Slashdot Mirror


Europol Describes Data Retention Desires

freakyboff writes "Found this on cryptome.org - It's a confidential document from Europol, basically a wish list of all data that they would like people to keep. Many things that violate peoples privacy are in the minimum requirements, such as caller line identification and assigned IP for dial-up Internet access; e-mail and ftp server logs; and companies running web servers should keep information on what information users put on their servers." Statewatch is a good source for more information. I find it odd that Europe is moving from a position of protecting a great deal of data with fairly strong laws to requiring that telecommunications companies store data on their customers for as long as seven years so that law enforcement can go data-mining - skipping the intermediate step of making it optional.

135 comments

  1. oh a wish list by LinuxCumShot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it's a wish list? who cares! i had a nuke on my christmas list, doesn't mean i'm going to blow up the world.

    --
    -- OMFG = Oh My Floatse Goatse
  2. Help save cryptome's poor server by sludgely · · Score: 4, Informative

    Use a mirror:

    Thanks to A for mirror:

    http://www.lessgov.org/cryptome
    Thanks to SC for crypto software:

    http://mrstef.dns2go.com/crypto
    Thanks to AJ for mirrors:

    http://cryptome.sabotage.org
    ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/varia/Cryptome/cryptome.o rg /

    the whole shebang is available at:
    ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/varia/Cryptome/
    Thanks to mb for mirror:

    http://while1.org/~xm/cryptome.tgz
    Thanks to VP for mirror:

    http://munitions.vipul.net/documents/cryptome/

  3. It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like the european governments care that much about their citizens privacy. In britain, for example, there are buses equiped with as many as 7(!) videocameras, just to protect the bus from grafiti.
    At london subways, there are already systems for identifying people using it in real time! Pretty horrid, I'd say.

    Anyway, it's not like the governments here really care that much about our privacy...

    1. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALLRIGHT ALLREADY!! Quit complaining... Use Crypto - that's why Phil invented PGP. Start using it, or some other form of strong crypto.

      Imagine what would happen of EVERYONE used Crypto.

      If anyone wanted to hide their tracks, they have M$ and Hotmail to thank. Sure, they know the IP, Node, Date and time, but they cant possibly know who sent it, or be able to read it.

    2. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, being British and having travelled extensively on the public transport system, I can assure you I've never seen more than a couple on buses.

      More importantly, though, I feel safer when in the presence of these cameras. And so do many others. Come here, check it out, you might find you liked it.

      And more on topic, cameras are in PUBLIC places. The issue of data logging is entirely different, because it concerns keeping information that I thought was being placed on an unloggable common carrier. If that makese sense.

    3. Re:It's europe, for god sake by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty horrid, I'd say.

      We've had bombs placed in the centers of our cities, people being shot, mugged, raped and generally fucked over so whats wrong with putting up the cameras if they help prevent it, or at least track down the guilty person afterwards.

      Why should I care if the police/govt/anyone watches me walk down the main street of town or sitting on a bus? I never understood the argument that they're invading our privacy by putting camera's in public places.

    4. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Dark+Legend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not what it's used for now, it's what it WILL be used for in the future, once the infrastructure is there to be abused it will be abused.. Have you never read 1984, yes i know it's a cliche, but it is SOO on the money.. How do you disagree with a government that has you under surveilance 24/7? How do you organise a resistance or a revolution without planning with other people? How can this EVER happen when you are under this constant surveillance. The more you hand people the means to control you the more they will try. Do you think it could never get to this stage? Well it will with people like you saying 'So What?' at every turn. These things are never a sudden shock, they are a gradual eroding change.. Barely perceptibly slipping towards complete control, before you know it, complee control IS possible and then it is a matter of time before it IS exerted.. once you are in that situation there is no way out.. Fully automated surveilance with facial recognition and computer controlled tracking of all subjects it's already theoretically possible, the infrastructure just needs setting up.. and THAT is why you should care..

    5. Re:It's europe, for god sake by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      You appear to have misunderstood me. I'm not saying "so what?" and letting it go by. I've made an informed decision that I'd rather we had the camera's than not have them and run a much higher risk of being shot/blown up/robbed/beaten up in public. I've read 1984 and the (imo much closer to the money) brave new world and they're both scary books. A little paranoia never did anyone any harm but there are perfectly valid reasons to have camera's on the streets other than some great orwellian conspiracy.

      iirc neither in 1984 nor in brave new world were the oppressive regimes brought on as a "gradually eroding change", instead they were created fairly suddenly and violently by wars (I think, don't have either book to hand now) so it's not a great example.

    6. Re:It's europe, for god sake by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      people being shot, mugged, raped and generally fucked over so whats wrong with putting up the cameras if they help prevent it, or at least track down the guilty person afterwards.

      People are shot, raped, beat up, get drunk, get high, write anti-government essays, organize terrorist activities, and plan revolutions all from their own private homes! So what's wrong with putting up the cameras in everyone's house, if it helps prevent it, or at least track down the guilty person afterwards?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it won't be by a violent war that the Civilized State suddenly gains absolute power over your life, at least not anymore. We can't fight those kinds of wars in Europe and North America because they destroy too much infrastructure.

      It will be by degrees - with the State taking an inch here and there, little by little. It will be so gradual that you don't even notice, and then one day, you will wake up and BAM, the police are knocking on your door because you accidentally posted to a suspicious newsgroup, and then the next BAM you hear will be your brain riding on the end of a bullet.

