My employer has AI initiatives, but we just engaged in some creative explanations to convince zoning board we are an R&D company so we can move into our new office park.
There are lots of reasons the reporting on these kinds of metrics is fuzzy.
I'm not sure I'd consider 90 C to be "extreme conditions", considering boiling water is something one can expect to be able to be handled by either metal or glass, and therefore conditions one might expect a metal-glass weld to withstand.
It's not that all companies are really expected to have balance. Just the really well known companies with really great careers. The failed startups and mom and pops paying below market are OK to hire all men, which provides the 9/10 balance.
Sure, but most of us do not own the copyright to most of our work.
The idea that MIT/BSD users don't understand the implications of those licenses and one day they will see the light of the GPL or Apache license is laughable.
Lol. Most of us write software because someone is paying us to. As devs, we have a huge amount of influence over what licenses get chosen at our employers. MIT/BSD isn't going anywhere. In fact, the MIT license is experiencing a renaissance over the GPL.
Here's what's great about the MIT license: it provides freedom for the code. If I wanna use that code in an app I develop on the side, I can do that. If I wanna use that code at my next employer, I can do that. If I wanna wrap it up into a paid-for support contract, I can do that, too. I have ultimate freedom over the code I wrote.
GPL and other related locked down licenses restrict my freedom to use the software I wrote. That's stupid.
I can understand the argument though. We (nix users, at least) all know monolithic software sucks and that each app should do one thing well.
Authentication, encryption, and firewalls are all different problems with a lot of different tools and approaches. ES just takes a hard stance on this and says that you handle those issues somewhere else in the stack.
It's not hard to put ES behind nginx and handle all your needs that way. But if you're more comfortable with other proxies, you can do that instead. ES isn't going to add anything to the HTTP security space of any value, so why bother?
We had a temporary misconfiguration on some of our ES hosts leaving them open to the public and discovered it from what appeared to be some gray hat hacker who was triggering periodic crashes as a way of communicating the problem.
It wasn't unknow that ES is not secure by design, so it's not the fault of ES, but they do make it easy to accidentally fuck up.
A troll is someone who posts on the Internet with the intention of ruining something for someone else. This most definitely applies. A human who doesn't want to see a movie simply ignores it. A troll who doesn't want to see a movie goes on Rotten Tomatoes and votes it down.
And then there are those who feel the need to explain they don't wanna see a movie with a female superhero lead. Those are misogynists.
Is critical review completely foreign to you? This is how it's ALWAYS worked. Critics need to create a reason for their existence. By telling everyone the movies they like suck, they imply that by following their critiques, you will be exposed to much better art.
The difference here is that you are giving your passwords to Apple and have to trust them to secure it. With the Android solution, you don't have to trust Google.
When I got in a fender bender, my car was nearly totalled from the airbag deploy. I have a feeling this is primarily intended to bring in more body work.
Your budget-ass phone is running horribly inefficient "apps" built largely by amateurs on several additional layers of abstraction over the Linux core. Linux and its apps are largely efficient C code or highly engineered JavaScript web apps written by relatively more competent devs.
Isn't most of it just legit ad blocking? You have to scan the page to remove ads and it seems like 75% of the extensions are somehow related to ad blocking or content manipulation or password management. They all need those permissions.
Slashdot Mirror
A kilobyte is 1,000. A kibibyte is 1,024.
Well, at least some of those machines are intelligent enough to know ML is AI. That makes them smarter than you.
My employer has AI initiatives, but we just engaged in some creative explanations to convince zoning board we are an R&D company so we can move into our new office park.
There are lots of reasons the reporting on these kinds of metrics is fuzzy.
Ready Player One makes me think he's trying to recapture his glory years from the 80s.
I'm not sure I'd consider 90 C to be "extreme conditions", considering boiling water is something one can expect to be able to be handled by either metal or glass, and therefore conditions one might expect a metal-glass weld to withstand.
What leads you to believe Google can't? They have decided they want a diverse workforce. No one is forcing them.
It's not that all companies are really expected to have balance. Just the really well known companies with really great careers. The failed startups and mom and pops paying below market are OK to hire all men, which provides the 9/10 balance.
But it's the only way to combat bias.
Well, either that or making everyone's salary available on a public list. It's the knowledge imbalance that generally drives the pay disparities.
Wow, I hadn't realized how inconsequential Spielberg had become. He's given up on competing, apparently...
Humans poop in the streets in NYC, SLC, Miami, Detroit, and every city. What's your point?
Sure, but most of us do not own the copyright to most of our work.
The idea that MIT/BSD users don't understand the implications of those licenses and one day they will see the light of the GPL or Apache license is laughable.
Lol. Most of us write software because someone is paying us to. As devs, we have a huge amount of influence over what licenses get chosen at our employers. MIT/BSD isn't going anywhere. In fact, the MIT license is experiencing a renaissance over the GPL.
Here's what's great about the MIT license: it provides freedom for the code. If I wanna use that code in an app I develop on the side, I can do that. If I wanna use that code at my next employer, I can do that. If I wanna wrap it up into a paid-for support contract, I can do that, too. I have ultimate freedom over the code I wrote.
GPL and other related locked down licenses restrict my freedom to use the software I wrote. That's stupid.
MariaDB is a fork of MySQL. They had no choice but to continue using a compatible license.
I can understand the argument though. We (nix users, at least) all know monolithic software sucks and that each app should do one thing well.
Authentication, encryption, and firewalls are all different problems with a lot of different tools and approaches. ES just takes a hard stance on this and says that you handle those issues somewhere else in the stack.
It's not hard to put ES behind nginx and handle all your needs that way. But if you're more comfortable with other proxies, you can do that instead. ES isn't going to add anything to the HTTP security space of any value, so why bother?
We had a temporary misconfiguration on some of our ES hosts leaving them open to the public and discovered it from what appeared to be some gray hat hacker who was triggering periodic crashes as a way of communicating the problem.
It wasn't unknow that ES is not secure by design, so it's not the fault of ES, but they do make it easy to accidentally fuck up.
This is a feature Opera had for at least a decade before they rewrote it to just be Chrome.
No modern browser comes close to Opera circa 1998, and it's absolutely pathetic what people think are features a browser should have.
High audience score simply means widely palatable. It most def doesn NOT mean it's a good movie.
A troll is someone who posts on the Internet with the intention of ruining something for someone else. This most definitely applies. A human who doesn't want to see a movie simply ignores it. A troll who doesn't want to see a movie goes on Rotten Tomatoes and votes it down.
And then there are those who feel the need to explain they don't wanna see a movie with a female superhero lead. Those are misogynists.
Is critical review completely foreign to you? This is how it's ALWAYS worked. Critics need to create a reason for their existence. By telling everyone the movies they like suck, they imply that by following their critiques, you will be exposed to much better art.
The difference here is that you are giving your passwords to Apple and have to trust them to secure it. With the Android solution, you don't have to trust Google.
When I got in a fender bender, my car was nearly totalled from the airbag deploy. I have a feeling this is primarily intended to bring in more body work.
Your budget-ass phone is running horribly inefficient "apps" built largely by amateurs on several additional layers of abstraction over the Linux core. Linux and its apps are largely efficient C code or highly engineered JavaScript web apps written by relatively more competent devs.
Isn't most of it just legit ad blocking? You have to scan the page to remove ads and it seems like 75% of the extensions are somehow related to ad blocking or content manipulation or password management. They all need those permissions.
By "accessibility" I mean, how does someone with motor deficiency in their hands use a touch device?
How do you distinquish between hover and "mouse" down?
If you don't understand the difference between a mouse and touch, you're probably not informed enough to continue discussing HIDs.