.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    20. Re:Series2 Tivo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, and it has been for a long time, just not for your model.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    21. Re:Series2 Tivo by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Ah I made a bad assumption. So what retail model that I can go buy in a store are you using that has 5.X?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    22. Re:Series2 Tivo by skids · · Score: 1

      You're correct about the compression being the reason why modems and Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDDs) will not work over some VoIP services.

      The sad thing is that even when RTP header compression is used, IP telephony voice compression doesn't save very much bandwidth, because in order to produce any decent latency figures, the data has to be sent in very small chunks, and so the packet header overhead eats up a great deal of the savings gained from compression of the payload.

      In typical myopic bean-counter fashion, the companies that use compression on VoIP instead of carrying raw data decided to invest in the hardware/processing power to do the compression and all the extra TCO it involves, when their money would have been better spent on fatter pipes to carry good old G.711 audio like normal telephone systems do, and in the process have inconvenienced a great number of potential users. Go figure.

    23. Re:Series2 Tivo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Both of the DVD tivos have it.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    24. Re:Series2 Tivo by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Ah... okay.

      So I just bought a new TiVo and I'm already a second-class citizen. (GRIN)

      Oh well.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    25. Re:Series2 Tivo by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Well, they might make 5.x available for the regular standalone series 2 units eventually. It is certainly compatible with them, in fact I have loaded it to mine before (a lot of hacking is required to do this though)

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  2. Cognitive dissonance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the writeup mentions broadband over power lines as a possible solution to the power failure problem. (talk about your cognitive dissonance!)

    That's not (in any aspect that I can see, anyway) cognitive dissonance....

    1. Re:Cognitive dissonance by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, that if your computer is off it can't send information, but it'd still be able to send information over power lines?

      How exactly do they intend to maintain a network over powerlines if the power lines are down, and if the powerlines supply the power to the datacom devices that are transmitting over them?

    2. Re:Cognitive dissonance by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Thats just a monkey writer throwing buzzwords together because its boss said so.
      Yes its wrong, but it is not cognitive dissonance.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Cognitive dissonance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, that if your computer is off it can't send information, but it'd still be able to send information over power lines?

      That's arguably stupid (I don't know enough about line transmission to say for sure, but my reaction is the same as yours) but how is it cognitive dissonance?

    4. Re:Cognitive dissonance by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it's a conflict in what you know and new information.

      In otherwords:

      Point A: VoIP fails if the power is off.

      and

      Point B: Broadband over powerlines is better.

      conflict because the base condition does not change: You can not communicate if your COMMUNICATION DEVICE itself does not have power. Cognitive dissonance is the need to rationalize or otherwise explain away information that contradicts information they already believe. In this case, it actually works both ways: VoIP must have flaws so I'll think of some whether or not they make sense. As well as: VoIP isn't as good as some other technology because it would fail in a certain condition THAT ALSO MAKES THE OTHER fail.

    5. Re:Cognitive dissonance by acebone · · Score: 1

      Eh... UPS anyone ?

      Another problem could be that broadband over powerlines only work if there is a current in the powerlines to carry the data.

      If that is the case (and I suspect it is) then broadband over powerlines wouldn't work of course, and the article would still be silly for making that statement, it would just be silly for another reason than what you guys carry forth here.

      Saying that all computersystems stops operating on a power outage is not correct.

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    6. Re:Cognitive dissonance by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The definition of cognitive dissonance is the ability to hold 2 conflicting ideas in your head at the same time, and not reject them.

      The classic example is smoking. Smokers know that smoking kills. Ask a smoker if they know this, and they asy "Nes". Ask them if they are suicidal, and they say "No". And yet, they are not sufficiently conflicted about these two viewpoints to do anything about it.

      So the use of the phrase "cognitive dissonence" when saying you'd use power lines to carry VoIP during a power failure is accurate.

    7. Re:Cognitive dissonance by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I'll bite... "Nes"?

      Not trolling, it just takes the wind out of your statement when the reader has to stop and evaluate whether "nes" is "yes" or "no", or something in the middle.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    8. Re:Cognitive dissonance by ShieldWolf · · Score: 1

      Cognitive dissonance is the need to rationalize or otherwise explain away information that contradicts information they already believe

      That's not the definition of cognitive dissonance.

      Cognitive Dissonance is the mental state created by the contradiction. It is not the resulting need to remove the contradiction.

      --
      just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
  3. I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by mbottrell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems VoIP is still in it's infancy...

    I'll be waiting for it to move out of Gen-1 status to the Gen-2 or Gen-3 devices.

    What amazes me is the lack of talk regarding the security of these devices...

    1. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by tdemark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What amazes me is the lack of talk regarding the security of these devices

      Yeah, because the security of cell phones and cordless phones is so rock solid.

      Almost nobody cares that anyone can eavesdrop on their cell and cordless conversations. Why should they care any different about their VOIP ones?

      - Tony

    2. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by mbottrell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I'm referring more to the fact your phone now sits on a network, and in theory is able to be hacked.

      Who will pay for the 10,000 calls ya phone racks up from 2am-6am every morning when you sleep due to the trojan/worm it's infected with.

      Sure it ain't gunna be ya VoIP provider!

    3. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody cares that anyone can eavesdrop on their cell and cordless conversations. Why should they care any different about their VOIP ones?

      Cordless phones and analog cell phones sure -- care to tell me how to eavesdrop on a digital (CDMA/TDMA/iDEN/GSM/etc) conversation using John Q. Public equipment?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Kakemann · · Score: 1

      Not "anyone" can eavesdrop a GSM phone or a DECT cordsless phone. Or VOIP over IPSec, for that matter.

    5. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by sellers · · Score: 1

      Switched to VoIP via Vonage and it works. Requires good broadband connection.

      The power over ethernet 911 issue resolution is funny. UPS's are probably more effective ;)

      It's not mainstream, but perfect for say a teenager who likes to talk a lot - as it all gets logged realtime so you can monitor a bit more if needbe.

      Please - don't take this article as a measure of VoIP. This person does not really understand technology.

    6. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> care to tell me how to eavesdrop on a digital

      sure. right after you let me know how you're planning on intercepting my SRTP-protected VoIP calls...

      True, VoIP security is just beginning to see the light of day, but since we're building on a good base of existing network-security tools it will ramp up fast.

      SRTP rfc: http://zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC3711/Output/index.html

    7. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm referring more to the fact your phone now sits on a network, and in theory is able to be hacked.

      And how does this differ from the cell network? Or, are saying that it is impossible to hack?

    8. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Almost nobody cares that anyone can eavesdrop on their cell and cordless conversations. Why should they care any different about their VOIP ones?

      Cordless phones and analog cell phones sure -- care to tell me how to eavesdrop on a digital (CDMA/TDMA/iDEN/GSM/etc) conversation using John Q. Public equipment?


      There have been reports (for ages) of $10K suitcases that can eavesdrop on GSM conversations. I imagine the price would have gone down considerably. After all, all you need is a hacked-up phone that can tune into the ether, spit out the bitstreams, and feed that into your laptop with some customized software. The underlying encryption mechanisms of GSM are really very weak. I'd imagine that iDen/CDMA/TDMA technologies suffer from the same lapses in encryption.

      There's no John Q Public for eavesdropping on wireless LANs, but then, given a suitable permissable WiFi card and wepcrack, you can get quite far - which is why they came up with WPA.. The GSM algorithms have been cracked by fine upstanding scientists who aren't selling complete kits to do this, which is quite possible (alongside with installed base) the reason nothing's been done about GSM's horrid insecurity.

      Now, I've never seen one of those GSM eavesdropping kits, but then, I've never bought a gun in a bar from Hell's Angels - but I know the latter is quite feasible.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    9. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeah, it is. They are fraudulent calls, just like fraudulent calls on a calling card. You just call them up and say "I didn't make these calls." And bam, they are gone. Especially since the VoIP provider probably sold you the equipment that got hacked. It costs them far less to do this than have consumer complaints at the BBB. So far reports of customer services from VoIP providers has been excellent, and even AT&T (don't get me started) removes fraudulent calls.

    10. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      At least in my state, the law requires phone companys to keep 911 service even if phone service is turned off. So I can just plug in a phone to the wall jack and call 911. Now for those people who wire VoIP into their house..thats another issue.

    11. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by blackbear · · Score: 1

      I'm of the opinion that almost no one cares about their lack of privacy unless some else is making money from it.
      Then it becomes a "privacy issue."

      Though they are aware that they can be evesdroped on, as long as they're not aware of it actually happening and it doesn't inconvienance them, they don't care.

    12. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      What are you? 12? A telephone always sat on a fucking network. And that network has been hacked countless times. Ever hear of a Blue Box? It's nothing new.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    13. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual, the C-Net article is false. My TiVo runs just fine over my Vonage VoIP line. Connects between 26400 and 28800 every time.

    14. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by wishus · · Score: 1

      You really don't understand VoIP, do you? The acronym stands for Voice Over Internet Protocol. There are other networks besides the internet that use IP.

      VoIP is mature and deployed, and businesses are already saving money with it. Consumer voice-over-internet services and VoIP are not the same thing, in much the same way that sheep and mammals are not the same thing.

    15. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Krondor · · Score: 1

      What amazes me is the lack of talk regarding the security of these devices...

      It's a standards issue, the SIP standard does not support encryption beyond the authentication framework (only in some cases). All transmissions are clear and open.

      This is a serious issue for me, and it's one of the reasons SKYPE is so attractive (even with it's proprietary nature). What we need is a new verioun of SIP that allows for end to end encryption and some layer for backwards compatibility. Gaim-encryption has a nice framework for this stuff it'd be smart to learn from that, since it's already had to deal with transparently encrypting some devices while leaving others open.

    16. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Krondor · · Score: 1

      Not "anyone" can eavesdrop a GSM phone or a DECT cordsless phone. Or VOIP over IPSec, for that matter.

      Not true, GSM is very hackable (warning PowerPoint document). However, you do need to know the targets SIM id but once you clone that, you're basically homefree.

      VOIP is totally insecure unless your either don't use the SIP protocol, or tunnel through IPSec or stunnel etc.. The obvious disadvantage of the latter is both sides need that tunnelling and in the real world that will rarely happen.

    17. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by mbottrell · · Score: 1

      Agree Krondor,

      Interesting enough I just finished an article yesterday on 'VoIP security'...
      Then along comes /.

      I'm amazed that /. readers are still confusing privacy with security (of the device). Whilst remotely related, they ain't the same...

    18. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Krondor · · Score: 0

      SRTP rfc: http://zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC3711/Output/index.html

      I was under the impression SRTP is only supported under the authentication mechanisms for SIP networks, and all voice transmissions are still unencrypted. Most people I deal with have gotten past this with stunnel and IPSec, but that is hardly a solution.

    19. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      He's implying COMPUTER network, dumbass.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    20. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Insecure is relative -- You still need to get my packets in the first place. I would hazard a guess that your average joe couldn't do that -- Or, if they're in a position where they could, they could just as easily tap a landline.

      Sure, it might be possible to monitor the packets in transit but your average slashdot reader probably couldn't do it.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    21. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      And the diffrence is?

      Hint there is none.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    22. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      voice transmissions are encrypted under SRTP, but that's all. It presumes that there will be a secure mechanism for key exchange (tls-encrypted signalling, for example).

    23. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      Your lucky, many people with TiVo's haven't had that kind of success...

      I just use a broadband connection with my TiVo, but it is a heavily modified series 1 and I haven't experimented with the newer units.

    24. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by DotNM · · Score: 1
      I completely agree. Similar to the incident with N2H2 Internet Filtering being found a couple of years ago to be selling logs of where students go in the internet. Nobody seemed to be concerned that the logs were being kept before, but everyone cries fowl as soon as they were sold.

      Reference: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-11_2-527592.html

      --
      There's no place like localhost
    25. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      It is a computer network.

      (Hint: Read up on SS7 sometime. Good luck making a call without it.)

      --
      +++OK ATH
    26. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody cares that anyone can eavesdrop on their cell and cordless conversations.

      You can't eavesdrop on GSM cell phones or DECT cordless phones, like we use in Europe. Maybe law enforcement agencies or high-tech criminals can (although I rather doubt the latter), but certainly not "anyone".

    27. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by screeble · · Score: 1
      (Hint: Read up on SS7 sometime. Good luck making a call without it.)

      MF signalling is still in widespread usage in the US and Canada. R2 bidirectional signalling is still used throughout the world. It is quite possible to make telephone calls without using SS7 at all. MF is a bitch to troubleshoot when calls fail but it is still out there... I chase calls that leave the SS7 world all the time.

    28. Re:I'm not convinced of VoIP yet... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't refute the point. The network *is* run by computers.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  4. Other DVRs work by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tivo may not work, but Dish Network's DVR does. I moved this weekend, and had Dish Network set up. I already had an internet connection, so when the dish installers asked for a phone line, I quickly unpacked my Vonage box, plugged it in and let it initialize, then plugged the DVR into it. It's working without any troubles now.

    With that said, I love using Vonage, and hope I never have to deal with Verizon or SBC again.

    1. Re:Other DVRs work by Bistronaut · · Score: 3, Informative

      The TiVo thing is patently false. TiVos do work without a phone line for initial setup - I know, that's how I set mine up.

    2. Re:Other DVRs work by eV_x · · Score: 1

      I have a Tivo and set up just fine over VOIP. The story seems to be a bunch of fear, but no real substance.

      Oh, and I ordered a pizza yesterday just fine from it.

    3. Re:Other DVRs work by pegr · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have a Tivo and set up just fine over VOIP. The story seems to be a bunch of fear, but no real substance.

      Oh, and I ordered a pizza yesterday just fine from it.


      Your TiVo? That's awesome! ;)

    4. Re:Other DVRs work by beej_55 · · Score: 0

      Think about it, what kind of phone line have we had for years? Analog! VoIP was just getting popular when TiVo came out, and analog still holds the market when it comes to phone. Eventually, TiVo may put instructions for VoIP in the manual, but do most home users have a VoIP line? And out of the numbers of TiVo users, how many are tech-savvy enough to set up TiVo on analog alone? Makes you think.

    5. Re:Other DVRs work by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      TiVo: What are you doing Dave?

      Dave: I'm trying to order pizza.

      TiVo: I can't let you do that, Dave.

      Dave: Why not?

      *knock knock knock*

      Delivery guy: Pizza delivery for Dave!

      Tivo: (red LED glows menacingly) Dave's not here, man.

      Dave: ???

    6. Re:Other DVRs work by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Makes you think? Did you even read what the other guy said?

      I have DirecTV with Tivo and I don't have a home phone at all. Vonage or otherwise. It works fine. Setting it up involved plugging it in, inserting my access card, and telling DirecTV I had a new receiver. It took less than 5 minutes. I think that this:

      And out of the numbers of TiVo users, how many are tech-savvy enough to set up TiVo on analog alone?

      is slightly uncalled for.

    7. Re:Other DVRs work by TGZubby · · Score: 1

      Actually... I got one over Christmas and I needed to update the firmware over phone line, before it would even recognize the USB network card.

    8. Re:Other DVRs work by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      What you need is an m68 port of this

    9. Re:Other DVRs work by pegr · · Score: 1

      re: ordering pizza with your TiVo...

      What you need is an m68 port of a this

      I stand in awe, truly...

      I've hacked my TiVo. I have bash, a web-based interface, and yes, now I want to order pizza with my TiVo... I cracked the joke, now I must make it happen.

      Thanks for the link!

  5. What a crock of... by avalys · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a joke, right?

    All the problems he mentions would certainly be valid points, but only if you're dumb enough to completely replace your phone system with VoIP!

    I have VoIP, but I kept one of my POTS lines when I switched. Without long distance service, it costs me a miniscule amount per month, and I can still use it for my TiVo, alarm system, 911, and so on. Everything he brings up is such a non-issue, it's almost funny.

    The only valid point he has is that it's difficult to get yourself listed in the phone book, but that's not a technical issue and should be resolved shortly.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:What a crock of... by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only valid point he has is that it's difficult to get yourself listed in the phone book, but that's not a technical issue and should be resolved shortly.

      I don't even see that as a problem. I don't want my phone to be listed. My Vonage phone never rings unless it's someone I have given my number to!

    2. Re:What a crock of... by ZeroGee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All the problems he mentions would certainly be valid points, but only if you're dumb enough to completely replace your phone system with VoIP!

      But that's exactly what VoIP SHOULD be -- a replacement for standard land-line telephony. Why should we settle (and adopt!) a system that requires you to keep, even at small cost, another phone system that goes through the traditional switching network in order to be able to use alarms, 911, etc.? Instead, VoIP should be improved where it can do everything the telephone system can do, and then we can do away with that antiquated network and use broadband everywhere.

    3. Re:What a crock of... by toasted_calamari · · Score: 1

      So we need to update the infrastructure so that it totally supports VoIP. Is there a really good reason why VoIP numbers have trouble getting into phone books? Is it an inate problem with the technology, or is it simply the phone book technologies getting stuck in a rut?

    4. Re:What a crock of... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The nature of the problem seems to be that VoIP could be so flexible - it could issue phone numbers the same way DHCP issues IP addresses.

      Fuck phonebooks for VoIP, you'd have to publish 4 a day to keep up! In my vision of the future, every phone has a small touch display, and you look up your numbers there against an authoratative source, ie; DNS for phone numbers.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:What a crock of... by CodeArtisan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, as soon as VoIP replaces POTS, you can guarantee that the price advantage will also be eliminated.

    6. Re:What a crock of... by Garabito · · Score: 1

      That depends. If you have a cell phone + broadband, and you don't have issues with TiVo or alarm, POTS is not really needed.

    7. Re:What a crock of... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I would actually LIKE to not be listed. Currently the teco charges a few bucks each month to retain unlisted service. This doesn't seem to screw up any of the local pizza delivery services, either.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    8. Re:What a crock of... by jallison · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The article is truly awful. Lots of generalities, no specifics. You get things like "a VoIP phone number won't likely be included in most phone directories" and "Protecting your home could get tougher, as well. Some home alarm systems have trouble ..." (emphasis mine). Then there's the Tivo misinformation that others have already commented on.

      This is just poor journalism. Of the complaints raised the 911 issue is the most legitimate due to the lack of location specifics when you dial 911 from a cell phone. The others are either bogus or are actually features to many folks.

    9. Re:What a crock of... by toasted_calamari · · Score: 1

      DNS for phone numbers, now that would be cool. data entry would be a problem though, take longer to type them in. maybe a voice recognition system?

    10. Re:What a crock of... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Sure, voice recognition would be no problem. Hell, last time I called 411 to look up a number I spoke with a machine, not a human, and it got me the number I wanted.

