ok. my point is, if they write down the commands to the letter, or draw pictures of the screen, what difference does it make if they are drawing Windows or Linux?
Sure... Cisco is the most dominant, so it must be the best and we should all still use it. So, by that measure, we should abandon that 'toy' Linux, right?
Cisco has a pseudo monopoly on the high end? My ass. Low and middle is more accurate.
I wonder what sort of problems having them learn to use linux would cause?
This is 2005. What kind of problems are people going to have with Linux as opposed to Windows? Is clicking on an icon of a little globe that much harder than clicking on a blue 'e'?
I think it's great that you are developing new products.
However, because of your poor form of not making documentation or firmware freely available, I will instead be sending my personal dollars, and (significantly larger) work budget, to AMD.
if not, take a look at Sun's Sun Ray Server Software (aka SRSS). it runs on linux now, but it costs $
we use it here (version 2 tho) and it works fine. you can be doing your thing, go to lunch, leave your apps running, come back (to another client even), and your apps are right there for you
basically, it works like this. you put up a bunch of fake email addresses on the web. said addresses get crawled by spammer's web bots. the spammers try to send mail to those fake addresses. you know they're fake, so now you blacklist that remote smtp server
spamd(8) gives you additional capabilies above that of a packet filter... greylisting, automatic whitelisting, etc. plus, you don't have to run it on your mail server and it will still function correctly. 3.7 will also have greytrapping
$12500 is nothing when compared to what can be lost to a shitty and cheaply designed ide raid subsystem
$12500 is a lot to me, personally, but if that's what the experts (marco@ in this case) recommend, and they know exactly how it's being used, then that's that
oh, and i've donated plenty to openbsd. if i had more $$, i'd give even more
i know it's too hard for you to bother yourself to see what all cvs.openbsd.org does, and how important it is to the infrastructure of openbsd. sata-raid isn't going to cut it!
$12500 is *NOTHING* when it comes to perhaps the single most important piece of hardware on *.openbsd.org
Slashdot Mirror
hopefully not ...
... satellites especially
but, they are probably using some communication network for command & control that is easily penetrated
the article refers to the JFCCNW as being the "... most formibidable hacker posse. Ever."
... so maybe the editors need to take anothNO CARRIER
looks like www.jfccnw.mil is offline
ok. my point is, if they write down the commands to the letter, or draw pictures of the screen, what difference does it make if they are drawing Windows or Linux?
Sure ... Cisco is the most dominant, so it must be the best and we should all still use it. So, by that measure, we should abandon that 'toy' Linux, right?
Cisco has a pseudo monopoly on the high end? My ass. Low and middle is more accurate.
I wonder what sort of problems having them learn to use linux would cause?
This is 2005. What kind of problems are people going to have with Linux as opposed to Windows? Is clicking on an icon of a little globe that much harder than clicking on a blue 'e'?
PF: Packet Queueing and Prioritization
works great, easy to use
since when were SANS certifcations considered, uh, respectable?
... when was SANS considered respectable?
nevermind their certifications
you're not asking the right people. you must be new here ...
I think it's great that you are developing new products.
However, because of your poor form of not making documentation or firmware freely available, I will instead be sending my personal dollars, and (significantly larger) work budget, to AMD.
when adultdex was next door/down the street?
snort is still around?
one of the only tools that allows for a box with no ip to be hacked. fantastic
because it's much easier to do that than have to leave my mom's basement and go talk to people, let alone give them candy. duh
if not, take a look at Sun's Sun Ray Server Software (aka SRSS). it runs on linux now, but it costs $
we use it here (version 2 tho) and it works fine. you can be doing your thing, go to lunch, leave your apps running, come back (to another client even), and your apps are right there for you
here ya go =)
basically, it works like this. you put up a bunch of fake email addresses on the web. said addresses get crawled by spammer's web bots. the spammers try to send mail to those fake addresses. you know they're fake, so now you blacklist that remote smtp server
no, this is openbsd's spamd aka spamd(8). the SA one is aka spamd(1)
assuming you're on an obsd machine, like me =)
spamd(8) gives you additional capabilies above that of a packet filter ... greylisting, automatic whitelisting, etc. plus, you don't have to run it on your mail server and it will still function correctly. 3.7 will also have greytrapping
oh, right. support Apple. champions of open source ...
does that take into account the connections started by spambots?
Yea. That's what happens when you go outside, away from your computer and physics books, even if for just a few minutes.
yea. that's why i've stopped using computers
anonymously tip off http://www.gpl-violations.org/?
he's not been a fan of apple for some time. that was a post i knew of because i remember reading it recently on misc@
$12500 is nothing when compared to what can be lost to a shitty and cheaply designed ide raid subsystem
$12500 is a lot to me, personally, but if that's what the experts (marco@ in this case) recommend, and they know exactly how it's being used, then that's that
oh, and i've donated plenty to openbsd. if i had more $$, i'd give even more
what other solutions? sata-raid? get real
i know it's too hard for you to bother yourself to see what all cvs.openbsd.org does, and how important it is to the infrastructure of openbsd. sata-raid isn't going to cut it!
$12500 is *NOTHING* when it comes to perhaps the single most important piece of hardware on *.openbsd.org
OpenBSD runs just fine on older sparc hardware. NetBSD too