Users who have been called thieves by the entertainment industry should sue for libel.
Calling someone a thief is very serious. Under English law, and therefore under US law as well possibly, accusations of theft do not require the accusee to prove real damages - the accusation is damage enough.
Perhaps if the industry was punished for doing this they would stop using such emotional language in order to make their point seem more serious than it is.
She didn't just skip school a couple of times, she attacked other children. The choices were tagging or a stay in a young offenders institution. Her lawyer says tagging was preferable
When it comes to security, getting root access to your machine in this case, many people would feel safer if the burden of proof was on the browser writer (MS included).
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could say "we're not using IE until you prove it is safe" rather than you saying "it is safe to use browser X until someone proves it isn't"
When are the writers of other browsers going to release the documentation proving that the gopher handling code has been security auditted, that sufficient gopher testcases have been built, and that the browser passed all the gopher handling tests?
The reason there are aren't reports of security holes in gopher code in other browers is that no-one has looked, not that the holes don't exist.
Slashdot Mirror
I live in a city
I hope they don't run out of blue.
Users who have been called thieves by the entertainment industry should sue for libel.
Calling someone a thief is very serious. Under English law, and therefore under US law as well possibly, accusations of theft do not require the accusee to prove real damages - the accusation is damage enough.
Perhaps if the industry was punished for doing this they would stop using such emotional language in order to make their point seem more serious than it is.
Nine twenty-nine (Pacific Time.
D-VHS has a maximum data rate of nearly 30Mbps.
http://www.dell.com/us/en/biz/learnmore/learnmore_ os_servers_popup_pedge_esg_linux.htm
NASA false-color these images
Since it's an infra-red camera, yes.
She didn't just skip school a couple of times, she attacked other children. The choices were tagging or a stay in a young offenders institution. Her lawyer says tagging was preferable
When it comes to security, getting root access to your machine in this case, many people would feel safer if the burden of proof was on the browser writer (MS included).
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could say "we're not using IE until you prove it is safe" rather than you saying "it is safe to use browser X until someone proves it isn't"
When are the writers of other browsers going to release the documentation proving that the gopher handling code has been security auditted, that sufficient gopher testcases have been built, and that the browser passed all the gopher handling tests?
The reason there are aren't reports of security holes in gopher code in other browers is that no-one has looked, not that the holes don't exist.
"hostile Gopher site"? Ouch ... I think shall wear kevlar underpants while using IE in future.
Here's why
This model works really well when one of the puzzles in the game is to decrypt an email encrypted with a 1024-bit PGP key.