      Really it'd just be 411 with visual feedback, and without the dollar-per-use fee.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    11. Re:What a crock of... by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      Most of the new cell phones (I don't know if they passed the regulations requiring it for all yet) have GPS that gives your exact location when you dial 911. I just wish that since the receiver is already built in, they would let you pull up the coordinates yourself instead of just using it for emergency service.

    12. Re:What a crock of... by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't even see that as a problem. I don't want my phone to be listed. My Vonage phone never rings unless it's someone I have given my number to!

      Exactly. People pay good money to have their phone number unlisted. This isn't a bug with voip, this is a feature, and an excellent one at that.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    13. Re:What a crock of... by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      How do you connect multiple handsets with a single VoIP box? If you live in a townhome and want a phone at each level, it could be a slight problem. Other than that, I am very happy with vonage.

    14. Re:What a crock of... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      It actually makes sense for 911 calls to use a switched network, because it matters that all of the packets get through. VoIP isn't designed to provide the other end with a complete recording, just to make a best effort to get the sound there with a low constant latency. Of course, at least currently, you don't actually need phone service to call 911 on a POTS phone.

      For that matter, they could use a simpler network to get 911 service over phone lines, because you don't need long distance connections or even connections beyond the local emergency center.

      Related issue: there really ought to be a way to test 911. The phone where I am now requires you to dial 9 before most number. Does this apply to 911? There are also a bunch of phone jacks in the office. How can I tell if 911 will work on them (some aren't connected to anything)? It would probably be good for the reliability of the system if people could call 911 and hold 0 and get a recorded message telling them what emergency response center they'd reached. Of course, testing the line will become more important when regular calls aren't testing most of it.

    15. Re:What a crock of... by avalys · · Score: 1

      But that's exactly what VoIP SHOULD be -- a replacement for standard land-line telephony

      No! We currently use land-line telephony as both a voice transmission system AND a data transmission system. VoIP should remain a system for transmitting voice, and any devices that want to send digital data should send it across the Internet.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    16. Re:What a crock of... by IsaacW · · Score: 1

      You mean as in Independence Day where Jeff Goldblum uses that cool "every phone book in America" thing to find his ex-wife's cell phone number by using is own last name? That would be awesome!

    17. Re:What a crock of... by jacquesm · · Score: 1
      you were duped...
      When you call 411 a voice response system guides you through the menu, but a human is listening in on the conversation and keys your request into a computer that then does the lookup, after they find the number they have the vrs tell you the answer.
      There are several reasons why it is done this way, the most obvious ones are:

      - people don't usually argue or get fresh with robots

      - it saves man hours (many more processed requests per attendant per hour)

      - it saves you time (because you now have a standard format, and never mind the smalltalk with the operator)

    18. Re:What a crock of... by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      My standard phone line (in the UK) isn't included in the telephone directory either. It's an option available to all users of the phone system here, and my telco doesn't include customers by default. This is actually probably due more to the administrative issues of passing customer details over to BT for the directory, but it suits me anyway.

      Isn't being excluded from the telephone directory allowed in the US?

    19. Re:What a crock of... by David_W · · Score: 1
      Of course, at least currently, you don't actually need phone service to call 911 on a POTS phone.

      Actually that's not always the case. I had my landline service cancelled a few months back (I'm using my cell exclusively now). When they turned it off, they turned it off completely. No dialtone, not even power on the line AFAICT (my speakerphone won't turn on anymore, so that's a pretty good sign that there isn't power, short of pulling out my meter and checking the pins :).

      FYI, I'm in northern Virginia and my old provider was Verizon. This might vary with other carriers or locations...

    20. Re:What a crock of... by alkali · · Score: 1

      Unplug the local carrier's service where it comes into the building. Plug the Vonage line into any wall jack. That should "light up" the rest of the jacks.

    21. Re:What a crock of... by DarthBart · · Score: 1

      Once your line has been inactive for a certain amount of time, the cable pair that its on is fair game for reuse.

      There's only a finite number of cable pairs in the bundle that services your neighborhood. Take into account bad pairs, houses/businesses with multiple lines, services such as T1s/HDSL that use multiple pairs and there's no way for the telcos to leave all of those wires allocated when service is terminated.

      So, they'll come along and yank your pair to use it somewhere else (sometimes even when you've got active service!)

    22. Re:What a crock of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent comment is more insightful than its seems. While it could be read as just another companies-are-evil rant on Slashdot, the fact remains that POTS adheres to much more stringent standards of performance and reliability than VoIP, and the tougher requirements are indeed one reason it costs more. Lifeline voice, 911 location, and the independent power supply are all harder problems than just slamming around some RTP packets with compressed voice data.

      Functioning networks aren't just about transporting bits along the success path.

    23. Re:What a crock of... by jjhall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But to take your comment a little farther, the telephone network wasn't designed to send digital data. POTS "should remain a system for transmitting voice, and any devices that want to send digital data should send it across" digital lines.

      Data over analog POTS is just a hack anyway. So why not emulate that same hack? Here is how it can work. Make your ATA and provider end point "speak modem." When you need a data connection for your PVR, modem, Analog IP Toaster Oven, etc..., your device picks up the line and dials as normal. When the remote end detects the modem answer tone, the remote end connects to that modem, and informs your ATA to provide a local modem connection to your analog device. Your ATA then sends its own modem answer tones and establishes a connection to your PVR. The ATA and endpoint establich a TCP connection in place of the voice UDP connection so no data is lost, and they exchange the data between themselves and emulate the modem connection on each end. There would be a slight delay on the data, but that would be no worse than a slow (noisy) POTS connection.

      That same scenario would resolve the fax problem too. Have the ATA "recieve" the fax and send the data stream to the provider. Their system then dials the remote fax and transmits the stream.

      The thing is, VoIP is a great replacement for POTS. 2 months ago I switched to straight VoIP (using Broadvoice) as I don't have anything that needs POTS, other than my Dish PVR. I don't order PPV, so that doesn't matter either. My wife and I both have cell phones to call 911 if needed. By using VoIP, I am saving 25-30 every month. Quality is just as good, if not better, especially when calling other people using VoIP (vonage, packet8, FWD, etc.) For that savings, I am willing to put up with some quality and reliability glitches, which so far have not been much more than I got with my POTS lines.

      For most people to switch however, it needs to be a drop-in replacement, meaning the basic digital communications people are used to (alarms, PVRs, faxes, and even modems) need to work. A reduced speed is fine, but they still need to work.

      The ATAs currently being used have the processing power to support this, so it shouldn't be that big of a deal to implement. Memory for buffer space may be the speedbump, I'm not sure.

      Jeremy

    24. Re:What a crock of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it is worth you can test 911 now. Just dial 911 and when the operator answers tell them that you just installed/upgraded, a PBX and needed to test 911 access. This is a pretty routine thing for them. Your PBX should be setup so that 911 or 9911 will both work.

    25. Re:What a crock of... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Just put your phone number on your website and screw the phonebook. Your friends, family, and googlers will find it, but telemarketers won't

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    26. Re:What a crock of... by mla_anderson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have almost completely replaced my phone system with VoIP. I say almost as I have DSL for my broadband and therefore need an actual line. All my voice is over the Vonage system even 911.

      • 911

        I register my location with Vonage for 911 service

      • Power outages

        I plug my equipment into a UPS. For last resort I can use the van and inverters as a crude generator

      • Tivo

        Well since I'm using DSL I do have to pay for an actual phone line. Tivo gets its own line for whatever it wants to do.

      • Phonebook listing

        I was unlisted long before I switched to Vonage

      I have been very happy with my VoIP system. I had all sorts of trouble with the analog line after SBC put in the DSL. Even before then I had a lot of trouble with SBC (Pacbell at the time). Now I don't have to deal with them.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    27. Re:What a crock of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it true that the VoIP services require that all calls use the full 10 digits for outgoing and incoming calls? That seems to me to be a serious disadvantage that was not even mentioned in the article. It is bad enough to force me to dial 10 digits for my own outgoing calls (since I am saving money by doing this), but to force all friends, family and business to dial all 10 digits seems to be too much -- IMHO.

    28. Re:What a crock of... by shayne321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Related issue: there really ought to be a way to test 911.

      I agree there should be an automated way to test 911, as you described.. That said, I work for a large multi-city real estate company and we are deploying Cisco IP phones to every new office we complete.. We always test 911 service, because there was one time when we first deployed IP phones in our corporate office we had not tested it and found out the hard way it wasn't working (luckily we were still migrating from a legacy PBX, so there were still legacy phones around to dial 911 with).

      We set our IP phones up so that 911 or 9911 will work (since people are so used to dialing a 9 first). We try each number and when the operator answers we start with "THIS IS NOT AN EMERGENCY CALL, we are testing a new phone system installation and need to know what number and address we are posting". Every one I've talked to has been happy to help and not acted put out in any way. They'd rather KNOW you have working 911 service than have to deal with answering emergency calls with the wrong phone number or address associated with the call.

      Also, for those curious about how E911 is handled with VoIP in the enterprise market, cisco has a product called Cisco Emergency Responder that adds on to the Cisco Call Manager Infrastructure and can do intelligent E911 routing. If someone picks their phone up and moves to another office (happens all of the time with real estate agents) the Emergency Responder figures out where they are and intelligently routes their 911 calls appropriately. It can also send you emails or automatically call your building's security team when someone places a 911 call. It's just a matter of time before someone conquers this in the residential VoIP arena.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    29. Re:What a crock of... by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      it costs me a miniscule amount per month

      Where do you live? I pay $28 a month for a dialtone. I know that not everyone lives on a student budget - but considering it's more expensive than the VOIP line, it's hardly a minuscule cost.

    30. Re:What a crock of... by Chirs · · Score: 1

      People keep talking about VoIP as though it is a single type of product. VoIP spans a whole range of solutions.

      There are telcos out there that are already using VoIP for complete landline services, including 911. Interestingly, their customers may not even know it.

      The most common implementation is to have a box on the outside of the house that handles the actual conversion between analog/digital. The customer then gets the usual POTS-type demarcation point inside, and uses regular POTS-type phones. The box has a battery backup for power outages.

      The telco gets the savings of packet voice, the customer gets to use their old phones, but gets cheaper rates. Everyone's happy.

    31. Re:What a crock of... by mirio · · Score: 1

      All the problems he mentions would certainly be valid points, but only if you're dumb enough to completely replace your phone system with VoIP!

      Well, I guess I'm dumb because I replaced my POTS line with a Vonage account. I now pay $16.95 (taxes included) for my local phone service and I used to pay $35.00 for my old POTS line. I now get 500 minutes of local or long distance calls per month and get voicemail caller-id, call waiting, you name it. My old POTS line had NO features. We've had the service for about 7 months now and the most minutes we've used in a month was about 280. We have our cell phones which can call 911 without a problem.

      Man, I'm must be freaking retarded.

    32. Re:What a crock of... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Costs may increase to some extent, but VOIP will always be more competitive than traditional local service. This will keep costs to a reasonable level and encourage providers to innovate and provide better service, in theory anyway. They might end up being like cellphone companies, where some suck slightly less than others.

    33. Re:What a crock of... by zod1025 · · Score: 1

      I agree on the GPS... isn't it obvious that it would be one more reason to buy the phone and would cost next to nothing to implement since it's already in the phone anyway? I suspect that the GPS in these phones isn't accurate enough to be used in such a manner, but for my needs it would rock.

      --

      -ZOD-
    34. Re:What a crock of... by sharper56 · · Score: 1

      Where are you living? In The Eastern PA area (around Philadelphia), you've had to do 10 digits for the last 3-4 years.

      As area codes continue to increase everybody will go 10 digit.

    35. Re:What a crock of... by Cee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. People pay good money to have their phone number unlisted. This isn't a bug with voip, this is a feature, and an excellent one at that.

      You have to pay for this "service"? Where I live in Sweden, everyone can have something called "secret phone number" which includes that you're number is not listed and that caller ID is blocked. Both for landline and cell. And it's free, they even ask you if you want that when you get get a new phone number.

    36. Re:What a crock of... by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Yes, really. Americans (and Canadians) have to pay in order to not be listed in the phone book. It's called an "unlisted number", and comes at a premium price. Crazy, eh?

    37. Re:What a crock of... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I'd glad to hear that they're happy to help with tests, but I suspect they'd have problems if home owners were encouraged to test their 911 service monthly.

    38. Re:What a crock of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you forget here is that VoIP allows anyone to become a phone company - once that broadband pipe is up I can deploy call management and unified messaging components anywhere in the world and as long as you have IP connectivity I can give you call control. That type of economy of scale will continue to drive down the cost of phone service and/or increase the features and quality of service that you get.

      This is why telco's are scared poop-less. Imagine a world where I could put up a single WiMax tower and become a broadband/telco company for everyone in a 30 mile radius.

      The beauty of it is that the phone companies screwed themselves in this case. They gave us shitty service from the land line side and even worse in cellular land. All someone has to do is provide mediocre service and the world will beat a path to their door. Hell, we won't even bitch too much about reception after getting our cell calls dropped every 2 minutes while driving down the road.

    39. Re:What a crock of... by ptudor · · Score: 1

      cool. I've always had a Live Person when I ring 411, but next time I'll have to Turing Test it if I get the mechanical voice of a bot.

    40. Re:What a crock of... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it - I was in TN a few weeks ago and it took a little time to figure out the area code since it wasn't written on the phone. Then it dawned on me that they don't do 10-digit-dialing...

  6. The problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Was that they did their interviews using a VoIP handset, and couldn't make out some of the answers.

  7. Tivo does not require a phone line by BMonger · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Tivo series 2 units *do not* require a phone line for initial setup. It said (or possibly still says this) on the Tivo web site but you can easily find information to set it up via broadband. I know it doesn't because I set mine up without a phone line as all I have is my cell phone.

    1. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by slartibart · · Score: 1

      It's not just series 2. All Tivos can use serial cable to connect over PPP.

    2. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a 40hr Series 2 refurb (only 100 bucks) probably 4 or 5 months ago. I paid the extra 30 bucks for the Linksys USB ethernet adapter. I get the unit, set it up, and it says to plug in the phone line. Like many people, I don't have a phone line, which is why I bought the network adapter. I call Tivo support and they told me that units were still shipping with old software on them. They didn't really see a problem in selling me a network adapter and a Tivo that couldn't use that adapter out of the box. I don't know if it was only refurb units or all series 2s. The only solution is to take the unit to an understanding friend's house, do the initial setup using their TV and phone line, then let the Tivo sit in thier house for 6 hours while the Tivo does it's thing. It was a total pain in the butt.

      -B

    3. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      **repeat post** logged in this time

      I bought a 40hr Series 2 refurb (only 100 bucks) probably 4 or 5 months ago from Tivo.com. I paid the extra 30 bucks for the Linksys USB ethernet adapter. I get the unit, set it up, and it says to plug in the phone line. Like many people, I don't have a phone line, which is why I bought the network adapter. I call Tivo support and they told me that units were still shipping with old software on them. They didn't really see a problem in selling me a network adapter and a Tivo that couldn't use that adapter out of the box. I don't know if it was only refurb units or all series 2s. The only solution is to take the unit to an understanding friend's house, do the initial setup using their TV and phone line, then let the Tivo sit in thier house for 6 hours while the Tivo does it's thing. It was a total pain in the butt.

      -B

    4. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by Sketch · · Score: 1

      Series 1 units do not require a phone line either. My Tivo has never been plugged into a phone line. I installed a network adapter from 9thtee before I even powered my Tivo on for the first time. This was back in the 1.3 days, so I did have to remove the drive and install the NIC drivers, etc.

      Last time I did a full reset on the Tivo, it had the 2.5 or 3.0 software that is also used on the Series 2 which comes with network support out of the box. I didn't even have to open it up that time, just put in the dialing prefix for using the network instead of the phone line.

      The Tivo may require a phone line as it comes out of the box, but that does not mean it absolutely requires one.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    5. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by DeadSea · · Score: 1

      That is partially true. A TiVo 2 with a recent firmware will work without a phone line if you have a wired ethernet connection. If you buy a TiVo 2 that has been sitting on the shelf for 8 months and has old firmware, or you are hoping to get it to work over wireless you in the outhouse without noseplugs.

    6. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      No Series 2 TiVo has to touch a phone line. Change the dial-up number to #401 if your unit has the older software. That will tell TiVo that you have a USB ethernet adapter. When I bought my Series2 Tivo in November 2002 it had version 3 of the software, which was the version just before they "officially" announced ethernet support. I plugged in a USB ethernet adapter and set the phone number to #401...nothing but net!

    7. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      I have a Series 2 TiVo with the older firmware, and it was NOT able to use the USB NIC for initial setup.

      However, it WAS able to use my Vonage line to make its modem call, after a couple failed attempts. Once the initial setup was over, I switched back to using TCP/IP, which is what I'd rather use anyway.

    8. Re:Tivo does not require a phone line by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately if your TiVo comes off-the-shelf of the retailer after sitting for a long time so it only has s/w version 4.00 (and not 4.02b as needed) and your USB-802.11b Linksys is a version 2.8 or higher -- you can't do jack shit with your broadband connection until after you let it place that dreaded phone call.

      Now I'm sure that Guided Setup would see the wireless device if the #401 hack were used, but the TiVo had no clue the 802.11b device was even there until after that first major software upgrade -- which TiVo kindly puts at the END of the Guided Setup process... download the Guide first and index it and THEN download the latest software?! Retarded.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  8. Re: VoIP Questioned by Scoria · · Score: 5, Funny

    It also notes that VoIP customers may not be listed in the local phone book, causing problems with "major fast food companies"

    That's horrible! Are you implying that some telemarketers won't be capable of easily obtaining my telephone number, and the local telephone company won't be capable of charging me to opt-out of the directory?

    What a shame! ;-)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  9. Broadband over power lines? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I guess that solves the problem of your internet connection being up while your power is down. I don't think it's going to help you much, though. I have an alternate solution, and it's called a UPS. Of course, if your ISP doesn't have their equipment on a battery backup, then you're screwed. Mediacom in Lake County, CA seems to have a very short-life battery backup on some of their hardware, because their network would actually go down before my UPS ran out (only a 650VA, and I had a 19" monitor at the time, plus an Athlon Tbird 1.4GHz) when the power failed, which is a common occurrence there.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Broadband over power lines? by Asprin · · Score: 1


      How?