      Consider that Adolph Hitler did not rise to power overnight. First he found a like minded group of thugs, and with those thugs he suborned larger and larger groups until Germany was in his control. Sure, he used brutality, but was careful in his application of it, always making sure that the reasons "sounded" right. Then, one day, he up and invades Poland. How many people back in Berlin actually knew how he did it? All they knew was that the radio and newspapers said "POLAND INVADES!" . Next thing you know, World War II and we're all invited to play.

      It won't be a sudden revolution, it will be slow and quiet. That's why we have to fight to protect our freedoms - right now, we have the option of doing it peacefully, speaking out and using our collective voices.

      Someday, we may not have that option.

    8. Re:It's europe, for god sake by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      It's not a black and white issue of simply what prevents crime and what doesn't. It's a case of balancing the need for security with the needs for privacy (to avoid big brother syndrome). Putting everyone in the country in prison would prevent crime but that doesn't make it a good idea. Putting cameras in public isn't even really a compromise because as far as I'm concerned I only gain from it.

      If any party here tried to put cameras in peoples houses they would be thrown out at the next election (or probably before). If any military government took over for whatever reason (e.g. a 1984 style ww3) and decided to put CCTV everywhere, they could do it anyway regardless of whether a public system was already in place.

      I understand your arguments, I just can't see the British public or government ever buying into it. Maybe it's me being shortsighted but after hearing all the dodgy shit some politicians get up to I hardly think they're going to want cameras watching them all the time either.

    9. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Bobzibub · · Score: 2

      Personally I like my cops walking the beat, not watching TV.

      Cheers,
      -b

    10. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People are shot, raped, beat up, get drunk, get high, write anti-government essays, organize terrorist activities, and plan revolutions all from their own private homes! So what's wrong with putting up the cameras in everyone's house, if it helps prevent it, or at least track down the guilty person afterwards?

      Not a hell of a lot, as ling as you don't mind your masturbation techniques being critiqued by the donut-stuffers down at the local station house. With what these guys want, George Washington and Patrick Henry wouldn't have had a chance and I'd be speaking English with an English accent.

      But you just go and sell your ass to the surveillance pimps if you like.

    11. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bring up a good point that everyone is missing, that is despite all the cameras and face scanning, etc. in Europe (esp. UK), crime is on the RISE. I repeat, RISE. Go look at the stats. Everyone has this idea (from TV or who-knows-where) that crime is only an issue in the US. Thus, what we have is a large-scale invasion of privacy for little or no benefit.

    12. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the "public place" justification for cameras. You're either for the government observing you with cameras, or you aren't.

      Is how you see the situation?:

      They're not watching me, they're watching the public.
      They're not watching me, because I've done nothing wrong.
      They're not watching me because I've nothing to hide.
      They're not watching me.

      The cameras don't automatically start recording when a criminal walks by. They're on all the time, watching everyone, that includes you.

    13. Re:It's europe, for god sake by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      The point is that while you are in a public place, you're being watched anyway, so what's the big problem with a camera being among the watchers? Are opposed to police partols, too? If you want to do something you don't want anyone to watch, you're not going to do it in a public place anyway.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    14. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you allow government cameras in your house? How about if they only put them outside the windows. Anyone from the street can see through your windows anyway.

      You equivate the observation of one policeman to that of one camera. That's not a justifiable comparison. If what you do is being recorded, you may as well have a policeman for every person in a crowd, since each of them can be observed in detail.

      Certainly you aren't arguing for having one policeman for every person on the street?

      Why wouldn't you want a camera inside of your house?

    15. Re:It's europe, for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be interpreting the book in a way that distances it from your real world perspective. I think your subconcious is is shielding you from something you're afraid of.

      History just appears to move rapidly because you can flip the pages of a history book as fast as you want. Look closely and you'll see all the subtle steps that lead to one major change or another.

      The people behind the cameras are the same species as those being observed. If there is a way to abuse the power of the cameras, you can be certain that people will will find a way to do so. Like water finding its level.

  4. Re:Firstus Postus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome first post there!

    Repectus Maximius.

  5. Re:Firstus Postus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello - I am a CLIT member ... however I have been banned due to extremely low karma. I currently posses -17 Karma on an account I opened two days ago. Does anyone have some words of wisdom for me? Will I be back after 72 hours? Or does the extra low karma keep me out longer?

    That is all now - long live CLIT.

  6. I'm just waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some dumbass German guy to reply to your post to say how much more America sucks than Europe in this respect.

    1. Re:I'm just waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yez, you are so right, my american friend. Why shouldn't our own governments be able to zpy on us when the american NSA is already doing that?
      /Dumbass german

  7. Cost? by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

    At a certain point, the gov't must take cost into consideration. So, I stole 15 blank licenses from the DMV The gov't spent 50 for my court paperwork and an additional 200 in probation costs. hmm.......should they have just fined me instead? or not bothered? they lost money, given that each blank is 89 cents to produce. In Britain, repairing graffeti has got to be cheaper then maintaining 7 camperas on a public bus. You get my point. THe ISPs will eventually rebel due to cost. Either that, or they will try and turn over monitoring and data storage to the government.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More on England:
      They like to invade on people's privacy. That must be their reason to put position tracking devices on 12-year-olds when they stay away from school... A bit drastic, I'd say

    2. Re:Cost? by bluGill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In your case yes, but consider for a moment the cost of no security whatsoever on the blanks. Want a blank license, just walk in and take as many as you want, no tracking, no chance of getting punished. Not you do you take 15 (presume that you need them for something), but everyone else does too. Now it isn't 15 blanks, it is 2,000 at a total cost of 1784 dollars. Starting to get meaningfull already. (note, the number 2000 was pulled out of the air). Now multiply that out by a few years...

