What's most interesting here is that while the number of transactions during this crash has risen to levels not seen since January, the transaction fees never went above $0.65. That's strong evidence that improvements like Lightning and SegWit have largely addressed the scaling concerns everyone had around the BTC/BCH split.
There are strategies for terraforming today which are left unexplored because of planetary NIMBY-ism. Having a planet we don't care about could advance the science greatly. In fact, I'd say that's just the type of high concept science we may need to address climate change on Earth.
Writing a reference to how PHP works is like writing a reference to how the law works. It's not designed with any cogent theory of operation; it's more of a mish-mash. If you need to know the details, you need to wade through the tangled mess of design.
Each problem space is likely to settle on its own most popular tool. Java fills the role of megalithic system design suitable for huge teams and projects. PHP dominates at generating web pages. Python has several niches in academia, control systems, and online news media. JavaScript runs the web front end, and also is the goto for writing network code to tie together web services et al.
New languages need to fill a niche better than the current crop in order to become dominant.
"I'm not asking people to change their licenses." -Me, a couple comments up
But if you value freedom and do not want to restrict people from using your software, as I do, then you release using the MIT license. That's not trying to benefit from other people's work, no matter how you want to spin it.
...and then a large, strong, handsome bird saw the wisdom of division of labor and forced the small toolmaking bird into servitude making tools for all birds for the greater good, becoming Avian Stalin.
So you think the science that had faulty analysis and which drew faulty conclusions is good science? That's almost Trumpian. You have the greatest science, dude. Wonder why there's an issue with public trust in science...
Could be wrong, but most countries I imagine can get away without the fallback. American consumers don't use nor do they carry cash. As many Europeans seem to find weird: we use credit cards to pay for gum. A downed payment machine is a good way to lose a customer permanently.
I live in the city because the suburbs are a depressing shithole. Most of my coworkers choose the city because they want to be there for going out to eat, etc. We all work in the suburbs because that's where our job happens to be, but no one without kids has any desire to move out of the city.
I think most people want to live in the city, but they aren't wealthy enough to make it work with children.
It's not that other art won't be found worthy, it's that the tech-enabled artists will be producting so much artistic output that it drowns the artisinal market. Sure, you'll get an occasional Banksy - a star in their own life - but getting to sound financial footing on such a (relatively) small amount of work will become more difficult as the media is saturated with AI-assisted art.
Most people prefer to spend their art budgets on derivative works.
Math is a critical component of science. It's that whole "measuring" component of science that gets you. The science is bad. Any attempt to argue otherwise is silly. Any attempt to straw man this into something else is illogical.
I am utterly shocked that an alarmist climate prediction would be made based on bad science. Shocked. What is this world coming to? So crazy. I've never even heard of such a thing. Everyone knows there is scientific consensus on this. It's solved science. I don't even understand why scientists still study climate since the science is so God damned settled.
Artists are no different from anyone else. If they reject technological advancement, they will lose their ability to make a living.
It's not hard to imagine future artists working with advanced AIs to amplify their work output. Suddenly every individual artist is expected to create multimedia blitz of derivative works in order to monetize their works, aided by an AI who has been trained for years to develop in the style of the artist. Every artist now has to become the Walt Disney company or they don't eat.
Slashdot Mirror
What's most interesting here is that while the number of transactions during this crash has risen to levels not seen since January, the transaction fees never went above $0.65. That's strong evidence that improvements like Lightning and SegWit have largely addressed the scaling concerns everyone had around the BTC/BCH split.
There are strategies for terraforming today which are left unexplored because of planetary NIMBY-ism. Having a planet we don't care about could advance the science greatly. In fact, I'd say that's just the type of high concept science we may need to address climate change on Earth.
Since no one uses those languages for those things, then JavaScript and PHP must be fine languages.
Writing a reference to how PHP works is like writing a reference to how the law works. It's not designed with any cogent theory of operation; it's more of a mish-mash. If you need to know the details, you need to wade through the tangled mess of design.
Each problem space is likely to settle on its own most popular tool. Java fills the role of megalithic system design suitable for huge teams and projects. PHP dominates at generating web pages. Python has several niches in academia, control systems, and online news media. JavaScript runs the web front end, and also is the goto for writing network code to tie together web services et al.
New languages need to fill a niche better than the current crop in order to become dominant.
"I'm not asking people to change their licenses." -Me, a couple comments up
But if you value freedom and do not want to restrict people from using your software, as I do, then you release using the MIT license. That's not trying to benefit from other people's work, no matter how you want to spin it.
...and then a large, strong, handsome bird saw the wisdom of division of labor and forced the small toolmaking bird into servitude making tools for all birds for the greater good, becoming Avian Stalin.
So you think the science that had faulty analysis and which drew faulty conclusions is good science? That's almost Trumpian. You have the greatest science, dude. Wonder why there's an issue with public trust in science...
In CA, most people go by the 200 millisecond rule.
This is just a sign of how the GPL has poisoned minds into confusion.
"The only right GPL restricts is the right to close the code". So, you admit the GPL removes your freedom to use the code how you want.
How the fuck am I benefiting from other people's work by writing and giving away code? Wtf is going on in your brain to draw that conclusion?
Could be wrong, but most countries I imagine can get away without the fallback. American consumers don't use nor do they carry cash. As many Europeans seem to find weird: we use credit cards to pay for gum. A downed payment machine is a good way to lose a customer permanently.
I live in the city because the suburbs are a depressing shithole. Most of my coworkers choose the city because they want to be there for going out to eat, etc. We all work in the suburbs because that's where our job happens to be, but no one without kids has any desire to move out of the city.
I think most people want to live in the city, but they aren't wealthy enough to make it work with children.
It's not that other art won't be found worthy, it's that the tech-enabled artists will be producting so much artistic output that it drowns the artisinal market. Sure, you'll get an occasional Banksy - a star in their own life - but getting to sound financial footing on such a (relatively) small amount of work will become more difficult as the media is saturated with AI-assisted art.
Most people prefer to spend their art budgets on derivative works.
Math is a critical component of science. It's that whole "measuring" component of science that gets you. The science is bad. Any attempt to argue otherwise is silly. Any attempt to straw man this into something else is illogical.
I am utterly shocked that an alarmist climate prediction would be made based on bad science. Shocked. What is this world coming to? So crazy. I've never even heard of such a thing. Everyone knows there is scientific consensus on this. It's solved science. I don't even understand why scientists still study climate since the science is so God damned settled.
Shocked...
Artists are no different from anyone else. If they reject technological advancement, they will lose their ability to make a living.
It's not hard to imagine future artists working with advanced AIs to amplify their work output. Suddenly every individual artist is expected to create multimedia blitz of derivative works in order to monetize their works, aided by an AI who has been trained for years to develop in the style of the artist. Every artist now has to become the Walt Disney company or they don't eat.
Search engines are super convenient for web developers. Much rather rely on Google to handle that for me than write my own (shitty) site search.
Sounds like Nintendo have created a successful advanced ARG for their dedicated fans.
It isn't piracy unless it involves hijacking. It's copyright infringement.
Turns out there's like almost 100 million people who want to to live in crowded East coast cities.
The last couple of times I bought groceries, the chip was rejected three times, then fell back to magstrip.
Turns out relying on chip and PIN is unreliable.
If you think there is only one culture of original inhabitants in CA, that itself is kind of racist.
Yeah... right..e
I'm not asking people to change their licenses. If you don't want people to use your code, just don't license it at all.
I license all my code MIT. I want people to have the freedom to use the code. If I used GPL, there's a lot of people out there who can't use the code.
As you even admit, GPL removes the freedom to use the code how you want.