      Depending on the cause of the outage (like a line cut) you'd lose power *and* ISP anyway.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    2. Re:Broadband over power lines? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It "solves" the problem by removing it - if the power is out, BOTH services will be out. Perhaps I didn't phrase very well, I should have said that it "eliminates the condition" in which your power is out but you still have an internet connection.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Broadband over power lines? by shayne321 · · Score: 1

      This was a silly point of the article, IMHO. Of the people you know that still have POTS lines that would be a candidate for VoIP (i.e. your tech savvy friendd, not your grandma), how many of them still use wired (not cordless) phones? Everyone I know has one or more 2.4ghz phones plugged into their POTS lines with no "wired" backup phone. Guess what, cordless phones will not work in a power outage either! stupid cnet FUD-spreading article writer

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    4. Re:Broadband over power lines? by Tiggan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the article talks about sending power over broadband, not broadband over powerlines. So, I guess he's wanting to power your router from your ISP?

      How much power would that require for the router and phone?

    5. Re:Broadband over power lines? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How much power would that require for the router and phone?

      Plenty.

      Your average broadband router has a good 500mA current draw at 5V. Telephones only use about 150mA at 48V but ring amperage is higher. Running all of that as DC is not going to help. Of course, you could run it on DSL or something, but then you can just get POTS by definition.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Broadband over power lines? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      That is not true either. My phone at home has a battery slot in the base, and can run for about half an hour after being disconnected from power.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  10. Any New Technology... by webword · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any new technology will face the exact same *kind* of issues. Users won't like it because of x, y, or z. The real issue isn't the technology itself but how well the businesses manage it, promote it, and so forth. Similarly, if usability doesn't improve, the issues in the article will become quite real and slow (or stop) any real progress in the market, and that would be the real crime.

  11. Ben Charny is my b1tch by netwiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow. that article is a total clusterfsck...

    Broadband over power is dead due to FCC restriction...

    TiVos can use an ethernet link and DHCP to get their updates... And besides, they make VoIP phone adapters...

    And who wants their home number in a book anyway? I've forgone the "unlisted number" charge, and as a result received more phone spam than god ever knew...

    Kinda makes me wonder who's pushing them to get this published on the website. Apparently noone interested in facts, or logic...

    1. Re:Ben Charny is my b1tch by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      SBC? This is a FUD article totally in the mode of MS. Same problem (losing marketshare), similar FUD.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Ben Charny is my b1tch by slashjames · · Score: 1

      Broadband over power line (BPL) deserved to die. It generates so much "noise" in parts of the spectrum that it doesn't use that it interferes with devices in those spectrums. Be glad the FCC is doing it's job or your cell phone might loose signal when someone turns on a TV in the apartment next to yours. Or, as a more emergency-related example, the police, ambulance, and fire dept. radios might suffer interference as a result of BPL. Any guesses as to who will get sued as a result of someone's 911 call not getting dispatched because of interference?

    3. Re:Ben Charny is my b1tch by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Ben Charny is my b1tch... that article is a total clusterfsck...

      Your keyboard appears to be broken. You should have it looked at. Hope this helps.

      --

      I write in my journal
  12. 911 by jaavaaguru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I needed to dial 911, I'd use my mobile phone rather than the POTS/VoIP one, because it's in my pocket all the time, I'd be able to get the call made faster. I don't see this being an issue for most people. Anyway, my POTS telephone system (BT XD500 DECT) requires mains power to operate. If my VoIP doesn't work, chances are my POTS phones isn't working either.

    1. Re:911 by mqx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If my VoIP doesn't work, chances are my POTS phones isn't working either."

      Very wrong. Your VOIP can easily fail because of so many domestic conditions, while the telco easily continues to send you 48v + current in the local loop.

      "If I needed to dial 911, I'd use my mobile phone rather than the POTS/VoIP one, because it's in my pocket all the time, I'd be able to get the call made faster. I don't see this being an issue for most people."

      Wrong again: the penetration of mobile phones is woefully low, and actually of reasonable cost, and not entirely of wide enough coverage. On the other hand, POTS two wire is just about everywhere and entirely dead cheap and simple for everyone to use.

      POTS is not going anywhere for a long time, even if its market share will decline.

    2. Re:911 by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      if I needed to dial 911, I'd use my mobile phone rather than the POTS/VoIP one, because it's in my pocket all the time, I'd be able to get the call made faster.

      Unless you need to dial 911 due to a general local emergency (earthquake, flooding, etc), becuase the cells rapidly get overwhelmed by the number of calls. The attacks on NYC and the Pentagon brought that out in sharp relief: The cell phone system in Manhattan basically shut down from the flood of calls and so on.

      It's not clear what sort of emergency would knock out cell phone 911 yet leave the authorities unaware, however.
    3. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cell phone system in Manhattan basically shut down from the flood of calls and so on.

      Actually that was because Verizon lost tens of thousands of lines and their center in the collapse of the WTC. It took a couple of weeks for them to get service back. The blackout was actually more devastating for cell service. I seem to remember that only my verizon phone was working.

    4. Re:911 by Jardine · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not clear what sort of emergency would knock out cell phone 911 yet leave the authorities unaware, however.

      Fire in the cell tower?

    5. Re:911 by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Most people believe POTS goes down due to power failures from experience, mostly because of cordless phones, fax machines, and combo phone/answering machines that require a seperate power source to operate. I have an old Western Electric rotary plugged in for those occasions.

    6. Re:911 by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Fire in the cell tower?

      And you're saying this blazing fire would somehow go completely unnoticed?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:911 by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      cordless phones, fax machines, and combo phone/answering machines that require a seperate power source to operate

      Of the several of these devices I've used, the phone still worked without power, except for the cordless part of a cordless (though the handset on the base station did work without power).

    8. Re:911 by BonrHanzon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess you weren't on the east coast of the US during the blackout last August. Most cell phones didn't work - probably due to overload. But POTS worked (at least in NJ), but not if you had only cordless phones. God help anyone who had an actual emergency during the blackout.

    9. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't give people the idea that you need a rotary phone to have service during an outage. A $15, corded phone (without any "frills") will work as just as well.

    10. Re:911 by tigerc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If my VoIP doesn't work, chances are my POTS phones isn't working either.

      When was the last time that your land line actually died? Not a "network busy", but just died. No dial tone. No power to the phone? Just died?

      In the age of monoploy of the telephones, we didn't care how much it actually cost. The system was built to last. If the power goes out, so does your VOIP, email, instant messaging, even your cell phone (how towers have battery backup?) But your phone will always be there.

    11. Re:911 by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Why not, there have been several major central office fires that were not detected until they had destroyed most of the equipment and building.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:911 by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, POTS two wire is just about everywhere and entirely dead cheap and simple for everyone to use.

      This is just not true. POTS is only available wherever you pay to drag a line to it. There's no POTS service in my bathroom, in my backyard, in my garage, or on the about 1/4 mile trek to my mail box on on the trails through the Tonto National Forest behind my home.

      The local cell tower covers all of these locations and more. With a handheld 600mw (milliwatt) mobile phone I can expect at least a 2 mile radius of service from the tower and 10-15 isn't uncommon.

      Flat rate, unlimited local calling is becoming a more common service from mobile carriers and compares, price-wise, with hard line service.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    13. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you folks think that cell "towers" (base stations) don't ever or even rarely go down, you're sadly mistaken. There are a plethora of issues - including regular maintenance - which can knock cell sites off the air for HOURs.

      Plus, cellular 911 includes NONE of the benefits of E911 service. And, if you're inside when you call, many times it won't get your location even close to where you are.

      I work in the cell phone industry on these problems directly. I have a POTS line for 911 use and won't even think about using the cell or VOIP for emergencies.

    14. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell "towers" (cell sites) most certainly have multiple sources of power backup, usually a battery bank good for several hours and that's normally backed up by a generator with a full fuel tank. Cell companies don't make revenue if people can't make or take calls, so keeping cell sites up is a priority.

      Other than that, you're correct.

    15. Re:911 by mqx · · Score: 1

      "This is just not true. POTS is only available wherever you pay to drag a line to it. There's no POTS service in my bathroom, in my backyard, in my garage, or on the about 1/4 mile trek to my mail box on on the trails through the Tonto National Forest behind my home."

      This is such a stupid statement that it's obvious you are trolling.

    16. Re:911 by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I would suspect such buildings are not to code. Most fire regulations insist on having hard-wired and battery backed up fire and smoke detectors. Even if there aren't any such regulations, it's incredibly stupid to run a business and not have proper fire monitoring and suppression devices installed.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    17. Re:911 by mqx · · Score: 1

      "Please don't give people the idea that you need a rotary phone to have service during an outage. A $15, corded phone (without any "frills") will work as just as well."

      The parent has a point: unfortunately we're engineers and understand this, but average people don't. So many people who have funky household cordless phone powered by the mains have bad luck during power outage, while standard handsets continue to work. Tell this to an average person they'll laugh. Wait until they have a blackout or someone dies because there's no way to make a call (well, in most cases, a neighbour could help) and then they'll take you seriously.

    18. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      God help anyone who had an actual emergency during the blackout.

      Precisely, you don't need any of these fancy new 911 setups, just get God to help you. A short prayer to God requires no electricity, no phone lines, no equipment (other than perhaps a rosary). You just need to go to church regularly.

      -hadohk

    19. Re:911 by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      With 75% of the population having mobile phones (at least in urban areas of the UK), do you think there are enough paramedics to answer allo those emergency calls? Calling probably just makes things worse by making hteir switchboard too busy.

    20. Re:911 by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      My landline has never died. Neither has my mobile phone since I started a contract with my current provider. The last time we had a powercut (everywhere for at least the surrounding 5 miles was out too), my mobile was my chosen way of keeping in touch with friends until the power came back.

    21. Re:911 by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      Even if there aren't any such regulations, it's incredibly stupid to run a business and not have proper fire monitoring and suppression devices installed.

      we are talking about the CLECs here, live Verizon. So "incredibly stupid" is not out of the realm of possibilities.

    22. Re:911 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But POTS worked (at least in NJ), but not if you had only cordless phones.

      I don't understand. I only have cordless phones in my home. I've called the power company on them when the power went out. I hopped online to check and see if the local news sites had anything on the power outage. My broadband was working fine.

      Of course, I didn't but the Wal-Mart $5 special cordless phones, but I bought ones with batteries in the base. I also have a UPS for my networking gear that will, if I turn my desktop off and boot up the laptop, last for hours and cost less than $100. That it is easier for a moron to screw themselves with VoIP doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with the technology.

    23. Re:911 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Your VOIP can easily fail because of so many domestic conditions, while the telco easily continues to send you 48v + current in the local loop.

      Yeah, and I have a UPS and my Internet connection is over DSL, so for my ability to do VoIP to go down, I'd have to be without power for hours, or there would have to be a problem at the phone company.

      "If I needed to dial 911, I'd use my mobile phone rather than the POTS/VoIP one, because it's in my pocket all the time, I'd be able to get the call made faster. I don't see this being an issue for most people."

      Wrong again: the penetration of mobile phones is woefully low, and actually of reasonable cost, and not entirely of wide enough coverage. On the other hand, POTS two wire is just about everywhere and entirely dead cheap and simple for everyone to use.


      If I get adequate cell service at my home, how does penetration and other such concerns affect me? They don't. If seconds count, my cell phone may be a better choice because it is in my pocket. I may have to run to another room to get a phone to run back in and deal with the situation (i.e. someone with an injury or extinguishing a fire). So a cell phone may be a better choice than a land line. Of course, there are situations where it may not be. But your condescending and quite innacurate "Wrong again" quip is inflamitory and just plain ol' FUD.

    24. Re:911 by jgs · · Score: 1

      I guess you weren't on the east coast of the US during the blackout last August. Most cell phones didn't work - probably due to overload. But POTS worked (at least in NJ), but not if you had only cordless phones. God help anyone who had an actual emergency during the blackout.

      Here in MI, cell sites dropped like flies after the first few hours. However, what was interesting was that a lot of people lost POTS after the first 12 hours or so. These are people with good old-fashioned wired phones, not cordless. I've never heard a good explanation for why -- presumably it was because they were served from a CO which didn't have adequate backup facilities. Or I suppose their service could have been routed through a distance extender without good backup. In any event, the point is that you can't 100% rely on POTS working during a power outage, although it is certainly more robust than cellular.

      My DSL never went out during the August outage, BTW.

    25. Re:911 by mqx · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, and I have a UPS and my Internet connection is over DSL, so for my ability to do VoIP to go down, I'd have to be without power for hours, or there would have to be a problem at the phone company."

      Sure, because like many of us, you're a jumped-up techie, and definitely in the minority. For the vast majority of people, we're talking about set-top boxes, DSL gateways, etc. All of these require domestic power and so on.

      "If I get adequate cell service at my home, how does penetration and other such concerns affect me? "

      Because we're not just talking about _you_. We're talking about the vast majority of people who are being "sold" VOIP as a "killer app", suggesting that they should ditch their POTS line, perhaps not aware of the consequences.

      "So a cell phone may be a better choice than a land line."

      I agree - cell phones and land lines are on par - but cell phone coverage is still not universal. There have been a couple of incidents where people have died or had emergency issues because they were in an out of coverage area. Granted, there was probably no land line there as well, but generally in rural areas, the land line coverage at least no worse than land lines.

      ''But your condescending and quite innacurate "Wrong again" quip is inflamitory and just plain ol' FUD. ''

      You clearly don't understand the issues, which hardly gives you an ability to make those calls - I mean, look at your first statement "my UPS ...", you're the one arguing from the elite technical position. If you want to understand the issues, take a wider social perspective, not "VOIP and me", but "VOIP and us".

    26. Re:911 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      ''But your condescending and quite innacurate "Wrong again" quip is inflamitory and just plain ol' FUD. ''

      You clearly don't understand the issues, which hardly gives you an ability to make those calls - I mean, look at your first statement "my UPS ...", you're the one arguing from the elite technical position. If you want to understand the issues, take a wider social perspective, not "VOIP and me", but "VOIP and us".


      So, you seem to agree that your broad statements are incorrect. So why are you so abrasive about it? I'm arguing from the informed consumer position. From that position, I have no problem keeping my stuff running during a national emergency. You are apparently arguing that first adopters of a new technology that are uninformed will have problems with it in certain circumstances. To which, I can only answer, "Well, duh."

    27. Re:911 by mibus · · Score: 1

      Stupendously unlikely in a base station, IMHO.

      At least around here (.au) they have remote temperature sensors... if they notice a huge spike in the temperature without the airconditioner failing (which they can also detect remotely) they'd notice.

      Bases generally have 6+ hours of backup battery life, too.

      Not to mention, most of the time you're actually in range of multiple towers, so if one goes down you're *probably* still covered.

    28. Re:911 by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      Our landline was completely dead this last winter. No dialtone, no power. Why? The wire was laying on the ground, broken. In several places. Anything that will take out your power has a good chance of taking out your landline as well. Stringing thin copper wires to poles above the ground isn't the most failsafe way to provide a service. Our cell phone, however, still worked.

    29. Re:911 by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      I've found that those $15 corded phones are only good as paperweights. They have horrible voice quality even for telephone standards, and they're also the first thing you need to unplug if you suspect a line problem, especially after a lightning strike in your area.

      My old Western Electric is over 30 years old, and as long as POTS is still around, it'll probably last another 30.

    30. Re:911 by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Buyer-beware.

      There's warnings about 911 and other issues all over Vonage's packaging, website, etc etc etc. They've done their job to inform their "consumers". (I hate that word.)

      If their "consumers" need more hand-holding and hugs than the already overdone warnings right on the box and in the box and on the website and whatever else have you -- they're too uneducated to survive or help the country thrive.

      That would mean there's a bigger educational problem. (Which there is.) Time to fix root-cause instead of wiping the butts of the idiots.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    31. Re:911 by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Not up to code? Have you ever seen the safety regulations for working in most Central Offices?

      If the building requirements are anything like those, the building is built well-beyond code. It's not a building issue.

      Someone either screwed up or the site hasn't been maintained due to financial considerations. Most sites are losing their on-site workers, and almost all telcos are slowly moving toward mostly unmanned sites as people quit/retire.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    32. Re:911 by mqx · · Score: 1

      "So, you seem to agree that your broad statements are incorrect."

      They were not - why do you put words in my mouth.

      "I'm arguing from the informed consumer position."

      No you're not, you just think you are.

      "From that position, I have no problem keeping my stuff running during a national emergency."

      There you go again. What's fine for you as 1% of the population that has a UPS unit at home is not fine for the other 20% of the population to switch entirely to VOIP and ditch their POTS and don't have UPS and then end up with a problem.

      "You are apparently arguing that first adopters of a new technology that are uninformed will have problems with it in certain circumstances."

      Didn't you read my post, where I said something about "wider social perspective" ? It other words, not just for the first adopters?

      "To which, I can only answer, "Well, duh." "

      You've proven yourself to be an idiot.

    33. Re:911 by screeble · · Score: 1

      "if you're inside when you call, many times it won't get your location even close to where you are."

      Prey tell, worker in the cell phone industry...

      How in the hell does being inside or outside change the relative ESZ reported to the PSAP by the cellular tower?

      The cell site (or landline switch it translates through) provides the 10-digit callback number of your unit and the specific cell vector info to the PSAP long before you even talk to a human.

      If that 10-digit number isn't available to the PSAP the responder almost immediatly asks "What is your location?"

      It is perfectly logical to dial 911 from any cell phone providing wireless E911 services. If you ARE truthfully dealing with WSP E911 services and don't know this sort of thing...

      Please, please, please tell us where you work so we can pick an alternate service provider with E911 service that actually works!

  13. Tivo can use a network connection by Otto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you get one of the newer boxes, plug a USB network dongle into the back of the thing, hook it up to your LAN, and use the proper codes and config and such, it can do the initial setup via the network. It's not obvious via the menus and such, I grant you, but it can be done.

    Which is anyway beside the point, as a lot of the VoIP services have boxes available that you can plug a POTS phone into, some of which can handle modem traffic just fine.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  14. Tivo still requires a phone? by sporkboy · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping Tivo does away with the phone requirement when they come out with their HD units. It's asinine to rely on landlines when so many people are moving to exclusively mobile phone + broadband internet. Seems like they're spiting the demographic most likely to buy their new products.

    I considered voip earlier this year, for an outbound connection for an alarm system dialer. There don't seem to be any "per-minute" type voip plans though where you only pay for use. Nor do there seem to be "outbound only". I can do without the telemarketers (do-not-call isn't enough) that come along with a land line.

    1. Re:Tivo still requires a phone? by entrager · · Score: 1

      TiVo did away with the phone line requirement a LONG time ago. I've had my TiVo for nearly 2 years and I've never had a land line. You can plug a USB network adaptor into the TiVo and use your broadband connection for updates. Official support for that was added about a year ago, but before that all you had to do was enter a certain code (,#401 or something) into the dialing prefix field during setup and it would use DHCP to get an IP and simply connect that way.

  15. Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by slash-tard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    or they wouldnt deliver to me. They wouldnt deliver to me even if I offered to prepay with a credit card.