      Security and prevention always comes at a cost. Insurance companys can draw fancy curves and graphs to show where your cost for secuiry (including punishing offenders, and insurance) is the least compared to your potential losses. Perhaps it isn't worth the goverment's time to do anything about the theif of blanks, perhaps it is. (I don't know how to do that analysis) At some point though you have something that costs more then it looks like it should because you can't account for the losses spending that much prevents.

    3. Re:Cost? by stubear · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Oh, really persuasive argument there chief. Crime costs too much to prosecute so we shoudl just fine the criminal and send them on theri merry way. What happens when graffiti becomes more common? It raises the cost to clean up and while it might still be more expensive to prosecute ALL those involved, it increases taxes paid by the citizens because cleanup costs have increased.

    4. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cos I have a right to live in a crime free world.

      So, it costs more, but then I don't have stuffed nicked.

    5. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell wanker.

    6. Re:Cost? by Fantanicity · · Score: 1

      She didn't just skip school a couple of times, she attacked other children. The choices were tagging or a stay in a young offenders institution. Her lawyer says tagging was preferable

    7. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats next, the evils of locking people who commit crimes in prision, nooo they taken away the freedoms of some crimanal.

      No, I guess you USAian are right, we should just kill every fucker that commits a crime.

    8. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      DUDE!!! ISP's already KEEP this kind of information. I'm not surprised if there is a law that says they are required to keep these logs for a considerable amount of time. Most of these logs are kept for a month, and are either ditched or archived.

      ISP's already know what number you dialed into, what number you're calling from, date, time, IP, duration of the session.

      Even with this information, it is next to impossible to track someone down using this information. Even with a court order.

      I've heard of some ISP's that won't allow your call to complete unless you un-block your number.

    9. Re:Cost? by gotih · · Score: 1

      a lot of people like good graffiti. maybe if those who practice it didn't have to look over thier shoulder they could make something you like (i doubt picasso had a friend watching for cops as he painted). and if it becomes more common that probably means people are getting practice and getting better.

      personally, i like graffiti. i have 4 murals in my apartment, painted by local kids. i gave them the whole day to work and they did a great job. most people think of tags when they think graffiti -- tags are the knee-jerk response to a society who won't let artists finish.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    10. Re:Cost? by stubear · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I have no problem with graffiti art. If graffiti artists were hired to paint a mural in a local community on a wall set aside for this artwork, I'm all for it. What I have a problem with is vandalism. Most graffiti is nothing more than this.

    11. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd clean up the gene pool at least.

    12. Re:Cost? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Hehe. Sometimes I wish I could leave people with their 'clean gene pool' of choice. I think, more often than not, you'd find the people made from the your preferred 'gene' pool would be just as likely to kill your before you kill them.

      Do you really want to be left alone in a gene pool filled with the same intelligent, elitist, passionate genes that you have? Stop assuming they'd all share your opinions and start thinking about having to face off against those with skills equivilent to yours (whatever those may be.)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    13. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, there are required to keep this info even now already. But the don't save all my http headers, ftp sessions and IRC nicknames and mail sessions. That's the problem. It's not just knowing you where online, but also knowing you visit slashdot and send mail to person X.

      It's a stupid solution anyway, everybody who really has somthing to hide can easily prevent getting his communication logged. Nothing is said about peer-to-peer networks and IM clients, nor about SLL and SSH trafic. And even the i could write my own prog, even based on using ICMP to transfer the message, they will have a hell of a lot of data to capture to make sure they got everything. That will likely make it impossible for an ISP to comply and still offer their service at an acceptable price...

    14. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THe ISPs will eventually rebel due to cost
      They already do

    15. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Learn to spell wanker

      W-A-N-K-E-R. Not difficult, is it?

  8. well for gods sakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please nuke palestine. they deserve it. bad.

    1. Re:well for gods sakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

  9. Re:Firstus Postus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to lower your Karma to -17 in 2 days....well you must be an utter DUMBASS. posting the most STUPID comments. ever considered that? why don't you just get the fuck out of Taco's Eden before CowboyNeal shoves a poll option up your sorry ass.

  10. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the data should be open as well?

  11. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like, so 1984.

    Why will they stop trampling on our rights with such disregard. I understand that we all have to make certain sacrifices, but when they make requests like those then the terrorists have already won.

    1. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEAL WITH IT DUDE! - These are the times, and it's only going to get worse. Start encrypting your Email. You DO put your letters in envelopes, don't you?

      If you have secrets to keep, then do the appropriate action to protect them.

    2. Re:1984 by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      Studied game theory at all? That only works for me if everyone else does it. Otherwise, it's like wearing a big "INVESTIGATE ME" sign. Better to blend in with all the other traffic, and hope they don't have a reason to look. Unfortunately, if that's the logic most people use, we're all screwed.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

  12. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mabey well all should host our own reality tv show

  13. Ha. Ha. Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Europe never quite got past their neo-facist control fetish. I seem to remember europeans talking about how much more free they are on every new "U.S. passes justified security law, infringes on some privacy" article to come along.

    Well HA!

    I'm glad I live in America. Still the MOST FREE, MOST DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!

    Down with the Eurotrash fascists!

  14. Is retention the problem? Or over-collection? by alouts · · Score: 1
    So they want these records to be held on to for longer than they are now. Bad as that may be, wouldn't it be simpler to fight the request if the information didn't get logged in huge detail in the first place? Are all of those details really necessary?

  15. MOD PARENT DIAGONALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dare you!

    HA! I knew you couldn't do it. Sucka!

  16. Most likely do to the War On Terror by WillSeattle · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that it's more likely to be a side effect of the US War On Terror that is driving them to keep better log info.