    Other pizza places dont have a problem with placing an order through a cell phone.

    Of course this ignorant policy cost them a customer.

    I imagine a VOIP line would cause even more problems.

    1. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by sporkboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Strange, I have a cellphone and they deliver to me all the time. In fact, I ordered from a friend's house in a different area code using my cellphone and they had my name on record (printed on the label) and no problems. Sounds like you got a bad-egg Dominos.

    2. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      I agree to this --- I have ordered an outrageously large number of pizzas to a house other than mine from a cell phone, with tons of yelling in the background, with no problems whatsoever.

      Kick that bad-egg Dominos in the ass

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by awhelan · · Score: 1

      As a college student I order Dominos from my cell phone all the time and it's never been a problem. Friends from out of state do the same thing. If the Boston area Dominos locations had a policy like that they would seriously lose about 80% of their business.

    4. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by BMonger · · Score: 1

      Who orders pizza via phone anymore? I always order Papa Johns online... :) Get with the times!

    5. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by selfabuse · · Score: 1

      I had the very same problem, but with Pizza Hut instead of Dominos. The Pizza Hut wouldn't deliver to me without a landline, but the Dominos had no problem at all. Coincidentally, this particular Pizza Hut is now out of business, and has been turned in to a gas station.

    6. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's up to them. Maybe they adopted that "ignorant policy" after the 100th time some asshole 13 year old kid sent a pizza to "I.C. Weiner" up at the cryogenics lab.

      Most of the smaller mom&pop shops usually act this way, ya know the ones that actually make good pizza. They dont have the deep pockets to absorb these costs, Pizza Hut and the rest who slop ketchup and cheeze whiz on a piece of flatbread and dare to call it a pizza don't care. They let you order online. No big deal, since their pizza is worth a nickel to them and the delivery boys time is worth zilch (ie; he works for tips).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by BrainStop · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It could possibly be that you live in an area with lots of credit fraud. The fact that your credit card goes through for them doesn't mean it's not a stolen credit card that hasn't been reported yet .... But then, it's still crap that you need a landline. Just my 3 cents.

    8. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Policies like that are up to the individual managers. If you were losing money because people were constantly being assholes and phoning in fake orders, etc, you might do the same thing.

      Even places with such policies wont care if you've dealt with them before. The lil pizza shop down the road from me has such a policy, but I order from my cell all the time, and they pull my name on the computer, see I've bought hundreds of pizzas and never dicked them around, and have no problem with it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Pizza Hut wouldn't deliver without a landline
      > Coincidentally, this Pizza Hut is out of business

      "Coincidentally"?
      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    10. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I tried Papa Johns online a couple years ago and it was terrible. Unless you use a coupon, the pizzas are like 18 bucks each. I couldn't find a way to use a coupon online (even though they have code numbers on the coupons). Unless you call at the worst peak times, ordering a pizza by phone is not a problem.

      -B

    11. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe they adopted that "ignorant policy" after the 100th time some asshole 13 year old kid sent a pizza to "I.C. Weiner" up at the cryogenics lab.

      The three of us thought it was pretty funny at the time.

    12. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forge your neighbors # for caller ID and then tell the guy you are him but will be next door (at your address.)

      Personally the ease of forging Caller ID is by far more of a risk of VoIP than anything else I've heard. Then again, *having* VoIP doesn't put you more at risk than having a regular phone line.

    13. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by IsaacW · · Score: 1
      Maybe they adopted that "ignorant policy" after the 100th time some asshole 13 year old kid sent a pizza to "I.C. Weiner" up at the cryogenics lab.
      If that hadn't happened, then Phillip J. Fry never would have gone into the future and then back into the past to become his own grandfather, thus ensuring both his existence and mine, you insensitive clod!

      Sincerely,
      Professor Hubert Farnsworth
    14. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a win for you. Dominos isn't pizza, it's f*cking cardboard covered with imitation cheese and soy-filler meat-like products. Who the hell orders from Dominos?

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    15. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm pretty sure "Coincidentally" means what you think it does. It's "Inconceivable!" that doesn't mean what you think it means . . .

    16. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      It's true I did the nasty in the pasty.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    17. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by magefile · · Score: 1

      He's being ironic. And yes, I do know what ironic means.

    18. Re:Dominos pizza insisted I have a land line by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      When a post gets modded up, you should wonder if perhaps there is an in-joke or pop-culture reference there that you just don't get.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  16. VoIP by jamis · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only issue I had with my VoIP (Vonage) service was yesterday with a disconnected call to my cable company about intermittent dropped cable modems connections.

    I realized what happened and whipped out the cell phone.

    As for the other points -

    1. I'd rather not be listed.

    2. I've had no problems with fast food delivery.

    3. ReplayTV uses a broadband connection.

    4. I have a UPS for the VoIP box, cable modem, router, cordless phone base-station. As long as the power outtage doesn't effect the cable company, I'm all set.

    5. 911 - Between what Vonage DOES offer for 911 service, 2 cell phones (mine and my wife's), and close proximity to neighbors (townhouse)... I feel safe enough.

  17. Never been a fan of the VoIP by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never been a big fan of the VoIP. Seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. I understand with large companies out there that run thousands of lines out a building, but for residential use, it just doesn't make sense. Am I missing something? My boss asked me if we should implement a VoIP solution for our (15-person) company, and my reaction has always been why? We already get dirt cheap (practically free) unlimited long distance, local calls, plus we have an analog phone switch that works fine. I have been seeking enlightenment in this issue since the idea first came out. My theory is that it involves people with too much time on their hands...

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    1. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by Barondude · · Score: 1

      Here is a problem VoIP solved for me. I recently moved 5 miles. SBC wouldn't let me keep the same number but I was able to transfer it to ATT's callvantage VoIP service. When moving day came, I picked up my VoIP router and took it to my new house. Problem solved.

      --
      "That's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage."-Monty Python
    2. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I understand with large companies out there that run thousands of lines out a building, but for residential use, it just doesn't make sense.

      Depends on the residence. Imagine you live in the US and your in-laws live in Australia. Now imagine your phone bill. (I've paid $80-$100 for a 20 to 30 minute phone call before. It's MUCH cheaper to call from Oz to the US.)

      So now we have our standard line and our VoIP line, which we use to call long distance, including to Australia. It's a godsend.

    3. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um.. Phone lines aren't that cheap everywhere. Here in Ireland we get burned pretty badly on landline calls & line rental; VOIP would teach our local ex-monopoly a thing or two about competitive price structures...

    4. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, and you can move it around with you.. and make cheap calls using an internet connection in another country. Isn't that useful ? Ever made a long distance call from a hotel ?

    5. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by afidel · · Score: 1

      Part time tellecommuters. At Cisco we had a bunch of people who worked flex time from home and came into the office one or two days a week for team meetings. If they were in their cubicle at work they entered in their info and that phone took their extension, if they were at home their VoIP phone behind the hardware router/firewall took it, if they were on the road at a clients they could use a soft phone and take their calls there. They could call anyone at their branch location for free (actually anyone in Cisco at all) and could make all of their business calls on the companies dime (as it should be). All of that could be implemented just as well for a small company, though the cost savings probably wouldn't work as well as just buying everyone unlimited use cellphones because of the high fixed cost of the VoIP system spread across so few employees.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Never been a fan of the VoIP by plover · · Score: 1
      I haven't made the switch to VoIP or cable telephone either, but I'm seriously considering it for several reasons.

      First, cost: I get my internet and my TV through the same pipe at the moment (Comcast.) I think they'll offer me a package deal if I sign up for telephone over the cable. Also, I believe the individual features are cheaper. In addition to the phone bill, I'm spending extra money every month for such crap as caller ID, conference calling, etc. This is simple stuff, they have to go out of their way to NOT give it to me because their switches have had it for years and years.

      Second, convenience: One less bill to deal with, one less company to hassle with. I've had problems with my land-line company switching long distance carriers. It takes a lot of time and a lot of "press 3 for a representative" to get any service from the phone company.

      Third, quality: I live less than 1km from a christian AM radio transmitting tower. Their signal used to inject itself into my phones on a semi-regular basis. "Hi, how are you -- ]]]BZZZZ[[[ REPENT YOU SINNERS ]]]BZZZZ[[[ -- sorry about that." (Or maybe it really was Jesus?) I had to run around with .1uf capacitors to try to scrub that crap from my lines. At least with IP telephony, I'm not talking over a 7km antenna wire. The IP packets themselves are immune to that sort of interference.

      My concerns are: will a single-provider jack me around in the future? I have cell phones, so that may not be a big deal. I'm only slightly concerned about E911 service, and by using Comcast's phone service I think the "local provider" concept still holds.

      Hmm. The more I think about it the less happy I am with my old two-pair....

      --
      John
  18. Tivo by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny I just setup my brand new DirecTV HD Tivo via a vonage line. No special codes, no special hardware (just what Vonage sent me a Cisco ATA) no fax line option. Realy what it is is persistances I probably redialed 20 times before it worked. My Googling for help led me down all sorts of roads with prefixes even plugging it into my fax line via vonage.

    What it seems to come down to is packet loss I've been told that Packet loss is what kills modem connections over VoIP and that Vonage can alter your packet size to help compensate. I was trying late afternoon and had issues my Tivo has since automaticaly dialed up and is fine on Vonage probably due to the low packet loss in the early morning. I didnt even have to call vonage. It dosent work well but it does work.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  19. Why wouldn't TIVO work? by ShieldWolf · · Score: 1

    If my Nortel phone can't tell that it is plugged into a Motorola VOIP modem rather than a plug in the wall, how does a TIVO know?

    Is this really a problem or simply conjecture?

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    1. Re:Why wouldn't TIVO work? by lintux · · Score: 1

      If my Nortel phone can't tell that it is plugged into a Motorola VOIP modem rather than a plug in the wall, how does a TIVO know?

      Possibly the VOIP codec would make the modem signals unusable?

    2. Re:Why wouldn't TIVO work? by cfoster611 · · Score: 1

      Generally, Voice Over IP uses a voice codec which using lossy compression, i.e, it purposely looses data that it thinks you don't need since the voice quality will still be ok. This works the same way as MP3s, for example.

      This is fine for voice because, even if the voice codec looses some of the data, it still sounds good enough for humans to understand. For a modem, like the one inside a Tivo or a fax machine, that's a problem. You can't have bits and pieces of the data stream disappear.

      Thats why Analog Telephony Adapters, which convert regular analog phones to VoIP phones, have fax modem features which use lossless codecs. Hense, the exact sound (modem sounds) are preserved during compression.

      Its sometimes tricky, but in no way impossible to get a Tivo or Fax machine to work with VoIP.

      --
      --- Kicking the Cheat since late 2002
    3. Re:Why wouldn't TIVO work? by Ricochet · · Score: 1

      Simple, if your voice call has problems you may hear a shift in voice or a brief something odd. But the conversation continues even with static you'll still understand much of what goes on. It's harder to have too many errors in a voice call. But a modem has to be precise, too many errors is easy. Static means the loss of the call because the higher level protocols stop working. If you could see the diagram for V90 modems and the analog - digital conversion it might be easier to understand (well it is for an engineer :-).

      Now add VoIP, the voice call can be compressed and silence can be suppressed. Once it's compress you can sample it and make it fit into a much smaller bandwitch. You can't do that with data. So to support data & voice you need use a codec that can supply enough bandwith. Most VoIP uses the lower bandwidth codecs.

      Sorry I couldn't explain it any better.

    4. Re:Why wouldn't TIVO work? by lintux · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation, even though I didn't even ask for it. ;-)

      I indeed noticed that analog-digital conversions don't improve the signal quality; my 56k modem was hardly able to make >28k8 connections when my parents switched to ISDN. (So obviously, it didn't take long before we bought a real ISDN adapter. :-)

      By the way, I think you missed the most important factor: lossy/psycho-acoustic compressions.

  20. The Tivo info is wrong. by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've owned four Tivos over the years and only once did I have to use a phone line for the initial setup, my very first Tivo back when there was no network support on them.

  21. emergencies by mqx · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Your 48v (?) POTS line continues to provide current during emergency because the telco has backup power supply: there's virtually no complexity on the user side (the phone is powered from the line, and analogue phones are dead simple and largely robust electromechanical device).

    On the other hand, even if your telco can keep PPP up during an emergency, and even if the telco pulled out 911 VOIP at the exchange and routed it on high availability circuits to operators to minimise internetworking failures, you still have the horrendous problem at the user side: i.e. complex customer home equipment that runs off domestic power that has large number of failure modes.

    Even mobiles are better in an emergency (i.e. handsets have portable power, and the basestation and infrastructure has emergency power + failover features).

    So even if you get QoS and all other other things in place to make VOIP really work: how the hell are you going to ensure high availability?

    Otherwise, VOIP is going to great for multimedia conferencing and everything else.

    1. Re:emergencies by akajerry · · Score: 1

      I only have cordless phones in my house. I know lots of people who only have cordless phones. Guess what, when the power goes out the phone doesn't work. I've thought about putting a UPS on my base, but you know what, it's not a big deal.

      I know the POTS system is incredibly reliable, a century of production deployment will do that to any technology. And that level of reliability is great for the fire department and the hospitals, but I'm not so convinced that we actually need that level of reliability in every single home.

      I don't think VoIP needs to be held to the same level of service. For now their customer base can and probably does provide its own fault tolerance in the form of cell phones, UPSes and multiple lines. If reliability becomes an issue the market will push it upon them. I hope they'll get the 911 issues worked out sooner rather than later, but when I grew up they taught us to dial "0" in case of an emergency; that probably still works.

  22. Also by swordboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And what about voice spam?

    Your VoIP phone is sitting right there for any spammer to call. Now, there is no cost "barrier" for them to call you from outside the country. Now, most slashdotters will respond that they are l33t enough to create a whitelist-only calling system but the average Joe generally isn't offered this luxury and wouldn't be technical enough to understand how to implement it.

    VoIP will become a new conduit for spam.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Also by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      VoIP will become a new conduit for spam.

      It'll be a conduit for telemarketing as traditional telphony is at the moment - but I think it's unlikely to be used for spam.

      Don't forget that email is generally sent free of charge by an ISP - with VoIP, there will need to be service providers who will, no doubt, levy a (small) charge for each call made. That alone should deter spammers.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Also by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      And boiler rooms in China are going to respect our national Do Not Call list, right?

      Wonder why the grandparent was labelled troll. Writing a script to have a recorded message play for every VoIP number would be as trivial as pumping out a million e-mails.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Also by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Writing a script to have a recorded message play for every VoIP number would be as trivial as pumping out a million e-mails.

      Yes, trivial but if you think that making a VoIP call will ever be truly free of charge, think again. You'll still need to register yourself with a service provider such that you have the capability to make a receive calls from anywhere in the world. (Trust me, I'm heavily involved in the VoIP business currently!)

      While I don't know if SIP is ultimately the core registration technology that will drive VoIP, the fact that each call will cost *some* money means that it will not be used for sending out millions of random calls across the globe.

      Even telemarketing calls aren't random - they're a nuisance but the people making them have invested some time and technology to target you specifically - spam is just random mailing that's done primarily because it costs no money to do it.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  23. Several things not mentioned in the article: by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. With the introduction of SIP technology, the ability to create "phonebooks" is just a natural extension - after all, if a central server knows where you are registered to and what IP telephony capabilities you have, integrating that into a centrallised on-line database should not be too difficult.

    2. If the VoIP world goes the way of SIP then for it to truly work will require SIP service providers so that you can connect transparently to VoIP networks from any point in the world. Presumably there will be a charge for this service from those providers who will, in turn record customer account detailes and "numbers" no differently to the way traditional PSTN service providers do.

    3. Even though there is no centralised email database, this does not stop someone who I want to email me (as well as others who I don't want to email me!) from getting in contact simply by handing out my email address to the appropriate people.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  24. Stupid is as stupid says by bored_lurker · · Score: 0
    The author says:
    For instance, a VoIP phone number won't likely be included in most phone directories, according to executives from various VoIP service providers, including VoicePulse, Voiceglo and Vonage. That could lead to trouble dealing with businesses such as banks and major fast food companies that often check local phone listings to verify addresses.

    Am I to believe that if I am not listed in the phone book I can't get a checking account? So EVERYONE who has an unlisted number is in the same boat? Stupid is as stupid says.

    And why is C/NET of all people running this? I have been in the telecom business for over 20 years. This sounds like something I would expect from Verizon, not C/NET.

    --
    --- Tolerance is the axiomatic "virtue" of those without convictions ---
  25. Social Change by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would say it's less of a biz issue and more of a social issue. Most of society didn't grow up with the kinds of technology advancement we have today.

    There is also what I have been told many times. "We've always done it that way, why change." Most people don't like change and that is a big change.

  26. If the phone companies by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 1

    do power over ethernet, then it can be just line a standard phone line and no worries about power outages.

    1. Re:If the phone companies by BearJ · · Score: 1
      Except...that requires the phone lines to distribute Ethernet to your house. The thing about DSL is that it uses the currently installed lines from the CO to your house, thus not requiring infrastructure upgrades.

      Unless of course you meant power the VoIP gateways off of the analog phone line, which is something I've been watching for. And it seems pretty cool.

      --
      Stand clear of the doors. The doors are now closing.
    2. Re:If the phone companies by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ah, PoE is over ethernet, not telco grade lines. It is also limited to the same sort of lengths that ethernet is, eg 100m. I know at Cisco we found out that a basestation at startup would pull too much power for a Cat6500 blade if the AP was out at the end of 100m of cat3. Once the customer tried it with Cat5e everything was fine but that wasn't an option for their several hundred stores so the solution was to just use the power injectors that came with the AP, they could inject more power then the spec called for unlike the Catalyst blades. Trying to provide the amount of power that PoE does over every phone line over the lengths that phonelines are run would result in the need for a power plant at every CO due to the massive line losses.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  27. Tivo calls not working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current Setup: Directv Tivo and Vonage with Comcast cable modem.

    I had a regular phone line during the initial setup of my directv/tivo service. A few months later, I got rid of SBC and subscribed to Vonage. Fantastic service and quality of calls, I'll never go back. But, the daily/weekly Tivo calls always fail. I've read reports on the vonage forum that some people get the daily call to work (via a DSL filter), but not such luck for me. I'm going on 70+ days without a call into tivo, and other then the occasional warning from tivo that the daily calls were not made, I still have full service. Hopefully it will continue to work. I did converse with Vonage customer service (who tried to be very helpful), and they said that due to the UDP / Vonage connection, it would be virtually impossible to guarantee a Tivo modem call. Has anyone else experienced this issue, or found a resolution?

    1. Re:Tivo calls not working by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, DirecTiVo gets guide data from over the dish. YMMV, but I worked with no line for over 6 months. They'll eventually block PPV (because it can't report back) and you might run into trouble with location-identified stuff, like the NFL package where they track location for blackout restrictions.

      Side note, when I finally moved and hooked it up, my software was updated sometime within the next 48 hours.

    2. Re:Tivo calls not working by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      Go to best buy, spend $30 on a linksys usb ethernet (most others will work too, but linksys is "officially" supported) card and plug it into the back of your tivo. In the phone and network settings for tivo go to tcp/ip settings. My guess is you can figure out the rest from there. Since I don't have my tiVo in front of me I can't be more detailed. Sorry about the $30 for the card, but you did take it upon yourself to implement an unsupported system when you got voip and dropped your landline. FYI, a tivo setup can be accomplished through this same method using something like ,#411(I think) for the phone number at the beginning.

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  28. Re: VoIP Questioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it you (and the submitter it seems) read the article it has to do with a delivery company verifying your phone number in the phone book. This seems silly to me either way, though, since some people have been unlisted for as long as I can remember.

  29. Cell Phones by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    A lot of these problems are also applicable or alleviated with a cell phone. I don't have a land line, (well, one for DSL, but no phone #), and the papa johns can still find me.

    --
    I do security
  30. Politically Charged by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Given the local telephone monopolies.

    As regulated monopolies, they're quick to point out any of the restrictions under which they must operate and want to insure that any newcomers to the market be equally or more burdened.

    Roads are publicly owned and maintained; why not public information corridors, too?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  31. INDUCE Act Threatens VoIP Innovation by The+Importance+of · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the problems that VoIP doesn't have right now, but will if the INDUCE Act passes is getting Hollywood's approval for innovative new services: Hatch's Hit List #7 - VoIP

  32. Not having my number listed? by twocoasttb · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a benefit to me! During a recent Vonage outage caused by a broken T3 connection, I was told by customer service that they had redundant connections. Either the guy didn't know what redundant meant, or he was lying. The virtual phone number feature is great; I have an east coast number and a west coast number. The only downside is the doubling of "I'm sorry, you have a wrong number" calls; some of these coming at ungodly hours.

  33. Not that FUD-dy. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of the concerns listed are legitimate, and have kept me from considering replacing my land line.

    Here in Maryland, hurricane Isabel knocked out our power for a week last summer. Land line phones still worked, so we could call around to our friends and family, find someone who still has juice, head over and ride out the storm. With VOIP, our options would be drive around the state aimlessly, or hunt down a payphone, etc.. Forget that. And if the storm had of hit us hard, knocked a tree into our kitchen or something, I'm sorry, but 911 service is not a small, inconsequential feature that VOIP-zealots make it out to be.

    The fast food delivery problem is less severe, but still there. Many pizza joints wouldnt even send a car out if they couldnt verify the address. They've been jerked around by cranks too many times. I've had friends with unlisted numbers or who were blocking caller-id have pizza joints hang up on 'em.

    It's a nice idea, but one whos time hasn't come yet. At least not as the primary phone for my residence. Not until my connection to the 'net has the same level of reliability as my land-line.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Beave · · Score: 1

      So, keep your landline. VoIP and landline work quite well together. Yesh.

    2. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but 911 service is not a small, inconsequential feature that VOIP-zealots make it out to be.

      But you apparently didn't call 911 during the hurricane. When was the last time you called 911 for a true emergency: "endangered life or crime in progress"? If you're like the majority of people... never or a long time ago.

      Calling 911 doesn't stop a person from dying and it doesn't stop a crime in progress and it doesn't bring help any faster: it will still take 5 to 15 minutes for responders to arrive depending on your area and the "emergency".

      If it weren't for federal requirements to implement 911 service it would probably be optional and a pay-per-use service, and frankly it should be anyway. It should cost $100 to call 911, billed directly on the phone bill. If your call turns out to be an emergency your fee is refunded. If not, then you just paid for your stupidity.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Ravenrage · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I'm sorry, but 911 service is not a small, inconsequential feature that VOIP-zealots make it out to be."
      ummmm.....you know that even if you do cancel your land line..you can still dial 911 and get thru....they can't exclude you from making 911 and toll free calls....so just keep a single phone plugged into the POTS network...that single handily kills your argument...

    4. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specifically, Vonage takes your address info and forwards everything to the 911 dispatch in your area. So, unless there is a major disaster that takes out your broadband you haven't lost much. (A UPS on your Vonage unit wouldn't be a bad idea though.) Most people who would consider VoIP also have cell phones. So of course, this reduces the "risk" even more.

    5. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must agree with you. The one electronic service I have never had problems with is POTS. There has never been an outage of POTS line. It has never failed to function as expected. The only time I had any trouble was durring the huge powerfailure last year. The phone still worked fine but I had to wait a few hours before I could place a call outside my local exchange because all the circuits were busy. VOIP is certainly not immune to that porblem either. We have a cisco system that I help maintain here at the office and the router can run out dsp resources with heavy call volume (effectively the same thing as "all circuits are busy now". POTS for all its inflexibility and other weakness is supper stable now days and availible just about everywhere. Its also dirt cheap. It has even proven itself when streached way outside the original specs, modems, DSL, callid, and even tone signalling, are all hacks to make POTS do stuff it was originally never designed to do. It may be old but I think few technologies have proven so practicle and future proof, its been more the a century now. I am not moving away from without a really good reason.

    6. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Daoenti · · Score: 1

      This isn't true in most areas, infact I've only ever seen this work in California. Most areas if you do not have phone service active to the house you do not have a dial tone, period. No calls of any sort can be made. Now, on the other hand, Pacific Bell kept a dial tone to my house all the time, and yes, you could call 800 numbers and 911.

      Just to test this theory, my current phone line (which has no service currently) has no dial tone at all. That's with Verizon.

    7. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by timmyd · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for federal requirements to implement 911 service it would probably be optional and a pay-per-use service, and frankly it should be anyway. It should cost $100 to call 911, billed directly on the phone bill. If your call turns out to be an emergency your fee is refunded. If not, then you just paid for your stupidity.


      Then what do colleges do about all their emergency call booths they place around campus? I've seen plenty of non-students and kids that walk by and press the emergency button and then walk away as if nothing happened. I bet the majority of false calls come from that sort of thing anyway.

    8. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It should cost $100 to call 911, billed directly on the phone bill. If your call turns out to be an emergency your fee is refunded. If not, then you just paid for your stupidity.

      In many communities, there is no non-emergency number for police/fire dispatch. If you call the local station, they will tell you to call 911, because they have centralized all of their assets in the 911 operations center.

      Some communities have added a three digit number (311) for non-emergencies. See here for more information.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They could put in cameras to catch these pranksters, then have the police pick them up and throw them in jail. Have a few of them spend several months in jail for tying up emergency resources, print stories about them in the news, and the problem should stop.

    10. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But you apparently didn't call 911 during the hurricane. When was the last time you called 911 for a true emergency: "endangered life or crime in progress"? If you're like the majority of people... never or a long time ago

      I think the 911 people had a clue the hurricane was in the area already. If something had happened to his house, then he could have called 911.

      Calling 911 doesn't stop a person from dying

      Doesn't it, though? If there is an accident and you are losing blood, a transfusion within 5-15 minutes from an ambulance may well keep you alive, a lot more likely then waiting for someone else, who can't bypass traffic with sirens and such, taking 20 - 30 minutes for medical attention. 911 isn't a perfect service, but saying it can never stop a person from dying is a shortsighted statement, ask some car crash victims if you don't believe me.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    11. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      My experience with those call boxes is that they don't dial 911, but are a direct line to the campus security/police force.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    12. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I don't have the same problems you do because I live in the middle of New York City. There won't be any hurricanes here for the next few hundred years. The chance of a power outage is so ridiculously low... 3 times in the last 50 years, that I don't worry about my phone not working when the power goes off. I replaced my landline with Vonage 6 months ago and have had no problems to report. Why not dial 911 on your cell? Vonage also has 911 service.

    13. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      If you make some calls (local hospitals, ambulance companies, etc) you will likely find out that ambulances do not carry blood on board. At least that's what I think you were saying.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    14. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Calling 911 doesn't stop a person from dying

      Doesn't it, though? If there is an accident and you are losing blood, a transfusion within 5-15 minutes from an ambulance may well keep you alive, a lot more likely then waiting for someone else, who can't bypass traffic with sirens and such, taking 20 - 30 minutes for medical attention. 911 isn't a perfect service, but saying it can never stop a person from dying is a shortsighted statement, ask some car crash victims if you don't believe me.

      I think you missed the point. 911 doesn't stop people from dying. There was one instance here where someone walked into a house, shot two people, then shot himself. Two were dead quite quickly, one lingered. She called 911. She gave her address and directions to her house. The dispatcher ignored her and sent the help to her address as it showed in the computer. That was not where she was. She gave her location multiple times. It wasn't until someone pointed out to the people on scene (or trying to get on scene) that they knew who she was and where she lived and took them there that they were able to assist. She lay bleeding from the gunshot wounds for an extra 30 minutes or so. 911 with a perfect response would have foud 2 dead and one living. 911 couldn't find her address even after she gave accurate directions because they ignored her, even after the people on the scene reported that they could not find the location.

      In short, 911 doesn't work the way it is touted to work. The "it's better than nothing" excuse still doesn't mean it is as good as it should be or that they tell us it is.

    15. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by magefile · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. What if it's an honest mistake, not stupidity? A good friend has the cell number 9X1-1XXX. I was at another friend's house, and they have a crappy phone that doesn't beep when you dial, and has really stiff keys; I dialled 911-XXX by accident. Why make them (or me, for that matter) pay?

    16. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      Thats part of it, which I didn't know, but also the fact an ambulance can legally run red lights, ride the shoulder, even go into opposing traffic if need be, may help save your life. Thanks for the info, though.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    17. Re:Not that FUD-dy. by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

      i am also with verizon...and i do have a dial tone...and i have never had phone service at this house

  34. I'm not in school anymore... by johnhennessy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... now children, give me a 2000 word essay on VoIP.

    I'd imagine that the bulk of kids these days would probably research the subject matter slightly better.

    This writer clearly has NO IDEA on what he is talking about. Lets see if we can refute everything he says:

    "TiVo, the digital video recording service, for example, requires a standard home phone line to complete the initial setup. Otherwise, you "can't get TiVo,"

    I'm sure TiVo would be absolutely thrilled to use broadband for completing the setup. Just think of all the money they spend on 1800 calls for people to finish the setup. I'm sure they'd also be pretty happy to get viewer stats more or less in real time.

    "That could lead to trouble dealing with businesses such as banks and major fast food companies that often check local phone listings to verify addresses."

    How is this different from not being listed ? Why not raise the point that AT&T / Vonage need to provide a reliable database rather than spreading this line of "Fear".

    "Some home alarm systems have trouble with broadband connections, or their manufacturers don't yet trust the reliability of the Internet."

    The "some" being the companies that are too lazy to use more modern methods for monitoring.

    "During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand, because delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis. An emerging alternative broadband-delivery technique, broadband over power line, will solve this problem, but wide deployment is years away."

    Where do I begin. Complete rubbish. Author probably read an article about it last month, so feels like he has to include it this month, just to get one back on New Scientist.

    From here on in the article, we get a "dump" of interesting facts and other pieces of information that seem to completely go against what the author has just said.

    Complete FUD. I wonder who's paying for the article.

    --
    [ Monday is a terrible way to spend one seventh of your life. ]
    1. Re:I'm not in school anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quibble: the word FUD only applies when the author has a financial or professional interest in opposing the subject of her article. Otherwise it may be misguided, even clueless, but it's not FUD.

  35. Eh? by randyest · · Score: 1

    That could lead to trouble dealing with businesses such as banks and major fast food companies that often check local phone listings to verify addresses.

    Really? I haven't had a landline in almost 2 years (wifey and I use cellphones) and I've never had a problem getting any food delivered or banking.

    My cellphone number isn't listed. I don't see why this is any different than the situation with VoIP service. The other "drawbacks" seem FUDdy too: my town 911 service uses my cellphones GPS to find me if I need it. Doesn't VoIP have a way to se location for this purpose (I think so)? Power failure isn't a problem for cellphone, of course. I guess this might be an issue for VoIP, but how often does the power fail (where I live, never had it happen in 8 years.)

    Despite its drawbacks, VoIP is attracting a growing number of consumers, although significantly more people are dropping their traditional phone lines and relying solely on a cell phone, which faces many of the same drawbacks.

    Again, what drawbacks? I live near Boston -- are things really that different in the rest of the country?

    --
    everything in moderation
  36. Re: Cell phone / Remote phone privacy by lcsjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yesterday, my daughter told me that she was having trouble hearing me because her next door neighbor's phone conversation was too loud. She even recognized the voice! Don't think for a minute that no one can hear. Even if you are on a wire connection, the other end may not be.

  37. We are using VoIP at the company I work for.. by isolation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and its great. I talk with our developers that are all over the world for nothing. Its also nice because I am a 20 hour drive from the office so I dont have to go in to answer my phone calls. The Asterisk voicemail system even emails me a wav file with Voice Mail in case I am not looking at the phone.

    These articals are just FUD.

    --
    Free Unix? Free Windows. http://www.reactos.com
  38. I wonder if C|net has ever tried VoIP service by darthcamaro · · Score: 1

    There's a downside and an upside to everything...for me its a real simple cost issue. It would cost me at least 3x more per month on my phone bill (if not more) with a regular PTSN line than my VoIP connection...AND of course I can take my number with me wherever I go...try that with a regular phone line C|Net FUD mongers!!

  39. Grasping for straws by atrizzah · · Score: 1

    It's kind of funny how the article seems to be just trying to find something to complain about, no matter how trivial the complaints are. It reads kind of like a news story from the Daily Show

  40. Let's see by stuph · · Score: 1

    911 - Cell phone still works, can keep around an old, non-subscribed phone just for that, just have to keep it plugged in

    Phone book - I'd rather not be in there anyway, anyone who wants to call me knows how to get in touch with me, anyone who doesn't know how shouldn't need to get in touch.

    Pizza - I worked at a pizza place, just give us your phone number and we'll plug it in for you, no muss, no fuss

    Tivo - broadband versions or roll-your own..

    The benefits of a phone line and unlimited LD for 20$ a month outweigh these "problems" by a mile..

    --
    --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    1. Re:Let's see by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      911 - Cell phones are useless in an emergency. If you lived on the east coast you would have seen this in action on 9/11. And what's the point of using VoIP to replace your POTS if you keep the POTS around in an emergency.

      And then what, I have to train everyone who comes into my home "hey if you need to call 911 you have to use the yellow phone in the den. No, not that phone, it wont work. Has to be this phone." What if I forget to tell someone, and I'm choking to death or having a heart attack, and they're using the wrong phone.

      Phone book - that's great that you dont want to be in there. What if you ran a business, or had any other reason to want to be in there? Not everyone wants to live "off the map".

      Pizza - depends on the store and their management, how much they've been jerked around by cranks, etc..

      Tivo - "roll your own" is only a decent solution to about 0.0000000001% of the population. Fortunately, 99.9999999 percent of the population really dont give a shit about Tivo or think it's as magical and wonderful as slashdot does. They think it's lame to pay a subscription for the same tv listings that scroll non-stop on channel 10 (or wherever the tv guide channel is).

      And, of course, unlimited LD is only a benefit if you make a lot of LD calls. I dont, and I pay 20 bucks a month for my land-line. VoIP really has nothing to offer me but some minor headaches.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Let's see by stuph · · Score: 1

      Well, why make an argument against it if you have no reason to use the system? It's around 20$ a month for VoIP, or you can pay 20$ a month for your POTS line. Your system works for you, so keep it. On the other hand, I have no real need for a landline, fitting in to none of these categories.

      What worries me a lot more than the small group of people who would call 911 in an emergency from VoIP or cell phones is the fact that in an emergency, 911 call centers get greatly overloaded and there's no way to get through for long periods of time. Plus, the 911 operation of VoIP phones has gotten better so now it's generally down to the fact that it won't work if the power or internet is out, which means that 99.99% of the time your houseguest CAN use any phone in the house.

      If I ran a business, I'd be sure to call up the white pages to put my number in there, and I'd also probably have a yellow pages ad, too. They might not put you in for VoIP by default, but if you called up and explained the situation I highly doubt they'd keep you out.

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
  41. If you can get a DT you call 911 by dacarr · · Score: 1
    Out here in SBC territory where I live (former Pacific Bell), many of the switches have provisions where if the line is disconnected, there is still a dial tone. This allows the user of this line to dial toll free numbers and 911.

    Now, we won't go into how you can use a prepaid card to call your friends on this, because this sentence explains it. (BTW, it has a phone number that can be called and rung - or at least mine did in 1998-1999.) But, note I mentioned you can call 911 if you have a dialtone on a disconnected line. So the point of 911 not being available is, as a general rule, moot.

    Get a $10 corded phone at radio shack if you don't already have one (one that DOES NOT rely on wall power, but phone power) and hook it to your wall outlet. If you get a tone, keep it - it's $10 of emergency preparedness equipment. (Yes, Virginia, that cellphone might fail you at the last second.) If not, well, your call if you wanna keep it.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  42. Phone number = demographic by prgrmr · · Score: 1

    causing problems with "major fast food companies" (do they mean pizza deliveries?)

    There are times when I refuse to be a demographic. Pizza Hut has not had problems when I call in an order and tell them no, they cannot have my phone number. Dominoes, however, refused to take my order even though I was going to pick it up because they don't deliver to my neighborhood. The drone on the phone not only didn't understand why I wasn't going to give him my unlisted phone number, he was surprisingly rude about it as well. Consequently I've not bought from them since.

  43. FUD? by DaHat · · Score: 1

    Since when is it FUD to look at the potential downsides of a given issue or technology?

    If one only looks at the benefits with out being aware of potential costs or flaws, one sets themselves up for ultimate failure due to ignorance and blindness.

  44. Re:Other DVRs work. And dTivo's by lcreech · · Score: 1

    The reference was probaly refering to Series 1 Stand Alone (SA) Tivo's. The Series 2 Tivo's can get the guide over bradband. My DirecTv Tivo's (both series 1 and 2), like your Dish Net DVR, has never seen a telephone line nor a broadband connection, they get thier data via the satellite.

  45. Re: VoIP Questioned by wfeick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've always gotten around the charge for an unlisted number by simply giving them a bogus name to publish in the book.

  46. The Death of the Telegraph by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1
    I'm sure similar articles were written when the telephone supplanted the telegraph. "How will people communicate reliably! Voice can be misunderstood! Think of the morse code transcribers!" The technology will adapt, and those who adapt with it will stand to reap the rewards. Those who don't can graciously bow out of the next act of the play.