    Sadly, most people are unwisely giving up their privacy under the rubrik of "cracking down on terror", while failing to realize that it isn't that useful in actually doing something about it.

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
    1. Re:Most likely do to the War On Terror by bafu · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems to me that it's more likely to be a side effect of the US War On Terror that is driving them to keep better log info.

      I doubt the EU is just waiting for the US to tell them what to do all the time. It's probably just the normal disconnect between the people whose job it is to investigate things and other elements of the gov't. The law enforcement elements will obviously focus on the benefits of collecting and keeping data that will make it easier for them to investigate things (especially in internal documents, like this one). It is to be hoped that their wish list, once offered, will be turned back due to privacy concerns. I guess what I am saying is that the bigger story will be the larger EU reaction to this, not the proposal itself.

  17. A ruse by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Informative
    This certainly seems like the US strong-arming the EU to pass these measures. After they get passed in the EU it is much easier to get them passed in the USA.

    George Bush, President of the USA, sent this demand -- among many others -- to the EU on October 16, 2001:

    Revise draft privacy directives that call for mandatory destruction to permit the retention of critical data for a reasonable period.
    1. Re:A ruse by GGardner · · Score: 2
      After they get passed in the EU it is much easier to get them passed in the USA.


      Huh? How about some evidence for this? Do you think that the Kyoto protocols are going to be mandated in the US because they've been accepted in Europe? Ditto for socialized medicine? Mandated shorter work weeks? The Euro?

    2. Re:A ruse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember the Mickey Mouse Copyright Extension act?

      When that was proposed in the US, there was some political opposition, and the proposal might not have passed.

      But then large US corporations lobbied the EU into passing a directive saying:

      • Copyright term should be extended in the EU.
      • Unless US also extends their copyright term, US corporations cannot have their works protected for this longer term in the EU countries.

      And suddenly there was no problem in the US with passing the copyright extension law.

  18. Just a Reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Source still has well under 5% of all computer use.

  19. Opening for a proxy service, maybe? by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I'm a syadmin at a University research lab, and when I want to do something the University may not like on the net (visit websites that may violate AUP or something) and I don't want those nosy upstream admins to notice, I pipe it through an IPSec tunnel I set up between my lab and my home network, since my DSL provider doesn't care what I do. So, I'll login remotely and run mozilla or something on my home comp and pipe the display back through the tunnel, so all anybody between my computer at the lab and my computer at home would see is a bunch of encrypted ESP packets flowing back and forth.

    I wonder if a company in a place where laws like this don't exist (is Sealand still around?) could set up a proxy service provider, so all your traffic (or at least any traffic you don't want somebody spying on, like email, some web traffic) would be routed securely through them, so your local ISP wouldn't have anything but encrypted packets to monitor. Then they wouldn't have anything of consequence to share when the cops come knocking. I'd pay for such a service, would you?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Opening for a proxy service, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just encrypt your email. Now there's a thought.

      Btw, gabber using the jabber protocol can encrypt your instant messaging using gpg.

    2. Re:Opening for a proxy service, maybe? by Shimbo · · Score: 1
      Or you could just encrypt your email. Now there's a thought.


      That does no good at all. We are talking about ISPs retaining mail headers; similar to the telco keeping records of numbers dialled, so the cops can try to identify contacts. What you need is a secure anonymizing service in a different jurisdiction.


      Not that encrypting your mail isn't a good idea too - but this legislation isn't about wiretaps.

    3. Re:Opening for a proxy service, maybe? by lu010300 · · Score: 1

      Check out www.primedius.com. They provide secure surfing/proxy service similar to what you described.

  20. I'm the Operator with my pocket calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I'm adding ... and subtracting ...

    What computer use do you refer to? VIC-20? Timex? Abacus?

    The strong-willed Open Source community of developers does not hold even 0.05% of the software used on computers.

    Only we learn where to place the decimal will the legions of Open Source developers reach the attainable goal of replacing DOS 6.2.

  21. RMS by cscx · · Score: 1

    I didn't know RMS posted here on a regular basis. Doesn't that fit in with his new idea on an "open-source spy satellite?"

  22. So??? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    There probably is another, more secret, document floating around Europol. In this document, they ask for
    - Every EU citizen submitting a full report each month about all Internet activity they had that month;
    - Each of those reports to be compared against the actual internet usage, by a bunch of underpaid exploited 3rd world country workers
    - Any activity unaccounted-for punished by a slap in the face with a largeish wet fish.

    When this highly secret document makes it into a proposal for EU legislation, then I'll start to petition against the proposal. Gah... If i had to worry about every little paper that fell off some clerk's desk...

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:So??? by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      slap in the face with a largeish wet fish

      ***twiztidlojik slaps JaredOfEuropa around with a large trout!

      It's a large trout. Go bone up on your mIRC before you post something like that again =D

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
  23. Just horrific.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Data that must be retained by Internet Service Providers:

    1. Network Access Systems - Date and time of connection of client to server - User-id and password - Assigned IP address NAS Network attached storage IP address - Number of bytes transmitted and received - Call Line Identification (CLI) - User's credit card number / bank account for the subscription payment

    2. Email servers - Date and time of connection of client to server - IP address of sending computer
    - Message ID (msgid) - Sender (login@domain)
    - Receiver (login@domain) - In some cases identifying information of email retrieved

    3. File upload and download servers - Date and time of connection of client to server - P source address - User-id and password - Path and filename of data object uploaded or downloaded