    I've seen better forward-looking statements from a Magic 8-ball than from this article. Of course there will be growing pains, but it's not the fault of the technology for introducing them!

  47. I just wanna know... by Alsee · · Score: 1

    ...will my 300 baud acustic modem still work over VOIP?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  48. Love to... by DaHat · · Score: 1

    I would love to order Papa Johns online... however I don't think they are going to drive the 60 miles from their nearest store to my house.

    1. Re:Love to... by IsaacW · · Score: 1
      I would love to order Papa Johns online... however I don't think they are going to drive the 60 miles from their nearest store to my house.
      Just have them FedEx it.
  49. Protokol: by Qbertino · · Score: 1


    Interogater: Where were you during the night of the 35th to 36th last month?

    VoiP: Uuuuuhmmm....

    SCNR

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Protokol: by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Interogater: Where were you during the night of the 35th to 36th last month?

      The 35th or 36th of *which* month?

      Where is this interrogation taking place? Mars?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  50. Back This Up!!! by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    What trojan horse? What virus?

    All I know is my SBC land line has gone up 3 times in the past 2 years. Screw them.

  51. The real problems wont be predictible by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    And the inability to predict them are why they will be problems. Foreseeable problems, with VoiP as with any other endeavour, are just that. You know the problem exists, and solutions and / or workarounds will be discovered in turn. But until you end up trying to implement this on a wide scale, you simply will not know what the problems will ultimately be.

    END COMMUNICATION

  52. Negative ghostrider by chamcham · · Score: 0
    broadband over power lines as a possible solution to the power failure problem

    As an amateur radio operator I enjoy having the HF bands in a semi-useable state. BPL is a bad idea in my humble opinion.

    -73s

  53. Been dealing with this for 4 years by jgman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been using my GSM standard digital phone exclusively for 4 years. I have dealt with most everything listed in this article. None of those things are of concern to me. While I can't help but wonder why TIVO needs a standard phone line to set up, thats TIVO's fault. If I really want, I'll just slap a TV Card into my computer, problem solved, one less sale for a company with an idiotic policy. And for that matter, like most Americans, I could probably do with watching less TV.

    I used to have problems with some companies not accepting that I did not have a land line (Video Rentals, etc...), but have found in the last couple years as it has become increasingly common for people to drop their land lines, that companies have adjusted. For that matter, I always figure if they can't accept I don't have a land line, they can do without my business, that is capitalism after all. Those compnaies that adjust to the new world of cell phones and VOIP will survive, those that do not, won't. I for one have never had a problem going elsewhere if a video store or pizza parlor is so backwards as to not want my business over a telephone number. I'm usually all too ready to drop a polite note to that companies management explaining why they lost a customer. But again, It has been at least 3 years since I ran into any problem like that. As for not being in the phone book, I find that to be a definite plus. As I am on a "cell" phone, I almost never get telephone solicitations. Those rare times I do, all I have to ask is if they are aware they are calling a cell phone. At that point the solicitor profusely apologizes and asks if there is a better number to reach me at, to which I gladly respond, no.

    --
    This is not the sig you are looking for...
    1. Re:Been dealing with this for 4 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I really want, I'll just slap a TV Card into my computer, problem solved,

      Yeah, just slap it in there and get the same functionality for the same effort. Right.

      You are 1/100 as smart as you think you are.

    2. Re:Been dealing with this for 4 years by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I have an ATI AIW in one of my computers that records all of my shows. I'm able to edit the commericals out of those shows with TMPGEnc DVD Author and burn them to DVD. I can pause, fast forward, and rewind live television. On recorded shows I can use PowerDVD to skip 30 seconds, i.e., skip commericals. I can also put my entire music collection on it. I can also play games on it. And it comes with a great remote control that works through the entire house.

      I do NOT have to pay any monthly fee. It NEVER records shows that it thinks I might like. I does NOT need a phone connection, ever.

      Exactly what functionality am I missing?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  54. Ben Charney by JosKarith · · Score: 1

    30 seconds with google reveals that he's very much against VOIP, and very much a supporter of the phone industry.
    God I love the internet - every opinion you've ever had displayed for the world to take out of context forever...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  55. GPRS? by TheGax · · Score: 1

    Why not add a little GPRS receiver into the box. Much like many cell phones, this would basically give the same E911 functionality. Or even a regular GPS receiver that could consult a list of known 911 centers based on location.

  56. When will VOIP spam start? by leehwtsohg · · Score: 1

    I think that could be the day free VOIP stops.

  57. Re: Cell phone / Remote phone privacy by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yesterday, my daughter told me that she was having trouble hearing me because her next door neighbor's phone conversation was too loud. She even recognized the voice! Don't think for a minute that no one can hear. Even if you are on a wire connection, the other end may not be.

    The ramifications go far. Lawyers can't legally demand attorney-client privilege for any information discussed over cell or cordless phones. I wonder what, if any, further legal statutes are needed?

  58. Fiber Optic to the home... not! by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...The Bell operating companies, comprised of Verizon, Qwest Communications International, SBC and BellSouth, prefer to wait until they build high-speed fiber-optic connections to homes for their all-out VoIP launches."

    Uh-huh... we'll all have telepathic brain implants by the time this happens.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:Fiber Optic to the home... not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you haven't gotten yours?

  59. Tivo works fine with broadband.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... even out of the box with appropriate USB ethernet/wifi widget if you get a new one with Tivo software v4+..

    When I first got mine I had to leave it with my folks for a few days since I didn't have an analog line, but once the system got its update I brought it home and got it working. It's been great ever since, though the whipperschnappers these days got it easy with the free HMO and whatnot..

  60. Phone? Bah! Use a command line to order pizza! by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 1

    I think this was on Slashdot at some point, but here is the original:
    http://www.beigerecords.com/cory/pizza_party/

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  61. 911 and VoIP and 99.999% by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1
    I think that laws regarding telephone systems and 911 often say that 911 systems must be on communication systems with nines 9's of uptime 99.999%. . . at least this was the original intent.

    VoIP doesn't meet this criteria, thus laws may need to be modified to account for this.

    Additionally, I don't understand the 911 hub-bub anyway . . . cell phones didn't have 911 for years . . . even while people were replacing their POTS with a cellphone in the house

    1. Re:911 and VoIP and 99.999% by afidel · · Score: 1

      Neither does the POTS system in all conditions. The next two towns over lost their complete LD and 911 service for ~8 hours the other day due to a dude with a backho. He dug up the primary and secondary lines for the two cities which were in the same trench for cost reasons. Sure the POTS system is pretty resilient and hardened but it isn't without weaknesses. I've had exactly one power outage in my lifetime that lasted longer than a UPS with the little load of a router + VoIP connector would stay up and landlines AND cellphones went up and down during that event (the great northeast blackout last year). Not only that but the iLEC's are REQUIRED to provide 911 service even to those who do not have a service plan, so as others have pointed out buy a simple corded phone and stick it in the corner for such occasions.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  62. FUD? not quite... by fikx · · Score: 1

    yeah, this isn't the most technically gifted article, but I didn't consider it FUD. I thought it gives a good warning (considering the audience for that site). VOIP isn't quite what is is advertised at. It's good to have an idea of what it DOES give you before relying on it. Buyer-beware. The only thing that looked actually wrong was the Broadband over powerline crap (if your power is out,um...so is broadband over POWERLINE. Hello)
    I took this as a way of waring people who are not as likely to know the limitations to look it up first, which is needed with the state of VOIP right now. Just the 911 thing is enough to think about (yeah, you don't need it much, but then again, do buy insurance because becasue you are planning on being in a wreck? It's just gotta be there for when it's needed.)

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  63. Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoIP by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I recently moved to a new town. I made an appointment with Comcast to install the works: broadband, cable, phone.

    The guy came, and my internet and cable were fine. But I forgot to check for a dialtone before he left. It (of course) didn't work. Turns out they don't offer phone service in my area but hadn't informed me of the fact, or the fact they had cancelled my order for it. Anyway, no phone line and I'm sitting here with my TiVo 2.

    Ok, no problem, I'll go get a wireless card and hook it up to my network. Done. No problem. Its downloading guides but it still thinks I live in the next town and the guide is the wrong one.

    Ok, no problem, I call my friend who work for TiVo. He says I need to do a system reset. A system reset to change my service? A system reset.

    Ok, no problem, I do a system reset. It starts asking me for my dialing options. Crap, it was just on the internet. Why is it asking for this now? I can't get it to work. I call up my friend at TiVo and he says they do the initial TiVo setup over the internet all the time with the latest firmware version (and I should have that version). However, they use wired ethernet. It might make a difference. He then told me that he was tired of answering my stupid questions and if I had any more I should read the bloody TiVo forums.

    Problem - the forums say I'm screwed. My options are to buy ay wired usb etheret for my TiVo, or go door to with my TiVo under my arm and find a neighbor who will take pity on me. I don't know the neighbors. Crap.

    So an hour later I'm in the living room of the 80 year old woman next door. I hook my TiVo into her VCR and spend about half an hour trying to figure out how to get the picture through. Turns out it needs a tape in the VCR. Ok. Picture. Great. Just plug it into the phone and we're good to go. But wait. No jack. Crap. Her phone is 50 years old and hard wired into the house.

    An hour later I'm at some other neighbors with my TiVo, and my own VCR trying to fend off their cat, while my TiVo goes through its hour of setup. Whew. Finally.

    I get it home and it works with my wireless network. Great.

    Still have to get a phone though. Maybe VoIP is right for me? I find 1TouchTone.com and order it. $15 a month. Not bad. It comes, I plug the box into my router, and the phone into the box. It works! I go rip the phone companies wires off the outside of my house, and plug the phone box into a nearby phone jack. All the phones in my house get dial tone. Sweet.

    I've really gotten addicted to the voicemail features. I get emails saying that I have a new voicemail. I get SMS saying I have new voicemail. The light on my phone blinks saying I have new voicemail. The email has an attachment with the wav file of my voicemail.

    Comcast hasn't complained - yet.

  64. This guy has never had VOIP by Uhh_Duh · · Score: 1

    I've been a Vonage subscriber for 6 months now. A few notes:

    1. I hooked my vonage unit into the core wiring of my house (unplugged the qwest line, and plugged vonage in there instead). This makes it so that my phone infrastructure inside my house remains unchanged. My wife wouldn't even know we didn't have a standard POTS line if I hadn't told her. All of the phone jacks in the house work as one would expect them to. (I even take advantage of the multiple phone-line support provided by the Vonage unit -- the phone jack in my office is wired into the other line).

    2. This means my TiVo (all three of them) work great.

    3. 911 calling is a feature provided by Vonage. While I've not had to use it yet, Vonage makes it clear that this is included and available.

    4. I've never run into a "major fast food" company (pizza hut?) that relied on a phone directory to deliver pizza. My pizza's make it just fine.

    5. The guy who wrote this article is a retard who doesn't know anything about consumer VOIP offerings.

    --
    -- People who hate Windows use Linux. People who love UNIX use BSD.
  65. Hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that given the commentary, maybe a better headline for this would be "VOIP questioning questioned".

  66. Luddite comment by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1

    It also notes that VoIP customers may not be listed in the local phone book, causing problems with "major fast food companies" (do they mean pizza deliveries?), That's a luddite comment if I've ever heard one . . . I've ordered pizza/fast food via email before without any phone numbers/phone calls entering into the equation. To imply that pizza delivery places can't or will have difficulty adapting to VoIP is naive at best . . . (Note I'm not knocking the original topic poster that I quoted from, but rather the article that he cites)

  67. Or, you use someone else's phone line. by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    When one of my friends was having phone problems, she came over to my place, set up the box, and then took it back home.

    Just because it needs a phone line, doesn't mean it needs your phone line -- as well as I know, these things aren't tied to your phone like satellite dishes are (if you want to order pay-per-view on 'em)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  68. 911 Access by jon3k · · Score: 1

    We just use a two port POTS voice card in all our equipment at remote sites. Gives you two lines in case of a failure of any type. One for 911 and one to try and continue some form of normal operation.

    Thats a ridiculious argument.

  69. no dialtone by InsaneCreator · · Score: 1

    unavailable during service and power outages

    So is my ISDN line. If I wanted it to work during power outage, I'd need battery power for both the phone and the network terminator thingie. In such situatins GSM is the only useful thing.

  70. USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a USB port where you can buy an ethernet adapter and plug it in. Can do wireless as well, although less wireless adapters are supported.

    1. Re:USB by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      What about DirecTivo Series 2?

  71. Dissecting the article by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) The price of VoIP's thriftiness

    Sounds condescending to me, or designed to be scary, typical tag line to get you worked up over the topic. Passing judgement before the facts are presented.

    2) If you have a home alarm system, need to dial 911, use TiVo or simply want your phone number included in the phone book, you're likely to be out of luck.

    Home alarm system's and TiVo can change. TiVo is a simple non-essential piece of hardware which should change to accomodate such customers as VOIP catches on. Alarm systems will figure a way around this. Of course, if you feel you can expend money on an alarm system for your home, you can probably afford the current rates your phone company is charging. I'm not saying an alarm system is elitist... its just expensive.

    As for phone listing, well damnit who cares? I'll pick up my next pizza. Besides, you can keep your old listing in the phone book when you switch to Vonage and as VOIP catches on this will be taken care of.

    As for 911 dialing during power outages, the article willfully and obviously glosses over the possibility that people might have cell phones. This is what makes me feel this is FUDish, because, while the 911 issue is important, the article failed to cover this very important and obvious point. I believe they were afraid that the original alarmist tone of the article would have been defused because 911 dialing is important to everyone, while all those other points are only important to a select few.

    3) VoIP certainly has it's selling points--unlimited local and long-distance dialing plans that are about 30 percent cheaper than standard services, dialing from any broadband connection and being able to choose a phone number regardless of your location--the TiVo situation if just the tip of the drawback iceberg.

    First, try 50 percent, maybe more. Vonage has a plan for just $15 for 500 talk minutes, anywhere in the country. For local free calling and no special LD plans, Verizon charges me somewhere between $30 and $40.

    Second, what the hell is the last part of that paragraph? It seems so cryptic to me.

    4) Protecting your home could get tougher, as well. Some home alarm systems have trouble with broadband connections, or their manufacturers don't yet trust the reliability of the Internet.

    Back to this a second, this sentences reeks of FUD, because it says "protecting your home could get harder." Not all of us buy alarm systems... goodness! I can't protect my home without a phone? GASP!

    5) 911 calls over VoIP are usually routed through a third party, and there's been the occasional detour to an emergency call center in the wrong part of the country. Because of VoIP's mobility--subscribers can use any broadband connection anywhere--emergency operators won't automatically know where the person's calling from.

    Facts please? I've heard of no such "detours." Can we have some proof to back this up please? Even instances from the slashdot community would be nice.

    And yes, they do tout VOIP as being mobile, and yet 911 calls could be routed back home while you are on the road. However, this will be a learning point for early adopters, but future versions should handle this better. This is by design for the convenience of the customer.

    6) The Bell operating companies, comprised of Verizon, Qwest Communications International, SBC and BellSouth, prefer to wait until they build high-speed fiber-optic connections to homes for their all-out VoIP launches. The so-called fiber-to-the-premises initiatives, however, could take a decade or more to complete.

    Translation: They don't have the infrastructure yet and they don't want to kill their current phone business too fast

    7) Both Cox and Comcast are promising faster VoIP rollouts.

    Translation: they are counting on early adopters so that they can eat the baby bells' lunches.

    8) Despite its drawbacks, VoIP is attractin

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Dissecting the article by LandGator · · Score: 1

      So, true, so true...

      If you have a home alarm system,

      My home alarm works just fine... since it was rewired properly to connect upstream of all other phones in the house. *Any* phone tech can figure this out, and most alarm techs; just not reporters.

      I also took the time to make sure the VOIP box was on the office BBS, just like the PCs, router and cable modem. D'oh.

      need to dial 911,

      My Vonage account included 911 connectivity, and Vonage is not the only VOIP provider which does. Don't buy VOIP service without it.

      use TiVo
      Oh, yeah, I want a DVR that thinks I'm gay, or which phones home to tattle on what I watch. Right. DISH Network does not care and does not need to phone home.

      or simply want your phone number included in the phone book,

      Vonage preserved my listing when I moved my phone number. Even if they did not, your'e saving enough to pay for a listing.

      you're likely to be out of luck.

      You're likely to be out of luck if you trust reporters.

      Because of VoIP's mobility-- subscribers can use any broadband connection anywhere-- emergency operators won't automatically know where the person's calling from.
      If I'm away from home, I won't be dragging the VOIP box with me, as it's serving the home alarm system. Remember the newsie just made a big flaming deal about the alarm system?
      Even if I took it with me, or used a softphone on my laptop, I certainly would not be so witless as to not report my location when making a 911 call. Geez.

      And, as far as high speed pizza delivery, well the Deliverator knows where I am. Changing from Qworst to Vonage did not affect my ability to order in the slightest.

      You know, I think this reporter got a press release from a telco filled with FUD and wrote the article based on that. Would anyone here be surprised, were that the case?

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    2. Re:Dissecting the article by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      3) VoIP certainly has it's selling points--unlimited local and long-distance dialing plans that are about 30 percent cheaper than standard services, dialing from any broadband connection and being able to choose a phone number regardless of your location--the TiVo situation if just the tip of the drawback iceberg.

      It's much more than that.

      My local service, with no extras except for Touch Tone dialing ($3.00 extra) and Caller ID ($7.95 extra) after all the Bullcrap Fees and other crud the phone company is supposed to be paying out of their profits instead of passing it on to the customer... is drastically different.

      My basic phone service with NO long distance calls is $50.00 a month after all the hidden "fees".

      My broadvoice voip connection costs me $9.95 has many more features and gives me free in state long distance. no hidden fees. no little extras that nail you at every turn and all my "POTS" line equipment works with it just fine. the Alarm panel calls out the Voip line perfectly.

      So %40.00 versus $10.00 a month? That is a HUGE savings. to the point that I'm geting a second broadvoice line for my daughter.

      MY cablemodem+broadvoice is cheaper than a regular phone line + ISP. and I get overall much better service.

      as for the part about Voip requires "requires a bit of imagination and creative thinking."... not really. their booklet with the hardware states that I should buy a cheap UPS to put my cablemodem and VOIP adapter on so I will have phone service through power outages. My $39.00 APC lasts almost 5 hours before it dies, It would probably go longer if I replaced it or the batteries. a $100.00 unit would almost go all night.

      My mother is thinking of going boradband+voip simply because it's $20.00 cheaper a month than her AOL+phone line. hell she can now afford a cellphone for those "emergencies" from the $20.00 a month saved.

      regular Telco's should be shaking in their boots, voip is uncovering their pricing scam and people are starting to pay attention.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Dissecting the article by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      5) 911 calls over VoIP are usually routed through a third party, and there's been the occasional detour to an emergency call center in the wrong part of the country. Because of VoIP's mobility--subscribers can use any broadband connection anywhere--emergency operators won't automatically know where the person's calling from.

      Facts please? I've heard of no such "detours." Can we have some proof to back this up please? Even instances from the slashdot community would be nice.


      Well, there are numerous accounts of cell phones being routed to the wrong places, leading to a 5 minute or longer wait as the proper call center is identified and the call is transfered. I can't imagine the infant VoIP 911 service being better than the established cell service. As it sits, there is nothing I've heard of that will detect location for VoIP in use. As such, if VoIP 911 service is properly set up for calls from home, you will get the wrong 911 center if you are traveling. That appears to be the current design.

  72. Definitely FUD by Excelsior · · Score: 1

    Ever tried to use a cordless phone to dial 911 during a power outage? Guess what? It doesn't work. New tagline:

    The price of 900 mhz's thriftiness

    If you're thinking of dumping your wired phone for a cordless phone, you might want to reconsider.


  73. "talk about your cognitive dissonance!" by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    All the first year psych students say Buzz word, say Buzz word.... Oh ya, uh huh, keep it going now.....

  74. 911 Service by ArgusTV · · Score: 1

    I would argue that in the profesional world (where VOIP is mostly used) has the same 911 problems as a standard PBX where any professional installer will install 'power fail' lines wired directly to POTS lines. As far as VOIP to 'Jow Homeowner' it's not there yet. But the 911 probles are not new. When cordless phones first became popular that same arguement was made that you had to have another phone in the house incase of a power outtage. Some people do follow this, but I have seen many that ignore this precausion There will problaly be similer apathy when/if VOIP for 'Joe Homeowner' takes off. Well, thats my two cents

  75. Apparently CNet missed the point... by luke923 · · Score: 1

    As many on here can attest, the writer of said article raised issues that are miniscule but left out the most major concern with any VoIP deployment - QoS. The reason being that voice calls are very latency-sensitive as dropped or delayed packets make the phone conversation very choppy. If your voice packet was guaranteed high priority from start to destination, packetized voice can be carried over modem lines rather smoothly. On the other hand, without any prioritization, voice packets runs the risk of being dropped. Even inside a self contained LAN, VoIP calls can be disconnected, become jittery, and all kinds of other problems occur without any sort of quality of service. And, I doubt that the major backbone carriers are giving any priority to packets destined for Vonage's or AT&T's voice servers. So, once again, an article that could have hit the mark veered wide right by a mile.

    --
    "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
  76. Unplug the local telco completely, then plug the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VoIP into one of your phone plugs and Viola!

  77. Still nothing, AFAIK, to address isochronicity... by BlueTT · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, there's also still nothing to address the issue of isochronicity with VOIP, or, if the network is slow, you will be saying "Hello? Hello?" into your phone when sound from the other end drops out, only to arrive later.

    People have a hard enough time dealing with the fact that their cordless phones don't work in a power outage; it's hardly FUD to point out that with VOIP their corded phones won't either unless their provider has installed UPSs throughout the network the provide the same backup capabilities that go along with POTS lines...

  78. Price by Scyber · · Score: 1

    It was price to me. For a basic Verizon local line I was paying $23+ including fees and such. And I could only call my local area. And I only used it a relatively small amount of time per month. I used my cell for long distance. Now I have Vonages 500 minute plan and I can call anywhere in the US and Canada for 500 minutes a month. Which works out well b/c I have relatives far away so I don't have to worry about go over my cell minutes anymore. And it costs aroudn $17/month. So it saves me $6/month plus no more overage charges from my cell company.

  79. Typical Ben Charney by rbrome · · Score: 1

    I didn't even have to click the link to know this was a Ben Charney article. He's by far the worst reporter at CNET. 90% of his articles are chock-full of innaccuracies and false conclusions. This is just classic Charney reporting. It's amazing he still has a job - he gives CNET such a bad name.

  80. How often do you have a hurricane wipe-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your phone service? I am guessing maybe every couple of decades?
    Take a tiny percent of the money you save and go on a nice vacation out of town when one approaches!

  81. Re: Tivo over VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can emulate a POTS line (FXO or FXS) from a VoIP service using a VoIP terminal adapter like those from Cisco (ATA-186, etc) or other vendors. It will allow you to plug any standard phone or device into a regular RJ-11 jack on the back and allow it to get DTMF and make a call. Really cool stuff. I have a Tivo, cable Internet access, a Cisco ATA-186, and I connect to works' phone system over SIP. Works like a charm. No land line what so ever.

  82. I love vonage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. I dont have a TIVO
    2. I dont WANT my vonage numer listed in the local phonebook (or anywhere else)
    3. bellsouth and ATT can KISS MY UNLISTED NUMBER HAVING, NON PRICE-GOUGING, VOIP-USING ASS!!

    ooh, btw, I love vonage.. ;)

  83. Lets start a discussion... by marksie531 · · Score: 1

    Hands up who thinks that mybe VoIP might really take off? I have been using a really cool little VoIP program known as Skype which uses advanced P2P technology.

    Skype claims to be the new MUST HAVE application... Is this the general view of the public?

  84. Put a battery in the VOIP box? by caveat · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you put a small-ish battery in the VOIP box and have it switch over in case of power failure? I realize VOIP hardware is a lot more complex than POTS, but surely a laptop sized battery can keep just a VOIP system running for several hours? in case of prolonged outages, the phone could shut down to conserve power, so you always have enough juice to make a 911 call or whatnot.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Put a battery in the VOIP box? by mqx · · Score: 2, Informative


      "Couldn't you put a small-ish battery in the VOIP box and have it switch over in case of power failure?"

      And how are you going to make sure people use the right type of boxes? Now we're taking FCC approval - all boxes certified to have backup operational mode that uses inbuilt cells or draws current from POTS.

      Can you hear the outrage as industry and consumers are told that the FCC is going to regulate domestic CPE (customer premise equipment) to ensure HA and emergency capability?

      Equally, can you hear the outrage when this doesn't happen, and we start to have reports of children dying because they couldn't get the 911 operator because VOIP was down because the little broadband wi-fi box was infected by a virus?

      I don't know the answer - but these are some substantial roadblocks.

    2. Re:Put a battery in the VOIP box? by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

      Frankly I think it is easier to just use a UPS for the customer premises infrastructure (VoIP hardware plus network infrastructure needed).

  85. Cordless phones during power outages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How many of you now exclusively have cordless phones in your home? You're SOL too if there's a power outage and need to call 911, so how is this any different?

    1. Re:Cordless phones during power outages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you have powered phone (answering machine, cordless, etc.) then you're crazy if you don't have UPS. You should always have a non-powered phone (which costs pennies if you can find them at garage sales or few bucks or even free after rebate at various office supply stores) as a backup.

      Your cable/DSL modem and routers should have UPS, too. As well as separate ones for your desktops (unless you only have notebooks).

      And one dedicated just for your PVR, of course! (priorities would be cordless, PVR, modem, desktops, but that's my preference :-)

  86. Drawbacks not in the article... by hirschma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have Vonage for home, Voicepulse for business. They both work mostly well, but both have big issues:

    1. Faxing - simply not reliable in general, forget about fax modems.

    2. The directory listings issue is definitely just that - I almost couldn't open a bank account for my business because of it, and then was initially rejected for a company credit card.

    However, with proper documentation, both of these things were overcome.

    3. Online ordering? A _few_, thankfully not most, ecommerce outfits do a 'sanity check' on your phone number to see if it 'matches' your address.

    4. Regional info line: can't dial 311 in NYC, which is pretty kick ass. You can, however, put the 10-digit 'out of area' version in your speed-dial.

    5. Most of the services don't have in-code-7 digit dialing. Of course, we lost in that in NYC a while ago anyway for POTS.

    6. Orphaning. As your VOIP provider starts using the newest, greatest, most bandwidth efficient VOIP adapter for new subs, earlier adopters with older adapters won't get the same features, or even the same level of service. This is definitely an issue with Voicepulse, may they burn in hell.

    7. Roach motel portability - or no portability. You can port your phone# to vonage, but not out. You can't port your number to/from voicepulse.

    Jonathan

  87. VoIP various problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. If the ISP is down (as is the case with our cable, rather too frequently, and even with DSL when we had it for few years), then you are up the creek. VoIP won't work when your ISP is down.

    2. voice connection can get bad. you may have to redial at the very beginning or during the course of a long conversation. voices fade either on your side or on the other side.

    3. Disconnection out of the blue is possible too (less frequent than bad connection but still something that never happens on a land line -- unless someone's cordless loses power).

    Vonage user since May'04, so the jury is out but the price advantage is what keeps me (still) signed up. If things don't improve than I will have to switch back to ma-bell....

  88. 911, Power Outage, and TiVO/Alarm Solution is Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used Vonage exclusively for over a year. It is simple to enable 911 through the Vonage Control Panel. I run my Cable Model, Router/Firewall, and Vonage box on a 1100va UPS and have had no problem during power outages, and I still have a cell if that does fail. Using Vonage exclusively allows for simple use by TiVo, Alarms and other services that need a phone line. I simply disconnected the Telco line at the Demarkation Box (to prevent the 48V) from hurting the Vonage Box, and then simply connected the Vonage Box to my normal phone outlet with normal phone line. This enabled every phone outlet in the house. I have Direct TV plugged into one outlet, cordless phones in many other outlets, and an Alarm hooked up at the Demarkation Box worked perfectly. This should not be an issue for anyone with minimal technical skills.

  89. 911 a non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm entirely sick of the 911 bashing when it comes to VoIP. I've been a vonage subscriber for a while now and I'm baffled to see a valid reasoning in considering this an issue. First and foremost, if there is catosprohic event to cause the power to go out (ie: tornado, huricane) you're better off just going somewhere else because help certainly is going come fast. I've had the power go out on me a number of times in my life and not once can I remember a time when I needed to call 911, if we're talking 99.9% thats perfectly fine with me. For things like a fire, there's a pretty good chance you're not going to be inside making phone calls to 911. Lastly, I don't know many people that don't have a cell phone, or don't have someone there living with that have a cell phone, in which case if any of the above happens I'd be on that long before I was cocerned about my VoIP box having redudant power.

    1. Re:911 a non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times have you needed to call 911 since going with Vonage? I'm absolutely certain I would not want 911 dependent on my cable delivery. It's relatively reliable, but when it goes down, it stays down for hours at a time. Outages are rare, and while it meets my criteria for internet service reliability, it does not meet my criteria for telephone service. A big part of the reason is 911 availability.

  90. Submitter needs to RTFA - twice by Lattitude · · Score: 1

    ...unavailable during service and power outages, the writeup mentions broadband over power lines as a possible solution to the power failure problem.
    Not quite... Although poorly written, the article does not suggest this - the broadband over power lines was suggested as a solution to the broadband-delivery problem.

    1. Re:Submitter needs to RTFA - twice by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand, because delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis. An emerging alternative broadband-delivery technique, broadband over power line, will solve this problem, but wide deployment is years away.

      The statements are poorly worded, vague and contradictory.

      In the statement "... broadband over power line, will solve this problem ..." which "this" is the sentence referring to? There are two problems stated earlier in the paragraph

      "During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand..."
      and
      "... delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis."

      The last statement "... but wide deployment is years away." is a restatement of the latter problem implying that both methods share the same problem of ... isn't possible on a wide commercial basis ...", so that can't be the problem it is an alternative to.

      Logic, or common sense, dictates that if VoIP can't work with cable modem or DSL during a power outage, that VoIP also can't work with broadband over power line if the power is out. If you have no power, you have no broadband over power either. When X delivers Y and X is broken, Y can not be delivered.

      It turns out the author used a lot of words to make no point.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Submitter needs to RTFA - twice by Tiggan · · Score: 1

      During a power outage, a VoIP phone is only as good as any battery backups on hand, because delivering power through the broadband connection isn't possible on a wide commercial basis. An emerging alternative broadband-delivery technique, broadband over power line, will solve this problem, but wide deployment is years away.

      Where did you get this quote? The article doesn't mention "broadband over power line". At least not now. And the web page says it hasn't been updated since 4 AM PDT.

      It seems that the author is trying to present a way to power your VoIP router/phone even during a power outage by supplying power over the broadband. Of course, you still have to have your DSL/Cable modem on UPS.

    3. Re:Submitter needs to RTFA - twice by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      I copied and pasted that paragraph from the linked article. Apparently someone figured out the paragraph as written made no sense and deleted the second sentence later.

      Why the masthead is not showing a more recent update time stamp, I don't know. Perhaps we should write to CNET and ask them why they are misrepresenting the update time of their articles. I suspect it's because they are an untrustworthy news source covering their tracks.

      Looking for other indications of the initial article's wording I notice that if you look at the comments at the bottom of the article's page you'll see that several other people pointed out and quoted the the same paragraph I did.

      I grant you that since they changed the text of the article my posting has no context. I unfortunately can not force them to re-insert the second sentence of the 9th paragraph .

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  91. Re: VoIP Questioned by alkali · · Score: 1

    Then don't you just get a bunch of telemarketer calls asking for Mr. "I.P. Freely" or whatever?

  92. You could be dead wrong by MarkEst1973 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    911 operators have no way of tracing where you are calling from if you use your cell phone. On the other hand, if you dial 911 on your POTS line and drop the receiver because a bad guy is chasing you around the house, the operators must send the police to your house... and they know exactly where your call is coming from.

    1. Re:You could be dead wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you dial 911 on your POTS line and drop the receiver because a bad guy is chasing you around the house...

      And the moral of the story is: always make sure you're at home when being chased by bad guys.

      -hadohk

  93. land line vs other by cuteintern · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only a couple years ago this was the policy because cell phones weren't very common, nobody (statistically speaking) had cut the cord and it was really about security- being able to put a phone number with a physical place.

    This has changed over the last couple years as cell phones saturated the population. They are now too common to refuse the business.

    As long as the store adheres to security policy, there really shouldn't be a problem. Just leave your phone on so they can make a security call-back before they leave with the delivery.

    And make sure to keep it on you if it's on vibrate- one night I had to get a hold of this chick because she wouldn't answer the door and she never heard her phone 'cause it was set on vibe. A shame too, cause her order ended up getting there 40 min later than it had to (and, of course, I had to re-send the driver).

    If you really get mad, call 1-800-DOMINOS (iirc) or go to www.dominos.com and fill out the email form.

  94. Ugh, just wait until Microsoft does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh, just wait until Microsoft does it, then CNET will praise VOIP as the next big thing. If anyone can secure VOIP, it'll be Microsoft, no?

  95. Re: VoIP Questioned by taniwha · · Score: 1
    I'm in the process of moving between countries .... and we've moved our (US) home phone number to a Vonnage account - it's a great deal ~$16 a month for local calling anywhere in the Bay Area - we can keep in touch with froends and relatives so easily .... and to add to the strangeness Vonnage's international calling from the US to our new home is about a third the price of internal long distance peak time rates there (someone is making a bundle somewhere) ...

    The downside is the telemarketters ... we've been on the do-not-call list from the start .... but they keep on coming .... even though we haven't finished our move yet I've already started the spiel .... "why are you calling me in another country? .... do you have any idea what the time is?" etc etc

    On the other hand I don't care much about 911 service ....

  96. TiVo does not require a POTS line by Turadg · · Score: 1

    My Tivo Series 1 downloads guide data by a model PPP connection over my Vonage VOIP phone line.

    I don't know what the negotiated connection speed is, but it works.

  97. Re: VoIP Questioned by wfeick · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, no. Besides, with the federal registry in place these days, I rarely get any sort of telemarketing calls anymore.

  98. Re: VoIP Questioned by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

    As someone who worked for a pizza Delivery resturante back in school I can say that we NEVER tried to verify a telephone number with a phone book.All you do is ask for a call back number incase you get lost^H^H^H^H^H a poorly written address.

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  99. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1

    I dont buy your Tivo problems. I have never had any of my Tivos plugged into ANY phone lines. Maybe you need to work on your Haxor skill set there buddy.

    --
    . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
  100. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by DeadSea · · Score: 1

    According to the forums, if I had wired ethernet I would be fine. Just wireless that is a problem. Do you use wireless?

  101. The internet is NOT built for safety. by DRWHOISME · · Score: 1

    He's right.

    The online banking , phone conversations and others are more easily monitored especially with the world reliance on shoddy, no safety minded, monopolist technology.

    It is a concern factor.

    1. Re:The internet is NOT built for safety. by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      And I can get your ATM pin number by looking over your shoulder.

      Think safety in numbers.

      --
      !hoD
  102. VoIP Works by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Not only is the whole TiVO thing not a reason to not get VoIP service, it's also not even really accurate.

    In many cases, people will pull a VoIP line into their house, from Vonage, for example. You get an ATA: Analog Telephone Adapter. So you use your normal telephones, and they go out over the Vonage line. So as far as your telephones (and thus the TiVO) are concerned, it's a POTS line.

    I've kind of been thinking about how nifty it would be to get VoIP, but things like the inability to dial 911, and the fact that my ISP sometimes tanks for days at a time (hasn't happened in a long time... knock on wood) scare me. But then I decided that it'd make a lot of sense to keep my POTS line, and just *add* a VoIP line. Something like Asterisk can be used to build a nice PBX, and route calls over the appropriate line, depending on which is cheaper / which is available.

    So really, the only point of the article is that having your only phone line come in over your cable connection is a bad idea. And that, if you ran VoIP phones internally, you'd need a $20 accessory to use your TiVO.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  103. I Was Thinking About It by bitflip · · Score: 1

    Until ten minutes ago. When my cable modem went out.

    Its back on now, but if I've ever needed a "sign", this was it.

    POTS all the way, baby!

  104. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

    "An hour later I'm at some other neighbors with my TiVo, and my own VCR trying to fend off their cat, "

    How did you train your VCR to fend off the cat?

    Anyhow, is TV really that important to people that missing a few days of it would be unbearable? I'd have just curled up with a book.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  105. I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off - if you use a VOIP service such as Vonage - they're already converting your analog lines to Digital when you plug in the box... So all the devices that are hardwired get a dialtone and figure they have a POTS line... So there's no issue with a Tivo or alarm, or whatever...

    The issue of no connection if the power goes out - uh huh. How many people have CORDLESS phones that die when the power goes out? Sure the handset works, but the base is FUBAR... So if the power's out and you don't have wired phones, you're fucked anyway... Another non-issue...

    As an aside, I have Comcast digital phone service. They carry my voice traffic thru a channel on the cable TV line, along with my internet traffic... They put a box on the outside of my house and tied it to a small UPS/transformer inside... If the power goes out, the UPS handles it for a zillion hours (I've been outa power for up to 8 hours, and the phones still worked...). I get 911 and all that other crap just fine - Another non-issue...