    4. Web servers - Date and time of connection of client to server - IP source address - Operation (i.e. GET command) - Path of operation (to retrieve html page or image file) - Those companies which are offering their servers to accommodate web pages should retain details of the users who inserts these web pages (date, time, IP, User ID, etc.) - "Last visited page" - Response codes

    5. Usenet - Date and time of connection of client to server - Protocol process ID (nnrpd[NNN...N]) - Hostname (DNS name of assigned dynamic IP address)
    - Basic client activity (no content) - Posted message ID

    6. Internet Relay Chat - Date and time of connection of client to server - Duration of session - Nickname used during IRC connection - Hostname and/or IP address

    7. Data that must be retained by telephone companies for fixed numbers' users: - Called number even if the call was not successful - Calling number even if the call was not successful
    - Date and time of the start and the end of the communication - Type of communication (incoming, outgoing, link through, conference) - In case of conference calls or call to link through services, all intermediate numbers - Information both on the subscriber and on the user (name, date of birth, address) - Address where the bill is sent - Both dates (starting and ending) from when the subscription has been signed and dismissed - Type of connection the user has (normal, ISDN, ADSL, etc., and whether it is for in-out calls or for incoming only) - The forwarded called number - The time span of the call - Bank account number/other means of payment - For a better investigative purpose Telcos should be able to know the nature of the telecommunication: voice/modem/fax etc.

    8. Data that must be retained by telephone companies for mobile / satellite numbers' users:- Called number even if the call was not successful- Calling number even if the call was not successful - Date and time of the start and the end of the communication - Type of communication (incoming, outgoing, link through, conference) - For conference calls or call to link through services, all intermediate numbers - Information both on the subscriber and on the user (name, date of birth, address) - IMSI and IMEI numbers - Address where the bill is sent - Both dates (starting and ending) from when the subscription has been signed and dismissed - The identification of the end user device - The identification and geographical location of the cells that were used to link the end users (caller, called user) to the telecommunication network - Geographical llocation (coordinates) of the mobile satellite ground station - Type of communication (incoming, outgoing, link through, conference) [duplicate item] - GPRS service - For conference calls or call to link through services, all intermediate numbers [duplicate item] - The forwarded called number - The time span of the call - Bank account number/other means of payment - As GPRS and UMTS work on Internet base, thus all the data above mentioned (as IP address) should be preserved - For a better investigative purpose Telcos should be able to know the nature of the tgelecommunication: voice/modem/fax etc.

  24. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be on yours if you'll be on mine.

  25. We could call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lake Gaza"

    1. Re:We could call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I hear there is a lack of parking space over there. I'm for making it a parking lot.

  26. Interpol and Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember what happened to Interpol after Germany overran France? Well it became part of the Gestapo. Many Many people lost their lives because of information in Interpol files.

    1. Re:Interpol and Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. But you shouldn't forget that the Germans also helped rebuild Interpol after the war. Come to think of it, they also helped with jet propulsion, missile technology, medical know-how (experimentation in concentration camps), GeStaPo intelligence and personnel were absorbed into the CIA and FBI. But also, without American aid such as supplying IBM card reader and card sorting equipment the holocaust wouldn't have been possible, GM produced replacement parts and later entire Tiger tanks in Switzerland...

  27. Isn't this already standard practice? by mpearce · · Score: 2, Informative
    Every ISP I have ever worked with has kept logs of assigned IP for dialup, caller id (when available and not cost prohibitive), email and ftp server logs. These logs are referred to when following up complaints of abuse (mainly spammers). Even if an ISP were not interested in fielding abuse complaints, they would be insane not to keep this information in the face of subpeonas and requests for cooperation by law enforcement (and lately DMCA notices).

    Why is this a violation of privacy? While the information may be handled casually in many cases, it is not published publicly. Do users really think they have an expectation of privacy in this way? Do they really think they have a right to be untracable and unaccountable for their actions online?

    I know slashdotters seem to be always fighting a losing battle for privacy, but these logs seem to be common sense.

    1. Re:Isn't this already standard practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In New Zealand it's illegal to keep personal information about someone (probably including their internet activity), without first obtaining their consent. You also have to tell them what you're going to do with the information, and you can't use it for anything else.

      Works well for us Kiwi's, so in short - no, I don't think it's that off-the-wall to expect privacy.

    2. Re:Isn't this already standard practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you kept the logs for 8 years then???

      Remeber the directive which this is a implementation draft from states a 8 year retention period.

      Its actually not that I see anything wrong with logging requirements, but with the retention time. Oh and that "trawling" is perfectly legal.

    3. Re:Isn't this already standard practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually an ISP might be more insane TO KEEP all this information....if they get subpeonaed or requests for co-operation, it makes it a lot easier to say you don't have that the info requested because you don't keep that kind of info.

    4. Re:Isn't this already standard practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is this a violation of privacy? While the information may be handled casually in many cases, it is not published publicly. Do users really think they have an expectation of privacy in this way? Do they really think they have a right to be untracable and unaccountable for their actions online?

      Bless your wolly little head, you sheep. Of course it's a violation of privacy. Have you ever heard the saying "Who will guard the guards themselves"? It's about 2000 years old, so may noot have gotten to your planet yet. ANd yes, contrary to Larry Ellison's wet dreams, I have full expectation of privacy as long as I live in an alledged democracy. And no, I see no reason to account to you or any others in your woolly flock for my actions online. In fact, it's none of your goddamned business what I do, online or offline.