    As for 911 not working - hey - do what we did back in the day - CALL THE POLICE or FIRE DEPT directly... Tell them where you are and they just might show up... If you're really fucked, hit 0, wait for the operator and tell her you need the cops/fire... She damn well knows where you're calling from and can relay that to the correct entity... Another non-issue...

    The whole FUD thing is related to the asshole RBOC's that like to feed at the Universal service fund trough... VOIP isn't funding that crap right now (nor should any of us, but I digress) and they're all pissed... I say it's another non-issue...

  106. Re: VoIP Questioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over here, Telus the local monopoly^Wphone company makes you present a picture ID (or two) before giving you a phone line. So you'll need to get a fake ID card, but then you'll expose yourself to being caught at a crime. Also, unless you tell them immediately not to, Telus will sell your listing to telemarketing companies as soon as you sign up.

    I got around all this by using VOIP in combination with a prepay cellphone for special occasions.

    -hadohk

  107. It's very simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution is very simple:

    DO NOT rely on VoIP to call 911, and don't expect VoIP to support 911, not today, not tomorrow, not ever. If you need to have access to 911, find a different solution.

    I use VoIP and no land lines. I can't call 911 through it but that's OK by me. I have a backup solution for that. What I like about VoIP is that it's cheap, unregulated and has none of the fucked up features of a land line: mandatory listing, telemarketers, dealing with quasi-monopolies etc.

    PLEASE PLEASE please! STOP trying to make VoIP like a fucking land line. It's good the way it is and it has all the features that it needs. You want to order pizzas and call 911? Get a fucking land line and pay $65/month and LEAVE my VoIP ALONE!

    -hadohk

  108. VoIP: ya gets what ya pays for by PigBoyOhBoy · · Score: 1
    Gosh, when I saw this subject I thought it was going to be a rant about the security issue: a subject that does make me uneasy.

    Since I converted my POTS line to Vonage, I am in the phonebook (at least for the time being), I have 911 service and I am thrilled not to have those indecipherable bills from the phone company. Voice quality is fair, but ya gets what ya pays for.

    Sure, 911 during a power failure is problematic, but then again, what are the odds? Unless it's a 911 call that is related to the power failure, which the authorities are likely to know about anyway. And besides, I still keep a cell phone around for desperate emergencies and network outages (more frequent than I'd like, but rarely inconvenient).

  109. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by DeadSea · · Score: 1

    My VCR is ferocious. ;-)

  110. Happy Packet8 user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been using Packet8 for a while now... even better, I moved to Sri Lanka temporarily, and I got ADSL, plugged in the Packet8 phone, and now I can call USA for free to keep in touch with friends and family! Packet8 has been a wonderful tool for me! Checkout www.packet8.net

    1. Re:Happy Packet8 user by numakris · · Score: 1

      yep, same thing here, is my primary phone. works over time warner cable. and e911 service soon.

  111. Re: VoIP Questioned by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    I have a vonage line here in Israel with a New York number. (I also have an israeli line on the same phone) Its great! My friends and family back in the usa can call me for free or close to it and I can call them for free. And it gets over the mental block of "Gee I have to call another country, which must be expensive."

    The only problems are sometimes sound quality is iffy if I am downloading stuff. And once in a while I get a wrong number at 2:00 which is ofcourse 7:00 pm New York time.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  112. And the fabric? by Naked+in+CA · · Score: 1

    And has anyone considered what this will do to the network frabric? Do you think that those companies which host the network will continue to upgrade their routers, switches, backbones for free just to make sure they can handle the additional traffic that VoIP could generate if everyone switched?

    Besides you realize that POTS has a 99.99% uptime, specifically for emergencies. I've read a lot of talk about batteries for your VoIP phones, UPS' and what not, but VoIP has a long way to go to match POTS. No I've never called 911 from my home but I'm not ready to give up that safety net yet for burgeoning technology. (I've called from my cell in the car twice, got through once so I've had experiences where I've had to call.)

  113. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by miltimj · · Score: 1

    Great story -- I'm very seriously considering getting VoIP (just haven't gotten around to it). Is there any software with it that you can configure on a file level?

    e.g. I'd like to delete voicemails (and not even know about them) if the WAV files are 100K or something (to delete the hangups).

    Also interested in eventually having an in-house speaker system read the Caller ID to me instead of ringing the phone.

    I'm just imagining that since it's getting closer and closer to the computer, that I can get the functionality...

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  114. Re: VoIP Questioned by wfeick · · Score: 1

    Yes, generally companies will require some sort of ID and credit check to purchase a phone line, but they don't require that the person who pays for the line be the person who is going to use it. Lot's of people pay for a phone line for their aging parent who has gotten forgetful about paying bills ontime, or for their child in school who cannot afford the line.

    I am simply paying for a phone line for my good friend Vladimir Macallan, and so it is his name that should be published in the phone book. Make up a suitably unrealistic name by mixing cross cultural first and last names, and you're pretty much guaranteed you won't accidentally get calls for people who really are looking for someone who happens to have that name.

  115. My remedies by Rytsarsky · · Score: 1

    I'm using Packet8's VoIP service. I get unlimited calling anywhere in US or Canada for under $20/month. I have a UPS that powers my Cable modem, router, VoIP box, and cordless phone base. Short Power outage are no problem, I have a cell phone that would come in handy for longer ones. The 911 issue is valid, but I have local fire/police numbers on speeddial. Packet8 has 911 service is some areas, but not mine yet. I have absolutely no complaints so far. The quality is roughly the same as a cell phone, there is a little bit of a delay, but I can live with that for the price. I wouldn't say that it's to a point that everyone should switch to VoIP for a primary phone line, but I'll be sticking with it for the time being.

    --
    God became man to enable men to become sons of God. -C.S. Lewis
  116. Re:Other DVRs work. And dTivo's by eison · · Score: 1

    My series one stand alone TiVo works fine over Vonage after I upped the Vonage bandwidth (simple selection box on the Vonage website)

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  117. You obviously don't live in the SF Bay Area by wsanders · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you call 911 on your cell phone in Bay Area, you will be routed to the CHP Golden Gate regional center and immediately placed on hold for 10 minutes. At least that's what's happened to me twice. I have the "local" numbers of various agencies programmed into my phone now.

    As for your cell phone working during an emergency, ha. As other posters have noticed, after even a minor disaster the first thing everyone does is jump on their cell phone. Since there haven't been any disasters in the SF Bay Area recently, my most recent data point comes from my brother, who was unable to use his cell phone for 45 min after the Seattle earthquake a few years ago.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  118. "Disconnected" POTS can still dial 911 by ChunkBeefpile · · Score: 1

    In the USA anyhow.
    When your phone service is "disconnected", it isn't physically disconnected, your service is just suspended.
    You can dial 911 on any home phone that still has a dial tone.
    Although the fact that nobody seems to know this is a problem. They should put that in the VOIP documentation.

  119. Vonage and Tivo by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    I can confirm the Tivo issue. The Cisco ATA186 that Vonage ships, is not setup to support T.37 or T.38. for FAX machines or V.Moip using G.711 and therefore my Tivo cannot phone home. I have now gone 300 days without my Hughes Tivo/Rcvr combo phoning home. Since the program guide is pulled from the air, there seems to be no downside to it but tech support gets upset when they hear this. I tell them I only own a cell phone, I don't mention Vonage. They tell me if I have broadband, to get the ethernet enabled version of my Tivo/Rcvr but unless they are going to ship it to me for free, I'm not paying for it.

    I heard Vonage converted to a Motorola gateway for the home, but I still don't think it uses any form of Modem-pass through over G711, I doubt even you turn all the compression settings off you get a modem to handshake with anything. And the Hughes Tivo doesn't allow you access to the modem settings inside the unit anyhow.

    This pretty much leaves me out on an island until I get a Hughes unit that has the ethernet and IP built in. I like the unit, it is far superior to the Sony unit I used to have, as Sony's used crappy Quantum Fireball hard drives that quickly fragmented and got bad sectors, causing the Tivo unit to stutter and even the pause function would get porked. This unit supports dual-LMB dish and you can watch one show and Tivo the other, other than the fact it can't call home over Vonage, it's ok.

    As to the E911 issue, Vonage has you fill out a form and send it in. I am moving and taking my Vonage with me, I need to fill out a new one. It routes 911 to the local PSAP and works just fine. Once Vonage send me confirmation I picked up the phone and dialed 911 and calmly told the operator that I was testing to see if PSAP routing was working over my IP phone. She confirmed my address and all was fine. So, don't let them FUD you on that.

  120. Phone book blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a Verizon landline business subscriber, and I am not in either the white or yellow pages Verizon phone book that plopped on my doorstep the other day. And don't even talk to me about trying to reach someone there (how can we blather on and on about giving you non-existent excellent service?) So there's one more VoIP non-issue.

  121. Re:Yeah, TiVo sucks so does comcast but I like VoI by DeadSea · · Score: 1
    Its not quite that close to the computer, at least with the provider I have. 1TouchTone.com sent me a black box that connects my phone to the WAN, but it doesn't have any configuration on it directly.

    Voicemail is all handled upstream by the provider. This is good because you will get voicemail even when not connected to the internet. If I wanted to delete voicemail without seeing them it would simply be an email filter. However, my phone has the flashing light that I have new voicemail and the only way to turn that off is to listen to the voicemail over the phone by calling 123 and entering my password.

  122. Re: Cell phone / Remote phone privacy by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

    Lawyers can't legally demand attorney-client privilege for any information discussed over cell or cordless phones.

    That's complete bullshit. The standard is a "reasonable expectation of privacy." A reasonable person expects their phone conversations to be private. If they didn't, we wouldn't need laws governing wiretaps.

    Hell, privilege even extends to a call made from a pay phone in a public place.

    The standard is not whether it's possible for you to be overheard. The standard is whether you can reasonably expect to be overheard.

    --

    I write in my journal
  123. VoIP works awesome for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly wonder who paid the author to write such a negative article. I have Broadvoice and several friends of mine have Packet8 and every one one of us is extremely happy with his VoIP service as well as the sound quality. None of us had any problems so far and as much as I have been concerned the installation has been the easiest thing on earth. Also, I find the argument about 911 calls to be absolutely irrelevant since every city has local emergency numbers - you just have to look it up or ask for them and that should be everyone's own responsibility and not the one of the VoIP provider.
    VoIP already beats legacy landlines by far and once you got it you will never go back. Instead of bashing VoIP the phone companies should simply accept it.

  124. VOIP for dummies... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Connecting to the POTS world:

    A properly setup H.323 network (VOIP) should have a gateway that connects the VOIP world to the POTS network - voila! Your pizza is served! As more and more of the network is converted to VOIP, less POTS gateways will be needed - until one magical day when there is no POTS network (20+ years from now - my guestimate).

    No 911 service! - BS - many people today opt for having a cellphone only - and disconnect, or never connect POTS in the first place. How do they get 911 service!!!? Through their cellphone! So the fact there is not any dialtone in their house is a moot point for exclusive cellphone user. VOIP landline phone users will be responsible for making sure their equipment has backup power - not only their phone - but all the firewalls/routers on their network that provide connectivity to the outside network for VOIP telephony, as well. In a cable company model, they will have a digital splitter to provide your phone service via a VOIP phone; for DSL, you will need a DSL modem, an (wireless) ethernet switch(router)/firewall and a VOIP phone - or software on your computer that emulates a VOIP phone - either way, the user will need to provide backup power for their phones when the power goes down. As mentioned before, the technology is in flux - so you will see changes as the best way from a functional and cost perspective shakes out. A large number of tech saavy users are already willing to take responcibility for keeping their phones charged up - this will carry over into the VOIP space, as well, in the long run.

    Security problems? - BS - as pointed out elsewhere, your 900Mhz cordless and your cellphone are wide open for interception. If you want really secure communications, don't use any transport medium. If you accept a lower level of security, that is 'good enough' - then I am sure there well be encryption options available, either through special voip phone sets (as can be found now in the POTS world today), or in the form of software to emulate this functionality on a computer.

    The article presented was thinly disguised FUD - nothing more.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  125. I haven't subscribed to POTS services for 10 years by hpj · · Score: 1

    I was one of those people who switched over to cell phone only service almost 10 years ago and have never looked back.

    Now I have gotten a VoIP account though because I relocated to California from Sweden and my cellphone bill was consistently over $150 a month. Now I have a VoIP terminated in Sweden so all my friends there can call me paying only for the local call and so do I (Making the call cost go from $0.29 a minute to around $0.01, way lower than even the cheapest calling card solutions). So for people who have migrated there simply is no substitute for VoIP.

    Also I can concur with a lot of other posts that setting up Tivo without POTS is no problem. /Mauritz

  126. VoIP for home users might have these issues.. by ctime · · Score: 1

    I have a unique prospective on this issue as I'm actually installing business grade avaya voip equipment for a living (in hawaii atm no less!).

    Now, for home users, yes, I can see if these could be an issue, but for business users, the advantage is simply amazing. We have failsafes in place so each location either has few hard phone lines (using cisco fxo cards) or for the big sites we've got a 24 channel PRI circuit, so all local outgoing calls and 911 still works as expected. Interoffice communication which used to cost a ton of money now rides over the wan circuits at little to no cost. Plus, the features with the new voip systems are amazing and really useful for business users.

    I guess what I'm saying is that the issues outlined in the article really don't effect large business users AT ALL, which is where a very large portion of the money going towards voip is being spent.

  127. Sigh. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed how many people bothered to respond to this "story". And a good story it is, too, as in "whopper".

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  128. VoIP over the Internet vs. VoIP over provider net by dr+fish+spit · · Score: 1

    Getting VoIP phone service from a provider such ad Vonage is pretty good I think, but I hate when I see a trade mag that says "Go to VoIP now or else your company will go bankrupt" or something stupid and then a manager sees the headline and decides right then he's going to do VoIP. Trying to do VoIP in an enterprise with branch offices using DSL/Cable links and encrypting them with VPNs is tough. I've experienced this first hand. When voice packets have to traverse multiple providers, who knows when you're going to get high latency. The kind that will make your phone quality terrible and annoying. This make sense really because there's now QoS on the Internet really. I've heard of a few companies trying to do VoIP this way. It's cheap because you just need broadband in each branch office, but it's way too unreliable. They find out the hard way that they still need their frame-relay network to do decent VoIP. Or else if the can get SLAs from a provider on broadband links they maybe could do it. But a lot of times the big providers can't give you SLA based broadband in small cities.

  129. Re: Cell phone / Remote phone privacy by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have thin walls too.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  130. Broadband over Power Line by rarkm · · Score: 1

    I've seen several broadband over powerline presentations, and the question of "what happens if the power goes out" was answered pretty definitively (and convincingly, IMHO) that BoPL is engineered and designed to work whether or not the lines are energized. Since BoPL will be used for the power companies own surveillance and control of the distribution system (including detection of faults and other problems) this makes obvious sense. Of course if there's a physical break in the line things might go out for downstream branches of the distribution system, but in that case, the telephone system is probably also knocked out, since telephone lines often reside on the same pole.

    There's always trusty wireless cell phones and amateur radio (unless the FCC wipes out the Amateur Service and sells off its spectrum to the highest bidder, that is). Handwritten letters often arrive at their destination in a week or two.

    --
    [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
  131. Issues fairly easily resolved by rshimizu12 · · Score: 1

    Ok let's see: 911: a issue now, but most people have cell phones. Power: Harder problem, but most people have cell phones. Not certain if Power over POT's is possible. Phonebook listings: I don't understand why we so behind. Why is it that when I want to lookup a business or person I am forced to enter a city or state. Why can't I just Google. Could need a regulatory solution. I think the phone companies want to maintain control. Security: Encryption and other technologies are coming along. So in summary I see problems, but no intractable issues.

  132. VoIP access throughout the house..... by slob-o-matic · · Score: 1

    I will be the first to admit that I haven't done much research in this area, but what (if anything) is available on the market to push that VoIP dialtone to the rest of the house? I thought that right now, most VoIP providers were only able to power one RJ 11 off the ATA that they give you to put behind the broadband modem. Yeah, there are new multi-handset phone systems out there but no one wants to buy a new phone "system" just because they get new service - if that becomes a requirement then VoIP @ home will never be more then a passing fancy. As I write this and mull it over (and having ZERO TDM knowledge) I would think that you would need to run wiring from the VoIP demarc device to the main box that your telco lines come into your home from and do some sort of cross-connect there. How else are you going to get that current going across the lines so that they rest of the phones in the house will ring?

    Alot of you were poo poo'ing the security blanket feature of a POTS line being up even in a blackout. Yeah, many people have cell service, but it's nice to have old reliable there when the shit hits the fan. I hate the LEC's but they do serve a purpose.

    1. Re:VoIP access throughout the house..... by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      I have Vonage.. and here is your answer. Disconnect your phone line from the box outside of the house. Now take the outlet on your ATA and plug it in to a wall outlet. Viola... every other jack is hot. Or use a splitter and even have a phone at that location.

  133. Re:VoIP over the Internet vs. VoIP over provider n by slob-o-matic · · Score: 1

    First things first, we all have to start talking the same language and stop comparing apples and oranges. First off, there is a big difference between providing IPT (IP Telephony) and VoIP. VoIP is simply the transport of voice as data packets. Every major carrier is doing it these days for long haul (trans or intercontinental). IPT is when you provide dial tone and the sundry services that we take for granted from Ma Bell as well as the newer converged services like unified messaging. We also end up getting sucked into ridiculous arguements about security, QoS, etc. I deploy IPT for a living and not one of the approx 20k phones that we have deployed to over 20 customers has ridden the Internet in any way shape or form. It's 100% IP traffic over the corporate LAN / WAN. Intersite comms are over customer T's - nothing else is acceptable in the enterprise! For that reason, security is a non-issue as well. There are the same problems for IPT as there are for any data transitting the network. A hacker is usuallly going to do more damage stealing data that is sitting around then randomly trying to snoop into live calls between end users. Defending against these and other IPT / VoIP attacks is a serious issue, but there are ways to deal with it. Other standard telecom issues are present as well i.e. monitoring long distance and 900 type numbers. QoS is no joke - but good engineering and a true commitment from the customer to make it happen will usually win that arguement as well. And as a shameless plug for a company that I love but have NO relationsip with, take a swing by http://www.crystalvoice.com/ - they have got some SLICK technology. I have no idea how it works, but I have tried it over a 56k dialup and it blew me away. I have to guess that someone is going to buy them sooner or later - Cisco, Yahoo, Google?? Done with my rant - c ya.

  134. Inconceivable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice Princess Bride reference there... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/