    5. Re:Isn't this already standard practice? by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same as in Europe. Of course, I suspect that you won't find any ISP either in Europe or NZ that will offer you a contract unless you agree to have your data filed to some degree.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  28. What the hell is going on in Europe? by vkg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Seriously, what the hell are these governments up to? Seems to me you'd have to be pretty afraid of something to mandate surveilence on the scale of what's going on in Europe these days, and last time I checked the climate wasn't right for a revolution (not enough poverty!).

    So, what's going on in Europe?

    1. Re:What the hell is going on in Europe? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Seriously, what the hell are these governments up to? Seems to me you'd have to be pretty afraid of something to mandate surveilence on the scale of what's going on in Europe these days, and last time I checked the climate wasn't right for a revolution (not enough poverty!)."

      Terrorism?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:What the hell is going on in Europe? by vkg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the whole surveilence thing got seriously started in the UK at least ten years ago, and there have been cameras everywhere for at least the last five...

    3. Re:What the hell is going on in Europe? by fini · · Score: 1

      Right now, in most EU countries, people tend to be far more worried by corporations than by governments. Because of socialist/social-democrat traditions, governments are the normal mode of action, the solution rather than the problem. Corporations have always been seen as greedy, corrupt and destructive. Quite the opposite of the USA where gvt is always bad and free market the only true truth yadayada. Seems to me it's changing a bit on both sides of the Big Pond, courtesy of Enron in the US and looming deficits for socialized health care and retirement in the EU.

      Yet, talking about revolutions, the EU people have a much shorter fuse than Americans. Normal, the government being the solution, when things go wrong, the government must change.

      --
      SNS Not Sig
    4. Re:What the hell is going on in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Terrorism?

      Sure. And if that doesn't work, try national security. And then there's the ultimate fallback position -- "For the love of God, will no one think of the children?"

  29. Re:This is required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Also, since everybody knows that trolls=terrorists, /. must be shut down.

  30. When will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Palestinians figure out that there is no world sympathy for their cause while these stupid suicide bombings continue...

    For crying out loud, if I have to hear about one more Palestinian mother exclaim how happy she is her son/daughter did such an idiotic act, makes me think they are not capable of being good world citizens...

    1. Re:When will... by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Maybe about the same time the Israelis figure out that there is equally little sympathy for their "retalitation" which basically amounts to executions without trial or outright murder.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  31. Not asking for a lot by freakinPsycho · · Score: 2

    I'm sure to get flamed for this, but they aren't really asking for that much. Let's face it, most of this information is available with verbose logs on systems. A lost of it is stuff that ISPs in the US have to keep anyway, for legal reasons and just to help with tech support.

    These are actually very reasonable requests. I work for a large company that is sometimes asked to produce some of this kind of information. Most of this is kept in our basic logs. Again, this is partly for legal reasons, but also so taht we can effectively troubleshoot problems that customers may have.

    --
    "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
    - Alexandar Woolcot
  32. I find it ironic that this is new to some people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I find it odd that Europe is moving from a position of protecting a great deal of data with fairly strong laws to requiring that telecommunications companies store data on their customers for as long as seven years so that law enforcement can go data-mining - skipping the intermediate step of making it optional.
    that is the equivelent of saying, "I find it odd that a politician claims to be passing the laws he passes because it is for the good of the people, yet he himself will not be subject to those laws."

    Insert comment about history repeating itself, but seriously this is not only not new but can be detected by anyone who does not let emotional bias and denial get in the way of pattern detection, or perhaps is just ignorant which could be solved easily.

  33. These records will be gold mines for .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These types of records will be gold mines for all kinds of people... political opponents, blackmailers putting the squeeze on unfaithful spouses, spies following government employee activities, stalkers, etc.

    something tells me that when some bigshot gets tagged and embarrassed by what is divulged, there will be some additional restrictions placed on what/how data can be stored and accessed.

    1. Re:These records will be gold mines for .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      something tells me that when some bigshot gets tagged and embarrassed by what is divulged, there will be some additional restrictions placed on what/how data can be stored and accessed.

      BFD. Look what happened after the Clarence Thomas hearings -- your video rental records are protected. Too bad they can turn your ass out on any other records. Note that DoJ now wants to be able to use "privete sector" databases for info gathjering. FOr good reason, they've been kept from gathering domestic information. Now, all they have to do to get anything is to deploy a "private concern" which just happens to gather, legally, the stuff they were forbidden to touch. Same as the recent suggestions, since "we don't do torture", of transferring "certain people" for questioning by governments not so squeamish. Of course they learned their techniques at the School of the Americas, but that doesn't count. These guys bring a whole new universe of meaning to the words moral turpitude.

    2. Re:These records will be gold mines for .... by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Nicely paranoid, but that doesn't add up. I haven't read the directive per se, but the common way to handle this kind of data in Europe is to only make them available to law enforcement that can present a court order for the info.

      So, yes, the fact that this much data gets logged is worrisome, and I'd need some iron-clad guarantees from my government to make sure abuse is curbed before I feel comfortable with it, but it is nowhere near as bad as you make it seem.

      I will make sure to watch how my government is going to implement these directives.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    3. Re:These records will be gold mines for .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, watch closely ... how they do exactly what you don't want them to do.

  34. SLASHDOT MEDIAFORCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's fight this disgusting business the best way Slashdot can! Click here to Slashdot Mediaforce!

  35. WISH list by nick_davison · · Score: 3
    I find it odd that Europe is moving from a position of protecting a great deal of data with fairly strong laws to [storing a great deal of information for law inforcement].

    Europol != Europe. Seriously, does Chicago PD equal the US government? It's a draft of a law enforcement agency's wish list - a starting point for one side of a debate, not anything that's passed in to law. Just because the MPAA have probably had a debate along the lines of "OK, what'd it be cool if we could force on users?" doesn't mean they get it - or even ask for it.

    1. Re: WISH list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because the MPAA have probably had a debate along the lines of "OK, what'd it be cool if we could force on users?" doesn't mean they get it - or even ask for it.

      Holy bleeding shit!!! Where do you live? in Milpitas or something? They got, and are getting, every damned thing they want. You can't make a move in anything media-related without looking over your shoulder for how the MPAA can chomp your ass.

      Read the Patriot Act. It's everything that was denied for years to Louis Freeh. Plus about 800% more. Ashcroft asked -- Congress rolled back and spread 'em. Never mind civil liberties -- we're talking about law enforcement "tools". Gee, shouldn't everyone have "tools". Shouldn't those who gather information on private citizens be allowed to "share". "Share good -- keep bad."

    2. Re: WISH list by nick_davison · · Score: 2
      Holy bleeding shit!!! Where do you live? in Milpitas or something?


      Actually, I'm English. As a result, I come from a nation that's endured decades of [primarily US citizen sponsored (IRA)] terrorism. That in turn means that while America got to do a "Holy Shit!" knee jerk response and dress it all up as patriotism, we got over it in the 70s with internment. While England's by no mean's perfect, or even as far as "OK", the seriously insane stuff does tend to get blocked ever since we saw what a f*** up it was with internment.

  36. Curious about the benefits... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Okay, there are huge privacy concerns at stake. I know that. I'm just curious what good could come from it. If that's the type of thing that can stop another 9/11 from happening, then it's possible I'd reluctantly approve of something like that.

    Unfortunately, I don't see the immediate connection between logging ftp logs and stopping terrorism. If anything, I think the MPAA or the RIAA would have more to gain than the War on Terrorism.

    So my question is, can anybody think of benfitis to this type of surveillance? I'm not looking for justification, just silver linings here and there.

    Heck, I'd love to hunt down that guy who modded me down earlier. Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Curious about the benefits... by sik+puppy · · Score: 2

      only one I can think of - getting ahold of spammers identities. Be nice if that info was made public.

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    2. Re:Curious about the benefits... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "only one I can think of - getting ahold of spammers identities. Be nice if that info was made public."

      ooooooooooooo!

      Wish I had mod points! heh

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Curious about the benefits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately, I don't see the immediate connection between logging ftp logs and stopping terrorism. If anything, I think the MPAA or the RIAA would have more to gain than the War on Terrorism.

      Good Lord. Finally, someone who understands. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

  37. Privacy violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Many things that violate peoples privacy are in the minimum requirements, such as caller line identification and assigned IP for dial-up Internet access; e-mail and ftp server logs; and companies running web servers should keep information on what information users put on their servers."

    I can see a problem with monitoring content, but why is keeping IP logs a very big deal? There aren't any laws that protect the secrecy of my IP address. The ISP 'owns' the IPs (sort of...well, they pay for them). Also, why make it easier for people to get away with kiddie porn, etc. - related offenses. As long as they don't sell this information to, say, make a profit (e.g. somehow for marketing purposes, or whatever), I don't see that becoming a very big deal, at least not something that violates my privacy.

  38. Tuttle....Buttle.... by Bobzibub · · Score: 2

    Hey. We're all in this together!
    -b

  39. Data Retention Desires? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

    Who would want to retain data? I always feel bloated when that happens.

  40. Re:Ha. Ha. Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just keep telling yourself that.

  41. Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a wish list compiled by an investigative police agency. What did you think would be on their wish list? A Barbie Dream House?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe those police agencies might like a direct pipeline to their PC of EVERYONE's web-browsing, not to mention all their file names(song-sharing?), JPGs(porno?), and a camera inside the monitor to let them see what's going on in the room at the time.

    2. Re:Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      wow! I made your list of worst sigs for a sig I had for a couple weeks to see if people had any ideas of how one might audit Microsoft for GPL violations. I do and I was curious.

      What didn't you like about it? Too trollish? (not judging from the response) You think it's not realistic? Or what? I wish you would have posted a comment in my journal on the subject then! Something I could have thought about (I'm optimistic about your ability to post useful criticism). Immortalizing the sig on your list (or whomever's list it is) is aweful nice though.

      yeah, offtopic...

      and don't forget, I'm not asking for your opinion because it matters... I'm just curious.

      --

      -pyrrho

    3. Re:Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      I just thought it was too unrealistic, really. It just seemed kinda like asking a bunch of gun nuts for their feelings on the second amendment. Obviously, people here are gonna want to see Microsoft nailed to the wall for one thing or another, but their reasons for wanting such and ideas on how to accomplish it wouldn't be particularly sane.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    4. Re:Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by pyrrho · · Score: 2

      ok, thanks for the explanation.

      --

      -pyrrho

    5. Re:Don't get your panties in a bunch, michael. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I like the 404 not found one...

  42. My wish list too by emkman · · Score: 1

    I would have loved a static IP back when I had dial-up, sounds great to me. The other stuff is another story.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  43. Commies! by herraukuli · · Score: 0

    I am not surprised. Europol is more communist than KGB!

  44. Dyslexia can Entertain by psyweather · · Score: 0

    I must have read that as 'Europol Describes Anal Retention Desires' at least twenty times.

  45. turnabout is fair game by qurk · · Score: 1
    Dont get me wrong I'm in for your rights as much as mine.

    but turnabout is fair game I've taken so much shiz from canadians and europeans on how my government (USA) is so evil and corrupt and the antichrist and how does it feel euroslut or canadaslut now :P

    when will you think it's a good idea to get along and not bitch and make fun of the people you relied on 50 years ago for your very existance :P

    1. Re:turnabout is fair game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Stalin "saved" us too - more Germans died on the East front than the West (a little-publicized fact, since much WWII history is written by Americans).

      I still don't think I owe the former U.S.S.R or the U.S. all that much.

    2. Re:turnabout is fair game by Shimbo · · Score: 2
      when will you think it's a good idea to get along and not bitch and make fun of the people you relied on 50 years ago for your very existance


      Who brought the Soviet Union into it?

    3. Re:turnabout is fair game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't make fun of the old folk, many of whom are dead now. It's the young shits who can't spell or string a proper sentence together I can't stand.

  46. Re:What we are talking about it seems: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it fits in nicely with my 'Echelon at home' vision. They watch us, we listen to their wire/cellphone traffic and decrypt it in a nice grid computing style algorithm. #1 target should be GSM SMS messages; the GSM algorithms are known, the text should be interesting, especially if we can set up listening stations in london, paris, rome, berlin etc;

  47. You're right - it's the natural European impulse by binkless · · Score: 1

    After all, Europe is the birthplace of the modern police state.

  48. No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use the network, don't use a cell phone etc. Go John Galt and become a non-productive member of society and see how long it holds together.

  49. No parliamentary control by drago · · Score: 1

    The really scary part is that afaik Europol is under no parliamentary control at all, they can do whatever they want and eavesdrop on each and everybuddy. Knowing that you somehow don't feel like being on the western side of the iron curtain.

  50. Terrific formatting! + my UberTelco and UberISP by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    You just recapitulated the original document. Nice formatting :-)

    Actually, most neo-fascist European UberISPs already log all the data requested in items 1-5 as most of them use (transparent) proxies for http and ftp. I wonder why the "last page visited" is so important to them, maybe they're trying to piece sessions together where a user disconnects and then logs on to another ISP. I'm not so sure about 6. IRC whether they already monitor it, but it's good OPSEC to assume that they do. Incidentally, the UberISP I'm subscribing to, actively assisted a German Pay-TV company by redirecting http-requests for a website containing hacking information to the homepage of the national police.

    I know that my telephone Ubercompany is logging all the data they ask for and in addition to that "legitimate interests" can connect at any time without having to present a warrant to their switches to listen in to all my calls. Same thing goes for my mobile phone, and say did you know that the austrian police requested and received all cell phone subscriber information of people who were either participating or just for being in the vicinity of a demonstration?

    The best kind of OPSEC in telecommunication is and always has been keeping your mouth shut.

  51. Don't believe everything you read by p-n-wise · · Score: 1
    Under '6. Internet Relay Chat' they state
    Copy of the contract Bank account / credit card for the payment
    Which I say is rather odd. The style is rather weird, I haven't seen many company reports in that style, it is too informal with no reasons behind the items. If this was a white paper, then I would expect more explaination and bulk.

    Don't believe everything you read kids!

    --
    I am the NUL and the DEL, the beginning and the end.
  52. Wanna know the technical background in detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well just go for the project looking to do an open-source implementation, This project want to build and open and free implementation of the specifications that have leaked from dutch tapping plans. They argue that not every hosting provider wich only has a single server somewhere in a rack will be able to meet the tapping requirements if only comercial solutions where available. The documentation served at opentap.org includes things like leaked specifications of the tunnel used to transmit trafic to law enforcement servers, specifications of a working implementation of the tapping systems including openbsd/mysql/openssl based servers and a pcb design for a optical listening and filtering device by inovative systems delft and specifications and examples of xml based "electronic warrants" (yes they still need warrants in this case).

    Why is the dutch situation so interesting? it seams like many european countries could learn a lot of the hassle that the dutch geverment has has gone trough enforcing its tapping ideas. and it also looks like the dutch laws which every isp has to folow will become similar if not the same.

  53. More like the buraucracy stepping in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what better place for them to do it then the EU, where democratic control is at a minimum.

  54. help them out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send an email to you favorite .co.uk email address with a appropriately large attached file for their achieving pleasures. and they tell two friends, and they tell two friends...

    seriously, in seven years, how big can these archives be?

  55. With apologies to Oscar Wilde by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    Europe is one of those political unions that goes from fairly liberal democracy to fascist police state without an intervening period of civilization.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  56. Re:Ha. Ha. Ha. by -brazil- · · Score: 1

    I prefer my neo-fascist control fetish to your neo-liberal corporate masochism, thankyouverymuch, Mr. trailer-trash hillbilly. Glad to live in Europe, still the place where people actually care for each other and have a sense of community beyond "Those fucking cops better beat up that dirty bum or I'll shoot him myself!"

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

  57. Re:all bullshit conspiracies. by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

    Well what about my freedom to walk down the street safely? Doesn't that count for anything?

    I just can't see any logical arguments here except conspiracy stories. It's a millions miles difference the government putting cameras in public places where there is already no privacy to them putting cameras in our houses.

    Why the hell do you all think because we let cameras in public we would then roll straight over and let them into our homes?

    By these paranoid arguments we should get rid of all weapons/army/police/cars/planes/tv/radio/technolog y as it *could* all be concevably abused by some future evil government(tm). Or how about putting everyone in prison. Because thats just one tiny little step down the road from putting cameras in public places isn't it.

  58. The illusion of choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find the manipulative behavior in this even more disturbing than the tagging itself.

    That's one way of making people submit to drastic tactics. Offer a new way of control alongside an even less desirable scenerio and then let them "decide".

    Neat way to introduce draconian concepts into society. Make it seem like the people are deciding for themselves. Playing mind tricks on you, and it's working.